<<

-.:r"

J.1. Chamberlain USDA Serv ce, Blacksburg, VA D. Mitchell T. Brigham T. Hobby Royal Roads Un versity, Victoria, BC, Canada L. Zabek ,:-... Greencover Canada Project, Kamloops, Bc, canada J. Davis North Carol na State University, Fletcher Practices

Fo.est f.rrming in North Anerica isbecoming popular as a wav for landowners to diversjfy irrcome opportunities, improve management of forest resources, and increase biological diversity. I'eople have been informallV "farming the " for generntions. However, i11 recer'lt years, attention has been directed at formalizing forest farming ancl imProving it through research and development activitjes. The purpose of this chaPter is k) Present historical arTd modern perspectiVes, as rt'el1 as examples of contemPorarY Practices, to Pro vide the reader a)T overview of the abundanf opportunities in forest farming. Most of the discussion focuses on the southern United States and $'estern Canada (i.e., Btilish Colum- bia). These are illustrative of the nany opportunities that exist, but clo not covcr other regions of Nortl'r America (northeastern ar-Id south\\,estern United States, eastern Canada, or Mexico), where there are also examples of dyrramic and excitil'lt forest farming. The reader is r.r'rcotrragecl to look bevolrd the erarnples provided and explore the mallY forest farning options. People have been informally tarming the forests ior generations. Ever since thev rec ognized the many benefits that can be re;llized from the forests, people have used these resources to meet personal needs and for profit. Indigenous people :rround the world have ioraged from tl're forests for products to eat, to shciter then from the elements, k) cover their bodies, and to aid them in medicating injurv and illness. Todny, indigenous people continue to farm tlle forests for much needed products. Moreovet lando\,vners in general are becoming more interested in farmint their forests to generate additior'ral lncome. In the last 25 to 30 yr, forest farming has been promoted as an alternative prnctice that can lead to better and n1ore sustainable management of resottrces.'[he practices have been documentecl and formalized, but in many situations thc science is not as developed as in other agroforestr), practices. Much of the earlv lrromotiolr of this alternative Iand use sys tem focused or1 developing countries, where people are more directly dePenclent on forest resources for basic sr-lstenance. Promotion of lorest farning jn North America is relativelY new and still evolving. The potential to diversify and stabilize income sotrrces, increase forest health, and promote alternative "green" enterPrises js tremendous. A sttldent ot forest farming in Nortl] America needs exposure to its historical evolution, the t'tuances of terminologl', the enigmatic markets, and the diversity of possible Products and Pro duction systems. This chapter was designed to provide students with a comprehensive

North Amerlcan : An Integrat€d Sclence and Practice, 2nd ed I on, H.E. Garreti (ed ) Copyr ght O 2009. American So.iely of Agronomy, 677 S 5e9oe Rd , Mad son, WI 53711, USA 1 understandirg oi tl're great \'.rriety of oppor, and other aliroforestry programs in Airica are tunities and challengcs with forest iarn,ing in morc oriented to$'ard the ilttrocluction oi Nortlr A meric.1. species into agricultLrral systenls than to forcsl iarming, bul in this ancl other regions n'ork on non- Historical Perspe

Chamberlain, Mitchell, Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

ur-rsuccessful, reflecting a lack of hardiness of abandoned farm lots. His ideal farm consisted of the stock and poor site preparation. The Erper- level and gentle sloped lands that u'ere protected imental Farm Stations Act of 1886 provided by terraces. Otirer areas were planted u'ith trees, opportunities for coordinated and region- under whicl'r was planted high qualit), forage 't!ao ally based and tree production. ln 8r,r55t.. 5mrll1 ad\oc.rtpd .tor'Ld' .lgri( rrl- addition to grain and livestock trials, the exper- ture that allowed farners to grow trees, \,vhile imental farms tested a wide variety of tree raising livestock under their shade. Nowi almost and plant materials for adaptation to regional eighty years after these visionary words u'ere conditions and plar-rt production culture, dis- posed, sih'opasture is \,\,ell accepted in manv seminating results to the farm community (Dick, parts oI North America. lc)Lrbr. l-ar.y errr i-iorreJ U-.r6, nl lree- in pr.rirre In the United States and Canada, focus has landscapes irrcluded shelterbelts arrd windbreaks shifted to inch.rde a broader range of potential for protectiorl from wind and snor'r', creatiorl ot crops. An increasing number of references call microclimates supporting garden establishment be found from across Canada concerning non and ctllture, and estabiishment of farm timber forest products, predominantly based for {'ood and fuel. The planting of on $'ild harvest information (e.g., Duchesne trees and shrubs into sparsely t.eed regions and Zasada,2000; Wills and Lipser', 1999; Ted- also served the aesthetic and psychological pur cler et al., 2000; Mitchell, 2004; Wetzel et a1., 2006). poses of approximating pastoral landscapes in a Indeed, some recently arising terminology sr-1r period dominated by European or Euro-North rounding compatible management (Hobby et Anericar'r settlement (Dick, 1996). a1., 2006) reflects a continuLrm of activities and was begun at several experimental farms, and intensities, from lvild harvest to exter'rsive, tree seed and seedlings were distributed directlv intensive forest farming approaches. Foa exam b settlers (Howe, 1986). In 1901, a permanent ple, research in British Co|-lmbia lras revealed a Forest Nursery Station (prectlrsor to the present- range of approaches to "compatible management" day PFRA Shelterbeit Center) was established at (Haynes et a1.,2003) of timber and non-timber Indian Head, Saskatchenan by the federal gov- forest products, although there is little inclusiorl errlment k) propagate and provide hardy tree and of non-timber forest products colrsiderations inlo shrub materials to prairie farmers. The Prairie overall forest resource management in the prov Farm Rehabilit;rtio11 Administration (PFRA) $,.rs ince. Compatible nanagement activities can be established in 1935 in response to tlre drought, r-lnderstood ns a contimrum fron1 "inactive" (or soil degradation, and farm abandorlment occur- "passive") compatibilitv, sr-1ch as r-1sing existing ring. Its role was to "...secure the rehabilitation of roads or topographic maps to iclentify or access the drought and soil drifting areas in the Prov- non timber forest products resources, to verv inces of Manitoba, Saskatche{'ar1 and Alberta, active management, such as planting non-tim- and to develop and promote within those areas, ber forest products species in forest systems of farm practice, tree culture, $'ater sup- (Cocksedge ancl Hobby,2006). Thus, the more ply, land utilization and land settlemenL that will active phases oi compatible managemerlt are afford greater economic security..." (AAFC, 2007). consistent $'ith extensive, intensive forest farm In 1929, J. Russeli Smitl, described how 'ter- i11g systems, as both resource types are explicitly tain crop vielding trees could provide useful managed for. substitutes for cereals in animal feeds as well as Compatible managemcnt activities that night conserve the environment" in the rural United be regarded as extensive lorest farming activities States. Early forest farming focused on harvesting reported in British Columbia inclr-lde intetrat products fron trees to supplement farm produc ing conifer foliage collection {'ith prlrning and tiorr. Today, foiest farming has progressed well Juvenile spacing, nranaging and studying the beyond this rudimentary model. It has expanded effects of and/or zonillg on mush- to use the space under the trees to produce crops room productivity, controlled burns Ior specific and other products. Trees have advanced from species regeneratiorr, riparian area restoratior-l producers of products, to producers of services with species of economic importance, (e.g., shade and protection) to enhance procluc and spacing to enhance the understory, targeted ti(n of ur-rderstorv crops. brushjng to enhance noncompetitive brush spe Smith (1929) proposed "progressive establish- cies, partial harvests, and longer tree rotations ment of massive complexes of tree farms." He for nrushroom production. envisioned "hi11s green u'ith crop-yielding trees" in place of poor pastures, eroding gullies, and -l-hese General Definitions and lanciscape. systcms represcrrt intetratod management of tinrber and non tinrber forest Descriptions crops. Man.rgement nlay rar'rgc from intensive Dr.lring tl're earlv development of forest farmirrg, cultivated sVstems in r,r'hich plants are intro- the priirar\'l-lan u'as kr increasc and clitersifY duced inb the understorY of a timber stand to the productive capacitv of r,r,oocllands. lnsteacl extensive approaches in $hich forest stands arc of procltrcing only timber nnd other woocl prod- modified k) ehhanco the mitrketability of exist ucts, the desir€'i{as to include a rvide range of lng Plarlts. ioodstr,rfts and other rau,materials. The early con- cepts integrated iorestry with farming, animal Non-Timber Forest Products husbanclrr', aid horticulture k) achieve maxi- A variety of terms have becn rrsecl kr describe n1ttm output and optimu m conservntion (Slrolkr the multitudc oi prodLrcts that come ironr iorcsts .1nd H.rrt, 19ti5). Thesc visionaries maintainecl that arc plant based but rlot timber based. Worcls that a fulh'apPlied forest fnrm integratcd three commonlv used k) clescribe tl're products inc)udc, main components-trees, livesk)ck, ancl ioralie. but are not linrited to, seconclar\', minor, speci.rl The trees woulcl proviclc timb€.r nnd associatecl or specialtv, non , ancl lrontrad itional. T

Chamberldrn. Mitchell. Bflghdm. Hobby. label Davrs forest farming practices

utility poles, minerals, animal parts, rocks, watet United States include nrushrooms, , and the and soil (USDA Forest Service,200l). fruits, leaves, and roots of many species. Perhaps In 1999, the U.S. Congress passed legislatior'l the most commonly collected of the culinary for recognizil'1g the importance of forest botanicals est prodlrcts are ramps (AIliut h'icoccutn Ait.), a and requiring that more etfort be made to man n ild nn ion lhal i. , 'ne of lhe F,rrlre:l .pring em( r- age for these products. For the purpose of Section gents. Another important culinary species, black 339 of I{.R. 2466, Congress defined f/csl irotnrl u'alnut (/r/srrrs tlqr'4 L.), which is natiYe to east- cnl L)toLluats as naturally occurring , ern United States, also is used in the medicinal fungi, flowers, seeds, r@ts, barks, leaves, and and dietarv suppiement industry. Large popu- other vegetation (or portion thereof) that grou' latiolls of mushroons and fungi can be found on National Forest System lands. Thc term does in \\'estenl United States and parts of Canada. rrot include trees, except as provided in regula also is cor1sidered an edible non-timber tions isslred under this section by the Secretary . of Agriculture (H.R. 2466, 1999). Specialty Wood-Based. Wood-based non-trm- A more common and widespread term is /iol ber forest products are produced from trees or fiinher This term relates to plants, Jbrcst ltotiurts. parts of trees, but are not commercially sau'n parts of plants, fungi, and other biolotical mate u'ood. For the most part, these products are des ri;rl lhat are harvested fronl rl'ithir, and on the tined for the cratt segment of the industry. Some edges of rratural. nanipulated or disturbed for- of the more important wood-based specialty ests. Non tinber forest products may come from forest products include the stems of natural forests, as well as from plantalions. They (Sassnfras alltidunt Nutt.) for walking sticks and include fungi, , lichen, herbs, r'ines, shrubs, u'illow (Sa/i:r spp.) stems for fr-lrniture. Vines, or trees. Many parts are harvested, including the particularly grapevine (yifis spp.) and smokev- roots, tubers, leaves, bark, tu'igs and branches, he (Arisfolochin ntacroltltlla Lam.) are used to frtlit, , and , as well as the wood. They make specialty wood-based products, as well may be processed into {inished products, such as as floral decorative products. A variety of hard- carvings, rvalking sticks, jams, tillctures, Jellies, are used for carvings. or teas. They are classified in many different ways, but one common approach is to segment Floral Decoratives, Manv forest plants and them into four major product categories: culi parts of plar,ts are used in decorative arrange nary, r,ood based, floral and decorative, and ments, to con-rplement and furnish the backdrop medicinal and dietary supplements (Chamber- for flor,r,ers, as rvell as for the main component lain et al., 1998). oi dried ornam*nl-. re crrd u.e. for m.rny i 'r- Elsewhere, non-timber forest products may est harvested floral greens include fresh/dried take on a broader corrcept. The Centre for Non flowers, aromatic oils, greenerv, basket fil1er, Timber Resources, a leading research and \\'reaths, and roping, as well as cralt items. Floral cxtension organization in Canada, clefines non- proclucts fion the oak ecosystems of southern timber forest products as ail botanical (p1anl) and Appalachia include variorrs species of grapevine, mycoloSical () species in the forest k.odztt (Pucrutin loltnla Willd.), and smokevine for other than those that produce timbet puip$,ood, !vreaths and baskets; galax (Calnr r.colnt'n Porr.) shakes, or other wood products. The definition for floral decoratirms; and twigs from several includes associated services such as tourism and tree species. Several genera of moss are har- eciucation relating to non-timber forest prod- vested from hard1\'ood forests of Appalachia and ucts. Some groups in Canada, particularly First used domestically and exportecl to the Euro Nations (indigenous peoples), consider non- pean florai industry. Inclr-1ded in this segnent timber forest products to ir'rclude forest animais. of the non-timber forest products industr)'are Animal products (e.g., "bushmeat" in Africa) are native plants used in ]]orticulture and restora- commorll)' corrsidered non-timber forest prod- tion (whole plant cxtraction). ucts in other parts of the world as well. One useful method of classification, catego- Medicinal and Dietary Supplements. Forest- rizes these products along market segments. In harvested plants used for tl'reir therapeutic value the southern Appalachian hardwood forests, there are marketed either as medicines or as dietary are four rnajor categories of products: edible and supplements. Plants that have been testecl for culinan', specialty w,oocl, floral, and medicinal. safety and efficacy and meet strict U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards are marketed as Edible and Culinary. Edible and culinary prod- medicines or drugs. Accordin[j to Farnsworth and r-1cts harvested from the forests of southeastern Morris (1976), 25'l; of all prescriptions dispensed of damaged and infected vegetation, and more in the Unitecl States contaii active ingredients active managenent of forest resoLrrces. It carl extracted from higher order plants. Plants and result irr adclitional and diversified forest incone plant prodr"lcts that do not meet the strictest FDA opportlrnities bv producirlg products tor more standards are marketed as dietary supplements markets \\,ith greater diversity. At the same time, in the United States. These products are legally iure-l fJrmi rrg re.1...rer morc :nten.itc rn.rnrtt. considered food items, nnd product labels can mer1t, w}ich demands grcater skills and more make no claims about their nedical benefits. timc. The markets for many of the prodr-1cts may l\hilc c.rLc!,ofj/irrE, plJIrl. Ir) lhi- rrar i' u-e be less fhan aderpatelv understood bv the land ful and convenient, many species have multiple owner, increasing the neecl for more research and uses anci may serve more than one narket. For assistance. Often the iask of learnin€l about and example, black cohosh (Acfaea rd.c,rosn L.) is a entering new markets is claunting to forest lancl- popuiar medicinal plant also used in nat!ral orvners. The integration of forestrv and farn1ing landscapes. Black walntrt has manv uses-the with nelv plants requires broader knorvledge is edible, fhe sheil can be used as an abra to encompass tlle growirlg arld marlagement of sive, and the ext.act from the shells and husks is trees, understorv crops, and their interactions. medicirTal. In the Pacific Northwest and British (Jverall, manv of the reasons producers mitl'rt Colr-Lmbia, salal (G0 lfltcl iti sllLlLlotl Pursh) is used adopt a forest farmirlg system are the same as for its foliage (as a floral greerr) and for its or -inril.rr lo ! lrv ll-(y nri8,hl ir\c.l ir'.trtr agr,, as an eclible forest product. C)regon grape (Malio system. System choices clepencl on the rin spp.) is used in landscaping nr,d as a floral people, expertise ancl interest resources, as lvcll green, rvhile the berries are harvested tor jellies as land and financial resources. In sonre cases, and rvines and the roots for natural dyes arrd the system chosen u,ill be designcd to address lrredicina] applications (Pojar and MacKinnon, a specific ecological function or to mitigate a 1994). Organizirlg r'ron tirnber forest products Per.Pired (nr)\ern. B\ dr\(r.rl\lnc cr"p-. pr,,d into market segments does not preclude haVillg ucts, production cycles, and land management -fr(ili, .l|,rc\ D. \(\rrrl ,.lteeorie.: .r 'p(ci(5 systems, the forest farmer mav be able to both nTav have muitiplc uses and therefore the poten r, drr,' fin.rnci.rI ri-l .rr)d c.cr'cr,rle crrvir,'rrn'' r'- tial {or multiple products. ta1, cultural ancl recreational benefits. Adopters of this divcrsilied land use system can realize econonic, ecological, and social ben- Why Forest Farming? efits (Table 9 l). Thc economic benefits range Forest farming has aclvantages and disadvan- from added income from nerv crops that provide tages over conventional forestry or farming interim income h,hile longer-term crops n]atrlre (Universit)' of Missouri Center for Agroforestr)', to improve(l rcvc.mres from larnds that are 2006). Forest farlning can leacl to improved iorest nrarginal for more traditional agricultural Pro- heaLth by increasing biological diversit),, removal duction. Additionalll', labor rct}rirements may

Table 9-1. Potential ben€Iits of forest farming systems.

New crops that (an lncrease and d versify product on and cash flow decfeaslrg dependenc€ on sinq e commodiiles. Introdu.t on of crops that provlde short term income wh le ong term crops matur€ Divers f cat on of labor, potentia y increaslng ih€ l€ngth of t me abor s needed and ncr€asing chances of reta nlng trained abor

.Potenl a for sholt tenn lncome derved from ca bon s€q!estratlon and offset.arbon credit account ng mechan sms Manag ng lands may have properly and income tax advantages (e 9., managed for€n or agr c! tura ands des gnat on in BC, and the Wi iamson Act I the U 5) Polenl a to mprove rev€nues from marg na ands that otherw se would be mlnima ly prodlrct ve. Potenl a for pald governmeni programs (e g, USDA-NRCS) thai may be compatib e w th forest farming. Ecoloqlcal

P otectian from or remed ation of env ronn'renta concerns (€ q., sediment ntercept on, inlerception of nutr ent rich gro!nd afd surfac€ waters, redu(ed impacts of f ooding, reduced w nd eros on, aid ln snow capture, etc ) Fiter effect for nolse, d!sl, odor afd light Enhanc€ment of wi d ife habitat, biod versity, and aesthet cs Eco o9 ca aspects ot increas ng carbon seq!estrat on through changes n management placl ces.

Soc a Soclal aspecls of improvlng env ronmenta stewardship, blod versity, and carbon sequenratron. Community and sector aspects of enhanced stab I ty through diversificatiof of products and productlon ,:ycles. Use of agroforerlry syst€ms as planninq too s, wh ch aid conrmLnities n connecting to resoLrrce synems and use of buffers to red!ce !rban r!ra conf ict

Chamberlain, Mitche , Brigham, Nobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices be diversifiecl as nelv crops can }rnve different ur-rderstanding what is practictrl, but tlley mav be grou'th and procluclive time frames. Ecological chalienged bv the marketing aspects. benefits mal be realizcd as a greater diversity of plants mav be growlr or nurtured under the for est canop\'. Water quality and quantity mav be Looking for Opportunities cnhancccl. $4rich improves resources ior acluatic Landowners interested in pursuir'rB ft)rest farm- i.runa. Overall, forest farming can providc both ing need to examille all internal nnd external economic and conservatiorl incentiVes, therebv factors that could inihence their slrccess. Many errhancirrg environmental stewardship and com- new enterprises n1av require additional skills munity development. and expertisc. Therc may be additional capital Possible Adopters of Forest Farming or labor inve$tments for i\4rich lanclowners will rrred (o brrdAet. Thu comFetitiulr in nr.rr- There are a Sror{ir1g number of priYate forest 'ome kets (e.8., ecl ible mushrooms, Christmas trees, landorvners in North America $.ho are taking and bees) may be such tl'rat the profit martins a nor'rtradjtional, comprehe.rrsive, and divcrsi- make tllese alternntives Iess atlractive. fied approach to Nanaging their n'oodlands. Inter ested Iando$,ners need to t'ramine the markets Man;rgir-rg the forest for timber may be a small and fully unclerstancl the potential and pitfalls of or nonexistent component in tlreir plans. Their each possible \'entrrre. Aithough there arc ntanv major objectives mav include managing the for- chaJlenges ot cleveloPing iorest farnling, a diver- est for recreation ancl kr enjov its iatural beautY, sified land use and nranagement strategv be protecting u,ildlife ancl fauna, keeping the for cilll econon,icallt' req'arclin5; to landorvners u illirrg est health\,, ;rnd growing non-timber products to invest tin1e and energy. ior personal use, arrd for sonre, making a profit. There are thr€'e gen€'ral categories of people $,ho Marketing Forest Farming Products pursue this approach: new landowners who pur Marketing is a nTuch more inr.olved process than chased the land because rvas people it beautiful; simplv letting a buyer knor,, you have something who lrave inherited the land but did not grou' to sell. Rather, it is the proccss of planning and up managilr8 it for timber; and, lclng-timt'for- implementing a strategy that inchtdes every- est lalldowrlers rt'lro are looking for alternative thing from idea deYelopment, pricing, prorlotion, income opportunities. nnd distribution of what yoLr are offering, right New landow,ners ol'tei look at tlreir forest as through to tl're exchange of your product for a prized possessior that needs to be treated i{,ith moner,. Muclr of the follou'ilrg discussion about great reverence. They want to keep it healthy and marketin€l n'as dralvn trom an extensloll note encourage a wide diversity of plants, ar'rirnals, prepared bv Ambrrs et al. (2007). and fungi to live there. TheY like to, or think theY As is lho case for producers in anv business, wotrld like to, grow th€'ir own food, make tlreir effectively marketing forest farming products olvn medicir're, and live close to nature. Grolr,i11g is rvhat makes th€'clifference between the suc- mushrooms, collecting herbs, and rrraking d1,es cess or faihrre of an operati(nt. [n this section, we from plants are part of the lifestyle they strive describe different approacl'res to generating rev to achieYe. Making an income {rom the forest is enue from forest farming products and services usually not a primarV Boal. (ior greater detail see Cold et al., 2009, Chapter People who inherit their land often do not l1 of this volume). Bcfore undertaking a new ini- knorv ho$'k) managc the forest or ra'ant to do tiatiYe n'ith significant investmentt producers it differer-rtl1' than tlreir ancestors. Making an should take the time to develop detailed mar- income from the forest is usuallv important. Thev ketinS and business plans. A well thought-out at least need to make enough to pay the taxes so mark€'ting strategv rvill help focus obi€'ctiYes, they don't have to sell the land. Man), oI these distinguish lrrod]-lcts fton others, and improve people have interestirlg experiences and educa- bargaining positioDs. tional backgrounds that lend themselves $'ell There are four main ways to generatc reve to starting new, innovative businesses based on nue from forest farnling products and services: nolr-tinber li)rest products. marketing conlmodities, marketing value'added Manv long-time forest landoi{iers $,ant to prodrrct.. nl,trlctint .er\ iac{ and (\pericr)((... cliversifv their income opportunities bevoncl tim- and charging fees to harvest. ber. Recreational uses and production of shrubs, nut trees, and other crops similar to trees are otten Marketing €ommodities nttractivc to them. Making an income from the land There are a wide variety of potential products is critical. This grotrp is usually rvell grounded in that can be marketed and sold as commodities fronr Iorest farms. Medicinal herbs, edible exanple, \,\,i11 thc crop(s) reqr-1ire big inputs of proclucts (e.9., mushrooms, berries), decorative labor during an alreadv busy time? grecnerv (Christmas greens and others), and .ls vour investment (land, live plants arc a fe\4'exantples of products iabot and capital) Just likelv to provicle an aciequate return? thnt can be sold into conmodity or ra\\' mate ri,rl rnarkcl.. lr', ng [or c,'mntodilier cat] r,tr'9, . Hor,v does that return conrpnre \{ith other pos- from relativelv stable to significant fluctr-1ation, sible crop/prodLrct options? de;rending on sr-rppl1' arld demand, including you srrpply from other parts of the r'!'orlc1 rvhere simi In the end, rnay dctermine that selling bulk commodities does not provide []re returlls 1ar sPccres 8ro1\'. \ou are l,u,kir t,'r. Rrll lr'e icle. Selling commodities n1ay be the simplest \,\'aV .l er th.rn dban.l"nl|rE to entcr the mnrket and is potentiaily less risky of producing a crop, it's lvorthwhile to take the than other approaches but may not al\,vavs iine to explorc the poterTtial value-added oppor provide the best returns. Tn.rreas u'here there tunities that may be available and mav providc are buyers in reasonable prorimitr', seliing rau' the return on investment you wat1t. Prodr-1cts is an easv 'ay to become familiar lviti1 Marketing Value-Added Products the scck)r and wilh the demands of the market When makirrg decisions about your choice of for prodr.rct quality. Production information \,vill products ar-rd hor'v you can market them, corl be plant- and/or regiorl specific, offering oppor sider \,vavs to add value. Adding value r,r,i11 allon, tullities to test and adapt available infornatior-r you to obtain a better price for the sam€! amount to new regiorls. Similarlv marketing prirlciples of rarv material. For small landou'ners, adding are highlv portablc, thus proclucers may learn valLle to crops (whether agrjcultural or non as mllch from another producer or resource timber) can make a si€lnificant difference to the professional across the countrv as from sonre botton1 linc. olre located $,ithin their province or state. An Valrre can be added to ra\'v products in thJo essential step beiore entering production is to general w,ays (SmalJ Woodlands Program of Bfit develop a clear picture of the indnstry in lvhiclr ish Columbia, 2001), either by changirlg the form you intencl to participate. In brjet this illvolves ,,f (h( pro(lu, t re.e.. gr.tdine. ,ir\.rA (.)rr .nt. focusing on: freezing) or bv selling flrrther along the mar- 1. Knorn'ledgc of product standarcis: keting chain (i.e., to a retail outlet rather than to wholl--.rler). . the form in which products are sold n ApJrl lrr,rn EJirrirF, .rn inarea-c . recFrilements for product handling in price for the same volume of rar'!' inaterials, . mininlum or preferred purchasing processing rarv materials can provide other \()111m es benelits, inclucling: 2. Awareness of external influences: . being able to sell s(,nc'products out of se.rson . lluciuations in markets regional, or over a longer period time (e.9., national, ancl international' of berrics . effects of climatic variables on local rvhich often all become ripe at the same timc), supplres minjmizirlg the need for cold storage ancl . seasonal pr-lrchasing trends redricing losses durin€i the shipping of flesJr 3. Arlticipatiorl of industrv trends: prodLrcts over lor,g clistances . exPected lontt-term market growth or . rlidercnt.alirg pr.'dU(l u.rrrA llrr -Jmp fri alec lr r1e r. ,rr r ',.ri.rl ,,,. r,,,r,. , '-i.11. mdrlel . development of new product areas . pricing .lirections, shifts, and swings Many e.iibles that can be prodtrced in forest . nelv varieties or cultivnrs for prodr-lction farminEi also have a market in a value-addcd As your marketing plan develops, it mav be form. Fresh products arc usually perishable lvise b rcfine your plans based on perceptiurs and only available for short pcriods. Process of \,vhich options have the best potential in the ing extends the period during which prodr-1cts marketplace. When selecting a list of marketable can be made available, ancl aliows processors to "best bets," consider: increase potential returrls. Creater profits are often achieved bv adding . Are there buyers nearby? Yalue, but there.rre also greater risks, includirrg . What is the clemand for the crop relative kr increased retluirements for investment in plant supPly? and equipment, training, operating capital, mar ket research, etc. Prices are higher furtl'ter down Hon'does . harvesting and selling these crops fit the marketing chain, but it may also take a good in with the rest of vour productiorl system? For

Chamberlain, Mitchel, Briqham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

deal of time to find and sell products to a large foods are currently available (Cerltre for Non number oI retail enl{rrprises, rather than to a sin- Ti mber Resou rces, 2007a, 2007b). Eramples {rom gle broker or processing plar,t. Tt is important to the United States include publicatror,s trom be aware of complications that come with mak- educational institutions (e.9., Center for Agrofor ing processed food products. Carefully examine estry, University of Missouri) and the USDA (e.9., l-,. a lth r,.gu Lrli' 'n. a nd rld nd,r rd. nr pn rl ol yulr r Thomas arT d Schumann, 1993; Vance and Thomas, market research. 1997). As with any btrsiness ventr-1re, you will Because forest farming products are so have to do the research, consider your resor-lrces, diverse, it is important to think about the specific and "crunch the numbers" to determine if a spe- nrarkets for each type of product. The markets cific idea Ior addirrg value is r'l'orthwhile. for food products such as jams, jellies, and syr Marketing Services and Experiences ups are different than those for flora1 products Small tenure holders can learn from the grou'ilrg or craft items. Especially for processed goods, ".leri touri-m' indrr.lrl. fnr llrr growirg pep1l such as jams. jellies, Christmas wreaths, or twig lation of well-educated, $'ell off urbanites, rural furniture, it is useful to research the mafkets 1ife, rural skills, and rural products can exert a ior handcrafted and specialtv items in related powerful pull. Depending on location, many for- industrv seck)rs. What are the trends and prices est farms may have good potential to provide for organic foods, for example? What are garden- amenities and services for local commr-lnities and ers buying? Where are Christmas clecoratior'rs visitors. As many small tenures are located near sold? On the other hand, soile tvpes of outlets population centers, they are in a good position such as farmers'markets or craft fairs may offer to capitalize on this market through, for exanl opportunities to sell a h'ide range of products. ple, mushroom and picking outings and Many snlall-scale non-timber forest products festivals, visits to a birch or maple forest for "sug their .ta rl al lhe.e l) pe. oi H\ en lr. Proce\\or5 8et aring off," cut-vour owr'1 Christmas trees witll Building on current product lines can also be a hot cider and perhaps a w'agon ride offered as r-1seftll strategy-producers oI Chrrstmas trees well. Classes and instructi()n in makirlg wreaths, might consider expanding lheir product line k) rustic furniture, floral design with lvild plants, incltlde cut bought Christmas $'reathes, or gar gor-1rmet cooking with wild and local foods, or lands, for example. If you are selling , other crafts are also poprrlar in many places. you could consider also selling fire starter cones Cuided exPeriences on your forest farm nrade from corres dipped in paraffin and are another exarnple of addilrt value to your packaged as gifts. Other creative wa)'s for add resources. On a straight value for u,eight of prod ing value to edible (or other) products inclucle uct harvestecl/ there is no question you will be direct marketing b consumers. In addition to the making considerably more than you could ever more traditional farm stands or farmers' markets, hope to make selling the produce without the there are also options for supplying consumers experience to go with it. Festivals with agricu)tural products through community also hold poten- tial for capturing more value at the local level by sr-rpported agriculture (CSA) programs. combining a number oI activities to drar,"'people Useful information for producing and market- in. The orgarlization required to run a successful ing value-added products is available from many festival is significant, but so can be the returns. sources that deal with general industry categc> Berry festivals, wild mushroom festivals, and ries, such as food processilrg and landscaping. lrerbJl Ir.l\e met h ith \u.ce:\ irr vrr Other resor-rrces kr consider when searching for Salherir)9. ious locatiolls. There is also the possibilit)' of information include bu sirT ess planning resources, organizing a fall harvest festival r,vhere forest industry associations, governmental agencies iarm products could play important roles. Often (1ocal, provincial, state, federal), and noF{or- one specific procluct is the focus of a festival, but proftts and universities or colleges. One can also the spin-offs for the community are much review more generai information sites such treatet than created bV the single resource. as ATTRA, The National Sustainable Agricul- ture Information Service (ATTRA,2007). More Charging Fees to Harvest forest farning exampies from British Colum Forest landolt'ners may have opportunities to bia include A Guidc to Agrohlesftv irr BC (Small charge fees to others to harvest products or use Woodlands Progran of British Columbia,200l) services provided by the tenure lT older (e.9., ttails and a ne\,v series of handbooks from the Centre or other amenities) if they have desirable forest for Non{imber Resources at Royal Roads Uni based goods and services and are able to legally versity. Publications on floral greens and wild r(5lricl .r(\css to there pr,,dual5 ,,r .(,r\ iL,.i. In the Paciiic Nortl'rwest of the United States ing in market research ior botl'\ short-tcrm and whL,re tovenlment larrdow,ners are autlrorized long-term opPortunitics. to charge tees tbr harvesting non-timber forest products, permits and other iees for non-tim- Market Outlook ber forest procluct harvesting are qujte commor] T]]or-rgh no formal estimates have been made (Tedder et al., 2002). In Britislr Colunbia, sorne of the btal value of the non-timber forest prod- con'rpanies !vith privately oi{,ned fbrest land (e.9., ucts markets in North America, ar,'ailable data TinberWest) and tl're Nisga'a First Nation (2007) illlrstrate the economic importance of some indi- charge harvester's t-ees k) access products such vidua) products. For example, in 1995, the United as salal and mushrtxrms. Even if you are legalh, Stat€'s export€'d moss and lichei, mrrch oi $,hiclr erltitled to charge fees, however, it may not be was from southern forests, \,alued at more than economically viable b do so. $14 million (Coldberg, 1996). In 199( colleclors of Tlre likelihood that harvesters \\ould be !r,ill- the fruit of black u'alnut, lvhich is fbund in easF forests, were ing to pay fbr access depencls large)y on how ern hardwood paid more than $2.5 (personal muc}r free access tl'rev alreaclv have in nearby milliorr comnlunication, J. Jorres for- areas. [f yor,r are close to a maior population merlv of Hammons Products Co., Stocktoll, MO). centet i{here forest lands are limited, or von One company in south$,est Virginia special- pin€. produce scarce or esPecjally high quality goods izir,g in roping had sales in excess oi $1.5 (Hauslol'tner,1997). or amenities, the prospects are much better than million in 1997 Volunteer fire gener- if yt>u are located in the midst of prrblicly acces- departments in \^'estenl North Carolina sible forest w,itlr similar attributes. ate from 30 b 90% of their budgcts from annual ramp festivals. Based on 2001 prices, the average In n'rost cases, anv fee income would be mod- rr'holt.sale vdhr(. (,t f,,resl-ll,rrtested ginsctrg est. The potentiai deg,ends on the commercial in.l four-state region of Aprpalachia exceedeci vah.re of the products, and whether the tenure $18.5 million. Certainl, tlre aggregate value of rTorr- )'rolder also carr provide serYices that ease access, timber forest products to the soutllern econonv protection, security o[ supPlli 61 trading. For t'a r exceeds tlrese examples. example, exclusive access to private roacls tnto the early 1990s, high-value sites or a secure storage area might be In bumper crops ol' eclible appealing features k) commercial harveste.s. In mushroonrs aPpeared on manv National For- ests Washingk)n (Freed, 1994) any event/ tlre introduction of fees or permits for in Oregorl and ns an harvesting resources tlTat may historically have a resuit oi major forest tires and sptrrred been freely accessible to all will require carefrrl increased intcrest in these alternative forest conrmunity artareness building and advanct' products. Sch l()sser and Blatner ('1995) estimated discussion !vith users. the wholesale valrre oi r,vild edible mushrooms in Wasl'ringtorl, Oregon, arrd Idaho at million. Manv of the skills and interests necessarv to $41.1 Thevestimated thatin 1992 buvers of mrrsh rooms successlully market forest farming goods ancl in the Pacific Northu,est purchasccl million services mav be quite different from those com- $20.3 of product from more than 10,0(l(l harvesters. mon in tl're productior'r and IDorketing of timber -lhe and timber products. Partnerships-possiblv floral industrv relies heavilv on prod- 'w'ith individuals and groups that are not in the ucts gathered from thc lorests. An earlY studl,oi the floral greens and clecoratjves segment the forc.strv comnlulrity can be verv beneficial. Colr- of sider, for exanrple, contacting local garden chrbs, noi-timber forcst products industry revealed chefs, craft groups, or floral dcsigners. Products that these businesses contribr,rted more than you consider as forest weeds mav be jtrst n'hat $128.5 million k) the econom\, (Schlosser and t}rey are looking for. Firrding entrepreneurs who Blatner, 1994). The study fonnd that buyers ilr are interested in design and marketing may allo\\' lvestern Washington and Oregon, and south- tenLrre holders to focus on productior'r, rvhile cre- eastern Britisl'r Columbia purclrased $3u million greens ating a new busilress opportur'ritv that berlefits worth of floral and $9.ti rrillion oi botLghs both parties. Contact local charitable groups in 19U9. Bough collectiorl, for holidav wreaths, is a maior economic activity in tlre northern states who nla1. be' looking fclr a novel iund-raising idea. of Wisconsin and Micl'rigan. Galax, an evergreen Finall1,, spend some time and resources i11 look- ing at developing trends and opportunities in grolrndcover, has been harvested from the for- ests kev areas lr4rere vorrr forest farm has something of u'esteri North Caroliia.nd southern to offer. If you r\rant to develop your business. Virginia since before lhe 20th century.'fhe pri- you need k) recognize the irnportance of invest- mary source of this importarrt floral product is seven counties in western N"orth Carolina, u'here millions of leaves are lrarvested annuallr,. Pickers

Chamberlain, Mitchell, 8ri9ham, Hobby, Zabek. Davis forest farming practices are paid by the leaf ancl can earn $50 to $120 for The value of mushrooms (CnrFralcl a box of 5000 leaves (Preclny and Chamberlain, Ius spp.) ranged annually betu'eerr Can$1 million 2005). By some estjmates, galax harvesting con and Can$6 mil1ior.r. The export value of the flo tributes multi millions of clollars to the local ral greens sector was estimated to range trom economy (Greenlield and Davis, 2003). Can$27 million to Can$65 million for the Past The findings of medical research have helped 5 yr, with an average nnnual value of approxi to increase market demand for non timber mately Can$,10 million. This conposite Picture medicinal forest prodlrcts (Eisenberg et al, 1993; supports the overall estimates provided bY Wills in Le Bars et al., l99Z Stix, 1998). The 1996 estin1ated and Lipsey (1999). The significant variatiorl value of the global markets for herbal medicines values provides a strong indication of the impor- was approximately $14 billion (Cenetic Errgi- tant effects of both changing environmental neering New's, 1997), of u,hicJ.r EuroPe and Asia conditions and the impact of global productiorr represented more than 80% of the global trade and prices. In 1998, the total retail market for medicinal Estimates of non timber forest product value herbs in the United States was estimated at $3 97 are not based on consistent or reliable data billion, more than double the estimate for North collection of production and values. Few non America in 1996 (Brevoort 1998; Genetjc Engi timber forest products, apart from a few sPecific neering News, 1997). products such as mapie syrup and lrr the late lgo0-. th( mn.. nlJrk, l-egmerrt lLrr (Vaccirirrrr spp.), are tracked regularlri and tl, e va1- herbal medicirral products, aPProximately 17'l. ues of those that mav have more regular reporhng of the U.S. market, grew at an arlnualized rale are likely underreported, since most wild harvest of more than 100% (Brevoort, 1998). Erports of ing is documented poorly or not at all. forest harvested girlseng from 1993 through 1996 grew more than 300% (USDA, 1999) Although exports of forest-harvested decreased in Edible Forest Products 1997and 1998, demand for other species increasecl Most people don't lhink of the forest as a source (USDA, 1999). For examPle, the estimated growth of vegetables, but there are a sr-lrPrisins, number in the mass market for St. John's wort (HvP.7'i.llrl of plants that have been traditionallv consLrmed ptrfornLtnt L.) and black cohosh for the 52-wk by people who live in or near the woods. Edi- period ending 12 Julv 1998 lvas aPProximately ble and culirrary products that can be farmed 2800 and 500'1,, respectively (Brevoort 1998). in the forests of North America include mush- In Canada, there are no accurate and comPle rooms, ferns, ar-rd the frtlits, leaves, and roots hensive estimates of the current and ProsPective of many species. Most of these are not sold in values of non timber forest Products, whether supermarkets, and on]1' a ' can be fountl for u'ild-harvested or produced ir1 forest farmint sale nt roadside stands. But elery year, People systems. Wetzel et al. (2006) estimated current forage these plants from the woods etnd share output of forest-based toods to be Can$1.33 them with their friends and familv. Within the billion, \'\,ith potential to expand to Can$5.'1 past few vears, the growing wild foods move- billion, including both \,vild-harvested and lor ment has created a small commercial demancl for est farmed Products. de Geus (1995) estimated these unusual arld tasty plants. Some have been that more than 200 products t{ere commerciallv highlighted on cooking shows and in tourm€t harvested in British Columbia in 1995. Wills and magazines. Many are sold online. You \'\'i1l Prob Lipsey (1999) estirnated direct revenues trom ably be surprised at what you find if you search non-timber and ecotourism related activities at the irlternet for the term ioild.foods. approximately Can$280 million. There is potential to make a Profit from culti- The Centre for Non-Timber Resources (CNTR) vating some forest vegetables, but understanding estimated the economic value of the trade in rvild the markets is critical. Only a small percentage mushrooms and floral greenerv (Cocksedge and of the public l\'ill buy these products, but those Hobby, 2006).In 2006, the value wild mushrooms who do are devoted ctlstomers who will return collected from British Columbia ranged from year after vear. This group includes wild food Can$10 million to Can$42 million for the Past enthusiasts, people w}o grew uP eating these decade, with an average annual value of Can$29 foods, gournet cooks, and high end restaurant million. Based on curient trade statistics. it is chefs. The average consumer u'ill stop and look estimated that the export value of pine musl] at these with interest, but Probably won't buv To rooms during the clecade of 1995 through 2005 be successful, yotr will have to find a way to tap ranged from Can$6 million to Can$32 million. into the narket. l,ocal food campaigns and the shady areas \,vith damp soil and arr abundance internet are obvioLrs places to start. of decomposed leaf litter or other or€lanjc matter. The plarrts prodnce ne\4' leaves in March to Aprii, Forest Farming for Wild Vegetables i,vhich die back as the forest closes \'vith have Tlrere are many forest vegetables that ncw, leaves. In fr-rrre, after the ieaves die back, a Poterltial for forest farn1irlg. Mos[ are wild har flower stalk energes. 'l'he flower blooms irt earlv vested for personal ltse or local sales. One of the summer and the seeds rlevelop in late sr,rmnlef. nrore popular forest vegetables in eastern United The seeds maiure ak)p a leafless stalk and evc'n- States is the ramp (,411irrrrr lr-i.?..!rr Ait.), a mem- tually fall to the ground k) germjnate near the ber of the onion family that is closely rclated to mother plant. The timint of these cvents is usu 1eeks. There arc only a few'errterprising land allv clelayed at high elevations ancl in locations qlate. .,\^ rrer5 ,n thc L rritcd thnt .rr, grn\^ ingl north of North Carolina arrd 'fennessee. ramps for commercial sale. In response to rising Ramps grow naturaliy under a foresl canopv consLlfter demand ancl concertl for the consel of beech (Fdgirs spp.), birch (B.trlld spp.), sugar vation of the species, r€'search or1 productidr maple (Accr sn..hnrurt Marsh.), and/or poplar and mirketing of ramps \\'as initiated at North (Pdfrlis spp.). Other Forest trees under u'hich Carolina State University in 1998. According to r,rmf- h ill gr,'\r irriludc hLr.kcv( l/'. r,1,' .PP.i Greenfield and Davis (2001), ramps are native linden (basswood) (Ti1in spp.), hickorr' (CarrTa to the eastern North American rnountarns nnd spp.), and oak (Qr.r'.irs spp.). A forested area can be four1d grou,ing in patches in rich, moist, \'!'ith any of these trees present provides an ideal deciduous forests and bottoms from as far tlorth location for planting a ramp crop. Afeas thal as Canada, r{est k) Missouri and Minnesota, and host trillium (Tr'l/lirr,il spp.), kx)thwort (Cardnnitrc 'fennessee. south to North Carolina ancl In earlY spp.), nettles (Ut litn diL)icn L.), black cohosh (A.t- spiing, rnmps send ulr smooth, broad, lily ol ncn rncorrosn L.), ginseng (Parrargirscttg C. Meyer.), the valle)'like leaves that disappear by summer bloodroot (Snttlltti utin .drdrl.rsis L.), trout lilv beforc the w)rite florvers appear. The bulbs have (ErVthrotiiunl untbilicntwn Parks and Hardin), the lrleasant taste of s\,veet spring onions lvith a bell$'ort ([.li,r//a/'id), and mayapple (PodLtphrl]lunt strong garlic like arona. r 7', /trr,,r,r | . -hnr rld bc -r rilnble lnr grn\virrg r'.rmp. As one of th€ first plants k) energe in the If there is not a u(x)ded area available b grow spring, ramps $'ere traditiorlally collsumed as ramps, a shade structure can be erected over the the season's tirst greens. They were corrsidereci a planting site. tonic becausc thev provjded necessary vitamir'rs Greenfield antl Davis (2001) rccommended arrcl minerals follorving long winter months growing ran]ps on rvell-drained sites that haYe rvithout any fresh vegetables. Traditions evolved rich, moist soil with high amounts ot organic around the arlnual fjatherirlg ancl PreParation matter. Soil moisture appears to be an imPortant r,rmP o ll-i\ PUngerlt pl.rrl. Anrr al :PrinA lc:' cnviroIlmcr.l.ll vr ri.Lt,. rrrfl rr"rrc,rrg. .ccd g,.rmr_ tivals are helcl in communities throughor"lt the nation, seedling emerfjence rate, slrrvivai, and mountains of the eastern United Stntes. These growth rate of the plant. Thus, adeqlrate mois festivals have become major tourist attractions turc rrust be mairrtaineci thror-rghout all seasor'ts, and are promotecl by the comnunities in which not just the active gro]\ ing scason. The growth thev are helcl. Thc tremendous volumes of ramPs period for ramps is limited to onlv a l'erv u'eeks festivals are gatherecl tl'rat are consumed at tl'rese in the spring, during lvhich tinle the Plant is from the forests. Studies in Calrada and Ohio dependent on having adecluate light, moisture, have clemonstrated that ramps are very sensitive and nutrients for survival. to hou' they are hnrvesterl. Althotrgh ramp seeds can be sown any time hr recent vears, high-end restnurants ltave the soil is not frozen, late sunmer to earlv fall begun servingl ramps, increasing the denrand for is usually considered tl're best time for seeding large, consistent supplies of the lvild forest Pla]11t. ramps. Fres} ramp seeds have a dormant, under In an effort to conserve native lroPulations ancl developtd .ml'rr,r The -.' d rc,lr'ire. . tn'trm. meet rising demand, forest farming of ramPs is moist period to break rool dormancy and a sr,rb stronglv encouraged. Harvesting ramPs from sequent cold period b brcak shoot clormaucv. easily accessible, concentrated plantings would Some vears there is er-rough warm h'eather after participants, chefs, and not only benefit festival sowing irT late sumner or eirrlv fall to break rooi consumers, but also create a r1e!v marketable dormancy. The follorving n'inter, cold breaks product for the commercial grower. sllooL dormancy and tl're planfs cmerge in sPring. In the southeastern United States, ramps begin If tl'rere is not an adequate $'arn Period alier grorving rapidlv ilt March and carlv APril in cool,

chamberlaln, Mitchell, Brigham, Nobby, Zabek, Dav s forest farming practices sowing, the seed t'i1l not Serminate until the like nitrogen, much neecled moisture is letained second spring. Thus, rarrp seeds carl tnke 6 Lo u'ithin the n'rulched area, ar'rd the acts as 18 mo to germinate. For example, in Fletcher, NC, an insulator to protect the plants in sub-zelo ramp seeds that were so$'n in the fall of 1999 temperatr-1res. In additioll, mrrlching helps to and spring of 2000 all gerninated in ApriJ 2001 suppress \{'eeds as well as Plotect newlv so$'n (Persons and DaYis,2005). Being able to Provide seeds and seedlings from u'ildlife. adequate soil moisture and Protection from wild- In native populations, ramps usuallv form life are other ke1' factors in determining where extensive colonies or patches. C)ften the bulbs .ve.l.. r nd w lrert to :orr lrod LI, L 'tl Jrom -o\^ irg are so denseiy spaced that other vegetation can seeds k) harvest can take 5 to 7 vr. hardlv penetrate the stands. Methods for har- To plant under a forested canopy, lake back vest include diggint the whole Patch, harvesting the leare- on llr( f,'re5t lo"r. r'.61ot nt ',nt a portion of a patch, or thinninfj out and ]rarvest- unwanted weeds, trec sprouts, or roots.lf the soil ing just the largest plants. Do not harvest Plants is not naturallv high in organic matter, IncorPo- until they have filled the site, have large bulbs, rate orgarlic materials such as composteai leaves arld have flo\t'ered. If lvhole pkrts are harvested arld other decaying plant material from the foi at one tin're, it is recommended to have enough est. Loosen the soil and rake to PrePare a hne patches to allow for a 5 to 7 yr rotation. That is, to seed bed. Solg seeds thinly on top of the ground have an annual harvest year after year, harvest pressing then gently into the soil. Cover seeds olrly one fifth or one seventh of your production $'ith several inches of leaves k) retain moisture area each year. When harvesting a Portion of a in tl,e soil and to protect the seeds fiom wildljfe. p1ot, no more than l5'/. of the ramps should be In a fielcl site under artificial shade, add organic rernoved. If the thin:ring method is used/ great matter i{ needed, till the soil, sow {he seedt and care should be taken not to damage Plants that are cover with composted leaves or other similar notharvested. Harvests of wild populations should natriral materials. be iimited to 5 to 10% oi the plants in each patch. Many gron'ers preier planting buibs or Young Tools for harvesting ramps vary. A ramp "dig- qirr\c flant. n.lcdd or .onirr8.eed5. S,crminJ ger" tool can be purchased or made. This hand tion of tlle seed can take up to l8 mo, ttansPlar,ts tool is the size of a hammer, with a k)ng, narro\\' and bulbs can be a good alternative for the head similar to a mattock. Other suitable tools beginning ramp grower. Planting iarge bulbs include a garden hoe, pick, and soil knife. For can provide harvestable ramps withirl 2 to 3 yr. commercial operations, having a tool that can be Bulbs can be purchased in February and March used comfortably all day is essential. or dug for transplanting between September Diggint methods are the same as those and March, ,ith FebrLrary to mid March being described for transplanting. Again, great care the best time. March is the best time for frans- should be taken not to damage the bulbs. While planting yourlg plants. If bulbs are to be dlLg harvesting, keep the dug ramps cool and moisl. for transplanting, once the ground has thawed, When harvesting is complete, u'ash ramps thor gently dig the ramps, taking great care not to oughly, and trim off the rootlets. Pack in waxed damage the roots or bulbs. In a prepared plant produce boxes and sbre in a cool ing bed, transplant the bulbs approximatelv 26 place, preferably a u'alk-in cooler. Do not store rn cm (3 in) deep, and 10.2 b 15.2 cm (4 to 6 in) aPart, airtight containers. allowing aJJ the roots to be buried and keeping Very little information is available on disease jtlst the very tip of the bulb above the surface. or insect pressures on ramps. In North Caro Planting bulbs at the proper depth is imPortant lina arrd Tennessee, ScPtorin leat spot has been for survival. Transplant leafed-out Plants at the observed in wild and cultivated ramps. Although same depth they lrad beer-r growing and sPace the spot u,as unsightly on the foliage, it did not L0.2 t t 75.2 cm (4 to 6 in) apart. If space is lim- appear to adversel)' aftect Plant yjelds in 2001 ited, clumps of four or five plants can be grouPed (Persons and Davis,2005). The long-term effects together. Mulch the planting bed \\'ith at least 5 of the disease ate unknou'n. New ramP Plant- to Z6 cm (2 to 3 in) of leaf litter. ings do not compete successfully with rveeds; Hardwood Jeaves provide the best mulch for thus, u,eeds should be controlled until the plants ramps. Poor results have been obtained u'ith are well established. pine bark and commercial and theY should be avoided until further research is done. Other Forest Vegetables The effects of mulching are numerolrs: clecay- There is an abundance of edible plants that ma), ing organic matter provides essential elements have potential markets. Many plant identification books include brief descriptions of or references to l'ristorical usage (e.g., Pojar and MacKirrnon, that can be founcl ihroughout North America. lt 1994; Johnson et a1., 1995). Other sources Pro grou,s in moist soil in light shade lo full sun. Bur- vide more detailed information on edibility and dock is commercially produced in sone areas for uses. Some of the plants described belorv may be its root. Leaves, stems, nnd roots are edible. VerY obscure, br-rt they illustrate the vast Potential of voung roots cnn be eaten ra\\', but usuallv tl'le forest vegctables that can be farmed in the forest, roots are boiled, steamed, or sliced for a stir fry. if even just for personal use. The fact tl, at a Plant Young stalks and leaves are eaten raw or cookecl. is discussed below does not mean that it has a Burdock is also a very imPortant n,ledicinal herb. ready market. Also, forest farmers need to be The plant gro\vs easily from seed. Harvest firsF concerned about introducillg invasive Plants or year plants, because roots of 2-yr

L4 Chamberlain, Mitcheil, Brigham, Hobby Zabek, Dav s forest farming practices

b soups. The dried leaves make a pleasant tast- shaded areas. Young seedlings or cuttirlgs cnn ing tea. Start seedlings ir1 the greenhouse and set be planted in the spring. If growr\ ir1 u'atet care out in the spring. must be taken to avoid infestation with parasites or other human pathogens. This plant is consid- Poke Sallet, Poke, American Pokeweed (Phy- eaed invasive in some areas and mav be banned tolacco americono L,). This tail, distirlctive in sone states. native perennial prefers to grow on the edges of tlre woods- Birds love the berries, but the raw Mushrooms and Fungi plant is highly toxic to livestock and humans. Tt Many edible mushrooms, such ns is, howevet a )riglrly desired traditional food in (Lulfitluld edadcs Berk.), maitake (CriJola frondosn the South. Young leaves and shoots are gatherecl Dicks.), Iion's mane (Hericiunt ctilncats B.ull-), and in the sprint and boilecl two times, discarding oyster (Plrur-r) spp.) can be grown commer the water each time to get rid of fhe toxins. It is cially in a forest farming setting. The shiitake then boiled a thifd time till tender and seasoned mushroom is the most popular for small scaie with salt and fat back. The plant also lTas medici cultivatior'l. Pfoductior, of sl,iitake in this courl- nal purposes. Similar to rhubarb this vegetable try started about two decades ago, when demancl should or-rly be sold to people who understand its exceeded the ability of importers to fulfill orders, toxicitv and how to prepare it. This plant can be and the technologv for landowner productioi found growing throu€il-rout mosL of North Amer became readily available and simple. Rural ica. It canbe very weedy and invasive. Although, development agencies began promoting shiitake it can be easiiy grown from seeds or divisions, mushroom production as an alternative income poke is so prevalent, it can probably just be \,'ild source for landorvners. Marry landolvners started harvested and managed as such. producing this valuable mushroom, arld today it is rt'e11 accepted in gourmet markets. (Polygonotum Sweet Safad, Sofomon's Seal Shiitake mushroons grow best on hardrroocl biflorum Walt.). This native perennial can be lots, cut from live trees in a moist clinate rang- found growing in moist, rich uoods throughout ing in temperatures from ]8.3 to 23.9'C (65 75"F). nost of North America. It can be weedy or inva Moderate temperatures and high humiditv pro- sive in some areas. Young shoots are boiled arrd mote fast growth of the'threadlike strlrctures eaten as a vegetable. It is easiest to propagate by from which the nushrooms grow' (called rl1rr- large plants in early spring the Ial1. dividing or /irorr). A forest stand that provides at least 60'/. .hrde Upland Cress, Creasy Greens, Creasy Sal- i. preferred ior best prndL.clinrr. lf po.- let, Early Yellow Rocket, Or Early Watercress sible, select a mixed softwood hard$'ood forest (Barboreo verno P. Mill.). This low-gron,irlg because the softwoods provide shade through- year plant from Europe resembles watercress. It pre- out the and contamirrants common to hardwood forests are less prevalent- fers to gro\a' on the edge of the forest, in a moist, but well-drainecl site, u'here it gets some sun and The first step in producilrg shiitake mush shade. It is a perennial, but lvhen grown as a salad rooms is to select the best tree species for the plant is usuallv treated as an arrnual. The young bgs. Shiitake mushrooms grow on white oak leaves have a hot, spicv flavor. They are usually (Qtrcrcus alhn L.), red oak (Q. ttbn L.), ironu'ood served cooked, but increasingly are being trsed (Cnrpinus cnrolininna Walt.), alder (,4lrls spp.), rarv in salads. In northern locations, seed can be cottonwood and poplar (Popr,rs spp.), as well sown in succession from spring through earl), as beech (Fagris .grnrdifolia Ehth.), and sweetgum fall for harvest over an extended season. In the (Liguidn ihnt sf'4ra.iflun L.). White oak logs work South, seeds are usually sown during the fall for the best, aithough hard maple (,4rrr spp.) also harvest in late \4'irlter and earlv spring (Sanders, rvorks well. 2001). At harvest, leaves may be cut for a tut-and- Log' -hoLrld be crrt irom liring lrc... llrdl come-again crop' or the entire plarlt may be cut. have no decay. The best time lo harvest the logs is during the dormant months, when the lr'ood Watercress (Nasturtium officinole Ait. F-)- has the greatest amount of stored carbohydrates. This creeping small leafed perennial is native to Tlre b.rrl r'r il1 rem.rin intJct longer,i the logr rre Eurasia but can nolv be found throughout most cut during the dormant months. Thev should be of North America. It js a pepper)' flavored salad inoculated within two to 3 u,k after . The herb, also used on sandwiches and in soups. lon8er cut log,, are left uninoc laicd. lhc gre,rtr'r Rich in vitamins and minerals, it has a long his the chance that ioreign contaminants u,ill invade tory of use as a medicinal herb. It likes to groh' the logs and compele with mushroom mycelium, in clean, flo*'ing streams or in very $'et soil in reducing vields. Log length is not as critical as lot diame- placed directly on bare soil brri sl'rould be raised ter. The Length should be detcrmine(l by what off the ground. is most easily managed by the person invoh'ed The spawn run is complete \,vhen u'hite myce- h'ith moving them. h1 general, logs 0.9 to 1.2 m lia appear on the end of the logs. The ftrngi n ill (3 4 feet) lorrg and larger than 76 cm (3 in) in fruit when the weather conditions are favorable, .liameter $,ork l'ell. Smaller logs r'r'i1l dry out u,hich typically occurs jn the spring and fall. lt more quickly- Logs greater than 15.2 cm (6 in) is possible to force prodr-lction by soakinS the in diameter may produce longet but neecl rnore logs in \,'ater for 48 kr 72 h; iruiting rvill begin inoculations to compensate for the bigger diame- in about a n,eek. If lett alone (not soaked), logs ter. It is important to retain the moisture content r'r'i11 produce over a longer time period, and pio- of the wood nhile keeping tl,e bark relatively duce about the sanle amount. As the optimal dr1'. If cut logs rvil1 not be inoculated for sev h.rrrr'-l lim. i.r.l- .'nl\ abnul l2 lr rl r. imf,,r- eial weeks after cutting, they should be covered tant to check for mushrooms dailv. Once the logs \\'ith a porous material (e.g,., burlap muslin) and begin to fruit, they will produce mushroolns a rl,atered regularl\. fe\'v times a ve.rr for up to 3 yr. After each harvest, Logs are prepared to receive the sfd.{,/r, a sub- the logs need 8 to 12 \\k of rest to alion, the nyce strate that contains active mvcelium, by drilling lia to reproduce. a diamond p.rttern of holes through the bark and To create n \,veekl),narket fot mushtoolts, into the sap\,vooc1. Holes should be drilled 15.2 you should fruit one-tu,ell1h of the logs u,eekly. cm (6 in) apart $,ithin rows along the length of ldealll', l6gs should be moved lo a produclior the log, with 5.1 to10.2cm(2 4 in)betrn'een rorvs. house. Mushrooms rvill not fruit \ 41er1 tempera The number of roir,s along the length oi the log tures exceed 29.4'C (85'F) or go below l0"C (50'F). -fo d"pend- orr llr, di.rnr, l' r ,'f llr" l^8 ln d,cner.rl. fulfill a r'r'eek1v market, you shorild have a cor] there sl-rould be one row less than the diameter trolled environment blrilding that can be heated in inches of the loB. So, if a log is 15.2 cm (6 in) irl arrd coolerl t() fnlit the most desirable mushrooms. dianeter, there worrld be five rows oI holes. Thc Farming a forest for mushrooms can be lucra- diameter and depth of the holes depends on the tive, but successful commercial pr()ducers are size of tl,e spawn container and the amount of those who market them yreli. The final cleci sparrn needed. sion to grow mushrooms as an alternative forest The fungrrs is introduced by inoculatint the product should be based on economrcs. As mar- lolls with mycelium in the form of spawrr. Suppli- lt.l. de\rlof .)r,(l m',r, pc.'ple begin tn grovr er s may recornnend co1d, !varm, or wide rangilrg mushrooms, profit margins decrease. lhe suc- r'!'eather spawn, depending on local growing cessftrl prodr,rcer r,vilJ figure out l-rou,to compete conditior-rs. Spau'n calr be refrigerated for several lvith establishccl and experienced tirms by find u'eeks, but should be kept at room temperature ing, niche markets and producing high-qualitv for a ferv days beiore inoculation. Spawn is avail- lo$-cost products- C)ne option is to cut and sell able in tl,ree forms: sau'dLrst p1ugs, clolvels or a logs kr mushroom prodr-lcers. Another is to mar- pre sealed plug tl'rat requires no \\,ax at the irroc- ket logs that are inoculnted and allowed to age r-rltrtion site. To reduce possible contamination, for4k)5rro. spawn should be inserted into the holes imme- A search of the internet can help ider,tifV bly d i.rtell/ after the holes arc drillecl. Once the holes ers of edible mushrooms. T.arge grocery chains are filled, ihe), should be sealed with hot r,trr relv on lvholesnle dislributors for protiucts and (paiaftin) or impermeable plugs to prevent dry- tapping into th;1t segn]ent may be clilficult for ing. Thc'ends of each log can be sealed r,vith wax small producers. It may be possible to sell to to reduce contamination.rnd moisture loss. $'holesale distributols, but direct sales k) local After inoculation, tlre logs are stacked ancl restaurants and consurners thlough farmer's protectecl from moisture loss k) allow the fungus markets m;1v prove more prolitable to snall to spread. This inclrbation pcriocl takes fron 6 to entrepreneurs. To succeed in the edible mush- 8 mo arrd depends t)n the type of spa\\,n, lot size, room business, the entrepreneur must fir-rd niche moisture content of the log, and temperature. markets and differentiate their products from Protect the logs during the incubation period by the many other n1ushroom producers. providing sufficient shade (tr0 80"2i,). Log mois- ture conterll should be monikrred t() prevent the Forest Farming for Bee Products logs from drvir-rg out. Logs should be stacked in The land rrnrler forest trees can be used to raise a particrilar pattern; the lean-to and criss-cross honel' bees (A,tis nrcllilcrn L.). These beneficial ttre t\'\''o common designs. Logs should not be insects provide valuable products when man aged properly. A single hive can produce 176

16 Chamberlain, Mltchell, Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

to 265 kg (80-120 lb) of harvestable honey eacl.r and is elrough to gain experience handling bees year. Specialty honey products such as flavored before expanding. Hives need to be inspected honeys, packaged honei, gifts, creamed honey', and certilied by the State Department of Agri- honey wine, and mead may command higher culture to ensure that they are free of pests and prices. Po11en, r,r'hich contains high levels of disease. Thev should be moved in rvinter n'hen protein and other nutrients, is used as a food the popLllatiorls are lou'and the bees are less additive, medicine, and in cosmetics. Beeswax is actrve. used in candles, cosmetics, foundation sheets for Another option is to order packaged bees, fran,es, and other assorted products. Wax is har- which usualJy contain 9000 to 22,000 bees and a vested from the cappings removcd during honey sinfile queen that is enclosed in a small cage. The extraction and frorn other broken combs in the cage is plugged with at one end, and a \\+rite hive. Proprlis is a mixture of beeswax and res- "queen candy-" To set Llp the hive, retnove half of ins from plants and is used in the hive to reduce the frames from the hive body and then suspend the entrance, repair cracks, cap brood, and seal fhe queen in the cnge betu'een two frames. The off intrr.rders. Antibacterial properties of propo rest of the bees should be poured into the hive lis make it useful in medicines, particularly for body around the queen. As they begin b settle wound healing. Furthet hives may be rented out do$'n, the rest of the frames, the other supers L, crof grnwcr\ i r pnllindlinn ser\ i.e.. and the cover are replaced. The n'orkers will Hives are made to standarcl dimensions and sb\,vly eat the queen candy, releasing the clueen have several interchangeable parts. The out- from her cage. The hive should be checked after 2 side of the hive should be painted to protect the d to make sure that the queen has been released, wood. The hive's botton board sits on biocks to and the empty cage is then removed. A w'eek keep it off the ground. Wooden frames with a later, the hive shoulcl be checked for the forma- beeswax foundation that is imprinted with hex tion of comb and brood cel1s. If the queen has not agonal cells for the bees b build their comb are staited laying eggs, she may be dead and shor,rld set in the hive body. A queen excluder is placed be replaced. between thebrood body and honey supers topre- Honevbe€s should be kept where they u'ill vent the qLreen from laying brood in frames that have access to u'ater and flowering plants and are harvested for honey. Honev supers are irlte- trees that produce nectar and pollerr. Hives gral parts of the hive, having shallow frames for should be placed in a low-traffic area that is storafje, and an inner cover that insu]ates the hive sheltered from wind and cold air and partially p.events bees from attaching comb to the outer shaded. A southern or southeastern exposure cover and protects the hive from the u'eather. with a windbreak to the north and deciduous Depending on the size of the colont several trees for shade can help regulate temperatures supers may be needed. The brood is reared in arorrnd arrd inside the hive. Areas where bees the lower sections of the hive, honey and pol- will disturb neighbors or public areas such as len are stored around the brood, and extra honey parks and schools should be avoided. is stored in the upper sections of the hive. Tu'o Hives require year-round management. large hive bodies are placed on the bottom for Treatment for pests and disease sl-rould be done the brood, and four shallow supers are placed on in January and February. On n'arm days in mid the top for honey. Interchangeable supers allow February (22'C [45'F] or higher), hives should for excess honev to be harvested from the upper receive a detailed inspection. The brood pat supers in the fall without disturbing the brood. tern and population growth shouid be checked Each super should contain at least nine frames and any signs of disease or pests noted. If a with comb. colony shows u'eak brood p.oduction, frames Additional equipment used in beekeeping lvith a sealed brood from stronger nests may includes a smoker to calrn bees and reduce sting be inserted into the hive. If trvo hive bodies are int, a hive tool to prv apart supers and frames used, they should be auanged so that the brood that are corlnected with comb and/or honey, a is contained in the lou'er brood chamber. veil and gloves to protect the head and arms Honey supers sl-rouid be added in early April from stirlgs, and feeders thaf are filled with sugar during nectar flows. Bees store nectar in cel1s, syrup to feed bees in winter and earJy spring. and olrce it is evaporated to 18'/n moisture colr- The best \\'ay to get started is to buy tu'o estab- tent, it is capped and finished. The color and taste Iished colonies frorr a reputable local beekeeper. of honev varies with the nectar source. Light Buying t1a/o colonies ra/ill allorl'the hives to be colored honey, such as sourwood arrd orange combined or interchanged if they become rt'ealt blossom, lTave a more delicate flavor than darker honeys such as tulip poplar, and they otten com used beekeeping equipment, irrcluding hives, mand a higher price. The dates of nectar flou' supers, combs, frames, or other appliances and varv \{ith different sources, so dark honey may supplies, may not be imported. Landowners be removed before lighter l-roney is produced. interested in pursuing forest farming for bees Honeybees, brood, and hive equiPment are shoLlld contnct their iespective state agricultute to learn about pertinent regulatiorls susceptible to numerot"ls Pests and diseases- Var- deparhnent roa (Vnt tu n dcst r uc tor) and tracheal mites (Aca rap i s anal restrictions. 90% wild and aroodl) have killed about of the Forest Farming for Syrups 60% of the commercial honeybees in the United In North America, tree sap has been used in a Statesl?l/\t,ll l()li (ifr. ,finrclll. Apistan (Tau multitude of ways by native people and Euro- fluvalinate; Wellmark, Schaumburg, IL) strips pean settlers for centr-1ries. Today, sap are hung inside hives for 30 consecutive days in Prodr-lcts have grorvn in inlportance, economicallY and early spring ancl for 60 consectrtive days in fall to culturalh,, and are a successfr-1] forest farming treat mites. Tracheal mites are treated with Miti- sector. Native people traditionally harvested the cur (Amitraz; Intervet, Millsboro, DE) or menthol sugar maple (Acer saccltnrunr Marsh.) for its sap formulations in edible oil sugar patties in winter to produce sugar, as a sweetener and as a condi and earrly spring. Hives infected rvith American ment in soups and meats. Early EuroPean settlers toul bruod (AFBI mu5t bp brrfited t', lhc Preveill learned to make sugar from the native spread of the disease. European foul brood (EFB) PeoPie and over time developecl syrup making methods. is not as infectious as AFB. To prevent these Early sap collection entailed boring holes rn trees infections, colonies can be fed the antibiotic Ter- with augers and using wooden sPikes to taP the ramycin (Oxytetrncycline; Pfizer, Neu' York) in trees and collect the sap ii-r wooden buckets. The earlv spring and fall. sap was then boiled in iron kettles and later, in Additional pests and diseases include chalk- flat-bottomed tin pans (Ramlal et ai.,2007). brood, a fungus (Ascosphtu:ra ,l,is) that affects While the use of sugar maple is well estab bru, rrrrrint d;mp.ondition - n -pring:no-cmJ 'd lished in eastern North America, there is also a (Noscrra npis), a protozoan disease that affects history of native people usir-rg sap {rom big leaf adult bees in damp, cold conditions; wax moths n\apire (Acc1'i11acr,.)ph17ltril Pursh.) and birch (Callcrin ncllonclla and Aclrroin grisclla), which lav (Bctuln pnplrltru Marsh.) (Turner, 1998). A spe- lheir eggs in the comb, particr-llarly comb in stor- cialty syr-lp industry associated l{'ith these sPecies age; and the small hive beetle (,4cirira lit idd), an (Hobby et a1., 2007) is beginning to emerge. e\otic pest that decimates comb with bulrolving and feeding. Africanized horreybees, which are Sugar Maple known as "killer bees," are indistintuishable Sugar maple is wiclespread in mixed hardr"'ood In'm nthcr bee r.r,.., but.rre m,'re a88re\-i\H forests of eastern North America (Anonymotls, and wilJing to attack. Hives ntav be moved into 2000; USDA, 1997cj Tirmenstein, 1991i Codlran but not out of areas infested with killer bees. et a1., 1990). It grot's from Nova Scotia k) New Proper management, including a schedule of Brunswick westward to Ontario and Marlitoba, preventative treatments, is needed to protect the North Dakota, and South Dakota, southward into colony. Hives should be jrlsPected carefullv for eastern Kansas and Oklahoma, and southu'ard anv signs of infestatior,s to detect and treat Prob in the east through Nen'England to Ceorgia. Jems as soon as they appear. Most treatments are Sugar maple grou's in a wide variet)' of Plant scheduied for early spring before nectar flows con1munities throughout eastern North America or in fall after bees are finished foraging. Many (Tirmenstein, 1991; USDA, 1997a). It is a domi- treatnents musl be removed ftoir Lhe hive {or a nant or co-dominant sPecies in many northeln specified period before nectar flows begin. Tl-re hardrvood and mesophytic comnrunities Sugar USDA Beltsville Bee Research Laboratory Pro- maple iorms pure star,ds but also grows mixed vides free testing and laboratory analysis for with other hardwoods and scattered coniters various pests, diseases, and identification of Common co dominants include beech (Fngrrs Africanized bees. 3rnrdrr{olla Ehrh.), birch, and American bassrvood Many states are recluiring the insPectioll, (Tilin anrricann L.). certification and retistration of beekeePing oPer Sugar maples are very toleranf of shade ('l'ir- ations to help combat the movement ofPests and menstein, 1991, USDA, l997bi Ontario Ministrv djseases. Inspection is necessary to sho$' that ,'f \.rtL.r.tl Rr''ource-. lqu)r. lhey c.trl itrr\ lvc i11 bees, combs, and hives are free of contagiolls the shade of other species for years until an open- and infectious pests and disease. In some states, ing in the canopy occurs and they are released

18 chamberlain, Mitchell, Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

to tro\\, in partial or ftr)) sunlight. This factor be a b€'tter strategy than previous forcst manage- makes sugar maple a good candidate for compat- ment approaches to maximize the highest and ible management with other tj|nber crops where best use of the land. it could be irrlercropped n ith conilerous species Bigleaf maple has a natural range irom C.rl- and or other mixed hardwood stands to }rromote ifomia to British Columbia, *,here it is founcl rvhile providing income Possibili- on most of Vancouver Island and throughout lies bet\\'ecn timber rotations. the Lou'er Mainland of British Columbia, Tvpi- As sugar maple can be managed either as pure calh,, it does not occur farther than 300 km (1135 or mixed stands, this aliows the forest manater miles) inland from the Pacific coast (Minore and k) plan multiple objectives of timber ancl non- Zasada, 7990). The species occurs primarilv ir1 timber opportunities and develop steadv cash the Coastal Douglas-fir and southern Coastal tlorvs. The Small Woodlands Program of British Western Hemlock climatic zones. On Vancouver Columbia (2001) reported that sugar bushes can Island, the species is often prominent in produc- be ir'rtercropped i{'itl'r longer lived peren n ia ls and tive Douglas-fir ecosvstems (Peterson et al., ]999; leguminous trees that enhance soil properties. Pojar and MacKinnon, 199.1). Sugar bush gro$'th is improved by the presence Bigleaf maple prefers damp forest habitats and of nurse trecs and logs that provide weed control, is frequently found along the edges of streams, reduce wind and inlprove tree form, and can be on floodplains and seepage sites. It thrives in the harvested once th€. maple tre€'s mature. Sugar porous, gravely soils of stream ba)rks and gro$,s bush stands are less compatible \a'ith other for- best in )righ nutrient soils, especially those riclr est values such as crops that re!]uire flooLling, or in nitroSerl and calcium (Farrar. 1995; Packec, tl'rat require substantial sunlight, as neil as the 1976; Minore and Zasada, 1990; Norse, 1990; Saf- Srazir'19 of animals. ford et al., 1990). It can be iotrnd in rockv and The sugar maple industry ht'rs evoh,ecl into a shallow soils, although groltth is reduced undct' giobal market ivith .rrlnual r'r'orldwide produc- these conditions (Safford et al., 1990). tion ranging from US$68 to $112 million from BigleaI maple can live ior approximate]y 200 1995 to 2004. Worlcln,icle lrroduction in 2004 yr. Early growtl't rate is hiil,h and can reach up k) was estimated at about ,12,783 rnetric tonnes oi 1 m (3.3 ft) vr''. Betu'een 15 and 30 yr. the species nraple svruP rvith C.lnada accounting for about maintains a height growth rate of 0.3-0.6 m (l 2 tl2% and the United States the remaining 18'/u ft) yrr and diameter expansion continues up k) (AAFC, 2005). As tl'te industry is 40 vr of age. A bigleaf maple tree can procluce up quite mature, entering this market may be chal- to 16 L sap dr, although productiYe trees typi- lenging and requires iinding a niche that has not cally yield an average of 2 k) ,l L d r. Tl'reoreticallr,, been filled. a tree could yield approxinately 60 L of sap dur- Bigleaf Maple ing a harvest season (Backlurrd ard Backlund, 200.1). While bigleaf maple sap has an average Bigleaf maple has been used in h'estern North sugar concentratiorr of 1.75' Brix, rarrgirTg from America by natjve people for various prrrposes 1.0 to 2.5', its concent.ation is lower than sugar irrcludir-rg tl'te vr'oocl for eatirrg utensils, fishing maple, rvhich ranges beti{'ecn 2 to .1'. (Brix, or Itrres, canoe paddies (Turnet l998), as well as the degrees brix Bx'] is a measurement of sap as a tonic (Parish et al., 1996). There has been lsvmbol the mass ration of dissolved sucrose k) \,vater in a increased interest irr developirrg a big leaf maple liquid. It is deternlined witll a saccharimeter tl'rat sap indristrv as marly managers see measurcs specific gravity oi a liquid or more eas- potential to manage big leaf maple for timber and ilv n'ith a refractometer.) sap production. On Vancouver Island, there are about 300 sal, harvesters that are experimenting Bigleaf maple sugaring has been success- n,ith various specialty products including big- ful, arcl there is an emergirrl; sap ir'rLlustry that leaf mapie svrup, maple n,ine, maple sap extract, produces svrup, r,r'ine, ancl other saP products. and other sap products (Hobbv et al., 2007). Bigleai maple trees typically grow in smaller stands than the sugar maple, this ilt combination Bigleaf maple has gained the atterltjon of for rvith a lo$,er Brix makes tradiiional syrup pro- est managers r4ro recognize that the species ductiorr economic.rllv disadvantaged. For these has significant value for timber and sap. This reasons/ the bigleaf maple syrup industry mav presents a potential diversification st.ategy as not achieve the economies of scale to compete former forest mar1agement strategies typically n'ith suS;ar maple. There is potential, hon'ever, flrr attempted to remove big leaf maple in favor of other value-added sap ancl novelty syrup prod- coniferous timber species. Managing bigleaf ucts th.rt may be able to capture niclre markets nraple with traditional coniferous species may

forest farming pra ctices ginseng in China ancl Cnnada. As expected, this prices than its cultivation under artificial shade." resr-1lted in an oversupply and fall in prices. That manual strongly recommended grolving In Canada, Clarence Hellyer successfully grew ginseng in the natural forest. Yet, there was not gir,serrg in 1896 under a wood stlucture in $'idespread interest in gron'ing ginseng in beds in Waterford, southern Ontario. His sons, Audrev the woods until the early 1990s. It lvas even more and Russell, formed Hellyer Brothers in 1918 and recently that growe$ seriously tried to produce greu' tinseng commercially until 1970 (Persons the most natural lookirrg ginseng by trowirlg in and Davis,2005). In 1962, there u'ere only eight the Iorest using a "rvild-simulated" method. ginseng farms in Orrtario, but by 1983 this num Follol\'ing the crash in the ginsent industry in ber greu'to about 60 farms. In British Columbia, the mid 1990s, many of the artificial shade grow- there is anecdotal but unsubstantiated evidence ers who did not quit trowing ginseng completely of a ferv small plantings in the 1920s and 30s converted to forest farming. A survey conductecl (BCMAFF, 2003a). The first cornmercial planting by Persons in 2000 indicated that there $'ere in British Columbia occurrecl in 1982. By the mid morc thrrr 4000 U.( Er,'n.r- lr,'lLr1 ng gi11.1pg dle of the 1990s, there were about 2041 ha (4500 in the woods, representing more than 809 ha acres) of ginseng rmder cultivatioll in Orltario (2000 acres) (Persorrs and Davis,2005). In Que- and alnost 1361 ha (3000 acres) irr British Colum- bec, there are an estimafed 2ll3 ha (700 acres) of bia (BCMAFF,2003a). All of this production was ginseng in the woods (personal communicatioll, u,rdcr arlifi( ial .hade. Simil.rr to Llr( carli(r grr- I ? l\ I:. \ Iilll NadeaLr, Ginseng Boreal, Plessisville, seng gold rusl-res in both countries, theboom was , Car1ada). Market predictions indicate followed by bust. Supplv grer\, more rapidiy than the demand for woods-cultivated and wild-sim- demand and prices fe11. By 2003, the area under r-llated ginsent 1\'ill continu€ to increase. cultivation in British Columbia lTad declirred to There are reports from the mid 1700s of Euro- about 688 h.r (1700 acres) (BCMAFR 2003a) rep- pean settlers in North America harvesting 'ild resenting 162 harvested lTectares (400 acres) and gtrldenseal (Hlldtislis.atiiLle sis L.) fron the for- 590000 kg (l.3 miJlion lb) of root sold (BCMAFF, ests. By 1860, the herb rvas in high demand, and 2003b). The number of growers had declined by the 1880s there was alreadv concein about from approrimately 130 in the mid 1990s to 40 in the impact of overharvesting on native popula- 2003 (BCMAFF,2003a). tions (Lbyd, 1912; Van Fleet, 1914). The USDA The history of forest farming ginseng is a little betan experimenting with cultiva harder to trace because no records were kept for tion under artificial shade in 1899 and published sale of this type of ginseng. Forest grown gin the first bulletin on it in 1905 (Henkel and Klugh, seng roots \{ere r-1sually nixed in with wild roots 1905). hr the fall of 1903, the rising popularitv and no distinction l{as made betra'een the t\\,o. of goldenseal as a medicinal tea pushed prices There is one paragraph devoted to "forest plant to $2.20 kt. This caught the ir'rterest ot manv ings" in the 1913 USDA Farmers' Bulletin (Van ginseng farmers, 14'ho then begarl cultivating Fleet, 1913) on cultivation of ginseng. It states goldenseal. In contrast to ginseng, however, that the early successes I{ith ginsent culture much of the early goldenseal cultivation appears were made in the forest and that the method was to have taken place in the forest. The first large- stili preferred bv many growers at that time. The scale commercial producer of goldenseal was the 1921 USDA Farmer's Bulletin (Sbckberget 1921) Skagit Vallev Golden Seal Farm in Washington explained that forest piantings were Jess expen State in 1905 (Verringa arrd Zaricor, 1976). sive to establish, but yielded about half as much An article on germjnating goldenseal seed as those under artificial shade. It also explained (Hus, 1907) explains that it was grown in gardens that [jrou,ers on the Pacific coast couid not grow as an ornamental, and gror,vn on a Jarge scale for t'nrerrA i') the woods. Arr irLerc5tirg guole lronl pharmaceutical purposes. The autl-ror's concern that bulletin is: "There is alwavs a ready saie $'as that p.opagation oi goldenseal was almost for the cultivated roots which closely resemble exclusively by division of rootstock, which the wild in quality and conditions, and prudent \vas not a very efficient method. Seed propaga- growers w,ill not fail to adopt the wild root as tion, hol\'evet was extremely difficult and tew, the standa.d of future productjon." Crowing growers attempted it. Hus (1907) staied, "The ginseng, in the forest produces "wilder looking" importance of sowing fresh seed cannot be over roots than growing in artificially shaded operr emphasized; it is one of the essentials of success." fields. An early ginseng manual (Bryant, 1949) Throughout his short article, Hus dispenses states, "Cinseng gro\\,n in the natural forest bed irrformation that would benefit any moderrr day will command much greater, more attractive goldenseal grower. A 1912 article bv John Uri Llovd is clevoted segment of the incllrstrv is driven by several fac- to the culti|ation of goldeuseal. He describes tols. M.1ny sm.rll lando\vr'rers \\'ant to make extra experiments b), Dr. H.T. Crime in Indiana from incone from thei|noodlands witllout c0tling 1908 in n'hich goldenseal \\'ns grown in gardens timber. There is a rising demand for domcsticallv shacled by beans gron rr on poles, fruit trees, ancl pr(rdu(ed, l)iBh (luJlitr. l,)re\l Arr)|\r. certrlr(d gr.rpevincs alrd occasionallY spraved \,vith Bor- organic material. There is more information and cleaux mixtr.rre. He reported tlrit the plants gre\,v supporl for growers wisl1ing k) Produce these rapidlr,, hacl leaves 30 cm (12 inches) il,r diame- croPs. People erj{)v the connection to their land te'r, and exlrarrsted tlre soil, "rrorse tha|1 k)bacco." and heritage, arrcl the sense of sustainabilitv that The author conclucled that goldenseal lvas easy to they tr I frnm tr,'!\ ing tl)r'rr ,l\\ n Ir.rli\( r1r(di.i cultivate and the greatest thrcat to natural wood- nal plants. l.1nd culti\'.1tion \\'ould come from the poacher. Crlrreit interest in grorving iorest botanic.rls Coldenseal cultivation, rrncler artificial shade is driven by .i variet\, ()f iorces. As tl're natu- nrlcl in the forest. rosc and fell in step with sup- rarl products inclustry grovr's, r'lerrrand for rarv plv and derrand for tl're next ferv decades. Some materials increases. Recent foocl safetv and farmers, ir.rcluding the Skagit Vallev opera- quality issues tvith inexpensiYe foreign imports tiorr, experienced severe disease problen'rs that have convincecl some companir.s to prrrchase calsed thcn] k) ceasc productiorl or n'rovc their rnore Llomestically l-r'ocltrced herbs. Consum oPeratiois complete'h. By 1960, the United States ers are drivirrg the deNnnd for ccrtified orgaiic Department of AgricLllture cstimated that there products. Concerns about the c()nservali()11 of were less tharr 2 ha (5 acres) of goldenseal under wildharvestecl herbs are puttir'rg pressure on cultivation in the countr\,. Veninga and Zari- manufacturers k)buv culliYated herbs. For manv cor (1976) estimated that there nere 40.5 ha (100 herbs, this has elevated the prices paid for cul acres) or lcss ir1 cultivation by the mid 1970s. In tivated naterial. At the same tiI]1e, increasint tlte earlr' 1990s, denrarrcl for goldenseal rose orrce numbers of li)rest landowners ale looking for a8ain. Pressure on u,ild popLrlalions tlas at dan- alternative crops, and since manv of thc herbs gerous levels, prompting action on the part of in clemand are native to North Americ;rr'r ior- governrnerll and ionprofit igenci€'s to protect ests, gro\\'ers often nssurre they sl'roulcl bc easy thc'plant. Ulited Plant Savers, a ionprofit orgn- to grol\. nization dedicated t() cor'1s€.rvation of medicinal plar'rts, \\,ith headclLlarters in VL.rnont, adopt€.d Marketing Medicinal Forest Products golclenscal as its "poster plarTt" b cncouragc Proclucing nlost of the popular herbs in a forest conserYation and cultiYation oi rvild medicinal setti!19 is not particui.rrlv difficult. The chal- plants. Grorvers across North America begarr lenges are in the marketing and r'cononics. The producing the croP once again. natural products industly deals with raw mate This latest increase in denand for golclenseal rials differentlY than the average agricr.rlttrra) coilrcided \\,ith the drop in demand for ginseng. comnrodit\'. For hundreds of vears, thc Yast n,ere obtainecl As a result, nlany gir'rseng growcrs in Wisconsin majority of the raw materials by harvesting from natural Populations. arT d Ontario began gro\.\'ing goldenseal. Much of 'lhere thc goldenseal lvas plnnted under the same shade are a plethora of n]anufacturers of structures tlre ginseng had been grown rLnder. herbal medicinal products, although there are In otl-rer areas, forest production of goldenseal relatively felv conpanies u,l]o supplv thenr raw t\i1s more popular. Accordirrg b the knnage materials. Most malrufactrrrers clo not Prlrchase surYev oi the American I'Ierbal Prodrrcts Asso- directlY irom the rvild l'rarvester or the iarmer. ciation (2007) (AHPA), in 199u tl.rere werc 42 I'rn T}ev buv theif rah, materials from clealers rvho (104 acres) of goldenseal cultivated under arti- buy from farmers, snall dealers,.rncl r,r,ild har- ficial shadt and I'1.6 ha (36 acres) in the rloods. vesters. Novices or ner\'comers k) this industrY In 2004 2005, therc were 25.5 ha (63 acres) under may be challenged kr iincl buvers or k> convince artificial shade aid 22.6 hn (56 acres) in the a buver to purchase proclucts flom them. As !vitll uoods. AIJPA reported that in 1998, llz'109 kg any commodit\,, relatiorrships and trust Inust be (25t.|,843 lb) of dried n'i)d golderrseal root and rhi- built between the grolver and the buyer. zor-ne werc harvestcd compared r{ith only 2923 Neu'anc1 interested growers need to leirn all kg, (6445 lb) of cultivated material. they can about the industry arrcl hon it works. Snrall commercial gardens of ginseng and They should inquire of the agencies (Univer golcienseal are being plantcd on private ior- sity extension services, state/provincial and est land across North America. Cron,tlr in this federal delrartments of agriculture, and agricul tural noRprofits) in their regioi and search the

22 Cl'dmbe'arr V tcl'ell Brigl-a- Hoboy. Zabek. Ddus forest farming practices internet for sLlpport protrams. Tnterested grorv- r,r'e1l-drained soil and will rot during a wet sea- ers should attend conferences, workshops, and at son ifplanted in an area u'here water stands. This least one of the large natural products conven- is why many of these plants are found growing tions that are held on the west and east coasts naturally on wooded slopes. Ginseng, for eram- each vear. Visiting other gro$'ers is an excellent p1e, usually thrives on a north-or east-facing u'ay to learn about the industry. Whereas most slope. Southern and western exPosLrres are usu farmers do not want to give away their secrets, ally warmer ar-rd drier, and thus less favorable for most medicinal growers are proud of their suc it. Look for other $,oodland botanicals, or simi- cesses and enjoy shnring what they are doing 1ar plants such as Solomon's seal, growing in the $'ith other interested farmers. Offering to pay for area (Table 9 2). If there arer.r't anv it might not consulting time makes the sharing of informa be a good place to put your plantirlt. tion a business transaction that most farmers are Manv woodland botanicals toierate a variety willing to engage in. There are many "tricks" to of soil types, although in general, heavy clays dealing with this industry that only experience, and very sandy soils should be avoider-1. An ideal yours and theirs, will teach you. soil is a loam with high organic matter. Collect soil samples fiom prospective sites and have Woodland them analyzed for nutritional status. Add soil malor medicinal herb grown Ginseng is the in amendmer'rts if rrecessary. Cinseng, for exam the forest, in terms of hectares and quantities p)e, benefits from having the soil pH adjusted to produced and sold. There are many excellent about 5.5 and having phosphorus and calcium books ar-rd websites devoted to the commer readily available. Depending on the soil types, cial production of ginseng. There is also good this may require the addition of lime, phosphate. information available on commercial cultiva and/or gypsum. tion of goldenseal. For other woodlar-rd plants, There are basicallv two types of forest cuiti- hoh,evet the informatiolr is limited. A general vation systems for herbs: woods cultivated and recommendation is to learn everything possi- \a,ild-simulated. The objective of a r,vild-simu- ble about the new plant and then start with the lated production system is to min1ic the way the production practices recommerrded for ginseng plant would grow naturally. It is sirnple, inex and goldenseal and modify as necessary- With pensive, and requires few inputs. Cenerally, the time and experience, productio, practrces can plants grow slower and yjelds are lower than be optimized for the new piant. Start sma11, keep in the other system, but since inputs are lower-, careful notes, and expect to make many modi- profits may be similar or even higher. For gir-r fications along the wav. A major raw matenal seng, the roots produced in a wild-simtrlated processor in North Carolina says it takes 7 vr system are more valuable than those produced for a farmer to master a new crop. The first fe\\ in a woods-cultivated system. In a woods cul years are spent learning ho\,\,to grow the plant tivaled systen, the objective is to produce the and meet the buyers'needs. A few more years highest yields feasible by growing intensively. are needed to acquire equipment and refine pro- All modern production practices and pest con- .p-

24 Chamberlain, Mitche , Briqham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

grape appears best suited k) production uncler enterprise needs of economic feasibility coupled iorest farming systems (Small Woodlands Pro- with environmental sustairrability. gram of British Columbia, 2001). With this in mind, one of tl.re initial goals of Oregon-grape can be harvested at any time of the Cooperative $'as to determine the ecot-romic year for the meclicinal market, but alkaloid leveis viability of native hawthorn as a medicinal herb may be higher in the late summer or fall. Rhi- crop. In adclifion to the reported health ben- zomes should be hand dugusinga fork;pulluntil efits and established markets for the standard the rhizome stops lifting, then cut or clip it off. It medicinal species, hah,thorn was chosen based may be possible to include the lower stem, below on local abLrndance', community familiarity, and the lowest leaves, in marketed material but it is personal use experience (jams, jellies, tinctures). advisable to check h,ith the buyer first. The soft These attributes were coupled with the potential outer bark is easily removed and care must be for plant usage in riparian restoration, mitiga- taken that it is not stripped off during harvesting tion of soil erosion, and enhancement of fish and because roots and rhizomes without root bark habitat. are unacceptable to buvers. Mechanical harvest- Hau'thorn (Cr"la.$rrs spp.) is a member of the it-Ig destroys other plants in the area, leads to soil Rosarea family, with 208 species and 215 taxa conpactiol-r, and damages the root bark, result (USDA, 2007). Species usecl in medicinal prepa- ing in an inferior producl. The rhizome/roots left rations include C. Laei.)ii:0fn Poir., C. oxrlacarthn L., behind should be able to regenerate new plants. C. ntotutg.4un Jacq., and occasionally C. pelltag-Wt0 Wash the material carefully k) avoid remov Waldst. and Kit. ex Willd (Nemecz,1999). Some ing the bark. Roots and rhizomes should be cut sources indicate C. arVncantll0 L. is synonymous before drying unless access to commercial cutting with C. ,7olro.tq?idJacq., though misapplied (USDA, machinery is available, as the roots become very 2007). The American Herbal lh..rrmrctrpueia hard and difficult to process when they are dry. (Upton, 1999a, 1999b) states that C. L)xr/nc|l1thn L. Althouglr lo, rllv .rblr,)dJnt in m.1n) parl. ol is synonymous with C. /ne.1gntn Poir. as wel1. The its range, Oregon grape is or1 the United Plant species, native to British Columbia, have been Savers "Plants to Watch" list. Fo|t{ild harvesting, reported to possess "medicinal value" and are an assessment of local stocks and monitoring of referenced in the American Herbal Pharmaco- regeneratioli rates for the site should be part of poeia, but neither has been studied extensively. any harvesting plan. Oregon-grape is frequently There is little in the way of detailed studies that cited as a substitute for goJdenseal and is there- provide sufficient evidence to health product fore being harvested more heavily than in the past manufacturers and distributors that native haw due to the endangered status of wild goldenseal thorn species mav be comparable to those used stocks (Hou'e, 2006 \Lr lll()li: \(l \l \J( lll\(i lor medicinal preparations. There is a scarcitv of lllr\l I\ lil:l- I 151: Il l:,\\l \i)\ lsJ ). inrormJtion regardrr'g \roF nlJndgctnel]l pr,l.. tices and basic processirlg techniques, such as A Community Group Farms the Forest for Hawthorne optimal drying conditions. Translnting social, economic, and ecological The West Kootenav Herb Crowers Cooperative goals into practice has nof been a simple pro- (Edgewood, Britis)r Columbia) grew out of a rural cess. There is a need to test and demonstrate that economic development initiative, tn a commu C. douglasii Lindl. and/or C. colrrnrbinla Hor,vell nity keenly interested in cotrntering population are equivalent to or of higher stanclard than the loss and a shrinking economy. The sentimerlts medicinal species. Tn turn, results of the research for the creation of the Cooperative are captured h,rvc lobe comm ni.aled h' rcAulJtory agen(i$ in the words of an utlknown membcr: researchers, labs, iranufacturers, etc. Thus, the None of us realll' h6ys any background on Cooperative is comparing four species (C. dorrg- medicinal herbs. Many oI us have small cattle/ /nsii Howell., C. colu lbia a Howell., C. ntonogyua ranch operations, sr-lbsistence farming, have tried Jacq., and C lac|igata Poir.), in a trial at a com- things like mushrooms, etc. What we share is a mon iocation. Additiorrally, they ate looking at common interest and strong motivation this in differences due to geographic and genetic vari- Jrca a. well d. tl-e envir"l'nenidl .r.lect5. Iir ] ations in plant and chemical characteristics. At The mairr purpose of the Cooperatrve 1s to every stage of the process, samples of the flower, develop herbal specialty crop opportunities, leaf, berry, and branch are sent to the lab for which balance economic, social, and ecolotical analysis. Additionally, pressings are also sent concerns, focusing production on agroforestry for DNA barcoding and species identitication, as practices. The integrated nature of agroforestry plant identitv is one of the most critical issues svstems reflects identified community (social) surrounding the purchase of ralv materials by and to learn as much as possible about the plant natural health product manufacturers Plant and its production and markets. The infotmation species must be specified for product licensing. contained here is clerived from Cech (2002) and The major steps il]volved in the process are: Persons and Davis (2005). 1. Botanical identificatioll of the native haw- Black Cohosh (Actaea rocemoso L.). This is a thorn species. very popular woman's herb used for the tleatr 2. Determiration of the variation in bioactive ment of menopausal svmptoms. The PoPularity characteristics due to intrinsic (e.9., genetic) ol Llri. herh h.r- (,rrr\ed corlcertr lor l5..pecies and extrinsic (e.t., growing, harvestinE;, and well-being, ancl cultivation is strongly encour- processing corlditions) effects. aged. Fortunatelv, it js easy to grow. It is arr 3. Comparison and evaltlation of results among attractive shrub n'hich can get qLrite tall, lvith the botanical species identitied (presumably delicate, lacy-type foliage.It thrives in rich, moist C. dorrglnsri Lindl. and C. coftrrrrbinrln Howell ), soil. The roots are harvested in early fall for introduced medicinal sPecies growing or1 the medicinal use. It can be propagated by dividing same sites, medicitlal standards, and variabil thc rootstock in the spring or fail. Seed propa- ity imparted by specific grola'th habitats and gation can be difficult. Demand for cultivated ma rraSement Practrces. material is increasint. 4. Development and doctlmentation of detailed managenent and processing Practices for Fafse Unicorn (Chomoelirium luteum L.). A.lso hawthorn based on trial results. known as star root, devil's bit, and faily lvand, false unicorrr is a rather unobtrusive that From the lrarketing side, the CooPerative has Plant starts out as a verv lou'rosette of leaves. It has found that manufacturers are verv ir,terested in separate male and female plants, rvhich send up the hawthorn project because it offers them the very tall flower stalks. The is slow to potential for access to a new pedigreed, high Plant tro\a', .lualitv lr,'m llar|e.l lu and mortality can be higlr in some years- False Pr,'duct. Proces'ing ur-ricorn can be grown from seed or rootstock good agricultural practices are criti.al All raw cr-1ttings. It is considered an impoitant woman's materjals are tested for biological and chemical herb but also is used to treat a wide range of dis- contaminants. Processirlg, stora€ie, and handling orders sr-rch as pain, poor appetite, and cough. have a significant influence ot't product clualitl', and quality is of paramount imPortance k) natu cinkgo (Ginkgo balobo L-), This an ancient tree ral health product manufacturers when sourcing that is used extensively as an olnamental in cities .;1a' plant n'raterial. The Cooperative will have across North America. The leaves are harvested developed a set of management Practices based and used to enhance memory and tteat clrcu on science and resealch, which $'ill ultimateiy latnry problern.. Cirrkg'' i- L.runlly Srown il. J lead to a higher qunlity Product that meets the monocultute system, and there are several verv manufactr-1rers' needs. Based on their recent large plantations in the United States (observa- communications $'ith a natural health Product tions by the authors). Crowirl€i it in a torest ol manufacturer, this will provide the necessarv mixed species is rare. access to the marketplace and the opPortunity to sell their product at a Premir-Lm. Ginseng. Wilh its long history of cultivation in North Americn, information on ho14' k) Srow Plants Commercially Forest Farmed ginseng is readily available. It is, howevet Prob- This chapter is devoted to cultivation of Plants ably the most difficult to grow of all the herbs in forest farming systems and is irltencled to Pro- listed here. lt is prone to disease and takes a verY vide alternatives of interest. The examPles above long ti me to reach hat vestable size. If vou liYe in illustrate horl'specific species can be farmed in .rr a re.l wlr( re PcoPlc h.lr\ e.t \\ 'ld Alll'cnE vnur 'fhere are nlany other species that are the forest. ginseng is also at risk from Poaching. Cinseng is either commercially farmed, or have Potential propagated bv seed, and by transPlanting l- or the herbs clescribecl to be forest farmed. Most of 2 yr-old roots. Cinsent is used as a Serleral ton1c, have many traditional and modern uses. onlv to improve fertilit, reduce stress, arld to treat a few uses are mentioned to give the reader a certain diseases. sense of tl're plant's use. There is an established market for the fol)owing herbs, and some com- Goldenseal- Goldenseal is used for nany Pur- mercial forest production is underu'ay in North poses, includirTg as a treatment for AIDS, cancer, America. Readers irlterested in pursuing these various digestive disorders, and to boost the alternati\'es are encouraged kr do more researc}t immune svstem. It once grew abundantly in

26 Charnberlain, Mitchel, Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

forests across eastern North America. Native flow'ers in very early spring, bloodroot can often populations have been seriously reduced by over- be found grorving in deep woods. It spreads nat- collection, and it is now an endangered species ilr urally by rhizomes and seeds and can be easily some states and refju]ated under the Convention propagated by both. The root has a long historv on lnternatiorlal Trade in Endangered Species of of use by Native Americans and has proven antj Wild Fauna and Flora. Coldenseal is propagated microbial .rctivities. It can be toxic, holvever, by clivisions and seeds. and rlr,'uld nnt hr' rr.r'd cacrrrlly. ln ilro p.r.t decade, bloodroot u'as used in a toothpaste and skuffcap (Sc.rtelloria loteriflora L.)- This lon, livestock feed. growjng perennial grows irl open woods and on the edge of \,voods. The roots are harvested in Bfue Cohosh {Caulophyllum thalictroides L-)- the fall ancl used as a laxative and to treat respi Another beautiful plant that is commonly iound ratory and uterine problems. Skullcap is grown in hard$,ood forests in southern Appalachia, blue commercialll, i11 some areas in the woods and cohosh plant gro\,\,s to about l n1 in height and open fie)ds. can have very blue foliage. The rhizomes can be clivided in spring or fal1. Seeds are difficult and Sf ippery Ef m (Ulmus rubra Muhl.). A tall tree slow to germinate. Blue cohosh is another u'om- that groh's ir'r the lvoods throughoul eastern an's herb, traditionally used b aid in childbirth. North America, the inner bark of slippery elm is harvestecl in the spring and fall. lt ls r-1sed as a Boneset (Eupoforium perfoliotum L.). Bone- laxative and to tleat skin conditions, sore throats, set is a shrub that grows in woods throughout sk)]nach ulcers, and wounds. Cultivation is eastern North America. The bp of the plant steadily increasing. is harvested and dried and used as a laxative and to treat coughs, fevers, and chest illnesses. (Dioscoreo wif d Yam villoso L.). Wild yam is a Boneset is grown in a wild sinrulated system by perennial vine thal gro\'vs in forests and on the a fe$/ gro$,ers, particulariy in the southeastern forest edge in tl,e eastern Ulrited States. R(x)ts Un ited States. nre harvested in the fall and used kr rrear meno pausal symptoms, asthma, and gastrointestinal Lady's Sfipper (Cypripedium spp.). Ladv's problems. The amount of cultivated u,ild yam is sLipper is a l.righly desirable ornamental and small but increasing. mcdic na' p Jrl, ,'i \1lri(h mJr)v .pc\ic- trot^ across North America. Most buyers stopped Plants with Potential for Forest Farming buvirrg ladv's slippers because wild populations These are |Iaditionally wild harvested herbs that were being so heavily damaged. Some culti- have been traded for generations. Some have vetv vated naterial is now on the market, and small limited markets ancl there are onlv a tew known amounts are again in trade. Lady's slippers have growers. Little is known about these plants and distinctive "pouch-like" flowers of a variety oI theii production metl-rods. Pursuing these alter colors. They prefer ricl-r woods and wet areas. natives may be more challenging, but also may Some of the species are very difficult to propa- be more rewarding. gate. The roots are used as a mild sedative, to treat headaches and depression, and for men- (I/iltium grows Bethroot erectum L.). Bethroot strr.ral difficulties. to about 0.5 m in height and has a single brown or greenis)T purple flol\.er. The roots of this plant Mayappfe (Podophyllum peltotum L.). Mayap are harvestecl in the fall and used to treat hem- ple grows on thc edtp of the wood.. It emerge. orrhages, skin infectiolls, and heart palpitations, in early spring ancl produces a tall plant (0.3 0.61 among other disorders. This plant is challenging m [1-2 ft]) with an umbrella-like leaf. [t is easy to ctlltivate and there is no forest farmed mate to propagate bv dividing the rhizomes. There is rial on the market. interest in its use for treatment of cancer, liver problems, and constipation. Bfack Root (Veronicastrum virginicum L-)- Also known as Culver's root, biack root is a tali Maypop (Possiflora incarnato L.). Also known perennial that grows in moist forests throughout as passi()nflou'et maypop is a perennial vine North America. The diiecl root is used as a mild that trou's or, the forest edge and in open woods, laxative. The fresh root is toxic. mostlv in the eastern United States. The top of the piant, lvith flowers and fruit, is harvestect rn (Songuinorio Bfoodroot canadensis L.)- An the summer. It is used as a mild sedative and k) attractive, low growing plant with pretty white

27 trcat skin problems. N{avpop is procluced on a has a long )ristorv of use for trcntnlent oi sore :'nl.rll !(nle t'\'.rl l(.r:'t n le\v Lrrnrer\. throats, tvphus, rrourrtis, and k) enhance the inrmuue syst('m, Oregon-Grape (Mohonia spp.). An evcrgreen

perennial shrub, thcre are clitfererlt species of ore- Ye I low Root (Xonfh orhizo simplicissimo Marsh.). gon grarpe that gro\\' throughout North America. A c()mmon shnrb that is often iotrnd grorvirrg in The roots corrtain berberine and are somefimes danrp u'oocls nnd on stream banks in th€. nloun ruscrl as a goldenseal substitute. It has antimicro- tains, it has a bright vcllo$, root tl'rat is usecl as a bial prol-'erties and is a liYer stimuiant. tonic and to trcnl manv of the disorders [or \vhich golclenseal is used. It is propagatcd by division. Partridge Befty (Mitchella repers L,). Also k r-rolvn as stluart' r'ine and scl u.ru' berr\i partridgc Wif d Ginger (Asqrum conodense L.). Wild gin- berrv is a lorv-grorvirrg perenrrial vine. forrnd in ger is a kxv-gro 'ing plant rlith heart shaped the east. 'l h€' top of tl,e plant is harvested in tho leaves and bron,n be'll-like florr'rrs. It grows in fall and userl to trdat diarrhei, as a dirrretic, antl cool, shadecl, moist li/oods arcl is propagated k) aid in childbirth. There art'some snlali scale bv root divisiorl. It is used to tre.rt intestinal gas, Producers oi the plarT t. nr'rlr()n \iclncs:,,,rrr.i.rs.r sLinrtrlant, Manv othcr forest medicinals arc rvild- (Spigelio Pinkroot morilondica L.). Referred kr harvested ancl coulcl bc cultivated. Cro\\'ers as Carolin.r pinkroot and Inclian pirTk, pinkroot intcrested in pursuing these Potential oPportu is a elongated flowers that bearrtiitrl plant $'ith nities shoulcl check rrr.lrket demancl ancl prices red on the oulside alrd yclloh' on tlTe insidc. lre bef()re attemptilrg k) gro\,v thcse plnnts on a large is propagate It is com- It easv to bY root divisions. scale. A greit dcal of timc, energ\', patience, and monly uscd aid (ligestion. to persistence is needed to realize the fr,lllbencfits of Iorest farmir'rg woodlancl n-redicinal iorest plants. Spikenard (Arolio rocemoso L.). Spikenard gros s 0.-3 kr 3 m (1-10 ft) tall nnd bears elongatcd tlorver st.rlks covered !vith yellorv green flor.ers Floral/Decorative Forest Products lhat dcvelop into ptrlple ber ries. It grolvs in rich rvoods and on rivcrbanks. Spikenarcl rs easv to Creative ancl entreprcnerlrjal l.rrrdou'nt'rs can cultiYate nnd can bc propagated by division. The farnr their fi)rests for pl.rnts used in productior) roots are harvesteLl in the fall and uscd to treit of dccorative products or lantlscapinS. \4ant' nranv ailn'rents, includ ing bnckaches. iorest plants nnd parts of lrlnrlts are used in arrang€'ments, k) comPiement and furnish the Stargrass (Aletris farinoso L.). Also known as backdrop for florvets, as w.ell as ior the main trure Lrnicorn root, devil's bit, and blazing star, comporlent of dried ornaments. The end uses stnrgrass is a percrlnial that gro$'s in moist for manv floral greens include fresh/driecl florv- rvoods antl meadoh's. The roots are harvested ill ers, aromatic oils, greener\i basket tiller, \vreaths, tl're fall. It is rlsed as a sedativc and tonic. There is and roping. Fk)ral products irom oak ecosys- litlle trade of cultivoted or wild-harvested mate- tenrs of soutl'reIrT Apl,alachia ir'rclude Vanous ri.1l at this time. species oi grapevine (lllis spp.), krrdzu (Prrr'rrrrio krirrrlrr Willcl.), snrokevine (Ar-istrr/rrclirr rrrrorr|,1n711a Stone Root (Collinsonio Cqnodersis L.). St(me Larr.) for wrt.rths ancl b.rskets; g.rlax (Colrrr rrlcr' root is a percnrlial that groh's in r'noist woods. ohld l)oir.) for floral clccolntions; .rnd tu,ills ironr Tl're roots nre harYested in the tall and used as.r qt\'(r,rl \'\'cr.ll lr(r' sPUcr('\. 8r'r1('r.r 0i rrr,,\s,rrc seclativc and bnic. It is knorvn to be grolvn on n harvestcd iroIn forests.rnd usecl clomestically or vcrV snall scale bV n fe\'\' gro\,vcrs. exPolted k) the Europe.]n floral inclustrt. l'hcse Virginia Snakeroot (Arktolochio serpentario L.r. ar-rci others can be farnrctl ironr thc iorests bY pri _l'his pererrnitrl gro\'\,s in moist n(x)ds in the east. vate landolvners. lloots are harvestccl in thc inlland us(]d to treat Decorative Products rr'ounds and skin rrlcers. An arrav oi plant sl'recies can bc iorest iarmed Yellow Indigo (Boptisio tinctorio L.l. A,lso know n for tl're decorative mnrkct. Baskcts made trom branc)-rt's, lrr'ct1les, and wood sPlits havc readv as u'ild irrcligo vclJow indillo tro\\'s to.rbout 1.2 n'r (-l ft) in hcight ancl has slnall leaYes and a large markets. The tips of pruned eYergreen trees can nr.rmber of sma1l yellor.r'tlor,vers. It prefers a littlc be iashionecl into \,\,rcaths, ropirlg, and g.rrl.rnds. Also Christnlas trees, lrom nativc or exotic ever more light and a drier soil than the other Pla!'rts cliscussecl here. P(rpagatc'bY cLrttings or seed. It greens, are a rvell-est.rblished segme)rt of the

28 Chamber ain, Ny'itchell, Brigha.n, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

decorative market. In Vancout'er British Colum smokevine. Mistletoe, the parasitic plant, is col- bia, the United Flou'er Crowers Cooperative has lected and usecl for decorations. Vines or twigs recorded commercial sales of nrore than 60 wild- are harvested in the fall and \a'inter rvhen plants harvestecl forest species. Some of the top selling are dormant, and evergreens are harvested from products include: beargrass, pussy , box October through Decernber. Wreaths are usually wood, moss, rose hips, , horsetail, 30.5 to 121.9 cm (12 4E in) in dianleter, and rop ferns, dogu'ood, and scotch broom (Cocksedge jng is prodlrced in lengths of 2.4 b 23 m (8 75 and Hobby, 2006)..\Ll-fJ l()ll | \lJ\ lll\()\ll feet) and sold in rolls. Some plant parts, such as \t5 A\t) ,\t. tTl( )l(1lll sl cones or clried fruit, and branches from decid- Native-stand Christmas trees and Christmas uous shrubs also may be valuable additions to tree farms produce important and lucrative sea wreaths and roping. sonal crops. Evergreen species generally grown Harvesting pine tips ("tippi11g") for holiday or managed for Christmas trees inclr-1de true greenery may bring added income while the firs (Abies spp.), pines (Pi,ris spp.), and eastern trees are naturing. Tippirlg is done after the fall red cedar (lutriperus oitgitintrd L.). Other spe needle drop ends, from October through Decem- cies that may be grown in certain areas of the ber, on trees that are more than 7 yr old. f ips United States and Canada include spruces (Plcca 20.3 to 45.7 cm (8 18 in) long are harvested with spp.), Douglas-fir (Psetrlotsugn nrcnziesii Mibe).), pruning shears or a sharp knife from the lower Leyland cvpress [rCuprocypnris levlindii (4.8. whorls of branches, leaving the termilral trow Jacks. & Dallim.) Farlonl, and Arizona cypress ing tip for future growth. No more tharr half of (Capr-cssrrs drizo,ri.d Creene.). The appearance the tips should be removed in one season. Tip- and health of a tree is very inportant. Trees pir)t cJr) bc rcf. ntcd I N, ",r lhrec I r mt.\ r n d 4-vr should have ample amor-1nts of rich, dark foliage; period \,\,ithout harming the tree. Tips shor-rld be have a straight trunki retain needles for a lon€j sold as soon as they afe harvested, or stored m a time after being crit; have branches thick and cool, dry area if necessary. durable enough to sLlpport ornaments; have a In a {orest Iarming system it may be necessary svmmetrical, dense, conical form; and a pleasant or desirable to thir-r trees to decrease shade or aroma. Trees are gerrerally harvested when they increase spacing. The thinned materials should are 2.1 m (5-7 ft) tall. Larger trees, however, may not be considered u,aste, but may present oppor be targeted for specialty markets. Landowners tunities for added income. The wood mav be may harvest trees to sell at retail lots, or allow used for a varietv of decorative products. Inter cLrst()mers b cut their own tree on the propertv esting features that vary the form, colot or grain (a "choose and cut" or "U cut" operation). In a of wood increase the value. Some of these valu choose-and-cut operation, trees that are ready able features include burls, which form when an to be harveste.l should be well marked. Land injLrry causes a deformity such as swirled, mar o\\!1ers may cut trees that cLrstomers choose or bled, wavv, spotted, or otherlvise unjque growth provide saws and sleds for customers to cut and patterns; crotch wood l{hich has a flamerl or transport trees. feathered grain pattern; spalted wood, where Pruning and shearing trees is essential to hardwood trees begin to decompose and are produce superior and premium trees. Evergreerr attacked by bacteria which create'ink lines' \,vith b, 'ugh, ,,r tip. ,,.,1 tn. r^ rc.jlh. roping .pra\ 5, an irlteresting appearance; )ratural variations swags, centerpiece displays, and garlands are in grain such as'turly" or "bird's-eye" patterns; particularly popular in the winter months dur- knees found on cypress (Toaodirlrr spp.) trees; or ing holidays. Using the or "waste" knots found in various species. Unique pieces typi- materials from harvest in wreaths and other cally are sold directly to craftert \!ood turners, seasonal pieces is one way of value adding in hardwood retail outletg or specialty u(xrd dealers. a Christmas tree business. Boughs commonly Understory forest trees and plants can be nur- used for wreaths in variolrs parts of North tured and harvested to produce useful products. America inch.rde pines (Pirrrs spp.), hollies (1/rr Ba-ket. arc fi'Jde lrom tlrirr, flerib'r'5lcm\, ncc- spp.), junipers (luniperus spp.), firs (,4bies spp.), dles, or "splints." Splints are made by splitting spruce (Picea spp.), western red cedar (Tlnia pli- logs fron'r the top to the base into quarters with ,nrd Dorrll t. DoL.glar hr rl-itrJal-tttn tttcttzt..ti a naui or wedge. A knife is then used to split Mirbel.), and yellow cedar (Chnnlnecrlllnris tlaot- lhe wood parallel to the Srowth rings. Splints kaLcttsis D. Don). Deciduous plants also are used are then shaved or trimmed until they are thin for wreaths and include (Salir spp.), and smooth. Plant species that are popular for ivy (various species), grapevines, kudzu, and baskets include wil)ow (Sa/ir spp.) branclres, blackberrv or raspberry (Rxhrs spp.) canes, pine hand or by machine. Scrape the top of the soii (Pi!/s spp.) rreedles, oak (Qxcf.lls spp.) splints, to remove weeds and grass. Tf the ball is dug by hickory (Cn|qn spp.), maple (Accr spp.), ash (Fta-ti hand, dig a tre:rch outside the area to be balled. rias spp.), or poplar (Rrpulrrs spp.). Kudzu (Puctaria Continue digging dor'vn for haif of the ball size, lo,ofa Wi1Jd.) also can be used to make baskets. and then start to carve out the bottom of the root Finished splints, needles, or stems are soaked in ball. The soil in the root ball should be disturbed !\'arm water to make them flexible for weaving. as little as possible to keep the ball firm and well- A variety of designs and techniques can be used packed. Afler the root ball is finished, the tree is to create baskets. placed onto burlap (or the burlap is slid under the tree if the root ball is loose), rvrapped, and Landscaping Plants secured w'ith string or special pinning nails. Many native plants are valued for larrdscaping rno r,'uld be farmed ir r lon-l .efting. Tree.. Salal: The Ubiquitous Floral Green shrubs, and perennials are commonly planted Salal (Caulthcria s/ralkrrr Pursh.) is among British around homes, offices, stores, and streets for Columbia's rnost important commercial non- both bea[tv and function. Well-planned land timber forest products. An evergreen perennial scaping can increase the economic value, visual native to the Pacific Northn'est, salal is one of the appeal, and usage of a site. Lanclowners can sup most common sl-rrubs in Coastal British Colum- plement their ir'rcome by forest farming desirable bia. It is {ound along the coastal regions from plants to sell as transplants k) nurseries, land- southern California to northern British Columbia scape businesses, or homeou'ners. in coniferous forests at low to medium eleva- A landowner interested in supplying the land- tions (Pojar and MacKinnon, 1994). Regarded as scape industrv can tro$'desired plants under the a nuisance by manv forest workers, salal is forest car'ropv. As transplanting causes stress that highly sought after by the floral industry for its mav weaken or kill the plant, only strong thriv leathery, longlastirrg, glossv dark green leaves ing plants tl'rat are free from pests and disease (Cocksedge, 2003). The species presents a viable should be harvested. Transplanting is best done opportunity to develop extensive forest farming in late fall and early spring while plants are dor- in much of British Colunbia. mant and the soil is not frozen. The less the root The annual harvcst of salal is estimated to system is disturbed, the better chance a plant has generate betl\'een Can$27 million and Can$45 of surviving. After digging, transplants should million to the econonry of British Columbia. be watered and placed in an area that is pro- Export and domestic sales have steadily grown tected from wind and direct sunlight until the in the last decade. Sor"lth Vancouver Island is landowrrer is ready to plant or sell them. estimated to contribute 25 to 30'l/. of the annual Herbaceous perennials may be dug and harvest. The general trend from 1995 to 2005 transferred to a pot for transport. Use a spade indicated a steady increase in exports, although or garden fork to gentlv loosen the soil around tlrc -rl;l mrrLei h,r. bepn (l).rne,irrg n re.enl the roots. Pulling a plant by the stem or crown years. Exports to Europe declined markedlv in can cause damage; the plarrt should be lifted by 2U04. The rising Canadian dollar has been a fac- sr-rpporting the roots instead- Extra soil may be tor in the softening salal market as the product needed to fill in arotlnd the roots to stabilize the has become more expeisive for Etlropean buyers transplant in the pot. and slrbstitutes may be decreasing demand. In interests have been chang- Larger trees and shrubs will rT eed to be balled additioll, consumer and n,rapped in burlap. Since most of the active ing arrd mav accor-rnt for some of the clecrease NJILr- ard nr.lrierlt ab.orbing rool\ nrc al lhe in demand. Interest has shifted from pre nade peripherl' of the root system, it is necessary to designed floral bouquets, in which sala1 is back prune the roots k) encotlrate rooting cl()ser to ground filler, to a "do-it-vourself" market whl!rc the trur,k. New roots u'i1l form at the cut edge, consumers prlrchase flowers and create their (Jverharvestillg inside the area that will be balled. Three to 6 mo own bouquets. may be affect- before transplanting, use a spade to prune roots irlg product qualit\t with an associated decline 10.2 to 15.2 cm (4 6 in) inside the area that is to of more desirable long stens (Cocksedge and be dug. To determine the ball size, add 30.1 cm Hobby,2006). (12 in) for each inch of trr-1nk diameter measured According to Hobby et al. (2006), the 1.5 mil at 15.2 cm (6 in) above fhe soil line.lf the trunk is lion hectares covered bv the South Var'rcouver 5 cm (2 in) in diametet the ball size would be 61 Isiand Forest District includes an estimated 650,000 cm (24 in) During the next dormant season but ha o{ suitable salal habitat- Much of this forest dis- no more than 2 yr later, the root ball is dug by trict is, uncharacteristicallv in priv.rte ownershiP,

30 Chamberlain, Mitche , Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices which presents opportunities for forest farming of The salal industry on Vancouver Island this valuable non timber forest product. displays many characteristics of the wider non There is a large ar-rd diverse labor force fronl timber forest prodr-1cts sector in British Columbia. which b build forest farning \r'ith salal. The Sala1 generallir is not included in forest planning, majority of the estimated 15,000 peoPle in Brit management, and practices. Also, salal harvest- ish Columbia u,ho participate in the salal harvest ing is characteristic of the sector in that it is are of first generatioll Asian descent, including neither recognized nor strllctured as an orga- Vietnamese, Laotiar,, Korean, and Cambodian, nized business sector. There is neither a salal ar'r1ong others. A survey of harvesters on cen trade association in British Columbia, nor any tral Vancouver Island (Flobby et a1.,2006) found sector wide or product-specific association to rep that they earn an avera[te of Can$150 d'r, u'ith resent the industry in policy debates nbout forest an estimated average full-time income of about management or the future of rural communities. Car-r$30,000, lvorking over nine- or 10 mo a Pine Straw period. The gender ratio of typical harvesters of Managing pine forests for the harvest of the nee the region is 40% female to 60'L male. Many har dles, also knou'n as pint: slrntu, offers an interim vesters rvoLk as coup)es and as small groups that income stream while tin1ber or stands share transportation. Almost three-quarteis ol are maturillg. Pine straw makes attractive land the harvesters are estimated to be 30 to 50 yr old. scape mulch and protects the roots of plants More than 80% also harvest other non-timber from extreme temperatures, supplies nLrtrients forest products, such as cedar and pine boughs, upon decomposition, and reduces weed gro$'th, berries, and morels. In addition, some harvesters erosion, and evaporation of water from the soil. are employed in other industries, such as oyster The low pH of the resirr on the needles creates a and shellfish farms. preferred er-rvironment ior acidJoving landscape The salal industry, r'hich has developeci over plants such as azalea (Rlododerd?'oit spp.), rhodo more than 50 yr, Jras a strong international mar- dendron (Rlododer;dror spp.), camelJia (Carrrellin ket. One factor that accounts for the successful spp.), garderlia (Cardenia Ellis), and conmercialization of salal is its long shelf life, insntinoides blueberries (yd..irirlrr spp.). With this in mind, it n'hich lowers the risk of product spoilage. The may be possible to farm the forest for multiple extensive road network in prine harvesting crops-pine stra$'and live plants for landscap- ,rr(d5 tpublic roJd- .rnd p,rrirrlllarly loggirp, ing. Compared with other mulches, pine straw roads) provides excellent access. Prices and mar- may last longer and cover nore area per cost kets have been stable, leading to predictable of materials. It has become a preferred mulch market conditions. thfoughout much of North America. Pine straw Conditions mav be changing for the continued is flammable and should be integrated into hom- unmanaged harvest may enhance opportu- that eowner fire plans. nities for forest farlring. Harvesters and buyers A goodsite toestabiisl, a pine straw operation have expressed concern that human impacts (e.9., should be relatively flat with minimai soil ero overharvesting, poor harvestillg techniques, and sion potential. The species that produce tl, e most ) are reducing the abundance of the salal desirable straw are longleaf (Pi.tt$ pnltsh'is P. resource. The lack of land tenure, 1\'hich allows Mill.) and slash (Pirrus clllollll Er.rgelm.) pine. Lob- for transients lvho don't take the time to harvest lolly pine (f,ilrs tacda L.) also may be used, but properlv to "raid" locals patches, puts excessive the needles are shorter and more difficult to bale. pressure on the resource. The harvest of tim Stands with basal areas of 6.95 to 11.6 mr har (75- ber and the lack of silvicultural treatments that 125ftrac can prodLrce approximately 125 to 175 take into account the light requirements of salal ) bales rakingr, respectivelv, each weighing about result in significar-rt increases ill sunlight, which 13.6 kg (30 1b). Pine stra$'is tl.re secondary crop decreases the quality of the f-loral greens. CIo b timber, and spacing shor,rld be determined bv sures of logging roads have also limited access the primary objective of growing lr'ood. The first to many harvesting erreas, potentially incieas harvest can begin as early as I to 12 vr in planta- ing pressure on the remaining accessible areas. tions, later in natural stands. Some private landowners in Washington state and British Columbia are responding to these i.rctors by seilirrg permits to salal buyers for Production exclusive rights to marrage the harvest. This may Most contemporary discussions of forest farm- lead to more integration of salal forest farming ilrg include orrly medicinal plants, other specialty rvith timber production in the region. crops and shade-tolerant plants, yet we consider a broader range o{ opportunities for forest Iand- Several plarrting schemes havebeen suggested owners to farm their lands. Biomass reters to for establishing biomass energy plantations. lene\\,able organic matter and includes trees and These include single, double, and quadrrrple rorv otlrer pl.]|r1.. \^nnd Jnd r'',od wa-te..)gr'\ul- plantings. In a single ro\,v planting, one ro\{ of tllral crops and residues, as well as municiPal trees is planted per bed. Traditional ecluipment and inclustrial $'aste products. Biomass Produc- (skidders and feller bunchers) can be used fot tion requires using farming practices to produce harvesting single row plantings. Double and forest crops and has great potential as an alterr,a- cluadruple row plantings require specialized tive income generating source. As an assoctated harvestin€l machines similar to those used in prd(li(e, Utili/alrnr ,'f fore-t biumJrr for eilert\ European plantations. may offer benefits to private landowners, includ- ing improved management of forest resources, Conclusions increased revenues, and fire ancl pest conttol. Only a small portion of the total amount ol The concept developed by Sholto and Hart (1985) woody biomass tl'rat is available for bioenergy recognized that farm forests were ecosystens is actually used for that purpose. Manv forest in themselves. They proposed designing torest farms conform to ecological princiPles and stands have a large number of stems Per hect to are with stagnated growtl that does not allow practices. The systems at least should preserve, trees to attain marketable dimensions. Hard and ideally improve, ecological functions. Mocl woods in pine forests are a potential source tbr ern forest farm i ng, lvhether extensive or inlensive these principles. The a tremendous amount o{ biomass for energy plo and lvell planned, holds to duction. Harvesting biomass from smaller and flrndamental purpo.e nf i6rp.1 f.lrming 3..Lrg- less desirable trees can enhar,ce the residual tested by Sholto and Hart (1985), is to integrate stand. Pre-commercial can provide the components into a complete stable dynamic financial returns if biomass energy markets exist. svstem, the components of which supPort the Biomass thjnnings can remove undesirable trees productive function of the others. and jmprove the growing conditions for the Most contemporarv discussions of forest remalnlng trees. farming include orrly medicinal plants, other Production oi short-rotatiotl woody croPs, special[y crops, and shade to]erant plants, J/et such as fast growing trees, grasses, and shrubs, we consider a broader ranfie of oPPortlrnities for can meet increasing fuel demands while pro- {orest Iandowners to farm their lands. A critical viding environmental and economic benefits feature that distinguishes fotest farning from for private landowners. Short-rotation woody other agroforestry systems is that forest farn]ing cr()ps can be ir-rtegrated as comPonents of for incorporates shade-tolerant, nontimber forest resources with trees that form a closed canopv est farming systems or grown in Plantations. The availability of land with favorable climate, and may be grorfn for timber. These non-timber growing conditions, appropriate species, and forest resources are a main comPonent of forest an establ ished transportation infrastructure are farming. The comanagement ot oversk)ry tlees critical factors $'hen considering development with shade-tolerant unclerstorv Plants is a major of biomass energy prodr-lctiolr facilities. Short- objective and challenge of forest farming. rotation u'oody crops harvested for biomass Landowners need to be ah'are of the advan- farming. Well energv production have the potential to Provide tages and disadvantages of forest Iorest farming can economic and environmental benefits to Private designed and implemer,ted, landowners. They can reduce the overall contri help improve forest health by irlcreasinEl Plant bution of fossil fuels to global warming, while diversity as well as removilrg injured or con- meeting energy production needs. taminated vegetation. Forest farming can lead to In forest farming systems fot short rotation additional income opportunities, as lvell. Con- $'oodv crops, trees are marTagecl intensively \'ersely, forest farming may reql-lire more and using farming practices that may include site different skills and expertise. Compared with preparation bv plowing, disking, harrot'ing, and traditional agricultural or forestry commodi herbicide applications. After growing for 3 to 15 ties, there may be few marketing structures in yr, the trees are harvested, cl-tipped, and trans place, and relatively sparse informntion regard ported to an energy plant. After several rotations, ing crop nranagement. Integrating forestry and the rootstock must be replaced, as they will no farming activities requires broader kno$'1edge to longer produce vibrant shoots. successfully manage the trees, l-lndeastorv and their interactiolls. Forest farming can take more time and energli which may be limiting factors.

32 Chamberlain, Mitchell, Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

In general, landorvners may lack the knowledge or animal husbandrv could grol{ mushrooms and expertise k) ullderstand and errter the mar- or raise bees ior additi(n1al income. Larrdowners kets for manv forest farming products. The task with an inclinatiorr for rnaking crafts could col- of learning about these neu opportunities ma)' lect a variety oi forest species that are us€'d for be over$'helming for many forest landowners, decorative producLs. but for the tenacious alrd patient entrepreneur, Whichever forest farming alternahve rs most forest iarming can be rervarding. appealing, the interested laiciou'ner should To bc successftrl at iotest farming requires always investigilte the costs, benefits ai.l poten- more than dedicatior-r and perseverance-it aiso tial pitfalls of each option. Is there a readv market requires the skills to produce qrralitv and con- for the products irorrr the ie\\' enterprise? If sistent prodrtcts ancl having a ready market for there is a ready market, what barriers might products. Forest farming is rrnlikely to take place impede a landowner irom elrterint the nlarket? on public lands in the absence of appropriate Are there goYernment regulati(ns to be consid- property rights, in the form of tenure systems. ered? The landowner must have a clear picture I:r Canada and tl-re United States, propertv right of tl're economics before commiLting resources systems for non-timber forest products on pub- to anv ventrrre. Economic analysis ancl finan- licly olvned lands are generally incomplete, or cial consideratiolls for each alternative were not nonexistent. With some exceptior'rs, sr-lcl'r as the covered in this chapter because they depend clI1 communitv forest tenure in British Columbia, the landou'ner's specific conditions and the mar- most forest tenures in Canada do not ir'rclude ket dvnamics at the time of analysis. To presenl undersk)ry species or non timber resollrces. econorric analyses nav nlislead the landowner Thus, it is likelv that most forest farming is, and as the situation (i.e., irputs and outputs) could $,ill continue k) be, practiced by owners of pri- change signifi cantly. Interested lando$'ners need vate forcst larrcls or those who manage private to evaluate \\4'rether tlrey have the skills rreeded and prrblic lands together on a fairlv small scale. to undertake the desired alternative. One of the In parts o[ North America \vh(re mosl iorcsls first things a landou ner should do is inventorv are publicly owrred (sr.rch as Western Canada), and identify resources (biological, peoPle, time, the absence of institutional arrangemeDts for and fiscal), habitats, opportunities, and con- non-timber resources is a major barrier to the straints. If possible, inyite a fore'stry conslrltant, cxpansion of forest farmirlg. state iorestry agency professional, or extensiorl Seldoln do public grolicies arrd progranrs, agerrt to walk tlle propertv and discuss 1-rossible rvhether forestry or agriculture, provide much options. The decision to grow a specific crop or support or er'rcouragement for forest farm- embark on a forest farming alternative, howevet ing. From the perspective of agricultural policy, is ultirnatelv the potential prodtrcer's sole deci- forest-farmed products nray not be considered sion. Thut potential producers \,viilneed t() identify "crops' f(,r prrrFrrse\ \rrch ,)5 crop in(rrrJn(e, where the iniormatior and resource gaps occur, marketirlg assistance, or other governm€'l1t snp and assess them against their deSree of acceptable port. In the long-term, therefore, it is important risk in pursr.ring altenatives of iiterest- ior forest farners k) work with other individuals and organizations with similar aims to attempt References to influence goverrrment policy and programs in AAfC.200:. C.rn;rdi.n mnplf prnductr situatbn.nd trcn.ls directions that are more supportive oi multiple 20(l.r-2005. Av.rilnble .tt htlp:/ !$ \!.agr.gc c.r/nlist'/hort/ uses of forest lands. sit4rdf/maplcr.blc0i06 e.pdi2.1 p. (nc..ss.d l7 Nlar. 200ir, vcrificll2l \o\.2008). Agriculturcrnd Agri lood Canad., Despite difficulties and challenges, there are Ottnsi, O\ many forest farming opportunities for landtxvn- AAFC 2002 I'rairic Fa.nr l{eh;rbilitnlion Altministration. ers to Irursue k) generate extra income activities. Availiblc nt hiip://w\!\!.agr.g...a/pfra/plhisi e.htnl Those n'ith large holdings of pirie forests might (accesscd 25 \'lr\' 2002 \.fifi.d 21 \o\. 2008). Agriculture nnlt lood Cana.ta, Agricult!('nnd Agri Foo.l Cin think about managing for straw or coincid- Ag.i ada, Ottawa, O\. ing prtrrring activities with evergreen bough Agrolorcstrv Iicsc.rch Tftrsi 2002 Iorcst F,rrnimg. A\ iilabl! markets. A forest landowner with a propensity at hti F://tr t! \ .ag roto.cst rv..o.u k/forIa rm htn I h.cesscd for growing or digging native plants might do l2 Jult 2002 \1.rificd 2r \o\.2008). ABrolorestr! lt.se.ir.h $,ell to investigate starting a landscaping busi- Trust, Dcvon, UK. Ambus, l-, D. Da\.is Casc, I) \'liiclrcll, ind S. T\,ler. 2007 rress. If oil and natural gas prices continue to 5t(r1gth in Lli!c.sit\; \4nrket opport!nitics ind bencfits exhibit volatilitv, forest lando$'ners might con- iro ) small t()rcst tcnures British Columbia. j. E(oslsl sider growing short-rotation woody crops for \4.n.rge. 8(2):iJ8-89. A!ail,rblc at hitp://w$\v forrcx.orgi puLllications/icnVISSalA\t8-nl]2 art8.pdf (acccssed 2e bioenergv. Those with a partjality b gardening SeFt. 2002 \ erifirt 2.r \'-o\. 2{108).

33 Anlerican llcrbal f,oclucts Associaiion 2002 Tonnagc survev dc Ceus, N 1995. Botanical forest P,oducts in Briiish Colum ofselectNorth American !!ild hancstcd plants,2004 20(15 bi.: An olervie\!. Integraicd Resources Policv Br;'nch, Amcri.an Herbal lrroducis Assoc, Siher SprinS, MD. British (:ol!mbia \,linistr\.of ljorcsts, Vi.ioria, BC. Anonvmous. 2000 Aceraccae: The .raplcs, .anop! ancl sl,b Di.k, I-. 1996. Thc gr.ening of the West: tiorti.,, t,,re of fhe cafoP! tr.cs, pLanis c,f southcmOntario fielcis and iorests, Canadi.n prairies, 187i1 1910. llanitoba Hisbrr no. 31 .onrnron plants of field afd fo.-.st ficl.l guide AraiLrbl. (Spring). Available nt http.//\'ww.mhs.mb.ca/clocs/hL1 rt htl ps //!L !! !L.ul u.c a/-cs.h weigert/co! rs.s/30r/a r.h ive/ hrsiorv/31/prairicho.ticultu.eshtnrl (a.ccssccl l8 Iune fall2001 wini.12002/Databasc/IicldGLride ht (accesse.l 2002 verified 2.1 N_o\,.2008). \,lafitut'a Historical Sociciy, l2 Jul} 20rZ vcrifie.i 24 \o\..2008). Winnipeg, MB, Cinnda. ATTRA. 2002 Naiiondl Sustainable Ag.ic!lltlrrc lnioDnatnrn Dixon-W;rrren, H. 2002 The birch s!r!1p productul manual: Se.yice. Availalrlc at http://wwr!.ati.a.o.g/ (accesscd 27 \o\'. Tapping inio svrL,p boreal forc'sts t!pe. Ql,esnel Commu 2002 verified 21 \oq 2008) ATTItA, ravelte!ille, AR nity and EcoroDic De!elopDlcnt Corporition, Quesncl, BC, Canada. tsackhnd, G,.in.1 K. tsacklLrn.l 200,1. Biglcaf sLrgaringtaPPing thc wcstern m.ple. Backwoods forest \4anatcment, I-adv Duchesne, I-.C., and I.C. Zasada. 2000. NonijDrber icrest P,od smith, Bc u.t indusir! in Cana.la: S.ol'e and re.car.h ne.ds. Fo. BCNIAL|. 2003.. GinsenS prftlucin,n 8u . tor .innme' Chron.76r743-746. ci.rl groh,crs. 2003 ecl. Avajlable at httP://$ wwagt.go\'. Eiscnberg, D.\'{., R.C. Kcssler, C. Foster, F.E. \orlock, D.R bc.ca/specctup/ginseng/ginseng production-8ui.lc htnl Calkins, and T.L Delbanco. 1993 Uncon!entional medi (acc.'ssed 22 Jun. 2002 lerified 2.1 Nov. 2008) British .ine in thc United Stites. N_. Engl. J Nle.l. 328:246 252. Collmlria Mnistry of Agriculhrre, Food and [isherjes, Farnsworth, N.R., and It.W. \ldris. 1976. HiSher Plants:Thc sleeFing giant oi.lrug llelelopmcnt. Am l. Pha.m Educ. BC\'IAFl. 2003b. Annudl Il.C. lftriicultL,nrl staiistics. Avail r481Ma.. Apr.)r46 52. able at httpr//w'!!v.al.gov.bc.ca/stais/2003Ho.tSt;tspdl Farfrir J.l-. 1995. Trecs in C.nada. Canadian Forcsi Sr'fvi.e, trcccssc{ 10 J!lv 2002 v.rifi€d 20 No\,.2008) British Ottisi, O\ and Fitzh€nn'and Whiieside P!blishft, LiL1., Columtri.r Vlinisiry of Agri.ultlrre, l-ood and Fishcnes, \4irkh,rn, ON.

Vicioria, BC. . - ii.,l lLol \t,.r.'l . - | I r ' . I r ' L1.,, I I ' ' " ' tr'-- tsrevoori, P 1998. Thc boomifg U.5. botanical market: A n.t! I 11 l,i C. Schn.pt (cd)Danctug with an.lePhant, Proc o\ crview. H€rb.lgram 4:33-'15. of ihc Conf., The Bosincss anrl Science of Sp.cial fo! Assoc., Bryani, C. 19.19. The sil.lcralle.s fainseng manual: A gL,icle to esi P.od!.ts. lvesk,rn forestry and Conservahon American gins€ng. .lth cd Laurence Barcl,s, ltockville, IN. Ccch, li.2002 Growing acrisl nredicinal hcrbs: Cultivdtion, l_ood and AgricuLture Organizaiion of the United \ations. conscrlatjon and ecology. Horizon Herbs, lvilliams, OR. 2002 \on Wood lorest Prod!cts lrogram. Prog.nnl definitions. Avail.rble at http://!virw.fao. Centrc for Non-Tinrber Resourccs. 2007. Adding value to flo descripiion and f p/en/ (acccssed 2 2002 !crilied rnl g.€ens. A handbook for cntrePrene!rs. Available at org/for.str)/siie/n$ ]lrlt hitp://cnt..ro\'.lroads.ca/fi les cnlr/Adding%20Val!'c',1,20 20 No!. 2008). io't,20Flor.]l'L20Grccns'%20Haidbook'1,20r9-04_06.Pdf Genetic Engincering News. 1997 C.rnranv n( .es to tlrc iore_ 17(8):u lv.rificd 2.r \ov. 200i1). Ccntrc for \on timbcr llesources, f roDt of the European herbal mc.licine nclus Y Rovdl ltoa.ls Univ., Vil:toria, BC. Cold, \'1A., M.M Cernus.., and l-.D. Godsev. 2009 Agrofor Centre tur fion-Timber Resources. 2007b Ad.ling value to estry p,oduct markeis and tuarkcting. f. i\\-\\\ I' rr I $ild foocls: A handbook for enircprcneurs Av;ilablc I nr',tli(f \i'lr liii..!.rn.rr L,t,n..tr\'\rr'rL.i,i:r,i athtip://cntr.ro),alruads..a/node/102 (\'erifi cd 2l \c\'. 2008) ..i,N!,,,,,,1 trr.li.f lf,lrtl .\\\ \l.rJ !,f i\l Cenhe for Non timber Reso!rccs, Roval Ro;ds Uni\', Vic_ Gol.lberg, C. 1996.lrom n€cessiiy, new foresiindustrv rises. P. L toria, tsc (in press). Nc$ YorkTimcs, NaiionalR€portSection,Sundi)',24Mar' Cenier for Subtropical Agrc)forestry. 2007 lo.est fartring. Codm.f, R \'1., H.W. Ya$ney, and C.H. Tubbs 1990. Sugar Available at http.//csiaLifasL,fl.edu/turcstfadnirthtn maplc. p.78-91. /,' It.M. Burns arlcl B.ll llonkila (Techni (!c.esscd l2 July 2002 !e.ificd 2l Nov 2008) Uni\' of Flor- c.rl Coordin.brs) Si1!i.s of Norih Ame.ica (hatu loods). ida, Gaines\,iUc. Timber Mdnag.mcnt Research, Agriculturil Hnndb 6:l Chanrberlaiil, J., lt Bush, .rncl A.l-. Ilammelt. l99ll \on USDA fo.cst Se.!ice, Washington, DC: Alailable at httPrT timber forest products: lhe other forL'st Prcd!cts l_or' wr! $.na.fs.fed.us/sl.rdprbs/sih ics,m!nuilA oltrm.' 2/ace'/ (accessed 21 2008) Produ.ts 1..18:2-12 saccharu .hhn 5 JL,l! 200i verifi ecl \o!' CIIOR. 2002 CIIOR'S res,:arch prcgranrmes in Ccniral Afric.' Crccnfield, L an.l 1.14. Dalis 2il0l. Cultildtion of ramPs Bogo, lndoncsra. ht1p,//e''!w..ifor.cgjar.org/R.gions/ \Allir,t tticotrrrl and /. Ii,,/ktit) Iloriiculhle hforma CAfrica/rese.rch CcntralAf.ic..htm (acccssed lL,ne 2007) tion Lcallci 133 Available ai http:/ !ws.ccs.fcn'.ed!/ (lepts/hort/hil/hil-133 htnl (ac.cssed 12 2002 !erifiecl Co.kse.lgc, !V 2003. Social .nd ccologi.al isP€cts of th..on] lL,lv Staie Univ, D€P of llofh_ nrercial harvcst oi ibe floral grccncf\', salal (Gdrlil.rrr 24 Nov. 2008). Nofih C.(tin. Science, l<.lcigh. srrllJ, PL,rsh, Efr.d..d4. M S. thesis. Uni\. of Victo'ia, Vic culiuril ioria. BC. Gre€nfield, J, and I. Davis.20i13. Weste.n \orth Carolina non forcsi products. D.afi fin.l report. USLrA tofesi Cocksedge, W., and T. rtobbv.2006. Criiical hforhation fd tinrber Servrce, Southern ltcscarch Stn., Blacksburg, \A. policf dcvelopnent and management of non limber foest prucllcts in Briijsh Columbia: tsaselife studi.s on eco liauslohne,, A.W. l99Z CouPle builcls greer emPirc Ntth nomic value and coDrPatitrle franagcmcni lofest sclencc pinc rophg outfit. Itoanokc Times, Mctro etl De.embcr program. Project Y061i165. Unpublishe.l rcPori. E\ecu ti\.e Sunrmarv available at htip.//tr'r'$.rovalrodds ca/\R/ ttavnes, RW., It.A Monsend, and A.C. knrison 2003 Com rdonlvres/868B4996 8607-'13.11 81E4 9;9IJICCDlBBD/il/ patible fofest mnnaFcnreni: background and context p IlasclincSiudies E\ecuti\'cSunrmirv.loc (!erificcl 24 \ot' 3 32. rr lt.A. \{onse.!d ct al. (e(l.) ConrPitiH. iorest man : ,08, R. . l{n.,,r- L'.. | \ \ i. r.r . B. agement Availabie at httP://'!!v\'.fs.feLl.!rs/pn'!/pubs/ Cornell Cooperaiilc Eltension.2002 fofesi fa.hing in N.t! tournals/pr$ 2003 harnesO0l P.1f (accessc'.1 l2 JLll) 2002 York's south€rn tier. Avarlable at htiPJ cnvai.cce.ronell !erificd 21 \o\.. 200E). Kluirer Ac;,demic hrblishers, Dof edu/iorcstfarming/index.htm (ac.essed l2 jlrl! 2002 ve.i drecht, the \cthcrlands fied 21No\,.2008). CornellUniv., lihaca, NY.

34 Chamberlain, Mitchell, Brigham, Hobby, Zabek, Davis forest farming practices

Helfferich, Il.200.1. Birch, Whit. gold in the borcal foresi. hiipt/wwr! Lrnl.edu/nac/aSroforesirvnotes/an07f f01.Pdt A!ailabie it htip://www.Lr;f.edu/snras/afes4rubs/misc/ (nccessed 12 Juh 2002 verified 20 \ov.20il8) USDAlorest \'lP 04 02.pdf (n.cessed 3u lLrne 2002 r.crificd 2'1 No\ Service, Lifcoln, \E. Natural 2008). Unilersitv of Alaska fairbanks, School of \cmccz, C. 1999. Ha$thorn. US Pharmacist, Febrl,.r\, P Resourc.s ind Agriculiural Sciences, Agriculiural afd 52 60. lorestrt Exp, Stn. Iairbanks. Nlsga'a lirst Nition.200Z Botani.al ibresi prcducts. Avail ticnkel, A., and f.G. Klugh 1905 Collen s€al. P. 35 .16. l,r able .t hiip:/Avw$.nisgaalisitus.ca/?pagc=Bovernnent/ USDA Bull.51, Misc. I'apers, Pnrt 6. tsur€au ofPlant lndls lands/forestlrotanical (ac.essed 2 ILrly 2002 !crificd 20 trv, \!ashington, DC. No\'. 2008). Nisga'a Lisims Covennrent. llobbr T., K. Do$,, and 5 MacKcnzic. 21106. Commcr.ial d.\'el- Norse, E.A 1990. Ancieni forcsis of the Pacific No.ths.st. opment of NTfl'js and fo.est bio produ.is: Critical lactors Idand l'ress, lvashington, ll.C. (C,r/!rr flr s/,di1d, cas. stlrdv. Avail for suc.ess; A silal Ontario Nlinisirv of r_ai!ril Resourccs. 1995. Extension notes: at http://cnirrc!alroads.ca/case-stL,dies 30 able lacccsscd SL,ga. maplc. A!ailable at http://s ww.lrconline..om/Exten' 2tl0Z !crifie.l 2.1\ov.2il08). Workint PaPe., ccnirc June sion Notes English/p.ttsgr nr .pdr (ac.cssed 5 Julv 2002 Itcsolrrccs, Roval Roads Unive.sitv, Vic for Non'Timb.r vcrifie.l24 No\' 2008). Sir S.nford fleming College and the toria, tsC. I-an.to$ ner Reso!rce C€mtrr', Qu.cn! Ilinter Ontario 2002 case studv ot Hobbv, T., K. \'Iahct and E Kell€r A I'a.kce, E.C 1976. An ccological approach tus,ard oPti Island. Avajl' lield biglcaf m.ple snp harvcsiing on Vaf.ouvcr mizaiion through species .llocation. lh D ihesis. Uni\. stlrdies (access.d 30 ibl€ it htip://cntr.rovnlroads.cn/case \,linnesoia, St. l'aul. June 2002 verificd 2.1 Nov.2008). Centr. for Non'TituL1cr R., Coupc, and Dennis I llovd (ed.) 1996. Uants of Itcsour.cs, Ro!al ltoads Univefsiiv, Victoria, 8.C., Canada Parisli, Ii. southern Inte.ior British Cohmbia afd ihe lnland \_orih Howe, J.A.G. 1986. One hundrcd vears of Prairie forcstr\ wesi. Lon. l'ine Putrlishing.rnd BC Mhistrv of Forests, Irraine lorum ll:2.13 2r1. Hus, tl. 1902 The germination of Hv,/ns/ir.d,d./driis. 85-95 P. and markct I'r Eightc.nth Annual Repo.i of the Missouri Boianical l'ersons, WS., .rnd J.M. Davis. 2005. G.osing ing ginseng, goldefseal, and oihcr toodland medicinals. Gard€n, St Lo!is, \4O. B.ighi Moonianr Books, Fdiniew, \_C. H R. 2:166. 1999. Dep.rrtn1e,li of ihc Interior and Relaicd Peterson, E.8., N-.\4. Peterson, I'.C. Comealr, and K.D. Thomas. Agen.ies Appropri.iicnrs Act, 2000. U.S rtouse of RePre 1999. Biglcaf nliple ma.ager's han.lbook for tsriiish Cohm' sentatives 8i11, scni io ihc President Octobcr 1999. t'ia. Available at h it p://r,rv *,.for.gov bc.ca/h fd /p u bs/docs/ Poiar. 1e95. lohnson, D., L. Kershnh,, A. MacKinron, an.l J. Mr/Mr090.htm (verifi€d 24 Nov 200u). BC Minjst.! oi ro. Plants western boreal forcst and asPen of ihe Parkland. ests, R€scarch Branch. Lone Pine Publishing and ihe Canadjan Forest Service, Plants for a futurc. 2002 Edible, medicinal and usciul plants Vancouver BC. for a beiter world. A rcsource center for rare and unusual 'tcchnical Kaudia, A A.,an.1L.V A.Omofo.2001 Is dl e expert plants. Available at hitp://!v!vi{.piaf.org/inclex.html rolc of farm forestrr cxtcnsion atefts fdding? Rcccni (a..ess.d 9 JLrly 2002 verified 24 No!. 2t)06). experiences fronr Africa and impli.aiions nr iL'turc cxtcn- Pojar, 1., and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Irlanis oi coastal B.itish sbn programs. Proc. 5th Internaibnal Union of forestrv Briiish ColLrmbia Ministrv of Iorests and Lone Reseafch Organizaiions Extensioli Working l'arty (56.06- Colombia. 03) Synrp. Forestr! E\t.nsion: Assisting Forcst Olvner, ljfe P!blishing, Van.ouver BC. t_arm.r and Stakehol!ier Decision Making. I-orne, Austra Prednv, \4.L., an.l l.L. Chamberld in. 2005. Calax (Gd/,ir i/radrti): lia. Arail.blc ai hlip:/ !rvw.regional.org.au/au/iufro/2001 Af annotate.l bibliographv. Gen T€ch. Rep. SRS 87 L]SDA (a..essed 5lune 2002 lcrific.l2.r Nov.200E). forestSe^ ice, South€.n Rescarch Shr., Ashelille, \C. Krochnral, A, R S. Waltr'rs, an.l R.M. Doughtv. 1969. A gukle Ranlal, E., C. fox, G. Pate, and l'. Cucrra.2007 Conrne, to nledicin.l plants oI Appalachia. USDA, lo.€st Se^ ic. cial derelopmcni ot non-tinrber reso!rces: A casc siud! Res€nrch l'apcr NIr-138. \ortheisn:rn foresi Experihent of ma e svrlp in Ontario. Avail.ble ai hitP://cntr.rolal Siation, UFP€rDarb!,IJA. \L ii()l \(il ( ll:) (rr. l(r tuads.ca/casc st!(lies (a.cessed 30 Junc 2002 \.erifie.l 2a L) Lt l Nor 2008). Univ. ofClrelph, Gueiph, O\. Le Bars, l'.L., \4.M. Katz, N.Ilerman, T.\4 ltil, A.\4 Freedman, Sifforcl, L.O.,I.C:. Bjorkbonr, and l.C. Zasadn. 199(1. /Jfir/,r tdfrl nnd A.f. Schaizberg. I99Z A ptacebo.onirolled, do!ble rili,rd N4arsh p. 158 171. Lr lt.\4. tsurns and B.H Honk.la blin.l rifclonized trial of an e\hact oi Grt,lto l,ilol," for (Technic.l Coordnaiors). Silvics of \orih Anrerica: (hard- dem.ntia. JA\,IA 278:1327 1332. ivoods) Agrlc. Han.lb. 614. Avaiiable at htlp://$'wtr.na ls fcd.Lrs/spfo/prL's/sjlvics nanual/volune 2/bet!la/papv I-lovd, U. 1912. The cultivdtlon ol ltttlnstis. J. Am. Phdrn. J rifera.htm (acc.sse.l 5 2002 le.ifie.l 21 \ov.2008) Assoc. l;5 12. Jlrlv USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC Minorc, D., and J.C. Zasada. 1990. A..r ,,dd?ltrvlh Pu.sh. p. DC.2001. cress. Horii.ulture lnformation 33 l,i lt.N1. Buns afd B.H. Honkala (lech.ical Coor Sanders, Uplard '10. I-eaflet 16,4. AlailabLc at http://wwr!.ces.n.su.cdu/depts/ dinato.s) Silvics of \orih America: thardwoods) Agric (accessed 2002 (erifi.d 21 Handb. 654. A!ailabl. al http:/ !ww.n,l.{s.fcd.us/spfo/ hort/hil/hil 16 n.html l2 JL,lv State Univ., Dep. of Hortic!1 plrtrs/sjLvics nranLral/vol!mc 2/acer/macroPh!ll!m.htm \o\'.2008). No.th C..olina Scicnce, Raleigh. (ic.ess.d l2Jul) 2002 verifiecl 2:l \o!.2008). USDA lorest tural Serrice, Washingion, DC. r!t.n\..r h.r..rdKA alinF,. o44. Ar' .i u Ur , , r Nljichell, D.A.2004. Manv voi.es, many vnlL,es: Commr' vietr, of ihe special for.st prodrcts industrv. p. 11 23. lr (ed.) Dancing witlr an elephani Prcc. The Btsi nity econonric diversi6cation ihrorgh nontimber forcst C Schnepf n€ss and Scien.e of Spe.ial Forest I'roducis. 1991 pro.lucis in .oastal British Colu bia, Canada. /D E.Nl. lanuary Doroghue et al. (L.hnical Coordinatort. Srstainabl. Hillsboro, OR. productron of wood an.1 non lvood forest Prcducts: Pro.. Schlosser W.E., and K.A Blaher. 1995 Economlc and markct- of the IUFIIO Division 5 Research Groups 5.11 and 5.12, ing inpli.aiions of the \!ild .dibLc mushroom harlest in Roion,a, Ne{ Ze.land, 11 12 Mar 2003. Ceneral T.ch- t\ashlngton, Oregon and lclaho. J for. 93:31-16 nical Rep. |NW-GTR 60.1. USDA lorcsi Ser\ice, Paci6. \1,,:1ni \ll I llr.rLLL . rii l.li rl.,',,n llr)! \ \L)t.r\11,,.,1 \"orthsrst Rcscarch Sh., Portland, OR. \\\ iii il (,rrtlr1r! r\,,f ir \J!,LrLL.ri N_ationdl Agroiorcstrv Center. l99Z Forest farming: An ,i!r.)'L,r.t\ \. rrirrr,'(,1 ,.!..,:f,l r,r,1,t,.. lrl ,rl agrcforestrl, Ffactice. Agrcforcslrv Note 7 Arailable ai \\ \. \l.fi\, i l\,

35 sholio, D.1., a,1cl R.A. dcJ. Hart 1985. Fotcst IaDnjDS:Tor!ards USDA 1997a I'lants dat.rbase, Classificaiion [on]ine dttabasel. a sollrtion to problems of worLd hunger and conserv.iion A!ailable ai hilp:// ants.L,sda.go\'/classificaiion.html htertuediatc Tcchnolotv PL1bl., Lon.1on. (acccssed l2Julv 2002 v.rilic(l 2l Nov 2008). Shall Woocllands i'rogranr o f British Collr nrlrin 2001 Agui.le USDA. t997b. Conserlation plant char!cteristi.s for,4.., !i. to.groforestrv in Briiish Colunlbia. Available at lrftp.// thLlnt Ntat;h. Sugar nr.rplc ACSAI Availablc .rt hlip:ri !!r\ s.!\arodlot.bc .a/s!! p/Dorvrlloads/f i lcsiAgrof or cst planis n,cs.urda.gov/cgi Lrin/tuPics.cgi?earl=piaf l .iiri. rvcuide.pdf (accessed l9 Octobcr 2002 verified 2il Nov. bulc.cgiands\nL1o1=ACSA3(accessed 12Julv200Z verificd 200u). SWPBC .nd Iorest llefetlal British Cohrnrbia 2,1\o\,.2008). Smith, I.R. 1929. Tfee croPs: A pcrmanent agrlcultur. HaF USDA 1997c. Plant guidc ftr n'..lnlrrrr lld,il. 5!8ar colrrt, Br;c€ nnd ConrPany, New York. miple ACSA:. Aqrilabl. at^n'r htlp://plrf ts f ,cs.usda.goU plantgul.le/do./pg .csa3doc (a..css.d l2 2(10; ve.i- Siix, G. 1998 Plant mattefs. Sci Am.278:301. l!i! fic.t 24 No! 2008) Stockberger, i!.Iv. 1921. Cinseng clrlt!rc USDA Fa.he.s tsull i999. agrl.uliufii rxporis Clctob.r 28 USDA, 1184. USDA, Washington, DC. USLIA. U.S Washington, DC Tc.lder, S., D. Mit.hcll, .nd R larran. 2000 Seeing thc for USDA. 2002 l)lants dat.bisc ditrbase of scicntilic csi Lrcneaih ih€ heesi The social nnd cconoDric Potential [(Dhnc Av!ilablc ai http://plants.L,scla.gov/ of non iiDrlrer forest p.odLrcts an.l sert,i.es in ih. Qlreen infornaiionon dantsl 29 fiell 21 Nov 2008). Ch lottc lsLan.ls/Haida G*aji Available .t http:/ !$s (accesse.l Jo n. 2002 \ eri for forcst f or.gov.bc.ca/f 1p/Ilei/exiernal/lpublish/webllon tin- USDA forcstScrvice.200l. Naiion.l straiegy sPecial bcr forest prodlcts/rlcismf-].pdf (acc.ssed l3 luly 2002 p( ucts. USDA Forest scr!icc, lvashrngton, DC. verific.t 2,1No\.. 200E). rinal lleport.South Moresb! lorest Van Fleet, \\. t913. The culti!,.tion ol r'\merican Sinseng. USDA Repla.ement Account, Victoria, tsC. l.'r1'.r' 8r''.'.1.1\DA h'-h,rgr I D.. Tedder S., D. \4itchell, and A. flill)er. 2002. ProPcrtv ri'his Van lleet, W 1914. Goldetseal undcr cultivatnrn USDA farm in thc s!strinabl. managemeni of non-tinrber forest ers Bull.613 USDA, WashingtoD, DC. prod!cis. A\iilable nt http://$ $ w tur.go!,.bc.ca/ftp/Het/ van Hook, I.\'1. 1904 Diseases of ginscnS. Bull.219 Corncll pro.l uci s/ external/lpublish/w€b/non timbcf forest Uni\'. Agric. Etp. Stn., College of Agric!liurc, Botanical AIt-02001 30 NTf P9,20Propert\,'t,20ltights'l'20FRBC'X,201 Depa.tm.nt, Ithaci, \_Y. pdf (acccssed 5 July 2002 verified 2.1 No!.2i108). British rwC., and Thonas (cd.). 1997 Special forcst pro.l- Columbia Nlinistrv of Forests and forest Rener'al, Vicio- V!fc€, I. ucis: Biodivcrsiiy nreets the markctplace. Gen. Tech. Rep. ria, BC. WO-GTR 63. A!.ilable ai http://( $ w.trc.scarch.fs.fed us/ 1995. Shirak.nrba bi.ch, sPicndid forest bionrass Tcraza$ a, M. pLrbs8oa9 (a.cessed 12 July 2u0Z lerjfiell 2r No\' 2008). 7-12 Ter.Tnwn et potcntial of living tree tissucs. P. t,M USIfA fo.€st Scrvice, Washingnrn, LrC al. (ecl Trcc sap proceedings of ihe lst inie.national s!nr' ) Vcninga, i-., an.l B.R. Ziricor. 1976. The culiiration of gold_ posilrm on sap uiiliTation (ISSU), Biflrka, Japan. 10-l2 APr' cns.aL. p. 53 72. Li Col(lense.rl/Etc. Ruka I\blic.rtions, 1995. ] Iokkaido Univ. Press, llokkaido Sania CrLrz, CA Thomas, V.G., and D.]t. Schumann. 1993. lncome opport!ni lvctzel, S., L.C DL,chesnc, and \{.L I-;tportc.2006. Bioproducis tics in special fo.est produ.is. Self help suggesiions tor forests: New pa, he.ships in lhe btuecono !. rural cntfepreneurs. USDA Agric Info. BulL. 666. Avail in Canada's Aca.ienic Publ., Boston. able at htlp://r!r!r!.fpl.fs.fed.us/do.umnts/usda/agib666/ Springer economic to aib666in.pdf (a.c.ssed 12 JL,lv 2002 verifie.l 20 \o! 2008). l\ills, R.M., and R.G. Lipse). 1999 An si.ategy de!clop non'timber lorcst scn'ices in British Tnnrenstein, D.A. l99l..4.cf sd.crdrrr,.l,, lire effects informa' Productsand Columbia. rorcsi Rene wa l BC. l'roje.t PA97538 OItt Ijnal iion system. Available at h tt q,w. fs. fed.Lls/d atabas./ Ptl$ Av;ilablc at hftp:/ Lw$.for ca/hfd/libr.rv/ feis/ (accessed .r No!. ?(10s, verifiecl 24 No\,. 2008). USDA ltcp. Bov.trc frbcle99/FRBC1999\4lt30.pdf (ac.essed 19 Oct. 2002 \eri forest Scrvice, Rock! N{olntain llesearch Stn, Iire S.r 6ed 2,1 Nov. 2008).

Turncr, \..J. 1996. Plant lechfolog! of Briiish Colunbia first pcopl.s. Unj\. of Briiish ColLrmbia Press, vancouver. Tlrrner, N.J 2001 Doing it right: Issucs and practices of sus- tainrblL'hafvesiing of non tinber fu test proLlucis relating to first peopl.s in British Cohmbia. BC I Ecoslst. \4anage. l(ll):.1+-53 A\ailable at http./ \ w w.io.fe\.org/PLl blica s/J EM/ISSI/!oIl arta,.pdf (accessell 27 \1a-'- 2002 tion -n ol lc'rified 21 Nov 2008). Turncr N.J., an.l W Co.ksedge 2001. Aboriginal !se of non- timbcr forest pro.lucts in norihtr,este,'n Norih Ame.ica: Applicntions and issues. p.3l-52 ,r \4.R. Enlcrv and R.l NI.Lain (€c1.) \on ijDrb€r forest prcclucts \'I€dicinalh.rbs, fungi, edibl€ f.uits and nuis an.1 oth.r natlrral Products frorn ihc forest. Hnworth l'ress, Binghamton, NY. Unilcrsitv of \lissouri Ccntcr for Agrcforcstr! 2006 Agro fore+rv prac tices: forest fanning. Availnble at htiPt^!!!$ centerfo rag roforesi rv.org/Praciiccs/ff.a s P (ac.essed l2 lLr ly 2002 verifie.l 2,1 \ov. 200tt) Upton, R. (cd.) 1999a. H.s,thonr Lr.'rrv analviical, qualit) conid, ind th.rapeutic monograPh. Ameri.nn llcrlral I'harmacopoeia and TheraPeutic Compendiuh, Scoits vallcl,, CA. Upton, ]i. (ed.) 1999b. Ilawthonr le.i with flowet analvtical, qu;rlitv control, and th.raptuti. monograph. Americdn Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Thcfrrpeutic Co PendtrrDr, Scotls Valle\, CA.

36 Chamber ain, Ny'itchell, Brigharn, Hobby, Zabek, Daus StudY Questions

What three major benefits can a landowner realize through forest farming?

2. Discuss the major challenges that a landowner may face before and following the adoption of forest farming as an alternative land use practice

The early visionaries of forest farming maintained that this integrated land use practice had three main components. Name and discuss the three components, and how the forest farming concept has changed through time.

What are the major advantages and disadvantages of forest farming?

ldentify the four primary methods of generating revenue from forest farming products and seryices. What are the major factors driving the increase in forest farming of ginseng and goldenseal?

Describe the evolution of ginseng cultivation in the United States. What were the major chal- lenges in the early production of this medicinal forest product?

1. Identify and discuss the factors that are affecting salal harvest in British columbia and provide recommendations to reduce the negative effects of these factors.

37