<<

Style of Play From Good to Great

Canada Super Clinic| Sunday, May 30, 2021 @philip_jevtovic • Pace • Spacing & Ball Movement • Shot Selection OFFENSIVE STYLE OF PLAY CHARACTERISTICS SHOT SPECTRUM

Shot Spectrum RIM 125 Points per 100 Shots

CORNER 3PT 123 Points per 100 Shots

ABOVE THE BREAK 3PT Rim FIBA | 125 Corner 3PT 102 Points per 100 Shots FIBA | 123

Paint PAINT FIBA | 86

86 Points per 100 Shots Non-Paint 2s FTT FIBA | 76 FIBA | 150 NON-PAINT 2s Above Break 3PT 76 Points per 100 Shots FIBA | 102 HIERARCHY Shot Location Points Per Shot Dunk 1.78 Trip 1.50 Corner 3PT Catch & Shoot 1.23 1.18 Top 3PT Dribble Jump Shot 1.10 Top 3PT Catch & Shoot Jump Shot 1.08 Wing 3PT Catch & Shoot Jump Shot 1.01 Tip-In 0.97 Wing 3PT Dribble Jump Shot 0.92 Top Mid-Range Catch & Shoot Jump Shot 0.90 Paint Runner / Floater 0.87 Paint Dribble Jump Shot 0.84 Wing / Corner Mid-Range Dribble Jump Shot 0.80 Paint 0.76 Wing / Corner Mid-Range Catch & Shoot Jump Shot 0.74 Top Mid-Range Dribble Jump Shot 0.72 Wing / Corner Mid-Range Runner / Floater 0.67 SCORING ACTIONS ADDING CONTEXT

• 10 scoring actions • Standardized analysis and video • Lead directly to an outcome (shot attempt, , ) SCORING ACTIONS Cut Transition ORB

Excellent Shots Excellent PnR Man

Spot Up Shots Great Great Off Hand Off Post Up Isolation Good Shots Good PnR BH SCORING ACTIONS AGE GROUP: U16 AGE GROUP: U19 • Outcome Stats vs Process Stats • Small sample size outcomes • Unique abilities of individual players TEAM • Defence! ANALYSIS EXAMPLE: PAINT THREATS • Driving efficient offence: • Uncontested & Wide-Open Threes • Getting to the FT line • Outcome Stats: • Shot spectrum, scoring actions, eFG%, TS%, etc. • Create a framework for tracking Process: Paint Threats EXAMPLE: PAINT THREATS • Applying Pressure on the Paint • Many different ways: • Drive • Roll • Post-Up • Transition Rim Run • Cut • Off Screen • Offensive EXAMPLE: PAINT THREATS • Tracking threats that contribute to efficient offence Paint Threat POSS PTS PPP FTT Drive 64 58 0.91 11 Roll 21 24 1.14 6 Post Up 8 7 0.88 2 …

• Multiple paint threats!? • Track anything within style of play INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS SHOT SELECTION RATING

Player X Shot Type Expected Value Actual Value

Shot 1 Layup 1.18 0

Shot 2 Free Throw Trip 1.50 1

Shot 3 Paint Runner/Floater 0.87 0

Shot 4 Top Mid-Range Dribble Jump Shot 0.90 0

Shot 5 Wing 3PT Catch & Shoot Jump Shot 1.01 3

Shot 6 Free Throw Trip 1.50 2

Total All Shots 7.0 6

SSR Per Shot 1.2 1 USING THIS INFORMATION

• Team assessment • Player assessment • Age group findings KEEP IN MIND! • Small sample size! • Expected efficiencies are averages • Does not take into account location and contest level of defender • Does not take into account position ANOTHER METHOD… • Setting up a simple scale • For example, rate every possession on a 0 – 5 • Individual and team totals • Can be tracked live in games • Over time, establish level you are familiar with INTERNATIONAL PLAYER PROFILE INTERNATIONAL PLAYER PROFILE • Objective athlete assessment tool • Consistent framework for analysis • Simple and clear diagrams • Grounded in video analysis • Easily replicable • Incorporates expert recommendations (ie. skills matrix) INTERNATIONAL PLAYER PROFILE • Identify what drives performance at each position: • Context of shots • Type of shots • Frequency of shots INTERNATIONAL PLAYER PROFILE

GMP SF Transition Points per possession (PPP) efficiency with 1.20 each offensive action

1.00 GMP SF 0.80

0.60

Isolation 0.40 Post Up

0.20

0.00

Efficiency in points per possession (PPP)

PnR Ball Handler Spot Up INTERNATIONAL PLAYER PROFILE

GMP SF

Points per possession Transition GMP: 16% (PPP) efficiency with 1.20 GMP SF each offensive action 1.00

0.80

0.60

Isolation 0.40 Post Up

0.20 GMP: 8% GMP: 10% 0.00

Primary Offensive Action

PnR Ball Handler Spot Up

GMP: 7% GMP: 29% USING THIS INFORMATION • Individual Performance Plans • Team Selection • Prep for training and assessment camps • Scouting • Team-level assessment Thank you! Q u e s t i o n s ?

@philip_jevtovic