GUJOE Spring 1997.PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GUJOE Spring 1997.PDF Tiw GEORGETOWN UNiVERSiTY JouiNAL OF TIlE ENVIRONMENT Volume 1, Number 1, Spring 1997 Managing Editors Table of Contents Jeffrey Horn Abigail Sarmac Introduction Jeffrey Horn and Abigail Sarmac Page 1 General Editors Megan Shoup Interview with William Butler Brita Patterson Jeffrey Horn The Journal ofthe Environment interviews Professor William Butler, an adjunct at Georgetown James Story University and the Georgetown Law Center, about his views concerning the environmental field, Sophie Chou his personal involvement, and the role ofstudents in the environmental movement. Page 2 Layout Editor Scott Kaiser The Effects ofWater Management on Vegetation and Fauna in the Florida Everglades Academic Advisor Jennifer Maniscalco This piece examines the original Florida Everglades ecosystem and the effects ofhuman interven Dr. TImothy Beach tion. The author begins with a concise suinmaiy ofthe history ofwater management and agricul ture in south Florida followed by an examination ofthe current trends in nutrient accumulation Cover photograph and its effects on vegetation both independently of and in relationship to altered hydrological by Philip Mulvaney. conditions. Finally, this article explores the effects ofwater management on two animal inhabit ants ofthe Everglades, the American alligator and wading bird populations. Special thanks to Page 4 Timothy Beach, Christopher Joyner Richard Matthew, Envfronmental Security As National Security James Story and Phillip Sze This piece surveys the literature ofthe emerging field of environmental security. It examines the for reviewing and debate ofenvironmental security as national security. commenting on the Page 17 articles in this issue. Infectious Disease as a Security Threat: Special thanks to A Case Study on Cholera Kathyrn Oleskofor Kelly Kirschner her encouragement This piece addresses the resurgence ofCholera in Peru in the early 1990s, situating it within the and support. economic, social, and environmental context that facilitated the evolution of a full-blown epi demic. Presented as a successful battle against re-emerging infectious diseases, the author places Funding provided the issue within the sphere ofnational security. by Georgetown Page 24 University Main Campus Executive Fairness Discourse in International Vice President EnvironmentalLaw ShelbyGuilbert William Cooper This piece argues that the international community should use Thomas Francks “fairness dis course” to reconcile the competing demands ofinternational environmental protection, Published using state sovereignty rights, and economic development States must resolve this ethical tension in order to Pagemaker 5.0. facifitate the fonnulation offair international environmental agreements that secure voluntary compliance. Copyright 1997 Page 31 Page 1 THE GEORGETOWN UNiVERSITY JOURNAL OF THE ENVIRONMENT Volume 1 • Issue 1 Editor’s Introduction Welcome to the inaugural issue of Georgetown University’s Journal of the Environment. In recent years, the environment has received tremendous attention from students, scholars, scientists, public policy analysts, businesses, and governments. In response, Georgetown has taken great strides in environmental education. To support this outgrowth of environmental interest, we have created this journal. As students at Georgetown University, we have undertaken rigorous educational training inside Healy’s hallowed halls. In our classes, students do not work in isolation on their studies. In fact, they often take a genuine interest in the work of their peers. Seminar courses in particular allow students to encourage each other, offer research aids such as source material and contacts, and critique their work. Unfortunately, we rarely find the opportunity to nurture our academic work with other students outside the classroom. Thus, we have established this journal to support the formation of peer networks and provide an outlet for student research and writing. The Journal of the Environment aims to bring together the disparate environmental interests of the Georgetown community. It publishes papers from both graduates and undergraduates, targeting students interested in the environment through classes, extracurricular activities, and work experiences. We draw from a diverse intellectual community, including SFS environmental studies majors, environmental science students in the College, nursing and business students interested in the environment, and graduate students. The journal also depends upon Georgetown professors for their expertise in a variety of environmental disciplines. We hope you enjoy the wide range oftopics addressed by our authors. In this issue, solid scientific research and in-depth policy analysis represent different styles and intellectual approaches that are both crucial to the environmental field. We hope that this issue promotes consideration of different perspectives as well as the inter-disciplinary nature of environmental studies. This publication would not have been possible without the hard work of students, the encouragement from faculty, and the funding and support of the administration. Thanks to you all. We welcome all comments, suggestions, and questions! Please address them to: Journal of the Environment do Dr. Timothy Beach SFS Dean’s Office, ICC 301 Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057 Jeffrey Horn Interview with William Butler Pane 2 worldwide influence (both literally and figuratively) that no Interview with Wiffiam Butler other nation can match. Jeffrey Horn 3) What direction do you see environmental policy in the United States moving toward in the 21st century? William A. Butler, an adjunct professor at both Georgetown I think risklbeneflt and costlbenefit analysis will play University and Georgetown Law Center, currently serves as an even larger role, as well as market incentives as compared Counsel to the law firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering. He with command and control regulation. I also think that for — — has taught courses in environmental policy & politics and the most serious and intractable environmental environmental & natural resources law. Among his many problems like global warming, the international sphere will distinctions, he was General Counsel and Acting Executive become increasingly important. Director ofthe Environmental Defense Fund, Vice President for Government Relations and Counsel of the National 4) How didyoupersonally get interested in the environmental Audubon Society, a recipient of the National Wildlife field? Federation Resources Defense Award, and a Marshall Scholar I personally became interested in birds and butterffies at Oxford University. He graduated from Stanford with a (not bees!) before I was five because ofthe hobbies of older Bachelor’s in Political Science, received his J.D. from Yale friends and because ofwhere I grew up, a suburb of Detroit Law School, and earned his Ph.D. in Government from where ponds and fields in which I played were rapidly being Harvard University. transformed into housing and shops. Family members encouraged these interests once established and we traveled 1) How would you describe the evolution of the a lot, allowing me to see what now would be called different environmental movement since you began working with it? ecosystems, which in turn heightened my interest in “Natural I began working in the environmental movement (the History.” Environmental Defense Fund) in 1970. Environmental groups at that time (e.g. the Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, National Wildlife Federation) were small, and largely focused on what we now would call conservation issues. “I think a certain intellectual curiosity, Employees were generally wildlife and/or public land diligence, and professional restlessness specialists; few had experience in political advocacy. have brought me to where I am today.” Obviously, the situation now is totally changed. National environmental groups are multimillion dollar businesses, employing lawyers, Ph.D. scientists, mass media experts, experienced fundraisers, and the like. Even smaller, local 5) Which accomplishments in the environmentalfield have environmental organizations or chapters ofnational ones now brought you the greatest satisfaction? are much more skilled and sophisticated on issue advocacy In retrospect, I am proud of individual roles I have and political influence than when I started. Even more played in the efforts to get rid of broad spectrum persistent important than organizational growth and sophistication, pesticides like DDT, as a counsel in the early legal efforts to however, is the role played today nationally and locally of protect porpoises (dolphins) from death in tuna fishermen’s environmental groups as acknowledged stakeholders and nets, and various other landmark legal team efforts. More respected participants in a broad range of societal decisions. generally, I am pleased how many students of mine have Back then, the “little old lady in tennis shoes” stereotype entered environmentally related careers, although I am not was widely believed and in many instances, a characterization honestly sure whether encouraged by or despite my efforts! not far offthe mark. Environmentalists were often not taken seriously. 6) Could you tell us a little about the formation of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)? 2) Do you see the US. as a leading environmental actor in EDF was formed in Long Island by biology teachers the global theater? concerned with the aerial spraying of DDT on Long Island Surely the U.S. is the leading environmental
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21 St Century
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.178.53.58, on 20 Jan 2020 at 19:24:33, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/AF7D40B152C4CBEDB310EC5F40866A59 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.178.53.58, on 20 Jan 2020 at 19:24:33, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/AF7D40B152C4CBEDB310EC5F40866A59 “In this outstanding volume, López-Claros, Dahl, and Groff document the existen- tial challenges facing our global institutions, from environmental decline and the failure of existing international security mechanisms to mass population flows and the crisis of sovereignty and civil society engagement. The resulting landscape might seem hopeless and overwhelming, if not for the authors’ innovative, wide-ranging, and thought-provoking recommendations for reshaping existing insti- tutions to expand their relevance and effectiveness. Their ideas for updating our seven-decades-old structures include creating an international peace force, ratifying a United Nations Bill of Rights, reforming the UN Security Council and Inter- national Monetary Fund, establishing a civil society chamber, and beyond. Readers may not endorse every one of their suggestions, but they are invited into a fascinat- ing game of ‘what if?’ and ‘why not?’ It is an invitation that should not be missed.” Ambassador Donald Steinberg, Board member, Center for Strategic and International Studies “The current UN-based world system of governance, largely formulated in the mid-20th century after the Second World War, is not up to dealing satisfactorily with 21st-century problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Security Threat That Binds Us the Unraveling of Ecological and Natural Security and What the United States Can Do About It
    THE SECURITY THREAT THAT BINDS US THE UNRAVELING OF ECOLOGICAL AND NATURAL SECURITY AND WHAT THE UNITED STATES CAN DO ABOUT IT FEBRUARY 2021 an institute of AUTHORS EDITED BY Rod Schoonover Francesco Femia Christine Cavallo Andrea Rezzonico Isabella Caltabiano This report was prepared by the Converging Risks Lab, an institute of the Council on Strategic Risks. With generous support from the Natural Security Campaign, funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. This report should be cited as: R. Schoonover, C. Cavallo, and I. Caltabiano. “The Security Threat That Binds Us: The Unraveling of Ecological and Natural Security and What the United States Can Do About It." Edited by F. Femia and A. Rezzonico. The Converging Risks Lab, an institute of The Council on Strategic Risks. Washington, DC. February 2021. © 2021 The Council on Strategic Risks an institute of THE SECURITY THREAT THAT BINDS US THE UNRAVELING OF ECOLOGICAL AND NATURAL SECURITY AND WHAT THE UNITED STATES CAN DO ABOUT IT February 2021 Cover Photo: Top Row: (1) Heaps of overfished mackerel minnows near Andaman Sea (Tanes Ngamson/ Shutterstock), (2) Demonstrators protest over ongoing drought in La Paz, Bolivia 2017. (David Mercado/Reuters). (3) Dead bee, killed by pesticide. (RHJ Photo and illustration/Shutterstock); Bottom Row: (1) Rhino dehorned to prevent its killing, South Africa (John Michael Vosloo/ Shutterstock); (2) Malaysian and Vietnamese fishing boats destroyed by Indonesia for illegal fishing. (M N Kanwa/Antara Foto, Reuters). Background image: Aerial drone view of tropical rainforest deforestation (Richard Whitcombe/ Shutterstock). Composition by Rod Schoonover. CONTENTS 6 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 KEY FINDINGS 10 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 12 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Jessica Mathews and Jonathan Kirshner Survey Never Pretentious
    HOW AMERICA AND CHINA CAN AVOID WAR MARCH/APRIL 2021 !"#$% / "&#'( )*)+ • ,-(.!/ Decline and Fall +** Can America Ever Lead Again? • 0.!1/# ) • !"#$%&" '&! ('$$ FOREIGNAFFAIRS.COM FA_MA_2021_cover.indd All Pages 1/25/21 9:48 AM DOWNLOAD CSS Notes, Books, MCQs, Magazines www.thecsspoint.com Download CSS Notes Download CSS Books Download CSS Magazines Download CSS MCQs Download CSS Past Papers The CSS Point, Pakistan’s The Best Online FREE Web source for All CSS Aspirants. Email: [email protected] BUY CSS / PMS / NTS & GENERAL KNOWLEDGE BOOKS ONLINE CASH ON DELIVERY ALL OVER PAKISTAN Visit Now: WWW.CSSBOOKS.NET For Oder & Inquiry Call/SMS/WhatsApp 0333 6042057 – 0726 540141 ENGLISH PRECIS & COMPOSITION HAFIZ KARIM DAD CHUGTAI For Order Call/WhatsApp 03336042057 - 0726540141 FPSC Model Papers 50th Edition (Latest & Updated) By Imtiaz Shahid Advanced Publishers For Order Call/WhatsApp 03336042057 - 0726540141 PPSC Model Papers 79th Edition (Latest & Updated) By Imtiaz Shahid Advanced Publishers For Order Call/WhatsApp 03336042057 - 0726540141 Volume 100, Number 2 DECLINE AND FALL Present at the Re-creation? 10 U.S. Foreign Policy Must Be Remade, Not Restored Jessica T. Mathews Gone But Not Forgotten 18 Trump’s Long Shadow and the End o! American Credibility Jonathan Kirshner A Superpower, Like It or Not 28 Why Americans Must Accept Their Global Role Robert Kagan The Fractured Power 40 How to Overcome Tribalism COVER: Reuben E. Brigety II PABLO Foreign Policy for Pragmatists 48 DELCAN How Biden Can Learn From History in Real Time Gideon Rose March/April 2021 FA.indb 1 1/22/21 9:00 PM The World Is Changing And So Are We The current global pandemic illustrates that the world is changing quickly and it is essential for leaders to understand how economics, geopolitics, security, health and the environment are inextricably linked— exactly what you will learn as a student at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Advisors and Panel Members
    Appendixes Appendix A List of Advisors and Panel Members ENERGY, MATERIALS, AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION Energy and Materials Program Industrial and Commercial Industrial Energy Use Advisory Panel Cogeneration Advisory Panel Herbert Fusfeld, Chairman James J. Stukel, Chairman Director Director Center for Science and Technology Policy Public Policy Program New York University College of Engineering E. Milton Bevington University of Illinois President Roger Blobaum Servidyne, Inc. Roger Blobaum & Associates Harold Bogart William H. Corkran Consultant General Manager Carlton Burtt The Easton Utilities Commission Equitable Life Assurance Society Claire T. Dedrick* William U. Chandler Air Resources Board Senior Associate State of California Worldwatch Institute Steven Ferrey William Cunningham Energy Counsel Research Department National Consumer Law Center, Inc. AFL-CIO Todd La Porte Gordon Geiger Institute of Government Studies Director of Technology University of California North Star Steel Evelyn Murphy J. M. Leathers c/o Evelyn Murphy Committee Vice President Theodore J. Nagel Dow Chemical Co. Senior Executive Vice President Harvey N. Morris American Electric Power Service Corp. President Thomas W. Reddoch Harvey Morris Associates Associate Professor of Electrical John Myers Engineering Professor University of Tennessee Department of Economics Bertram Schwartz Southern Illinois University Senior Vice President Henry Page Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Manager Harry M. Trebing Federal Government Relations Director, Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    The Rockefeller Foundation 2003 Annual Report The Rockefeller Expanding Opportunity 420 Fifth Avenue New York, NewYork The Rockefeller 2003 10018-2702 U.S.A. Foundation Annual Report www.rockfound.org TM 2003 Table of Contents President’s Letter 2003 Grants Financial Reports 2 46 84 Mission Program Goals Treasurer’s Letter 4 48 86 Contacting the Foundation Report of About Grants Creativity & Culture Independent Auditors 5 52 89 Statements of Essay Food Security Financial Position 6 56 90 Statements of Health Equity Activities 61 91 Statements of Working Communities Cash Flows 64 92 Notes to Global Inclusion Financial Statements 70 93 420 Fifth Avenue New York, New York Regional Programs Trustees and Staff 10018-2702 U.S.A. 72 98 www.rockfound.org Special Programs 76 TM Creativity & The Rockefeller 2003 Foundation Annual Report Working Global President’s Letter ast November I stood on a platform with Mayor Residents of any community need certain essential Thomas Menino of Boston for one of those moments goods and services: access to employment, to quality that reveals what government, philanthropy, busi- health care and to education. They also want affordable nesses and local communities can achieve when housing, transport and child care. All need opportunities Lthey work creatively together. We were there to launch the for creative expression, for spiritual refreshment and for Boston Workforce Development Initiative, a $14 million connection with the wider society. In developing countries partnership aimed at helping people move into jobs more the needs are even more basic—affordable vaccines and quickly, and move up the ladder once they are employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement in Support of Rob Malley
    Statement in Support of Rob Malley Every presidential transition invites a reconsideration of domestic and foreign policies. Under the Trump administration, a relentlessly belligerent approach, dubbed “maximum pressure,” defined U.S. policy toward Iran and repeatedly brought the two nations to the brink of war. The Biden administration has affirmed its interest in diplomatic re-engagement, including a return to the original 2015 nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic, but proponents of what has proved to be a failed strategy appear intent already to undermine these efforts. Their response to the potential appointment of Robert Malley, President and CEO of the International Crisis Group, as special envoy for Iran is a case in point. Malley is among the most respected foreign policy experts in the United States. An astute analyst and accomplished diplomat, he previously served as chief White House negotiator in the talks that led to the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, a robust multilateral agreement that significantly curbed Iran’s nuclear program. Additionally, Malley was critical to the safe return of American hostages held by the Iranian government – a role he played during his time with the Obama administration, as well as afterwards. Those who accuse Malley of sympathy for the Islamic Republic have no grasp of – or no interest in – true diplomacy, which requires a level-headed understanding of the other side’s motivations and knowledge that can only be acquired through dialogue. Diplomatic engagement is as critical with foes as it is with friends. As the head of the world’s premier conflict prevention organization, Malley’s mandate – and that of the organization – is to speak with all parties to a conflict to better understand their perspectives and perceived interests in order to identify possible areas of agreement and resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 the Science of Politics 3 Copyright ©2022 by SAGE Publications, Inc
    The Science of Politics 1 INTRODUCTION Why do states do what they do? Who are the relevant nonstate actors in international relations, and why do they do what they do? What causes conflict and cooperation in the international system? These are the foundational questions that the discipline of interna- tional relations seeks to answer, and they are the questions that the readings collected in this volume address in one way or another. This is reflective of the fact that international relations (IR), like its parent discipline of political science, is fundamentally about asking and answering questions. The world is a complex, confusing, fascinating, and confounding place: political scientists ask questions and hope to find answers to the many puzzles that the political world presents them. But can the study of politics really be considered “scientific”? In an age when nearly every man, woman, and child with a smartphone and a Twitter account can play the role of political pundit to their stable of followers, what differentiates people’s political opin- ions from the ideas that political scientists publish? Put differently, what is the difference between the ideas written in the editorial section of The Washington Post and those pub- lished in the American Political Science Review? On what grounds can we claim that the former is mere opinion but the latter is science? We make such claims on the grounds of the scientific method, as adapted for appli- cation to the social sciences. “Science” is fundamentally about asking questions, following systematic and structured procedures for collecting data, conducting rigorous and critical analysis of that data, drawing appropriate conclusions from the analysis, and communi- cating the results of that analysis to others who would benefit from knowing what the researcher has learned.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN: Maintaining American Leadership in a Dangerous Age
    THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN: Maintaining American Leadership in a Dangerous Age Preface by Joseph Nye and Condoleezza Rice Edited by Nicholas Burns, Leah Bitounis, and Jonathon Price CONTRIBUTORS INCLUDE: Madeleine K. Albright, Stephen E. Biegun, Nicholas Burns, Richard Danzig, John Deutch, John Dowdy, Michèle Flournoy, Michael Froman, Stephen Hadley, Christopher Kirchhoff, Anja Manuel, Joseph Nye, Condoleezza Rice, Carla Anne Robbins, David E. Sanger, David Shambaugh, Dov S. Zakheim, and Philip Zelikow. To: Walter Isaacson You have taken the Institute to new heights, and have done it with grace. We at the Aspen Strategy Group have benefited from your leadership and salute you. Copyright © 2017 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2017 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-670-2 Wye Publication Number: 17/018 Cover design by: Steve Johnson Interior layout by: Sogand Sepassi aspen strategy group Aspen Strategy Group Leadership CHAIR EMERITUS ASPEN INSTITUTE PRESIDENT Brent Scowcroft Walter Isaacson President President and CEO The Scowcroft Group, Inc. The Aspen Institute CO-CHAIRS MEMBERS Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Madeleine K. Albright University Distinguished Service Professor Chair Emeritus Albright Stonebridge Group Harvard University Graham Allison Condoleezza Rice Douglas Dillon Professor of Government Denning Professor of Global Business Harvard Kennedy School Stanford University
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report>> the Rockefeller Foundation 2005 Annual Report
    The Rockefeller Foundation 2005 Annual Report>> The Rockefeller Foundation 2005 Annual Report Annual 2005 Foundation Rockefeller The Confronting Risks Creating Opportunities >Lower Ninth Ward, New Orleans, December 10, 2005. CONTENTS 03 President’s Letter TABLE OF TABLE 05 The Year in Review 30 The Rockefeller Foundation in Brief 31 How We Develop Programs and Make Grants 32 2005 Grants 64 2005 Financial Reports 66 Treasurer’s Letter 69 Independent Auditors’ Report 70 Statements of Financial Position 71 Statements of Activities 72 Statements of Cash Flows 73 Notes to Financial Statements 80 Trustees and Staff TM 420 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10018-2702 U.S.A. www.rockfound.org >Lower Ninth Ward, New Orleans, December 9, 2005, 102 days after Hurricane Katrina. The Rockefeller Foundation 2005 Annual Report>> THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION PRESIDENT’S LETTER VIETNAM For the Rockefeller Foundation, 2005 was a year of reflection and evaluation, a time when some long- standing commitments approached the end of their planned life cycle and others were ripe for reas- sessment or revision. There was nothing unprecedented about this; most foundations face the need, from time to time, to rethink the way they use their resources and to take fresh stock of the ways the world has changed. We have had many such moments of transition over the past nine decades. Still, the pace of change in the world is much faster today than when John D. Rockefeller, Sr., estab- lished the Rockefeller Foundation in 1913. The velocity of information and capital flows, the gaps in the distribution of economic and political influence around the world, and the number of institu- tions addressing global problems are all much greater today than at the start of the last century.
    [Show full text]
  • RF Annual Report
    2000 ANNUAL REPORT ABOUT THE FOUNDATION The Rockefeller Foundation is a knowledge-based, global foundation with a commitment to enrich and sustain the lives and livelihoods of poor and excluded people throughout the world. In order to maximize its resources and leverage the Foundation's strengths, grantmaking is organized around four thematic lines of work: Creativity & Culture, Food Security, Health Equity and Working Communities. A cross- theme of Global Inclusion supports, promotes and supplements the work of these themes. In addition, the Foundation supports a number of programs that are developing or in transition, among them the Africa Regional Program, Communication for Social Change, Public/Private Partnerships and Global Philanthropy. One year into the execution of a new strategic direction that is more pointedly focused on the needs of the poor, we have reaffirmed some of our original assumptions about development, most notably that: For the Foundation's strategies to be most effective, the poor and excluded should have a voice in the process, that we should actively find ways to unleash those voices, and that such voices should be heeded; that The poor and excluded themselves should participate in researching, planning and doing the work, and that Neither this foundation, nor any other, can work alone. We must seek creative ways to leverage our limited dollars in order to attract new funding from the private sector, international aid organizations and national, state and provincial governments. Even though the Rockefeller Foundation's endowment still ranks in size among the top 20 U.S.-based foundations, we cannot begin to solve any single world problem alone.
    [Show full text]
  • RF Annual Report
    2002 ANNUAL REPORT MISSION AND VISION As most of you read this letter, the Rockefeller Foundation will have celebrated its 90th birthday. In 1913 the challenges of poverty and inequality were pressing and visible, as they are now. Ron Chernow writes in "Titan," a biography of John D. Rockefeller, that New York City in the early 20th century was a place where the poor were sick, badly housed and poorly fed. Today urban and rural poverty persists in the United States. Yet poverty is most acute in the developing countries where more than one billion people live on less than one U.S. dollar per day. Given the social challenges 90 years ago, our founder could have decided to give away his wealth rapidly, arguing that the world needed his money then rather than at some future date. Wisely, he anticipated that by setting up an endowment money would be available in the future for unforeseen problems. Mr. Rockefeller gave us a broad mandate to further the "well-being of mankind throughout the world." He didn't want the Foundation to be a charity-- dispensing coins into begging bowls or responding to disasters--but would rather uncover root causes of problems and find their solutions. This past year we have become more analytical in our grantmaking approach. We've narrowed the grantmaking focus to about 20 well-defined areas of work. Each of these is subject to "problématique analysis," which is a way of defining a problem taking into account the economic, political and policy context of the issue. Of course we are not the big player today that our money allowed us to be 90 years ago.
    [Show full text]