<<

Allopatric - 2

Allopatric speciation in nature Ring in the lab Parallel speciation in nature [Blackboard: of 2]

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 1 Allopatric speciation

Platanus

P. occidentalis Eastern N America P. orientalis SE , SW

P. x hispanica (hybrida) "London plane“, fertile

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 2 Allopatric speciation

n When is allopatric speciation complete?

q isolation only by a geographic barrier is not considered speciation

q , in

q no hybridization in the lab? sufficient but not necessary

q morphological / genetic differentiation? not enough for BSC!

n Can we prove that speciation occurred in allopatry?

q if currently sympatric, did a geographic barrier exist in the past?

q if currently allopatric, are they biological species?

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 3 Allopatric speciation in nature

n Known geographic barrier: The closed 3 My ago Alpheus (snapping shrimp, Knowlton et al 1993)

behavioural isolation (white=strong) mtDNA

C=, P=Pacific sister spp 3-10 My old, older spp are living deeper

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 4 Allopatric speciation in nature

n Sister species are often allopatric

(hybridize) Diadema mtDNA tree (Lessios et al. 2001)

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 5

Larus argentatus - L. fuscus (Phylloscopus trochiloides) circumpolar, overlap in N Europe around Tibet and the

interbreeding between adjacent , reproductive isolation in sympatry

- are these “good” species? still exists via the ring - if the ring is continuous, this is not allopatric speciation - the ring shows discontinuities in real examples (e.g. sudden change of allozyme frequencies) – past allopatry?

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 6 Allopatric speciation in the lab?

n Experimental lines subject to divergent selection : DDT resistant vs control lines maintained for 40 years in isolation (Boake et al. 2003)

Multiple choice mating test (expect 1:1:1:1 under random mating)

s 40 2

g 35 35 n χ =16.85* i

t 30 30

a - ? 23 m 25

f - hitchhiking? 20 o 15 r 15 - independent e

b 10

m 5 e.g. by ? u n 0 genes responsible for Res x Res Cont x Cont Res x Cont Cont x Res isolation and for resistance weak prezygotic isolation (no postzygotic) are on different

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 7 Allopatric speciation in the lab?

Melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae, Miyatake & Shimizu 1999)

Selected lines: Diurnal mating activity short development -1 short development -2 long development -1 long development -2 pleiotropy "clock genes"

Multiple-choice mating tests no drift hitchhiking unlikely

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 8 Modes of allopatric speciation

n Vicariant speciation: isolated populations of reasonably large size

n : a small population becomes isolated or an isolated patch ("island") is colonised

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 9 Modes of allopatric speciation

n Several islands: natural replicates J

q isolates from the same main population may differ due to sampling (founder effect) and may evolve into different species

q or may follow similar evolutionary pathways and become one (polyphyletic) species = parallel speciation strong evidence for adaptive speciation

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 10 Parallel speciation

n Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) benthic - limnetic species pair, two biological species across 6 lakes q single origin of benthic + limnetic? q in each lake? q double invasion of low-lying lakes?

microsatellite DNA, nearby lakes max. likelihood tree B = benthic L = limnetic S = solitary M = marine Taylor & McPhail 2000

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 11 Parallel speciation

Are alternative trees worse? significant = rejected

double invasion (some sympatric speciation cannot be ruled out)

multiple origin of benthic-limnetic pairs: polyphyletic species parallel speciation

SPECIATION / EVA KISDI / 2018 FALL / LECTURE 6 12