DOCSLIB.ORG

Traffic and Transportation Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traffic and Transportation Management Plan Traffic and Transportation Management Plan FERC Docket No. CP09-54-000 July 2010 RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Traffic Impacts ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Pipeline Road Crossings .......................................................... 1-3 1.1.2 Construction Traffic .................................................................. 1-4 1.1.3 Noxious Weeds ...................................................................... 1-10 1.1.4 Dust Control ............................................................................ 1-10 1.1.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................. 1-11 1.1.6 National Conservation Areas .................................................. 1-11 1.2 Traffic Analysis .................................................................................. 1-12 2.0 Transportation Related to Construction Worker Housing and Access Roads on the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge ........................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Vya Construction Camp ............................................................ 2-1 2.2 Lakeview Lodging Facility ......................................................... 2-3 3.0 References ............................................................................... 3-1 Attachment A: Access Roads .............................................................. A-1 Attachment B: Construction Spreads ............................................. B-1 July 2010 i RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN List of Tables Table Page Table 1.1-1 Permits Relating to Roads Associated with the Ruby Pipeline Project .......................................................................................................... 1-2 Table 1.1-2 Summary of Ruby Pipeline’s Road and Railroad Crossings .......................... 1-4 Table 1.1-3 BLM Surprise Field Office Requirements for Access Road Reclamation .................................................................................................. 1-7 Table 1.1-4 Permanent Access Roads .......................................................................... 1-10 Table 1.2-1 Analysis of Relationship Between the Existing Road Network and Proposed Ruby Pipeline Construction Traffic Based on Compressor Stations, Construction Yards, and Storage/Staging Yards.* .............................................................................. 1-13 Table A-1. Access Roads for the Ruby Pipeline Project .......................................................... A-2 List of Figures Figure Page Figure B-1 Construction Spreads: Contractor Construction and Storage/Staging Yards .................................................................................. B-2 July 2010 ii RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN List of Abbreviations and Acronyms AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic BLM Bureau of Land Management CR County Road CS compressor station CY construction yard DOT Department of Transportation FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FWNF Fremont-Winema National Forest Hwy Highway I Interstate MP milepost mph miles per hour NCA National Conservation Area NDOW Nevada Department of Wildlife NV DOT Nevada Department of Transportation ODFW Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife OR DOT Oregon Department of Transportation Project Ruby Pipeline Project ROW right-of-way Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation RFCYP Route from Construction Yard to Pipeline RFVCP Route from Vya Camp to Pipeline RTCY Route to Construction Yard RTVC Route to Vya Camp Ruby Ruby Pipeline, LLC SR State Route Traffic Plan Traffic and Transportation Management Plan USDA-NRCS United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service USFS United States Forest Service UT DOT Utah Department of Transportation UDWR Utah Division of Wildlife Resources WGFD Wyoming Game and Fish Department WY DOT Wyoming Department of Transportation July 2010 iii RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 1.0 Introduction The Ruby Pipeline Project (Project), proposed by Ruby Pipeline, LLC (Ruby), is comprised of approximately 675.2 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas pipeline, along with associated compression and measurement facilities, located between Opal, Wyoming and Malin, Oregon. An approximate 2.6-mile lateral would also be constructed north to the Malin Hub in Klamath County, Oregon. The pipeline right-of- way (ROW) would cross four states: Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon. Four new compressor stations (Roberson Creek, Wildcat Hills, Wieland Flat, and Desert Valley) would be installed as part of the Project. The pipeline would also tie in to one existing compressor station: the King Compressor Station in Wyoming. The purpose of this Traffic and Transportation Management Plan (Traffic Plan) is to: • Describe how Ruby will use, improve, and maintain roads for construction of the Project; and • Evaluate potential impacts of construction traffic ingress and egress at contractor yards, storage/staging yards, and compressor stations. The Traffic Plan also describes how Ruby would implement equipment access to and from the ROW, drainage improvement procedures, dust control and maintenance measures, and, if required, reclamation and abandonment of roads. 1.1 Traffic Impacts The road network in Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon in the vicinity of the Project area is a rural system generally characterized by paved two-lane state roads and by unpaved roads managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), as well as county and private roads. There would be temporary impacts to these roads due to pipeline crossings and construction traffic. These impacts would be within the bounds of approval by federal agencies, local permits, and guidelines, and as permitted by local landowners. Permits relating to roads associated with the Ruby Project are listed in Table 1.1-1. At completion of the Project, Ruby would restore all roads back to their original status, unless Ruby is directed otherwise in writing by the landowner or land management agency. July 2010 1-1 RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 1.1-1 Permits Relating to Roads Associated with the Ruby Pipeline Project COUNTY, STATE REQUIREMENTS WYOMING Lincoln County Lincoln County Engineering & There are no specific weight, height, or length Surveying Ross Turner - County restrictions at the county level. Only state standards Engineer apply (see WYDOT below). Uinta County Uinta County Public Works County would like to be informed in advance of what AJ Barker roads will be accessed. A few roads and bridges may incur restrictions. There are no published weight, height, or length conditions. State of Wyoming WY DOT Office of Overweight Height: 14' max (with permit max is 17') Loads Width: 8'6" max (with permit max is 18') Kim Moore, Permits Length: 81' (with permit max is 110') Weight: 117,000 lbs. (with permit max is 150,000 lbs.) UTAH Rich County Rich County Planning Commission Encroachment Permit. This will cover moving Al Harrison equipment across roads and for any necessary re- grading of roads. Ray Lutz, County Road Supervisor Regarding length, weight, and height restrictions, there are restrictions on bridges. Wooden bridges with weight restrictions of 10 to 25 tons. Notify County Roads before using bridges. Cache County Cache County Planning Over-length, weight, and height permits: the standards Lynn Lemon, County Administrator, depend on what roads are used. and Josh Runhaar, Dir. Of Dev. Services Box Elder County No road use permits required State of Utah Department of Transportation ROW Encroachment Permit Application (by Tommy Vigil, ROW Control contractor), the ROW Encroachment Permit will cover Supervisor any necessary road crossings (for moving equipment). NEVADA Elko County Elko County Planning and Zoning Public ROW Encroachment Permit Commission Scott (Randy) Brown. July 2010 1-2 RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 1.1-1 Permits Relating to Roads Associated with the Ruby Pipeline Project COUNTY, STATE REQUIREMENTS Humboldt County Humboldt County Road Department County wants to see Transportation Plan for moving of (775) 623-6416 or (775) 623-6475 equipment and pipe. Also wants to be informed where any equipment and potential pipe storage yards will be located. Washoe County Nevada Department of Right-of-way Occupancy Permit Application Transportation Temporary Right-of-way Occupancy Permit Application Jim Aagard & J.P. Marden Underground Installation standards and requirements. And Washoe County Public Works Department, (775) 328-2040 State of Nevada Nevada Department of Permanent Encroachment/Right-of-Way permits are Transportation required for crossing state and U.S. highways. OREGON Lake County Lake County Planning Commission If crossing county roads a ROW permit is required Rick DuMileu, Lake County Road Master Klamath County Klamath County Public Works All road permits will be issued through the Public Stan Strickland, Director Works Office after Public Hearings take place. Requires stamped engineering plans detailing crossing and updated digital shape file. Key: ROW = Right-of-Way
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised January 19, 2018 Updated June 19, 2018
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION / BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC WILDLIFE YUBA PROJECT YUBA RIVER RANGER DISTRICT TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST REVISED JANUARY 19, 2018 UPDATED JUNE 19, 2018 PREPARED BY: MARILYN TIERNEY DISTRICT WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 II. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 4 III. CONSULTATION TO DATE ...................................................................................................... 4 IV. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............................................................................... 5 V. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES ......................... 6 VI. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES, AND DETERMINATION ......................................................................... 41 SPECIES-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION ........................................................... 54 TERRESTRIAL SPECIES ........................................................................................................................ 55 WESTERN BUMBLE BEE ............................................................................................................. 55 BALD EAGLE ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • October 3, 2013 Minutes
    MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF CHURCHILL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 155 No. Taylor Street, Fallon, NV Fallon, Nevada October 3, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Churchill County Board of Commissioners was called to order at 8: 15 a.m. on the above date by Chairman Erquiaga. PRESENT: Carl Erquiaga, Chairman Pete Olsen, Vice-Chair Harry Scharmann, Commissioner Ben Shawcroft, Civil Deputy District Attorney Wade Carner, Civil Deputy District Attorney Eleanor Lockwood, County Manager Alan Kalt, Comptroller Kelly G. Helton, Clerk of the Board Pamela D. Moore, Deputy Clerk of the Board ABSENT: N/A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by the board and public. VERIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA: It was verified by Deputy Clerk Moore that the Agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with NRS 241 . ACTION ITEMS: AGENDA: Commissioner Scharmann made a motion to approve the Agenda as submitted. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. MINUTES: Commissioner Olsen made a motion to approve the Minutes of the special meeting held on September 26, 2011; the regular meeting held on September 5, 2013; and the regular meeting held on September 18, 2013 as submitted. Commissioner Scharmann seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. PUBLIC COMMENTS : Chairman Erquiaga inquired if there were any public comments on issues that were not listed on the Agenda. Michelle Ippolito said she is here as President of the Fallon Animal Welfare Group. She had a prepared handout that explained more about what she is talking about today, which was distributed to the board and public and which included a brochure for the group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.5 Highway Financial Matters
    CTC Financial Vote List April 9-10, 2008 2.5 Highway Financial Matters Project # Allocation Amount Budget Year State County Item # Federal Dist-Co-Rte Location EA Program Postmile Project Description Program Codes Total Amount 2.5a. District Minor Projects Resolution FP-07-63 1 $943,000 In Bakersfield, from south of State Route 119 to north of 7th 0H4001 2007-08 Standard Road. Outcome/Outputs: Install microwave vehicle 302-0042 $943,000 Kern detection systems at 20 locations to monitor traffic congestion, SHOPP 20.20.201.315 06S-Ker-99 analyze traffic patterns, and develop computer models to $943,000 17.0/31.1 evaluate current and future needs of the highway system. (Substitute for project EA 06-0A5701) Project # Allocation Amount EA State County PPNO Budget Year Federal Dist-Co-Rte Location Program/Year Item # Postmile Project Description Prog Amount Program Code Total Amount 2.5b.(1) SHOPP Projects Resolution FP-07-64 1 $7,205,000 In Richmond, at Hilltop Drive overcrossing #28-0113R. 1A2501 2007-08 Outcome/Outputs: Replace 1 bridge to conform to the current 04-0248B 302-0042 $608,000 Contra Costa seismic design and vertical clearance standards. SHOPP/07-08 302-0890 $6,597,000 04N-CC-80 20.20.201.113 6.0 $8,800,000 $7,205,000 2 $6,082,000 Near Johannesburg, north of San Bernardino County line to 0E6901 2007-08 south of China Lake Boulevard. Outcome/Outputs: Widen 04-6266 302-0042 $609,000 Kern shoulders to 8 feet and install shoulder rumble strips along SHOPP/07-08 302-0890 $5,473,000 06S-Ker-395 14.5 centerline miles to improve motorist safety.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Interstate in Nebraska
    Nebraska and the Nation of InterstateInterstate NebraskaNebraska andand thethe NationNation National Interstate System – Past, Present, Future… “Linking the power of the past to the promise of the future.” June 29, 2006, marks the 50th anniversary Past of the “Dwight David Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways,” often National Interstate System called the greatest public works project in Development – Brief History history. This year’s national celebration recognizes the signing of the Federal-Aid As early as 1803, the federal government Highway Act of 1956, by President showed interest in roadways between Dwight D. Eisenhower. This act created the states (interstate highways) when funding Highway Trust Fund as a dedicated source of funding for the interstate highway was provided for the construction of the system, on a pay-as-you-go basis through National Pike from Cumberland, Maryland the federal gas tax and other motor-vehicle to Wheeling, West Virginia to ease the user fees. movement of the westward-bound pioneers. Today the national interstate system consists of approximately 47,000 miles of From 1916 onward, there was a concerted roadway. While interstate highways effort to create a national road system comprise less than 1 percent of all and to provide the states with financial roadway lane miles in the country, they assistance to enable them to develop their carry over 24 percent of all vehicle traffic, own highway systems. including 41 percent of total truck miles traveled. There are approximately 15,000 interchanges and over 55,000 bridges. 1919 Transcontinental Army Convoy The Nebraska Department of Roads joins Following World War I, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan 2035
    2035 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY MAPA 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ........................................................................................................................... Before 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Demographics and Forecasts ................................................................................................. 6 3. Regional Goals .............................................................................................................................. 23 4. Future Growth and Livability ..............................................................................................29 5. Street, Highway and Bridge .................................................................................................. 52 6. Traffic and Congestion Trends * ....................................................................................... 66 7. Future Streets and Highways ............................................................................................. 84 Federally-Eligible Project Map and Listing: ............................................... After 96 8. Transit ............................................................................................................................................... 97 9. Coordinated Transit and Paratransit ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Inyo National Forest Land Management Plan
    Revision of the Inyo National Forest Land Management Plan Biological Evaluation for Region 5 Sensitive Species Wildlife, Fish and Invertebrate Species Prepared by /s/ Eduardo Olmedo Eduardo Olmedo Wildlife Biologist/Environmental Planner November 7, 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse DEIS
    Chapter 3. Affected Environment This page intentionally left blank Draft Resource Management iii PlanEnvironmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Dear Reader Letter ....................................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... xiii _1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 _2. Proposed Action and Alternatives .......................................................................................... 1 _3. Affected Environment ............................................................................................................. 3 _3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1. Organization of Chapter 3 ...................................................................................... 5 _3.2. Greater Sage-Grouse and Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat ................................................. 7 3.2.1. Range and Taxonomy ............................................................................................ 7 3.2.2. Biology and Life History ....................................................................................... 7 3.2.3. Management Zones .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Identification and Calculation of Horizontal Curves with Geographic Information System Road Layers
    Improved Identification and Calculation of Horizontal Curves with Geographic Information System Road Layers Hao Xu and Dali Wei Horizontal curve data are collected or calculated by transportation the length of each particular curve class (A through F) of a seg- agencies for different purposes because there is always a demand to ment. For example, the total length of Level B curves on an HPMS generate new curve data either to improve the data quality or to extend record segment is reported; tangents and different levels of curves the data coverage. There are different approaches and technologies for are included. The reported data could not give detailed information curve data collection. The selection of methods takes into consideration on curve location, length, or radius. The curve data in HPMS also accuracy, cost, and available sources. There is, consequently, a wide cover only paved principal arterial and rural minor arterial sample interest in extracting curve information from available road network panel sections; it is optional for an HPMS database to include other data of the geographic information system (GIS). When the cost of sections beyond the limits of the sample panel. The HPMS curve GIS data extraction is much lower than the cost of other approaches, data cannot meet new requirements in traffic engineering and high- it is significant to improve the accuracy of GIS curve identification way safety. For example, accurate radius information is a mandatory and calculation. This paper analyzes errors related to existing GIS curve input for state systemic safety improvements and the highway safety cal culation methods and introduces a new method to identify and to cal­ software of SafetyAnalyst.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Snowplow Development and Demonstration: Phase I: Driver Assistance*
    California AHMCT Program University of California at Davis California Department of Transportation ADVANCED SNOWPLOW DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION: * PHASE I: DRIVER ASSISTANCE Kin S. Yen1, Han-Shue Tan2, Aaron Steinfeld2, Colin H. Thorne1, Bénédicte Bougler2, Eli Cuelho3, Paul Kretz2, Dan Empey2, Ronald R. Kappesser1, Hassan Abou Ghaida1, Mike Jenkinson4, Stephen R. Owen5, Wei-Bin Zhang2, Ty A. Lasky1, and Bahram Ravani1, Principal Investigator AHMCT Research Report UCD-ARR-99-06-30-03 Final Report of Contract Task Order 96-9 under IA65X875 June 30, 1999 Affiliations: 1. AHMCT Research Center, Department of Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-5294 2. California PATH, University of California, Berkeley, 1357 So. 46th St., Richmond, CA 94804-4603 3. Western Transportation Institute, PO Box 173910, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3910 4. Caltrans New Technology & Research Program , P.O. Box 942873, MS 83, Sacramento, CA, 94273-0001 5. Arizona DOT, Arizona Transportation Research Center, 1130 N. 22nd Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85009 * This report has been prepared in cooperation with the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation and is based on work supported by Contract Number IA 65X875 T.O. 96-9 through the Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology Research Center at the University of California at Davis. Advanced Snowplow Development and Demonstration: Phase I ABSTRACT This final report documents application of Intelligent Vehicle (IV) and Advanced Vehicle Control and Safety Systems (AVCSS) technologies to enhance the safety and efficiency of snow removal. The system developed, known as the Advanced Snowplow (ASP), includes lane position indication and lane departure warning, as well as a forward collision warning system.
    [Show full text]
  • Juniper and Pinyon Juniper
    Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model The Rapid Assessment is a component of the LANDFIRE project. Reference condition models for the Rapid Assessment were created through a series of expert workshops and a peer-review process in 2004 and 2005. For more information, please visit www.landfire.gov. Please direct questions to [email protected]. Potential Natural Vegetation Group (PNVG) R2PIJU Juniper and Pinyon Juniper Steppe Woodland General Information Contributors (additional contributors may be listed under "Model Evolution and Comments") Modelers Reviewers Steve Bunting [email protected] George Gruell [email protected] Krista Waid [email protected] Jolie Pollet [email protected] Henry Bastian [email protected] Peter Weisberg [email protected] Vegetation Type General Model Sources Rapid AssessmentModel Zones Woodland Literature California Pacific Northwest Local Data Great Basin South Central Dominant Species* Expert Estimate Great Lakes Southeast Northeast S. Appalachians JUOS LANDFIRE Mapping Zones PIED Northern Plains Southwest 12 17 N-Cent.Rockies JUOC 13 18 PIMO 16 Geographic Range This PNVG is found throughout the Great Basin zone. Juniper Steppe generally occurred at the lower elevation portions and transitions into the Pinyon-juniper woodlands at the upper end of its range. Pinyon is not found north of northwestern Nevada (Interstate 80 in Nevada is close to the northern edge of pinyon distribution) and is absent from lower elevations where juniper can tolerate drier conditions (elevation of lower limit varies greatly throughout the Great Basin). Similarly, pinyon is found in pure stands at higher elevations where juniper cannot establish. PNVG is Juniper Pinyon-Infrequent Fire type, scattered throughout the Colorado Plateau, Southern Rockies, and Southwest Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Current List of Designated Preferred and Restricted Routes
    LEGEND Restrictions (Columns A to K) Designations (Columns L to P) 0 = All Hazmats A = All NRHM Hazmats 1 = Class 1 Explosives B = Class 1 Explosives 2 = Class 2 - Gas P = Class 7 HRCQ Radioactive 3 = Class 3 - Flammable I = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) 4 = Class 4 - Flammable Solid/Combustible M = Medical Waste 5 = Class 5 - Organic 6 = Class 6 - Poison 7 = Class 7 - Radioactive ID 8 = Class 8 - Corrosives REST = Restricted Route 9 = Class 9 - Dangerous (Other) PREF = Preferred Route i = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) PRES = Prescribed Route RECOM - Recommended Route YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR ALABAMA YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBattleship Parkway [Mobile] froma By Bridge Rd. Alabama Mobile [Mobile] to Interstate 10 [exit 27] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBay Bridge Rd. [Mobile] from Interstate 165 to Alabama Mobile Battleship Parkway [over Africa Town Cochran Bridge] [Westbound Traffic: Head south on I165; To by-pass the downtown area, head north on I165.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 26B Alabama Mobile [Water St] [Eastbound Traffic: To avoid the downtown area, exit on I-65 North] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 27 Alabama Mobile 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Interstate 10 ton Iterstate 165 Alabama Mobile [A route for trucks wishing to by-pass the downtown area.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Mobile City Limits to Interstate Alabama Mobile 165 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 165 from Water St.
    [Show full text]