DOCSLIB.ORG

Current List of Designated Preferred and Restricted Routes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LEGEND Restrictions (Columns A to K) Designations (Columns L to P) 0 = All Hazmats A = All NRHM Hazmats 1 = Class 1 Explosives B = Class 1 Explosives 2 = Class 2 - Gas P = Class 7 HRCQ Radioactive 3 = Class 3 - Flammable I = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) 4 = Class 4 - Flammable Solid/Combustible M = Medical Waste 5 = Class 5 - Organic 6 = Class 6 - Poison 7 = Class 7 - Radioactive ID 8 = Class 8 - Corrosives REST = Restricted Route 9 = Class 9 - Dangerous (Other) PREF = Preferred Route i = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) PRES = Prescribed Route RECOM - Recommended Route YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR ALABAMA YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBattleship Parkway [Mobile] froma By Bridge Rd. Alabama Mobile [Mobile] to Interstate 10 [exit 27] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBay Bridge Rd. [Mobile] from Interstate 165 to Alabama Mobile Battleship Parkway [over Africa Town Cochran Bridge] [Westbound Traffic: Head south on I165; To by-pass the downtown area, head north on I165.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 26B Alabama Mobile [Water St] [Eastbound Traffic: To avoid the downtown area, exit on I-65 North] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 27 Alabama Mobile 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Interstate 10 ton Iterstate 165 Alabama Mobile [A route for trucks wishing to by-pass the downtown area.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Mobile City Limits to Interstate Alabama Mobile 165 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 165 from Water St. [Mobile] to Bay Alabama Mobile Bridge Rd. exit [Mobile] 1993 09/27/93 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 459 from Interstate 20/I-59 [Northeast of Alabama Birmingham Jefferson Birmingham] to Interstate 20/I-59 [Southwest of Birmingham]g] [This[ route should be used in lieu of I- 20/I-50 in the Birmingham area, Jefferson county.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALWater St. [Mobile] from Interstate0 1 [exit 26B] to Alabama Mobile Interstate 165 1994 11/07/94 PRES - ---------- A---- ALUS 43/Alt US90 from State 16/US0 9 or I-10 to Alabama Mobile State 16/US 90 or I-10 [Alternate route for Wallace Twin Tunnels, Mobile County.] 1994 11/07/94 REST 0 ---------- ----- ALWallace Twin Tunnels [I10 & US90 in Mobile] Alabama Mobile [A signed detour is in place to direct traffic along Water St., US43, and Alt US 90. Traffic will pass over the Mobile River using the Cochrane Bridge.] ALASKA YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Gambell Street from Third Ave. to New Seward Alaska Anchorage Rd. 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Glenn Highway from Third Ave. northeast Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Ingra Street from Third Ave. to New Seward Rd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Minnesota Drive from Tudor Rd. to O'Malley Rd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Muldoon Road from Glenn Highway to Tudor Rd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK New Seward Road from the Gambell/Ingra split Alaska Anchorage southward 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Ocean Dock Road from the ocean to Whitney Rd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK O'Malley Road from Minnesota Drive to New Alaska Anchorage Seward Rd. 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Post Rd. from Whitney Rd. to Reeves Blvd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Raspberry Road from the ocean to Minnesota Alaska Anchorage Drive 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Reeves Blvd. from Post Rd. to Glenn Highway Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Third Avenue from the ocean to Reeves Blvd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Tudor Road from Muldoon Rd. to Minnesota Drive Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Whitney Rd. from Ocean Dock Rd. to Post Rd. Alaska Anchorage 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Airport Way from Mitchell Parks Highway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Cushman St. North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Badger Loop Road from Richardson Highway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Richardson Highway North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Cushman St. from the Johansen Expressway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Peger Rd. North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Elliott Highway from Steese Highway north Alaska Fairbanks and the North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Geist Rd. from Mitchell Parks Highway to Peger Alaska Fairbanks and the Rd. North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Illinois Street from the Johansen Expressway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Phillips Field Rd. North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Johansen Expressway from Geist Rd. to Elliott Alaska Fairbanks and the Highway North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Laurance Rd. from Richardson Highway north Alaska Fairbanks and the North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Mitchell Parks Highway from Parks Highway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Richardson Highway North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Old Richardson Rd. from Richardson Highway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Laurance Rd. North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Paarrksks HHiighwghwayay fromfrom MMiitcheltchelll Parksarks HHiighwghwayay AAllaskaaska Fairbanksbanks andand thethe southwest North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Peger Rd. from Geist Rd. southward Alaska Fairbanks and the North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Phillips Field Rd. from Geist Rd. to Illinois St. Alaska Fairbanks and the North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Richardson Highway from Mitchell Parks Highway Alaska Fairbanks and the southeast North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Sheep Creek Goldstream from Parks Highway to Alaska Fairbanks and the Elliott Highway North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Steese Highway from Elliott Highway north Alaska Fairbanks and the North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Van Horn Rd. from Cushman St. west Alaska Fairbanks and the North Pole 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Airport Rd. from Haines Highway east Alaska Haines 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Beach Rd. from Second Ave. east Alaska Haines 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Ferry Terminal Road from ocean to Haines-Lutek Alaska Haines Road 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Haines Highway from Old Haines Highway west Alaska Haines 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Haines -Lutek Rd. from Ferry Terminal Rd. to Alaska Haines Union St. 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Klondike Highway Alaska Haines 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Old Haines Highway from Second Ave. to Haines Alaska Haines Highway 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Second Ave. from Union St. to Beach Rd. Alaska Haines 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Union St. from Haines-Lutek Rd. to Old Haines Alaska Haines Highway 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Kachemak Bay Drive Alaska Homer 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Airport Access Road Alaska Hoonah 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Cannery Road Alaska Hoonah 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Channel Dr. from Egan Dr. to Egan Dr. Alaska Juneau 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Douglas Highway along coast Alaska Juneau 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Egan Dr. from Glacier Highway to Thane Rd. Alaska Juneau 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Glacier Highway along coast to Egan Dr. Alaska Juneau 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK North Douglas Highway along coast to Douglas Alaska Juneau Highway 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Shell Simmons Dr. from Yandukin Dr. to Yandukin Alaska Juneau Dr. 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Thane Rd. from Egan Dr. along coast Alaska Juneau 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Yandukin Dr. from Egan Dr. west Alaska Juneau 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Airport Rd. from Keku Rd. north Alaska Kake 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Church Street Alaska Kake 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Fourth St. from Church St. to Kake Rd. Alaska Kake 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Kake Rd. from 4th St. to Keku Rd. Alaska Kake 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Keku Rd. from Church St. to Airport Rd. Alaska Kake 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Silver Spike Rd. Alaska Kake 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Bridge Access Road from Marathon Rd. to K- Alaska Kenai Beach Rd. 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK K-Beach Rd. from Bridge Access Rd. to Sterling Alaska Kenai Highway 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Kenai Spur Rd. along coast to Marathon Rd. Alaska Kenai 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Marathon Road from Kenai Spur Rd. north Alaska Kenai 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Nikishka Dock Rd. from ocean to Kenai Spur Rd. Alaska Kenai 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK Sterling Highway along coast to Kachemak Bay Alaska Kenai Dr. 2005 11/1/2005 PRES A AK North Tongass Highway along coast to North Alaska Ketchikan Tongass Rd.
Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx

    Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx

    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
  • December 2012 Storm Data Publication

    December 2012 Storm Data Publication

    DECEMBER 2012 VOLUME 54 STORM DATA NUMBER 12 AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photos courtesy of NCDC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena......…….…....…………...…...........….........................3 Reference Notes.............……...........................……….........…..….….............................................252 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events resulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confirmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except
  • 2016 RTP/SCS Transportation Finance Appendix, Adopted April

    2016 RTP/SCS Transportation Finance Appendix, Adopted April

    TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMFINANCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS APPENDIX ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 INTRODUCTION 1 REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 1 CORE AND REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUES 3 EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES AND METHODOLOGY 14 SUMMARY OF REVENUE SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES 18 APPENDIX A: DETAILS ABOUT REVENUE SOURCES 21 APPENDIX B: SCAG REGIONAL FINANCIAL MODEL 30 APPENDIX TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM I TRANSPORTATION FINANCE APPENDIX C: ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUE SOURCES 34 APPENDIX D: FINANCIAL PLAN ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 39 TRANSPORTATION FINANCE INTRODUCTION REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS In accordance with federal fiscal constraint requirements (23 U.S.C. § 134(i)(2)(E)), the The region’s revenue forecast timeframe for the 2016 RTP/SCS is FY2015-16 through Transportation Finance Appendix for the 2016 RTP/SCS identifies how much money the FY2039-40. Consistent with federal guidelines, the financial plan takes into account Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) reasonably expects will be available inflation and reports statistics in nominal (year-of-expenditure) dollars. The underlying data to support our region’s surface transportation investments. The financially constrained 2016 are based on financial planning documents developed by the local county transportation RTP/SCS includes both a “traditional” core revenue forecast comprised of existing local, commissions and transit operators. The revenue model also uses information from the state and federal sources and more innovative but reasonably available sources of revenue California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Transportation to implement a program of infrastructure improvements to keep freight and people moving. Commission (CTC). The regional forecasts incorporate the county forecasts where available The financial plan further documents progress made since past RTPs and describes steps and fill data using a common framework.
  • Patriot Hills of Dallas

    Patriot Hills of Dallas

    Patriot Hills of Dallas Background: After years of planning and market research our team assembled over 200+ - acres of prime Dallas property that was comprised of 8 separate properties. There is no record of any construction every being built on any of the 200 acres other than a homestead cabin. Much of the property was part of a family ranch used for grazing which is now overgrown with cedar and other species of trees and native grasses. Location: View property in the Dallas metroplex is one of the most unique features unmatched in the entire Dallas Fort Worth area. Most of the property is on a high bluff 100 feet above the surrounding area overlooking the Dallas Baptist University and the skyline of Fort Worth 21+ miles to the west. Convenient access to the greater Fort Worth and Dallas area by Interstate 20 and Interstate 30 Via Spur 408 freeways, Interstate 35, freeway 74, and the property is currently served by DART bus stops which provide connections to other mass transit options. The property is located 2 miles north of freeway 20 on the Spur 408 freeway and W. Kiest Blvd within the Dallas city limits. The property fronts on the East side of the Spur 408 freeway from Kiest Blvd exit on the North and runs continuous to the South to Merrifield Rd exit. The City of Dallas has plans to extend this road straight east to connect to West Ledbetter Drive that will take you directly to the Dallas Executive Airport and connecting on east with Freeway 67, Interstate 35 and Interstate 45.
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area

    Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area

    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
  • Kansas Lane Extension Regional Multi-Modal Connector

    Kansas Lane Extension Regional Multi-Modal Connector

    Department of Transportation Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD Transportation) Grants Program Kansas Lane Extension Regional Multi-Modal Connector City of Monroe, Louisiana May 2020 Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 -- Application Snapshot ........................................................................................................ 3 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 4 Concise Description ............................................................................................................ 4 Transportation Challenges .................................................................................................. 7 Addressing Traffic Challenges ............................................................................................ 8 Project History .................................................................................................................... 9 Benefit to Rural Communities .............................................................................................. 9 Project Location .....................................................................................................................10 Grant Funds, Sources and Uses of Project Funds .................................................................12 Project budget ....................................................................................................................12
  • Appendix H Locational Impacts of Trans Theme Packages

    Appendix H Locational Impacts of Trans Theme Packages

    Appendix H Facility Specific Impacts of the Transportation Theme Packages Appendix H Facility specific impacts of the Transportation Theme Packages Appendix H discusses the facility specific impacts of the transportation theme packages. The appendix is divided into three parts. Part 1 (page H-2) lists the analyzed transportation options for each grouping within each theme. Part 2 (Page H-4) lists the facility specific impacts of each of the options. Part 3 (page H-15) describes the key findings of these analyses. Part 1 – Analyzed Transportation Options for Each Theme and Grouping Interstate Theme Interstate 1 (Grouping 1) -- This package includes primarily system management types of strategies: · #2 - Increase speed limit on the Maine Turnpike from 55 mph to 60 mph between 6A and 9 and on Falmouth Spur · #3 - Reconfigure Falmouth Spur/I-95/I-295 Interchange in Falmouth · #4 - Add SB lane on I-295 between Exit 3 (Westbrook St) and 4 (Route 1) in South Portland · #5 - Add NB lane on I-295 between Exit 6 (Forest Ave) and 7 (Franklin St) in Portland · #7 - Regional Ring road (keeps Route 703 as freeway facility) · #11 - Reconfigure I-295 Exit 4 in South Portland (not modeled) · #12 - Ramp reconfiguration of Exit 3/Westbrook Street in South Portland · #13 - Full interchange at Route 26/100 and Falmouth Spur in Falmouth · #6 - Regional Toll system with new toll plaza per latest Maine Turnpike Authority concept at Exit 7 (keeping Exit 6A plaza) and removing other plazas on Turnpike and Falmouth Spur. Interstate 2 (Grouping 2) -- Adds Turnpike widening to increment 1: · #1 - Widen Turnpike from 6A to 9 and increase speeds from 55 mph to 65 mph in South Portland, Portland and Falmouth.
  • Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate

    Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate

    New 9+/-Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate 15 & Dale Evans Parkway Apple Valley, CA Freeway Location Traffic Counts in Excess of 66,000VPD 1 Acre Pads Available, For Sale, Ground Lease or Build-to-Suit Highlights Gateway to Apple Valley Freeway Exposure / Frontage to I-15 in excess of 66,000 VPD Off/On Ramp Location. Located in highly sought after freeway ramp location on I-15 in high desert corridor Interstate I-15 heavily Traveled with Over 2 Million Vehicles Per Month Located 20 Miles South of Barstow/Lenwood, 10 Miles North of Victorville Located in Area with High Demand for Gas, Food and Lodging Conveniently Located Midway Between Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada Adam Farmer P. (951) 696-2727 Xpresswest Bullet Train from Victorville to Las Vegas plans to Cell. (951) 764-3744 build station across freeway. www.xpresswest.com [email protected] 26856 Adams Ave Suite 200 Murrieta, CA 92562 This information is compiled from data that we believe to be correct but, no liability is assumed by this company as to accuracy of such data Area / I-15 Gateway To Apple Valley Site consists of a 9 acre development at the North East Corner of Dale Evans Parkway and Interstate 15 located in Apple Valley. Site offers freeway frontage, on/off ramp position strategically to capture all traffic traveling on the I-15. Development will offer 9 pad sites available for gas, food, multi tenant and lodging. Interstate 15 runs North and South with traffic counts in excess of 66,000 ADT. Pads will be available for sale, ground lease or build-to-suit.
  • Transportation/4

    Transportation/4

    TRANSPORTATION/4 4.1/OVERVIEW Like the rest of the City, Biloxi’s transportation system was The City of Biloxi is in a rebuilding mode, both to replace aging profoundly impacted by Hurricane Katrina. Prior to Hurricane infrastructure and to repair and improve the roadways and fa- Katrina, the City was experiencing intensive development of cilities that were damaged by Katrina and subsequent storms. coastal properties adjacent to Highway 90, including condo- - minium, casino, and retail projects. Katrina devastated High- lowing reconstruction of U.S. Highway 90, the Biloxi Bridge, way 90 and other key transportation facilities, highlighting andPre-Katrina casinos. traffic Many volumes transportation and congestion projects haveare in returned progress fol or Biloxi’s dependence on a constrained network of roadways under consideration, providing an opportunity for coordinat- and bridges connecting to inland areas. ed, long-range planning for a system that supports the future The City of Biloxi operated in a State of Emergency for over land use and development pattern of Biloxi. In that context, two years following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall on August 29, the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan lays 2005. Roadway access to the Biloxi Peninsula is provided by out a strategy to develop a multi-modal system that improves Highway 90 and Pass Road from the west and by three key mobility and safety and increases the choices available to resi- bridges from the east and north: Highway 90 via the Biloxi dents and visitors to move about the City. Bay Bridge from Oceans Springs and I-110 and Popp’s Ferry Road over Back Bay.
  • Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities

    Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities

    60 Transportation Research Record 1074 Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities ROOSEVELT STEPTOE and CLARENCE THORNTON ABSTRACT The purpose of the research on which this paper is based was to measure the changes in land use and related economic and environmental variables that were attributable to the location and operation of a portion of an Interstate high­ way in the Scotlandville community of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. More specifi­ cally, the research was designed to determine the degree to which low-income minority communities experience unique highway impacts. The research was con­ ducted in two phases--a baseline assessment phase and a follow-on, longitudinal phase. In the baseline phase, measures were taken of several significant vari­ ables including (a) land use on a parcel-by-parcel basis; (b) recreational pat­ terns; (cl traffic volumes and residential densities; (d) number and variety of minority businesses; (e) housing types, quality, and conditions; and (fl street types and conditions. The follow-on phase was completed after the highway was completed and opened to traffic. A comparison of these two sets of data consti­ tutes the assessment of the highway impacts on this community. The literature was carefully examined and the reported impacts on nonminority communities were summarized for comparison with the Scotlandville community. One conclusion reached was that many of the highway impacts identified in Scotlandville were similar to those reported in other communities. The major exception is that, whereas highways generally induced commercial developments around major inter­ changes in nonminority communities, the highway does not appear to attract new businesses in minority communities.
  • View the Meeting Presentation

    View the Meeting Presentation

    SHERIDAN EXPRESSWAY – HUNTS POINT PLANNING STUDY March 7, 2013 NYCDCP & NYCDOT ‐ SEHP 1 AGENDA Review of Scenarios Traffic Model Results •Travel Times •Truck Volumes •Summary Next Steps 3/7/2013 NYCDOT - SEHP - DRAFT South Bronx Transportation Network + SEHP Study Area CROSS BRONX EXPRESSW AY SEHP Study Area SHERIDAN EXPRESSWAY Trucks exit the Sheridan at Westchester Ave and continue on local streets BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY LOCAL STREETS Hunts Point Food Distribution Center north Oak Point Ramp Area Truck Route on Local Streets Improved access to Hunts Point Oak Point Ramps BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY • On/Off ramps going east BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY and west on the Bruckner Expressway • Ramp design requires L E GGETT approx 9,000 linear feet AVE of roadway • Design requires acquisition of private property and potential realignment of rail lines AMTRAK / CSX OAK POI NT A VE NYS Department of Transportation ‘Bruckner-Sheridan Expressway Interchange Reconstruction and Hunts Point Peninsula Access Environmental Impact Statement’ July 2010 East Ramps • On/Off ramps going Y BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWA east on the Bruckner BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY BRUCKNER EXPRESSWAY Expressway • Ramp design requires approx 4,000 linear feet LE GGET T of roadway AVE • Less impact on private or rail properties • Potential to remove north traffi c from Hunts Pt Ave through Sheridan ramp OAK POI closure NT A VE NYC Department of Transportation Proposal to create direct access to Hunts Point • Catalyzes changes to Sheridan Expressway at grade section Sheridan Expressway CROSS BRONX Cross Bronx - connections to remain E 174th E 173th at grade E 172nd At grade JENNINGS Bruckner Expressway - WESTCHESTER AVE connections to remain Below Grade below grade BRUCKNER EXPWY north Above Grade above grade Sheridan Expressway - At Grade - Existing Conditions CROSS BRONX Key map • $81M of public investment along West E 174th the southern Bronx River has Farms E 173th Rezoning led to a cleaner more active E 172nd JENNINGS waterfront.
  • Florida Traveler's Guide

    Florida Traveler's Guide

    Florida’s Major Highway Construction Projects: April - June 2018 Interstate 4 24. Charlotte County – Adding lanes and resurfacing from south of N. Jones 46. Martin County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the south- 1. I-4 and I-75 interchange -- Hillsborough County – Modifying the eastbound Loop Road to north of US 17 (4.5 miles) bound Rest Area at mile marker 107, three miles south of Martin Highway / and westbound I-4 (Exit 9) ramps onto northbound I-75 into a single entrance 25. Charlotte County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the SR 714 (Exit 110), near Palm City; the northbound Rest Area at mile marker point with a long auxiliary lane. (2 miles) northbound and southbound Weigh Stations at mile marker 158 106, four miles south of Martin Highway /SR 714 (Exit 110) near Palm City; the southbound Weigh-in-Motion Station at mile marker 113, one mile south of 2. Polk County -- Reconstructing the State Road 559 (Ex 44) interchange 26. Lee County -- Replacing 13 Dynamic Message Signs from mile marker 117 to mile marker 145 Becker Road (Exit 114), near Palm City; and the northbound Weigh-in-Motion 3. Polk County -- Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the eastbound Station at mile marker 92, four miles south of Bridge Road (Exit 96), near 27. Lee County – Installing Truck Parking Availability System for the northbound and westbound Rest Areas at mile marker 46. Hobe Sound and southbound Rest Areas at mile marker 131 4. Polk County -- Installing a new Fog/Low Visibility Detection System on 47.