DOCSLIB.ORG

1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R The original documents are located in Box 67, folder “1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 67 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 94TH CoNGREss } REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { No. 94-1106 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES ACT REPORT OF THE COM1.IITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS . •. ' ~ ! ' .; · together with ADDITIONAL AND SEPARATE VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 9719 MAY 7, 1976.-0rdered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 57-Q06 WASHINGTON : 1976 COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HOtJSll: OF REtRESENTATIVES JAMES A. HALEY, Florida, Chairman Y '·•·All TAYLOR, North Carolina JOE SKUBITZ, Kansas, Ranking Minoritv ; ·'~ ROLD '1\i:!.OHNSON, California Member ,· MORRIS K. 'f;}>AI.L, Arizona SAM STEIGER, Arizona CONTENTS f.j,j PHILLIP BURtON, California DON H. CLAUSEN, California ~~ ROBERT W. ~STENMEIER, Wisconsin PHILIP E. RUPPE, Michigan MANUEL LUJAN, JR., New Mexico \';_...PATSY T. MINK, Hawaii Pace \ LLOYD MEE.l>S, Washington KEITH G. SEBELIUS, Kansas H.R. 9719, as reported ______ -------------- ________________________ _ '• Q RAHAJ\il :KAZEN JR., Texas A4ANSTEELMAN,T&as Introduction _____________________________________________________ _ 1 ROllE1!:'f G. STEPHENS, JR., G~orgia DON YOUNG, Alaska 4 JOSEPH P. VIGORITO, Pennsylvania ROBERT E. BAUMAN, Maryland .') JOHN MELCHER, Montana STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho ~aaj~~r~~~~s~~~-~~~~============================================== 7 What should the level of payments be? __________________________ _ 7 TENO RONCALIO, Wyoming JAMES P. (JIM) JOHNSON, Colorado l<'or what lands should the payments be made? ___________________ _ JONATHAN B. BINGHAM, New York ROBERT J. LAGOMARSINO, California 9 Should special provision be made for Federal lands acquired from JOHN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio VIRGINIA SMITH, Nebraska private ownership?------------ ______________________________ _ HAROLD RUNNELS, New Mexico SHIRLEY N. PETTIS, California 11 To whom should the payments be made? ________________________ _ 11 ANTONIO BORJA WON PAT, Guam Section-by-section analysis _________________________________________ _ RON DE LUGO, Virgin Islands 12 Committee consideration __________________________________________ _ 16 BOB ECKHARDT, Texas Inflationary impact _______________________________________________ _ GOODLOE E. BYRON, Maryland 16 Cost and budget analysis ________________________________ ----------_ 16 JAIME BENITEZ, Puerto Rico April 28, 1976, letter from the Secretary of the Interior ____________ _ JIM SANTINI, Nevada 17 PAUL E. TSON GAS, Massachusetts Computation of payments under H.R. 9719 by State and county ___ _ 19 Projected costs for National Park Service land acquisition _________ _ 31 ALLAN T. HOWE, Utah Congressional Budget Office cost estimate _______________________ _ JAMES WEAVER, Oregon 32 Oversight statement_ _____________________________________________ _ 33 BOB CARR, Michigan Committee recommendation ___________________________ ------------- GEORGE MILLER, California 33 Departmental reports _____________________________________________ _ 34 THEODORE M. (TED) RISENHOOVER, Additional and separate views ______________________________________ _ Oklahoma 40 JAMES J. FLORIO, New Jerse.y (ID) CHARLES CONKLIN, Staff Director LEE McBt.VA,IN, Oenmal Coonael MICHAEL C. liU!U>:IN, MhwrUU Counael DALE PONTIUS, Counsel, Subcommlttlie on Energy and the Environment MICHAEL B. METZ, Minority CoutUtJ on Energy and the Environment (tt) 94TH Co:NGimss.} HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { REPORT !tdSession , • No. 94-1106 - .. PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PAYMENTS TO BE MADE TO STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR BASED UPON THE AMOUNT OF CERTAIN PUBLIC LANDS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH STATE OR LOCALITY MAY 7, 1976.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. HALEY, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, submitted the following REPORT together with ADDITIONAL AND SEPARATE VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 9719) The Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 9719) To provide for certain payments to be made to State or local"governments by the Secretary of the Interior based upon the amount of certain public lands within the boundaries of such State or locality, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendments are as follows: Page 1, beginning on line 3, strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu thereof the following: SEcTION 1. Effective for fiscal years beginning on and after October 1, 1976, the Secretary is authorized and directed to make payments on a fiscal year basis to each unit of local government in which entitlement lands (as defined in section 6) are located. Such payments may be used by such unit for any governmental purpose. The amount of such payments shall be computed as provided in section 2. SEc. 2. (a) The amount of any payment made for any fiscal year to a unit of local government under section 1 shall be equal to the greater of the following amounts- (1) 75 cents for each acre of entitlement land located within the boundaries of such unit of local government (but not in excess of the population limitation determined under subsection (b)), reduced (but not below 0) by the aggregate amount of payments, if any, received by such unit of local government during the preceding fiscal year under all of the provisions specified in section 4, or (1) 2 3 (2) 10 cents for each acre of entitlement land located within the boundaries (c) For purposes of this section, "population" shall be determined on the of such unit of local government '(but not in excess of' the population limitation same basis as resident population is determined by the Bureau of the Census for determined under subsection (b) )2 general statistical purposes. In the case of any payment under a provision specified in section 4 which is re­ (d) In ~he. case of a sm~ller unit of local government all or part of which is ceived by a State, the Governor (or his delegate) shall submit to the Secretary a located Within another umt of loeal government, entitlement lands which are statement respecting the amount of such payment which is transferred to each within the jurisdiction of both such units shall be treated for purposes of this unit of local government within the State. section as only within the jurisdiction of such smaller unit. (b) (1) In the case of any unit of local government having a population of less S.EJc. 3. (a) In the case of any land or interest therein acquired by the l:"nited than five thousand, the population limitation applicable to such unit of local States (i) for the Redwood National Park pursuant to the Act of October 2 1968 government shall not exceed an amount equal to $50 multiplied by the population (82 Stat. 931) or (ii) acquired for addition to the National Park System or Na'tional within the jurisdiction of such unit of local government. Wilderness Preservation System after December 31, 1970, which was subject (2) Ill the case of any unit of local goyernment )laving a .population of five to local real property taxes within the five years preceding such acquisition the thousand or more, the population limitation applicable to such unit of local govern­ Secretary is authorized and directed to make payments to counties withiy{ the ment shall not exceed the amount computed under the following table (using a jurisdiction of which such lands or interests therein are located, in addition to population figure rounded off to the nearest thousand): payments under section I. The counties, under guidelines established by the Paument sMll not exued the Secretary, shall distribute the payments on a proportional basis to those units amount romlpltted b1f mltltiply- i'll(l IIUch populo.tion b!l- of local government which have incurred losses of real property taxes due to the 5,000 ________________________________________________________ $50.00 acquisition of lands or interests therein for addition to either such system. In those eases in which another unit of local government other than the county acts 6,0007,000 ________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------ ·47.44.00 00 as the collecting and distributing agency for real property taxes, the payments shall be mad~ to s~ch ~it of loc~ government, which shall distribute such payments 8,000_____ -------------~----------------------- 41.00 as provided m this subsection. The Secretary may prescribe regulations under whiCh payments may be made to units of local government in any case
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service
    Wilderness Stewardship Division National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program U.S. Department of the Interior Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service A USER GUIDE TO INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PARK PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING Keeping it Wild in the National Park Service A User Guide to Integrating Wilderness Character into Park Planning, Management, and Monitoring National Park Service | U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division | Wilderness Stewardship Program January 2014 Cover photos: (Top) NPS/Suzy Stutzman, Great Sand Dunes Wilderness, Great Sand Dunes National Park (Left) NPS/Peter Landres, recommended wilderness, Canyonlands National Park (Right) NPS/Peter Landres, recommended wilderness, Cedar Breaks National Monument KEEPING IT WILD IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE A USER GUIDE TO INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PARK PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING Developed by the National Park Service Wilderness Character Integration Team with funding and support from the NPS Office of Park Planning and Special Studies and the Wilderness Stewardship Division A Companion Document to the 2014 Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook: Planning to Preserve Wilderness Character WASO 909/121797; January 2014 EXECUTIVE SummARY This User Guide was developed to help National Park Service (NPS) staff effectively and efficiently fulfill the mandate from the 1964 Wilderness Act and NPS policy to “preserve wilderness character” now and into the future. This mandate applies to all congressionally designated wilderness and other park lands that are, by policy, managed as wilderness, including eligible, potential, proposed, or recommended wilderness. This User Guide builds on the ideas in Keeping It Wild: An Interagency Strategy to Monitor Trends in Wilderness Character Across the National Wilderness Preservation System (Landres and others 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices Beneficiaries Who Are Disabled Based on Date: February 8, 1995
    9342 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 33 / Friday, February 17, 1995 / Notices beneficiaries who are disabled based on Date: February 8, 1995. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DA&A. Charlotte Whitenight, URBAN DEVELOPMENT Number of Respondents: 184,000 Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Frequency of Response: One (SSA±386) Administration. Office of the Assistant Secretary for One per month (SSA±387) [FR Doc. 95±3672 Filed 2±16±95; 8:45 am] Community Planning and Average Burden Per Response: 5 BILLING CODE 4190±29±P Development minutes (SSA±386) 10 minutes (SSA± [Docket No. N±95±1917; FR±3778±N±24] 387) Estimated Annual Burden: 395,600 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Federal Property Suitable as Facilities hours Services Administration to Assist the Homeless 2. Employer Verification of Earnings AGENCY: Office of the Assistant for Children Under Age 7Ð0960±0505. Substance Abuse Treatment Secretary for Community Planning and The information on form SSA-L3231±C1 Conference Grants Development, HUD. is used by the Social Security Administration to ensure that the proper AGENCY: Center for Substance Abuse ACTION: Notice. Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental person is credited with earnings SUMMARY: This Notice identifies reported for a minor under age 7. The Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), HHS. unutilized, underutilized, excess, and respondents are businesses reporting surplus Federal property reviewed by earnings for children under age 7. ACTION: Clarification notice. HUD for suitability for possible use to Number of Respondents: 20,000 assist the homeless. Frequency of Response: 1 SUMMARY: Public notice was given in the ADDRESSES: For further information Average Burden Per Response: 10 Federal Register on July 25, 1994, contact William Molster, room 7256, minutes Volume 59, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Monitoring
    Page 1 http://www.carmachicago.com MilAir CARMA Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association CARMA Military Monitoring An F-16C from the Illinois Air National Guard’s 183rd Tactical Fighter Wing lands at its home base - Abraham Lincoln Memorial airport in Springfield during an Air Rendezvous air show. The state capital building is on the horizon. Command post for the unit was on 138.200 (AM) VHF and 272.175 (AM) UHF. V1.1 Send updates to: [email protected] November 2008 Page 2 http://www.carmachicago.com MilAir CARMA Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association CARMA V1.1 Send updates to: [email protected] November 2008 Page 3 http://www.carmachicago.com MilAir CARMA Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association CARMA Mid-air refuelling tracks and anchor areas: Track Primary Secondary Entry / Exit control via ARTCC AR16 343.500 319.700 353.500 343.700 AR17 276.500 320.900 353.700 338.200 AR19 295.400 320.900 360.650 322.500 AR24 295.400 320.900 338.200 353.700 AR105 238.900 320.900 269.000 AR106H 295.800 320.900 269.400 306.200 AR106L 305.500 320.900 269.400 306.200 AR107 324.600 282.700 353.600 AR109H 343.500 320.900 327.100 AR109L 327.600 320.900 327.100 AR110 327.600 319.700 277.400 346.400 319.000 AR111 348.900 319.700 122.200 124.200 132.375 124.275 257.600 288.350 354.150 AR116 366.300 260.200 269.400 343.700 363.200 AR206H 348.900 282.700 323.000 354.100 AR206L 235.100 282.700 323.000 307.800 AR217 283.900 282.700 298.950 294.650 AR218 352.600 282.700 299.200 379.200 AR219 366.300 282.700 363.100 288.300 AR220 352.600 282.700
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2018 REPORT
    National Park Service US Department of Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division Visitor and Resource Protection Directorate 2018 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2018 REPORT The National Park Service will manage wilderness areas for the use and enjoyment of National Park Service Management the American people in such a manner as will leave them unimpaired for future use and Policies 2006, Chapter 6: Wilderness enjoyment as wilderness. Management will include the protection of these areas, the Preservation and Management preservation of their wilderness character, and the gather and dissemination of information regarding their use and enjoyment as wilderness. The purpose of wilderness in the national parks includes the preservation of wilderness character and wilderness resources in an unimpaired condition and, in accordance with the Wilderness Act, wilderness areas shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreational, scenice, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical use. Cover Photo: Shenandoah Wilderness, Shenandoah National Park. Photo Credit: NPS 3 Table of Contents Message from Division Chief ............... 4 2018 NPS Wilderness Champions ......... 5 STEWARDSHIP & SCIENCE ........ 7 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT ... 10 COMMUNICATION & COLLABORATION ........................ 12 Park-Based Wilderness Character Preservation of Wilderness Character Preservation Efforts Trainings Upcoming NPS WIlderness Interpretation Wilderness Character
    [Show full text]
  • E Ts in E of Taxes July, 2013
    Town of Andover, Massachusetts Pll e ts In e of Taxes July, 2013 Tax pt Property in 1. 2. unidpal Pl in Massachusetts 5. 3. illi Acade PILOT Payments & Agreeme 7. assachusetts State Owned la PILOTs Page 5. nding Legislation Authorizing 6. Exa Municipal PILOT Policies and Agreements PILOT Reports - Worcester and Boston IUWH UI ~llUUY•r ...,. r:aump1rrupuny •t"T4U1" ~n,. ....... --.· 1<t1tt1maTan 1R••1 UWl\ll!f - ll ..... PHltllPS ACADEMY TRUSTEES OF 126 $193,752,100 $2,811,343 $187,034,700 $2,713,873 ,__TOWN OF__ ANDOVER 521 AUGUSTINlAN COLLEGE/ THE MERRIMACK VALLEY 13 . Si8,726..300 $416,819 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSffiS I 24 $22,527,100 $326,868 GREATER LAWRENCE REG voe /TECH HIGH SCHOOL 3 $22,222,900 $322,454 USA GENERAL SERVICES ADMIN /INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2 $21,782,800 ANDOVER HOUSING AUTHORITY 19 $20,932,100 m ANDOVER VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY (AVIS) 152 $20,488,600 $297,290 ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP/ OF BOSTON - 18 $13,066,800 $189,599 S OF FRIARS OF 0 OF ST FRAN 3 $11,135,300 $161,573 PIKE SCHOOL INC 3 $10,695,700 $155,195 MASS SCHOOL OF LAW AT /ANDOVER INC 1 $7,559,000 $109,681 TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS 29 $7,111,400 $103,186 $93,864 CHRIST CHURCH ____ , 4 $6,468,900· SOUTH CHURCH !NC 4 $4,574,300 $66,373 ~ElMARK NEW ENGLAND INC 3 $4,517,800. $65,553 CONGREGATION TEMPLE/ EMANUEL. OF LAWRENCE 1 $3,937,000 $57,126 WEST PARISH CHURCH/ OF ANDOVER 3 $3,067,200 $44,SOS LAWRENCE YOUNG MENS/ SHRISTIAN ASSOCfATIO_fi._ ___ 1 $2,630,100 $38,163 FREE CHRISTIAN CHURCH ~-- 4 $2,429,300 $35,249 ~FOUNDATION/ CONSERVATION FUND INC 11 $1,973,700
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Classification, 2003. 577 Pp. Pdf Icon[PDF – 7.1
    Instruction Manual Part 8 Vital Records, Geographic Classification, 2003 Vital Statistics Data Preparation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland October, 2002 VITAL RECORDS GEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION, 2003 This manual contains geographic codes used by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in processing information from birth, death, and fetal death records. Included are (1) incorporated places identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing; (2) census designated places, formerly called unincorporated places, identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census; (3) certain towns and townships; and (4) military installations identified by the Department of Defense and the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The geographic place of occurrence of the vital event is coded to the state and county or county equivalent level; the geographic place of residence is coded to at least the county level. Incorporated places of residence of 10,000 or more population and certain towns or townships defined as urban under special rules also have separate identifying codes. Specific geographic areas are represented by five-digit codes. The first two digits (1-54) identify the state, District of Columbia, or U.S. Possession. The last three digits refer to the county (701-999) or specified urban place (001-699). Information in this manual is presented in two sections for each state. Section I is to be used for classifying occurrence and residence when the reporting of the geographic location is complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Military Journal
    CANADIAN MILITARY JOURNAL Vol. 17, No. 1, Winter 2016 Vol. 17, No. 1, Winter 2016 CONTENTS 3 EDITOR’S CORNER 4 LETTER TO THE EDITOR CANADA’S MILITARY OF TOMORROW 5 Core Competencies and the Army: A Complex yet Potentially Rewarding Relationship Cover by Christopher Young A CC-177 Globemaster III 15 From an International Strategy to Tactical Actions: aircraft prepares to land How Canada Could Run Campaigns at Thule Air Force Base, by Erick Simoneau Greenland, after dropping off 25 Simple Changes, Strategic Gain: equipment at Canadian Forces The Case for Personnel Recovery in Canada Base Alert during Operation by James Pierotti Boxtop, 30 September 2016. Credit: DND photo TN11-2016-0804-018 PERSONNEL ISSUES by Corporal Ryan Moulton 38 Reflections of a Liaison Officer by James McKay MILITARY HISTORY 47 Canadian Infantry in North Africa, January–May 1943 by R. Daniel Pellerin 57 The Missiles of Anadyr: Soviet Cold War Plans That Could Have Included the Destruction of RCAF Station Comox, 1962–1969 by Sean M. Maloney VIEWS AND OPINIONS 68 150 Years of Military History in Downtown Montreal Core Competencies and by Diane Joly the Army: A Complex yet 75 Poland’s Choice for Patriot Potentially Rewarding by Debalina Ghoshal Relationship COMMENTARY 79 Maritime Futures Revisited by Martin Shadwick 84 BOOK REVIEWS From an International Strategy to Tactical Actions: How Canada Could Run Campaigns Canadian Military Journal/Revue militaire canadienne is the official professional journal of the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence. It is published quarterly under authority of the Minister of National Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • List of United States Air Force Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    List of United States Air Force aircraft control and warning squadrons From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contents [hide ] • 1 Content • 2 Site codes o 2.1 Sites Within the United States o 2.2 Sites Outside the United States • 3 Squadrons • 4 See also • 5 References • 6 External links Content [edit ] The List of United States Air Force Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons identifies Squadron Emblem or patch Location, Air Force Station (AFS), or Air Station (AS) North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) code or other identification code for the location Any pertinent notes, including dates active and other designations. Site codes [edit ] Sites Within the United States [edit ] • DC-xx Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) Direction Center/Combat Center. • F-xx Alaskan air defense sites. • H-0x Hawaiian air defense sites. • L-xx Original Air Defense Command (ADC) 1946 "Lashup" Radar Network of temporary sites to provide detection at designated important locations using radar sets left over from World War II . • LP-xx "Lashup" site which was incorporated into the first ADC permanent radar network in 1949. • P-xx Original 75 permanent stations established in 1949. • RP-xx Sites that replaced a permanent 1949 station. • M-xx 1952 Phase I Mobile Radar station. • SM-xx 1955 Phase II Mobile Radar Station. • TM-xx 1959 Phase III Mobile station. • TT-x Texas Towers , radar tower rigs off the East Coast of the United States, named because of their resemblance to oil drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. • Z-xx NORAD designation for sites after 31 July 1963. P, M, SM, and TM stations active after that date retained their numbers, but were designated "Z-xx".
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE July 11, 1997
    July 11, 1997 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE S7253 leaked into the environment. Ade- is sufficient for the TWRS project to slow down work on the Hanford tank quately addressing this situation is ab- proceed with absolutely no delay in the farm cleanup. We are, in fact, trying to solutely essential, and is in fact codi- schedule or change in the intended ensure a stable funding environment fied in the Tri-Party Agreement en- work scope. The TWRS project will for such projects in order that they can tered into by the DOE, EPA, and Wash- have $371 million in authorized funds move forward expeditiously. ington State. Regardless of the method available if the committee mark be- Mr. GORTON. I thank the Senator of contracting selected, the time line comes law. Given anticipated spending for his clarification on these points. I required in that agreement must be rates for both contractor teams, the also appreciate his assurance to sup- met. TWRS project will end fiscal year 1998 port $147 million in TWRS in con- Currently, DOE is employing an in- with a surplus of $207 million. We be- ference and his demonstrated commit- novative contracting approach to deal- lieve this authorization level sends the ment to the environmental manage- ing with the remediation of those tank proper signal to the contractor and the ment privatization concept. I yield the wastes called privatization. DOE em- investor communities that Congress is floor. barked on privatization to attract out- committed to cleaning up Hanford's f side financial resources to finance the tank farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Read This Report - - - I-Iii
    The Finances of Nonprofits and Public Policy: What Do We Need to Know – and Change – to Do Better? A report from ARNOVA’s Symposium held in June 2011 with leading scholars, practice-leaders, policy makers and regulators who are experts on the nonprofit sector and public policy. The report describes the questions, discussions, and findings of their examination of the challenges now facing nonprofits in the realm of public policy, especially as they pertain to the financing of nonprofits presently and in the future. The report outlines an agenda for research needed to develop a better understanding these challenges and issues. The Financing of Nonprofits and Public Policy: What Do We Need to Know – and Change – to Do Better? A Report on the Proceedings & Findings of ARNOVA’s nd 2 Symposium on Nonprofits & Public Policy Table of Contents Executive Summary – Why Read this Report - - - i-iii Introduction – Background and Rationale for the Symposium - 1-4 Proceedings of the Symposium – Narrative - - - 5 – 33 – Overview of the Proceedings - - - 5 – Locating the Line between Public & Private - - - 6 – Government Funding: Levels and Forms - - - 11 – Tax Exemptions, Deductions & Incentives - - - 20 – Governments Extracting Revenues - - - 25 – Refining Issues & Framing Research - - - - 29 Findings & Research Needed to Form Better Policy - - 34 – 36 Specific Research Goals & Projects - - - - 36 – 37 End Notes - - - - - - - 38 Bibliography of Resources on Research on Public Policy & Nonprofit Issues - - - - - - 39 Roster of Participants - - - - - 43 Acknowledgements - - - - - - 44 The Financing of Nonprofits and Public Policy: What Do We Need to Know – and Change – to Do Better? An Executive Summary & Invitation Why Read this Report? Nonprofit organizations in the U.S., particularly public charities, now confront difficulties more severe than any seen for decades.
    [Show full text]