DOCSLIB.ORG

Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse DEIS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse DEIS Chapter 3. Affected Environment This page intentionally left blank Draft Resource Management iii PlanEnvironmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Dear Reader Letter ....................................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... xiii _1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 _2. Proposed Action and Alternatives .......................................................................................... 1 _3. Affected Environment ............................................................................................................. 3 _3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1. Organization of Chapter 3 ...................................................................................... 5 _3.2. Greater Sage-Grouse and Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat ................................................. 7 3.2.1. Range and Taxonomy ............................................................................................ 7 3.2.2. Biology and Life History ....................................................................................... 7 3.2.3. Management Zones .............................................................................................. 13 3.2.4. Regional Context ................................................................................................. 32 _3.3. Vegetation (Including Invasive and Exotic Species/Noxious Weeds) .......................... 36 3.3.1. Weed Control Guidance and Programs ................................................................ 36 3.3.2. Current Condition ................................................................................................ 37 _3.4. Riparian Areas and Wetlands ........................................................................................ 48 _3.5. Fish and Wildlife and Special Status Species ............................................................... 51 3.5.1. Conditions on BLM-Administered Lands ........................................................... 51 3.5.2. Conditions on Forest Service-Administered Lands ............................................. 54 3.5.3. Species Accounts ................................................................................................. 54 3.5.4. Federal Endangered, Threatened, Proposed, and Candidate Species .................. 57 3.5.5. Management Indicator Species (Forest Service) ................................................. 61 _3.6. Wild Horses and Burros ................................................................................................ 61 3.6.1. Current Conditions ............................................................................................... 62 _3.7. Wildland Fire and Fire Management ............................................................................ 66 _3.8. Livestock Grazing ......................................................................................................... 76 _3.9. Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 85 _3.10. Comprehensive Travel and Transportation Management ........................................... 87 _3.11. Land Use and Realty ................................................................................................... 93 _3.12. Renewable Energy Resources ................................................................................... 102 _3.13. Mineral Resources .................................................................................................... 106 _3.14. Special Designations ................................................................................................. 122 3.14.1. Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ........................................................ 123 3.14.2. Wilderness ........................................................................................................ 125 3.14.3. Wilderness Study Areas ................................................................................... 126 3.14.4. Wild and Scenic Rivers .................................................................................... 128 3.14.5. Other Special Designations .............................................................................. 128 Table of Contents iv Draft Resource Management PlanEnvironmental Impact Statement _3.15. Water Resources ........................................................................................................ 130 _3.16. Soil Resources ........................................................................................................... 139 _3.17. Cultural Heritage Resources ..................................................................................... 140 _3.18. Tribal Interests (including Native American Religious Concerns) ........................... 141 _3.19. Lands with Wilderness Characteristics (BLM) ......................................................... 153 _3.20. Visual Resources ....................................................................................................... 155 _3.21. Air Quality ................................................................................................................ 157 _3.22. Climate Change ......................................................................................................... 159 _3.23. Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ............................................................. 168 Table of Contents Draft Resource Management v PlanEnvironmental Impact Statement List of Figures Figure 3.1. Historic Sage Grouse Range .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 3.2. Preliminary Priority and General Sage-Grouse Habitat and WAFWA Management Zones .................................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 3.3. Populations/Subpopulation Management Units and WAFWA Management Zones ... 15 Figure 3.4. Occupied Habitat ......................................................................................................... 20 Figure 3.5. Areas with a High Probability of Cheatgrass Occurance ............................................ 22 Figure 3.6. Fire History 2000-2012 ............................................................................................... 22 Figure 3.7. Landscape Condition ................................................................................................... 33 Figure 3.8. Bioclimate Change Summary: Greater Sage-Grouse .................................................. 35 Figure 3.9. Wild Horse and Burro Herd Areas, Herd Management Areas, and Territories ........... 62 Figure 3.10. Areas with Sagebrush and Pinyon-Juniper Conifer Interface ................................... 69 Figure 3.11. Areas with High Fire Probability ............................................................................... 76 Figure 3.12. .................................................................................................................................... 85 Figure 3.13. Renewable Energy ................................................................................................... 104 Figure 3.14. Existing Oil and Gas Leases and Wells ................................................................... 117 Figure 3.15. Existing Geothermal Leases and Power Plants ....................................................... 117 Figure 3.16. Special Designations and Other Important Resources ............................................ 123 Figure 3.17. Conceptual Groundwater Flow System ................................................................... 136 Figure 3.18. Designations for the Particulate Matter PM10National Ambient Air Quality Standards .......................................................................................................................... 158 Figure 3.19. Forecasted Monthly Maximum Summer Temperature Change (degrees F) by the 2020s, for July, August, and September (Comer et al. 2012a) ........................................ 163 Figure 3.20. Forecasted Monthly Maximum Summer Temperature Increases (degrees F) for 2060, for July and August (Comer et al. 2012a) .............................................................. 163 List of Figures This page intentionally left blank Draft Resource Management vii PlanEnvironmental Impact Statement List of Tables Table 3.1. Characteristics of Sagebrush Rangeland Needed for Productive GRSG Habitat ......... 11 Table 3.2. Habitat Health Indicators and Objectives ..................................................................... 12 Table 3.3. WAFWA Management Zones in the Planning Area ..................................................... 14 Table 3.4. Surface Ownership within Nevada and Northeastern California Population/Subpopulation Areas ........................................................................................ 17 Table 3.5. GRSG Habitat1 within Nevada and Northeastern California Population/ Subpopulation Areas .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematics of the Northern Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Pacific–North American Plate Boundary
    Kinematics of the northern Walker Lane: An incipient transform fault along the Paci®c±North American plate boundary James E. Faulds Christopher D. Henry Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, MS 178, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA Nicholas H. Hinz ABSTRACT GEOLOGIC SETTING In the western Great Basin of North America, a system of dextral faults accommodates As western North America has evolved 15%±25% of the Paci®c±North American plate motion. The northern Walker Lane in from a convergent to a transform margin in northwest Nevada and northeast California occupies the northern terminus of this system. the past 30 m.y., the northern Walker Lane has This young evolving part of the plate boundary offers insight into how strike-slip fault undergone widespread volcanism and tecto- systems develop and may re¯ect the birth of a transform fault. A belt of overlapping, left- nism. Tertiary volcanic strata include 31±23 stepping dextral faults dominates the northern Walker Lane. Offset segments of a W- Ma ash-¯ow tuffs associated with the south- trending Oligocene paleovalley suggest ;20±30 km of cumulative dextral slip beginning ward-migrating ``ignimbrite ¯are up,'' 22±5 ca. 9±3 Ma. The inferred long-term slip rate of ;2±10 mm/yr is compatible with global Ma calc-alkaline intermediate-composition positioning system observations of the current strain ®eld. We interpret the left-stepping rocks related to the ancestral Cascade arc, and faults as macroscopic Riedel shears developing above a nascent lithospheric-scale trans- 13 Ma to present bimodal rocks linked to Ba- form fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Spanish Springs Valley, Washoe County, West-Central Nevada
    ltl nru eX' 1506-00055 Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Urban Development on Water Resources of Spanish Springs Valley, Washoe County, West-Central Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water- Resou rces I nvestigations Repo ft 96-4297 Prepared in cooperation with the NEVADA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1506-00055 Northeastward photographic views of irrigated lands in southern part of Spanish Springs Valley in (A) 1967 and (B) 1996. Orr Ditch is in foreground. Trailer park seen at left in 1967 view is hidden by trees thirty years later. ln 1996, urban development in the form of a subdivision coexists with irrigated lands. Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Urban Development on Water Resources of Spanish Springs Valley, Washoe County, West-Central Nevada By David L. Berger, Wyn C. Ross, Carl E. Thodal, and Armando R. Robledo U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Wate r- Reso u rces I nvesti gatio ns Report 96- 4297 Prepared in cooperation with the NEVADA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City, Nevada 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver. CO 80225-0286 email : [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract....... Location and General Features of Study Area ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Urban Development on Water Resources of Spanish Springs Valley, Washoe County, West-Central Nevada by David L
    Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Urban Development on Water Resources of Spanish Springs Valley, Washoe County, West-Central Nevada By David L. Berger, Wyn C. Ross, Carl E. Thodal, and Armando R. Robledo U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4297 Prepared in cooperation with the NEVADA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City, Nevada 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver, CO 80225-0286 email: [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction............................................................................................~^ 1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Location and General Features of Study Area .......................................................................................................... 2 Urban Development .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revised January 19, 2018 Updated June 19, 2018
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION / BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC WILDLIFE YUBA PROJECT YUBA RIVER RANGER DISTRICT TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST REVISED JANUARY 19, 2018 UPDATED JUNE 19, 2018 PREPARED BY: MARILYN TIERNEY DISTRICT WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 II. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 4 III. CONSULTATION TO DATE ...................................................................................................... 4 IV. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............................................................................... 5 V. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES ......................... 6 VI. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES, AND DETERMINATION ......................................................................... 41 SPECIES-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION ........................................................... 54 TERRESTRIAL SPECIES ........................................................................................................................ 55 WESTERN BUMBLE BEE ............................................................................................................. 55 BALD EAGLE ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Southern Washoe County Urban
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Carson City Field Office Carson City, Nevada January 2001 FINAL SOUTHERN WASHOE COUNTY URBAN INTERFACE PLAN AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................2 LOCATION ..................................................................2 PLAN AMENDMENT MODIFICATIONS ........................................2 FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT DECISION ........................................3 LANDS ................................................................3 MINERALS ............................................................5 RECREATION ..........................................................6 WILDLIFE .............................................................6 AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (ACEC) .................6 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION .......................................8 DECISION RECORD/FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) ...........10 APPENDIX A ...............................................................11 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS & RESPONSES APPENDIX B ...............................................................20 CARSON WANDERING SKIPPER ACEC NOMINATION APPENDIX C ...............................................................28 PAH RAH HIGH BASIN PETROGLYPH DISTRICT ACEC NOMINATION APPENDIX D ...............................................................38 VIRGINIA RANGE WILLIAMS COMBLEAF HABITAT AREA ACEC NOMINATION APPENDIX E ...............................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of the Reno 1 O by 2° Quadrangle, Nevada and California
    Geology and Mineral Resources of the Reno 1 o by 2° Quadrangle, Nevada and California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2019 Geology and Mineral Resources of the Reno 1 o by 2° Quadrangle, Nevada and California By DAVID A. JOHN, JOHN H. STEWART, JAMES E. KILBURN, NORMAN J. SILBERLING, and LARRY C. ROWAN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Geology and mineral resources of the Reno 1 o by 2° quadrangle, Nevada and California I by David A. John ... [et al.]. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 2019) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:2019 1. Mines and mineral resources-Nevada-Reno Region. 2. Mines and mineral resources-California. 3. Geology-Nevada-Reno Region. 4. Geology-California. I. John, David A. II. Series. QE75.89 [TN24.NJ 557.3 s-dc20 [553'.09793'55] 92-32554 CIP CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 2 Background studies 2 Geologic mapping 2 Gravity data 4 Aeromagnetic data 4 Isotopic-dating studies 4 Paleomagnetic data 4 Geochemical data 5 Mines and prospects data 6 Remote-sensing data 7 Area description 7 Geology 8 Pre-Tertiary
    [Show full text]
  • Empsi Document Template
    US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City District, Nevada March 2013 Carson City District Resource Management Plan Revision Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Report on the Application of the Relevance and Importance Criteria TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 II. REQUIREMENTS FOR ACEC DESIGNATION ...................................................................... 4 III. SPECIAL MANAGEMENT ATTENTION ............................................................................... 8 IV. EVALUATION PROCESS ..................................................................................................... 8 V. LIST OF PREPARERS ......................................................................................................... 36 APPENDICES A Maps of ACECs Recommended for Further Analysis in the Draft RMP TABLES Page 1 Proposed ACECs Found to Meet the Relevance and Importance Criteria ...................................... 6 2 Summary of the Existing and Proposed ACECs in the Planning Area Determined to Meet the Relevance and Importance Criteria ......................................................................................................... 10 3 Summary of the Proposed ACECs in the Planning Area Determined Not to Meet the
    [Show full text]
  • Pah Rah Grazing Allotment Field Office, Nevada
    Sierra Front Sierra DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Pah Rah Grazing Allotment Nevada Office, Field DOI-BLM-NV-C020-2012-0048-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City District Sierra Front Field Office 5665 Morgan Mill Road Carson City, Nevada 89701 775-885-6000 March 2013 It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DOI-BLM-NV-C020-2012-0048-EA ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scoping and Issue Identification .......................................................................................... 2 1.4 Decision to Be Made ............................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Land Use Plan Conformance Statement............................................................................... 3 1.6 Relationships to Statutes, Regulations and Other Plans ....................................................... 3 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 5 2.1 Alternative A: No Action (Current Management)
    [Show full text]
  • Lineament Analysis Of' an Aeromagnetic Survey, Warm Springs Valley, Washoe County, Nevada
    I 3725'00045 LINEAMENT ANALYSIS OF AN AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY, I WARM SPRINGS VALLEY. WASHOE COLINTYNEVADA I I I I I I I I I I I I I Michael C.Widmer t Washoe County Department of Water Resources t Reno- Nevada October 2001 T I I I LINEAMENT ANALYSIS OF' AN AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY, WARM SPRINGS VALLEY, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA I Introduction This report discusses a lineament analysis of aeromagnetic data for Warm Springs Valley. The results can be used to further the understanding of geologic structure, particularly fault structure. I The analysis combines recent work with a previous report by Paul Hartley (1995), under contract with the Washoe County Department of Water Resources. His analysis was to determine the I depth of bedrock and the delineation of sediments within a portion of Warm Springs Valley. Airborne Geophysical Data Dighem, Inc. was contracted by Washoe County to conduct an airborne geophysical survey I (Dighem, 1994). Magnetic and electromagnetic instrumentation was installed in a Lama turbine helicopter (Geoseis Helicopters, Inc.) which flew at an average airspeed of 100 kph (62 mph) I with a magnetometer bird height of 30 meters (98 feet) above ground level. The survey consisted of 414 kilometers of traverse line (257 miles) oriented at 50'1230'to geographic north with 667 meters (2000 feet) line spacing. Two tie lines were oriented at 140'1320o to geographic ! north. The magnetic data was collected with a Picodas 3340 optically pumped cesium vapor magnetometer. The sampling rate was l0 per second with a sensitivity of 0.01nT. Navigation and positioning consisting of a Sercel NR 106 real-time differential global positioning system I with <5 meter accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • October 3, 2013 Minutes
    MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF CHURCHILL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 155 No. Taylor Street, Fallon, NV Fallon, Nevada October 3, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Churchill County Board of Commissioners was called to order at 8: 15 a.m. on the above date by Chairman Erquiaga. PRESENT: Carl Erquiaga, Chairman Pete Olsen, Vice-Chair Harry Scharmann, Commissioner Ben Shawcroft, Civil Deputy District Attorney Wade Carner, Civil Deputy District Attorney Eleanor Lockwood, County Manager Alan Kalt, Comptroller Kelly G. Helton, Clerk of the Board Pamela D. Moore, Deputy Clerk of the Board ABSENT: N/A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by the board and public. VERIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA: It was verified by Deputy Clerk Moore that the Agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with NRS 241 . ACTION ITEMS: AGENDA: Commissioner Scharmann made a motion to approve the Agenda as submitted. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. MINUTES: Commissioner Olsen made a motion to approve the Minutes of the special meeting held on September 26, 2011; the regular meeting held on September 5, 2013; and the regular meeting held on September 18, 2013 as submitted. Commissioner Scharmann seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. PUBLIC COMMENTS : Chairman Erquiaga inquired if there were any public comments on issues that were not listed on the Agenda. Michelle Ippolito said she is here as President of the Fallon Animal Welfare Group. She had a prepared handout that explained more about what she is talking about today, which was distributed to the board and public and which included a brochure for the group.
    [Show full text]