DOCSLIB.ORG

Orient East Med Study Annexes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orient East Med Study Annexes Orient/East-Med Core Network Corridor Study Final Report Annexes December 2014 mmmll Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Corridor, Final Report, Appendix Content Annex 1: Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Annex 1a: Rail Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013 Annex 1b: IWW Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013 Annex 1c: Road Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013 Annex 2: Lists of Reviewed Documents Annex 2a: List of Multinational Projects and Studies Annex 2b: Documents related to CEF Projects Annex 2c: List of National Projects and Studies Annex 3: Maps of the Corridor Annex 4: Review of Port Demand studies Annex 5: List of Projects per Transport Mode Annex 6: ERTMS Deployment Plan Annex 7: Review of most important corridor related studies Annex 8: List of Stakeholders Annex 9: Bottleneck Mitigation Analysis Disclaimer The information and views set out in this Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. December 2014 2 Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Core Network Corridor Final Report Annex 1 – Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters 5 December 2014 Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Corridor, Final Report, Annex 2 Tables Table A Rail Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013, issued 5 Dec 2014 Table B IWW Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013, issued 5 Dec 2014 Table C Road Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013, issued 5 Dec 2014 Disclaimer The information and views set out in this Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. December 2014 2 Study on the Orient / East Med Core Network Corridor – Annex 1a Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Rail Compliance Test 2013 5 December 2014 Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC Legend Compliance with TEN-T regulation 1315/2013 Technical parameter is compliant Technical parameter is compliant for core pass. line Technical parameter is not compliant ↔ Need for reversing passenger trains Technical Requirements for Rail according to Art 15 (ECMT Class IV) • Electrification: to be electrified by 2030 (including sidings where necessary) • Axle load (Core freight lines): 22.5 t by 2030 • Line speed (Core freight lines): 100 km/h by 2030 • Train length (Core freight lines): to allow for 740m trains by 2030 • ERTMS / signalling system: to be equipped with ERTMS by 2030 • Track gauge: 1435mm* *) Along OEM corridor, track gauge is 1435mm everywhere and therefore not depicted in the following illustrations. Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Warnemünde RostockHbf Kavelstorf Rostock Seehafen Kavelstorf km 0 50 km 0 50 Important nodes Conventional, mixed traffic Conventional, mixed traffic Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 1 1 Number of tracks 120 160 100 Max operational speed, km/h 740* 740* Max train length, m 225 kN 225 kN Axle load No ETCS No ETCS Signaling GSM-R GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Kavelstorf Waren Neustrelitz Birken- werder Brieselang Hasselberg Berlin Blanken- felde Elster- werda km 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Important nodes Conventional, High Speed, mixed traffic mixed traffic High Speed, mixed traffic Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 2 2 Number of tracks 160 120 160 Max operational speed, km/h 740* Max train length, m 225 kN Axle load No ETCS Signaling GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Birken- werder Berlin Biesdorfer Kreuz Grünauer Kreuz Blanken- felde km 0 50 100 Important nodes Conventional, mixed traffic Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 Number of tracks 120 100 120 Max operational speed, km/h 740* Max train length, m 225 kN Axle load No ETCS Signaling GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Elster- werda Kottewitz Wilhelms- haven Oldenburg Bremen Hbf Bremer- haven Bremen Hbf km 350 400 km 0 50 100 0 50 100 Important nodes/stations High Speed, mixed traffic Conventional, mixed traffic Conventional, mixed traffic Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Diesel 15 kV, 16,7 Hz 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 2 2 2 Number of tracks 160 100 160 160 Max operational speed, km/h 740* 740* 740* Max train length, m 225 kN 225 kN 225 kN Axle load No ETCS No ETCS No ETCS Signaling GSM-R GSM-R GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Country: Germany Country: of TEN Fulfilment Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEM/ Railistics / Panteia/ITC / iC Contractor: Corridor Network Core /East-Med Orient the on Study Telecommunication Telecommunication Signaling loadAxle length, m train Max speed, km/h operational Max Number tracks of Traction Line type nodes/stations Important -T Technical Parameters Parameters Technical -T km Mode: Rail 0 Hamburg 160 A / Prodex / UPB/ PwC/ Prodex/ A Rothen- burgsort , DG MOVE, European Commission, Commission, European MOVE, DG , 200 Aumühle Schwarzen- bek 50 230 Hagenow 100 Land Status: 2013 Status: *: timetable-related timetable-related *: length. length. High Speed, mixed traffic traffic mixed Speed,High 150 15 kV, 16,7 Hz 15 kV, Witten- No ETCS No ETCS GSM-R berge 740* 225 2 kN / / operational restrictions may have influence po have influence the may on restrictions operational 200 Neustadt (Dosse) 250 Brieselang 100 Brieselang- Hasselberg 300 ssible ssible train Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Bremen Hbf Wunstorf Seezle Hannover Lehrte Braun- schweig Hbf Helmstedt Magde- burgHbf Roßlau km 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Important nodes/stations Conventional, mixed traffic Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 Number of tracks 160 120 100 160 120 160 100 120 100 Max operational speed, km/h 740* Max train length, m 225 kN Axle load No ETCS Signaling GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Schöna DE/CZ Lutherstadt Wittenberg Falkenberg (Elster) Zeithain Kottewitz Dresden Hbf Obervogel- gesang Stadt Wehlen km 350 400 450 500 550 Important nodes/stations Conventional, mixed traffic Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 Number of tracks 100 100 120 160 120 160 100 120 Max operational speed, km/h 740* Max train length, m 225 kN Axle load No ETCS Signaling GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Germany Mode: Rail Status: 2013 Roßlau Dessau Süd Jeßnitz Greppin Bitterfeld Leipzig Messe Leipzig Nord Leipzig Hbf Leipzig Paunsdorf Riesa Zeithain km 0 50 100 150 ↔ Important nodes/stations Note to Train Length: Conventional, High Speed, Rosslau – Dresden is defined mixed traffic mixed traffic as Core Passenger Rail Line. Line type 15 kV, 16,7 Hz Traction 2 Number of tracks 120 120 120 160 160 200 160 160 Max operational speed, km/h 740* Max train length, m 225 kN Axle load No ETCS Signaling GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, *: timetable-related / operational restrictions may have influence on the possible train Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC length. Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Czech Rep. Mode: Rail Status: 2013 II Border DE/CZ Decin Usti n.L. see Note 1 V. n. Kralupy Praha Poricany Kolin km 0 50 100 150 200 Important nodes/stations Conventional, mixed traffic Line type 3 kV, DC Traction Note 1: The depicted section Decin – Praha is 2 3 part of the comprehensive corridor, while the core passenger rail line will be the Number of tracks planned High Speed Rail Link between border DE/CZ and Praha (after 2020) 120 160 <100 Max operational speed, km/h 600 700 Max train length, m 225 kN Axle load No ETCS ETCS L2 Test Signaling GSM-R Telecommunication Study on the Orient / East-Med Core Network Corridor, DG MOVE, European Commission, Contractor: iC / ITC / Panteia / Railistics / SYSTEMA / Prodex / UPB / PwC Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Country: Czech Rep.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects
    Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the selection of projects July 2020 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE AS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANTS IN THE TENTEC PROPOSAL SUBMIS- SION SYSTEM. THE INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUE ARISING FROM SAID DESCRIPTIONS. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency is not liable for any consequence from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Distorting the original meaning or message of this document is not allowed. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos and other material that is not under the copyright of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-9208-086-0 doi:10.2840/16208 EF-02-20-472-EN-N Page 2 / 168 Table of Contents Commonly used abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport, 2017 Austria 1. GENERAL DRIVING RESTRICTIONS Vehicles Concerned Trucks with Trailers, If
    Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport, 2017 Austria 1. GENERAL DRIVING RESTRICTIONS Vehicles concerned Trucks with trailers, if the maximum authorised total weight of the motor vehicle or the trailer exceeds 3.5t; trucks, articulated vehicles and self- propelled industrial machines with an authorised total weight of more than 7.5t. Area Nationwide, with the exception of journeys made exclusively as part of a combined transport operation within a radius of 65km of the following transloading stations: Brennersee; Graz-Ostbahnhof; Salzburg- Hauptbahnhof; Wels-Verschiebebahnhof; Villach-Fürnitz; Wien- Südbahnhof; Wien-Nordwestbahnhof; Wörg; Hall in Tirol CCT; Bludenz CCT; Wolfurt CCT. Prohibition Saturdays from 15h00 to 24h00; Sundays and public holidays from 00h00 to 22h00 Public holidays 2017 1 January 1HZ<HDU¶V'D\ 6 January Epiphany 17 April Easter Monday 1 May Labour day 25 May Ascension 5 June Whit Monday 18 June Corpus Christi 15 August Assumption 26 October National holiday 1 November $OO6DLQWV¶'D\ 8 December Immaculate Conception 25 December Christmas Day 26 December 6W6WHSKHQ¶V'D\ Exceptions concerning trucks with trailers exceeding 3.5t · vehicles transporting milk; concerning vehicles with an authorised total weight of more than 7.5t · vehicles carrying meat or livestock for slaughter (but not the transport of heavy livestock on motorways); · perishable foodstuffs (but not deep frozen goods) which are as follows: fresh fruits and fresh vegetables, fresh milk and fresh dairy products, fresh meat and fresh meat products, fresh fish and fresh fish products, live fish, eggs, fresh mushrooms, fresh bakery products and fresh cakes and pastry, fresh herbs as potted plant or cut and ready-to-eat food preparations, as well as empty transports linked to the transports of the above mentioned goods or return journeys for carriage of transport facilities and wrapping of the above mentioned goods (a CMR (a consignment note) needs to be carried onboard and presented in case of inspection).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet
    Luxembourg, 21st October 2015 Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: D4R7 SLOVAKIA PPP Project Number: 2015-0059 Country: Slovakia Project Description: The project consists of the design, construction and financing of approximately 27 km of the D4 motorway around Bratislava, which will connect to the R7 expressway and is to be procured as part of the D4R7 PPP. EIA required: yes 1 Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise : yes (details for projects included are provided in section: “EIB Carbon Footprint Exercise”) Summary of Environmental and Social Assessment, including key issues and overall conclusion and recommendation The D4 motorway is to be procured, together with the R7 expressway, as part of the D4/R7 public private partnership (PPP). The D4/R7 project was divided into five sections for preparation and assessment: D4 Jarovce – Ivanka Sever, D4 Ivanka Sever – Rača, R7 Prievoz – Ketelec, R7 Ketelec – Dunajská Lužná and R7 Dunajská Lužná – Holice. The project was included in the Programme of Highways and Expressways, amendment number 3 (2012), and also in the Strategic Plan for Development of Transport Infrastructure in Slovak Republic by 2020 (2014). Both programmes were subject to a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in accordance with Directive 2001/42/EC. The D4 motorway is a class of development that falls under Annex I of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) Directive 2011/92/EU. The EIAs for all D4 and R7 sections were initially completed between 2008 and 2010 and received favourable opinion for development subject to conditions from the Slovak Ministry of Environment (MoE). Subsequently the project design was amended and further assessments were undertaken between 2013 and 2014 – including appropriate assessment in accordance with Article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Sec(2005)1396
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 7.11.2005 SEC(2005) 1396 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Annex to the: ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COHESION FUND (2004) {COM(2005) 544 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. General Context......................................................................................................... 16 1.1. Convergence and economic development in the beneficiary countries of the Cohesion Fund ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.1 Greece ........................................................................................................................ 16 1.1.2. Spain........................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.3. Portugal ...................................................................................................................... 17 1.1.4. Cyprus ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.1.5. Czech Republic.......................................................................................................... 18 1.1.6. Estonia........................................................................................................................ 19 1.1.7. Hungary...................................................................................................................... 20 1.1.8. Latvia.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • T12 Traffic Management.Pdf
    Page 2 / 99 Submitted by: Task 12 group leader, Paul van der Kroon Prepared by: Group leader: Paul van der Kroon (The Netherlands) Group members: Austria Markus Bartsch , Sigrid Pirkelbauer , Michael Schneider Cyprus Alexis Avgoustis Denmark Finn Krenk Finland Petteri Portaankorva France Christophe Desnouailles Germany Georg Stern Italy Sandro La Monica, Pier Paolo Cartolano The Netherlands Bert Helleman Henk Jan de Haan Maarten Amelink (supporting consultant) Sweden Maria Nichan i Henrik Sundquist Bjorn Carselid Switzerland Gerhard Petersen / Markus Bartsch United Kingdom David Stones Nicholas Taylor (supporting consultant) Felicity Keen Overview meetings: 3–4 June 2009 Utrecht, the Netherlands 24 –25 September 2009 Stockho lm, Sweden 19 –21 January 2010 Paris, France (joint meeting with task group 11) 19 –20 May 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 6–7 October 2010 Vienna, Austria 10 –11 February 2011 Rome, Italy 22 –23 June 2011 Helsinki, Finland 3–4 November 2011 Bern, Switzerland 22 –23 February 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 29 June 2012 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 27 September 2012 This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not consider these views to be statements of the official position of CEDR's member states. ISBN : 979-10-93321-00-4 Traffic management to reduce congestion Page 3 / 99 This report is: FOR DECISION 1. Executive summary Purpose of the paper Congestion on the European road network has increased significantly over the past decade. This is the result of an increase in car ownership and car use in most European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians
    Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Part of Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit TRANSGREEN Project “Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning in the Danube-Carpathian Region for the Benefit of People and Nature” Danube Transnational Programme, DTP1-187-3.1 April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Authors Václav Hlaváč (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Member of the Carpathian Convention Work- ing Group for Sustainable Transport, co-author of “COST 341 Habitat Fragmentation due to Trans- portation Infrastructure, Wildlife and Traffic, A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions” and “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Petr Anděl (Consultant, EVERNIA s.r.o. Liberec, Czech Republic, co-author of “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Jitka Matoušová (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic) Ivo Dostál (Transport Research Centre, Czech Republic) Martin Strnad (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, specialist in ecological connectivity) Contributors Andriy-Taras Bashta (Biologist, Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, National Academy of Science in Ukraine) Katarína Gáliková (National
    [Show full text]
  • Eib Information
    EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BAN ¡998 1958 Φ+ilô EIB INFORMATION DEN EUROPÆISKE INVESTERINGSBANK BANQUE EUROPEENNE D'INVESTISSEMENT EUROPÄISCHE INVESTITIONSBANK BANCA EUROPEA PER GII INVESTIMENTI EUROPESE INVESTERINGSBANK ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΑ ΕΠΕΝΔΥΣΕΩΝ BANCO EUROPEU DE INVESTIMENTO 1 ­ 1998·Ν°96 EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK EUROOPAN INVESTOINTIPANKKI ISSN 0250­3891 BANCO EUROPEO DE INVERSIONES EUROPEISKA INVESTERINGSBANKEN 1997: European Investment Bank aunches ¡ob-support action plan and strengthens its commitment to EMU In 1997, the European Investment Bank intensified its support for economic and social cohesion in Europe in the run up to Economic and Monetary Union. The Bank launched a special action programme to encourage job-creating investment to underpin the European Union's growth and employment policies, and expanded its financing for investment in key areas sucri as regional development and Trans-European Networks. Total lending in the year increased by 13%, to ECU 26.2 billion (of which ECU 23 billion was in the Member States of the Union) and the Bank borrowed ECU 23 billion on the international capital markets, making it the world's largest non-sovereign borrower. "Our two top priorities during 1997 have been to step up our activities to help the European Union move successfully towards Economic and Monetary Union and the single currency and to prepare the way for the Union's enlargement. We responded rapidly and in a practical way to the Resolution on Growth and Employment of the June Amsterdam Summit by launching our Amsterdam Special Action Programme (ASAP). This is now well under way with substantial financing operations already con­ cluded in the areas of health and education and through a "special window" for venture capital, in the high-growth, technology oriented, small and medium-sized enterprise sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • NTS A1 Motorway
    REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE UPGRADE TO SIX LANES OF THE SECTION OF THE NICOSIA-LIMASSOL MOTORWAY BETWEEN AGIA VARVARA AND NICOSIA, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERSECTION AT THE GSP STADIUM FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY: A. F. MODINOS & S. A. VRAHIMIS Environmental MANAGEMENT CHARTERED ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CONSULTANTS LTD Stadiou 75, Strovolos, PO box 25479 1310 Nicosia Agias Elenis 8 – 1060 Nicosia, Mezzanine, Office 01 PO Box 21559-1510 Nicosia, tel. 22767312, fax: 22767315 Tel. 22876050 Fax: 22514679 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SUMMARY 2.1 The man-made environment 2.2 Impact on the natural environment 2.3 Quantification of impacts 2.4 Conclusions 1. INTRODUCTION This study has been prepared following an expression of interest by the Ministry of Communications and Works (Public Works Department) of Cyprus, concerning the provision of services by specialist firms of consultants in connection with the preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment of the upgrade, to six lanes, of the section of the Nicosia-Limassol motorway between Agia Varvara and Nicosia, and the construction of an intersection at the GSP Stadium (Contract no. PS/D/239). This assessment presents the views expressed by the Cypriot consultancy firm A. F. MODINOS & S. A. VRAHIMIS, CHARTERED ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, in collaboration with he consultancy firm Environmental Management Consultants Ltd of Nicosia. The Nicosia - Agia Varvara section of the A1 motorway, as the connecting link between Nicosia and other towns, bears the heaviest traffic load,. The assessment concerns the upgrade to six lanes of the section of the existing motorway between the road junction of the Strovolos industrial zone and Agia Varvara, 12.4 km in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Liquefaction Plant Location of the Energy Centre
    30-31-VASILIKO_EUROKERDOS 6/4/15 2:29 PM Page 31 CYPRUS ENERGY: THE NEW ERA A formal Request for Proposals followed between 11/05/2012 and 06/07/2012, and two (2) proposals were finally submitted. These were evaluated by the appointed Evaluation Committee and on 12/12/2012, the Council of Ministers, following recom- mendations from the competent Ministe- rial Committee, issued a Decision to com- mence negotiations with the prevailing economic operator, with the purpose of finalizing the agreements to be signed bet- ween the joint venture members for the materialization of the project. The Vasilikos Oil Terminal includes: • facilities for the storage of operational oil reserves, • facilities for the storage of strategic oil reserves, and • facilities to allow it to operate as an oil have an initially export capacity of 5 million from the city of Larnaca and 25 kilometres trading hub. tonnes of LNG per annum (one liquefac- away from the city of Limassol. tion train), expandable to 15 million tonnes The location was judged, based on the Natural Gas Liquefaction Plant of LNG per annum (three liquefaction location and morphology of the area, as trains). the most suitable choice for the installation In June 2012, the Government of the of the facilities for the storage and distribu- Republic of Cyprus decided the commen- Location of the Energy Centre tion of petroleum products and for the cement of the necessary actions for the establishment of the Liquefaction Plant. establishment of the Natural Gas Liquefac- The Vasilikos area is located southerly of Another reason which counted towards tion Plant at Vasilikos.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Public Transport
    ROMANIA Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program (P169577) COMPONENT 1. ELABORATION OF BUCHAREST’S IUDS, CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Output 3. Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS and Identification of a long list of projects. A. Rapid assessment of the current situation Section 4. Mobility and Transport March 2021 DISCLAIMER This report is a product of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. This report does not necessarily represent the position of the European Union or the Romanian Government. COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable laws. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with the complete information to either: (i) the Municipality of Bucharest (47 Regina Elisabeta Blvd., Bucharest, Romania); or (ii) the World Bank Group Romania (Vasile Lascăr Street 31, FL. 6, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania). This report was delivered in March 20221 under the Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program, concluded between the Municipality of Bucharest and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development on March 4, 2019. It is part of Output 3 under the above-mentioned agreement – Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS and Identification of a long list of projects – under Component 1, which refers to the elaboration of Bucharest’s Integrated Urban Development Strategy, Capital Investment Planning and Management.
    [Show full text]