DOCSLIB.ORG

Advisory Services Agreement on Strengthening Planning And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Advisory Services Agreement on Strengthening Planning and Budgeting Capacity and Supporting the Introduction of Performance Budgeting (P156889) Output No. 5 Institutional Strategic Plan 2018-2021 for the Ministry of Transport July 2018 Project co-financed from the European Social Fund through the Operational Programme Administrative Capacity 2014-2020 This report has been delivered under the Advisory Services Agreement on Strengthening Planning and Budgeting Capacity and Supporting the Introduction of Performance Budgeting signed between the General Secretariat of the Government and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development on June 8, 2016. It corresponds to Output 5 under the above-mentioned agreement. Disclaimer This report is a product of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank. The findings, interpretation, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. This report does not necessarily represent the position of the European Union or the Romanian Government. Copyright Statement The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable laws. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with the complete information to either: (i) the General Secretariat of the Government (1 Victoriei Square, Bucharest, Romania); or (ii) the World Bank Group Romania (Vasile Lascăr Street, No 31, Et 6, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania). Table of Contents Preamble ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 I. Context of the Sector ............................................................................................................................ 7 II. Mission and Vision ............................................................................................................................. 15 III. Strategic Objectives, Programs, Measures and Indicators .................................................................. 16 Strategic Objective 1: Develop an integrated and environmentally friendly national transport system . 16 Program 1.1. Optimizing the national transport system and maintaining a balanced and sustainable rail and road network ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Program 1.2. Development of road and rail infrastructure within the main internal and international transport corridors ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Program 1.3. Increase the operational capacities of the Danube River and Ports .................................... 29 Strategic Objective 2: Develop a multimodal national transport system that is sustainable and efficient32 Program 2.1. Increasing the competitiveness of rail passenger transport services .................................. 37 Program 2.2. Development of an intermodal freight transport system, mainly served by environment- friendly transport modes ........................................................................................................................... 41 Program 2.3. Strengthening the regional and municipal organization of public passenger transport ..... 43 Program 2.4. Achieve a single transport area in air transport .................................................................. 46 Strategic Objective 3: Provide safe, accessible and clean transport solutions for the citizens ................ 48 Program 3.1. Safer transport ..................................................................................................................... 53 Program 3.2. Cleaner transport ................................................................................................................. 56 Program 3.3. Increased transport accessibility .......................................................................................... 57 Program 3.4. Connection of rural areas to major road transport axes ..................................................... 59 Program 3.5. Development of Intelligent Transport Systems ................................................................... 60 Strategic Objective 4: Optimize the performance of the Ministry of Transport to provide better services to the public ...................................................................................................................................... 63 Program 4.1: Improve the administrative capacity of the sectoral policy management and implementation ......................................................................................................................................... 66 IV. Arrangements for Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of the ISP .......................................... 69 V. Multiannual and Annual Budgeting and Financing Sources ................................................................. 72 Annex 1a: Budgetary Objectives and Programs for the period 2018-2021 (thousand RON) ...................... 76 Annex 1b: Programs, Measures and Budget allocations 2018-2021 ......................................................... 77 Annex 2: Institutional Strategic Plan (summary table) ............................................................................ 82 Annex 3: Programs and connected Measures, Output Indicators (summary table)................................... 91 Annex 4: Institutional Profile ............................................................................................................... 140 Annex 5. Draft normative acts proposed in the Government's Annual Work Plan by the Ministry of Transport for 2018 ............................................................................................................................... 150 ii List of Acronyms ATM Air Traffic Management CEO Chief Executive Officer CFR Călători Societatea Naţională de Transport Feroviar de Călători, “ CFR Călători” (railway passenger company) CFR Marfă Societatea Naţională de Transport Feroviar de Marfă, “CFR Mărfă S.A.” (railway freight company) CFR SA Societatea Naţională de Căi Ferate, “ CFR S.A.” (railway infrastructure company) CNAIR National Road Management Company CSIR Inter-Ministerial Council for Road Safety EC European Commission ERDF EU Regional Development Fund ERTMS European Rail Traffic Management System EU European Union EUR Euro currency unit GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gas GTMP General Transport Master Plan ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICT Information and communication technology IRI International road roughness index ITS Intelligent transport System MAIC Multi-Annual Infrastructure Contract (with the infrastructure managers) MoT Ministry of Transport OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OPT Operational Programme for Transport PBMC Performance-based maintenance contract PPP Public Private Partnership PSC Passenger Service Contract PSO Public Service Obligation PSP Private Sector Participation RIS River Information Services RNCMNR Romania National Company for Motorways and National Roads RON Romanian New Lei Ro-Ro Roll-on Roll-off RRA Rail Reform Authority SES Single European Sky SESAR Single European Sky ATM research GSG General Secretariat of the Government of Romania SOE State-owned enterprise TEN-T Trans- European Network for transport TEU Twenty-foot equivalent Units TU Traffic Unit VMS Vehicle Management System VNIS Vessel Information Navigation System iii List of Figures Figure 1. Monitoring cycle for Ministry of Transport’s Institutional Strategic Plan ............................................. 70 Figure 2. ISP structure by funding source ............................................................................................................. 73 Figure 3. Breakdown of financial envelopes, by year and strategic objective ..................................................... 74 List of Tables Table 1. EU financial allocations in Romania for 2014-2020 (mil. EUR, 2011 constant prices) .................................. 72 Table 2. Financial resources for operationalizing the 2018-2021 ISP (thousand RON) .............................................. 73 Table 3. Breakdown of estimated financial resources, by year and strategic objective (thousand RON, 2018-2021) .................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 iv Acknowledgments This report was prepared by a team comprised of Cătălin Păuna (TTL, Senior Economist), Jérôme Bleuchot (Transport Strategy expert), Mara Bubberman (Public Policy expert), Costel Todor and Mircea Tulea (World Bank experts). The report benefited from thoughtful comments from Jean-Francois Marteau (Program Leader Sustainable Development), Antonio Nunez (Transport Specialist) and Nadia Badea (Operations Officer) and of the overall guidance from Lalita Moorty (Practice Manager, Macro Economics and Fiscal Management)
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Progress Recorded in the Achievement of the National Energy

    Report on the Progress Recorded in the Achievement of the National Energy

    THE NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (AUTORITATEA NAȚIONALĂ DE REGLEMENTARE ÎN DOMENIUL ENERGIEI) DEPARTMENT FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY (DEPARTAMENTUL PENTRU EFICIENŢĂ ENERGETICĂ) REPORT ON THE PROGRESS RECORDED IN THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY OBJECTIVES 24 APRIL 2019 Str. Constantin Nacu, nr. 3, Sector 2, Bucharest, Postcode: 020995 Tel. +40 213278100 Fax +40 213124365 E-mail: [email protected]. Website: www.anre.ro CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. UPDATES OF THE MAIN LEGISLATIVE AND NON-LEGISLATIVE 3 REGULATORY ACTS ENFORCED IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR [as per Annex 11(b) of Law No 121/2014 on energy efficiency, as subsequently amended and supplemented] Primary legislation 6 Secondary legislation 6 3. MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS ON TREND IN ENERGY 10 CONSUMPTION [as per Annex 11(a) of Law No 121/2014 on energy efficiency, as subsequently amended and supplemented] 4. POSITION HELD BY ROMANIA IN EUROPE IN TERMS OF ENERGY 17 EFFICIENCY 4.1 Quantitative evaluations and qualitative assessments 17 4.2. Energy productivity 20 5. MONITORING IN THE FIELD OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY 23 5.1 Monitoring of economic operators 23 5.2 Monitoring of localities with over 5 000 inhabitants 25 5.3 Monitoring of energy efficient equipment market 27 30 5.4 Monitoring of the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP) A. Energy supply system 32 B. The final energy consumer. (Article 7 of DEE 2012/27/EU) 44 6. STATEMENT OF ENERGY AUDITS AND ACCESS TO THE SYSTEMS OF 55 AUTHORISATION OF ENERGY AUDITORS AND CERTIFICATION OF ENERGY MANAGERS 6.1 Energy manager certificates 55 6.2. Authorisation of energy auditors 59 6.3 Energy services providers 70 6.4 Authorisation of legal persons involved in the business of assembly and operation of cost allocation systems for heat and hot water for consumption in 72 condominium type buildings 7.
  • Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269

    Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269

    CONSOLIDATED REPORT Framework agreement to support EIB advisory services (EIBAS) activities inside and outside EU-28 Lot 3: Transport Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269 CONSULTING SAFEGE De Kleetlaan 5 B-1831 DIEGEM International Division SAFEGE SAS - SIÈGE SOCIAL Parc de l’Ile - 15/27 rue du Port 92022 NANTERRE CEDEX www.safege.com The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the view of the Advisory Hub, nor the European Investment Bank, nor the European Commission Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269 Framework agreement to support EIB advisory services (EIBAS) activities inside and outside EU-28 Lot 3: Transport Document quality information General information Author(s) Ilie Bricicaru, Kristiana Chakarova, Matthew Chamberlain, Loreta Robertina Gherman, Razvan Iulian Mazilu Project name RSIP in Romania – AA-010269 Document name Consolidated Report on Road Safety Investment Program in Romania Date April 05th, 2021 Reference Version 4 Addressee(s) Sent to: Name Organisation Sent on (date): Kevin CHEUNG, Per MATHIASEN, Teodora TATARU EIB Borislava GABROVSKA EIAH, EIB 05.04.2021 Cristian Andrei, Flavius PAVAL, Denyssa PPELIN CNAIR Copy to: Name Organisation Sent on (date): Joanna TALLEC, Spiros TRIANTAFILLOS SUEZ Consulting 05.04.2021 History of modifications Version Date Written by Approved & signed by: Ilie BRICICARU, Kristiana CHAKAROVA, Version 1 20.01.2021 Matthew CHAMBERLAIN Loreta Robertina GHERMAN Razvan Iulian MAZILU Ilie
  • Commercial Management and Financing of Roads (1998)

    Commercial Management and Financing of Roads (1998)

    WORLD BANK TECHNICAL PAPER NO. 409 Work in progress for public discussion Commercial Management and Financing of Roads Iann G Heggie Piers Vickers RECENT WORLD BANK TECHNICAL PAPERS No. 334 Mosse and Sontheimer, PerformanceMonitoring Indicators Handbook No. 335 Kirmani and Le Moigne, FosteringRiparian Cooperation in InternationalRiver Basins:The World Bankat Its Best in DevelopmentDiplomacy No. 336 Francis, with Akinwumi, Ngwu, Nkom, Odihi, Olomajeye, Okunmadewa, and Shehu, State, Community, and LocalDevelopment in Nigeria No. 337 Kerf and Smith, PrivatizingAfrica's Infrastructure: Promise and Change No. 338 Young, MeasuringEconomic Benefits for WaterInvestments and Policies No. 339 Andrews and Rashid, The Financingof PensionSystems in Centraland EasternEurope: An Overviewof Major Trendsand TheirDeterminants, 1990-1993 No. 340 Rutkowski, Changesin the WageStructure during EconomicTransition in Centraland EasternEurope No. 341 Goldstein, Preker, Adeyi, and Chellaraj, Trendsin HealthStatus, Services,and Finance:The Transitionin Central and EasternEurope, Volume I No. 342 Webster and Fidler, editors, Le secteurinformel et lesinstitutions de microfinancementen Afrique de l'Ouest No. 343 Kottelat and Whitten, FreshwaterBiodiversity in Asia, with SpecialReference to Fish No. 344 Klugman and Schieber with Heleniak and Hon, A Survey of Health Reformin CentralAsia No. 345 Industry and Mining Division, Industry and Energy Department, A Mining Strategyfor LatinAmerica and the Caribbean No. 346 Psacharopoulos and Nguyen, The Roleof Governmentand the PrivateSector in Fighting Poverty No. 347 Stock and de Veen, ExpandingLabor-based Methodsfor RoadWorks in Africa No. 348 Goldstein, Preker, Adeyi, and Chellaraj, Trendsin Health Status, Services,and Finance:The Transitionin Central and EasternEurope, Volume 11, Statistical Annex No. 349 Cummings, Dinar, and Olson, New EvaluationProceduresfor a New Generationof Water-RelatedProjects No.
  • 6. Public Transport

    6. Public Transport

    ROMANIA Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program (P169577) COMPONENT 1. ELABORATION OF BUCHAREST’S IUDS, CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Output 3. Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS and Identification of a long list of projects. A. Rapid assessment of the current situation Section 4. Mobility and Transport March 2021 DISCLAIMER This report is a product of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. This report does not necessarily represent the position of the European Union or the Romanian Government. COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable laws. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with the complete information to either: (i) the Municipality of Bucharest (47 Regina Elisabeta Blvd., Bucharest, Romania); or (ii) the World Bank Group Romania (Vasile Lascăr Street 31, FL. 6, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania). This report was delivered in March 20221 under the Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program, concluded between the Municipality of Bucharest and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development on March 4, 2019. It is part of Output 3 under the above-mentioned agreement – Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS and Identification of a long list of projects – under Component 1, which refers to the elaboration of Bucharest’s Integrated Urban Development Strategy, Capital Investment Planning and Management.
  • Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments in Romania - Final Report

    Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments in Romania - Final Report

    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 103461 Project co-financed from the European Regional development Fund through the OPTA 2007-2013 Advisory Services Agreement on Harmonizing State and EU Funded Projects in Regions Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments in Romania - Final Report - June 26, 2015 This report corresponds to the deliverable “Final Report on Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments In Romania” under component 3 “Assisting in improving the use of efficient designs and technologies in investment overseen by MRDPA” of the Advisory Services Agreement on ”Harmonizing State and EU Funded Projects in Regions” between the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, signed on May 27, 2014. This report was prepared by a core team comprised of Radoslaw Czapski, Antonio Nunez, Marcel Ionescu-Heroiu, Sebastian Burduja, Alina Burlacu, Marius Cristea, Florian Gaman, Oana Luca, Andrei Stănescu, Alina Armașu, and Cristian Postolache. The report benefited from thoughtful comments by peer reviewers: Thierry Davy, Antti Talvitie, Megan Schlotjes, Rakesh Tripathi, and Carmen Racanel. The team would like to thank Juan Gaviria and Jean-Francois Marteau for the advice, support, and guidance provided throughout the elaboration of this report. The team would also like to thank the counterparts in the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration for the timely feedback, the support offered in the elaboration of this study, and the excellent collaboration throughout. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the Executive Directors of the World Bank, the European Union, or the Government of Romania.
  • Annotated Agenda (Rbgg IWG 2.1)

    Annotated Agenda (Rbgg IWG 2.1)

    AEWA RED-BREASTED GOOSE INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP Doc: RbG IWG Inf. 2.2 Date: 28.10.2019 2nd Meeting of the AEWA Red-breasted Goose International Working Group 13-15 November 2019 – Bucharest, Romania GENERAL INFORMATION FOR MEETING PARTICIPANTS Meeting date and venue The meeting will be held on Thursday the 14th to Friday the 15th of November 2019 at the premises of the Ministry of the Environment located at: 12 Libertății Avenue, 5th District, Bucharest, Romania. The meeting will be opened at 09:00 on Thursday the 14th and is scheduled to finish at 12:00 on Friday the 15th of November. There will be a registration desk in front of the meeting room. Registration will be open from 08:00 - 09:00. For further details, see the annotated agenda (RbgG IWG 2.1). The meeting will be preceded by a joint excursion with the AEWA Lesser White-fronted Goose International Working Group on Wednesday the 13th of November (see further details below). The 2nd Meeting of the AEWA Red-breasted Goose International Working Group is being hosted by the Romanian Ministry of the Environment with the support of the Romanian Ornithological Society and is organized with funding and logistic support by the Red-breasted Goose EU LIFE Project “LIFE for Safe Flight” coordinated by the Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds (BSPB), and co-funded by the EU LIFE Program and Whitley Fund for Nature Excursion A joint excursion with the AEWA Red-breasted Goose International Working Group will take place on Wednesday the 13th of November to Balta Alba Lake which is a Natura 2000 site, located approximately 180 km North-East from Bucharest.
  • 1WG3 Practical Information

    1WG3 Practical Information

    Towards and enabling ecosystem for social enterprises WG3 Research Workshop 12nd-13rd February 2020 University of Bucharest (Romania) PRACTICAL INFORMATION Seminar facilities The seminar will be held at the facilities of the Faculty of Sociology and Social Work within the University of Bucharest, at the Panduri headquarters, near the Military Academy and the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. The exact address is: Panduri St. no. 90, sector 5, Bucharest 1 | EMPOWER-SE | 1st WG3 Workshop | University of Bucarest (Romania), 12–13 February 2020 | empowerse.eu | #empowerse_cost Travel information The Henri Coandă International Airport (OTP) is the arrival airport in Bucharest. It is situated 16,5 km in the North of Bucharest. HOW TO GET TO THE CITY By bus From the airport you can take the Express-Bus lines 783 (to Piata Unirii, city centre) or 780 (to Gara de Nord / North trainstation). From the arrivals hall you have to go to level -1 (there is an escalator to level -1 right in front of the hall windows) and the bus stop is just outside, the ticket point being located to the right as you go out. The buses leave at an interval of approx. 30 minutes or less. The Express Busses travel full time, both during day and night. Travel card: Magnetic cards are used for travelling by public transportation in Bucharest. The card can be bought from the ticket point (please note that you cannot purchase the card inside the bus). The card valid for 4 travels (round trip from and to the airport plus connecting bus) costs 10 lei (2,25 EUR).
  • Investigating the Role of Traffic Volume in The

    Investigating the Role of Traffic Volume in The

    Geographia Technica, Vol. 12, Issue 2, 2017, pp 20 to 29 EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON ACCIDENTS: THE CASE OF ROMANIA’S NATIONAL ROADS Rodica Dorina CADAR1, Melania Rozalia BOITOR1, Mara DUMITRESCU1 DOI: 10.21163/GT_2017.122.03 ABSTRACT: Every road accident is important. Investigating the road accidents and their causes is the main action to be conducted in the prevention and the prediction stages. The main aim of the paper is to investigate the state-of-the-art regarding road accidents research in Romania, one of the top country in the EU Road Death Statistics. It came out that there is an inconsistent research conducted in the country, with very few studies which were spread across different fields, along with a major lack in accident prediction methods. The study provides a starting point for the accident prediction by validating an international model which could be employed in Romania. The specific goal of the paper is to investigate the impact of the traffic volumes on the accidents occurrence. The traffic data were provided by the National Road Infrastructure Management Company (CNAIR). The road accident data were provided by the Traffic Department of the General Inspectorate of Romanian Police (GIRPTD) and it consisted in the information collected in the field during 2015 on the main national roads in Romania. The database was simplified in accordance to the aim of the paper to include only the relevant details regarding the accident, the vehicles, and the participants. The preliminary analyses were performed using Geographic Information System (GIS) software. The outcome was employed further in the research to highlight the correlation between accidents and the traffic volumes, by means of power regression.
  • Full Article

    Full Article

    Alpopi C., and Manole C. QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN BUCHAREST mrp.ase.ro MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Vol. 4 Issue 2 (2012) pp: 68-86 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN BUCHAREST 1Cristina ALPOPI, 2Cristina MANOLE 1 Academy of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected] 2 Academy of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected] Abstract This paper presents the results of an analysis aiming to evaluate the quality of public transport services in Bucharest. The analysis was performed from two perspectives: the perceived quality of passengers and the quality desired by them. This paper will provide information on the impact that transport has on human life and the need for continuous 2 improvement of this service. Keywords: public transport, transportation, travel, quality, analysis. 201 1. INTRODUCTION June / The quality of the public transport system shall cover at least two aspects: problems experienced by constant 2 users, permanent users, as well as occasional users. The desired quality is different from perceived quality, given that the first of these does not refer to the daily experiences of users, but rather what they want from Issue Issue public transport system (Dell'Olio, Ibeas and Cecina, 2001). This is why the study of the desired quality is , 4 important, because its knowledge enables the local authorities to gather information for marketing policies customized according to user requirements. Society perceives transport as a vital element, our entire existence depends on mobility, so that one of the Volume Volume Management Research and Practice and Research Management reasons we conducted this study, consists in the desire to discover the causes for the large part of the population that is using the personal vehicle in preference to public transport .
  • Component 1. Elaboration of Bucharest's Iuds, Capital

    Component 1. Elaboration of Bucharest's Iuds, Capital

    ROMANIA Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program (P169577) COMPONENT 1. ELABORATION OF BUCHAREST’S IUDS, CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Output 3. Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS and Identification of a long list of projects. Chapter 3. Spatial and Functional Profile March 2021 DISCLAIMER This report is a product of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. This report does not necessarily represent the position of the European Union or the Romanian Government. COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable laws. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with the complete information to either: (i) the Municipality of Bucharest (Bd. Regina Elisabeta 47, Bucharest, Romania); or (ii) the World Bank Group Romania (Str. Vasile Lascăr 31, et. 6, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania). This report was delivered in March 2021 under the Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program, concluded between the Municipality of Bucharest and the
  • Documentation for Environmental Impact

    Documentation for Environmental Impact

    NATIONAL COMPANY FOR ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE ADMINISTRATION BRAȘOV – ORADEA MOTORWAY OGRA – BORȘ SECTOR GILĂU – BORŞ SECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE TRANSFRONTIER CONTEXT “ Brașov – Oradea Motorway, sector Ogra – Borș” Documentation for environmental impact in the cross - border context Contents 1. Description of the proposed activity and its purpose .................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Purpose of the project ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Project description ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1. Longitudinal profille ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2. Transversal profile .............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.3. Thus the overall width of the transversal profile will be 27.5 m / 28.0 m. ............................................................... 8 1.2.4. The route: .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.5. Works necessary to provide the rainwater drainage ............................................................................................11
  • State of Play in Romania`S Road Infrastructure – a Comparative Analysis

    State of Play in Romania`S Road Infrastructure – a Comparative Analysis

    State of Play in Romania`s Road Infrastructure – A Comparative Analysis GEORGE CORNEL DUMITRESCU Ph.D., Structural change in the world economy The Institute for World Economy 13th Calea 13 Septembrie, Sector 5, ZIP Code 050711 ROMANIA george.dumitrescu@iem Abstract: Road transport is the most important mode of transportation in the EU, followed by sea and rail. Therefore, the road infrastructure network can be considered the backbone or the primary enabler of trade and mobility in an EU country. This year we celebrate 100 years since the creation of Great Romania, a country in which the cities, towns, villages, and its citizens are still not adequately connected by a modern network or motorways and roads as a symbol of unity. As Ionel I.C. Brătianu used to say ”the roads make a country”. Our paper aims at portraying the state of play in road infrastructure in Romania, as compared to some relevant countries from the Soviet bloc (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland). We based our research on the statistics provided by Eurostat, the OECD, and on the positions of the primary stakeholders. Keywords: carbon emissions, road, transports, accidents, motorways JEL Classification: L92, N70, O18, R4 1. Introduction The beginnings of road transportation on the territory of nowadays Romania are lost in the mists of time. However, the Romans built a good and stable roads network during the reign of Emperor Trajan to enable the conquest and afterwards to better connect Dacia to the empire. The Middle Ages was a ”dark” time for the roads in the Romanian principalities.