DOCSLIB.ORG

URSA MAJOR Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
URSA MAJOR Evaluation Report URSA MAJOR Evaluation Report Project reference: I.208.S.258.O1 Version: 1.0 www.its-platform.eu . Document Information Authors NAME ORGANISATION Luca Studer Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Giovanna Marchionni Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Marco Ponti Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Valeria Paglino Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Reiner Dölger Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau Rheinland-Pfalz Revision NAME ORGANISATION Paola Mainardi Sina S.p.A. Stephanie Kleine Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau Rheinland-Pfalz Henk Taale Rijkswaterstaat Water, Traffic and Environment URSA MAJOR Version 1.0 2/97 Table of Contents Document Information .................................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations/Acronyms .................................................................................................. 5 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Impact on Traffic Efficiency ........................................................................................... 7 1.2 Impact on Safety ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Impact on Environment ................................................................................................. 7 1.4 Other results ................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Overall impact ............................................................................................................... 7 2 Overview on Ursa Major ........................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Issues Addressed ......................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Site description ............................................................................................................. 9 2.3 ITS Selection and Objectives ...................................................................................... 10 2.4 Status of the Projects .................................................................................................. 10 2.5 Systems and Technologies Applied ............................................................................ 10 2.6 ITS Deployment Status (Deployment KPIs) ................................................................ 10 2.7 Selected Benefit KPIs ................................................................................................. 11 2.8 Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 11 2.8.1 Definition of the Evaluation Taskforce ................................................................ 12 2.8.2 Selection of projects to be evaluated ................................................................. 12 2.8.3 Results management and transferability ............................................................ 13 2.8.4 Integration of Floating Car Data ......................................................................... 13 3 Evaluated Projects within Ursa Major ................................................................................ 14 3.1 Ursa Major Evaluated Projects List ............................................................................. 14 3.2 Description of Evaluated Projects ............................................................................... 15 4 Impacts grouped by ITS service ......................................................................................... 26 4.1 Traveller information services ..................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Impact on traffic efficiency ................................................................................. 27 4.1.2 Impact on safety ................................................................................................ 28 4.1.3 Impact on environment ...................................................................................... 29 4.1.4 Other results ...................................................................................................... 30 4.1.5 Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Dynamic rerouting ....................................................................................................... 32 4.2.1 Impact on traffic efficiency ................................................................................. 33 4.2.2 Impact on safety ................................................................................................ 35 4.2.3 Impact on environment ...................................................................................... 35 4.2.4 Other results ...................................................................................................... 36 4.2.5 Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 36 URSA MAJOR Version 1.0 3/97 4.3 Dynamic lane management ........................................................................................ 37 4.3.1 Impact on traffic efficiency ................................................................................. 39 4.3.2 Impact on safety ................................................................................................ 41 4.3.3 Impact on environment ...................................................................................... 42 4.3.4 Other results ...................................................................................................... 43 4.3.5 Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 44 4.4 Traffic monitoring and management ............................................................................ 45 4.4.1 Impact on traffic efficiency ................................................................................. 47 4.4.2 Impact on safety ................................................................................................ 49 4.4.3 Impact on environment ...................................................................................... 50 4.4.4 Other results ...................................................................................................... 51 4.4.5 Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 51 4.5 Variable speed limits ................................................................................................... 52 4.5.1 Impact on traffic efficiency ................................................................................. 53 4.5.2 Impact on safety ................................................................................................ 55 4.5.3 Impact on environment ...................................................................................... 56 4.5.4 Other results ...................................................................................................... 56 4.5.5 Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 57 4.6 Other ITS services ...................................................................................................... 58 4.6.1 Avoiding rush hour ............................................................................................. 58 4.6.2 Extension of motorway exits and entrances ....................................................... 60 4.7 Integration of floating car data analysis ....................................................................... 62 4.7.1 Evaluation of FC data for the assessment of benefits from Traffic Management – Establishing and using a cross-border statistical database .................................................... 62 4.7.2 Usage of FCD to improve the traffic situation in Bavaria, Germany .................... 65 4.8 Summary of impacts ................................................................................................... 66 5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 72 5.1 Final evaluation of each ITS service’s impact.............................................................. 72 5.1.1 Impact on Traffic Efficiency ................................................................................ 73 5.1.2 Impact on Safety ................................................................................................ 73 5.1.3 Impact on Environment ...................................................................................... 74 5.1.4 Other results ...................................................................................................... 74 5.2 Expansion of results to the overall Ursa Major project ................................................. 75 5.3 Overall impact ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport, 2017 Austria 1. GENERAL DRIVING RESTRICTIONS Vehicles Concerned Trucks with Trailers, If
    Driving Restrictions, Goods Transport, 2017 Austria 1. GENERAL DRIVING RESTRICTIONS Vehicles concerned Trucks with trailers, if the maximum authorised total weight of the motor vehicle or the trailer exceeds 3.5t; trucks, articulated vehicles and self- propelled industrial machines with an authorised total weight of more than 7.5t. Area Nationwide, with the exception of journeys made exclusively as part of a combined transport operation within a radius of 65km of the following transloading stations: Brennersee; Graz-Ostbahnhof; Salzburg- Hauptbahnhof; Wels-Verschiebebahnhof; Villach-Fürnitz; Wien- Südbahnhof; Wien-Nordwestbahnhof; Wörg; Hall in Tirol CCT; Bludenz CCT; Wolfurt CCT. Prohibition Saturdays from 15h00 to 24h00; Sundays and public holidays from 00h00 to 22h00 Public holidays 2017 1 January 1HZ<HDU¶V'D\ 6 January Epiphany 17 April Easter Monday 1 May Labour day 25 May Ascension 5 June Whit Monday 18 June Corpus Christi 15 August Assumption 26 October National holiday 1 November $OO6DLQWV¶'D\ 8 December Immaculate Conception 25 December Christmas Day 26 December 6W6WHSKHQ¶V'D\ Exceptions concerning trucks with trailers exceeding 3.5t · vehicles transporting milk; concerning vehicles with an authorised total weight of more than 7.5t · vehicles carrying meat or livestock for slaughter (but not the transport of heavy livestock on motorways); · perishable foodstuffs (but not deep frozen goods) which are as follows: fresh fruits and fresh vegetables, fresh milk and fresh dairy products, fresh meat and fresh meat products, fresh fish and fresh fish products, live fish, eggs, fresh mushrooms, fresh bakery products and fresh cakes and pastry, fresh herbs as potted plant or cut and ready-to-eat food preparations, as well as empty transports linked to the transports of the above mentioned goods or return journeys for carriage of transport facilities and wrapping of the above mentioned goods (a CMR (a consignment note) needs to be carried onboard and presented in case of inspection).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    2012 ANNUAL REPORT www.autostrade.it L REPORT A NNU A 2012 CONTENTS 1. Highlights and overview 3 2. 3. 4. Introduction Report on operations Financial statements and notes 11 17 77 5. 6. 7. Reports Key indicators extracted Shareholders’ resolutions from the most recent financial statements of subsidiaries, principal associates and joint ven- tures, according to art. 2497, paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Italian Civil Code 185 193 205 HIGHLIGHTS 1. AND OVERVIEW 1.1 Corporate bodies 4 1.2 Financial and operating highlights 5 1.3 Group structure 6 1.4 Key performance indicators for Autostrade per l’Italia’s principal subsidiaries 7 1.5 Map of planned upgrades and modernisation of the network operated under concession in Italy 8 3 3 1.1 Corporate bodies BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN OFFICE UNTIL APPROVAL OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012 CHAIRMAN Fabio Cerchiai CEO Giovanni Castellucci DIRECTORS Valerio Bellamoli Stefano Cao Giuseppe Piaggio Roberto Pistorelli Giovanni Quaglia (*) Antonino Turicchi (**) SECRETARY Andrea Grillo BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS ELECTED FOR THE THREE-YEAR PERIOD 2012-2014 CHAIRMAN Alessandro Trotter AUDITORS Gaetana Celico Giandomenico Genta Antonio Mastrapasqua Stefano Meroi ALTERNATE AUDITORS Salvatore Benedetto Francesco Mariano Bonifacio INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE PERIOD 2012-2020 Deloitte & Touche SpA (*) Prof. Giovanni Quaglia resigned with effect from 31 December 2012. (**) Antonino Turicchi was co-opted on to the Board of Directors on 18 January 2013. 4 1. Highlights and overview 1.2 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Brisa – Concessão Rodoviária, SA (Incorporated
    Brisa – Concessão Rodoviária, S.A. (incorporated with limited liability under the laws of Portugal) Euro 3,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme Base Prospectus Under this Euro 3,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”), Brisa - Concessão Rodoviária, S.A. (“Issuer” or “Concessionaire”) may from time to time issue notes (the “Notes”) denominated in any currency agreed between the Issuer and the relevant Dealer or Dealers (as defined below) subject to applicable legal and regulatory central bank and securities authority requirements. The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes from time to time outstanding under the Programme will not exceed Euro 3,000,000,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies calculated as described herein), subject to increase as described herein. Application has been made to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) in its capacity as competent authority under the Luxembourg Act dated 10 July 2005 on prospectuses for securities (loi relative aux prospectus pour valeurs mobilières) to approve this document as a base prospectus in relation to the Issuer. The CSSF assumes no undertaking as to the economical and financial soundness of the information contained herein and the quality or solvency of the Issuer, pursuant to the provisions of article 7 (7) of the Luxembourg Law dated 10 July 2005 on prospectuses for securities (implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 and amendment thereto, including Directive 2010/73/EU (the “Prospectus Directive”)). Application has also been made to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange for Notes issued under the Programme to be admitted to trading on the Bourse de Luxembourg, which is the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to be listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • T12 Traffic Management.Pdf
    Page 2 / 99 Submitted by: Task 12 group leader, Paul van der Kroon Prepared by: Group leader: Paul van der Kroon (The Netherlands) Group members: Austria Markus Bartsch , Sigrid Pirkelbauer , Michael Schneider Cyprus Alexis Avgoustis Denmark Finn Krenk Finland Petteri Portaankorva France Christophe Desnouailles Germany Georg Stern Italy Sandro La Monica, Pier Paolo Cartolano The Netherlands Bert Helleman Henk Jan de Haan Maarten Amelink (supporting consultant) Sweden Maria Nichan i Henrik Sundquist Bjorn Carselid Switzerland Gerhard Petersen / Markus Bartsch United Kingdom David Stones Nicholas Taylor (supporting consultant) Felicity Keen Overview meetings: 3–4 June 2009 Utrecht, the Netherlands 24 –25 September 2009 Stockho lm, Sweden 19 –21 January 2010 Paris, France (joint meeting with task group 11) 19 –20 May 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 6–7 October 2010 Vienna, Austria 10 –11 February 2011 Rome, Italy 22 –23 June 2011 Helsinki, Finland 3–4 November 2011 Bern, Switzerland 22 –23 February 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 29 June 2012 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 27 September 2012 This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not consider these views to be statements of the official position of CEDR's member states. ISBN : 979-10-93321-00-4 Traffic management to reduce congestion Page 3 / 99 This report is: FOR DECISION 1. Executive summary Purpose of the paper Congestion on the European road network has increased significantly over the past decade. This is the result of an increase in car ownership and car use in most European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • VINCI, the World’S Leading Concession and Construction Group*
    2007 Annual Report Key fi gures Revenue by business line Operating profi t from ordinary activities by business line 2% 2% 15% 22% Concessions 4,580 Concessions 1,747 14% Energy Energy 44% 4,301 56% 229 Roads Roads 7,706 13% 392 25% Construction 13,653 Construction 668 Property 558 Property 58 7% Net profi t attributable to equity holders of the parent Cash fl ow from operations by business line before tax and cost of debt 2% 1% 20% 28% Concessions 680 Concessions 2,834 44% Energy 142 Energy 250 11% Roads 263 Roads 514 17% Construction 438 63% Construction 895 Property 39 Property 59 9% 5% Before elimination of transactions between business lines. Revenue by geographical area 2.8% 2.6% France 19,717 3.3% Central 4.2% & Eastern Europe 2,308 2.7% United Kingdom 2,048 5.3% Germany 1,621 Belgium 826 6.7% Rest of Europe 1,250 The Americas 982 7.6% 64.8% Africa 859 Asia, Middle East & Oceania 817 In € millions Revenue Operating profi t from ordinary activities 30,428 25,634 26,032 19,717 16,825 17,223 3,113 2,669 10,711 2,580 8,809 8,809 +17% +17% France International 2006 actual 2006 2007 2006 actual 2006 2007 pro forma pro forma Net profi t attributable Cash fl ow from operations to equity holders of the parent 4,515 3,999 1,461 3,755 1,277 1,270 +14% +13% (+23% excluding exceptional items 2006 actual 2006 2007 in 2006) 2006 actual 2006 2007 pro forma pro forma Net fi nancial debt at 31 December 16 303 14 796 up €1,507 million 2006 2007 In € millions Pro forma: full consolidation of ASF/Escota from 1 January 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Recbae Cons 2014UK.Pdf
    CONTENTS I - INTRODUCTION 4 II - BRISA CONCESSION 13 III - OTHER MOTORWAY CONCESSIONS 18 IV - MOTORWAY RELATED SERVICES 24 V - VEHICLE INSPECTIONS 37 VI - OTHER PROJECTS 39 VII - INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS 41 VIII - CORPORATE ACTIVITY INDICATORS 44 IX - FINANCIAL REPORT 48 X - CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 62 XI - FINAL NOTE 86 XII - CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ATTACHED NOTES 88 XIII - TRAFFIC STATISTICS 169 I - INTRODUCTION Brisa 2014. The Year in Review January - Via Verde opens new shop in Oeiras - The Via Verde system is introduced at Hospital Garcia da Horta, Almada February - The Via Verde system is introduced at São Bento car park (Clube Nacional de Natação), in Lisbon - Brisa renovates the drainage system of Ribeira da Laje viaduct (A5) and Rio Grande da Pipa viaduct (A10) March - Slope maintenance works are carried out on the A1 (Santa Iria da Azóia/Alverca sub-stretch) April - Brisa promotes road safety with students, included in the Semana Braga Capital Jovem da Segurança Rodoviária event (Student Driving Camp) - Brisa's "Ser Solidário" project grants EUR 44 thousand to the welfare centre of Aveiras de Cima and to Make a Wish Foundation - Brisa awards quality prize to service areas May - Via Verde launches customer service App - Mcall wins Gold Trophy awarded by the Portuguese Call Centres Association, for services provided to Via Verde Portugal June - Brisa, Egis and NedMobiel create a joint-venture for mobility - Start up of improvement works at Albergaria/Estarreja sub-stretch (A1) July - Launching of Brisa's new App
    [Show full text]
  • W&C Standard Template
    BASE PROSPECTUS SIAS S.p.A. (incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Republic of Italy) €2,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme Under the €2,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”) described in this Base Prospectus, SIAS S.p.A. (“SIAS” or the “Issuer”), subject to all applicable legal and regulatory requirements, may from time to time issue notes in bearer form and in any currency agreed between the Issuer and the relevant Dealer(s) (as defined below) (the “Notes”). The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes from time to time outstanding under the Programme will not exceed €2,000,000,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies at the date of issue), save that the maximum aggregate principal amount may be increased from time to time, subject to compliance with the relevant provisions of the Programme and applicable laws and regulations in force from time to time. Notes will be issued in Series and, in the case of Secured Notes (as defined below), will be subject to, and have the benefit of, (i) an Italian law-governed intercreditor agreement dated 8 October 2010 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Intercreditor Agreement”) between, inter alios, the Issuer, Mediobanca – Banca di Credito Finanziario S.p.A. as intercreditor agent (the “Intercreditor Agent”), Deutsche Trustee Company Limited as trustee (the “Trustee”) and the other Secured Creditors (as defined below) and (ii) one or more Italian law-governed deeds of pledge over the Issuer’s receivables and monetary claims (crediti pecuniari) arising pursuant to the Intercompany Loans (as defined below) granted out of the proceeds of the Secured Notes (the “Deeds of Pledge”) to be entered into by the Issuer in favour of the holders of the relevant Series of Secured Notes and the Trustee on or about the date of issue of each Series of Secured Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantia S.P.A
    Atlantia S.p.A. (incorporated as a joint stock company in the Republic of Italy) Unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A. €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme Under this Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”), Atlantia S.p.A. (“Atlantia” or the “Issuer”) may, from time to time, subject to compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and directives, issue debt securities in either bearer or registered form (respectively, “Bearer Notes” and “Registered Notes” and, together, the “Notes”) to be unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A. (“Autostrade Italia” or the “Guarantor”), Atlantia’s wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Guarantee”). The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes from time to time outstanding under the Programme will not exceed €10 billion (or the equivalent in other currencies). The Notes may be issued on a continuing basis to one or more of the Dealers defined below or any additional Dealer appointed under the Programme from time to time, which appointment may be for a specific issue or on an ongoing basis (each a “Dealer” and together, the “Dealers”). References in this Offering Circular to the relevant Dealer, in the case of an issue of Notes being (or intended to be) subscribed by more than one Dealer, shall be to all Dealers agreeing to subscribe for such Notes. This Offering Circular is a “base prospectus” in accordance with Article 5.4 of Directive 2003/71/EC (the “Prospectus Directive”) as amended (which includes the amendments made by Directive 2010/73/EU (the “2010 PD Amending Directive”) to the extent that such amendments have been implemented in the relevant Member State of the European Economic Area).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Cohesion Fund 1996
    % ζ·:· j-r ''■'■" European Union • 2· Regional Policy ι· * Ι and Cohesion ··· Ι ·-·-· Annual report of the Cohesion Fund 1996 European Commission European Union Regional Policy and Cohesion Annual report of the Cohesion Fund 1996 European Commission PREFACE The present annual report on the activities of the Cohesion Fund covers the calendar year 1996. It has, however, been necessary to include some remarks on activities in earlier years as well as comments on planned measures for the future in order to give the reader the full picture of the current affairs of the Fund. The reporting format is largely unchanged from previous reports and reflects the detailed requirements of the Annex to Annex II to the Cohesion Fund Regulation. Nevertheless, comments made by the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on earlier reports have been duly taken into account and adjustments made in the presentation. In particular attention has been given to a detailed explanation of how the conditionality principle has been implemented and to the Commission Decision on information and publicity measures. The specific requests for a section on ultra-peripheral regions and for a developed section on evaluation have also been met. The report fulfils the legal requirements of the Cohesion Fund Regulation. It is hoped that it will also serve as a useful reference for all who are interested in the promotion and furtherance of the economic and social cohesion of the Union. Annual report of the Cohesion Fund 1996 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Economic and Social Cohesion is one of the main objectives of the Treaty on European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report CONTENTS
    2015 Annual Report CONTENTS 01 Album 18 Profile 19 Message from the Chairman and CEO 20 Corporate governance 21 Corporate management structures 22 New directions and strategy 25 Stock market and shareholder base 28 Sustainable development 41 CONCESSIONS 44 VINCI Autoroutes 56 VINCI Highways 62 VINCI Airports 70 VINCI Railways 72 VINCI Stadium 74 Other public amenities 77 CONTRACTING 78 VINCI Energies 90 Eurovia 100 VINCI Construction 114 VINCI Immobilier 117 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 118 Report of the Board of Directors 216 Report of the Chairman of the Board on corporate governance and internal control procedures 222 Report of the Vice-Chairman and Senior Director of the Board of Directors 224 Consolidated financial statements 303 Parent company financial statements 320 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on regulated agreements and commitments 322 Persons responsible for the registration document 324 Cross-reference table for the registration document 326 Cross-reference table for the annual financial report 327 Cross-reference table for workforce-related, environmental and social information Cover photo – The Arturo Merino Benitez Airport in Santiago de Chile will double its capacity to 30 million passengers by 2020. Key data Key data Group Revenue (1) 280,000 €38.5 billion projects (2) Market capitalisation at 31 December 2015 185,452 €34.8 billion employees worldwide (3) Net income attributable to owners of the parent €2,046 million Revenue (1) Ebitda (4) Operating income (in €m) (in €m and as a % of revenue (1) ) from ordinary
    [Show full text]