<<

Groundwater Body Boundaries in a Hydrogeological Model: the case of Saarland ()

Thomas WALTER Landesamt für Umwelt- und Arbeitsschutz Don-Bosco-Str. 1, D-66119 Saarbrücken Germany

Identification of Groundwater Bodies in Saarland Saarland

2568 km²

1.1 million inhabitants

415 inh./km²

GWBIdentification Workshop, of Groundwater GWB Boundaries Bodies inin Saarlanda hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 GWB Identification

Groundwater body deli- GWB-Delineation neation is the first and most sensitive step!

Characterisation Therefore, groundwater bodies should be hydraulically and hy- drochemically as homogene- ous as possible Monitoring

but: Groundwater bodies Measurement plans also should have a reasonable size!

GWBIdentification Workshop, Berlin of Groundwater GWB Boundaries Bodies inin Saarlanda hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Schematic Vertical Section

Structural boundary

Stratigraphic boundary

Hydraulic b.

Political boundary NW SE

- kalk

Muschel- Upper Permian kalk

Devonian Triassic sandstone Carboniferous/ Lower Permian

GWBIdentification Workshop, Berlin of Groundwater GWB Boundaries Bodies inin Saarlanda hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Groundwater Bodies

GWBIdentification Workshop, Berlin of Groundwater GWB Boundaries Bodies inin Saarlanda hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Overall Groundwater Mineralisation

LTS TSC UPV    CLP DSQ   2500        2000         1500         1000      500    0

5 1 6 8 9 11 13 14 15 7 10 16 2 3 4 12 Groundwater Body

GWBIdentification Workshop, Berlin of Groundwater GWB Boundaries Bodies inin Saarlanda hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Model Conception

Complexity, Degree no. of of fidelity parameters, costs and effort Aquifer simulator

Planning model

Simplification, uncertainty, Principle model

assumptions of the Saarland model Intended accuracy Intended accuracy range

Conceptual Model

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Geology and Hydrogeology

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Exemplary Profiles

Length of section: 24 km

Length of section: 54 km GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Main Aquifer Geometry

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Layer Structure and Parametrisation Permeability [m/s] Layer Stratigraphy Starting Calibrated HÜK values values Quater- 1 Flood plains, terraces q -6 -4 -4 -4 -4 nary 10 – 10 10 10 - 5 ·10 Upper Keuper ko -5 -6 -6 2 Upper 10 9·10 9 ·10 Middle Keuper km Triassic Lower Keuper ku 3 10-6 - 10-4 5 ·10-6 5 ·10-6 Upper Muschelkalk mo2 -5 -3 -5 -5 4 Middle Upper Muschelkalk mo1 10 - 10 5 ·10 5 ·10 5 Triassic Middle Muschelkalk mm 10-9 - 10-7 5 ·10-8 5 ·10-8 Lower Muschelkalk mu 6 10-6 - 10-4 10-5 10-7 - 10-6 Lower Upper Buntsandstein so Triassic Middle Buntsandstein sm 7 10-5 - 10-3 5 ·10-5 10-6 - 10-4 Kreuznach facies ro3 Permian Upper Rotliegend ro1, ro2 8 <10-5 5 ·10-6 3 ·10-7 Lower Rotliegend ru -5 -6 -7 9 Carbo- Stephanian cst <10 5 ·10 3 ·10 10 niferous Westphalian cw <10-5 5 ·10-7 8 ·10-8 11 Devonian undifferentiated d <10-5 5 ·10-7 8 ·10-8

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Mean Long Term Groundwater Recharge Recharge: 406,5 Mio. m³/a i.e. ca. 160 mm/year

[mm/a]

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Final Mesh

187.835 nodes 280.648 elements Max distance between nodes: 200 m 11 layers

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 EXEMPLARY RESULTS GW Surface and Geology

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 GW surface map

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Depth to groundwater

GWB Workshop, Berlin 15./1612.2011 GWB AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODEL GWB Graben

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Protective Cover

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Quantitative Status of GWB

GWR (mm) GWR (l/s/km²) GWR (m³/a) source ÖWAV- 346,0 10,96 7.556.713 Südwest

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Lebach Graben

GW Recharge

Main aquifer

Carboniferous, low permeability

Carboniferous, very low permeability

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 GWB and GW Catchment

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Eastern Saarland

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Central Saarland

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Conflicting Interests

Quantitive status Qualitive status

hydrochemically homogeneous groundwater catchment zones bodies

Additional factors also apply (politicals borders, pressure on resource etc. …)

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 GWB delineation is highly subjective

„natural factors“ „subjective factors“

intentions Natural conditions GWB implementer professional skills

Availability of useful data

„administrative factors“

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 Conclusion

Regional hydrogeological models are very effective tools: - -Flow conditions within a GWB - quantification of lateral and vertical exchanges between GWBs - quantification of exchanges between ground and surface waters - improved understanding of hydraulic conditions of measuring points - definition of residence time in unsaturated zone - forecasting of effectiveness of measurements - … Hydrogeological models can help to mitigate the influence of the „subjective factor“

Availability of suitable data, elevated costs and computing limitations of modern soft- and hardware are still the main hindrances for a broader application of regional hydrogelogical models

Use of 3D Models in geology and hydrogeology is the future!

GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011 GWB Workshop, Berlin GWB Boundaries in a hydrogeological Model: Saarland 15./1612.2011