DOCSLIB.ORG

The Strategic Defence and Security Review and the National Security Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Strategic Defence and Security Review and the National Security Strategy House of Commons Defence Select Committee THE STRATEGIC DEFENCE AND SECURITY REVIEW AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY Written Evidence This is a volume of submissions, relevant to the inquiry into The Strategic Defence and Security Review and the National Security Strategy, which have been reported to the House but not yet approved for publication in final form. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that it is not yet an approved final record of the written evidence received by the Committee. List of written evidence 1 Roger Bunbury 2 John Farley 3 Unite the Union 4 Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) and Prospect 5 Andrew Dow 6 Edward Featherstone 7 Nigel Hall 8 David Hobbs MBE 9 DefenceSynergia 10 David Faddy 11 Church of England 12 Raytheon UK 13 Professor Malcolm Chalmers 14 Admiral Sir John Woodward and colleagues 15 Derek M Long 16 Dr Sue Robertson 17 Chamber of Shipping 18 Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 19 Vice Admiral Sir Jeremy Blackham and Professor Gwyn Prins 20 Royal Aeronautical Society 21 Dr Robert Crowcroft, University of Leeds 22 Prospect 23 Project Management Institute 24 Dr Duncan Redford, Centre for Maritime Historical Studies, University of Exeter 25 James H. Longworth 26 Scottish National Party 27 Brian. K. Sargeant and Mr Frank James 28 Fleet Air Arm Officers’ Association 29 McAfee 30 Campaign Against Arms Trade 31 Ministry of Defence 32 Greenpeace 33 The Trades Union Corporate Steering Group at BAE Systems 34 Saferworld 35 World Vision UK 36 Oxford Research Group 37 Defence Police Federation 38 Medact Written evidence from Roger Bunbury 1. The decision to scrap the Harriers shows that we have forgotten the lessons of history. Once more we seem destined to repeat the failures of the interwar years which led to the Fleet Air Arm being ill-prepared for war in 1939. 2. The Royal Navy pioneered the use of aircraft at sea and the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) played an important role in the First World War. However on 1st April 1918 the RNAS was amalgamated with the Royal Flying Corps of the Army to form the Royal Air Force. At the time of the merger, the Navy's air service had 2,949 aircraft and 55,066 personnel. Many of the navy's flying personnel transferred to the RAF and until shortly before World War 2 the air power of the Royal Navy was provided by the Fleet Air Arm (FAA) of the RAF. 3. Between the wars the combination of ships operated by the Royal Navy with aircraft provided and part manned by the RAF was recognised as unsatisfactory and by the end of the inter-war period British naval aviation which had been in the forefront of the world's navies was markedly inferior to that of the United States and Japanese navies, both in equipment and in capability. 4. Debate about control of the FAA came to a head in the late 1930s when a committee was convened at the level of the Chiefs of Staff to consider the matter: In the interests of impartiality the committee was chaired by a lawyer: Sir Thomas Inskip. 5. "The Admiralty based their case chiefly on the specialised nature of airwork over the sea, particularly from carriers.............while the Air Ministry pressed the somewhat abstract concept of 'the indivisibility of air power' ". Because no agreed recommendations emerged Sir Thomas Inskip wrote his own report. 6. Inskip's principal conclusion, still pertinent today, was "that when so much that concerns the air units depends upon the Naval element in the ship and in the Fleet, the Admiralty should be responsible for selecting and training the personnel, and generally for the organisation of the Fleet Air Arm.'' As a result of the Inskip Report administrative control of the FAA was transferred to the Board of Admiralty on 24th May 1939. 7. By the end of World War 2, by acquiring modern aircraft, principally from the US Navy, and with recruitment and training under Admiralty control, naval aviation was a major component of the Royal Navy's capability, commanding slightly over half the naval budget, and once more matching the most advanced practice in naval aviation. 8. Innovations by the Royal Navy in the post-war years , including the angled-deck, the deck landing sight, and the steam catapult, (all of which were adopted by the US Navy) made possible the operation of fast jets from the decks of aircraft carriers, and naval aircraft which had hitherto been accepted as inevitably inferior to their land-based counterparts now ranked among the best. 9. From the Korean War onwards naval air was a key component in the British response to any crisis overseas and when one arose it is said that the first question of the Prime Minister of the day was "Where are the Carriers?" 10. The decision to scrap the Harrier means that the fixed wing component of the Fleet Air Arm has now once more fallen under the effective control of the RAF. A suggestion that as an economy measure the RAF should disband all its fast jet squadrons and resurrect them again after 10 years would rightly be treated with derision but this is exactly the position in which the Royal Navy has been placed with the removal of all of its fixed wing aircraft for the next 10 years. After this gap who will rebuild the infrastructure and the operational experience, maintain the aircraft, and fly them? Naval Aviation requires a wide range of skills and experience extending well beyond the aircrew, and if the aircrew are provided by the RAF there will still be, both in the air and in the ships, a lack of the naval training, knowledge and operational experience which are essential to providing an effective naval air arm. 11. The decision to scrap the Harrier needs to be reviewed as a matter of urgency if we are to avoid naval aviation being reduced to an even worse state of unpreparedness than it found itself in the late 1930s. Because of its defective administrative structure the FAA had many shortcomings at the outbreak of World War 2 but the skills and experience essential to the operation of aircraft from carriers had been maintained. This will no longer be the case. January 2011 Written evidence from John Farley 1 The Prime Minister and others have said that our troops deserve the best while they are on operations. According to my information this is not happening in Afghanistan where our soldiers are less well supported by the Tornado than they were by the Harrier. This is not surprising as the Tornado was not designed to operate in the close air support role nor the ‘hot and high’ conditions of Afghanistan. I understand that one aircraft has been lost and another very badly damaged because of the difficulty of operating the Tornado from the one available runway. 2 Because it was not designed for this task, the Tornado necessarily takes longer to get airborne and on task from alert, a time often exacerbated by the need to flight refuel after takeoff due to weight restrictions in the local conditions. It also has experienced poor mission reliability, with many planned missions cancelled every month (45 in November I believe). This has resulted in other forces having to step in to ensure that our troops get urgent support. 3 This is in contrast with the record of the Harrier which spent nearly five years in Afghanistan and never failed to get a pair airborne (with serviceable mission equipment) following an unscheduled request for air support. All this was achieved with far fewer aircrew and engineers than the Tornado requires. The Harrier GR9 was designed for close support of ground forces operating from austere bases and it is arguably world class for that mission. 4 Perhaps the time has come to face the realities that a specialist aircraft is needed in such difficult and limited circumstances and to redeploy the Harriers while UK forces remain in Afghanistan. At a time when we aim to minimise costs deploying a single crew, single engine aircraft needing less man hours per flying hour must surely be better than using a two crew, two engine aircraft not purpose designed for the task. 5 May I respectfully suggest that you ask for the full comparative statistics behind my points above and take these into consideration during your review of the SDSR. January 2011 Written evidence from Unite the Union Unite welcomes the opportunity to respond to the committee inquiry and intends in this letter to address the part of the inquiry which has an impact on Unite members. The question Unite is responding to is: ‘what capability gaps will emerge due to the SDSR, including how these were assessed as part of the development of the strategies and what impact this may have on the UK’s defence planning assumptions and the ability to adapt to changing threats or unforeseen occurrences’. Unite has submitted written evidence previously and on a number of occasions regarding serious concerns about capability gaps, and the linkage between government’s focus on cutting defence budgets as a short term measure to try to reduce public spending and the impact this has on defence sector jobs, skills, investment in R&D, innovation and income from exports of defence products and services. Harrier Unite believes the decision to decommission the Harrier fleet and not to buy JSF Stoval means the UK has lost the capability, skills, knowledge and experience forever. The UK will never be in a position to build, upgrade, repair or use this type of combat aircraft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Limited Capacity of Management to Rescue UK Defence Policy: a Review and a Word of Caution
    The limited capacity of management to rescue UK defence policy: a review and a word of caution TREVOR TAYLOR* The three dimensions of defence In terms of press coverage and political debate, the story of British defence since the end of the Cold War has been marked by three themes: policy (direction and review), management (shortcomings and initiatives), and military opera- tions, although academic studies and courses tend to neglect the management domain.1 In principle, these three elements should be closely linked, with policy defining the evolving state of the world and constraining the direction of the country’s military response, management delivering the leadership, organiza- tion and coordination to build the forces to enable the policy to be implemented, and military operations being undertaken in line with the policy guidance and management preparations made. In practice, however, there have been significant disjunctions between the operations mounted and the policy and management. Military operations launched since 1990 have all been something of a surprise, most of them requiring significant extra funding to be obtained through Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs) to enhance and modify British capabilities before the operations could begin. The concept of Force Elements at Readiness (FE@R), the key output of the mainstream defence budget, came to be recognized in the MoD as of only limited utility unless consideration of the specific attributes of a particular adversary, the physical environment of the envisaged operation and the contribution of allies were also included in the equation. Also, in some cases a policy decision associated with specific changes in military posture was significantly undermined or even contradicted by events.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History
    GRUB STREET Military History 2015/2016 Welcome to our new catalogue and thank you for your continued support of our list. Here is a reminder of the praise we’ve received in the past: GRUB STREET NEW BOOKS & STOCKLIST ‘Many readers will already have Grub Street books on their shelves, the publisher having cut a well-deserved niche for accuracy and JANUARY 2015–JANUARY 2016 readability – not an easy balance. They have an enviable reputation for well-researched works that are difficult to put down.’ Flypast CONTENTS ‘Grub Street is a publisher to be congratulated for reprinting New Titles 2 important books.’ Cross & Cockade International Bestselling Ebooks 21 Ebooks 23 ‘Some of the most valuable, and well-researched books in my library are those published by Grub Street. Although a publishing company Illustrated backlist 24 of modest size, they have consistently produced a list of titles WW2 – Battle of Britain 24 that have filled gaps in the marketplace.’ Tony Holmes, Jets WW2 – Bomber Command 25 WW2 – General Interest 26 ‘The GOGS (Gods of Grub Street) have maintained an awesome quantity and quality of production.’ Cartoons 27 The Aerodrome WW1/Modern Aviation 28 ‘Books from Grub Street can always be relied upon to be the A-Z Backlist by Title 29 very best in their class.’ The Bulletin of the Military Historical Society All trade orders should be sent to: All correspondence should be addressed to: ‘For some time now Grub Street have been producing fantastic Littlehampton Book Services Ltd Grub Street Ltd Faraday Close 4 Rainham Close books on the classic British war jets.’ Durrington London SW11 6SS War History Online Worthing Tel: 0207 924 3966/738 1008 West Sussex Fax: 0207 738 1009 BN13 3RB Email: [email protected] Tel: 01903 828500 Web: www.grubstreet.co.uk Fax: 01903 828801 Twitter: @grub_street From time to time we have signed editions of our titles.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Security in a Changing World Future Capabilities
    Delivering Security in a Changing World Future Capabilities 1 Delivering Security in a Changing World Future Capabilities Presented to Parliament by The Secretary of State for Defence By Command of Her Majesty July 2004 £7.00 Cm 6269 Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Force Structure Changes 5 Chapter 3 Organisation and Efficiency 11 Chapter 4 Conclusions 13 Annex Determining the Force Structure 14 © Crown Copyright 2004 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: licensing@cabinet-office.x.gsi.gov.uk Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence the Right Honourable Geoff Hoon MP In the Defence White Paper of last December I set out the need to defend against the principal security challenges of the future: international terrorism, the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and weak and failing states. Our need in the future is for flexible and adaptable armed forces properly supported to carry out the most likely expeditionary operations. To create a more sustainable and affordable force structure which better meets these operational requirements we have secured additional resources: the 2004 Spending Review allocated £3.7 billion to defence across the Spending Review period, which represents an average real terms increase of 1.4% a year.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Our Money Back' Could Cost Us Dear
    Press Cuttings from Broad Street Associates Sunday telegraph 3 1 JAN 1988 JOCK BRUCE-GARDYNE ‘Our money back’ could cost us dear LAST Friday’s Anglo- increase in the sub unless and plan”: Lord Shackleton and his to have been long on charm bad guy$ led by the Germans, sub-committee were not even and short on substance, are—well, bad guys. “Our mon- allowed to see this magic Maybe that was inevitable. ey back” does not come into it. document. But is there not a whiff of But of course it does. And the To one who shared in the the Falklands about the pro- Germans, determined at all reflected glory of George gress of our plans to cut the costs to make the rest of Brown’s National Plan in 1965, European Community’s Europe prop up their allotment this was evidently a harrowing grain silos down to size? farmers, are equally determined experience. For the "space , r",r "■?, SfW&rsfts Office tried to do a deal oith the The Falklandets have cost us onetdal a checkltst of planets Aerentinians But everv time it billions. ‘‘Our money back to be visited, and the timescale, was met by cries of derision and could, paradoxically cost us bil- And they weren t allowed to see reTuHinlTailu^i^/t^to’grips "The case for space". Lord bunch of foreigners. The Argen- with >he community's propen- Shackleton and friendsi con- limans didn't give a damn about shy to shed its oad of surpluses eluded is that it inspires the Falklands- thev were iust a on ever-v global highway drives enthusiasm and it carries pres diversion from their little local the Americans to retaliate.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Defence Review Working Paper Number 1 Royal United Services Institute July 2009
    FUTURE DEFENCE REVIEW Working Paper Number 1 Royal United Services Institute July 2009 Preparing for the Lean Years Malcolm Chalmers Issue Future Defence Review Working Papers How will British defence spending fare in an age of austerity? This series provides Context independent analysis and opinion on issues that The core defence budgets for 2009/10 and 2010/11 have already been are likely to feature in a set, and are unlikely to be substantially altered. But, in the immediate Future Defence Review. aftermath of the next election, most analysts now expect there to be a new comprehensive spending review, leading to a prolonged period of It seeks to promote public austerity, including in defence. a vigorous and comprehensive debate, unconstrained by any Key Findings preconceptions of Britain’s role in the ¾ If the MoD’s current and capital budgets are reduced in line world or the purposes with those for the whole government (excluding interest of its armed forces, payments and social security), total defence spending would amongst political fall by an estimated 6.8% in real terms between 2010/11 parties, the academic and 2013/14. The estimated reduction over the six years to community, industry 2016/17 would be 11% in real terms. and the electorate as a whole. ¾ If the MoD succeeds in obtaining an exemption from the full impact of planned capital cuts, it could face pressure from another source. Assuming, for example, that health and education are given special treatment and their budgets are frozen at 2010 levels in real terms, and that the rate of growth Related analysis: in social security spending is reduced to 1% per year, this would www.rusi.org/fdr leave the rest of government, including the MoD, facing a cut of 14% in their budgets over the period from 2010 to 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No
    MILITARY AVIATION REVIEW FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No. 291 EDITORIAL TEAM COORDINATING EDITOR - BRIAN PICKERING WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL”[email protected]” BRITISH REVIEW - GRAEME PICKERING 15 ASH GROVE, BOURNE, LINCS PE10 9SG TEL NO. 01778 421788 EMail "[email protected]" FOREIGN FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (see Co-ordinating Editor above for address details) US FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (COORDINATING) (see above for address details) STATESIDE: MORAY PICKERING 18 MILLPIT FURLONG, LITTLEPORT, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB6 1HT E Mail “[email protected]” EUROPE: BRIAN PICKERING OUTSIDE USA: BRIAN PICKERING See address details above OUT OF SERVICE - ANDY MARDEN 6 CAISTOR DRIVE, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, LINCOLN LN4 2TA E-MAIL "[email protected]" MEMBERSHIP/DISTRIBUTION - BRIAN PICKERING MAP, WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL.”[email protected]” ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (Jan-Dec 2012) UK £40 EUROPE £48 ELSEWHERE £50 @MAR £20 (EMail/Internet Only) MAR PDF £20 (EMail/Internet Only) Cheques payable to “MAP” - ALL CARDS ACCEPTED - Subscribe via “www.mar.co.uk” ABBREVIATIONS USED * OVERSHOOT f/n FIRST NOTED l/n LAST NOTED n/n NOT NOTED u/m UNMARKED w/o WRITTEN OFF wfu WITHDRAWN FROM USE n/s NIGHTSTOPPED INFORMATION MAY BE REPRODUCED FROM “MAR” WITH DUE CREDIT EDITORIAL - Welcome to the February edition of MAR! This issue sees the United Kingdom 2012 Review from Graeme - a month later than usual due to his work commitments. Because of this the issue is somewhat truncated in the Foreign Section department, but we should catch up with the March issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffp2facts May06
    STAFF CADET PART II FACT SHEET HQ Kent Wing Air Training Corps Yeomanry Cottages, Boxley Road, Maidstone, Kent ME14 2AR Officer Commanding Wing Commander A. Atkins RAFVR(T) Wing Administrative Officer Squadron Leader R. Bushby RAFR (Including co-ordination of Camps and AEF) Wing Hon Chairman Squadron Leader R. E. Fawkes RAFVR(T) (Retd) Wing Chaplain Reverend D. Barnes Squadrons: 36 Staff Numbers: Officers: 63; Adult SNCOs: 68; Civilian Instructors 146 (correct at 20-Mar-06) Number of Cadets: 1115 enrolled and probationers (correct at 30-Sep-05) Wing Staff and Duties (as at 01-Jan-05) Post Duties WSO1 Squadron Leader V. R. Beaney RAFVR(T) Deputy Adventure Training Technical Officer, BELA Course Director, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award & Area 1 Staff Officer WSO2 Squadron Leader C. Hatton RAFVR(T) Gliding Liaison, Health and Safety, Airshows, Aircraft Recognition, Aeromodelling, AWO/Adult SNCO Liaison & Area 2 Staff Officer WSO3 Squadron Leader B. J. Fitzpatrick RAFVR(T) Classification and Syllabus Training (inc. BTECs), Pre-Adult and Adult Training Courses, Marconi-Elliott and Clarke Competitions, Bands & Area 3 Staff Officer WSO4 Squadron Leader R. C. Goodayle RAFVR(T) Deputy OC Wing, Adventure Training Technical Officer, Green Camps and ACF Liaison, PMC, Pentathlon & Area 4 Staff Officer WSO5 Flight Lieutenant D. C. Horsley RAFVR(T) Corporate Communications, Radio Communications, Flying Development and Flying Opportunities, Work Experience and Station Visits, Elworthy Trophy & Special Projects WSO6 Squadron Leader P. Atkins RAFVR(T) Cadet NCO Training Courses, Adult and Cadet First Aid Training, Techniques of Instruction, Nijmegen, Overseas Visits & Sun’n’Fun WWO AWO H. Hollamby Area Warrant Officers Wing Duties Performed by Squadron Staff Shooting Flight Lieutenant M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 South Pacific Aviation Safety Management Systems Symposium
    2nd South Pacific Aviation Safety Management Systems Symposium Queenstown, 17 th /18 th Feb 2010 Symposium Programme compiled, designed and sponsored by , , 2nd South Pacific Aviation `Safety Management Systems’ Symposium – Queenstown, 17 th /18 th Feb 2010 SMS Implementation and Metrics “How do you do it , and how do you measure it” DAY ONE (17 th Feb 2010) Times Activity / Presentation Speaker 10.00-10.30 Registrations and Morning Tea - Sponsored by Queenstown Airport 10.30-10.40 • Call together Capt Bryan Wyness • Welcome on behalf of AIA Irene King • Welcome on behalf of CAANZ Graeme Harris 10.40-11.05 • GAPAN welcome Capt Wyness • Summaries and Reflectives from the first Symposium (getting on the same page) • Symposium Themes and format SMS Progress Reports: our `systems of safety’ of `systems our our `systems of safety’ of `systems our our `systems of safety’ of safety’ `systems of our `systems our • SAC/IRM Committees Ashok Poduval • ACAG and PWG (Project Working Group) Qwilton Biel • CAANZ Simon Clegg 11.05-11.45 • “The challenges of SMS implementation Dr Rob Lee and integration - some practical guidance” 11.45-12.10 • “A look at the new AS/NZS31000 - Geraint Birmingham implications and insights for the development of SMS’s” 12.10-12.20 • Questions From Delegates 12.20-12.50 Lunch – Sponsored by Navigatus Risk Consulting 12.50-12.55 Brief on the first workshop – format and Neil Airey outcome, 12.55-13.25 Workshop #1 1. Identify Top 10 issues within each 1. Odd Numbered Groups Certificate (Airline, GA, Airport, Airways How are we integrating, operating and implementing implementing and operating integrating, we are How How are we integrating, operating and implementing implementing and operating integrating, we are How How are we integrating, operating and implementing implementing and operating integrating, we are How How are we integrating, operating and implementing implementing and operating integrating, we are How and Maintenance), 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Argyll Bird Report with Sstematic List for the Year
    ARGYLL BIRD REPORT with Systematic List for the year 1998 Volume 15 (1999) PUBLISHED BY THE ARGYLL BIRD CLUB Cover picture: Barnacle Geese by Margaret Staley The Fifteenth ARGYLL BIRD REPORT with Systematic List for the year 1998 Edited by J.C.A. Craik Assisted by P.C. Daw Systematic List by P.C. Daw Published by the Argyll Bird Club (Scottish Charity Number SC008782) October 1999 Copyright: Argyll Bird Club Printed by Printworks Oban - ABOUT THE ARGYLL BIRD CLUB The Argyll Bird Club was formed in 19x5. Its main purpose is to play an active part in the promotion of ornithology in Argyll. It is recognised by the Inland Revenue as a charity in Scotland. The Club holds two one-day meetings each year, in spring and autumn. The venue of the spring meeting is rotated between different towns, including Dunoon, Oban. LochgilpheadandTarbert.Thc autumn meeting and AGM are usually held in Invenny or another conveniently central location. The Club organises field trips for members. It also publishes the annual Argyll Bird Report and a quarterly members’ newsletter, The Eider, which includes details of club activities, reports from meetings and field trips, and feature articles by members and others, Each year the subscription entitles you to the ArgyZl Bird Report, four issues of The Eider, and free admission to the two annual meetings. There are four kinds of membership: current rates (at 1 October 1999) are: Ordinary E10; Junior (under 17) E3; Family €15; Corporate E25 Subscriptions (by cheque or standing order) are due on 1 January. Anyonejoining after 1 Octoberis covered until the end of the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2017 Issue-All
    SPRING 2017 - Volume 64, Number 1 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Report
    IMPACT REPORT 2017 SUPPORTING NAVAL SERVICE OFFICERS THROUGH LIFE HM THE QUEEN, PATRON Officers within the Naval Service are often the people who are looked to for Official Portrait of HM The Queen © www.royalimages.co.uk leadership, guidance, inspiration and help. But who’s there for them when Please convey my warm thanks has continued to support things get tough – financially or personally? to the President and the Board Officers and their families. of Trustees of the Royal Navy I much appreciate your Officers’ Charity for their thoughtfulness in writing as loyal greetings. you did and, in return, send WE ARE. my best wishes to you all. As your Patron, I was pleased to The Royal Navy Officers’ Charity (RNOC) is the only charity dedicated to supporting be reminded of how the Charity serving and former officers of the Royal Navy, Royal Marines, QARNNS and their families and dependants – at every stage in their lives and careers. ADMIRAL SIR MARK STANHOPE GCB OBE DL, PRESIDENT FIRST ESTABLISHED IN The Royal Navy Officer’s Charity for Debt, Care in the Home and has this past year again made a Care Homes as well as regular real impact on many of the lives annuities. Membership of its sister of those in the serving and retired organisation, The Association of 1739... officer community as well as their Royal Naval Officers, is buoyant families. A sign of the times is that with real positive growth in ...Under the name of The Amicable Navy we are seeing a rise in serving numbers commensurate with added Society, our objectives were to ‘afford relief members requesting assistance.
    [Show full text]