AUTHOR Perceptions of Former Students on Degree of Emphasis

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 261 997 SP 026 556 AUTHOR Denton, Jon J.; And Others TITLE Perceptions of Former Students on Degree of Emphasis to Place on Pedagogical Topics, INSTITUTION Texas A and M Univ., College Station. Instructional Research Lab. PUB DATE 25 Jul 85 NOTE 83p. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Educational AssessmentrEducational Attitudes; *Graduate Surveys; HigherNEducation; Program Content; *Program Effectiveness; *Responses; *Teacher 'Education Curriculum ABSTRACT This inquiry was conducted to:(1) examine potential interactions among characteristics of survey. subjects and incentives to enhance mail returns, with the quality of subject responses assessed in terms of response patterns; and (2) obtain perceptions of former students on the emphasis to place on pedagogical concepts and principles in teacher education curricula. A mail survey sent to 300 former students produced responses from 48 percent of the sample. Analyses of returns yielded the'following observations':(1) Sampling former students across years of experience, level of teaching experience and year of graduation does not result in a response bias, provided the instrument requests perceptions germane to the preparation of teachers, but not to the program the former student experienced; (2) Using small monetary incentives i.e., 25 cents, to encourage responding to the survey requests is nonproductive, although the literature indicates 50 cent and one dollar tokens do increase response ratio;'and (3) The emphasis to place on pedagogical knowledges/skills anging from greatest to least are as follows:

tlassroom managemen , instructional methods, legal and ethical aspects, measurement td evaluation, curriculum planning, organization and management of schools, and needs of special populations. (Author)

*********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** \,

BEST COPYAVAILABLE

Perceptions of FormerStudents

on_

Degree of Emphasisto

Place on PedagogicalTopics

"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) "

U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION EDUC TIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality

Points of view or op mons stated in this docu ment do not necessarily represent official NIE position or policy

La% ra-1 '04 4,11)

71 , -

Perceptions of Former Students

Degree of Emphasis to

Place on Pedagogical Topics

Jon J. Denton

4 Chiou-Yueh Tsai

Tatricia Chevrette

Instructional Research Laboratory

Educational Curriculum and Instruction

July 25, 1985 Abstract

This inquiry was conducted to: (1) examine potentialinteractions among characteristics of survey subjects and incentives to enhance mailreturns with the quality of subject_responses assessed in terms ofresponse patterns; and (2). obtain perceptions of former students on the emphasis to placeon pedagogical concepts and principles in teachereducation curricula. A mail survey sent to 300 former students produced responses from 48 percent of the-Sample. Analyses of returns yielded the followingobservations:

1. Sampling former studentsacross years of experience, level of teaching Experience andyear of graduation does not result ina response bias, providing the instrument\ requestsperceptions germane to the preparation of teachers, butnot to the program the former student experienced.

2. Using small monetary incentivesi.e., 25 cents, to encourage responding tothe survey requeSts is nonproductive,, although the literatureindicates 50 cent and one dollar tokens doincrease response ratios.

3. Theemphasis to placeon pedagogical knowledges/skills ranging fromgreatest to least are as follows: classroom management, instructional methods...,, legal and ethicalaspects..., measurement and evaluation, curriculumplanning..., organization and management of schools,and needs of special populations.

1 Educational decision-makers spend substantial resources in gathering

perceptional data from students, former students, and colleagues regarding

existing programs and proposed plans and experiences. Typically these data

cannot be obtained from analyzing institutional records. Thus, information-

gathering efforts which employ survey techniques often play an important role in

providing data for academic planning and policy decisions. Given limited

resources of personnel and funds plus demanding time schedules, the mail

questionnaire* often is the most, feasible technique for obtaining survey data.

Yet the validity and utility of this approach to data gathering depend on the

response ratio (percentage_of"individuals surveyed who complete and return the

instrument) as well as response quality (whether respondents actually complete

returned instrument). A major limitation of the Mail survey-is a low response

ratio which seriously affects whether the respondent group represents the

characteristics and perceptions of the populatiqn surveyed. Dillman (1978) has

noted that response ratios need to be at least 50 percent in order for the data to accurately reflect the perceptions of the targeted respondents.

Unfortunately it is not uncommon for survey efforts directed to students to

yield response ratios of 30-40 percent with even lower response ratios occurring when the subjects lack an association with the institution at the time of the

study (Furse, Stewart and Rados, 1981; Matross, 1981). It has been hypothesized

that former students are less likely to respond to mail surveys than current

students because they have a limited interest in the business of the institution and they will not be personally affected by policies and programs emanating from

the survey findings (Zusman & Duby,1984).

A variety of techniques for enhancing survey returns can be found in the

literature of marketing, sociology, political science and education.These techniques include: pre-contacts (advanced notification of the upcoming survey), multiple and intensive follow-upcorrespondence to non-respondents,

_ hand- stamped postage and personalizedcover letters, ,and the use of incentives

both monetary and nonmonetary . (Armstrong, 1975.; Dillman, '1978; Furse, Stewart

and Rados,1981; Heberlein and Baumgartner,1978; 'Tollefson, Tracy and Kaiser,

1984; Zusman and Duby, 1984). Yet, Jackson and Schuyler (1984) have. reported

mixed results through their application oftechniques thought to enhance

returns. To illustrate they report:

-Preliminary telephoning of graduates to verify addressesdid not produce higher returns...

-Cover letters printed on (more expensive) colored-letterhead stationary did not produce a higher return rate than thesame letter photocopied all in black.

-No differences were found in return rates from graduateswhose surveys were mailed to arrive on Wednesday and those whose questionnaires were to arrive on Saturday. (Reminderswere mailed on the same schedule.)

-Fewer responses were received from graduates who received "cute" reminders than from those whose reminderswere more businesslike.

-No.difference was found inreturn rate on parent questionnaires when half were mailed first class and half bulkrate.

-The lowest return rate ever from graduatescame the yearqwe mailed questionnaires in April instead of February.

-Reminders (with a new survey included) substantiallyincreased returns [p. 1, 21.

The prepayment of monetary incentives is thoughtto be one of the most

powerful techniques for motivating mailsurvey participation. Armstrong (1975)

and Linsky (1975) have reported that theuse of monetary incentives with survey

subjects have consistently resulted In higherresponse ratios for those subjects

compared with control subjects who did not receivemonetary incentives for their

participation. Additionally, the most cost-effective amount ofmoney to offer

-is considered to be a quarter, yet greater response ratios have resultedfrom

one dollar incentives. Further, monetary incentives have been found to bemost 6 3 effective when enclosed with_the first mailing rather than promised upon receipt

of the completed questionnaire (Armstrong, 1975).Finally, while there is

concern that the use of monetary incentives introduces bias,there is no

-evidence to support this potential problem (Nederhof, 1983; Zusman and Duby,

1984).

Theoretical perspectives to explain the function of incentives in enhancing survey responses appear to be linked with behavioralism. One justification for using incentives is that they provide recognition for the accomplishment of an important task rather than a payment for rendering a service. It is thought that when an incentive is offered in advance, its acceptance will foster an obligation of the subject to complete and remit the instrument (Linsky, 1975).

The present study which incorporates elements from survey research reported previously is unique for two reasons. First,it examines the potential interaction among variables, i.e., ideographic characteristics of subjects and incentives to enhance returns, with the quality of subject responses assessed in terms of response patterns. Second, the survey questionnaire sought perceptions of former students on the emphasis that should be placed on the knowledges and skills deemed necessary for inclusion in teacher preparation curricula by the

1984 Texas Administrative Code and Statutory Citations, Title 19, Part II.

(Texas Education Agency, 1984). Information obtained from the survey will provide useful insights from practicing teachers on the relative emphasis to place on topics as the various teacher preparation programs are restructurqd.

While the preceding description delineates the general purposes of the study,evaluation questions were phrased to guide the inquiry process. These evaluation questions include:

1. What are the, perceptions of former students regarding the amount of

emphasis that should be placed on various topics in EDCI teacher education

curricula which are mandated by the Standards for Teacher Education? 4

2. Do the years and level of teaching experience of former students influence

their perceptions of what topics should be emphasized in EDCI's teacher

education progams?

3. Do the number of years since graduation influence the perceptions of former.

students regarding what topics should be emphasized, in EDCI's teacher

education programs?

4. Do incentives influence the respoase ratio and the perceptions of former

students regarding what topics should be emphasized in EDCI's teacher

education programs?

5. Do perceptions of former students who responded to an initial request

differ from students who responded to a second request for informatiOn in

the amount of emphasis to place on topics in EDCI's teacher education

curricula.

Method

This survey was conducted during the 1985 spring semester, by the

Instructional Research Laboratory, for the Department of Educational Curriculum

and Instruction andthe. College Of Education at Texas A&M University.

Information gathering from former students is an iterative process within the

College of Education occurring,in conjunction with prograM development. Due to

the high level of activity in program development, five surveysti have preceded

this mail survey during the past decade, i.e., 1974, 1977, 1978, 1982 and 1983.

Subjects

A random sample, stratified by year of graduation was used to select 297

subjects. This sample represents 21.6 percent of the total number of graduates

(baccalaureate degree) from EducatiOnal Curiculum and Instruction duringa five

year period (May 1980 through December 19 %4). This sampling percentage was used

O to provide a hypothesized sample size of returns sufficientin magnitude (141150) to yield the statistical power of .69 assuming an alpha levelof ;10 and the effect size difference of.20 for the variousstatistical

comparisons designated for thisinquiry (Cohen, 1977).

Instrumentation

One instrument requesting the subject's.name, current address,year of graduation, current occupational status, containing 43 Likerttype items --- associated with pedagogical knowledge and skills'was developed for this inquiry. Following these items, three additional questionswere listed which sought yes/no responses regarding a departmental newsletter. The instrument concluded with an open-ended item (additional comments). The Likert itemswere organized into seven content domains consistent with the skillsdeemed tessary by the 1984 Texas Administrative Code and Statutory Citations,Title 19, Fart II (TEA, 1984),i.e., Instructional methods-strategies-media-technology (12items);_ Classroom management (6 items); measurement and evaluation (5 items);Needs of special populations (4 items); Curriculum planning: scope and sequence of essential elementsas specified in Ch. 75 (6 items); Legal and ethicalaspects of teaching (4 items); Organization and management ofschools (6 items). An alpha coefficient ofinternal consistency was determined for this portion ofthe

instrument to be °( = .93.

The instrument, printed on a single sheet of card stock,was folded in such a manner so the return address and postage label appearedon an external surface. Subjects completing the questionnaire simply stapledor taped the folded instrument and remitted it by mail. Recommendations of Sudman and Bradburn (1983) regarding mail survey instrumentswere incorporated into the instrument's format. A copy of the instrumentis provided in Appendix A.

J 6 Data Collection

Subjects for this inquiry were identified from graduation announcements

beginning with the Spring 1980 commencement list and continued through the Fall

1984 commencement list. Former students identified by this process were then

assigned sequential identification numbers, 1-1144. Subsequently, subjects were

randomly selected with parameters established by the year of graduation and

number of graduates. For example, 59 subjects were selected without replacement

for the 1980 raduates,whose identification numbers ranged from 838 to 1144.

Appendix B p ovides a complete listing of former students and selection

parameters for the sample strata (table 1B).

Address s for these individuals were obtained from one of the following

sources; "departmental newsletter mailing list, inactive departmental and

college student records, and the address file of the Association of Former

Students. The departmental newsletter mailing list represented the most currea

source, since addresses in this list were updated following each newsletter mailout during the current year (October 1984 and February 1985).Addresses

obtained from the inactive student records were dated, reflecting the graduates'

permanent address during their final semester in residence at Texas A&M

Unil)ersity. Similarly, the address list from the Association of Former Students was last updated in 1983. Concern for the accuracy of addresses drawn from

these latter sources was well founded since 38 questionnaires were returned undelivered.

Because the influence of incentives on the response ratio was of interest in this inquiry, 40 subjects from the total sample were randomly selected to receive token monetary incentives (quarters) with the initial survey request.

Similarly it was noted that 88 or\33.6 percent of the sample had received one or more departmental newsletters. Pssibly these newsletters served as incentives or at least served to foster a stronger association between the graduate and their Alma Mater and thus encouraged a response to this request for information.

The initial mailout, consisting of a coverletter which emphasized the opportunity to influence teacher preparation curricula and a questionnaire, was placed in the mail Tuesday, April 23, 1985. A quarter wd8 attached to the cover letter (form B, Appendix C) for those students selected to receive the monetary incentive. A sentence in their cover letters stated that the quarter was intended as` a small token of appreciation for their assistance.

A second mailout was conducted three weeks after the original mailing, i.e., May 16, 1985. Each subject who had not responded by that time was sent a follow-up packet which contained a letter (form C, Appendix C) explaining the importance of their response to program development and another copy of the questionnaire. Data received through June 17 was included in the analysis and findings of this report.

It should be noted that we were aware of the potential difficulty of achieving a substantial return given the mailing date of the surveys and the brief period between the initial and follow-up mailings. The literature

(Jackson and Schuyler, 1985) and our experience with pastsurvey efforts both signaled limitations with our data collection plans.Unfortunately, other projects and scheduled efforts delayed the planning and implementation of this inquiry until late in the spring semester.

Findings

The findings of this inquiry addressed two purposes: (1) to determine the interaction of demographic characteristics of subjects and incentives to enhance returns with the quality of subject responses; (2) to determine graduates' perceptions of the relative emphasis to place on various knowledges and skills inherentin the preparation of teachers. The overall survey response was 48.3 percent with 125 former students responding out of 259 who received

8 questionnaires. Questionnaires for 38 additional students could not be delivered due no doubt to the dated sources used to obtain the addresses.

The first mailing yielded 101 returns (70 returned instruments and 31 undelivered packets), while the second mailing resulted in 62 additional returns

(55 returned instruments and 7 undelivered packets). This response ratio

(48.3%) was substantially lower than previous mailsurveys conducted with former students, i.e. 1974-63%, 1977-63%, J978-58%, 1983-60% (Rosser and Denton, 1'977;

Denton, 1979; Denton, Ash, Brown, Schmidt, Gutcher, Swinney & Hoyle 1978;

GarcAa, Armstrong, Dockweiler, Wiseman, 1983). (In 1982 a telephone survey was conducted, thus the response ratio for that effort is not comparable with the present findings). All of the preceding mail surveys were conducted during the middle of, the academic year (December-February) while the present effort was conducted during the late stages of the spring semester. Comparing these response ratios across the surveys conducted within the department, it appears that at least one contributing factor to the smaller response ratio was timing ofthe project, i.e. late spring (April /May). Thus one recommendation, ancillary to the findings associatea. with the evaluation questions of this inquiry, is to conduct mail\surveys with former students during the middle stages of the academic year. If circumstances prevent the initiation of a survey project during the fall semester, other techniques for obtaining needed information should be explored.

One additional analysis of response ratios was conducted which did not relate directly to the stated evaluation questiOns.In this case, response ratios were calculated based on the year of graduation of the former students in the sample. The response ratios by year of graduation were: '.449/1980,

.385/1981, .469/1982, .500/1983, .548/1984. Since the range of ratio values was

(.163),the recency of graduation did influence the return of mail surveys,with higher response ratios occurring for the more recent graduates.

9 12 Evaluation question one sought information on the relative emphasisto

place on various knowledges and skills necessary for the preparation of

'teachers. Table 1 provides percentage responses from the total sample. After,

averaging the values across each of the seven domains, itwas determined-that

the doMain classroom management received the greatest .frequency ofresponses for

the rating, "substantial emphasis". This isn't surprising since classroom

management, especially in the area of "control in social settings," haslong

been a special concern of recent graduates. The order of "substantial emphasis"

ravings by the remaining domains was: Instructional Methods..., legal and ethical aspects..., measurement and evaluation, curriculum planning,

organizational management of schools and needs of special populations.

Respondents to this questionnaire perceived role of prerequisites (18.7%)

Individual Educational Plans (IEPs), (20.9%) Admission, Review Dismissalof

students for specialized Programs (ARD procedures) (18.0%) andimpact of

cultural, ethnic, 'language and social differences in instruction (20.7%),

leadership styles (18.9%) and school climate (19.8%)among the least pressing

concerns for our preparation programs.However, items receiving even lower frequencies of "substantial emphasis" ratingswere content maps (12.6%) and instructional applications: of video recordings/films (13.5%), audio recordings

(5.4%), slides/tranparencies (15.3%). Yet,these low ratings for media related content did not carry over to microcomputers (43.2%).

[See Table 1]

Written comments accompanying the ratings frequently noted the importance of emphasizing classroom management, reading instruction and microcomputer applications in the preparation, programs. A.-complete listing of these comments are provided in Appendix D.

Evaluation questions two through five, address the potential inte-rattions.

10 13 Table 1

Percent of Responses Designating "Substantial Emphasis" for Pedagogical Knowledges/Skilis

Item Content/Skill Item ConteetJSkIll

DOMAIN: INSTRUCTIONAL DOMAIN: CLASSROOM MANAGE- , METHODS, STRATEGIES MENT MEDIA, TECHNOLOGY

13. Rule specification 82.9 1. Time' management 46.8 (communicatrng clear (academic engaged time expectations about of learners) classroom behavior)

2. Learner motivation 74.8 14. Rule monitoring 69.4

3. Role of prerequi- 18.7 15. Managing disruptive 85.6 sites (reviewing pre- behavior among stu- requisite learning) dents

4. Intended learning out- 39.6 16. Physical environment 43.2 comes (objectives) conducive for learning 5. Learner guidance (cues 49.5 to aid learning) Managing classroom 63.6 processes (such as, 6. Learner performance 51.4 clarity of directions (application of new and assignments, learning) availability of resources, transitions 7. Feedback (information 45.0 between activities). on appropriateness of

performance) 18. Reinforcement and 69.4 praise 8. Reading strategies for 59.3 content areas! DOMAIN: MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION 9-12 instructional appli-

cations of: 19. Test Item con- 30.0 struction 9. Video recordings/films 13.5 20. Criterion-referenced 38.2 10. Microcomputers 43.2 testing (linking instructional objectives II. Audio recordings to'learner assessment).

12. Slides/transparencies 15.3 21. Learner evaluation and 43.6 . documentation

BEST COPY AVAILABLE 22. Evaluating oaf's In- 37.8 of -itruction 35. Code of ethics for 32.4 teaching 23. Grading practices 27.0 36.' Classroom and personal 38.7 liabilities DOMAIN: NEEDS OF SPECIAL POPULATIONS 37. Legal rights of teachers 42.3

24. Diagnostic techniques 40.5 DOMAIN: ORGANIZATION AND (assessing needs of MANAGEMENT or SCHOOLS special, learners) 38. Organizational struc- 18.2 . 25. Individual, Educational 20.9 ture?tschools Plans-1EP (instructional plan for Indivi- 39. Organizational tasks 23.4 dual learners) and roles-4ncludUng non- instructional tasks) 26. Admission, Review, Dis- 18.0 missal of students for 40. Formal and informal 27.0 specialized programs communicatrOn channels (ARO procedures) In schools

27. Impact of cultural, 20.7 41. Leadership styles of 18.9 4 ethnic, language and administrators social differences in

Instruction ' 42. School climate 19.8

DOMAIN: CURRICULUM PLANNING: 43. Teacher appraisal sys- 36,4 SCOPE AND SEQUENCE OF ESSEN, tems and career ladders TIAL ELEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN CH 75

28. Content sequencing 31.5

29. Content maps 12.6

30. Content pacing 29.7

31. Specifying objec- 41.8 tives (congruence between objectives

and essential ele- a ments)

32. Congruence between, 38.7 objectives and instructional strategies (instructional account- ability)

33. Evaluation of curri- 24.3 cular materials

DOMAIN: LEGAL'AND ETHI- CAL,ASPECTS OF TEACHING 15

34. Legal requirements 56.9 for teaching 12 'among subject characteristics and incentives to enhancereturns with the quality

of responses. Specifically, question two asked:

Do the years and level of teaching experienceinfluence the perceptions of former students regarding the emphasisto place on topics in teacher preparation curricula?

Years'of teaching experience had littleeffect on the perceptions of

subjects regarding the relative emphasisto place on pedagogical topics to be

included in the various teacher educationcurricula offered by Educational

Curriculum and/Instruction at Texas A&M University. Althosigh the item response

patterns categorized by years-of-experience did yieldstatistically different

response patterns on six items, i.e. items 12, 21; 22, 23, 27, 43,the response

patterns on the remaining 37 items were not statisticallydifferent. Three of

these items are clustered under the domain;Measurement and Evaluation. These

items, learner evaluation and documentation (item 21),evaluating one's

instruction (item 22)and grading practices (item 23)were marked more

frequently for "substantial emphasis" by former student'swith no experience than

by their experienced counterparts. Moreover, the final item, teacher appraisal

system and career ladders (item 43) received sufficientlydifferentratings

i across years of experience to be statistically different. This item logically

relates to the other evaluation items. Ther1 emaining items which were'

\ I statistically different in this analysiswere_ ,s1fdes/transparencies (item 1),

and impact of cultural, ethnic, language and socihldifferences in instruct on \' (item 27). Similar to the other statistically differentitem responses,,

respondents with less experience marked,thesejcontent topics as deserving1

, "substantial emphasis" more frequently than theirexperienced counterparts./ In fact, few of the respondents with 2or more years of teaching experience rated these items as deserving "substantial emphasis." A numerical summary forleach item related to years of teaching experience is providedin table 2.

[See table 2] 1

1 16 13 Table 2

Percent of Responses DeSignating "SnbstanriP1 Emphasis" for Skills/Knowledge Categorized by Years of Teaching Experience

Years of Experience Test of Significance

0 1 2 3 5* x2 df 1XIMAIN: INSTRUCTIONAL WIHODS, STRATEGIES MEDIA, TECIVOLOGY

1. Time management 5540 48 54 31 18.1 15 N.S. (academic engaged ttrip of learners)

2. Learner Motivation 87 68 69 11.2 10 N.S.

3. Role of prerequi- 22 17 15 12.4 15 N.S. sites (reviewing pre- requisite learning)

4. Intended learning out- 5536 30 52 31 8.82 13 N.S. comes (objectives)

5. Learner guidance (mpq 55 56 48 36 62 11.62 15 N.S. to aid learning)

6. Learner performance 5546 48 63 54 11.79 15 N.S. (application of new iEarning)

7. Feedback (information 7340 48 38 46 11.40 15 N.S. on appropriateness of performance)

8. Reading strategies for 46 61 48 70 69 6.75 15 U.S. content areas

9-12 Instructional applications of:

9. Video recordings /films /27 14 13 12 0 11.77 15 N.S.

10. Microcarputers 55 53 39 36 39 14.11 15 N.S.

11. Audio recordings 9 3 13 4 0 9.92 15 N.S.

12. Slides/transparenCies 46 17 17 8 0 23.93 15 .07

17 14 Years of Test of Significance

DOMAIN: CLASSROOM MANAGE- 0 1 x2 df . MEW

13. Rule specification 82 78 78 88 92 731 10 N.S. (comMunicatinip1par expectations about plaqsroan behavior)

14. Rule monitoring 73 69 70 64 69 9.76 15 N.S.

15. Managing disruptive 82 83 83 88 100 5.46 10 N.S. behavior among students

16. Physical environment 73 44 39 32 39 17.36 15 N.S. conducive for learning

17. Managing Classroom 91 64 61 60 58 21.76 20 N.S. processes (such as, clarity of directions and assignments, availability of resources, transitions between activities).

18. Reinforcement and 82 78 61 .56 77 16.64 15 N.S.

praise ".

DOMAIN: IsEASUREWMAND EVALUATION

19. Test item con- 64 31 17 36 8 21.58 20 N.S. struction

20. Criterionreferenced 82 42 35 33 8 19.88 15 N.S. testing (linking instructional objectives to learner assessment)

21. Learner evaluation and 80 33 39 56 31 24.56 station 15 .06

22. Evaluating one's in- 82 28 26 52 23 26.81 15 .03 struction

23. Grading practices 73 25 17 32 8 35.15 15 .002

15 Years of Experience Test of Significance

DOMAIN: NEEDS OF SPECIAL 0 1 2 3 5* x2 df POPULATIONS

\ 24. Diagnostic techniques 46 58 22 44 15 19.73 15 N.S. (assessing needs of \I..5 special learners)

IndiTldual Educational 27 31 13 20. 0 ,26.26 20 N.S. Plans-lEE' (instruc- \ tional plan for indiVi- rival learners) !!

26. Admission, Review, Dis- 27 31 0 12 15 \20.40 15 N.S. missal of students for specialized programs CARD proceOures)

27. Impact of mltural, 64 28 4 12 8 23.78 15 .07 ethnic, language and social differences in instruction

DAIN: CURICDMIIM PLANTDIG: 8C)PE AND mina OF ESSEN- TIAL EMEENTS AS =FLED 124 CR 75

28. Content sequencing 46 .36 44 20 15 15.85 20 N.S.

29. Content maps 27 14 17 8 .0 20.05 20 N.S.

30. Content pacing 27 44 30 '20 0 23.79 20 N.S. ;T. 31. Specifying objec- \ 73 39 44 40 25 15.51 20 N.S. tives (congruence

betweeacbjectives , and essential eIe- newts) \

32. Congruence between 64 33 52 28 31 17.49 20 N.S. objectives andin- structional strategies (instructional account- phility)

33. Evaluation ofcurri- 46 19 35 4 31 20.65 20 N.S. clOnr materials

16 19 Years of Experience Test of Significance

WMAIN: LEGAL AND EMT- 0 1 2 3 5* x2 df . CAL ASPECTS OF TEACHING

34. Tpgal requirements 4f 39 35 28 46 12.28 15 N.S. for teaching

35. Code of ethics for 64 31 39 16 39 27.62 20 N.S. teaching

36. Classroom and personal 55 42 44 24 39 13.17 liabilities

37. Legal rights of teachers 55 39 52 32 39 10.60 20 N.S.

WHAM: ORGANIZATION AND NANAORMIT OF SCHOOLS

38.Organizational strut- 46 19 17 4 15 25.15 20 N.S. turd of schools

39. Organizational tasks 46 25 17 8 39 20.26 20 N.S. and roles (including non- instructional tasks)

40. Formal and informal 55 36 22 8 23 27.67 20 N.S. communication channels in schools

41. Leadership styles of 27 17 26 8 31 20.99 20 N.S. administrators

42. School climate 46 17 22 4 31 20.52 20 N.S.

43. Teacher appraisal sys- 64 25 46 32 46 29.58 20 .08 terns and career ladders

* 4 Years of experience was deleted because °f law number of responses.

20 17 Categorizing the perceptions of former students interms oftheir

experience level., that is, teaching kindergarten, teaching elementary, etc.,

yielded 6 of 43 statistically different response patterns. The percentage of

responses per item designating "substantial emphasis" categorized by level of

teaching experience is provided in table 3 (pages 19 - 22). These items

occurred across three domains, that is, domain: instructional methods--

...objectives (item 4), learner performance (item 6), reading strategies for

content areas (item 8);domain: classroom management-rule monitoring (item 14),

reinforcement and praise (item 18);and domain: needs of special populations-

diagnostic techniques (item 24), While a common response pattern was not as

evident across these items registering statistically different frequencies as

with the statistically different items for years of experience, respondents with

one year: -of experience tended to mark the "substantial emphasis" category more

frequently than their more experienced. counterparts.

[see table 3]

Evaluation question three asked: Do the number c6f years since graduation influence the perceptions of former students regarding the emphasis to place on topics in the curricula o( teacher education?

Table 4 presents a summary of item responses which were statistically

different (d,< .10) categorized by the year of graduation. Reviewing these

values from a conservative position it appears that only one item, content maps

_(item 29), had a sufficiently different response4pattern to deem it

statistically different. However, from a more liberal position regarding alpha

levels, that is, using a significant level of .10, 6 of 43 items were

different. In either case, data presented to address this evaluation question

suggest that years since graduation did not aplireciably influedce perceptions of

former students regarding content emphasis in Curricula for teacher preparation

18- Table 3

Percent of Responses Designating "Substantial &Oasis" for Skills/Knowledge Categorized by Level of Teaching Experience

Level of Experience Test of Significance

1 2 3 4 x2 df . DICMAIN: INSTRUCTIONAL ZETEDDS, STRATEGTES TECENOLOGY

1. Time management 31 54 33 60 5.15 6 N.S. (academic engaged rima of learners)

2. Learner motivation 75 71 73 64 5.56 6 N.S.

3. Role of prerequi- 25 11 14 18' 10.56 sites (reviewing pre- requisite learning)

4. Intended learning out- 50 40 13 36 14.55 9 comes (objectives)

5. Learner guidance (cliPs 50 46 67 36 7.32 9 N.S. to aid learning)

6. Learner performance 60 52 33 46 24.26 9 .003 (application of new learning)

7. Feedback (information 40 46 27 36 9.29 9 N.S. on appropriateness of performance)

8. Reading strategies for 67 . 73 51 9 27.81- 9 .001 content areas

9-12 Instructional applications of:

9. Video recordings/films 13 8 20 '''18 13.20 9 N.S.

10. Microcomputers 38 31 53 73 9.58 9 N.S.

11. Audio recordings 6 0 13 18 14.11 9 N.S.

12. SlidP9/transparencies. 13 6 33 18 10.89 9 N.S. Level of Experience Test of Significance

DOMAIN: CLASSROOMMANAGE- 1 2 3 4 x2 df /ENT

13. Rule specification 81 88 80 '82 2.16 6 N.S. (ccomunicating c'lcar expectations about classroom behavior)

14. Rule monitoring 81 69 67 73 16.81 9 .05

15. Managing disruptive 81 83 93 91 2.64 6 N.S. behavior among students

16. Physical environment 19 46 40 50 9.76 9 N.S. conducive for learning

17. Managing classroom 73 63 53 64 14.03 9 N.S. processes (such as, clarity of directions and assignments, availability of resources, transitions between activities).

18. Reinforcement and 94 63 53 82 19.70 9 .02 praise

DOMAIN: MOMENT AND EVALUATION

19. Test item con- 19 19 40 55 14.62 12 N.S. struction

20. Criterionrreferenced 19 31 36 55 10.20 9 N.S. testing (linking instructional objectives to learner assessment)

21. Learner evaluation and 44 42 27 55 12.12 9 N.S. documentation

22. Evaluating one's inn 19 40 27 36 7.22 9 N.S. struction

23. Grading practices 6 23 27 36 8.34 9 N.S.

20 23 VI, I

Level of Experience CIest of Significance

1.)

DCMA1N: NEEDS OF SPECIAL 1 2 3 4 x2 df POPULATIONS

24.Diagnostic techniques 38 38 67 27 16.21 9 .06 (assessing needs of special lea: nets)

25. Individual Educational 25 19 21 18 10.72 12 N.S. 'Plans-IEP (instructional plan for indivi- dijal learners)

26. Admission, Review, Dis- 25 21 20 0 8.51 9 N.S. missal of students for specialized programs (PARD procedures)

27. Impact of cultural, 25 17 7 0 13.04 9 N.S. ethnic, language and social differences in instruction

DOMAIN: CURRICULUM PIMNINU: SCOPE AND SEQUENCE OF ESSEN- TIAL ETINWIS AS SPECIFIED IN CR75

28. Content sequencing 38 31 20 27 14.18 '12 N.S.

29. Content maps' 6 19 0 9 12.03 12 N.S.

30. Content pacing 38 31 27 18 6.57 12 N.S.

31. Specifying objec- 31 45 20 46 11.84 12 N.S. tives (congruence' between objectives and essential elements)

32. Congruene between 44 40 13 36 8.34 12 N.S. objectives and in- structicpalstrategies (instructional account- ability)

33. Evaluation of curri- 19 31 7 18 11.82 12 N.S. cular materials

21 2 4 Level of Experience Test of Significance

DOMAIN. LEGAL AND Ern- 1 2 3 4 x2 df .

_ CAL ASFECTS OF TEACHING

34. Legal requirements 56 38 33 27 8.71 9 N.S. for teaching

35. Code of ethics for 31 31 20 36 9.34 12 N.S. teaching

36. Classroom and personal 50 31 47 36 6.64 9 N.S. liabilities

37.Legal rights of teachers 56 42 40 36 7.25 9 N.S.

DOMAIN: ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS

38. Organizational struc- 13 19 7 18 6.44 12 N.S. tune of schools

39. Organizational tasks 31 23 20 9 14.64 12 N.S. and roles, (including noir instructional tasks)

40. Formal and informal 31 23 27 18 7.38 12 N.S. cammunicatiOn channels in schools

41. Leadership styles of 13 21 13 27 7.40 12 N.S. administrators

42. School climate 19 17 13 27 4.24 12 N.S.

43. Teacher appraisal sys- 20 42 27 46 13.90 i2 N.S. tams and career Milder

level of experience

Teaching Kindergarten 1 --Teaching Elementary School 2 Teaching Middle or Junior High Sdhool....3 Teaching High School 4

22 2J Table 4

Descriptive Statistics for Statistirally-Different (coi< .10) Response Summaries Categorized by Year of Graduation

Ye rd of Experience Test of Significance

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 F DOMAIN:INSTRUCTIONAL IETHDDS, MA EO:ES MEDIA, TECHNOLOGY

3. Role of prerequi- x 3.8 4.0 3.7 4.2 3.5 2.12 .08 sites (reviewing pre- requisite learning) s .83 1.05 .79 .68 .89

DCMAIN: MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION

19. Test item con- x 3.6 4.3 3.8 4.3 3.8 2.22 .07 struction s .95 .65 1.02 .90 1.07

20. Criterion7referenced x 3.8 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.0 2.05 .09 testing (linking instructional objectives s .97 .67 .85 .75 1.02 to learner assessment)

DCMAIII: CURRICULUM PLANNING: SCOPE AND SEQUENCE OF ESSEN- TIAL EIEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN CH 75

29. Content maps x 3.6 2.9 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.97 .02

s ,.83 1.00 1.08 .67 1.11

DOMAIN: LEGAL AND ETHI- CAL ASPECTS OF TEACHING 0

35. Code of ethics for x 4.0 3.7 3.6 4.4 3.7 2.19 .08 teaching s 1.00 1.15 1.12 .75 1.25

DOMAIN: ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS

40. Formal and informal x 3.8 3.4 3.2 4.0 3.9 2.03 .09 communication channels in schools s 1.16 1.17 1.17 1.02 1.13

23 programs since 37 of the item responses were not statistically different.

[See table 4]

Evaluation question four asked: Do incentives influence the response. ratio and the perceptions of former students regarding the emphasis to placeon curricular topics for teacher education preparation programs?

Table 5addressesthe initial portion of this question. Clearly,

establishing communication networks via newsletters mailed-to formerstudents

enhanced the response ratio .of subjects completing and remittingcompleted mail

survey instruments. Equally evident was the low yield of providingmonetary

incentives in the request.

Table 5

Influence ofthe Incentives on the Response Ratios of Subjects Mailed Questionnaires

Reward Number of Number of Condition Responses (n) Instruments Mailed (13) Ratio (A/B)

No Incentive 59 140 .421

Newsletter .50 88 .568

Quarter 16 38** .421

..,_ Total ' 125 259* .483

*number adjusted to account for undelivered instruments 297-38= 259 **number adjusted due to return of undelivered instrument andincentives

Reviewing the data analysis associated with the issue ofresponse bias due

to incentives yielded 2 instance in 43 comparisons (time management-item 1:F =

2.4,ot =.07, df = 3, evaluating one's instruction-item21: F = 3.2, d = .03, df

= 3) where the response patterns were sufficiently different to be statistically significant. Given the overwhelming number of comparisons which do not support a response bias, evidence from'phis inquirysuggest that 27 24 incentives used to induce subject participation in mailsurveys serves this

function without adverse side effects.

Evaluation question five asked: Do perceptions of-former students who responded to an initial survey request differ from those who responded to a second invitation to participate in a mail survey?

Five of 43 responses were statistically different when the responses'were

categorized by whether the return occurred in conjunction with thefirst or

second request for survey information from former students. These responses are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6

Descriptive Statistics for Statistically Different (c4 < .10) Response Summaries Categorized by Response Invitation

Item Invitation Test

first second F

17 Managing Classroom X 4.60 4.27 3.7 .06

18Rel,nforcementand S .75 .94 Prise X 4.71 4.41 5.1 .03

S .53 .86 .

27 Impact of cultural, X 3.61 3.97 3.1 .08 ethnic, language S 1.10 .72 . ...in instruction

41 Leadership Styles X 3.32 3.91 '6.1 .02 of administrators S 1.28 .79

42 School Climate X 3.39 3.79 2.8 .10 S 1.26 .95

The averaged response across mailouts favored the first mailoutgroup for items 17 and 18, but was reversed for items 27, 41 and 42 favoring thesecond mailout. Clearly, the answer to evaluation question five given these analyses

28 25 is that perceptions of former students were not markedly different whet r they

responded to an initial or second request for informationon a mail survey.

Discussion

Educational decision makers at our institution and elsewhere often relyon

mail surveys to gather information because this techniqueis adaptable to a

population with a wide geographic dispersion, and has relativelylow cost

especially when compared with personal interviews.An additional positive

attribute is that mail surveys can be conducted in-elatively brieftime

interval. Yet attempts to use the mail questionnaire with student and former

student samples are often frustrating, because of the difficulty-in motivating

sufficient participation.

This inquiry was condUcted to fulfill twopurposes. One purpose was to

examine potential relations among ideographic characterisltics of subjects and

incentives to enhance returns with the quality of subjectresponses assessed in

terms of their response patterns. The second purpose related directly to the

content of the questionnaire was to obtain perceptions of former studentson the p relative emphasis to place on select pedagogical knowledges and skills in the

teacher preparation curricula offered through the Department of Educational

-.Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University.

The initial evaluation question of this inquiry sought reformation on the

relative emphasis to place on various pedagogical topics inour teacher

preparation curricula. Since the response ratio did not achieve the minimal

level of 50 percent as prescribed by Dillman (1978) interpreting the,related

data must be done with caution.Judging the validity of these findings in terms

of their consistency with past surveys has yielded encouraging comparisons. For

example, items grouped under classroom management received the highestfrequency

of ratings for "substantial emphasis.' in this effort. Similarly, classroom

management has traditionally been rated as one of the most important topicsto

29 26 be addressed in our curricula in past surveys (Rosser & Denton, 1974; Denton,

1979, Garcia et.al., 1983). Thus, current findings are consistent with past efforts regarding classroom management. Similarly, responses to the items grouped under measurement and evaluation and the legal and ethical aspects of teaching in this inquiry are comparable to response patterns of previous survey efforts. Conversely, survey results from 1977 (Denton,1979) reflected higher ratings for topics associated with the needs of special learners than the 6 current findinge. Collectively, the values obtained to address evaluation question one are fairly consistent with. past survey summaries and as such, represent a current view of topics perceived to be important in our curricula.

Evaluation questions 2-5, addressed, potential relations between subject characteristics, response incentives and quality of responses on the questionnaires. Characteristics of individuals responding to the survey included years of teaching experience, level of that teaching' experience, and years since graduation. These characteristics were used as categorical variables for a series of analyses associated with evaluation questions 2 and 3.

The resulting analyses yielded 18 statistically different item response patterns across these variables with no repeated items. For those items yielding statistically different response patterns categorized by years of teaching experience,a response trend was noted that the more inexperienced teachers rated the topics higher. With the independent variable, level of teaching experience, teachers at the kindergartenand elementary leV'els tended to rate the topics higher than their junior and senior high teacher counterparts for those items with different response patterns.The-final set of comparisons linked to the year of graduation, failed "to produce an Observable trend in contrastto the other comparisons. In addition, when response ratios were calculated for each graduation class small differences were noted.AsSociating these findings with the survey research literature is difficult since these

findings are inherently linked to the content of the questionnaire. And while

the content of the questionnaire is rather commonplace in teacher education, it

certainly does not generalize to all mail survey instruments.

Evaluation question four addressed the use of incentives to enhance return of survey instruments as well as the quality of responses. The findings from this inquiry were mixed regarding the use of incentives to increase response ratios. Individuals who had received newsletters from the department prior to receiving the questionnaire responded more often than those who had not received the departmental newsletter.Perhaps the mechanism at work in this case was salience, with those subjects who had received the departmental newsletter being aware of program development efforts through items in the newsletter, and thus understood the significance of their responses to the program development effort. This explanation is consistent with the importance Heberlein and

Baumgartner (1978) place on salience in-motivating individuals to respond to mail surveys.

In -contrast,the use of monetary incentives in this inquiry resulted in a

response ratio equal to that of the no incentive condition. . This finding is contrary to the work of Armstrong (1975) and Linsky (1975) who have reported that monetary incentives consistently enhance response ratios. Moreover research of.Huck and Gleason (1974) who successfully used 25 cent incentivesto increase mail survey respOnses, and successful efforts by Furse, Stewart.and

Rados (1981) and Zusman and Duby. (1984) with 50 cent and one dollar.inCentives provide sufficient evidence that something was amiss in the present. study.

Undoubtedly the monetary incentiye was not viewed as a token of appreciation by the majority of individuals receiving it in their packets. Rather, the quarter apparently served as an irritant or was considered a "cheap trick" to encourage respondingto the survey and thus resulted in an unexpected low return.

28 31 On a more positive note, however,was the related finding from this inquiry

that response incentives did not influenceitem response patterns. This finding

is consistent with the work of Nederhof (1983),and Zusman and Duby (1984) who

report no response bias due to theuse of incentives to increase participation

in mail surveys.

The final evaluation question of this inquiryrequested an empirically

supported response to theconcern whether differences in perception to the

content of the questionnaire wouldoccur across requests for information.

Results from this inquiry indicate that perceptionsof former students were not

markedly different across the initialand second requests for information.

Similar analyses were not located in theliterature reviewed.

In summary, although theresponse ratio was less than expected, the

following recommendations are offered to guidefuture mail survey projects:

1. Conduct mail surveys with former studentsduring the middle of the academic year rather than late in the springsemester.

2. Sampling former students acrossyears of experience, level of teaching experience and year of graduation doesnot result in a response bias, providing the instrument requestsperceptions germane to the preparation of teachers, and not to theprograms the former student experienced.

3.- Establish contact with former studentsprior.ta.conducting a mail survey through newsletters or a communication network Aorder-to enhance response ratios.

4. Refrain from using small monetary incentivesi.e., 25 cents, to encourage responding to the survey requests', although theliterature indicates 50 cent and one dollar tokens doincrease response ratios.

5. Use multiple requests to\increaseresponse ratios from former students since respOnse patterns do notappear to change across mail out requests.

The following recommendation isoffered with respect to ordering pedagogical topics perceived by former studentsas deserving "substantial emphasis" in our teacher education curricula. b. The emphases to place on pedagogical knowledges/skills ranging from greatest to'least are as follows: classroom management, instructional methods..., legal and ethical aspects..., measurement and evaluation, curriculum planning..., organization and management of schools, and needs of special populations. References

Armstrong, J. S. (1975). "Monetary incentives in mail surveys." Public Opinion

Quarterly, 39, 111-116.

Cohen, J.(1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.New

York: Academic Press.

Denton, J. J. (1979). Adequacy of teacher preparation programs perceived by

graduates of agricultural education, industrial education, and educational

curriculum and instruction. Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 5,

65-78.

Denton, J. J., Ash M. J., Brown, H. D., Schmidt, N. G., Gutcher, G. D., Swinney,

R.. J., & Hoyle, J. R. (178). 19,78 Report of College of Education Standing

Committee on Follow-up Evluations.(graduate programs). College of

Education,Texas A&M UniverSity.

Dillman, D. A. (1978);Mail and telephone surveys, the total design method.

New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Furse, D. H., Stewart, D. W. & Rados, D. L. (1981). Effect of foot-in-the door,

cash incentives, and follow-ups on survey responses. Journal of Marketing

Research. 18, 473-478.

Garcia, J., Armstrong, D. C., Dockweiler, C., & Wiseman, D. L. 1983 Follow-up

Survey of Undergraduate P o rams in EDCI. Educational Curriculum and

Instruction, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

Heberlein, T. A. & Baumgartner, R. M.,(1978). Factors affecting 'response rates

to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published

literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 447-462.

Huck, S. W. & Gleason, E. M., (1974). Using monetary inducement to increase'

response rates froth mail surveys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 222-

225.

3134 Jackson,, E.E. & Schuyler, N. B. (1984). Practice makes perfect? Ski US gained

in seven years of questionnaires. Paper presented at the annual meeting of

the American Educational ResearchAssociation, New Orleans.'

Linsky, A. S., (1975), "Stimulating responses to maildquestionnaires: A

review." Public Opinion Quarterly, 39,82-101.

Matross, R.P., (1981), "Uses and abuses ofcampus opiniop polls." Journal of College Student Personnel, 22, 114-119.

Nederhof, A. J., (1983), "The effects of material incentivesin mail surveys:

Two Studies." Public Opinion Quarterly,47, 103-111.

Rosser, R.S. & Denton, J. J. (1977). Assessing recent teacher education

graduates using a two sealed instrument. Education, 98, 92-104.

Sudman, S. and Bradburn, N.M. (1983). Asking questions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 4 Texas Education Agency. (1984). Texas administrative code and,statutory

citations, Title 19, Part II. Aqstin; Texas.

Tollefson, N., Tracy, D. B., & Kaiser,J. (1984). Improving response rates and

response quality in educational survey research. Paper presented at the

annual meeting of the AmericanEducational Research Association,New Orleans, LA.

Zusman, B. J. & Duby, P. B. (1984). An evaluation of theuse of token

monetary incentives in enhancing the utility ofpostsecondary survey

research techniques. Paper presented at the annual meeting ofthe American

Educational Research Association, New Orleans,LA.

3 5

NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES

BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS PERMIT NO. 148 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE

Texas A6cM University Educational' Curriculum and Instruction College Station, Texas 77843-4232 FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE

Survey of Graduates of TeacherEducation Programs, at Texas ALM University

This'questionnaire was developedto obtain information emphasis that should be placed on the amount of for Teacher Education on various topics mandated by ,the1984 Standards free, the Texas Education Agency. Information Obtained from these, questionnaires willbe quite useful preparation programs. in modifying existingteacher

Name Class of Address Years of teaching experience

Current occupational status (check as many as needed) Teaching Kindergarten Teaching Elementary School ( ) ( ) Teaching Middle or JuniorHigh School Teaching High School ( ) ( 1 Teaching Junior Collegeor Post Secondary ( 1 Graduate education (Gettingan Advanced Degree)( Other ) Please Specify )

Note: If you are not .teaching or working in an instructional elect not to complete capacity you may the remainder of thissurvey. your current address and However, we do want toknow occupational status, so pleaseremit the form to vs. Directions; Please respond to each appropriate blank. item on the scale byplacing an (X) on the

Skill/Kriowledge. .Program Emphasis My rating of the emphasis that should be placedon the following content/skill in education is:

substantial moderate undecided minimal emphasis emphasis no emphasis emphasis DOMAIN: INSTRUCTIONAL HETHOOS, STRATEGIES MEDIA, TECHNOLOGY

t. Time management (academic engaged time of learners)

2. Learner motivation

1( 3. Role of prerequisites (reviewingpre- 4 requisite learning)

4. Intended learningout- comes (objectives)

5. Learner guidance (cues to aid learning)

0. Learner performance (application of new learning)

7. Feedback (information on appropriateness of performance)

38 BEST,COPY AVAILABLE

35 BEST COPY.PipiliJki3LL

substantial moderate undecidedminimal no emphasis emphasis emphasis emphasis 8. Reading strategies for content ireas

9-12 Instructional applications of:

9. Video recordings/films"

10. Microcomputers

11. Audio recordings

12. Slides/transparencies

DOMAIN: CLASSROOM MANAGE- MENT

13. Rule specification (communicating clear expectations, about classroom behavior)

14. Rule monitoring

15. Managing disruptive behavior among -students

16. Physical environment conducive for learning

1.1. Managing classroom processes (such as, clarity of directions and assignments, availability of resources, transitions between activities).

18. Reinforcement and 4 praise

DOMAIN: MEASUREMENT IMO EVALUATION

19. Test item con- struction

20. Criterion-referenced testing (linking instructional objectives to learner assessment)

21. Learner evaluation and documentation

22. Evaluating one's instruction

23. Grading practices

DOMAIN: NEEDS OF SPECIAL POPULATIONS

24. Diagnostic techniques (assessing needs of special learners)

25. Educational Plans-I P (instructional Ian for individual learners)

36 substantial moderate undecided minimal no emphasis emphasis emphasisemphasis 26. Admission, Review,qis- missal of students tr specialized programs (ARD procedures)

27. Impact of cultural, ethnic, language and social differences in instruction

DOMAIN: CURRICULUM PLANNING: SCOPE AND SEQUENCE OF ESSEN- TIAL ELEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN CH 7b

28. Content sequencing

29. Content maps

30. Content pacing

31. Specifying objectives (congruence between objectives and essential elements)

32. Congruence between objectives and instructional strategies (instructional account- ability)

33. Evaluation of curricular materials

DOMAIN: LEGAL AND ETHI- CAL ASPECTS OF TEACHING

34. Legal requirements for teaching

35. Code of ethics-Tor teaching

36. Classroom and personal liabilities

37. Legal rights of teachers

DOMAIN: ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS

38. Organizational Struc- ture of schools

39. Organizational tasks and roles (includingnon- instructional tasks)

4U. Formal and informal communication channels in schools

41. Leadership styles of administrators

42. School climate

43. Teacher appraisalsys- tems and career ladders

BEST COPYAVAILABLE 0 37 BEST COPY AVAILABLE

44. Have you received issues of the IRL Newsletter (EDCIdepartment newsletter) yes no

45. If no, are you interested in receiving the newsletterat no cost? yes no

46. If yes, do you want to continue receiving the newsletter? yes no

47. Additional Comments:

38 Appendix. B

39 Table 1-B

Parameters for Selecting Survey Sample

Year of Sampling Range of ID Graduation Frame Number (n) numbers

1980- 59 838-1144

1981 47 1145-1376 1982 74 1-255 1983 51 256-508

1984 66 509-837

Total 297

40 0920 Austin ViCarol Ann Atha .g 64fellua Dar. McKenzie Baytown001q 5s-,3t. Huntsville -"Martha Jean McMillan Abiliatne AcUth Ann Rippe! Orlando, Florida Byron Ray Walston 0911 -n McCabe Stella' Michael Cecil Weaver Killeen 09 sz lellnda Od sea .-Valerie Rivera Houston Hearn. 0 aosemary Robertson s Snipe' perm's Niel Webb Beaumont San Antonio Houstoni too 4(:):, 92(9 5.:-.): a Alison Swanson Plano -"Paula Kay Milner Grove. I/Reni. Marie Roemer Houston Arthur Rennehea Williams 0924 Lubbock 0 cl 58 Isla Kay Tamble Beaumont bora Carol Mitchell Houston o Lazne Diane Rummel Port Neches hn Calvin Winbery zi...6" 0 New Braunfels v6ynthia Lee Sage Houston to Ann Tamp lin nda Kay Wise Batlesvllle, Oklahoma s6 eith Hamilton Mitchell San Antonio Houston El Paso /Lorraine G. Salazar. San .y Lyn Turos Sharon Louise Woodeehick. 1"41IlMelante Janet Mohr Navasota :hard Allan Vance Houston Victory!' Richmond 0 Jeannette Secheliki Temple Sharon Celine Woolsey 9a8" Mary Margaret Moore to Kathleen Wallace o Julie Marloen Nile San Antonio s/Joan Ellen Sexton 09a9 Uvalde /t/NoncY Anne Shiring Rockdale°O q4 -66 : 0930',Connie Jo Nelson Dallas 0 964. 09 at3renda Morris Nouse= New Braunfels Sandra Dockery Sims vboneva Alice Nolan Halleville i"*!dra Kay Slornlnskl 09'32 San Antonio no Lu Smith Houston004 661 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION D 93 3 Dorothy Norma Nunnelly Houlihan o967 .3u0sribanalaEnuaebethalliy O'M Richardson v-11.-.14a Carol. Smith Pasadena "Lisa Williams Smith- Waco 0/68 Interim Dean of theCollege of Education Hy. o 96 9 Dr. Philip C. Limbacher, 09 3 g /Sarah lane Parsons Sari Antonio vtyriottelensclike Smith 09 a-1 .Cynthia JaynePaul Houston %%Pamela Denys. Sneed Guy CiCarol Lynn Staten CollegesicteariTonan ,),° 9 ,; ci BachelOr of Arts 0q a gOMary Lydia Pavlicek Andrews-it?2 seork enter Shelbyville 0 Dana Jean Stilwell 001;4?,90 MmaarrielepoPai Bremondo '1' 3 01 Corpus Christit-Bevorly Cox SWick Curricuh and Instruction paiaBdryenaan 0 7'14 Dallai 0 840 094_1 °Cynthia Ann Pettit College Station 1,1tavid Wane Taylor San Aritonto.Nancy.Ann Nichols Houston o"Lisa Louise Thomas Aydan Bilir o q 4 2 °Bernadette Jean Plaits La Verniero0142. ctie LaGrange 09 4 3 "'Mary PatriciaPrachyl Dallas aarils Lynn Tschlrhart 4arilyn lane Kallus Dallas -Tammy Ray' Turner 9 0 q44 ,Dianne Jeanne Pruett Bryan 014 rEarl Lynn Pullen Hearn. ofianyia Turner Bachelor of Science Ann Rabolne Henderson 0 Randall Lynn Walker Gonzales o 946 !..Marsha wBAlvineeran ny 0: fig-'710 / . 941 Susan Carol Radford Dallas told Lynn Wallace i urriculum and InstructionItA5 Spring iscilla Kay Whigham Houston Houston;91412. yes Silsbee uanne Wilson South Houston vDoileen AnitaFroehlich "tinantla'AralizaDiannRee;eep Houstono 4f Beverly Wenona Adkins St epmphoaeornstahninalltYdlel 00°0 82: s882 it ,./Sandra Ann Rental San Antonio `'Tracy Charlotte Wilson San Antonio,,, Sue Ann Fulks :01145%9g Elizabeth Yates Houston 04;43 iKaren Lynn Bachle . At. Alvin v-Keiton Ann Furrh 0 9Fri 0 Rhonda DianeRichard's°n.... New Braunfels ...Candace .4iArlene Fay Barborak 09 6.2 ...4o Frances Riddle Pensacola, Florida Baskin Bay. Llano -Kathy Lynn Gardner le vg g 51., 44 M'Lissa Arlene Gdrland viltertha Victoria Garza BrowAncrntio :15 Vickie Ruth Benson Whitesboro 0 Marsha. MatusGerik Bertino San Antonio (sg 87 4 6 Diana Lynette Missouri City s' Amy Rae Glasgow iloalth Education 12- -,.17 Jennene MarieBockholt Graham Bellville 0 e 88 Mineral Wells 4.1ary Ann Irving a esti New Orleans, qt dra (dello Peterson Dallas '',Ig Janet Lee Boon Kingwood- 0-Deborah LynnHarris llizine Theresa Bergeron Navasota os 90 Louisiana thlean Ellen Pfeiffer Pittsburgh, 49 Laura Jean Boswell Hamilton OSharon Kay Harris PennsYlyania $ED Susan Kay Bottlinger Navasota 0Es011 IRebecca Ann Bridges Houston Corpus Christi roni AnnHarris Arcadia 8c! Brenda Marie Bourg Wharton 089 2 Vickie Gall Greenlee Daingerflold Alan Walter Ponder Jasper /Kathy Ann Henry..cil Bryan 52Elizabeth Lynn Allen Bridges College StationDo secip Bryan.fiCharlea Edward Saxon Houston .Elaine Lynelle Herring iltIleHyden /Debra McCandless Shafer ...College Station 53 Barbara Mask Brooks Hood ackson Tulla Houston "'timothy Arthur Houston 0S --95 Houston Melesa Joy Sproen Corpus Christi ,54- Rita Ivey Browning Houston ,r-Linda Ann Hughes thy Lynn Jewett ss Debra WhlttenburgBurr Dickinson 0 'III c, Chilton pan Elaine Hungerlord Taylor 02,91 .5-67.Charlanne Cohn Burson Waxahachie -.Lisa ReneeJacobson 5-7 Elizabeth RuthCampbell Houston 'Diane Gayle Jechow Industrial Education I'-. 5'8-' Julia ChambersCampbell Ballobidusatolen6's I 1'11 Houston Elgin ....Karen Marie Johnson Port Bolivar 0J Oo 4aul Wayne Elkins College StationIsiaren Renee Jordan 7' Lou Dove Christensen Richardion 0 Katherine Gail Johnson \./ Dickinson ban Heflin Kuykondall. Jr. Bryan 60/Marcie Jo Click Lake Jackson 6 q 0 ( ,ThomasEarl Gregory, III .-Bryan Houston VRobin Winstead !ones -Richard Jett Grub. Dallas,.'. nclall Wayne Ledger 4,1. Carolln ElinorCoad Smithvillo 0/b2 Bryan Duncanville flcki Jo Juliano El Paso 0, c,?.. Jeffrey Wayne Hillery Duncanville'William Thomas Light, Jr 62vCindy Ann Cochran Abbie Louise Karr /LaDeanna Lois Rohl Canyon Connor Dallas Mission ,Douglas Edward Holmes Newton 6 33 Georg ia. Carol Killingsworth Bryan'Stephen Donald Prager Fort Worth Beaumont I'Mary Leidner Houston040°41.- Janis Mario Husgen b4 Terri LynnCrabtree Conroe tZteborah leanLaBouli e55-.... carol Ann Cryar Palestine -.Kris Carol LaCavera 0106 id, .-Susan taylor Davis Waco iSandra Ann Lando San Antonio Physical Education LI 1.. 67 /Sherri Lyn DeCluttt Texas City f,fore AnnLandrum Borger ,S? 0 Valerie to DeCuir Lazarine San BeeAntavnililaa oocilor) V/ /RitaCecilia Aguilar El Paso ilhonda Kay Clark China Spring VKathryn Frances Houston 0 leg 'Liza Beth Cooanougher Decatur c .5/ -' KathyAlice Dicorte Houston °Delrick JohnLeatherwood ynthla Sue Bartlett Farmers Branch Frisco./Flay Gene Collins Richardson ge t7Betsy Dobbs Houstonjradley Dwight Lind verly Stisan Baum Houston g rvi -Carol Rae Dobranich Houston (1,,q9 II al ;Pamela Christine Belk° San Antonio"Celia Ann Cottingham Corpus ChrisU amela Sue Lind erl 2..(Derinda Rae Dore Houston 0 9 12. tviThoresa Lynne Billman- MissionioLeststr Langford Crenwelge... Fredericksburg Bryan 4Mary Margaret Ling Rosenberg 0 q (3 Lampasas e.7,3G.rudith Yvonne Dunn Chireno ,/Cynthia Kay Lys William Dean Blair, Odessa"Melinda Louise Daugherty 441/Laura Sue Earls Bryan 0 (714 Houston /Thomas David Dean, II Waco Gonzales-L.-Brenda. Gale Manthei Beth Mart. Bokortialy Dallas §risValorie Howell Elkin Grapevine 0 ti1,5 KayBoyd Corpus Christi 'Kimberly Ann Falkenburg Weatherford ,...Mary Dale Marks Irving 0916 "'Diana Margarete Foltz College Station .76, Vlulla Terry Emmitt Richardson Vlan. Ann Mason nna Made Branch Pasadena 91s/Robin Elizabeth Fcidely Richardson0 1ir,) Mountain Home("Diana Le. Fisk Houston Wellborn VRi-tonda Lynn Mays Laurie Gwen Bushong Corsicana 78% ..ilobert Wayne Field, Jr McDaniel Duncanville0 q 19 troarnie Nell Christian College Station...Cynthia Ann Gillespie Fisher .Gl, Kilgore 0 t.nnlier Leigh Fort Worth 0 ,} lot "/ 9 .famela Early Katy rothy Laura McElvain ?ea VRaeLynn Franz 38 39 44 tit.SICOPY AVAILABLE 4 5 I Michael Dean Tanamachi Edwards fame. Permetti Houston ocict 6)Annolie,LeaCrush Iowa Park,Deborah Stehling McGlaun San Antont(004 Houston John Christopher Powell College Station ocra, q Celeste DeniseDavis College Station 4usan Nell Miller IowaPa:toio Robert Bruce Elsom Ranger Holly Midi Ransom Tyler ocicii4/ Mary Wilson Edwards ...... College Station/Mary Alice Myers lourdantc 101.1 Manuelde Jesus Garcia Laredo Mary Ann Robinson Tulsa, Oklahoma oril 8"Molly Anne Enloe Dallas o Marie Annette Neuman Pattisc (012 Michael Dennis Gibson College Station Steven Otis Robinson Cleburne °lite Vickie Lynn Fowler KilgorePhilip Ad m Oppenheimer Carolyn Christine Goa. Juliet Ann Jacquet Roland San Antonio I 000 Christine Janet Griffin Houston Briarcliff Manor, New Yo: 1013 Sundance. Wyoming Larry Dean Roland La Feria loo itlustm Marie Gustafson Plano plane Alis n Phillips Pasaden 1 o fel. Larry Wayne Haag New Braunfels Lea Anne Seely Fort Worth 1 D02. Edith Ann Hardin Tyler 0 Karen Elizabeth Reagan Conn. to 1.5. Quinn Stephen Henderson Houston Hank Alan Slawson Killeen 1 003 ,/Edward Charles Haynes Houston/ §ylvia Trono San Anton./ o16 Marilyn Lynette Hendricks. New Braunfels Jeffrey Scott Smiley . Austin i 004 Melissa Gay Johnson Nacogdoches (1Terry Lynn Vaughn Arlingtc 1011 Teresa Ann Icryrcie Burke, Virginia John William Stimson Dallas 1&05 v Elizabeth AnnJoiner Houston Dawn Campbell Wilson Conrcl sf8 Terry Dale Kidd Andrews Mary Kathryn Sustaire College Station 1 006 0 Katherine Elizabeth Joseph Austin%/Patricia Marian Wilson Liberty H. tom Karen Ann Mahl Houston Kristin Le. Tautenhahn Houston t owl 0 Kathleen Margaret Lamberth El Paso 4/Jimmie Beasley Young Dallc tow William Wade MatthiJetz Giddings Trudy Louise Tuna Baytown 100$ 0 Pamela Ann Lino Lexington "Dan Vyron McGaughey, Jr. Houston Teresa Marie Villarreal Houston Barbara Louise Miller San Antonio'Kenneth Douglas Wade Killeen )0 Randall Coy Morgan Bridge City Danny Ray Wood Pearland O Health Education `,Laura lone Brougher Dallas Denny Cooley foe ppm, Marketing Lee Ann Crawford KerenscLlnda F. Livingston Midlor. Elizabeth Diane Arthur Troy Benjamin Cameron McElroy IV ..... Marshall lo Tamasy Gill Cypress"Pamela Louise McMahon San Anton. Arispah Elise Avera College Station Nancy Ian. Munger Houston ,Kimberly Goodwin Hammon Beverly,"Deanie Lynn Meadows Pote. Kevin Tyler Baker Lake Jackson John David Nix Temple Massachusetts Rhonda Kellone Stokes Houstc David Paul Bane Henderson Cynthia Gay Odom Mesquite Nancy Elisabeth Harris Alvarado Vickie Donnell Becker Spicewood Yvaun Evaleen Olsen Navasota Kevin Reece Bittner Troy Releana Louise O'Mara Houston Rhonda Lee Blinderman Fort Worth Bernard Beatus Palela Industrial Education Wesley Dan Bownds Andrews Dares Salaam. Tanzania Stephen Leroy Austin San Antonio Paul Michael Sinter College Static Robert Glenn Bridges Wills Point Christopher Seel Parker Houston Brian Gerard McDermott College Station Mary Ann Turner Bryo Kathryn Kay Burka Richardson Dinah Lynn. Parker Houston lames Everett McKee ...... Morgantown, Gary Loyd Cooper College Station Charles Clark Potty Temple West Virginia Kathleen Crouch Madisonville Vernon Joseph Plowman Hitchcock Michael Paul Cutbirth Crosby Patricia Ann Reynolds Athens lames Jude Dees Houston Janet Elizabeth Rice Denison Physical Educationc'"\ David Carlton Debts Houston Joey Ronn Robinson Tulsa. Oklahoma Grace Ann Dohmann Victoria Becky Lea Bollinger Schult Bryan J lonni Annette Barbour DallasRandall Troy Gresham Housk. Jerald Wayne Ellington II Lyford Dorothy lean Shepherd Galveston 11 Debra Elaine Bastron San AntonioAlary Lane lacobt Elect! Janet Susan Ettinger Stafford Karen Noel Sherlock Spring Mark Duane Bell Killeen' Gail Annette lemelka Yoaku Philip Daniel Eubanks Corpus Christi Nibble Kay Simpson Tula 4 Kathy Jarvis Bishop Groesbeck. Dawn Ellen Lackey . . Muleilic Cathleen Dawn Gear ...Concord. California Judith Anne Skene Houston v ion Clyde Colbert Abernathy!Thomas Daniel Mohr Beaumc Karen Lynette Gourley Galveston Clifford Scott Stewart Harlingen Davis McCall Denny III Copperas Cove Thomas Eugene Nesrsta San Anton Mark Wetzel Hall Arlington Valerie lean Teach!) Houston ,Peggy Ann Dworaczyk Falls Cityy Shelene Pierson . Pasadet Barry fames Hannes Houston lack Lewis Torregrossa Galveston "Randall Glenn Ellison Potentrl Randy Byrori Prescott Odes) Wade Trent Harlan Baytown Tern Lynn Torres Beaumont u David Douglas Fain Dallas "Anthony Mark Reinberg Fort Dm. Roger John Harris Dallas Jeffrey lay Waller Houston Thomas Duane Fought Blum 4-'Bronda Kay Schuh% Sweer Keith Randall Harvey Duncanville Richard Michael Whitehead Houston (-Charles William Garland Caldwell " Amelia Ann Standard Houstc John Anthony Huber San Antonio Beth Ann Wilson Pasadena Elizabeth Dehn Gilbert Richardson Jarrett Ray Turner Texarkai Terry Susan Irwin Houston Susan Elaine Wilson Dallas Hunan Vernon Kellen Conroe Gilbert Lee Winne. Jr. Houston Rebecca Johnson Kelly Beaumont John Glen Woytek Houston Mary Katherine LePage Houston Dorris Kathleen Barbo Port Neches COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Larry Keith Manuel Dayton. Ohio Thomas Earl Zen Taylor Dr. Robert H. Page, Dean of thJ College of Engineering COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of the College of Education Aerospace Engineering Bachelor of Science. Hassan Said Hosseint Zandian, Iran Don Walter Reeder Granny.). Georgia Louise Heather Hughes... Honolulu. Evan Bethel Richardson Wk J Curriculum and Instruction Hawaii 085"MarthaAnn Adams Orange oTerry Lynn Sanders Berkenhoff La Ward 044 0 0986 °Cynthia Schoeps Bain Ennis Rose Ann BI-..ugh El Paso 094 I 987 0 Connie Marie Baker San Antonk Brenda Lynne Booker Cotulla (Aga. Bioengineering 4ist.1 Susan Anne Beckman Dana., Catherine Anne Campbell Conroe oqq 3 William Barry Canon Kerrville Mahnaz Shalat College Stan i',3)) Becky to Bell Cuero "Ann Louise Corso McAllen ori.f. Robert Curtis Clark El Paso Nasrin Shafal College Stan. Mouricio Guerrero Villasmil Tachira, Double Major Venezuela -42V- 46 28 BEST COPY AVAILABLE o-kl 81)

Robert Leith Walker...Northridge, Salliornia Rosa Caroline Williams Greenville Marsha Pauline Werner Abilene Scott Kellum Wilpitz David Wayne Wharton Dallas Nome Sydney Roy Wolf San Jose, Costa Rlca Bachelor of Science Robert Leslie White Arlington ,Kathryn Lorraine Zettel Sealy Curriculum and Instruction 1023 elinda Gay Aymond 'Layne Ann Howard Macksting 1014 OSusan Carolyn Bach Atlanta WRS i Dallaso,Lisa Ann Hoyt Spring1086 Ellen Anderson (025 °Teresa Jean Baevich Killeen Abilene Ch'eryl Lynn Leavitt Plano Steven Craig Hughes Caldwell' 057 Nancy Lynch Anderson Schertz Monica Lee Lewis 1 02E, 'Deborah Wynn Bailey Irving*Cindy Dawn Hulme Dallas I v21 oAddle Evonne Baker Round Rock1088 Nancy Ann Lucksinger Atkins Burnet Patricia Lynn Link later Haouisqlow (Mary Louise lanosek Leslie Kay Atterberry Huntsville ( o82. a Patsy Sue Bell Corpus Christi I 08 cl Austin Her Undo Tomasita Lozano...... San Antonio La. v Karen Sue Ione. Snyder 1090 Harold Gilbert Barber t ozq ., Mary lizabeth Bennett San Antonio Irving Susan Ackley Lukens College Station Wanda Gall Knox..., Baytown lOcl I Mark Edward Bayliss Bryan 1 030 Gary L Blazek Bryan Rebecca Maria Mato Laredo 1031 Gwendol '0 Joanna Rene Kobs Houston 1021 Susan Dawn Becker Lake Jackson Shelton Dockery McMath Dee Bledsoe Bryan°Georgia Lynne Koontz Kevin Howard Bell San Antonio 1°32 . Susan Eliza h Bohn Woodsboro (0q3 Houston Daniel Horatio Moore Dallas °Claudia Korff Houston (0941 Ronald Lynn Blase 1033 °Barbara Ellen le Houston Houston Edward Bruce Moore Houston o Becky Foist Lane College Station lai5, Lynda Anne Brady Pasadena 1 034- v Margaret Louise Bonnot Lolita9Scott Elliot Lone Matthew Singleton Moore UI Kilgore 1 (>3B-- jMortha Dean Bowles F. m Antonio, (i'll; Kathryn Mary Broussard Sulphur, Cindy Mullaney .. . Seabrook4 Candace Ann Leland Richardson ?- San Antonio 107 . Louisiana 1 o6 r Francine Bowling Sudan David Brian Murphy Tyler /637 4, Carol Marlene VPriscilla Ellen Lightsey Houston 108 Rebecca Ann Brubaker Conroe Dawn Michelle Narciso Boy.tt HoustonMarisa Marin Robert Lyndon Cain San Antonia I 03F?Lewis Thomas 'Britt Brownsville trig; Lubbock Steven Mark Nebrig Wheeler0 Marla Dean Martin Houston f Lynda Ann Cater Seabrook 1 039 a Kelly Taylor Brothers College Station floc), Temple Joe Lawrence Mahn. San Antonio I o4 o V Lisenell Brown Gary Lynn Mathews West Monroe, ii oll-.. Sherry Ann Chamblee Dallas Michael Trent Oswalt Winters iJennifer Louise Charlton Albuquerque, 104 t °Warner Davis Brundrett Louisiana T,' Houston New Mexico ., Duncanvillefamara Rae Mayberry..,, Waco 11 al. Dennis Patrick Coburn 164 2 ()Elizabeth Busboy ,. Houston Sprint; Robin Anne Parker Dallas i 043u 0Darlene Renee McClain Richmond 11 0 3; Nancy leniler Coyle Diane Sylvia Bush \. ..Hsatuasutoonn Bryan Ann Marie Paulson IrDorothy Ann Johnson McMurroy .. Carol Ann Crowley Wichita. Kansas 1044 °Ann Clarke Butler Richardson Krlstie Lynne Rapstine, Kingsville College Station I 1 04 i Jack Warren Dillard Bryan 104 Dal Mary Lynn Roehr Spring 3 Darlene Lynette Mercer Longview11051 Kelly Al lisOn Elliott Houston Allred Camacho Salazar, Jr tl °bib? Brylaans a Judy Lynn Miller Cecil Scott Forrest San Antonio College Station 110 C : Nederland David Brian Scoggins Houston 1 Usa Claire Montlort Corsicana II 07' Ann Gradwohl 1100444 vasaCanrraireaCsialthrynsabetbceei Oa Harker Heights Lincoln, Nebraska Susan Valerie Shaw Fort Worth ...Cindy Lou Moyers Kilgore'w08 Clinton Douglas Greenwall Houston Mesquite Cassandra Kay Sheppard...... El Paso 5- 9 Dana Dee Mullenner Spring (loci ; Martha Ragland Griffith 00 *Linda Marie Chastain.. Killeen Fort Warth Randall Joe Smith Temple V Nancy Newton Kingsville lit o James Richard Gubera Houston 1t/Marilyn Carol Clayton College Station lay Renee Steele Dallas o Mary Magdalen Nuspliger Wharton IIIt Robert Dean Guenther, Jr Baytown Kathy Lynne Clegg Van Vleck David James Sterling Woodville k.eynthla Bodemann Oberthier ...:on. 0.1112; Pamela Kay Gurecky. , '0Lisa Lau Clifton., Valley View Rosenberg Johnnie Ray Svqtek Wharton o Anita Louise Oiler In) gilt 3! Sherry Lee Hagan Columbus Carol Anne Swan 1.054 /Ginger Sue Cockerham College Station%Allen O'Quinn-- Hal Deane Hardy Arlington I 0 $--s- / Lisa Lynne Cook Lutki) j 1 o 4 i. Houston Lynda Anne Thompson Alvin LufkinV,Nancy Patricia Paisley Beaumont ,Il 5; Susan Ilona Hatridge Corpus Christi Cooper Rockport Teresa. Ann Volt Houston Iol6cr 0 0 DanaLynn NancYjo Coonhav!r JCynthla Pierce Marton /II 6 i Mark Clinton Herring Conroe Mona Catherine Walton Brownsvillea Johanna Preston Jan Carol Hill Bryan Paris it -/ f Brenham Sharon Denise Wells Laredo*Patrice Ann LaMonica Preston Kathleen Anne Hitt Devine I 059 %/Belinda Darlene Crosby Houston 111 51. Fort Worth Wendy Sue White...... Kansas City, Kansas .3Angela Jean Ray McGregor ' 149, Laura Lorraine Hovel Laredo I ob 0 "'Linda Ann Dorman Houston°Nancy Ann Richardson Barry Doan Williamson Houston t o6 I1 Mark Anthony Dunk Waco110- Michael Steven Hudlor McAllen Larry Frank Wright, Jr Brookshire° Beth Annette Shurtlell Janet Teresa Katchinoski Lake Jackson (o6-1 vGretta Anne Eakin..Q Seguini121' Houston Kathleen Ann Wunsch Katy Mesta,,Gaye Lynn Skaggs .. College Station, 122 Gina Gerard LaRocca Beaumont 1 06 3 vRobin Dale Elliott Houston.0 Cheryl Ann Smith fo64 a Karen Elaine Erdely Denison 11:, 3 t Tomball0 Christine Louise Smith Houston '124 I t 65 Bruce Foreman Fain Meru°Diana Ruth Smith r O b 6 0 Judith Ann Fturar Camp WOod i 1.a5, °Sonja Kay Smith 1077 0 lard Lynn Fesperman Rusk ip6 j ° Yolanda M. Souquette .gt, Bryant) 21 , I °SS° Diane Finstrom' Toledo, ino k/ Monica Nicole Stem Franklin 1129 : / 06 c 0 Pamela Everett Fitzgerald Tyler /o70 0 Cynthia LynaFlom 0 Carrie Ann Thigpin Bryan ii AI Austin.lenr /Fonia Jayne Tipton Clear Lake City )1:26 COLLEGE Of EDUCATION 1 A 71itJeanette Marie Freeman 0, Bryan .--Mellssa Ann Towson ,Houston,131 . ioq21/ Regina Geralyn Glanotti San Antonio j Julia Nan Traylor Tyler 111 . Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of theCollege of Education I 0.73 °Patti Lynn Godby BryanLlamas Butler Trimble I 0,74 °Yvette Marie O'Berg Gondeck:.. San Antonio lacksonvill: I )?, / 015 v'Ellen Vittoria Goodearle Oihristy Rogers Tucker Houston1134-: Hoto tzabeth Schmitz TummIns Houston i i 35 Jo% 0 Stephen Edward Green SanAntonio allyn Turner Bachelor of Arts i orl 0 Cynthia Morel Gremlllion Breckenridge 0,3,6, missoHuoaucstottyntrloorie Lea Walker ,7 Clutet t 41 : / o78 a Stool Alone Grey `''Lucinda Ann Walker Curriculum and Instruction t o'79 0 Diana Rayne Schneider Griffin Del Rio( 1 3g. 102.1 Poth0 Carol Ann Warlick. Norma Guzman Cardenas San Antonio 1 0a° a Catherine Shell Hague College Stational 39' Elizabeth Lee Panders Santa Tecla, 1022 Houstonnetheryl Ann Whitley Bayloiin II 40 i 0,a 1i Debora Lynn Hanna WichitaFails El Salvador / 0 8a. vlanet Kay Hes/long CCatherine Estrella Wilder Big Spring (t 41 Ednas---C ynthla Lynne Williams oc,ie4 0 uboraraHhoNffmulal Houston f .41.- 'Barbara Ann Wood Dallas 1 143 AVAILABLE LAjulinvighPansy Gay Wright Bryan I I 44 - 48 16 BEST COPY 17 dci Kathy Lynne West Midland Patrick Robert Willey Rebecca Lynn Winham Dallas Dallas Larry Laster Woytek Ellen Elizabeth Wilson Harker Heights Ledbetter Sharon Renee Wright Pasadena

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Deari-ofthe College of. Education Bachelor of Arts Curriculuin and Instruction t45 Marie Scarborough Richmond Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction I146 Patricia Ann Abramson... Arlington.Virginia. larnye Katherine Hignight Fort Worth 1 I q 1147 Brenda Jean Austin ..4-..... college Station Patricia Ann Hodde rtsle- Betty Jean Avery Longview Brenham ige. 1149 Mary Margaret Barnett Cynthia Joyce Homer Houston (195 Bryan Cathy Ann Opersteny Hurd 115U Julie Ann Barrett Springfield, Virginia Bryan 1196 1151 Lea Ann Barton Robin Rhea Inman Bellville Bridget Denise Jaska Mezia 114'7 1152 Brenda Kay Blough Waco119 El Paso Jeanine Marie Jensen 1 153 Sherrie Ann Borchardt Brenham Houston ti9q 1154 Kathryn Sue Borski Juanice Shenkir Knight. Hearne 1100 Bryan Katherine Ann Koch , IIST Mabelle Sowers Bramhall Kerrville /. ot San Angelo Deborah Merle Kuhn 1156 Deborah Groom Brendel Spring Liberty1 ao2 I Ise? Sandra Lynn Broaddus Marc Randall LaRocca Beaumont 12c 3 Caldwell Barbara lean Leeper Lake Jackson 1204 t 152 Ann Tares Bryant College Station I15-g Kelly Lynn Bull Nancy lean Lohmeyer Navasota 12 o5 Sugar Land Sandra Louise Lading / it 6o loyce Kay Burnett Cameron Houston 1106 1161 Janet Lea Butlar Jane Elizabeth Loft Ulysses, Kansas 12.01 Killeen Dora Pursch Loughan VS: ( 16a Donalyn Marie Byous Pleasanton 1208' San Antonio Frances Andrea Maloney ....College Station t163 .Less Anne Clenunons Corsicana i '2o41 i1 64 Gay Lynn Collins Kathleen Elizabeth Mann Midland{ ).,I0 Houston Susan Michelle Mann 1165 Jo Ann Cook Houstonto iI Lake Jackson Catherine Mciry Martin District Heights, 1166 Donna Donal! Conner Lake Jackson 1212 1161 Linda Lorraine Cooper Maryland Hou Katherine Ellen McKitterlck 11,62. DeniseGayleCrawford Midland tat 3 Tyler Kathryn Lou McNamara San Antonio i 21a ti69Lauren Lesly Crosser Houston Pattie Brown Merrill. Sonorat ;,_ 1 5 ills Kent Malcolm Cunningham Spring t 11 / Martha Jane Dolby Ann Elizabeth Mitchell Garland ia.ly DeKalb Cynthia Lynne Moore 1172 Susan lane Dempsey San Angelo t.1,I9 Gordonville Cheryl Lynn Moran ti /3 Margaret Taylor Duncan WeatherfordI a I 8 Hotiiton Deborah Michelle Moseley... College Station ill "I (I kgs.4AnnDarden College Station Ann Elizabeth Norris Abilene/ az D Judy Eberhardtihardt Burton Hollis Ann Parker Orange/ 22, % i 1176 Allison Angelo Edwards RiChmond t I f 7r) Stormy Gayle Ford Kathy Ann Parker Waco(2..,.2 Fort Worth Jean Mario Peterson i 09 Dianne Dreyling Forgason Seabrook ... 3 Wharton Virginia Ann Pozneckl San Antonio 1.324 1 I'79Kathy Kim Christopher Freed Houston I I eo Jane Elizabeth Furin Linda Marie Pruski Kosciuskot .1. 25 Fort Worth Denise Marie Psenclk' West \ a ..I. 11'81 Cindy lean GatifschY Houston (1122 Patricia Viktortn Gertson Laura Dave Pumphrey .g Fort Worthla 2 '"? Rest Bernard SheilaKay Reuter Houston 12.a. (193 Cheryl Leigh Goolsby Brownsville i I 84-Kathy Irene Groce Marsha Lee Rhodes Houston127.4 Caldwell Cindy Riley Bristol 11q-5. MaryMa Ann Hamilton City i 2 a 0 Elizabeth Crocker Rogers Dallas1,7 3 I e6 Margaret Ann Harwell Rice Mary C.. Scarborough (j II 6,7 Debra Lynn Hatley Henderson1232 Lampasas Cheryl Lynn Schroeder Washington /7_33 ligeBarbara Lee Haworth Houston. Linda Kay Sparkman Patricia James Hazlett San Antonio %a. 34 Hai Victoria Rhodema Ann Spearman )1.96Kelly Ann Heffernan TylerIa.-v.,- Angleton Albin John Stanish. Jr. Houston iz 34 It 9Marilyn Ann Helton Pasadena Kathie Ann Steele Dana Dawn Higgins q. Datngerfieldis 2.7 Malec25Karen Elizabeth Stephenson Sugar Land 123E

5U BEST COPYAVAILABLE 44 (231Leslie Diane Stevens Bay City Karen Alisa Walraven DeKalb I 14e 1240 Kelly Lynn Stewart Andrews Loretta Kunz Walthall.... ,, .. Cameron1249 1241Jane Michelle Stopschinskl Houston Geraldine Florence Weeks College Station1 150 1242 Laura Gay. Stover Tyler Byron Eugene Welch U Brenham 1251 i 243 Peggy Lynn Telg -- Houston Laura Elizabeth Williams Waxahachie1 a 5 2 t144Kimberly Patricia Hamilton Thornton Mary Alice Williams Fort Worth Santa Ana, California Linda Louise Worthen Houston I,i545 3 1145Vicki Ann Umphress Van Alstyne Margaret Ann Wythe College Stationi .:;_gs- 1248Rebecca Lynn Walker Bryan Laura Lisa Young HoustonI 1 Se; (24iSue Elaine Walkup Bryan Mary Elizabeth Zentner San Angeloi 1 57

Health Education Judy Lynn Bruce Irving Pamela Sue Ross Dallas Catherine Ann Cantini Galveston Jo Lynn Rusk Henderson Julie Anne Dodson Houston Stephanie Simpson Kari Kathleen Ekeland Greenville Susan Ann Teague Morgan City, Lisa Ann Hollabaugh Garland Louisiana Sandra Marie Moke Houston Tama Jean Wheeler Corpus Christi

Industrial Education David Earl Ball La Vernia Alan Wayne Nedbalek Snook David Wayne Godfrey Hallsville Charles Nelson Needhan1 Houston Susan Clare Greer Houston Ferd John Rock Hondo Elizabeth Lee Hill Seguin Roberta Jean Scroggins.Waukegan, Illinois Kirk Randall Krienke McAllen Paul Stewart Whittemore Lockhart Adriana_Elena Meza Laredo

Physical Education Julie Ann Atkinson FlorenceDarla Ann Godfrey Leming Charles Memory BartlettYukon, Oklahoma Kendra Lee Goodloe Red Oak John William Beam 111 San Antonio Bryan Allen Gover Pendleton James Alton Bell Lancaster Lisa Ann Herwald Bryan Carol Elizabeth Berry Houston Vernon Paul Laywell Richardson Mary Elizabeth Berry College StationJanet Claire Marble Temple Jesse Mark Blakley Plano Tammy Ann Massengale Henderson Renee Dianne Borth Goliad Anna Margaret McCredie Houston Elizabeth Loraine Bray Bryan Bobby Lee McKim Beaumont George Edward Brewer Richardson William Gregory Moore Hitchcock David Brothers Seguin William Fred Reed Benton, Louisiana James Thomas Brown Pasadenb Amy Schrickel Arlington Drucilla Ann Craighead Vernon Lucinda Ann Sekal Houston Kathleen Ann Currin Richardson Wayne Earl Spiekermann Burnet Rebecca Lynn Darce Aransas Pass Derah Frances Stanley Houston Terry Jack DeMaret. Jakarta, Indonesia La'ura Jill Stetgman Tyler Peggy Anne Dodson Beaumont Michael Roger Stenseth Victoria Carrene HintonTloyd Portland Julie Marie Toolson Killeen Marianne Frey Abbott Paula Jeanne Wamack Tin Top Catherine Elaine Fuller Weslaco Julie Rene White Arlington Suzanne Glameyer Houston Janet Ann Wilder Lancaster

BESTCOPY AVAILABLE -26-

45 Sum 31

Robert Thomas O'Neal John Fleming Orth Orange Robin Frances Sparks Houston Callas Pamela Kay Phillips Gregory B. Steglich Missouri Sherry Lynn Pierce Weatherford Michele Denise Stell Pasadena Janis Kay Stone Houston Michael James Probst Baytown Houston Steven Harold Ray Gwendolyn Ann Thurman. Houston Deer Park Deborah Renee Truelove Rebecca Lynn Rieger Wharton Lafayette. Denis Michael Riordan Belton. Missouri Louisiana Fred William Rogers Ruth Faye Vlereck Sealy Frank Ralph Schnitzer Tyler Marianne Albanese Wade Magnolia Terrence John Wolf Bryan Elizabeth Ann Shelton Houston Dallas Edward Lee Simmons Deborah Gregory Wright Carrollton lane Etta Simms College Station Mary Ellen Welton ZieLski Houston Midland

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of the College ofEducation J Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction 1:2- 5$ oStizanne Gay Adams BaytownoKathy Lynn Lisman la 54 oTheresa Louise Bissing La Vernia Plano t 6r7 (.2.6ooKathy Gail Bubela 0 Karen Virginia Mathews 1261 Houston0 Linda Joann Meek Groves 1232 0Robin Leanne Burgess Dallas 120 10-62. oCharis Elaine San Antonioe Karen Joan ROY...L*. Corley Houstono Diane Sax Houston 1 a ?O 1.6.3 ° Meredith SariFischer Houston I..6.4 Houston Kellye Suzanne Carter Stark i Darrell Edward Glenn Amarillo' .... Weatherford 1265 oLouceyette Ullmann Hill Laurie Walls Floresville*Robin Gayle Willett Longview13`7-3 1166 oColeen Mary Leeds o Houston Seminole 1 274

Health Education 11 1 2- Deborah Lynn Armstrong Houston Tiffany Anne Barnett Dora Arta Garcia Dallas Sheri Ann Gibbons Bryan Rae Ann Brown Dallas Lois Anne Cole Spring Caryl Ann Goodnight Seguin Killeen Kathryn Jernigan Conrad Debbi Kathleen Grar El Paso Irving Deborah Christine Probst Julie Navels Fairchild San Antonio Brady Pamela Howton Schulman Houston Industrial Education William Lawrence Kiel Brenham Ralph James Wells Houston Physical Education Deborah Kaye Bougher Pleasanton Brennct Maureen Kerns David Michael Blakley Plano Houston Candace Lea Burnett.. Tracey Diane Klement Houston Kenneth Scott Lee Muenster Bruce Crawford Coachman Killeen Linden Bryan Douglas Collie Sherri Lynn Marino. San Antonio Tamara Lee McComb Houston Julie Raye Currey kmartllo Austin Joseph George Danna. Jr Donald Ray Royder. Jr. Snook Houston Stephen Wayne Stinson Donelle De Moss Garland Grapevine Beth Ann Gammil.. Debra Lynn Takacs.... Friendswood ...... Houston Angela Denise Taylor Coleman Shelton Good Grand Prairie Marshall Pamela Dee Graman Anna Dunn Vaughan . Bay City ... Dallas Leslie Patrick Yezak Melissa Ann Hill .... Victoria Caldwell Cheryl Diane Houghton Granada Hills. California 27---

51k.ST COPY AVAILABLE.

46 Pee. a

BEST CO YAVAILABLE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of the College of Education Bachelor of Science Curriculum & Instruction I 217 5" Paula Sue Adams Nederland Rebecca Elaine Mariam JonesACuoreenk 13322.6 I. Stacy Sue Aldridge Houston Joseph Lee Maverick Jr 12'7?Diana Lynn Andrews San Antonio Karen Elizabeth McCreary Houston 13 2S pn Nancy Lynne Austin San Antonio Julie Ann McMurry Grand Prairie, o lalqLinda Anne Baker Carrizo Springs Margaret Gayle Mills Baytown 1 330 laas Rebecca Lynn Batten North Zulch Gail Denis. Morris Caldwell 13 3 I ta2 tLaurie Suzanne Best Elysian Fields Peggy Biggs Neugebauer ....College Station 2 Ilit'a Karen Cecile Bienvenu Longview Lisa Ann Newsom Seabrook 13 3 3 I .12-3 Vicky Stephens Bloodworth Brenham Debra Dean Garman Adkins 13 34 laSe Donna Lynn Bostick Houston Marilyn Arnold Pace Houston- 13 35 I_,i,sLisa Lane Brotherton Wichita Falls Laurie Ann Pagonas 12 &6 Susann Boum Brundrott Killeen Emory Ann Parrish Houston /lagElizabeth Anne Williams Cain Houston Torresct Lea Payne Pita Romero Canales Houston Pamela Dawn Piwonka Ba lags aBaytownBryanryci ua 133: :3313', 1.2,9Sherrill Ann Carpenter West Columbia Katherine Poe Fort Worth 134 c> 12.10 Gayle Lee Caskey. Hitchcock Amy Eileen-Quick 1 o.9 4John Damian Casmus Seabrook Susan Marie Reed Houston /aq a Teresa Miller Causal/ Conroe Janet Delors Rodell C 11:ti1oa Ai 11 1:4: Iy93 Elizabeth Anne Cowart Henderson Leisa Carol Roden Spring- 344 (1.544Mary Elizabeth Craig Portland Elizabeth Buchanan Sawyer Temple 13 3 g lal '5Diana Lee Crumby Houston Lisa Lorrain. Scarborough ta.46Nancy Lance Davis Robstown 13.30 Sudan Shannon Smith Scarmardo Dallas1 3 4r). 12_9'2Judy Kay Dixon Plano Stacy Patricia Schnellenbach ArlingtonI 342 t .aef 8 Diana Joy Dotson Llano Elizabeth Ann Schnuriger San Antonio 3 1. 11.11Suzanne McCullar Dugat Weslaco Penelope Ann Scullion Northumberland. 0 go Early ti 300 PottlePtti Alcryne Kilgore England 13o1Annette Lee Echols College Station Carol Sue Seeber Brenham 35-1 I 30a-Donna Kay Havard Edinburgh ....Texas City Deborah Kay Sims, Hewitt (3 52 1 303 Diana Elena Fernandez San Antonio Kathleen Elaine Sissom Dallas 13 -5-3 1 304 Gary Lane Gray Wink Elisa Lea Slaughter Tyler I3 05 Michelle Groce Caldwell Brenda Dianne Slone 1304 Laura Ellen Guiles Richmond Fort Worth Janice Marie-Smith rilixt,Hnouosritdoan I 31Y/Elizabeth Dawn Hamilton Ridgefield, Karla Ann Smith. Ta Connecticut Elizabeth Miller SParks 1 308 Heidi Virginia Hedrick Houston Houston Joy Susan Spencer . (4 Huntsville11/:;;; 13o,/Lauri. Anne Hernandez San Antonio Kathryn Ann Stowe 1 310 Deena Leigh Herron* Farmers Branch a 60 Garland Leslie Carol Stuber Bryan 13 I I Holly Frances Hevenor Bandera a 6 Martha Ann Swize Brookshire I 6., 1311 Loretta Lynn Hill Humble Lori Thomas Baytown 3 6 1 313 Tammi Jo Hogg Dallas Mary Alice 'Merino Corpus Christit 3 64 I 314 Carol Hunsaker College Station Laura Kathryn Tracy New Braunfelsi 3 g 1 3 , 6- Deborah Joanna Ingram Bryan Martha Anne Verbrugge 3 1;4 13 /6Patricia Dawn Jacob Cuero Susan Lee Wallace Edinburg Is, /7Jeanne Yvette Jacobs Friendswood Sandra Corinne Ward Houston a i , ii, Lucy Helen Jones Livingston Diana Lynn Wass Houston 116 9 i 1 t3 Kathleen Mary Jordan Houston Bad Eugenia Watson La Portora 13.2o Nancy Elizabeth Keehn -. Houston Jennifer Lynn Watts i 3 2 I Houston Bothlyn Killen Houston Jennifer Lee Wiginton BryanI 3 i 32a Tanta Lynn Landrum Seabrook Tammy May Wits Seabrook B 1 313 Lynette Adele Lewandowski Boerne 3,7 Kimberley Yates Williams Houston1 3,7 4- 1314 Mary Bird Linne Bryan Madeline Mildred Williams 132,5 Marcella Elizabeth Macha East Bernard Margaret Denise Zimmerman Galvestona6- Health Education Karen Annette Boyd Houston Julie Deitch Durham Terrle Lynn Cooper Sinton Bryan Katherine Alice Fishman Dallas Cherie Ruth Dixon Houston Deborah Lynn Hamilton Dallas Linda Gay Dunk Nassau Bay11Indalita Holleman Holt San Antonio

47 A C

Harlingen "Jean Elise Wiersig Waal. Bryan Jeffrey Paul Weston Liberty Houston Tillman Deen Wood, Ir. Leah Whitby . Nassau Bay .... Brenham Alison Pamela Worden.. . Robert Louts Whitmarsh ..... Longview Karen Louise Zager . . Brenda Gail Wilkins Amarillo Timothy Douglas Wold . Conroe . COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of theCollege of Education Bachelor of Arts Curriculum and Instruction 0121 Patricia Sue Lynch Galveston Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction Houston CC.4 4- LongviewMichele Ann Guidry Lisa Zoeann Adams Magnolia 1000 BryanDeborah Ann Gullo CC:0 2Mary Kathryn Nowak Anderson Jacksonville C:t--4; Cynthia Rene Antley BryanTruth Lynn Hardin 000 3 Jaime Susan Harrell Houston C.,: Susan Marie Boats Houston COO 4. Melanie Ann Harrison ...... Lufkin C7C Lesa Gayle Ball Snyder Edna c-D.J.q °CD 5 Hockley Mary Elizabeth Haecloill COO 6 Becky Ann Barnes Sulphur. c *".C. TempleBobbiKay Henderson . cOo 7 bonMichellBarrett. k4- Louisiana 0=08,David Rock Beal Del Rio Irving 0 ,"=!:3-1 Lam Hendrick CCO Kathy JanBaloney Alvin Janeou 5.2 Jan Elizabeth Herz* . Bryan CO CO( Diana Kay Bitsis San Antonio . San Antoruo C: 53 Margaret AnnflInchey.. . CC Adona Rene Blaschke Brazona Jamison Hollingsworth . Bryan 0054 Lisa Rene. Bohan HoustonJoni c, 55 CO I 2 BeaumontAmy Beth Hopper San Antonio 0013 Lonn Faye Brock Corpus Christi KingwoodJo Beth Hornung ct:Di 4 Karla Diane Bruton Ann Huddlesion . Texarkana c 001.5 Marsha Ann Bryan Grand PrairieCatherine Pearsall c'; 58 Diane Bush HoustonMitzi Hula cot& Patricia CollegovSictatonnoan pC, IL .! 001 '9 Kimberlin Lacey Calvert College StationCheryl Lynn Jeffries SweetwaterDeborah Ann Walker lentscit Carol Ann Carmichael Bryan c c,61 0012 SpringNancy Elizabeth Wilson Jones COI 9 Judith Kathleen Cartwright.. losety Langley AFB.c ;-a Patti Ann Riechers Clay BrenhamKatherine Ann C'020 Crystal City 1 Nancy Gail Coggins Victona Jo E.-3 . 002 Nancy Ellen Kindred ...: .. Della Booth Colbum Bryan 0022 Sugar LandLisa Ann Lack trf q Laurie Cole G 7 gKilleenCf:::-.C. 44 0023 HoustonCatherine Lynn Mahon . Michelle Gay Cook. San Antonio-, r, 0024 EddyBrenda Le. Malone Ooas Cynthia Sue Corby La Porte t:.--,;., ? Patncta Grace Crawford BryanJean Fullen Martin 00,a8 GalvestonAmy Melinda Mash ." Mary Ann Curne MDid.lnatn°ild ..) C'4.3.j 6rf co27 Austin Diana Beth McCleskey Susan Mane DesRossers ..... Belton DD t: D (50.2g Lindsey Ann McFarland.. . Susan Rene* Domak El Campo La Grange 0 c-7 , 0029 Stafford Elizabeth Ellen McGehee 003 ,c) Anna Carol Dougharty Baytown 0 0 t" 7_ Pamela Rushing Emmert . ... New BraunfelsRock Edward McNulty 00 I Kathleen Pettit Middleton . College Station 0 0 ''' 3 Linda Katheryn Erdelt Bellying Baytown ,.) Dr- 4. 0 032. Carol Clay Moak Susan Ann Forbes Kingwood 0633 CaldwellLisa Michelle Moore Lewis Gregg Fort Midlanddu I D: :: ': ,::: 00-34 Humble Laura Jean Morton C035 Michelle Lynn Fowler Houston 0036 Ann Teresa Franke DallasLeshe Anne Moss DallasSuzanne Mane Johnson Nesmith Lattra Eileen Furr 0,....0,.... 7 ? 003'7 Fort Worth CollegHearTna Virginia Suzanne Gaines Harlingen CO3C3 Houston Jeanette Kingston Nix 0 03 q Patricia AnnGendron New BrauDanlliealss 'C'7,....r;;.: '4.51 Rebecca Anne Golf Los Angeles Michell. Grander 0040 California Jill Lynn Parry - .- Crane c e 2 caiBdrywcimi I Marton Lee Grisham '..7-:'3' 004 Nancy Jean Raba San Antonio -.SusanWemey Groce r'..t. 0042 Lynda Jean Radeker Ittatolia l 004 3 Susan Patrice Gross Houstim "Double Major 18

54 BEST COPY AVAILABLE 48 bt.ST COPYAVAILABLE

et"

coos. Robbie AnnRagsdale Kerens coU Sharon Mane Rains Mark William Stewart Abilene 010 3 C1C182 Linda Kay Ray ousion Donna Mane Such 0089 Donna jean feed Houston Robin Dale Stout C;) Houstonctr: 4 Houston Dumas 0 105 0040 Carolyn SueRobinson Cheryl Elizabeth Sumner 0091 Spring Darla Von Taylor Houston " 1 C 6 122Annette Rogers Amanllo 009 2 Delouse Id Russell Conroe Ludy Gail Taylor MadisonvilleCurtis Millet Templet Temple c I 009 3 Kimberly Ann Rutland Baker, Louisiana og Belton Linda one Toole ct o 0044 Kathy Ann Sch landt Houston Bryan Elizabeth Ann Viterbo ot cfccfS Elizabeth Anne Schwarer Nederland Luling, Mario Heinz Ward Cif 0094 Lisa. Diane Seale Louisiana Vicki Lee Whisenant El Paso Cf I 2 Dallas 0097 Jana Mane Shambeck Electra Polly Lynette Wiese 0113 College Station Clifton Charlotte Aileen Wiggins "1 14 rgr:39$ Tamara Fdrell Shannon Granbury 0099 Sharla Ruth Sinclair Duncanville Theresa lane Wilkins Garland0115 0100 Diane Mane Snyder Baytown Kimberly Sue Williamson C116 Kingwood 01 of Beverly lean Spencer San AntonioSandra Diane Winkler 011'7 Houston 0102. Susan Spencer Corsicana.Melissa Elaine Wuthnch Graham Bridget Ann Zwinggl Pierce0119 San Antonio0120 Health Education Larry Enc Adams Annette Louise Bilnoski Alvin Sarah Lynn Johnson Dallas Jeanne Mane Bin. Houston Karen Lea joiner Corpus Chnsu Houston Amy Elizabeth Budges Tracy Claudette Kelly Houston Juke Bliss Carmichael Bryan David Gray King Sugar Land Rebecca lean Carpenter Rockwall Gregory Paul King Wiesbaden. Holly Rene Kirchhoff Houston Universal City Robin Lamer Connolly Germany Madelaine LaFlam me Paula S. Cook Lockhart Debra Elizabeth Mahler Dallas Beaumont San Antonio Sharon Elaine Munger Susan Laura De Felice Clear Lake City Devon Dublin Harlingen Karen Ann O'Neal College Station Ronda Ellen Duckers lcicksorrntl Joyce Lynell Swetlick The Woodlands Robstown Peggy Sue Gorden Vicki Jewel 'Thomason Palo fill Hamrick Florelville Altda Marie Thompson Austin Fort Worth Carol Denise Truitt Bellvtlle Margaret Nancy Hennen San Antonio Lee Beverley Hughes Denton Kai:lett. Kay Whaley Richardson Pampa

Industrial Education Patricia Jean Caperton Cynthia Lee Everts Bryan Brenda Kay Humphnes Dallas less* Edward Watson Waco Helen Elaine Herbst College Station Comfort William Phillip Wilhelm Dickinson Physical Education Michael lames Albers LedbetterLydia Ann House. lane Elizabeth Anderson Brenham BryanDouglas Wayne Kuhl Stuart Martin Bell Taylor Corpus ChristiDeborah Lyn Lackey Billy Ray Brown Bryan GaldthwaiteBarbara Ann Lansford Beckie Jean Burns Carrizo Springs William Darryl Busch IngramBarbara Denise Leshikar Taylor Brent Bass Butler HumbleIrvin Edward Lindsey League City Sari, Marcos Barbara Ann Collinsworth John Walter Luocike i Marlin West Islip, Carol lean Mahoney Bryan Gay Lynn Dodson New YorkHeidi Sue McCoy Conroo Dripping SpringsMartha D'Anne Melling Melinda Mane Dornak Yorktown jaurdantonKaren Kay Morgan George Gilbert Drushel f1I. HoustonMichael Dale Mullins Houston Vernon Brent Dubber ley Alvarado Bruce Eric Dunn Lewisville Kenneth Ellis Newbold. jr. Cochranville, Robert Lee Ondrasek Bryan Caldwell Mary Hope Edmondson PennsylvaniaSuzanne Renee Phillips Brenham Kathenne Ann San AntonioChnstopher Bryan Pierson Frank Abilene Carolyn Anne Goble Sealy Bill Erwin Pinkerton Dallas Cynthia Lynn Hennigar Housfon Robert Daniel Poarc:i Luhbock Olive Anne Poteet Garland Theresa Ann Hensley ,, . Wichita Falls Stafford lames D. Pruitt, Ir ,, Wichita Falls 19--

55 49 Miguel Antonio Villarreal Laredo Rita Mary Warrall Paul William Mules Welch Pearland Potomac, Sarah Melissa Yeary Health Education Maryland Laredo Lori Dawn Whitacre Young Houston Pamela Jo Bailey Janet Lynn Wilson Teague Katherine Ann McGovern Laura Anne Beat Te le Beaumont Kenna Sue Hamiltonflaberts Mary Frances Perez Corpus Christi BrY n Debra Kay Sistrunk Ruth Laurette Krugler Henderson: Bryan Marketing Ronda Kaye Thurston Gainesville Kathryn Maxine Acker. .. Randolph AFB Sharon Kay Lamb. Till Suzanne Attaway. . Whitehouse Dallas Glenn Bacham Lanier Industrial pduciition "'Willard Francis Brawn Stephenville Linden Juan Carlos Ledesma Quito, Ecuadar Charles-Patrick Gannaway Dallas Laura Jeanne Butler Houston lodis;.Lau Rhodes Jennings, Louisiana Angela Rase Callen Patricia Anne Llnck La Parte Houston Roel Raul Lopez Ria Grande City Mark Gerard Cangelsse Bryan Diane Marie Lana Physical Education Rebecca lane Coney Carter Bryan Temple Kathryn Marie Marr Herbert Lee Booker Steven Eric Clark ... Houston Buna Gloria Leticia 'Gonzalez Rabstown Karen Elizabeth McClure Crystal Kay Bowles Brownsville Debra Diann Cosby Missouri City Tyler William-Blansit Harrington Center Richard Wade McEachern Amelia Carnes Corpus Christi Monahana Ian Hubert Davis Amarillo Huntsville Lisa Kathryn Israel William Christopher Oellinger Houston Sammie Teresa Carroll Waco Richardson (sown Elizabeth Dishmun Dallas Vlckilee Cabern John Patrick Kelly College Station Anne Doyle Petrick Arlington Lameta naistupher George Doering Tracey Ann Medley Raymondville Greeley. Deborah Louise Philp Bobby Darrell Cotton Hewitt Colorado Dallas Rebecca Lynn Mezger Nancy Jeanette Palson Robert Joseph Cax Houston Marble Falls Carolyn Drawhorn Part Neches Bryan George Thomas Pesek, Jr Corpus Christi Danny Jerre] Rich Mesquite Daniel Nathan Davis Texarkana William Allen Durham Carpus Christi Lisa Marie Davis Lisa Nehring Robinson Round Rock Denise Marie Richard Houston Fort Worth ;'hones Lee Fields Humble Steven Fred Douglass Elizabeth Ann Salazar San Antonia Stephen Carroll Roberts Richardson Tampa, Florida (-awhile Arm Finck. .. San Antonia Paula Williams Foore Janice Lanelle Walker Brian Eugene Schaper Manchester, Houston Portland Cuful Ann Flores .. San Antonia Janet Kay Wyatt Bryan Jason Matthew Flayd .. Spring Missouri Patrick Wayne Schmid Brenham Laurie Elise Frank . Hurst Carolyn Canaly Shanley Pearsall . Technical Educational Ana Maria Garcia Lcireda les3e Paul Garrett Anne McAlpineSherbert Houston 'Thomas Patrick McAulilf Midland Rob Miller Somers Dallas Babatunde Oloyemi Sholalu luhn Robert Gilbert. Jr Beaumont Lagos, Claremont. Harry Lance SI. Clair Nigeria California Freeport Mark Cliffard.Suchman Mexico Clly, Steven Robert Grimes Richardson Stephanie Louise Harkleroad.... San Antonia Mexico Lisa Lynet Suter Houston COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING lay Stuart Harris Dallas Karen Denise Tepera Joseph Eugene Harris Texas City Houston Louise Terasaki Dr. fibbed H. Page, Dean of Frances Feral Hinkle Willis the College of Engineering Temple Bonnie Ruth Torres Cynthia Merle Hasmer Hausion tTr Hack ley Renee Ann Ulbrich' CD Tina Ray Hunger.. College Station Weimar Joann Thdrese Wadden Norwalk. Bachelor of Science Rodney Dean Hunter . Odessa Connecticut Laura Billingsley Kellett San Antonia Mary Nael Watkins Randall Thomas Kennedy San Antonia Aerospace Engineering Dallas Kimberly Gayle Welch Robert Douglas Atkinson, Jr. John Blackshear Keys Carpus Christi Plainview Houston Michael Scott lvfenser Julia R. Waattan Conroe El Paso Pamela Lee LaBorde Houston Deanna K. Young Texas City Bioengineering 'v Frank Joseph Claydan, Ill COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Raleigh, Robert Scott Staewen North Carolina San Antonio Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of theCollege of Education Chemical Engineering Robert Dean Austin Bachelor of Science San Antonia'Jahn Robert Miller Jahn Eric Balliew El Paso Bush, Louisiana Anna Lisa Mills Severna Park, Maryland Curriculum and Instruction William Henry Bassett Houston David Brent Bassung Mark Edward Nagle Lake Jackson 221.isa Marie AgLire Haustan Kirk Allan Newton ...... Dallas Janet Lee Hawingtan Carolyn Mary Bulavas Orange Houston 0123 Elizabeth Ann Brown . Haustan Linda Diane Lay James Jefferson Coburn Rebecca Christine Peters Carpus Christi .1124 Kathy Meinhart Bumguardner APuasriteinrc(:::11,3343 Freeport Thrall Laura Lee Murphy 'Claire Minolta Day David Eugene Slivensky Taylat 7125 Patricia Ann Copshaw Conroe Celeste Maine Steen Houston Andrea Susan Ognibene Larry Ray Dietrich Pasadena -.)I16 Katherine lean Hussman Cox. SonBLyttaanwino ,:C3D256 HaustanCon Christopher Lane Stephenson La Parte Laury Ellen Paschal Richmond 0 /3 ? 'Daniel Lee Draughon Port Arthur D12? Sharon Eaks anchheld . . Salada Rase Marie Rudolph Jeffrey Paul Greif' College Station Sandra Lon Fisher. Bryanci38 Brenham Richard Kirk Stumberg San Antonio Deborah Ann Stalk° Caldwell Banda Leigh Lenser College Station Marilyn Elizabeth Hardy .. Dallas Peter David Laftspiing Joel Tyler Tomlin Theresa Ann Trevino San Antonia Houston Lindale o 130f:ell' Mayberry Hedrickttl College Station She'll Wendt :0:1:740 Glenn Charles Lutz 'James Dan Vick. Jr Abilene College Sicilian Houston Barton Alan Withrow laborah Jeanette Heller Garden Ridge Garnett Anne Work Louis Michael Moscolo Houston 131111116SINO Hobbs Midland Katy 0 / 42 Roger Wayne McConnell 'Julie Ann Zrubek R asenitreiS nrgg Houston

Awarded POSIIIUMOUt4 'Cooperative education certificates have completed the cooperativeare being awarded with the diplomas tothose students who education program in their respectivecolleges. 26---- 27-- 56 COPSMAILABLE 5'/ Candidates for BaccalaureateDegrees December 11, 1982 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean ofthe College of Education Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction 0 14-3 Cindy Lea Abney Alvin 0 144 Donna Kay Robison Acord Jennifer Ann Johnson.... Sheridan. Wyoming 01 q,.,4 0145 Pasadena Kathleen Diane Kaley Valerie Kay Ahoyt Houston 0 i'''',.- Del Rio Lesa Kellee Kennedy-Barrow o146, Roberta Jean Allan 0(4-7 Irving Susan Margaret Andrews San Antonio College Station 0 196 0148 Estela Arevalo Mary Suzanne Kiminins Austin 0I 41'7 Bryan Kay Lynn Kinney 014 q Leslie Carol Baker Houston Colleyville 0 I q 0150 Jeri Lynn Bell Brenda Sue Kunz Cameron c-1 9 9 0151 Burleson Harriet Lynn Kusler Amy Lorraine BIllington Brazoria West '07000 01S1 Mary Anne Birkner Theresa Adair Lawrence Austin 0 2 0 I 0153 Bay City Lon Ann Lester Laura Ruth Bishop Houston Devine 0 2.01. 01 54 Lisa Gayle Blythe Dome Ann Lisenba Roanoke a 20 3 0 1 5"S- Rockwall Cathleen Magruder Deborah Ann Boudoin Aransas Pass Dallas 0204- 0156 Suzanne Marie Bouffard Neda Rae Lee Mays Humble 0 20.3 0.-1 5? Houston Lisa Ann McCall Jody. Madeline Brock Canadian Wichita Falls 0 .2 0 & 0158 Georgia Sue Chiles Debra Denise McClain Houston 0 :0'7 Sugar Land Marianne Louise Masters McDaniel i 59 Susan Bridgforth Chiles...... San Antonio 0160 Mindy Pierce Cobb . College Station Kerrville 02Ce Cheryl Lynn Conkling Michael Alan McDaniel Kerrville ig New Orleans. Kelly Elaine McElroy Louisiana Terri Lynn Mills Kingwood o210 01 62 Dorothy Lynn Cooper El Campo 0211 Houston Susan Ann Morgan 0163 Jeannette P. Curtice San. Antonio Houston 021 2 0 / 64 Cathryn Lynn Davis Nancy Loetterle Nelson College Station 02.13 Lufkin Ten Reed Nelson 01 65. Susan Elizabeth Davis Bryan 0214 Dayton Judy Mae Niccolai of 6 6 Elizabeth Karen Dew Richwood Luz Maria Olguin League City on. 15 0167 Kimberly Jean Dillon Texas City Navasota 0216 Ruth Gayle Patranella 1 0 16 it Meredith Leigh Dodgen Bryan 0:0'7 016 9 Tyler Sarah Anne Phillips Forest Elizabeth Doshier Crane Henderson 0219 017 0 Donna Rae Duggan Karla Denise Pittman Navasota Saralyn Ploetz Bryan 0219 01 11 I Cynthia Clark Dumas Vernon Gonzales 0220 01 q2 Mindy Ann Dunn Carla Marie Porter College Station Abilene Elizabeth Rene Porter 0. I2 Jan Lon Eskew Kingsville 0221 01 74. Corpus Christi Traci Leigh Dennis Porter Ramona Lee Fincher Cameron Ponca City.0262 0 1 7s- Diane Lynn Franke Oklahoma o Arlington Mary Kathryn Rawson as 3 0 1'76 Dana Diane Ganes New London 0224 0 I T? Houston Valerie Ian Reeves Sandra Kay Gary Del Rio Angleton 0205 01 78 Ginayaree Geiger Ruth Lucille Richards Houston Lisa Karen.Robbins Iola ci20 O I 79 Diana Lynn Gescheidle. Gonzales Longview O:22,7 Phala Jo Roberts College Station 0 1e0 Denise Warren Glockzin Bryan C2:18 01a 1 Dana Deeanne Graham Anna Maria-Rodriguez Stavanger. Phyllis Diane Rogers Baytown 0 2:- cl Norway Normangee^23C 0 1 $2 Belinda Lee Hagler John Stewart Ruff Dallas 02 3 I Anson Carol Ann Runnels Ole .3 Dianne Mane Hakan. Ironwood, Michigan Clute 0:2 :,..-.. 01 $4 Tammy Lu Headrick Marilyn Frances Sanchez.. Z.D....Somerville 0 :33 0,/ Rockdale Lanette Rose Buffington Schulte e$ Kimberly Ann Herr College Station Kellye Enright Hickman College Station 0 2 34 01c36 Fort Worth David W. Scott 0199 Kathy Marie Hobbs Jasper 0 :2 3 Gainesville Debbie Lea Scott 5 01ee Phyllis Ann Holcomb Luling Baytown 0 .7,...36 01 gq Vicky Ruth Imhoff Evelyn Joyce Smith Fort Worth 0 Corpus Christi Sandra Gail Smith 237 01 q 0 Mahe Ann Fritz Jackson Seguin Bryan 0..3e Mary Jane Jackson Carole Leigh Sralla Houston 0 01 q 1 Gonzales 2a 9 tern Lynn lobe Sandra Jaeckle Stevens San Antonio 0:. 4 0 t 92 Friendswood Suzanne Barrett Stolle 0 t93 Dana Lynn Johnson...... Joshua .... Richardson 024 Margaret Sanders Terry. McLean. Virginia 7--

L BEST COPY- v`EliLiA 5 // "WYAVAILABLE

0.)43Beth Ann Wallace . Temple Kann Marie Whittregge Baytown C250 0244 Shelly Watson. Dallas Kathryn Louise Williams Houston C 251 0145 Janet Lee Weatherby...... Sonora Lisa Gaye Williams Marcie Fails 05:2 Pamela Denise Wehring . San Antonio Kirstie Yeuk.Kiu Wang Hang Kong 0 2 53 0.246 Houston 0._5'4 024,2loan Renee Weishutin...... Columbus Pamela lean Workman. Janice Whiting Houston Marianne Zimmei . Houston ,_5 0-14Tami Corrine Whttington Hooks 2,4c)

Health Education Bobby Glenn Alexander. Ir... Mt Pleasant Mary Sybil Howell San Antonio Nancy Annette Anti Wharton Kala Denise Wes.. .. . Midland Karol Ann Beadling Dallas Charles Ray Janson . La Porte. .Debbra Lynn Clemons Killeen Denise Elaine Kalmbach. Kerrville Mark Russell Costa Houston Mark Kelly Labhco. For; Worth Dana Lynne Custer ...... Corpus Christi Gwendolyn Marie Mays Mark Randall Daughrity Lake Jackson Anita Jo Pitt 't.Canton Jay Dee Dickens Houston Christine Sifuentes . .. Victoria Richard Barkley Elliott Arlington Mary Ann Taylor.. Bryan Elizabeth Janet Hacker Falcone Kingwood Cheri Renee Trahan Nederland William Logan Hood Edna Kelly Rene Wallace Houston

Industrial Education

William Gibson Grimmer Dallas Gregory Thomas Manthei . . Sugar Land Robert Alan Kirkpatrick Refugia Timothy Ivan Murphy.. Henderson Teresa Kittrell Komar Milano Gregone Lucille Trant Bryan

Physical Education CindyMahoney Arnold College Station David Christian Post. Vidor Sam David Bell Dallas Lorilynn Men Pye.... College Station Joseph Rhybon Blanda Orange Brenda Annette Quinn Spring John Paul Bucey Corpus Christi Sharon Hughes Rafferty College Station Bette Ann Buford Mt. Pleasant John David Reyes... lourdanton Bruce Barton Davis. Ir Houston Michael Paul Mae.... La Marque Catarino Diaz Benavides Wayne Franklin Schaper. Ir. . Houston Kristen Kay Douglass . Pampa Francis Joseph Schott. Ir. Nacogdoches Leann Francine Drozd Floresville Larry Edwin Schubert Houston Barbara Ellen Everett Garland Karen Harlan Schumacher .. Baytown James Ernest Fischer Bartlett Lone Dawn Scott ...... Amarillo David Lynn Flentge Caldwell Gale Lynn Seitz Amarillo Theresa Elizabeth Garnett Brenham Annette Shores Smith . Ccrpus Christi Adana Creel Hess Silsbee Thomas Marshall Smith. . Baytown

. Lee Ann Holbrook Alta Loma Rebecca Lynn Stecher .. . Axtell. Grace Catherine Holub Pasadena Kathie Louise Tatom _ Dallas lohn Richard Hoyle. Ir...... College Station William Cass Thomson. Ir. Farmington. 'New Mexico Kimberly Payton Johnson...... Houston lack Ross Lanmore, Robstown Monica Marie Welsh .... Austin Marcia Lynn Lewis Dallas Karen Ann Williams .. Beaumont Joanne Marie Linck La Porte Edward Kelley Wilson Kansas City. Kitty Lynn Manuel San Antonio Missouri Leroy Vernon Miller...... Victoria Mary Lou Youngblood . College Station lane Ann Moore BoWie Edward Lee Zavodny Caldwell Loatnce Ann Moore Dallas

Technical Education East Bernard Anthonia Hayti-ma Chigbc . . . Amokwe. Michael Deuane Massey Anambra St., Nigeria8Mariann Charlyn Wetooer San Antonio

52 Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees vIldlichelle Denise Pesek (74'14 ...... Corpus Chr isti-"Dolores lean Kaska Tufts 0 475L.Qttristina Mario Plugge Abbott 049 yEllinor Louise Prudhomme Dallas 1.4`ilatslia l.ynn Velvin . Longview c,fr December 10, 1983 Houston .Peggy toWallek '416%/Janice Hruzek Raska Wallis Hallettsville oa r4'77 "Lee Ann Rector .-Elizabeth Rosselle Watkins. . Uvalde c,4 Decatur krouren Belle Weisberg. Presented by Dr. Gordon VSharon Kay Ridgway Silver Spring. Dallas044r: P. Eaton I-Marion Elaine Welborn . Provost and Vice President Midland0411, for Academic Affairs 0499 Maryland ..--reanna Darlene West . Trent 4,11-0- Rebecca Rivera EDevineI Pa s o 04e0 artha Rene Roberts Ann Westbrook .. Longviewhel qe ...Sherry Dean Wheat ...... Eastland° 048'1"%leonine Ann Robinson New Caney 4014 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION 4A-tison la White Corsicana o 5-00 o422ikiaryKathleen Rollow San Antonio s,..-Lisa Ann Wier.... o483..Mcirgaret Dawn Rowan ...... Corpus Christi 6501 Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean 04e4 m tPassandra Louise Deden Wiley {no Lynne Ruddock Houston 04SS Missouri Cityn50.2 renda Lee Schroer SanAntonio Pippen Cooke Williams. ..Carthage05-03 00 Netsa Diane Smith Waco .-Ronda Lyn Williams Bachelor of Science 648261aula Turnette Smith ..... Longview05 04 04i'1S%.6haron C. Steller 1-Etina Marie Woodall . Port Arthuro5o5 Brenham ^-t'ynn Michelle Worthey.. Curriculum and Instruction X489',Beverly Ann Sullivan ...... Eigni0566 Pasadena 'Cynthia Jo Yaggi 039513eth ElaineAbbott 04'10.'1acye Armando Tipps ...... FortWorth0507 Wimberiey '*h%ri Christine FloydGudgel Fort Wortha- allyAnn Yokubaltis 03'74 sl.Phn Rand Adolph Houiton Whitewright 0424- Houston 06013 "377/Robin Caryl Richey Aiken LL enfamin Samuel Hadad Temple elia Marie Hanratty Houston 04:15 03)3,/Nancy lane Appleby Dallas Houston 04 ,V" 071.01'ami Denise Rabin onny Dwain Harris Health Education Houston rah Ann Harrison Christine 04 21 o2,4304 orry Lou Spitzer Bailey Houston 04 28 ,-.- Leslie Baccus Waco eborah Susan Havemann Centervilles- Kimberly Ann Odom 'o3211velyn Ann Baird Houston 0 429 ,... Raymond Alfred Bailey San Antonio Richardson San Antonio ebbie Kay Heitmeyer A-Valerie Parkerson Gladewater 058aiLisa Diane Barron Garland c430 -Matthew Kirk Burnett Dallas .M6rganne ltzi Ann Henderson-Stripling ' -Chris Lee Davis ElizabethReed Conroe 038.344orY Patricia Bates Houston Lampasas 04 31 Wills Point...Clay Daniel Rotenberg racy Leigh Hillman -L'i'nda Teresa Gostenhofer...... Houston oJ84.i4arian Bobbelte Berna Frost Centerville o432 . Houstontynne Kennedy Satterwhite 0?o,vMelinda Kaye Blackmon treiTiaron Kay Hinton Crosby o433 Jeanie Louise Honeycutt Corpus Christi Panhandle GroesbeckL. Carmen Gray Hohlt ...Debra Lynn Scott..... College Station r>386,,Alyson Ann Bondurani Longview 0434 -Sharon Elizabeth Jones Amarillo Beaumont%Cathrine Ann Chalin Homeyer x-ewendolyn Kay Shipe Fort Worth o399-Jana Rae Boomer Caldwell o435 - Maricelta Margo Albuquerque. Cypress ssica Lou Huddleston ..-Corinne Kay Sloan Waco o 38e./connie lean Boston ..q Tyler Midland 0436 New Mexico1..loyce Ann Spencer 10329.1Allyson Carol BOX eredlth liullman '--Renae Michelle McBroom Graham Houston Longview 0437 Haskell lly Ann Volmert 40 37°)Gerald Mark Braun ynthia Sue Huff% Bonnie Dawn Sorenson Moss.... San Houston Bienharn Christine Ellen Hurley Carrollton 0438 Antonio ok 039 1.0Eisa Smith Brown Madisonville ... Duncanvillec439 Brownfield %Mary Charles Hutchins Sugar Land 044 WacovSusan Lea Hutchins 0 o;n aura Buchmeyer Garland Cross Plains 044 I Industrial Education 0374arol Ann Bumpas fordfold Ann Wfttneben Jackson Dallas 8ellviile 0442 o395.0Martha lane Burnett Janine Jones ..."-----"46rY Jennifer Boyce College StationA.-Paulette Catherine Fonteno Houston Kerrville 0443 Castillo III .... Kemott .^3%-/Hozel Ann Cairns JCarol Ann Kersey Bryan I.-Andrew Charles Getz Waco Sugar Land o444 ..-eharles Cohen . Houston 03,refolulie Aline Mangum Calhoun ',Karen Anita Kirkman Killeen I.-Gary Alan Lee ...... Lake Jackson ....RichardsonviCristy Kay Krueger Houston o445 Veril Dietzmann a 3 48.1Amy Lynn Cardwell Houston 0446 CypressLEdward Todd Oliver...... Eagle Pass 0 an/Melinda Kay Carter HuffmanLisa Ann Lamb Q EI.Campo Spring 049 6 ippwrames Mark Casmus.. itiso Leigh Larrabee Seabrook 0 448 Seabrook-.Patti Lynn Lerche Physical Education 0401 repro' Elizabeth Chamness Tyler Lexington 0444 o402 seise loan Chennault aurel Conner Magee Elizabeth Anne Alsmeyer Palestine Wharton 0460 Houston -Linda Gail Philips 0463Alsa Diane Bland Collard enntfer Lee Mann Ruby Arizmendez Tyler Corpus Christi Louie Ann Massengale Houston 0451 San Antonio Kenneth Wayne Pruitt 0 404.-Pptricia Ann Lehrmann Cooke Dallas0 452 Carrie Sue Austgen La Grange, Illinois Canton Bryan%/Denise Lillian Mathias Katherine Lynnel Quinn Conroe 04a5Vrenda Sue Cornelius Dallaso4 6 a Michael Paul Ferris, Jr Kingwood Robin Lynn Ralston 6466 Bay City era Kay Matocha Leslie Anna Gaffney Blooming Grove arol Mayo Countie Rosenberg Houston Jana Johnston Raymond 040.7 erry Ann Houston 2Sherllyn Susan MayseHoffmann 0464 fill Hardy Mesta Craig Brownsville ....Houston Huntsville Michael Glen Robbins 04458 elley McCarter 6455 Holly Ann Hugebock Richardson nna Jean Denmark College Station Henderson046-6 Giddings Paul Richard Rogers 11404 eanette Susanne Doran %/Denise Ann McCaskill Brazoria Jonathan Brett Kendall Fart Worth Richardson ura Elaine McClellen 04-6'7 Hempstead Cynthia Lynn Smith...... North Little Rock. 0410 lie Marie Driskill Texas City Lisa Kay Krenet Corpus Christi. San Antonio amela Ann Meaaher 04-643 Arkansas 04 1i'teven Allen Early Richardson0469 Teresa Rose Landry Plainview Houston"Ian Lucille Miller . Marcia Lynn Smith 1 Rockdale 164,2 lisa Lorraine Eddleman Port Arthur04 60 Bruce Wayne Lester La Marque Judith Ann Stewart 0413 Houston"Marjorie Lynn Miller Vicki Kay Lewis Amarillo irginia Kay Finch Odessa Recite, Brazil .046 % College Station Craig Alan Stuart 0411- uzanne Lezert Fischer .,Beverly lane Mims Houston 0 4-6 2 Kathryn Ann Mann Refugio Houstondiary Lynn Mobley Dallas David Reese Stilton Kingwood 641 obert David Fowler Kingwood 0 4 63 Linda Louise Martin Allen 041C Kilgore%Mary Knowles Moon Patrick Lyn Talley Houston ichele Rene Fredericks Schulenburg San Antonio 0 464 Manette Cecelia Mathews Center Juliana Urban 04/9 rbara Gagnon 't°linen Patricia Moravits Gaye Lea Matlock Victoria Houston Portland 0 46 6 Duncanville James Neal Whiddon 0411? Tana Dee Getschmann aurle Ann Morrison West 0 466 Monika fill McDonald Amarillo Houstonlif Elvis Diane Nelson Liberty Teresa Kay Wiedemann 041 inda Gay Gibson Kautz, Hawaii ,, ... Bryan 0 4 67 Denise Marian Pearce Alvin 000/Tamie Danette Blume Gllstrap ...Karen Louise Newman Fort Worth 0462 6426) osanne Givens Lytle%Arvladeletne Sophie Nixon Seabrook Pinehurst 0 4 b 4 64 ila Lea Grape `itodney Melvin Paris Garland 0,49 0 O SomervilleViatticia Lynne Pavlas Tamara Lynne Gresham College Station Houston 049 I *-Irina Darlene Watson Perkins Princeton0492 8 61 MAILABLE 6U. BEST COPY 9 ... Houston Jan* Louise Greenawalt Bryan BaytownMelanie Rand Mosley Houston Jay Charles Henry CarrolltonJames Michael David Murphy ... Houston Jane Frances Herfort . Arlington Rosenberg Mineral Wells Pamela Kay Herring Bryan Julia Anne Murphy San Antonio Pasadena Bradley Michael Holder .... Mission TomballAmy Ruth Newman Odessa Gail Lynn Holt NavasotaDaniel Heigh Nottebart Irving David Henry Johnson Houston BeaumontLaura Stehr Peters Bryan Tyler John Jefferson Johnson ... Houston BaytownCarole Kathleen Presson Longview Lisa Ellen Jorgensen Spring Brian Christopher Rhodes .... College Station to Rhonda Gail Kaminski ara. Mexico HoustonNatalie Vernita Rich Universal City Lisa Kay Klussmann Bryan Dianne Davis Russell ..Conroe Vanessa Kay Klyng San Antonio . Houston League CityStewart Lee Sherrill Fort Worth Michael Edward Kollman San AntonioTerry Lynn Smith McGregor Robert Curtis Kovar Palacios Taylor Jamie Solomon Dallas 'Renee Theresa LaSance Houston Michael Anthony Suarez Fort Worth Jeffrey Daniel Luntz Houston Ray. Arm Sutton Jefferson City, Missouri Marie Mace College Station Mary Elizabeth Unsvvorth Dallas Ke4 Melissa Mann Houston John Harry Welch Lori Jean Markowich Bridge City The WoodlandsNita Ruth Wilson Kemp Richmond Karen Lawcryne Morgan Corsicana ... Burton . Webster- 2 Alice an Antonio COLLEGE OF EDUCATION .... Dallas .... Bryan Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean eorge West Bandera an Angelo Bachelor of Science Cedar Hill age Station Curriculum and Instruction 03 56 Diana Kay Bulkley Mississippi San Antonio Janet Kay McDivitt Houston,: 366 ...Uvalde 03s-6Jan Cargill Bryan Julie Waldrip Muennink 0357Debra Sue Balch Dawson Lubbock73,..7 . Brenham Fort Stockton Laurie Jill Pinkham Nelson Bryan.- z.; 4? o 358 Susan Kay Dickerson Houston ....Bryan Desna Renee Newman . Houston -_-_, A 4, Mabank 0359 Donald Eugene Fluker College Station Gaye Lynn Osburn San Antonio 0 3,70 . La Costs 0360Sabrina Renee Hardin Orange Debra Louise Payne Longview c 2.; t .nneapolis, .136 I Susan Elaine Herwald Bryan Sharon Eubanks Rouse 0362 Sherri Ruth Jones Lucedale, o 3 '7 2. Minnesota Texas City Mississippi ;ugar Land 033 Karen Patricia Kane Bullard Luanne Kay'Little Sammons 0364Melissa Kyle Kurtz Rockport o 3? 3 age Station Arlington Laura Catherine Thomas San Antonio :6 4. .... Dallas 6345 Tonya Jean Lanthrip Lake Jackson 3n Antonio . Navasota Beaumont Health Education .. Houston Patricia Mane Adams.... Larkspur, Colorado an Antonio Ana Mercedes Gonzalez... Bogota, Colombia Janet Dawn Burnam Marble Falls . Dallas Douglas William Hamaker Irving Traci-Ann Cannizzaro Dallas Michele Reyne Hilberth Houston Lisa LeAnne Dees Gainesville Kart Elizabeth Keesee Dwight Lynn Dittmar Cypress Columbus Clara Ann Patrenella Houston Donna Carol Douglass Austin Kathryn LuAnn Pierce San Antonio Maria Giamfortone .La Marque ...Austin ... Bryan . Orange Industrial Education Houston Glenn Lewis Failinger Bryan James Morey La Peyre Beaumont Rory James Gillies Dickinson Brownsville Allan Douglas Shivers Houston . . Bryan Willis Robert Hudson H Calvert David Duclos Van Mater Bryan . Dallas Karl Allen Kloptenstein Houston . Houston ericksburg .. Dallas an Angelo Physical Education Giddings Ramona Louise Bockholt Farmers BranchClinton Wayne Cowan Livingston .. Irving Lucy Patricia Bourne Houston Brenda Darnell Crim Caldwell James Winston burns. Ir . BrownsvilleJohn Martin Dorman Pasadena 'Double Major 29---

CO?' ( AILAI3LE BES1 Janet Lee Swaner Arlington Susan Williams Baytown Warren Allen Swanson Taylor. 0329 Susan Marie Russo Ful Sim Tan Tina Alene Wilson Pasadena Houston Shelli Denise Stewart Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia Keith Davidson Witty 0330 Valerie Salaman Sande! Bryan Arlingtor4341 Debra Lynn Taylor Missouri City Debra jean Sanderson Lisa Ann Stockton Angleton0342 Houston Dean Andrew Wolpert r.).3). Irving Morianne Vardaman Deborah Lynn Trumble Pasadena Webster Ce.-= Sandra Jeanne Secrest t Orange° 343 lower Villarreal Ortiz Cheryl Jean Wood San Antonia Dallas Sandra Lee Vogel Monterey. Mexico 03.43 Karen Ann Serstad Glenview, Illinois_ San Antomo0344 Lester Otis Warner \Pamela Kristine Wright Houston Roberta Pool Watts .. Harlingen 0334 Donna Kay Sims Sinton0345' Allan Winslaw Yaung Houston Lexington Shelly Raye West Lawrence Hewson Warnock Da llos , 0335Stephen Sterling Sines.... St. Louis, Missouri Conroe03416 .Celia Elaine Zama Houston Janno Dixell Wheat Diane Leslie Webb Beaumont 0336Julie Suzanne Silva Nixon034.9 Janet Marie Werner Patricia Lavinia Zepeda Houston Kathy Rae White Taylor 0337 Angela Rene Smith Corsicana White.Oak 0348 Wesley Owen .Wiggintan Tegucigalpa. Honduras tulle Shannon LaGaw Wilson Dollarr44 Sealy 0338 RobertsSmith Dallas Kelly Jo Winham 0339Janis Gayle Slayton .Dallas0350 Brenham Kimberty Ann Walle 0340 Lisa Gayle Stevens Denton Dallaso3V I 1Ck COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Health Education Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean of theCollege of Education Mercedes Ilse Bock San Antonia Tyrene Fae Hill Sandra Lee Brewer Hurst Vidor lane Marilyn Hollingsworth Martha Beth Casienson Port Arthur Bryan Barbara Lynn Kothmann Ashley Renee Cook Big Spring Bachelor of Arts Carrollton Jeanne Marie Longbrake Kathleen Dean. College Station Midland DeniseEileen McGee Stephen Paul Eckert San Antonio Curriculum and Instruction Seabrook Susan Ann McKee Eddie Lee Felder Houston 0352 SallyRuth Antes I Bryon Stacey Ann Ruff Houston Ada Iris Villarreal Pamela Lee Franklin Dallas 0353 Arrenia Ann Trotter Brownsville 0354 - Houston Tammy Lynn Sheppard College Station Derald Preston Grtce Richardson San Antonia Leslie Ann Shourd Houston Bachelor of Science Industrial Education Curriculum and Instruction Anthony Lee Alotto Bryan Larry Philip Pecht 0256 Brenda Lynn Ahlhardt Larry Martin Collis Houston Houston Lad Anne Johnstone Quitman Allen Ray Slater -Inge Grove 0269 Lisa Elaine Anderson Temple02q3 Ralph William McNair Houston Milton Woodley Lufkin Suzanne Collins King Robert Murry Paxton , Tennessee C",:-Z13 Karon lane Ashby Carthage Wylie 0,2c:r4 Houston Karen Louise Lander Lake Jackson 0385 025q Laura Jean Baker Garth° Springs Eileen Fae LoBello (7%266 Paula Elizabeth Banister Houston Melody Jo Lock Bryan 02116 1.12.6f Lynda Diane Beard Bryan Magnolia' 02.1? Physical Education r.:262 Karen Bea Biough Jeannine Marie Lomax Houston °Q rte El Paso Leni Suzanne Lumbley Susan Elaine Bicknell Spring 0-;163 Glenna Jean Boney Port Arthur Lynn Marie Hudson Houston Houston Karen Marie Maddux-Mangham q Kristen Morgaret Bloom 0.:d4 Ruth Louise Borens Humble029 Arlington Philip Lawrence lmbody San Antonia Longview Janice Leigh Manning 030c" Charles Wayne Burton Houston Lisa Jones Kieschnick 0:266 Patrick Murphy Browder Wake Village°3 0 i Laurie Denise Stanford Campbell...Woodville College Station Lorena Carol Lynn Mayse Freeport 0 302 Christina lane Kimmins 0.:-')6ic Laura Lea Campbell Mission Marianna Louise McNamara Craw Austin (1162 Penny Sue Cannon Angela Rene McCraw Richardson D 3(13 Karen rano Laberman...... Baytown Carrollton 0:2 AR Patricia Anne Cazaurang Lisa Mellyn. McNeal Dickinson 0 304 Simonton Deborah Hicks Leland' ....West Columbia Frances Merrill Jeffrey Alan Davis College Station rN-.(.4 Melinda jean Collinsworth Dallas a 305 Richardson Tracy Leigh Luster Hearne Pampa Sharon Ann Milner. (..v7 Cheryl Leigh Dyer 0:2')()Ann Marie Conway Groves 0306 Arlington Amy Merle Moore Hughes Springs Tyler Julie Downy Minyard Lea Ann Filipp Danbury Susan Trocy Poole 4.--,..21Michelle Rene Lake Crowson Pasadena Missouri City 0a0 -7 Lorna loan Ford Austin n272 Lori Annette Dalian Mary Ergle Mize Houston Clifford Marian Ranson Spring Diane Marie Mock Nancy Jane Ford McAllen 0,fk,., Donna Gayle Dorsey FBr yr Yd ae nk gl0-,, Dallas Maria C. Resendez Pasadena, California Crockett Marty Lynn Monica) Shirley lane Furlong r-,:'';', I Dana Denise Dean Lake Jackson San Antonio Tammy Renee Richardson Silsbee Magnolia Nanette Eblen Moody aI 0 Gayanne Gaines 0: r,..5fill Marie Entwistle Canton 0 .3 1 I Midland Ellen Marie ...... Fort Worth Houston Caroline Louise Morgan Melanie Lois Gotthardt r.i,i,:, Charles David Edandsan Fort Worth 0 31 2 Hobson Kathleen Annette Smyth Uvalde . . College Station Reva Louise Tawslee Morton Tammy Joyce Harmon Jackson, Mississippi OL:'')// Marla Lea Francis Caldwell 0 313 Robert Steven Sloss Austin Houston la Susan Mosby Melinda Lee Harrington Gorman Kelley Anne Sullivan 02'16 Koren Leo Gale Cypress Melinda Kay Helber Houston Terrell Rochelle Anne Mueller La ke Houston Dana Lynn Thfessen t--.;:f)el Michelle Arlene Gamble °D?...... ,.....Pasadena ...... Fort Hood CharSusan Eileen Myers 145 Paul William Holzhaus Castroville Houston r, David Earl Walker 02 .Dellanie Ann Gasaway. Q;k. Houston 31 6.. Lynn West Honeycutt, Jr Sulphur, Louisiana Kathy Jo Gilmore Catherine Sue Nelson San Antonia 0 ao 9 Texas City lames Lionel Walton w1 Huntsville Kathleen Denise Nicholls Ann Marie Home Brady 0.-.,,82 Michele Ann Griner Houston 0 218 Plainview Terri Ruth Warren . Bryan Emily Elizabeth O'Brien Waco c'',2123. Pamela Gayle Hamilton Waxahachie 0Blc( Andrews Daniel Louise Orozca Bastrop a 320 n1 2't -f- Gynna Jay Harlin Eldorado 022.5 Laura Lea Hengst Margaret Denise Pappas Houston Technical Education Longview Pamela Ann Pardue 301 0.22,; Darla Sue Hill College Station Lord Lou Peters. LisaKay Carswell Richardson 0 2E/) Elizabeth Anne Hogshead ,. FriendsWwoodacog 332232 Houston Nancy Lynn Pollock 02e,f'.3 Pamela Lynn Holder Rosenberg 0 324 San Antonio Katina Lee Reed Giddings° 3 .F.;' 0.:.'j Rebecca Marie Hollas Houston Ruth Audrey Roberts 02 IC. Terry Lawrence Hughes Bellaire Odessa a 3 16 029 1 Karla Flores Jakstadt Elizabeth Ann Robison Houston o 3 a7 Baytown 0292 Launeio Johnson Angela Maria Rodriguez Barranquilla, c 3,8 Woco Colombia 22 BEST COPYRVAtIABLE 43 63 64 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan.Dean Bachelor of Arts Curriculum and InStruction 05001 Jerenda Gale Frierson °6-1° Mary,AnnGarciaBameau Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction o I t Connie Lynn Adams 0512 Sydney Rebecca Alderman 0564 Tama. RayeGurecky o 51 3 Susan Leigh Alexander o565Paula Diane Hall 0566Shelley Lee Hamilton 0514IGthenne Bailer Andersen 0567 0.51 5 Lucille Catherine Askew Janet Lynn Hargrove 051 6 0668Cheri Lynn Hillendahl Kimberly Kay Baldwin 0561 051'7 Donna Elizabeth Bates Jan Mane Holliday 057oJulla.Ann Huff 0518 Marylynne Bauer 0571 0519 Diana Lee Cargill Bayliss Carol Ann Gilliam Hughes 0,520 o572Elizabeth Lorraine Hummert lohnna Kay Sloan Basch 005,75734 0521Melissa Mignon Bond LaLisauritnlenianvelyvy 0572Karen Louise Banner 05',5 -)05-11Lisa Louise Brown Melanie Ann Jarrell OS 2.4 0596Jana Sue -Jernigan Lynette lean Brown o6-7) ->o .52.5Sandra Lynette Browne Cheryl Ann Jones 0517S1Connie Annette Jones 0526Kathy Ann Bryant .05'79 Tambra Ann Taylor Burns 0550Cynthia Marie Jones 5:-'?Jeanna Lynn Byrd Donna Sue Evers Jones 0529 45'11 fJulie Anne Jones Kalil D'aun Byrom 05"32 0510Deborah Kaye Canon Virginia Leatha Jones 0.5 31Diana Lisa Cardenas 05$3Karl McNally Jordan 0532Steffen Elizabeth Carlson Os-4Shirleen Ann Kalmus -,0533Beverly Ann Simmons Castro o's'aS- Lorraine Ann Kasper' aSerS Kathryn Diann Kendall 05.34Gloria Nelda Cavazos -,0587 Shelley Wendell Jane Chapman Mary Anita Kothmann 0535 ..0562Lori Beth Knstek n514Darla Ann Clarice 0,51,9 0 537Christine Lynnette Cloyd Kathleen Ann Krumm 9-->0 53 SKaren Denise Cones 0 s90MargartvSusanLacey 0539Laura Nell Crenan- 059 Kristine etzell Landherr 0S 4-0Carol Ann Davis 92.Debi Lyn Lane 0 541Kay Lynn Davis as 93India Ann Lelnweber 0 54-2Mary Kay Bevans Davis 0594Jennifer Louisa Lewellyn 0543 -)054)5Amy Jo Lively Gloria Elena de Cardenas 054 6 0544Diane Kimberly De Forrest Mary Carol Lona 0 547Debra Ann Lyons or4SNancy Lynne Dore 0,5-18 46Ann Leigh Downing Shirley Sue Maddox o 41Michael Lee Eidson 0599Stephanie Kate McAdams OS" Amy Louise Eldred o 600Cynthia McDonald 0601Teri Michele McEvoy o6-4 Mary Elizabeth Farmer 0602 550 any Kay Fazzino Lorianne McNeill oSs-1L e a h Grace Fick 3 0603Christina Vorhee5 Faller Mae 004Michelle Ranae Metcalf -)0 552Me nie M. Fisher-Gerken 060.5- o5-5 3Louis\Roy Fussell Kimberly Ann Mouton 0 $-54 --)0604Claire Elizabeth Mueller Karen Michele Gatdousek 0607 ocTSMargaret Gonzales Garcia Holly Annette Norwood 05V,Melissa Janine Gest 0608Gloria Ovalle Mickie Joyce Gill 0609Deena Renee Parish 577 06 toMelanie Michelle Patterson 0550Melissa Graham Price Gillespie o6r tJennifer Rene Perry .5 5-5?Jennifer Tara Glass o6/2 )0560Karen Diane Goen Phyllis Susanne Phillips 0 5-6 fAndrew Paul Gomez o6t3Jeannie Poskey -.06/4Terry Elaine Proctor 0562Cheryl Lee Graff 06(5. Debra Kay Gunter Lon DeAnn Quarles 2306 16Nancy Lee Rains

D 06 ir?Renee Marie Ramsey .6 t8Lisa Gayle Rankin 06'37Nancy Louise WaddillTerry 0.6/RCynthia Jeanne Reed 0632Jackie F. Thomas' 62.0Kayla Bobbin Reeves o6t? Carol Denise Thompson Annette Lynn Richardson 0640Terry Neal Thompson o622Bonnie Dolores Roberts 0641 Aletha Robin VanCleve ob.23Deanna Kay Robertson 0642Deborah Atkinson Vanderweide 0624Linda Kay Rutledge 0 64 3Ronda Lee Walker 0625Nancy Ann Samford -> 0644Marian Walters o6.26Mollie White Shaw 0645Terri° Fay Watson o 627Julie Edna Shepherd o646Brenda Gail Weaver-Thomas -> obzeLinda Carolyn Short 064 7Richard Alan Webb o62.9Jamie Lyn Smith o649Lydia Louise Webber - 0630Nancy Elaine Spoils 0641Deborah Lynn HargreavesWheeler o6 Kenneth Glenn Stavinoha Samuel Hartwell Wilds e06 Lisa Suzanne Strasburger Connie Renee Williams ..x633Mary Elisabeth St'ruthwolf

Health Education Mary Elizabeth Barone Judi Carole Bean Gwendolyn Marie SebastianLamascus Elizabeth Anne Berry Shawn Ramsey Lockie Jeanne Louise Brakebill Claire Marie Mommessm Susan lane Brown Margaret Lynn Murphey Ana Eugenia Callejas Lori Kay Oswalt Lezlie Anne Carr Michelle Marie Parish Arlene Maire Cohrs Marilyn Ann Pemberton Paula Anne Dunick Meredith Anne Pike Phyllis Kay Etheredge Nancy Ann Rohlack Margaret Louise Foster Lucy lean Sherman Lee Ann Gilbreath Pamela Karen Stafford Megan Louise Harrington Reagan Lee Stevens Ellen Suzanne Harris Lori Lynn Towson Brenda Kay.Hartmann Cynthia Ann Morris Walker Norma Kay Kelbly Cheryl LaVerne Webb Mary Ann Knox Linda Marie Wolf Karen Elizabeth Zorn

Industrial Education Come Jacobs Bergeron.fr. William Scott Hopper Catherine Louise Ramsay Leland Roy Redding

Physical Education Walt Van Beasley Donald Case Brackett Tommylu Lavender Richard Waldron Brainerd.Jr. Marilyn Ruth McCormick Alan Lynn Burns Lisa Annette McCorstin Thomas lames Carmody Treshan Helen McDonald Thomas Dean Chandler Douglas Lamar McGown Kelly Jane Cox Alfred Bernard Nasser Robert Wayne Eoff Rosemary Ruffino Marla Gail RichardsonEstes Todd Baker Shaw David Edward Hadley Donna Kay Tate Sheri Lynn Hahn David Paul Thompson Pattie Sue Holthaus JoEllen Marie Vrazel Elizabeth Lyn lames David Eugene Wayne Ten Denise ShaverJohnson Diane Carroll Wholey Michael Wayne Kipp Susan Kathleen Willis Jennie Lee Klepper Mary Lauren Wilson

-24-

57 Traci. Kim Foster Laura Leigh Robinson Larry Michael Fritsch Timothy Craton Roesler Cynthia Eileen Grace ly Elizabeth Bea Roosa William Baker Hays Mitchell Anthony Ross Lea Ann Hoover Mary Jo Ruhe Deborah Ann Hrab Ross Hansen Ryon Michelle Johnson William Joseph Schneidau Stacy Layne Kerley Donald Gordon Shafer Patricia Eileen Kerns Richard Shawn Smith Laura Kothmann Paula Kaye Standley Kathryn Ann Lux Charles Alan Tindall Michaele Mead Tamra Marie Turner Patricia Renee Medley Michael Edgin'Wilkes Carol Ann Moore Tracy Lee Womack trig,Barbara D. Nesloney Rebecca Ann Zellers C COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction 065'7 Sandra Carol Baker o6'74 Becky Lou Neei 06 5 Michelle Lenor Barco 0675 Sandra West Rasavage 0659 Allen Dean Bozarth 0676Bonnie Kay Beck Reininger ad6o Marian Faye Broun 067')Sherilyn Scott Richmond c),61 Valicia Bland Bryant o6?S Dee Ann Rucker 7- o66 2Barbara Fay Casner o671Patricia Susan Linhart Savage o663Patricia Pinkerton Coleman 62,-0 Donna Lynn Smith X0664 Ruth Ann Davenport o6.2- Molly Elizabeth Davidson Smith 46 Bonnie Leigh Helmke o682 Shelley Kay Starnes 6Carolyn Anne Mullinnix Hendry o6?3 Lisa Kay Taylor 0667Tina Gay Herod 06 e4 Kathleen Kehr Tevis -) o66gDada D'Ann Hollabaugh c6g5.- Lisa Kay Timmermann 0669Cheryl Ann Holloway 062-6 Brenda Marie Uecker Turnbull 0'6?0Tammye Louise Lay 3 0 6 S'"7 Kelly Kate Ward o6,7 Karen Anne Leach ad, SS Kimberly Ann Williams -7 o 6'72Florence Ann Mokry 6 al Tommie Gay Wright 0 67 3Karen Louise Mulos 0 6 90 Jennifer Lynne Yockey

Health Education Linda Ann Copenhaver Janie Irene Rowell Cara Ann Coreale Joyce Elaine Schmidt Deborah Fay, Dean Melody Dawne Stephenson Ronald Wayne Divin

Industrial Education Douglas Keith Crum Paul Marvin Leftwich John William Fazzino Diana L Liljedahl Joe Luis Gonzalez David Patrick Neil Malcolm Eugene Graham Karen Diane Staeger Glenn Varnell Jones

Physical Education Susan Elaine Adams Tracy Lynn Bucek Pamela Lee Barker 31Iayna Lyn Crow

58 <,LCandidates for Baccalaureate Degrees December 8, 1984 Presented by Dr. Gordon P. Eaton Provost and Vice Presideht for ACademic Affairs

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Dr. Dean C. Corrigan, Dean

Bachelor of Arts Curriculum and Instruction 0611 Hilda DeLeon Connell

Bachelor of Science Curriculum and Instruction 0692. Margaret Bongie Anderson 0734Jana Faye Graves 0613. Deborah Ann Awtry 0145-Shelly Ann Greenberg o;94 Diana Christine Batley 013 Deborah Patton Griffin 06s76- Janet Kay Bailey 09,27Linda Ann Hawley oiSclg Ann Elizabeth Akan- Barnes Debra Lynn Heald c6 Elizabeth Anne Barton 5739Virginia Sue Heilman 06 7 S Belinda Carol Baylis o740Laura Lynn Hendricks *64q Anne Claire Bergeron 074)Karen Anne Hennahene Patricia Lynn Birkner n742Amy Katherine Hill 0'70 I Kelley lean Blachly o743Susan Kay Hill 0 702 Jennie Renee. Blackwood 0'; 44PatriciaMichelleHolmes 0'103 Diane Elizabeth Boswell 0746lana Dunkin Hooper Debra Ann Bower o'? 04 - 0746Shari Rae Templin Horne 0".? ferry Nathan Bowles ? 074 Laura Leigh Hoyle 0'706 Carol Dee Braund Amy Kay Hudgins 0707 Teresa Leurannah Smith Bridges cv7.4.qJoni Kay Hughes o?o3 Renee Brisbots 0'750Karen Marie Hunter 0709 Martha Bess Burch 0'73-1Chnsuanna lacob 0, / 0Tem Faye Burnett 0'75-2Alison Kimberly Smith lohnson 071 / Rebecca Holden Burns 0153Lisa Suzanne Johnson '2Men Gae Burton Elizabeth Terry lones ''?? 3 Pamela Kay Buster 0'755Elizabeth Anne Jordan 07 (4Charlotte Ann.Calhoun 0/5-Karen Renee Kapichinskie o? Lou bf nn Canatella 0757)Jennifer Nan Kelley o? / Kimberly Ann Carter 07SEKtmber Kalisse Kelly 07 /7 lulie Diane Casbeer 07S-9Tricia lean Kelsey ".7')/1? Betsy Mobley Casfeei o76 oKaren Collett' Kibodecur a-719Anna Parrish Chappeil o7 Sally Jean Kirby D Shirley lean Chumchal o161Tammy Lynn Kirk o 21Melissa Evelyn Clark .0763Kimberly Paige Klaus 0? 22 Korey Elise Coleman a 764Mary Kathryn Koonce Cynthia Ann Courtin 0123 o 765"loan Wendler Landes es 024Lynette Erlean Floyd Cross Sally Ann Lane 0 ?2.5-Holly Culver 0961Lisa Catherine LaRocca 0706 Penne Duncan Currell Alison Anne Lee Ramon Ramiro De Lean 0962 0:69Ranie Douglas Lindeman o'728.Karen lune DeMoss -- 090Melissa Jo Lindner 6'7.29Ruthanne Eubank O'n 1Debra Susan Dowell Lohn 0'730Kimberly Alice Evans BeLynda Gaye Lopez 0931 Donna Poliseno Fairbanks 0772 o '213Lisa Gayle Lumley 0-732.Candace Louise Gibbs Mark Allan Lydahl o733Kathleen Marie Glass 0 8775Lori Ann Martin

COPT eitS1

59 O'776 Lisa Irene Maspero oqrsi 08-07 Elizabeth Anne Sauer Avis Ann Matura P23aa`08 Lori Ann Sauer on Donna Ann McCrea an'IR o8-o9 Gwen Rae Schmidt on Anna Meadows °Pio Michelle Maria Sheasley 01a.Marcia Gayle Metcalf rs- Delaine Kay Smith Lauralee Meyer 08I2lalyn Parr Smith .10182Julia Anne Moffat 02 I 3Julie Ann Smith o783Mary Lou Harvey Moore o014Laura Lynn Henley Smith 0'784Laura Ann Morris CSISSharon Smith 0,8)E"Dorothy Lynne Morrison o$16Sandra Lee Staples 0'76'4Jennifer Brewer Morton 081')Cynthia Marie Stevenson Mitzi Lyn Muirhead Kathleen Ann Stribling 088Gaylynn Muller Katherine Renee Svoboda 0-/e9Anna Pettit Nelf 0820Michele Marie Tagliabue -4014 0Lisa Brashears Noble e821Robert Franklin Thomas III qiAlicia Eileen O'Brien o522.Janell Elaine -Tidmore 0792Nancy Ann GMalley 08 23Patty Radell Todd 3Nancy Elizabeth Osburn es 24Catherine Ann Turner 17 04Cheryl! VanWay Ownby 08 15Catherine Marie Vaglica Linda Michele Paar 0$21,Gretchen Gay Vander Wiel &let Lisa LaVone Payne 0821 Connie Boothe Vasquez 0191Lisa Ellen Peters 0cx 2$ Jacqueline Rena Vinson d'74/13Jeffrey Allen Pilchiek 2q Sandra Fay Wagner nnqqMaureen Elizabeth Reap 'o$ SO Sharon Elizabeth Walker 09 etoSheryl Lynn Reeh 011 31 Kim Elizabeth Walters 0801Daurtlyn Reimer 0832 Jennifer Tapp .Walterscheid o 802Sylvia Ann Ringmacher 08 3-2 Georgia Louise Weaver 0863Gloria Contreras Roberts ) o334 Ramona Marie Wilkerson o a-04Robin Elaine Roberts 0 835 Laura Anne Wilson 08.0 6"Jeanne Marie Rod ..., 1111 Lee Woodring e-o6Tana Kay Ryar. Log 11Shelly Suzanne Wylie

Health Education Beth Ann Adoue Blanch Adele Leissner Gregg Alan Barfield Andrea Ruth McCollum James Carroll Brady Selina Ruth Mendieta Jayne Suzanne Muma Clark Karen Jeanette Morris Tern Lyn Davis Rebecca Ann Mullins John Lawrence Downs, fr. Patrick Brian Polk Lydia Suzanne Feltner Denise Renee Popp Amy Denise Gosney Ida Phyllis Robbins Vela Lea Gregory Robin Scot Ryan Dcbney Scales Helms Celeste Marie Swartz Stacy Lee Horn Lisa Sue Thom Mary Linda Howell Susan Kay Ude Mary Elizabeth Jackson Nan Lorraine Wilpitz Judith Sharon Keenmon Beverly Alton= Youdal Tamara Dee Phame Kretsinger

Industrial Education Michael Anthony Ashley Dennis John Moore Dominic John Fazzino. Ir. David O'Brian Shelby Larry Joe McHaney fill Kay Taylor Sandra Kay Miller

Phyaical Education Sharon Dale Atkins Diana Lynne Cooper Lester Hoyle Beaird. Jr. Knsfy Lea Crenshaw Dana Lyn Beasley Laura McIntyre Curtis Rebecca Sue Beck Bryan Francis Dausin Mauri C Bird Stacey Lenora 'Duke Graylyn Camise Boyd Grace Heather (Jimmie: John Michael Canker Linda Gayle Fergus-cm Mary Ellen Cook Kelly Ann Gaffga -9--

6 3

Department of 000 000000000 Educational Curriculum&Instruction 0000000000000 000000 * 000000000000 00 000 0'41: *000r;00010000M yo,.. Texas A&M University '0..00.....0... College Station, Texas

April 22, 1985

Undergraduate Degree Recipients, from the College of Education May 1980 through May 1984

Dear Former Student:

The Department of Educational Curriculum and Instruction at Texas AM University is conducting an assessment of the topics to be included in teacher preparation programs in-Texas. In particular, we are interested in your perceptions regarding the emphasis that should be placed on various topics. Your responses will be carefully considered as modificationsto the current teacher preparation programs at Texas A&M are being made.

Please assist the department with this important assessment bycompleting the enclosed questionnaire and remitting it to us. We estimate it will take approximately 15 minutes to complete. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation.

Sinc

William H. Peters, Head Department of Educational Curriculum & Instruction

WHP:mb

Enclosure

62 D¢partment of 00 '0000000000 Educational Curriculum &InstructiOn 0000000000000 00000 0000000 0 0000 000.000000 Texas A&M University College Station, Texas

April .22, 1985

Undergraduate Degree Recipients from the College of Education May 1980 through May 1984

Dear Former Student:

The Department of Educational Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University is conducting an assessment of the topics to be included in teacher preparation programs in Texas. In particular, we are interested in your perceptions regarding the emphasis that should be placed on various topics. Your responses will be carefully considered as modifications to the current teacher preparationprograms at Texas AM are being mad.

Please assist the department with this importantassessment bycompleting the enclosedquestionnaire and remitting it to us. We estimate it will take approximately 15 minutes to complete. Thank you for your help. A small gift has been includedas a token of appreciation for your invaluable assistiAnce.

-ICtz& William H. Peters, H Department of Educ turriculum & Instr

WHP:mb Farm B Enclosure

63 Department of 00.000000 00000 Educational Curriculum &Instruction 0000000000000 00000 0000000 0 0000 000 000 000 Texas A&M University College Station, Texas

May 15, 1985

Undergraduate Degree Recipients from the College of Education May 1980 through May 1984

Dear Former Student:

Sincewe have not heard from you we are sending a second instrument with the hope that you will assist us in restructuring our teacherpreparation programs. In particular, we are interested in your perceptions regarding the emphasis that should be placed on various topics. Your responses will be carefully considered as modifications to the current teacher preparation programs at Texas AM are being made.

Please assist the department by completing the enclosed questionnaire and remitting it to us. We estimate it will take approximately 15 minutes to complete. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation.

William H. Peters, Head. Department of /Educational Curriculum & Instruction

WHP:mhb

Enclosure Form C

64 Appendix D

(Written Comments)

65 Comments from FollowUp Questionnaire

Class Comments

1981 I teach in an inner city school in Dallas Independent School District. Classroom management is my major concern. The "essential elements" and CH. 75 do not mean much if you do not have control in the classroom.

1981 I think much more emphasis should be put on instructional methods and evaluation. As far as I'm concerned, organization and school management can take a back seat until we get all the new laws figured out. I still think A&M has an excellent teacher preparation program, and I know it will continue in that capacity.

1983 I enjoyed the survey and I hope it does some good for A&M, the future teachers, and the EDCI department.

1980 More emphasis needstobe placed on teaching potential educators realistic classroom management techniques. Teaching how to set up a classroom conducive to learning and how to make smooth transitions is fine, but it doesn't help alot. with children whose behavior is difficult to handle.

1980 In "Perspective" Volume 1, Number 3 Spring 1985, there was an article entitled "Invitational Conference on HB 72". If at all possible, I would like to have a copy of the summary report funded by Texans for quality education. (CommentJ.D.ss, copy of report was sent to this individual)

DOMAIN: Organization & Management of Schools This area is important. However, the future educator needs to be aware of the fact that he/she is being told of organization and management of schools in general. Each school district handles things in much their own way. I am sure you are aware of this, but as a student I remember believing that all schools were run the same way throughout the state with the possible exception of financial status. In my 5 years of teaching I have found this belief to be quite false. C? 1983 I feel that my education at Texas A&M prepared me very well for the teaching profession. The only area in which I felt my education to be quite weak was computer education. A&M did not prepare me well for using computers as teaching ai0.I feel I would have benefited greatly from/A course that acquainted me with some of the many educational programs available. In addition,I wish that I had had suggestions on how to use computers to reinforce and remediate skills in various subject areas.

I would also like to mention one of the strongest points of tJe

7 66 Texas A&M elementary educationprogram. The handson experiences I gained during EDCI 227, the reading practicum, the science course (Dr.Janke) andthe Math course (Dr. Dockweiler) were great!

Overall, I feel the Texas A&M elementary educationprogram is excellent. (I realize that while Iwas at A&M computers were not being used in the classroom as extensivelyas they now are in many districts).

1982 Texas A&M has given me the best educational foundation. I am so appreciative of the strong professional leadership and role models I had the opportunity of receiving duringmy undergraduate years. I was well prepared for the teaching profession because of the standards that A&M deemedimportant.

Please continue as I know you will, -to,produce anddemand excellence in teaching.

I am now working towards an M.ED. at A&M because Ifeel that Texas A &M University will do the best job in preparingme for future roles.

1984 The program in general needs to be made muchmore challenging. The courses I felt challenged inwere not EDCI courses. In general they were quite repetitious and simplistic.

1984 I felt that in the area of specialization of reading Ireceived no instruction in teaching phonics. Phonics is the main method of teaching reading'in the schools whether it is the best method or not. A teacher has to conform to the readingprogram of the district and this program is usually phonics based (at least partially). At least 3 hours of course instruction for all elementary school teachers should be in phonics.

I learned more about phonics at A&M ina linguistics course than in all my reading courses.

I felt the micro teaching segment in EDCIwas helpful. Also, probably the best training I had at A&Mwas in my student teaching . I feel that student teaching shouldcompose one full year of the undergraduate's training with the possibility of changing grade levels at the end of a semester.

1983 Overall, I feel that the EDCI program at A&M preparedme very well for the situations that I face daily in the classroom.

1984 I have found that the methods courses I tookat A&M were very helpful.After speaking to other teachers, I think that A&M prepares teachers for the classroom much better than most other universities. I- wouldn't change a think inthe methods courses.

1982 I'd like to take courses through A&M closerto Columbus. I am aware that a couple of courses can be taken at Katy in the Fall

7 67 and Spring. What about the summer?

1980 We have a set of textbooks we must use.Teach how to use the textbooks and other mandated materials effectively.

1980 Co much emphasis is placedon theory where it needs to be on methodology. First year teachers need to know exactly how to teach the alphabet, writing letters, number concepts--Four years of college did not prepare me for teaching in an inner city school. It seems sometimes experience is the best teacher.

1981 Thank you for taking the time to prepare this document. I believe in the quality of education as it is elicited from responsible individuals. I believe this is the intention of this questionnaire.I am currently working on a career path that will lead me back to education...

I am encouraged.

1984 I believe the A&M College of Education has one of the, if not the, best student teaching programs available--that experience was most valuable!

1984 My training at A&M prepared me well for teaching but lacked in a few areas, i.e. science and social studils instruction. I also think all students rather than just reading specialists should be required to take More than three hours of Reading methods classes. Reading is the core of elementary school curriculum, thus more emphasis should be placed on it in college classes.

1982 Less time should be spent on learning the specifics about theories, of educational psychology and more time on practical 'applications of these theories.Also, classroom management techniques should be stressed.

1982 All items listed have their own importance and need to be covered. However, I think the program needs to have emphasis on the practical points of teaching. More classes where the student (future teacher) goes outto schools and in the classroom and does more teaching under supervision than just the one semester of student teaching. Also more care needs to be taken in explaining all that is involved. Example, I quit teaching because I did not realize the reality of what itwas. So much work with no pay! I am now vicepresident of a management co. I am using my degree, however, because I'm responsible for all training and development manuals in addition to my administrative duties. I can't tell you the /number of people I have come across in the business world with Education degrees that are no longer in the teaching profession. I loved teaching and I loved the kids but I had bills to pay and a standard of living to maintain. I think even education majors should be required to take basic business courses so they are not so ignorant of the business world.

77 68 1983 I am glad to see that you are interested in the opinions of "regular" classroom teachers. Sometimes, administrators and others outside of the classroom lose touch with the activities and requirements. Thank you for your concern!

1980 Ch. 75 has taken away so much of what was formerly left to teacher judgement (i.e. curricular evaluation, materials, sequencing, pace, etc.)Now, you have to know how to stream line paperwork, what to document, etc.

1981 I feel very fortunate to have graduated from A&M.I feel as though I am much more prepared and diversified in my studies. I do feel though, that more emphasis needs to be placed on classroom management & behavioral problems within the classroom.

1984 Do away with the busy work. Incorporate more labs with "hands on" work into the curriculum. Many of my peers were terrified with student teaching because they had had only one "oncampus" class at the sophmore level. Model after the SPED curriculum which gives applicational labs almost every semester.

1984 The only area that I felt I needed more training in before I graduated from the teacher education program was classroom management and discipline. I think that A&M should offer a course devoted only to these subjects and make it a requirement (not elective) of all teacher education students. This is an important area in teaching, and one that needs more emphasis placed on it.

1984 Thank you for the fantastic education I received.

1982 TEA has created extremely low morale in my school this year. I was asked to complete a survey for TEA recently and there was not one question about dealing with children on an emotional level. The best teachers are those who teach an spend time with their children. We have a greater influence on them. TEA is forcing us to do paperwork during class time so that we can get everything done. The good teachers are being pushed out of the profession.

1980 I did not go into a teaching career, though I feel I am a good teacher, because I was not adequately prepared to deal with discipline problems.

1984 I have enjoyed being informedof Texas A&M's education department. The newsletters have been enjoyable and informative.

1980 The Teacher Education Program at TAMU must implement an Early Childhood Degree if it is to be considered a leader in teacher preparation and among the best colleges of education in major universities. Since graduating, I have held numerous preschool/early childhood teacher positions and owned my own preschool. Our society is moving towards a standard of dual career marriages. The children of the6e families need quality education/daycare. TAMU's College of Education must address itself to thisissue and prepare educators to fill a void in the preschool/daycare early.childhood business.

A total program needs to be developed, howeveran early childhood endorsement can be the first step.

1984 I received this questionnaire on May 5, 1985.Please excuse the delay. I feel stress management for teachers is a necessary element which needs to be addressed before graduation.

Also, guidelines for working with parents would be most helpful.

1984 I feel that perhaps some time should be spent in techniques of dealing with gifted and talented kids. So much time is spent with mainstreaming and learning disabled, butnone with the other side of the Coin, and I feel that many ofyour teachers will end up teaching some gifted and talented kids atsome point.

Talking specifically about secondary mathmore andmore practical geometry should be included in the curriculum.

1981 Thank you for assessing these issues and for including the opinion of the EDCI former students of Texas A&M. This type of followup questionnaire helps to maintain the high standards for which Texas A&M is known.

1982 Overall I felt that my education prepared me formy career as a teacher. I have a few suggestions related to the course work. First,the reading curriculum for a reading specializationwas very repetitive. The objectives in each course need to be. correlated with each other. My instructors in these courses (usually graduate students) tended to rely heavilyon the text book.

Second, a course on teaching writing and writing techniques needs to be offered. My language arts class spent a moderate amount of time on the need to include creative witing in the curriculum. I received no training on ways to teaCh structured essays. The TABS test requires that studentSrecognize and respond to different modes of writing.

7,y

70' (second mail out)

1982 After my student teaching through TAMU, I felt confidentto enter the teaching profession. I had an extremely successful first year, and haVe one on to write curriculum for the Spring School District. I brag on the education department at A&M whenever I get the chance!

1980 My main area of weakness after graduation was in teaching reading. I was only required one (or that is all I remember) course since reading was not my specialization. I have since learned so very much through experience, but I highly recommend more required reading courses. Also, more classroom management techniques in dealing with problems would be beneficial. Finally, please warn and prepare your undergraduates about "demanding, negative parents" with whomyou must learn to deal. Teaching in itself is a regarding field, yet thereare many who will try to "drag you down!"

1984 In my year of teaching, I realized that Iwas almost totally unprepared to handle serious discipline problems. Also I was not in a-position where I could help my reading classes because I hadn't had enough reading preparation in college. More reading classes should be required for all elementary teachers.

1981 I feel students in EDCI need much ftsre specializationin useable teaching field topics and much more time in real classroom situations. This would help relating useable subject matter to student needs and curriculum regulations,and help the teacher develop better motivational skills and material information relating skills. Most of all, real classroom time would help to cope with the discipline problems thatare experienced in real teaching situations.

1982 I feel a need has arisen for teachers to be able to recognize signs of abuse. Also how to handle personal problems of students as I know mine have problems not handled at home.

1981 Probably the area in which there is the greatest need for training and preparation is in classroom management, yet h dly any EDCU class addresses it. EDCI 327 discusses this conc rn briefly, but the approach in my classwas one of mostly "side stepping," rather than the teaching of any direct, concrete, practical techniques.

Of course, a new teacher is going to learnsome classroom management just through onthejob experience, but it would be so mush better to go into the job with some solid preparation.

1983 After I started teaching,I felt thatI had received an excellent education in certain areas, but that I lacked in others." For example, the writing of objectivesmay be overly emphasized. I feel very comfortable writing objectives formy classes, but in the area of classroom management Iam learning as I go along. I feel that A&M needs to offer courses with emphasis on classroom management skills and the legal rights of teachers under HB.72. Also, A&M needsto emphasiZe documentation in the areas of classroom management and in eligibility for career ladders.

1980 Summer 2-3 week seminar to meet HB.72 credit for career ladder.

1984 The items I checked as minimal emphasis I feel are based largely on common sense. They should betaught but not extensively. I feel more emphasis should be placed on levels and competency test ng in reading and math. There is also a-. lot of record keepi g (cumulative foldrs.) for each student of which I knew nothi g about. I also 'nea very little about the available materia s usually found i dia center, or available through the scho I budget. I realize this is too specific and varies prom dis rict to district, but I feel it should have been touched upon.

1983 My ratings fo questions #9-43:

Moderate Emphasis shquld be covered in education classes, however, these things are more easily picked up once in the teaching atmosphere.

Substantial Emphasis these- things are needed before teacher (or substitute as my case may be) walks into a classfoom: trying to learn these "as you.go" may be too late.

As a substitute teacher, I strongly support an entire course .of Classroom Management Skills. Also,I feel the duties,tasks, and role of the substitute teacher should be touched upon at some point in the curriculum. I don't remember this:'

1984 ;The student teacher should have experience in filling out test forms, ie: TABS, SRA: and reading those forms. There should be a course in how to" begin and end a school year.This could be done by having teachers come in and talk tot'-e students teachers during seminar hours. It would cut down orthe stress they will suffer their first teaching year.

1982 I appreciate they training I have received from A&M.

19&4 Major emphasis on teaching throw in minor details such as the "first day of school." A

1983 I feel that a lot of these questions were difficult to answer as a lot of these come with experience and lecturing will not 'expose a new teacher to the real class.

1983 I am very glad that you are trying to restructure the teacher education program. It is nice'to know that A&M is trying,,to keep ahead of all the teaching changes. I'm sure other classes will benefit from this. (I sure wish

72 8i that in 1982 we would have had more knowledge of essential elements. -It would have certainly helped thetransition intothe regular classroom.)However, I feel like A&M has an excellent education program.

1980 I feel privileged to have studied at A&M. I feel very well prepared and have had a good five years of teaching. I've also gone on to get /a Masters in reading and have taught at a 19 a junior college.

1984 I do not feelthat I can nswer this questionnaire since I chos not to pursue a teaching career. I do believe that I had enough teaching exper -nce to help you.

1980 So many of above items can only be learned through experience. Such as making out tests and etc. I felt I spent too much in my college classes trying 'to figureut how to write objectives, and every teacher's manual has them listed.

I think more time needs to be spetht talking about how to manage a discipline problem.

Also, I feel very weak when to teaching reading. I was given so many ideas, but never really saw them in practice. I feel many new teachers need someone to tell them how to structure a reading program and then after a couple of years of experience, they can branch out on their own and use their own ideas.

73 Class Comments

1984 I feel TAMU should be very proud of its fine education department. I. think it is the best in the State. I do feel more information about interviewing for jobs should be given to the graduating students.

1984 I want to take this time to say thank you for the excellent job the College of Education does with its students. I have been told by many teachers and administrators, that Texas A&M Education graduates are among the best.That makes me very proud to be an Education graduate of Texas A&M. I was well-prepared for my first year of teaching and it was very successful. Thanks again!

1984 Special Education Department - More emphasis placed on, initiating, carry out, and reviewing behavior management plans.

Educational Psychology -.How to deal with agressive/antisocial behavior.

1984 I am a paralegal and have worked in the litigati,:n field for the past 16 months. There are many times that I need to utilize knowledge acquired in the EdUcation Dept. at A&M.A request has been made ofmeto utilize audio/visual materials in trial preparation. Information can be presented to a jury following the same methods used in the classroom.

I would appreciate it if you could send me some Ed.Tech. information pertaining to equipment, advances, methods, etc. This would be quite helpful to me. Please send this information to me at the following address:

Spivey, Grigg, Kelly & Knisely P. 0. Box 2011 Austin, ,Texas 78768-2011

Thank you.

74.