DOCSLIB.ORG

Abbreviations Used in Notes and Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abbreviations Used in Notes and Bibliography Abbreviations Used in Notes and Bibliography AUA-M Air University Archive, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama ANL Archives Nationales Luxembourg BaB Bundesarchiv Berlin BaMF Bundesarchiv Militärarchiv Freiburg BaZnsA Bundesarchiv Zentralnachweisestelle Aachen GHM German History Museum Berlin HsaD Hauptstaatsarchiv Düsseldorf HasH Hauptstaatsarchiv Hannover HSaM Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg HStAWi Hauptstaatsarchiv Wiesbaden HIADL Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford Library, Daniel Lerner Collection IWML Imperial War Museum London IfZM Institut für Zeitgeschichte München IMTN International Military Tribunal Nuremberg LaSaar Landesarchiv Saarland LaSpey Landesarchiv Speyer LWVH Landeswohlfahrtsverband Hessen MHAP Military Historical Archive, Prague NAA National Archives of Australia NAL National Archives Kew Gardens, London NAW National Archives Washington D.C. OKaW Österreichisches Kriegsarchiv Wein ÖStA Österreichisches Staatsarchiv Vienna PMGO Provost Marshall General’s Office (U.S.A) SaL Staatsarchiv Ludwigsburg SaW Staatsarchiv Würzburg SAB State Archive Bydgoszcz, Poland TBJG Elke Frölich, Die Tagbücher von Joseph Goebbels: Im Auftrag des Institute für Zeitsgeschichte und mit Unterstützung des Staatlichen Archivdienstes Rußlands. Teil II Dikate 1941–1945 (Münich 1995–1996). WLC Weiner Library Collection 191 Notes Introduction: Sippenhaft, Terror and Fear: The Historiography of the Nazi Terror State 1 . Christopher Hutton, Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Third Reich (Cambridge 2005), p. 18. 2 . Rosemary O’Kane, Terror, Force and States: The Path from Modernity (Cheltham 1996), p. 19. O’Kane defines a system of terror, as one that is ‘distinguished by summary justice, where the innocence or guilt of the victims is immaterial’. 3 . See Robert Thurston, ‘The Family during the Great Terror 1935–1941’, Soviet Studies , 43, 3 (1991), pp. 553–74. 4 . Golfo Alexopoulos, ‘Stalin and the Politics of Kinship: Practices of Collective Punishment, 1920s–1940s’, Comparative Studies in Society and History , 50, 1 (2008), p. 91. 5 . Alexopoulos, ‘Stalin and the Politics of Kinship’, p. 93. 6 . Discussing the 20 July 1944, Peter Hoffmann, The History of the German Resistance, 1933–1945 (Montreal 2001), p. 519, describes Sippenhaft as an inte- gral part of post-20 July 1944 terror, ‘not merely individuals, therefore, but their ... families ... were to be exterminated’. While Hannsjoachim Koch, In the Name of the Volk: Political Justice in Hitler’s Germany (New York 1997), p. 216, contends that Sippenhaft only existed post-20 July, and ‘belongs in the realm of legends’. See also Timothy Mason & Jane Caplan, Nazism, Fascism and the Working Class (New York 1995), p. 261. 7 . Evidence provided during the Nuremberg Trials shows that a policy of taking hostages (not exclusively but often members of the same family) were enacted and used in retaliation for acts of resistance in occupied Europe. In the Netherlands, document number PS1587 dated August 1942, from the Commander of the Wehrmacht, proscribes the taking of hostages for acts of resistance. In France, document UK20, 26 May 1943 – an order signed by Keitel decreeing that the families of ‘Free French’ airmen caught fighting on the Eastern Front are to have ‘severe measures taken against them’. In Poland, PS4041 (GB-556) consists of 31 posters for the years 1943–1944, signed by the Chief of the SS and Police or the Commander of the Security Police and SD in Warsaw, announcing the killing of hostages. Later, docu- ment USA-506 of 19 July 1944, written by the commandant of the Sipo and SD in Radom, specifically outlines that male relatives of individuals involved in resistance would be shot, while the female relatives over 16 years old would be sent to concentration camps. In Norway and Denmark, C-48 (RF-280) dated 30 November 1944, from Keitel to the Supreme Command of the Navy threatening ship-yard workers that they and their families will be held accountable for acts of sabotage. This resulted in a reply, PS870 (RF-281), from the Reichskommissar for Norway Josef Terboven, ‘This request 192 Notes 193 only makes sense and will only be successful if I am actually allowed to have executions carried out by shooting.’ See also the ‘Hostages Trial’, ‘The United States of America versus Wilhelm List, et al’, 8 July 1947 until 19 February 1948, United Nations War Crimes Commission Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals , Volume VIII, 1949; Raphael Lemkin & Samantha Power, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress (London 2005), pp. 249 & 615, and Thomas Laub, After the fall: German Policy in Occupied France 1940–1944 (New York 2010). 8 . Norbert Haase ‘The conscription of ethnic Germans in the occupied terri- tories by the Wehrmacht in World War Two and the repression of resist- ance among them’. Paper given at the XXVth Biennial Conference of the ‘Australasian Association for European Historians’, Melbourne University, Melbourne Australia, 11–15 July 2005. 9 . Peter Phillips, The Tragedy of Nazi Germany (London 1969), p. 156. 10 . Speaking about the role of women and wives in resistance activities, Timothy Mason contends, ‘Some working-class women were active in communist and social democratic resistance groups, not many; the wives and female supporters of the conservative and military groups appear to have played hardly any active role at all. In this, as in so many respects, the so-called Red Orchestra (a communist group led by a senior civil servant and an air force officer) was the exception which proves the rule.’ Mason & Caplan, Nazism, Fascism and the Working Class , pp. 150–1. See Klemens von Klemperer for the counter-argument, ‘In my own studies of the subject [German Resistance] I have rarely encountered a conspirator who did not need and rely on his family – on his father, mother, sister, brother, and especially on his wife, who stood by him and offered him understanding and support.’ Klemens von Klemperer, ‘Foreword’, in Dorthee von Meding (Trans. Michael Balfour & Volker Berghahn), Courageous Hearts: Women and the Anti-Hitler Plot of 1944 (Providence 1997), p. vi. 11 . For an excellent summary of this debate see Richard Evans, ‘Coercion and Consent in Nazi Germany’, Proceedings of the British Academy , 151 (2007), pp. 53–81. 12 . See Eugen Kogon, Der SS-Staat: das System der deutschen Konzentrationslager (Munich 1946); Han Bernd Gisevius, To the Bitter End (London 1948); Edward Crankshaw, Gestapo: Instrument of Tyranny (London 1956); Jacques Delarue, The Gestapo: A History of Horror (New York 1987); Gerald Reitlinger, The SS: Alibi of a Nation 1922–1945 (Englewood Cliffs 1981). Partly, this embellished the story of Sippenhaft . Constantine Fitzgibbon claimed that many of 20 July conspirator Claus von Stauffenberg’s relatives ‘died in [concentration] camps’. Fitzgibbon, The Shirt of Nessus (London 1956), p. 220. 13 . Robert Gellately, Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany (London 2001), p. vii. Also Eric A. Johnson, Nazi Terror: The Gestapo, the Jews, and Ordinary Germans (New York 1999), p. 373. 14 . Gellately, Backing Hitler , p. 203. Gellately argues that whilst not unimpor- tant, Nazi party terror ‘should not be overstated’. 15 . Vandana Joshi, ‘The “Private” became “Public”: Wives as Denouncers in the Third Reich’, Journal of Contemporary History , 37, 3 (2002), pp. 419–35. 16 . Karl-Heinz Reuband & Eric A. Johnson, What We Knew: Terror, Mass Murder and Everyday Life in Nazi Germany (London 2005), p. 355. 194 Notes 17 . Eric A. Johnson, ‘Criminal Justice, Coercion and Consent in “Totalitarian” Society: The Case of National Socialist Germany’, British Journal of Criminology , 51, 3 (2011), pp. 599–615. 18 . Johnson, ‘Criminal Justice’, p. 603. Johnson’s research, especially his survey results needs some qualification. The survey was based on the average respondents being born in 1921 (being therefore 12 years old when the Third Reich began, 19 when war broke out and only 24 years old when the war actually finished), to suggest that this is a representative sample of the whole German nation between 1933 and 1945 is misleading. It also only credits those still alive with a voice about Nazi terror. In addition, Johnson’s figures do show that over 20 per cent of the non-Jewish respondents did actually fear arrest either ‘constantly’ or ‘occasionally’. In his analysis of special court documents, where he suggests that the low figures for individ- uals from a non-communist or non-socialist background sent to concentra- tion camps is representative of the ‘overwhelming majority of the German population’ is slightly dubious (in the November 1932 elections the KPD and SPD won 13.1 million votes compared to the Nazis’ 11.7 million). He also suggested that studying terror in the latter part of the war is also not representative of the Third Reich contradicts the majority of the adult expe- rience of his survey respondents. To claim that the period after Stalingrad or the 20 July should not be included in surveys of terror is limited in its outlook. 19 . See Nikolas Wachsmann, Hitler’s Prisons: Legal Terror in Nazi Germany (New Haven 2004) for an excellent survey of legalized terror. 20 . Evans, ‘Coercion and Consent in Nazi Germany’, pp. 63–7. 21 . Nikolas Wachsmann, ‘The Policy of Exclusion, 1933–1945’, in Jane Caplan (ed.), Oxford History of Nazi Germany (New York 2008), pp. 126–7. 22 . Geoff Eley, ‘Hitler’s Silent Majority: Conformity and Resistance under the Third Reich’, Part II, Michigan Quarterly Review , 42, 3 (Summer 2003), p. 561. 23 . Michelle Mouton, From Nurturing the Nation to Purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi Family Policy (New York 2007), p. 277. 24 . Alexopoulos, ‘Stalin and the Politics of Kinship’, p. 105. This view is supported by Robert Thurston, who found in his interviews with survivors from the Great Purge that most felt family punishment was reserved only for the families of ‘big party people’ as opposed to average Russians. See Thurston, ‘The Family during the Great Terror’, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hitler's American Model
    Hitler’s American Model The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law James Q. Whitman Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford 1 Introduction This jurisprudence would suit us perfectly, with a single exception. Over there they have in mind, practically speaking, only coloreds and half-coloreds, which includes mestizos and mulattoes; but the Jews, who are also of interest to us, are not reckoned among the coloreds. —Roland Freisler, June 5, 1934 On June 5, 1934, about a year and a half after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of the Reich, the leading lawyers of Nazi Germany gathered at a meeting to plan what would become the Nuremberg Laws, the notorious anti-Jewish legislation of the Nazi race regime. The meeting was chaired by Franz Gürtner, the Reich Minister of Justice, and attended by officials who in the coming years would play central roles in the persecution of Germany’s Jews. Among those present was Bernhard Lösener, one of the principal draftsmen of the Nuremberg Laws; and the terrifying Roland Freisler, later President of the Nazi People’s Court and a man whose name has endured as a byword for twentieth-century judicial savagery. The meeting was an important one, and a stenographer was present to record a verbatim transcript, to be preserved by the ever-diligent Nazi bureaucracy as a record of a crucial moment in the creation of the new race regime. That transcript reveals the startling fact that is my point of departure in this study: the meeting involved detailed and lengthy discussions of the law of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Militärgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich (Circa 1850–1945)
    BRGÖ 2016 Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs Martin MOLL, Graz Militärgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich (circa 1850–1945) Military jurisdiction in Austria, ca. 1850–1945 This article starts around 1850, a period which saw a new codification of civil and military penal law with a more precise separation of these areas. Crimes committed by soldiers were now defined parallel to civilian ones. However, soldiers were still tried before military courts. The military penal code comprised genuine military crimes like deser- tion and mutiny. Up to 1912 the procedure law had been archaic as it did not distinguish between the state prosecu- tor and the judge. But in 1912 the legislature passed a modern military procedure law which came into practice only weeks before the outbreak of World War I, during which millions of trials took place, conducted against civilians as well as soldiers. This article outlines the structure of military courts in Austria-Hungary, ranging from courts responsible for a single garrison up to the Highest Military Court in Vienna. When Austria became a republic in November 1918, military jurisdiction was abolished. The authoritarian government of Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuß reintroduced martial law in late 1933; it was mainly used against Social Democrats who staged the February 1934 uprising. After the National Socialist ‘July putsch’ of 1934 a military court punished the rioters. Following Aus- tria’s annexation to Germany in 1938, German military law was introduced in Austria. After the war’s end in 1945, these Nazi remnants were abolished, leaving Austria without any military jurisdiction. Keywords: Austria – Austria as part of Hitler’s Germany –First Republic – Habsburg Monarchy – Military Jurisdiction Einleitung und Themenübersicht allen Staaten gab es eine eigene, von der zivilen Justiz getrennte Strafgerichtsbarkeit des Militärs.
    [Show full text]
  • Zum Gedenken an Peter Borowsky
    Hamburg University Press Zum Gedenken an Peter Borowsky Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 3 Zum Gedenken an Peter Borowsky Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 3 Herausgeber: Der Präsident der Universität Hamburg ZUM GEDENKEN AN PETER BOROWSKY herausgegeben von Rainer Hering und Rainer Nicolaysen Hamburg University Press © 2003 Peter Borowsky INHALT 9 Zeittafel Peter Borowsky 15 Vorwort 17 TRAUERFEIER FRIEDHOF HAMBURG-NIENSTEDTEN, 20. OKTOBER 2000 19 Gertraud Gutzmann Nachdenken über Peter Borowsky 25 Rainer Nicolaysen Trauerrede für Peter Borowsky 31 GEDENKFEIER UNIVERSITÄT HAMBURG, 8. FEBRUAR 2001 33 Wilfried Hartmann Grußwort des Vizepräsidenten der Universität Hamburg 41 Barbara Vogel Rede auf der akademischen Gedenkfeier für Peter Borowsky 53 Rainer Hering Der Hochschullehrer Peter Borowsky 61 Klemens von Klemperer Anderer Widerstand – anderes Deutschland? Formen des Widerstands im „Dritten Reich“ – ein Überblick 93 GEDENKFEIER SMITH COLLEGE, 27. MÄRZ 2001 95 Joachim Stieber Peter Borowsky, Member of the Department of History in Recurring Visits 103 Hans Rudolf Vaget The Political Ramifications of Hitler’s Cult of Wagner 129 ANHANG 131 Bibliographie Peter Borowsky 139 Gedenkschrift für Peter Borowsky – Inhaltsübersicht 147 Rednerinnen und Redner 149 Impressum ZEITTAFEL Peter Borowsky 1938 Peter Borowsky wird am 3. Juni als Sohn von Margare- te und Kurt Borowsky, einem selbstständigen Einzel- handelskaufmann, in Angerburg/Ostpreußen geboren 1944 im Herbst Einschulung in Angerburg 1945 nach der Flucht aus Ostpreußen von Januar
    [Show full text]
  • Social Penetration and Police Action: Collaboration Structures in the Repertory of Gestapo Activities
    Social Penetration and Police Action: Collaboration Structures in the Repertory of Gestapo Activities KLAUS-MICHAEL MALLMANN* SUMMARY: The twentieth century was "short", running only from 1914 to 1990/ 1991. Even so, it will doubtless enter history as an unprecedented era of dictatorships. The question of how these totalitarian regimes functioned in practice, how and to what extent they were able to realize their power aspirations, has until now been answered empirically at most highly selectively. Extensive comparative research efforts will be required over the coming decades. The police as the key organization in the state monopoly of power is particularly important in this context, since like no other institution it operates at the interface of state and society. Using the example of the Gestapo's activities in the Third Reich, this article analyses collaboration structures between these two spheres, which made possible (either on a voluntary or coercive basis) a penetration of social contexts and hence police action even in shielded areas. It is my thesis that such exchange processes through unsolicited denunciation and informers with double identities will also have been decisive outside Germany in the tracking of dissident behaviour and the detection of conspiratorial practices. I do not think it is too far-fetched to say that the century which is about to end will go down in history as the era of dictatorships. But a social history of this state-legitimized and -executed terror, let alone an interna- tional comparison on a solid
    [Show full text]
  • 1940 Commandés À Plusieurs Chantiers Navals Néerlandais, Seuls Quatre Exemplaires (T-61 À T-64) Doivent Être Poursuivis, Les Autres Seront Annulés
    Appendice 1 Ordre de bataille de l’Armée Rouge sur le front au 1er juin 1943 (forces principales) (pour les deux Fronts Baltes – les indications pour les autres Fronts ne sont entièrement valables qu’à partir du 1er juillet) 1er Front de la Baltique (M.M. Popov) Du sud de Parnu (Estonie) au sud de Võru (Estonie). – 1ère Armée (A.V. Kourkine) – 4e Armée (N.I. Gusev) – 7e Armée (A.N. Krutikov) – 42e Armée (V.I. Morozov) – 12e Corps Blindé (V.V. Butkov) – 15e Corps Blindé (F.N. Rudkin) Aviation subordonnée : 13e Armée Aérienne (S.D. Rybalchenko) 2e Front de la Baltique (K.A. Meretskov) Du sud de Pskov (Russie) au nord de Vitebsk (Biélorussie). – 27e Armée (N.E. Berzarine) – 34e Armée (A.I. Lopatine) – 39e Armée (A.I. Zigin) – 55e Armée (V.P. Smiridov) – 13e Corps Blindé (B.S. Bakharov) – 14e Corps Blindé (I.F. Kirichenko) – 101e Brigade Blindée lourde Aviation subordonnée : 14e Armée Aérienne (I.P. Zhuravlev) 1er Front de Biélorussie (A.I. Eremenko) De Vitebsk (Biélorussie) à Orsha (Biélorussie) – 20e Armée (P.A. Kourouchkine) – 1ère Armée de la Garde (I.M. Chistiakov) – 3e Armée de la Garde (I.G. Zakharkine) – 63e Armée (V.I. Kuznetsov) – 18e Corps Blindé (A.S. Burdeiny) Aviation subordonnée : 2e Armée Aérienne (N.F. Naumenko) 2e Front de Biélorussie (I.S. Koniev) D’Orsha (Biélorussie) à Gomel (Biélorussie). – 2e Armée de la Garde (L.A. Govorov) – 29e Armée (I.M. Managrov) – 15e Armée (I.I. Fediouninski) – 54e Armée (S.V. Roginski) – 3e Armée de Choc (M.A. Purkayev) – 7e Corps Blindé (A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Knut Døscher Master.Pdf (1.728Mb)
    Knut Kristian Langva Døscher German Reprisals in Norway During the Second World War Master’s thesis in Historie Supervisor: Jonas Scherner Trondheim, May 2017 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Preface and acknowledgements The process for finding the topic I wanted to write about for my master's thesis was a long one. It began with narrowing down my wide field of interests to the Norwegian resistance movement. This was done through several discussions with professors at the historical institute of NTNU. Via further discussions with Frode Færøy, associate professor at The Norwegian Home Front Museum, I got it narrowed down to reprisals, and the cases and questions this thesis tackles. First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Jonas Scherner, for his guidance throughout the process of writing my thesis. I wish also to thank Frode Færøy, Ivar Kraglund and the other helpful people at the Norwegian Home Front Museum for their help in seeking out previous research and sources, and providing opportunity to discuss my findings. I would like to thank my mother, Gunvor, for her good help in reading through the thesis, helping me spot repetitions, and providing a helpful discussion partner. Thanks go also to my girlfriend, Sigrid, for being supportive during the entire process, and especially towards the end. I would also like to thank her for her help with form and syntax. I would like to thank Joachim Rønneberg, for helping me establish the source of some of the information regarding the aftermath of the heavy water raid. I also thank Berit Nøkleby for her help with making sense of some contradictory claims by various sources.
    [Show full text]
  • When Die Zeit Published Its Review of Decision Before Dawn
    At the Front: common traitors in West German war films of the 1950s Article Accepted Version Wölfel, U. (2015) At the Front: common traitors in West German war films of the 1950s. Modern Language Review, 110 (3). pp. 739-758. ISSN 0026-7937 doi: https://doi.org/10.5699/modelangrevi.110.3.0739 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/40673/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5699/modelangrevi.110.3.0739 Publisher: Modern Humanities Research Association All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online AT THE FRONT: COMMON TRAITORS IN WEST GERMAN WAR FILMS OF THE 1950s Erst im militärischen Geheimnis kommt das Staatsgeheimnis zu sich selbst; da der Krieg als permanenter und totaler Zustand vorausgesetzt wird, läßt sich jeder beliebige Sachverhalt unter militärische Kategorien subsumieren: dem Feind gegenüber hat alles als Geheimnis und jeder Bürger als potentieller Verräter zu gelten. (HANS MAGNUS ENZENSBERGER) Die alten Krieger denken immer an die Kameraden, die gefallen sind, und meinen, ein Deserteur sei einer, der sie verraten hat. (LUDWIG BAUMANN) Introduction Margret Boveri, in the second volume of her treatise on Treason in the 20th Century, notes with respect to German resistance against National Socialism that the line between ethically justified and unethical treason is not easily drawn.1 She cites the case of General Hans Oster, deputy head of the Abwehr under Admiral Canaris.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of an Internationally Codified Denial of the Defense of Superior Orders
    xv The Rise and Fall of an Internationally Codified Denial of the Defense of Superior Orders 30 Revue De Droit Militaire Et De Droit De LA Guerre 183 (1991) Introduction s long as there have been trials for violations of the laws and customs of A war, more popularly known as "war crimes trials", the trial tribunals have been confronted with the defense of "superior orders"-the claim that the accused did what he did because he was ordered to do so by a superior officer (or by his Government) and that his refusal to obey the order would have brought dire consequences upon him. And as along as there have been trials for violations of the laws and customs ofwar the trial tribunals have almost uniformly rejected that defense. However, since the termination of the major programs of war crimes trials conducted after World War II there has been an ongoing dispute as to whether a plea of superior orders should be allowed, or disallowed, and, if allowed, the criteria to be used as the basis for its application. Does international action in this area constitute an invasion of the national jurisdiction? Should the doctrine apply to all war crimes or only to certain specifically named crimes? Should the illegality of the order received be such that any "reasonable" person would recognize its invalidity; or should it be such as to be recognized by a person of"ordinary sense and understanding"; or by a person ofthe "commonest understanding"? Should it be "illegal on its face"; or "manifesdy illegal"; or "palpably illegal"; or of "obvious criminality,,?1 An inability to reach a generally acceptable consensus on these problems has resulted in the repeated rejection of attempts to legislate internationally in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring and Perpetuating the Legacy of Dietrich Bonhoeffer
    Honoring and Perpetuating the Legacy of Dietrich Bonhoeffer The 2014 Charles H. Hackley Distinguished Lecture in the Humanities May 8, 2014 It is a great privilege to stand before you tonight and deliver the 2014 Charles H. Hackley Distinguished Lecture in the Humanities, and to receive this prestigious award in his name. As a child growing-up in Muskegon in the 1950s and 1960s, the name of Charles Hackley was certainly a respected name, if not an icon from Muskegon’s past, after which were named: the hospital in which I was born, the park in which I played, a Manual Training School and Gymnasium, a community college, an athletic field (Hackley Stadium) in which I danced as the Muskegon High School Indian mascot, and an Art Gallery and public library that I frequently visited. Often in going from my home in Lakeside through Glenside and then to Muskegon Heights, we would drive on Hackley Avenue. I have deep feelings about that Hackley name as well as many good memories of this town, Muskegon, where my life journey began. It is really a pleasure to return to Muskegon and accept this honor, after living away in the state of Minnesota for forty-six years. I also want to say thank you to the Friends of the Hackley Public Library, their Board President, Carolyn Madden, and the Director of the Library, Marty Ferriby. This building, in which we gather tonight, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church, also holds a very significant place in the life of my family. My great-grandfather, George Alfred Matthews, came from Bristol, England in 1878, and after living in Newaygo and Fremont, settled here in Muskegon and was a very active deacon in this congregation until his death in 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abwehr : from German Espionage Agency, to Centre of Resistance Against Hitler Student: Greg Elder Sponsor: Dr
    The Abwehr : From German espionage agency, to centre of resistance against Hitler Student: Greg Elder Sponsor: Dr. Vasilis Vourkoutiotis The Project: About the Abwehr: My research for Dr. Vourkoutiotis has mainly involved searching the microfilmed finding-aids for the German The name “Abwehr” in German can be translated literally as Captured Records archive located in Washington, D.C. The task requires me to scan the microfilmed data sheets “defence.” However, despite its name, the Abwehr became one of for information relevant to the project, and then summarize that info for the Professor. The process has greatly the forefront intelligence gathering establishments in Nazi Germany. familiarized me with the everyday work of a professional historian, and some of the necessary research steps for The organization was tasked with gathering information on the a historical monograph. The project has also furthered my knowledge of German history, especially regarding country’s enemies, primarily using field-based agents. The Abwehr the different espionage organizations at work during World War II. fell under the administration of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (Supreme Command of the Armed Forces) and interacted heavily This work is in preparation for Dr. Vourkoutiotis’s eventual trip to the archives in Washington D.C. where he will with other German espionage agencies such as the locate the important documents relating to the Abwehr. The research completed by myself in Ottawa will enable Sicherheitsdienst (Security Service of the SS and Nazi Party). him to visit the archives already aware of what relevant documents exist, and where to begin in his search for primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation 1005 in Belorussia: Commonalities and Unique Features, 1942–1944
    DOI:10.17951/k.2017.24.1.155 ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN – POLONIA VOL. XXIV, 1 SECTIO K 2017 Tel Aviv University, Goldstein-Goren Diaspora Research Center LEONID SMILOVITSKY Operation 1005 in Belorussia: Commonalities and Unique Features, 1942–1944 ABSTRACT The article is devoted to the little-studied topic of concealing the traces of Nazi mass crimes on the territory of Belarus, in the period from the spring of 1942 to the liberation of the Republic in the summer of 1944. “Operation 1005” is the code name of a top-secret large-scale operation, carried out by Nazi Germany in order to hide the traces of mass killings committed in Europe during World War II. Citing numerous examples of the cities, regions and areas of Belarus, the author reveals the mechanism used by the Nazis for concealing the consequences of mass murders, names the initiators of these crimes, the executioners and their accomplices. The article has been written on the basis of documentary materials found in various archives, which have been supplemented by the testimony of witnesses of those events, that allowed the author to show the general and the particular, and to draw the necessary conclusions. Key words: “Operation 1005”, Belarus, Jews, Holocaust, genocide, Belarus Jewry, WW2, Nazi crimes INTRODUCTION During the Second World War, in the region of Belorussia (in the territory of modern-day Belarus), the Nazis established over 260 SS and SD forced-labor and internment camps, prisons, penal colonies, and transit camps and colonies for women and children [Mikhnuk 1995: 295]. The Jewish population of Belorussia was cut off and doomed to die in over 300 small and large ghettos throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Transkribierte Fassung
    Die Seelen der Gerechten sind in Gottes Hand und des Todes Qual berührt sie nicht. Den Augen der Toren schienen sie zu sterben. Als Unglück wurde ihr Ende angesehen, ihr Scheiden von uns als Untergang: Sie aber sind in Frieden. Wenn sie auch bei den Menschen Qualen erlitten, so ist doch ihre Hoffnung voll der Unsterblichkeit. Ein wenig nur wurden sie gepeinigt, aber viel Herrliches wird ihnen widerfahren. Denn Gott hat sie geprüft und er fand sie seiner wert. Wie Gold im Ofen hat er sie geprüft und wie ein Brandopfer sie angenommen. Zu seiner Zeit wird man nach ihnen schauen. Sie werden die Völker richten und über die Nationen herrschen und der Herr wird ihr König sein in Ewigkeit. (Buch der Weisheit Salomonis 3, 1–8) † Nach Gottes heiligem Willen und in der Kraft ihres Glaubens starben den Heldentod im freien, ehrenvolle Kampfe für Wahrheit und Recht, für des Deutschen Volkes Freiheit, für der Deutschen Waffen Reinheit und Ehre, als bewußte Sühne für das vor Gott verübte Unrecht unseres Volkes die Führer der aktiven Widerstands-Bewegung des 20. Juli 1944: Ludwig Beck, Generaloberst, erschossen 20. Juli 1944 Dr. Karl Goerdeler, vorm. Oberbürgerm., erhängt 1. Febr. 1945 Graf Claus Schenk von Stauffenberg, Oberst i. G., erschossen 20. Juli 1944 Erwin v. Witzleben, Generalfeldmarschall, erhängt 8. Aug. 1944 – zusammen mit zahlreichen Kameraden aus der Armee und aus allen Stämmen, Ständen und Parteien des Deutschen Volkes – namentlich: ╬ Robert Bernardis, Oberstleutnant † 8. Aug. 1944 Albrecht Graf von Bernstorff, Botschaftsrat † 23. April 1945 Hans-Jürgen Graf v. Blumenthal, Major i. G. † 13. Okt. 1944 Hasso von Boehmer, Oberstleutnant i.
    [Show full text]