DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Main Achievements of Cohesion Policy Programmes and Projects Over the Longer Term in 15 Selected Regions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Main Achievements of Cohesion Policy Programmes and Projects Over the Longer Term in 15 Selected Regions EVALUATION OF THE MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS OF COHESION POLICY PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS OVER THE LONGER TERM IN 15 SELECTED REGIONS (FROM 1989-1993 PROGRAMMING PERIOD TO THE PRESENT) (2011.CE.16.B.AT.015) Case Study Norte (Portugal) Regina Salvador, Ricardo Simões and David Charles 19 September 2013 European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde Graham Hills Building 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE United Kingdom Tel: +44-141-548 3339 Fax: +44-141-548 4898 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] http://www.eprc.strath.ac.uk/eprc/ The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, number SC01526 Evaluation of the main achievements of Cohesion policy programmes and projects over the longer term in 15 selected regions: Norte (Portugal) Case Study PREFACE This report presents the case study for Norte Region of Portugal as part of the study ‘Evaluation of the Main Achievements of Cohesion Policy Programmes over the Longer Term in 15 Selected Regions (from 1989-1993 Programming Period to the Present)’ which is being managed by the European Policies Research Centre and London School of Economics. The authors would like to thank everyone who has participated in the study and provided valuable insights, including all interviewees, survey respondents, workshop participants and others who facilitated the research by providing information, contacts, data and documents. In particular, we would like to thank and acknowledge the suggestions, comments, data and logistical support received from Francisco Carballo Cruz, Eduarda Ferreira, José Lúcio and Paula Remoaldo. LSE i EPRC Evaluation of the main achievements of Cohesion policy programmes and projects over the longer term in 15 selected regions: Norte (Portugal) Case Study LSE ii EPRC Evaluation of the main achievements of Cohesion policy programmes and projects over the longer term in 15 selected regions: Norte (Portugal) Case Study Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 2. REGIONAL CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS OF NEEDS ........................................................... 9 3. PROGRAMME EVOLUTION AND RELEVANCE ............................................................. 17 3.1 Explicit and implicit strategies and their evolution .................................................. 17 3.1.1 1989-1993: The Formalisation of a Regional Policy in Portugal .............................. 17 3.1.2 1994-1999: Infrastructure and the Restructuring of Traditional Sectors ................... 20 3.1.3 2000-2006: A Geo-economic Approach ............................................................ 23 3.1.4 2007-2013: En Route Towards a Regional Policy ................................................. 26 3.2 Relevance of programmes to regional needs ......................................................... 27 4. EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS ..................................................................................... 33 4.1 Financial allocations ....................................................................................... 33 4.2 Expenditure compared with allocations ................................................................ 35 5. ACHIEVEMENT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 43 5.1 Reported & actual achievements ........................................................................ 43 5.1.1 Programme-level achievements .................................................................... 43 5.1.2 Analysis by theme ..................................................................................... 53 5.1.3 Institutional factors affecting achievements .................................................... 82 5.2 Complementarities and synergies ....................................................................... 84 5.2.1 Complementarity between ERDF-funded programmes ......................................... 84 5.2.2 Complementarity with domestic regional policy ................................................ 85 6. ASSESSMENT OF ACHIEVEMENTS AGAINST OBJECTIVES AND NEEDS (EFFECTIVENESS AND UTILITY) ........................................................................................................ 89 6.1 Overall achievements of ERDF programmes measured against programme objectives (effectiveness) .............................................................................................. 89 6.2 Overall contribution of ERDF programmes to regional development (utility) ................... 94 6.3 Key elements of success and failure .................................................................... 97 6.3.1 Good practices and successes ....................................................................... 97 6.3.2 Bad practices and failings ........................................................................... 99 7. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 103 7.1 EQ1: To what extent did the programmes address regional needs and problems over time?103 7.2 EQ2: To what extent do ERDF achievements meet regional objectives and needs in each programming period and across all periods? ......................................................... 106 7.3 EQ3: What are the main lessons learnt on the effectiveness and utility of ERDF interventions? ............................................................................................. 109 8. ANNEX I – ANALYSIS OF PROJECT SAMPLES ............................................................ 111 8.1 Leixões Maritime Port .................................................................................... 111 8.2 The Norte Footwear Industry ........................................................................... 117 8.3 Ermida Bridge Project ................................................................................... 123 8.4 The Route of the Romanesque ......................................................................... 125 9. ANNEX II: STRUCTURE OF PROGRAMMES 1989-2013 IN NORTE ................................... 131 10. ANNEX III: REPORTED ACHIEVEMENTS ................................................................... 135 10.1 1989-1993 Regional Operational Programmes (PROAVE, PROAM, PRORAMP, PRORN and PROTAD) .................................................................................................... 135 10.2 1994-1999 Regional Operational Programme (PRONORTE) ........................................ 139 LSE iii EPRC Evaluation of the main achievements of Cohesion policy programmes and projects over the longer term in 15 selected regions: Norte (Portugal) Case Study 10.3 2000-2006 Regional Operational Programme (ON-Operation Norte OP) ........................ 142 10.4 2007-2013 Regional Operational Programme (ON.2-New Norte OP) ............................. 150 11. ANNEX IV: LIST OF INTERVIEWEES ....................................................................... 159 12. ANNEX V: OVERVIEW OF SOURCES USED FOR THE CASE STUDY ................................... 162 13. ANNEX VI: REFERENCES .................................................................................... 164 14. ANNEX VII: SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................ 174 LSE iv EPRC Evaluation of the main achievements of Cohesion policy programmes and projects over the longer term in 15 selected regions: Norte (Portugal) Case Study Figures Figure 1: Norte Region Administrative Divisions (NUTS 3) .................................................... 5 Figure 2: Gross Domestic Product per capita .................................................................... 9 Figure 3: Gross Domestic Product per capita and Labour Productivity disparities in NUTS 2 regions (PT average = 100) .................................................................................................. 10 Figure 4: Weight of manufacturing in the total GVA for Norte and Portugal ............................. 11 Figure 5: Unemployment Rate .................................................................................... 13 Figure 6: Change in employment in Norte region and Portugal relative to 1992 levels ................ 14 Figure 7: CSF I 1989-1993 Structure .............................................................................. 18 Figure 8: 1989-1993 Norte ROPs .................................................................................. 19 Figure 9: CSF II 1994-1999 Structure ............................................................................. 21 Figure 10: CSF III 2000-2006 structure ........................................................................... 24 Figure 11: NSRF 2007-2013 Structure ............................................................................ 26 Figure 12: Community Support Frameworks per capita investment by NUTS 2 (Portugal=100) ....... 33 Figure 13: 1989-2013 NOP and ROP ERDF expenditure (thousands of Euros, 2000 prices) ............. 34 Figure 14: Total expenditure on ERDF projects - CSF I, II, III (thousands of Euros in 2000 prices) ... 35 Figure 15: Percentage of ROP and NOP expenditure on ERDF - CSF I, II, III .............................. 36 Figure 16: EFDR expenditure (NOPs + ROPs) by thematic priority (expressed as percentages) ....... 38 Tables Table 1: CSF I Norte ROPs .......................................................................................... 19 Table 2: Comparison of regional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet
    Luxembourg, 20 July 2018 Public Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: TAMEGA IBERDROLA HYDROPOWER AND STORAGE PORTUGAL Project Number: 2015-0651 Country: Portugal Project Description: The project concerns the construction of 3 new large dams and 3 hydropower plants with a total capacity of 1,158 MW in the Douro River Basin in northern Portugal. EIA required: yes Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise1: yes Environmental and Social Assessment The Project is located on Tâmega River and Torno River, within the Douro river basin, in Northern Portugal, 90 km of Porto. The Project construction works shall be completed by June 2023. The Project comprises the following components: 1. Alto Tâmega HPP: 108m arch dam with a monthly reservoir (470ha, 131.7 hm3) and 160 MW, 87m head, 200 m3/s power plant; 2. Daivões HPP: 77m arch gravity dam with a weekly reservoir (340ha, 56.2hm3) and 118 MW, 65m head, 227 m3/s power plant; 3. Gouvães PSP: 32m gravity dam with a daily reservoir (176ha, 12.7hm3) and 880 MW, 657m head, 160 m3/s pumped -storage plant; 4. The associated facilities inter alia access roads, 20kV overhead lines. 5. A quarry located in Gouvães; 6. 400kV grid connection facilities including 400kV Gouvães susbstation and around 15km overhead lines connecting the three sites to the point of delivery, Ribeira de Pena substation. In addition, in order to evacuate the power of the Project from Ribeira de Pena substation to the national grid, the Portuguese transmission system operator Redes Energética Nacionais (REN) will upgrade the national grid in Grande Porto area and build new 132 km 400kV overhead lines Feira – Ribeira de Pena – Vieira do Minho.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report Portugal
    NATIONAL REPORT PORTUGAL | August 2016 TECHNICAL TEAM Coordinator Cristina Cavaco Coordination Team DGT António Graça Oliveira, Cristina Gusmão, Margarida Castelo Branco, Margarida Nicolau, Maria da Luz França, Maria do Rosário Gaspar, Marta Afonso, Marta Magalhães, Nuno Esteves, Ricardo Gaspar Network of Focal Points Habitat III Albano Carneiro (AMP), Alexandra Castro (ISS), Alexandra Sena (CCDR-ALG), Alexandre N. Capucha (DGTF), Álvaro Silva (IPMA), Ana C. Fernandes (APA), Ana Galelo (IMT), Ana Santos (AMP), Ana Veneza (CCDR-C), António M. Perdição (DGADR), Avelino Oliveira (AMP), Carla Benera (IHRU), Carla Velado (CCDR-C), Carlos Pina (CCDR-LVT), Conceição Bandarrinha (AML), Cristina Faro (IEFP), Cristina Guimarães (CCDR-N), Cristina Magalhães (ANMP), Demétrio Alves (AML), Dina Costa Santos (ACSS), Dulce Gonçalves Dias (DGAL), Elsa Costa (ANPC), Elsa Soares (INE), Fernanda do Carmo (ICNF), Francisco Chagas Reis (ICNF), Francisco Vala (INE), Gabriel Luís (LNEG), Gonçalo Santos (ACSS), Graça Igreja (IHRU), Guilherme Lewis (DGADR), Hélder Cristóvão (IMT), Hernâni H. Jorge (RAA), Isabel Elias (CCIG), Isabel Rodrigues (IHRU), João José Rodrigues (RAM), João Lobo (REN-SA), João Pedro Gato (DGAL), José Correia (AML), José Freire (CCDR-N), José Macedo (CCDR-A), Linda Pereira (CCDR-LVT), Luís Costa (AML), Margarida Bento (CCDR-C), Maria João Lopes (ANMP), Maria João Pessoa (CCDR-N), Miguel Arriaga (DGS), Mónica Calçada (AdP), Nuno F. Gomes (ISS), Nuno Portal (EDP), Pedro Ribeiro (DGS), Ricardo Fernandes (ANSR), Rita Ribeiro (APA), Rui Gouveia
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • T12 Traffic Management.Pdf
    Page 2 / 99 Submitted by: Task 12 group leader, Paul van der Kroon Prepared by: Group leader: Paul van der Kroon (The Netherlands) Group members: Austria Markus Bartsch , Sigrid Pirkelbauer , Michael Schneider Cyprus Alexis Avgoustis Denmark Finn Krenk Finland Petteri Portaankorva France Christophe Desnouailles Germany Georg Stern Italy Sandro La Monica, Pier Paolo Cartolano The Netherlands Bert Helleman Henk Jan de Haan Maarten Amelink (supporting consultant) Sweden Maria Nichan i Henrik Sundquist Bjorn Carselid Switzerland Gerhard Petersen / Markus Bartsch United Kingdom David Stones Nicholas Taylor (supporting consultant) Felicity Keen Overview meetings: 3–4 June 2009 Utrecht, the Netherlands 24 –25 September 2009 Stockho lm, Sweden 19 –21 January 2010 Paris, France (joint meeting with task group 11) 19 –20 May 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 6–7 October 2010 Vienna, Austria 10 –11 February 2011 Rome, Italy 22 –23 June 2011 Helsinki, Finland 3–4 November 2011 Bern, Switzerland 22 –23 February 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 29 June 2012 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 27 September 2012 This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not consider these views to be statements of the official position of CEDR's member states. ISBN : 979-10-93321-00-4 Traffic management to reduce congestion Page 3 / 99 This report is: FOR DECISION 1. Executive summary Purpose of the paper Congestion on the European road network has increased significantly over the past decade. This is the result of an increase in car ownership and car use in most European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report Annual 2019
    a force for good. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 1, cours Ferdinand de Lesseps 92851 Rueil Malmaison Cedex – France Tel.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 Fax: +33 1 47 51 91 02 www.vinci.com VINCI.Group 2019 ANNUAL REPORT VINCI @VINCI CONTENTS 1 P r o l e 2 Album 10 Interview with the Chairman and CEO 12 Corporate governance 14 Direction and strategy 18 Stock market and shareholder base 22 Sustainable development 32 CONCESSIONS 34 VINCI Autoroutes 48 VINCI Airports 62 Other concessions 64 – VINCI Highways 68 – VINCI Railways 70 – VINCI Stadium 72 CONTRACTING 74 VINCI Energies 88 Eurovia 102 VINCI Construction 118 VINCI Immobilier 121 GENERAL & FINANCIAL ELEMENTS 122 Report of the Board of Directors 270 Report of the Lead Director and the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors 272 Consolidated nancial statements This universal registration document was filed on 2 March 2020 with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, the French securities regulator), as competent authority 349 Parent company nancial statements under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval pursuant to Article 9 of the 367 Special report of the Statutory Auditors on said regulation. The universal registration document may be used for the purposes of an offer to the regulated agreements public of securities or the admission of securities to trading on a regulated market if accompanied by a prospectus or securities note as well as a summary of all 368 Persons responsible for the universal registration document amendments, if any, made to the universal registration document. The set of documents thus formed is approved by the AMF in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1129.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 VINCI Concessions Activity Report
    2012ACTIVITY REPORT SUPPORTING A CHANGING WORLD REPORT Y IT V 2012 ACTI 2012 S — S NCESSION CO 9 PLACE DE L’EUROPE – 92851 RUEIL-MALMAISON CEDEX – FRANCE – TEL.: +33 1 47 16 35 00 – FAX: +33 1 47 16 35 33 www.vinci-concessions.com VINCI VINCI_Concessions_RA2012_GabaritCouv_GB.indd 1 03/05/13 19:01 70 VINCI’S CONCESSIONS PORTFOLIO INFRASTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION COUNTRY SHARE CAPITAL END OF HELD CONTRACT HIGHWAY AND ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK UNDER CONCESSION ASF network (excl. Puymorens tunnel) 2,709 km France 100% 2033 Coroute network (excl. A86 Duplex tunnel) 1,100 km France 83% 2031 Escota network 459 km France 99% 2027 Arcour (A19) 101 km France 100% 2070 Openly, Lyons 10 km France 100% 2013 (1) R1 expressway (2) (PR1BINA) 52 km Slovakia 50% 2041 A4 “A-Modell“ highway 45 km Germany 50% 2037 A5 “A-Modell“ highway (2) 60 km Germany 50% 2039 A9 “A-Modell“ highway (2) 46.5 km Germany 50% 2031 Newport Southern Distributor Zone 10 km United Kingdom 50% 2042 Road district, Hounslow 432 km of roads and 763 km of pavements United Kingdom 50% 2038 Road district, Isle of Wight 821 km of roads and 767 km of pavements United Kingdom 50% 2038 Moscow-Saint Petersburg highway (2) 43 km Russia 39% 2040 Athens-Tsakona highway (2) 365 km Greece 30% 2038 Maliakos-Kleidi highway (2) 240 km Greece 14% 2038 Fredericton-Moncton highway 200 km Canada 25% 2028 Trans Jamaican highway 34 km Jamaica 13% 2030 ROAD BRIDGES AND TUNNELS A86 Duplex tunnel Rueil-Malmaison – Jouy-en-Josas / Versailles (11 km) France 83% 2086 Puymorens tunnel Tunnel in the Pyrenees (5 km)
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilidade E Transportes No Grande Porto
    Revista da Faculdade de Letras — Geografia I série, vol. XV/XVI, Porto, 1999-2000, pp. 7 - 17 Mobilidade e transportes no Grande Porto Maria da Luz Costa1 1. Considerações introdutórias A finalidade de um sistema de transporte de passageiros é a movimentação de pessoas, não a movimentação de veículos. A movimentação de veículos, a sua paragem e estacionamento, é um meio para atingir este objectivo, não um objectivo em si. Em termos económicos, de gestão do espaço urbano, de segurança, de energia e ambiental, é sempre desejável atingir essa finalidade com um número mínimo de veículos. As características dos diferentes segmentos do mercado de deslocações, conjugadas com as vocações específicas de cada um dos modos de transporte, deverão determinar o equilíbrio correcto na repartição e na complementaridade dos modos de transporte de passageiros. Este equilíbrio é obviamente influenciado e induzido pelas condições e quantidade de oferta atribuídas a cada modo de transporte e pelos sistemas globais dos transportes públicos e individuais: muitas decisões de repartição modal são tomadas não em função de uma única deslocação, mas sim em função de um conjunto de deslocações quotidianas do agregado familiar. Para os utilizadores de transportes, o custo, o tempo e o conforto da deslocação têm uma influência decisiva na escolha da modalidade de transporte. Todavia, os utilizadores de automóveis originam uma série de custos em que eles próprios não incorrem e que, por isso, não consideram quando decidem como vão deslocar-se. Estes custos incluem impactes ambientais, como, por exemplo, a poluição sonora e do ar, e aspectos associados a acidentes, congestionamentos, utilização do espaço, entre outros.
    [Show full text]
  • Recbae Cons 2014UK.Pdf
    CONTENTS I - INTRODUCTION 4 II - BRISA CONCESSION 13 III - OTHER MOTORWAY CONCESSIONS 18 IV - MOTORWAY RELATED SERVICES 24 V - VEHICLE INSPECTIONS 37 VI - OTHER PROJECTS 39 VII - INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS 41 VIII - CORPORATE ACTIVITY INDICATORS 44 IX - FINANCIAL REPORT 48 X - CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 62 XI - FINAL NOTE 86 XII - CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ATTACHED NOTES 88 XIII - TRAFFIC STATISTICS 169 I - INTRODUCTION Brisa 2014. The Year in Review January - Via Verde opens new shop in Oeiras - The Via Verde system is introduced at Hospital Garcia da Horta, Almada February - The Via Verde system is introduced at São Bento car park (Clube Nacional de Natação), in Lisbon - Brisa renovates the drainage system of Ribeira da Laje viaduct (A5) and Rio Grande da Pipa viaduct (A10) March - Slope maintenance works are carried out on the A1 (Santa Iria da Azóia/Alverca sub-stretch) April - Brisa promotes road safety with students, included in the Semana Braga Capital Jovem da Segurança Rodoviária event (Student Driving Camp) - Brisa's "Ser Solidário" project grants EUR 44 thousand to the welfare centre of Aveiras de Cima and to Make a Wish Foundation - Brisa awards quality prize to service areas May - Via Verde launches customer service App - Mcall wins Gold Trophy awarded by the Portuguese Call Centres Association, for services provided to Via Verde Portugal June - Brisa, Egis and NedMobiel create a joint-venture for mobility - Start up of improvement works at Albergaria/Estarreja sub-stretch (A1) July - Launching of Brisa's new App
    [Show full text]
  • Campanulaceae), a New Species from the Madeira Archipelago (Portugal)
    Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid Vol. 64(2): 135-146 julio-diciembre 2007 ISSN: 0211-1322 Musschia isambertoi M. Seq., R. Jardim, M. Silva & L. Carvalho (Campanulaceae), a new species from the Madeira Archipelago (Portugal) by Miguel Menezes de Sequeira1, Roberto Jardim2, Magda Silva1 & Lígia Carvalho1 1 Dep. Biologia/CEM, Universidade da Madeira, Campus da Penteada, 9000-390 Funchal, Portugal 2 Jardim Botânico da Madeira, Caminho do Meio, 9064-512 Funchal, Portugal [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Resumen Menezes de Sequeira, M., Jardim, R., Silva, M. & Carvalho, L. 2007. Menezes de Sequeira, M., Jardim, R., Silva, M. & Carvalho, L. 2007. Musschia isambertoi M. Seq., R. Jardim, M. Silva & L. Carvalho Musschia isambertoi M. Seq., R. Jardim, M. Silva & L. Carvalho (Campanulaceae), a new species from the Madeira Archipelago (Campanulaceae), una nueva especie del archipiélago de Madeira (Portugal). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 64(2): 135-146. (Portugal). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 64(2): 135-146 (en inglés). A new species of Musschia Dumort. (Campanulaceae), endemic Se describe una nueva especie de Musschia Dumort. (Campanu- from Madeira Archipelago (Portugal), is described as Musschia laceae), endémica del archipiélago de Madeira (Portugal), Muss- isambertoi M. Seq., R. Jardim, M. Silva & L. Carvalho. Both veg- chia isambertoi M. Seq., R. Jardim, M. Silva & L. Carvalho. La mor- etative and reproductive structures have been studied and are fología de las estructuras vegetativas y florales estudiadas es cla- remarkably distinct from the recognized species [M. aurea (L. f.) ramente distinta de la de las otras dos especies conocidas, Muss- Dumort. and M.
    [Show full text]
  • URSA MAJOR Evaluation Report
    URSA MAJOR Evaluation Report Project reference: I.208.S.258.O1 Version: 1.0 www.its-platform.eu . Document Information Authors NAME ORGANISATION Luca Studer Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Giovanna Marchionni Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Marco Ponti Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Valeria Paglino Politecnico di Milano – Mobility and Transport Laboratory Reiner Dölger Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau Rheinland-Pfalz Revision NAME ORGANISATION Paola Mainardi Sina S.p.A. Stephanie Kleine Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau Rheinland-Pfalz Henk Taale Rijkswaterstaat Water, Traffic and Environment URSA MAJOR Version 1.0 2/97 Table of Contents Document Information .................................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations/Acronyms .................................................................................................. 5 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Impact on Traffic Efficiency ........................................................................................... 7 1.2 Impact on Safety ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantia S.P.A
    Atlantia S.p.A. (incorporated as a joint stock company in the Republic of Italy) Unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A. €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme Under this Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”), Atlantia S.p.A. (“Atlantia” or the “Issuer”) may, from time to time, subject to compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and directives, issue debt securities in either bearer or registered form (respectively, “Bearer Notes” and “Registered Notes” and, together, the “Notes”) to be unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A. (“Autostrade Italia” or the “Guarantor”), Atlantia’s wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Guarantee”). The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes from time to time outstanding under the Programme will not exceed €10 billion (or the equivalent in other currencies). The Notes may be issued on a continuing basis to one or more of the Dealers defined below or any additional Dealer appointed under the Programme from time to time, which appointment may be for a specific issue or on an ongoing basis (each a “Dealer” and together, the “Dealers”). References in this Offering Circular to the relevant Dealer, in the case of an issue of Notes being (or intended to be) subscribed by more than one Dealer, shall be to all Dealers agreeing to subscribe for such Notes. This Offering Circular is a “base prospectus” in accordance with Article 5.4 of Directive 2003/71/EC (the “Prospectus Directive”) as amended (which includes the amendments made by Directive 2010/73/EU (the “2010 PD Amending Directive”) to the extent that such amendments have been implemented in the relevant Member State of the European Economic Area).
    [Show full text]