<<

1.5 million described BIOL2007 Maybe as many as 30 million species overall

How does happen? THE ORIGINS OF SPECIES Speciation – within a

Need to prevent/reduce flow for species to . Kanchon Dasmahapatra Process is usually slow. Genetic divergence takes time

How do species evolve? : vicariance

Geographic modes of speciation allopatric parapatric sympatric

Causes of speciation random forces ( and drift) deterministic forces ()

Barrier to (mixing)

1 1) Allopatric speciation Alpheus snapping shrimps a) Vicariance Range of a species split in two. No gene flow. Divergence in separate

Eventually, barriers erode and maybe . Three outcomes are possible:

1) Little divergence: broad or narrow zone.

2) /sterililty Snapping 3) May have already become separate species shrimps

P C Alpheus snapping shrimps b) Allopatric speciation - the founder effect C P A speedier allopatric mechanism C across P was suggested: "founder effect" C P Mayr (1954): C P P 1) founders , take small fraction of available genetic P C variation (). P C C P 2) Strong selection leading to to different P C ecological in new home. P P C C P P C C P C P C C C P

2 Hawaiian Hawaiian Drosophila

500 named species + 350 other known but undescribed species

Start of Hawaiian Drosophila dated to 20 Mya

Similar speciation patterns for Hawaiian snails and crickets Carson 1983

Host races in the maggot, 2) Rhagoletis pomonella Genetic divergence of populations inhabiting the same geographical area Native : hawthorn

Became apple pest in 1860s, Speciation must occur under very high levels of gene due to a flow. Selection causing speciation must be very strong. Apple-eating form quickly spread all over E. USA

Reduced gene flow of 6% between races

If this kind of sympatric (or almost-speciation) can occur in a few tens of years, could be an extremely important over geological time

3 in African Great Lakes Cichlid fish in crater lakes Schliewen et al (1994)

Lake Area / No. endemic Area Endemic 2 km species Lake / km 2 species Victoria 68,600 ~500 Barombi Mbo 4 11 Malawi 29,600 660-1000 Tanganayika 32,900 170-250 Bermin 0.6 9 Victoria mtDNA trees One or two colonisations in Tanganayika and Malawi

Malawi Specialised feeders : males often brightly coloured

3) Causes of speciation Speciation due to non-random of a population within a continuous geographic area.

Difficult to prove parapatric speciation. random forces (mutation and drift)

In any case allopatry only superficially different from deterministic forces (natural selection) parapatry; gene flow is always somewhat restricted

4 Speciation by by selection or drift? doubling by autopolyploidy or allopolyploidy

4 populations raised on -rich diet: Ist, IIst , IIIst, IVst

This of speciation is rapid 4 populations raised on maltose-rich diet: Ima, IIma, IIIma, IVma

Whether new polyploid species survives is stochastic. One year of adaptation to diet like mates with like

Needs to establish local population not swamped experiments: there is ? by parental

Polyploidy very common: 40-70% of species Selection and NOT drift causes assortative mating

Dodd (1988) Evolution

Speciation by drift + selection Selection against intermediates Hawaiian Drosophila radiation Disruptive selection + assortative mating can New species clearly due to founders from older islands produce a bimodal distribution

But NO evidence for low in these species Probably important for sympatric speciation

Speciation on new islands due to selection in new environment NOT due to drift in founders

5 Host races Rhagoletis pomonella Native host: hawthorn Speciation in

Became apple pest in 1860s, due Sympatric speciation due to disruptive selection to a host switch leading to ecological specialisation? Apple-eating form quickly spread all over E. USA

1. less successful with apple larvae ( selective advantage of host switch) 2. Females have genetic preference for laying on fruits of own host (disruptive selection on host choice) 3. Males use host fruits as mating venue. So host switch has a pleiotropic effect on assortative mating 4. Apple earlier than hawthorn race. again 5. Leading to genetic differentiation

Speciation in cichlids: Reinforcement

Reinforcement: the enhancement of prezygotic isolation in by natural selection Sexual dimorphism: males often brightly coloured

Closely related species often different colours Divergent forms meet in secondary contact Assortative mating: female preference based on male colour Random mating may now create unfit hybrids Random mating when no colour information (e.g. when Hybridization opposed by natural selection. Direct water is turbid). selection for assortative mating (Dobzhansky 1940)

Adaptive mate choice , now termed reinforcement .

Prediction : Premating isolation stronger in sympatric Seehausen et al. (1997) 277 : 1808-1811 compared to allopatric populations.

6 Reinforcement in Drosophila Reinforcement in Drosophila Coyne & Orr (1997) Evolution 51: 295-303 Coyne & Orr (1997) Evolution 51: 295-303

171 pairs of closely related divergent forms.

Pre-mating isolation = fraction of trials of Pre-mating isolation males and females of two species in sympatric pairs > allopatric pairs resulting in mating. Post-mating isolation Post-mating isolation = fraction of crosses in sympatric pairs ≈ allopatric pairs of males and females of two species in which hybrids sterile or inviable.

Brief summary Brief summary Causes of speciation Status Random Mutation + drift Deeply suspect! If occurs, probably Geographic modes Status very slow, needs allopatry of speciation Chromosomal mutation Known Sympatrc Known, but good (polyploidy) examples are rare Selection Environmental, Known Parapatric Known, likely pleiotropic and disruptive Little different in theory Reinforcement Known. Possibly uncommon? from allopatric Allopatric Known. Slow? Sexual selection Suspected Random + Founder effect Dubious, contested selection Shifting balance Possible, contested

7 Further Reading

FUTUYMA, DJ 1998. . Chapter 16 (pp. 481-516). Speciation.

BARTON, NH (ed.): Trends in and Evolution, Speciation special issue, July 2001.

COYNE, JA & ORR, HA 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. xiii+545 pages.

8