DOCSLIB.ORG

Boca Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boca Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project Boca Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project Environmental Assessment/Initial Study Environmental Assessment No. 15-03-MP Nevada County, California U.S. Department of the Interior California Regional Water Quality Control Board Bureau of Reclamation Lahontan Region Mid-Pacific Region Office Region 6 – South Lake Tahoe Office Sacramento, California South Lake Tahoe, California January 2018 [This page intentionally left blank] 0 Table of Contents SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Need for Proposed Action/Proposed Project ............................................................ 7 1.3 Document Structure ................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 8 1.4.1 Topography and Geology .............................................................................................................. 8 1.4.2 Weather.......................................................................................................................................... 9 1.4.3 Hydrology and Water Supply ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4.4 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................... 14 1.4.5 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.6 Biological Resources ................................................................................................................... 18 1.4.7 Recreational Activities .................................................................................................................. 21 1.4.8 Visual Resources ......................................................................................................................... 22 1.4.9 Traffic and Circulation .................................................................................................................. 22 1.4.10 Fire Danger .................................................................................................................................. 23 1.4.11 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 23 1.4.12 Waters of the U.S./Waters of the State ........................................................................................ 24 1.4.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 24 SECTION 2 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 25 2.1 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 25 2.2 Proposed Action Alternative – Shear Key and Stability Berm .................................. 26 2.2.1 Schedule ...................................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.2 Reservoir Operations During Construction .................................................................................. 28 2.2.3 Spillway Modifications .................................................................................................................. 29 2.2.4 Site Preparation ........................................................................................................................... 30 2.2.5 Cutoff Wall, Shear Key, Stability Berm, and Embankment Overlay Construction ....................... 31 2.2.6 Road Use and Public Access....................................................................................................... 36 2.2.7 Haul Routes ................................................................................................................................. 40 2.2.8 In-Reservoir Borrow Area (IRBA)................................................................................................. 41 2.2.9 Staging and Stockpiling Areas ..................................................................................................... 42 2.2.10 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Action Alternative ............................................................ 43 2.2.11 Obtaining Permits and Other Approvals ...................................................................................... 56 2.3 Reservoir Restriction Alternative .............................................................................. 57 2.3.1 Mitigation Measures for the Reservoir Restriction Alternative ..................................................... 59 2.4 Dam Breach Alternative ........................................................................................... 59 SECTION 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................ 61 3.1 Resources Analyzed ................................................................................................ 61 3.1.1 Aesthetics .................................................................................................................................... 61 3.1.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ............................................................................................ 64 3.1.3 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 65 3.1.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................................................... 68 3.1.5 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 87 3.1.6 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................ 89 3.1.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................ 91 3.1.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................. 92 3.1.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ....................................................................................................... 96 3.1.10 Land Use and Planning .............................................................................................................. 115 3.1.11 Mineral Resources ..................................................................................................................... 116 1 3.1.12 Noise .......................................................................................................................................... 117 3.1.13 Population and Housing ............................................................................................................. 121 3.1.14 Public Services .......................................................................................................................... 122 3.1.15 Recreation .................................................................................................................................. 124 3.1.16 Transportation/Traffic ................................................................................................................. 128 3.1.17 Utilities and Service Systems..................................................................................................... 131 3.1.18 Tribal Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................... 132 3.1.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................... 133 SECTION 4 OTHER FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS....... 138 4.1 Indian Sacred Sites ................................................................................................ 138 4.2 Indian Trust Assets ................................................................................................ 138 4.3 Environmental Justice ............................................................................................ 140 4.4 Consultation and Coordination ............................................................................... 141 SECTION 6 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 142 2 Figures Page Figure 1 Location of Boca Dam 6 Figure 2 Features of Boca Dam 7 Figure 3 Profile of modeled dam deformation during 9 an earthquake Figure 4 Drought areas in the western United States 10 Figure 5 Little Truckee River Watershed within the 11 Lower Truckee River Watershed Figure 6 Hydrograph of Boca Reservoir since 2009 14 Figure 7 Air basin location 16 Figure 8 Attainment status for the NSAQMD 18 Figure 9 Concept Level Construction Schedule 27 Figure 10 Hypothetical Boca Reservoir Operation at Full Pool during Temporary Reservoir 29 Drawdown Figure 11 Proposed Action Alternative in-reservoir 30 borrow area (indicated in orange) Figure 12 Proposed Action Alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised January 19, 2018 Updated June 19, 2018
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION / BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC WILDLIFE YUBA PROJECT YUBA RIVER RANGER DISTRICT TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST REVISED JANUARY 19, 2018 UPDATED JUNE 19, 2018 PREPARED BY: MARILYN TIERNEY DISTRICT WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 II. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 4 III. CONSULTATION TO DATE ...................................................................................................... 4 IV. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............................................................................... 5 V. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES ......................... 6 VI. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES, AND DETERMINATION ......................................................................... 41 SPECIES-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION ........................................................... 54 TERRESTRIAL SPECIES ........................................................................................................................ 55 WESTERN BUMBLE BEE ............................................................................................................. 55 BALD EAGLE ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reallocating Water in the Truckee River Basin, Nevada and California Barbara Cosens University of Idaho College of Law, [email protected]
    UIdaho Law Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law Articles Faculty Works 2003 Farmers, Fish, Tribal Power and Poker: Reallocating Water in the Truckee River Basin, Nevada and California Barbara Cosens University of Idaho College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation 14 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envt'l L. & Pol'y 89 (2003) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The law governing allocation of water in the western United States has changed little in over 100 years.1 Over this period, however, both our population and our understanding of the natural systems served by rivers have mushroomed. 2 To meet growing urban needs and to reverse the environmental cost extracted from natural systems, contemporary water pol- icy globally and in the West increasingly Farmers, Fish, Tribal Power focuses less on water development and and Poker: Reallocating more on improvements in management, Water in the Truckee understanding. 3 River Basin, Nevada and efficiency, and scientific California These efforts are frequently at odds with & Associate Professor, University of Idaho, By BarbaraA. Cosenss College of the Law, Former Assistant Professor, Environmental Studies Program, San Francisco State University. Mediator for the Walker River dispute. Former legal counsel, Montana Reserved Water rights Compact Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Basis for the TROA California Guidelines
    Truckee River Operating Agreement Basis for the 2018 California Guidelines for Truckee River Reservoir Operations This page intentionally left blank. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY John Laird, Secretary for Natural Resources Department of Water Resources Cindy Messer Karla Nemeth Kristopher A. Tjernell Chief Deputy Director Director Deputy Director Integrated Watershed Management Division of Integrated Regional Water Management Arthur Hinojosa, Chief Truckee River Operating Agreement BASIS for the 2018 CALIFORNIA GUIDELINES for TRUCKEE RIVER RESERVOIR OPERATIONS This informational document was prepared for use by the Truckee River Operating Agreement Administrator and all signatory parties to that Agreement pursuant to Public Law 101-618 and the Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA) Preparation Team Department of Water Resources North Central Region Office, Regional Planning and Coordination Branch California – Nevada & Watershed Assessment Section Juan Escobar, P.E, Office Chief (Acting) Amardeep Singh, P.E., Branch Chief Paul Larson, P.E., Section Chief Tom Scott, P. E . , Engineer, W.R. David Willoughby, Engineer, W.R. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Laurie Hatton, Senior Environmental Scientist In coordination with: Truckee River Basin Water Group (TRBWG); Richard Anderson, Chair This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Zone Connectivity and Restoration Project Draft Decision
    DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT for the East Zone Connectivity and Restoration Project USDA Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest and Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Truckee Ranger District and Carson Ranger District Placer, Nevada, and Sierra Counties, California Decision and Reasons for the Decision Introductions The Forest Service proposes actions in the East Zone Connectivity and Restoration Project including motorized road and trail management, improvement, and restoration activities. Actions are needed due to: increased demand on trails; erosion; ongoing trail maintenance; poor trail drainage; fragmented trails; impacts to natural and cultural resources; and public safety concerns as described in the East Zone Connectivity and Restoration Project Environmental Assessment. The Project area is located on Tahoe National Forest System lands within three areas which have been determined to exhibit high levels of motorized recreation use on the Truckee Ranger District: Verdi Ridge, Boca Hill and Prosser Reservoir, and the Hwy 89 south / 06 Road / Big Chief area connecting Truckee and Tahoe City. Actions are also proposed to be implemented at adjacent connected locations on Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest System lands at the north end of the Verdi Ridge. The Forest Service has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the East Zone Connectivity and Restoration Project in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other relevant laws and regulations. The EA discloses the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects that would result from the proposed alternatives. This document contains a Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The Decision Notice identifies the decision and the rationale for its selection.
    [Show full text]
  • RTO-Handbook-2018.Pdf
    Table of Contents ......................................................................................... 1 Welcome Letter ............................................................................................ 2 Safety including Odyssey Safety Manifesto ................................................. 3 Checklist Of The Most Critical Rules ........................................................... 12 Check In Process .......................................................................................... 13 Release / Authorization Form ..................................................................... 14 Fun Stuff ....................................................................................................... 15 Additional Info You Need To Know ............................................................. 21 Looking for something to eat or drink as you travel the course .................. 23 Runner Line-Up and Team Time Log .......................................................... 24 Course Information Table ............................................................................ 25 Course Maps ................................................................................................. 26 Driving Instructions for the "Resting Van" .................................................. 63 Staying On Course ............................. .......................................................... 65 Relay Basic Guidelines .................................................................................. 67 Tips
    [Show full text]
  • October 3, 2013 Minutes
    MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF CHURCHILL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 155 No. Taylor Street, Fallon, NV Fallon, Nevada October 3, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Churchill County Board of Commissioners was called to order at 8: 15 a.m. on the above date by Chairman Erquiaga. PRESENT: Carl Erquiaga, Chairman Pete Olsen, Vice-Chair Harry Scharmann, Commissioner Ben Shawcroft, Civil Deputy District Attorney Wade Carner, Civil Deputy District Attorney Eleanor Lockwood, County Manager Alan Kalt, Comptroller Kelly G. Helton, Clerk of the Board Pamela D. Moore, Deputy Clerk of the Board ABSENT: N/A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by the board and public. VERIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA: It was verified by Deputy Clerk Moore that the Agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with NRS 241 . ACTION ITEMS: AGENDA: Commissioner Scharmann made a motion to approve the Agenda as submitted. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. MINUTES: Commissioner Olsen made a motion to approve the Minutes of the special meeting held on September 26, 2011; the regular meeting held on September 5, 2013; and the regular meeting held on September 18, 2013 as submitted. Commissioner Scharmann seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. PUBLIC COMMENTS : Chairman Erquiaga inquired if there were any public comments on issues that were not listed on the Agenda. Michelle Ippolito said she is here as President of the Fallon Animal Welfare Group. She had a prepared handout that explained more about what she is talking about today, which was distributed to the board and public and which included a brochure for the group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.5 Highway Financial Matters
    CTC Financial Vote List April 9-10, 2008 2.5 Highway Financial Matters Project # Allocation Amount Budget Year State County Item # Federal Dist-Co-Rte Location EA Program Postmile Project Description Program Codes Total Amount 2.5a. District Minor Projects Resolution FP-07-63 1 $943,000 In Bakersfield, from south of State Route 119 to north of 7th 0H4001 2007-08 Standard Road. Outcome/Outputs: Install microwave vehicle 302-0042 $943,000 Kern detection systems at 20 locations to monitor traffic congestion, SHOPP 20.20.201.315 06S-Ker-99 analyze traffic patterns, and develop computer models to $943,000 17.0/31.1 evaluate current and future needs of the highway system. (Substitute for project EA 06-0A5701) Project # Allocation Amount EA State County PPNO Budget Year Federal Dist-Co-Rte Location Program/Year Item # Postmile Project Description Prog Amount Program Code Total Amount 2.5b.(1) SHOPP Projects Resolution FP-07-64 1 $7,205,000 In Richmond, at Hilltop Drive overcrossing #28-0113R. 1A2501 2007-08 Outcome/Outputs: Replace 1 bridge to conform to the current 04-0248B 302-0042 $608,000 Contra Costa seismic design and vertical clearance standards. SHOPP/07-08 302-0890 $6,597,000 04N-CC-80 20.20.201.113 6.0 $8,800,000 $7,205,000 2 $6,082,000 Near Johannesburg, north of San Bernardino County line to 0E6901 2007-08 south of China Lake Boulevard. Outcome/Outputs: Widen 04-6266 302-0042 $609,000 Kern shoulders to 8 feet and install shoulder rumble strips along SHOPP/07-08 302-0890 $5,473,000 06S-Ker-395 14.5 centerline miles to improve motorist safety.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 ^e>J-, AO-"1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS THE^-NEWLANDS RECLAMATION Pft9«JE T (TRUCKEE-CARSON PROJECT) AND/OR COMMON The Truckee-Carson Irrigation District (TCID) LOCATION The project area encompases a large area in west- central Nevada centered near Reno and a smaller area STREET & NUMBER in north-eastern California within the Sierra Nevada range (See enclosed map) NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Fallen X VICINITY OF Reno Nevada-at-large STATE COUNTY CODE California/Nevada CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X-PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED X.AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM X_BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS X_YES: RESTRICTED X.GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC X Thematic —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED XJNDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Water & Power Resources Service - Mid-Pacific Region STREET & NUMBER Federal Building, 2800 Cottage Way CITY, TOWN STATE Sacramento VICINITY OF California LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. Churchill County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Nevada REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Nevada Historic Engineering Site Survey DATE 3725779 FEDERAL X.STATE COUNTY LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS History of Engineering Program. Texas Tech University CITY, TOWN Lubbock 79409 DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X_QRIGINALSITE .XGOOD —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE____ —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The theme of this nomination is Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment Stampede Dam Safety of Dams Modification
    Draft Environmental Assessment Stampede Dam Safety of Dams Modification Washoe Project, California and Nevada Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado November 2011 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Environmental Assessment Stampede Dam Safety of Dams Modification Washoe Project, California and Nevada Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado November 2011 Acronyms and Abbreviations ADT average daily traffic APE area of potential effect BMPs Best Management Practices CAS Corrective Action Study CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations Cfs, ft3/s cubic feet per second CWA Clean Water Act DPS distinct population segment EA Environmental Assessment EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact ft3/s cubic feet per second IDF Inflow Design Flood ITA Indian Trust Assets LCT Lahontan cutthroat trout MSE Mechanically Stabilized Earth NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRHP National Register of Historic Places NSAQMD Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District O&M operation and maintenance P.L. Public Law PMF probable maximum flood Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board RWS reservoir water surface SHPO State Historic Preservation Office SOD Safety of Dams SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load USFWS U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Interstate in Nebraska
    Nebraska and the Nation of InterstateInterstate NebraskaNebraska andand thethe NationNation National Interstate System – Past, Present, Future… “Linking the power of the past to the promise of the future.” June 29, 2006, marks the 50th anniversary Past of the “Dwight David Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways,” often National Interstate System called the greatest public works project in Development – Brief History history. This year’s national celebration recognizes the signing of the Federal-Aid As early as 1803, the federal government Highway Act of 1956, by President showed interest in roadways between Dwight D. Eisenhower. This act created the states (interstate highways) when funding Highway Trust Fund as a dedicated source of funding for the interstate highway was provided for the construction of the system, on a pay-as-you-go basis through National Pike from Cumberland, Maryland the federal gas tax and other motor-vehicle to Wheeling, West Virginia to ease the user fees. movement of the westward-bound pioneers. Today the national interstate system consists of approximately 47,000 miles of From 1916 onward, there was a concerted roadway. While interstate highways effort to create a national road system comprise less than 1 percent of all and to provide the states with financial roadway lane miles in the country, they assistance to enable them to develop their carry over 24 percent of all vehicle traffic, own highway systems. including 41 percent of total truck miles traveled. There are approximately 15,000 interchanges and over 55,000 bridges. 1919 Transcontinental Army Convoy The Nebraska Department of Roads joins Following World War I, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 CNDDB Occurrence Report
    Occurrence Report California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database Query Criteria: Quad is (Sattley (3912054) or Sierraville (3912053) or Sardine Peak (3912052) or Dog Valley (3912051) or Webber Peak (3912044) or Independence Lake (3912043) or Hobart Mills (3912042) or Boca (3912041) or Soda Springs (3912034) or Norden (3912033) or Truckee (3912032) or Martis Peak (3912031) or Royal Gorge (3912024) or Granite Chief (3912023) or Tahoe City (3912022) or Kings Beach (3912021)) Map Index Number: 73692 EO Index: 74664 Key Quad: Kings Beach (3912021) Element Code: AAABH01170 Occurrence Number: 10 Occurrence Last Updated: 2009-02-27 Scientific Name: Lithobates pipiens Common Name: northern leopard frog Listing Status: Federal: None Rare Plant Rank: State: None Other Lists: CDFW_SSC-Species of Special Concern IUCN_LC-Least Concern CNDDB Element Ranks: Global: G5 State: S2 General Habitat: Micro Habitat: NATIVE RANGE IS EAST OF SIERRA NEVADA-CASCADE CREST. NEAR HIGHLY AQUATIC SPECIES. SHORELINE COVER, SUBMERGED AND PERMANENT OR SEMI-PERMANENT WATER IN A VARIETY OF EMERGENT AQUATIC VEGETATION ARE IMPORTANT HABITAT HABITATS. CHARACTERISTICS. Last Date Observed: 1934-06-29 Occurrence Type: Transplant Outside of Native Hab./Range Last Survey Date: 1934-06-29 Occurrence Rank: Unknown Owner/Manager: UNKNOWN Trend: Unknown Presence: Presumed Extant Location: KINGS BEACH AREA, NORTH END OF LAKE TAHOE. Detailed Location: LOCATION GIVEN AS, "TROUT CREEK, 2.5 MI W STATELINE". MAPPED ACCORDING TO COORDINATES PROVIDED BY MVZ BETWEEN KINGS BEACH AND TAHOE VISTA. Ecological: Threats: General: 6 INDIVIDUALS (MVZ #17175-80) COLLECTED ON 29 JUN 1934 BY H.S. FITCH. TRANSPLANT OUTSIDE OF NATIVE RANGE. PLSS: T16N, R17E, Sec.
    [Show full text]