DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar March 2020 |Volume I IMPEL | Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award ABOUT IMPEL The Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award works to improve the design and implementation of Food for Peace (FFP) funded development food security activities (DFSAs) through implementer-Led evaluations and knowledge sharing. Funded by the USAID Office of Food for Peace (FFP), the Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award will gather information and knowledge in order to measure performance of DFSAs, strengthen accountability, and improve guidance and policy. This information will help the food security community of practice and USAID to design projects and modify existing projects in ways that bolster performance, efficiency and effectiveness. The Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award is a two-year activity (2019-2021) implemented by Save the Children (lead), TANGO International, and Tulane University, in Haiti, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, Malawi, Nepal, and Zimbabwe. RECOMMENDED CITATION IMPEL. (2020). Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY Development Food Security Activity in Madagascar (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: The Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning Associate Award PHOTO CREDITS Douglas R. Brown. Rice fields in central Madagascar at various stages of planting. September 2019. DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the Implementer-Led Evaluation & Learning (IMPEL) award and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTACT INFORMATION IDEAL Activity c/o Save the Children 899 North Capitol Street NE, Suite #900 Washington, DC 20002 www.fsnnetwork.org [email protected] PREPARED BY: Final Performance Evaluation of the ASOTRY DFSA in Madagascar ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The ASOTRY Qualitative Evaluation Team would like to express their appreciation to all those individuals who willingly gave of their time and shared their knowledge during this final evaluation. First of all, we would like to thank all those who participated in the focus group discussions and key informant interviews conducted in the 28 fokontany that served as the sites for the qualitative study. We would also like to thank those individuals who participated in interviews, both during the course of fieldwork and in the capital Antananarivo, including representatives of the Government of Madagascar. Patrice Charpentier, Chief of Party, and Tsarafidy Rasendraharison, Deputy Chief of Party, as well as several other ADRA staff participated in and/or supported this qualitative evaluation; this support covered the gamut from planning and logistics, to site selection, accompanying the Evaluation Team during fieldwork, and participation in interviews and the validation workshop. Without all the support provided by Mr. John Ravelomanantsoa and Mr. Zafy Martin, two members of the ADRA team who accompanied us in the field, it would have been impossible for the evaluators to complete the program of fieldwork according to plan. We would also like to thank ADRA’s two local implementing partner organizations, Land O’Lakes and Association Intercooperation Madagascar, who shared their insights with the qualitative team and participated in the validation workshop. While in the field, the team’s work was greatly facilitated by the interpreters, notetakers and drivers provided by Agence CAPSULE. They played an essential role in the completion of the fieldwork portion of the qualitative evaluation. We also thank Heritiana Rabarijaona and others at Agence CAPSULE who provided invaluable assistance in organizing the staff, training, and logistics for the quantitative survey and qualitative study, and to Elizabeth Cuellar, who co-led the survey training. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. Onja Holisoa Rahamefy, the independent survey monitor for the quantitative survey. The qualitative team wishes to acknowledge the excellent support of our field assistants. Extensive support was provided to the Evaluation Team throughout the process by multiple colleagues at TANGO International. Behind the scenes at TANGO HQ we have appreciated the guidance and support of Jeanne Downen, Mark Langworthy, Monica Mueller, Elizabeth Cuellar, Carrie Presnall, Robin Al-haddad, and Padraic Finan. Finally, we appreciate the guidance and interest from USAID Food for Peace Washington in this project: Arif Rashid and Adam Trowbridge. Thanks to all who contributed to the work that led to this report, and apologies to any contributors omitted from this acknowledgement. The authors of the report accept full responsibility for the content and any unintended errors or omissions therein. Sincerely, Douglas R Brown, PhD, Independent Consultant (Team Leader) Bernard Crenn, Independent Consultant Dr. Onja Holisoa Rahamefy, Independent Consultant Dr. Haingo Lalaina Ralaison, Independent Consultant Acknowledgments i IMPEL | Implementer-Led Evaluation and Learning TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures .................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... v Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Program Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Theory of Change ........................................................................................................................... 2 2. Evaluation Overview ....................................................................................................................3 2.1 Evaluation Purpose......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Evaluation Questions ..................................................................................................................... 3 3. Evaluation Methods .....................................................................................................................5 3.1 Quantitative Data Collection .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Survey Team .................................................................................................................. 5 3.1.3 Population-Based Sample Design ................................................................................. 5 3.1.4 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Qualitative Data Collection ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Sample Design ............................................................................................................... 9 3.2.3 Evaluation Team .......................................................................................................... 10 3.2.4 Methods ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.5 Analysis, Coding, and Interpretation Methods ........................................................... 11 3.3 Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Findings .................................................................. 11 3.4 Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 11 4. Evaluation Findings .................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Targeting ...................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Purpose 1: Improved health and nutrition status of women of reproductive age and children under five (CU5) ................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 14 4.2.2 Results ......................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.3 Conclusions ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Sample Procurement Plan Agriculture and Land Growth Management Project (P151469) Public Disclosure Authorized I. General 2. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Original: January 2016 – Revision PP: December 2016 – February 2017 3. Date of General Procurement Notice: - 4. Period covered by this procurement plan: July 2016 to December 2017 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable Public Disclosure Authorized procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Type de contrats Montant contrat Méthode de passation de Contrat soumis à revue a en US$ (seuil) marchés priori de la banque 1. Travaux ≥ 5.000.000 AOI Tous les contrats < 5.000.000 AON Selon PPM < 500.000 Consultation des Selon PPM fournisseurs Public Disclosure Authorized Tout montant Entente directe Tous les contrats 2. Fournitures ≥ 500.000 AOI Tous les contrats < 500.000 AON Selon PPM < 200.000 Consultation des Selon PPM fournisseurs Tout montant Entente directe Tous les contrats Tout montant Marchés passes auprès Tous les contrats d’institutions de l’organisation des Nations Unies Public Disclosure Authorized 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Guidelines. July 9, 2010 3. Proposed Procedures for CDD Components (as per paragraph. 3.17 of the Guidelines: - 4. Reference to (if any) Project Operational/Procurement Manual: Manuel de procedures (execution – procedures administratives et financières – procedures de passation de marches): décembre 2016 – émis par l’Unite de Gestion du projet Casef (Croissance Agricole et Sécurisation Foncière) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • Les Marchés De Travaux
    MARCHES DE TRAVAUX SAISIS SUR SIGMP DURANT L'ANNEE 2015 Appel à Manifestation Marché sur Appel d'offres Légende : AMI AOOI AOO Marché sur Appel d'Offres National d'Intêret International Marché sur Appel Marché sur Appel d'Offres AOR AORI AV Avenant d'Offres Restreints Restreints International BC Bon de Commande CNV Convention sous forme de Marché GG Marché de Gré à Gré Financ Région Contrat Montant TTC Unité Autorité Contractante Objet Titulaire ement AGENCE PORTUAIRE Travaux de réaménagement du terminal Centrale AOO 2 652 000 000,00 MGA RPI SOCIETE COLAS MADAGASCAR SA MARITIME ET FLUVIALE Ankify Nosy Be Travaux de rénovation d¿une villa MINISTERE DES FINANCES Centrale AOR 2 497 601 060,20 MGA RPI administrative a usage d¿habitation sise JEANNE D ARC ET DU BUDGET a Ambohibao SECRETARIAT D'ETAT Travaux de construction des bâtiments AUPRES DU MINISTERE DE complémentaires (une soute à Centrale AOR 1 551 197 540,00 MGA LA DEFENSE NATIONALE RPI munition,une salle de musculation avec RANDRIANASOLO JEAN ODON CHARGE DE LA foyer,une infirmerie,deux hangars pour GENDARMERIE hélicos et automobiles,deux locaux à Travaux de construction des quatorze MINISTERE DE L'EDUCATION (14) EPP à deux salles de classes pour RASOLOFONIRINA VEROHANITRA Centrale GG 1 481 249 460,86 MGA RPI NATIONALE les Régions ANALAMANGA et PERLE ALAOTRA MANGORO Travaux de construction des écoles primaires publiques à deux salles MINISTERE DE L'EDUCATION Centrale AOO 1 226 561 839,20 MGA RPI réparties en Dix (10) lots Lot 8: BESOA ERICK NATIONALE QUATORZE (14) EPP à deux (02) salles
    [Show full text]
  • TDR Annexe7 Rapport Analyse 322 Communes OATF
    ETAT DES LIEUX DES 319 COMMUNES POUR LE FINANCEMENT ADDITIONNEL DU PROJET CASEF Février 2019 TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES .................................................................................................................... i LISTE DES ACRONYMES ................................................................................................................ iii Liste des tableaux ......................................................................................................................... v Listes des Cartes ........................................................................................................................... v Liste des figures ............................................................................................................................vi Liste des photos ...........................................................................................................................vi I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 II METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................................... 2 II.1 CHOIX DES 322 COMMUNES OBJETS D’ENQUETE ............................................................... 2 II.2 CHOIX DES CRITERES DE SELECTION DES COMMUNES ........................................................ 5 II.3 METHODOLOGIE DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES ET ACTIVITES ................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • Juillet 2016 Lancement Officiel Du Programme Eaurizon
    Programme N°01 Juillet 2016 ****** 1. Editorial / Actualité du programme Animée par sa volonté de rendre à 2. Etude technique eau potable / En bref l’eau sa vocaon primordiale, celle de servir l’humanité, et forte de ses expé- 3. Assainissement / Geson intégrée de la ressource riences dans le domaine de la geson raonnelle de l’eau, la Métropole de 4. Echos des communes / Et ailleurs / Dans le rétro / Lyon entame aujourd’hui la troisième Chaners phase de sa coopéraon avec la Région Haute Matsiatra. L’objecf étant de donner au programme une dimension prépondérante avec comme horizon Lancement officiel du programme Eaurizon l’accès de tout un chacun à l’eau po- table vecteur de l’assainissement et de l’hygiène. Ainsi, le 3ème projet dénommé « Eaurizon » est lancé pour une période de 4 ans, avec un budget de 2,7 mil- lions d’euros au profit de 16 communes partenaires. Il est considéré comme l'un des plus importants projets dans la Région, et est ainsi une vitrine du sec- De gauche à droite : Le représentant de la Préfecture, le Chef de Région, le Directeur Régional du Ministère teur, de par son origine, ses ambions de l’Eau de l’Assainissement et de l’Hygiène, le représentant de la Commune Urbaine de Fianarantsoa et le et ses démarches structurées et struc- représentant résident de la Métropole de Lyon turantes. Des deux projets antérieurs, L’atelier de lancement officiel du pro- permis de connaître le ressen des ac- les leçons sont comptabilisées et les gramme Eaurizon s’est tenu dans teurs du secteur EAH au niveau de la acquis capitalisés pour être mis au ser- l’amphithéâtre du Palais de la Région , région : vice de Eaurizon.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis.Pdf (1.137Mb)
    Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education Francesca Castagnetti Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies May 2018 Seeds of Resistance: Civil Society Organisations, Land Rights and Food Sovereignty in Madagascar A Participatory Research with VOIALA-Madagascar on Communities’ Resistance to Large Scale Land Acquisition Deals in Haute Matsiatra, Madagascar Seeds of Resistance: Civil Society Organisations, Land Rights and Food Sovereignty in Madagascar A Participatory Research with VOIALA-Madagascar on Communities’ Resistance to Large Scale Land Acquisition Deals in Haute Matsiatra, Madagascar By Francesca Castagnetti Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education May 2018 Supervisor Camilla Brattland Adviser Jennifer Hays Cover Photo: Photos by the Author – Artwork by Sasha Castagnetti i ii To the Communities I have called Home, in Sápmi, Madagascar and Kent, that welcomed me with their wealth of Generous Hearts and Inspiring Minds iii George Orwell wrote in 1944 in the UK: “Stop to consider how the so-called owners of the land got hold of it. They simply seized it by force, afterwards hiring lawyers to provide them with title-deeds. In the case of the enclosure of the common lands, which was going on from about 1600 to 1850, the land-grabbers did not even have the excuse of being foreign conquerors; they were quite frankly taking the heritage of their own countrymen, upon no sort of pretext except that they had the power to do so.” 1 1 7<,22,57., -!-+, 49/,70.0485-756,79>04 (4+''(*,#.#&#.#-$#+%'*!*"#. *'%9/,570.04(2'& '.%* ,970,;,+ (7*/ &**,88,+ ' iv Acknowledgements The last two years were filled with plenty of people and explorations to be grateful for, so this is a long list.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • Ambositra Est La Suivante
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO École Supérieure Polytechnique d’Antananarivo UFR Sciences Economiques et de Gestion de Bordeaux IV MEMOIRE DE DIPLOME D’ÉTUDES SUPÉRIEURES SPÉCIALISÉES OPTION : « ÉTUDES D’IMPACTS ENVIRONNEMENTAUX » En co-diplômation entre L’Université d’Antananarivo et l’Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV Intitulé : EETTUUDDEE DD’’’IIIMMPPAACCTTSS EENNVVIIIRROONNNNEEMMEENNTTAAUUXX EETT SSOOCCIIIAAUUXX DDUU PPRROOJJEETT «VVIIITTRRIIINNEE DDEE LL’’’EENNTTRREETTIIIEENN RROOUUTTIIIEERR NN°° 0022 »» SSUURR LL’’’AAXXEE :: AAmmbboossiiittrraa –– IIImmaaddyy IIImmeerriiinnaa –– MMaahhaazzooaarriiivvoo -- FFaannddrriiiaannaa Présenté le 09 octobre 2012 par Monsieur: RANDRIAMANANJO Dina Lalaina D E S S - E I E 2011 – 2012 D E S S EIE 2011 - 2012 École Supérieure Polytechnique d’Antananarivo UFR Sciences Economiques et de Gestion de Bordeaux IV MEMOIRE DE DIPLOME D’ÉTUDES SUPÉRIEURES SPÉCIALISÉES OPTION : « ÉTUDES D’IMPACTS ENVIRONNEMENTAUX » En co-diplômation entre L’Université d’Antananarivo et l’Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV Intitulé : EETTUUDDEE DD’’’IIIMMPPAACCTTSS EENNVVIIIRROONNNNEEMMEENNTTAAUUXX EETT SSOOCCIIIAAUUXX DDUU PPRROOJJEETT «VVIIITTRRIIINNEE DDEE LL’’’EENNTTRREETTIIIEENN RROOUUTTIIIEERR NN°° 0022 »» SSUURR LL’’’AAXXEE :: AAmmbboossiiittrraa –– IIImmaaddyy IIImmeerriiinnaa –– MMaahhaazzooaarriiivvoo -- FFaannddrriiiaannaa Présenté le 09 octobre 2012 par Monsieur : RANDRIAMANANJO Dina Lalaina Devant le jury composé de : Président : - Monsieur ANDRIANARY Philippe Antoine Professeur Titulaire Examinateurs : - Mme Sylvie
    [Show full text]
  • 3302 Ambohimahasoa
    dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana ----------------- HAUTE COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE RESULTATS DEFINITIFS DU SECOND TOUR DE L'ELECTION PRESIDENTIELLE DU 19 DECEMBRE 2018 dfggfdgffhCode BV: 330201010101 dfggfdgffhBureau de vote: EPP AMBATOFOLAKA SALLE 1 dfggfdgffhCommune: AMBALAKINDRESY dfggfdgffhDistrict: AMBOHIMAHASOA dfggfdgffhRegion: HAUTE MATSIATRA dfggfdgffhProvince: FIANARANTSOA Inscrits : 291 Votants: 107 Blancs et Nuls: 8 Soit: 7,48% Suffrages exprimes: 99 Soit: 92,52% Taux de participation: 36,77% N° d'ordre Logo Photo Nom et Prenoms Candidat Voix obtenues Pourcentage 13 RAJOELINA Andry Nirina 85 85,86% 25 RAVALOMANANA Marc 14 14,14% Total voix: 99 100,00% Copyright @ HCC 2019 dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana ----------------- HAUTE COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE RESULTATS DEFINITIFS DU SECOND TOUR DE L'ELECTION PRESIDENTIELLE DU 19 DECEMBRE 2018 dfggfdgffhCode BV: 330201020101 dfggfdgffhBureau de vote: EPP AMBOHIMAHATSINJO SALLE 1 dfggfdgffhCommune: AMBALAKINDRESY dfggfdgffhDistrict: AMBOHIMAHASOA dfggfdgffhRegion: HAUTE MATSIATRA dfggfdgffhProvince: FIANARANTSOA Inscrits : 316 Votants: 124 Blancs et Nuls: 15 Soit: 12,10% Suffrages exprimes: 109 Soit: 87,90% Taux de participation: 39,24% N° d'ordre Logo Photo Nom et Prenoms Candidat Voix obtenues Pourcentage 13 RAJOELINA Andry Nirina 71 65,14% 25 RAVALOMANANA Marc 38 34,86% Total voix: 109 100,00% Copyright @ HCC 2019 dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm
    [Show full text]
  • Répartition De La Caisse-École 2020 Des Collèges D'enseignement
    Repartition de la caisse-école 2020 des Collèges d'Enseignement Général DREN ALAOTRA-MANGORO CISCO AMBATONDRAZAKA Prestataire OTIV ALMA Commune Code Etablissement Montant AMBANDRIKA 503010005 CEG AMBANDRIKA 1 598 669 AMBATONDRAZAKA 503020018 C.E.G. ANOSINDRAFILO 1 427 133 AMBATONDRAZAKA 503020016 CEG RAZAKA 3 779 515 AMBATONDRAZAKA SUBURBAINE 503030002 C.E.G. ANDINGADINGANA 1 142 422 AMBATOSORATRA 503040001 CEG AMBATOSORATRA 1 372 802 AMBOHIBOROMANGA 503070012 CEG ANNEXE AMBOHIBOROMANGA 878 417 AMBOHIBOROMANGA 503150018 CEG ANNEXE MARIANINA 775 871 AMBOHIBOROMANGA 503150016 CEGFERAMANGA SUD 710 931 AMBOHIDAVA 503040017 CEG AMBOHIDAVA 1 203 171 AMBOHITSILAOZANA 503050001 CEG AMBOHITSILAOZANA 1 671 044 AMBOHITSILAOZANA CEG TANAMBAO JIAPASIKA 622 687 AMPARIHINTSOKATRA 503060013 CEG AMPARIHINTSOKATRA 1 080 499 AMPITATSIMO 503070001 CEG AMPITATSIMO 1 530 936 AMPITATSIMO 503070015 CEG ANNEXE AMBOHITANIBE 860 667 ANDILANATOBY 503080025 CEG ANDRANOKOBAKA 760 039 ANDILANATOBY 503080001 CEG ANDILANATOBY 1 196 620 ANDILANATOBY 503080026 CEG ANNEXE SAHANIDINGANA 709 718 ANDILANATOBY 503080027 CEG COMMUNAUTAIRE AMBODINONOKA 817 973 ANDILANATOBY 503080031 CEG COMMUNAUTAIRE MANGATANY 723 676 ANDILANATOBY 503080036 CEG COMMUNAUTAIRE RANOFOTSY 668 769 ANDROMBA 503090005 CEG ANDROMBA 1 008 043 ANTANANDAVA 503100020 CEG ANTANANDAVA 1 056 579 ANTSANGASANGA 503110004 CEG ANTSANGASANGA 757 763 BEJOFO 503120016 C.E.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuration Des Organisations Paysannes De Haute Matsiatra Et Accompagnement Du Changement Table Des Matières
    REPOBLIKAN’I MADAGASIKARA Tanindrazana – Fahafahana – Fandrosoana MINISTERE DE L’AGRICULTURE (MINAGRI) SECRETARIAT GENERAL et DIRECTION GENERALE DE L’AGRICULTURE Appui au renforcement des organisations professionnelles et des services agricoles (AROPA) ÉTUDE DE CAS PROGRAMME PAYS MADAGASCAR Direction: Caroline Bidault. Chargée de Programme FIDA Madagascar Rédaction: Laurent Foubert mai 2011 Étude de cas : Structuration des organisations paysannes de Haute Matsiatra et accompagnement du changement Table des matières 1. Introduction ............................................................................................4 2. Méthodologie .........................................................................................5 3. Modèle de diffusion ...............................................................................5 3.1 Lʼenvironnement andragogique et lʼimportance de la dimension comportementale .....................................................................................................5 3.2 Lʼenvironnement institutionnel et le rôle de la dimension psycho- technique ..................................................................................................................7 3.2.1 Exemplarité ......................................................................................................7 3.2.2 Complémentarité : sensibilisation / exemplarité .........................................8 3.2.3 Développement des canaux informels .........................................................9 4. Capacité dʼinternalisation
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental And
    Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental and Social Management Plan Translation of the original French version 19 May 2016 (Updated 23 August 2016) 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 10 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 17 1.1 Background and Project Objectives ...................................................................................... 17 1.2 Objectives of the ESMP ........................................................................................................ 17 1.3 Link between the ESMP and the Environmental and Social Management Tools for the COFAV and CAZ Protected Areas ........................................................................................................ 18 2 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Description of Components, Activities, and Relevant Sectors .............................................. 20 2.2 Targets and Characteristics
    [Show full text]