DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental And Sustainable Landscapes in Eastern Madagascar Environmental and Social Management Plan Translation of the original French version 19 May 2016 (Updated 23 August 2016) 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 10 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 17 1.1 Background and Project Objectives ...................................................................................... 17 1.2 Objectives of the ESMP ........................................................................................................ 17 1.3 Link between the ESMP and the Environmental and Social Management Tools for the COFAV and CAZ Protected Areas ........................................................................................................ 18 2 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Description of Components, Activities, and Relevant Sectors .............................................. 20 2.2 Targets and Characteristics .................................................................................................. 21 2.3 Project Funding and Structure .............................................................................................. 22 3 Description of the Receiving Environment .............................................................................. 24 3.1 Project Intervention Areas ..................................................................................................... 24 3.2 The Zahamena – Ankeniheny Forest Landscape ................................................................. 25 3.2.1 Location and Sociocultural Background ........................................................................ 25 3.2.2 Biophysical Environment ............................................................................................... 26 3.2.3 Type of Uses of and Dependence of Livelihoods on Forest Resources and Forest Products in the CAZ ...................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.4 Zoning and Planning in the CAZ ................................................................................... 29 3.2.5 Transfer of Natural Resources Management (TNRM) .................................................. 30 3.3 The Fandriana – Vondrozo Forest Landscape ..................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Location and Sociocultural Background ........................................................................ 30 3.3.2 Description of the Biophysical Environment .................................................................. 31 3.3.3 Type of Uses of and Dependence of Livelihoods on Forest Resources and Forest Products ………………………………………………………………………………………………….32 3.3.4 Zoning and Planning of the COFAV .............................................................................. 36 4 Description and Assessment of the Political Framework and the National Regulations Applicable to the Project .................................................................................................................... 38 4.1 Scoping the Project according to National Policies .............................................................. 38 4.2 Assessment of the GCF and EIB Environmental and Social Performance and Standards (ESPS) and CI Standards and Safeguard Policies ............................................................................... 44 4.3 Legal Framework of the Environmental and Social Management of the Project .................. 48 4.3.1 Main Regulations and Legislations related to the Project ............................................. 48 4.3.2 Adequacy of the Classification of Environmental Studies based on GCF/EIB/CI and the National Legislation ....................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.3 Consultation under the MECIE Process ....................................................................... 56 4.3.4 Grievance Mechanism according to the MECIE Process ............................................. 57 4.3.5 International Conventions ............................................................................................. 59 5 Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation or Enhancement Measures ................... 60 5.1 Approach ............................................................................................................................... 60 2 5.2 Environmental and Social Issues related to the Project Activities: ....................................... 60 5.3 Risk Analysis, Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures: ................................................. 64 5.4 Assessment of Positive Impacts and Enhancement Measures ............................................ 66 6 Structure and Environmental Assessment Process of the Project Sub-Projects/ Activities ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..69 6.1 Project Organizational Framework ........................................................................................ 69 6.2 Environmental Categorization of Sub-Projects ..................................................................... 71 6.3 Institutional Arrangement for the Implementation of the Environmental Assessment Process of a Sub-Project .................................................................................................................................... 73 6.3.1 Charter of Responsibilities of the Various Actors for the Environmental Assessment Process ………………………………………………………………………………………………….73 6.3.2 Administrative Process for the Screening of Sub-Projects ........................................... 76 6.3.3 Administrative Process for the Scoping of Sub-Projects............................................... 76 6.3.4 Administrative Process for Conducting and Reviewing Environmental Studies ........... 77 6.3.5 Administrative Process for the Integration of Environmental and Social Measures in the Implementation of a Sub-Project ................................................................................................... 78 6.3.6 Administrative Process for Evaluations, Environmental and Social Performance ........ 79 6.4 Consideration of the IFC Performance Standards and CI Safeguard Policies in Impact Studies or Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................. 80 6.5 Tools and Recommendations to Implement the Environmental Assessment Process of the Project ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..80 6.5.1 Screening Form for Sub-Projects .................................................................................. 80 6.5.2 Content of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) .............................................. 80 6.5.3 Content of the Environmental Commitment Program ................................................... 81 6.5.4 Recommendations for the Environmental and Social Management of the Project ...... 81 6.5.5 Recommendations for the Environmental and Social Management of the COFAV and CAZ Protected Areas .................................................................................................................... 81 6.6 Capacity-Building Needs in Environmental and Social Management ................................... 82 6.6.1 Assessment of Existing Capacities ............................................................................... 82 Conservation International Madagascar .................................................................................... 82 Althelia ……………………………………………………………………………………………….85 6.6.2 Capacity-Building Needs ............................................................................................... 85 7 Environmental and Social Monitoring and Surveillance Program ......................................... 87 7.1 Monitoring Plan ..................................................................................................................... 87 7.2 Surveillance Plan .................................................................................................................. 90 8 Stakeholder Consultations ......................................................................................................... 93 8.1 Completed Public Consultations ........................................................................................... 93 8.2 Stakeholder Consultation and Participation during Project Implementation ......................... 94 8.2.1 Stakeholder Consultation during the Lifecycle of a Sub-Project ................................... 94 8.2.2 Levels of Stakeholder Consultation and Participation in Project Implementation ......... 95 8.2.3 Grievance Mechanisms ................................................................................................. 96 8.2.4 External Communication, Information Dissemination, and Access .............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pezzottaite from Ambatovita, Madagascar: a New Gem Mineral
    PEZZOTTAITE FROM AMBATOVITA, MADAGASCAR: A NEW GEM MINERAL Brendan M. Laurs, William B. (Skip) Simmons, George R. Rossman, Elizabeth P. Quinn, Shane F. McClure, Adi Peretti, Thomas Armbruster, Frank C. Hawthorne, Alexander U. Falster, Detlef Günther, Mark A. Cooper, and Bernard Grobéty Pezzottaite, ideally Cs(Be2Li)Al2Si6O18, is a new gem mineral that is the Cs,Li–rich member of the beryl group. It was discovered in November 2002 in a granitic pegmatite near Ambatovita in cen- tral Madagascar. Only a few dozen kilograms of gem rough were mined, and the deposit appears nearly exhausted. The limited number of transparent faceted stones and cat’s-eye cabochons that have been cut usually show a deep purplish pink color. Pezzottaite is distinguished from beryl by its higher refractive indices (typically no=1.615–1.619 and ne=1.607–1.610) and specific gravity values (typically 3.09–3.11). In addition, the new mineral’s infrared and Raman spectra, as well as its X-ray diffraction pattern, are distinctive, while the visible spectrum recorded with the spec- trophotometer is similar to that of morganite. The color is probably caused by radiation-induced color centers involving Mn3+. eginning with the 2003 Tucson gem shows, (Be3Sc2Si6O18; Armbruster et al., 1995), and stoppaniite cesium-rich “beryl” from Ambatovita, (Be3Fe2Si6O18; Ferraris et al., 1998; Della Ventura et Madagascar, created excitement among gem al., 2000). Pezzottaite, which is rhombohedral, is Bcollectors and connoisseurs due to its deep purplish not a Cs-rich beryl but rather a new mineral species pink color (figure 1) and the attractive chatoyancy that is closely related to beryl.
    [Show full text]
  • Tapia Woodlands of Highland Madagascar: Rural Economy, Fire Ecology, and Forest Conservation
    The 'degraded' tapia woodlands of highland Madagascar: rural economy, fire ecology, and forest conservation Christian A. Kull This is an author-archived version of the following paper: Kull 2002. The 'degraded' tapia woodlands of highland Madagascar: rural economy, fire ecology, and forest conservation. Journal of Cultural Geography 19 (2): 95-128. The final definitive version is available from Taylor and Francis (www.tandfonline.com) Direct link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873630209478290 Abstract Madagascar is well-known for deforestation. However, highland "tapia" (Uapaca bojeri) woodlands may present a counter-example of indigenous management leading to woodland conservation. Contrary to common wisdom that these woodlands are degraded, tapia woodland extent and composition have seen little change this century. Tapia woodlands harbor many benefits, including wild silkworms (whose cocoons have been harvested for centuries to weave expensive burial shrouds), fruit, woodfuel, mushrooms, edible insects, and herbal medicines. As a result, villagers shape and maintain the woodlands. Burning favors the dominance of pyrophitic tapia trees and protects silkworms from parasites. Selective cutting of non-tapia species and pruning of dead branches also favors tapia dominance and perhaps growth. Finally, local and state-imposed regulations protect the woodlands from over-exploitation. These processes -- burning, cutting, and protection -- are embedded in complex and dynamic social, political, economic, and ecological contexts which are integral to the tapia woodlands as they exist today. As a result, I argue on a normative level that the creation and maintenance of the woodlands should not be seen as “degradation,” rather as a creative “transformation.” INTRODUCTION Few endemic forests exist in highland Madagascar, a region dominated by vast grasslands, rice paddies, dryland cropfields, and pine or eucalyptus woodlots.
    [Show full text]
  • Fianarantsoa
    NY FIA NGONA NA /SA N-KER/N TA ONA TAO FIANARANTSOA. NY KOMITIN, NY ISAN-KERINTAONA. N y M isio n ar y.— Kev. J. Pearse sy Rev. T. Rowlands sy Rev. A . S. Hnekett ary Rev. H . T. Johnson. N y Evangelistra.— Rafolo fFianarantsoaJ, Rainizana- mandroso f Ambalavao AtsimoJ, Andrianome f TsimaitohasoaJ, Rainijaonary fAlarobiaJ, Rainizanabelo fVohitsisahyJ, Rako- tovao f TsimahamenalamhaJ, Rainijoelina fAlahamisyJ, Ra- benjanahary f AmbohinamboarinaJ, Rakotovao f laritsenaJ. N y M pita n le in a n y Re n i- fiangon ana.— Ramorasata sy Rarinosy f A ntranobirikyJ, Rainiboreda sy Ravelojaonina flvohidahyJ, Andriamahefa sy Rabarijaonina f AmbalavaoJ, Rahaingomanana fFanjakana'j, Rainivao sy Rainimamonjy fAmbohinamboarinaJ, Rainisamoelina fAmbohimandroso A m - bonyj, Rajoelina sy Rasamoelina f Ambohimandroso AmbanyJ. N y I r a k y n y Re n i- eiangonana,— Andrianaivo sy Raben- godona f AntranobirihyJ, Rajaonimaria sy Razaka flvohidahyJ, Rainiketakandriana sy Rakotovao f AmbalavaoJ, Raiaiz&kftnosy sy Rainitsimba ary Rainizanajaza f Ambohimand,»eàQ T sermana a m y n y K om ity.— Raveloj aoniAa Sek r e ta r y.—Rakotovao. M p it a h ir y v o l a .— Rev. J. Pearse. M pa n d in ik a n y taratasim - bola.— Rafolo IRAKY NY ISAN-KERINTAONA NT AMPOVOA.N-TANT. Anarany. Tany ampianarany. Andria nainelona . Iavonomby, Halangina. Andriambao ........... Ambohibary, Isandra (avar.) Rapaoly ........... Vohimarina, Iarindrano (avar.) Andrianay ................ Nasandratrony, Isandra (atsiai.) Raobena | ........... Manandriana Mpanampy J Rainianjalahy......... Iarinomby, Ambohimandroso (atsin.) Andriamitsirimanga Iandraina, Ambohimandroso (andref.) NY ANY AMY NY BARA. Ramainba ................ Sahanambo Andriambelo ...... Vohibe NY ANY AMY NY TANALA. Andrianantsiony .. Vohitrosy Anjolobato Vohimanitra NY ANY AMY NY SAKALAVA.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • TDR Annexe7 Rapport Analyse 322 Communes OATF
    ETAT DES LIEUX DES 319 COMMUNES POUR LE FINANCEMENT ADDITIONNEL DU PROJET CASEF Février 2019 TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES .................................................................................................................... i LISTE DES ACRONYMES ................................................................................................................ iii Liste des tableaux ......................................................................................................................... v Listes des Cartes ........................................................................................................................... v Liste des figures ............................................................................................................................vi Liste des photos ...........................................................................................................................vi I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 II METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................................... 2 II.1 CHOIX DES 322 COMMUNES OBJETS D’ENQUETE ............................................................... 2 II.2 CHOIX DES CRITERES DE SELECTION DES COMMUNES ........................................................ 5 II.3 METHODOLOGIE DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES ET ACTIVITES ................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • Juillet 2016 Lancement Officiel Du Programme Eaurizon
    Programme N°01 Juillet 2016 ****** 1. Editorial / Actualité du programme Animée par sa volonté de rendre à 2. Etude technique eau potable / En bref l’eau sa vocaon primordiale, celle de servir l’humanité, et forte de ses expé- 3. Assainissement / Geson intégrée de la ressource riences dans le domaine de la geson raonnelle de l’eau, la Métropole de 4. Echos des communes / Et ailleurs / Dans le rétro / Lyon entame aujourd’hui la troisième Chaners phase de sa coopéraon avec la Région Haute Matsiatra. L’objecf étant de donner au programme une dimension prépondérante avec comme horizon Lancement officiel du programme Eaurizon l’accès de tout un chacun à l’eau po- table vecteur de l’assainissement et de l’hygiène. Ainsi, le 3ème projet dénommé « Eaurizon » est lancé pour une période de 4 ans, avec un budget de 2,7 mil- lions d’euros au profit de 16 communes partenaires. Il est considéré comme l'un des plus importants projets dans la Région, et est ainsi une vitrine du sec- De gauche à droite : Le représentant de la Préfecture, le Chef de Région, le Directeur Régional du Ministère teur, de par son origine, ses ambions de l’Eau de l’Assainissement et de l’Hygiène, le représentant de la Commune Urbaine de Fianarantsoa et le et ses démarches structurées et struc- représentant résident de la Métropole de Lyon turantes. Des deux projets antérieurs, L’atelier de lancement officiel du pro- permis de connaître le ressen des ac- les leçons sont comptabilisées et les gramme Eaurizon s’est tenu dans teurs du secteur EAH au niveau de la acquis capitalisés pour être mis au ser- l’amphithéâtre du Palais de la Région , région : vice de Eaurizon.
    [Show full text]
  • Dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfs
    dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana ----------------- HAUTE COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE RESULTATS DEFINITIFS DU SECOND TOUR DE L'ELECTION PRESIDENTIELLE DU 19 DECEMBRE 2018 dfggfdgffhCode BV: 330601010101 dfggfdgffhBureau de vote: EPP ALAKAMISY ITENINA SALLE 1 dfggfdgffhCommune: ALAKAMISY ITENINA dfggfdgffhDistrict: VOHIBATO dfggfdgffhRegion: HAUTE MATSIATRA dfggfdgffhProvince: FIANARANTSOA Inscrits : 405 Votants: 238 Blancs et Nuls: 2 Soit: 0,84% Suffrages exprimes: 236 Soit: 99,16% Taux de participation: 58,77% N° d'ordre Logo Photo Nom et Prenoms Candidat Voix obtenues Pourcentage 13 RAJOELINA Andry Nirina 92 38,98% 25 RAVALOMANANA Marc 144 61,02% Total voix: 236 100,00% Copyright @ HCC 2019 dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm REPOBLIKAN'I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana - Tanindrazana - Fandrosoana ----------------- HAUTE COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE RESULTATS DEFINITIFS DU SECOND TOUR DE L'ELECTION PRESIDENTIELLE DU 19 DECEMBRE 2018 dfggfdgffhCode BV: 330601020101 dfggfdgffhBureau de vote: EPP AMBALAFAHIBATO SALLE 1 dfggfdgffhCommune: ALAKAMISY ITENINA dfggfdgffhDistrict: VOHIBATO dfggfdgffhRegion: HAUTE MATSIATRA dfggfdgffhProvince: FIANARANTSOA Inscrits : 576 Votants: 212 Blancs et Nuls: 3 Soit: 1,42% Suffrages exprimes: 209 Soit: 98,58% Taux de participation: 36,81% N° d'ordre Logo Photo Nom et Prenoms Candidat Voix obtenues Pourcentage 13 RAJOELINA Andry Nirina 68 32,54% 25 RAVALOMANANA Marc 141 67,46% Total voix: 209 100,00% Copyright @ HCC 2019 dfggfdgfdgsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfsdfdsfsdfdsfdmmm
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Madagascar – Ankarinomby
    The Feedback Trust Scottish Charity No. SC023568 Construction of a new school for the Ankarinomby Secondary School in Madagascar (FF 441 - 01) Final report May 2019 Feedback Madagascar/Ny Tanintsika (FBM/NT) – The Eagle Foundation 1 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Project location ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Calendar of achievements ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Details on the project ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Difficulties encountered ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Project beneficiaries ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Expenditure summary ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Current situation........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar
    Public Disclosure Authorized Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar INCEPTION REPORT [ENGLISH VERSION] August 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared by SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a. in association with Mhylab, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro Renewable Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning [Project ID: P145350]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be a Madagascar Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Boissiera 71
    Taxonomic treatment of Abrahamia Randrian. & Lowry, a new genus of Anacardiaceae BOISSIERA from Madagascar Armand RANDRIANASOLO, Porter P. LOWRY II & George E. SCHATZ 71 BOISSIERA vol.71 Director Pierre-André Loizeau Editor-in-chief Martin W. Callmander Guest editor of Patrick Perret this volume Graphic Design Matthieu Berthod Author instructions for www.ville-ge.ch/cjb/publications_boissiera.php manuscript submissions Boissiera 71 was published on 27 December 2017 © CONSERVATOIRE ET JARDIN BOTANIQUES DE LA VILLE DE GENÈVE BOISSIERA Systematic Botany Monographs vol.71 Boissiera is indexed in: BIOSIS ® ISSN 0373-2975 / ISBN 978-2-8277-0087-5 Taxonomic treatment of Abrahamia Randrian. & Lowry, a new genus of Anacardiaceae from Madagascar Armand Randrianasolo Porter P. Lowry II George E. Schatz Addresses of the authors AR William L. Brown Center, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. [email protected] PPL Africa and Madagascar Program, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205, Centre national de la Recherche scientifique/Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle/École pratique des Hautes Etudes, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Universités, C.P. 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris CEDEX 05, France. GES Africa and Madagascar Program, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. Taxonomic treatment of Abrahamia (Anacardiaceae) 7 Abstract he Malagasy endemic genus Abrahamia Randrian. & Lowry (Anacardiaceae) is T described and a taxonomic revision is presented in which 34 species are recog- nized, including 19 that are described as new.
    [Show full text]
  • En Suivant Ce Lien
    Coopération décentralisée entre Suivi technique et financier des gestionnaires de réseau d’eau potable dans la Haute Matsiatra RAPPORT ANNUEL RESULTATS DE L’ANNEE 2018 Avec le soutien de TABLE DES MATIERES Table des matières .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Liste des figures ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Sigles et abréviations ........................................................................................................................................... 7 En résumé… 8 1. Éléments de cadrage ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Contexte général ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Les réseaux objet du STEFI 2018 ............................................................................................................. 9 2. La méthodologie de collecte de données ................................................................................................... 15 3. Présentation des acteurs et des adductions d’eau objet du STEFI 2018 .................................................... 16 3.1. Les communes concernées ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hazavanahazavana Herin’Aratra Vokarina Amin’Ny Zava-Maniry Fandrehitra Electrification Rurale Décentralisée Par Combustion De Biomasse
    Pierre Montagne, Mamisoa Rakotoarimanana, François Pinta et Serge Razafimahatratra Coordinateurs scientifiques HAZAVANAHAZAVANA Herin’Aratra Vokarina Amin’ny Zava-Maniry Fandrehitra Electrification Rurale Décentralisée par Combustion de Biomasse IRONNEME NV N E T L’ E T E D D E S E R F O E T R S E I T N I S M HAZAVANA Herin’Aratra Vokarina Amin’ny Zava-Maniry Fandrehitra Electrification Rurale Décentralisée par Combustion de Biomasse Expérience des projets Gesforcom et Bioenergelec à Madagascar, de 2008 à 2015 BIOENERGELEC Biomasse énergie pour la réduction de la pauvreté par l’électrification rurale décentralisée à Madagascar Pierre Montagne, Mamisoa Rakotoarimanana, François Pinta et Serge Razafimahatratra Coordinateurs scientifiques © Homme et Environnement ISBN : 978-2-9555221-0-3 L’Homme et l’Environnement Lot II M 90 Antsakaviro, Tél. +261 22 674 90 e-mail : [email protected] http ://www.madagascar-environnement.com www.bioenergelec.org Le contenu de cette publication n’engage que la responsabilité de ses auteurs et ne représente pas nécessairement l’opinion de l’Union Européenne. L’Union Européenne n’est pas responsable de l’usage qui pourrait être fait des informations qui y figurent. Pierre Montagne, Mamisoa Rakotoarimanana, François Pinta et Serge Razafimahatratra Coordinateurs scientifiques HAZAVANA Herin’Aratra Vokarina Amin’ny Zava-Maniry Fandrehitra Electrification Rurale Décentralisée par Combustion de Biomasse Expérience des projets Gesforcom et Bioenergelec à Madagascar, de 2008 à 2015 Ouvrage de synthèse édité à partir
    [Show full text]