<<

                 

      2943 12/16/19 noonest          BrandonT.Boatman,P.E. 208652,205089 Various  Underwater Bridge Safety Inspection - North and Superior Region

                                                    

                     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

                                

       

                       

                 

                   

                                          

  

                       

                                                                                        

                                               

                                                                 

                 

                            

                                

         

                                                   

  

                                                   PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Proposals must be submitted for this project electronically. Proposal submittal requirements are listed in PART IV – INSTRUCTION FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS at the following link Selection Guidelines for Service Contracts

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-PREQUALIFIED VENDORS Financial Requirements for Non‐Prequalified Consultants/Vendors

E-VERIFY REQUIREMENTS E-Verify is an Internet based system that allows an employer, using information reported on an employee’s Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, to determine the eligibility of that employee to work in the United States. There is no charge to employers to use E-Verify. The E- Verify system is operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration. E-Verify is available in Spanish.

The State of Michigan is requiring, under Public Act 200 of 2012, Section 381, that as a condition of each contract or subcontract for construction, maintenance, or engineering services that the pre- qualified contractor or subcontractor agree to use the E-Verify system to verify that all persons hired during the contract term by the contractor or subcontractor are legally present and authorized to work in the United States.

Information on registration for and use of the E-Verify program can be obtained via the Internet at the DHS Web site: http://www.dhs.gov/E-Verify.

The documentation supporting the usage of the E-Verify system must be maintained by each consultant and be made available to MDOT upon request.

It is the responsibility of the prime consultant to include the E-Verify requirement documented in this NOTIFICATION in all tiers of subcontracts.

DIGITAL SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTS On January 4, 2018, Contract Services Division implemented the use of CoSign as the exclusive software for digitally signing all consultant contracts and consultant contract related documents. All other digital signing methods are no longer accepted.

Prior to using CoSign, all external partners must apply for a free digital signature user account by submitting a MDOT Digital Signature Certificate Request Form.

MDOT INSURANCE UPDATED 3.9.17

At a minimum, the insurance types and limits identified below, may be required from the selected consultant, prior to contract award.

Required Limits Additional Requirements Commercial General Liability Insurance Minimal Limits: Consultants must have their policy endorsed $1,000,000 Each Occurrence Limit to add “the State of Michigan, its $1,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury Limit departments, divisions, agencies, offices, $2,000,000 General Aggregate Limit commissions, officers, employees, and $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations agents” as additional insureds

Automobile Liability Insurance

Minimal Limits: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence Workers' Compensation Insurance Minimal Limits: Waiver of subrogation, except where waiver is Coverage according to applicable laws prohibited by law. governing work activities. Employers Liability Insurance Minimal Limits: $500,000 Each Accident $500,000 Each Employee by Disease $500,000 Aggregate Disease Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance Minimal Limits: $1,000,000 Per Claim

The Insurer shall provide at least thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation. The Prime Consultant will be responsible to verify subconsultant(s) compliance with MDOT’s insurance requirements.

Michigan Department of Transportation

SCOPE OF SERVICE FOR DESIGN SERVICES Underwater Bridge Safety Inspection

CONTROL SECTION(S): 84900

JOB NUMBER(S): 208652, 205089 SCOP

PROJECT LOCATION: Services will be performed at various locations throughout the North and Superior Regions. The bridges for this project include MDOT Region owned structures. See the attached “Diver Inspection Work Package” for specific structure locations.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In accordance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), each bridge with submerged substructure elements that cannot be inspected by wading or boat and probe methods must be inspected by a qualified diver at a frequency of 60 months or less. The work defined in this scope is limited to performing an underwater inspection of bridge substructure elements and preparing reports that detail the inspection findings.

This work is split over a two-year period. All North Region structures shall be inspected in, or one month prior, to July 2020. All Superior Region structures shall be inspected in, or one month prior, to July 2021. The reports in MiBRIDGE shall be entered within 30 calendar days of starting field work at each location and may be edited for a period of up to 90 calendar days from the date of inspection. Final reports shall be submitted by the end of each calendar year.

The work associated with this project is broken into two phases: Site inspection and data gathering, and the completion of report writing and communication of the information to MDOT. Both phases are necessary for successful completion of the project.

PRIMARY PREQUALIFICATION CLASSIFICATION: Design – Bridges: Safety Inspection - Underwater

SECONDARY PREQUALIFICATION CLASSIFICATION: Design – Bridges: Safety Inspections

ANTICIPATED SERVICE START DATE: April 1, 2020

ANTICIPATED SERVICE END DATE: December 31, 2021

DBE REQUIREMENT: None

Page 1 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

MDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Brandon T. Boatman, P.E. North & Superior Region Bridge Engineer 1088 M-32 East Gaylord, MI 49735 Mobile: (517) 242-5597 E-mail: [email protected]

Any questions regarding this Scope of Service please contact the MDOT Project Manager.

DURATION & SCHEDULE A. Work Plan & Schedule

The CONSULTANT must review the Scope of Service to develop a Work Plan that details the inspection dates and process of inspecting the specific elements for a typical bridge. Submittal of the Work Plan is required as part of the Priced Proposal. Submit any changes to the Work Plan in writing to MDOT’S PROJECT MANAGER (PM) for review and approval.

The CONSULTANT must be prepared to begin the field inspection work within one month after receiving the Notice to Proceed (NTP).

B. Meeting Dates

The CONSULTANT is required to attend Project Initiation Meetings and Progress Meetings held via conference call or at the MDOT North or Superior Region office. Shown below are the expected periods for these meetings. MDOT, however, reserves the right to adjust these periods.

Project Initiation Meetings: One week after NTP, prior to any fieldwork in North Region, and another in Spring of 2021, prior to any fieldwork in Superior Region.

The intent of the Project Initiation Meeting is to exchange information regarding the general procedures for communication within each region, review the schedule, discuss emergency procedures and communication, and discuss any open questions that remain. Additional MDOT region and statewide staff may attend the meeting.

Progress Meetings: Monthly during the Field Inspection Phase (Some may be done by conference call)

The CONSULTANT will include a copy of all the non-emergency Request for Action forms completed during the previous inspection period and will review these in the meeting with the MDOT PM.

Page 2 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

Project Closeout Meetings: Two weeks after completion of the final inspection for each region.

These meetings are intended as a review of any outstanding contract requirements and final presentation of the deliverables. The completed “Consultant Performance Evaluation” form will be given to the CONSULTANT and reviewed at the final project closeout meeting.

The CONSULTANT will keep notes of these meetings and provide minutes to the MDOT PM within one week after the meeting.

TEAM REQUIREMENTS: The Consultant must provide personnel with qualifications that meet or exceed the requirements below and comply with all applicable FHWA regulations. One individual may act in different capacities at different times. However, they must meet the qualifications of both jobs. This accommodation does not allow for a reduction in staff size at the site as described below.

The Project Manager/Team Leader will be responsible for writing the Inspection Reports and will be the primary contact with MDOT’s project manager.

Only one manager level position will be allowed and paid for on this project.

Diver Inspection Team Composition

1. Each bridge will be inspected by a composed of three (3) people in a combination of Diver(s) and Tender(s). The dive inspection team will be composed of a dive team leader/qualified dive inspector and two (2) tenders. The Consultant PM may also serve as one of the team members if properly certified. The Consultant PM will act as Team leader while in the field.

Diver Qualifications

1. Certified by a nationally recognized authority, such as the Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI), Association of Commercial Diving Educators (ACDE), Scuba Schools International (SSI), or National Association of Underwater Instructors (NAUI) in the type of that will be used for the inspections. They must be in sound physical condition and have proof of a medical physical examination within the last twelve (12) months on file with the company.

2. Three years of documented structural inspection experience with bridges and similar structures. This experience must be actual performance of the work and not supervision or ancillary activities.

3. Be able to verbally communicate well and able to write and sketch the

Page 3 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

observations found during the inspection.

4. Must be a Qualified Team Leader as defined by NBIS.

5. Must have successfully completed the FHWA-NHI-130091 Underwater Bridge Inspection course.

Diver Tender Qualifications

1. Two years of experience in assisting diver operations. This must be actual performance of the work and not supervision or ancillary activities.

Changes made to the CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER/CONSULTANT QUALIFIED TEAM LEADER that occurs after the authorization must be submitted in writing for MDOT’S PROJECT MANAGER’S approval. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in termination of the contract.

DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK (cont’d) Bridge File Review In this phase of the work the CONSULTANT will take several steps to review the documentation for each bridge and register on-line to be assigned to complete the inspections.

1. The CONSULTANT DIVER(S) must gain access to the MiBRIDGE web based application. For access please use the instructions at the following link: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot/ACCESS_To_MiBRIDGE_using_the_MiLogi n_User_Authentication_557244_7.pdf

2. After access to MiBRIDGE has been provided, contact Brandon Boatman at [email protected] to assign the inspections.

3. Review the bridge files, and become familiar with the online and file documentation for each bridge. Arrangements to review the file copy will be made with the MDOT PROJECT MANAGER at the MDOT North or Superior Region office.

4. Review of the previous underwater inspection reports, if available.

Based upon the information gained during the file review, the CONSULTANT shall provide a diving schedule in PDF format 30 calendar days prior to diving. The schedule must include MDOT Bridge ID, proposed inspection date(s), and duration for each structure.

Page 4 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

Underwater Diving Inspection Briefly stated, Inspection Team will go to the bridge site, enter the water with underwater equipment, and physically examine the condition of the structure under the water’s surface and elements up to 24” above the surface. Level I intensity as defined in the FHWA Bridge Inspector’s Reference Manual shall be performed on 100 percent of submerged substructure element surfaces. The Level I intensity inspection shall be followed by Level II intensity inspection on approximately 10 percent of the inspected surface area. This inspection will be done according to NBIS and will include a topographical examination of the stream bed in and around the substructure elements and probing along the mud line for support. The Diver Inspection Team will record their observations in narrative form as well as with sketches and pictures as is appropriate.

Prior to commencing diving operations, the Diver Inspection Team will evaluate and make notes on the waterway such as bank erosion or evidence of waterway movement, debris buildup, and obstructions which may adversely affect the bridge. Any deficiencies visually observed on substructure elements above or below the water will be noted in the report.

Timber dolphin and fender systems on or near the bridge or in the waterway for the protection of the bridge will be inspected. The structural condition of the elements will be determined and they will be evaluated to determine if they meet the latest FHWA clearance requirements.

The elevation of the river bed relative to an established USGS datum must be measured for all structures over water. These measurements must be taken at the previous locations along the length of the bridge that is over the water and recorded on the “Stream Cross Section Report” form. This information must be compared to the previous data, if available, in the form of a graph. The form is set up to automatically graph the new data with the old for comparison. With the approval of the MDOT PM, the CONSULTANT may contact Erik Carlson, P.E., Consultant PM-Manager of the MDOT Hydraulics Unit in Design for additional information.

Problems, which could affect the continued safe operation of the bridge, must be brought to the attention of the MDOT PM before the Diver Inspection Team leaves the site. The CONSULTANT may be requested to submit a Request For Action report in MiBRIDGE prior to leaving the site.

For the structures in the “Diver Inspection Work Package” identified as “Special Inspection”, the same procedures stated above shall be followed. Additionally, all culvert, substructure, superstructure and deck bottom elements shall be inspected, and deficiencies noted.

Bridge Inspection Reports The inspection reports phase will include fulfilling NBIS and Michigan Bridge Inspection Program reporting requirements. A Michigan Registered Professional Engineer working for the consultant will review the underwater inspection for compliance with the NBIS and CFR 650 for the thoroughness of the inspection.

Page 5 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

1. NBIS Reporting Requirements: The CONSULTANT will complete the Inspection Report in MiBRIDGE for each structure inspected. The report is required for compliance with the NBIS and shall be entered within 30 days of starting field activities. The report may be edited afterward to modify condition ratings or improve the quality of comments. Refer to Michigan Structure Inspection Manual Chapter 8 for additional information.

The CONSULTANT shall contact the MDOT Project Manager prior to increasing the underwater inspection frequency in MiBRIDGE.

The CONSULTANT shall submit Request For Action Reports in MiBRIDGE for safety related deficiencies that should be resolved in 24 months or less.

Copies of MiBRIDGE documents including the Underwater Inspections Reports, Structure Inventory and Appraisal sheet, and Request For Action reports (if applicable) shall be provided in the appendix section of the detailed inspection report.

2. Detailed Inspection Report: The CONSULTANT will complete a detailed inspection report for each structure inspected that expands on the information entered into MiBRIDGE. The CONSULTANT shall submit a draft of the detailed inspection reports to MDOT within 90 calendar days of beginning field inspection.

The detailed inspection report may be utilized by the MDOT Design Unit to reference all locations which require structural repair and/or scour mitigation. The level of detail provided in the report should allow a design team to prepare drawings without performing a site visit at the bridge.

The report should be organized in the following manner:

a. Cover Sheet: Include the MDOT Bridge ID, facility, feature, unique name (if applicable), description, date of field activities, and elevation photo.

b. Table of Contents: Provide titles and page numbers for significant sections, subsections, and appendices.

c. Executive Summary: Briefly describe the structural design type, location, length, year constructed, and substructure units inspected. In addition, the CONSULTANT will describe the general condition, foundation type, observed scour or deterioration, pier protection (if any), and work recommendations. The and proposed ratings for Items #60, #61, #71, #111, #113 and a Scour Inspection Rating shall also be listed. For those listed as “Special Inspection”, also provide current and proposed ratings for Items #58B, #59, #62.

Page 6 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

d. Inspection Procedures: Identify the number of people that were present during the entire inspection, equipment utilized, level of inspection, boat access location (if applicable), and whether any approvals from the U.S. Coast Guard were required.

e. Field Inspection Findings: Develop a table for use during routine inspections, depth soundings, and high flow events. The table shall include information for each substructure unit inspected, observations below the water surface, and observations above the water surface. At a minimum, when footing exposure is present, provide measurements for the depth of scour along each face of the substructure unit.

Describe the observed condition, type, and quantity of substructure components, scour countermeasures, navigation protection systems, channel, and channel protection. Evaluate the waterway adequacy including deck and roadway approaches for of overtopping during flood events. Provide details that describe why an inspection rating or appraisal coding item should be modified.

Identify the water elevation, substructure units in water, channel width, and direction of flow at the time streambed cross-sections were recorded. Compare changes in the streambed profile since the previous diving inspection or cross-section recording. Provide explicit details that state the location and degree of change.

f. Substructure Sounding Plan: Create a computer generated sketch, drawn to scale, of the abutments, piers, channel, and any other significant physical features. Label the location and depth of each sounding around the submerged substructure elements. Provide labels for each item shown and reference measurements for each span.

g. Substructure Elevation Drawings: Create a computer generated sketch, drawn to scale, for each substructure element in the water. A sketch for the south, north, west, and east faces of the element shall be provided on a single page. Include pier cap, pier wall, columns, bents, footing, and . Provide horizontal and vertical dimensions. Identify the elevation of the water surface, pier cap, pier wall, footing, and tremie. Provide the profile of the water and streambed along each face in contrasting color. Include and quantify defects such as cracking, scaling, delamination, section loss and spalling on the drawings. MDOT will provide existing plan and elevation drawings for each bridge to aid production of the sketches.

Page 7 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

h. Stream Cross Section Report: Profile measurements will be included in each report and on the standardized forms provided on the MDOT Bridge Operations website. The streambed profile measurements will be saved in the MiBRIDGE document storage area in MS Excel format. They will also be included in the detailed inspection report. These measurements must be taken at the previous locations along the length of the bridge that is over the water and recorded on the “Stream Cross Section Report” form. The previous location is normally along each fascia. This information must be compared to the previous data, if available, in the form of a graph. The form is set up to automatically graph the new data with the old for comparison. The CONSULTANT shall contact the Project Manager when comparison of the measurements indicate that they may not have been recorded in similar locations.

i. Photographs: All photographs will be in color and captioned. Photographs which appear in the report body will be formatted for consistent size, uniform location within the text, and have blue labels. Photos in the report will also have an arrow, circle, or other shape to highlight deficiencies that are noted. Photographs, at a minimum, will include the channel, elevations, substructure units, quadrants, and any significant defects when water clarity permits.

j. Appendices: Utilize the appendices to include the MiBRIDGE Underwater Diving Inspection Report, Structure Inventory and Appraisal, Request For Action (if applicable), US Coast Guard Permit, and location map.

An electronic copy of the draft report will be provided to the MDOT Project Manager in MS Word or PDF format. Comments will be returned to the CONSULTANT for review. A progress meeting may be held with the MDOT representatives and the CONSULTANT to review and discuss comments. The CONSULTANT will then incorporate revisions into the final report. MDOT reserves the right to request additional drafts for review if, in the opinion of MDOT’s Project Manager, the changes required are extensive. The contract will be unsatisfactory if the CONSULTANT fails to make changes to the report as required by MDOT’s Project Manager.

The CONSULTANT will save the final report for each bridge in the MiBRIDGE document storage area and notify the Project Manager after they been added to the application.

Page 8 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

EQUIPMENT The consultant will be responsible for providing all equipment necessary to complete the project in an efficient and safe manner. The consultant will be responsible for selecting the type of dive equipment (SCUBA, surface-supplied air, or mixed gas) that will best be suited for the work at a given site and is required to have all of the typical forms of commercial diving equipment available for the project. The boat or marine vessel used for the project must have room to accommodate MDOT staff as necessary.

The consultant must provide all of the necessary inspection tools for completion of the inspection. Typical items such as cameras, hammers, lights, message boards, and scrapers can be expected.

The consultant must provide all of the necessary personal safety equipment for each employee at the work site.

All equipment must be in sound working order, meeting applicable inspections for safe operation. Lost time due to equipment failures will not be paid for.

The CONSULTANT must conform to all watercraft transportation laws to prevent the spread of invasive species.

SAFETY MDOT requires safe working operations. The consultant and its employees must be trained in all the applicable state and federal regulations as well as industry practices for the work being performed. It is not the responsibility of MDOT or the MDOT PM to regulate the consultant’s safety practices, however, the MDOT PM has the authority to have any individual who is found working unsafely removed from MDOT right of way. If the consultant is found to be working unsafely, the MDOT PM can stop all operations and terminate the contract.

The structures included in this contract may be over navigable waters as defined by the United States Coast Guard. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for coordination with United States Coast Guard for diving operations located in designated Navigable Waters.

Some, but not all, of the regulations that can be expected to apply are the latest revisions of:

Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (MIOSHA) Part 79 & Part 504, Diving Operations Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (OSHA) Subpart N, Commercial Diving Standards. Marine Occupational Safety and Health Standards (USCG Regulations), 46 CFR 197.200- 197.488 plus Appendix A, Subchapter V. Consensus Standards for Commercial Diving Operations, Association of Diving Contractors, latest edition (ADC Standards)

Page 9 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE MDOT will furnish the CONSULTANT access to any available, pertinent information related to the bridge(s) proposed for inspection. Information furnished to the CONSULTANT is not to be released or distributed to anyone outside of MDOT. The CONSULTANT is not allowed to make copies of the information in the bridge files unless given written approval from the MDOT PM. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT firm to maintain security of records could result in legal penalties.

APPLICABILITY & STANDARDS The CONSULTANT is to have the following reference material and be familiar with their contents.

1. National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) Federal Code of Regulations, 23 CFR 650.

2. AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation, Third Edition 2018

3. NHI Bridge Inspection Reference Manual (2012 BIRM)

4. FHWA Recording and Coding Guide for SI&A of the Nations Bridges

5. AASHTO Element Manual

6. Michigan Structure Inspection Manual (MiSIM)

7. Michigan Bridge Element Inspection Manual (MiBEIM)

8. Michigan SI&A Coding Guide

9. MDOT NBI Rating Guidelines

10. MDOT Bridge Inspection Frequency Guidelines

11. MDOT Bridge Analysis Guide

Page 10 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

CONSULTANT PAYMENT – Actual Cost Plus Fixed Fee: Compensation for this project shall be on an actual cost plus fixed fee basis. This basis of payment typically includes an estimate of labor hours by classification or employee, hourly labor rates, applied overhead, other direct costs, subconsultant costs, and applied fixed fee. The fixed fee for profit allowed for this project is 11.0% of the cost of direct labor and overhead.

All billings for services must be directed to the Department and follow the current guidelines. Payment may be delayed or decreased if the instructions are not followed.

Payment to the Consultant for services rendered shall not exceed the maximum amount unless an increase is approved in accordance with the contract with the Consultant. Typically, billings must be submitted within 60 days after the completion of services for the current billing. The final billing must be received within 60 days of the completion of services. Refer to your contract for your specific contract terms.

Direct expenses, if applicable, will not be paid in excess of that allowed by the Department for its own employees in accordance with the State of Michigan’s Standardized Travel Regulations. Supporting documentation must be submitted with the billing for all eligible expenses on the project in accordance with the Reimbursement Guidelines. The only hours that will be considered allowable charges for this contract are those that are directly attributable to the activities of this project.

MDOT will reimburse the consultant for vehicle expenses and the costs of travel to and from project sites in accordance with MDOT’s Travel and Vehicle Expense Reimbursement Guidelines, dated May 1, 2013. The guidelines can be found at http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot/Final_Travel_Guidelines_05-01- 13_420289_7.pdf?20130509082418. MDOT’s travel and vehicle expense reimbursement policies are intended primarily for construction engineering work. Reimbursement for travel to and from project sites and for vehicle expenses for all other types of work will be approved on a case by case basis.

MDOT will pay overtime in accordance with MDOT’s Overtime Reimbursement Guidelines, dated May 1, 2013. The guidelines can be found at http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot/Final_Overtime_Guidelines_05-01- 13_420286_7.pdf?20130509081848. MDOT’s overtime reimbursement policies are intended primarily for construction engineering work. Overtime reimbursement for all other types of work will be approved on a case by case basis.

Page 11 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

DIVER INSPECTION WORK PACKAGE

NORTH REGION Structure Next Insp. Bridge ID Facility Carried Features Intersected Structure Name Latitude Longitude Number Date 326 04104012000B010 M-65 THUNDER BAY RIVER 04012-B01 7/31/2020 45.1208 83.7223 330 04104021000B030 M-32 S BR THUNDER BAY RIVER 04021-B03 7/30/2020 45.0609 83.5851 335 04104032000B010 US-23 THUNDER BAY RIVER 04032-B01 7/30/2020 45.0746 83.4481 359 05105011000B010 US-31 ELK RIVER 05011-B01 7/27/2020 44.8999 85.4094 752 10110011000B010 M-22 BETSIE RIVER 10011-B01 7/28/2020 44.6204 86.2215 1490 16116023000B020 M-68, M-33 BLACK RIVER 16023-B02 7/31/2020 45.3551 84.2917 4129 35135032000B010 US-23 AU SABLE RIVER 35032-B01 7/29/2020 44.4075 83.3247 6439 51151021000B010 M-55 MANISTEE RIVER 51021-B01 7/28/2020 44.2638 86.2951 6443 51151031000B010 M-22 RICHLEY CREEK 51031-B01 7/28/2020 44.4824 86.2322 7541 60160022000B020 M-32 THUNDER BAY RIVER 60022-B02 7/31/2020 45.0086 83.9725 12574 83183053000B010 M-115 MANISTEE RIVER 83053-B01 7/27/2020 44.4065 85.7336

SUPERIOR REGION Structure Next Insp. Bridge ID Facility Carried Features Intersected Structure Name Latitude Longitude Number Date 485 07107012000B050 US-41 BAYOU & BLK WATER CREEK 07012-B05 7/13/2021 46.7535 88.4938 500 07107041000B010 M-38 STURGEON RIVER 07041-B01 7/13/2021 46.7827 88.6179 1563 17117011000B020 M-123 TAHQUAMENON RIVER 17011-B02 7/12/2021 46.5565 85.0314 1595 17117043000C010 M-48 BR BIG MUNUSCONG RIVER 17043-C01 7/9/2021 46.0715 84.2294 2097 21121024000C010 US-2 BR OGONTZ RIVER 21024-C01 7/8/2021 45.8971 86.7543 2098 21121024000C020 US-2 LITTLE FISHDAM RIVER 21024-C02 7/9/2021 45.8921 86.5144 2173 22122011000B010 M-95 MENOMINEE RIVER 22011-B01 7/14/2021 45.7856 88.0822 3401 31131051000B020 US-41 BACKWATER PORTAGE RIVER 31051-B02 7/13/2021 47.0093 88.4927 3402 31131051000B030 US-41 STURGEON RIVER SLOUGH 31051-B03 7/13/2021 47.0122 88.4967 3403 31131051000B040 US-41 STURGEON RIVER 31051-B04 7/13/2021 47.0175 88.5058 3406 31131051000C010 US-41 JARVI CREEK 31051-C01 7/14/2021 46.967 88.4605 3407 31131051000C020 US-41 MARSH DRAIN 31051-C02 7/14/2021 47.0063 88.4894 5968 49149041000B010 M-134 PINE RIVER 49041-B01 7/9/2021 46.0571 84.6567 6478 52152031000C010 M-35 SAWMILL CREEK 52031-C01 7/12/2021 46.2808 87.3252 6480 52152032000B030 M-35 MIDDLE BR ESCANABA RIVER 52032-B03 7/12/2021 46.3156 87.5311 6799 55155031000B010 M-35 BIG CEDAR RIVER 55031-B01 7/8/2021 45.4142 87.3498 9673 75175021000B010 US-2 MANISTIQUE RIVER 75021-B01 7/17/2024 45.9537 86.2493

Page 12 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019

SUPERIOR REGION - SPECIAL INSPECTION Structure Next Insp. Bridge ID Facility Carried Features Intersected Structure Name Latitude Longitude Number Date 487 07107012000C020 US-41 BOYLES CREEK 07012-C02 46.7587 88.5003 2095 21121024000B070 US-2 BIG FISHDAM RIVER 21024-B07 45.9026 86.5773 2096 21121024000B080 US-2 LITTLE FISHDAM RIVER 21024-B08 45.9009 86.5667 4168 36136021000C010 US-2 NASH CREEK 36021-C01 46.1139 88.7089 6802 55155031000C020 M-35 SPRINGER CREEK 55031-C02 45.1817 87.5667 6804 55155031000C040 M-35 BAILEY CREEK 55031-C04 45.2554 87.4827 6805 55155031000C050 M-35 ROCHEREAU CREEK 55031-C05 45.2911 87.4455 9686 75175051000C010 M-77 LAKE ANN LOUISE 75051-C01 46.1225 85.9273 9700 75175061000C050 M-28 BR MARSH CREEK 75061-C05 46.3456 86.1579 13819 55155031000C060 M-35 BIS CREEK 55031-C06 45.1723 87.5763

Page 13 of 13 Final Posted Scope: 11/25/2019