Jansburgh's and Said: in the World Is Second Only to 1 of the Seven-Year Plan Unveiled Transit Franchise

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jansburgh's and Said: in the World Is Second Only to 1 of the Seven-Year Plan Unveiled Transit Franchise TKt EVENING STAR legislative session are these de- >. i WeMtag—i C., Tossdbi, tmmn IP, IM9 velopments which may set the A-6 Dillon Calls Russians' stage for Integration in two localities next Monday unless MOSCOW the State steps In: Bluff on More i 1. A ruling is scheduled today in Trade by Federal District Judge Wai- £ ..... .y E. Hoffman validity allm NEW ORLEANS. Jan. 27 1 Wanted more credit from the -1 ter on the (AP).-—America's top foreign of Norfolk City Council's reso- Khrushchev Boosts 1 United States, it ought to settle for all trade challenged Rus- lution to cut off funds official ' ite past debts—for example |2.8 sia today to prove it really public school grades above tbe wantt trade. He suggested itt billion still owed for civilian sixth to avoid integration. Os ICBM Production buy unlimited quantities oft goods lend-leaaed during World 2. Charlottesville’s city coun- put itself firmly the line nrwß h(c special guests, Including United States consumer goods » War H. cil on CooUMd rtnt i dred today favoring accept- high military officers, high offl- to “brighten the shabby ex- as the ¦re ¦ hopeless business whm average [ Weald Welcome Trade ance of “a minimum of ; among them several dep- yfl istence of the Soviet Inte- they refer to tbe Soviet cials. gration” uty ministers of foreign affaire, citizen.” Reporting that vast quan- rather than have . fi** Union. public schools closed. city scientists C. Douglas Dillon, Under- ‘ titles of food, clothing, The But he offered no new solu- and others. house- night correspondents secretary of State for Economic school board last com- tlon for the Berlin crisis, ¦ Western re- j hold appliances and other eon- reopening ceived tickets valid only for Affaire said in effect he waa mitted Itself to the major source of East-West fric- to- , sumer goods are available for closed High day’s inaugural session of the calling the bluff of his Kremlin Lane and Venable tion. He said neither East nor ¦ counterpart. Deputy purchase by elementary schools on inte- . Premier r Russia, Mr. Dillon an West Germany can be elimi- conference. grated necessary. optimistic and trade expert Anastas I.¦ said: basis It nated "without touching off a While as to the today ' Mikoyan. “As a matter ot national Council’s action was an world war." future. Mr. Khrushchev warned me! Mikoyan 'American indorsement of the school > that much work lay ahead, Mr. told policy, the United States Oov- Germany unification can be hard businessmen on whirlwind J board's stand. achieved, he said, only through i He called on the Soviet people his -1 eminent would welcome a sig- United States tour that Russia -1 nifleant improvement in Soviet 3. The Arlington School Board negotiations between the two i to; trade but living will seek a postponement to- 1. Catch up with and surpass wanted United States 1 standards, in the hope Germanys. A peace treaty i States trade curbs morrow of Federal Court Judge West Berlin’s i the leadinr capitalist countries that United ¦ that this would serve to put a would "Insure prevented it. He made the : damper on the aggressive and Albert V. Bryan’s order to ad- cityhe » in per capita output. conversion Into s free same argument last week in an » expansionist ambitions of their mit four Negroes to Stratford added. The West has rejected I 2. "Ensure the Soviet Un- with . conference Mr. Communist leaders. ~. Junior High School February 2. triumph peaceful official the Soviet free city proposal I ion’s In the Dillon. “In truth, the only thing Board attorneys will appeal economic competition the l the and wants free elections to i with Wm Rebuffed then. Mr. Mikoyan t Soviet Union needs to do if it to Judge Bryan to put the in- unify Germany. capita list countries.'’ sourly that, “the > really wishes to expand its tegration off next -• ' .. commented until fall. 3. "Strengthen further the k '¦ • y ¦ 1 . i, ¦ ¦ cold Is still on at the State > trade with is, quite simply, Judge Bryan’s order up- Teaaiau might’’ war us. was Blames V. 8. far economic sad defense SOVIET EMPHASIS—Russian Premier Khrushchev (right) waves a Department.” The department t to begin trading. I can think held Friday by the United Mr. Khrushchev blamed the . of the Soviet Union. finger for emphasis during a talk with Hans Kroll (back to camera), labeled his comment “fatuous.” ’ of no more direct way to state States Fourth Circuit Court of States for in the Higher Living West German Ambassador to Russia. The conversation came in Moscow the position of the United Appeals. United tension Standard Silent UntO Today Far East. He declared a zone of a reception marking India’s National Day. Facing the camera is States Government.” Attorney General A. 8. Har- Although he said expansion during peace—-an atom-free tone—- 1 Alfred Zehnder, Swiss Ambassador to Mosqow.—AP Wirephoto via radio Mr. Dillon himself was silent t Mr. Dillon said 900 products rison, Jr., notiflea the Virginia . ot heavy Industry would atlll specific j must be created in the Far East from Moscow. —until today, when he gave de- . require no license for! Supreme Court today the State priority. Mr. Khrushchev k and the entire Pacific Ocean , have J tails in a speech prepared forr sale to Russia and many oth- will seek a rehearing of the promised the Soviet people a I i f Mississippi Valley World I era including machinery, area. i ' T the case in which the court knocked The Premier bad last l substantial rise in the stand..re Trade Council. metals and polio vaccine—have down the massive said : living result of the In resistance night at a diplomatic reception of as a Mr. Dillon said Mr. Mikoyan i recently been licensed for ex- laws against racial mixing in ! > crease in his country’s eco- cial, charged that Washington port that “we want a thaw—to thaw laid down “an absolute precon- • to the Soviet bloc. In fact, the public schools. ,; potentialities, financial Interests so far have, out the cold war.” He added nomic further dition to increased trade” - he said, only 10 per cent of all In a 5-2 decision on Janu- technical progress in all eco Khrushchev Renews been unable to participate in United States should United States goods in for- Deputy Premier Anastas I. that the I ary 19, the Supreme Court held that nomic spheres, and “contin- eign Mikoyan’s trip to the United [ a the slum clearance "because underwrite such trade with a l trade are subject to the the school closure, tuition growth of the produc- embargo - States may have helped. uous of a lack of any definite or long-term credit. on war potential! grant, and fund cut-off laws tivity of labor.” Russia, In his speech before the con- socialist Mikoyan Plea Thaw dear plans” for carrying the Mr. Dillon described this as s items to were unconstitutional. The The Soviet people, he said. for gress, Mr. Khrushchev said Mr. program forward. ridiculous. Here, he said, was s Mr. Dillon said nobody could court held, too, the constitu- ' have "such summits’’ expect Mikoyan’s visit showed senti- reached MOSCOW. Jan. 27 (AP).—Soviet Premier Khrushchev told j He referred specifically to the the world's No. 2 economic : i the United States tot tional requirement for the Gen- that they now have the chance ; a diplomatic reception last night: “We want a thaw—to thaw I Southwest, urging that the pro- power asking for trade on the ?provide Russia “with ment for good neighborly rela- important r the! eral Assembly to maintain an growing j enter a “new. out the cold war.” He said Anastas I. Mikoyan’s trip to the • gram there be solidified. same basis as an underdevel- sinews of war while its policies public sys- tions is in the United periodto. development, 1 ¦ efficient free school reported [ of the United States may have helped. [ Mr. Weinberg said the urban , oped country. menaee our own and other free States. The Premier period of extensive building j tem throughout the State still that Soviet trade with the \ of[ Spirited and ebullient on the eve of the 21st Communist I I renewal effort has been too i Meanwhile, instead of work- • world countries." ; society." Soviet living stand- was alive. United States and Europe Communist Party Congress, Mr. Khrushchev made an off-the-cuff talk at t.'complex and that there has ing to raise ; In the political field he called the celebration here of India's. ibeen too slow correlation of the' jarda, Mr. Dillon aald, Russia Edict Due Today trebled from 1990 to 1950. He : for consolidation f further of world ‘further of 1 national day. He said the re- military bases around the So- . actions of public agencies. has made extensive credits said extension the socialist system, the might Judge Hoffman promised a help 1 Soviet port on the United States from viet Union as well as the So- Asked what be done, J1 available In a trade-aid drive trade could ease interna- unity and solidarity of the ¦ Gen. Welling replied: and eventually VIRGINIA ruling today in the Nor- tension. ; his No. 2 man gave him “the viet claim that “w« have plenty r “to penetrate’ the tional Soviet people, development of I “We’re all in this thing to- capture, the newly developing ! Continued From First Page folk case. If he throws out s ma- ¦ idea that there is no excluded of roeketa in position.” plan—and Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Kabul Times Digitized Newspaper Archives
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Kabul Times Digitized Newspaper Archives 9-12-1962 Kabul Times (September 12, 1962, vol. 1, no. 155) Bakhtar News Agency Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/kabultimes Part of the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bakhtar News Agency, "Kabul Times (September 12, 1962, vol. 1, no. 155)" (1962). Kabul Times. 153. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/kabultimes/153 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Newspaper Archives at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kabul Times by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. - , - > • -~ ....... , 1 •• " , '. -:- ~.-'-- '-':'....,....~ - . ~ ... -' .., ...... ~4 ~ ,:",.:~ ":S~'" . .' . :\. - 4 •• :-_ _- - '. .- :.. -r: 'S._ ""__'" _ _ - _-_ k ,- ~ • ¢ • - • '. -~•• . j -.-- ~:... :.,--.- .-' .. '. .... ' .. .- . - •- j"-- - -" . ~ " .' ,. l .I' , - .. .' ., .' .' .I .:1tABUL mas··_, '- ·"'M4iJmum· +28°Co , Minimum +l%°C. (;on1~oli~e~lth Pr~miers. KennrAly'~:r .Sun.sets ~ at s:ZO 'p.m. Piess .'.Review· With . SuD rises- toJDorrow- at 5-36 a.m. ~ " ; . ~ ~~- "~" ~-.:r'.'_:::-~ ~ -::~. ~ .~-:;~'.' . ~(CoDtd. trom PaCe·!) ., :·.Briefea~·On···r~·Brussels.·~Tcdks· ·:(~Af~~'fd~~i'Ke~~ y;:~ ~ .. o .' '. • "'./ - ::",-." :'.""'" :._ •••• i''''J o:--t:- '.:", .•. ",- • CIw'; 4..::. _. 'Jt·. ., -' .'_ ,- , ~'--:.-cians· ~t t~rday: usse ~hthe. ~iepu~~: .... .-. ': .... :.... ~.:~ '...':; .:·::':·.·.-.·:::::~·.~·r ~. '.~:--': ~ .:":.' ". -~... ~.-.:-.::.:;. ,~~ .'~~'A'r+! ± _~n:;~l·:;:~~"'!:: ~:: ~::~~ .~ should'reveal the. f.acts: '. - '0',7 , U.K' "1 < Et< ". " '," t' 'C M' .' m:: ·d ' .... The -same issue of the . paper· . n· '. "5 ntry' no' SIOns m ~rlin Wl .~. • L.':'~'!"·""'·liiIiiil·IIit!oo"';"~""~~ VOL- 1,. NO.. 155 WEDNESD~~:, .S~.~~ (SOMBpLElr~21;' ~: ~ :" { carries ~ report'abOut the Woollen:.· .' '" .....•. ..." :'. .' ., •...• ".can pred~cessor. MJ::. E~nhower.
    [Show full text]
  • Christoph Brüll Belgien Im Nachkriegsdeutschland Besatzung, Annäherung, Ausgleich (1944–1958)
    Christoph Brüll Belgien im Nachkriegsdeutschland Besatzung, Annäherung, Ausgleich (1944–1958) Christoph Brüll Belgien im Nachkriegsdeutschland Besatzung, Annäherung, Ausgleich (1944–1958) Die Titelabbildung zeigt [???] Zugl. Diss. Phil., Universität Jena, 2008 1. Auflage [??? November 2009] Satz und Gestaltung: Klartext Medienwerkstatt GmbH, Essen Umschlaggestaltung: Volker Pecher, Essen Druck und Bindung: Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar © Klartext Verlag, Essen 2009 ISBN 978-3-8375-0252-7 Alle Rechte vorbehalten www.klartext-verlag.de Inhalt Einleitung . 7 Teil I Eine belgische Präsenzpolitik im besetzten Deutschland 1. Die letzten Kriegsmonate . 25 1.1 Belgische Pläne für ein Nachkriegseuropa mit dem Fokus auf der Zukunft Deutschlands . 25 1.2 Schritte zur Konkretisierung: auf dem Weg zum Eden-Spaak Abkommen vom November 1944 . 37 1.3 Die belgische Beteiligung an der Besetzung Deutschlands . 44 2. Die Reparationsfrage (1945–1947) . 57 3. Die militärische Präsenzpolitik im besetzten Deutschland . 99 3.1 Eine belgische Unterbesatzungszone in der britischen Besatzungszone . 99 3.2 Die Besatzungsarmee als Garant der belgischen Interessen in Deutschland . 116 4. Die belgischen Reparationsforderungen in der Diskussion von Diplomaten und Grenzbevölkerung . 151 4.1 Die Alliierten und die belgischen Forderungen . 151 4.2 An der Grenze . 165 5. Um die deutsche Westgrenze (1948–1949) . 185 5.1 Die Pariser Besprechungen . 185 5.2 Diskussionen an und um die deutsche Westgrenze . 192 5.3 Entscheidungen im Westen . 214 5.4 Die Auftragsverwaltung in den »übertragenen Gebieten« . 234 6. Fazit . 247 Teil II: Die »Europäisierung« der deutsch-belgischen Beziehungen 1. Belgiens Platz im neuen Besatzungsstatut . 255 1.1 Truppenstatut, bilaterale Abkommen, Stationierungsverträge . 255 1.2 Von der »Belgischen Besatzungsarmee« zu den »Belgischen Streitkräften in Deutschland« .
    [Show full text]
  • I TURKEY and the RESCUE of JEWS DURING the NAZI ERA: a RE-APPRAISAL of TWO CASES; GERMAN-JEWISH SCIENTISTS in TURKEY & TURKISH JEWS in OCCUPIED FRANCE
    TURKEY AND THE RESCUE OF JEWS DURING THE NAZI ERA: A REAPPRAISAL OF TWO CASES; GERMAN-JEWISH SCIENTISTS IN TURKEY & TURKISH JEWS IN OCCUPIED FRANCE by I. Izzet Bahar B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 1974 M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering, Bosphorus University, Istanbul, 1977 M.A. in Religious Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Art and Sciences in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cooperative Program in Religion University of Pittsburgh 2012 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by I. Izzet Bahar It was defended on March 26, 2012 And approved by Clark Chilson, PhD, Assistant Professor, Religious Studies Seymour Drescher, PhD, University Professor, History Pınar Emiralioglu, PhD, Assistant Professor, History Alexander Orbach, PhD, Associate Professor, Religious Studies Adam Shear, PhD, Associate Professor, Religious Studies Dissertation Advisor: Adam Shear, PhD, Associate Professor, Religious Studies ii Copyright © by I. Izzet Bahar 2012 iii TURKEY AND THE RESCUE OF JEWS DURING THE NAZI ERA: A RE-APPRAISAL OF TWO CASES; GERMAN-JEWISH SCIENTISTS IN TURKEY & TURKISH JEWS IN OCCUPIED FRANCE I. Izzet Bahar, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 This study aims to investigate in depth two incidents that have been widely presented in literature as examples of the humanitarian and compassionate Turkish Republic lending her helping hand to Jewish people who had fallen into difficult, even life threatening, conditions under the racist policies of the Nazi German regime. The first incident involved recruiting more than one hundred Jewish scientists and skilled technical personnel from German-controlled Europe for the purpose of reforming outdated academia in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Kordula Kühlem: „Burgfrieden“: Die Bedeutung Und Verwendung Des Begriffs Zwischen Bonn Und Moskau 1958–1963, In
    „Burgfrieden“: Die Bedeutung und Verwendung des Begriffs zwischen Bonn und Moskau 1958–1963 Von Kordula Kühlem „Burgfrieden“ ist immer noch ein vielgebrauchter Begriff, der in der Gegen- wart sowohl in der Innen- wie Außenpolitik als auch im Bereich des Sports benutzt wird. Seit seiner Schöpfung im Mittelalter bezeichnet der prinzipiell positiv konnotierte Terminus dabei den freiwilligen Frieden der Bürger unter- einander. Eine Renaissance erlebte der Begriff im 20. Jahrhundert; für das bei Aus- bruch des Ersten Weltkriegs viel beschworene deutsche Einheitsgefühl bürger- te sich das „Schlagwort ‚Burgfrieden‘“1 ein. Doch das Schlagwort hielt nicht, was sich viele nach dem Aufruf des Kaisers oder der gemeinsamen Bewilli- gung der Kriegskredite versprochen hatten. Schon Zeitgenossen urteilten ne- gativ; der Historiker Arthur Rosenberg kam sogar zu dem vernichtenden Vo- tum: „Mit Hilfe von Zensur und Belagerungszustand konnte die Regierung jede politische Meinungsäußerung im Volke unterdrücken. Das war der deut- sche Burgfrieden von 1914.“2 Der freiwillige Aspekt fehlte bei der Verordnung von Reichspräsident Hin- denburg „zur Sicherung des inneren Friedens“3 vom Juli 1932 vollkommen. Es war ein Verbot politischer Versammlungen von Staatsseite. Trotzdem wurde es von der Regierung eine „Verordnung über einen Burgfrieden“4 genannt, offen- sichtlich in dem Bemühen um eine positive Grundhaltung gegenüber dem Ge- bot. Gut ein Vierteljahrhundert später, nach Krieg und Zusammenbruch, wurde in Westdeutschland als Reaktion auf das Berlin-Ultimatum Chruschtschows vom 27. November 1958 die Forderung laut, die Parteien sollten „angesichts der sowjetischen Bedrohung einen Burgfrieden schließen“5. Doch ein Schulterschluss der Parteien kam nicht zustande. Bundeskanzler Konrad Adenauer bemühte sich vor allem intensiv um eine Abstimmung mit den westlichen Alliierten.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories and Methods in Japanese Studies: Current State and Future Developments
    Hans Dieter Ölschleger (ed.) Theories and Methods in Japanese Studies: Current State and Future Developments Papers in Honor of Josef Kreiner V&R unipress Bonn University Press Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.des abrufbar. ISBN 978-3-89971-355-8 Veröffentlichungen der Bonn University Press erscheinen im Verlag V&R unipress GmbH. © 2008, V&R unipress in Göttingen / www.vr-unipress.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen bedarf der vorherigen schriftlichen Einwilligung des Verlages. Hinweis zu § 52a UrhG: Weder das Werk noch seine Teile dürfen ohne vorherige schriftliche Einwilligung des Verlages öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden. Dies gilt auch bei einer entsprechenden Nutzung für Lehr- und Unterrichtszwecke. Printed in Germany. Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Table of Contents PREFACE...........................................................................................................7 Ronald DORE Japan – Sixty Years of Modernization? .........................................................11 KUWAYAMA Takami Japanese Anthropology and Folklore Studies................................................25 ITŌ Abito The Distinctiveness and Marginality of Japanese Culture.............................43 FUKUTA AJIO
    [Show full text]
  • The Uneasy Relatıonshıp Turkey's Foreign Policy Toyvards the Sovıet Unıon at the out Bre Ak of the Second World War
    THE UNEASY RELATıONSHıP TURKEY'S FOREIGN POLICY TOYVARDS THE SOVıET UNıON AT THE OUT BRE AK OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR YÜCEL GÜÇLÜ Aftcr the Lausanne Peace Treaty of 24 July 1923, Turkey followed a policy aiming consciously at peace and co-operation with ali nations. The whole purpose of the country presupposed a long period of tranquillity, without which its far-reaching plans for development and reform would have been meaningless. It was natural that at this period Republican Turkey and Soviet Russia should be attractcd towards each other. Each was striving for freedom from foreign shackles, and each was faced with formidable programmes of internal transformation. It was one of the majör tenets of Soviet foreign policy at the time to cultivate Turkey's good will and understanding, in order to show the exploited nations of Asia that Moscow was their only and true friend. Furthcrmore, Turkish friendship carricd with it promise of an advantageous accommodation in the Straits, in case of war with the Wcst a consideration which no Russian governmcnt could disregard.1 1 See Cumhuriyetin İlk On Yılı ve Balkan Paktı: 1923-1934 (The First Ten Years of the Republic and the Balkan Pact: 1923-1934), Publication of the Directorate General of Research and Policy Planning, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Ankara, 1973, pp. 10-34. 106 THETURKıSH YEARBOOK [VOL. xxvnı A close friendship united new Turkey with the Soviet Union. After achieving its complete independence, and while fully preserving it, Turkey observed neutrality between the Soviet Union and the Western powers. Without damaging its friendship towards Moscow, it also kept open ali ways leading to the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Germany and the Arab World
    Nazi Germany and the Arab World This book considers the evolving strategic interests and foreign policy intent of the Third Reich toward the Arabic-speaking world, from Hitler’s assumption of power in January 1933 to 1944, a year following the final Axis defeat in and expulsion from North Africa in May 1943. It does so within the context of two central, interconnected issues in the larger history of National Socialism and the Third Reich, namely Nazi geopolitical interests and ambitions and the regime’s racial ideology and policy. This book defines the relatively limited geopolitical interests of Nazi Germany in the Middle East and North Africa within the context of its relationships with the other European great powers and its policies with regard to the Arabs and Jews who lived in those areas. francis r. nicosia is Professor of History and the Raul Hilberg Distinguished Professor of Holocaust Studies at the University of Vermont. He is the author of Zionism and Anti-Semitism in Nazi Germany (Cambridge, 2008); the coeditor of Jewish Life in Nazi Germany: Dilemmas and Responses (2010); and the coauthor of The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust (2000). Nicosia was a Revson Fellow at the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum from 2000 to 2001 and a Senior Fulbright Research Scholar in Berlin from 1992 to 1993 and from 2006 to 2007. He received the Carnegie Foundation’s Vermont Professor of the Year award in 2000 and the Holocaust Educational Foundation’s Distinguished Achievement Award in 2014. Nazi Germany and the Arab World FRANCIS R.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Foreign Policy As Regards the Soviet Union at the Outbreak of the Second World War
    THE UNEASYRELATIONSHIP: TURKEY'S FOREIGN POLICY AS REGARDS THE SOVIET UNION AT THE OUTBREAK OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR YÜCEL GÜÇLÜ Historically, Turkey and the Straits have occupied a central position in Russian planning for war. The simple reason for this was that Turkey, as custodian of the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, could open Russia's only exit to warm waters and conversely, prevent hostile powers from attacking it in the rear through the Black Sea. Russia has always begrudged Turkey its sovereignty over the Straits. Since the late eighteenth century, when the Turks and the Russians fought for control of the Straits, the threat of a Russian take-over of this strategic arca has always been foremost among the preoccupations of Turkey's diplomats. This was particularly true in the years before, during and after the Second World War, when a determination to maintain sovereignty over the Straits became one of the guiding factors of Turkey's cautious foreign policy. The main topic of discussion of this paper is concerned with the uneasy relationship between Turkey and its big northern neighbour created by Moscow's ambitions on the Straits at the outbreak of the Second World War. The question of the Straits dates essentially from 1774 when Russia won commercial access to the waterway — a right later extended to other powers. But the Straits remained closed to non-Turkish warships according to the "ancient rule" of the Ottoman Empire which continued to be the law undl the end of the First World War. The war brought the Straits an entirely new status.
    [Show full text]
  • German Historical Institute London Bulletin Vol 32 (2010), No. 1
    German Historical Institute London Bulletin Volume XXXII, No. 1 May 2010 CONTENTS Article Imperialism and Globalization: Entanglements and Interactions between the British and German Colonial Empires in Africa before the First World War (Ulrike Lindner) 4 Review Articles Micro Views of National History: Local and Regional Dimen- sions of the End of the Old Reich in 1806 (Torsten Riotte) 29 Hans-Ulrich Wehler’s Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte (A. J. Nicholls) 38 Book Reviews Klaus Herbers and Nikolas Jaspert (eds.), Grenzräume und Grenzüberschreitungen im Vergleich: Der Osten und der Westen des mittelalterlichen Lateineuropa (Andrew Jotischky) 55 Peter D. Clarke, The Interdict in the Thirteenth Century: A Question of Collective Guilt (Christoph T. Maier) 60 Nicholas Edward Morton, The Teutonic Knights in the Holy Land 1190–1291 (Kristjan Toomaspoeg) 63 Simon Phillips, The Prior of the Knights Hospitaller in Late Medieval England (Jyri Hasecker) 69 Beat Kümin, Drinking Matters: Public Houses and Social Exchange in Early Modern Central Europe (Martin Scheutz) 75 (cont.) Contents Peter H. Wilson, Europe’s Tragedy: A History of the Thirty Years War (Georg Schmidt) 82 Stefan Kroll, Soldaten im 18. Jahrhundert zwischen Friedens- alltag und Kriegserfahrung: Lebenswelten und Kultur in der kursächsischen Armee 1728–1796 (Robert I. Frost) 86 Hubertus Büschel, Untertanenliebe: Der Kult um deutsche Mon archen 1770–1830 (Tim Blanning) 92 Heinz Duchhardt, Stein: Eine Biographie (Christopher M. Clark) 94 Michele Gillespie and Robert Beachy (eds.), Pious Pursuits: German Moravians in the Atlantic World (Gisela Mettele) 98 Warren Rosenblum, Beyond the Prison Gates: Punishment and Welfare in Germany, 1850–1933 (Beate Althammer) 101 Klaus Nathaus, Organisierte Geselligkeit: Deutsche und britische Vereine im 19.
    [Show full text]
  • B~R ALMAN D~PLOMATIN TÜRK~YE ANILARI 237 Istikametine Ilerlemeleri Gerekti~Ini Tekrarlad~
    Çeviriler: B~R ALMAN D~ PLOMATIN TÜRK~YE ANILARI (1936-1943) Yazar: HANS KROLL Çeviren: PULAT TACAR Çevirenin Önsözii ~kinci Dünya Sava~~~ döneminde Türkiye'nin d~~~ politikas~~ konusu çok say~da diplomat ve siyasetçinin an~lar~nda ele al~nm~~t~r. Dönemi inceleyen tarihçiler, politikac~lar ve akademisyenler, Türk devlet adamlar~n~n sava~~ d~~~nda kalma becerisini ço~u kez överek irdelemi~lerdir~ . 1936-1943 y~llar~~ aras~nda Ankara'daki Alman Büyükelçili~inde Müste~ar, ~~güder, Elçi un- yanlar~~ ile görev yapan Hans Kroll'un o dönemi de içeren an~lar~~ bugüne kadar dilimize aktar~lmam~~t~. Konu ile ilgili kapsamh ara~t~rmalarda Hans Kroll'un an~lar~na pek de~inilmedi~ini gözlemledim. Örne~in en kapsaml~~ incelemelerden biri say~lan ve Nisan 2010'da dilimize de kazand~r~lm~~~ bulunan Zehra Önder'in a~a~~da dipnotta de~inilen kitab~nda geni~~ bir kaynak ve literatür listesi bulunmas~na ra~men, Hans Kroll'un an~lar~ndan bahis yoktur. An~lan, Hans Kroll'un, 1941 y~l~nda Berlin'de kat~ld~~~~ bir toplant~da Türkiye hakk~nda olumsuz ifadelerde bulunan D~~i~leri Bakan~~ Ribben- trop'a, kendisinden farkl~~ dü~ündü~ünü herkesin önünde aç~ kça söyleye- cek derecede sözünü esirgemeyen bir ki~ili~e sahip bulundu~unu gösteri- yor. Berlin'e yazd~~~~ baz~~ raporlardaki de~erlendirmeleri D~~i~leri Bakan~- n~n ho~una gitmedi~i için merkezde kendisini tan~yanlar tarafindan uyar~- l~yor. Hans Kroll, bizzat belirtti~i gibi, görü~ünü aç~kça savunmaktan geri durmad~~~~ için ad~~ "kavgac~ya" ç~km~~~ olan, çok dikkatli, ama gerekti~inde temkinli, diplomasi sanat~n~n tüm gereklerini yerine getirmesini bilen, üs- tün kaliteli bir diplomatt~r.
    [Show full text]
  • Gromyko, Khrushchev, and Gomulka) on the International Situation, N.D
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified October 01, 1961 Rough Notes from a Conversation (Gromyko, Khrushchev, and Gomulka) on the International Situation, n.d. [October 1961] Citation: “Rough Notes from a Conversation (Gromyko, Khrushchev, and Gomulka) on the International Situation, n.d. [October 1961],” October 01, 1961, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, AAN, KC PZPR, p. 115, t. 39, pp. 318-23. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112004 Summary: Original Language: Polish Contents: English Translation Comrade Gromyko: In talks with [U.S. Secretary of State Dean] Rusk, [U.K. Foreign Minister Lord Alec] Home, [U.S. President John F.] Kennedy and [U.K. Prime Minister Harold] Macmillan, it struck me above all else how they conducted them in a friendly tone, which has not always been the case. We concluded that they are trying to find ways to achieve an understanding on the question of Germany and West Berlin. During the exchange of views, every major issue was touched upon. Nevertheless, it was stressed in the conversations that this is only a preliminary exchange of views before official talks. From the very beginning, Rusk 1 , Macmillan and Kennedy declared that we should discuss on the basis of the actual situation what would be acceptable to the Western countries. It has to do with access to West Berlin. Rusk emphasized that we should guarantee free access to West Berlin. We utilized Comrade Khrushchev's discussion with [Belgian Premier Paul-Henri] Spaak2 and tried to justify ourselves by emphasizing that the GDR and the USSR have declared that they will respect the general order of the people of West Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin & the Origins of Detente
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Berlin & the Origins of Detente: multilateral & bilateral negotiations in the Berlin Crisis, 1958-1963 Richard Dean Williamson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Williamson, Richard Dean, "Berlin & the Origins of Detente: multilateral & bilateral negotiations in the Berlin Crisis, 1958-1963" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3908. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3908 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BERLIN & THE ORIGINS OF DETENTE: MULTILATERAL & BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS IN THE BERLIN CRISIS, 1958-1963 A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Richard D. Williamson B.A., University of New Orleans, 1990 M.F.A. University of New Orleans, 1993 M.A, University of New Orleans, 2006 December 2010 Preface I became interested in a longer range interpretation of the Berlin crisis while researching a seminar paper for Dr. Guenter Bischof at the University of New Orleans. I was familiar with the Wall and the Airlift, but hadn‟t understood that the crisis began in 1958 with Nikita Khrushchev‟s demands for a „free city‟ (without Western troops) and a German peace treaty.
    [Show full text]