DOCSLIB.ORG

Macroevolution Vs. Microevolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macroevolution Vs. Microevolution Looks Can Be Deceiving! Definition of Species Macroevolution vs. Microevolution • These meadowlarks look • A species is a group of interbreeding organisms • Macroevolution is evolution on a scale of very similar yet they are not that produce viable, fertile offspring in nature. separated gene pools. the same species. • Members of a species will interbreed with one • Macroevolutionary studies focus on change that another but not other organisms outside of the occurs at or above the level of species, in species. (At least most of the time!) contrast with microevolution, which refers to • By contrast, these brittle smaller evolutionary changes (typically stars look very different from described as changes in allele frequencies) Macroevolution Part II: one another, but they are within a species or population. the same species. Allopatric Speciation 2 3 4 Ring Species Asexual Species Ring Species Ring Species Asexual Species • Ensatina escholtzi is a salamander ring species Even though asexual groups do not • A ring species is a connected series of neighboring • The blue zones represent exchange genes, they do form populations, each of which can interbreed with closely that has a range along the where interbreeding is recognizable groups. sited related populations, but for which there exist at coast and inside range of occurring. California. Most have evolved from a sexual least two "end" populations in the series. species. Only those whose phenotype • These end populations are too distantly related to • All along this range, the • So are there is gene flow is best adapted to the environment, interbreed, though there is a potential gene flow between salamanders interbreed, but all along the salamander’s will continue to survive. However, it each "linked" species. the salamanders on the range, yet the ends of the makes them less adapted to ends of the ring do not environmental change. • Such non-breeding, though genetically connected, "end" rings do not interbreed. populations may coexist in the same region thus closing interbreed. Are they the same Dandelions are asexual. The pollen is • Their groupings are called sterile and the egg is diploid. a "ring". species? subspecies. 5 6 7 8 Ring Species Limited Interbreeding Limited Interbreeding Cladogenesis vs. Anagenesis • Each Canis species will • Tigers and lions will interbreed in captivity, but they I. Anagenesis- is the accumulation interbreed with the do not interbreed in nature. of changes in one species that domestic dog but not • Lions form groups or prides and live in the grasslands. leads to another species. It is the readily with one another. lineage of a species. Over time a • Tigers are more solitary and live in the forests. species may accumulate enough • Tiglon are products of male tigers and female lions. changes that it is considered a • This is true, even when • Ligers are the opposite cross. species that differs from the given the opportunity to do ancestral species. so. Thus, they are not the II. Cladogenesis- is the budding of same species since they do one or more new species from an not interbreed in nature. ancesteral species that continues to exists. This results in biological diversity. 9 10 11 12 Allopatric Speciation Allopatric Speciation Allopatric vs. Sympatric Speciation Why does speciation occur after geographic isolation? • First, geographic isolation occurs. This is an extrinsic isolating 1. They become separate species, as evidenced by the fact they can Allopatric speciation- mechanism. no longer interbreed. Speciation occurs because a 1. The population that left the original group will have • The two populations must become isolated geographically from given group has been separated 2. They can still interbreed, thus they remain the same species. one another. a different allelic make-up than the original species, from the parent group, usually thus experiencing the “founder effect”. because of a geographic • If the groups become sympatric again one of two things result… separation as time goes by. 2. The two groups will continue to experience different mutations. Sympatric speciation- 3. The two groups will now experience genetic drift speciation occurs even though and different selection pressures due to living in the two groups are still living in separate and perhaps different environments. the same area. Islands produce some of the most profound examples of speciation due to geographic isolation. 13 Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation The Amazing Galapagos Islands • The classic adaptive radiation example involves the • One would expect that each finches of the Galapagos Islands. island would have only one • There are 14 different species of finches and 13 main species, however, each island islands, 3 smaller islands, and 107 rocks and islets. has more than one species of finch and larger islands may have as many as ten. • The process one species inhabiting a new area and evolving into several new species is called adaptive radiation. Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation • Lets suppose that finch species A, from South • Now let’s suppose that some of the new finch species • Now some of the newly evolved finch species C make their • Obviously, species C is different from finch species B thus America migrates to an island . B migrate over to a second island. (speciation) & way to yet another new island. they can no longer interbreed back on the original island. • Finch species A would undergo speciation into finch (migration) • Guess what? Yep! Once again finch species C will evolve into • Finch species C may or may not evolve into another species. species B due to one or more of the following: • The finches in this new environment are finch species D (not shown yet) for the same three reasons. (Founder effect, varying selection pressures, or varying • If there is a niche similar to that of the second island, the – The Founder effect geographically isolated from the other island and now mutations.) selection pressure may also be similar and species C may be – Varying selection pressures will evolve into finch species C for the same three slow to change. • But suppose some of species C make it back to the first island. – Varying mutations basic reasons. (Founder effect, varying selection pressures, (The plot thickens…) or varying mutations.) • So, both first and second islands will have species C. The third island will have a new species D. Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation The Amazing Galapagos Islands The Amazing Finches From the Galapagos Islands • Now lastly, lets suppose that finch species D from the • Alas, the first island has no such niche. Now, there Differences are found among the third island returns to the first and second islands. ( exists a selection pressure on finch species D causing it beaks and feathers of the finches. & ) to evolve (character displacement) into species E. Darwin found 14 different species • On the second island finch species D does not of finches inhabiting these islands • As a result, the first island now has three different which are a result of adaptive change because it finds a niche similar to the third species of finches. Two of which are not found on radiation. island so no selection pressure is exerted upon it. other islands (B & E). Each species has a distinct There are finches that eat seeds, habitat with different food sources. This process is cacti, insects and other interesting called adaptive radiation and most commonly involves foods. islands. He also observed adaptive radiation among the tortoises and So, NOW we understand how it is possible that each island has more mocking birds. than one finch species. Some islands actually have as many as 10 species. Examine the map once more. The Amazing Finches From the Galapagos Islands Example of Natural Selection How Does Speciation Occur? Prezygotic: Ecogeographic Isolation • During droughts in the Galapagos Islands, larger seeds are more • So, two populations of abundant. Finches with slightly larger beaks have an advantage organisms are not the same • Ecogeographic Isolation – Two populations have become so since they are able to crack larger seeds. species unless they can specialized for survival in different environments, that once the geographical barrier is removed the two species will never • Thus, natural selection favors finches with larger beaks. These interbreed, and produce viable, again interbreed as one species. The adaptations for survival in finches are more likely to survive and pass those genes on to the fertile offspring in nature. 1.Vegetarian Finch 8. Cactus ground finch next generation. A study conducted by Peter and Rosemary Grant their geographic locations prevent gene flow. 2. Warbler finch 9. Cocos finch over a 20 year period confirmed these assertions. • Each Prezygotic and 3. Large insectivorous tree finch 10. Woodpecker finch Postzygotic barrier listed left 4. Medium insectivorous tree finch 11. Large ground finch explains HOW speciation 5. Mangrove finch 12. Sharp-beaked ground finch occurs. 6. Small insectivorous tree finch 13. Medium ground finch 7. Large cactus ground finch 14. Small ground finch Prezygotic: Ecogeographic Isolation Prezygotic: Habitat Isolation Prezygotic: Seasonal Isolation Prezygotic: Behavioral Isolation • The Plantus occidentalis (sycamore tree) is found in Habitat isolation- two the eastern United States and the Plantus orientalis species have developed (oriental plane tree) is found in the Mediterranean area. a preference for two different habitats. Even • They can form fertile hybrids when artificially crossed if the species become but are so different from one another that neither tree sympatric, the can survive in the other's habitat. probability that they will meet and mate is low. Seasonal isolation- the two species have developed different times of Behavioral isolation- If courtship behavior changes during Example: Bufo woodhousei and Bufo americanus are two closely the year to mate. separation, then sympatric mating will not occur and two new species related toads. B. woodhousei prefers to reproduce in the quiet water Example: There are four species of frogs from the genus, Rana, each are formed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hybrid Vigor Between Native and Introduced Salamanders Raises New Challenges for Conservation
    Hybrid vigor between native and introduced salamanders raises new challenges for conservation Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick*† and H. Bradley Shaffer‡ *Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996; and ‡Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved August 10, 2007 (received for review May 22, 2007) Hybridization between differentiated lineages can have many populations by alleviating inbreeding depression (13, 14) or different consequences depending on fitness variation among facilitating adaptive evolution in modified or degraded habitats hybrid offspring. When introduced organisms hybridize with na- (15–17). tives, the ensuing evolutionary dynamics may substantially com- The long-term consequences of hybridization are strongly plicate conservation decisions. Understanding the fitness conse- influenced by the genetic basis of hybrid fitness. In the case of quences of hybridization is an important first step in predicting its hybrid vigor, genetic models fall into two classes: heterozygote evolutionary outcome and conservation impact. Here, we mea- advantage and recombinant hybrid vigor (18–20). Heterozygote sured natural selection caused by differential viability of hybrid advantage (overdominance) refers to beneficial interactions larvae in wild populations where native California Tiger between heterospecific alleles of a single locus. Recombinant Salamanders (Ambystoma californiense) and introduced Barred hybrid vigor depends on multilocus genotypes and may be caused Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum mavortium) have been by epistasis (beneficial interactions between heterospecific al- hybridizing for 50–60 years. We found strong evidence of hybrid leles from different loci) or by complementary effects of inde- vigor; mixed-ancestry genotypes had higher survival rates than pendent advantageous alleles from each parental population (19, genotypes containing mostly native or mostly introduced alleles.
    [Show full text]
  • Sympatric Speciation: Models and Empirical Evidence
    ANRV328-ES38-19 ARI 24 September 2007 7:20 Sympatric Speciation: Models and Empirical Evidence Daniel I. Bolnick1 and Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick2 1Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712; email: [email protected] 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996; email: benfi[email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007. 38:459–87 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on assortative mating, disruptive selection, reinforcement August 8, 2007 reproductive isolation The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics is online at Abstract http://ecolsys.annualreviews.org Sympatric speciation, the evolution of reproductive isolation with- This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095804 out geographic barriers, remains highly contentious. As a result of new empirical examples and theory, it is now generally accepted that Copyright c 2007 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved sympatric speciation has occurred in at least a few instances, and is theoretically plausible. Instead, debate has shifted to whether sym- by Rutgers University Libraries on 09/21/09. For personal use only. 1543-592X/07/1201-0459$20.00 patric speciation is common, and whether models’ assumptions are generally met in nature. The relative frequency of sympatric spe- ciation will be difficult to resolve, because biogeographic changes have obscured geographical patterns underlying many past specia- Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007.38:459-487. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org tion events. In contrast, progress is being made on evaluating the empirical validity of key theoretical conditions for sympatric spe- ciation. Disruptive selection and direct selection on mating traits, which should facilitate sympatric speciation, are biologically well supported.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B
    Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B. M ü ller, G ü nter P. Wagner, and Werner Callebaut, editors The Evolution of Cognition , edited by Cecilia Heyes and Ludwig Huber, 2000 Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Development and Evolutionary Biology , edited by Gerd B. M ü ller and Stuart A. Newman, 2003 Environment, Development, and Evolution: Toward a Synthesis , edited by Brian K. Hall, Roy D. Pearson, and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2004 Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach , edited by D. Kimbrough Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2004 Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems , edited by Werner Callebaut and Diego Rasskin-Gutman, 2005 Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution , by Richard A. Watson, 2006 Biological Emergences: Evolution by Natural Experiment , by Robert G. B. Reid, 2007 Modeling Biology: Structure, Behaviors, Evolution , edited by Manfred D. Laubichler and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2007 Evolution of Communicative Flexibility: Complexity, Creativity, and Adaptability in Human and Animal Communication , edited by Kimbrough D. Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2008 Functions in Biological and Artifi cial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives , edited by Ulrich Krohs and Peter Kroes, 2009 Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain, and Behavior , edited by Luca Tommasi, Mary A. Peterson, and Lynn Nadel, 2009 Innovation in Cultural Systems: Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology , edited by Michael J. O ’ Brien and Stephen J. Shennan, 2010 The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited , edited by Brett Calcott and Kim Sterelny, 2011 Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology , edited by Snait B.
    [Show full text]
  • Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution Refers to Varieties Within a Given Type
    Chapter 8: Evolution Lesson 8.3: Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are "horizontal" in effect, not "vertical." Such changes might be accomplished by "natural selection," in which a trait ​ ​ ​ ​ within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by "artificial selection," such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Lesson Objectives ● Distinguish what is microevolution and how it affects changes in populations. ● Define gene pool, and explain how to calculate allele frequencies. ● State the Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● Identify the five forces of evolution. Vocabulary ● adaptive radiation ● gene pool ● migration ● allele frequency ● genetic drift ● mutation ● artificial selection ● Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● natural selection ● directional selection ● macroevolution ● population genetics ● disruptive selection ● microevolution ● stabilizing selection ● gene flow Introduction Darwin knew that heritable variations are needed for evolution to occur. However, he knew nothing about Mendel’s laws of genetics. Mendel’s laws were rediscovered in the early 1900s. Only then could scientists fully understand the process of evolution. Microevolution is how individual traits within a population change over time. In order for a population to change, some things must be assumed to be true. In other words, there must be some sort of process happening that causes microevolution. The five ways alleles within a population change over time are natural selection, migration (gene flow), mating, mutations, or genetic drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Driven by the Interplay of Eco-Evolutionary and Landscape Dynamics R
    Adaptive radiation driven by the interplay of eco-evolutionary and landscape dynamics R. Aguilée, D. Claessen, A. Lambert To cite this version: R. Aguilée, D. Claessen, A. Lambert. Adaptive radiation driven by the interplay of eco-evolutionary and landscape dynamics. Evolution - International Journal of Organic Evolution, Wiley, 2013, 67 (5), pp.1291-1306. 10.1111/evo.12008. hal-00838275 HAL Id: hal-00838275 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00838275 Submitted on 13 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Adaptive radiation driven by the interplay of eco-evolutionary and landscape dynamics Robin Aguil´eea;b;∗, David Claessenb and Amaury Lambertc;d Published in Evolution, 2013, 67(5): 1291{1306 with doi: 10.1111/evo.12008 a Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution´ de Montpellier (UMR 5554), Univ Montpellier II, CNRS, Montpellier, France b Laboratoire Ecologie´ et Evolution´ (UMR 7625), UPMC Univ Paris 06, Ecole´ Normale Sup´erieure,CNRS, Paris, France c Laboratoire Probabilit´eset Mod`elesAl´eatoires(LPMA) CNRS UMR 7599, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France. d Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (CIRB) CNRS UMR 7241, Coll`egede France, Paris, France ∗ Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Triantafyllidou
    The limits of species recognition: heterospecific song learning in pied flycatchers Maria Triantafyllidou Degree project in biology, Bachelor of science, 2016 Examensarbete i biologi 15 hp till kandidatexamen, 2016 Biology Education Centre and Department of Ecology and Genetics/Animal Ecology, Uppsala University Supervisors: Dr. Anna Qvarnström and Dr. David Wheatcroft ABSTRACT The closely related species pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) and collared flycatcher (F. albicollis) co-occur on the Swedish island of Öland, where they compete over similar resources. The majority of male pied flycatchers have been found to incorporate elements of the collared flycatcher song in their repertoire. Given that birdsong is partly inherited and partly learned, the relative contribution of genetic predispositions versus acoustic stimuli varies across different species. The results show that in pied flycatchers, song acquisition is tightly correlated with imprinting, and can therefore be greatly influenced by heterospecific tutors in their surroundings, i.e. male collared flycatchers. I found that pied males are capable of not only memorizing collared song elements, but also producing them with high fidelity. Thus, I infer that pied flycatchers are characterized by a high degree of vocal plasticity. INTRODUCTION The importance of sexual signals in speciation It is largely recognized that sexual signals play a key role in mate recognition as they indicate species identity and mate quality. It has been increasingly appreciated that they also play a significant role in patterns of speciation (Slabbekoorn and Smith 2002, Ritchie 2007, Verzijden et al. 2012). That is linked with the fact that sex traits evolve quickly and are therefore likely to diverge among closely related species, eventually leading to reproductive isolation (Qvarnström et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Fitness, Adaptation and Evolutionary Diversification: Lessons
    Heredity (2012) 108, 159–166 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0018-067X/12 www.nature.com/hdy REVIEW Hybrid fitness, adaptation and evolutionary diversification: lessons learned from Louisiana Irises ML Arnold, ES Ballerini and AN Brothers Estimates of hybrid fitness have been used as either a platform for testing the potential role of natural hybridization in the evolution of species and species complexes or, alternatively, as a rationale for dismissing hybridization events as being of any evolutionary significance. From the time of Darwin’s publication of The Origin, through the neo-Darwinian synthesis, to the present day, the observation of variability in hybrid fitness has remained a challenge for some models of speciation. Yet, Darwin and others have reported the elevated fitness of hybrid genotypes under certain environmental conditions. In modern scientific terminology, this observation reflects the fact that hybrid genotypes can demonstrate genotypeÂenvironment interactions. In the current review, we illustrate the development of one plant species complex, namely the Louisiana Irises, into a ‘model system’ for investigating hybrid fitness and the role of genetic exchange in adaptive evolution and diversification. In particular, we will argue that a multitude of approaches, involving both experimental and natural environments, and incorporating both manipulative analyses and surveys of natural populations, are necessary to adequately test for the evolutionary significance of introgressive hybridization. An appreciation of the variability of hybrid fitness leads to the conclusion that certain genetic signatures reflect adaptive evolution. Furthermore, tests of the frequency of allopatric versus sympatric/parapatric divergence (that is, divergence with ongoing gene flow) support hybrid genotypes as a mechanism of evolutionary diversification in numerous species complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation by Prof
    Workshop on Population and Speciation Genomics 2020 W. Salzburger | Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation by Prof. Walter Salzburger Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland The diversity of life on Earth is governed, at the MACROEVOLUTIONARY scale, by two antagonistic ———————— MACROEVOLUTION processes: Evolutionary radiations increase and extinction events decrease the organismal diversity on our Evolution on the grand scale, that is, planet through time. Evolutionary radiations are termed adaptive radiations if new lifeforms emerge evolution at the level rapidly through the extensive ecological diversification of an organismal lineage. of species and above. Examples of adaptive radiations ECOLOGICAL NICHE The relational position of a species Adaptive radiation refers to the evolution of ecological and morphological disparity within a rapidly or population in an diversifying lineage. It is the diversification of an ancestral species into an array of new species that ecosystem. It includes the interactions of all occupy various ECOLOGICAL NICHES and that differ in traits used to exploit those niches. Adaptive biotic and abiotic radiation includes the origination of both new species (speciation) and phenotypic disparity. factors that determine how a species meets Archetypal examples of adaptive radiations include Darwin’s finches on the Galápagos archipelago; its needs for food and shelter, how it silversword plants on Hawaii; anole lizards on the islands of the Caribbean; threespine stickleback fish survives, and how it in north temperate waters; and cichlid fishes in the East Africa Great Lakes and in various tropical reproduces. crater lakes (see FIGURE 1). Adaptive radiations are also visible in the FOSSIL record. For example, the FOSSIL CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION is considered an adaptive radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Allopatric Speciation with Little Niche Divergence Is Common Among
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) 43, 591–602 ORIGINAL Allopatric speciation with little niche ARTICLE divergence is common among alpine Primulaceae Florian C. Boucher1*, Niklaus E. Zimmermann2,3 and Elena Conti1 1Institute of Systematic Botany, University of ABSTRACT Zurich,€ 8008 Zurich,€ Switzerland, 2Dynamic Aim Despite the accumulation of cases describing fast radiations of alpine Macroecology, Swiss Federal Research plants, we still have limited understanding of the drivers of speciation in alpine Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland, 3Department of Environmental floras and of the precise the timing of their diversification. Here, we investi- Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of gated spatial and temporal patterns of speciation in three groups of alpine Technology ETH, CH-8092 Zurich,€ Primulaceae. Switzerland Location Mountains of the European Alpine System. Methods We built a new phylogeny of Primulaceae including all species in three focal groups: Androsace sect. Aretia, Primula sect. Auricula and Soldanella. Combining phylogenetic information with a detailed climatic data set, we investigated patterns of range and ecological overlap between sister-species using an approach that takes phylogenetic uncertainty into account. Finally, we investigated temporal trajectories of diversification in the three focal groups. Results We found that a large majority of sister-species pairs in the three groups are strictly allopatric and show little differences in substrate and cli- matic preferences, a result that was robust to phylogenetic uncertainty. While rates of diversification have remained constant in Soldanella, both Androsace sect. Aretia and Primula sect. Auricula showed decreased diversification rates in the Pleistocene compared to previous geological epochs. Main conclusions Allopatric speciation with little niche divergence appears to have been by far the most common mode of speciation across the three groups studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Stability of Ring Species
    Evolution and Stability of Ring Species 1 Ayana de Brito Martins Marcus A. M. de Aguiar 2,3 Yaneer Bar-Yam 3 1 Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo 2 Instituto de Física, Universidade Estadual de Campinas 3 New England Complex Systems Institute Ring Species REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION Ring species in nature Phylloscopus Irwin et al. 2005 Geographical barriers Geographical barriers POPULATION Geographical barriers Geographical barriers The model GENES AGENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSITION IN SPACE X(AGENT), Y(AGENT) The model L CARRYING CAPACITY MUTATION RATE The model: Time evolution Tn Tn+1 DISCRETE GENERATIONS The model: Time evolution Tn Tn+1 DISCRETE GENERATION The model: Time evolution Tn Tn+1 DISCRETE GENERATIONS The model: Time evolution Tn Tn+1 DISCRETE GENERATIONS The model: Time evolution Tn Tn+1 Tn+2 DISCRETE GENERATIONS The model: population growth Tn Tn+1 The model: population growth Tn Tn+1 The model: population growth Tn Tn+1 The model: Reproduction BREEDING NEIGHBORHOOD S The model: Reproduction BREEDING NEIGHBORHOOD S The model: Reproduction THERE IS A CRITICAL GENETIC DISTANCE ABOVE WHICH INDIVIDUALS DO NOT REPRODUCE INDIVIDUAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 NEIGHBOR 1 ≠ ≠ ≠ ≠ ≠ ≠ 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 ... 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 ADDITIVE EFFECT The model: Reproduction The model: Reproduction ! The model: Reproduction RECOMBINATION 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Causes
    NEET (/neet/) > NEET Study Material (/neet/neet-study-material/) > NEET Biology (/neet/neet-biology/) > Adaptive Radiation (/neet/important-notes-of-biology-for-neet- adaptive-radiation/) What is adaptive radiation? Adaptive radiation is the evolutionary diversification of many related species from a common ancestral species in a relatively short period. Osborne (1902) coined the term “Adaptive Radiation”. He stated that each large and isolated region, with sufficiently varied topogr aphy, soil, vegetation, climate, will lead to organisms with diverse characteristics. Darwin had called it “Divergence”, i.e. the tendency in an organism descended from the same ancestor to diverge in character as they undergo changes. Adaptive radiation plays a significant role in macroevolution. Adaptive radiation gives rise to species diversity in a geographical area. Adaptiv e Radiation Causes: Adaptive radiation is more common during major environmental changes and physical disturbances. It also helps an organism to successfully spread into other environments. Furthermore, it leads to speciation. Moreover, it also leads to phenotypically dissimilar, but related species. Major causes of adaptive radiation are: Ecological opportunities: When an organism enters a new area with lots of ecological opportunities, species diversify to exploit these resources. When a group of organism enter a new adaptive zone then organisms tend to adapt themselves differently. It results in adaptive divergence An adaptive zone is an unexploited area with numerous ecological opportunities, e.g. nocturnal flying to catch small insects, grazing on the grass while migrating across Savana, and swimming at the ocean’s surface to filter out Plankton Vacant adaptive zones are more common on islands, as fewer species inhabit islands compared to mainland When adaptive zones are empty, they get filled by species, which diversify quickly, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Erosion of Agrobiodiversity in India and Intellectual Property Rights: Interplay and Some Key Issues
    Genetic Erosion of Agrobiodiversity in India and Intellectual Property Rights: Interplay and some Key Issues Sabuj Kumar Chaudhuri [SRF (UGC) NET], Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32 [West Bengal], India. email: [email protected] Abstract Agrobiodiversity is the backbone of a nation’s food security and the basis of economic development as a whole. Over the years this diversity in India is under pressure due to the massive commercialisation of agriculture leading to the almost extinction of traditional farming systems. The top-down system of agricultural research, where farmers are seen merely as recipients of research rather than as participants in it, has contributed to an increased dependence on a relatively few plant varieties. This trend and the increasing industrialization of agriculture are key factors in what can only be called "genetic erosion". The term refers to both the loss of species and the reduction of variety. Behind this commercialization there lies the interest of the breeders for obtaining intellectual property rights. It has a very complicated relationship with this diversity. The paper highlights this relationship and provides some suggestions in order to rectify the current negative phenomenon. India’s agrobiodiversity is most significant one in the world. This diversity is the result of thousand of years of farmer’s selection, experimentation (even cross breeding) and propagation of desirable traits of desirable species in innumerable ways for their subsistence and cultural purposes. Over the years this unparallel diversity of various crops of India has been eroded. Replacement of landraces (a crop cultivar that evolved with and has been genetically improved by traditional agriculturists, but has not been influenced by modern breeding practices) or TVs (traditional varieties) by MVs (modern varieties) or HYVs (High Yielding Varieties) is one of the most important reasons.
    [Show full text]