DOCSLIB.ORG

Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Division National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program U.S. Department of the Interior Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service A USER GUIDE TO INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PARK PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING Keeping it Wild in the National Park Service A User Guide to Integrating Wilderness Character into Park Planning, Management, and Monitoring National Park Service | U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division | Wilderness Stewardship Program January 2014 Cover photos: (Top) NPS/Suzy Stutzman, Great Sand Dunes Wilderness, Great Sand Dunes National Park (Left) NPS/Peter Landres, recommended wilderness, Canyonlands National Park (Right) NPS/Peter Landres, recommended wilderness, Cedar Breaks National Monument KEEPING IT WILD IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE A USER GUIDE TO INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PARK PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING Developed by the National Park Service Wilderness Character Integration Team with funding and support from the NPS Office of Park Planning and Special Studies and the Wilderness Stewardship Division A Companion Document to the 2014 Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook: Planning to Preserve Wilderness Character WASO 909/121797; January 2014 EXECUTIVE SummARY This User Guide was developed to help National Park Service (NPS) staff effectively and efficiently fulfill the mandate from the 1964 Wilderness Act and NPS policy to “preserve wilderness character” now and into the future. This mandate applies to all congressionally designated wilderness and other park lands that are, by policy, managed as wilderness, including eligible, potential, proposed, or recommended wilderness. This User Guide builds on the ideas in Keeping It Wild: An Interagency Strategy to Monitor Trends in Wilderness Character Across the National Wilderness Preservation System (Landres and others 2008). The User Guide offers practical guidance and tools to integrate wilderness character into park planning, management, and monitoring, and is divided into six chapters and a companion document: • Chapter 1, Introduction to the User Guide and Wilderness Character—Describes the context for why wilderness and wilderness character are important and the special role of the National Park Service in its preservation; defines the concept of wilderness character and the general benefits of its integration into planning, management, and monitoring. • Chapter 2, Building Blocks for Integrating Wilderness Character—Describes the fundamental information needed to effectively integrate wilderness character into park planning, management, and monitoring. • Chapter 3, Integrating Wilderness Character into Planning—Describes how to address wilderness character in a park foundation document and selected park planning products, which can serve as examples for other types of planning efforts. • Chapter 4, Integrating Wilderness Character into Management and Operations— Describes how wilderness character relates to NPS Director’s Order 41: Wilderness Stewardship, staff training, minimum requirements analysis, scientific activities, environmental compliance, emergency services, and natural and cultural resources. • Chapter 5, Monitoring Change in Wilderness Character—Describes how to identify and prioritize measures to assess current conditions and track change in wilderness character over time in a park in a way that is nationally consistent and locally relevant. • Chapter 6, Emerging Tools to Integrate Wilderness Character—Describes several new tools that are still being developed, including: wilderness character mapping, the wilderness character monitoring database, and evaluating the “extent necessary” for commercial services. Other tools will be added as they are developed. • Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook 2014—Describes the development and components of a wilderness stewardship plan driven by the concept of wilderness character. The Handbook is a standalone document not included within the User Guide, but directly associated with it. The User Guide is not prescriptive but instead offers a wide range of guidance and tools for incorporating wilderness character into park planning, management, and monitoring. Each chapter may be used in any order that makes the most sense. On page xii, the table “Where Can I Find What I Need?” enables quick reference to topics of interest. In addition, worksheets and examples are included in the User Guide and are also on the NPS Wilderness Character tab under the Wilderness Stewardship Program Sharepoint site at http://share.inside.nps.gov/sites/WASO/WSD/WC. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Developing Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service: A User Guide to Integrating Wilderness Character into Park Planning, Management, and Monitoring and the accompanying Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook: Planning to Preserve Wilderness Character would not have been possible without the vision, funding, and support of Patrick Gregerson, NPS Office of Park Planning and Special Studies, and Garry Oye, NPS Wilderness Stewardship Division. The User Guide was developed by the Wilderness Character Integration Team. All the members of this Team generously gave their time and effort to openly and civilly discuss and debate, argue, consider other viewpoints, and finally reach consensus on literally hundreds of issues. All the members of this Team contributed their vision, passion, and 234 years of combined on-the-ground experience to write the User Guide. These team members, in alphabetical order, are Michael Bilecki, Carol Cook, Sarah Craighead, Jeremy Curtis, Tim Devine, Sandee Dingman, Michael Haynie, Chris Holbeck, Chip Jenkins, Peter Landres, Adrienne Lindholm, Melissa Memory, Christina Mills, Ray O’Neil, Ruth Scott, Miki Stuebe, Suzy Stutzman, Karen Trevino, Frank Turina, and Wade Vagias. Dozens of other people were instrumental in producing the User Guide. Of particular note, Mary Lucid used her accounting acumen to make it all happen, Erin Drake was the consummate professional helping in enumerable ways to ensure that the User Guide was successfully completed, and Ángel López made the User Guide look so good. The Team is extremely grateful to several people who helped write various sections in the User Guide: Dave Vana-Miller helped write the “Resource Stewardship Strategy” section in chapter 3, Don Weeks helped with the climate change section in chapter 3, and Jeff Manley helped write the initial draft of the fire management plan section in chapter 4. Several people helped with their insight, expertise, and patience to integrate wilderness character with cultural resources (Jill Cowley, Michele Jesperson, Sande McDermott, and Jeff Rasic), and foundation documents (Sarah Conlin and Tokey Boswell). In addition, the first group of NPS Wilderness Fellows in 2010 (Monica Patel, Emily Biesecker, Christina Mills, Lisanne Petracca, Katie Hawks, Alicia Burtner, and Brian Tarpinian) helped lay the foundation for several of the tools offered in the User Guide with their passion, insight, and creativity. The Team sincerely appreciates all the time and effort of the reviewers who provided comments on the April 2012 version of the User Guide and the Handbook that was released for comment on the Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (PEPC) planning tool: Kenneth Biddle, Susan Dolan, Michael Edwards, Mark Husbands, Michael Rees, Bruce Rogers, Danny Rosencrans, Sam Tamburo, Dave Trevino, Dave Vana-Miller. In addition to these individuals, the Intermountain Regional Wilderness Executive Committee and the Alaska Regional Cultural Resources Team provided many substantial and helpful review comments. iv The Team also greatly appreciates all the comments from the staff at all the units that were formal pilot test sites for the User Guide: the Denver Service Center, Death Valley National Park, Fire Island National Seashore, Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Olympic National Park, Pinnacles National Park, Rocky Mountain National Park, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, and Mojave National Preserve. Many of the ideas presented in the User Guide were informally piloted tested and honed by many parks that participated early-on in different workshops. The Team is extremely grateful to all of the superintendents and staff at these parks for their willingness to be early adopters and engage in a little experimentation to figure out what works and what doesn’t. These parks, in rough chronological order, were: Haleakala National Park, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park, Everglades National Park, Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Buffalo National River, El Malpais National Monument, Fire Island National Seashore, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Death Valley National Park, Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Zion National Park, Olympic National Park, North Cascades National Park, Dinosaur National Monument, Noatak National Preserve, Rocky Mountain National Park, Saguaro National Park, and Denali National Park and Preserve. Russ Cash from Zion National Park graciously provided material for appendix 4.1 on the cabin restoration. Dave Craig was of crucial help in honing the writing of the User Guide and the Handbook. And Danette Paige was always in the background helping to keep track of budgets and travel for this large team. v BRIEF TABLE OF CONTENTS Where Can I Find What I Need?. xii. Chapter 1—Introduction to the User Guide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wrestling with Liability: Encouraging Climbing on Private Land Page 9
    VERTICAL TIMESSection The National Publication of the Access Fund Winter 09/Volume 86 www.accessfund.org Wrestling with Liability: Encouraging Climbing on Private Land page 9 CHOOSING YOUR COnseRvatION STRateGY 6 THE NOTORIOUS HORsetOOTH HanG 7 Winter 09 Vertical Times 1 QUeen CReeK/OaK Flat: NEGOTIATIONS COntINUE 12 AF Perspective “ All the beautiful sentiments in the world weigh less than a single lovely action.” — James Russell Lowell irst of all, I want to take a moment to thank you for all you’ve done to support us. Without members and donors like you, we would fall short F of accomplishing our goals. I recently came across some interesting statistics in the Outdoor Foundation’s annual Outdoor Recreation Participation Report. In 2008, 4.7 million people in the United States participated in bouldering, sport climbing, or indoor climbing, and 2.3 million people went trad climbing, ice climbing, or mountaineering. It is also interesting to note that less than 1% of these climbers are members of the Access Fund. And the majority of our support comes from membership. We are working on climbing issues all across the country, from California to Maine. While we have had many successes and our reach is broad, just imagine what would be possible if we were able to increase our membership base: more grants, more direct support of local climbing organizations, and, ultimately, more climbing areas open and protected. We could use your help. Chances are a number of your climbing friends and partners aren’t current Access Fund members. Please take a moment to tell them about our work and the impor- tance of joining us, not to mention benefits like discounts on gear, grants for local projects, timely information and alerts about local access issues, and a subscrip- tion to the Vertical Times.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001-2002 Bouldering Campaign
    Climber: Angela Payne at Hound Ears Bouldering Comp Photo: John Heisel John Comp Photo: Bouldering Ears at Hound Payne Climber: Angela 2001-20022001-2002 BoulderingBouldering CampaignCampaign The Access Fund’s bouldering campaign hit bouldering products. Access Fund corporate and the ground running last month when a number community partners enthusiastically expressed of well-known climbers signed on to lend their their support for the goals and initiatives of support for our nationwide effort to: the bouldering campaign at the August •Raise awareness about bouldering among land Outdoor Retailer Trade Show held in Salt Lake managers and the public City. •Promote care and respect for natural places As part of our effort to preserve opportuni- visited by boulderers ties for bouldering, a portion of our grants pro- •Mobilize the climbing community to act gram will be targeted toward projects which responsibly and work cooperatively with land specifically address bouldering issues. Already, managers and land owners two grants that improve access and opportuni- •To protect and rehabilitate bouldering ties for bouldering have been awarded (more resources details about those grants can be found in this •Preserve bouldering access issue.) Grants will also be given to projects that •Help raise awareness and spread the message involve reducing recreational impacts at boul- about the campaign, inspirational posters fea- dering sites. The next deadline for grant appli- turing Tommy Caldwell, Lisa Rands and Dave cations is February 15, 2002. Graham are being produced that will include a Another key initiative of the bouldering simple bouldering “code of ethics” that encour- campaign is the acquisition of a significant ages climbers to: •Pad Lightly bouldering area under threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Use and Seasonal Movement of Isolated Mountain Goat Populations in the North Cascades, WA
    Space Use and Seasonal Movement of Isolated Mountain Goat Populations in the North Cascades, WA Jennifer Sevigny ( [email protected] ) Amanda Summers: Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Natural Resources Department, 22712 6th Avenue NE, Arlington, WA 98223 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-3872 Amanda Summers Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Emily George-Wirtz Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Research Keywords: mountain goat, home range, spatial overlap, utilization distribution overlap index, seasonal range, Cascades Posted Date: October 5th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-84165/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/25 Abstract Background: The spatial distribution and seasonal movement patterns of isolated populations of mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) in the North Cascade range of Washington State is not fully understood. Determining harvest potential in these populations is challenging without a clear understanding of spatiotemporal movement, space use, and spatial overlap. Mountain goat populations in the North Cascades are fragmented and many have declined considerably from historic estimates. Identication of harvestable populations requires a clear understanding of population size, distribution, and movement. We investigated the population trends and spatial distribution of mountain goats in the Boulder River North Harvest Area in Boulder River Wilderness of Washington State. Methods: We reviewed recent mountain goat population estimates and used Global Positioning System collar data to determine year-round and seasonal home range distributions, spatial overlap within these ranges, and proximity of mountain goats to roads and trails. Results: We found 2 populations of mountain goats inhabiting the Whitehorse and Three Fingers Mountains in the Boulder River North Harvest Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2018 REPORT
    National Park Service US Department of Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division Visitor and Resource Protection Directorate 2018 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2018 REPORT The National Park Service will manage wilderness areas for the use and enjoyment of National Park Service Management the American people in such a manner as will leave them unimpaired for future use and Policies 2006, Chapter 6: Wilderness enjoyment as wilderness. Management will include the protection of these areas, the Preservation and Management preservation of their wilderness character, and the gather and dissemination of information regarding their use and enjoyment as wilderness. The purpose of wilderness in the national parks includes the preservation of wilderness character and wilderness resources in an unimpaired condition and, in accordance with the Wilderness Act, wilderness areas shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreational, scenice, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical use. Cover Photo: Shenandoah Wilderness, Shenandoah National Park. Photo Credit: NPS 3 Table of Contents Message from Division Chief ............... 4 2018 NPS Wilderness Champions ......... 5 STEWARDSHIP & SCIENCE ........ 7 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT ... 10 COMMUNICATION & COLLABORATION ........................ 12 Park-Based Wilderness Character Preservation of Wilderness Character Preservation Efforts Trainings Upcoming NPS WIlderness Interpretation Wilderness Character
    [Show full text]
  • 1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 67, folder “1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 67 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 94TH CoNGREss } REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { No. 94-1106 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES ACT REPORT OF THE COM1.IITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS . •. ' ~ ! ' .; · together with ADDITIONAL AND SEPARATE VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 9719 MAY 7, 1976.-0rdered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 57-Q06 WASHINGTON : 1976 COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HOtJSll: OF REtRESENTATIVES JAMES A. HALEY, Florida, Chairman Y '·•·All TAYLOR, North Carolina JOE SKUBITZ, Kansas, Ranking Minoritv ; ·'~ ROLD '1\i:!.OHNSON, California Member ,· MORRIS K. 'f;}>AI.L, Arizona SAM STEIGER, Arizona CONTENTS f.j,j PHILLIP BURtON, California DON H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fork in the Wilderness Road (It Was ‘Time to Look in the Mirror’)
    THE ZEPHYR CHRONICLES CONTINUE... The Fork in the Wilderness Road (It was ‘Time to Look in the Mirror’) August/September 2014 Volume 26 Number 3 Celebrating 25 Years THE ZEPHYR/ AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2014 [email protected] this requires would be devastating. I can- dor promoted in the early 90s, which was BOOK CLIFFS HIGHWAY UPDATE not overstate how much destruction would vigorously opposed by many Grand County & SOME THOUGHTS ON occur if this project went forward. It would citizens. “PRODUCTION v CONSUMPTION require the removal of every plant and tree, from one edge of the canyon floor to the Now, Jackson has predicted that the on- other, for 20 miles, to accommodate the going feasibility studies will indeed con- Four months ago, the Grand County scale of the proposal. clude the Sego Canyon route is not viable. I Council presented a proposal to build an hope he’s right, because to build that road, “energy transportation corridor” via Sego Last month, Grand County Council Chair via that route, would prove to be one of the Canyon, through the Book Cliffs, to pos- Lynn Jackson, who helped spearhead the greatest environmental disasters since the sible oil development sites in the northern Sego Canyon plan, suggested that the fea- construction of Glen Canyon Dam. tip of Grand County. The plan included sibility studies being performed for Grand the creation of a paved But if Jackson’s highway, for energy prediction holds transportation and tour- true, that leaves ism, that would have Hay Canyon and linked Vernal, Utah with we’re right back I-70 and other recre- where we were 20 ation destinations in years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Vf & Cf Listing
    VF & CF LISTING V-Z VF Valdez, Bernard. VF Vale, Thomas R. Valentine, Dan see Valentine, Daniel Reed. VF & CF Valentine, Daniel Reed. VF Valley Bank and Trust. CF Valley Fair Mall. CF Valley House. VF & CF Valley Music Hall. Valley State Bank see Valley Bank and Trust Company. CF Van Alstyne, Arvo, 1922-1985. VF & CF Van Cott, Lucy May, 1868-1957. CF Van Cott, Oscar, 1863-1954. VF Van Dam, R. Paul. see also Utah. Attorney General. VF Van Straten, Robert H. 1 VF Van Valkenburg, M. E. VF Van Wagoner, Merrill Y. CF Van Winkle, Richard A. VF Vandalism. VF Vaughn, Jack. Vegetation see Geography, Historical. VF & CF Velez de Escalante, Silvestre, fl., 1768-1779. CF Venereal disease. VF Venereal disease--Utah. VF Venereal disease--Utah. 1990- VF Verhei, J. L. Vernal Unit see Central Utah Project. VF & CF Vernal, Utah. CF Vernal, Utah. 1991- VF Vernon, Glenn M. 2 VF Verrill, A. Hyatt. VF & CF Veterans Administration. CF Veterans Administration Hospital. CF Veterans Administration Hospital. 1989- VF & CF Veterans--Utah. CF Veterans--Utah. 1976-1985. CF Veterans--Utah. 1986-1987. CF Veterans--Utah. 1988. CF Veterans--Utah. 1989. CF Veterans--Utah. 1990. VF Veterans--Utah. 1990- CF Veterans--Utah. 1991-1992. CF Veterans--Utah. 1993- VF Vickery, Robert K. VF & CF Vietnam. see also Utah Committee on Vietnam. 3 CF Vietnam. 1966. CF Vietnam. 1967. CF Vietnam. 1968. CF Vietnam. 1969. CF Vietnam. 1970. CF Vietnam. 1971-1985. CF Vietnam. 1986-1989. CF Vietnam. 1990-1992. CF Vietnam. 1993- VF Vietnamese in Utah. see also Asians in Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Metolius Climbing 2
    2010 METOLIUS CLIMBING 2 It’s shocking to think that it’s been twenty-five years since we cranked up the Metolius Climbing machine, and 2010 marks our 25th consecutive year in business! Wow! Getting our start in Doug Phillips’ tiny garage near the headwaters of the Metolius River (from where we take our name), none of us could have envisioned where climbing would be in 25 years or that we would even still be in the business of making climbing gear. In the 1980s, the choices one had for climbing equipment were fairly limited & much of the gear then was un-tested, uncomfortable, inadequate or unavailable. Many solved this problem by making their own equipment, the Metolius crew included. 3 (1) Smith Rock, Oregon ~ 1985 Mad cranker Kim Carrigan seen here making Much has changed in the last 2 ½ decades since we rolled out our first products. The expansion we’ve seen has been mind-blowing the 2nd ascent of Latest Rage. Joined by fellow Aussie Geoff Wiegand & the British hardman Jonny Woodward, this was one of the first international crews to arrive at Smith and tear the and what a journey it’s been. The climbing life is so full of rich and rewarding experiences that it really becomes the perfect place up. The lads made many early repeats in the dihedrals that year. These were the days metaphor for life, with its triumphs and tragedies, hard-fought battles, whether won or lost, and continuous learning and growing. when 5.12 was considered cutting edge and many of these routes were projected and a few of Over time, we’ve come to figure out what our mission is and how we fit into the big picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Comments
    Response to Comments Table of Contents 1.0 Collation Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Comment Procedure ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Comment Tracking Method ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 Comments and Responses ............................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Letters from Indian Tribes and Government Agencies ............................................................................... 238 Response to Comments Index By Resource Area: 02.0 – Non-Substantive Comments ............................................................................................................................... 3 03.0 – Out-of-Scope Comments .................................................................................................................................. 13 05.0 – General Comments ........................................................................................................................................... 29 10.0 – Climate and Snow Comments..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]