(SANICH) CHINOOK JARGON TEXT 1 Dell Hymes University of Virginia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Growing up Indian: an Emic Perspective
GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTIVE By GEORGE BUNDY WASSON, JR. A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Anthropology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy june 2001 ii "Growing Up Indian: An Ernie Perspective," a dissertation prepared by George B. Wasson, Jr. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. This dissertation is approved and accepted by: Committee in charge: Dr. jon M. Erlandson, Chair Dr. C. Melvin Aikens Dr. Madonna L. Moss Dr. Rennard Strickland (outside member) Dr. Barre Toelken Accepted by: ------------------------------�------------------ Dean of the Graduate School iii Copyright 2001 George B. Wasson, Jr. iv An Abstract of the Dissertation of George Bundy Wasson, Jr. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology to be taken June 2001 Title: GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E Approved: My dissertation, GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E describes the historical and contemporary experiences of the Coquille Indian Tribe and their close neighbors (as manifested in my own family), in relation to their shared cultures, languages, and spiritual practices. I relate various tribal reactions to the tragedy of cultural genocide as experienced by those indigenous groups within the "Black Hole" of Southwest Oregon. My desire is to provide an "inside" (ernie) perspective on the history and cultural changes of Southwest Oregon. I explain Native responses to living primarily in a non-Indian world, after the nearly total loss of aboriginal Coquelle culture and tribal identity through v decimation by disease, warfare, extermination, and cultural genocide through the educational policies of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. -
Language Index
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86573-9 - Endangered Languages: An Introduction Sarah G. Thomason Index More information Language index ||Gana, 106, 110 Bininj, 31, 40, 78 Bitterroot Salish, see Salish-Pend d’Oreille. Abenaki, Eastern, 96, 176; Western, 96, 176 Blackfoot, 74, 78, 90, 96, 176 Aboriginal English (Australia), 121 Bosnian, 87 Aboriginal languages (Australia), 9, 17, 31, 56, Brahui, 63 58, 62, 106, 110, 132, 133 Breton, 25, 39, 179 Afro-Asiatic languages, 49, 175, 180, 194, 198 Bulgarian, 194 Ainu, 10 Buryat, 19 Akkadian, 1, 42, 43, 177, 194 Bushman, see San. Albanian, 28, 40, 66, 185; Arbëresh Albanian, 28, 40; Arvanitika Albanian, 28, 40, 66, 72 Cacaopera, 45 Aleut, 50–52, 104, 155, 183, 188; see also Bering Carrier, 31, 41, 170, 174 Aleut, Mednyj Aleut Catalan, 192 Algic languages, 97, 109, 176; see also Caucasian languages, 148 Algonquian languages, Ritwan languages. Celtic languages, 25, 46, 179, 183, Algonquian languages, 57, 62, 95–97, 101, 104, 185 108, 109, 162, 166, 176, 187, 191 Central Torres Strait, 9 Ambonese Malay, see Malay. Chadic languages, 175 Anatolian languages, 43 Chantyal, 31, 40 Apache, 177 Chatino, Zenzontepec, 192 Apachean languages, 177 Chehalis, Lower, see Lower Chehalis. Arabic, 1, 19, 22, 37, 43, 49, 63, 65, 101, 194; Chehalis, Upper, see Upper Chehalis. Classical Arabic, 8, 103 Cheyenne, 96, 176 Arapaho, 78, 96, 176; Northern Arapaho, 73, 90, Chinese languages (“dialects”), 22, 35, 37, 41, 92 48, 69, 101, 196; Mandarin, 35; Arawakan languages, 81 Wu, 118; see also Putonghua, Arbëresh, see Albanian. Chinook, Clackamas, see Clackamas Armenian, 185 Chinook. -
Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia
Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology Spring 2016 Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia Henry B. Zenk Portland State University Yvonne P. Hajda Robert T. Boyd Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Zenk H., Hajda, Y., and Boyd, R. (2016). Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia. Oregon Historical Quarterly, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 6-37. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia HENRY ZENK, YVONNE HAJDA, AND ROBERT BOYD VILLAGES WERE THE CENTER of Chinookan life, filling the role that tribes did for Native people in other parts of North America. Every village of any size or significance had a recognized leader or chief, and constituted a named local group with which its members identified themselves. Although the villages themselves are long vanished, early travelers, missionaries, and settlers have left us eyewitness accounts of what some were like. The names and approximate locations of many more can be reconstructed from historical sources and information shared by later generations of lower Columbia -
MI 071 837 RC 006 /44 AUTHOR Willis, Cecilia A., Comp.; Travis, M
DOCUMENT RESUME MI 071 837 RC 006 /44 AUTHOR Willis, Cecilia A., Comp.; Travis, M. Eunice, Comp. TITLE _Significant Literature by and about Native Americans. .PUB DATE Feb 73 NOTE 126p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-S6.58 DESCRIPTORS ..*American Indians; Art; *Bibliographies; Booklists; *Cultural Background; education; Geographic Location;. .Government Role; *History; Language; *ti- zliture; Medicine; Religion; Socioeconomic BackgrcId; Tribes ABSTRACT Significant literature about Native Americans,some written. by Native Americans, comprises this bibliography.Materials _relevant to Native Americans found at Eansas State .Universityare listed. Over 850 books, articles on microfiche, studies, documents, and publications arranged by subject categoriesare contained in this bibliography. The subject categories include antiquities, captives, . .culture, economic conditions, education, geographic location, government relations, history, Indians of North America,. medicine, . reference tools, religion, and tribes.. The culture .subjectcategory includes literature pertaining to art, basketmaking, childrenRs literature, costume and adornment, general references to culture, dances, dwellings, folklore, food, implements andweapons, language, literature, music, pictorial works, pottery, and social life and customs. Accompanying each title entry is the call numberas assigned . by the Library of Congress, and an author index is provided. (NQ; TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Antiquities 1 Captives 5 Culture Art 6 Basketmaking 9 Children's Literature 11 Costume and Adornment 13 Culture (general references, to) 14 Dances 15 Dwellings 16 Folklore 17 Food 21 Implements and Weapons 22 Language 24 Literature 28 Music 31 Pictorial Works 33 Pottery 35 Social Life and Customs 37 Economic Conditions 43 Education. 45 Geographic Location 47 Government Relations 66 History 72 Indians of North America 81 Medicine 88 Reference Tools 89 Religion 90 Tribes 95 Index, Author 113 INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been a growing interest in Native Americans. -
89 Annual Meeting
Meeting Handbook Linguistic Society of America American Dialect Society American Name Society North American Association for the History of the Language Sciences Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas The Association for Linguistic Evidence 89th Annual Meeting UIF+/0 7/-+Fi0N i0N XgLP(+I'L 5/hL- 7/-+Fi0N` 96 ;_AA Ti0(i-e` @\A= ANNUAL REVIEWS It’s about time. Your time. It’s time well spent. VISIT US IN BOOTH #1 LEARN ABOUT OUR NEW JOURNAL AND ENTER OUR DRAWING! New from Annual Reviews: Annual Review of Linguistics linguistics.annualreviews.org • Volume 1 • January 2015 Co-Editors: Mark Liberman, University of Pennsylvania and Barbara H. Partee, University of Massachusetts Amherst The Annual Review of Linguistics covers significant developments in the field of linguistics, including phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and their interfaces. Reviews synthesize advances in linguistic theory, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, language change, biology and evolution of language, typology, and applications of linguistics in many domains. Complimentary online access to the first volume will be available until January 2016. TABLE OF CONTENTS: • Suppletion: Some Theoretical Implications, • Correlational Studies in Typological and Historical Jonathan David Bobaljik Linguistics, D. Robert Ladd, Seán G. Roberts, Dan Dediu • Ditransitive Constructions, Martin Haspelmath • Advances in Dialectometry, Martijn Wieling, John Nerbonne • Quotation and Advances in Understanding Syntactic • Sign Language Typology: The Contribution of Rural Sign Systems, Alexandra D'Arcy Languages, Connie de Vos, Roland Pfau • Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations, • Genetics and the Language Sciences, Simon E. Fisher, Beth Levin Sonja C. -
Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics
Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics Proceedings from the first Workshop on American Indigenous Languages May 9-10, 1998 Department of Linguistics University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Papers in Linguistics Linguistics Department University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California 93106 U.S.A. Checks in U.S. dollars should be made out to UC Regents with $5.00 added for overseas postage. If your institution is interested in an exchange agreement, please write the above address for information. Volume I: Korean: Papers and Discourse Date $13.00 Volume 2: Discourse and Grammar $10.00 Volume 3: Asian Discourse and Grammar $10.00 Volume 4: Discourse Transcription $15.00 Volume 5: East Asian Linguistics $15.00 Volume 6: Aspects of Nepali Grammar $15.00 Volume 7: Prosody. Grammar, and Discourse in Central Alaskan Yup'ik $15.00 Proceedings from the first $20.00 Workshop on American Indigenous Languages Proceedings from the second $15.00 Workshop on American Indigenous Languages Proceedings from the third $15.00 Workshop on American Indigenous Languages CONTENTS FOREWARD............. .. 1 PRELIMINARY REMARKS ON TONE IN COATLAN-LoXICHA ZAPOTEC. 3 Rosemary G. Beam de Azcona ELIDING THE OBVIOUS: ZERO SUBJECTS IN LUSHOOTSEED . 15 David Beck LANGUAGE REACQUISITION IN A CHEROKEE SEMI-SPEAKER: EVIDENCE FROM CLAUSE CONSTRUCTION. 30 Anna Berge VERBAL ARTISTRY IN A SENECA FOLKTALE. 42 Wallace Chafe SOME OUTCOMES OFTHE GRAMMATICALIZATION OFTHE VERB ..2'00' IN APINAJE. 57 Christiane Cunha de Oliveira THE DOUBLE LiFE OF HALKOMELEM REFLEXIVE SUFFIXES. 70 Donna B. Gerdts LOCATION AND DIRECTION IN MOCOVI. 84 Veronica Grondona NOTES ON SWITCH-REFERENCE IN CREEK. -
Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of Ethnology : [Bulletin]
.rM* 'v^ w^^. \^: % >^ v>3 ^J. v^^^r^4;^ i^'^-r \^ .4 Si SMITHSONIAN I N S T I T H 1 1 ( ) N BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY: J, W. POWELL, DIRECTOR BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CHINOOKAl LANGUAGES {INCLUDINd THE VHINOOK JARGON) BY JAMES CONSTANTINE PILLINa WASHINGTON G O V E K N M E N T P It I N T I N (i OFFICE 18 03 LINGUISTIC BIBLIOGRAPHIES ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY. Smithsonian institution—Bureau of ethnology. Catalogue of lin- guistic manuscri]>ts in the library of the Bureau of ethnology. By James 0. Pilling, In Bureau of ethnology first annual report; half-title as above p. 553, text pp. .555-577, Washington, 1881, royal 8°. Issued separatelj^ with cover title as follows: Catalogue of linguistic manuscripts in the library of the Bureau | | | | of ethnology James C. Pilling (Extracted from the first annual by | | | report of the Bureau of ethnology) [Vignette] | | | Washington Government printing office 1881 | | Cover title as above, no inside title, half-title as under entry next above p. 553, text pp. 555-.577, 1'oyal 8°. One hundred copies issued. Smithsonian institution Bureau of ethnology J. W. Powell director — | Proof-sheets of a bibliography of the languages of the North ] | | | | | I American Indians by James Constantine Pilling (Distributed only j | | to collaborators) | Washington Government printing office 1885 | | Title verso blank 1 1. notice (signed .J. W. Powell) p. iii, preface (November 4, 1884) pp. v-viii, introduction pp. ix-x, list of authorities pp. xi-xxxvi, list of libraries re- ferred to by initials pp. -
To Appear in Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Algonquian Conference, Edited by C
To appear in Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Algonquian Conference, edited by C. Wolfart. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba. Kutenai, Algonquian, and the Pacific Northwest from an Areal Perspective* Matthew S. Dryer University at Buffalo Kutenai is a language isolate spoken in southeastern British Columbia and adjacent areas in northern Idaho and northwestern Montana. It is immediately to the west of the westernmost Algonquian language, Blackfoot. The other languages adjacent to Kutenai are Interior Salish languages, including Shuswap and Kalispel. Although a language isolate, Kutenai bears a number of resemblances both to Algonquian languages and to Salish languages. The main thesis of this paper is that the resemblances of Kutenai to Algonquian are of a very different nature from the resemblances to Salish. In section 1 of this paper, I summarize some of the resemblances to Algonquian. There are roughly speaking two similarities. The first is that Kutenai has an obviation system that is strikingly similar to the obviation system of Algonquian languages. The second is that Kutenai has a set of words that I call preverbs that resemble preverbs in Algonquian in that they immediately precede the verb, they cover a range of meanings that are not commonly associated with a single word class in other languages, and they are preceded by a number of grammatical proclitics, including pronominal morphemes that code the person though not the number of the subject.1 These resemblances involve quirky features, features that few other languages share.2 -
Bibliography of the Chinookan Languages (Including the Chinook
J-MRLJF. B 3 3B1 9 ; B k tek LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA GIFT OF" ., \\MAJU Class 15 SMI T II S X I A X I X S T I I U T I < ) X BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY: J. W. POWELL, DIRECTOR BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CHINOOKAH" LANGUAGES (INCLUDING THE CHINOOK JARGON) BY JAMES CONSTANTINE FILLING^ WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1893 SMITHSONIAN INST1T U T I ON BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY: J. W. POWELL, DIRECTOR BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CHINOOKAN LANGUAGES (INCLUDING THE CHINOOK JARGON} BY JAMES CONSTANTINE FILLING I WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1893 LINGUISTIC BIBLIOGRAPHIES ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY. Smithsonian institution Bureau of ethnology. Catalogue of lin guistic manuscripts in the library of the Bureau of ethnology. By James C. Pilling. In Bureau of ethnology first annual report; half-title as above p. 553, text pp. 555-577, Washington, 1881, royal 8. Issued separately with cover title as follows : of in the of the Bureau Catalogue | | linguistic manuscripts | | library of James C. from the first annual ethnology | by | Pilling | (Extracted report of the Bureau of | ethnology) | [Vignette] | Government office 1881 Washington | printing | Cover title as above, no inside title, half-title as under entry next above p. 553, text pp. 555-577, royal 8. One hundred copies issued. Smithsonian institution Bureau of J.W.Powell director ethnology | Proof-sheets of a of the of the North | | | bibliography | | languages | | American Indians James Constantine | | only by | Pilling (Distributed to collaborators) | Government office 1885 Washington | printing | 1 1. Title verso blank notice (signed J. W. -
Morphological Systems: Some Cases from Native America1
CONTACT-INDUCED CHANGE AND THE OPENNESS OF ‘CLOSED’ MORPHOLOGICAL SYSTEMS: SOME CASES FROM NATIVE AMERICA1 Anthony P. Grant Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK 1. Introduction Linguists who try to classify languages firstly into families and then into their constituent subgroups (thereby practising genetic classification or, as Malcolm Ross’s happier phrase has it, genealogical classification) operate with a certain number of assumptions. Some of these have to do with the role of borrowing or, as it has increasingly (and more felicitously) been called since the publication of Thomason & Kaufman (1988), contact-induced (language) change (CIC or CILC). There are some areas in which the operation of CILC is assumed to have fairly free rein in very many languages, such as the absorption of large quantities of culturally-salient vocabulary reflecting the mores and mechanisms of speakers of a prestige language. We have come a long way from the pre-Sir William Jones days of the 1700s, when similarities between languages were often thought to be evidence of borrowing (when in truth they were genealogically based), while actual borrowings—to say nothing of typological similarities grosso modo—were often erroneously taken to show some kind of non-existent genealogical linguistic relationship. But there are some areas where it is generally (if incorrectly) assumed that borrowing cannot and has not taken place. One of these is the realm of inflectional morphology, and the stricture is felt to apply especially strongly if such morphology is bound rather than free, or if it constitutes components of a paradigm. An exception to the claim that such morphology cannot be borrowed is made by some linguists in the case of the handful of ‘mixed languages’ which seem to have different origins for their morphology and for their basic lexicon. -
Raoul Zamponi
DOI: 10.26346/1120-2726-112 First-person n and second-person m in Native America: a fresh look Raoul Zamponi Macerata, Italy <[email protected]> Appendix A: Tables 1-8 Table 1. Reconstructed proto-languages of American language families FAMILY REFERENCE(S) NOTES Algic Proulx (1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1994, 2004) Arawakan Matteson (1972), Payne (1991) Arawan Dixon (2004) Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit Leer (2010), Nikolaev (2014) Aymaran Emlen (2017) Cf. Hardman (1978) for the reconstruction of various personal designators of Proto-Aymaran. Barbacoan Curnow & Liddicoat (1998) Boran Seifart & Echeverri (2015) Bororoan Camargos (2013) Caddoan Taylor 1963 Cariban Girard (1971a) Meira (2002) is specifically dedicated to the reconstruction of the Proto- Cariban personal pronouns. Gildea (1998) presents the reconstruction of the Proto- Cariban personal markers used with nouns and verbs. Chapakuran Angenot-de Lima (1997) Chibchan Wheeler (1972), Constenla Umaña (1981), Holt (1986) Chimakuan Powell (1974) Chocoan Constenla Umaña & Margery Peña (1991) Chumashan Klar (1977) Guahiboan Christian & Matteson (1972) Guaicuruan Viegas Barros (2013a) Huavean Suárez (1975) Huitotoan Aschmann (1993) Italian Journal of Linguistics, 29.2 (2017) Online appendix (received March 2017) Raoul Zamponi Iroquoian Julian (2010) Jicaquean Campbell & Otrogge (1980) Kakua-Nukak Epps & Bolaños (2017) Kalapuyan Shipley (1970) Kamakanan Martins (2007) Keresan Miller & Davis (1963) Kiowa-Tanoan Hale (1967), Sutton (2014) Lencan Arguedas Cortés (1988) Maiduan Ultan (1964) Cf. -
Francis Drake's 1579 Voyage
Francis Drake’s 1579 voyage: Assessing linguistic evidence for an Oregon landing∗ John Lyon Drake Anchorage Research Collaboration Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia Abstract: This article consists of a linguistic investigation of the hypothesis that Sir Francis Drake may have landed somewhere on the Oregon coast in 1579 rather than in California, as is usually assumed (Heizer 1974; Heizer and Elmendorf 1942), and surveys language data from select Native Oregon languages. There are some compelling and plausible matches which come to light in this study, and though they are by themselves inconclusive as evidence, that should be consid- ered in light of any forthcoming physical evidence, especially since some of the matches from these Oregon languages are as-close-to or stronger than the Miwok correspondences cited in Heizer and Elmendorf (1942) and Heizer (1974). 1 Introduction This article reports on the results from an investigation by the Drake Anchorage Research Collaboration (DARC) into the origins of linguistic material collected during Francis Drake’s journey up the Pacific Coast in 1579 (Drake 1628). The chief purpose of the investigation is to assess whether or not Drake may have contacted an Oregon group, particularly of Salishan, ‘Penutian’1, or Athabaskan- speaking stock, rather than ancestors of the California Coast Miwok, as is gener- ally assumed (Heizer 1947; Heizer and Elmendorf 1942).2 The relevant linguistic material from Drake’s voyage consists of short word lists collected by (i) Francis ∗The Drake Anchorage Research Collaboration (DARC) consists of Melissa Darby, Lee Lyman, John Lyon, Margaret Mathewson, Gary Wessen, Heather Wolfe, Lawrence Conyers, Roddy Coleman, and Peter Mancall.