DOCSLIB.ORG

A Settlement History of Okeeheepkee: Community

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Settlement History of Okeeheepkee: Community A SETTLEMENT HISTORY OF OKEEHEEPKEE: COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION AT THE LAKE JACKSON SITE IN FLORIDA by Jesse Colin Nowak, B.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in Anthropology May 2017 Committee Members: F. Kent Reilly III, Chair Adam King Daniel Seinfeld James F. Garber COPYRIGHT by Jesse C. Nowak 2017 FAIR USE AND AUTHORS’S PERMISSON STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defines in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from the material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Jesse Colin Nowak, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purpose only. DEDICATION To my parents, whose sacrifices have made me forever grateful. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis and the work behind it owes a great deal of gratitude to many people. I would first like to thank my advisor, F. Kent Reilly III, who inspired, pushed, and supported my scholarly endeavors since the day I met him. I truly am thankful and honored to have been taught by a scholar that works so hard and selflessly for his students. Thank you to my committee members, Daniel Seinfeld, Adam King and Jim Garber for their guidance, patience, and constructive feedback on my thesis. I need to particularly thank my committee member Dan Seinfeld, for promoting the idea of new research at Lake Jackson and his hands–on mentorship during the research design and field work portions of this thesis. His patience and mentorship have been immeasurable. I would like to also give a special thank you to Adam King, for his patience, time, and stimulating conversations about my research. I wish to give thanks to Louis Tesar, Julie Byrd, Mary Glowacki, Mike Wisenbaker, Jeremy Vause, Ryan Duggins, Marie Prentice, and everyone at the Florida Bureau of Archaeological Research and the Florida Historical Commission for their openness and hospitality during my research. Thank you to Brandon Ackerman, Haley Messer, Charlie Harper, Krissy Hogeweg, Selena Garza, and Lisa Barden–Thompson for all of their hard work during the field school at Lake Jackson. Thank you to the Lake Jackson park ranger Evan Martin for his advice and guidance. Thank you to my supervisor at the Gilcrease Museum, Diana Folsom. Her support and flexibility has allowed me to finish this work. v I would also like to give thanks to my father, who has shown me what it means to be a good man by example. Thank you to my mother, who encouraged me to follow my passions. Thank you to my brother Shane Nowak for his support throughout the years. I need to thank Karen, Turner, and the entire Stauffer family for their enormous hospitality by opening their house to me during my fieldwork. This work would not have been possible without them. I wish to extend a deep thanks to my fellow graduate student Grant Stauffer. His openness in scholarship and friendship motivated and inspired my thesis research. I would also like to say thank you to James Barrera, Antonio Padilla and Andy Cloud, who took me under their wings during my undergraduate and early professional career. They taught me what it means to be an archaeologist. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................x ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... xiv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 Thesis Outline .................................................................................................4 II. HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND .......................6 Natural Environment ......................................................................................9 Site Setting ...................................................................................................12 Ethnographic and Historic Narrative ...........................................................14 Archaeological Investigations at Lake Jackson ...........................................19 Willey and Woodbury, 1940 ..................................................................19 Griffin, 1950 ..........................................................................................20 Smith and Fairbanks, 1953 (Mound 1) ..................................................20 Penton, 1968 ..........................................................................................21 Fryman, 1969 .........................................................................................21 Jones, 1975–1976 ...................................................................................22 Mound 6 .................................................................................................23 Jones, 1990–1992 ...................................................................................23 Terzis and Smith 1990 and Lozowski 1991 ...........................................24 Payne, 1994 ............................................................................................25 Martinez, 2001 .......................................................................................25 Stephenson, 2003 ...................................................................................27 Andrews, 2007 .......................................................................................28 Bigman and Seinfeld, 2012 ....................................................................28 Prehistoric Overview ...................................................................................28 Diagnostic Design Elements: Deep South Mississippian and Woodland Cultures ..................................................................................................31 Landscape, Community Construction, and Political Ideology ....................42 vii III. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................46 Remote Sensing Surveys..............................................................................46 Shovel Testing .............................................................................................49 Archival and Artifact Analysis ....................................................................50 IV. RESULTS .........................................................................................................53 Northern Section ..........................................................................................53 Eastern Section.............................................................................................56 Western Section ...........................................................................................61 Mound Precinct ............................................................................................65 Remote Sensing Results ...............................................................................71 Grid 1 .....................................................................................................76 Grid 2 .....................................................................................................77 Grid 3 .....................................................................................................78 Chronological Development of the Site .......................................................84 Lake Jackson I........................................................................................87 Early Lake Jackson II.............................................................................88 Early and Late Lake Jackson II ..............................................................90 Lake Jackson III .....................................................................................90 Overview of Results .....................................................................................93 V. DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................97 Design Characteristics of Lake Jackson ......................................................97 Mississippian Dissemination and the Chattahoochee Valley ....................105 Conclusions and Future Work ...................................................................108 APPENDIX SECTION ....................................................................................................111 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................151 viii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 4.1. Northern section shovel test pits .................................................................................57 4.2. Fairbanks 1953 Mound 1 excavations ........................................................................57 4.3. Stevenson 2003 auger test results ...............................................................................57 4.4. Terzis and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Born of Clay Ceramics from the National Museum of The
    bornclay of ceramics from the National Museum of the American Indian NMAI EDITIONS NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON AND NEW YORk In partnership with Native peoples and first edition cover: Maya tripod bowl depicting a their allies, the National Museum of 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 bird, a.d. 1–650. campeche, Mexico. the American Indian fosters a richer Modeled and painted (pre- and shared human experience through a library of congress cataloging-in- postfiring) ceramic, 3.75 by 13.75 in. more informed understanding of Publication data 24/7762. Photo by ernest amoroso. Native peoples. Born of clay : ceramics from the National Museum of the american late Mississippian globular bottle, head of Publications, NMai: indian / by ramiro Matos ... [et a.d. 1450–1600. rose Place, cross terence Winch al.].— 1st ed. county, arkansas. Modeled and editors: holly stewart p. cm. incised ceramic, 8.5 by 8.75 in. and amy Pickworth 17/4224. Photo by Walter larrimore. designers: ISBN:1-933565-01-2 steve Bell and Nancy Bratton eBook ISBN:978-1-933565-26-2 title Page: tile masks, ca. 2002. Made by Nora Naranjo-Morse (santa clara, Photography © 2005 National Museum “Published in conjunction with the b. 1953). santa clara Pueblo, New of the american indian, smithsonian exhibition Born of Clay: Ceramics from Mexico. Modeled and painted ceram institution. the National Museum of the American - text © 2005 NMai, smithsonian Indian, on view at the National ic, largest: 7.75 by 4 in. 26/5270. institution. all rights reserved under Museum of the american indian’s Photo by Walter larrimore.
    [Show full text]
  • Narratives of the Career of Hernando De Soto in the Conquest of Florida
    iâratrforír ©Iuí> feries. NUMBER FIVE. ***Or*n ' i j DE 3DT0. wed for the Bradford Club NewYork L365 NARRATIVES OF THE CAREER OF HERNANDO DE SOTO CONQUEST OF FLORIDA AS TOLD Bf A KNIGHT OF ELYAS ANJ) IN A RELATION BY FACTOll OF THE EXPEDITION TRANSLATED BY BUCKINGHAM SMITH N E W Y O R K M DCCC LXVI ^/éz+cyti (í? / ,S 7^5-7 copy & SUBSCRIBERS COPY, Ao. _C^, Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1866, By John B. Moreau, FOE THE BRADFORD CLUB, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. IP ^hi> SEVENTY-FIVE COPIES PRINTED. TO JOHN EARL WILLIAMS, A MEMENTO OF A FRIENDSHIP WHICH, BEGUN IN YOUTH, HAS STRENGTHENED WITH ADVANCING TEARS. — THE BRADFORD CLUB. Under this designation, a few gentlemen, interested in the study of American History and Literature, propose occasionally to print limited editions of such manuscripts and scarce pamphlets as may be deemed of value towards illustrating these subjects. They will seek to obtain for this purpose unpublished journals or corre- spondence containing matter worthy of record, and which may not properly be included in the Historical Collections or Documentary Histories of the several States. Such unpretending contemporary chronicles often throw precious light upon the motives of action and the imperfectly narrated events of bygone days; perhaps briefly touched upon in dry official documents. The Club may also issue fac-similes of curious manuscripts, or documents worthy of notice, which, like, the printed issues, will bear its imprint.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flags of Florida History
    Sunland Tribune Volume 21 Article 10 1995 The Flags of Florida History Sunland Tribune Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune Recommended Citation Tribune, Sunland (1995) "The Flags of Florida History," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 21 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune/vol21/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sunland Tribune by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FLAGS OF FLORIDA HISTORY Many flags have flown over Florida since Juan Ponce de Leon landed in 1513. Among these have been the flags of five sovereign nations: Spain, France, Great Britain, the United States, and the Confederate States of America. Numerous other unofficial flags also have flown on the peninsula at one time or another. Only a written description remains of some and one has no known description at all. SPAIN FRANCE Research indicates Spain had no truly The French established a short-lived national flag in 1513, when Juan Ponce settlement, in 1564, near Jacksonville at de Leon landed on Florida shores, but the the mouth of the St. Johns River. During Castle and Lion flag of the King was this period there was no single official recognized as the flag of the country flag for France. Their flag may have had a blue field which bore the royal golden fleurs-de-lys. The French also occupied Pensacola from 1719 to 1722 during the War of the Quadruple Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition
    Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition Submitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Constance Arzigian Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse July 2008 MINNESOTA STATEWIDE MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM FOR THE WOODLAND TRADITION FINAL Mn/DOT Agreement No. 89964 MVAC Report No. 735 Authorized and Sponsored by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 1725 State Street La Crosse WI 54601 Principal Investigator and Report Author Constance Arzigian July 2008 NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires 1-31-2009) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. __X_ New Submission ____ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Woodland Tradition in Minnesota B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Brainerd Complex: Early Woodland in Central and Northern Minnesota, 1000 B.C.–A.D. 400 The Southeast Minnesota Early Woodland Complex, 500–200 B.C. The Havana-Related Complex: Middle Woodland in Central and Eastern Minnesota, 200 B.C.–A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Valley Water Supply Project Class I Cultural Resources Inventory and Assessment, Eastern North Dakota and Nortwestern Minnesota
    RED RIVER VALLEY WATER SUPPLY PROJECT CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT, EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND NORTWESTERN MINNESOTA Michael A. Jackson, Dennis L. Toom, and Cynthia Kordecki December 2006 ABSTRACT In 2004-2006, personnel from Anthropology Research, Department of Anthropology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, conducted a Class I inventory (file search) for the Red River Valley Water Supply Project (RRVWSP). This work was carried out in cooperation with the USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, Bismarck, ND. The file search dealt with hundreds of cultural resource sites across much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Archeological sites, architectural sites, site leads, and isolated finds were examined for 14 North Dakota counties and four Minnesota counties. Five different action alternatives were investigated to determine the number and types of previously recorded cultural resources located within each. Each alternative was ranked in terms of its potential to cause impacts to cultural resources, both known and (presently) unknown. Analysis indicated that the Red River Basin Alternative (#3) has the largest potential for cultural resource site impacts. From a least-impact cultural resources perspective, the other four alternatives represent the best, least-impact options for construction of the RRVWSP. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St Marks Lighthouse
    NavigatingNavigating thethe Gulf:Gulf: PastPast && PresentPresent StSt MarksMarks NationalNational WildlifeWildlife RefugeRefuge NavigatingNavigating thethe Gulf:Gulf: PastPast && PresentPresent ----FCATFCAT StandardsStandards • Meets the social studies Sunshine State Standards for a student. Grades PreK-2: SS.B.1.1.2 uses simple maps, globes, and other three-dimensional models to identify and locate places. SS.B.2.1.5 knows the modes of transportation used to move people, products, and ideas from place to place, their importance, and their advantages and disadvantages. Grades 3-5: SS.A.2.2.2 Understands developments in transportation and communication in various societies SS.B.1.2.4 Knows how changing transportation and communication technology have affected relationships between locations. Grades 6-8 – Meets the social studies Sunshine State Standards for a student: SS.A.2.3.4. Understands the impact of geographical factors on the historical development of civilizations. SS.A.4.3.2 Knows the role of physical and cultural geography in shaping events in the United States Grades 9-12 : SS.B.1.4.1 Uses a variety of maps, geographic technologies including geographic information systems and satellite-produced imagery, and other advanced graphic representations to depict geographic problems. SS.B.2.4.6 Understands the relationships between resources and the exploration, colonization, and settlement of different regions of the world. OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES 1. Students will exhibit an understanding of the impact of transportation on the interactions between the Native Americans and European Explorers. 2. Students will be able to identify the importance of resources to the development of trade through Apalachee Bay. 3. Students will identify the influence of geographic and environmental factors such as hurricanes, rivers, coastline, etc on cultural development 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Luis Bertucat and William Augustus Bowles: West Florida Adversaries in 1791
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 49 Number 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 49, Article 7 Number 1 1970 Luis Bertucat and William Augustus Bowles: West Florida Adversaries In 1791 Jack D. L. Holmes Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Holmes, Jack D. L. (1970) "Luis Bertucat and William Augustus Bowles: West Florida Adversaries In 1791," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 49 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol49/iss1/7 Holmes: Luis Bertucat and William Augustus Bowles: West Florida Adversari LUIS BERTUCAT AND WILLIAM AUGUSTUS BOWLES: WEST FLORIDA ADVERSARIES IN 1791 translated and edited by JACK D. L. HOLMES * AND J. LEITCH WRIGHT, JR. ** N AN EFFORT to check the expansion of the American frontiers- I men onto Indian lands after the American Revolution, William Augustus Bowles, self-styled head of the Creek-Cherokee Nation, and later “Director-General of the State of Muskogee,” wrote the Spanish minister of state, the Conde de Floridablanca, in 1791. Bowles asked for Spanish protection for the Creeks and Cherokees and urged a wider alliance or confederation of the Choctaws, Chickasaws, Cherokees and Creeks. 1 He also suggested that Spain modify its commercial restrictions and remove the monopoly which had been granted the firm of William Panton, Thomas Forbes, and Robert Leslie, and instead open Florida ports to all nations - especially Muscogee - on a free and unimpeded basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2001 Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie- Woodland Interface: Cranial Morphology in the Upper Midwest and Contiguous Areas of Manitoba and Ontario Susan Mary Myster University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Myster, Susan Mary, "Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie-Woodland Interface: Cranial Morphology in the Upper Midwest and Contiguous Areas of Manitoba and Ontario. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2001. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3532 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Susan Mary Myster entitled "Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie-Woodland Interface: Cranial Morphology in the Upper Midwest and Contiguous Areas of Manitoba and Ontario." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. Richard L. Jantz, Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Charles H. Faulkner, Lyle W. Konigsberg, David A. Gerard Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Conquistadors at Saltville in 1567 Revisited
    Conquistadors at Saltville in 1567 Revisited Jim Glanville © 2014 Introduction This article continues and extends its author’s study of the interaction between the archeological and documentary evidence for the Spanish period of sixteenth century Virginia history. In 2004, the author published in the Smithfield Review an article titled “Conquistadors at Saltville in 1567? A Review of the Archeological and Documentary Evidence,” 1 which was footnoted in a review of sixteenth century Florida historiogra phy published in 2012 in connection with the 500-year anniversary of Juan Ponce de León’ s exploration of the Florida coast in 1513.2 Today, the story of the Spanish attack in Southwest Virginia is a part of mainstream Virginia history.3 The author subsequently published three follow up articles about the conquistadors. The first of these described a metal blade found in Smyth County, Virginia, that its finder speculated might have a Spanish connection (it did not).4 The second article was a brief progress report.5 The third article discussed the modern background to the story of the conquistadors and how that story developed.6 The present article reviews the routes of the Hernando de Soto7 (1539– 1542) and Juan Pardo (1566–1568) entradas into the American Southeast as revealed by the combination of archeological and documentary evidence. It also describes ongoing archeological studies at the conquistadors’ base camp at present-day Morganton, North Carolina; it cites two recently-found 145-year old newspaper reports (reproduced in the Appendix) of a buried Spanish soldier—who lies just a few miles outside the southern boundary of modern-day Virginia; and, via an examination of documentary evidence for the entradas, it compares with a modern map the region of Virginia shown in the third (1584) edition of the first-ever printed world atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans Alabama, and Coushatta
    History of Covington The early historic Creeks were probably descendants of the mound builders of the Mississippian culture along the Tennessee River in modern Tennessee[2] and Alabama, and possibly relat- County Alabama ed to the Utinahica of southern Georgia. More of a loose con- federacy than a single tribe, the Muscogee lived in autonomous Part 1 villages in river valleys throughout what are today the states of Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama and consisted of many ethnic groups speaking several distinct languages, such as the Hitchiti, Native Americans Alabama, and Coushatta. Those who lived along the Ocmulgee The Choctaw are a Native American people originally from the River were called "Creek Indians" by British traders from South Southeastern United States (Mississippi, Alabama, and Carolina; eventually the name was applied to all of the various Louisiana). They are of the Muskogean linguistic group. The natives of Creek towns becoming increasingly divided between word Choctaw (also known as Chahta, Chactas ,Chato, Tchakta, the Lower Towns of the Georgia frontier on the Chattahoochee and Chocktaw) may derive from the Castilian word "chato," River, Ocmulgee River, and Flint River and the Upper Towns of meaning flat; however, noted anthropologist John Swanton sug- the Alabama River Valley. gests that the name belonged to a Choctaw leader.[2] They were a part of the Mississippian culture which was located throughout The Lower Towns included Coweta, Cusseta (Kasihta, the Mississippi River valley. The early Spanish explorers, Cofitachiqui), Upper Chehaw (Chiaha), Hitchiti, Oconee, according to historian Walter Williams,encountered their Ocmulgee, Okawaigi, Apalachee, Yamasee (Altamaha), antecedents.[3] In the 19th century, Choctaws were known as Ocfuskee, Sawokli, and Tamali.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN LUIS DE TALIMALI Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 SAN LUIS DE TALIMALI Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: San Luis de Talimali (UPDATED DOCUMENTATION for San Luis de Apalache, designated a National Historic Landmark on October 9, 1960) Other Name/Site Number: San Luis de Apalachee/Mission San Luis (8LE4) 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 2020 West Mission Road Not for publication: N/A City/Town: Tallahassee Vicinity: N/A State: Florida County: Leon Code: 073 Zip Code: 32304 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: _ Building(s): _ Public-Local: _ District: Public-State: X. Site: X. Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object:_ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 13 buildings (7 1930s & 1940s buildings and 6 reconstructions) __ sites _1 structures (parking lot) __ objects 1 14 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 SAN LUIS DE TALIMALI Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]