<<

Applications of to

Vibrational Spectroscopy Raman & IR Apparatus and Concept

Selection Rules (Allowedness)

Symmetry of Vibrational Modes

Normal mode analysis

Raman, Raman, CARS

Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS)

(: not to be covered in class)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Comparison between IR and Raman

“virtual levels” light is a 2 event!

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

1 Comparison between IR and Raman light scattering is a 2 photon event:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

2 Kinds of Light Scattering

John William Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh, Nobel Prize for in 1904, for Ar discovery. 1842-1919.

Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Rāman, 1888-1970. Nobel in Physics 1930.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

2 Vibrational Spectroscopy : of IR light.

Dispersive (dual beam)

FTIR: InfraRed Michelson interferometer

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

FTIR Interferogram

An FTIR interferogram converts into mirror position (i.e. energy into time). The central peak is at the ZPD position ("Zero Path Difference") where the maximum amount of light passes through the interferometer to the detector.

The interferogram is then fast Fourier transformed (FFT) back into the wavelength regime: i.e., the IR absorbance spectrum.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

3 FTIR Advantages

• Speed: all measured simultaneously, FT-IR scans in sec. rather than several minutes. Felgett Advantage.

• Sensitivity: Sensitivity dramatically improved with FT-IR. The detectors are much more sensitive. Optical throughput is much higher (Jacquinot Advantage, better S/N). Fast scans enable co-addition of several scans (signal averaging).

• Internally Calibrated: HeNe used as internal wavelength calibration (Connes Advantage).

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Spectroscopy

Raman: Scattering of visible light with loss (or ) of corresponding to vibrational quanta.

CCD

grating

sample

laser resolution slit beam

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

4

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

5 Raman Sample Handling

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Spectroscopy

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

6 Molecular Vibrations: 3N-6 (5) Rule

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Infrared Absorption

IR Selection Rule: For any IR absorption, the vibrational excitation must change the moment of the in order for radiation absorption to occur.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

7 Infrared Absorption Selection Rule

The Dipole Moment (M) must change during vibration

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Group Theory View of Selection Rules

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

8 Group Theory View of Selection Rules

2 All f (x) will/must include an A1g (totally symmetric) function. © K. S. Suslick, 2013

Infrared Absorption Selection Rule

The Dipole Moment (M) must change during vibration

The ground vibrational state is always

totally symmetric (A1g): i.e., the aren’t “moving” (sorta…)

And dipole moments are just vectors: i.e., they transform as x, y and z. 18 © K. S. Suslick, 2013

9 Infrared Absorption Selection Rule

The Dipole Moment (M) must change during vibration must be x, y, or z symmetry for allowed IR band!

In GT terms: must contain an A1g to be non-zero:

i.e., ( Γ x A1g = Γ )

19 © K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman vs. Infrared Selection Rules

dipole moment vector Infrared absorption: (1 photon process)

: (2 photon process)

The polarizability tensor goes as the quadratics of xyz.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

10 Infrared Absorbance & Dipole Moment Changes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Vibrational Selection Rules

Selection Rules: IR active modes must have IrrReps that go as x, y, z. Raman active modes must go as quadratics (xy, xz, yz, x2, y2, z2) (Raman is a 2-photon process: photon in, scattered photon out)

Raman IR Active Active

© K. S. Suslick, 2013 22

11 Vibrational Selection Rules

Selection Rule Summary:

IR active modes must have IrrReps that go as x, y, z.

Raman active modes must go as quadratics (xy, xz, yz, x2, y2, z2)

Raman IR Active Active

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

The Centrosymmetric Rule

If a molecule has an inversion center (i.e., is “centrosymmetric”), then no vibration can be both IR and Raman allowed (active, absorbing).

x, y, z symmetries must have

i = -1 (for IR activity)

Quadratic symmetries must have

i = +1 (for Raman activity)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

12 The Centrosymmetric Rule: CO2

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Normal Modes of H2O

For H2O (because the H’s are light), stretching frequencies are much higher than bending frequencies. i.e., very little mixing of stretches and bends;  we can consider stretches and bends separately.

Accounting Rule: stretches/bends behave as double headed arrows, counted individually only if they stay in the same place after symmetry operation.

Both O-H Stretches: | 2 0 0 2 | O-H = A1 + B2 => z & y H O Bend:  | 1 1 1 1 | 2 θ = A1 => z

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

13 Normal Modes of H2O

Both O-H Stretches: | 2 0 0 2 | O-H = A1 + B2 => z & y H O Bend:  | 1 1 1 1 | 2 θ = A1 => z

O O O H H H H H H

-1 -1 -1 A1: 3657 cm B2: 3756 cm A1: 1595 cm

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Symmetry Effects on Infrared Active Vibrations

2- Sulfate (SO4 ) can be ligated in several ways:

Non-coordinated: Td

Unidentate: C3v

Bidendate: C2v M' & M same , chelated: "η2-" M' & M different, bridging: "μ-"

28 © K. S. Suslick, 2013

14 Symmetry Effects on Infrared Active Vibrations

S-O | 4 1 2 | All S-O Stretches

Accounting Rule: stretches are double headed arrows, counted individually only if they stay on the same bond.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Irreducible Representations (IrR): 

1 Order = 1+2+3 = 6 = h

# of A1 = 1/h ( 1*1*4 + 2*1*1 + 3*1*2) = 1/6 (12) = 2 A1

# of A2 = 1/h ( 1*1*4 + 2*1*1 + 3*-1*2) = 1/6 (0) = 0 A2 # of E = 1/h ( 1*2*4 + 2*-1*1 + 3*0*2) = 1/6 (6) = 1 E

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

15 Symmetry Effects on Infrared Active Vibrations

Thus, ΓS-O = 2 A1 + E for C3v (unidentate)

A1 and E are both IR active ( i.e., z and (xy) )

2- Therefore: 3 IR bands expected for C3v unidentate SO4

ICBST: For Td symmetry, only 1 IR Active stretch,

For C2v symmetry, 4 IR Active stretches.

31 © K. S. Suslick, 2013

Symmetry Effects on Infrared Active Vibrations

-2 SO4 can be ligated in several ways:

Non-coordinated: Td

Unidentated: C3v

Bidentate: C2v

M & M’ same atom: chelated, “2-” -1 M & M’ different: For S-O stretches (1000 – 1200 cm ): bridging, “-” “Descent in Symmetry”

1 IR Band  Non-coordinated (Td) 3 IR bands  Unidentate (C3v) 4 IR bands  Bidentate (C2v) © K. S. Suslick, 2013

16 Symmetry Effects on Infrared Active Vibrations

-2 SO4 can be ligated in several ways:

Non-coordinated: Td

There exist "correlation tables" Unidentated: C3v for this kind of "descent in symmetry", which is easier than re-figuring out the local Bidentate: C symmetry point group and 2v allowed IR or Raman transitions.

M & M’ same atom: e.g., chelated, “2-” http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/j.p.goss M & M’ different: /symmetry/Correlation.html bridging, “-”

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

GT & Vibrational Spectroscopy: Cisplatin

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

17 GT & Vibrational Spectroscopy: Cisplatin

… etc. for B1 & B2

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

GT & Vibrational Spectroscopy: Cisplatin

symmetric But actually there anti-symmetric is a little bit of stretch Pd motion, too. stretch (w.r.t. C2 or σyz)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

18 GT & Vibrational Spectroscopy: Cisplatin

h = 8

ΓM-Cl 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 = A1g + B2u

z y

Raman Active IR Active

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

GT & Vibrational Spectroscopy: Pd(NH3)2Cl2

1 band in IR

2 bands in IR

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

19 IR Stretches for Metal Carbonyls

# IR bands

1 3 1 4 2 3

CO

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

IR Stretches for Metal Carbonyls

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

20 Polyatomic Vibrations: Normal Modes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Naming Normal Modes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

21 GT & Cartesian Coordinate Analysis

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

GT & Cartesian Coordinate Analysis

Raman IR IR © K. S. Suslick, 2013

22 GT & Cartesian Coordinate Analysis

But what are these vibrations (i.e., 3 Ag, Au, and 2 Bu) ?

Au is easy. By inspection:

(remember, center of mass must be preserved or it becomes a translation/!)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

GT & Cartesian Coordinate Analysis

For the 3 Ag and 2 Bu, let us use Bond Stretch Vectors and Angles as a starting basis set:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

23 GT & Cartesian Coordinate Analysis

For the 3 Ag and 2 Bu, let us use Bond Stretch Vectors and Angles as a starting basis set:

But in all cases, the extent of mixing (“”) is NOT available from GT.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Alternative Method: Projection Operators

E C2 i σ Bu = 1 -1 -1 1

form a projection operator:

So again, the 2 Bu vibrations are a combination of the N-F asymmetric stretch and the asymmetric bend (θ1 – θ2). © K. S. Suslick, 2013

24 Extent of Mode Mixing

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Short, Short Cut

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

25 A Short, Short Cut

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

A Short, Short Cut

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

26 Vibrational Group Frequencies

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Vibrational Group Frequencies

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

27 Complications: Coupling of Normal Modes

If two normal modes have the same symmetry, then they can mix (“Fermi Coupling”)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Harmonic vs. Anharmonic Oscillators

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

28 Harmonic vs. Anharmonic Oscillators

Second kind of anharmonicity: mixtures of normal modes. e.g., combinations, overtones, difference bands.

Even if symmetry allowed, Anharmonic bands are usually weak.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Normal Coordinate Analysis

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

29 Normal Coordinate Analysis

F11 = force along L1 F12 = force between L1 and L2 F13 = force between L1 and θ F22 = force along L2 F33 = force along θ ….

Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational, by E. B. Wilson, J. C. Decius, P. C. Gross Infrared Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, by K. Nakamoto

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Normal Coordinate Analysis

(GF = distance x force = energy)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

30 Normal Coordinate Analysis GF matrices seldom are solvable due to lack of sufficient ν so we make simplifications or we calculate potentials from ab initio or DFT:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Example: GVFF

But even 16 force constants out- numbers the number of observables considerably! © K. S. Suslick, 2013

31 Applications of Group Theory to Spectroscopy

Vibrational Spectroscopy Raman & IR Apparatus and Concept

Selection Rules (Allowedness)

Symmetry of Vibrational Modes

Return to vibrations and normal mode analysis

Raman, Resonance Raman, CARS

Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS)

Rotational Spectroscopy

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Complications: Anharmonicity

The Harmonic Oscillator

Hook’s Law

all same energy

ICBST: For a HO, only Δn = ±1 is IR allowed.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

32 Complications: Anharmonicity

The Harmonic Oscillator

relevant to electronic spectra, too.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Complications: Anharmonicity

Bonds can never break for any HO!

For any non-HO, |Δn| > ±1 are allowed (but weak).

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

33 Complications: Anharmonicity

Morse Potential hard to solve Schroedinger Eqn. Easier to do a Cubic Perturbation:

k = force constant (Hook’s Law) l = cubic correction

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Consequences of Anharmonicity: Coupling of Normal Modes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

34 Consequences of Anharmonicity: Coupling of Normal Modes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Consequences of Anharmonicity: Coupling of Normal Modes

Even if symmetry allowed, coupled bands are usually weak.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

35 Consequences of Anharmonicity: Coupling of Normal Modes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

The Force Constant

Force Constant, k, measures the curvature of the bottom of the potential energy well. k is a measure of the stiffness of internal motions.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

36 Sinclair’s Monofilament (a la Larry Niven) aka Shigawire (Dune by Frank Herbert), monomolecular filament (Johnny Mnemonic by William Gibson) and The Space Elevator (of Arthur C. Clarke) What’s the ultimate strength of a monomolecular chain of macroscopic length?

How much energy?

How much force to break? 280 J / 0.5 m = 560 Nt ~ 100 Lbf Strength of 1 cm2 rope? 1014 nm2/cm2 / 1 nm2 / chain ~ 1016 Lbf ~ 280 J (= 5x106 Empire State Buildings) © K. S. Suslick, 2013

Isotope Effects on Vibrations

(constant vs. )

(changes vs. µ isotope)

C-H vs. C-D

Remember the problem in polyatomics of not enough frequencies vs. too many force constants?

Isotopic labeling gives you more observables, but same force constants. © K. S. Suslick, 2013

37 Isotope Effects on Vibrations

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Correlations between k and Physical Properties

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

38 Correlations between k and Physical Properties

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Correlations between k and Physical Properties

Badger’s Rule

CO adsorbed on Pt and Ir as function of electrode potentials. Force Constant

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

39 Correlations between k and Physical Properties

Badger’s Rule applied to Fe-O stretches in heme and non-heme oxygenases

X-ray

Force Constant

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Correlations between k and Physical Properties

Lippincott’s Rule for diatomics

Force Constant

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

40 Effects of Metal Coordination on 

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Comparison between IR and Raman

light scattering is a 2 photon event:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

41 Raman vs. Infrared Selection Rules

dipole moment vector Infrared absorption: (1 photon process)

polarizability tensor Raman Scattering: (2 photon process)

The polarizability tensor goes as the quadratics of xyz.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

2 Kinds of Light Scattering

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

42 Raman Spectroscopy: Stokes v. Anti-Stokes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Spectroscopy: Stokes v. Anti-Stokes

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

43 Raman Spectroscopy

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Selection Rule

The polarizability (i.e, induced dipole created by the electromagnetic radiation field) must change during the excited vibration.

Consider N2

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

44 Raman Selection Rule

½  Iraman

The polarizability goes as the quadratics within any point group. And the polarizability is frequency dependent (more later).

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Scattering Intensities

reason sky is !

2

where:

. . sponge analogy:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

45 Raman Scattering Intensities: Kramers-Heisenberg-Dirac Equation (!)

The polarizability is a function of photon frequency:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Scattering Intensities: Kramers-Heisenberg-Dirac Equation (!)

The polarizability is a function of photon frequency:

Thus the polarizability, and therefore Iraman increase as:

1. Increases in strength of coupling of electronic-excited states with both ground and vibrationally excited states.

2. Closeness of incident radiation to actual electronic transition: "Resonant enhancement" i.e., "Resonance Raman Spectroscopy"

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

46 Relative Intensities of Raman Scattering

Type Iscat / I incident

Fluorescence 1 – 0.01 Rayleigh 10-4 Raman Fundamentals (Stokes) 10-7 Raman Overtones (Stokes 10-9 Raman Anti-Stokes Fundamentals 10-9 Resonance Raman 10-2 to 10-4 Surf. Enhanced Raman >1 (multiple scatters)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Raman Scattering Cross-Section d scattered flux/unit solid angle  d indident flux/unit solid angle d  d  d Process Cross-Section of  (cm2) ( ) = target area absorption UV 10-18 ex presented by a -21 absorption IR 10 molecule for scattering emission 10-19 scattering Rayleigh 10-26 scattering Raman 10-29 scattering RR 10-24 scattering SERRS 10-15 scattering SERS 10-16 Table adapted from Aroca, Surface Enhanced Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2006 © K. S. Suslick, 2013

47 Resonance Raman Scattering

Advantages: 1. Affected only by chromophore (usually the metal center) 2. Sensitive to small structural changes 3. Unaffected by medium

(e.g., H2O, powders, glasses, …) 4. High sensitivity (μM)

Disadvantages: 1. Affected only by the chromophore! 2. Fluorescence often interfers (impurities, …) 3. Thermal and photo- stability can be problematic. 4. Analysis usually by empirical correlations.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Uses of Resonance Raman Scattering

M 1. Materials available only in low concentrations (> µM) Especially biological chromophores. Probes changes only near the chromophore. Often hard to assign bands except emipirically (e.g., fingerprinting oxidation states).

2. Assignment of Electronic Spectra if one already knows the vibration modes, then the coupling between the electronic absorbance bands and the vibrational modes can assign electronic states.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

48 Bioinorganic Applications of Resonance Raman

Bioinorganic systems with chromophores, e.g., 1. Heme 2. Photosynthetic reaction centers & antennae 3. & vision pigments (non metallic) 4. Fe & Cu enzymes (often near UV)

Types of information obtained: a. Type of ligands (but selective, not all necessarily) b. Oxidation state of metal (indirectly, marker bands) c. Comparisons between proteins and synthetic analogs, or among proteins d. Dynamics (down to ps) of photoinduced rxns.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Resonance Raman of Heme Proteins

π*

π

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

49 Resonance Raman Scattering: Heme Proteins

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Resonance Raman of Hb

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

50 Resonance Raman Scattering: Heme Proteins

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Low Frequency Raman Scattering: Lattice Vibrations Whole within a will vibrate and partially rotate with respect to one another: lattice vibrations and librations. a.k.a. “”. Very low energy (big masses). Very hard to do far-IR (<600 cm-1), not hard to do Raman.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

51 Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering: SERS

. SERS is a surface sensitive technique that results in the enhancement of Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on rough metal surfaces or .

. The enhancement factor can be as much as 1012, which allows the technique to be sensitive enough to detect single molecules (through heroic efforts, multiple scatters per molecule over time).

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

How Does SERS Work?

. SERS substrates commonly used Silver (Ag), gold (Au) and copper (Cu) The energy required to generate matches the Raman light source . Surface preparations Largest enhancements for rough surfaces of 10 – 100 nm

metal island film roughened metal nanostructured surface metal coating

Base Support layer Base Support metal coated nanostructure metal coating embedded metal nanoparticle film coated layer of n.p. layer metal nanoparticles base support base support

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

52 Origins of SERS

A. Electromagnetic field enhancement mechanism • excitation of surface • tends to form spatially localized “hot areas” for adsorbates • the magnitude of enhancement ~106-107 times for single Ag np • ~108 for the gap between two coupled particles B. Chemical enhancement • due to specific interactions, forming charge-transfer complexes • the magnitude of chemical enhancement ~10-100 times

Conductive Ag or Au nanofeatures concentrate oscillating electric field from light through plasmon resonance. Even greater concentration of field at “hot spots” at small radii of curvature (sharp points)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

CARS: Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Spectroscopy

Raman = 2 photon process (1 laser + 1 scattered)

CARS = 4 photon Process (3 laser + 1 scattered)

non-linear optical effect, must be very high flux (short pulsed)

1. When a - b = real vibration , molecules are driven into v=1 state.

2. Then laser A (at a) drive v=1 molecules back to v=0, with

emission of  + a This is called stimulated anti-Stokes Raman.

CARS is ~106 more efficient than Raman.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

53 EELS Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

EELS

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

54 High Resolution EELS (HREELS)

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

HREELS

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

55 HREELS Selection Rule For electron to lose/gain energy from scattering off of an adsorbate, it must interact with a surface charge or dipole. Only adsorbate perpendicular to metallic surface will be felt by incoming e-.

e-

adsorbate

metal surface No net surface dipole!

image dipole

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

HREELS of Adsorbates

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

56 HREELS of Adsorbates

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

57 Rotational Spectra: Far IR-µwave, Rot. Ram.

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Rotational Spectra: Selection Rules

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

58 Rotational Spectra: Linear

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

Rotational Spectra Informational Content

Limitations:

© K. S. Suslick, 2013

59