DOCSLIB.ORG

Documentation for Environmental Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Documentation for Environmental Impact NATIONAL COMPANY FOR ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE ADMINISTRATION BRAȘOV – ORADEA MOTORWAY OGRA – BORȘ SECTOR GILĂU – BORŞ SECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE TRANSFRONTIER CONTEXT “ Brașov – Oradea Motorway, sector Ogra – Borș” Documentation for environmental impact in the cross - border context Contents 1. Description of the proposed activity and its purpose .................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Purpose of the project ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Project description ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1. Longitudinal profille ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2. Transversal profile .............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.3. Thus the overall width of the transversal profile will be 27.5 m / 28.0 m. ............................................................... 8 1.2.4. The route: .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.5. Works necessary to provide the rainwater drainage ............................................................................................11 2. Description of the analyzed alternatives ...................................................................................................................13 2.1. Route alternatives ................................................................................................................................................14 2.2. Construction alternatives ......................................................................................................................................15 3. Description of the environment possibly affected by the proposed activity and suggested alternatives .......................16 3.1. Water ..................................................................................................................................................................17 3.2. Air .......................................................................................................................................................................18 3.3. Soil ......................................................................................................................................................................20 3.4. Biodiversity ..........................................................................................................................................................20 3.5. Human settlements ..............................................................................................................................................22 3.6. Cultural patrimony ................................................................................................................................................23 4. Description the potential impact of the proposed activity. Describe the potential impact of the proposed alternatives. Estimation of the importance of the impact ..................................................................................................................24 4.1. The potential impact on the quality and quantity of water .......................................................................................24 4.2. Potential impacts on air and climate quality ...........................................................................................................26 4.3. Potential impacts on flora and fauna .....................................................................................................................29 4.4. Potential impacts on soil, subsoil and land use ......................................................................................................34 4.5. The potential impact on the landscape and the visual environment ........................................................................35 4.6. Impact on human settlements and other objectives ...............................................................................................37 4.7. Impact of noise and vibration ................................................................................................................................38 4.8. Impact on historical and cultural heritage ..............................................................................................................39 5. Description of the proposed improvement measures in order to reduce as far as possible the impact on the environment ...............................................................................................................................................................40 5.1 Proposed measures to prevent, reduce and compensate adverse effects on the water environment factor ..............40 5.2 Proposed measures to prevent, reduce and compensate for adverse effects on the air environment factor ..............44 5.3. Proposed measures to prevent, reduce and compensate for adverse effects on the soil-subsoil environmental factor ........ .................................................................................................................................................................45 5. Outline surveillance and management programs and other plans for further analysis of the project ...........................54 6. Non-technical summary, including a graphical presentation (maps, graphics, etc.) ....................................................56 Beneficiary: National Company For Road Infrastructure Administration “ Brașov – Oradea Motorway, sector Ogra – Borș” Documentation regarding the environmental impact in the cross - border context List of figures Figure 1. Braşov – Oradea Motorway, Ogra – Borş Sector and crossed counties .......................................................... 5 Figure 2. Route alternative .........................................................................................................................................15 Figure 3. The route alternative proposed within the constructive option that includes the building of Meseş Tunnel .......16 Figure 4. Overlapping of the Brasov-Oradea Highway route, Ogra-Borş sector with Romania's hydrographic basins .....17 Figure 5. Location of the Brasov - Oradea motorway route in relation to the surface water bodies in Hungary ...............18 Figure 6. Overlap of the motorway route with the climate zones defined in Romania ....................................................19 Figure 7. Location of the Brasov - Oradea motorway in relation to the protected natural areas......................................21 Figure 8. Map of the location of protected natural areas within the Natura 2000 network in Hungary located at a distance of no more than 10 km from the axis of the Brasov - Oradea Motorway ........................................................................22 Figure 9. The location of the Brasov - Oradea motorway in relation to the residential areas of Hungary ........................23 Figure 10. Landscapes in the plain area: agroecosystems (left), mosaic of agroecosystems (right) ...............................36 Figure 11. Landscapes in the hill area: agro-ecosystems mosaic, semi-natural habitats and habitat areas (right) and landscapes dominated by natural formations (meadows, forests, riparian-lying areas) ..................................................36 Figure 12. Structure of gutters to be made along the paths of temporary technological roads .......................................40 Figure 13. A model of a giant and reinforced stone gutter that ensures the drainage of rainwater in a manner that replicates natural structures ........................................................................................................................................41 Figure 14. Bank Stabilization Solutions: Left: Model of a gabion mattress prepared to receive rockfalls (Arrigo Gabioni Inc); Right: the use of rockfalls for the protection of some banks...................................................................................42 Figure 15. Temporary water storage areas provide significant local biodiversity indices contributing to enhanced fluid balance ......................................................................................................................................................................48 Figure 16. The use of microhabitats boulders that is able to provide additional environmental niches (left) and acting as a water drain zones of the washer which substantially contribute to stabilizing slopes (Right) ........................................49 Figure 17. Location of the Brasov-Oradea motorway in relation to the protected natural areas declared on the territory of Romania .....................................................................................................................................................................58 List of tables Table 1. Species and habitats of Community interest based on which were declared Sites of Community Importance within the Natura 2000 network in Hungary located
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pozsony a Zene Városa
    M2019. JÚLIUS XXIII. évf. 2. szám ZAIK O A COLAS CSOPORT MAGAZINJA Találkozási pont POZSONY A ZENE VÁROSA INTERJÚ GUILLAUME MOUNIER-VEL ÚJRAINDULT A TISZATARJÁNI BÁNYA ZAJLIK A MUNKA AZ AUTÓPÁLYÁKON A Colas Europe munkavédelmi vezetőjével Közel három év szünet után a Colas Északkő Számos gyorsforgalmi útszakaszon nagy erőkkel a legújabb kampányokról is beszélgettünk. ismét megindította a termelést. dolgozunk. MOZAIK 2019. JÚLIUS XXIII. ÉVF. 2. SZÁM 1 Az én apukám is itt dolgozik! FÓKUSZBAN OLDALSZÁM 2–13 40 >> Hírek >> Interjú Guillaume Mounier-vel >> Interjú Görbedi Lászlóval >> Interjú Dudás Istvánnal FOTÓPÁLYÁZAT >> Újraindult a tiszatarjáni bánya >> Segítségnyújtás az M25-ös autóútnál MUNKÁINK OLDALSZÁM 14–29 >> Hídépítési munkák Nyugat-Magyarországon >> Próbaüzem Pincehelyen >> Burkolatfelújítás az M1-es autópályán >> Kecskeméten dolgozik a Colas Út >> Forgalomba helyeztük a turbó körforgalmat az 51-es úton >> Készül az M30-as autópálya 14 46 utolsó szakasza >> Folytatódik a munka az M4-esen MUNKATÁRSAINK OLDALSZÁM 30–37 >> Portrék SAFETY OLDALSZÁM 38–39 >> Az én apukám is itt dolgozik Fotózd le a kampány- KITEKINTŐ OLDALSZÁM 40–43 logót valamilyen kreatív >> Találkozási pont: Pozsony >> „Hogy lehet így futni?!” Ultrabalaton 2019 formában és 14 HÍDÉPÍTÉSI MUNKÁK NYUGAT-MAGYARORSZÁGON A dunántúli hídépítő főmérnökség csapatáról, eddigi eredményeiről – töltsd fel az Instagramra és jelenlegi munkáiról. TECHNOLÓGIA ÉS GÉPÉSZET OLDALSZÁM 44–49 #mydadworksherecontest >> Pályaszerkezetek méretezése 40 TALÁLKOZÁSI PONT: POZSONY >> Keverőtelepek korszerűbben hashtaggel Szlovákia fővárosa alig két és fél óra közúton, és számtalan >> Bányabemutató: Nógrádkövesd – vagy küldd el a fotód izgalmas látnivalót kínál. (Szanda-bánya) a [email protected] 46 KEVERŐTELEPEK KORSZERŰBBEN BESZÁMOLÓ OLDALSZÁM 50–54 Felsőzsolcára új keverő érkezett, a korábbi berendezés e-mail-címre. >> Családi nap a Vasúttörténeti Parkban Jánosházára került.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020
    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HEP LÉTAVÉRTES 2015 Felülvizsgált
    Helyi Esélyegyenlőségi Program LÉTAVÉRTES VÁROS ÖNKORMÁNYZATA 2013. április 2. 2013-2018. Létavértes, 2013. Június 25. (Felülvizsgálva: 2015. június) Készítette: Szatmári Imre főelőadó 1 Tartalom Helyi Esélyegyenlőségi Program (HEP) ................................................................................................. 3 Bevezetés................................................................................................................................................ 3 A település bemutatása .......................................................................................................................... 3 Értékeink, küldetésünk .......................................................................................................................... 6 Célok ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 A Helyi Esélyegyenlőségi Program Helyzetelemzése (HEP HE) ...................................................... 9 1. Jogszabályi háttér bemutatása ....................................................................................................... 9 2. Stratégiai környezet bemutatása.................................................................................................. 10 3. A mélyszegénységben élők és a romák helyzete, esélyegyenlősége ........................................ 12 4. A gyermekek helyzete, esélyegyenlősége, gyermekszegénység .............................................. 36 5. A
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269
    CONSOLIDATED REPORT Framework agreement to support EIB advisory services (EIBAS) activities inside and outside EU-28 Lot 3: Transport Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269 CONSULTING SAFEGE De Kleetlaan 5 B-1831 DIEGEM International Division SAFEGE SAS - SIÈGE SOCIAL Parc de l’Ile - 15/27 rue du Port 92022 NANTERRE CEDEX www.safege.com The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the view of the Advisory Hub, nor the European Investment Bank, nor the European Commission Road Safety Investment Program in Romania - AA-010269 Framework agreement to support EIB advisory services (EIBAS) activities inside and outside EU-28 Lot 3: Transport Document quality information General information Author(s) Ilie Bricicaru, Kristiana Chakarova, Matthew Chamberlain, Loreta Robertina Gherman, Razvan Iulian Mazilu Project name RSIP in Romania – AA-010269 Document name Consolidated Report on Road Safety Investment Program in Romania Date April 05th, 2021 Reference Version 4 Addressee(s) Sent to: Name Organisation Sent on (date): Kevin CHEUNG, Per MATHIASEN, Teodora TATARU EIB Borislava GABROVSKA EIAH, EIB 05.04.2021 Cristian Andrei, Flavius PAVAL, Denyssa PPELIN CNAIR Copy to: Name Organisation Sent on (date): Joanna TALLEC, Spiros TRIANTAFILLOS SUEZ Consulting 05.04.2021 History of modifications Version Date Written by Approved & signed by: Ilie BRICICARU, Kristiana CHAKAROVA, Version 1 20.01.2021 Matthew CHAMBERLAIN Loreta Robertina GHERMAN Razvan Iulian MAZILU Ilie
    [Show full text]
  • 24.17. Melléklet
    FELÜGYELETI, ELLENŐRZÉSI SZERVEK, HATÓSÁGOK ÉS FÜGGETLEN TESTÜLETEK ELÉRHETŐSÉGEI Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal Cím: 1054 Budapest, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky út 52. Postacím: 1444 Budapest, Pf.: 247. Telefon: 1/459-7777 Telefax: 1/459-7766 E-mail: [email protected] Népegészségügyi Hatóság: Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal Népegészségügyi Főosztály Cím: 4028 Debrecen, Rózsahegy u. 4. Postacím: 4001 Debrecen, Pf.: 115. Telefon: 52/552-700 Telefax: 52/413-288, 52/420-022 E-mail: [email protected] Járás illetékességi területe: Debrecen, Hajdúsámson, Mikepércs, Ártánd, Biharkeresztes Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kormányhivatal Népegészségügyi Főosztály Cím: 4400 Nyíregyháza, Árok u. 41. Postacím: 4401 Nyíregyháza, Pf.: 119. Telefon: 42/501-008 Telefax: 42/501-007 E-mail: [email protected] Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal Berettyóújfalui Járási Hivatal Járási Népegészségügyi Intézete Cím: 4100 Berettyóújfalu, Kossuth u. 6. Telefon: 54/505-310 Fax: 54/505-335 E-mail: [email protected] Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal Balmazújvárosi Járási Hivatal Járási Népegészségügyi Intézete Cím: 4060 Balmazújváros, Kossuth tér 3. Telefon: 52/550-611 Fax: 52/550-198 E-mail: [email protected] Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal Hajdúszoboszlói Járási Hivatal Járási Népegészségügyi Intézete Cím: 4200 Hajdúszoboszló, Rákóczi u. 20., / Püspökladány: 4150 Püspökladány, Kossuth u. 6. Telefon: Hajdúszoboszló: 52/362-216 / Püspökladány: 54/517-200 Fax: Hajdúszoboszló: 52/550-660 / Püspökladány: 54/451-128 E-mail: [email protected] Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal Derecskei Járási Hivatal Járási Népegészségügyi Intézete Cím: 4130 Derecske, Köztársaság út 126. Telefon: 54/548-003 Fax: 54/795-012 E-mail: [email protected] Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kormányhivatal Mátészalkai Járási Hivatal Népegészségügyi Osztály Központi Cím/Postacím: 4700 Mátészalka, Kossuth út 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Csökmo. DAIMCSHÁZA. DARVAS. 9 4 Csökmő BIHAR VÁRMEGYE
    9 4 Csökmő BIHAR VÁRMEGYE CSöKMo. Testvérek (157) — Merza Gyula Csizmadiák: Balogh István — Kerékgyártók: Antal Sándor és Funcsek György. Hozzátartozik: Barsatanya, (639) — Nagy Ferencné (185) — Lódi Károly — özv. Nagy Már­ tonná — Sárközi Ferenc — Kocsmárosok: Kiskorú L eitner Cirkó, Darusziget, Halaspuszta, Ozv. Nagy Sándorné (126) — Ozv. Olasz Laiosné (106) — Zs. Sárközi Gyula. Berta — Németh Imre — Ifj. Kóróssziget, Nyárfás, Szöcsköd, Szabó János (166) — Zs. Szabó Darálómalmok: Sinka Béla — Papp István. Veresmajor. Károlyné (356) — özv. Tóth Ist­ Zákány Gábor. Kovácsok: Gitye József — Kovács Nk.. berettyóújfalui j., 3.438 1., vánná (229) — Török Imre (117) Építőmesterek: Sebestyén Sán­ Lőrinc — Oswald Márton — ref. fe, 14.151 kh., tsz., púig.: — Úrbéres birtokosság (238). dor — Turányi József. Pásztor János — Szabó József. Debrecen, jb., adóhiv.: Berettyó­ Fö/dbérlök: Aradszky és Zsilák Fakereskedök: Berger Vilmos Kőművesek és ácsok: Halász újfalu, -%r ( t e (12 km.), (166) — Boros Nándor (124) — — Gold József — Kiss Dániel András — Kamuti Imre — Pász­ Szeghalom, Berettyóújfalu. Jenei Gyula (229) — Nagv D. Rubin Salamon — Weinber- tor Sándor. Autóbuszjárat : Berettyóújfalu— József (639) - Polgár Pál (186). ger Sámuel. Malomtulajdonos és pék: Nagy Csökmő között. Asztalosok: Balogh Ignác — Si­ Fogyasztási Szövetk.: Hangya. Albert. Községi hirő: Nagy Márton. pos Jenő. Gyógyszerészek: Benkő Sándor Mészkereskedök: Halász László Vezető jegyző: Meszszer T. Baromfi kereskedők: Banuta Mi­ — Pataky Sándor. — Rosenberg Mór. hály — Fülöp János. Gyűmö/cskereskedők: Grünfeld Szabók: Ármás Mihály — Weisz Földbirtokosok: özv. gr. Csáky Borbélyok: Hunyák Mátyás — Jenő — Kun Andrásné — Me- Kálmánná (1948) — Futó Józseíné Izidor. Pataki Lajos. gyesi János — Modog László — Terménykereskedő: Kéri István. (123) — Közbirtokosság (475) — Cipész: Vékony Vince. Nagy Gábor — Ostváth József. Vegyeskereskedők: Izsák József Nagy D. József (102) — Nagy Cséplőgéptulajdonosok: Ifj.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Management and Financing of Roads (1998)
    WORLD BANK TECHNICAL PAPER NO. 409 Work in progress for public discussion Commercial Management and Financing of Roads Iann G Heggie Piers Vickers RECENT WORLD BANK TECHNICAL PAPERS No. 334 Mosse and Sontheimer, PerformanceMonitoring Indicators Handbook No. 335 Kirmani and Le Moigne, FosteringRiparian Cooperation in InternationalRiver Basins:The World Bankat Its Best in DevelopmentDiplomacy No. 336 Francis, with Akinwumi, Ngwu, Nkom, Odihi, Olomajeye, Okunmadewa, and Shehu, State, Community, and LocalDevelopment in Nigeria No. 337 Kerf and Smith, PrivatizingAfrica's Infrastructure: Promise and Change No. 338 Young, MeasuringEconomic Benefits for WaterInvestments and Policies No. 339 Andrews and Rashid, The Financingof PensionSystems in Centraland EasternEurope: An Overviewof Major Trendsand TheirDeterminants, 1990-1993 No. 340 Rutkowski, Changesin the WageStructure during EconomicTransition in Centraland EasternEurope No. 341 Goldstein, Preker, Adeyi, and Chellaraj, Trendsin HealthStatus, Services,and Finance:The Transitionin Central and EasternEurope, Volume I No. 342 Webster and Fidler, editors, Le secteurinformel et lesinstitutions de microfinancementen Afrique de l'Ouest No. 343 Kottelat and Whitten, FreshwaterBiodiversity in Asia, with SpecialReference to Fish No. 344 Klugman and Schieber with Heleniak and Hon, A Survey of Health Reformin CentralAsia No. 345 Industry and Mining Division, Industry and Energy Department, A Mining Strategyfor LatinAmerica and the Caribbean No. 346 Psacharopoulos and Nguyen, The Roleof Governmentand the PrivateSector in Fighting Poverty No. 347 Stock and de Veen, ExpandingLabor-based Methodsfor RoadWorks in Africa No. 348 Goldstein, Preker, Adeyi, and Chellaraj, Trendsin Health Status, Services,and Finance:The Transitionin Central and EasternEurope, Volume 11, Statistical Annex No. 349 Cummings, Dinar, and Olson, New EvaluationProceduresfor a New Generationof Water-RelatedProjects No.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments in Romania - Final Report
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 103461 Project co-financed from the European Regional development Fund through the OPTA 2007-2013 Advisory Services Agreement on Harmonizing State and EU Funded Projects in Regions Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments in Romania - Final Report - June 26, 2015 This report corresponds to the deliverable “Final Report on Efficient and Innovative Designs and Technologies for Public Infrastructure Investments In Romania” under component 3 “Assisting in improving the use of efficient designs and technologies in investment overseen by MRDPA” of the Advisory Services Agreement on ”Harmonizing State and EU Funded Projects in Regions” between the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, signed on May 27, 2014. This report was prepared by a core team comprised of Radoslaw Czapski, Antonio Nunez, Marcel Ionescu-Heroiu, Sebastian Burduja, Alina Burlacu, Marius Cristea, Florian Gaman, Oana Luca, Andrei Stănescu, Alina Armașu, and Cristian Postolache. The report benefited from thoughtful comments by peer reviewers: Thierry Davy, Antti Talvitie, Megan Schlotjes, Rakesh Tripathi, and Carmen Racanel. The team would like to thank Juan Gaviria and Jean-Francois Marteau for the advice, support, and guidance provided throughout the elaboration of this report. The team would also like to thank the counterparts in the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration for the timely feedback, the support offered in the elaboration of this study, and the excellent collaboration throughout. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the Executive Directors of the World Bank, the European Union, or the Government of Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dél-Nyírség, Erdőspuszták LEADER Egyesület Tagsága 2015.12.20-Án
    A Dél-Nyírség, Erdőspuszták LEADER Egyesület tagsága 2015.12.20-án 1. A TÉGLÁSI ISKOLÁS GYERMEKEKÉRT ALAPÍTVÁNY 4243 TÉGLÁS, ÚTTÖRŐ U 15 TAG 2. ÁBRÁNYI LOVAGOK MOTOROS SZÖVETSÉG SE 4264 NYÍRÁBRÁNY HATÁRŐR ÚT. 113. TAG 3. AGRO-KATE KFT 4283 LÉTAVÉRTES KARCZA DÜLLŐ 8 TAG 4. ALAPVETŐ SEGÍTSÉG ALAPÍTVÁNY 4241 BOCSKAIKERT, MONOSTOR U. 33. TAG 5. ÁLMOSD KÖZSÉG ÖNKORMÁNYZATA 4285 ÁLMOSD, FŐ U 10. TAG 6. ANDREA VENDÉGHÁZ 4251 HAJDÚSÁMSON-MARTINKA DEBRECENI U 86 TAG 7. ARI SÁNDOR 4285 ÁLMOSD BÉKE U 9. TAG 8. BAGAMÉR KÖZSÉG ÖNKORMÁNYZATA 4286 BAGAMÉR, KOSSUTH U 7. TAG 9. BÁRÁNYFELHŐ KÖZHASZNÚ EGYESÜLET 4271 MIKEPÉRCS VARJAS U 3/A TAG 10. BARDOVICS SÁNDOR E.V. 4285 ÁLMOSD ÁRPÁD U 12/A TAG 11. BEK PÁL KERTBARÁTKÖR EGYESÜLET 4243 TÉGLÁS, POZSÁR GY. U 8 TAG 12. BENDAVIDAT BT 4254 NYÍRADONY GALAMB U 31 TAG 13. BILA 2000 BT 4254 NYÍRADONY BOKRÉTÁS U 28 TAG 14. BOCSKAIKERT JÖVŐJÉÉRT ÉS FELEMELKEDÉSÉÉRT TAG ALAPÍTVÁNY 4241 BOCSKAIKERT ETELKÖZ U 6. 15. BOCSKAIKERT KÖZSÉGI ÖNKORMÁNYZAT 4241 BOCSKAIKERT, POROSZLAY U. 20 TAG 16. BONAVILL KFT 4254 NYÍRADONY BOKRÉTÁS U 2-4 TAG 17. BOROS TORMA KFT 4288 ÚJLÉTA DÓZSA U 32. TAG 18. CARACTER-SOLARIS-PONT KFT 4241 BOCSKAIKER BAROSS G. U. 18. TAG 19. CARBON KFT 4287 VÁMOSPÉRCS LÉTAI U 15 TAG 20. CÍVIS-ÚT KFT 4251 HAJDÚSÁMSON-MARTINKA ORGONA U 2 TAG 21. CZIGLE TESTVÉREK KFT. 4266 FÜLÖP BÁNHÁZA ÚT 11. TAG 22. CSEH SÁNDOR E.V. 4288 ÚJLÉTA DÓZSA GY. U. 32. TAG 23. CSONTOS FERENC SE FÜLÖP KOSSUTH U. 30. 4266 TAG 24. DÁVID LÁSZLÓ 4274 HOSSZÚPÁLYI ZÖLDFA U 25 TAG 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Role of Traffic Volume in The
    Geographia Technica, Vol. 12, Issue 2, 2017, pp 20 to 29 EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON ACCIDENTS: THE CASE OF ROMANIA’S NATIONAL ROADS Rodica Dorina CADAR1, Melania Rozalia BOITOR1, Mara DUMITRESCU1 DOI: 10.21163/GT_2017.122.03 ABSTRACT: Every road accident is important. Investigating the road accidents and their causes is the main action to be conducted in the prevention and the prediction stages. The main aim of the paper is to investigate the state-of-the-art regarding road accidents research in Romania, one of the top country in the EU Road Death Statistics. It came out that there is an inconsistent research conducted in the country, with very few studies which were spread across different fields, along with a major lack in accident prediction methods. The study provides a starting point for the accident prediction by validating an international model which could be employed in Romania. The specific goal of the paper is to investigate the impact of the traffic volumes on the accidents occurrence. The traffic data were provided by the National Road Infrastructure Management Company (CNAIR). The road accident data were provided by the Traffic Department of the General Inspectorate of Romanian Police (GIRPTD) and it consisted in the information collected in the field during 2015 on the main national roads in Romania. The database was simplified in accordance to the aim of the paper to include only the relevant details regarding the accident, the vehicles, and the participants. The preliminary analyses were performed using Geographic Information System (GIS) software. The outcome was employed further in the research to highlight the correlation between accidents and the traffic volumes, by means of power regression.
    [Show full text]