<<

Brief for GSDR 2016 Indigenous Minorities of the North in conditions of modern Environmental Management Vaver Olga Yu., Vykhodtsev Aleksandr M., Chuikova Ekaterina N., State University,

constant maintenance of a sufficient amount of INTRODUCTION food, shelter, clothing and access to the benefits General characteristics of the problem area in of consumption; health, including good health and question are the following. of having a healthy physical environment, clean air the North, including those living in the and access to clean water); normal social autonomous areas of the Tyumen Region of relationships (social cohesion, mutual respect, the Russia, belong to ethnic groups, poorly adapted to ability to help others and to care for children); modern living conditions. For a long time their way security (secure access to natural and other of life has not changed, but the Russian expansion resources, personal security and protection from into Western has brought developments. natural phenomenon); freedom of choice and Heavy colonization of the territories densely action, including the possibility for an individual to populated by indigenous peoples resulted in the be who he wants and to do what he wants destruction of the natural environment, the (Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing…, 2005). destruction of traditional industries and MATERIALS AND METHODS handicrafts, traditional way of life, culture and customs. The crisis of traditional economic The materials were collected during the expedition activities has led to an aggravation of social trips to the place of residence of indigenous problems. The standard of living of the citizens of peoples in the -Mansi Autonomous Okrug - a significant number of small peoples of the North (Tyumen region, Russia) in the period of living in rural areas or living nomadically is below 2009-2012. The rural population has been chosen the national average. The unemployment rate in as the most vulnerable in the present conditions, the North, where the small peoples of the North as city dwellers, in our opinion, are more mobile, live, is 1.5-2 times higher than the average for the adapted part of the population. Russian Federation (Nazarov, 1997). Loci of study were identified as settlements with All of the above is observed despite the fact that the status of a national community, or being a as a whole in the Russian Federation there place of compact residence of indigenous peoples developed regulatory and legal framework to of the North Yugra (Khanty, Mansi, Nenets). They protect the rights and traditional way of life of the were Saranpaul, Ugut, Varyogan and indigenous peoples of the North, securing Peregryobnoe – settlements in Berezovsky, , governmental support (in the form of incentives, , and Oktyabrsky districts of Ugra, subsidies, quotas on the use of biological respectively. The settlements are located along resources). Benefits for members of minorities of the Liapin, Big Yugan, Agan, and rivers. In the North are provided by the Tax, Forest, Water addition, we visited the yurts (a traditional type of and Land Codes of the Russian Federation (Prava settlement of the Khanty people) on the Big Yugan korennykh narodov Severa …, 2005). River. In this connection, the aim of our study was to The study was conducted using a questionnaire investigate the perceptions of well-being of developed by the Association of Indigenous indigenous minorities in the modern Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East, in environmental management. According to the association with the Inter-Ministerial Commission records of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment for the and Antarctic under the Ministry of International Programme, features determining Economy of the Russian Federation (Krasovskaja, human well-being may include: basic materials for 2008), upgraded by Olga Yu. Vaver. a good life (safe and decent living conditions, 1

*The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors’ and do not necessarily represent those of the Secretariat of the United Nations. Online publication or dissemination does not imply endorsement by the United Nations. RESULTS to the modern market, and a management system that meets the same problem. Analysis of the legislative provision of the rights and traditional way of life on the regional level in The greatest concern of the respondents cause Yugra has shown that in the area there was such negative social factors as (the total number implemented an institute of protected areas - the of responses): alcohol and drug abuse (24%), territories of traditional nature management unemployment (17%), the destruction of nature (Polozhenie o statuse…, 1992), and there (15.5%), the impoverishment of the population approved the Concept of Sustainable (9%), injustice (9%). Overall, only 24.6% of Development of Indigenous Peoples of the Khanty- respondents believe that traditional culture is Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra (Kontseptsia…, preserved and the majority of people will keep 2011). At the same time, the number of their traditional way of life. 21.5% of respondents indigenous peoples, leading traditional lifestyles believe that traditional culture is preserved only in within the boundaries of the traditional territories the ethnic and cultural centres, and the majority of is 12.0 % of the total aboriginal population. The indigenous peoples will work in other than the number of families among the indigenous peoples, traditional economy, industries. The majority - keeping the traditional way of life amounts to 974 46.2% - declared the complete ethnic and cultural families, including 507 families engaged in assimilation. At the same time 48% of respondents breeding (Informatsia…, 2016) living in yurts, believe that the people retain their culture, and 52.4% of respondents living in Thus, it should be noted that representatives of villages, believe that assimilation will occur in the indigenous peoples of Yugra do not seek to next 15-20 years. maintain a traditional way of life, most of them live in cities, which leads to ethnic and cultural Most respondents answer that the unemployment assimilation and loss of ethnic identity, and in rate is high and does not change, which especially general - to the loss of national culture. This is affects young people (youth outflow from their confirmed by the analysis of the research homes is mainly influenced by the lack of work). materials. The main source of income is pensions and various social benefits, as well as wages of employees of Among the factors that prevent well-being, most municipal institutions (schools, administrations, often respondents put in the first place such items kindergartens, clubs, etc.). Additional revenues are as fishing grounds and resources, money, housing, generated by sales of products of traditional forms quality health care (21.8%, 20%, 20% and 18.2% of of industries (hunting, reindeer breeding, fishing respondents, respectively). In the second place and gathering wild plants). Only in Ugut additional there are such items as money, quality health care source of income is construction and trade. This and normal living conditions (27.5%, 25% and 20% allows to evaluate the acuteness of this issue for of respondents, respectively). This quite clearly the small peoples of the Yugra, as traditional revealed the difference in the views of industries are increasingly superseded by highly respondents living in yurts and villages: for profitable occupation in oil and gas producing and respondents living in yurts, the priority is the servicing industry, construction and trade. availability of commercial land and resources, to villagers - the availability of housing. On the In the villages, next to which oil is extracted, 100% second and third places most frequently of respondents note environmental degradation: mentioned by all respondents there were such contamination of water in the rivers flowing items as money and quality medical care. The around settlements and being the basis for fishing, respondents from villages in their priority list permanent forest fires, oil spills. (though not shown first) indicated the need for It is to be noted that the settlements under recreation and communication conditions, which investigation are sufficiently distant from the was not noted by the yurts residents. Several regional centres of the area. The main transport respondents offered special opinions, which are routes to connect these settlements with other important in the context of the investigation: they territories are often rivers. As a result, due to the believe that it is necessary to provide a socio- remoteness and inaccessibility, the expenditure economic system that allows fitting the minorities part of life increases. Without participation of the 2

inhabitants of these settlements in the traditional economic situation due to the payment under forms of industries, they cannot cover the costs by economic agreements (compensation for the revenues, which are formed mainly by the damages). But it is 100% of the surveyed owners governmental support. However, the majority of of tribal lands, and 80% of those who do not have respondents recognize the reluctance to leave any, note that this improvement is temporary. their homes for cities; they note uncomfortable Later (after fires, oil spills, etc.) there will be lack of conditions of urban living. space within the boundaries of tribal lands, where they will be able to implement the traditional FINDINGS industry in reality. In addition, the "easy money" Analysis of the results of the study of provokes lack of motivation to continue the representations about the welfare of indigenous traditional way of life not only within youth, but peoples in current environmental management also among adults. has shown that: CONCLUSION 1. Traditional environmental management for Thus, the study showed that the existing system of indigenous peoples is a traditional lifestyle, governmental support of indigenous peoples of relevant for the conservation and protection of the North does not take into account the their original habitat, which corresponds to the identified trends. We think that to solve these objectives of sustainable development. Despite issues can be made these follows: the efforts of Russia's measures, the situation of minorities of the North is complicated by 1. To create active groups of indigenous people in unsuitability of their traditional way of life to their localities for studying: ideas to reduce modern economic conditions. This leads to a unemployment, involvement of young people rather low estimate of indicators characterizing in the traditional industry, negative social welfare. factors, and other obstacles for their well- being. 2. National rural settlements of Yugra differ by their economy, which is formed at the expense of 2. To use results of the study and the groups budget revenues and lower-income types of themselves for effective management of traditional industries, in connection with what national rural settlements. they observe outflow of youth, unemployment, 3. To create a mechanism for "strategic pronounced antisocial factors (alcoholism and compensation": the account for damage suicidal thoughts), an active process of caused by human activities should include a assimilation takes place, traditional value loss of profit while the ecosystem recovery orientations are lost. Thus, in accord with after the fire, oil spills, water pollution. questionnaire data processing (preliminary results were published earlier in Vaver, 2011) only 87.7% 4. To consider the model of "ethnic nature of the respondents can be classified as indigenous parks" ∗, in which indigenous peoples are peoples in some degree preserving elements of guaranteed the right to pursue their traditional traditional culture in its various manifestations. In lifestyles, as a form of territorial organization of this case, among the respondents living in yurts, national rural settlements. the figure is around 100%, while among respondents living in settlements it is 81%. The vast majority of respondents, 80%, identify themselves as indigenous peoples only by culture- connected criteria (language, religion, traditions, folklore). In total 15.4% of respondents believe that their people are different from the rest of the Russian population by their special culture of ∗ In Russia, ethnic nature park is a protected area, in nature management. which the preservation of historical and cultural heritage of indigenous peoples takes place in the sustainable use 3. The owners of tribal lands, where oil is of natural resources. Example – ethnic nature park Uch- extracted, note an improvement in their socio- Enmek (http://uchenmek.ru).

3

References Yugra Administration. Access mode : http://www.kmns.admhmao.ru/wps/portal/km Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis / n/home/koncepciya/material/f3d2baea-7539- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 4654-8fbb-35e3ed2e5462. Accessed date: Washington, DC : Island Press, 2005. 154 p. 14.01.2016. Informatsia o korennykh malochislennykh Krasovskaja T.M. Prirodopol'zovanie Severa Rossii narodakh Severa XMAO – Yugry (Information (Environmental management of the North of about indigenous minorities of the North Russia). M.: LKI, 2008. P. 263-270. KhMAO – Yugra) [Digital resource] // Official Nazarov A.V. Problemy razvitiia narodov Severa web-site of the Department of Natural (Issues of Development of Northern Peoples) // Resources and Non-energy Sectors of Social and Political Journal. 1997. № 6. P. 200- Economics of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous 209. Okrug – Yugra. Access mode : Polozhenie o statuse rodovykh ugodiy v Khanty- http://ugrales.ru/korennye-narody.html. Mansiiskom avtonomnom okruge : utv. Accessed date: 14.01.2016. Resheniem Soveta narodnykh deputatov Kontseptsia ustoichivogo razvitiia korennykh Khanty-Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 7 malochislennykh narodov Severa Khanty- fevralia 1992 (Provision on the Status of Tribal Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga-Yugry: utv. Lands in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug: Postanovleniem pravitelstva Mansiiskogo approved by the decision of Soviet Delegates avtonomnogo okruga-Yugry ot 27 maya 2011 Council dated 7 February, 1992). Khanty- № 183-п (Concept of Sustainable Development Mansiisk : Novosti Yugry, 1992. 200 p. of Indigenous Peoples of the Khanty-Mansi Prava korennykh narodov Severa: realizatsiia Autonomous Okrug dated 27 May 2011 No mezhdunarodno-pravovykh standartov v 183-п) [Digital resource] // Official web-site of Rossiiskoy Federatsii (Rights of Indigenous the the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Peoples of the North: Implementation of Yugra Administration. Access mode : International Legal Standards in the Russian http://www.kmns.admhmao.ru/wps/portal/km Federation): collection of scientific papers / n/home/koncepciya/material/f3d2baea-7539- edited by G.A. Bordovsky, S.A. Goncharov. 4654-8fbb-35e3ed2e5462. Accessed date: Saint-Petersburg : RGPU publishing, 2005. 265 14.01.2016. p. ustoichivogo razvitiia korennykh malochislennykh Vaver O.Yu. Analiz social’nyh konfliktov narodov Severa Khanty-Mansiiskogo prirodopol’zovaniya v Hanty-Mansijskom avtonomnogo okruga-Yugry: utv. avtonomnom okruge – Yugre (The analysis of Postanovleniem pravitelstva Mansiiskogo social conflicts of environmental management avtonomnogo okruga-Yugry ot 27 maya 2011 in the Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug – № 183-п (Concept of Sustainable Development Yugra) // Fundamental research. 2011. № 11, of Indigenous Peoples of the Khanty-Mansi unit 3. P. 533-537. Autonomous Okrug dated 27 May 2011 No

183-п) [Digital resource] // Official web-site of the the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug –

4