Eib Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The War Years
1941 - 1945 George Northsea: The War Years by Steven Northsea April 28, 2015 George Northsea - The War Years 1941-42 George is listed in the 1941 East High Yearbook as Class of 1941 and his picture and the "senior" comments about him are below: We do know that he was living with his parents at 1223 15th Ave in Rockford, Illinois in 1941. The Rockford, Illinois city directory for 1941 lists him there and his occupation as a laborer. The Rockford City Directory of 1942 lists George at the same address and his occupation is now "Electrician." George says in a journal written in 1990, "I completed high school in January of 1942 (actually 1941), but graduation ceremony wasn't until June. In the meantime I went to Los Angeles, California. I tried a couple of times getting a job as I was only 17 years old. I finally went to work for Van De Camp restaurant and drive-in as a bus boy. 6 days a week, $20.00 a week and two meals a day. The waitresses pitched in each week from their tips for the bus boys. That was another 3 or 4 dollars a week. I was fortunate to find a garage apartment a few blocks from work - $3 a week. I spent about $1.00 on laundry and $2.00 on cigarettes. I saved money." (italics mine) "The first part of May, I quit my job to go back to Rockford (Illinois) for graduation. I hitch hiked 2000 miles in 4 days. I arrived at my family's house at 4:00 AM one morning. -
(CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects
Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the selection of projects July 2020 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE AS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANTS IN THE TENTEC PROPOSAL SUBMIS- SION SYSTEM. THE INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUE ARISING FROM SAID DESCRIPTIONS. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency is not liable for any consequence from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Distorting the original meaning or message of this document is not allowed. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos and other material that is not under the copyright of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-9208-086-0 doi:10.2840/16208 EF-02-20-472-EN-N Page 2 / 168 Table of Contents Commonly used abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor. -
Air-To-Ground Battle for Italy
Air-to-Ground Battle for Italy MICHAEL C. MCCARTHY Brigadier General, USAF, Retired Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2004 Air University Library Cataloging Data McCarthy, Michael C. Air-to-ground battle for Italy / Michael C. McCarthy. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-128-7 1. World War, 1939–1945 — Aerial operations, American. 2. World War, 1939– 1945 — Campaigns — Italy. 3. United States — Army Air Forces — Fighter Group, 57th. I. Title. 940.544973—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112–6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii PREFACE . ix INTRODUCTION . xi Notes . xiv 1 GREAT ADVENTURE BEGINS . 1 2 THREE MUSKETEERS TIMES TWO . 11 3 AIR-TO-GROUND BATTLE FOR ITALY . 45 4 OPERATION STRANGLE . 65 INDEX . 97 Photographs follow page 28 iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Foreword The events in this story are based on the memory of the author, backed up by official personnel records. All survivors are now well into their eighties. Those involved in reconstructing the period, the emotional rollercoaster that was part of every day and each combat mission, ask for understanding and tolerance for fallible memories. Bruce Abercrombie, our dedicated photo guy, took most of the pictures. -
Smart Specialisation at City Level 2018-2022
3RD DISTRICT OF BUCHAREST’S INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN FOR SMART SPECIALISATION PERIOD: 2018-2022 Document developed within the framework of the IN FOCUS – Smart Specialisation at City Level Project URBACT III Programme Partners: Bilbao, Porto, Plasencia, Ostrava, Bielsko-Biala, Frankfurt, Bordeaux Métrople, Grenoble-Alpes Métrople, Metropolitan City of Torino 3rd DISTRICT OF BUCHAREST’S INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN FOR SMART SPECIALISATION Page Foreword : Robert Sorin Negoiţă, The Mayor of 3rd District 3 Abstract 4 Content: 1. THE URBACT-IN FOCUS FRAMEWORK 6 2. COLLABORATIVE MODEL 8 2.1. The URBACT Local Group 9 2.2. Challenges and achievements 12 3. SMART SPECIALISATION AS A DRIVER 13 3.1. Vision 13 3.2. Local context 13 3.3. SWOT Analysis of the 3rd District 20 3.4. Priority domains 21 3.5. Key objectives of the Integrated Action Plan 25 4. SET OF ACTIONS AND FINANCING SOURCES 26 4.1. Set of actions 26 4.2. Financing sources 43 5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 44 5.1. Stakeholders involvement 44 5.2. Implementation calendar 45 5.3. Key Performance Indicators – KPI 46 5.4. Monitoring methodology for IAP implementation 47 5.5. Risks analysis of IAP’s implementation 48 6. CONCLUSIONS 50 ANNEXES 51 2 3rd DISTRICT OF BUCHAREST’S INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN FOR SMART SPECIALISATION FOREWORD ith nearly half a million inhabitants the 3rd District of Bucharest is the W most populous of the six districts of the capital city of Romania, and it presents numerous opportunities for economic and social development. If in the last few years the priorities of the local administrations were focused on improving public services, the urban image and the comfort of citizens in public space, as well as modernizing the educational infra- structure and ensuring the thermal rehabilitation of buildings, now it is time to channel our efforts to develop a favorable climate for business and innovation activities that can dynamize the local economy and support the sustainable develop- ment of the district in medium and long-term. -
Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport Germany 2019
Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport Germany 2019 Vehicles concerned trucks with a total permissible weight of over 7.5t, as well as trucks with trailers in case of business-like/commercial or paid transportation of goods including related empty runs. Area throughout the road and motorway network Prohibition Sundays and public holidays from 00h00 to 22h00 Exceptions (applies also to the additional summer driving restrictions) 1. Combined rail/road goods transport from the shipper to the nearest loading railway station or from the nearest designated unloading railway station to the consignee up to a distance of 200km (no limitation on distance during the additional summer restrictions); also combined sea/road goods transport between the place of loading or unloading and a port situated within a radius of 150km maximum (delivery or loading). 2. Deliveries of fresh milk and other dairy produce, fresh meat and its fresh derivatives, fresh fish, live fish and their fresh derivatives, perishable foodstuffs (fruit and vegetables). 3. Transportation of animal by-products according to category 1, Art. 8 as well as category 2, Art. 9f of regulation (EG) No. 1069/2009. 4. Use of vehicles of recovery, towing and breakdown services in case of an accident or other emergencies. 5. Transport of living bees. 6. Empty vehicles, in connection with the transport operations mentioned under point 2-5. 7. Transport operations using vehicles subject to the Federal Law on the obligations of service; the relevant authorisation must be carried on board and produced for inspection on request. Also exempted from the prohibition are vehicles belonging to the police and federal border guard, fire brigades and emergency services, the federal armed services and allied troops. -
Results Presentation and Company Profile on 30 June 2021 TABLE of CONTENTS
Photo: Dambovita MallPhoto: Results Presentation and Company Profile on 30 June 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 RESULTS SUMMARY 15 INCOME PROPERTY SCHEDULE Jun 21 4 CEE GLA STATUS, FOOTFALL, TENANTS’ SALES, INVOICING & COLLECTION Jan — Jun 21 16 DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY SCHEDULE Jun 21 5 EARNINGS Jan — Jun 21 17 INCOME PROPERTY HELD FOR SALE SCHEDULE Jun 21 6 NET ASSET VALUE Jun 21 18 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW 7 EARNINGS Jan — Jun 21 vs. Jul — Dec 20 19 INCOME PROPERTY 8 NET ASSET VALUE Jun 21 vs. Dec 20 31 DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 9 CEE PASSING NET RENTAL INCOME & FAIR VALUE MOVEMENTS Jan — Jun 21 41 GROUP MANAGEMENT 10 CEE DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY MOVEMENTS Jan — Jun 21 43 NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 11 DEBT CAPACITY AND REPAYMENT PROFILE Jun 21 45 DEVELOPMENT JOINT VENTURE STRUCTURE 12 CREDIT RATINGS 46 BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDERS HOLDING OVER 5% Jun 21 13 COMPANY PROFILE 47 GLOSSARY 14 ENVIRONMENTAL Note: All figures in this document are based on segmental financial information (Note 3 in the consolidated annual financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2021 — the 'IFRS financial statements'), where the development joint venture ('DJV') is consolidated under the proportionate method, instead of the equity method. This information is intended to be a complement to, not a replacement of, MAS' (hereafter referred to as the Group or the Company) IFRS financial statements. Historical segmental analysis information in editable format may be downloaded here. 2 RESULTS SUMMARY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS RESULTS 2.81 eurocents 124 eurocents Adjusted distributable Tangible net asset CEE tenants' sales above 2019 levels earnings/share value/share 87% Pro-Forma CEE collection rate Jan – Jun 2021 Jun 2021 Sepsi Value Centre opening (Mar 2021) CEE OPERATIONAL RESULTS 23.3% 2.8% Strong liquidity profile Sales/m2 (LFL)* Passing NRI (LFL) Jan – Jun 2021 vs. -
Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport Germany 2019 Vehicles Concerned Trucks with a Total Permissible Weight of Over 7.5T, As We
Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport Germany 2019 Vehicles concerned trucks with a total permissible weight of over 7.5t, as well as trucks with trailers in case of business-like/commercial or paid transportation of goods including related empty runs. Area throughout the road and motorway network Prohibition Sundays and public holidays from 00h00 to 22h00 Exceptions (applies also to the additional summer driving restrictions) 1. Combined rail/road goods transport from the shipper to the nearest loading railway station or from the nearest designated unloading railway station to the consignee up to a distance of 200km (no limitation on distance during the additional summer restrictions); also combined sea/road goods transport between the place of loading or unloading and a port situated within a radius of 150km maximum (delivery or loading). 2. Deliveries of fresh milk and other dairy produce, fresh meat and its fresh derivatives, fresh fish, live fish and their fresh derivatives, perishable foodstuffs (fruit and vegetables). 3. Transportation of animal by-products according to category 1, Art. 8 as well as category 2, Art. 9f of regulation (EG) No. 1069/2009. 4. Use of vehicles of recovery, towing and breakdown services in case of an accident or other emergencies. 5. Transport of living bees. 6. Empty vehicles, in connection with the transport operations mentioned under point 2-5. 7. Transport operations using vehicles subject to the Federal Law on the obligations of service; the relevant authorisation must be carried on board and produced for inspection on request. Also exempted from the prohibition are vehicles belonging to the police and federal border guard, fire brigades and emergency services, the federal armed services and allied troops. -
November 1943
12th Air Force, 57th Bombardment Wing 321st Bombardment Group History: November 1943 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For my dad, Colonel John “Jack” Fitzgerald, U.S. Army (deceased) “Lil Butch” John T. Fitzgerald, SMSgt, U.S. Air Force (retired) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12th Air Force, 57th Bombardment Wing 321st Bombardment Group History: November 1943 The following is a compilation of the 321st Bomb Group’s Headquarters and individual Squadron War Diaries. They have been transcribed word for word, from the Squadron Histories provided by the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA), Maxwell Air Force Base Alabama. At the end of each Squadron’s daily entry, the individuals cited in the entry are identified by full name, rank and duty, in alphabetical order. The day’s entry begins with the Tactical Operations Statement, from the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) Chronology, for the Mediterranean Theater of Operations (MTO). The history also includes mission reports, mission crew rosters, Missing Air Crew Reports (MACR), personal mission logs, journals, and diaries made available by various sources. Invitation Anyone who has documentation pertaining to the 321st Bomb Group or its members, and would like to have it included in this history, is welcome to participate. Copies of: photos (official or personal); orders (promotion, decoration, travel, etc.); Mission Reports; Missing Air Crew Reports; personal diaries, logs, journals, etc; other documentation; or information that will help identify hi-lited individuals will be greatly appreciated, as one of my goals is to correctly identify every man and plane assigned to the 321st Bomb Group. My only interest in this project is to honor those who served by perpetuating their story, and making it available for future generations, particularly the families and friends of our Great Heroes. -
Africa to the Alps the Army Air Forces in the Mediterranean Theater
The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II Africa to the Alps The Army Air Forces in the Mediterranean Theater Edward T. Russell and Robert M. Johnson AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM 1999 Africa to the Alps The Army Air Forces in the Mediterranean Theater By the time the United States declared war on Germany and Italy on December 11, 1941, most of Europe had fallen under the domination of Adolf Hitler, dictator of Germany’s Third Reich. In the west, only Great Britain, her armies expelled from the European continent, re- mained defiant; in the east, Hitler faced an implacable foe—the Sovi- et Union.While the Soviets tried to stave off a relentless German at- tack that had reached Moscow, Britain and her Commonwealth allies fought a series of crucial battles with Axis forces in North Africa. Initially, America’s entry into the war changed nothing. The Unit- ed States continued to supply the Allies with the tools of war, as it had since the passage of the Lend-Lease Act in March 1941. U.S. military forces, however, had to be expanded, trained, equipped, and deployed, all of which would take time. With the United States in the war, the Allies faced the question of where American forces could best be used. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British prime minister Winston S. Churchill had al- ready agreed that defeating first Germany and then Japan would be their policy, but that decision raised further questions. Roosevelt wanted U.S. troops in combat against German troops as soon as possible. -
The Total Tourism Turnover in Romania (2015)
1 Tourism industry Made by: Business Consulting Club (Gazdasági Tanácsadó Klub) Strategic coordination: Kerezsi Miklós Györfy Lehel Rácz Béla Gergely Szász Levente Fekete Réka Coordination: Deák Levente, Nagy Loránd, Szabó László Tamás Research & Analysis: • by: Balla Zsófia Gergely Andrea Korcsmáros Boglárka Boros Éva Griz Zsuzsanna Pitó Emőke Bálint Alexandra Teodóra Győri Hunor Pádár Zsuzsa Costiniuc Norbert Géger Gyopár Pál Tamás Csíki Ottó Horváth Adrienn Szabó Norbert Deák Péter Jeszenszky Attila Szász Karina Dibernardo Attila Jánosi Eszter Tankó Attila Éltes Rita Kelemen Kincső Vizeli Ibolya Gagiu Krisztina Kiss Norbert Vojkuj Csongor AGENDA [World] [Europe] [Romania] Overview Overview Overview Subsectors Subsectors Subsectors CEE Attractions [conclusions] AGENDA [World] Overview Global travel & tourism industry overview The global travel & tourism industry generated a total revenue of 2.06 € trillion in 2015. With this number it gained the 5th place on the top sectors list. The top sectors by revenue in 2015 The size of the travel & tourism industry in (€ trillion) 2015, (€ trillion) 1.0 1.3 2.06 1.5 2.1 Travel & Tourism 2.5 industry 2.6 World GDP 4.3 67.85 8.8 The industry accounts for 3.03% of the World GDP if we only Revenue Technology Sector Financial Sector look at its direct contribution. This means it generates 2.1 Retail Sector Capital Goods Sector trillion (€) revenue and it`s the 5th on the top industries list. Travel & Tourism Sector Services Sector Counting the total economic impact of the sector, this number Consumer Discretionary Sector Energy Sector would rise to 9.75%. Source: statista.com; wttc.org; databank.worldbank.org; csimarket.com; Bloomberg.com International tourism revenue The tourism revenue growth between 2011-2015 with a 2.24% CAGR. -
Efficient Bridges Solutions in Romania
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov • Vol. 9 (58) - 2016 Series I: Railways, Roads and Bridges Section EFFICIENT BRIDGES SOLUTIONS IN ROMANIA C. DIRSCHL1 S.B. KAISER2 A. BARATKI3 E. PETZEK4 Abstract: An important factor within Europe’s development process is the transportation system. “Design and build” projects allow the implementation of efficient, economical and also modern structures. The present paper presents a quick overview of new designed and executed structures in Romania. These bridge solutions combine many important aspects: reduced costs, fast and simple erection, modularity, durability and robustness, low maintenance costs and an appealing aesthetical aspect. Key words: integral bridges, semi-integral bridges, modern bridge solutions, frame structures, composite dowels. 1. Introduction durability and robustness, low maintenance costs, aesthetic aspects. Many of the new investments in the land The current trend aim is to develop communication system are assigned by concepts and technologies that simplify tender projects in form of „design & build” and streamline as much as possible the and in this way joint ventures between existing solutions on the market, thus execution companies and structural various research programs were developed engineering offices are given the in the past years in which have been possibility to build whole road sectors in involved both the private business and the an economic advantageous manner. This state. A step forward to increase the assignment method permits the newly competitiveness of the bridges, the developed, innovative and economical modular concept was development. By solutions to be used in Romania as well. eliminating the bearings and the expansion The current paper presents a quick joints leads as much to a simplification and overview of a series of efficient solutions acceleration of the construction phases, but of integral bridges from Romania, that take also to a reducing of the maintenance costs into account several important aspects for those structures.