DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate. Patrick Vaught, and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Acting Manager, Jackson Airports District Each carrier may select up to 2 of the Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Previous remaining slot exemption times, one Office, Southern Region. Meeting Minutes; (4) Receive report on [FR Doc. 00±30774 Filed 12±1±00; 8:45 am] arrival and one departure, in each the deliberations of Working Group 1 BILLING CODE 4910±13±M round, until a total of 159 slot (Data Needs); (5) Receive report on the exemption times have been selected. deliberations of Working Group 2 f. If the last remaining slot exemption (Technology); (6) Discuss Interim DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION times available do not permit a Report; (7) Review First Draft of Final reasonable arrival-departure Report Outline; (8) Presentations; (9) Federal Motor Carrier Safety turnaround, the FAA will take requests Other Business; (10) Establish Agenda Administration for limited trades among AIR±21 for Next Meeting; (11) Date and Location operators, or may make an adjustment to of Next Meeting; (12) Closing. Transportation of Hazardous Materials; Designated, Preferred, and Restricted one of the times to assure that all slot Attendance is open to the interested Routes exemption time pairs selected, public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, combined with other slots and slot AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety members of the public may present oral exemptions available to the operator, Administration (FMCSA), DOT. provide for a viable operation by the statements at the meeting. Persons ACTION: Notice. selecting carrier. In addition, the FAA wishing to present statements, obtain information or pre-register for the may approve the transfer of slot SUMMARY: This notice provides the exemption times between carriers only committee should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, current listing of all restricted, on a temporary one-for-one basis for the designated, and preferred road and purpose of conducting the operation in NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 833±9339 (phone); (202) highway routes for transporting a different time period. Carriers must radioactive (RAM) and non-radioactive certify to the FAA that no other 833±9434 (fax). Members of the public may present a written statement to the hazardous materials (NRHM) that have consideration is involved in the transfer. committee at any time. been reported to the FMCSA by State g. The Chief Counsel will be the final and Indian Tribe routing agencies as of Issued in Washington, DC, on November November 14, 2000. This listing has decisionmaker concerning eligibility of 22, 2000. carriers to participate in the lottery. been extracted from the National Janice L. Peters, Hazardous Material Route Registry h. The slot exemptions reallocated by Designated Official. lottery will remain in effect until (NHMRR). The information contained in [FR Doc. 00±30775 Filed 12±1±00; 8:45 am] this notice supersedes that published at September 15, 2001. BILLING CODE 4910±13±M 63 FR 31549 on June 9, 1998. The i. Carriers that participate and select periodic updating and publishing of this exemption slots during the lottery must listing is required by the Hazardous re-certify to the Department of DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Materials Transportation Act of 1975 Transportation in accordance with the (HMTA), as amended (49 U.S.C. 5112). Federal Aviation Administration procedures articulated in OST Orders Also, the FMCSA's regulations include 2000±4±10 and 2000±4±11, and provide Notice of Intent To Rule on Application Federal standards and procedures the Department and the FAA with the To Impose and Use the Revenue From which the States and Indian Tribes must markets to be served, the number of a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at follow if they establish, maintain, or exemption slots, the frequency, and the Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airport, enforce routing designations that: (1) time of operation, which is consistent Hattiesburg, MS Specify highway routes over which with AIR±21 prohibition on the sale or NRHM or RAM may, or may not, be lease of exemption slots. AGENCY: Federal Aviation transported within their jurisdictions; Issued on November 29, 2000 in Administration (FAA), DOT. and/or (2) impose limitations or Washington, DC. ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on requirements with respect to highway application. routing of NRHM or RAM. States and James W. Whitlow, Indian Tribes are also required to Deputy Chief Counsel. SUMMARY: This correction revises furnish updated route information to the [FR Doc. 00±30793 Filed 11±29±00; 4:18 pm] information from the previously FMCSA within 60 days of establishing BILLING CODE 4910±13±U published notice. or changing a route. VerDate 11<MAY>2000 16:58 Dec 01, 2000 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM pfrm01 PsN: 04DEN1 75772 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. coordination with the States and Indian category will not appear in the route Richard Swedberg, (303) 969-5772, ext. Tribes, to update and publish listing. 363, FMCSA, 555 Zang St., Room 400, periodically a list of current effective Each route will be identified with one Lakewood, CO 80228-1010; or Mr. hazardous materials highway routing or more restriction or designation codes Joseph Solomey, Office of the Chief designations and restrictions. For which will follow the route description. Counsel, (HCC-20), (202) 366-0384, NRHM routing designations or Restriction codes identify which Federal Motor Carrier Safety restrictions, 49 CFR 397.73(b) requires materials may not be transported along Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., each State or Indian Tribe to furnish the given route, while designation codes Washington, D.C. 20590-0001. Office information on any new or changed indicate which materials the routing hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., routes to the FMCSA within 60 days authority has determined must be e.t., Monday through Friday, except for after establishment. For RAM preferred shipped along the route. These codes Federal holidays. routing, 49 CFR 397.103(c)(1) requires can be deciphered using the Restriction/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the authorized routing agency to Designation key which precedes the Electronic Access provide the FMCSA with written route listing. Note that the restriction notification in order for the route to code ``0'' indicates that ALL hazmats, An electronic copy of this document become effective. Updates should be both RAM and NRHM, are restricted for may be downloaded by using a sent to: Mr. Richard Swedberg, FMCSA, the indicated route. These routes will be computer, modem and suitable 555 Zang St., Room 400, Lakewood, CO listed under the main category communications software from the 80228-1010. ``Restricted Routes for ALL Hazmats'' Government Printing Office's Electronic for that State. Because of this, you may Bulletin Board Service at (202)512-1661. This notice is being published to need to look in two sections to find Internet users may reach the Federal provide the public with the FMCSA's routes that are restricted for either RAM Register's home page at: http:// current list of State-assigned hazardous or NRHM. For example, to find all www.nara.gov/fedreg and the materials (HM or hazmat) routes restricted RAM routes, first look under Government Printing Office's web site (alphabetically by State) along with the the ``Restricted Routes for ALL at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara. To State and Federal points of contact. For Hazmats'' and then look under the find the most up-to-date listing of each routing agency, the route listing ``RAM Restricted'' section, which lists hazmat routes, you may access the may be divided into three main routes in which RAM alone is restricted. National Hazardous Material Route categories as follows: (1) Restricted Registry (NHMRR) directly at: http:// Routes for ALL Hazmats, (2) Radioactive Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5112; and 49 CFR hazmat.fmcsa.dot.gov/. This site is Routes, (3) and Non-Radioactive Hazmat 1.73. considered the source of this Routes. Within the RAM and NRHM Issued on: November 28, 2000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Storm Data Publication
    DECEMBER 2012 VOLUME 54 STORM DATA NUMBER 12 AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photos courtesy of NCDC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena......…….…....…………...…...........….........................3 Reference Notes.............……...........................……….........…..….….............................................252 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events resulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confirmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 RTP/SCS Transportation Finance Appendix, Adopted April
    TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMFINANCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS APPENDIX ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 INTRODUCTION 1 REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 1 CORE AND REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUES 3 EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES AND METHODOLOGY 14 SUMMARY OF REVENUE SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES 18 APPENDIX A: DETAILS ABOUT REVENUE SOURCES 21 APPENDIX B: SCAG REGIONAL FINANCIAL MODEL 30 APPENDIX TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM I TRANSPORTATION FINANCE APPENDIX C: ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUE SOURCES 34 APPENDIX D: FINANCIAL PLAN ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 39 TRANSPORTATION FINANCE INTRODUCTION REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS In accordance with federal fiscal constraint requirements (23 U.S.C. § 134(i)(2)(E)), the The region’s revenue forecast timeframe for the 2016 RTP/SCS is FY2015-16 through Transportation Finance Appendix for the 2016 RTP/SCS identifies how much money the FY2039-40. Consistent with federal guidelines, the financial plan takes into account Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) reasonably expects will be available inflation and reports statistics in nominal (year-of-expenditure) dollars. The underlying data to support our region’s surface transportation investments. The financially constrained 2016 are based on financial planning documents developed by the local county transportation RTP/SCS includes both a “traditional” core revenue forecast comprised of existing local, commissions and transit operators. The revenue model also uses information from the state and federal sources and more innovative but reasonably available sources of revenue California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Transportation to implement a program of infrastructure improvements to keep freight and people moving. Commission (CTC). The regional forecasts incorporate the county forecasts where available The financial plan further documents progress made since past RTPs and describes steps and fill data using a common framework.
    [Show full text]
  • 700 S Barracks St WHSE 9& 10 LEASE DD JG .Indd
    Port of Pensacola - WHSE 9 & 10 52,500-92,500 SF WHSE +/- Port of Pensacola, one of Florida’s 15 Deep Water Ports PORT PENSACOLA FACTS: Shortest steaming distance pier side to the 1st sea buoy in the Gulf of Mexico 55+ acre facility (zoned industrial); 24/7 operations with security 3,370 feet of vessel berthing space on 6 deep draft berths (33 ft channel depth) CSX rail service & superior on-Port rail availability and access 400,000± SF of covered storage in six general warehouses Signifi cant Paved dockside area for cargo laydown, heavy lift, or special project storage One of Florida’s 15 Deep Water Ports and integrated into Florida Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) DeeDee Davis, SIOR MICP John Griffi ng, SIOR CRE +1 850 433 0577 +1 850 450 5126 [email protected] jgriffi [email protected] WHSE 9 & 10 Ter ms WHSE 9&10 Protected Harbor 11 miles from #1 Sea Buoy Quickest Vessel Egress Along the Gulf of Mexico Zoned M-1, SSD, WRD (City of Pensacola) Building and Leasing Description Term- Building 9-52,500 SF Clear Span WHSE One (1) year- negotiable that can be expanded into a partially completed WHSE to total 92,000 SF. Lease Type- NNN Tenant has the option to complete the warehouse to their specifi cations. $6/PSF, plus NNN, S/T Clear Span Zoned M-1, SSD, WRD (City of Pensacola) 50 x 50’ column spacing Two (2) 20’8” x 16’ Overhead Doors Additional acreage available for ground lease Lease Rate $26,000-46,000 per mo, plus NNN, plus S/T Port of Pensacola- WHSE 9 & 10 STRATEGIC - Port Pensacola is located on the Gulf of Mexico only 11 miles
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual
    Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual Massachusetts Foreword The Specialized Carriers & Rigging Association is pleased to publish this Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual. Each state analysis includes information in a standardized format: contact, legal limits, special permit limits, general restrictions, types of permits available, fees, escort needs, fines, and restricted travel areas. Telephone numbers, locations, and hours of operation are listed for ports of entry and permit branches. However, readers are always advised to check with the state offices on current laws and procedures. This project could not have been completed without the advice and consultation of many state officials. We thank all of those who provided permit manuals, maps, laws, regulations, and various other forms of documentation. Legal Notice This SC&RA Oversize/Overweight Permit Manual is intended only to provide concise, easily read information, useful in planning movements of overdimensional and overweight loads. This Permit Manual is not intended to be an accurate summary of all the applicable laws and regulations. Users of the Permit Manual should confirm the information contained herein before dispatching vehicles and loads. The SC&RA cautions Permit Manual users that state laws and regulations are subject to change without notice, and that some time elapses between the effective date of such changes and the amendment of the Permit Manual to reflect those changes. The SC&RA assumes no responsibility for accident, injury, loss or claim, penalties or any other
    [Show full text]
  • I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility
    I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility Brad Freeze, Director, Traffic Operations Division, TDOT The Need • Interstate 24 (I-24) is a integral part of the Nashville transportation network and a major route for commuters and freight. • Traffic volumes along the I-24 corridor have experienced exponential growth rates over the past decade. Since 2005, traffic volumes have increased more than 60% on I-24 near Murfreesboro. • Currently, peak hour volumes exceed capacity and even a minor incident can have a severe impact on travel time reliability. • Due to physical, environmental, and financial constraints along the Corridor there are no viable, short term roadway widening projects. Area Map I-24 Congestion Contributors Traffic Incidents 27% Incidents Breakdown 2015 Contributors to Congestion (Total Crashes:1,661) Crash History & Analysis I-24 Section Crash Rate Crash Rate Data represents information collected between 2013-2015 System Performance Review AM Peak Period Travel Time I-24 From I-840 to Briley Pkwy. 85 High Variability 75 65 55 Travel Time 95th Percentile 45 Average Travel Time Travel Time (min) Time Travel 35 25 15 Reliability From Exit 78 (SR-96) & Exit 53 (I-440 Interchange), 25 miles Westbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 39.64 3.59 69.32 30.14 36 27.94 43.98 4.48 73.64 31.04 37.3 27.57 43.57 4.63 73.22 31.18 37.59 27.32 Eastbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 2.76 19.18 27.22 45.71 24.93 30.63 2.86 22.16 27.31 48.69 24.97 32.53 1.97 25.85 26.43 52.38 24.46 33.92 2014 User Costs 2015 2016 Previous Studies I-24 Multimodal Corridor Study • Identified short- and long-term solutions for improving problem spots along the entire corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight Hearing on the Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Project
    S. HRG. 106–1110 OVERSIGHT HEARING ON THE BOSTON CENTRAL ARTERY/TUNNEL PROJECT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 3, 2000 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 80–706 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Apr 24 2002 08:01 Jun 10, 2003 Jkt 080706 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\80706.TXT SCOM1 PsN: CAROLT SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CONRAD BURNS, Montana DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii SLADE GORTON, Washington JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia TRENT LOTT, Mississippi JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JOHN B. BREAUX, Louisiana OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine RICHARD H. BRYAN, Nevada JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota BILL FRIST, Tennessee RON WYDEN, Oregon SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan MAX CLELAND, Georgia SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARK BUSE, Republican Staff Director MARTHA P. ALLBRIGHT, Republican General Counsel KEVIN D. KAYES, Democratic Staff Director MOSES BOYD, Democratic Chief Counsel (II) VerDate Apr 24 2002 08:01 Jun 10, 2003 Jkt 080706 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\80706.TXT SCOM1 PsN: CAROLT C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on May 3, 2000 ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation/4
    TRANSPORTATION/4 4.1/OVERVIEW Like the rest of the City, Biloxi’s transportation system was The City of Biloxi is in a rebuilding mode, both to replace aging profoundly impacted by Hurricane Katrina. Prior to Hurricane infrastructure and to repair and improve the roadways and fa- Katrina, the City was experiencing intensive development of cilities that were damaged by Katrina and subsequent storms. coastal properties adjacent to Highway 90, including condo- - minium, casino, and retail projects. Katrina devastated High- lowing reconstruction of U.S. Highway 90, the Biloxi Bridge, way 90 and other key transportation facilities, highlighting andPre-Katrina casinos. traffic Many volumes transportation and congestion projects haveare in returned progress fol or Biloxi’s dependence on a constrained network of roadways under consideration, providing an opportunity for coordinat- and bridges connecting to inland areas. ed, long-range planning for a system that supports the future The City of Biloxi operated in a State of Emergency for over land use and development pattern of Biloxi. In that context, two years following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall on August 29, the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan lays 2005. Roadway access to the Biloxi Peninsula is provided by out a strategy to develop a multi-modal system that improves Highway 90 and Pass Road from the west and by three key mobility and safety and increases the choices available to resi- bridges from the east and north: Highway 90 via the Biloxi dents and visitors to move about the City. Bay Bridge from Oceans Springs and I-110 and Popp’s Ferry Road over Back Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities
    60 Transportation Research Record 1074 Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities ROOSEVELT STEPTOE and CLARENCE THORNTON ABSTRACT The purpose of the research on which this paper is based was to measure the changes in land use and related economic and environmental variables that were attributable to the location and operation of a portion of an Interstate high­ way in the Scotlandville community of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. More specifi­ cally, the research was designed to determine the degree to which low-income minority communities experience unique highway impacts. The research was con­ ducted in two phases--a baseline assessment phase and a follow-on, longitudinal phase. In the baseline phase, measures were taken of several significant vari­ ables including (a) land use on a parcel-by-parcel basis; (b) recreational pat­ terns; (cl traffic volumes and residential densities; (d) number and variety of minority businesses; (e) housing types, quality, and conditions; and (fl street types and conditions. The follow-on phase was completed after the highway was completed and opened to traffic. A comparison of these two sets of data consti­ tutes the assessment of the highway impacts on this community. The literature was carefully examined and the reported impacts on nonminority communities were summarized for comparison with the Scotlandville community. One conclusion reached was that many of the highway impacts identified in Scotlandville were similar to those reported in other communities. The major exception is that, whereas highways generally induced commercial developments around major inter­ changes in nonminority communities, the highway does not appear to attract new businesses in minority communities.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Meeting Presentation
    SHERIDAN EXPRESSWAY – HUNTS POINT PLANNING STUDY March 7, 2013 NYCDCP & NYCDOT ‐ SEHP 1 AGENDA Review of Scenarios Traffic Model Results •Travel Times •Truck Volumes •Summary Next Steps 3/7/2013 NYCDOT - SEHP - DRAFT South Bronx Transportation Network + SEHP Study Area CROSS BRONX EXPRESSW AY SEHP Study Area SHERIDAN EXPRESSWAY Trucks exit the Sheridan at Westchester Ave and continue on local streets BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY LOCAL STREETS Hunts Point Food Distribution Center north Oak Point Ramp Area Truck Route on Local Streets Improved access to Hunts Point Oak Point Ramps BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY • On/Off ramps going east BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY and west on the Bruckner Expressway • Ramp design requires L E GGETT approx 9,000 linear feet AVE of roadway • Design requires acquisition of private property and potential realignment of rail lines AMTRAK / CSX OAK POI NT A VE NYS Department of Transportation ‘Bruckner-Sheridan Expressway Interchange Reconstruction and Hunts Point Peninsula Access Environmental Impact Statement’ July 2010 East Ramps • On/Off ramps going Y BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWA east on the Bruckner BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY Expressway • Ramp design requires approx 4,000 linear feet LE GGET T of roadway AVE • Less impact on private or rail properties • Potential to remove north traffi c from Hunts Pt Ave through Sheridan ramp OAK POI closure NT A VE NYC Department of Transportation Proposal to create direct access to Hunts Point • Catalyzes changes to Sheridan Expressway at grade section Sheridan Expressway CROSS BRONX Cross Bronx - connections to remain E 174th E 173th at grade E 172nd At grade JENNINGS Bruckner Expressway - WESTCHESTER AVE connections to remain Below Grade below grade BRUCKNER EXPWY north Above Grade above grade Sheridan Expressway - At Grade - Existing Conditions CROSS BRONX Key map • $81M of public investment along West E 174th the southern Bronx River has Farms E 173th Rezoning led to a cleaner more active E 172nd JENNINGS waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Dig $458.2 Million Global Agreement
    Big Dig $458.2 Million Global Agreement State Agencies State A-Z Topics Skip to main content Need help resizing text? State Forms The Official Website of the Attorney General of Massachusetts Attorney General in Attorney General Martha Coakley About the Attorney Consumer Doing Business in Government News and Updates Public Safety Bureaus General's Office Resources Massachusetts Resources Home News and Updates Press Releases 2008 MARTHA COAKLEY For Immediate release - January 23, 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL Big Dig Management Consultant and Designers To Pay $450 Million Media Contact Press Conference Audio and Supporting Documents Included Below Massachusetts Attorney General's Office: Emily LaGrassa (617) 727-2543 BOSTON - The joint venture of Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, Bechtel Infrastructure Corp., and PB Americas, Inc., f/k/a Parsons U.S. Attorney's Office: Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. ("Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff"), the management consultant to the Central Artery/Tunnel Christina DiIorio-Sterling Project ("the Big Dig") has agreed to pay over $407 million to resolve its criminal and civil liabilities in connection with the collapse (617) 748-3356 of part of the I-90 Connector Tunnel ceiling and defects in the slurry walls of the Tip O'Neill tunnel. In addition, 24 Section Design Consultants-other contractors who worked on various parts of the project--have agreed to pay an additional $51 million to resolve certain cost recovery issues associated with the design of the Big Dig. In total, the United States and the Commonwealth will recover $458 million, including interest. United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, Theodore L.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Traveler's Guide
    Florida’s Major Highway Construction Projects: April - June 2018 Interstate 4 24. Charlotte County – Adding lanes and resurfacing from south of N. Jones 46. Martin County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the south- 1. I-4 and I-75 interchange -- Hillsborough County – Modifying the eastbound Loop Road to north of US 17 (4.5 miles) bound Rest Area at mile marker 107, three miles south of Martin Highway / and westbound I-4 (Exit 9) ramps onto northbound I-75 into a single entrance 25. Charlotte County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the SR 714 (Exit 110), near Palm City; the northbound Rest Area at mile marker point with a long auxiliary lane. (2 miles) northbound and southbound Weigh Stations at mile marker 158 106, four miles south of Martin Highway /SR 714 (Exit 110) near Palm City; the southbound Weigh-in-Motion Station at mile marker 113, one mile south of 2. Polk County -- Reconstructing the State Road 559 (Ex 44) interchange 26. Lee County -- Replacing 13 Dynamic Message Signs from mile marker 117 to mile marker 145 Becker Road (Exit 114), near Palm City; and the northbound Weigh-in-Motion 3. Polk County -- Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the eastbound Station at mile marker 92, four miles south of Bridge Road (Exit 96), near 27. Lee County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the northbound and westbound Rest Areas at mile marker 46. Hobe Sound and southbound Rest Areas at mile marker 131 4. Polk County -- Installing a new Fog/Low Visibility Detection System on 47.
    [Show full text]