Ttpiii Arc H/Eology of Rome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ttpiii Arc H/Eology of Rome TTPI Ii A R H /EO LO GY O F R O M E C . O H N H E N R P A R KE R B Y C . J , H N M A X ON . A L O . F . ON D . O , S KE E P E R OF T HE ASH M OLE A N M U S E U M OF H I ST ORY A N D A R CH /E OLOG Y OX FORD , , V I CE - P RE S I D E N T OF T H E OX FORD A R CH I T E CT U RAL AN D H IS T O R I CA L S OCI E T Y , A N D OF T H E B R I T I S H A RCH JEO LOG ICA L S OCI E T Y OF ROM E H ON ORA RY M E M E R OF VA R I OUS A RCH EEOLOG I CAL S OCI E T I E S B , E N G LI S H A N D FOR E I N G . L L ART H. VO . P I L L U S T R A T I O N S T O H E P I M IT IVE RT I FI AT ION S . I . T R FO C I H WA LL N D G AT E F R ME . I . T E S A S O O I I I T H E H I T I A L C N T RU I N OF WALLS . S OR C O S CT O O X F O R D A M E S A R E R A N D J P K CO. L O N D O N : O H N M R R A Y A L - E MA R L E R E E . J U , B S T T 1 8 74 . N E N CO T T S . f P LAT E S P RI MIT IVE FORT I FI CAT I ON S . 3” D a rams I —IV i h P ans and . 1 Descr ption oft e l i g . I — V 9 D ri n fhe V ew s . I esc ptio o t i . — App end ix De sol iption ofthe P hoto Engravings ofthe H ills of Q — R ome the P a a ine th e Vim na the Coe an the A en ne I . I I : l t , i l , li , v ti XX M WALLS AN D GAT E S OF RO E . —VI I I ' ofthe D a rams I . D escription i g . P o - E n ra n s I -t Descripti on ofthe hot g vi g . N R CT I N F WALL CO ST U O O S . fh P a s — 3 Desc ri on o t e e I VI I I . pti l t . X — — A end ix Mamer ne P r son &c . X I X II pp ti i , . XX . — fons ru on Ca i o um &c . De a s o C c p t li , t il t ti Descri on ofthe D a rams o fth e Ca o um c on n n pti i g pit li , tai i g fErarium T abu a u m S enaculum and Mun ci u , l ri , , i pi m D ESC R IPTION OF T H E PLANS AN D DIAGRAMS OF T H E P R VE S I MI T I FORT IF ICA T IO N . O RI MIT IVE Fo RT I FI CAT I ON s — L AN S AN D DI A RA P P G MS . P LAT E I EN E RAL LAN OF R OME W ofA G P , with the alls of the Kings , ure lian , and of the Popes . In this small Plan the hills are tinted grey, and the valleys left white , with the streams of water flowing through them , green ; the W A alls of the Kings are tinted red that of urelian , with the towers , L H adrianum is solid black 3that of the eonine City and the , a thick black line and that Ofthe Popes in black outline . This plan , with the section above , was taken originally from what R was considered as the best geological plan of ome . But it does n not profess to be a geological plan in its prese t form , it is only ‘ int end e d t o give a general idea of the? nature of the ground on R which the City of ome stands , in the valley of the Tiber . The S even Hills have probably all been originally promontories , from a - OLLES the high t ble land on each side . The three C , the Quirinal , E Viminal , and squiline , clearly are so, and the Janiculum and Vatican on the western side . P LAT E 3. ME GENERAL PLAN OF RO , TE E WALLS F T HE KIN O GS, AURELIAN, AND HE T P OPES. Wall s ofServius u sta bl e . I l l a L S . Walls and Gat e , f s o Anrelian . Streams f o Wat er . 1 . Mbiit M i e ar o. 2 . Mant P r i a a oli . 3 . Ianioulnm. o !o o o 1 0 0 0 l — _g M E T R A RI MI T IVE FORT IFICAT ION S— LAN S A N D DIAG RA P P MS . P LAT E I I . RI M IT VA T he R OMA P I . obj ect of this Plate is to give a more ' ‘ Czz o R ome clear idea of the original y f , both of the first and second period . The first City consisted of the Palatine Hill only, of which n the norther part was more strongly fortified than the rest . This strongest part , or citadel , was an oblong space on the side next the S S Hill of aturn , of which the abines were then in possession , and w ar R were for a time at with the omans . This space , called R oma uadm m w as a r x Q , the , citadel , or keep of the Palatine City . It may uadr atic; have been called Q either from its oblong form , or because O it was surrounded by walls built of large blong blocks of tufa, of O us uadm lu m the construction called by Vitruvius p g . It had a triple a rx line of defence round it at different levels , as was usual for the . ' R emains of the wall against the upper c lifi are now visible on three w sides . This all is distinguished on the plan by a solid red line where it is now visible, and by a dotted red line where it has been On an . d destroyed , but must have gone the south, the west , the north, parts of the wall remain against the cliff on the south side is u the great foss across the middle of the hill, called by some a nat ral r a valley, or it was probably partly natural, but ce t inly f only in part, with the cli fs supported by walls on both sides of the M i is . u on great foss The Porta g is near the east end of this foss , ’ the approach to it protected by the c lifis on both sides spreading T ba s econd Cit out in a gorge as usual . y consisted of the two hills , the Palatine and the Hill of Saturn inclosed in one wall, which is l remains and also marked by a red line , solid where it , in dots only w d here it must have passed . It must have include the Velia at the east end, to protect the approach to the principal gate , and have gone to the Tiber on the south - wes t in order to keep open that highway for provisions . The tufa wall of the second period against P uld zr um Lim a the bank of the Tiber, called the , must have formed A part of this line of defence, and the small river lmo may also have formed a wet ditch for a certai n distance . The other streams and marshes in the valleys added greatly to the strength of the Palatine fortress , before they were collected in the great drain , ' Cloam M xz called a ma . P LAT E ll . R O M A P R M IT I I V A . WALL OF PALAT INE AND CAPIT OL COMBINED IN ONE CIT Y. M _. w i PAV E D ROA D S wA T E R RI MI T IVE FORT I FI CAT I ON S— LA N S AN D DIAGRAMS P P . LAT P E I I I . IAGRAMOF T HE ALAT I N E I LL WIT H A MALL P D P H , S ORT ION OF T H E AP IT OLI N C E . H IS T Plate contains a section of a portion of the Capitoline Hill , ‘ di Marforio ft f with a plan of the Via , a narrow street at the oo o it on the eastern side , with some excavations made there in the spring 1 8 2 a e? l of 7 , shewing the junction of the g and wa l of the second City with the rock of the Capitol .
Recommended publications
  • Planning Versus Fortification: Sangallo's Project for the Defence of Rome Simon Pepper
    Fort Vol. 2 1976 Planning versus fortification: Sangallo's project for the defence of Rome Simon Pepper Since 1527, when Rome had been captured and sacked by the mutinous soldiers of Charles V, it had been clear that the defences of the Papal capital were hopelessly outdated. The walls of the Borgo (the Vatican precinct) were constructed during the pontificate of Leo IV (847-855): those of Trastevere and the left bank, enclosing by far the largest part of the city, dated from the reign of the Emperor Aurelian (AD270-75) [1]. Impressive both for their length and antiquity, these walls were poorly maintained and fundamentally unsuitable for defence against gunpowder artillery. In 1534 the Romans were once again forcefully reminded of their vulnerability when a large Turkish fleet moored off the Tiber estuary. Fortunately the hostile intentions of the Turks were directed elsewhere: after taking on fresh water they sailed north to raid the Tuscan coastline. But in the immediate aftermath of the Turkish scare the newly elected Paul III committed himself to an ambitious scheme of re-fortification. Antonio da Sangallo the Younger, advised by many of the leading architects and soldiers employed by the Pope, was commissioned to submit design proposals [2]. Father Alberto Guglielmotti, the nineteenth-century historian of the Papal armed forces, tells us that Sangallo and his consultants decided to replace the Aurelian wall with a new line of works defending the developed areas on both banks of the river. The 18000 metre Aurelian circumfer- ence was to be reduced by half, a decision which is not difficult to understand when one glances at a contemporary map of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N
    Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N. Purcell, 1997 Introduction The landscape of central Italy has not been intrinsically stable. The steep slopes of the mountains have been deforested–several times in many cases–with consequent erosion; frane or avalanches remove large tracts of regolith, and doubly obliterate the archaeological record. In the valley-bottoms active streams have deposited and eroded successive layers of fill, sealing and destroying the evidence of settlement in many relatively favored niches. The more extensive lowlands have also seen substantial depositions of alluvial and colluvial material; the coasts have been exposed to erosion, aggradation and occasional tectonic deformation, or–spectacularly in the Bay of Naples– alternating collapse and re-elevation (“bradyseism”) at a staggeringly rapid pace. Earthquakes everywhere have accelerated the rate of change; vulcanicity in Campania has several times transformed substantial tracts of landscape beyond recognition–and reconstruction (thus no attempt is made here to re-create the contours of any of the sometimes very different forerunners of today’s Mt. Vesuvius). To this instability must be added the effect of intensive and continuous intervention by humanity. Episodes of depopulation in the Italian peninsula have arguably been neither prolonged nor pronounced within the timespan of the map and beyond. Even so, over the centuries the settlement pattern has been more than usually mutable, which has tended to obscure or damage the archaeological record. More archaeological evidence has emerged as modern urbanization spreads; but even more has been destroyed. What is available to the historical cartographer varies in quality from area to area in surprising ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781107013995 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01399-5 — Rome Rabun Taylor , Katherine Rinne , Spiro Kostof Index More Information INDEX abitato , 209 , 253 , 255 , 264 , 273 , 281 , 286 , 288 , cura(tor) aquarum (et Miniciae) , water 290 , 319 commission later merged with administration, ancient. See also Agrippa ; grain distribution authority, 40 , archives ; banishment and 47 , 97 , 113 , 115 , 116 – 17 , 124 . sequestration ; libraries ; maps ; See also Frontinus, Sextus Julius ; regions ( regiones ) ; taxes, tarif s, water supply ; aqueducts; etc. customs, and fees ; warehouses ; cura(tor) operum maximorum (commission of wharves monumental works), 162 Augustan reorganization of, 40 – 41 , cura(tor) riparum et alvei Tiberis (commission 47 – 48 of the Tiber), 51 censuses and public surveys, 19 , 24 , 82 , cura(tor) viarum (roads commission), 48 114 – 17 , 122 , 125 magistrates of the vici ( vicomagistri ), 48 , 91 codes, laws, and restrictions, 27 , 29 , 47 , Praetorian Prefect and Guard, 60 , 96 , 99 , 63 – 65 , 114 , 162 101 , 115 , 116 , 135 , 139 , 154 . See also against permanent theaters, 57 – 58 Castra Praetoria of burial, 37 , 117 – 20 , 128 , 154 , 187 urban prefect and prefecture, 76 , 116 , 124 , districts and boundaries, 41 , 45 , 49 , 135 , 139 , 163 , 166 , 171 67 – 69 , 116 , 128 . See also vigiles (i re brigade), 66 , 85 , 96 , 116 , pomerium ; regions ( regiones ) ; vici ; 122 , 124 Aurelian Wall ; Leonine Wall ; police and policing, 5 , 100 , 114 – 16 , 122 , wharves 144 , 171 grain, l our, or bread procurement and Severan reorganization of, 96 – 98 distribution, 27 , 89 , 96 – 100 , staf and minor oi cials, 48 , 91 , 116 , 126 , 175 , 215 102 , 115 , 117 , 124 , 166 , 171 , 177 , zones and zoning, 6 , 38 , 84 , 85 , 126 , 127 182 , 184 – 85 administration, medieval frumentationes , 46 , 97 charitable institutions, 158 , 169 , 179 – 87 , 191 , headquarters of administrative oi ces, 81 , 85 , 201 , 299 114 – 17 , 214 Church.
    [Show full text]
  • C HAPTER THREE Dissertation I on the Waters and Aqueducts Of
    Aqueduct Hunting in the Seventeenth Century: Raffaele Fabretti's De aquis et aquaeductibus veteris Romae Harry B. Evans http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=17141, The University of Michigan Press C HAPTER THREE Dissertation I on the Waters and Aqueducts of Ancient Rome o the distinguished Giovanni Lucio of Trau, Raffaello Fabretti, son of T Gaspare, of Urbino, sends greetings. 1. introduction Thanks to your interest in my behalf, the things I wrote to you earlier about the aqueducts I observed around the Anio River do not at all dis- please me. You have in›uenced my diligence by your expressions of praise, both in your own name and in the names of your most learned friends (whom you also have in very large number). As a result, I feel that I am much more eager to pursue the investigation set forth on this subject; I would already have completed it had the abundance of waters from heaven not shown itself opposed to my own watery task. But you should not think that I have been completely idle: indeed, although I was not able to approach for a second time the sources of the Marcia and Claudia, at some distance from me, and not able therefore to follow up my ideas by surer rea- soning, not uselessly, perhaps, will I show you that I have been engaged in the more immediate neighborhood of that aqueduct introduced by Pope Sixtus and called the Acqua Felice from his own name before his ponti‹- 19 Aqueduct Hunting in the Seventeenth Century: Raffaele Fabretti's De aquis et aquaeductibus veteris Romae Harry B.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegato Capitolato Tecnico ELENCO STRADE MUN 1
    MUN. LOTTO Denominazione strada Note 1A 1 BELVEDERE ANTONIO CEDERNA 1A 1 BELVEDERE TARPEO 1A 1 BORGO ANGELICO 1A 1 BORGO PIO 1A 1 BORGO S. ANGELO 1A 1 BORGO S. LAZZARO 1A 1 BORGO S. SPIRITO 1A 1 BORGO VITTORIO 1A 1 CIRCONVALLAZIONE CLODIA 1A 1 CIRCONVALLAZIONE TRIONFALE 1A 1 CLIVO ARGENTARIO 1A 1 CLIVO DEI PUBLICII 1A 1 CLIVO DELLE MURA VATICANE 1A 1 CLIVO DI ACILIO 1A 1 CLIVO DI ROCCA SAVELLA 1A 1 CLIVO DI SCAURO 1A 1 CLIVO DI VENERE FELICE 1A 1 FORO ROMANO 1A 1 FORO TRAIANO 1A 1 GALLERIA GIOVANNI XXIII 1A 1 GALLERIA PRINCIPE AMEDEO SAVOIA AOSTA 1A 1 GIARDINO DEL QUIRINALE 1A 1 GIARDINO DOMENICO PERTICA 1A 1 GIARDINO FAMIGLIA DI CONSIGLIO 1A 1 GIARDINO GEN. RAFFAELE CADORNA 1A 1 GIARDINO PIETRO LOMBARDI 1A 1 GIARDINO UMBERTO IMPROTA 1A 1 LARGO ANGELICUM 1A 1 LARGO ARRIGO VII 1A 1 LARGO ASCIANGHI 1A 1 LARGO ASSEN PEIKOV 1A 1 LARGO BRUNO BALDINOTTI 1A 1 LARGO CARLO LAZZERINI 1A 1 LARGO CERVINIA 1A 1 LARGO CORRADO RICCI 1A 1 LARGO CRISTINA DI SVEZIA 1A 1 LARGO DEGLI ALICORNI 1A 1 LARGO DEI MUTILATI ED INVALIDI DI GUERRA 1A 1 LARGO DEL COLONNATO 1A 1 LARGO DELLA GANCIA 1A 1 LARGO DELLA POLVERIERA 1A 1 LARGO DELLA SALARA VECCHIA 1A 1 LARGO DELLA SANITA' MILITARE 1A 1 LARGO DELLA SOCIETA' GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA forse parco 1A 1 LARGO DELL'AMBA ARADAM 1A 1 LARGO DELLE TERME DI CARACALLA 1A 1 LARGO DELLE VITTIME DEL TERRORISMO 1A 1 LARGO DI PORTA CASTELLO 1A 1 LARGO DI PORTA S.
    [Show full text]
  • Progetto Per Un Parco Integrato Delle Mura Storiche
    ROMA PARCO INTEGRATO DELLE MURA STORICHE Mura Aureliane - Mura da Paolo III a Urbano VIII Esterno delle Mura lungo viale Metronio Mura storiche di Roma 2 Pianta di Roma di Giovanni Battista Nolli - 1748 3 Mura di Roma, Grande Raccordo Anulare e anello ciclabile 4 Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma - 2003/2008 5 Ambiti di programmazione strategica: quadro di unione 1-Tevere 2-Mura 3-Anello ferroviario 1 4-Parco dell’Appia 5-Asse nord-sud 5 2 3 4 6 Pianta di Pietro Visconti (Archeologo) e Carlo Pestrini (Incisore)- 1827 7 Quadro di unione Forma Urbis Romae di Rodolfo Lanciani - 1893/1901 8 Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma - 1883 9 Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma - 1909 10 Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma - 1931 11 Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma - 1961 12 Stralcio Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma - 1961 13 Intersezioni delle Mura con gli assi viari storici e ambiti di progettazione 2 1 - Corso_Flaminia 2 - XX Settembre_Salario 3 - Laterano_Appio 4 - Caracalla_Appia Antica 1 5 - Marmorata_Ostiense 6 - Trastevere_Gianicolo Aurelia antica 6 5 3 4 14 Centralità lungo le Mura storiche 15 Parchi e ambiti di valorizzazione ambientale Villa Borghese Villa Doria Pamphili Parco dell’Appia 16 Ambito di programmazione strategica Mura - Risorse 17 Ambito di programmazione strategica Mura - Obiettivi 18 Progetto «Porte del Tempo» Museo del Sito UNESCO a Porta del Museo dei Bersaglieri Popolo di Porta Pia Museo garibaldino e repubblica Romana a Porta Portese e Porta San Pancrazio Museo delle Mura Museo della resistenza a Porta San a Porta Ostiense Sebastiano 19 Porta del Popolo (Flaminia) 20 Porta San Sebastiano (Appia Antica) 21 Porta San Paolo (Ostiense) 22 Parco lineare integrato 23 Schema direttore generale del progetto urbano delle Mura 24 Parco lineare integrato delle Mura - Progetti realizzati e approvati Responsabili del procedimento: Arch.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Writing in the Street: The Development of Urban Poetics in Roman Satire Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x66m4vs Author Gillies, Grace Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Writing in the Street: The Development of Urban Poetics in Roman Satire A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Grace Gillies 2018 © Copyright by Grace Gillies 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Writing in the Street: The Development of Urban Poetics in Roman Satire by Grace Gillies Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Amy Ellen Richlin, Chair My dissertation examines Roman imperial satire for its relationship with non-elite street culture in the Roman city. I begin with a lexicon of sites and terms related to Roman concepts of disgust in the city, as they appear in the satiric sources I am working with. Then, in my next four chapters, I work chronologically through the extant satires to show how each author reflects or even appropriates practices from Roman street culture. Satirists both condemn parts of the city as disgusting—the parts and people in them who ignore social and cultural boundaries—and appropriate those practices as emblematic of what satire does. The theoretical framework for this project concerns concepts of disgust in the Roman world, and draws primarily on Mary Douglas (1966) and Julia Kristeva (1982). The significance of this work is twofold: (1) it argues that satire is, far from a self-contained elite practice, a genre that drew heavily on non-elite urban ii culture; (2) that it adds to a fragmentary history of Roman street culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aqua Traiana / Aqua Paola and Their Effects on The
    THE AQUA TRAIANA / AQUA PAOLA AND THEIR EFFECTS ON THE URBAN FABRIC OF ROME Carolyn A. Mess A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Architectural History In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Architectural History May 2014 Cammy Brothers __________________ Sheila Crane __________________ John Dobbins __________________ ii ABSTRACT Infrastructure has always played an important role in urban planning, though the focus of urban form is often the road system and the water system is only secondary. This is a misconception as often times the hydraulic infrastructure determined where roads were placed. Architectural structures were built where easily accessible potable water was found. People established towns and cities around water, like coasts, riverbanks, and natural springs. This study isolates two aqueducts, the Aqua Traiana and its Renaissance counterpart, the Aqua Paola. Both of these aqueducts were exceptional feats of engineering in their planning, building techniques, and functionality; however, by the end of their construction, they symbolized more than their outward utilitarian architecture. Within their given time periods, these aqueducts impacted an entire region of Rome that had twice been cut off from the rest of the city because of its lack of a water supply and its remote location across the Tiber. The Aqua Traiana and Aqua Paola completely transformed this area by improving residents’ hygiene, building up an industrial district, and beautifying the area of Trastevere. This study
    [Show full text]
  • Rome, November 10 - 18, 2018
    International Conference of the Frontinus-Society on the History of Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering in the Mediterranean Region Rome, November 10 - 18, 2018 INVITATION AND CALL FOR PAPERS The conference will be held as a series of lectures and excursions on the history of water management and hydraulic engineering in the Mediterranean region. Its aim is to stimulate interdisciplinary discussion about water in antiquity. The participation of archaeologists, historians, hydraulic engineers, civil engineers, town planners and geologists ensures an information exchange about the latest findings and theories. The emphasis will be on ancient water supply and use. The organizer of this conference is the Frontinus-Society, with support of the American University of Rome, the Centro Ricerche Speleo Archeologiche Sotterranei di Roma, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Rom, Istituto Austriaco di Studii Storici at Rome and the John Cabot University at Rome. One full and two half days of lectures will be followed or interrupted by excursions to ancient water installations outside and inside of Rome. The following list intends to suggest some of the topics which could be discussed at the symposium. NEWEST RESEARCH RESULTS ON AQUEDUCTS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE THIRD MILLENIUM: Water supply systems of ancient cities are increasingly documented as a whole. This is the reason why todays research results are clearer and offer more detailed analyses than in the past when only monumental sections of aqueducts were studied closely. For instance the recently resumed explorations of the aqueducts at Ephesus made clear, that ordinary sections often reveal more important insights than spectacular aqueduct bridges or siphons.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 43 Latium Vetus Compiled by L
    Map 43 Latium Vetus Compiled by L. Quilici and S. Quilici Gigli, 1995 Introduction The environs of Rome have undergone enormous changes from antiquity onwards, caused more by human intervention than by natural phenomena. Changes were already occurring in the archaic period as the region's population increased; these earliest phases of urbanization have been considerably illuminated by recent research. The changes intensified in Late Republican and imperial times, when urbanization reached a level unique for antiquity. Building activity connected with the city extended far enough into the countryside to link with construction centered upon surroundings towns. Thus the towns on the Tiburtine, Praenestine and Alban hills, as well as Ostia and Antium on the coast, were considered suburbs of the metropolis. After antiquity, by contrast, the region was almost deserted except in the hills. In the Late Middle Ages and subsequently, the spread of malaria and the extension of a pastoral economy reduced it to little more than a wilderness littered with the ruins remaining from an earlier era. By definition, there is some difficulty about showing settlements of different periods on a single map. We have marked those that can be located with either certainty or a fair degree of probability. At this scale no attempt is made to include every small settlement, let alone the whole complex infrastructure of the area. But we do mark cultural features notable for their size, state of preservation, or historical significance. These include large Late Republican and imperial villas, and the greatest monumental tombs. Inevitably, many estates, villas and tombs (some of them far from negligible) have had to be omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Xxv Edizione Della Maratona Di Roma
    XXV EDIZIONE DELLA MARATONA DI ROMA Domenica 7 aprile in occasione della 25esima edizione della Maratona di Roma il trasporto pubblico subirà variazioni di servizio. Ecco la guida al trasporto: COME MUOVERSI IL GIORNO DELLA GARA: nella giornata di domenica la rete di trasporto pubblico centrale e semicentrale sarà modificata per lasciare spazio ai maratoneti. Occorrerà fare attenzione, quindi, al percorso della propria linea di bus. I particolari sono in questa guida PER SPOSTARSI IN CITTA’ METROPOLITANE E FERROVIE: il servizio della metropolitana e delle ferrovie non subirà variazioni, per muoversi nelle zone interessate dalla maratona, quindi, converrà usare le linee su ferro. La stazione Colosseo, resterà chiusa da inizio servizio e sino a cessate esigenze, per raggiungere la zona di via dei Fori Imperiali, sono utilizzabili anche le stazioni Cavour o Circo Massimo. SITUAZIONE DEL TRASPORTO PUBBLICO IN TEMPO REALE: per tutta la durata della manifestazione, la situazione in tempo reale del trasporto pubblico sarà disponibile sul sito www.atac.roma.it – sezione tempo reale - e sul profilo Twitter di Atac spa @infoatac, accessibile all’indirizzo www.twitter.com/infoatac e, su WhatsApp inviando una richiesta di informazioni al numero 335.1990679 WhatsApp 335.1990679 www.atac.roma.it @infoatac - www.twitter.com/infoatac XXV EDIZIONE DELLA MARATONA DI ROMA GUIDA AL TRASPORTO IN OCCASIONE DELLA 25ESIMA EDIZIONE DELL MARATONA DI ROMA DOMENICA 7 APRILE 2019 LINEA MODIFICA DELL’OPERATIVO DI SERVIZIO Dalle 14.00 alle 17.15 Direzione Termini:
    [Show full text]
  • Il Percorso Con I Mezzi Pubblici the Route Using Public Transportation *
    IL PERCORSO CON I MEZZI PUBBLICI THE ROUTE USING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION * Parco degli acquedotti (Park of the Aqueducts) - Via Lemonia, 256 800 m SUBAUGUSTA Metro A (4 fermate/stops) QUADRARO - PORTA FURBA 650 m Arco (Arch of) di Porta Furba - Via Tuscolana 547 50 m Fontana di (Fountain of) Porta Furba - Via Tuscolana 545 650 m ARCO DI TRAVERTINO Metro A (5 fermate/stops) SAN GIOVANNI 50 m P.LE APPIO 51 (4 fermate/stops) LODI 250 m Acquedotto del (Aqueduct of the) Mandrione - Piazza Lodi 250 m CASILINA/GALLARATE 50 (1 fermata/stop) CASILINA/P.LE LABICANO 200 m Porta Maggiore - Piazzale Labicano Porta Maggiore - Piazzale Labicano 300 m PORTA MAGGIORE GIARDINETTI (1 fermata/stop) S.BIBIANA 450 m Arco di (Arch of) Sisto V - Piazzale Sisto V 500 m GIOLITTI 70 (2 fermate/stops) REPUBBLICA 100 m Fontana delle (Fountain of) Najadi - Piazza della Repubblica 300 m Fontana del (Fountain of) Mosè - Piazza San Bernardo 600 m Fontane di (Fountain of) Piazza Barberini - Piazza Barberini 100 m Quattro Fontane - Piazza delle Quattro Fontane 700 m Fontana dei (Fountain of the) Dioscuri - Piazza del Quirinale 300 m MILANO/NAZIONALE 71 (4 fermate/stops) S. MARIA MAGGIORE 714 (5 fermate/stops) L.GO AMBA ARADAM 100 m Fontana della (Fountain of the)Navicella - Via della Navicella Fontana della (Fountain of the)Navicella - Via della Navicella 100 m NAVICELLA/PORTA METRONIA 81 (6 fermate/stops) CERCHI/BOCCA DELLA VERITA' 300 m Fontana dei (Fountain of the)Tritoni - Piazza Bocca della Verità 100 m LGT AVENTINO 23 (3 fermate/stops) LGT VALLATI/PETTINARI 650 m Fontana
    [Show full text]