Military Monitoring
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000. -
FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No
MILITARY AVIATION REVIEW FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No. 291 EDITORIAL TEAM COORDINATING EDITOR - BRIAN PICKERING WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL”[email protected]” BRITISH REVIEW - GRAEME PICKERING 15 ASH GROVE, BOURNE, LINCS PE10 9SG TEL NO. 01778 421788 EMail "[email protected]" FOREIGN FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (see Co-ordinating Editor above for address details) US FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (COORDINATING) (see above for address details) STATESIDE: MORAY PICKERING 18 MILLPIT FURLONG, LITTLEPORT, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB6 1HT E Mail “[email protected]” EUROPE: BRIAN PICKERING OUTSIDE USA: BRIAN PICKERING See address details above OUT OF SERVICE - ANDY MARDEN 6 CAISTOR DRIVE, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, LINCOLN LN4 2TA E-MAIL "[email protected]" MEMBERSHIP/DISTRIBUTION - BRIAN PICKERING MAP, WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL.”[email protected]” ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (Jan-Dec 2012) UK £40 EUROPE £48 ELSEWHERE £50 @MAR £20 (EMail/Internet Only) MAR PDF £20 (EMail/Internet Only) Cheques payable to “MAP” - ALL CARDS ACCEPTED - Subscribe via “www.mar.co.uk” ABBREVIATIONS USED * OVERSHOOT f/n FIRST NOTED l/n LAST NOTED n/n NOT NOTED u/m UNMARKED w/o WRITTEN OFF wfu WITHDRAWN FROM USE n/s NIGHTSTOPPED INFORMATION MAY BE REPRODUCED FROM “MAR” WITH DUE CREDIT EDITORIAL - Welcome to the February edition of MAR! This issue sees the United Kingdom 2012 Review from Graeme - a month later than usual due to his work commitments. Because of this the issue is somewhat truncated in the Foreign Section department, but we should catch up with the March issue. -
Polar Bears from Space: Assessing Satellite Imagery As a Tool to Track Arctic Wildlife
Polar Bears from Space: Assessing Satellite Imagery as a Tool to Track Arctic Wildlife Seth Stapleton1*¤a, Michelle LaRue3, Nicolas Lecomte4¤b, Stephen Atkinson4, David Garshelis2,5, Claire Porter3, Todd Atwood1 1 United States Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America, 2 Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America, 3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America, 4 Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada, 5 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Grand Rapids, Minnesota, United States of America Abstract Development of efficient techniques for monitoring wildlife is a priority in the Arctic, where the impacts of climate change are acute and remoteness and logistical constraints hinder access. We evaluated high resolution satellite imagery as a tool to track the distribution and abundance of polar bears. We examined satellite images of a small island in Foxe Basin, Canada, occupied by a high density of bears during the summer ice-free season. Bears were distinguished from other light-colored spots by comparing images collected on different dates. A sample of ground-truthed points demonstrated that we accurately classified bears. Independent observers reviewed images and a population estimate was obtained using mark– recapture models. This estimate (N^ : 94; 95% Confidence Interval: 92–105) was remarkably similar to an abundance estimate derived from a line transect aerial survey conducted a few days earlier (N^ : 102; 95% CI: 69–152). Our findings suggest that satellite imagery is a promising tool for monitoring polar bears on land, with implications for use with other Arctic wildlife. -
US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994 Steven High
Document generated on 09/29/2021 3:10 a.m. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies Farewell Stars and Stripes US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994 Steven High Volume 32, Number 1, Spring 2017 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/nflds32_1art02 See table of contents Publisher(s) Faculty of Arts, Memorial University ISSN 1719-1726 (print) 1715-1430 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article High, S. (2017). Farewell Stars and Stripes: US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies, 32(1), 42–85. All rights reserved © Memorial University, 2017 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Farewell Stars and Stripes: US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994 Steven High Despite a chilly wind off of Placentia Bay, thousands of people gath- ered in Argentia to watch the controlled implosion of the 10-storey Combined Bachelor Quarters, known affectionately as the “Q,” on 6 November 1999. Cars lined up bumper to bumper for eight kilometres on the only road leading to the former US Navy base on Newfound- land’s Avalon Peninsula. In anticipation, the organizers had prepared a designated viewing area, a bandstand, a first aid station, and conces- sion stands where visitors could purchase their “Implosion ’99” t-shirts. -
Mitchell Fields Archist Cov.Ai
FINAL HISTORIC BUILDING INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT GENERAL MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIR RESERVE STATION MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN June 2007 FINAL HISTORIC BUILDING INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT GENERAL MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIR RESERVE STATION MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN June 2007 This page left intentionally blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY S.1 PURPOSE AND NEED This Historic Building Inventory and Evaluation Report was undertaken by the US Air Force, Headquarters, Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) in conjunction with the disposal and reuse of General Mitchell International Airport (IAP) Air Reserve Station (ARS) in the City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. General Mitchell IAP ARS occupies a 102-acre tract located at the southwest corner of General Mitchell IAP, the principal airport in the City of Milwaukee. The transfer of the property is being undertaken in accordance with the federal Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act (DBCRA) of 1990, commonly known as Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). In 2005, General Mitchell IAP ARS was selected for closure through the BRAC process, and it is anticipated that the installation will close in 2008 (Mehring, August 8, 2006; Guenther, pers. comm., March 15, 2007). The purpose of this report is to identify potentially significant historic architectural resources in the area of potential effect (APE) in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 USC 470f). Under Section 106 of NHPA, codified as 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800-Protection of Historic Properties, prior to execution of an undertaking, including transfer of property out of federal hands, the federal agency, in this case AFCEE, is required to consider the undertaking’s impact on any district, site, building, structure or object that is listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). -
Spring 2017 Issue-All
SPRING 2017 - Volume 64, Number 1 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations. -
NWS SOW Doc Apr 2020
North Warning System (NWS) Office Statement Of Work (SOW) April 2020 SOW Main Table Of Contents SOW Section 1: SOW Section 1- Table of Contents Sub Section 1 - NWS Concept of Operations (CONOPS); . Operational Authority (Comd 1 CAD) - Operational Direction and Guidance OUT . NWS CONCEPT OF OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Sub Section 2- NWS Program Management (PM) . NWS Project Management . Customer And Third Party Support . Ancillary Support . Significant Incidents . Technical Library and Document Management . Work Management System . Information Management Services and Information Technology Introduction . Security . Occupational health and Safety . NWS PM Position Requirements Sub Section 3- NWS Maintenance (Maint) and Sustainment (Sust) . Life Cycle Materiel Management And Life Cycle Facilities Management . Configuration Management . Sustainment Engineering . Project Management Services . Depot Level Support SOW Section 2: SOW Section 2 - Table of Contents Section 2 NWS Infrastructure . Introduction to Infrastructure SOW . 1- Maintenance Management and Engineering Services . 2- Facilities Maintenance Services . 3- Project Delivery Services . 4- Asset Management Plans, Facilities Condition Surveys and Building Condition Assessments . 5- Fire Protection Services . 6- Environmental Management Services . 7- Work Deliverables . 8- Service Delivery Regime and Acceptance Review Requirements . 9- Acceptance of the Real Property Service Delivery Regime SOW Section 3: SOW Section 3 – Table of Contents Sub Sec 1- Communications and Electronics (C&E) -
Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub. -
Remembering the Battle of Britain 80 Years Later En Souvenir De La Bataille D’Angleterre 80 Ans Plus Tard Article By: R.D
1 SEPTEMBER / SEPTEMBRE 2020 VOL. 54, NO. 9 Remembering the Battle of Britain 80 years later En souvenir de la bataille d’Angleterre 80 ans plus tard Article by: R.D. Newman, Wing Heritage Officer 80 years have elapsed since the Battle of Britain. Most Canadians, including in the armed forces, have never heard of it. To many of those who have, it is a blip of history in an ancient, largely forgotten war. The question begs: so why do we bother to commemorate it? Because that single three-and-a-half-long month battle in summer 1940 decided more than the survival of Britain--the fate of the entire world and its 2 ½ billion people were at stake. September 1939 Nazi Germany fell upon Poland, enslaving and murdering its people, starting the Second World War, then over the next 10 months swept through Western Europe (neutral countries excepted) until only Britain was left standing. Britain was key to the world. If it was defeated, Germany would gain total dominion over Europe and be impossible to dislodge. Its armies would be free to strike at Russia, Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Meanwhile, since 1936 Japan been waging a campaign to conquer the Far East, with an Hit by gunfire from the twin-engine German Heinkel He-111 bomber seen here, a flaming Royal Air Force Spitfire fighter flashes by the eye to seize all of Asia. And Italy had been bomber as its pilot seeks room to bail out. Taken during combat, the image is naturally grainy. Image Courtesy and Copyright Bundesarchiv rampaging in Africa and the Mediterranean, Koblenz All Rights Reserved. -
Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour. -
Domestic Operations
Unit Crest DOMESTIC OPERATIONS AIR RESERVE BGen EB Thuen DG Air Reserve Unit Crest Topics Air Reserve . Vision & Mission . Air Res Employment . Lessons . Future Considerations Unit Crest Air Reserve Mission & Vision . An Air Reserve integral to the capability of Canada's Air Force - ready to serve when and where most needed, at home and abroad. To provide a flexible, responsive and reliable contribution to Air Force capabilities where and when required. Unit Crest Air Reserve Employment Model Air Reservists are integrated into Total air force units across the country and follow the normal operational chain of command of the unit at which they are employed. Working reserve rather than a force in waiting Unit Crest Air Reserve Locations 440 Sqn Yellowknife CFB Goose Bay CFB Gander CFB Cold Lake CFB Comox CEF 403 Sqn Gagetown BFC Bagotville Abbottsford CEF Pictou County 443 Sqn Esquimalt 3 CFFTS Portage 12 Wing HQ Shearwater 430 Sqn Valcartier CFB Greenwood 408 Sqn Edmonton 438 Sqn St Hubert CFB Moose Jaw 1 Cdn Air Div HQ CAS Ottawa CEF Lunenburg CFB North Bay 2 Cdn Air Div HQ 412 Sqn Ottawa CFB Winnipeg 1 Wing HQ Kingston CFB Trenton 427 Sqn Petawawa Unit Crest Sample Domestic Res Activities . Construction Engineering Flights 192 AEF Aldergrove 14 CES Bridgewater • 91 CEF Gander • 143 CEF Lunenburg • 144 CEF Pictou . Tac Aviation Daily Lines of Task 400 Sqn Lead mounting unit for OP PODIUM Counter Drug Support to Northern Operations . Flying Aircraft . Servicing Aircraft . MOB Management/Operation . Operations Centres (CAOC) . Logistical Support . Managing the AF (HQs, Air Staff, Wing Staff… incl Key appointments) Unit Crest Reserve CE - Domestic Gun Carriage for smooth bore Naval Cannon near Hector (built 3 of them) – Pictou NS Construct Boy Scout Cabins Lake Mush a Mush NS – 143 CEF Hangar Project – Norris Arm, NL – 91 CEF Unit Crest Support to Domestic Operations Daily Work . -
US Army Air Force 100Th-399Th Squadrons 1941-1945
US Army Air Force 100th-399th Squadrons 1941-1945 Note: Only overseas stations are listed. All US stations are summarized as continental US. 100th Bombardment Squadron: Organized on 8/27/17 as 106th Aero Squadron, redesignated 800th Aero Squadron on 2/1/18, demobilized by parts in 1919, reconstituted and consolidated in 1936 with the 135th Squadron and assigned to the National Guard. Redesignated as the 135th Observation Squadron on 1/25/23, 114th Observation Squadron on 5/1/23, 106th Observation Squadron on 1/16/24, federalized on 11/25/40, redesignated 106th Observation Squadron (Medium) on 1/13/42, 106th Observation Squadron on 7/4/42, 106th Reconnaissance Squadron on 4/2/43, 100th Bombardment Squadron on 5/9/44, inactivated 12/11/45. 1941-43 Continental US 11/15/43 Guadalcanal (operated through Russell Islands, Jan 44) 1/25/44 Sterling Island (operated from Hollandia, 6 Aug-14 Sep 44) 8/24/44 Sansapor, New Guinea (operated from Morotai 22 Feb-22 Mar 45) 3/15/45 Palawan 1941 O-47, O-49, A-20, P-39 1942 O-47, O-49, A-20, P-39, O-46, L-3, L-4 1943-5 B-25 100th Fighter Squadron: Constituted on 12/27/41 as the 100th Pursuit Squadron, activated 2/19/42, redesignated 100th Fighter Squadron on 5/15/42, inactivated 10/19/45. 1941-43 Montecorvino, Italy 2/21/44 Capodichino, Italy 6/6/44 Ramitelli Airfield, Italy 5/4/45 Cattolica, Italy 7/18/45 Lucera, Italy 1943 P-39, P-40 1944 P-39, P-40, P-47, P-51 1945 P-51 100th Troop Carrier Squadron: Constituted on 5/25/43 as 100th Troop transport Squadron, activated 8/1/43, inactivated 3/27/46.