DOCSLIB.ORG

DAVIS-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf (2.307Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TALES OF EXPULSION: REMEMBERING POPULATION TRANSFER IN WEST GERMANY AND THE CZECH LANDS, 1968-1997 A Dissertation by STEVEN B DAVIS ENJAMIN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Adam R. Seipp Committee Members, Chester S. L. Dunning Stjepan G. Meštrović David Z. Chroust Head of Department, David Vaught May 2017 Major Subject: History Copyright 2017 Steven B. Davis ABSTRACT This dissertation investigates changing memory discourses of the post- World War II (WWII) expulsion of ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia in late-Cold War Central Europe. By uncovering the grassroots networks of Czech and Sudeten German cooperation in which these discourses evolved I illustrate how this cooperation contributed to German-Czech understanding, after 1989. This dissertation addresses three crucial questions: Firstly, why did revision of the expulsion become an important issue for Czech dissidents and émigré activists across Europe? Secondly, how did the Catholic Sudeten German organization the Ackermann Gemeinde emerge as an important partner for Czech dissidents, ,the underground Czech Catholic, Church, and émigré activists during this period? And thirdly, how did these grassroots cooperations affect public discourse and policy in German-Czech relations after 1989? I argue that the push to reconcile disparate West German and Czechoslovakian narratives of the expulsion and the promotion of a shared cultural heritage illuminates an early process of transnationalizing historical memory and identity that defines more recent discourses of history-writing in Europe in the 21st century. This project explores assertions of a cosmopolitan Central European identity in Czechoslovakia and West Germany that emerged in Czech underground and émigré circles and in prominent sectors of Sudeten Germans in West Germany in the 1970s. Based on archival research and interviews conducted in Germany and ii the Czech Republic, I use this case study to speak to broader currents in the ways Europeans think about identity and history-writing as they deal with histories of conflict and violence on the continent in the context of increasing European integration. iii DEDICATION For Sarah and Sophie. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support of my committee and all those around me who provided encouragement, support, and guidance throughout the process. First and foremost, I would like to thank my committee chair and mentor, Dr. Adam R. Seipp. He was one of my primary inspirations for taking up graduate studies in history, and his unequivocal support and guidance have helped me in more ways than I can ever express. His keen ability to help me refine raw ideas and mold them into pointed arguments is truly inspiring. I owe so much of the insight in this work to him, and it is with humility that I put my name on it, knowing that without his mentorship this dissertation would be a mere shadow of what it has become. Dr. Stjepan G. Meštrović has been an unwavering rock of support and was always happy to meet over coffee and hash through my findings with inquisitive curiosity. His questions and perspective helped me see the greater sociological forces at play in my research story and their implications, and for that I am truly thankful. Dr. Chester S. L. Dunning has been a bedrock of support from the beginning and always had an open door to discuss my progress and guide me along the process. His guidance and encouragement helped me through the ups and downs and made me an all-around better scholar and person. In addition to his enthusiasm and dedication, Dr. David Z. Chroust provided crucial insight and perspective on Czech history and challenged me to think bigger and consider v sources and storylines I otherwise would not have encountered, and his sharp editorial eye has helped me turn rough drafts into a polished final product. Thank you to all my friends and colleagues in the History Department for making my time here such an enjoyable and rewarding experience, and for ensuring that I had every resource and opportunity available to me through generous funding and unwavering support. I especially want to thank the excellent staff at Evans Library for never failing to track down copies of every rare book, newspaper or journal I ever requested, and for even purchasing them when borrowing was not possible. This institution is truly remarkable. A very special thank you to all those who opened up and shared their personal life stories with me, including Matthias Dörr, Rudolf Kučera, František Miks, Jiří Múller, Petr Pithart, Miroslav Pospíšil, Franz Olbert, Anton Otte, Bernd Posselt, and Wolfgang Stock. The experiences you shared helped immensely in crafting this dissertation, and I hope I have treated them with the respect they deserve. In addition to granting his time for interviews on several occasions, I would like to especially thank Vilém Prečan for his generous support in guiding my research and assisting me in setting up interviews and new contacts. A historian is only as good as their archivists, and I would like to thank Dr. Benita Berning of the Archdiocese Archives in Munich, Dr. Helmut Dimattio of the Bavarian State Archives, Jitka Hanáková at the Czechoslovak Documentation Center, Dr. Eleonora Jeřábková at the Moravian National Museum, and the excellent staffs of the Libri Prohibiti Archive and the archives of the Czechoslovak State vi Security. I also would like to thank Wolfgang Stock for generously loaning me his entire personal archive on the Academia Copernicana. I want to thank my family for their unquestioning support and encouragement over the years as I pursued my degree even when it meant me (and perhaps more importantly, their grandchildren) being absent for weeks and months at a time. Their love has kept me going throughout this process. And finally, to my loving wife, Anne. You quit your job and left home to come across the ocean to help me pursue my dream, then you left it again to go back with me while on research only to return again. Your support has been unwavering through thick and thin, and you have always been understanding, patient, and encouraging even when it meant barely seeing me for days, weeks, and even months. You have been my research assistant, my sounding board, my editor, my rock, and my friend. This would not have been possible without you. vii CONTRIBUTORS AND FUNDING SOURCES This work was supervised by a dissertation committee consisting of Professor Adam R. Seipp (advisor), Professor Chester S. L. Dunning of the Department of History, Professor Stjepan G. Meštrović of the Department of Sociology, and Dr. Daviz Z. Chroust of the Cushing Memorial Library and Archives. All work for the dissertation was completed independently by the student. The research and writing of this dissertation was supported by grants and fellowships from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the U.S. Department of Education, a Murray and Celeste Fasken Graduate Student Research Grant, the Department of History, the College of Liberal Arts, and the Office of Professional and Graduate Studies. The contents of this dissertation are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of these institutions. viii ABBREVIATIONS AC Academia Copernicana AG Ackermann Gemeinde BayHStA Bavarian State Archives (Bayerisches Hauptstaatsarchiv) BdV Federation of German Expellees (Bund der Vertriebenen) CC Collegium Carolinum CDU Christian Democratic Union (Christlich Demokratische Union) Charter Charter 77 Council Sudeten German Council (Sudetendeutscher Rat) ČR Czech Republic (Česká republika) ČSDS Czechoslovak Documentation Center (Československé dokumentační středisko) ČSFR Czechoslovak Federative Republic ČSSR Czechoslovak Socialist Republic Czech Mission Czech Catholic Mission in West Germany (Česká misie) Decrees Beneš Decrees EU European Union FDP Free Democratic Party (Freie Demokratische Partei) IGMF International Society for Human Rights in West Germany JA Junge Aktion JHEF Jan Hus Educational Foundation ix OB Opus Bonum Party Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (Komunistická strana Československa) SDA Sudeten German Archive (Sudetendeutsches Archiv) SL Sudeten German Homeland Association (Sudentendeutsche Landsmannschaft) StB State Security (Státní bezpečnost) Thesis “Thesis on the Deportation of the Czechoslovakian Germans” by Danubius (Ján Mlynárik) WSA Wolfgang Stock Personal Archive WWII World War II ZgV Center Against Expulsions (Zentrum gegen Vertreibung) x TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ ii DEDICATION ........................................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... v CONTRIBUTORS AND FUNDING SOURCES ............................................................................. viii ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • DER SPIEGEL Jahrgang 1994 Heft 05

    DER SPIEGEL Jahrgang 1994 Heft 05

    Werbeseite Werbeseite MNO DAS DEUTSCHE NACHRICHTEN-MAGAZIN Hausmitteilung Betr.: Wahlen, Crime a Das Super-Wahljahr ’94 fordert seine Rechte – vom Bürger, der sich durch 19 Wahlen möglicherweise überfordert sieht, von den Medien, die das Mara- thon zu werten haben. Nie war Demokratie so span- nend. Steht Deutschland erneut vor einer Wende? Wie konkurriert der Frust der Nichtwähler mit ei- ner erstaunlichen Polit-Lust, die sich im Elan neuer Bewegungen zeigt? In einer losen Folge von Artikeln analysieren SPIEGEL-Redakteure das “Feind- bild Politiker“ (Seite 36), die Mechanismen und die Schwächen der Parteiendemokratie sowie den um- worbenen großen Unbekannten des Jahres – den Wäh- ler. a Wer zöge nicht das sonnige Florida dem Niesel-Ne- bel-Nässe-Deutschland vor? Leider werden in dem Sonnenland Touristen neuerdings bevorzugt umge- bracht – so wie es einer der Hel- den des Krimi-Au- tors Carl Hiaasen empfohlen hatte, um Florida touri- stenrein zu ma- chen. Nach einem Besuch bei dem Schriftsteller, der gerade den Internationalen Deutschen Krimi- preis erhalten Polizist, Wellershoff bei Unfall-Aufnahme hat, erlebte SPIEGEL-Redakteu- rin Marianne Wellershoff Hiaasen pur: Auf dem Highway I-95 mitten in Miami rammte nächtens ein schwerer Geländewagen das Mietauto von Wellershoff und Fotografin Cindy Karp, offenkundig, um mittels Unfall einen Stopp zu erzwingen. Als Wellershoff Gas gab, tauchte der Verfolger neben dem Mietwagen auf. Die Insassinnen hörten es knallen, die Tür bekam eine erbsengroße Delle ab. Florida-Mietwagen, früher durch Kennzeichen mit Y oder Z am Anfang ausgewiesen, sind heute angeblich nicht mehr zu identifizieren. Wirklich nicht? Im Hof der Leihwa- genfirma standen nun lauter Autos mit den Buchsta- ben L und P – die Gangster werden es bemerkt ha- ben.
  • Political, Moral and Legal Aspects of the Resettlement of German Population After World War II

    Political, Moral and Legal Aspects of the Resettlement of German Population After World War II

    POLISH REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW 2018, Vol. 7, Issue 2 WOLLT IHR DEN TOTALEN KRIEG? Political, Moral and LEGal Aspects of the Resettlement of German Population After World War II Jerzy Kranz* Abstract: Germany had started the Second World War in an intentional and conscious manner, obviously being aware that every action can have unpredictable and unwanted consequences. The Potsdam decisions were taken by the Great Powers after assuming supreme authority in Germany. They constituted a manifestation of the Allies’ rights and responsibilities. The territorial changes of Germany and the transfer of population were part of the general regulation of the effects of the Second World War. These decisions were not a simple matter of revenge. They must be perceived in a wider political perspective of European policy. The resettlement by Germany of ethnic Germans to the Reich or to the territories it occupied constituted an instrument of National Socialist policy. This German policy turned out in 1945 to be a tragic irony of fate. The resettlement decided in Potsdam must be perceived in the context of German legal responsibility for the war’s outbreak. The individual perception of the resettlement and individual guilt are different from * Professor, Department of International Law and European Union, Kozminski University 9 Jerzy Kranz the international responsibility of the state and from the political-historical responsibility of the nation. In our discussion we made the distinction between the individual and the collective aspect as well as between the legal and historical/ political aspect. We deal with the guilt of individuals (criminal, political, moral), the international legal responsibility of states, and the political and historical responsibility of nations (societies).
  • Twenty Years After the Iron Curtain: the Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010

    Twenty Years After the Iron Curtain: the Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010

    Twenty Years after the Iron Curtain: The Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010 Assistant Professor at Masaryk University in the Czech Republic n November of last year, the Czech Republic commemorated the fall of the communist regime in I Czechoslovakia, which occurred twenty years prior.1 The twentieth anniversary invites thoughts, many times troubling, on how far the Czechs have advanced on their path from a totalitarian regime to a pluralistic democracy. This lecture summarizes and evaluates the process of democratization of the Czech Republic’s political institutions, its transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market economy, and the transformation of its civil society. Although the political and economic transitions have been largely accomplished, democratization of Czech civil society is a road yet to be successfully traveled. This lecture primarily focuses on why this transformation from a closed to a truly open and autonomous civil society unburdened with the communist past has failed, been incomplete, or faced numerous roadblocks. HISTORY The Czech Republic was formerly the Czechoslovak Republic. It was established in 1918 thanks to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and his strong advocacy for the self-determination of new nations coming out of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after the World War I. Although Czechoslovakia was based on the concept of Czech nationhood, the new nation-state of fifteen-million people was actually multi- ethnic, consisting of people from the Czech lands (Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia), Slovakia, Subcarpathian Ruthenia (today’s Ukraine), and approximately three million ethnic Germans. Since especially the Sudeten Germans did not join Czechoslovakia by means of self-determination, the nation- state endorsed the policy of cultural pluralism, granting recognition to the various ethnicities present on its soil.
  • A Supplementary Figures and Tables

    A Supplementary Figures and Tables

    A Supplementary figures and tables This Online Appendix provides supplementary material and is for online publication only. A1 Figure A1: Population in the Czech lands (in millions) 10 8 6 4 2 Total population Czechs Germans 0 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Notes: The figure shows total population of the Czech Republic (Czech lands consisting of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia) between 1921 and 2011 (light gray), and population by self-declared ethnicity (black and dark gray). The German population (dark gray bullets) was almost entirely expelled in 1945 and 1946 and partly replaced by residents mainly from Czech hinterlands and Slovakia. ‘Czechs’ refers to all other non-German residents (black triangles). A2 Figure A2: Demarcation line and pre-existing infrastructure 1930 counties 1938 Sudetenland Main roads and railways Rivers Notes: The maps compare the demarcation line between US and Red Army forces in 1945 Czechoslovakia (red line) to county boundaries as of 1930, Sudetenland as of the Munich Agreement in 1938, main roads and railways, and rivers. A3 Figure A3: Demarcation line between US and Red Army forces in 1945 Czechoslovakia US-liberated Sudetenland Red Army-liberated Sudetenland Notes: The map zooms into Figure 1 in the main text. The red line represents the demarcation line between US and Red Army forces in 1945 Czechoslovakia, which runs from Karlovy Vary over Plzeň to České Budějovice (black dots). Prague is the capital city. The US-liberated regions of Sudetenland are in dark gray, the Red Army-liberated regions are in light gray. Sudetenland was settled by ethnic Germans and annexed by Nazi Germany in October 1938.
  • 16. Bundesversammlung Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Berlin, 12

    16. Bundesversammlung Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Berlin, 12

    16. Bundesversammlung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Berlin, 12. Februar 2017 Gemeinsame Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages und des Bundesrates anlässlich der Eidesleistung des Bundespräsidenten Berlin, 22. März 2017 Inhalt 4 16. Bundesversammlung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 6 Rede des Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages, Prof. Dr. Norbert Lammert 16 Konstituierung der 16. Bundesversammlung 28 Bekanntgabe des Wahlergebnisses 34 Rede von Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier 40 Gemeinsame Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages und des Bundesrates anlässlich der Eidesleistung des Bundespräsidenten Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier 42 Programm 44 Begrüßung durch den Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages, Prof. Dr. Norbert Lammert 48 Ansprache der Präsidentin des Bundesrates, Malu Dreyer 54 Ansprache des Bundespräsidenten a. D., Joachim Gauck 62 Eidesleistung des Bundespräsidenten Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier 64 Ansprache des Bundespräsidenten Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier 16. Bundesversammlung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Berlin, 12. Februar 2017 Nehmen Sie bitte Platz. Sehr geehrter Herr Bundespräsident! Exzellenzen! Meine Damen und Herren! Ich begrüße Sie alle, die Mitglieder und Gäste, herzlich zur 16. Bundesversammlung im Reichstagsgebäude in Berlin, dem Sitz des Deutschen Bundestages. Ich freue mich über die Anwesenheit unseres früheren Bundesprä- sidenten Christian Wulff und des langjährigen österreichischen Bundespräsidenten Heinz Fischer. Seien Sie uns herzlich willkommen! Beifall Meine Damen und Herren, der 12. Februar ist in der Demokratiegeschichte unseres Landes kein auffälliger, aber eben auch kein beliebiger Tag. Heute vor genau 150 Jahren, am 12. Februar 1867, wurde ein Reichstag gewählt, nach einem in Deutschland nördlich der Mainlinie damals in jeder Hinsicht revolu- tionären, nämlich dem allgemeinen, gleichen Rede des Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages, Prof. Dr. Norbert Lammert 6 und direkten Wahlrecht. Der Urnengang zum konstituierenden Reichstag des Norddeut- schen Bundes stützte sich auf Vorarbeiten der bekannte.
  • Young Czechs' Perceptions of the Velvet Divorce and The

    Young Czechs' Perceptions of the Velvet Divorce and The

    YOUNG CZECHS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE VELVET DIVORCE AND THE MODERN CZECH IDENTITY By BRETT RICHARD CHLOUPEK Bachelor of Science in Geography Bachelor of Science in C.I.S. University of Nebraska Kearney Kearney, NE 2005 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2007 YOUNG CZECHS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE VELVET DIVORCE AND THE MODERN CZECH IDENTITY Thesis Approved: Reuel Hanks Dr. Reuel Hanks (Chair) Dale Lightfoot Dr. Dale Lightfoot Joel Jenswold Dr. Joel Jenswold Dr. A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Reuel Hanks for encouraging me to pursue this project. His continued support and challenging insights into my work made this thesis a reality. Thanks go to my other committee members, Dr. Dale Lightfoot and Dr. Joel Jenswold for their invaluable advice, unique expertise, and much needed support throughout the writing of my thesis. A great deal of gratitude is due to the faculties of Charles University in Prague, CZ and Masaryk University in Brno, CZ for helping administer student surveys and donating their valuable time. Thank you to Hana and Ludmila Svobodova for taking care of me over the years and being my family away from home in the Moravské Budejovice. Thanks go to Sylvia Mihalik for being my resident expert on all things Slovak and giving me encouragement. Thank you to my grandmother Edith Weber for maintaining ties with our Czech relatives and taking me back to the ‘old country.’ Thanks to all of my extended family for remembering our heritage and keeping some of its traditions.
  • Papers Situation Gruenen

    Papers Situation Gruenen

    PAPERS JOCHEN WEICHOLD ZUR SITUATION DER GRÜNEN IM HERBST 2014 ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG JOCHEN WEICHOLD ZUR SITUATION DER GRÜNEN IM HERBST 2014 REIHE PAPERS ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG Zum Autor: Dr. JOCHEN WEICHOLD ist freier Politikwissenschaftler. IMPRESSUM PAPERS wird herausgegeben von der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung und erscheint unregelmäßig V. i. S . d. P.: Martin Beck Franz-Mehring-Platz 1 • 10243 Berlin • www.rosalux.de ISSN 2194-0916 • Redaktionsschluss: November 2014 Gedruckt auf Circleoffset Premium White, 100 % Recycling 2 Inhalt Einleitung 5 Wahlergebnisse der Grünen bei Europa- und bei Bundestagswahlen 7 Ursachen für die Niederlage der Grünen bei der Bundestagswahl 2013 11 Wählerwanderungen von und zu den Grünen bei Europa- und bei Bundestagswahlen 16 Wahlergebnisse der Grünen bei Landtags- und bei Kommunalwahlen 18 Zur Sozialstruktur der Wähler der Grünen 24 Mitgliederentwicklung der Grünen 32 Zur Sozialstruktur der Mitglieder der Grünen 34 Politische Positionen der Partei Bündnis 90/Die Grünen 36 Haltung der Grünen zu aktuellen Fragen 46 Innerparteiliche Differenzierungsprozesse bei den Grünen 48 Ausblick: Schwarz-Grün auf Bundesebene? 54 Anhang 58 Zusammensetzung des Bundesvorstandes der Grünen (seit Oktober 2013) 58 Zusammensetzung des Parteirates der Grünen (seit Oktober 2013) 58 Abgeordnete der Grünen im Deutschen Bundestag im Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2013 59 Abgeordnete der Grünen im Europäischen Parlament im Ergebnis der Europawahl 2014 61 Wählerwanderungen von bzw. zu den Grünen bei der Landtagswahl in Sachsen 2014 im Vergleich zur Landtagswahl 2009 62 3 Wählerwanderungen von bzw. zu den Grünen bei der Landtagswahl in Brandenburg 2014 im Vergleich zur Landtagswahl 2009 62 Wählerwanderungen von bzw. zu den Grünen bei der Landtagswahl in Thüringen 2014 im Vergleich zur Landtagswahl 2009 63 Zur Sozialstruktur der Grün-Wähler bei den Landtagswahlen in Branden- burg, Sachsen und Thüringen 2014 63 Anmerkungen 65 4 Einleitung Die Partei Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (Grüne) stellt zwar mit 63 Abgeordneten die kleinste Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag.
  • 5. Fight Against Terrorism (Debate)

    5. Fight Against Terrorism (Debate)

    C 124 E/16EN Official Journal of the European Union 25.5.2006 Tuesday 7 June 2005 — Alain Lipietz, Monica Frassoni, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Raül Romeva i Rueda and Eva Lichtenberger, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0365/2005); — Jonas Sjöstedt, Helmuth Markov, Luisa Morgantini, Vittorio Agnoletto, Ilda Figueiredo and Athana- sios Pafilis, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0367/2005); — Fernando Fernández Martín, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra and Bernd Posselt, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0376/2005). II. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN ALGERIA — Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, on behalf of the ALDE Group, on Algeria (B6-0359/2005); — Pasqualina Napoletano and Raimon Obiols i Germà, on behalf of the PSE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0363/2005); — Hélène Flautre and Raül Romeva i Rueda, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0366/2005); — Francis Wurtz, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0368/2005); — Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, on behalf of the UEN Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0380/2005); — Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0381/2005). III. AZERBAIJAN — Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, on behalf of the ALDE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0360/2005); — Pasqualina Napoletano, Hannes Swoboda and Jan Marinus Wiersma, on behalf of the PSE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0364/2005); — Vittorio Agnoletto, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on the situation in Azerbaijan (B6-0369/2005); — Charles Tannock, Vytautas Landsbergis, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi and Bernd Posselt, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0375/2005); — Bastiaan Belder, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0378/2005); — Marie Anne Isler Béguin and Cem Özdemir, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0379/2005); — Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, on behalf of the UEN Group, on human rights and democracy in Azerbaijan (B6-0382/2005).
  • Afet Pv(2009)0901 1

    Afet Pv(2009)0901 1

    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Foreign Affairs AFET_PV(2009)0901_1 MINUTES Meeting of 1 September 2009, from 15:00 to 18:30, and 2 September 2009, from 09:00 to 12:30 and from 15:00 to 18:30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15:10 on Tuesday 1 September 2009, with Gabriele Albertini (Chair) in the chair. 1. Adoption of agenda AFET_OJ (2009)0901_01v03-00 The revised draft agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 16 July 2009 PV – PE427.151v01-00 21 July 2009 PV – PE427.176v01-00 Decision: the minutes were approved. 3. Chairman’s announcements • the hearing of Commissioner-Designate Karel de GUCHT was taking place in parallel with the meeting; the Committee on Foreign Affairs was represented by Mr Fiorello Provera, 1st Vice-Chairperson and Ms Heidi Hautala, Chairperson of the Subcommittee on Human Rights, • the Chairman would have his first meeting with the High Representative for the CFSP, Javier SOLANA on Thursday, 3 September 2009 and would debrief the Enlarged Bureau at its next meeting, • the Chairman announced that he would be participating in the meeting of the PV\788923EN.doc PE427.984v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Conference of the Chairs of the EU Foreign Affairs Committees on Monday, 7 September 2009 in Gotland, organized by the Swedish Presidency. 4. Any other business 5. Exchange of views with Pieter Feith, EU Special Representative in Kosovo Speakers: Doris Pack, Hannes Swoboda, Graham Watson, Ulrike Lunacek, Geoffrey Van Orden, Nikolaos Chountis, Marietta Giannakou, Zoran Thaler, Pino Arlacchi, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Ana Gomes, Richard Howitt, Johannes Cornelis van Baalen, Evgeni Kirilov, Jelko Kacin, María Paloma Muñiz De Urquiza Decision: request to send an ad-hoc delegation to the municipal elections in Kosovo on 15 November 2009 to be submitted to CoP.
  • Dezember 2017

    Dezember 2017

    ★ ★ ★ Dezember ★ ★ 2017 ★ ★ ★ Vereinigung ehemaliger Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages und des Europäischen Parlaments e. V. Editorial Rita Pawelski Informationen ...Grüße aus dem Saarland Termine Personalien Titelthemen Mitgliederreise Saarland und Luxemburg Berichte / Erlebtes Europäische Assoziation Jahreshauptversammlung in Bonn Mein Leben danach Erlesenes Aktuelles Die Geschäftsführerin informiert Jubilare © Carmen Pägelow Editorial Informationen Willkommen in der Vereinigung der ehemaligen Abgeordneten, Termine © Thomas Rafalzyk liebe neue Ehemalige! 20.03.2018 Frühlingsempfang der DPG (voraussichtlich) Für mehr als 200 Abgeordnete 21.03.2018 Mitgliederversammlung der DPG (voraussichtlich) beginnt nun eine neue Lebens- 14./15.05.2018 Mitgliederveranstaltung mit zeit. Sie gehören dem Deutschen Empfang des Bundespräsidenten / Bundestag nicht mehr an. Je Jahreshauptversammlung mit Wahl / nach Alter starten sie entweder Studientag „Die Zukunft Europas“ in eine neue Phase der Berufs- 12.-20. Juni 2018 Mitgliederreise nach Rumänien tätigkeit oder sie bereiten sich auf ihren dritten Lebensabschnitt vor. Aber egal, was für sie für sich und ihre Zukunft geplant haben: die Zeit im Bundestag ist nun Vergangenheit. Personalien Ich weiß aus Erfahrung, dass der Übergang in die neue Zeit von vielen Erinnerungen – und manchmal auch von Wehmut – begleitet wird. Man hat doch aus Überzeugung im Deutschen Bundestag gearbeitet… und oft auch mit Herzblut. Man hatte sich an den Arbeitsrhythmus gewöhnt und daran, dass der Tag oft 14 bis 16 Arbeitsstunden hatte. Man schätzte die fleißigen Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter im Büro, die Planungen über- © Deutscher Bundestag / Achim Melde nommen, Reisen gebucht, an Geburtstage erinnert, den Termin- kalender geführt, Sitzungen vorbereitet und Akten sortiert haben. Auf einmal ist man selbst dafür zuständig: welchen Zug muss ich nehmen, wann fährt der Bus, wer hat wann Geburtstag.
  • UID Jg. 19 1965 Nr. 34, Union in Deutschland

    UID Jg. 19 1965 Nr. 34, Union in Deutschland

    Z 6796 C BONN 26. AUGUST 1965 NR 34 • 19. JAHRGANG UNIONtnl>^utsc/üantt INFORMATIONSDIENST der Christlich Demokratischen und Christlich Sozialen Union Die Grenze zur SPD Hessische CDU kritisiert sozialdemokratischen Machtmißbrauch Eine scharfe Grenze gegenüber der SPD wurde in der letzten Landesver- ten, so verspielten sie gleichzeitig die sammlung der hessischen CDU in Wiesbaden gezogen. Auf der Rednerliste Chancen für ein Europa, das über dem standen u.a. Frau Bundesminister Dr. Schwarzhaupt, Bundestagsabgeordne- westlichen Teil des Kontinents hinaus- \x Dr. Martin und CDU-Landesvorsitzender Dr. Fay. gehe. Die SPD bezeichnete Dr. Fay als eine dem Traditionalismus verhaftete Die Erhaltung der Freundschaft mit den Aus diesen und aus wirtschaftlichen Partei, die keine neuen Ideen habe und USA, die Weiterentwicklung der Freund- Gründen sei der Sozialismus nicht zu ge- sich in einem noch immer nicht vollzoge- schaft mit Frankreich und den Ausbau brauchen, meinte Dr. Martin. Erst der nen Prozeß der Umstellung um eine der kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Be- kulturelle Einfluß und die Wirtschafts- „künstliche Modernität" bemühe. Dies ziehungen zu Osteuropa bezeichnete die kraft hätten es der Bundesrepublik er- wundere nicht, da die Grundeinstellung Spitzenkandidatin der hessischen CDU- möglicht, in Ländern des Ostblocks prä- der SPD auf dem „Phylosophischen Pessi- Landesliste, Frau Bundesminister Dr. sent zu werden, ohne in der Deutschen mismus" basiere. Die heutige SPD ist Schwarzhaupt, auf der Landesversamm- Frage Konzessionen eingehen zu müssen. nach Ansicht von Dr. Fay zu sehr nach lung der CDU Hessen in Wiesbaden als Dieser Weg müsse weiter beschriften den Erfordernissen der Massenpsycholo- Kernstücke der deutschen Außen- und werden. gie ausgerichtet, als daß man ihr und Sicherheitspolitik in der Sozialpolitik ihren Führern vertrauen könne.
  • Public Opinion and Democracy In

    Public Opinion and Democracy In

    PUBLIC OPINION AND DEMOCRACY IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE (1992-2004) by Zofia Maka A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and International Relations Summer 2014 © 2014 Zofia Maka All Rights Reserved UMI Number: 3642337 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3642337 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 PUBLIC OPINION AND DEMOCRACY IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE (1992-2004) by Zofia Maka Approved: __________________________________________________________ Gretchen Bauer, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Political Science and International Relations Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ James G. Richards, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Julio Carrion, Ph.D.