<<

AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF

Matthew W. Loewen for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in presented on December 16, 2013.

Title: Volatile Mobility of Trace Metals in Volcanic Systems.

Abstract approved:

______Adam J.R. Kent

Semi-volatile trace metals like Li, Cu, Mo, Sn, In, and Pb have the potential to track mobility of a volatile phase in volcanic systems. In this dissertation four studies are presented that either directly investigate or are motivated by observations of trace metal behavior in volcanic systems. A common tool for trace element determination in solid materials is laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Although this technique has the potential to measure concentrations of many elements to << 1 ppm, it also has the potential to fractionate elements of different volatility resulting in increased analytical uncertainty. Potential sources of fractionation in two different laser ablation systems are characterized, including a previously unrecognized source of fractionation related to differential carrier gas flow at the site of ablation. Glass and melt inclusions from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Iki record little evidence for volatile behavior of metals, but do record variations related to mixing of distinct batches of . Variations in concentrations of metals like Cu, Zn, and Mo can be explained with olivine fractionation. Only Sn variations appear to be compatible with volatile mobility. Lithophile element variations in both glass and melt inclusions require that the Kilauea Iki magma was a mixture of melts generated from different mantle sources by variable degrees of melting. Amphibole phenocrysts from Mt. Pinatubo, Mt. Hood, Mt. St. Helens, and Shiveluch Volcano record a variety of trace element signatures related to the sources and fractionation processes acting in each of these systems. Variations in Li and Cu in amphiboles are decoupled from any other trace element but positively correlate with each other. Their behavior appears to be consistent with mobility in volatile-rich fluids followed by rapid equilibration with amphibole phenocrysts. New 40Ar-39Ar incremental heating age determinations and whole rock major and trace element analyses from the Curaçao Lava Formation and the Dumisseau Formation have provided a revision of the timing and geochemical character of the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. These data provide evidence for almost 30 million years of volcanic history beginning around 94-60 Ma with mantle plume-like geochemical character. To reconcile the duration of volcanism and the observed geochemical signature with models of mantle plume impingement, a new model for development of the Caribbean Large Igneous Province is proposed that calls on nearby subduction zones to induce asthenospheric flow in the mantle that allows for continuous tapping of plume-influenced mantle for a 30 million year period. ©Copyright by Matthew W. Loewen December 16, 2013 All Rights Reserved Volatile Mobility of Trace Metals in Volcanic Systems

by Matthew W. Loewen

A DISSERTATION

submitted to

Oregon State University

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

Presented December 16, 2013 Commencement June 2014 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Matthew W. Loewen presented on December 16, 2013.

APPROVED:

Major Professor, representing Geology

Dean of the College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences

Dean of the Graduate School

I understand that my dissertation will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my dissertation to any reader upon request.

Matthew W. Loewen, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

A small acknowledgements section at the beginning of this dissertation cannot properly thank or even recognize all of the many people who made completing this work possible and more importantly enjoyable. In each chapter separate acknowledgement sections address important logistical support, funding, and reviews that went into each chapter. Here I want to recognize people who were most important to my completion of this overall degree.

First I want to note my appreciation for Adam Kent, my advisor, and the members of my thesis committee: Bob Duncan, John Dilles, Frank Tepley, and Anthony Koppers as well as late substitutes for my defense Anita Grunder and Dave Graham who stepped in after a beautiful December snowstorm cancelled my original defense date and required me to reschedule for a time when Bob and John could not attend. I could not ask for a better advisor than Adam. He trusted me with the freedom to work out my own problems and work on my own schedule, but also readily answered questions and gave exceptional guidance on how to write. The data we collected often was unexpected and quite frankly disappointing, but he kept me positive and helped to point out the value of whatever results we found. All of my committee members have provided support beyond their required rolls. Bob has acted more like a co-advisor, especially with the Caribbean project, and made huge contributions to publishing that chapter before my defense. I have only been able to apply a fraction of John’s wealth of knowledge to the discussion of metal behavior in volcanic systems, and all of his suggestions including those not included here will help improve the eventual publications of those projects. In addition, I am grateful to have had the opportunity to learn from him by working as his teaching assistant in Mineralogy and taking several of his courses. Frank was always a friendly face with his office down the hall from mine. I probably dropped in on him and asked him for as much advise as I asked Adam for. Most importantly, he was always willing to help and take the time to listen. Anthony played the role of a GCR, but actually taught me how to prepare samples for Ar-Ar dating and gave me my first examination on the literature of the Caribbean LIP during his isotope class. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Continued)

Beyond my committee, I want to acknowledge the entire VIPER community of fellow students and faculty. While working at OSU, I had the fortune to work with a group of genuinely good people who made work fun. The students who were here when I arrived established a culture of friendliness and excitement. I especially want to acknowledge the conversation and friendships with Alison Koleszar, Mark Ford, Allison Weinsteiger, Morgan Salisbury, BJ Walker, and Erin Lieuallen. My cohort of incoming VIPERs in 2008-09, Ashley Bromley, Amy Lange, and Fede Cernuschi, still blow me away with their intelligence, but they are also the best people I could ever hope to work with and are among my best friends. Ashley especially has become a lifelong friend in all adventures geologic and union. New students have come (and gone) since I got here and I don’t know half of them as well as I’d like, but I want to point out some who have been especially helpful as sounding boards and friends including Dale Burns, Jason Kaiser, Stephanie Grocke, Kyle Krawl, Richard Bradshaw, Luc Farmer, Christine Chan, Daniel Eungard, Andrew Burleigh, Casey Tierney, Darrick Boschmann. The good nature of most people who have chosen to join the VIPER group at OSU is this research programs’ strongest asset.

Outside of the VIPER group, I have been lucky to be involved in the Coalition of Graduate Employees (CGE 6069). This is the best organization I have ever been a part of and have been proud to be a member and volunteer. The people I have met in this organization are some of the most generous people I know and have made meaningful improvements in both Oregon State University and the university/research communities around the country. I think the best work I’ve done while working on a PhD are not in this dissertation but with this organization. I hope as long as CGE represents graduate employees at OSU people do not hesitate to join this great union and continue to volunteer to make it better. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Continued)

Before coming to OSU many important people inspired me to not only study first in the sciences but then geology. Dr. Kaser was an especially inspiration high school physics/astronomy teacher. My undergraduate advisor, Jeff Tepper, is a geologic role model and taught me my core skills in this wonderful subject. Two of my closest friends as an undergraduate, Eric and Marissa, helped drive my passion and excitement in all things scientific and academic.

My immediate and extended family has been a big part of my life and gave me the encouragement and support to get through all my schooling. I have ben fortunate to have them close the last few years even if school has kept me too busy to see everyone as much as I would like. I want to especially note my Dad from whom I inherited a love for debate, thinking, and standing up for what is right, and my Mom who taught me to love the mountains and the world around me. Studying geology for almost 10 years now started with exploring the spectacular volcanoes of the central Cascades in Oregon.

My most important acknowledgement is reserved for my best friend and wife, Caitlin. When I started at OSU she lived in McMinnville and then Portland. Without the fun of visiting her almost every weekend my first two years in grad school I would have burned out and never continued past a masters degree. After marrying me and living with me she has been my most important companion sharing my excitement and comforting my dismay through all of my experiences the last few years. My best memories in graduate school have been adventures with her and those experiences are what fueled my ability to work hard on my degree. She deserves more credit than anyone for me completing this degree and I look forward to all of the adventures we will share in the future. CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS

Adam Kent was involved in the design, interpretation, and writing of all chapters. Robin Tuohy and Paul Wallace were responsible for major and volatile element analysis of melt inclusions and olivine in Chapter Three. Robert Duncan was involved in the design, interpretation, and writing of Chapter Four. In addition, he was responsible for all 40Ar-39Ar ages from the Dumisseau Formation, Haiti. Kyle Krawl assisted in data collection for Chapter Four, especially 40Ar-39Ar ages and trace element analyses for Curacao and major and trace element analyses for the Dumisseau Formation. TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. General Introduction ...... 1

References...... 4

2. Sources of Elemental Fractionation and Uncertainty during the Analysis of Semi- Volatile Metals in Silicate Glasses using LA-ICP-MS...... 6

Abstract...... 7

Introduction...... 7

Experimental...... 9

Results and Discussion ...... 11

Elemental fractionation during LA-ICP-MS analysis...... 11

Laser-induced fractionation ...... 12

Fractionation within a single-volume ablation chamber...... 13

Fractionation within a two-volume ablation chamber ...... 17

Controls on analytical reproducibility during LA-ICP-MS...... 17

Conclusions...... 19

Acknowledgements...... 19

References...... 20

3. Fractionation, Magma Mixing, and Volatile Degassing During the 1959 Eruption of Kilauea Iki, Hawaii ...... 32

Abstract...... 33

Introduction...... 33

Methods...... 35

Melt Inclusion Corrections ...... 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

Results and Discussion ...... 39

Control on Major Element Compositions...... 39

Controls on Lithophile Trace Elements ...... 41

Behavior of Volatile Elements...... 44

Semi-Volatile Trace Metal Behavior...... 44

Conclusions...... 47

Acknowledgements...... 48

References...... 49

4. Trace Metals in Amphibole from Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood, Shiveluch, and Mount Pinatubo: Insight into Metal Mobility in Volcanic Systems...... 69

Abstract...... 70

Introduction...... 70

Methods...... 72

Results...... 74

Discussion...... 76

General amphibole variations ...... 76

Volatile metal behavior...... 77

Mt. St. Helens ...... 78

Mt. Hood...... 80

Pinatubo ...... 81

Conclusions...... 82 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

Acknowledgements...... 83

References...... 83

5. Prolonged Plume Volcanism in the Caribbean Large Igneous Province: New Insights from Curaçao and Haiti...... 100

Abstract...... 101

Introduction...... 101

Geologic Background ...... 103

Curaçao ...... 103

Dumisseau Formation, Haiti ...... 104

Beata Ridge and the Interior of the Caribbean Plate...... 105

Sampling and Methodology...... 105

Results...... 108

Curaçao Geochronology ...... 108

Dumisseau Formation Geochronology ...... 110

Geochemistry ...... 110

Isotopes ...... 111

Discussion...... 112

Geologic History of Curaçao ...... 112

Geologic History of the Dumisseau Formation ...... 115

Timing and Geochemistry of Volcanism Across the CLIP ...... 115

Tectonic Model ...... 118

Conclusions...... 120 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

Acknowledgements...... 121

References...... 121

6. Conclusions ...... 138

Bibliography ...... 141

Appendices...... 158

A. Supplemental Information for Chapter Three...... 159

B. Supplemental Information for Chapter Four...... 173

C. Supplemental Information for Chapter Five ...... 203 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1.1. Location map of study locations in this dissertation ...... 5

2.1. Elements analysed in LA-ICP-MS experiments...... 24

2.2. Schematic of the single-volume ablation chamber used in this study ...... 26

2.3. Fractionation index measured for a 120 second analysis of standard glasses ablated within a single-volume ablation chamber...... 27

2.4. Three chips of GSE-1G glass analyzed in different positions within the single- volume ablation chamber...... 28

2.5. Summary of fractionation induced within the chamber for a single-volume ablation cell...... 29

2.6. Results from repeat analyses of GSE-1G from positions across a two-volume ablation chamber...... 30

3.1. Location of Kilauea volcano and Kilauea Iki on the island of Hawaii...... 54

3.2. Corrections of melt inclusions for post-entrapment crystallization (PEC) and diffusive Fe-loss...... 55

3.3. Major element variation diagrams ...... 57

3.4. Ratio of CaO over Al2O3 against MgO...... 58

3.5. Trace element variation diagrams against MgO ...... 59

3.6. Trace element variation diagrams...... 60

3.7. Multielement diagrams normalized to chondrite and primitive mantle...... 62

3.8. Plots of olivine-incompatible trace element ratios with modes of mantle melting ...... 63

3.9. Major volatile concentrations measured with EMPA (S) and FTIR (H2O and CO2) ...... 64

3.10. Examination of potentially volatile metal behavior against major volatile components ...... 65

3.11. Selected metal concentrations examined against lithophile trace elements...... 66 LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure Page

3.12. Metal loss during degassing calculated from studies of volcanic gasses...... 68

4.1. Comparison of Ti concentrations by EMPA and LA-ICP-MS...... 88

4.2. Calculated amphibole pressure (P) compared to calculated temperature (T) and molar Al/Si ...... 89

4.3. Rare earth element and muli-element spider diagrams comparing high- and low-Al amphiboles ...... 90

4.4. Calculated pressure versus Ce concentrations in amphiboles...... 91

4.5. Variation diagrams for Ce versus lithophile trace elements and Eu anomalies.....92

4.6. Comparisons of Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu*) compared to Sr concentrations...... 93

4.7. Variation diagrams for Ce versus potentially volatile trace elements ...... 94

4.8. Covariation between Cu and Li shown on a log-log plot ...... 95

4.9. Concentrations of Cu and Li in amphiboles from Mt. St. Helens grouped by sample ...... 96

4.10. Enclave and host amphibole compositions from Mt. Hood...... 98

4.11. Amphibole concentrations over the course of the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo ...... 99

5.1. Overview map of prominent Caribbean Large Igneous Province exposures (insert) and simplified geologic map of Curaçao ...... 128

5.2. Selected age spectra from the Curaçao Lava Formation ...... 130

5.3. Selected age spectra from the Dumisseau Formation...... 132

5.4. Multi-element diagrams for samples from the CLF and Dumisseau Formation .133

5.5. Plume and MOR derived can be differentiated on a plot of Zr/Y and Nb/Y as shown by Fitton (1997) with samples from Iceland ...... 134

5.6. 40Ar-39Ar plateau ages determined in this study and previous work ...... 135

5.7. Conceptual model illustrating prolonged CLIP volcanism with mantle plume influence...... 137 LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

2.1. LA-ICP-MS instrument setup...... 25

2.2. Summary of uncertainty sources during LA-ICP-MS analysis of GSE-1G ...... 31

3.1. Constants and parameters used in melt inclusion correction equations...... 56

3.2. Pearson correlation coefficients from glass and melt inclusions...... 61

3.3. Expected concentration decrease for potentially volatile trace elements during degassing based studies of volcanic gas emissions at Kilauea ...... 67

4.1. Copper-Lithium correlation coefficients for individual samples from Mt. St. Helens ...... 97

5.1. 40Ar-39Ar age determinations for the Curaçao Lava Formation lavas, dikes, and hyaloclastites...... 129

5.2. 40Ar-39Ar age determinations for Dumisseau Formation lavas and sills...... 131 LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES

Figure Page

C1. Complete 40Ar-39Ar age spectra for the Curaçao Lava Formation...... 208

C2. Complete 40Ar-39Ar age spectra for the Dumisseau Formation ...... 214 LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES

Table Page

A1. Long-term accuracy of EMPA basaltic glass calibration...... 160

A2. Trace element accuracy in secondary standards by LA-ICP-MS ...... 161

A3. Major and trace element analyses of matrix glass from Kilauea Iki...... 164

A4. Major and trace element analyses of melt inclusions from Kilauea Iki...... 169

A5. Major and trace element analyses of olivine from Kilauea Iki...... 172

B1. Summary of analytical uncertainty for EMPA amphibole analyses ...... 173

B2. Summary of trace element secondary standard accuracy and precision ...... 174

B3. Amphibole analyses from the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo ...... 177

B4. Amphibole analyses from the 1980 eruptions of Mt. St. Helens ...... 187

B5. Amphibole analyses from Mt. Hood...... 197

B6. Amphibole analyses from Shiveluch volcano...... 201

C1. Major and trace element whole rock analyses from the Curaçao Lava Formation and the Dumisseau Formation ...... 204 Volatile Mobility of Trace Metals in Volcanic Systems

CHAPTER ONE

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The systematics of semi-volatile trace metals (e.g., Li, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, W, Pb) provide important clues to a number of magmatic and volcanic processes, although these elements are less frequently used to study magmatic systems than lithophile trace elements (REE, HFSE, LILE) and major volatile components (e.g.,

H2O, CO2, S, Cl). Despite this, volatile metal systematics highlight a number of key interactions between silicate and sulfide melts, , and volatile components of a magma, and thus provide insight into how these processes can influence ore deposit formation, eruption timing and style, and volcanic interactions within the environment. The projects of this dissertation are all linked by a desire to measure and understand how volatile trace metals behave in volcanic environments. Essential to predicting how semi-volatile metals will behave in volcanic systems is an understanding of the controls on metal partitioning into a volcanic fluid. Exsolution of a volatile phase is a ubiquitous process in and a key driver of volcanic eruptions (Blake, 1984). Volatiles can also fracture wall rocks leading to emplacement of hydrothermal veins and alteration associated with ore deposits (Hedenquist and

Lowenstern, 1994). Typically the first fluids exsolved from a melt are dominated by CO2

followed by H2O dominant fluids (e.g., Roedder, 1984). Two fundamental processes lead to separation of a volatile phase from a melt. Simple decompression of ascending magmas, or “first boiling,” will reduce the solubility of water in the melt resulting in exsolution of a lower-density fluid. Burnham (1979) also proposed a model of “second boiling,” where crystallization of anhydrous phases increases the H2O concentration in the melt until saturation is reached and volatile exsolution occurs. With exsolution of a volatile phase, minor volatile components (e.g., Cl, S, and F species) as well as semi- 2 volatile trace metals can be partitioned out of the melt and physically separated from a magma. Many trace metals have the potential to partition into this fluid phase. Chloride, S, and F species all can act as complexing anions enabling the transport of many elements such as Cu. The role of Cl, especially in the transport of Cu, was one of the earliest recognized complexing agents for trace metals (Candela and Holland, 1984) although recent work has suggested that S complexes may also play a role in enhancing metal transport or even complex metals independently (Pokrovski et al., 2008; Seo et al., 2009). In addition to composition, metal partitioning can be influenced by the number of fluid components such as a single supercritical fluid, a dense Cl-rich brine, and/or a low density vapor (Candela and Piccoli, 1995). In this dissertation, the behavior of different semi-volatile trace metals is determined in a laser ablation laboratory environment, an ocean island , and in arc volcanoes. The final project in the Caribbean Large Igneous Province does not directly examine trace metal behavior, but was motivated by a desire to understand the potential implications of trace metal release into the oceans during a large submarine eruption. Specifically, Chapter 2 develops our understanding of how volatile metals behave during laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). These include the level of characterization and homogeneity of the materials used for standardization together with fractionation of elements of different volatility during ablation, transport, and within the plasma furnace (e.g., Sylvester, 2008). In this chapter two different laser ablation systems are compared and a new source of fractionation, and therefore uncertainty, is documented. This study demonstrated that the laser ablation technique applied in the subsequent chapters of this dissertation minimized semi-volatile trace metal fractionation resulting in more precise trace element concentration determinations. Chapters 3 and 4 examine trace metal behavior in two different volcanic systems, ocean island basalts and silicic arc volcanoes. Olivine-hosted melt inclusions and matrix glasses were examined from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Iki, Hawaii. The study aimed to quantify any metal degassing from the magma by comparing metal concentrations in 3 melt inclusions to matrix glasses. Most measured trace metals, with the possible exception of Sn and B, were shown to have no discernable degassing patterns. Analysis of fumarolic emissions of trace metals compared to sulfur release suggests that, even though metals are transported in volcanic gasses in Hawaii, the decrease in metal concentration in the magma would be well below limits of detection. In addition to examining trace metal behavior, new lithophile trace element determinations for Kilauea Iki demonstrated the fractionation and mixing processes that control compositional variations during this eruption. In Chapter 4 semi-volatile trace metal concentrations were determined for four different arc volcanoes: Mt. St. Helens, Mt. Hood, Mt. Pinatubo, and Shiveluch volcano. Amphibole phenocrysts document systematic lithophile trace element variations potentially resulting from source variations, crystal fractionation, and mixing processes. Tin, In, and Zn are shown to be typically enriched in shallow, felsic magmas although no direct evidence for volatile mobility of these elements was found. Copper and Li, however, were shown to be decoupled from all other trace elements and behave in a manner consistent with partitioning into a volatile-rich fluid that can then physically separate from the magma. Chapter 5 looks at a Large Igneous Province, where we initially hoped to document metal release from this massive eruption and relate it to biological impacts associated with this geologic event (Sinton and Duncan, 1997). The trace metal results from Hawaii, along with the altered nature of our collected samples in Curaçao and in the Dumisseau Formation, Haiti, made answering this question impractical. Instead, we fully characterized the timing and geochemistry of submarine lava flows revealing a surprisingly long duration for a volcanic formation previously thought to erupt over only a few million years. Geochemical data are consistent with a mantle plume source and that are largely unchanged over the volcanic history. We propose a new tectonic model that can reconcile the longevity of the volcanic province as well as the plume-like geochemical character. 4

References:

Blake, S., 1984. Volatile oversaturation during the evolution of silicic magma chambers as an eruption trigger. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 8237–8244.

Burnham, C.W., 1979. Magmas and hydrothermal fluids. Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits 2, 63–123.

Candela, P.A., Holland, H.D., 1984. The partitioning of copper and molybdenum between silicate melts and aqueous fluids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48, 373–380.

Candela, P.A., Piccoli, P.M., 1995. Model ore-metal partitioning from melts into vapor and vapor/brine mixtures. Magmas, fluids, and ore deposits 23, 101–127.

Hedenquist, J., Lowenstern, J.B., 1994. The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. Nature 370, 519–527.

Pokrovski, G.S., Borisova, A.Y., Harrichoury, J.-C., 2008. The effect of sulfur on vapor– liquid fractionation of metals in hydrothermal systems. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 266, 345–362.

Seo, J.H., Guillong, M., Heinrich, C.A., 2009. The role of sulfur in the formation of magmatic–hydrothermal copper–gold deposits. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 282, 323–328.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., 1997. Potential links between ocean plateau volcanism and global ocean anoxia at the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary. Economic Geology 92, 836–842. 5

Figure 1.1. Location map of study locations in this dissertation. Also shown are active volcanic systems from the Smithsonian’s Global Volcanism Project. 6 CHAPTER TWO

SOURCES OF ELEMENTAL FRACTIONATION AND UNCERTAINTY DURING THE ANALYSIS OF SEMI-VOLATILE METALS IN SILICATE GLASSES USING LA-ICP-MS

Matthew W. Loewen Adam J.R. Kent

This manuscript is published in: Journal of Analytical and Atomic Spectrometry Royal Society of Chemistry Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WF September 2012, v. 27, no. 9, p. 1502-1508. 7 Abstract We investigate elemental fractionation and sources of analytical uncertainty during in situ determination of a range of semi-volatile trace metals (e.g., Cd, Sn, Pb, Zn, Cu, Mo) in silicate glasses using laser ablation-ICP-MS (LA-ICP-MS), and compare the performance of single-volume and two-volume ablation chambers. In a single-volume ablation chamber we document the differential response of volatile and refractory elements relative to 43Ca at different ablation sites within the ablation chamber as a primary source of analytical uncertainty. This fractionation is unrelated to interaction between the laser pulse and solid material during progressive ablation, but does correlate with the local He velocity at the position of analysis. Evidence suggests that fractionation relates to differences in behaviour of refractory and volatile elements during condensation from the laser-induced plasma, and interaction between condensate and the carrier gas. The dependence of fractionation on local He flow regime results in relatively poor reproducibility in 43Ca normalized ratios (up to ~ 20%, 2 s) for a number of volatile metals as well as some with siderophile and chalcophile tendencies (e.g., B, Co, Cu, Zn, Mo, Ag, In, Sn, Sb, W, Pb). Fractionation of this type may be a major feature of many single-volume ablation chambers and also may occur in other instances where the He flow regime varies substantially with location in the ablation chamber. Analyses within a two-volume sample chamber, where the He flow rate at the site of ablation remains more uniform across the chamber, show no evidence for this style of elemental fractionation, and normalized ratios measured for volatile trace metals show reproducibilities for normalized ratios that are typically < 10% (2 s).

Introduction Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) has revolutionized the microanalysis of solid geologic materials over the last two decades (Durrant, 1999; Fryer et al., 1995; Longerich, 2008) providing the means for rapid and inexpensive quantification of trace elements with high spatial resolution (typically 30-100 µm). Although many geologic studies focus on determination of refractory and lithophile trace elements, study of semi-volatile and/or chalcophile or siderophile metals has also 8 provided important information in many areas, including contributions to the understanding of fundamental petrologic processes such as core-mantle interactions in plumes (Norman et al., 2004; Witt-Eickschen et al., 2009), volcanic degassing (Collins et al., 2009; Rowe et al., 2008), magmatic differentiation (Jenner et al., 2010), and the transport of ore metals in magmatic systems (Zajacz and Halter, 2009). Nonetheless, there are also limitations for LA-ICP-MS analysis of geologic materials, many of which may be more critical for study of elements of relatively high volatility. These include the characterization and homogeneity of the materials used for standardization together with fractionation of elements of different volatility during ablation, transport, and within the plasma furnace (Sylvester, 2008). Although somewhat dependent on the particular laser wavelength employed, UV radiation is generally absorbed more efficiently in basaltic glass compared to felsic composition glasses (Günther and Heinrich, 1999; Russo et al., 2000; Yu et al., 2003). This effect appears to affect determination of elements with lower melting and boiling points more significantly (Outridge et al., 1997). In addition, there is the longstanding recognition that semi- volatile and chalcophile trace elements may exhibit different behaviour during ablation (Eggins et al., 1998) and during particulate breakdown within the plasma (Gaboardi and Humayun, 2009; Günther et al., 1999; Kroslakova and Günther, 2006; Wang et al., 2006) relative to the standard lithophile trace element suites used for many petrologic investigations, and to the refractory lithophile elements that are typically used as internal standards (Günther et al., 1999; Günther and Heinrich, 1999; Hirata and Nesbitt, 1995). Although there are suggestions that femtosecond laser ablation systems may also result in reduced elemental fractionation, these systems are less common, and a focus on understanding controls on elemental fraction in longer pulse width lasers remains a high priority (Borisova et al., 2010; Claverie et al., 2009; Horn, 2008; Koch et al., 2007). In this contribution we study elemental fractionation during LA-ICP-MS analysis of a range of trace metals of varying volatility and geochemical affinity, and document the effect of this on analytical performance. We also highlight the role of ablation chamber performance during analysis of semi-volatile metals and compare the behaviour of single-volume and two-volume ablation chambers. 9

Experimental Analyses used a NewWave DUV 193 nm ArF Excimer Laser system or a Photon Machines Analyte G2 193 nm ArF “fast” Excimer Laser system. Operating conditions are shown in Table 2.1. Both 80 and 50 µm spot sizes were used for analyses of samples of GSE-1G, a synthetic basaltic glass developed by the USGS to fulfil the need for a

basaltic (~ 50 wt.% SiO2) composition glass standard (Guillong et al., 2005). GSE-1G has sufficient levels of most trace metals (120-400 ppm; GeoReM database, Jochum et al., 2005) to provide adequate calibrations for a wide range of trace metal compositions, and to date does not appear to suffer from heterogeneity of volatile metals (Guillong et al., 2005; Loewen, 2011) as has been demonstrated for the NIST-61X series glasses (Eggins and Shelley, 2002). Between 30 and 43 masses were measured in each analysis including elements with a wide range of geochemical affinities (lithophile, chalcophile, and siderophile) including a number of volatile and semi-volatile elements (based on condensation temperatures from Lodders, 2003) and are shown in Fig. 2.1. With a few exceptions, we found little evidence for significant isobaric interferences for the elements and matrices analysed in this study. Almost all elements in this study that have multiple isotopes available for measurement exhibit a high level of accuracy for concentrations measured in GSD-1G glass (using GSE-1G as a calibration standard) using different isotopes (24,25Mg, 52,53Cr, 63,65Cu, 64,66Zn, 95,98Mo, 107,109Ag, 111,112Cd, 118,120Sn, 121,123Sb, 182,183W, 185,187Re; Loewen, 2011). Exceptions may exist for Se where 76Se and 82Se both consistently returned values significantly greater than reported values for GSD-1G and had unusually large uncertainties calculated for each individual spot analysis (> 10%). These isotopes both suffer from significant Ar- and Kr- based interferences, although these potentially can be largely controlled by the gas blank subtraction. Selenium may also suffer for relatively poor levels of characterization in many materials. We processed data using in-house LaserTRAM software using Visual Basic running within Microsoft Excel. This software was used to select a 20-30 second background interval and a ~30 second ablation interval for each analysis. The software 10 corrects for background and normalizes the count rates for each element over the ablation interval to the selected internal standard (43Ca). The software subdivides the selected ablation interval into a preselected number (typically 3-5) of subintervals of equal duration and background-corrected counts recorded in each of these were binned before calculating normalized ratios for each subinterval. In materials that are homogenous at the scale of an individual analysis crater this approach reduces error magnification related to low count rates and short dwell times. Final normalized ratios for each sample are the median value of the normalized ratios calculated for each subinterval (we use the median as it is more robust with respect to outliers than the mean). Uncertainties in each normalized ratio are determined as 2 standard error (2 se) of the results for each subinterval. Analyses we report herein include a number of spot analyses of different chips of GSE-1G glass as well as multi-point transects across individual mm-sized chips of GSE- 1G. Transects consist of lines of spots rather than continuous rastered traverses. Transects were also analysed with sample mounts in different locations within the ablation chamber to study cell transport effects. To simplify comparisons, our data are primarily presented as 43Ca normalized ratios (X/43Ca) for each isotope instead of calibrated concentrations. Although this approach does not automatically correct for short-term instrumental drift, comparison of secondary standard glass analyses before and after the analysis of GSE-1G were used to monitor significant changes and none were observed. To assess the role of laser-induced fractionation during progressive ablation, fractionation factors (Fryer et al., 1995; Mank and Mason, 1999; Sylvester, 2008) were measured with 80 µm spot sizes over longer ablation intervals (120 seconds with a pulse rate of 4 Hz) for GSE-1G and NIST-610 glasses. The fractionation index was then calculated from the ratio of the median X/43Ca ratios measured in the first and last 30 seconds of a 120 second ablation period (Fryer et al., 1995; Mank and Mason, 1999). This procedure results in fractionation factors that are relative to Ca = 1. We also conducted experiments in two different styles of ablation chamber in this study. A schematic of the single-volume ablation chamber used for this study is shown in Fig. 2.2. For routine analyses samples set in 25 mm diameter epoxy mounts are located in 11 a central position with smaller (~12 mm) mounts used for standards located on either side. Helium enters and is extracted from the chamber at points located along the axis of the three sample/standard mount locations. Experiments were also conducted in a two- volume ablation chamber. This unit follows a design developed at Australia National University (Eggins et al., 1998) where a smaller cone is placed over the sample surface above the ablated region, and He flow from the chamber transports ablated material into this cone and then into the tubing that leads to the ICP-MS. The two-volume chamber used in this study has two separate He carrier gas inputs, one for the entire sample chamber and another within the cone itself. During routine analyses the two flow rates are each set at 0.4 L min-1 and the flow rate listed in Table 2.1 represents these two gas inputs combined. The effect of this design is a much smaller effective volume ablation chamber with faster signal response rates and more uniform gas flow regime over the entire sample chamber (Eggins et al., 1998; Müller et al., 2009). In addition the chamber itself is considerably larger than a single-volume chamber, and the one used herein holds nine 25 mm diameter sample mounts in a 100 x 120 mm area. As we demonstrate later, this design also significantly improved precision for volatile element analyses.

Results and Discussion Element fractionation during LA-ICP-MS analysis Elemental fractionation is a common occurrence during laser ablation ICP-MS analysis, particularly when comparing elements with markedly different volatilities (Hirata and Nesbitt, 1995; Sylvester, 2008). Studies that have investigated this phenomenon have emphasized the role of fractionation induced during progressive ablation due to changes in the local condensation regime and laser-induced plasma extraction as an ablated crater becomes deeper (Eggins et al., 1998; Mank and Mason, 1999). This phenomenon is typically referred to as laser-induced fractionation. Other workers have focused on the role of transport of the particulate material produced by ablation and the elemental fractionation produced by incomplete breakdown of larger particles within the ICP-MS plasma furnace (Guillong et al., 2003; Outridge et al., 1997). Finally there is also the potential effect of differential carrier gas flow and the 12 corresponding efficiency of condensation and particulate transport within the ablation chamber. Modern two-volume chamber designs minimize differential particulate transport (Eggins and Shelley, 2002; Müller et al., 2009), but many ablation systems currently in use, including one of the two instruments used in this study, have a single- volume design that exhibits significant variations in carrier gas velocity and flow mode within the chamber (Bleiner and Bogaerts, 2007; Koch et al., 2008). In the following sections we investigate the possible origins of elemental fractionation during laser ablation analysis, focusing on analysis of elements with a range of volatile and refractory behaviour and geochemical affinity. We also directly compare performance of a single-volume and two-volume ablation chamber, demonstrating the improved performance of the two-volume system for analyses of volatile trace elements.

Laser-induced fractionation To gauge the level of laser-induced fractionation, fractionation factors for progressive ablation of a single crater were measured using the protocol described above and are shown in Fig. 2.3. Previous studies have shown that in some instances significant fractionation of elements of different volatility may occur during extended ablation and production of deep ablation craters (Eggins et al., 1998; Fryer et al., 1995; Hu et al., 2011; Jackson, 2001; Mank and Mason, 1999). For this study we determined fractionation factors for GSE-1G and NIST-610 glasses. To minimize the effects of sample chamber location (see below) we report only fractionation factors from analyses within the centre of the single-volume ablation chamber (Fig. 2.2). Estimates of crater depth using transmitted light microscopy show that transparent glasses ablated to greater depths than opaque glasses over the 120 second ablation interval; NIST-610 glass ablated at 4 Hz to 86 ± 2 mm (~170 nm per pulse), whereas the relatively opaque GSE-1G ablated to 60 ± 2 mm (~125 nm per pulse). Overall we see little evidence for significant fractionation of elements based on volatility or other properties during progressive ablation of a single crater (Fig. 2.3). Fractionation factors in all cases are typically low (0.9-1.1), compared to values reported elsewhere that range up to three using 266 and 248 nm wavelength ablation systems and 13 longer ablation times (Fryer et al., 1995; Mank and Mason, 1999). In addition, our data show no consistent relation between volatility or geochemical affinity and fractionation factor. Our fractionation factors are broadly consistent with previous work that suggests that laser-induced elemental fractionation is less important when using the shorter wavelength ArF Excimer lasers and in shorter (up to 40 second) ablation intervals and larger spot sizes (>44 µm; Günther and Heinrich, 1999; Hu et al., 2011; Kent and Ungerer, 2005). In addition, ablation craters produced by the 120 second ablation intervals reported here have depth to width aspect ratios close to one, much less than the six or greater aspect ratio needed to produce significant volatile fractionation (Mank and Mason, 1999). Our data suggest that fractionation of elements on the basis of volatility, related to differences in condensation and laser-induced plasma or extraction from a deepening crater or both (Eggins et al., 1998; Mank and Mason, 1999), is negligible with the instrumental setup and analysis protocol detailed herein. For this reason, and because our typical analysis protocol for unknown materials uses only 45 seconds of ablation (producing 20-30 µm deep craters), we believe that laser-induced elemental fractionation during ablation is likely insignificant (< 10%) for the purposes of measurements of elemental composition, even where large differences are apparent in the volatility of the analyte and internal standard element. Calculation of fractionation indices over these shorter ablation periods confirms that little apparent elemental fractionation occurs.

Fractionation within a single-volume ablation chamber Although we see little evidence that laser-induced elemental fractionation is significant using our protocol, our initial results using a single-volume ablation chamber did show evidence for large variations in degree of volatile/refractory element fractionation depending on position within the ablation chamber. These data suggested that differences in fractionation were evident between samples located in the centre of the ablation chamber, and those in more peripheral locations. We conducted a series of experiments designed to study this further by systematically varying the analysis location 14 of GSE-1G glass by rotating a mount containing three different chips of glass by 90° between analyses as shown in Fig. 2.4. Three distinct sets of behaviour were observed between the three chips dependent on their position in the sample chamber (Fig. 2.4). When all three chips were aligned in a direction parallel to the He flow direction (Positions 2 and 4 in Fig. 2.4), the ratios of elements to 43Ca determined from multiple analyses of each separate chip were broadly similar and largely within uncertainty of each other. However, when the sample mount is aligned so that only a single glass chip is positioned along the axis of the sample chamber (Positions 1, 3) then a number of volatile and/or chalcophile elements (in order of increasing depletion: Pb, Cd, Sb, Cr, Ag, Bi, Li, Co, Zn, Te, Rb, Si, W, In, As, Sn, Mo, V, B, Re, Cu, Ir, Au) have distinctly lower X/43Ca ratios (10-15% on average) in the two glass chips that sit at the top and bottom locations relative to the chip located in the centre (Fig. 2.4 and 2.5). Conversely, in these positions some refractory elements (e.g., Sc, Zr, Y) show enrichments (10-22%) relative to those measured in the two adjoining glass chips, although other refractory elements (e.g., Ti, Ba, Sr) show no consistent offset. The overall magnitude of these offsets varies from -35% to +15% relative to analyses in the centre of the chamber and is the most depleted for highly volatile and/or non-lithophile elements (Fig. 2.5). This effect is also highly reproducible (e.g., Fig. 2.4). By comparing the relative position of chips and their Ca normalized ratios, it is clear that a zone of relative depletion of more volatile or sidero- and chalcophile elements and relative enrichment in some refractory elements exists across the centre of the sample chamber (Fig. 2.4 and 2.5). This zone is aligned with the He input and output orifices. While the ablation chamber moves in relation to the laser for different analyses, the sample does not change its position relative to the He carrier gas intake and outtake from the ablation chamber (Fig. 2.2). The pattern of enrichment is moderately systematic with volatility (based on condensation temperature) for most lithophile elements. However the most volatile lithophile elements (Rb, B) along with chalcophile (e.g., Cu, Pb) and siderophile (e.g., Mo, W) elements all have depletions within a restricted range between 10-15%. 15 Although determining the detailed mechanism by which our observed elemental fractionation occurs is beyond the scope of this paper, we can make some important observations. Given the clear relation of element enrichment/depletion relative to Ca and location within the sample chamber, the variations observed in the elemental response are clearly related to differential He carrier gas velocities at the site of ablation. The location of the He intake and outtake orifices along the axis of the sample chamber results in a region of distinctly faster He flow along the centre of the ablation chamber (Fig. 2.2). Computational modelling (Bleiner and Bogaerts, 2007; Bleiner and Chen, 2008; Bleiner and Günther, 2001) of gas flow within drum-shaped ablation chambers that are similar to that which we have used in our experiments confirms that this geometry produces a narrow zone of high velocity flow along the centre of the chamber. This zone closely corresponds to the region in which we observe the significant elemental enrichment and depletion (Fig. 2.2 and 2.5). In contrast, along the top and bottom of the sample chamber, He velocities are slower and locally may even flow back towards the He intake (Bleiner and Bogaerts, 2007). Koch et al. (2008) demonstrate that this velocity zonation can be reduced or eliminated by using a narrower He input “nozzle” in conjunction with an Ar carrier gas and a higher carrier gas flow rate. All experiments with a He carrier gas, however, demonstrate some level of carrier gas flow heterogeneity. Although the fractionation we observe appears correlated with He flow rates at the site of ablation, it is unlikely to be related to increased transport of larger ablated particulates to the plasma furnace at high He flow rates as: (1) incomplete ionization of larger particulate in the plasma furnace would preferentially increase the response of more volatile elements (Jackson, 2008), the reverse of what we observe when ablation occurs in the high He velocity portion of the ablation chamber where increased extraction of larger particles is likely to occur (Fig. 2.4), and (2) particles produced by ablation at the 193 nm wavelength we utilize are dominated by small sizes (< 150 nm; Guillong et al., 2003) and thus we expect relatively minor contributions from the problematic larger particles that may experience incomplete breakdown. We suggest instead that the fractionation we observe relates to flow-rate dependent variations in condensation and particulate formation and transport at the site of 16 ablation. There are several mechanisms by which this may occur. After a laser pulse arrives at the sample surface it creates an expanding laser-induced plasma that undergoes cooling and condensation until the gas pressure within the chamber causes it to partially collapse back onto the surface (Koch et al., 2007). As suggested by Eggins et al. (1998), the more refractory elements will condense first during the plasma expansion phase, forming refractory particulates that enter the He stream preferentially due their higher intrinsic momentum at this point. In contrast volatile species will tend to remain within the vapour as the laser-induced plasma plume eventually collapses back to the surface, and will be preferentially concentrated in the material deposited back onto the sample surface around the ablation crater. An alternative model, suggested by Outridge et al. (1997), is that after ablation refractory elements may be preferentially incorporated into particulates relative to the more volatile elements that tend remain in the vapour phase. In low He velocity zones, these particulates are more easily deposited back onto the sample surface due to slower carrier gas velocity and the longer travel times required for ablated material to exit the sample chamber. This effect would also result in relative depletion of refractory relative to volatile elements in area of low He velocity at the margins of the ablation chamber. Although we cannot distinguish between these two possibilities with our data set, both models emphasize the importance of the interaction between condensing particulates and the He flow regime near the site of ablation for producing differences between refractory and volatile element behaviour. In addition, both of these models also predict that relative depletion of refractory elements and enrichment of volatile elements should occur preferentially in regions of relatively low He velocity, consistent with our observations (Fig. 2.5). The fractionation we observe here also underlines the importance of sample chamber geometry and He flow regime in controlling precision and accuracy of volatile and/or siderophile-chalcophile elemental analysis during LA-ICP-MS. Single-volume ablation chambers similar to the one used herein are used in many commercial ablation systems. As it may be difficult and inefficient to control the analysis location within the sample chamber, particularly for natural samples where analysis locations are typically distributed throughout a specific matrix, differential fractionation within the ablation 17 chamber represents a key limit on the accuracy of measurement for any element that behaves unlike the internal standard (typically Ca), and may introduce a systematic bias from samples located away from the calibration standards, which are typically fixed in one location. For more volatile elements, there is potential to use Si as an alternate internal standard, however in many geologic samples that are low in Ca (e.g., composition glasses), no viable alternative to Si can be used for internal standardization resulting in increased uncertainties for typical refractory and lithophile elements (e.g., REE).

Fractionation within a two-volume ablation chamber Two-volume ablation chambers are designed to maintain uniform He flow rates at the site of ablation over a large ablation chamber. If we are correct in our assertion that differential He flow rates contribute substantially to elemental fractionation then the more uniform He flow regime in the two-volume chamber should minimize the effects of position within the ablation chamber on volatile/refractory element fractionation (Eggins et al., 1998; Müller et al., 2009). We have analysed sample mounts with chips of GSE-1G glass located in eight different locations in a two-volume ablation chamber, and also in chips spread across all parts of a single 25 mm sample mount. In these experiments, we observed none of the systematic variations that were evident in the single-volume ablation chamber, despite the increased area covered. Normalized ratios measured using the two-volume chamber showed no systematic changes with positions in the ablation chamber shown in Fig. 2.6 or on an individual sample mount and the overall reproducibility of normalized ratios were broadly similar to those calculated from analyses restricted only to the central portion of the single-volume chamber where the He flow regime was broadly uniform (Table 2.2).

Controls on analytical reproducibility during LA-ICP-MS analysis To quantify investigate the effect of sample chamber design on the reproducibility of 43Ca normalized ratios during analysis of volatile and refractory elements we have summarized the results of repeat analyses of GSE-1G glass in Table 2.2 using both 18 single-volume and two-volume ablation chambers. For the single-volume chamber we report reproducibility (as 2 s) for measurements made only in the central position of the ablation chamber (see Fig. 2.4) and for analyses from of all positions within the chamber during a single analytical session. This approach allows us to estimate the effects of elemental fractionation within the chamber for analyses made in dispersed locations within the ablation chamber. For the two-volume chamber we include 2 s uncertainties calculated from multiple analysis of a single 25 mm sample mount, and from analyses made on eight sample locations within the chamber, again during a single analysis session. For both ablation chamber types we see similar reproducibility of 43Ca normalized ratios for analyses made in restricted locations (Table 2.2). For the single-volume chamber, if we consider analyses made only the central high He flow rate region (Fig. 2.4), then we see reproducibility of < 10% (2 s) for elements with a range of volatility and chemical affinity. However if we include analyses made in all locations on the single 25 mm sample mount, which includes analysis locations in both the high and low He flow rate regions in the middle and peripheral regions of the ablation chamber, reproducibility of normalized ratios is considerably worse, up to ~20% (2 s) with a factor of up to three increase, for almost all elements shown in Table 2.2. Routine analysis of unknown materials within the ablation chamber rarely allows for specific placement of analysis locations thus the variations in elemental fractionation that we document represent a primary control over analytical accuracy and precision. The reproducibility we show provides the best estimate of the long-term accuracy and precision of volatile and semi-volatile metal analyses in single-volume sample chambers. For the two-volume chamber we see comparable reproducibility for normalized ratios that are measured across a single 25 mm sample mount as we see for analyses from across the entire ablation chamber (Table 2.2). These reproducibilities are also broadly similar to those evident from the analyses restricted to the central portion of the single- volume ablation chamber (i.e., < ~10% at 2 s in most cases), although the reproducibility evident for some volatile elements (e.g., B, Cu) are slightly higher (up to 12%) than typical for lithophile and refractory elements. Importantly we see no significant increase 19 in reproducibility for analyses made over eight available sample positions within the ablation chamber, again emphasizing the improved analytical performance resulting from the uniform He flow regime across the entire sample chamber.

Conclusions We observe considerable elemental fractionation between different analysis locations in LA-ICP-MS experiments conducted within a single-volume ablation chamber. Elemental fractionation is most evident in a range of volatile, chalcophile and siderophile elements and is correlated with the local He flow rate at the location of the analysis. Fractionation results from differential behaviour of refractory and volatile elements during condensation from the laser-induced plasma, and interaction between condensate and the He carrier gas at the site of ablation. Elemental fractionation of this type likely represents a primary control over precision and accuracy during LA-ICP-MS trace metal analyses in single-volume ablation chambers, and in other systems where He flow rate varies substantially from point to point within the ablation chamber. Two-volume ablation chambers, designed to produce uniform He flow regimes during analysis throughout the ablation chamber, show little evidence of this style of elemental fractionation. While it may be possible to modify single-volume ablation chambers to homogenize He flow and reduce the impact of this uncertainty (Koch et al., 2008), this work highlights the need for awareness of this effect as a potential limitation to any volatile element analysis. Our approach provides a simple methodology for investigating this effect for different ablation systems.

Acknowledgements Support for this work was provided by National Science Foundation grants NSF- OCE-0452727 and NSF-OCE-1028707 to AJRK. A. Koleszar and A. Ungerer provided analytical assistance for LA-ICP-MS. We also appreciate discussions on sample chamber flow dynamics with D. Bleiner and with members of the VIPER group at Oregon State University. Suggestions by three anonymous reviewers are appreciated and significantly improved the quality of this manuscript. 20

References

Bleiner, D., Bogaerts, A., 2007. Computer simulations of sample chambers for laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 62, 155–168.

Bleiner, D., Chen, Z., 2008. Computer Modeling of Laser Ablation Elemental Microanalysis. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 35–52.

Bleiner, D., Günther, D., 2001. Theoretical description and experimental observation of aerosol transport processes in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 16, 449–456.

Borisova, A.Y., Freydier, R., Polve, M., Jochum, K.P., Candaudap, F., 2010. Multi- Elemental Analysis of ATHO-G Rhyolitic Glass (MPI-DING Reference Material) by Femtosecond and Nanosecond LA-ICP-MS: Evidence for Significant Heterogeneity of B, V, Zn, Mo, Sn, Sb, Cs, W, Pt and Pb at the Millimetre Scale. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 34, 245–255.

Claverie, F., Fernández, B., Pécheyran, C., Alexis, J., Donard, O.F.X., 2009. Elemental fractionation effects in high repetition rate IR femtosecond laser ablation ICP-MS analysis of glasses. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, 891–902.

Collins, S.J., Pyle, D., Maclennan, J., 2009. Melt inclusions track pre-eruption storage and dehydration of magmas at Etna. Geology 37, 571–574.

Durrant, S., 1999. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: achievements, problems, prospects. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 14, 1385–1403.

Eggins, S.M., Kinsley, L., Shelley, J.M.G., 1998. Deposition and element fractionation processes during atmospheric pressure laser sampling for analysis by ICP-MS. Applied Surface Science 127, 278–286.

Eggins, S.M., Shelley, J.M.G., 2002. Compositional heterogeneity in NIST SRM 610-617 glasses. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 26, 269–286.

Fryer, B., Jackson, S.E., Longerich, H., 1995. The design, operation and role of the laser- ablation microprobe coupled with an inductively coupled plasma; mass spectrometer (LAM-ICP-MS) in the earth sciences. Canadian Mineralogist 33, 303–312. 21 Gaboardi, M., Humayun, M., 2009. Elemental fractionation during LA-ICP-MS analysis of silicate glasses: implications for matrix-independent standardization. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, 1188–1197.

Guillong, M., Hametner, K., Reusser, E., Wilson, S.A., Günther, D., 2005. Preliminary Characterization of New Glass Reference Materials (GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G, GSE-1G) by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry Using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm Wavelengths. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 26, 315–331.

Guillong, M., Horn, I., Günther, D., 2003. A comparison of 266 nm, 213 nm and 193 nm produced from a single solid state Nd:YAG laser for laser ablation ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 18, 1224–1230.

Günther, D., Heinrich, C.A., 1999. Comparison of the ablation behaviour of 266 nm Nd: YAG and 193 nm ArF excimer lasers for LA-ICP-MS analysis. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 14, 1369–1374.

Günther, D., Jackson, S.E., Longerich, H., 1999. Laser ablation and arc/spark solid sample introduction into inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 54, 381–409.

Hirata, T., Nesbitt, R., 1995. U-Pb isotope geochronology of : evaluation of the laser probe-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry technique. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 59, 2491–2500.

Horn, I., 2008. Comparison of Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser Interactions with Geologic Matrices and Their Influence on Accuracy and Precision of LA-ICP-MS Data. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 53–65.

Hu, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhou, L., Li, M., Zong, K., Zhu, L., Gao, S., 2011. Contrasting matrix induced elemental fractionation in NIST SRM and rock glasses during laser ablation ICP-MS analysis at high spatial resolution. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 26, 425–430.

Jackson, S.E., 2001. The application of Nd: YAG lasers in LA-ICP-MS. Principles and Applications of Laser Ablation ICP-Mass Spectrometry in the Earth Sciences. Mineralogical Association of Canada (MAC), Short Course Series 29, 29–45.

Jackson, S.E., 2008. Calibration Strategies for Elemental Analysis by LA-ICP-MS. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 169–188.

Jenner, F.E., O'Neill, H.S.C., Arculus, R.J., Mavrogenes, J.A., 2010. The Magnetite Crisis in the Evolution of Arc-related Magmas and the Initial Concentration of Au, Ag and Cu. Journal of Petrology 51, 2445–2464. 22 Jochum, K.P., Nohl, U., Herwig, K., Lammel, E., Stoll, B., Hofmann, A.E., 2005. GeoReM: A new geochemical database for reference materials and isotopic standards. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29, 333–338.

Kent, A.J., Ungerer, C., 2005. Production of barium and light rare earth element oxides during LA-ICP-MS microanalysis. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 20, 1256–1262.

Koch, J., Schlamp, S., Rösgen, T., Fliegel, D., Günther, D., 2007. Visualization of aerosol particles generated by near infrared nano-and femtosecond laser ablation. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 62, 20–29.

Koch, J., Wälle, M., Dietiker, R., Günther, D., 2008. Analysis of Laser-Produced Aerosols by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: Transport Phenomena and Elemental Fractionation. Analytical Chemistry 80, 915–921.

Kroslakova, I., Günther, D., 2006. Elemental fractionation in laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: evidence for mass load induced matrix effects in the ICP during ablation of a silicate glass. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 22, 51–62.

Lodders, K., 2003. Solar system abundances and condensation temperatures of the elements. The Astrophysical Journal 591, 1220–1247.

Loewen, M.W., 2011. Analysis of semi-volatile trace metals in basaltic glass by LA-ICP- MS. Oregon State University MS Thesis, Corvallis.

Longerich, H., 2008. Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma- Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): An Introduction. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 1–18.

Mank, A., Mason, P., 1999. A critical assessment of laser ablation ICP-MS as an analytical tool for depth analysis in silica-based glass samples. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 14, 1143–1153.

Müller, W., Shelley, M., Miller, P., Broude, S., 2009. Initial performance metrics of a new custom-designed ArF excimer LA-ICPMS system coupled to a two-volume laser-ablation cell. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, 209–214.

Norman, M.D., Garcia, M.O., Bennett, V.C., 2004. Rhenium and chalcophile elements in basaltic glasses from Ko’olau and Moloka’i volcanoes: Magmatic outgassing and composition of the Hawaiian plume. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68, 3761–3777.

Outridge, P., Doherty, W., Gregoire, D., 1997. Ablative and transport fractionation of trace elements during laser sampling of glass and copper. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 52, 2093–2102. 23 Rowe, M.C., Kent, A.J., Thornber, C.R., 2008. Using amphibole phenocrysts to track vapor transfer during magma crystallization and transport: An example from Mount St. Helens, Washington. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 178, 593–607.

Russo, R., Mao, X., Borisov, O., Liu, H., 2000. Influence of wavelength on fractionation in laser ablation ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 15, 1115– 1120.

Sylvester, P.J., 2008. Matrix Effects in Laser Ablation-ICP-MS. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 67–78.

Wang, Z., Hattendorf, B., Günther, D., 2006. Vaporization and ionization of laser ablation generated aerosols in an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer—implications from distribution maps. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 21, 1143–1151.

Witt-Eickschen, G., Palme, H., O'Neill, H.S.C., Allen, C.M., 2009. The geochemistry of the volatile trace elements As, Cd, Ga, In and Sn in the Earth’s mantle: New evidence from in situ analyses of mantle xenoliths. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73, 1755–1778.

Yu, Z., Norman, M.D., Robinson, P.T., 2003. Major and trace element analysis of silicate rocks by XRF and laser ablation ICP-MS using lithium borate fused glasses: Matrix effects, instrument response and results for international reference materials. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 27, 67–89.

Zajacz, Z., Halter, W., 2009. Copper transport by high temperature, sulfur-rich magmatic vapor: Evidence from silicate melt and vapor inclusions in a basaltic andesite from the Villarrica volcano (Chile). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 282, 115–121. 24

Figure 2.1. Elements analysed in LA-ICP-MS experiments exhibit a wide range of volatility (50% condensation temperature from a solar nebula composition, after Lodders, 2003) and geochemical affinities (bold elements are siderophile or chalcophile). Volatile and moderately volatile elements were emphasized in this study to characterize their fractionation behaviour during LA-ICP-MS. *Denotes elements commonly used as internal standards. 25 Table 2.1. LA-ICP-MS instrument setup. Parameter Description Instrumentation VG ExCell NewWave DUV 193 Photon Machines Analyte G2 Laser Ablation System ArF Excimer Laser Excimer Laser Thermoscientific X Series 2 ICP-MS System VG PQ ExCell Quadrupole Quadrupole Laser Conditions Wavelength 193 nm 193 nm a Frequency 4-5 Hz 5 Hz Pulse Duration 20 ns 4 ns Spot Diameter 50, 80, 100, and 160 mm 50 mm 45 seconds (up to 120 seconds for Ablation Duration 45 seconds fractionation tests)

Output Energy 9-12 J cm-2 4.84 J cm-2

Analyzer Conditions Aerosol carrier gas flow 0.8 L min-1 (He) 0.8 L min-1 (He) -1 Nebulizer gas flow 0.80-0.95 L min (Ar) 0.8-0.9 L min-1 (Ar) -1 Outer (cool) gas flow 13.00 L min (Ar) 13.00 L min-1 (Ar) Dual (pulse counting and Detector mode Dual (pulse counting and analogue) analogue) RF power 1300 W 1380 W 8-10 x 10-7 mbar (analyzer), 1.5-1.9 8-9 x 10-7 mbar (analyzer), 2.0- Vacuum Pressure mbar (expansion chamber) 2.2 mbar (expansion chamber) Dwell time/mass/scan 10 ms 10 ms Standardization Internal Standard 43Ca Calibration Standards GSE-1G, NIST-610 a 5 Hz used in transects, 4 Hz used in fractionation tests 26

Figure 2.2. Schematic of the single-volume ablation chamber used in this study. The chamber is a shallow cylindrical drum approximately 20 cm3 in volume. During experiments He carrier gas flow was 0.8 L min-1 from left to right. On the right are the calculated flow velocities modified from Bleiner and Bogaerts (2007) for a similar geometry sample chamber (drum-shape, 33 cm3, He gas flow of 0.5 L min-1, scaled to match our sample chamber) illustrating the formation of a distinct high velocity zone across the centre of the chamber. 27

Figure 2.3. Fractionation index measured for a 120 second analysis of standard glasses ablated within a single-volume ablation chamber. Data are the mean of 5-6 spot analyses (± 2 se) calculated as the median ratio of X/43Ca measured over the last 30 seconds of ablation divided by the first 30 seconds (Fryer et al., 1995; Sylvester, 2008; Mank and Mason, 1999). Within each geochemical affinity group, elements are ordered by increasing condensation temperatures (Lodders, 2003). Dashed lines bracket ± 10% fractionation. No consistent difference was found for fractionation at different element volatilities or in different matrices despite greater ablation depths in NIST glasses. Note Ca = 1 by definition. 28

Figure 2.4. Three chips of GSE-1G glass analysed in different positions within the single-volume ablation chamber. The shaded region is the centre position in the ablation chamber in each rotation of the sample mount. Arrows highlight significant enrichment of refractory elements (e.g., Sc) and depletion of volatile elements (e.g., Cu) relative to 43Ca while chip B was located in this central region. Bars are mean values for each chip (± 2 s, n = 3). 29

Figure 2.5. Summary of fractionation induced within the chamber for a single-volume ablation cell. This is quantified by dividing the values measured for X/43Ca ratios of chip A and C in positions 1 and 3 and chip A, B, and C in positions 2 and 4 (see Fig. 2.4) by the values of chip B in positions 1 and 3 for each normalized ratio measured. Values below one represent elements that are enriched in analyses made at the top and bottom of the sample chamber relative to Ca, while values above one are enriched in the centre of the chamber. Lithophile elements show some indication of a positive correlation with volatility (expressed as condensation temperature, Lodders, 2003) while highly volatile lithophile elements (Rb, B, Li, Cr, Si) and all chalcophile and siderophile elements are consistently enriched in the top and bottom of the chamber by 10-15% with no relation to condensation temperature. 30

Figure 2.6. Results from repeat analyses of GSE-1G from positions across a two-volume ablation chamber. Seven spots were analysed in each mount position (± 2 s). Position seven held NIST-612 used as a drift monitor and no significant changes with time were observed. Variations throughout the chamber are smaller than observed in the single- volume ablation chamber (Fig. 2.4) and do not show any dependence on volatility. 31 Table 2.2. Summary of uncertainty sources during LA-ICP-MS analysis of GSE-1G. Single-Volume Chamber Two-Volume Chamber Isotope 2 s % for 2 s % 2 s % for 2 s % Single Ablation Single Ablation Transectsa Chamberb Mountc Chamberd 11 B 11.0 19.1 10.0 9.9 45 Sc 3.6 9.2 3.8 4.2 47 Ti 5.6 5.9 2.8 4.3 51 V 5.7 11.3 8.9 7.1 59 Co 6.8 13.7 11.7 8.0 63 Cu 9.5 19.1 12.6 8.1 65 Cu 8.2 18.0 12.6 7.4 66 Zn 5.7 16.1 8.2 8.0 90 Zr 4.1 12.7 6.4 6.7 95 Mo 8.0 14.7 9.0 8.0 107 Ag 8.5 17.4 7.6 6.7 115 In 7.9 16.0 7.4 6.4 118 Sn 7.2 15.1 8.0 7.7 121 Sb 7.7 15.0 7.9 6.7 140 Ce 4.2 6.6 5.0 3.8 182 W 7.3 12.4 7.4 7.3 208 Pb 6.0 14.5 7.8 7.2 a Calculated for a centrally located transect (see Fig. 2.4) of GSE-1G to avoid fractionation related to position within the single-volume ablation chamber (n = 34). b Calculated on transects across three chips of GSE-1G located throughout the single-volume ablation chamber (n = 104). c Variations across a single one- inch mount in a two-volume ablation chamber (n = 16). d Variations across eight one-inch mounts in a two- volume ablation chamber (n = 56). 32 CHAPTER THREE

FRACTIONATION, MAGMA MIXING, AND VOLATILE DEGASSING DURING THE 1959 ERUPTION OF KILAUEA IKI, HAWAII

Mathew W. Loewen Adam J.R. Kent Robin M. Tuohy Paul J. Wallace 33 Abstract We report major and trace element data for glass, olivine, and olivine-hosted melt inclusions from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Iki, Hawaii. Major element compositions of glasses match the results of earlier studies and suggest that crystallization of olivine and mixing between different magma batches control melt compositional variations. Lithophile trace element variations result from mixing of magmas with distinct mantle source regions and/or different degrees of . Melt inclusions have higher concentrations of volatile components like sulfur (~0.1-0.13 wt.%), water (0.4-0.7 wt.%), and CO2 (0-250 ppm) than matrix glass, requiring inclusion entrapment of variably degassed magma at or near sulfide saturation. A number of transition metals with affinity to partitioning into a volatile-rich phase were also analyzed including those with a range of volatility and geochemical affinity. Of these, most (e.g., Mo, Pb) display typical incompatible behavior in melt compositions whereas others appear to be compatible in known phases (primarily olivine: Zn, Co). Copper concentrations are variable, and can be explained by minor compatibility in olivine and potential retention in trace amounts of a sulfide phase. Boron and Sn show some patterns consistent with degassing. Although fumarolic condensates at Kilauea and other basaltic volcanoes are commonly enriched in volatile and semi-volatile metals, mass balance calculations of the changes in magmatic abundances related to volcanic gas emissions are consistent with very small (< 10%) compositional changes. These expected changes in melt composition cannot be resolved by our analyses using LA-ICP-MS.

Introduction The 1959 eruption of Kilauea Iki, Hawaii, provides an appropriate system to investigate the fundamental behavior trace elements during melt evolution and degassing of basaltic magma and to compare the behavior of refractory and semi-volatile trace elements in a shallow basaltic volcanic system. The compositional evolution of Kilauea Iki is literally a textbook example of magma diversification by olivine control (e.g., Winter, 2001), and thus potentially represents a well-behaved system where more subtle variations due to degassing or other processes may be identified. The samples examined 34 here are also well suited for olivine-hosted melt inclusion studies as many are picritic with large olivine phenocrysts. In addition, the sequence of the eruption was extensively documented and sampled by staff at the USGS Hawaiian Volcano observatory (Murata and Richter, 1966a; 1966b; Richter et al., 1970; Richter and Murata, 1966). Previous work has refined our understanding of mixing and fractionation controls on major element chemistry (Wright, 1973), olivine composition and petrography (Helz, 1987), and volatile abundances and character of trapped melt inclusions (Anderson and Brown, 1993; Wallace and Anderson, 1998). Despite this work, relatively few data have been published on trace elements of the magma composition, and no previous trace element data are available for melt inclusions, glass, or minerals. Kilauea Iki crater is located on the east side of the Kilauea Caldera on the island of Hawaii (Fig. 3.1). The summit eruption of Kilauea Iki began on November 14th and continued through December 20th, 1959, consisting of 17 phases of fire-fountaining, each of which partially filled the Kilauea Iki crater with a substantial lava lake that partially drained back into the vent following each phase (Richter et al., 1970). The first phase followed a 3-month period of precursory seismicity and inflation that began with a deep (55 km) earthquake swarm August 14-19 followed by intermittent and progressively shallower earthquakes and rapid inflation in November (Eaton and Murata, 1960). The eruption began on November 14 as a 750 m long fissure with 30-m-high fire fountains, but quickly coalesced into a single vent. Over the course of the eruption, the fire fountains reached a height of 500 m with incandescent scoria observed to over 650 m (3rd phase, November 28) and spread a wide tephra deposit outside of the Kilauea Iki crater (Fig. 3.1). Lava temperatures at the vent were variable with the highest recorded (1192 °C) midway through the eruption on December 4. Over the eruption the lava lake filled to a maximum depth of 125 m on December 10 covering an area of 61 hectares. The majority of the volume was erupted during the first phase of the eruption (30 million m3) whereas later phases added smaller volumes (2-10 million m3), most of which drained back into the vent at the end of each cycle (Murata and Richter, 1966a). On January 13th, 1960, nearly a month after the end of the summit eruption, a flank eruption began and continued through mid-February. The compositions of this eruption were similar to 35 material from an earlier eruption of Kilauea in 1955 (Murata and Richter, 1966a; Wright and Fiske, 1971). The goal of this study was to examine the composition of both lithophile trace element suites and semi-volatile trace elements of glass and melt inclusions from the 1959 Kilauea Iki eruption with the goal of constraining the effect of crystallization, magma mixing, and volatile exsolution on trace element variations.

Methods The Division of Petrology and Volcanology, Department of Sciences, Smithsonian Institution provided forty-six glass samples collected by the USGS during the 1959 eruption. These samples spanned the entire duration of the summit eruption. Glass samples were picked by binocular microscope to include only glassy material with few vesicles. Samples were subsequently mounted together in two 25 mm epoxy rounds and polished with diamond and alumina polishing compounds down to a 1µm grit. Sixteen melt inclusions were prepared from sample Iki-22 (see Anderson and Brown,

1993) and individually exposed in order to analyze for volatile (H2O, CO2) species as well as major and trace elements. Basaltic matrix glass was analyzed by electron microprobe (EMPA) at Oregon State University using a Cameca SX100 Electron Microprobe Analyzer. For glass analyses, a focused 1 µm beam with a 15 keV accelerating voltage and 30 nA beam current was used with variable peak count times: 20 seconds (s) for Si, Al, Na, and Ti; 30 s for K, Ca, Mn, and Fe; 40 s for Cr; and 60 s for P, S, Cl, Ni, Mg, and F. Volatile loos was corrected by measuring zero time intercepts for Na, K, Al, and S. Melt inclusions and olivine were analyzed at the University of Oregon also using a Cameca SX 100 Electron Microprobe Analyzer.1 Makaopuhi Lava Lake basaltic glass (USNM 113498/1 VG-A99, “BASL”) was analyzed during calibration and unknown analyses to monitor for accuracy and stability. Long-term stability of this standard as well as accuracy of secondary standards (BHVO-2G, BCR-2G, GSD-1G) are shown in the Supplementary

1 Analytical conditions for UO EMPA and FTIR work are not available at this time. 36 Data (Appendix A). Concentrations reported here are generally the averages of 2 analyses. Trace element analysis was carried out by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at Oregon State University using a Photon Machines G2 193 nm Ar-F laser attached to a Thermoscientific Xseries 2 quadrupole mass spectrometer with instrument conditions and data processing similar to that in Loewen and Kent (2012). Glass, olivine, and melt inclusions were analyzed using a 50 µm spot at 7 Hz for approximately 30 seconds. GSE-1G was used as a calibration standard whereas GSD-1G and natural glasses were used as secondary standards. Data were processed using in-house LaserTRAM and LaserCalc software, which use a Visual Basic script operated in Microsoft Excel. These programs allow for manual selection of a 20-30 second background interval and a 15-30 second ablation interval. The software normalizes each analyte mass to the 43Ca internal standard and calculates a concentration of the analyte using the Ca concentrations determined by EMPA. Standardization is provided by measurements of GSE-1G once every 5-10 unknowns over the course of an experiment. Errors displayed on figures in this paper are standard error (se) of the mean of 5 sub-intervals for each analysis propagated with both the uncertainty in repeated measurements of the calibration standard (GSE-1G) and uncertainty in Ca concentration measured by EMPA. Additional propagation of uncertainty in characterization of the calibration standard doubles reported uncertainties for many elements and is reflective of the uncertainty in the absolute concentration. The former uncertainty is appropriate for internal comparison within this study. Reported concentrations are again the average of 2-3 analyses for each glass sample and one analysis for olivine and melt inclusions. A list of all measured isotopes, concentrations for glass, melt-inclusion, and olivine, and analysis of secondary standards, is available in the Supplementary Data (Appendix A). Glass and melt inclusion analyses that exhibited evidence for significant contribution of the host or from microphenocrysts into the ablated volume are not included here. 37 Melt Inclusion Corrections Melt inclusions are portions of glass initially trapped as melt inside phenocrysts during crystal growth. Melt inclusions have the potential to shed light on magma compositions not expressed at the surface, including pre-eruptive volatile concentrations, since inclusions are typically trapped at higher pressures than the matrix glass formed during eruption and quenching (Kent, 2008; Schiano, 2003; Wallace, 2005). Post- entrapment crystallization (PEC) of olivine along the walls of the inclusion after entrapment, however, has modified the major and trace element contents of all analyzed inclusions from this study. In samples from Kilauea Iki, melt inclusions are not only lower in Mg, but also lower in Fe compared to what can be predicted using the liquid line of descent for whole rock and matrix glass compositions (Fig. 3.2). This anomalous loss of iron is described as diffusive Fe loss by Danyushevsky et al. (2000) and together with PEC can be corrected to initial compositions by various methods (Danyushevsky et al., 2000; Gaetani and Watson, 2002; Kent, 2008). We use an iterative calculation with the geothermometer of Putirka et al. (2007) to correct measured melt inclusion compositions to equilibrium with their host olivine. In this experimentally calibrated model, two equations relate the olivine/melt distribution ol/liq ol/liq coefficients of Mg (DMg ) and Fe (DFe ) to pressure (P, in GPa), temperature (T, in

°C), and melt composition (H2O, Na2O, K2O, and SiO2, in wt. %):

ol/liq (1) ln DMg = -a + b * (P/T) – c*[H2O] + d/T + e*[ Na2O + K2O] ol/liq (2) ln DFe = -a + b * (P/T) – c*[H2O] + d/T + e*[ Na2O + K2O] + f*[SiO2] where a, b, c, d, e, and f, are constants defined for each equation in Table 3.1. We use pressures and water contents from this and previous melt inclusion studies (Anderson and Brown, 1993; Wallace and Anderson, 1998), total Fe and ferrous Fe (FeO*/FeO) of whole rock via wet chemical analyses (Murata and Richter, 1966a), MgO and FeO concentrations measured in host olivine, and Na2O, K2O, and SiO2 from each measured melt inclusion. The calculation determines an equilibrium Fe and Mg melt concentration at a given temperature using the measured melt (white circles, Fig. 3.2) and host olivine 38 compositions. The temperature is then iteratively adjusted until calculated Mg-Fe concentrations lie along the liquid line of descent as defined by whole rock and glass data (red circles, Fig. 3.2). The difference between the original Mg measured in the melt inclusion and the calculated equilibrium Mg is used to determine the required amount of olivine mixed with the measured melt inclusions. All other elements are then corrected for this amount of crystallization by mixing measured melt inclusion concentrations with the measured host olivine composition. We note that FeO* concentrations measured here by EMPA are generally 0.5 wt. % lower than previous analyses of either glass (Helz, 1987) or whole rock (Murata and Richter, 1966a) samples from Kilauea Iki, yet slopes of FeO* evolution with MgO are similar. We use our measured FeO* values for internal consistency, but note that these may be systematically offset from values determined in other studies due to calibration settings unique to our analyses (FeO* is calibrated on an Fo83 crystal standard, not basalt glass). In analyses of secondary standards (Supplementary Data, Appendix A) FeO* is slightly lower (~3% relative) than the accepted standard values for a number of basaltic glass standards, but the difference is not enough to explain the offset between the OSU EMPA and Helz (1987) data. The resulting corrections range from 8 to 16 wt. % of PEC. For purely incompatible elements this will result in a dilution of the measured inclusion concentration by the same amount. The value of this approach is that it also provides an estimate of the equilibration temperatures that serves as an additional check on the correction. In addition, by using measured host olivine to correct all elements, we can provide a reasonable correction for any trace elements that are present in appreciable quantities in olivine (e.g., Ni, Co, Zn). It is also important to note that the most important parameters for the calculation of crystallization temperature (and subsequently, percentage of PEC) in these equations are the Mg and Fe compositions of olivine. Terms reflecting the influence of the melt

composition (H2O, Na2O + K2O, SiO2) have relatively little influence on the magnitude of the correction. Pressure also has little importance, as Fe-Mg partitioning in olivine is not pressure dependent. In addition, formation pressures for melt inclusions from Kilauea 39 Iki are well constrained from previous work (Anderson and Brown, 1993) and by our

H2O-CO2 data.

Results and Discussion Analyses by EMPA and LA-ICP-MS for matrix glass, corrected melt inclusions, and host olivine are reported in the Supplementary Data (Appendix A). In the following sections we discuss the trends and significance of major element variations, standard trace element compositions, volatile concentrations, and patterns of trace metals. Within these sections we identify the effects of crystallization, mixing, and volatile exsolution on compositional variations.

Control on Major Elements Compositions Most major element variations observed in melt inclusions, glasses, and whole rock samples can be explained with crystallization of olivine plus Cr-spinel and late crystallization of clinopyroxene, consistent with previous whole rock (Murata and Richter, 1966a) and glass (Helz, 1987) studies (Fig. 3.3). Glass compositions range from

9.8 to 5.7 wt. % MgO with a sharp decrease in SiO2 and CaO occurring at ~7 wt. % MgO, consistent with the onset of clinopyroxene crystallization. Aluminum behaves incompatibly over the entire compositional range suggesting an absence of plagioclase crystallization. Whole rock compositions (Murata and Richter, 1966a) do not show the same inflection in CaO suggesting that clinopyroxene primarily is a groundmass phase crystallized upon eruption and was generally not removed from the magma. Corrected melt inclusions record more primitive compositions than matrix glasses and generally fall along compositional evolution paths defined by glass values and whole rock compositions. They are more magnesian than matrix glass (up to 12.8 wt. % MgO), consistent with entrapment of a more primitive magma during early olivine growth. Whole rock compositions range up to almost 20 wt. % MgO as a result of olivine accumulation. The most magnesian glasses known from Hawaii are around 15 wt. % MgO (Clague et al., 1995; 1991), which is compatible with the idea that these melt inclusion compositions are reasonable. 40 MELTs modeling (Asimow and Ghiorso, 1998; Ghiorso and Sack, 1995) at 1 kb

pressure, QFM redox conditions (matching the measured Fe2O3/FeO from Murata and Richter, 1966a) and 0.7 wt. % initial water (Wallace and Anderson, 1998) provide a good match to the observed compositional trends and closely match the volume of olivine crystallization calculated with lever law principles. The most primitive glass composition observed represents approximately 8 wt. % olivine crystallization in order to modify glass compositions from the most primitive corrected melt inclusion. An additional 7-8 wt. % crystallization of olivine is required before initial crystallization of clinopyroxene and a corresponding compositional inflection of CaO at 7 wt. % MgO in the model. Temperature outputs from the MELTs model are also consistent with eruption temperature observations and calculated olivine-hosted melt inclusion entrapment temperatures (Table 3.1; Putirka et al., 2007). Our highest calculated melt inclusion trapping temperature was 1315 °C, close to the calculated MELTs liquidus of 1307 °C. The lowest temperature associated with the most evolved melt inclusion was 1216 °C at 9.3 wt. % MgO, matching the MELTs composition at this point and slightly lower in both MgO and MELTs predicted temperature than the most primitive glass composition (12.8 wt. % MgO, 1230 °C). Temperatures recorded during the eruption ranged from 1190- 1060 °C consistent with the final groundmass crystallization we observe in the most evolved glasses but well below the calculated trapping temperatures of observed melt inclusions. Some scatter is evident in major element trends that cannot be explained by olivine crystallization alone. Murata and Richter (1966b; 1966a) recognized two distinct compositional endmembers in samples from the beginning of the eruption in samples S-1 and S-2 (Fig. 3.4). S-1 lies off olivine control lines and is richer in CaO whereas S-2 marks the least magnesian endmember of the olivine-control line. Glass and melt inclusion compositions span the composition range between these two components. Low

TiO2 and K2O concentrations in melt inclusions fall out of the compositional range defined by glass and major element analyses and likewise cannot be explained by olivine crystallization (Fig. 3.3). 41 Controls on Lithophile Trace Elements The new data presented in this study greatly expand the previously limited lithophile trace element data set for Kilauea Iki (Tilling et al., 1987) and provides a means to evaluate further the role and source of mixing during the 1959 eruption. Trace elements follow broadly similar patterns to major elements. Olivine-compatible elements (e.g., Ni, Co) systematically decrease with decreasing MgO consistent with olivine crystallization as the primary control (Fig. 3.5). Corrected melt inclusions fall along the same compositional trend as glasses, demonstrating that our method of correction for PEC reproduces a reasonable trapped melt composition. Scandium decreases at < 7 wt. % MgO consistent with compatibility at the onset of clinopyroxene crystallization. Elements incompatible in olivine and clinopyroxene (e.g., Sr, Zr, Ce) broadly increase with decreasing MgO, but with considerably more variability than observed in incompatible major elements. Olivine crystallization cannot alone explain this range of incompatible trace element compositions. We use a Raleigh fractionation model of 16 wt. % crystallization of olivine that corresponds to the MELTs output of olivine crystallization before the onset of clinopyroxene crystallization with partition coefficients from Beattie (1994) or median olivine/melt values from melt inclusion and olivine pairs analyzed in this study (Fig. 3.6). Whereas lower MgO glasses do generally have higher concentrations of trace elements (especially Ce, Sr, and Ba), the full compositional range of trace elements requires 2-3 times more olivine crystallization than predicted by major element compositional variations and the MELTs model. Variable degrees of partial melting of mantle can also generate a range of trace element concentrations with similar major element characteristics. Rare earth elements (REE) have characteristic enrichment in light-REE (high La/Yb) consistent with partial melting of a deep, garnet-bearing source (Fig. 3.7). All elements in Figure 3.6 are incompatible in olivine, and therefore fractional crystallization should result in linear correlations between any two the elements. Partial melting, however, can result in non- linear variations due to variable crystal/melt partition coefficients in mantle source rocks for many of these elements. Departures from a simple linear correlation between pairs of 42 different trace elements are summarized in the correlation matrix in Table 3.2. Elements highly incompatible in a garnet peridotite mantle source (Ba, Th, Nb, Ce) strongly correlate with each other (R > 0.8). Likewise, more compatible elements in garnet peridotite (Hf, Dy, Y, Yb) are also strongly correlated. Incompatible and compatible element pairs (e.g., Hf-Ba, Ce-Y), however, have worse (R < 0.6), although significant, correlations due to increased scatter. To further evaluate source(s) of the Kilauea Iki magma, we compare trace element ratios of incompatible elements in order to minimize the effects of olivine fractionation (Fig. 3.8). The most evolved glass compositions directly overlap the more primitive compositions on these plots demonstrating the negligible effect of olivine crystallization on these ratios. Similarly, melt inclusions uncorrected and corrected for PEC directly overlap each other. Broad compositional arrays on these plots require more than one source component for the Kilauea Iki magmas. Melt inclusions record more extreme trace element ratios than glasses, however, they mirror the same compositional trends. The similarity between melt inclusion and glass compositional trends is consistent with their record of melt composition, as opposed to inclusion specific processes such as boundary layer entrapment (Kent, 2008; Lu et al., 1995; Roedder, 1984). Partial melting models of two different mantle sources following the models of Pietruszka et al. (2013) bracket the majority of Kilauea Iki compositions (Fig. 3.8). Our purpose is not to provide a vigorous investigation of source melting in Hawaii, which has been studied by a number of authors (Feigenson et al., 1996; Frey and Rhodes, 1993; Hofmann et al., 1984; Hofmann and Jochum, 1996; Pietruszka et al., 2013; Pietruszka and Garcia, 1999), but to show that the range of compositions we observe could be reasonably produced by variations in source composition and partial melting percentages. We use a batch partial melting model with source compositions and partition coefficients similar to Pietruszka et al. (2013). This model mainly calls on mixtures of recycled crust and mantle to explain Hawaiian primary melt compositions from Loihi, Kilauea, Mauna Loa, and Koolau. The model in this study uses simplified mantle sources from those of Pietruszka et al. (2013) similar to their early 20th century Kilauea source and Mauna Loa source. We use a mixture of 90-85 wt. % ambient Hawaiian mantle (equal parts depleted 43 and enriched mantle; compositions from McDonough and Sun, 1995) mixed with 10-15% variably altered and dehydrated MORB crust (see Figure 3.8 caption for more detail). The MORB component is necessary to explain the high Ba/Th and Sr/Y characteristic of some melt inclusions. The models are consistent with 3-5 wt. % partial melting for most glass compositions and up to 10 wt. % partial melting for some melt inclusions. These ratio plots require that the erupted Kilauea Iki lavas were sourced not only from magmas generated by variable degrees of partial melt from the Hawaiian mantle, but also by magmas derived from different mantle sources that contain variable amounts of recycled oceanic crust (Hofmann and White, 1982; Lassiter and Hauri, 1998; Sobolev et al., 2000). This heterogeneity has been observed in other Hawaiian eruptions (Pietruszka and Garcia, 1999), although it is striking here with variations in glass occurring over a single month-long eruptive episode and an even greater range of variability recorded in melt inclusions from a single sample collected at the beginning of the eruption. The trace element ratios discussed above do not systematically change over the course of the 1959 eruption. Preservation of diverse melt compositions even in matrix glass is consistent with conclusion of Helz (1987) that the magma erupted at Kilauea Iki was not fully equilibrated upon eruption based on observations of heterogeneous glasses and the timing of deep earthquakes prior to the eruption. Wright (1973) calculated that variable proportions of the S-1 and S-2 endmembers throughout the 1959 eruptive period and suggested that some portion of the two magma types remained distinct during the eruption while each component contributed magma to the conduit. The unusually shallow trapping pressures (< 1 kb) for the majority of inclusions noted by Anderson and Brown (1993) is consistent with this model if mixing between thermally distinct magmas triggered rapid olivine growth during ascent and resulting melt-inclusion entrapment during the mixing between these two magmas. We note that the Ca/Al variability characteristic of the S-1 and S-2 component is not correlated with any incompatible elements. The incompatible trace elements, however, record a more accurate sampling of the melt source since the degree of crystallization strongly influences major element composition. 44

Behavior of Volatile Elements

Significant shallow volatile loss of S species (mostly has SO2) and H2O, and deeper degassing of CO2 characterize Hawaiian magmas (Anderson, 1974; Gerlach, 1986; Gerlach and Graeber, 1985). Chlorine may also form a significant volatile component of many volcanic systems (Anderson, 1974) but was near EMPA detection limit in our glass and melt inclusion samples (typically < 200 ppm). All glass compositions from Kilauea Iki are clearly degassed, with S concentrations near EMPA detection limits (< 200 ppm) whereas concentrations in melt inclusions range from similar values to the glass up to 1300 ppm (Fig. 3.9). Melt inclusions record 0.4-0.7 wt.%

H2O and 0-250 ppm CO2 suggesting minimum pressures of 0.5 kb (Newman and Lowenstern, 2002). Previous melt inclusions studies have recorded a larger range of inclusion volatile concentrations and average pressures of 1 kb (Haughton et al, 1974; Anderson and Brown, 1993; Wallace and Anderson, 1998). Sulfide saturation is commonly related to iron content and uncorrected melt inclusions lie parallel to and about 300 ppm above a regression of sulfide saturated MORB samples (Mathez, 1976) and experimental and theoretical sulfide saturation concentrations (Fig. 3.9; Wallace and Carmichael, 1992). Corrected inclusions lie at or below sulfide saturation. This pattern is consistent with observations of rare sulfides in some samples from the erupted scoria (Helz, 1987; Pitcher et al., 2009; Stone and Fleet, 1991). The correlation of FeO* and S in uncorrected inclusions suggests that PEC and/or diffusive Fe-loss may have driven inclusions to sulfide saturation.

Semi-Volatile Trace Metal Behavior While lithophile trace elements can be used to constrain the role of partial melting, mixing and crystallization at Kilauea Iki, semi-volatile chalcophile and siderophile elements have the potential to record mobility related to subaerial degassing (Collins et al., 2009; Norman et al., 2004; Zajacz and Halter, 2009). Existing studies show that S and H2O partition into a volatile phase at low pressures (< 3 MPa) within

subvolcanic systems at Kilauea whereas CO2 begins degassing at much greater depth (> 45 10 MPa; Gerlach, 1986). The observed difference in sulfur concentration between melt inclusions and matrix glasses is consistent with extensive degassing of sulfur at shallow pressure during eruption (Fig. 3.9). While pervasive volatile loss of sulfur and other highly volatile species is a common observation in volcanic eruptions, other studies have noted several lines of evidence suggested that semi-volatile metals (e.g., Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn) may also be released into the atmosphere in significant quantities during degassing. This includes direct measurement of fumarolic gases and condensates (Crowe et al., 1987; Hinkley et al., 1999; Mather et al., 2012; Olmez et al., 1986) and contents of marine particulates (Rubin, 1995). Despite this evidence, there is currently little data that indicates that such degassing has a detectable effect on metal abundances in lavas. Some studies have suggested volatile loss of low concentration elements such as Re, Cd, and Bi based on rock compositions (Norman et al., 2004; Pitcher et al., 2009), but behavior of the more abundant semi-volatile trace metals like Cu, Pb, Mo, and Zn remains unclear. The volatile loss of these elements has more significance to potential interactions of volcanic degassing with the environment (Sinton and Duncan, 1997) or ore deposition. In this study we use our analyses of metals in glasses and melt inclusions to look for trace metals abundances that have been affected by degassing by applying the so called “petrologic method” (Thordarson and Self, 1996). In Figure 3.10, we compare several potentially volatile metals to major volatile components S, CO2, and H2O. None of the trace elements measured in this study have clearly higher concentrations in melt inclusions than in glass as would be expected by degassing trends similar to S vs. FeO (Fig. 3.9). In fact, glass compositions are typically higher than melt inclusions (e.g., Cu, Mo, Fig. 3.10). The only trace elements with higher concentrations in melt inclusions than matrix glass are Ni, Co, Cr, B, and Sn. Nickel, Co, and Cr are higher as a result of compatibility in olivine (Fig. 3.5). Boron and Sn, however, are not easily explained by crystallization of any mineral phase. Whereas B has no apparent correlations to volatile phases, Sn shows a positive correlation with CO2 abundance (R = 0.68, 95% confidence level; Fig. 3.10). 46 Other workers have also attempted to resolve volatile behavior and degassing of trace elements by examining their compositional trends compared to more refractory elements. Collins et al. (2009) argued at Mt. Etna that volatile mobility caused increased scatter on Ce vs. Cu variation diagrams. We have examined potentially volatile trace elements with olivine crystallization vectors against Ce and Hf in Figure 3.11. Of the elements we display, only Mo has strongly incompatible behavior, actually increasing with melt evolution more rapidly than we would predict with removal of only olivine. Zinc has a nearly flat trajectory with increases in Ce or Hf, consistent with moderate partitioning into olivine. Copper also has a nearly flat trajectory and is consistent with crystallization of olivine, which is able to incorporate some Cu (~ 5 ppm Cu measured in olivine in this study). Although significantly high and low Cu concentrations of melt inclusions were analyzed, this range can easily be explained with removal or addition of << 1% Cu-sulfide, which have been analyzed at Kilauea Iki (Pitcher et al., 2009; Stone and Fleet, 1991). Tin values are highly scattered and concentrations in matrix glass are notably lower than we would predict from crystallization of olivine. This behavior is consistent with potential volatile loss. Given that our data suggest that there is little if any loss of volatile metals associated with subaerial degassing at Kilauea, with the possible exception of Sn and B, we have also estimated the amounts of volatile element loss predicted in Kilaeua lavas based on reported compositions of fumarolic gases (Table 3.3). To do this we use measurements of trace metals in fumarolic gases at Kilauea from Hinkley et al. (1999) and Mather et al. (2012). In these studies metal abundances are reported as ratios to S. If the amount of S degassed from a volcanic system is known and we assume that the fumarole gas compositions represents the metal contents of the degassed phase, then these ratios can be used to calculate the metal loss from the melt during degassing. We assume a 1200 ppm loss of S in basaltic liquid at Kilaeau Iki based on differences between melt inclusions and matrix glass (Fig. 3.9). To calculate the metal loss, the ratio of metal to S in gas is then multiplied by the S lost from the Kilauea Iki magma. We have made this calculation using both the average and maximum compositions of metals in fumarole gases in Table 3.3. 47 Based on the average concentrations of elements measured in glasses from Kilauea Iki, only Cd, Ag, In, Sn, B, Pb, and Sb would be predicted to have a > 1% decrease in concentration during degassing, other metals would have lesser decreases (Table 3.3, Fig. 3.12). Analytical uncertainty is typically 5-10% for most trace elements, and much greater at concentrations < 0.1 ppm (Ag, Cd, Cs, In, Sb), so LA-ICP-MS analyses in this study would not be expected to detect degassing losses for most elements (Zn, Cu, Ni, Mo, Cs, Li, W, Cr, Rb, Ta, Ba, Co, Ga). Of the elements we study here, only Sn, Pb, and B have concentrations high enough that we could potentially resolve any degassing (Fig. 3.12). Although the degree of degassing of Cd is predicted to be quite high, the low abundance (< 0.1 ppm) precludes measurement of this element using the protocol we describe, however more precise techniques might be expected to detect Cd loss (Norman et al., 2004). The predicted B concentration loss from the average fumarolic gas analysis is 0.2 ppm, whereas median B concentrations in melt inclusions are 0.1 ppm higher than matrix glass. This is consistent with volatile degassing of B although overlapping compositions of matrix glass and melt inclusions makes this conclusion less certain. Median Sn concentrations are also 0.1 ppm higher in melt inclusions than matrix glass. This is closer to the maximum predicted decrease in concentration from fumarolic studies. This concentration decrease along with a correlation with CO2 suggests that we may detect the effects of Sn, and possibly B, degassing in glass compositions at Kilauea Iki.

Conclusions We have presented the first comprehensive examination of the trace element character of both glasses and melt inclusions from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Iki. Our results refine our understanding of the petrologic evolution of this eruption:

1) We confirm the dominant control of major element composition by a mixture of olivine fractionation and late clinopyroxene groundmass crystallization. 2) Trace element variations require that the 1959 magma was a mixture of magmas sourced from different mantle composition by variable degrees of partial melting. 48 3) Less than 10% partial melting of a garnet-peridotite mantle that contains a few percent of recycled oceanic crust generated these magmas.

We also report a number of potentially volatile trace metals (e.g., B, Cu, Li, Mo, Sn,

Zn) and examine these against major volatile components such as CO2, H2O, and S. Lack of correlation between known volatile components with most potentially volatile trace metals (e.g., Cu, Li, Mo, Sn) and compositional variations that are generally consistent with olivine crystallization suggests there is minimal compositional effects from partitioning of metals into a volatile-rich fluid. Tin, however, does show significantly higher average concentrations in melt inclusions than in matrix glass and are consistent with expected degassing trends. Given the very low concentration of most trace metals with respect to sulfur in fumarolic gasses and condensates, we would not expect large (>10%) changes in magma trace metal concentrations during degassing. The data presented here support broadly incompatible behavior with some evidence for compatibility in major (Co and Zn in olivine) and trace (Cu in sulfide) phases.

Acknowledgements National Museum of Natural History generously provided samples of glass from Kilauea Iki. Rosalind Helz provided discussion and a temporary loan of sulfide sample (not presented here). Dale Burns, Allison Weinsteiger, Frank Tepley provided assistance with microprobe analysis. Members of the VIPER (Volcanology, Igneous Petrology, and Economic Resource) group provided many valuable discussions during the development of this project, especially reviews provided by John Dilles, David Graham, Robert Duncan, and Frank Tepley. Financial support for this project was provided by National Science Foundation grant OCE-1028707 to A.J.R.K and Robert A. Duncan. 49 References

Anderson, A.T., Jr, 1974. Chlorine, sulfur, and water in magmas and oceans. Geological Society of America Bulletin 85, 1485–1492.

Anderson, A.T., Jr, Brown, G., 1993. CO 2 contents and formation pressures of some Kilauean melt inclusions. American Mineralogist 78, 794–803.

Asimow, P.D., Ghiorso, M.S., 1998. Algorithmic modifications extending MELTS to calculate subsolidus phase relations. American Mineralogist 83, 1127–1132.

Beattie, P., 1994. Systematics and energetics of trace-element partitioning between olivine and silicate melts: implications for the nature of mineral/melt partitioning. Chemical Geology 117, 57-71.

Clague, D.A., Moore, J.G., Dixon, J.E., Friesen, W.B., 1995. Petrology of submarine lavas from Kilauea's Puna Ridge, Hawaii. Journal of Petrology 36, 299–349.

Clague, D.A., Weber, W., Dixon, J.E., 1991. Picritic glasses from Hawaii. Nature 353, 553–556.

Collins, S.J., Pyle, D., Maclennan, J., 2009. Melt inclusions track pre-eruption storage and dehydration of magmas at Etna. Geology 37, 571–574.

Crowe, B.M., Finnegan, D.L., Zoller, W.H., Boynton, W.V., 1987. Trace element geochemistry of volcanic gases and particles from 1983–1984 eruptive episodes of Kilauea volcano. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012) 92, 13708–13714.

Danyushevsky, L.V., Della-Pasqua, F., Sokolov, S.V., 2000. Re-equilibration of melt inclusions trapped by magnesian olivine phenocrysts from subduction-related magmas: petrological implications. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 138, 68–83.

Eaton, J.P., Murata, K.J., 1960. How volcanoes grow. Science 132, 925–938.

Feigenson, M.D., Patino, L.C., Carr, M.J., 1996. Constraints on partial melting imposed by rare earth element variations in Mauna Kea basalts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012) 101, 11815–11829.

Frey, F.A., Rhodes, J.M., 1993. Intershield geochemical differences among Hawaiian volcanoes: Implications for source compositions, melting process and magma ascent paths. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences 342, 121–136. 50 Gaetani, G.A., Watson, E.B., 2002. Modeling the major-element evolution of olivine- hosted melt inclusions. Chemical Geology 183, 25–41.

Gerlach, T., 1986. Exsolution of H2O, CO2 and S during eruptive episodes at Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 12177–12,185.

Gerlach, T., Graeber, E., 1985. Volatile budget of Kilauea volcano. Nature 313, 273–277.

Ghiorso, M.S., Sack, R.O., 1995. Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 119, 197– 212.

Haughton, D.R., Roeder, P.L., Skinner, B.J., 1974. Solubility of sulfur in mafic magmas. Economic Geology 69, 451–467.

Helz, R.T., 1987. Diverse Olivine Types in Lava of the 1959 Eruption of Kilaeau Volcano and their Bearing on Eruption Dynamics. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1350, 691–722.

Hinkley, T., Lamothe, P., Wilson, S.A., Finnegan, D., Gerlach, T., 1999. Metal emissions from Kilauea, and a suggested revision of the estimated worldwide metal output by quiescent degassing of volcanoes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 170, 315–325.

Hofmann, A.W., Feigenson, M.D., Raczek, I., 1984. Case studies on the origin of basalt: III. Petrogenesis of the Mauna Ulu eruption, Kilauea, 1969–1971. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 88, 24–35.

Hofmann, A.W., Jochum, K.P., 1996. Source characteristics derived from very incompatible trace elements in Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea basalts, Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project. Journal of Geophysical Research 101, 11831–11839.

Hofmann, A.W., White, W.M., 1982. Mantle plumes from ancient oceanic crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 57, 421–436.

Kent, A.J., 2008. Melt inclusions in basaltic and related volcanic rocks. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 69, 273–331.

Lassiter, J.C., Hauri, E.H., 1998. Osmium-isotope variations in Hawaiian lavas: evidence for recycled oceanic lithosphere in the Hawaiian plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 164, 483–496.

Loewen, M.W., Kent, A.J.R., 2012. Sources of elemental fractionation and uncertainty during the analysis of semi-volatile metals in silicate glasses using LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 27, 1502–1508. 51 Lu, F., Anderson, A.T., Jr, Davis, A.M., 1995. Diffusional gradients at the crystal/melt interface and their effect on the compositions of melt inclusions. The Journal of Geology 103, 591–597.

Mather, T.A., Witt, M.L.I., Pyle, D.M., Quayle, B.M., Aiuppa, A., Bagnato, E., Martin, R.S., Sims, K.W.W., Edmonds, M., Sutton, A.J., Ilyinskaya, E., 2012. Halogens and trace metal emissions from the ongoing 2008 summit eruption of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 83, 292–323.

Mathez, E., 1976. Sulfur solubility and magmatic sulfides in submarine basalt glass. Journal of Geophysical Research 81, 4269–4276.

McDonough, W.F., Sun, S.S., 1995. The composition of the Earth. Chemical Geology 120, 223–253.

Murata, K.J., Richter, D.H., 1966a. Chemistry of the Lavas of the 1959-60 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1–28.

Murata, K.J., Richter, D.H., 1966b. The settling of olivine in Kilauean magma as shown by lavas of the 1959 eruption. American Journal of Science 264, 194–203.

Newman, S., Lowenstern, J.B., 2002. VolatileCalc: a silicate melt–H2O–CO2 solution model written in Visual Basic for excel. Computers & Geosciences 28, 597–604.

Norman, M.D., Garcia, M.O., Bennett, V.C., 2004. Rhenium and chalcophile elements in basaltic glasses from Ko’olau and Moloka’i volcanoes: Magmatic outgassing and composition of the Hawaiian plume. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68, 3761–3777.

Olmez, I., Finnegan, D.L., Zoller, W.H., 1986. Iridium emissions from Kilauea volcano. Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 653–663.

Pietruszka, A.J., Garcia, M.O., 1999. A rapid fluctuation in the mantle source and melting history of Kilauea Volcano inferred from the geochemistry of its historical summit lavas (1790–1982). Journal of Petrology 40, 1321–1342.

Pietruszka, A.J., Norman, M.D., Garcia, M.O., Marske, J.P., Burns, D.H., 2013. Chemical heterogeneity in the Hawaiian mantle plume from the alteration and dehydration of recycled oceanic crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 361, 298–309.

Pitcher, L., Helz, R.T., Walker, R.J., Piccoli, P.M., 2009. Fractionation of the platinum- group elements and Re during crystallization of basalt in Kilauea Iki Lava Lake, Hawaii. Chemical Geology 260, 196–210. 52 Putirka, K., Perfit, M., Ryerson, F., Jackson, M.G., 2007. Ambient and excess mantle temperatures, olivine thermometry, and active vs. passive upwelling. Chemical Geology 241, 177–206.

Richter, D.H., Eaton, J.P., Murata, K.J., Ault, W., Krivoy, H.L., 1970. Chronological Narrative of the 1959-1960 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 537-E, 1–73.

Richter, D.H., Murata, K.J., 1966. Petrography of the lavas of the 1959-60 eruption of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper.

Roedder, E., 1984, Fluid Inclusions, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 12, p. 1-644.

Rubin, A., 1995. Propagation of magma-filled cracks. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science Letters 23, 287–336.

Schiano, P., 2003. Primitive mantle magmas recorded as silicate melt inclusions in igneous minerals. Earth Science Reviews 63, 121–144.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., 1997. Potential links between ocean plateau volcanism and global ocean anoxia at the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary. Economic Geology 92, 836–842.

Sobolev, A.V., Hofmann, A.E., Nikogosian, I., 2000. Recycled oceanic crust observed in “ghost plagioclase”within the source of Mauna Loa lavas. Nature 404, 986–990.

Stone, W.B., Fleet, M.E., 1991. Nickel-copper sulfides from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii: Contrasting compositions and phase relations in eruption pumice and Kilauea Iki lava lake. American Mineralogist 76, 1363–1372.

Thordarson, T., Self, S., 1996. Sulfur, chlorine and fluorine degassing and atmospheric loading by the Roza eruption, Columbia River Basalt Group, Washington, USA. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 74, 49–73.

Tilling, R.I., Wright, T.L., Millard, H.T., Jr, 1987. Trace-element chemistry of Kilauea and Mauna Loa lava in space and time: A reconnaissance. Volcanism in Hawaii 2, 641–689.

Wallace, P.J., 2005. Volatiles in subduction zone magmas: concentrations and fluxes based on melt inclusion and volcanic gas data. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 140, 217–240.

Wallace, P.J., Anderson, A.T., Jr, 1998. Effects of eruption and lava drainback on the H 2 O contents of basaltic magmas at Kilauea Volcano. Bulletin of Volcanology 59, 327–344. 53 Wallace, P.J., Carmichael, I.S., 1992. Sulfur in basaltic magmas. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56, 1863–1874.

Winter, J.D., 2001. An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice- Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 697.

Wright, T.L., 1973. Magma mixing as illustrated by the 1959 eruption, Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84, 849–858.

Wright, T.L., Fiske, R., 1971. Origin of the differentiated and hybrid lavas of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Journal of Petrology 12, 1–65.

Zajacz, Z., Halter, W., 2009. Copper transport by high temperature, sulfur-rich magmatic vapor: Evidence from silicate melt and vapor inclusions in a basaltic andesite from the Villarrica volcano (Chile). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 282, 115–121. 54

Figure 3.1. Location of Kilauea volcano and Kilauea Iki on the island of Hawaii. The 1959 summit eruption began as a fissure (red line) and converged to a single vent (black circle) eventually filling much of the Kilauea Iki Crater (yellow). High fire fountains spread an unusually large tephra deposit (extent shown in purple) for Hawaiian eruptions. Figure modified from Richter et al. (1970). 55

Figure 3.2. Corrections of melt inclusions for post-entrapment crystallization (PEC) and diffusive Fe-loss. Glass and whole rock compositions all lie along a relatively restricted compositional control line. Our glass and olivine FeO* values measured by EMPA are consistently offset from previous work by ~0.5 wt.% suggesting a difference in calibration between the two data sets. For internal consistency, we correct all melt inclusions relative to our glass analyses, although we use the slope of Fe evolution calculated with a linear regression of whole rock values since the greater spread of compositions provides a more accurate regression. All melt inclusions have been iteratively corrected to this control line using the olivine-melt geothermometer of Putirka et al. (2007) requiring a median PEC correction of 12% by weight. S1 and S2 endmembers are defined by whole rock analyses (Murata and Richter, 1966) and are discussed in Figure 3.4. 56

Table 3.1. Constants and parameters used in melt inclusion correction equations.

Equation Constantsa a b c d e f Eqn 1 Mg 2.158 55.09 6.213E-02 4430 5.115E-02 N/A Eqn 2 Fe 3.3 47.57 5.192E-02 3344 5.595E-02 1.633E-02

Melt Evolution Control Line [FeO*]=m*[MgO]+b m=b 0.0406 b=c 10.572 FeO*/FeO=d 1.13

Physical Conditions Pressure (GPa)e 0.1 e H2O (wt.%) 0.7

Calculated Temperature (deg. C) Median= 1275 Range= 1316-1216 a Olivine-melt thermometer from Putirka et al. (2007) b Slope calculated from a linear regression of whole rock analyses in Murata and Richter (1966). c Intercept calculated from a linear regression of whole rock analyses minus the systematic offset we observe in FeO* between our data and previous work. d FeO*/FeO calculated from wet chemical analyses of Murata and Richter (1966) e Pressure and water contents within the range defined by melt inclusions for Anderson and Brown (1993) 57

Figure 3.3. Major element variation diagrams. Compositions show evidence of olivine fractionation for whole rock and glass compositions and clinopyroxene crystallization on glass values < 7 wt. % MgO. Corrections for PEC place melt inclusions at more primitive values than glass and in line with expected compositional trends. Note linearity of Al2O3 at all MgO values that suggests no involvement of plagioclase. The grey dashed line shows the results of MELTs modeling at QFM redox, 1 kbar depth, and 0.7 wt.% water. The model closely follows the compositional trend, although clinopyroxene onset is slightly later than indicated by compositional variations. Very late plagioclase in the MELTs model is consistent with observations of rare plagioclase microlites in thin section observations by Helz (1987). 58

Figure 3.4. Ratio of CaO over Al2O against MgO. This ratio most clearly illustrates major element mixing variations between the “S-1” and “S-2” components. The dashed line represents the MELTs output. Our glass and melt inclusion analyses span the compositional range between these two endmembers while most whole rock compositions and the MELTs model share affinity with the S-2 component. 59

Figure 3.5. Trace element variation diagrams against MgO. Error bars are 1 se and are smaller than symbol size if not shown for this and all subsequent trace element diagrams. Variations generally agree with the major element trends, although more scatter exits than would be expected by pure fractionation. A Raleigh fractionation model of 16% olivine crystallization is shown (grey dashed line). The MELTs output was used to determine the amount of olivine fractionated up to the onset of clinopyroxene crystallization. The model provides a good match for compatible elements (Ni and Co) but does not explain the range of incompatible element variation. 60

Figure 3.6. Trace element variation diagrams. Elements with similar compatibility (Sr and Ba vs. Ce; Y and Zr vs. Hf) in a garnet-bearing mantle source show strong correlations (R2 ≥ 0.8). Incompatible and compatible elements, however have poor correlations (R2 ≤ 0.5). Linear regressions are of combined glass and melt inclusion data and are displayed with a light blue line. The grey dashed line is 16% fractionation of olivine as in Figure 3.5. 61

Table 3.2. Pearson correlation coefficients from glass and melt inclusions (n=62) Ba Th Nb Ce Sr Nd Zr Hf Dy Y Yb Ba 0.89 0.94 0.88 0.82 0.70 0.50 0.59 0.52 0.50 0.57 Th 0.94 0.85 0.77 0.82 0.68 0.76 0.70 0.71 0.74 Nb 0.93 0.83 0.78 0.57 0.65 0.55 0.57 0.62 Ce 0.86 0.80 0.55 0.57 0.43 0.47 0.53 Sr 0.82 0.63 0.66 0.47 0.51 0.54 Nd 0.89 0.86 0.74 0.82 0.74 Zr 0.94 0.86 0.91 0.80 Hf 0.90 0.91 0.87 Dy 0.94 0.86 Y 0.85 Yb All values are greater than 99% confidence. 62

Figure 3.7. Multielement diagrams normalized to chondrite and primitive mantle (McDonough and Sun, 1995). The steep REE pattern (high La/Yb) is typical of other Hawaiian basalts. Most melt inclusion analyses, with the exception of KIKI-14b, have lower concentrations of REE consistent with more primitive compositions major element compositions. Note, fewer trace elements were analyzed for melt inclusions, and not all odd-numbered HREEs analyzed in glass are plotted to avoid scatter resulting from poor precision on low abundance elements. Large depletions of W, Pb, and Li are evident. 63

Figure 3.8. Plots of olivine-incompatible trace element ratios with models of mantle melting. Two mantle sources melt curves are shown with melt fractions (F) indicated by marks along line. The model uses the same parameters as Pietruszka et al. (1999). Source 1 is a mixture of 10% altered MORB after 4% dehydration mixed with 90% ambient Hawaiian mantle (a mixture of 50% enriched and 50% depleted mantle). This source is a simplified version of the early 20th century Kilauea source of Pietruszka et al. (1999). Source 2 has a larger component of 15% altered MORB with no dehydration and 85% ambient Hawaiian mantle. This second source is somewhat similar to the Mauna Loa source of Pietruszka et al. (1999). Kilauea Iki compositions can be explained as 3-10% partial melting (3-5% for most glasses) and mixing between these two source compositions. 64

Figure 3.9. Major volatile concentrations measured with EMPA (S) and FTIR (H2O and CO2). Sulfur is strongly degassed in matrix glass while melt inclusions lie close to or at sulfide saturation (Mathez, 1976). Isobars calculated with VolatileCalc (Newman and Lowenstern, 2002). 65

Figure 3.10. Examination of potentially volatile metal behavior against major volatile components. No clear correlation between potentially volatile trace elements and volatile components is present, with the exception of a positive correlation between Sn and CO2 (R2 = 0.48, > 99% confidence). Tin concentrations are 10% higher in median melt inclusions than in the median glass analysis (t-test p < 0.00). 66

Figure 3.11. Selected metal concentrations examined against refractory lithophile trace elements. Raleigh fractionation vectors are shown with partitioning estimated from the average composition of host olivine and matrix glasses. Tin values for glass are about 0.5 ppm less than we would expect after continued fractionation of the melt inclusions suggesting either removal of a Sn-bearing mineral phase or with volatile components. 67 Table 3.3. Expected melt concentration decreases for potentially volatile trace elements during degassing based on studies of volcanic gas emissions at Kilauea.

Average Maximum Average Error Element Average (ppm) Max (ppm) depletion (%) depletion (%) (%) Cd 0.04 0.32 55 405 25.0 Ag 0.00 0.01 1.4 16 16.7 In 0.00 0.01 1.5 12 12.5 Sn 0.03 0.15 2.5 11 4.4 B 0.21 0.21 9.7 9.7 6.4 Pb 0.05 0.10 4.2 8.3 4.6 Sb 0.00 0.00 1.8 5.8 16.7 Zn 0.18 0.61 0.16 0.52 2.7 Cu 0.04 0.29 0.03 0.22 3.4 Ni 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.07 2.6 Mo < 0.00 < 0.00 0.06 0.06 4.8 Cs < 0.00 < 0.00 0.02 0.02 10.0 Li < 0.00 < 0.00 0.02 0.02 3.7 W < 0.00 < 0.00 0.02 0.02 10.5 Cr 0.03 0.03 0.009 0.009 3.5 Rb < 0.00 < 0.00 0.003 0.003 3.3 Ta < 0.00 < 0.00 0.002 0.002 2.9 Ba < 0.00 < 0.00 0.001 0.001 2.3 Co < 0.00 < 0.00 0.001 0.001 2.8 Ga < 0.00 < 0.00 0.001 0.001 2.8 Zr < 0.00 < 0.00 0.001 0.001 1.9 Th < 0.00 < 0.00 0.001 0.001 2.6 La < 0.00 < 0.00 0.001 0.001 2.2 Estimated degassed concentration using measured metal/S from Hinkley et al. (1999) and Mather et al. (2012) and assuming a 1200 ppm decrease in S during the 1959 Kilauea Iki eruption. Percentage decrease calculated using the median glass concentration from our study. 68

Figure 3.12. Metal loss during degassing calculated from studies of volcanic gasses. Also shown is analytical error during LA-ICP-MS analysis of glass (in red). See Table 3.3 for details. 69 CHAPTER FOUR

TRACE METALS IN AMPHIBOLE FROM MOUNT ST. HELENS, MOUNT HOOD, SHIVELUCH, AND MOUNT PINATUBO: INSIGHT INTO METAL MOBILITY IN VOLCANIC SYSTEMS

Matthew W. Loewen Adam J.R. Kent 70 Abstract Arc magmas associated with subduction zones commonly are the direct source of fluids that produce many magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits. Observing the processes associated with metal mobility and enrichment in active arc volcanoes can elucidate the controls that lead to the formation of such ore deposits. In addition, the behavior of these metals in a volcanic system may provide information on the timing and style of volcanic eruptions. We have used LA-ICP-MS to analyze trace metal abundances (Cu, Li, Mo, Pb, Sn, Zn, others) in amphibole from Mt. St. Helens, Mt. Hood, Mt. Pinatubo, and Shiveluch Volcano in order to understand trace metal behavior in arc magmas. Non-volatile lithophile trace elements from these volcanoes record variations related to source variability, fractionation, and magma mixing. Many potentially volatile trace metals appear to follow lithophile trace elements and behave incompatibly. For example, In, Sn, and Zn are all enriched in low-Al amphiboles that crystallize in a shallow felsic magma source. Copper and Li are notably decoupled from other trace elements but correlate strongly with each other. At Mt. St. Helens, Cu and Li concentrations are similar in each individual sample but vary widely between different samples from the same eruption. Copper variability is typically greater than Li variability. At Mt. Hood, low-Al amphibole rim compositions contain higher Cu and Li concentrations that overlap with the range of Cu and Li concentrations observed in high-Al amphiboles from associated mafic enclaves. At Mt. Pinatubo, Cu and Li concentrations are higher in low-Al amphiboles erupted in andesite and basalt inclusions from June 7-12 eruptions than from otherwise identical low-Al amphiboles erupted during the climatic June 15 eruption. All of these observations are best explained by some degree of Cu and Li partitioning into a volatile- rich fluid that rapidly equilibrated with amphibole phenocrysts, although details of these processes remain unclear.

Introduction Separation of a volatile-rich phase in magmas is a key driver of volcanic eruptions and in some cases can also lead to the formation of magmatic ore deposits (Blake, 1984; Hedenquist and Lowenstern, 1994). In arc volcanic systems, volatile-rich fluids are 71 typically dominated by H2O and CO2 along with subordinate Cl, S, and F species (Wallace, 2005). In addition, a number of semi-volatile trace elements may be enriched in this fluid (Candela and Piccoli, 1995). Common enrichment of economically valuable elements such as Cu, Au, and Mo in hydrothermal fluids from crystallizing magmas contributes to the development of porphyry and epithermal ore deposits (Candela and Holland, 1986; Holland, 1972). Direct measurement of trace element concentrations in gasses from volcanic systems can only constrain final near-surface compositions and cannot examine extinct systems. The so-called “petrologic method” of measuring volatiles and trace elements in melt inclusions and groundmass glass can provide a useful means of evaluating volatile behavior during degassing, but is complicated by post-entrapment modification of melt inclusion compositions, sampling bias of compositions recorded in melt inclusions, and difficulty of finding and preparing inclusions, as well as the recognition that not all volatile phases may be initially dissolved in trapped liquid – the so called “excess” volatile problem (Kent, 2008; Lowenstern, 1992; Thordarson and Self, 1996; Wallace, 2005; Zajacz et al., 2009). Alternatively, several studies have examined concentrations of semi-volatile trace elements in phenocryst phases (Chambefort et al., 2013; Charlier et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2007; Rowe et al., 2008). Amphibole provides an especially favorable target for examination of trace element trends in subduction-related magmatic systems, as it is widespread in arc-related magmas over a range of compositions and crustal pressures (e.g., Gill, 1981). The complex crystal structure of the mineral also allows for the incorporation of a wide variety of trace elements, whereas the major element composition can be used to estimate crystallization pressures, temperatures, and bulk composition of the parental melt (Holland and Blundy, 1994; Ridolfi and Renzulli, 2012; Ridolfi et al., 2010; Rutherford and Devine, 1988). Herein we examine trace element concentrations in amphiboles from several Holocene volcanic centers: Mt. Pinatubo, Mt. Hood, Mt. St. Helens, and Shiveluch Volcano. Each of these volcanic systems have been well-characterized by previous studies and all of the samples analyzed in this study, except those from Mt. Hood, are 72 from eruptions that were carefully observed and samples that were collected shortly after eruption to minimize potential complications from weathering.

Methods Amphibole phenocrysts have been examined from four volcanic centers. These include the May 18, June 12, July 22, and August 7, 1980 eruptions of Mt. St. Helens, Washington; the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo, Philippines; the 2001 eruption of Shiveluch Volcano, Kamchatka; and samples from the Old Maid eruptive period (~1780 C.E.) of Mt. Hood, Oregon. We report a total of 435 amphibole major and trace element analyses including 172 from Mt. St. Helens, 174 from Mt. Pinatubo, 57 from Mt. Hood, and 32 from Shiveluch. All samples except those from Shiveluch are either whole rock samples mounted in 25 mm epoxy rounds polished with 1 µm diamond grit or are standard polished petrographic thin sections. Pumice and cryptodome samples from the May 18, 1980, eruption of Mt. St. Helens were collected from the pumice plain of Mt. St. Helens. The pumice samples were deposited during pyroclastic flows from the main Plinian eruptive phase on May 18. Cryptodome samples were identified as dark grey blocks with breadcrust cooling fractures within initial blast deposits of the May 18 eruption (Hoblitt and Harmon, 1993). We also have examined thin sections provided by Kathy Cashman of airfall and pyroclastic pumice deposited during the June 12, July 22, and August 7, 1980, Plinian eruptions. These samples are described in Cashman and McConnell (2005). We examined five samples of andesite and basaltic enclaves from the June 7-12, 1991, eruptions of Mt. Pinatubo provided by John Pallister and described in Pallister et al. (1996). Five additional pumice samples were examined spanning the climatic eruption of June 15, 1991. Plagioclase analyses and whole rock 210Pb/226Ra from these samples were previously reported in Kayzar et al. (2009). Five thin sections were examined from dome samples and associated mafic enclaves erupted during the Old Maid eruptive period around 1780 C.E. of Mt. Hood, Oregon. Previous analyses from these samples have been reported in Kent et al. (2010), Koleszar (2011), and Koleszar et al. (2012). 73 Amphibole separates provided by Madeline Humphreys from three samples of the 2001 eruption of Shiveluch Volcano, Kamchatka, were analyzed. Previous major element analyses of these amphiboles were reported in Humphreys et al. (2006, 2007). Major element analyses of amphibole for Shiveluch Volcano and 16 of the major element analyses for Mt. Hood were obtained from previous works (Humphreys et al., 2006; Koleszar, 2011). All other major element analyses of amphibole were obtained for this study at the Electron Microprobe lab at Oregon State University on a Cameca SX- 100 Electron Microprobe Analyzer. All analyses used a 1 µm beam diameter, 30 nA current, and a 15 keV accelerating voltage. Count times were variable with 60 seconds for Cl, 30 seconds for Mg, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe, Al, and S, 20 seconds for F, K, and P, and 10 seconds for Na and Si. Sodium, Si, and K were corrected to zero time intercepts. Background count times were half the peak times. Kakanui hornblende (USNM 143965) was used as a secondary standard with results reported in Appendix B. Trace element analyses were by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma- Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) in the W. M. Keck Collaboratory for Plasma Spectrometry at Oregon State University using an Ar-F 193 nm Photon Machines G2 laser ablation system and a Thermo Scientific X-series2 quadrupole ICP-MS following the general procedure and data processing approach outlined in Loewen and Kent (2012). Amphiboles were analyzed using a 30 or 50 µm spot pulsed at 7 Hz for approximately 30 seconds. Standard reference material GSE-1G was used as a calibration standard and GSD-1G, BHVO-2G, and BCR-2G were monitored as secondary standards. Calcium concentrations from EMPA were used as internal standards. Accuracy was generally within 10% of accepted values and full summaries of secondary standards are provided in Appendix B. Errors shown on all figures are 1 se and do not include the uncertainty related to characterization of the calibration standard, GSE-1G, following the procedure outlined in Loewen and Kent (2012). Many trace elements, especially volatile metals, are poorly characterized in this and other reference materials (Jochum et al., 2005a; 2005b) amplifying the uncertainty in our absolute concentrations. Our errors, which do not include this additional uncertainty, are appropriate for internal comparisons within our data set of samples all calibrated with the same standard. 74 Amphibole analyses were filtered for evidence of contamination by hidden melt or mineral inclusions during laser ablation. This was initially done via examination of

time-resolved spectra produced during each analysis. In addition, the comparison of TiO2 determined by LA-ICP-MS and electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) shown in Figure 4.1 shows excellent agreement between the two methods (r = 0.98, > 99% confidence). Any analyses not within error of a linear regression of the data were rejected (a total of 33 analysis, mostly from Mt. Hood and Shiveluch analyses where microprobe data were provided by previous studies) and are not reported. Concentrations of TiO2 determined by LA-ICP-MS are systematically higher than those determined by EMPA at Oregon State University (LA-ICP-MS/EMPA = 1.15). Major elements determined by Humphreys et al.

(2006) fall closer to a 1:1 line with LA-ICP-MS data. We suggest the offset of TiO2 is therefore related to an EMPA calibration issue rather than any systematic contamination during LA-ICP-MS.

Results All amphibole major and trace element analyses are reported in Appendix B. The methods of Ridolfi et al. (2010) and Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) were used to calculate the pressure and temperature of amphibole crystallization for each analysis. This geothermobarometer uses the complete major element composition of amphibole (total and octahedral aluminum, silicon, and magnesium index) to estimate pressure and temperature, calibrated with experimental data of calc-alkaline and alkaline melts in equilibrium with amphibole. Calculated crystallization pressures for amphiboles from this study range from < 100 to almost 1000 MPa and temperatures range from 800 to almost 1000°C (Fig. 4.2). The pressure determination is largely a function of molar Al/Si. We use a natural break in our data at Al/Si = 0.27 to divide high- and low-Al amphiboles (Fig. 4.2). This break

corresponds to a liquidus melt composition of 69.5 wt.% SiO2 and pressure of 240 MPa (Fig. 4.2). Abundant low-Al amphiboles exist for all four volcanic systems examined. Mt. Hood and Mt. Pinatubo samples have bimodal amphibole populations grouped at 100-200 MPa (Al/Si = 0.15-0.24) and 470-580 MPa (Al/Si = 0.31-0.40). Mt. Pinatubo has a third 75 high-Al group that extends to over 900 MPa. Conversely, pressures and temperatures recorded by amphiboles from Mt. St. Helens amphiboles are nearly continuous over the same range as the Mt. Hood amphiboles. Shiveluch amphiboles are also continuous but extend to only 330 MPa (Al/Si = 0.32). Trace element compositions are systematically variable with amphibole Al content (Fig. 4.3). Incompatible trace elements, including the rare earth elements (REE) and Nb, Y, Sc, and Zn, are consistently higher in the low-Al amphibole populations. Notable negative anomalies of Sr, Zr, Eu, Ti, and V in the low-Al amphiboles bring concentrations closer to or even below the concentrations in high-Al amphibole. In contrast, high-Al amphiboles have positive anomalies in Ba and Ti that bring concentrations up to and higher than many low-Al amphiboles. Nickel is highly depleted in all amphiboles although high-Al amphiboles typically have higher Ni concentrations than low Al amphiboles. is depleted in all amphiboles sometimes below detection limits, with the exception of high-Al Mt. Pinatubo samples that have unusually high Rb concentrations. Concentrations of Li, Pb, and Cu are all highly variable with no clear correlation with high- or low-Al amphiboles. Concentrations of Ce are precisely measured in all amphiboles (10-70 ppm) and provide a proxy for general melt evolution since Ce is generally incompatible in all crystal phases (Fig. 4.4). As shown in Figure 4.2, low pressure (and low-Al) amphiboles are generally in equilibrium with more felsic melts than high-Al amphiboles. Likewise, more evolved Ce concentrations correspond to low pressure amphiboles (Fig. 4.4). Comparing Ce variations to other trace elements allows for examination of melt evolution trends and amphibole population variations. Lithophile elements display systematic variations with Ce (Fig. 4.5). Many of the same trends inferred from multielement diagrams (Fig. 4.3) are evident on these plots. In addition, significant differences between volcanic systems are evident. Yttrium, Nb, and Ce concentrations vary by volcano. In contrast, Ni and Ti are compatible in amphibole with with higher concentrations in the low-Ce, high-Al amphiboles. and Sr compositional trends are more complex. Zirconium generally is positively correlated with Ce, with the notable exception of high-Ce, low-Al Pinatubo 76 amphiboles where Zr is negatively correlated with Ce. Mt. Hood amphiboles from this same compositional range vary widely with respect to Zr. High-Al amphiboles have two distinct Sr trends: the first trend has a positive correlation with Ce and is observed in Mt. Pinatubo, Mt. Hood, and some Mt. St. Helens amphiboles; the second has a negative correlation between Sr and Ce. All low-Al, high-Ce amphiboles are lower in Sr and correspondingly have pronounced negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* < ~0.7; Fig 4.6). In contrast, Eu anomalies are highly variable in high-Al amphiboles. Potentially volatile trace elements such as Cl, Zn, In, and Sn also have systematic variations with Ce and are generally present at higher concentrations in high-Ce, low-Al amphiboles (Fig. 4.7). Low-Al (shallow) amphiboles from Mt. Hood have notably higher Cl than comparable amphiboles from Pinatubo, and also have higher In, Li, and Cu concentrations. Conversely, Zn and Sn, are more concentrated in low-Al amphiboles from Pinatubo. We observe no systematic variations for Li and Cu with Ce. This is also the case for Ag and Pb, however, these elements are also present at much lower concentrations (< 1 ppm) and corresponding uncertainties are higher. Whereas Li and Cu do not systematically vary with any lithophile elements or between amphibole pressure populations, their concentrations are significantly correlated with each other (Fig. 4.8). This correlation is significant at > 99% confidence using either a linear correlation of concentrations (r = 0.72) or a linear correlation after a log transformation of concentrations (r = 0.82).

Discussion General amphibole variations Lithophile trace element variations observed in amphibole phenocrysts provide valuable information on magmatic processes. The bimodal distribution of amphibole crystallization pressures at Mt. Hood and Mt. Pinatubo is consistent with magma storage and amphibole crystallization in separate magma chambers and has been described in other studies (Kent et al., 2010; Koleszar et al., 2012; Prouteau and Scaillet, 2003; Ridolfi et al., 2010; Walker et al., 2012). The higher concentrations of incompatible trace 77 elements in the low-Al amphiboles are also broadly consistent with a more evolved parental melt (Rutherford and Devine, 2008) although some of this variation is likely due to higher crystal/melt partitioning in more felsic magmas (Cambefort et al., 2013). Variations in trace element concentrations in amphibole between volcanoes also suggest differences in source and/or fractionation histories are recorded in amphiboles from each volcanic system. For example, variable degree of Ba enrichment in high-Al amphiboles is consistent with Ba mobility in arc fluids. Zirconium variations are most easily explained by fractionation of zircon in more silicic magmas. For example the tight decreasing trend of Zr concentrations with increasing Ce concentration in low-Al amphiboles from Pinatubo is consistent with removal of zircon from the melt during differentiation. Low Sr concentrations in low-Al amphibole is most easily explained by significant plagioclase fractionation from the evolved parental melt prior to crystallization of amphibole. Variations in Sr in high-Al amphiboles are more complex (Fig. 4.6). Increasing Sr with differentiation suggests these melts may be evolving without crystallization of Na-rich plagioclase. Although lithophile trace elements reveal a substantial amount of information about magmatic processes, the primary focus of this work is on the behavior of potentially volatile metals. For this reason we do not treat the lithophile element variations in detail, but use the observed patterns of these elements to provide a baseline to assess anomalous metal behavior that could be related to mobility within an volatile- rich fluid during or after amphibole crystallization.

Volatile metal behavior For most volatile metals studied here there is little direct evidence for mobility in a volatile-rich fluid. Positive correlations between Zn, In, and Sn versus Ce are consistent with generally incompatible behavior in the melt and appear typical of other refractory incompatible elements (Fig. 4.7). If these metals are eventually incorporated into a volatile-rich fluid during eruption or hydrothermal release accompanying ore deposit deposition, these data suggest they are sourced from more felsic melts since their concentrations are lower in amphiboles crystallized from more mafic melts. In contrast, 78 Li and Cu show behavior that appears inconsistent with typical petrologic processes like fractionation, partial melting, or magma mixing (Fig. 4.7) since they have no systematic variations with other lithophile elements that are expected for variations in melt source or crystallization history. Lead and Ag also show slightly decoupled trends from other lithophile elements (Fig. 4.7); however, their low abundances (< 1 ppm) result in larger analytical uncertainty making interpretation of their trends difficult. Positive correlation between Li and Cu (Fig 4.8) suggests similar processes controls the concentrations of these two elements. Several previous workers have called on volatile fluids to transport Cu and especially Li in volcanic systems (Berlo et al., 2004; Charlier et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2007; Nadeau et al., 2013; Rowe et al., 2008). The following sections examine Cu and Li behavior in more detail at Mt. St. Helens, Mt. Hood, and Mt. Pinatubo.

Mt. St. Helens Whereas Li and Cu positively correlate across all samples from Mt. St. Helens, concentrations of both Li and Cu are strikingly clustered in individual amphiboles analyzed from within the same samples (Fig. 4.9). Concentrations vary greatly between samples, however, even where these come from a single eruption. For example, the five samples analyzed from the June 12 eruption span almost the entire observed range of Li and Cu variations (5-500 ppm Li, 1-70 ppm Cu). Within a single sample, Cu is generally more variable than Li as demonstrated by the slope of best fit lines for each sample; only three out of the eleven samples analyzed have strongly positive slopes while most have slopes close to zero (Table 4.1). This sample-to-sample variability in Li and Cu has been observed in other studies, notably Chiaradia et al. (2012), who attributed it to the effects of fractionation from variable initial magma compositions. This is unlikely to be the case here, however, as the bulk composition is similar for many of these samples (Pallister et al., 1992a). In addition comparison between Cu, Li, and elements that show variations related to fractional crystallization suggest that Cu and Li are decoupled from other elements during melt evolution (Figs. 4.5, 4.7). 79 An alternate explanation for sample-to-sample variability is found in Berlo et al. (2004), Kent et al. (2007), and Rowe et al. (2008), who proposed that Li was transported in an aqueous fluid. Separation of a vapor phase may allow significant partitioning of Cu and Li from the melt into the fluid phase (Candela and Holland, 1986; Candela and Piccoli, 1995). Transport of this phase to other parts of the magma reservoir via convection, bubble rise, and/or other mechanisms (Kayzar et al., 2009), results in transport of Li and Cu. These can then rapidly re-equilibrate with minerals, which preserve a diversity of Li and Cu contents. Although the diffusivity of Li and Cu in amphibole is presently uncertain, other silicate minerals exhibit rapid Li diffusion (Coogan et al., 2000; Giletti and Shanahan, 1997; Parkinson et al., 2007). Thus on short time scales Li can re-equilibrate within individual minerals. The diffusivity of Cu is also likely rapid (Zajacz et al., 2009), and the pervasive broad similarity of Li and Cu within samples suggests that diffusive equilibration after removal or addition of a volatile fluid to a sample must be extremely rapid. We find no evidence to support Li and Cu variations being inherited from magma storage conditions. Textural classifications were used by Cashman and McConnell (2005) to infer the depth of magma storage. If Li and Cu variations were inherited at depth in the magma, we would expect some correlation of textural types (Cashman and McConnell, 2005) with Li and Cu concentrations. However, no pattern of textural type and Li or Cu concentration can be observed. In addition, there is no observed correlation of Li and Cu with calculated amphibole crystallization pressure (Fig. 4.7). The large compositional variability between pumices from the same eruption and individual trends of Li and Cu within the same samples suggests that some of this variation may be due to the depositional history of the individual samples as opposed to magma storage conditions. Both Li and Cu can rapidly diffuse in silicate phases (Kent et al., 2007; Rowe et al., 2008; Zajacz et al., 2009). Lithium is smaller than Cu and therefore should diffuse more rapidly. Thus differences in cooling rate couple with variations in diffusion of Li and Cu could also modify amphibole trace element contents. If we assume differential Cu and Li diffusivity, greater Cu variations could be due to the longer time required for Cu to fully equilibrate within a sample compared to Li. 80 Interestingly, the two steepest slopes on a log plot of Li versus Cu (Fig. 4.9) are for airfall samples (12af16 and 12af9) that presumably cooled more quickly and could preserve greater variations in Li concentration. More detailed study of samples from single depositional units could help clarify the timing and cause of Li and Cu variability. Our results from Mt. St. Helens demonstrate a need for caution when comparing Li and Cu variations. Lithium or Cu variability observed by previous workers between samples of different bulk composition (Chiaradia et al., 2012) or over the course of an eruptive period (Berlo et al., 2004; Kayzar et al., 2009; Kent et al., 2007; Rowe et al., 2008) may be due to short-term eruption or depositional history. Lithium and Cu variations that occur over an eruption or series of eruptions may be masked by much larger variations occurring during a single event.

Mt. Hood At Mt. Hood we have examined amphibole compositions from a single mafic enclave and its associated dacitic host lava (Fig. 4.10). These samples were erupted in small dome-forming eruptions, and define a highly bimodal magma population that includes an especially high-Cl, low-Al amphibole population (Koleszar et al., 2012; Fig. 4.7). Amphiboles in the host dacite belong to the low-Al population and also have lower Sr and higher La and Ce concentrations consistent with growth in an evolved shallow magma chamber (Fig. 4.10). No consistent zoning was observed in any amphiboles for major element compositions or lithophile trace element concentrations. In contrast, Cl, Li, and Cu are all offset to higher concentrations in the rims of amphiboles from the host dacite (Fig. 4.10). Amphiboles in the mafic enclave are generally small (< 100 µm) and separate core and rim analyses of single grains were rarely possible. Rim compositions of Cu in amphiboles from the host dacite overlap the range of Cu concentrations in amphiboles from the mafic enclave, with both enclave and host rim compositions at higher Cu concentrations than any host core compositions. Elevated concentrations of the volatile elements Li, Cu, and Cl in amphibole rims are not associated with elevated concentrations of any trace element variations and thus 81 are best explained by diffusion. Separation of a volatile fluid could partition all three of these elements out of the magma and result in diffusion into rims of host amphiboles.

Pinatubo Little variability in any major or trace element amphibole composition is observed from the June 15, 1991, climatic eruption of Mt. Pinatubo (Fig. 4.11), the majority of which are classified as low-Al amphibole. Considerably more variability is evident in amphiboles from June 7-12, 1991, andesite and basalt inclusions consistent with their eruption during mixing after a mafic recharge event (Pallister et al., 1996). High- and low-Al amphiboles were recorded from these early eruptions. Low-Al amphiboles are compositionally similar in all non-volatile incompatible lithophile elements (e.g., La, shown in Fig. 4.11). Copper and Li, however, are found with notably higher concentrations in low-Al amphiboles from June 7-12 than in low-Al amphiboles from the June 15 climatic eruption. High-Al amphiboles from June 7-12 generally have lower Li and Cu concentrations than corresponding low-Al amphiboles. This observation suggests some evidence for the timing and source of Cu and Li variability at Mt. Pinatubo. Low-Al amphiboles in the June 7-12 andesite probably crystallized from the existing shallow silicic magma chamber and were mixed with high- Al amphiboles derived from a deep magma during mafic recharge (Pallister et al., 1996). Other than Li and Cu concentrations, these low-Al amphiboles are identical to those from June 15. If an aqueous fluid with Li and Cu were separated from the magma during the initial eruptions the remaining amphiboles erupted on June 15 may have equilibrated with a melt containing considerably less Li and Cu. This explanation suggests that Li and Cu could diffusively equilibrate through the magma body over period of a few days.

The 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo released over 20 million tons of SO2, more than any other observed volcanic eruption (Bluth et al., 1992). Comparison of melt inclusions and matrix glass cannot account for the loss of sulfur (Rutherford and Devine, 1996; Westrich and Gerlach, 1992) resulting in some controversy over the origin of the

SO2 with some arguing for flux from a deeper mafic intrusion (Pallister et al., 1996; 1992b), breakdown of anhydrite in the felsic magma (Rutherford and Devine, 1996), 82 and/or existence of a separate vapor phase (Hattori, 1993; Westrich and Gerlach, 1992) before the eruption. Our observed decrease in Li and Cu concentrations for samples

erupted after June 7-12 can be explained if Li and Cu were released with SO2 followed by rapid equilibration with the melt. Melt inclusions from the June 15 dacite have similar Cu concentrations to the matrix glass (Borisova et al., 2006), however, if Cu is able to rapidly equilibrate through whole amphibole phenocrysts it also may be equilibrated with any melt inclusions. The underlying source of Cu and Li is unclear. The fact that concentrations are higher in low-Al amphiboles than corresponding high-Al amphiboles from the June 7-12 samples suggests higher concentrations were present in the shallow, felsic magma chamber. This is also consistent with incompatible Cu behavior inferred by Borisova et al. (2006).

Conclusions • Amphiboles track magmatic conditions at these four volcanic centers, including two distinct magma bodies (a shallow evolved magma and a deep less-evolved magma) at Mt. Pinatubo and Mt. Hood and more continuous pressure and temperature conditions at Mt. St. Helens. • The semi-volatile elements Ag, Mo, Sb, Cd are often above analytical detection limits in amphiboles in this study, but not at high enough concentrations to determine clear trends. • Amphiboles record higher concentrations of In, Sn, and Zn in felsic parental melts than in mafic parental melts. • Cu and Li in amphiboles from Mt. Hood, Mt. St. Helens, Mt. Pinatubo, and Shiveluch are generally correlated and do not match any other compositional trends. • Significant Cu-Li variability in amphibole can exist between samples from a single eruption. 83 • Both Cu and Li seem to be related to the presence of a volatile phase and may diffuse very rapidly (on the scale of days?) through amphibole phenocrysts and the host melt.

Acknowledgments Samples examined in this project have been provided by Katherine Cashman (Mt. St. Helens), John Pallister (Mt. Pinatubo), Madeline Humphreys (Shiveluch), and Mt. Hood (Alison Koleszar). Extraordinary assistance with Electron Microprobe analysis by Frank Tepley and especially Dale Burns was instrumental in our ability to examine a large number of amphiboles with limited microprobe time. Discussions with Alison Koleszar and other members of the VIPER (Volcanology, Igneous Petrology, and Economic Resources) group at Oregon State University contributed to the development of this paper.

References

Berlo, K., Blundy, J.D., Turner, S., Cashman, K.V., Hawkesworth, C., Black, S., 2004. Geochemical precursors to volcanic activity at Mount St. Helens, USA. Science 306, 1167–1169.

Blake, S., 1984. Volatile oversaturation during the evolution of silicic magma chambers as an eruption trigger. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 8237–8244.

Bluth, G.J., Doiron, S.D., Schnetzler, C.C., Krueger, A.J., Walter, L.S., 1992. Global tracking of the SO2 clouds from the June, 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruptions. Geophysical Research Letters 19, 151–154.

Borisova, A.Y., Pichavant, M., Polve, M., Wiedenbeck, M., Freydier, R., Candaudap, F., 2006. Trace element geochemistry of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo silicic melts, Philippines: Implications for ore-forming potential of adakitic magmatism. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70, 3702–3716.

Candela, P.A., Holland, H.D., 1986. A mass transfer model for copper and molybdenum in magmatic hydrothermal systems; the origin of porphyry-type ore deposits. Economic Geology 81, 1–19.

Candela, P.A., Piccoli, P.M., 1995. Model ore-metal partitioning from melts into vapor and vapor/brine mixtures. Magmas, fluids, and ore deposits 23, 101–127. 84 Cashman, K.V., McConnell, S., 2005. Multiple levels of magma storage during the 1980 summer eruptions of Mount St. Helens, WA. Bulletin of Volcanology 68, 57–75.

Chambefort, I., Dilles, J.H., Longo, A.A., 2013. Amphibole Geochemistry of the Yanacocha Volcanics, Peru: Evidence for Diverse Sources of Magmatic Volatiles Related to Gold Ores. Journal of Petrology 54, 1017–1046.

Charlier, B.L.A., Morgan, D.J., Wilson, C.J.N., Wooden, J.L., Allan, A.S.R., Baker, J.A., 2012. Lithium concentration gradients in feldspar and quartz record the final minutes of magma ascent in an explosive supereruption. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 319-320, 218–227.

Chiaradia, M., Ulianov, A., Kouzmanov, K., Beate, B., 2012. Why large porphyry Cu deposits like high Sr/Y magmas? Scientific Reports 2, 1-7.

Coogan, L.A., Kempton, P.D., Saunders, A.D., Norry, M., 2000. Melt aggregation within the crust beneath the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: evidence from plagioclase and clinopyroxene major and trace element compositions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 176, 245–257.

Giletti, B.J., Shanahan, T.M., 1997. Alkali diffusion in plagioclase feldspar. Chemical Geology 139, 3–20.

Gill, J.B., 1981. Orogenic Andesites and Plate Tectonics. Minerals and Rocks 16, 390 p.

Hattori, K., 1993. High-sulfur magma, a product of fluid discharge from underlying mafic magma; evidence from Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. Geology 21, 1083– 1086.

Hedenquist, J., Lowenstern, J.B., 1994. The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. Nature 370, 519–527.

Hoblitt, R.P., Harmon, R., 1993. Bimodal density distribution of cryptodome dacite from the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Bulletin of Volcanology 55, 421–437.

Holland, H.D., 1972. Granites, solutions, and base metal deposits. Economic Geology 67, 281–301.

Holland, T., Blundy, J.D., 1994. Non-ideal interactions in calcic amphiboles and their bearing on amphibole-plagioclase thermometry. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 116, 433–447.

Humphreys, M., Blundy, J.D., Sparks, R.S.J., 2006. Magma Evolution and Open-System Processes at Shiveluch Volcano: Insights from Phenocryst Zoning. Journal of Petrology 47, 2303–2334. 85 Humphreys, M., Blundy, J.D., Sparks, R.S.J., 2007. Shallow-level decompression crystallisation and deep magma supply at Shiveluch Volcano. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 155, 45–61.

Jochum, K.P., Nohl, U., Herwig, K., Lammel, E., Stoll, B., Hofmann, A.E., 2005a. GeoReM: A new geochemical database for reference materials and isotopic standards. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29, 333–338.

Jochum, K.P., Willbold, M., Raczek, I., Stoll, B., Herwig, K., 2005b. Chemical Characterisation of the USGS Reference Glasses GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G, GSE-1G, BCR-2G, BHVO-2G and BIR-1G Using EPMA, ID-TIMS, ID-ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29, 285–302.

Kayzar, T.M., Cooper, K.M., Reagan, M.K., Kent, A.J., 2009. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 181, 124–140.

Kent, A.J., 2008. Melt inclusions in basaltic and related volcanic rocks. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 69, 273–331.

Kent, A.J., Blundy, J.D., Cashman, K.V., Cooper, K.M., Donnelly, C.T., Pallister, J.S., Richter, D.H., Rowe, M.C., Thornber, C.R., 2007. Vapor transfer prior to the October 2004 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Geology 35, 231–234.

Kent, A.J., Darr, C.M., Koleszar, A.M., Salisbury, M., Cooper, K.M., 2010. Preferential eruption of andesitic magmas through recharge filtering. Nature Geoscience 3, 631–636.

Koleszar, A.M., 2011. Controls on Eruption Style and Magma Compositions at Mount Hood, Oregon. Oregon State University PhD Thesis, Corvallis.

Koleszar, A.M., Kent, A.J., Wallace, P.J., Scott, W.E., 2012. Controls on long-term low explosivity at andesitic arc volcanoes: Insights from Mount Hood, Oregon. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 219-220, 1–14.

Loewen, M.W., Kent, A.J., 2012. Sources of elemental fractionation and uncertainty during the analysis of semi-volatile metals in silicate glasses using LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 27, 1502–1508.

Lowenstern, J.B., 1992. Evidence for a copper-bearing fluid in magma erupted at the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes, Alaska. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 114, 409–412.

Nadeau, O., Stix, J., Williams-Jones, A.E., 2013. The behavior of Cu, Zn and Pb during magmatic-hydrothermal activity at Merapi volcano, Indonesia. Chemical Geology 342, 167–179. 86 Pallister, J.S., Hoblitt, R.P., Crandell, D.R., Mullineaux, D.R., 1992a. Mount St. Helens a decade after the 1980 eruptions: magmatic models, chemical cycles, and a revised hazards assessment. Bulletin of Volcanology 54, 126–146.

Pallister, J.S., Hoblitt, R.P., Meeker, G.P., Knight, R.J., Siems, D.F., 1996. Magma mixing at Mount Pinatubo: petrographic and chemical evidence from the 1991 deposits, in: Newhall, C.G., Punongbayan, R.S. (Eds.), Fire and Mud: Eruptions and Lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 687–731.

Pallister, J.S., Hoblitt, R.P., Reyes, A.G., 1992b. A basalt trigger for the 1991 eruptions of Pinatubo volcano? Nature 356, 426–428.

Parkinson, I., Hammond, S., James, D., Rogers, N.W., 2007. High-temperature lithium isotope fractionation: Insights from lithium isotope diffusion in magmatic systems. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 257, 609–621.

Prouteau, G., Scaillet, B., 2003. Experimental Constraints on the Origin of the 1991 Pinatubo Dacite. Journal of Petrology 44, 2203–2241.

Ridolfi, F., Renzulli, A., 2012. Calcic amphiboles in calc-alkaline and alkaline magmas: thermobarometric and chemometric empirical equations valid up to 1,130°C and 2.2 GPa. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 163, 877–895.

Ridolfi, F., Renzulli, A., Puerini, M., 2010. Stability and chemical equilibrium of amphibole in calc-alkaline magmas: an overview, new thermobarometric formulations and application to subduction-related volcanoes. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 160, 45–66.

Rowe, M.C., Kent, A.J., Thornber, C.R., 2008. Using amphibole phenocrysts to track vapor transfer during magma crystallization and transport: An example from Mount St. Helens, Washington. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 178, 593–607.

Rutherford, M.J., Devine, J., 1988. The May 18, 1980, eruption of Mount St. Helens 3. Stability and chemistry of amphibole in the magma chamber. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 11,949–11,959.

Rutherford, M.J., Devine, J., 2008. Magmatic Conditions and Processes in the Storage Zone of the 2004-2006 Mount St. Helens Dacite. US Geological Survey professional paper 703–725.

Rutherford, M.J., Devine, J.D., 1996. Preeruption pressure-temperature conditions and volatiles in the 1991 dacitic magma of Mount Pinatubo, in: Newhall, C.G., Punongbayan, R.S. (Eds.), Fire and Mud: Eruptions and Lahars of Mt. Pinatubo, Philippines. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 751–756. 87 Thordarson, T., Self, S., 1996. Sulfur, chlorine and fluorine degassing and atmospheric loading by the Roza eruption, Columbia River Basalt Group, Washington, USA. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 74, 49–73.

Walker, B.J., Klemetti, E.W., Grunder, A.L., Dilles, J.H., Tepley, F.J., Giles, D., 2012. Crystal reaming during the assembly, maturation, and waning of an eleven- million-year crustal magma cycle: thermobarometry of the Aucanquilcha Volcanic Cluster. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 165, 663-682.

Wallace, P.J., 2005. Volatiles in subduction zone magmas: concentrations and fluxes based on melt inclusion and volcanic gas data. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 140, 217–240.

Westrich, H.R., Gerlach, T.M., 1992. Magmatic gas source for the stratospheric SO2 cloud from the June 15,1991, eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Geology 20, 867.

Zajacz, Z., Hanley, J.J., Heinrich, C.A., Halter, W.E., Guillong, M., 2009. Diffusive reequilibration of quartz-hosted silicate melt and fluid inclusions: Are all metal concentrations unmodified? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73, 3013–3027. 88

Figure 4.1. Comparison of Ti concentrations by EMPA and LA-ICP-MS. Error bars for this figure are 1 se for LA-ICP-MS data and include uncertainty in characterization of the calibration standard (GSE-1G). Concentrations by LA-ICP-MS are slightly higher than EMPA from Oregon State University, while EMPA data from Humphreys et al. (2006) lie on the 1:1 line. All reported data are within error of a linear regression between the two methods. Any analyses without agreement between the two methods have been excluded from the data set. 89

Figure 4.2. Calculated amphibole pressure (P) compared to calculated temperature (T) and molar Al/Si. Pressure and temperatures are calculated using Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) and plotted with amphibole stability zone (dashed black lines), equilibrium melt SiO2 (grey lines), and representative P-T error bars from Ridolfi et al. (2010). Pressure and to a lesser extent temperature is largely a function of molar Al/Si and the division between high and low amphiboles used in this study was chosen from a small natural break occurring at Al/Si = 0.27. 90

Figure 4.3. Rare earth element and multi-element spider diagrams comparing high- and low-Al amphiboles. Low-Al, low pressure amphiboles generally have higher concentrations of trace elements except Li, Rb, Ba, Pb, Sr, Zr, V, Zn, Cu, and Ni. Shallow amphiboles also have more pronounced Eu anomalies. A clearly bimodal distribution of amphibole compositions is evident at Mt. Hood and Mt. Pinatubo. Mt. St. Helens amphiboles have a near continuum of composition between low- and high-Al amphiboles. Fewer analyses were available for Shiveluch and only define a low-Al population. 91

Figure 4.4. Calculated pressure versus Ce concentrations in amphiboles. Pressures calculated from Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012). High-Ce amphiboles are generally low pressure. Concentration of Ce is a reasonable proxy for magmatic evolution. Error bars shown for Ce and all future trace element plots are 1 se not including uncertainty in the calibration standard. 92

Figure 4.5. Variation diagrams for Ce versus lithophile trace elements and Eu anomalies. Lithophile trace elements have generally systematic variations with Ce that can be explained by crystal fractionation, melt source variations, and magma mixing. 93

Figure 4.6. Comparison of chondrite normalized Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu*) compared to Sr concentrations. Eu* calculated as the Eu concentration divided by the chondrite normalized average of Sm and Gd. Fractionation of low-An plagioclase in oxidizing systems should decrease Sr and decrease the Eu anomaly of a melt. Plagioclase fractionation regardless of An content or redox condition is likely to decrease Sr. High-Al amphiboles from all four volcanoes have higher Sr and Eu/Eu* than low-Al amphiboles, although they comprise a considerable range in both Sr and Eu/Eu* and show no correlation between the two parameters. Conversely, low-Al amphiboles are grouped tightly at Mt. Pinatubo, Mt. St. Helens, and Mt. Hood and have a large range of Eu/Eu* over a short range of Sr concentration. 94

Figure 4.7. Variation diagrams for Ce versus potentially volatile trace elements. All elements shown except Cl are measured by LA-ICP-MS. Concentrations of Cl, Zn, In, and Sn all vary systematically with Ce and are typically higher in amphiboles sourced from more evolved and shallow magma bodies within any given volcano. Both Cu and Li are highly variable and have no relationship with Ce concentration or pressure. Concentrations of Ag and Pb are also variable, but at very low concentration and with high analytical uncertainties. 95

Figure 4.8. Covariation between Cu and Li shown on a log-log plot. Across all four volcanic systems Cu and Li are significantly correlated (> 99% confidence) using either a linear regression of Cu vs. Li or a linear regression on log(Cu) vs. log(Li) (r = 0.72 and 0.82, respectively). 96

Figure 4.9. Concentrations of Cu and Li in amphiboles from Mt. St. Helens grouped by sample. Compositions are clearly grouped sample-to-sample in addition to an overall positive correlation between Cu and Li. Different samples from one eruptive episode have almost the same range of Cu and Li contents as the entire data set. Lines are linear regressions of log (Cu) and log (Li) for each eruptive episode. Sample names for the June 12-July 22 eruptions are for one thin section each, with lettering describing airfall (af) or pyroclastic flow (pf) deposition. Table 4.1. Copper-Lithium correlation coefficients for individual samples from Mt. St. Helens. Regression for Li and Cu log (Cu) and log (Li) Sample na Li (ppm)b Cu (ppm)b rc CLd me rc CLd me 18cd01 24 18.9 7.8 0.13 46 0.01 0.09 32 0.01 18pp01 17 3.9 2.3 0.38 87 0.13 0.36 84 0.12 12af16 15 283 41.2 0.77 100 4.76 0.76 100 0.75 12af9 17 12.6 2.5 0.72 100 6.58 0.74 100 1.30 12pf1 13 7.2 2.0 -0.01 3 -0.02 0.08 20 0.04 bl12pf10 21 64.2 16.9 0.91 100 2.99 0.88 100 0.79 22af19 9 3.7 1.9 -0.11 22 -0.13 -0.11 22 -0.07 22af3 3 3.6 1.5 0.92 74 0.62 0.90 71 0.33 22pf17 31 32.7 11.9 0.45 99 0.49 0.50 100 0.22 22pfA6 9 11.4 3.7 0.46 79 0.47 0.48 81 0.20 7wrs16 13 4.0 1.5 -0.19 47 -0.24 -0.21 51 -0.12 a n is the number of amphibole analyses included in regression; b median amphibole concentrations; c r is the correlation coefficient; d CL is the confidence limit for calculated r values given n analyses; e m is the slope of the regression line. 97 98

Figure 4.10. Enclave and host amphibole compositions from Mt. Hood. All analyses are from an enclave and associated dacite host from the Old Maid eruptive period (host lava MH09-04 and mafic enclave MH09-04a). High- and low-Al populations are clearly evident. No significant core-rim zonation is observed in pressure calculations, Sr, or La. Rims of amphiboles from the low-Al dacite host magma (rims outlined in yellow), however, have elevated Cl, Cu, and Li concentrations compared to the cores of these same amphiboles. Core compositions from the amphiboles in the host dacite are lower in Cu than any amphiboles from the enclave (range of rim compositions outlined in blue). 99

Figure 4.11. Amphibole compositions over the course of the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. June 7-12 samples are arranged by whole rock composition (left to right— basalt to andesite) while the June 15 dacite samples are arranged by eruptive sequence (left to right—early to late). Most elements behave like La and have no discernable trends over the duration of the eruption. Low-Al amphiboles consistently have higher La than high-Al amphiboles. The low-Al amphiboles erupted June 7-12 however, have notably higher Cu and Li than any of the June 15 shallow amphiboles (range shown in pink). High-Al amphiboles from June 7-12 are also higher in Cu and Li than the June 15 samples, although not as high as the low-Al amphiboles from the same period. 100 CHAPTER FIVE

PROLONGED PLUME VOLCANISM IN THE CARIBBEAN LARGE IGNEOUS PROVINCE: NEW INSIGHTS FROM CURAÇAO AND HAITI

Matthew W. Loewen Robert A. Duncan Adam J.R. Kent Kyle Krawl

This manuscript is published in: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 October 2013, v. 14, no. 10, p. 4241-4259. 101 Abstract We present 36 new 40Ar-39Ar incremental heating age determinations from the Caribbean Large Igneous Province (CLIP) providing evidence for extended periods of volcanic activity and suggest a new tectonomagmatic model for the province’s timing and construction. These new 40Ar-39Ar ages for the Curaçao Lava Formation (CLF) and Haiti’s Dumisseau Formation show evidence for active CLIP volcanism from 94 to 63 Ma. No clear changes in geochemical character are evident over this period. The CLF has trace element signatures (e.g., Zr/Nb = 10-20) and flat rare earth element (REE) trends consistent with plume volcanism. The Dumisseau Formation also has plume-like geochemistry and steeper REE trends similar to ocean island basalts. Volcanism in the Dumisseau Formation appears to have largely ceased by 83 Ma while at Curaçao it continued until 63 Ma. A rapidly surfacing and melting plume head alone does not fit this age distribution. Instead, we propose that the residual Galapagos plume head, following initial ocean plateau construction, was advected eastward by asthenospheric flow induced by subducting oceanic lithosphere. Slab rollback at the Lesser Antilles and Central America subduction zones created an extensional regime within the Caribbean plate. Mixing of plume with upwelling asthenospheric mantle provided a source for intermittent melting and eruption through the original plateau over a ~30 Ma period.

Introduction Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) represent enormous volumes (> 106 km3) of mafic magmas, typically emplaced over geologically short intervals of a few million years (Coffin and Eldholm, 1994). The Caribbean Large Igneous Province (CLIP) is a large submarine plateau thought to have been constructed initially as a LIP that now forms a thickened zone of oceanic crust between North America and South America (Burke et al., 1984; Duncan and Hargraves, 1984). LIPs are generally considered to form from melting related to a decompressing mantle plume head during the initiation of hot spots (Morgan, 1981; Richards et al., 1989; Campbell and Griffiths, 1990; Duncan and Richards, 1991). 102 Geochemical and geochronological evidence strongly associates the Galapagos hot spot with a ~95-90 Ma initiation of the CLIP. Originally formed in the eastern Pacific at the initiation of Galapagos mantle plume activity, the CLIP moved northeastward with the Farallon plate between the North and South American plates until collision with the Greater Antilles arc (Burke et al., 1984; Duncan and Hargraves, 1984; Kerr et al., 2003). Volcanism can then be traced from the voluminous CLIP to the Galapagos Islands through a fragmentary 60 million year history partially preserved as accreted seamounts along the Central American coast and via the Cocos and Carnegie ridges (Hoernle et al., 2002; Buchs et al., 2011). Isotopic domains present in the Galapagos Islands can be matched with similar compositional arrays observed in CLIP lavas (Hauff et al., 2000; Geldmacher et al., 2003; Thompson et al., 2003). In addition, rare earth element (REE) patterns and mantle temperature calculations are consistent with melting from a mantle plume (Sinton et al., 1998; Herzberg and Gazel, 2009; Hastie and Kerr, 2010). Despite significant evidence for a mantle plume and a Pacific origin of the CLIP, a number of studies propose alternative models. Pindell et al. (2006) and Wright and Wyld (2011) suggest formation above a slab window with possible plume influence, and propose a much older age of CLIP initiation. Conflicting age estimations of CLIP lavas from the Curaçao Lava Formation (CLF; Beets, 1972) highlight this controversy. 40Ar- 39Ar ages of Sinton et al. (1998) at 89.5 Ma and 88 Ma from samples identified as the bottom and top of a 5 km submarine lava section described by Klaver (1987) suggest a relatively short emplacement period for the majority of lavas. Fossilized ammonites in one locality of intercalated sediments, however, have been identified as mid-Albian (~105 Ma; Wiedmann, 1978). Poikilitic sills and quartz-diorite plugs intruding the CLF have younger reported ages of 75 Ma (40Ar-39Ar whole rock; Sinton et al., 1998) and 86 Ma (U-Pb zircon; Wright and Wyld, 2011). Observations at CLIP localities north of Curaçao have led to a more consistent model of plume activity. The 1.5 km thick Dumisseau Formation of Haiti has previously reported radiometric ages of 94 to 88 Ma, in agreement with biostratigraphic data (Sinton et al., 1998). At Beata Ridge, a fault-bounded monocline located just south of Haiti, a sub-seafloor sill complex is younger at 81 to 74 Ma (Révillon et al., 2000), lying below 103 the plateau surface dated at 94 to 89 Ma (Edgar and Saunders, 1973; Sinton et al., 1998). The light rare earth element (LREE) enriched character of the Dumisseau basalts compared with the more depleted Beata Ridge basalts led Sinton et al. (1998) and Révillon et al. (2000) to propose the older phase of activity was the result of initial plume volcanism and the younger phase was the result of extension and thinning of the plateau during interaction with the Greater Antilles subduction zone to the east. The aim of this paper is to present new high precision geochronology and geochemistry for the CLF, Curaçao and the Dumisseau Formation, Haiti. These two formations span a N-S transect of the CLIP and are perhaps the best exposures of internal structure and composition of the eastern portion of this ocean plateau. Combining our results with extensive geochronology already available for plateau rocks elsewhere in the Caribbean has allowed us to re-examine the tectonomagmatic origin of this submarine LIP.

Geologic Background Curaçao The CLF forms much of the interior of the island of Curaçao, a tectonically uplifted part of the southern margin of the CLIP, located off the northern coast of Venezuela (Fig. 5.1). It was first mapped by Beets (1972) as a late Cretaceous sequence of submarine lavas more than 1000 m thick, unconformably capped by sedimentary rocks of the Knip Group and Midden-Curaçao Formation. Klaver (1987) provided the first detailed study of the petrology of this formation. He proposed a 5 km section of submarine basalts ranging from picrites and olivine tholeiitic pillow basalts at the bottom of the sequence to plagioclase-clinopyroxene tholeiitic pillows, hyaloclastites, and poikilitic sills at the top. The variable thickness proposed for the CLF reported by these two studies reflects the highly weathered and discontinuous outcrops present on Curaçao making interpretation of the structural and stratigraphic relationships uncertain. The major, minor, and trace element geochemistry of these rocks was described in detail by both Klaver (1987) and Kerr et al. (1996), with both studies concluding that observed variations could be achieved by crystal fractionation and/or accumulation from a 104 common parental melt. Trace element and isotopic signatures are consistent with large degree melting of a plume-like mantle source, similar to conclusions reached from other Caribbean locations (Kerr et al., 1996; Hauff et al., 2000). Limited age constraints on CLF samples have provided inconsistent information. Ammonites from the only observed sediments intercalated with lava flows were identified as mid-Albian (~105 Ma; Wiedmann, 1978), although the fossils were broken and highly deformed and could be reworked deposits (Kerr et al., 2003). Sinton et al. (1998) analyzed three samples with identified 40Ar-39Ar plateau ages of 89.5 ± 1.0 and 88.0 ± 1.2 Ma from lavas at the top and bottom of the formation and a 75.8 ± 2.0 Ma age on a diabase sill. The oldest of these ages was reanalyzed by Snow et al. (2005) with a slightly older and more precise plateau age of 92.8 ± 0.5 Ma. These ages were consistent with the previously identified volcanic stratigraphy (Klaver, 1987), and consistent with an interpretation of rapid eruption of lava flows, based on the relative lack of intercalated sediments, followed by later intrusions. The most recent work on the island is less conclusive; Wright and Wyld (2011) reported a 86.2 ± 0.8 Ma U-Pb zircon age for a quartz diorite plug that intrudes the CLF at the north end of the island and Humphrey (2010) reported an older and less precise age of 112.7 ± 7.3 Ma from U-Pb dating of baddeleyite from a diabase sill, and suggested an older emplacement age for the CLF.

Dumisseau Formation, Haiti The Dumisseau Formation of Haiti is exposed by thrust and strike-slip faulting along the northern margin of the CLIP (Fig. 5.1 insert). The formation consists of a 1.5 km section of massive and pillow basalt and picrite flows with intercalated pelagic limestones, siltstones, and turbidites, intruded by dolerite sills (Maurrasse et al., 1979). Sen et al. (1988) showed that the geochemistry of the formation was typical of CLIP lavas found in the center of the Caribbean Plate from ocean drilling during DSDP Leg 15. Most samples have trace element signatures and isotopic compositions similar to other CLIP localities, although many samples show LREE enrichment more characteristic of ocean island basalts (OIB). 105 Sinton et al. (1998) analyzed five whole rock samples from the Dumisseau Formation using 40Ar-39Ar incremental heating experiments and obtained plateau ages ranging from 96.2 ± 6.5 to 89.8 ± 1.1 Ma. These ages overlap the Coniacian to Turonian fossils (94-84 Ma) from interbedded sediments at the bottom of the Dumisseau Formation and are older than the late Santonian to early Campanian (84-80 Ma) fossils found in sedimentary interbeds at the top of the formation (Maurrasse et al., 1979). Five additional samples were analyzed by Snow et al. (2005) with 40Ar-39Ar total fusion ages from 95.1- 92.2 Ma although these analyses were all affected by significant 39Ar recoil and did not develop age plateaus.

Beata Ridge and the Interior of the Caribbean Plate The CLIP has also been sampled in an intact central area of the Caribbean Plateau at the Beata Ridge and several Deep Sea Drilling Program (DSDP) and Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) sites (Donnelly et al., 1973; Révillon et al., 2000; Sinton et al., 2000; Kerr et al. 2009; Fig. 5.1 insert). Together, the Dumisseau Formation, CLF, and these central sites provide a N-S transect through the center of the Caribbean plateau and CLIP outcrops. Both the LREE enriched, OIB-like basalts of the Dumisseau Formation and flat REE patterns similar to those found in the CLF are found in the Beata Ridge and DSDP sites (Sinton et al., 1998; Révillon et al., 2000). The oldest ages are found from DSDP Site 146 lavas: 40Ar-39Ar whole rock plateau ages of 90.6 ± 3.2, 92.1 ± 4.7, and 94.3 ± 2.8 Ma (Sinton et al., 1998). At the Beata Ridge, where a thick sill complex was sampled by submersible, considerably younger ages were obtained for whole rock and plagioclase separates: 9 plateau ages between 81 and 74 Ma, and two plateau ages at ~56 Ma (Révillon et al., 2000).

Sampling and Methodology Samples for this study were collected on the island of Curaçao in April 2010 and supplemented with samples previously described in Kerr et al. (1996) and Klaver (1987). 106 Coordinates for the collected samples are available in the Supplementary Data1 while locations of previously studied samples are estimated from location maps provided within those references (Fig. 5.1). Samples from the Dumisseau Formation, Haiti, were previously described in Maurrasse et al. (1979) and Sen et al. (1988). Age determinations for 22 samples from Curaçao and 14 samples from the Dumisseau Formation were derived from whole rock, groundmass, plagioclase, or glass separates. Whole rock samples consisted of 4 mm diameter mini-cores of the fresh and relatively phenocryst-free portions of rock fragments. The groundmass and plagioclase samples were crushed and sieved to a 200-300 or 400-500 µm size fraction and subjected to an extended acid leaching procedure following Koppers et al. (2000). This consisted of

15 minute sequential leaching in 1 N HCl, 6 N HCl, 1 N HNO3, and 3 N HNO3. Before irradiation, 50-100 mg of material was hand picked from the final leached separate. Whole rock and glass separates were not subjected to acid leaching. All samples were irradiated at the Oregon State University 1 MW TRIGA Reactor. Neutron flux was monitored using a Fish Canyon Tuff biotite (FCT-3) with a monitor age of 28.02 ± 0.16 Ma (Renne et al., 1998). Argon extraction and analysis was achieved with a Merchantek

10 W CO2 laser and an MAP-215-50 mass spectrometer following the methods outlined in Duncan and Hogan (1994) and Duncan et al. (1997). Data reduction utilized ArArCALC v.2.2 (Koppers, 2002) using decay constants suggested by Steiger and Jäger (1977). Total fusion, plateau, and isochron ages are summarized for all analyzed samples in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. Total fusion ages incorporate all heating steps in a given incremental heating experiment and some step ages are clearly influenced by post- crystallization Ar-loss evident in the age spectra. Several samples are affected by redistribution of 39Ar and 37Ar atoms during neutron irradiation. This occurs in fine- grained rocks where 39Ar from K-rich phases that generally release Ar at lower temperatures (e.g., clays, intersertal glassy matrix) transfers to K-poor phases that generally release Ar at higher temperatures (e.g., pyroxene, olivine), and 37Ar transfers

1 Supplementary Data can be found in the online version of this article or in Appendix C of this thesis. 107 from relatively Ca-rich phases (e.g., feldspar, pyroxene) to Ca-poor phases (e.g., clays, intersertal glassy matrix). These so-called recoil effects produce erroneously old ages at low temperature steps and erroneously young ages at high temperature steps resulting in descending step ages with gas release (“inverse staircase” age spectra). In such cases, and where there is no evidence for 40Ar-loss (in low temperature steps), the total fusion ages are equivalent to K-Ar ages. Isochron ages are calculated from the slopes of linear regressions through the step isotopic compositions (40Ar/36Ar vs 39Ar/36Ar) and make no assumption about the initial Ar composition (40Ar/36Ar). Because the step compositions do not typically show large dispersion, the analytical uncertainties for isochron ages are larger than for corresponding plateau ages. All age spectra were examined for evidence of disturbance, namely, 40Ar-loss (at lower temperature heating steps), and recoil. Conventionally, plateau ages are considered reliable if they include 3 or more contiguous step ages constituting >50% of the total gas released. A statistical parameter, mean square of weighted deviations (MSWD), compares error within step ages with scatter about the mean step age, and has a 2σ (95%) confidence limit below about 2.5 (depending on the number of heating steps). The probability, p, combines MSWD and number of heating steps in a chi-square statistic that expresses the level of confidence that the plateau-forming step ages define a meaningful age. Values equal to or greater than 5% (95% confidence) indicate statically meaningful ages. Our analyzed samples show evidence for low temperature alteration, exposure to seawater, and subaerial weathering. In such cases the possibility for 40Ar-loss and K- addition during fluid-rock chemical exchange is significant. Baksi (2007) compared fresh and altered basalts dated by 40Ar-39Ar incremental heating experiments and developed several quantitative measures of levels of alteration at which age data may be compromised. The first is the concentration of 36Ar (atmospheric, corrected for reactor produced 36Ar from Ca), which lies below about 3x10-14 mol/g for whole rock basalts and 10x10-14 mol/g for plagioclase in samples that produced acceptable (crystallization) plateau ages. Another parameter, the “alteration index,” calculated from 36Ar/39Ar, also 108 relates the amount of atmospheric-derived Ar to intrinsic K-content, has a threshold value of <0.0006 for acceptable ages. New major, minor, and trace element geochemical analyses were performed on whole rocks. Major and minor elements were analyzed by X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) for the Curaçao samples at Pomona College and for the Dumisseau Formation at Washington State University (WSU) Geoanalytical Lab. All whole rock trace element data were obtained at WSU using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Sample preparation involved selecting visually unaltered chips of rock and powdering the samples in a W-Carbide shatterbox, mixing with Li-tetraborate flux, and fusing, following the general procedure outlined in Johnson et al. (1999). ICP-MS samples were also dissolved in acid prior to analysis following WSU’s standard procedure (Knaack et al., 1994). In addition to whole rock analyses, hyaloclastite samples from Curaçao were analyzed by Electron Microprobe Analysis (EMPA) at the University of Oklahoma and laser ablation-ICP-MS (LA-ICP-MS) at Oregon State University, using the methodology described in Loewen and Kent (2012).

Results Curaçao Geochronology Of the 22 dated samples from Curaçao, 16 provided reliable plateau ages ranging from 92 to 63 Ma (Table 5.1). In all cases plateau ages are consistent with isochron ages and show no evidence for significant recoil, or 40Ar-loss (Fig. 5.2). Within this age range, there are samples with ages grouped at 92 Ma, 88-84 Ma, 80-75 Ma, and 70-63 Ma (Fig. 5.2). This broad age range does not fit with that expected from the volcanic stratigraphy described by Klaver (1987; Fig. 5.1) and earlier age determinations of Sinton et al. (1998). Below we discuss each of the age groupings. Isochron and plateau diagrams for all analyzed samples are available in the Supplementary Data and Appendix C; full data files used for age calculations, including tables and plots, can be accessed at the online database http://earthref.org. The oldest ages are 92.0 ± 1.0 Ma from a groundmass separate of basaltic lava collected by Kerr et al. (1996) and 91.8 ± 2.1 Ma from a plagioclase separate from a 109 plagioclase-clinopyroxene poikilitic sill. The groundmass sample exhibited a very slight recoil age spectrum, with MSWD just outside the 95% confidence limit, but with six heating steps that encompassed over 80% of the total 39Ar released used in the plateau calculation (Fig. 5.2a). The plagioclase separate returned a plateau with no evidence of recoil or 40Ar-loss, but low proportions of radiogenic 40Ar resulted in higher uncertainty on individual steps and the plateau age. Both samples are located on the southeast end of the island and very near a sample with previously reported plateau ages of 89.5 ± 1.0 Ma and 92.8 ± 0.5 Ma (Sinton et al., 1998; Snow et al., 2005; Fig. 5.1). Glass separates from hyaloclastite units (Cao-07 and Cao-35d) returned ages between 88 and 86 Ma (Fig. 5.2b). Both of these deposits are on the northwest end of the island adjacent to significantly younger lavas. Hyaloclastites from the southeast end of the island are generally more altered, and the one attempted age on a glass separate from this region (BK-79-263) exhibited an 40Ar-loss profile from which no reliable age could be determined (Table 5.1, Supplementary Data, Appendix C). Plagioclase separates from two poikilitic sills (Cao-13 and Cao-18) in the southeast returned good plateaus between 86 and 83 Ma (Fig. 5.2c). While petrographically and geochemically similar to the 92 Ma plagioclase separate, these two samples were near the northern extent of CLF outcrops and could represent a stratigraphically younger position according to Klaver (1987). Sill rock Cao-14 (plagioclase separate) produced a reasonable 79.4 ± 1.9 Ma plateau profile comprising about 70% of the gas released and passes all criteria for age reliability. However, it is petrographically similar to and less than 2 km away from the 86 Ma sill sample (Fig. 5.1). A number of groundmass separates from plagioclase-clinopyroxene-bearing lavas display a range of plateau ages from 80 to 63 Ma (Fig. 5.2d-f). Several of these samples with excellent plateau profiles are found near sill and hyaloclastite samples with significantly older ages. One 74.9 ± 2.1 Ma sample (BK-79-262) is a reanalyzed groundmass portion of an 88.0 ± 1.2 Ma whole rock analysis (Sinton et al., 1998), suggesting the possibility that phenocryst phases (olivine ± clinopyroxene) may retain 110 mantle-derived 40Ar (Fig. 5.2d). The youngest of these samples are directly adjacent to the Mid-Albian ammonite fossil locality described by Wiedmann (1978; Fig. 5.2f). Quantitative measures of alteration proposed by Baksi (2007) have been calculated from the isotopic data. In general, 36Ar concentrations are below the suggested cutoff values for whole rocks and plagioclase separates (Table 5.1). Sample BK-79-163 has a much higher 36Ar concentration (28.3 x 10-14 mol/g), consistent with the observed significant 40Ar-loss. Samples BK-79-118 and Cao-03 have slightly high 36Ar concentrations, but statistically acceptable plateaus and isochrons, and ages that are not dissimilar to those of other less altered rocks. The alteration index values for Curaçao samples are high, 0.02-0.5, and we believe this reflects the very low K-contents of these rocks, rather than high concentrations of 36Ar. We feel that this parameter is not appropriate for evaluating age quality in such compositions.

Dumisseau Formation Geochronology Samples from the Dumisseau Formation, Haiti, exhibit a smaller age range, and overlap the older ages from Curaçao. We consider eight of the fourteen analyzed samples to have reliable plateau ages, while the others are compromised by recoil or 40Ar-loss patterns (Table 5.2). The oldest plateau ages are 94-90 Ma (Fig. 5.3a) while the youngest is 83 Ma (Fig. 5.3b). With the exception of this youngest age, uncertainties on all of the other plateau ages are overlapping and yield no conclusive evidence for a hiatus in activity (Fig. 5.3b-c). In addition to the statistical criteria (MSWD, p > 5%) for acceptable plateaus, these samples also exhibit low concentrations of 36Ar, consistent with their petrographically fresh appearance. The one exception is HA-77-245, which has a very high 36Ar content and displays an 40Ar-loss age spectrum.

Geochemistry We use trace element analyses of all dated samples to compare the geochemical character across the broad age range, and with that of the entire CLIP. Major elements were also analyzed, and are consistent with previous work, demonstrating that the chemistry of most samples can be modeled as olivine ± clinopyroxene and plagioclase 111 cumulates or fractionates from parental melts of similar composition (Klaver, 1987; Kerr et al., 1996). Trace element signatures of the CLF are broadly consistent with other CLIP localities. Rare earth element profiles are generally flat (normalized to chondritic values; McDonough and Sun, 1995; Fig. 5.4). Elemental ratios associated with plume sources, such as Zr/Nb, are lower (10-20) than typical mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB, Zr/Nb >30) and on the plot of Nb/Y vs. Zr/Y shown in Figure 5.5 almost all CLF samples plot well within the plume-associated Icelandic Array of Fitton et al. (1997). Mafic samples have Ba/Nb <10, although more felsic intrusions in the NW corner of the island as well as nearby basalts (Cao-22) are more arc-like with Ba/Nb > 50, similar to analyses of the coeval Aruba Batholith (White et al., 1999; Fig. 5.6). While Ba may be sensitive to hydrothermal alteration, La/Nb, which is less susceptible to low temperature chemical exchange, shows the same trend. All anomalously high Ba/Nb also having high La/Nb but most CLF samples having La/Nb < 1 (Fig. 5.6). The Dumisseau Formation samples have similar major element chemistry to the other lavas described above, but contrast with CLF lavas in that they exhibit LREE enriched patterns (Fig. 5.4). Other trace element concentrations are also higher, such as Ti, Zr, Nb, Sr, Hf, Ta, Th, and U. Overall, trace element contents of Dumisseau Formation lavas are more similar to typical ocean island basalts (OIB).

Isotopes Extensive whole rock isotopic work has been conducted on Curaçao by Kerr et al. (1996), Walker et al. (1999), Hauff et al. (2000), Geldmacher et al. (2003), and White et al. (1999), while Sr-Nd isotopic analyses have been reported for the Dumisseau Formation by Sen et al. (1988). Although these compositions were not on the same samples for which we have age determinations, they likely sample similar units. These studies all concluded that isotopic values are consistent with melting from plume influenced mantle sources with similar endmembers as those contributing to the current Galapagos hot spot. We report one new He isotopic analysis of an olivine separate from a

Dumisseau Formation picrite (HA-77-34), which produced an Ra/R = 12.4 ± 0.21 (2σ) 112 within the range of high values obtained from Gorgona and Galapagos (Révillon et al., 2002; Kurz et al., 2009). These values are all higher than expected for MORB mantle

(Ra/R = 8-10) and at the low range expected for a plume source (Graham, 2002).

Discussion Geologic History of Curaçao Our new 40Ar-39Ar age determinations require a revision of models for the formation of the CLF. In contrast to earlier studies, which argued for rapid formation (Klaver, 1987; Sinton et al., 1998), our data show a more extended geologic history for the sequence. Magmatism occurred from 92 to 63 Ma with no clear evidence for breaks in volcanic activity during this period (Fig. 5.2). These results have several important implications: (1) The volcanic stratigraphy of Curaçao consists of multiple volcanic pulses despite a lack of observed erosional horizons or sedimentary interbeds; (2) the CLF did not form prior to 95 Ma as other workers have proposed (Wiedmann, 1978; Wright and Wyld, 2011); and (3) the lavas of the CLF were not emplaced in a short 1-5 million year duration typical of LIPs worldwide (Coffin and Eldholm, 1994; Sinton et al., 1998). Consequently, despite virtually uniform major, minor and trace element patterns (Klaver, 1987; Kerr et al., 1996), the Curaçao lavas appear to represent continuous or intermittent magma generation from a broadly similar mantle source over a period of ~30 million years. Our new data and observations argue that the stratigraphy of the island is more complex than the relatively simple sequences presented by Klaver (1987) and Beets (1972). As shown in Figure 5.1, there is no systematic change in age across the island. In addition, intrusive rocks (sills and plugs) yield ages that span the first half of the volcanic history (Table 5.1). This includes ages from plagioclase separated from poikilitic sills in the southeast end of Curaçao and zircon separated from intrusive plugs in the northwest end of the island (Wright and Wyld, 2011). Field exposures are insufficient to determine the relationships between outcrops separated by flat areas covered by soil and vegetation We suggest that the internal structure of the CLF is a sequence of hyaloclastites, pillow and massive lava flows, and sills, which have been gently folded and offset by WNW- 113 ESE faulting. In our field sampling, we did not observe evidence for the simple stratigraphic sections proposed by Beets (1972) or Klaver (1987). The second of these studies determined some of the structural orientations on Curaçao by measuring the bedding of pillow lavas. This method, however, can be problematic since observations of recent pillow lava flows often show chaotic and steep-sided flow fronts (Jones, 1968; Moore, 1975). The complex nature of submarine lava flows coupled with the extensively weathered and discontinuous outcrops within the CLF, low relief, and similarity of rock types, leads us to conclude that previous stratigraphic reconstructions did not observe the unconformities between volcanic sequences or faulted sections implied by the age range of our data. Similarly, some reconciliation is required between the younger ages identified in the CLF and previous estimates of the age of overlying sedimentary units. The Knip Group is unconformably separated from the CLF by a distinct brecciated soil horizon and is estimated to be Campanian to Maastrichtian in age (~84-66 Ma; Beets, 1972; 1977). Recent U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains and 40Ar-39Ar detrital hornblende of both continental and island arc origin return a maximum age of ~74 Ma for these sediments (Wright and Wyld, 2011). Our new ages suggest that four lava flows of the CLF are broadly coeval (66-63 Ma) with the Knip Group sediments. We note, however, that the sediments accumulated rapidly (>1 km thickness suggested for the Knip Group in NW Curaçao, in ~8 m.y.) while there is minimal evidence for sediments within the CLF over 30 m.y. of intermittent volcanic activity. Several key field relationships could help explain the occurrence of young lava flows (without intercalated sediments) erupted within the time frame of Knip Group sedimentation. (1) Unrecognized faulting may form some contacts of the CLF. The collision of the Caribbean Plate and South America has resulted in regional right-lateral transform motion. The extreme NW outcrops of the CLF are geochemically distinct from lavas found elsewhere on Curaçao and are similar to samples from the island of Aruba located nearby to the NW. Deconstruction of right-lateral motion could move this portion of the CLF closer to Aruba. (2) Erosional unconformities occur between the CLF and Knip Group and between the Knip Group and younger sedimentary units (Beets, 1972). 114 The thickness of the Knip Group is also variable, with thick sequences in the NW pinching out to the SE. (3) The CLF is exposed in two NW-trending anticlinoria occupying the elliptical NW and SE highlands of the island, separated by a syncline in the center of Curaçao. Although previous work suggests these structures developed in the early Tertiary (Beets, 1972), considerable deformation occurred on Aruba at the same time as younger CLF lavas erupted (Wright and Wyld, 2011). If some of the folding began to occur during the late Cretaceous, the young CLF lavas would have erupted on uplifting regions while CLF lavas with intercalated sediments are hidden below the surface in the syncline. Hence, the anticlinal crests may have been at or above sea level at the time of Knip Group sedimentation. Given the poor exposure of outcrops on Curaçao, these new age determinations should provide motivation to consider alternate interpretations of the geologic structure of the island. Our results contradict the recent interpretation by Wright and Wyld (2011) that the CLF formed earlier than 95 Ma. Their work rejected previous 40Ar-39Ar geochronology (Sinton et al., 1998) in favor of an imprecise U-Pb microbadellyite age (Humphrey, 2010) and an early identification of broken and highly deformed Mid-Albian ammonites in intercalated sediments (Wiedmann, 1978). The large number of new 40Ar-39Ar ages presented here provides compelling evidence that the CLF formed after 95 Ma, with lavas adjacent to the ammonite locality returning the youngest ages (Fig. 5.1). These results also show that instead of two distinct magmatic events proposed by Sinton et al. (1998), volcanism was intermittent throughout the 30 Ma development of the CLF. We also observe similar major, minor, and trace element compositions in our CLF samples through time. These systematic geochemical patterns cannot be the result of the evolution of a single magma batch over a 30 million year time span. Instead, the compositional similarities between samples of different ages require a similar mantle source for melting and common petrogenic processes acting over the time interval from ~92-63 Ma. Trace element ratios such as Zr/Nb or La/Nb (Fig. 5.6) require that the melt source region is similar in composition through time, and relatively tight major element trends (Kerr et al., 1996) suggest magma batches follow comparable paths of compositional modification (olivine fractionation or accumulation followed by 115 clinopyroxene and plagioclase fractionation). A notable exception may be the geochemistry of the picrites, which have notably lower εNd (Kerr et al., 1996). These samples could not be directly dated due to low potassium contents and heavy alteration. Their occurrence on the SE end of Curaçao (Klaver, 1987) associates them with the oldest samples we have dated, and is consistent with high temperature magmatism expected with the initial impingement of a mantle plume (Hastie and Kerr, 2010).

Geologic History of the Dumisseau Formation Our new ages fall largely within the expected range of previous radiometric dating on the Dumisseau Formation (Sinton et al., 1998; Snow et al., 2005) and fossil assemblages identified in interbedded sediments (Maurrasse et al., 1979). Only 10 million years of volcanism is evident here compared with 30 million years on Curaçao, although the earliest lavas of both formations are 93-92 Ma. This initial age is consistent with the earliest samples from most other CLIP localities (Fig. 5.6) and Turonian to early Coniacian fossil age estimates of interbedded sediments in the lowest sections of the Dumisseau Formation. Late Santonian to early Campanian fossils in the basalts from near the top of the Dumisseau Formation match our youngest radiometric ages (82.8 ± 0.7 Ma). Geochemically the Dumisseau Formation is distinct from the Curaçao lavas with

LaN/YbN > 3 (Fig. 5.6), and these differences can most easily be related to lower degrees melting of a plume-influenced mantle source. Trace element ratios that change by smaller amounts with degree of melting but largely reflect source character (e.g., Zr/Nb) are similar to the CLF.

Timing and Geochemistry of Volcanism Across the CLIP The age range and geochemical character of samples from the CLF and the Dumisseau Formation exemplify the broader character and timing of the CLIP. We compare our new age and trace element geochemistry with additional published plateau ages from throughout the Caribbean in Figs. 5.5 and 5.6 (Alvarado et al., 1997; Kerr et al., 1997; Sinton and Duncan, 1997; Sinton et al., 1998; Lapierre et al., 1999; White et 116 al., 1999; Révillon et al., 2000; Sinton et al., 2000; Hoernle et al., 2002; 2004; Escuder- Viruete et al., 2011; Serrano et al., 2011). We have restricted our consideration to samples with well-constrained plateau ages. Figure 5.6 shows that CLIP volcanism on Haiti and Curaçao, bracketing the eastern CLIP, commenced between 95 and 90 Ma. Volcanism waned in the northern CLIP localities after ~10 million years but continued in the southern Caribbean and Central American CLIP localities until approximately 60 Ma. After this time, geochemically related volcanic activity is found in accreted seamounts on the Pacific coast of Central America associated with the trail of the Galapagos hot spot (Hoernle et al., 2002). In addition to covering the span of CLIP volcanism, CLF and Dumisseau Formation lavas include some of the earliest examples of CLIP volcanism. Our oldest dated samples (93.6 ± 1.8 Ma for the Dumisseau Formation and 92.0 ± 1.0 Ma for the CLF) are also among the earliest ages reported for the entire CLIP (Fig. 5.6). The only older ages are 94.3 ± 2.8 Ma from DSDP Leg 15 located in the middle of the Caribbean plate (Sinton et al., 1998) and 98.4 ± 2.4 Ma from Gorgona Island (Serrano et al., 2011). Two considerably older ages reported from Hoernle et al. (2004; 137 ± 2 and 118.2 ± 1.8 Ma) are limited in occurrence to the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica, which may represent preexisting oceanic crust of the Farallon plate. The abundance of basalt crystallization ages from throughout the CLIP starting after 95 Ma and the relative absence of ages before this time strongly support this time as the initiation of plume volcanism which continues today in the Galapagos hot spot. The trace element signature of the vast majority of CLIP samples is that of a plume source. Ba/Nb is generally < 10 and La/Nb < 1, suggesting no substantial subduction influence, and Zr/Nb = 10-20, excluding a typical MORB depleted mantle source (Fig. 5.6). Samples also plot clearly within the plume-sourced “Iceland Array” as opposed to the MORB field of Fitton et al. (1997; Fig. 5.5). The CLF samples as well as most CLIP

lavas have relatively flat REE patterns with LaN/YbN ~ 1 (Fig 5.4). REE patterns such as these can be formed from either high degrees of melting of an enriched or primitive mantle source or much lower degrees of melting from a depleted source. Low Zr/Nb (10- 20), however, cannot be achieved through different degrees of partial melting, but instead 117 requires that melts were generated from at least a partially enriched to primitive source. There are two noteworthy exceptions to the geochemical trends described above: (1) high Ba/Nb and La/Nb signatures are found in the Aruba batholith (White et al., 1999) and samples from NW Curaçao that could suggest a subduction influence on the

magmas or magma differentiation processes; and (2) high LaN/YbN are found in the northern portions of the CLIP including the Dumisseau Formation and < 65 Ma samples from Central America (Fig. 5.6) as well as locations in South America (Kerr et al., 2002). These latter compositions are more typical of ocean island basalts derived from small degrees of partial melting (Pilet et al., 2008). The possible subduction influence in rocks of the Aruba batholith and other evolved plutonic rocks coincides roughly with suggested collision of the CLIP with North and South America between 90 and 80 Ma (Duncan and Hargraves, 1984; Pindell and Kennan, 2009). While some subduction signature would be expected in rocks at this time, it is perhaps most remarkable that none of the other CLIP lavas from this age and younger exhibit any such influence. It could be that any arc-derived rocks within the CLIP are underrepresented in existing studies, and/or that a newly initiated subduction zone (discussed below) would generate very limited volcanism atypical of classic subduction volcanism or adakitic signatures such as White et al. (1999) described in Aruba. Unlike the typical CLIP lavas found in many parts of the Caribbean region, including Curaçao, the OIB-like signature is primarily restricted to two distinct periods, 95-83 Ma lavas in the Dumisseau Formation and the < 65 Ma lavas of volcanic centers in Costa Rica and Panama. The Central American samples have been described as accreted seamounts of the Galapagos hot spot trail formed in the Pacific as the Caribbean Plate was isolated from the plume with the ~70 Ma initiation of the Central American subduction zone. The Haitian samples can best be explained as the result of melting beneath the northern edge of tapered plume head whose center was to the south, closer to Curaçao. 118 Tectonic Model Our new data show that the timing and geochemical character of the eastern CLIP exposed in Curaçao requires melting of a mantle source with a plume component over a ~30 million year period. Lower degrees of melting and a shorter volcanic history is evident in the northern extent of the CLIP. These observations do not fit a traditional plume head model for LIP development, which typically calls for a short time span of volcanism and a rapid transition to ocean island basalt (OIB-type) compositions along a spatially restricted hot spot track produced by much lower eruption rates (Coffin and Eldholm, 1994; Kerr et al., 2002). Instead, we propose that the plate tectonic setting of the plateau and, specifically, the interaction of the residual plume head mantle material with nearby subduction zones, can explain the prolonged period of plume-influenced volcanism. Underlying this model is the understanding that mantle plumes can be strongly advected by ambient asthenospheric flow, particularly coupled flow at the base of the lithosphere (Richards and Griffiths, 1988). In our model, volcanism of the CLIP began around 94 Ma in the eastern Pacific basin during the initial impingement and decompression melting of a plume head at the base of Farallon plate oceanic lithosphere, just to the west of an east-dipping subduction zone (Duncan and Hargraves, 1984; Fig. 5.7a). At this time, we see volcanism in almost all CLIP localities (Fig. 5.6), suggesting mantle melting was widespread and similar to other LIPs formed from plume heads (Coffin and Eldholm, 1994). However, the chemical character of volcanism appears to vary with location, probably reflecting distance from the plume head center with apparently lower degrees of melting in the north of the province. Models of mantle flow beneath subduction zones show that an upwelling plume will be deflected by shear flow in the asthenosphere coupled to the base of a subducting slab (Druken et al., 2012). Applying this model to initial CLIP volcanism, the northeastward trajectory of the Farallon plate and underlying asthenosphere dragged the residual Galapagos plume head with it, thus distributing and mixing plume head material with ambient asthenosphere in a flow regime dictated by slab subduction. In this scenario, the OIB-like volcanism observed in the Dumisseau Formation was derived from 119 the cooler, lower melt-fraction edge of the initial plume head, while the classic larger melt-fraction LIP patterns seen throughout the southern extent of the CLIP are the result of melting near the hotter main plume axis. By 85 Ma, reconstructions suggest the Caribbean Plateau collided with the Greater Antilles Arc between North and South America, blocking the existing subduction zone and causing a subduction polarity reversal (Duncan and Hargraves, 1984; Fig. 5.7b). The high La/Nb volcanism we see in Aruba and the NW edge of Curaçao, some of which has adakitic characteristics, could be the expression of the newly forming west-dipping subduction zone. After this time the subduction zone rolled back to the east (Fig. 5.7c). Mantle dynamic models suggest that asthenospheric counterflow will be very strong behind a rapidly rolling back slab, and eastward flow of the Caribbean region could capture the residual mantle plume and help drive continued mantle upwelling and magmatism (Druken et al., 2012; Long et al., 2012). We suggest that this process entrained the residual head of the Galapagos plume, allowing for plume-like mantle to continue producing LIP volcanism for another 30 million years. Around 70 Ma east-dipping subduction began at the western margin of the CLIP, along what is now the Central American Arc (Fig. 5.7d). This event cut off the plume tail from the Caribbean region, restricting expression of plume tail OIB volcanism to the Pacific. Evidence for this activity is found in accreted seamounts along the Central American west coast (Hoernle et al., 2002; Buchs et al., 2011). This plume tail material is the result of lower degree melting resulting in observed high LaN/YbN seen in 66 Ma and younger samples in Central America (Hoernle et al., 2002; Fig. 5.6). The Caribbean Plateau, now isolated from the Galapagos plume tail, experienced continued CLIP volcanism in an extensional regime between two subduction zones until ~60 Ma. During this time melting could no longer be driven by upwelling and decompression of a mantle plume, but by upwelling associated extension in a back-arc basin and the plume geochemical signature of lavas resulted from the residual plume head. The model we present here is able to explain the features observed in the CLIP although the geodynamic consequences of plume-subduction zone interactions require further study. However, the results and our interpretations from this study directly 120 contrast some other recent work from the CLIP. Serrano et al. (2011) reported a similar duration of CLIP volcanism from Gorgona (98-64 Ma) as this study found for the CLF (92-62 Ma). The Serrano et al. (2011) study, however, called on a magmatism associated with a slab window for the Gorgona and other CLIP lavas following Pindell et al. (2006), with “fortuitous” coincidence of a mantle plume to explain high 3He/4He and other plume-like geochemistry in the region. As discussed in Hastie and Kerr (2011), the geochemistry of CLIP lavas is not compatible with a slab window environment. Also, the slab window model does not explain the focusing of volcanism in the southern Caribbean plate after 80 Ma or the clear cessation of CLIP activity by 60 Ma. In fact, we would expect a slab window initiated at 90 Ma to expand as it developed rather than contract as observed in this study.

Conclusions • We report new 40Ar-39Ar geochronological data and chemical data for the CLIP, demonstrating plateau volcanism in the CLF from 92-63 Ma and in the Dumisseau Formation from 94-83 Ma. This age range significantly expands the period of formation of the CLF and reaffirms the proposed initiation of CLIP volcanism around 94 Ma. • Volcanism in the CLF lacks systematic geochemical changes over ~30 Ma, contradictory to a classic plume-head model where initial large degrees of voluminous melting transitions to small degree melting in only a few million years. Spatial patterns in duration and geochemical character are present over the entire CLIP with lower degrees of melting and only ~10 Ma of volcanism present along the northern margin as shown in the Dumisseau Formation. • All CLIP volcanism originates from a plume-like mantle source distinct from typical MORB mantle (Zr/Nb = 10-20). Most volcanism is the result of a large degree of partial melt resulting in flat REE patterns, however LREE enrichment from lower degrees of partial melt occur in the northern portion of early CLIP lavas (Dumisseau Formation, 94-83 Ma). 121 • We suggest that interaction of a plume with the Greater Antilles subduction zone could explain the observed geochemistry and longevity of CLIP volcanism.

Acknowledgements This research was funded by National Science Foundation grant OCE 1028707 to R.A.D. and A.J.R.K. Kaj Hoernle, Peter Michael and Alan Hastie assisted with sample collection in Curaçao. Florentin Maurasse provided samples from the Dumisseau Formation. Chris Sinton and Jade Star Lackey along with students at the Pomona College provided XRF analyses for Curaçao samples and Peter Michael provided electron microprobe values for Curaçao glasses. John Huard assisted with 40Ar-39Ar sample preparation and analysis. David Graham provided the He-isotopic analysis. Valuable conversations with many members of the VIPER (Volcanology, Igneous Petrology, and Economic Resources) research group at OSU contributed to the development of this project. We appreciate detailed and constructive reviews by Andrew Kerr and Folkmar Hauff that greatly improved the quality of the final manuscript.

References

Alvarado, G.E., Denyer, P., C.W. Sinton, 1997. The 89 Ma Tortugal komatiitic suite, Costa Rica: Implications for a common geological origin of the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific region from a mantle plume. Geology 25, 439–442.

Baksi, A.K., 2007. Water, chemical weathering, and atmospheric argon in undisturbed rocks and minerals--I:A quantitative tool for detecting alteration. Geological Society of America Special Paper 430, 285-303.

Beets, D., 1972. Lithology and Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous and Danian Succession of Curaçao. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 153 p.

Beets, D., 1977. Cretaceous and Early Tertiary of Curaçao. GUA Papers of Geology 10, 7–17.

Buchs, D. M., R. J. Arculus, P. O. Baumgartner, and A. Ulianov, 2011. Oceanic intraplate volcanoes exposed: Example from seamounts accreted in Panama. Geology 39(4), 335–338. 122 Burke, K., Dewey, J.F., Cooper, C., Mann, P., Pindell, J.L., 1984. Caribbean tectonics and relative plate motions. Geological Society of America Memoir 162, 31–63.

Campbell, I.H., Griffiths, R.W., 1990. Implications of mantle plume structure for the evolution of flood basalts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 99, 79–93.

Coffin, M.F., Eldholm, O., 1994. Large igneous provinces: crustal structure, dimensions, and external consequences. Reviews in Geophysics 32, 1–36.

Donnelly, T.W., Melson, W., Kay, R., Rogers, J., 1973. Basalts and dolerites of Late Cretaceous age from the central Caribbean. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 15, 989–1004.

Druken, K.A., Stegman, D.R., Kincaid, C.R., Griffiths, R.W., 2012. Subduction disfigured mantle plumes: Plumes that are not plumes? Abstract DI43A-02 presented at the 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.

Duncan, R.A., Hogan, L., 1994. Radiometric dating of young MORB using the 40Ar-39Ar incremental heating method. Geophysical Research Letters 21, 1927–1930.

Duncan, R.A., Richards, M.A., 1991. Hotspots, mantle plumes, flood basalts, and true polar wander. Reviews in Geophysics 29, 31–50.

Duncan, R.A., Hargraves, R.B., 1984. Plate tectonic evolution of the Caribbean region in the mantle reference frame, Geological Society of America Memoir, 162, 81–93.

Duncan, R.A., Hooper, P.R., Rehacek, J., Marsh, J.S., Duncan, A.R., 1997. The timing and duration of the Karoo igneous event, southern Gondwana. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 18127-18138.

Escuder-Viruete, J., Pérez-Estaun, A., Joubert, M., Weis, D., 2011. The Pelona-Pico Duarte basalts Formation, Central Hispaniola: an on-land section of Late Cretaceous volcanism related to the Caribbean large igneous province. Geologica acta: an international earth science journal 9, 307–328.

Edgar, N.T., Saunders, J.B., 1973. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 15, U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, D.C., 1135 p.

Fitton, J.G., Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J., Hardarson, B.S., Taylor, R.N., 1997. Thermal and chemical structure of the Iceland plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 153, 197–208.

Geldmacher, J., Hanan, B., Blichert-Toft, J., Harpp, K., Hoernle, K., Hauff, F., Werner, R., Kerr, A.C., 2003. isotopic variations in volcanic rocks from the Caribbean Large Igneous Province and Gala ́pagos hot spot tracks. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4, 1–24. 123 Graham, D.W., 2002. Noble Gas Isotope Geochemistry of Mid-Ocean Ridge and Ocean Island Basalts: Characterization of Mantle Source Reservoirs. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 47, 247-317.

Hastie, A.R., Kerr, A.C., 2010. Mantle plume or slab window?: Physical and geochemical constraints on the origin of the Caribbean oceanic plateau. Earth Science Reviews 98, 283–293.

Hauff, F., Hoernle, K., Tilton, G., Graham, D.W., Kerr, A.C., 2000. Large volume recycling of oceanic lithosphere over short time scales: geochemical constraints from the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 174, 247–263.

Herzberg, C., Gazel, E., 2009. Petrological evidence for secular cooling in mantle plumes. Nature 458, 619–622.

Hoernle, K., Hauff, F., van den Bogaard, P., 2004. 70 m.y. history (139–69 Ma) for the Caribbean large igneous province. Geology 32, 697–700.

Hoernle, K., van den Bogaard, P., Werner, R., B. Lissinna, B., Hauff, F., Alvarado, G.E., D. Garbe-Schonberg, D., 2002. Missing history (16−71 Ma) of the Galápagos hotspot: Implications for the tectonic and biological evolution of the Americas. Geology 30, 795–798.

Humphrey, C.G., 2010. In-situ U-Pb secondary ion mass spectrometry (IN-SIMS) geochronology from the Leeward Antilles islands of Aruba, Curaçao, Bonaire, and Gran Roque. University of Georgia M.S. Thesis, Athens.

Johnson, D.M., Hooper, P.R., Conrey, R.M., 1999. XRF analysis of rocks and minerals for major and trace elements on a single low dilution Li-tetraborate fused bead. Advances in X-ray Analysis 41, 843–867.

Jones, J.G., 1968. Pillow lava and pahoehoe. The Journal of Geology 76, 485–488.

Kerr, A.C., Pearson, D.G., Nowell, G.M., 2009. Magma source evolution beneath the Caribbean oceanic plateau: new insights from elemental and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopic studies of ODP Leg 165 Site 1001 basalts. Geological Society of London Special Publications 328, 809–827.

Kerr, A.C., Marriner, G.F., Tarney, J., Nivia, A., Saunders, A.D., Thirlwall, M.F., Sinton, C.W., 1997. Cretaceous Basaltic Terranes in Western Colombia: Elemental, Chronological and Sr–Nd Isotopic Constraints on Petrogenesis. Journal of Petrology 38, 677–702. 124 Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Kempton, P.D., Spadea, P., Nivia, A., Marriner, G.F., Duncan, R.A., 2002. Pervasive mantle plume head heterogeneity: Evidence from the late Cretaceous Caribbean-Colombian oceanic plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research 107, 1–13.

Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Marriner, G.F., Klaver, G.T., Saunders, A.D., Thirlwall, M.F., 1996. The geochemistry and petrogenesis of the late-Cretaceous picrites and basalts of Curaçao, Neterlands Antilles: a remnant of oceanic plateau. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 124, 29–43.

Kerr, A.C., White, R.V., Thompson, P.M., Tarney, J., Saunders, A.D., 2003. No Oceanic Plateau—No Caribbean Plate? The Seminal Role of an Oceanic Plateau in Caribbean Plate Evolution. AAPG Memoir 79, 126–168.

Klaver, G.T., 1987. The Curaçao Lava Formation: An ophiolitic analogue of the anamalous thick layer 2B of the mid-Cretaceous oceanic plateaus in the western Pacific and central Caribbean. GUA Papers of Geology 1, 1–120.

Knaack, C., Cornelius, S.B., Hooper, P.R., 1994. Trace element analyses of rocks and minerals by ICP-MS. Washington State University, open file report, http://www.sees.wsu.edu/Geolab/note/icpms.html, checked 01 July 2013.

Koppers, A.A.P., 2002. ArArCALC--software for 40Ar/39Ar age calculations. Computers & Geosciences 28, 605–619.

Koppers, A.A.P., Staudigel, H., Wijbrans, J.R., 2000. Dating crystalline groundmass separates of altered Cretaceous seamount basalts by the 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating technique. Chemical Geology 166, 139–158.

Kurz, M.D., Curtice, J., Fornari, D., Geist, D., Moreira, M., 2009. Primitive neon from the center of the Galapagos hotspot. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286, 23- 34.

Lapierre, H., Dupuis, V., Mercier de Lepinay, B., Monie, P., Tardy, M., Maury, R.C., Hernandez, J., Polve, M., Yeghicheyan, D., Cotton, J., 1999. Late Jurassic Oceanic Crust and Upper Cretaceous Caribbean Plateau Picritic Basalts Exposed in the Duarte Igneous Complex, Hispaniola. The Journal of Geology 107, 193– 207.

Loewen, M.W., Kent, A.J.R., 2012. Sources of elemental fractionation and uncertainty during the analysis of semi-volatile metals in silicate glasses using LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 27, 1502–1508. 125 Long, M.D., Till, C.B., Druken, K.A., Carlson, R.W., Wagner, L.S., Fouch, M.J., James, D.E., Grove, T.L., Schmerr, N., Kincaid, C., 2012. Mantle dynamics beneath the Pacific Northwest and the generation of voluminous back-arc volcanism. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 13, Q0AN01.

Maurrasse, F., Husler, J., Georges, G., Schmitt, R., Damond, P., 1979. Upraised Caribbean sea floor below acoustic reflector B” at the Southern Peninsula of Haiti, Geologie Mijnbouw 8, 71–83.

McDonough, W.F., Sun, S.S., 1995. The composition of the Earth. Chemical Geology 120, 223–253.

Moore, J.G., 1975. Mechanism of Formation of Pillow Lava: Pillow lava, produced as fluid lava cools underwater, is the most abundant volcanic rock on earth, but only recently have divers observed it forming. American Scientist 63, 269–277.

Morgan, W.J., 1981. 13. Hotspot Tracks and the Opening of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. The Sea, ideas and observations on progress in the study of the seas 7, 443–487.

Pilet, S., Baker, M.B., Stolper, E.M., 2008. Metasomatized Lithosphere and the Origin of Alkaline Lavas. Science 320, 916–919.

Pindell, J.L., Kennan, L., 2009. Tectonic evolution of the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean and northern South America in the mantle reference frame: an update. Geological Society London Special Publications 328, 1–55.

Pindell, J., Kennan, L., Stanek, K.P., Maresch, W., Draper, G., 2006. Foundations of Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean evolution: eight controversies resolved. Geologica Acta 4, 303–341.

Renne, P.R., Swisher, C.C., Deino, A.L., Karner, D.B., Owens, T.L., DePaolo, D.J., 1998. Intercalibration of standards, absolute ages and uncertainties in 40Ar/ 39Ar dating. Chemical Geology 145, 117–152.

Révillon, S., Chauvel, C., Arndt, N.T., Pik, R., Martineau, F., Fourcade, S., Marty, B., 2002. Heterogeneity of the Caribbean plateau mantle source: Sr, O and He isotopic compositions of olivine and clinopyroxene from Gorgona Island. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 205, 91–106.

Révillon, S., Arndt, N.T., Chauvel, C., Duncan, R.A., 2000. A Complex History for the Caribbean Plateau: Petrology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology of the Beata Ridge, South Hispaniola. The Journal of Geology 108, 641–661.

Richards, M.A., Griffiths, R.W., 1988. Deflection of plumes by mantle shear flow: experimental results and a simple theory. Geophysical Journal 94, 367–376. 126 Richards, M.A., Duncan, R.A., Courtillot, V.E., 1989. Flood basalts and hot-spot tracks: plume heads and tails. Science 246, 103–107.

Sen, G., Hickey-Vargas, R., Waggoner, D.G., Maurrasse, F., 1988. Geochemistry of basalts from the Dumisseau Formation, southern Haiti: implications for the origin of the Caribbean Sea crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 87, 423–437.

Serrano, L., Ferrari, L., Martínez, M.L., Petrone, C.M., Jaramillo, C., 2011. An integrative geologic, geochronologic and geochemical study of Gorgona Island, Colombia: Implications for the formation of the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 309, 324–336.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., 1997. Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica: A single suite of Caribbean oceanic plateau magmas. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 15507–15520.

Sinton, C.W., Sigurdsson, H., Duncan, R.A., 2000. Geochronology and petrology of the igneous basement at the lower Nicaraguan Rise. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 165, 233–236.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., Storey, M., Lewis, J.F., Estrada, J., 1998. An oceanic flood basalt province within the Caribbean plate. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 155, 221–235.

Snow, L.J., Duncan, R.A., Bralower, T.J., 2005. Trace element abundances in the Rock Canyon Anticline, Pueblo, Colorado, marine sedimentary section and their relationship to Caribbean plateau construction and oxygen anoxic event 2. Paleoceanography 20, 1–14.

Steiger, R.H., Jäger, E., 1977. Subcommission on geochronology: convention on the use of decay constants in geochronology and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36, 359–362.

Thompson, P.M., Kempton, P.D., White, R.V., Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Saunders, A.D., Fitton, J., McBirney, A., 2003. Hf-Nd isotope constraints on the origin of the Cretaceous Caribbean plateau and its relationship to the Galapagos plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 217, 59–75.

Walker, R.J., Storey, M., Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Arndt, N.T., 1999. Implications of 187Os isotopic heterogeneities in a mantle plume: evidence from Gorgona Island and Curaçao. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63, 713–728.

White, R.V., Tarney, J., Kerr, A.C., Saunders, A.D., Kempton, P.D., Pringle, M.S., Klaver, G.T., 1999. Modification of an oceanic plateau, Aruba, Dutch Caribbean: implications for the generation of continental crust. Lithos 46, 43–68. 127 Wiedmann, J., 1978. Ammonites from the Curaçao Lava Formation, Curaçao, Caribbean, Gelogie en Mijnbouw 57, 361–364.

Wright, J.E., Wyld, S.J., 2011. Late Cretaceous subduction initiation on the eastern margin of the Caribbean-Colombian Oceanic Plateau: One Great Arc of the Caribbean (?). Geosphere 7, 468–493. 128

Figure 5.1. Overview map of prominent Caribbean Large Igneous Province exposures (insert) and simplified geologic map of Curaçao (modified after Beets, 1972). Sample locations along with age determinations (in Ma) are shown. The locations of 89.5 and 88.0 Ma 40Ar-39Ar ages reported by Sinton et al. (1998) are shown with asterisks as reanalyzed 92.8 Ma (Snow et al., 2005) and 74.9 Ma (this study) ages. The location of a 75.8 Ma age reported by Sinton et al. (1998) for a diabase sill is not known. Also shown are the locations of U-Pb ages reported in Wright and Wyld (2011; stars) and the location of a Mid-Albian ammonite (Wiedmann, 1978). NP denotes locations of analyzed samples with no plateau age. No clear age pattern is discernable in surface exposures as would be expected if previously proposed stratigraphic relationships were correct (see Klaver, 1987). Table 5.1. 40Ar-39Ar age determinations for the Curaçao Lava Formation lavas, dikes and hyaloclastites. Total Fusion Age Sample Material Lithology Age Plateau Age N MSWD Probability Isochron Age MSWD 40Ar/36Ar 36Ar spectrum (10-14 (Ma ± 2s) (Ma ± 2s) steps (%) (Ma ± 2s) (initial ± 2s) mol/g) type

Cur-21i gm lava flow 92.0 ± 1.5 92.0 ± 1.0 6/10 2.32 4 91.9 ± 1.0 2.42 295.9 ± 2.4 0.8 plateau Cao-40b pl sill 91.5 ± 1.7 91.8 ± 2.1 7/7 1.72 11 90.5 ± 3.2 1.92 299.2 ± 8.7 2.3 plateau Cao-07 gl hyaloclastite 87.4 ± 2.3 88.4 ± 2.1 9/10 0.61 77 83.2 ± 22.9 0.72 319 ± 106 1.5 plateau Cao-35d gl hyaloclastite 86.0 ± 2.8 86.3 ± 2.4 10/10 0.54 84 89.0 ± 6.1 0.47 278.6 ± 32.5 1.0 plateau Cao-13 pl sill 85.7 ± 3.0 86.0 ± 1.9 7/7 0.44 85 86.0 ± 1.9 0.47 295.1 ± 1.6 7.1 plateau Cao-18 pl sill 83.9 ± 1.7 83.9 ± 1.6 7/7 0.40 88 83.4 ± 2.1 0.41 296.5 ± 3.6 2.6 plateau Cao-14 pl sill 97.5 ± 3.0 79.4 ± 1.9 6/7 1.62 15 81.0 ± 8.6 1.83 291.7 ± 19.7 2.8 plateau 79-Be-069 gm pillow lava 74.4 ± 4.6 79.6 ± 3.6 8/10 0.35 93 77.6 ± 6.1 0.33 296.5 ± 2.7 5.0 plateau BK-79-262 gm sill 73.7 ± 2.6 74.9 ± 2.1 10/10 0.78 63 77.8 ± 4.1 0.54 288.6 ± 8.1 4.9 plateau Cao-20 gm pillow lava 74.1 ± 2.3 74.2 ± 2.4 9/10 1.56 13 72.9 ± 2.5 1.19 298.8 ± 3.8 2.6 plateau Cao-04a gm pillow lava 69.1 ± 1.2 70.2 ± 1.1 10/11 0.82 60 70.7 ± 2.5 0.89 294.0 ± 5.7 4.7 plateau Cao-03 gm lava flow 66.3 ± 0.9 66.7 ± 0.8 12/12 1.20 28 67.2 ± 1.2 1.18 294.3 ± 2.2 9.8 plateau BK-79-118 gm pillow lava 65.5 ± 2.9 65.7 ± 2.4 10/10 0.85 57 68.0 ± 3.8 0.64 293.8 ± 2.2 12.2 plateau Cur-10-02 gm pillow lava 62.6 ± 0.8 63.0 ± 1.0 10/12 1.91 5 63.8 ± 2.4 2.02 291.1 ± 10.7 3.1 plateau Cao-30 gm pillow lava 63.2 ± 1.0 62.8 ± 1.0 9/12 1.42 18 62.5 ± 2.1 1.61 296.2 ± 7.0 3.9 plateau Cao-10 gm pillow lava 60.1 ± 0.8 62.3 ± 0.8 8/12 1.74 9 64.6 ± 1.7 0.45 281.5 ± 9.0 2.6 plateau

39

BK-79-183 gm pillow lava 53.4 ± 10.8 66.4 ± 10.7 5/9 0.38 83 71.0 ± 22.5 0.42 292.3 ± 13.0 1.6 low Ar

BK-79-163 gm pillow lava 41.2 ± 2.9 n/a n/a 23.3 Ar-loss

BK-79-263 gl hyaloclastite 53.1 ± 1.5 n/a n/a 1.5 Ar-loss

Cao-32 gm lava flow 118.0 ± 3.5 n/a n/a 0.4 recoil

Cao-22 gm lava flow 72.4 ± 0.5 n/a n/a 2.0 recoil

Cao-21 gm lava flow 61.2 ± 0.7 n/a n/a 4.8 recoil

Ages calculated using biotite monitor FCT-3 (28.02 Ma; Renne et al., 1998) and the total decay constant λ = 5.530*10-10/yr (Steiger and Jäger, 1977). N is the number of heating steps (defining plateau/total); MSWD is an F-statistic that compares the variance within step ages with the variance about the plateau age. Material abbreviations are gl = glass, gm = groundmass, pl = plagioclase, and wr = whole rock. Sample BK-79-183 and below are not considered reliable plateau ages due to low proportions of total 39Ar (< 70%) in the plateau, unusually high uncertainty on individual heating steps, or an MSWD > 3, although some useful age information may be found in the total fusion or isochron ages. 129 130

Figure 5.2. Selected age spectra from the Curaçao Lava Formation. All samples shown have well-defined age plateaus and are considered reliable estimates of the crystallization age. Samples shown range from 92 to 63 Ma with no clear evidence of a hiatus in volcanic activity. Table 5.2. 40Ar-39Ar age determinations for Dumisseau Formation lavas and sills. Total Age Sample Material Fusion Age Plateau Age N MSWD Probability Isochron Age MSWD 40Ar/36Ar 36Ar spectrum (Ma ± 2s) (Ma ± 2s) steps (%) (Ma ± 2s) (initial ± 2s) (10-14 mol/g) type

HA-77-109 gm 95.4 ± 2.1 93.6 ± 1.8 9/9 1.90 6 92.5 ± 1.8 1.20 300.6 ± 4.6 4.0 plateau HA-77-170 pl 92.7 ± 2.1 90.8 ± 1.8 7/8 0.24 96 90.2 ± 2.1 0.08 298.0 ± 4.7 5.0 plateau HA-77-29 pl 88.7 ± 1.2 88.0 ± 1.2 13/13 1.58 9 87.1 ± 1.1 0.80 310.1 ± 8.9 2.4 plateau HA-76-28 pl 87.7 ± 1.2 87.1 ± 1.1 7/8 0.45 84 86.9 ± 1.2 0.54 297.8 ± 10.5 1.3 plateau HA-77-144 pl 86.8 ± 0.8 86.8 ± 0.7 10/10 0.14 100 86.9 ± 0.8 0.15 293.1 ± 18.5 1.0 plateau HA-77-178 pl 86.4 ± 1.2 86.0 ± 1.1 8/8 0.45 87 85.5 ± 1.2 0.22 302.5 ± 10.7 1.8 plateau HA-77-244 pl 86.0 ± 1.4 85.2 ± 1.1 9/9 0.54 83 84.9 ± 1.2 0.2 299.4 ± 4.6 3.6 plateau HA-77-159 wr 75.8 ± 0.8 82.8 ± 0.7 7/10 1.52 17 83.4 ± 0.9 1.03 286.7 ± 9.7 2.8 plateau

39

HA-77-62 pl 105.2 ± 6.0 105.0 ± 5.3 13/13 1.09 36 100.8 ± 7.2 1.06 298.4 ± 4.1 5.4 low Ar

HA-76-117 wr 91.1 ± 0.7 85.5 ± 0.7 6/10 1.02 40 85.2 ± 0.9 0.89 300.4 ± 8.7 2.3 recoil

HA-77-237 gm 89.8 ± 1.1 86.1 ± 0.8 4/9 1.24 29 86.4 ± 3.9 1.24 292.0 ± 49.0 3.2 recoil

HA-77-245 wr 77.7 ± 1.1 n/a n/a 28.3 Ar-loss

HA-77-110 gm 90.5 ± 1.8 n/a n/a 4.8 recoil

HA-77-164 wr 91.0 ± 0.6 n/a n/a 5.0 recoil

See Table 5.1 for full explanation. Sample HA-77-62 and below are not considered reliable plateau ages. 131 132

Figure 5.3. Selected age spectra from Dumisseau Formation. Samples with well-defined plateau profiles are shown for ages between 94 and 83 Ma, although the youngest of these (b, HA-77-159) shows some evidence for 40Ar-loss from low temperature steps. 133

Figure 5.4. Multi-element diagrams for samples from the CLF and Dumisseau Formation. Notable anomalies include low K and Pb in all Dumisseau Formation samples and most Curaçao samples. Samples with minimal K anomaly also have high Sr possibly due to greater alteration of these samples, although other fluid-mobile elements such as Cs, Ba, and U are not enriched. Curaçao samples have mostly flat REE profiles while Dumisseau Formation samples have notably higher LREE concentrations with the exception of HA-77-62. 134

Figure 5.5. Plume and MOR derived basalts can be differentiated on a plot of Zr/Y and Nb/Y as shown by Fitton et al. (1997) with samples from Iceland. Here, trace elements for the CLF and the Dumisseau Formation are compared to regional samples from throughout the Caribbean Large Igneous Province with reported 40Ar-39Ar age determinations (Alvarado et al., 1997; Kerr et al., 1997; Sinton and Duncan, 1997; Sinton et al., 1998; Lapierre et al., 1999; White et al., 1999; Révillon et al., 2000; Sinton et al., 2000; Hoernle et al., 2002; 2004; Escuder-Viruete et al., 2011; Serrano et al., 2011). Rocks from the CLIP consistently plot within the plume portion of this array, consistent with previous isotopic studies and other trace element ratios (e.g., Zr/Nb, Fig. 5.6).

Figure 5.6 (following page). 40Ar-39Ar plateau ages determined in this study and previous work (see Fig. 5.5 for references). A histogram fitted with a probability density function shows clear evidence that CLIP volcanism began 90-95 Ma and largely ceased by 60 Ma. Samples from the CLF (shown in blue) span this range and are representative of Caribbean-wide activity while samples from the Dumisseau Formation (shown in red) are present only during the first 10-15 million years of activity. A few samples <50 Ma from the western margin of Central America are interpreted as accreted seamounts from the Galapagos hot spot trail, and also display distinctive trace element signatures. 135

Figure 5.6. 136

Figure 5.7 (following page). Conceptual model illustrating prolonged CLIP volcanism with mantle plume influence. Plume material is shown in red, oceanic lithosphere in light blue, CLIP volcanism in dark blue, and arc volcanism in green. Blue arrows depict movement of oceanic lithosphere and black arrows expected movement of asthenospheric mantle. (a) Between 95 and 90 Ma and shortly before collision between the American plates, the initial Galapagos plume head thickened the oceanic lithosphere of the Farallon plate. Unlike plume head volcanism in a fully intraplate setting, entrainment of upwelling mantle by the downgoing slab may have mixed residual plume head material diluted and extended the influence of plume-like mantle. (b) This thickened lithosphere blocked east- dipping subduction, which initiated a subduction polarity reversal between 90-85 Ma. During this time plateau volcanism continued and some arc activity began with initiation of a west-dipping subduction zone that continues today at the Lesser Antilles arc. (c) Slab rollback between 85-70 Ma dragged residual plume material to the east of the plume tail within the mantle-reference frame, as well as induced upwelling and backarc extension allowing thinning of the plateau and continued, although less extensive, volcanism. (d & e) Initiation of east-dipping subduction after 70 Ma created the Central American volcanic arc CLIP volcanism in waned in a back-arc extensional environment while the Galapagos plume tail produced OIB seamount trails now observed in the Panama basin and in accreted seamounts in Central America. 137

Figure 5.7. 138 CHAPTER SIX

CONCLUSIONS

Three chapters of this dissertation have examined trace metal behavior in a laboratory environment (Chapter 2) and two different natural volcanic settings (ocean island basalts in Chapter 3 and arc volcanoes in Chapter 4). Another chapter (Chapter 5) has provided new age and geochemical constraints on one of the largest volcanic provinces on the earth, the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. In Chapter 2, a major source of analytical uncertainty in many laser ablation systems was described for the first time. Variations in local He flow rate in single-volume ablation chambers were shown to cause different signal intensities depending on the volatility of an individual analyte. An updated two-volume ablation chamber, designed to produce uniform He flow regimes during analysis throughout the ablation chamber, showed little evidence of this style of elemental fractionation. Recognition of this effect explained the source of large uncertainties for many more volatile or refractory elements in single-volume ablation chambers. Through recognition of the source(s) of uncertainty in laser ablation analysis specific to semi-volatile elements, this chapter set the base for subsequent studies of trace metals in Chapters 3 and 4. Chapter 3 presented the first comprehensive major and trace element characterization of both olivine-hosted melt inclusions and matrix glass from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Iki, Hawaii. Patterns of lithophile trace element concentrations elucidated the details of crystal fractionation and magma mixing that produced the chemical variations of lavas during this eruption. The variations of most potentially volatile trace metals were inconsistent with their mobility in a magmatic volatile phase, with the possible exception of B and Sn. This work has shown that the mobilization and release of many trace elements in volcanic gasses associated with mafic eruptions cannot be detected in geochemical compositions of glass using LA-ICP-MS. Trace metal release associated with volcanic degassing may in mafic environments may still occur, and direct 139 measurements of volcanic gasses supports this process, however, for most elements the partitioning of metals into a vapor is insignificant compared to the concentration of the elements in the melt and/or the analytical uncertainty of LA-ICP-MS. Chapter 4 presented over 400 new trace element analyses from Mt. Pinatubo, Mt. Hood, Mt. St. Helens, and Shiveluch Volcano. Trace element compositions in these amphiboles track magmatic conditions at these four volcanic centers. Both Cu and Li vary independently of all other potentially volatile trace elements and positively correlate with each other. Their behavior is consistent with partitioning into a magmatic volatile phase and rapid diffusivity through amphibole phenocrysts and the melt. This work highlights the potential for Cu and Li to track separation of a magmatic volatile phase during eruptions. It does not define where the in a volcanic system the Cu and Li variations originate from. Variations within and between samples suggest that Cu and Li are recording relatively late processes occurring during the eruption in the magma chamber or even after deposition. Future work examining the Cu and Li concentrations from amphiboles at different locations within a single pyroclastic or lava flow could help determine if depositional conditions are an important factor. Experimental work to determine diffusion coefficients for Cu and Li and/or comparison to hydrogen isotope behavior, which should be even more rapidly diffused in samples, also would help define when time scales associated with the patterns observed here. Chapter 5 presents new 40Ar-39Ar geochronological data that require a 94-63 Ma history of volcanism to produce the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. This duration of volcanism is inconsistent with classical models of large igneous provinces being initiated by the impingement of a mantle plume, however the geochemistry of these samples requires a consistent plume-like mantle source throughout the entire period of volcanism. Interaction of a plume with the Greater Antilles subduction zone could explain the observed geochemistry and longevity of CLIP volcanism. This model provides a new framework to evaluate the geology of the Caribbean region. Even at a local scale, the range of ages shown for the island of Curaçao will be useful in future evaluation of the island’s geology. Unlike the previous chapters, this final chapter does not directly address the behavior of trace metals in volcanic systems. The confirmation of initiation of the 140 large igneous province at 94 Ma, however, is consistent with this province’s temporal connection to ocean anoxic events that could be related to trace metal release. The projects presented in this dissertation highlight the utility of examining well- understood systems with creative techniques. All of the systems examined here including laser ablation techniques, Kilauea Iki, Mt. St. Helens and Mt. Pinatubo, and the Caribbean, have all been extensively studies by previous workers. Despite all that has been shown previously in these systems, the results presented in this dissertation contribute critical new observations that refine or challenge the established understanding of each system. 141 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alvarado, G.E., Denyer, P., C.W. Sinton, 1997. The 89 Ma Tortugal komatiitic suite, Costa Rica: Implications for a common geological origin of the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific region from a mantle plume. Geology 25, 439–442.

Anderson, A.T., Jr, 1974. Chlorine, sulfur, and water in magmas and oceans. Geological Society of America Bulletin 85, 1485–1492.

Anderson, A.T., Jr, Brown, G., 1993. CO 2 contents and formation pressures of some Kilauean melt inclusions. American Mineralogist 78, 794–803.

Asimow, P.D., Ghiorso, M.S., 1998. Algorithmic modifications extending MELTS to calculate subsolidus phase relations. American Mineralogist 83, 1127–1132.

Baksi, A.K., 2007. Water, chemical weathering, and atmospheric argon in undisturbed rocks and minerals--I:A quantitative tool for detecting alteration. Geological Society of America Special Paper 430, 285-303.

Beattie, P., 1994. Systematics and energetics of trace-element partitioning between olivine and silicate melts: implications for the nature of mineral/melt partitioning. Chemical Geology 117, 57-71.

Beets, D., 1972. Lithology and Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous and Danian Succession of Curaçao. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 153 p.

Beets, D., 1977. Cretaceous and Early Tertiary of Curaçao. GUA Papers of Geology 10, 7–17.

Berlo, K., Blundy, J.D., Turner, S., Cashman, K.V., Hawkesworth, C., Black, S., 2004. Geochemical precursors to volcanic activity at Mount St. Helens, USA. Science 306, 1167–1169.

Blake, S., 1984. Volatile oversaturation during the evolution of silicic magma chambers as an eruption trigger. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 8237–8244.

Bleiner, D., Bogaerts, A., 2007. Computer simulations of sample chambers for laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 62, 155–168.

Bleiner, D., Chen, Z., 2008. Computer Modeling of Laser Ablation Elemental Microanalysis. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 35–52. 142 Bleiner, D., Günther, D., 2001. Theoretical description and experimental observation of aerosol transport processes in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 16, 449–456.

Bluth, G.J., Doiron, S.D., Schnetzler, C.C., Krueger, A.J., Walter, L.S., 1992. Global tracking of the SO2 clouds from the June, 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruptions. Geophysical Research Letters 19, 151–154.

Borisova, A.Y., Freydier, R., Polve, M., Jochum, K.P., Candaudap, F., 2010. Multi- Elemental Analysis of ATHO-G Rhyolitic Glass (MPI-DING Reference Material) by Femtosecond and Nanosecond LA-ICP-MS: Evidence for Significant Heterogeneity of B, V, Zn, Mo, Sn, Sb, Cs, W, Pt and Pb at the Millimetre Scale. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 34, 245–255.

Borisova, A.Y., Pichavant, M., Polve, M., Wiedenbeck, M., Freydier, R., Candaudap, F., 2006. Trace element geochemistry of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo silicic melts, Philippines: Implications for ore-forming potential of adakitic magmatism. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70, 3702–3716.

Buchs, D. M., R. J. Arculus, P. O. Baumgartner, and A. Ulianov, 2011. Oceanic intraplate volcanoes exposed: Example from seamounts accreted in Panama. Geology 39(4), 335–338.

Burke, K., Dewey, J.F., Cooper, C., Mann, P., Pindell, J.L., 1984. Caribbean tectonics and relative plate motions. Geological Society of America Memoir 162, 31–63.

Burnham, C.W., 1979. Magmas and hydrothermal fluids. Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits 2, 63–123.

Campbell, I.H., Griffiths, R.W., 1990. Implications of mantle plume structure for the evolution of flood basalts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 99, 79–93.

Candela, P.A., Holland, H.D., 1984. The partitioning of copper and molybdenum between silicate melts and aqueous fluids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48, 373–380.

Candela, P.A., Holland, H.D., 1986. A mass transfer model for copper and molybdenum in magmatic hydrothermal systems; the origin of porphyry-type ore deposits. Economic Geology 81, 1–19.

Candela, P.A., Piccoli, P.M., 1995. Model ore-metal partitioning from melts into vapor and vapor/brine mixtures. Magmas, fluids, and ore deposits 23, 101–127.

Cashman, K.V., McConnell, S., 2005. Multiple levels of magma storage during the 1980 summer eruptions of Mount St. Helens, WA. Bulletin of Volcanology 68, 57–75. 143 Chambefort, I., Dilles, J.H., Longo, A.A., 2013. Amphibole Geochemistry of the Yanacocha Volcanics, Peru: Evidence for Diverse Sources of Magmatic Volatiles Related to Gold Ores. Journal of Petrology 54, 1017–1046.

Charlier, B.L.A., Morgan, D.J., Wilson, C.J.N., Wooden, J.L., Allan, A.S.R., Baker, J.A., 2012. Lithium concentration gradients in feldspar and quartz record the final minutes of magma ascent in an explosive supereruption. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 319-320, 218–227.

Chiaradia, M., Ulianov, A., Kouzmanov, K., Beate, B., 2012. Why large porphyry Cu deposits like high Sr/Y magmas? Scientific Reports 2, 1-7.

Clague, D.A., Moore, J.G., Dixon, J.E., Friesen, W.B., 1995. Petrology of submarine lavas from Kilauea's Puna Ridge, Hawaii. Journal of Petrology 36, 299–349.

Clague, D.A., Weber, W., Dixon, J.E., 1991. Picritic glasses from Hawaii. Nature 353, 553–556.

Claverie, F., Fernández, B., Pécheyran, C., Alexis, J., Donard, O.F.X., 2009. Elemental fractionation effects in high repetition rate IR femtosecond laser ablation ICP-MS analysis of glasses. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, 891–902.

Coffin, M.F., Eldholm, O., 1994. Large igneous provinces: crustal structure, dimensions, and external consequences. Reviews in Geophysics 32, 1–36.

Collins, S.J., Pyle, D., Maclennan, J., 2009. Melt inclusions track pre-eruption storage and dehydration of magmas at Etna. Geology 37, 571–574.

Coogan, L.A., Kempton, P.D., Saunders, A.D., Norry, M., 2000. Melt aggregation within the crust beneath the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: evidence from plagioclase and clinopyroxene major and trace element compositions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 176, 245–257.

Crowe, B.M., Finnegan, D.L., Zoller, W.H., Boynton, W.V., 1987. Trace element geochemistry of volcanic gases and particles from 1983–1984 eruptive episodes of Kilauea volcano. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012) 92, 13708–13714.

Danyushevsky, L.V., Della-Pasqua, F., Sokolov, S.V., 2000. Re-equilibration of melt inclusions trapped by magnesian olivine phenocrysts from subduction-related magmas: petrological implications. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 138, 68–83.

Donnelly, T.W., Melson, W., Kay, R., Rogers, J., 1973. Basalts and dolerites of Late Cretaceous age from the central Caribbean. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 15, 989–1004. 144 Druken, K.A., Stegman, D.R., Kincaid, C.R., Griffiths, R.W., 2012. Subduction disfigured mantle plumes: Plumes that are not plumes? Abstract DI43A-02 presented at the 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.

Duncan, R.A., Hargraves, R.B., 1984. Plate tectonic evolution of the Caribbean region in the mantle reference frame, Geological Society of America Memoir, 162, 81–93.

Duncan, R.A., Hogan, L., 1994. Radiometric dating of young MORB using the 40Ar- 39Ar incremental heating method. Geophysical Research Letters 21, 1927–1930.

Duncan, R.A., Hooper, P.R., Rehacek, J., Marsh, J.S., Duncan, A.R., 1997. The timing and duration of the Karoo igneous event, southern Gondwana. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 18127-18138.

Duncan, R.A., Richards, M.A., 1991. Hotspots, mantle plumes, flood basalts, and true polar wander. Reviews in Geophysics 29, 31–50.

Durrant, S., 1999. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: achievements, problems, prospects. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 14, 1385–1403.

Eaton, J.P., Murata, K.J., 1960. How volcanoes grow. Science 132, 925–938.

Edgar, N.T., Saunders, J.B., 1973. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 15, U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, D.C., 1135 p.

Eggins, S.M., Kinsley, L., Shelley, J.M.G., 1998. Deposition and element fractionation processes during atmospheric pressure laser sampling for analysis by ICP-MS. Applied Surface Science 127, 278–286.

Eggins, S.M., Shelley, J.M.G., 2002. Compositional heterogeneity in NIST SRM 610-617 glasses. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 26, 269–286.

Escuder-Viruete, J., Pérez-Estaun, A., Joubert, M., Weis, D., 2011. The Pelona-Pico Duarte basalts Formation, Central Hispaniola: an on-land section of Late Cretaceous volcanism related to the Caribbean large igneous province. Geologica acta: an international earth science journal 9, 307–328.

Feigenson, M.D., Patino, L.C., Carr, M.J., 1996. Constraints on partial melting imposed by rare earth element variations in Mauna Kea basalts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012) 101, 11815–11829.

Fitton, J.G., Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J., Hardarson, B.S., Taylor, R.N., 1997. Thermal and chemical structure of the Iceland plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 153, 197–208. 145 Frey, F.A., Rhodes, J.M., 1993. Intershield geochemical differences among Hawaiian volcanoes: Implications for source compositions, melting process and magma ascent paths. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences 342, 121–136.

Fryer, B., Jackson, S.E., Longerich, H., 1995. The design, operation and role of the laser- ablation microprobe coupled with an inductively coupled plasma; mass spectrometer (LAM-ICP-MS) in the earth sciences. Canadian Mineralogist 33, 303–312.

Gaboardi, M., Humayun, M., 2009. Elemental fractionation during LA-ICP-MS analysis of silicate glasses: implications for matrix-independent standardization. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, 1188–1197.

Gaetani, G.A., Watson, E.B., 2002. Modeling the major-element evolution of olivine- hosted melt inclusions. Chemical Geology 183, 25–41.

Geldmacher, J., Hanan, B., Blichert-Toft, J., Harpp, K., Hoernle, K., Hauff, F., Werner, R., Kerr, A.C., 2003. Hafnium isotopic variations in volcanic rocks from the Caribbean Large Igneous Province and Gala ́pagos hot spot tracks. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4, 1–24.

Gerlach, T., 1986. Exsolution of H2O, CO2 and S during eruptive episodes at Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 12177–12,185.

Gerlach, T., Graeber, E., 1985. Volatile budget of Kilauea volcano. Nature 313, 273–277.

Ghiorso, M.S., Sack, R.O., 1995. Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 119, 197– 212.

Giletti, B.J., Shanahan, T.M., 1997. Alkali diffusion in plagioclase feldspar. Chemical Geology 139, 3–20.

Gill, J.B., 1981. Orogenic Andesites and Plate Tectonics. Minerals and Rocks 16, 390 p.

Graham, D.W., 2002. Noble Gas Isotope Geochemistry of Mid-Ocean Ridge and Ocean Island Basalts: Characterization of Mantle Source Reservoirs. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 47, 247-317.

Guillong, M., Hametner, K., Reusser, E., Wilson, S.A., Günther, D., 2005. Preliminary Characterization of New Glass Reference Materials (GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD- 1G, GSE-1G) by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry Using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm Wavelengths. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 26, 315–331. 146 Guillong, M., Horn, I., Günther, D., 2003. A comparison of 266 nm, 213 nm and 193 nm produced from a single solid state Nd:YAG laser for laser ablation ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 18, 1224–1230.

Günther, D., Heinrich, C.A., 1999. Comparison of the ablation behaviour of 266 nm Nd: YAG and 193 nm ArF excimer lasers for LA-ICP-MS analysis. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 14, 1369–1374.

Günther, D., Jackson, S.E., Longerich, H., 1999. Laser ablation and arc/spark solid sample introduction into inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 54, 381–409.

Hastie, A.R., Kerr, A.C., 2010. Mantle plume or slab window?: Physical and geochemical constraints on the origin of the Caribbean oceanic plateau. Earth Science Reviews 98, 283–293.

Hattori, K., 1993. High-sulfur magma, a product of fluid discharge from underlying mafic magma; evidence from Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. Geology 21, 1083– 1086.

Hauff, F., Hoernle, K., Tilton, G., Graham, D.W., Kerr, A.C., 2000. Large volume recycling of oceanic lithosphere over short time scales: geochemical constraints from the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 174, 247–263.

Haughton, D.R., Roeder, P.L., Skinner, B.J., 1974. Solubility of sulfur in mafic magmas. Economic Geology 69, 451–467.

Hedenquist, J., Lowenstern, J.B., 1994. The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. Nature 370, 519–527.

Helz, R.T., 1987. Diverse Olivine Types in Lava of the 1959 Eruption of Kilaeau Volcano and their Bearing on Eruption Dynamics. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1350, 691–722.

Herzberg, C., Gazel, E., 2009. Petrological evidence for secular cooling in mantle plumes. Nature 458, 619–622.

Hinkley, T., Lamothe, P., Wilson, S.A., Finnegan, D., Gerlach, T., 1999. Metal emissions from Kilauea, and a suggested revision of the estimated worldwide metal output by quiescent degassing of volcanoes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 170, 315–325.

Hirata, T., Nesbitt, R., 1995. U-Pb isotope geochronology of zircon: evaluation of the laser probe-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry technique. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 59, 2491–2500. 147 Hoblitt, R.P., Harmon, R., 1993. Bimodal density distribution of cryptodome dacite from the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Bulletin of Volcanology 55, 421–437.

Hoernle, K., Hauff, F., van den Bogaard, P., 2004. 70 m.y. history (139–69 Ma) for the Caribbean large igneous province. Geology 32, 697–700.

Hoernle, K., van den Bogaard, P., Werner, R., B. Lissinna, B., Hauff, F., Alvarado, G.E., D. Garbe-Schonberg, D., 2002. Missing history (16−71 Ma) of the Galápagos hotspot: Implications for the tectonic and biological evolution of the Americas. Geology 30, 795–798.

Hofmann, A.W., Feigenson, M.D., Raczek, I., 1984. Case studies on the origin of basalt: III. Petrogenesis of the Mauna Ulu eruption, Kilauea, 1969–1971. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 88, 24–35.

Hofmann, A.W., Jochum, K.P., 1996. Source characteristics derived from very incompatible trace elements in Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea basalts, Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project. Journal of Geophysical Research 101, 11831–11839.

Hofmann, A.W., White, W.M., 1982. Mantle plumes from ancient oceanic crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 57, 421–436.

Holland, H.D., 1972. Granites, solutions, and base metal deposits. Economic Geology 67, 281–301.

Holland, T., Blundy, J.D., 1994. Non-ideal interactions in calcic amphiboles and their bearing on amphibole-plagioclase thermometry. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 116, 433–447.

Horn, I., 2008. Comparison of Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser Interactions with Geologic Matrices and Their Influence on Accuracy and Precision of LA-ICP-MS Data. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 53–65.

Hu, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhou, L., Li, M., Zong, K., Zhu, L., Gao, S., 2011. Contrasting matrix induced elemental fractionation in NIST SRM and rock glasses during laser ablation ICP-MS analysis at high spatial resolution. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 26, 425–430.

Humphrey, C.G., 2010. In-situ U-Pb secondary ion mass spectrometry (IN-SIMS) geochronology from the Leeward Antilles islands of Aruba, Curaçao, Bonaire, and Gran Roque. University of Georgia M.S. Thesis, Athens.

Humphreys, M., Blundy, J.D., Sparks, R.S.J., 2006. Magma Evolution and Open-System Processes at Shiveluch Volcano: Insights from Phenocryst Zoning. Journal of Petrology 47, 2303–2334. 148 Humphreys, M., Blundy, J.D., Sparks, R.S.J., 2007. Shallow-level decompression crystallisation and deep magma supply at Shiveluch Volcano. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 155, 45–61.

Jackson, S.E., 2001. The application of Nd: YAG lasers in LA-ICP-MS. Principles and Applications of Laser Ablation ICP-Mass Spectrometry in the Earth Sciences. Mineralogical Association of Canada (MAC), Short Course Series 29, 29–45.

Jackson, S.E., 2008. Calibration Strategies for Elemental Analysis by LA-ICP-MS. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 169–188.

Jenner, F.E., O'Neill, H.S.C., Arculus, R.J., Mavrogenes, J.A., 2010. The Magnetite Crisis in the Evolution of Arc-related Magmas and the Initial Concentration of Au, Ag and Cu. Journal of Petrology 51, 2445–2464.

Jochum, K.P., Nohl, U., Herwig, K., Lammel, E., Stoll, B., Hofmann, A.E., 2005a. GeoReM: A new geochemical database for reference materials and isotopic standards. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29, 333–338.

Jochum, K.P., Willbold, M., Raczek, I., Stoll, B., Herwig, K., 2005b. Chemical Characterisation of the USGS Reference Glasses GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G, GSE-1G, BCR-2G, BHVO-2G and BIR-1G Using EPMA, ID-TIMS, ID-ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29, 285–302.

Johnson, D.M., Hooper, P.R., Conrey, R.M., 1999. XRF analysis of rocks and minerals for major and trace elements on a single low dilution Li-tetraborate fused bead. Advances in X-ray Analysis 41, 843–867.

Jones, J.G., 1968. Pillow lava and pahoehoe. The Journal of Geology 76, 485–488.

Kayzar, T.M., Cooper, K.M., Reagan, M.K., Kent, A.J., 2009. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 181, 124–140.

Kent, A.J., 2008. Melt inclusions in basaltic and related volcanic rocks. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 69, 273–331.

Kent, A.J., Blundy, J.D., Cashman, K.V., Cooper, K.M., Donnelly, C.T., Pallister, J.S., Richter, D.H., Rowe, M.C., Thornber, C.R., 2007. Vapor transfer prior to the October 2004 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Geology 35, 231–234.

Kent, A.J., Darr, C.M., Koleszar, A.M., Salisbury, M., Cooper, K.M., 2010. Preferential eruption of andesitic magmas through recharge filtering. Nature Geoscience 3, 631–636. 149 Kent, A.J., Ungerer, C., 2005. Production of barium and light rare earth element oxides during LA-ICP-MS microanalysis. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 20, 1256–1262.

Kerr, A.C., Marriner, G.F., Tarney, J., Nivia, A., Saunders, A.D., Thirlwall, M.F., Sinton, C.W., 1997. Cretaceous Basaltic Terranes in Western Colombia: Elemental, Chronological and Sr–Nd Isotopic Constraints on Petrogenesis. Journal of Petrology 38, 677–702.

Kerr, A.C., Pearson, D.G., Nowell, G.M., 2009. Magma source evolution beneath the Caribbean oceanic plateau: new insights from elemental and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopic studies of ODP Leg 165 Site 1001 basalts. Geological Society of London Special Publications 328, 809–827.

Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Kempton, P.D., Spadea, P., Nivia, A., Marriner, G.F., Duncan, R.A., 2002. Pervasive mantle plume head heterogeneity: Evidence from the late Cretaceous Caribbean-Colombian oceanic plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research 107, 1–13.

Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Marriner, G.F., Klaver, G.T., Saunders, A.D., Thirlwall, M.F., 1996. The geochemistry and petrogenesis of the late-Cretaceous picrites and basalts of Curaçao, Neterlands Antilles: a remnant of oceanic plateau. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 124, 29–43.

Kerr, A.C., White, R.V., Thompson, P.M., Tarney, J., Saunders, A.D., 2003. No Oceanic Plateau—No Caribbean Plate? The Seminal Role of an Oceanic Plateau in Caribbean Plate Evolution. AAPG Memoir 79, 126–168.

Klaver, G.T., 1987. The Curaçao Lava Formation: An ophiolitic analogue of the anamalous thick layer 2B of the mid-Cretaceous oceanic plateaus in the western Pacific and central Caribbean. GUA Papers of Geology 1, 1–120.

Knaack, C., Cornelius, S.B., Hooper, P.R., 1994. Trace element analyses of rocks and minerals by ICP-MS. Washington State University, open file report, http://www.sees.wsu.edu/Geolab/note/icpms.html, checked 01 July 2013.

Koch, J., Schlamp, S., Rösgen, T., Fliegel, D., Günther, D., 2007. Visualization of aerosol particles generated by near infrared nano-and femtosecond laser ablation. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 62, 20–29.

Koch, J., Wälle, M., Dietiker, R., Günther, D., 2008. Analysis of Laser-Produced Aerosols by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: Transport Phenomena and Elemental Fractionation. Analytical Chemistry 80, 915–921.

Koleszar, A.M., 2011. Controls on Eruption Style and Magma Compositions at Mount Hood, Oregon. Oregon State University PhD Thesis, Corvallis. 150 Koleszar, A.M., Kent, A.J., Wallace, P.J., Scott, W.E., 2012. Controls on long-term low explosivity at andesitic arc volcanoes: Insights from Mount Hood, Oregon. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 219-220, 1–14.

Koppers, A.A.P., 2002. ArArCALC--software for 40Ar/39Ar age calculations. Computers & Geosciences 28, 605–619.

Koppers, A.A.P., Staudigel, H., Wijbrans, J.R., 2000. Dating crystalline groundmass separates of altered Cretaceous seamount basalts by the 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating technique. Chemical Geology 166, 139–158.

Kroslakova, I., Günther, D., 2006. Elemental fractionation in laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: evidence for mass load induced matrix effects in the ICP during ablation of a silicate glass. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 22, 51–62.

Kurz, M.D., Curtice, J., Fornari, D., Geist, D., Moreira, M., 2009. Primitive neon from the center of the Galapagos hotspot. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286, 23- 34.

Lapierre, H., Dupuis, V., Mercier de Lepinay, B., Monie, P., Tardy, M., Maury, R.C., Hernandez, J., Polve, M., Yeghicheyan, D., Cotton, J., 1999. Late Jurassic Oceanic Crust and Upper Cretaceous Caribbean Plateau Picritic Basalts Exposed in the Duarte Igneous Complex, Hispaniola. The Journal of Geology 107, 193– 207.

Lassiter, J.C., Hauri, E.H., 1998. Osmium-isotope variations in Hawaiian lavas: evidence for recycled oceanic lithosphere in the Hawaiian plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 164, 483–496.

Lodders, K., 2003. Solar system abundances and condensation temperatures of the elements. The Astrophysical Journal 591, 1220–1247.

Loewen, M.W., 2011. Analysis of semi-volatile trace metals in basaltic glass by LA-ICP- MS. Oregon State University MS Thesis, Corvallis.

Loewen, M.W., Kent, A.J.R., 2012. Sources of elemental fractionation and uncertainty during the analysis of semi-volatile metals in silicate glasses using LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 27, 1502–1508.

Long, M.D., Till, C.B., Druken, K.A., Carlson, R.W., Wagner, L.S., Fouch, M.J., James, D.E., Grove, T.L., Schmerr, N., Kincaid, C., 2012. Mantle dynamics beneath the Pacific Northwest and the generation of voluminous back-arc volcanism. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 13, Q0AN01. 151 Longerich, H., 2008. Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma- Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): An Introduction. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 1–18.

Lowenstern, J.B., 1992. Evidence for a copper-bearing fluid in magma erupted at the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes, Alaska. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 114, 409–412.

Lu, F., Anderson, A.T., Jr, Davis, A.M., 1995. Diffusional gradients at the crystal/melt interface and their effect on the compositions of melt inclusions. The Journal of Geology 103, 591–597.

Mank, A., Mason, P., 1999. A critical assessment of laser ablation ICP-MS as an analytical tool for depth analysis in silica-based glass samples. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 14, 1143–1153.

Mather, T.A., Witt, M.L.I., Pyle, D.M., Quayle, B.M., Aiuppa, A., Bagnato, E., Martin, R.S., Sims, K.W.W., Edmonds, M., Sutton, A.J., Ilyinskaya, E., 2012. Halogens and trace metal emissions from the ongoing 2008 summit eruption of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 83, 292–323.

Mathez, E., 1976. Sulfur solubility and magmatic sulfides in submarine basalt glass. Journal of Geophysical Research 81, 4269–4276.

Maurrasse, F., Husler, J., Georges, G., Schmitt, R., Damond, P., 1979. Upraised Caribbean sea floor below acoustic reflector B” at the Southern Peninsula of Haiti, Geologie Mijnbouw 8, 71–83.

McDonough, W.F., Sun, S.S., 1995. The composition of the Earth. Chemical Geology 120, 223–253.

Moore, J.G., 1975. Mechanism of Formation of Pillow Lava: Pillow lava, produced as fluid lava cools underwater, is the most abundant volcanic rock on earth, but only recently have divers observed it forming. American Scientist 63, 269–277.

Morgan, W.J., 1981. 13. Hotspot Tracks and the Opening of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. The Sea, ideas and observations on progress in the study of the seas 7, 443–487.

Müller, W., Shelley, M., Miller, P., Broude, S., 2009. Initial performance metrics of a new custom-designed ArF excimer LA-ICPMS system coupled to a two-volume laser-ablation cell. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, 209–214.

Murata, K.J., Richter, D.H., 1966a. Chemistry of the Lavas of the 1959-60 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1–28. 152 Murata, K.J., Richter, D.H., 1966b. The settling of olivine in Kilauean magma as shown by lavas of the 1959 eruption. American Journal of Science 264, 194–203.

Nadeau, O., Stix, J., Williams-Jones, A.E., 2013. The behavior of Cu, Zn and Pb during magmatic-hydrothermal activity at Merapi volcano, Indonesia. Chemical Geology 342, 167–179.

Newman, S., Lowenstern, J.B., 2002. VolatileCalc: a silicate melt–H2O–CO2 solution model written in Visual Basic for excel. Computers & Geosciences 28, 597–604.

Norman, M.D., Garcia, M.O., Bennett, V.C., 2004. Rhenium and chalcophile elements in basaltic glasses from Ko’olau and Moloka’i volcanoes: Magmatic outgassing and composition of the Hawaiian plume. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68, 3761–3777.

Olmez, I., Finnegan, D.L., Zoller, W.H., 1986. Iridium emissions from Kilauea volcano. Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 653–663.

Outridge, P., Doherty, W., Gregoire, D., 1997. Ablative and transport fractionation of trace elements during laser sampling of glass and copper. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 52, 2093–2102.

Pallister, J.S., Hoblitt, R.P., Crandell, D.R., Mullineaux, D.R., 1992a. Mount St. Helens a decade after the 1980 eruptions: magmatic models, chemical cycles, and a revised hazards assessment. Bulletin of Volcanology 54, 126–146.

Pallister, J.S., Hoblitt, R.P., Meeker, G.P., Knight, R.J., Siems, D.F., 1996. Magma mixing at Mount Pinatubo: petrographic and chemical evidence from the 1991 deposits, in: Newhall, C.G., Punongbayan, R.S. (Eds.), Fire and Mud: Eruptions and Lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 687–731.

Pallister, J.S., Hoblitt, R.P., Reyes, A.G., 1992b. A basalt trigger for the 1991 eruptions of Pinatubo volcano? Nature 356, 426–428.

Parkinson, I., Hammond, S., James, D., Rogers, N.W., 2007. High-temperature lithium isotope fractionation: Insights from lithium isotope diffusion in magmatic systems. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 257, 609–621.

Pietruszka, A.J., Garcia, M.O., 1999. A rapid fluctuation in the mantle source and melting history of Kilauea Volcano inferred from the geochemistry of its historical summit lavas (1790–1982). Journal of Petrology 40, 1321–1342.

Pietruszka, A.J., Norman, M.D., Garcia, M.O., Marske, J.P., Burns, D.H., 2013. Chemical heterogeneity in the Hawaiian mantle plume from the alteration and dehydration of recycled oceanic crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 361, 298–309. 153 Pilet, S., Baker, M.B., Stolper, E.M., 2008. Metasomatized Lithosphere and the Origin of Alkaline Lavas. Science 320, 916–919.

Pindell, J., Kennan, L., Stanek, K.P., Maresch, W., Draper, G., 2006. Foundations of Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean evolution: eight controversies resolved. Geologica Acta 4, 303–341.

Pindell, J.L., Kennan, L., 2009. Tectonic evolution of the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean and northern South America in the mantle reference frame: an update. Geological Society London Special Publications 328, 1–55.

Pitcher, L., Helz, R.T., Walker, R.J., Piccoli, P.M., 2009. Fractionation of the platinum- group elements and Re during crystallization of basalt in Kilauea Iki Lava Lake, Hawaii. Chemical Geology 260, 196–210.

Pokrovski, G.S., Borisova, A.Y., Harrichoury, J.-C., 2008. The effect of sulfur on vapor– liquid fractionation of metals in hydrothermal systems. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 266, 345–362.

Prouteau, G., Scaillet, B., 2003. Experimental Constraints on the Origin of the 1991 Pinatubo Dacite. Journal of Petrology 44, 2203–2241.

Putirka, K., Perfit, M., Ryerson, F., Jackson, M.G., 2007. Ambient and excess mantle temperatures, olivine thermometry, and active vs. passive upwelling. Chemical Geology 241, 177–206.

Renne, P.R., Swisher, C.C., Deino, A.L., Karner, D.B., Owens, T.L., DePaolo, D.J., 1998. Intercalibration of standards, absolute ages and uncertainties in 40Ar/ 39Ar dating. Chemical Geology 145, 117–152.

Révillon, S., Arndt, N.T., Chauvel, C., Duncan, R.A., 2000. A Complex History for the Caribbean Plateau: Petrology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology of the Beata Ridge, South Hispaniola. The Journal of Geology 108, 641–661.

Révillon, S., Chauvel, C., Arndt, N.T., Pik, R., Martineau, F., Fourcade, S., Marty, B., 2002. Heterogeneity of the Caribbean plateau mantle source: Sr, O and He isotopic compositions of olivine and clinopyroxene from Gorgona Island. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 205, 91–106.

Richards, M.A., Duncan, R.A., Courtillot, V.E., 1989. Flood basalts and hot-spot tracks: plume heads and tails. Science 246, 103–107.

Richards, M.A., Griffiths, R.W., 1988. Deflection of plumes by mantle shear flow: experimental results and a simple theory. Geophysical Journal 94, 367–376. 154 Richter, D.H., Eaton, J.P., Murata, K.J., Ault, W., Krivoy, H.L., 1970. Chronological Narrative of the 1959-1960 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 537-E, 1–73.

Richter, D.H., Murata, K.J., 1966. Petrography of the lavas of the 1959-60 eruption of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper.

Ridolfi, F., Renzulli, A., 2012. Calcic amphiboles in calc-alkaline and alkaline magmas: thermobarometric and chemometric empirical equations valid up to 1,130°C and 2.2 GPa. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 163, 877–895.

Ridolfi, F., Renzulli, A., Puerini, M., 2010. Stability and chemical equilibrium of amphibole in calc-alkaline magmas: an overview, new thermobarometric formulations and application to subduction-related volcanoes. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 160, 45–66.

Roedder, E., 1984, Fluid Inclusions, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 12, p. 1-644.

Rowe, M.C., Kent, A.J., Thornber, C.R., 2008. Using amphibole phenocrysts to track vapor transfer during magma crystallization and transport: An example from Mount St. Helens, Washington. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 178, 593–607.

Rubin, A., 1995. Propagation of magma-filled cracks. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 23, 287–336.

Russo, R., Mao, X., Borisov, O., Liu, H., 2000. Influence of wavelength on fractionation in laser ablation ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 15, 1115– 1120.

Rutherford, M.J., Devine, J., 1988. The May 18, 1980, eruption of Mount St. Helens 3. Stability and chemistry of amphibole in the magma chamber. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 11,949–11,959.

Rutherford, M.J., Devine, J., 2008. Magmatic Conditions and Processes in the Storage Zone of the 2004-2006 Mount St. Helens Dacite. US Geological Survey professional paper 703–725.

Rutherford, M.J., Devine, J.D., 1996. Preeruption pressure-temperature conditions and volatiles in the 1991 dacitic magma of Mount Pinatubo, in: Newhall, C.G., Punongbayan, R.S. (Eds.), Fire and Mud: Eruptions and Lahars of Mt. Pinatubo, Philippines. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 751–756.

Schiano, P., 2003. Primitive mantle magmas recorded as silicate melt inclusions in igneous minerals. Earth Science Reviews 63, 121–144. 155 Sen, G., Hickey-Vargas, R., Waggoner, D.G., Maurrasse, F., 1988. Geochemistry of basalts from the Dumisseau Formation, southern Haiti: implications for the origin of the Caribbean Sea crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 87, 423–437.

Seo, J.H., Guillong, M., Heinrich, C.A., 2009. The role of sulfur in the formation of magmatic–hydrothermal copper–gold deposits. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 282, 323–328.

Serrano, L., Ferrari, L., Martínez, M.L., Petrone, C.M., Jaramillo, C., 2011. An integrative geologic, geochronologic and geochemical study of Gorgona Island, Colombia: Implications for the formation of the Caribbean Large Igneous Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 309, 324–336.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., 1997. Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica: A single suite of Caribbean oceanic plateau magmas. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 15507–15520.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., 1997. Potential links between ocean plateau volcanism and global ocean anoxia at the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary. Economic Geology 92, 836–842.

Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., Storey, M., Lewis, J.F., Estrada, J., 1998. An oceanic flood basalt province within the Caribbean plate. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 155, 221–235.

Sinton, C.W., Sigurdsson, H., Duncan, R.A., 2000. Geochronology and petrology of the igneous basement at the lower Nicaraguan Rise. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 165, 233–236.

Snow, L.J., Duncan, R.A., Bralower, T.J., 2005. Trace element abundances in the Rock Canyon Anticline, Pueblo, Colorado, marine sedimentary section and their relationship to Caribbean plateau construction and oxygen anoxic event 2. Paleoceanography 20, 1–14.

Sobolev, A.V., Hofmann, A.E., Nikogosian, I., 2000. Recycled oceanic crust observed in “ghost plagioclase”within the source of Mauna Loa lavas. Nature 404, 986–990.

Steiger, R.H., Jäger, E., 1977. Subcommission on geochronology: convention on the use of decay constants in geochronology and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36, 359–362.

Stone, W.B., Fleet, M.E., 1991. Nickel-copper sulfides from the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii: Contrasting compositions and phase relations in eruption pumice and Kilauea Iki lava lake. American Mineralogist 76, 1363–1372.

Sylvester, P.J., 2008. Matrix Effects in Laser Ablation-ICP-MS. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course 40, 67–78. 156 Thompson, P.M., Kempton, P.D., White, R.V., Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Saunders, A.D., Fitton, J., McBirney, A., 2003. Hf-Nd isotope constraints on the origin of the Cretaceous Caribbean plateau and its relationship to the Galapagos plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 217, 59–75.

Thordarson, T., Self, S., 1996. Sulfur, chlorine and fluorine degassing and atmospheric loading by the Roza eruption, Columbia River Basalt Group, Washington, USA. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 74, 49–73.

Tilling, R.I., Wright, T.L., Millard, H.T., Jr, 1987. Trace-element chemistry of Kilauea and Mauna Loa lava in space and time: A reconnaissance. Volcanism in Hawaii 2, 641–689.

Walker, B.J., Klemetti, E.W., Grunder, A.L., Dilles, J.H., Tepley, F.J., Giles, D., 2012. Crystal reaming during the assembly, maturation, and waning of an eleven- million-year crustal magma cycle: thermobarometry of the Aucanquilcha Volcanic Cluster. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 165, 663-682.

Walker, R.J., Storey, M., Kerr, A.C., Tarney, J., Arndt, N.T., 1999. Implications of 187Os isotopic heterogeneities in a mantle plume: evidence from Gorgona Island and Curaçao. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63, 713–728.

Wallace, P.J., 2005. Volatiles in subduction zone magmas: concentrations and fluxes based on melt inclusion and volcanic gas data. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 140, 217–240.

Wallace, P.J., Anderson, A.T., Jr, 1998. Effects of eruption and lava drainback on the H 2 O contents of basaltic magmas at Kilauea Volcano. Bulletin of Volcanology 59, 327–344.

Wallace, P.J., Carmichael, I.S., 1992. Sulfur in basaltic magmas. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56, 1863–1874.

Wang, Z., Hattendorf, B., Günther, D., 2006. Vaporization and ionization of laser ablation generated aerosols in an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer—implications from ion distribution maps. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 21, 1143–1151.

Westrich, H.R., Gerlach, T.M., 1992. Magmatic gas source for the stratospheric SO2 cloud from the June 15,1991, eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Geology 20, 867.

White, R.V., Tarney, J., Kerr, A.C., Saunders, A.D., Kempton, P.D., Pringle, M.S., Klaver, G.T., 1999. Modification of an oceanic plateau, Aruba, Dutch Caribbean: implications for the generation of continental crust. Lithos 46, 43–68.

Wiedmann, J., 1978. Ammonites from the Curaçao Lava Formation, Curaçao, Caribbean, Gelogie en Mijnbouw 57, 361–364. 157 Winter, J.D., 2001. An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice- Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 697.

Witt-Eickschen, G., Palme, H., O'Neill, H.S.C., Allen, C.M., 2009. The geochemistry of the volatile trace elements As, Cd, Ga, In and Sn in the Earth’s mantle: New evidence from in situ analyses of mantle xenoliths. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73, 1755–1778.

Wright, J.E., Wyld, S.J., 2011. Late Cretaceous subduction initiation on the eastern margin of the Caribbean-Colombian Oceanic Plateau: One Great Arc of the Caribbean (?). Geosphere 7, 468–493.

Wright, T.L., 1973. Magma mixing as illustrated by the 1959 eruption, Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84, 849–858.

Wright, T.L., Fiske, R., 1971. Origin of the differentiated and hybrid lavas of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Journal of Petrology 12, 1–65.

Yu, Z., Norman, M.D., Robinson, P.T., 2003. Major and trace element analysis of silicate rocks by XRF and laser ablation ICP-MS using lithium borate fused glasses: Matrix effects, instrument response and results for international reference materials. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 27, 67–89.

Zajacz, Z., Halter, W., 2009. Copper transport by high temperature, sulfur-rich magmatic vapor: Evidence from silicate melt and vapor inclusions in a basaltic andesite from the Villarrica volcano (Chile). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 282, 115–121.

Zajacz, Z., Hanley, J.J., Heinrich, C.A., Halter, W.E., Guillong, M., 2009. Diffusive reequilibration of quartz-hosted silicate melt and fluid inclusions: Are all metal concentrations unmodified? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73, 3013–3027. 158

APPENDICES APPENDIX A 159

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR CHAPTER THREE

Accuracy and precision for major and trace element analyses are shown with repeat analyses of secondary standards. Table A1 provides an analysis of the EMPA accuracy and precision with different secondary standards. Table A2 provides similar data but for trace elements and LA-ICP-MS. Note that in Table A2, all concentrations are in ppm which accuracy is a % calculated as measured/actual concentrations. Actual concentrations are estimated with the GeoReM database. Stdev is standard deviation, stderr is standard error, and n is the number of times each secondary standard was analyzed for each element. Analyzed isotopes are identified on the left column and are the same masses monitored during unknown analysis. Secondary glass standards were also run during olivine and melt inclusions analyses, but followed a similar procedure and uncertainties are similar to those shown in Table A2. Major and trace element compositions of matrix glass along with sample information are provided in Table A3. Table A4 displays major and trace element compositions for melt inclusions analyzed from olivine separates from sample Iki-22. Volatile concentrations determined by FTIR are also presented in Table A4. Table A5 displays host olivine compositions from Iki-22. Note that Electron Microprobe analyses in Table A4 and A5 were performed at the University of Oregon and Table A1 may not be representative of the uncertainty in these analyses. Table A1. Long-term accuracy of EMPA basaltic glass calibrations.

SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 Cr2O3 FeO* MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 Total BASL Value 50.94 4.06 12.94 13.49 0.15 5.08 9.3 2.66 0.84 0.38 99.84 Uncertainty Measured (n=15) 50.90 4.12 12.54 13.16 0.19 5.11 9.41 2.43 0.81 0.46 99.27 Std Dev 0.65 0.10 0.18 0.15 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.49 0.04 0.02 Accuracy % (avg/accepted) 99.9 101.5 96.9 97.6 126.5 100.6 101.2 91.4 96.8 119.9 BCR-2G Value 54.40 2.27 13.40 0.005 12.40 0.19 3.56 7.06 3.23 1.74 0.37 98.62 Uncertainty 0.40 0.04 0.40 0.001 0.30 0.01 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.04 0.01 Measured (n=3) 54.64 2.40 14.11 0.006 12.43 0.19 3.59 7.31 2.82 1.71 0.37 99.57 Std Dev 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.034 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.09 0.04 0.01 Accuracy % 100.4 105.8 105.3 123.4 100.2 99.6 100.9 103.5 87.2 98.1 100.9 (avg/accepted) BHVO-2G Value 49.30 2.79 13.60 0.086 11.30 0.17 7.13 11.40 2.40 0.51 0.29 98.98 Uncertainty 0.10 0.02 0.10 0.004 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.02 Measured (n=3) 50.54 2.85 14.03 0.044 10.99 0.13 7.21 11.58 2.16 0.52 0.29 100.33 Std Dev 0.16 0.02 0.04 0.011 0.08 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 Accuracy % 102.5 102.1 103.1 51.5 97.3 77.2 101.1 101.6 89.9 101.8 99.3 (avg/accepted) BIR-1G Value 47.50 1.04 15.50 0.115 10.40 0.19 9.40 13.30 1.85 0.03 0.03 99.35 Uncertainty 0.30 0.07 0.20 0.007 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.20 0.07 0.01 0.00 Measured (n=3) 48.00 0.97 15.92 0.053 10.20 0.15 9.43 13.46 1.77 0.05 0.03 100.04 Std Dev 0.15 0.01 0.10 0.039 0.09 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.01 Accuracy % 101.1 93.7 102.7 46.0 98.1 80.7 100.3 101.2 95.7 150.4 107.2 (avg/accepted) All concentrations are in wt. %. 160 161 Table A2. Trace element accuracy in secondary standards by LA-ICP-MS* BCR-2G Actual +/- Median Accuracy Stddev n stderr 7Li 9 1 8.78 98 0.77 14 0.20 11B 6 1 4.63 77 4.87 14 1.30 45Sc 33 2 35.76 108 1.50 14 0.40 47Ti 14100 1000 14058 100 312 14 83.37 51V 425 18 415 98 36.97 14 9.88 52Cr 17 2 16.93 100 2.73 14 0.73 55Mn 1550 70 1479 95 65.95 14 17.63 59Co 38 2 34.78 92 2.88 14 0.77 60Ni 13 2 11.88 91 1.01 14 0.27 65Cu 21 5 16.25 77 1.24 14 0.33 66Zn 125 5 148 119 11.53 14 3.08 69Ga 23 1 38.23 166 5.49 14 1.47 85Rb 47 0.5 42.55 91 3.65 14 0.98 88Sr 342 4 323 95 4.69 14 1.25 89Y 35 3 30.09 86 0.94 14 0.25 90Zr 184 15 171 93 5.41 14 1.45 93Nb 12.5 1 11.03 88 0.48 14 0.13 98Mo 270 30 254 94 20.06 14 5.36 107Ag 0.5 0.4 1.02 204 0.32 14 0.09 111Cd 0.2 0.15 76 0.04 14 0.01 115In 0.11 0.02 0.08 73 0.01 14 0.00 120Sn 2.6 0.4 1.57 60 0.13 14 0.04 121Sb 0.35 0.08 0.33 93 0.04 14 0.01 133Cs 1.16 0.07 1.10 95 0.09 14 0.02 137Ba 683 7 659 97 8.90 14 2.38 139La 24.7 0.3 23.11 94 0.66 14 0.18 140Ce 53.3 0.5 49.19 92 1.38 14 0.37 141Pr 6.7 0.4 6.04 90 0.18 14 0.05 146Nd 28.9 0.3 27.14 94 0.70 14 0.19 147Sm 6.59 0.07 6.14 93 0.28 14 0.08 153Eu 1.97 0.02 1.83 93 0.05 14 0.01 157Gd 6.71 0.07 6.27 93 0.26 14 0.07 159Tb 1.02 0.08 0.89 87 0.05 14 0.01 163Dy 6.44 0.06 5.75 89 0.25 14 0.07 165Ho 1.27 0.08 1.12 88 0.04 14 0.01 166Er 3.7 0.04 3.43 93 0.20 14 0.05 169Tm 0.51 0.04 0.43 85 0.03 14 0.01 172Yb 3.39 0.03 3.04 90 0.10 14 0.03 175Lu 0.503 0.005 0.44 87 0.02 14 0.01 178Hf 4.84 0.28 4.38 90 0.16 14 0.04 181Ta 0.78 0.06 0.63 81 0.03 14 0.01 182W 0.5 0.07 0.49 97 0.05 14 0.01 208Pb 11 1 10.16 92 0.97 14 0.26 232Th 5.9 0.3 5.47 93 0.15 14 0.04 238U 1.69 0.12 1.54 91 0.17 14 0.05 162 Table A2. (Continued) BHVO-2G Actual +/- Median Accuracy Stddev n stderr 7Li 4.4 0.8 4.27 97 0.32 14 0.08 11B 3.50 5.91 14 1.58 45Sc 33 2 32.60 99 1.57 14 0.42 47Ti 16300 900 16611 102 254 14 67.90 51V 308 19 315.06 102 18.97 14 5.07 52Cr 293 12 290 99 16.97 14 4.53 55Mn 1317 232 1320 100 28.35 14 7.58 59Co 44 2 42.31 96 2.10 14 0.56 60Ni 116 7 119 102 6.87 14 1.84 65Cu 127 11 119 93 6.70 14 1.79 66Zn 102 6 113 110 8.60 14 2.30 69Ga 22 3 22.62 103 1.05 14 0.28 85Rb 9.2 0.04 8.37 91 0.52 14 0.14 88Sr 396 1 385 97 5.70 14 1.52 89Y 26 2 21.38 82 0.75 14 0.20 90Zr 170 7 152 90 5.41 14 1.45 93Nb 18.3 0.8 15.89 87 0.52 14 0.14 98Mo 3.8 0.2 3.98 105 0.23 14 0.06 107Ag 0.36 0.12 14 0.03 111Cd 0.1 0.02 0.07 68 0.02 14 0.01 115In 0.1 0.02 0.09 86 0.02 14 0.00 120Sn 2.6 0.6 1.33 51 0.09 14 0.02 121Sb 0.3 0.13 0.13 43 0.02 14 0.00 133Cs 0.1 0.02 0.10 98 0.01 14 0.00 137Ba 131 2 129 98 2.65 14 0.71 139La 15.2 0.2 14.32 94 0.42 14 0.11 140Ce 37.6 0.2 35.79 95 0.78 14 0.21 141Pr 5.35 0.22 4.88 91 0.15 14 0.04 146Nd 24.5 0.2 23.18 95 0.41 14 0.11 147Sm 6.1 0.03 5.72 94 0.18 14 0.05 153Eu 2.07 0.01 1.97 95 0.07 14 0.02 157Gd 6.16 0.05 5.61 91 0.21 14 0.06 159Tb 0.92 0.04 0.76 82 0.03 14 0.01 163Dy 5.28 0.05 4.66 88 0.15 14 0.04 165Ho 0.98 0.04 0.83 85 0.03 14 0.01 166Er 2.56 0.02 2.30 90 0.14 14 0.04 169Tm 0.34 0.02 0.28 81 0.02 14 0.00 172Yb 2.01 0.02 1.75 87 0.09 14 0.02 175Lu 0.279 0.003 0.23 84 0.02 14 0.01 178Hf 4.32 0.18 3.87 90 0.20 14 0.05 181Ta 1.15 0.1 0.92 80 0.05 14 0.01 182W 0.23 0.04 0.23 100 0.03 14 0.01 208Pb 1.7 0.2 1.70 100 0.15 14 0.04 232Th 1.22 0.05 1.09 89 0.04 14 0.01 238U 0.403 0.003 0.40 100 0.02 14 0.01 163 Table A2. (Continued) GSD-1G Actual +/- Median Accuracy Stddev n stderr 7Li 43 6 45.37 106 3.00 25 0.60 11B 50 20 53.76 108 4.26 25 0.85 45Sc 52 2 53.46 103 2.09 25 0.42 47Ti 7434 360 8102 109 167 25 33.35 51V 44 2 44.34 101 3.18 24 0.65 52Cr 42 3 47.35 113 2.87 25 0.57 55Mn 220 20 223 101 10.60 25 2.12 59Co 40 2 40.27 101 2.56 25 0.51 60Ni 58 4 63.17 109 4.49 25 0.90 65Cu 42 2 43.08 103 2.91 25 0.58 66Zn 54 2 54.59 101 4.63 25 0.93 69Ga 54 7 54.71 101 3.67 25 0.73 85Rb 37.3 0.4 38.35 103 2.36 25 0.47 88Sr 69.4 0.7 67.09 97 1.16 25 0.23 89Y 42 2 37.74 90 1.76 24 0.36 90Zr 42 2 40.88 97 1.89 24 0.39 93Nb 42 3 41.46 99 0.90 24 0.18 98Mo 39 3 40.92 105 2.30 25 0.46 107Ag 23 3 23.09 100 1.33 25 0.27 111Cd 18 4 18.40 102 1.44 25 0.29 115In 38 5 38.55 101 2.81 25 0.56 120Sn 29 6 29.75 103 1.93 25 0.39 121Sb 43 7 46.12 107 3.21 25 0.64 133Cs 32 2 33.73 105 2.53 25 0.51 137Ba 67 1 69.35 104 1.01 25 0.20 139La 39.1 0.4 36.91 94 1.25 24 0.25 140Ce 41.4 0.4 39.93 96 1.23 25 0.25 141Pr 45 1 42.52 94 1.49 24 0.30 146Nd 44.7 0.5 42.96 96 1.01 24 0.21 147Sm 47.8 0.5 46.01 96 1.44 24 0.29 153Eu 41 2 38.95 95 0.65 24 0.13 157Gd 50.7 0.5 46.61 92 2.11 24 0.43 159Tb 47 2 42.14 90 1.44 24 0.29 163Dy 51.2 0.5 47.49 93 1.69 24 0.35 165Ho 49 2 44.01 90 1.77 24 0.36 166Er 40.1 0.4 38.05 95 2.19 24 0.45 169Tm 49 2 43.93 90 1.94 24 0.40 172Yb 50.9 0.5 47.56 93 1.83 24 0.37 175Lu 51.5 0.5 46.22 90 1.97 24 0.40 178Hf 39 2 36.64 94 1.41 24 0.29 181Ta 40 4 37.26 93 1.10 24 0.22 182W 43 4 43.99 102 2.74 25 0.55 208Pb 50 2 49.60 99 3.45 25 0.69 232Th 41 2 39.73 97 12.53 24 2.56 238U 41 2 41.75 102 3.38 24 0.69 164 Table A3. Major and trace element analyses of matrix glass from Kilauea Iki. Sample Information Alias Eruption Eruption Specimen Analytical Sample a Alias 1 2 Date Time Name Texture/Structure Total 1 Iki-01 s-2 14-Nov-59 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.00 Pumice 2 Iki-02 s-4 17-Nov-59 15:00 (basaltic) Glassy, Pumiceous 99.28 3 Iki-03 - 19-Nov-59 8:00 Basalt Flow 99.48 5 Iki-05 s-8 21-Nov-59 7:10 Basalt Flow, Glassy Crust 99.58 7 Iki-07 s-9 21-Nov-59 20:00 Basalt Glassy 99.34 8 Iki-08 s-10 26-Nov-59 4:50 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.71 9 Iki-09 s-12 28-Nov-59 18:15 Basalt 99.36 11 Iki-11 s-11 26-Nov-59 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.66 12 Iki-12 s-14 4-Dec-59 9:45 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.57 13 Iki-13 s-15 5-Dec-59 9:30 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.24 15 Iki-15 s-17 7-Dec-59 1:00 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.35 17 Iki-17 - 7-Dec-59 23:30 Basalt 98.99 18 Iki-18 - 8-Dec-59 3:30 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.94 19 Iki-19 s-18 8-Dec-59 18:30 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.30 21 Iki-21 s-19 11-Dec-59 6:00 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.40 24 Iki-24 - 13-Dec-59 14:00 Basalt Glassy 98.97 25 Iki-25 - 14-Dec-59 12:00 Basalt Olivine, Glassy, Pumiceous 99.36 26 Iki-26 s-21 14-Dec-59 14:00 Basalt Flow 99.22 27 Iki-27 - 15-Dec-59 20:00 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.90 29 Iki-29 - 16-Dec-59 20:50 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.35 30 Iki-30 - 16-Dec-59 14:20 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.11 31 Iki-31 - 8-Dec-59 12:00 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.30 32 Iki-32 s-22 17-Dec-59 14:45 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.41 33 Iki-33 s-24 19-Dec-59 6:30 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.48 34 Iki-34 - 19-Dec-59 4:30 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.99 35 Iki-35 - 17-Dec-59 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.81 36 Iki-36 s-20 13-Dec-59 16:00 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 99.36 38 Iki-38 s-25 19-Dec-59 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.61 42 Iki-42 s-3 16-Nov-59 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.65 Olivine, Glassy, 44 Iki-44 s-7 20-Nov-59 7:00 Basalt Scoriaceous 99.47 51 Iki-51 - 21-Nov-59 9:30 Basalt Olivine, Glassy, Pumiceous 99.00 53 Iki-54 - 26-Nov-59 12:00 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 100.06 55 Iki-56 - 18-Nov-59 12:30 Basalt Glassy, Scoriaceous 99.12 Olivine, Glassy, 56 Iki-57 - 20-Nov-59 13:30 Basalt Scoriaceous 97.99 58 Iki-59 - 7-Dec-59 16:20 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.66 60 Iki-61 - 5-Dec-59 12:00 Basalt Olivine, Glassy 98.53 61 - - 9-Dec-59 11:00 Basalt Olivine, Vesicular 99.59 62 - - 15-Dec-59 20:30 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.15 63 - - 17-Nov-59 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.92 64 Iki-65 - 18-Nov-59 12:30 Basalt Olivine 99.05 65 Iki-66 - 26-Nov-59 4:50 Basalt Glassy, Pumiceous 98.79 70 Iki-71 - 19-Nov-59 14:15 Basalt Olivine, Vesicular 99.27 72 Iki-73 - 9-Dec-59 11:00 Basalt Olivine, Vesicular 99.13 73 Iki-74 - 20-Nov-59 15:00 Basalt Olivine, Vesicular 98.99 74 Iki-75 - 23-Nov-59 Basalt, Olivine Olivine, Vesicular 98.85 76 Iki-77 - 15-Dec-59 8:00 Basalt Olivine, Vesicular 99.11 a Prefix for Smithsonian catalogue number is NMNM 116111-X. 165 Table A3. (Continued) Electron Microprobe (wt. %)

Sample SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 Cr2O3 FeO* MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 S Cl F 1 50.12 3.14 14.81 0.04 11.51 0.14 5.74 10.97 2.53 0.65 0.36 0.07 0.02 0.05 2 50.19 2.73 13.10 0.07 10.91 0.16 8.28 11.65 2.13 0.50 0.26 0.01 0.02 0.04 3 49.64 2.59 12.55 0.08 11.09 0.18 9.78 11.33 2.02 0.48 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.03 5 50.22 2.87 13.53 0.04 10.97 0.18 7.61 11.41 2.32 0.56 0.29 0.02 0.02 0.01 7 50.04 2.75 13.30 0.07 11.08 0.13 8.39 11.25 2.19 0.50 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.01 8 50.51 2.91 14.02 0.03 10.83 0.21 6.66 11.66 2.34 0.52 0.29 0.01 0.02 0.01 9 50.10 2.96 13.93 0.04 11.12 0.16 6.76 11.65 2.38 0.59 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.04 11 50.00 2.79 13.23 0.06 10.99 0.16 8.40 11.30 2.20 0.57 0.29 0.01 0.02 0.01 12 50.33 3.10 13.97 0.00 11.19 0.18 6.53 11.36 2.41 0.61 0.32 0.00 0.02 0.02 13 49.71 2.75 13.01 0.08 10.99 0.17 8.93 11.40 2.16 0.52 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.02 15 49.98 2.82 13.32 0.04 11.00 0.17 8.10 11.54 2.23 0.51 0.30 0.02 0.02 0.02 17 50.25 2.94 13.46 0.04 11.14 0.16 7.57 11.30 2.22 0.62 0.29 0.01 0.02 0.03 18 49.82 2.72 13.16 0.08 11.00 0.14 8.65 11.42 2.21 0.53 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.04 19 50.06 2.79 13.36 0.06 10.79 0.15 8.25 11.52 2.18 0.54 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.03 21 49.85 2.73 13.05 0.07 10.95 0.18 8.79 11.35 2.21 0.54 0.27 0.01 0.02 0.02 24 50.30 2.72 13.03 0.09 10.65 0.18 8.66 11.38 2.18 0.53 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.04 25 50.03 2.76 13.30 0.07 10.82 0.15 8.34 11.50 2.23 0.51 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.01 26 49.89 2.75 13.15 0.06 10.92 0.15 8.60 11.45 2.19 0.54 0.30 0.01 0.01 0.02 27 50.31 2.73 13.14 0.08 10.77 0.16 8.46 11.37 2.18 0.52 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.00 29 49.98 2.78 13.32 0.07 10.80 0.16 8.31 11.54 2.21 0.55 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.04 30 50.14 2.80 13.37 0.07 10.63 0.17 8.28 11.53 2.22 0.53 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.03 31 49.56 2.75 13.14 0.07 11.06 0.17 8.85 11.41 2.17 0.51 0.30 0.01 0.01 0.03 32 50.09 2.78 13.33 0.05 10.76 0.17 8.21 11.60 2.19 0.55 0.27 0.01 0.02 0.02 33 49.97 2.75 13.15 0.09 10.77 0.17 8.69 11.44 2.17 0.50 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.04 34 50.03 2.82 13.23 0.04 10.74 0.17 8.48 11.45 2.20 0.56 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.04 35 50.58 2.89 13.99 0.03 10.46 0.16 6.82 11.84 2.34 0.57 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.03 36 50.24 2.89 14.09 0.06 10.77 0.13 6.84 11.76 2.37 0.56 0.29 0.00 0.02 0.04 38 50.39 2.93 14.07 0.03 10.90 0.17 6.61 11.67 2.33 0.58 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.03 42 50.26 2.95 14.19 0.01 11.39 0.21 6.29 11.30 2.45 0.63 0.31 0.01 0.02 0.04 44 49.74 2.77 13.32 0.07 11.10 0.16 8.46 11.35 2.21 0.54 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.04 51 50.20 3.15 13.90 0.02 11.48 0.18 6.32 11.33 2.48 0.62 0.33 0.01 0.02 0.04 53 50.05 2.79 13.29 0.08 10.92 0.19 8.02 11.57 2.25 0.55 0.30 0.01 0.01 0.03 55 50.25 3.08 13.97 0.01 11.69 0.21 6.17 11.25 2.45 0.59 0.32 0.01 0.02 0.01 56 50.32 3.15 13.92 0.01 11.33 0.19 6.32 11.43 2.41 0.61 0.31 0.01 0.02 0.03 58 50.33 2.87 14.01 0.05 10.79 0.17 6.78 11.86 2.27 0.58 0.30 0.00 0.02 0.05 60 51.34 3.21 14.25 0.04 10.49 0.17 6.31 10.88 2.33 0.62 0.35 0.01 0.02 0.03 61 50.32 2.91 13.87 0.05 10.69 0.15 6.95 11.85 2.37 0.57 0.28 0.00 0.01 0.06 62 50.33 2.92 13.94 0.03 10.65 0.19 6.96 11.82 2.31 0.56 0.29 0.00 0.01 0.03 63 50.31 2.93 13.85 0.05 10.72 0.18 6.96 11.84 2.31 0.56 0.28 0.00 0.01 0.01 64 49.98 2.65 12.96 0.06 11.01 0.15 8.64 11.61 2.14 0.52 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.02 65 50.35 2.90 14.09 0.03 10.85 0.18 6.67 11.72 2.33 0.57 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.03 70 49.72 2.58 12.54 0.08 11.02 0.17 9.72 11.32 2.10 0.50 0.27 0.02 0.01 0.04 72 50.30 3.00 14.28 0.05 10.89 0.19 6.43 11.56 2.36 0.65 0.30 0.00 0.01 0.02 73 50.09 2.80 13.32 0.05 11.04 0.17 8.20 11.32 2.18 0.55 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.02 74 49.69 2.66 12.81 0.09 10.90 0.15 9.05 11.76 2.11 0.52 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.03 76 50.37 2.92 14.07 0.05 10.71 0.16 6.76 11.74 2.35 0.58 0.29 0.00 0.01 0.04 166 Table A3. (Continued) LA-ICP-MS (ppm)

Sample Li B Sc Ti V Cr Mn Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Rb Sr Y Zr 1 5.53 2.34 26.7 18,161 39 1,432 45 74 188 122 24.8 11.0 421 2 4.68 2.42 33.3 15,878 286 386 1,328 48 158 112 117 21.4 7.9 364 25.4 168 3 3.91 1.02 33.6 15,336 291 550 1,379 54 232 120 113 22.7 8.7 355 21.4 152 5 4.73 2.54 33.3 16,523 303 296 1,385 46 144 148 162 23.4 10.5 381 22.3 161 7 4.14 1.86 34.1 16,254 314 387 1,373 48 170 134 110 20.7 9.4 374 24.8 166 8 4.36 1.86 32.6 16,766 316 232 1,301 41 90 132 109 20.6 9.6 400 24.1 171 9 5.85 2.24 33.8 17,550 336 205 1,420 46 104 144 126 25.5 11.1 410 24.4 167 11 5.79 2.4 32.8 16,520 356 439 1,467 55 196 144 137 23.9 11.0 382 22.0 161 12 5.13 2.31 32.5 16,490 285 205 1,294 41 95 127 115 21.7 10.1 395 23.7 156 13 4.08 1.78 34.6 16,287 325 534 1,436 52 215 126 118 22.5 8.8 370 22.5 153 15 4.76 1.42 33.6 16,451 306 412 1,367 51 173 112 117 20.7 9.6 385 21.6 158 17 4.56 2.19 34.5 15,491 267 426 1,294 46 195 116 115 21.4 9.6 380 26.7 182 18 3.57 2.2 37.9 16,402 323 461 1,412 53 204 125 121 21.4 9.5 373 20.4 148 19 5.16 2.16 32.6 17,299 - 393 1,497 56 177 145 116 23.7 10.6 395 - - 21 3.81 3.03 36.7 16,270 326 477 1,435 57 248 153 174 24.3 9.8 373 22.1 152 24 4.33 1.28 35.4 16,075 290 411 1,301 46 171 119 101 20.0 8.7 378 23.3 157 25 4.82 1.79 36.1 16,677 335 454 1,444 53 199 153 108 24.4 10.9 388 22.4 156 26 4.27 1.95 32.5 16,063 287 400 1,292 46 140 116 103 19.7 8.7 379 22.2 160 27 4.55 2.18 30.9 15,776 320 460 1,405 53 187 119 123 22.7 10.1 380 21.0 149 29 4.52 3.09 32.9 15,902 310 388 1,345 47 166 159 120 24.8 10.0 377 21.3 148 30 4.86 2.09 29.1 15,985 307 410 1,344 47 175 127 109 21.9 9.9 378 21.9 152 31 5.11 2.67 33.7 16,151 327 489 1,424 51 228 135 132 25.1 10.4 376 20.9 147 32 4.42 2.39 34.5 16,268 293 416 1,356 46 152 129 126 23.1 9.2 380 23.4 161 33 5.29 2.21 32.3 15,874 291 450 1,373 51 223 125 125 23.3 9.7 378 20.7 137 34 4.36 1.97 30.5 16,019 314 419 1,350 48 184 125 111 21.6 9.6 379 22.3 148 35 5.06 2.19 35.6 17,066 326 255 1,285 41 111 132 115 22.7 10.9 411 22.4 156 36 5.42 2.13 32.8 17,056 320 329 1,346 44 110 139 121 25.6 10.8 419 24.1 162 38 4.44 2.67 33.5 17,756 327 208 1,355 43 93 122 117 24.4 11.1 411 22.7 154 42 4.73 2.11 28.4 16,789 291 98 1,278 43 85 135 115 21.2 11.1 400 25.0 175 44 4.33 1.69 34.3 15,912 298 361 1,284 47 178 117 111 19.8 9.0 377 24.4 163 51 - - - 16,595 293 114 1,224 37 - 136 - - 10.7 367 23.6 171 53 4.67 1.72 35.3 15,986 312 449 1,352 48 155 129 125 22.6 10.0 379 23.3 160 55 ------56 ------58 4.72 2.81 33.4 16,904 306 271 1,320 42 105 139 129 22.9 10.4 401 24.2 170 60 4.27 1.9 30.1 17,257 329 179 1,223 37 95 124 107 22.7 10.0 400 25.6 182 61 5.21 2.34 32.1 17,018 341 307 1,379 46 114 148 116 24.7 11.1 396 20.7 146 62 4.71 2.26 33.8 16,722 - 296 1,388 44 118 148 124 23.6 11.4 393 - - 63 4.55 2.23 34.6 16,970 328 286 1,335 45 115 138 116 23.5 10.9 395 23.0 169 64 3.89 2.07 34.8 15,196 278 420 1,316 47 177 115 110 21.3 8.2 361 22.5 153 65 4.77 2.12 33.1 16,804 315 234 1,327 43 96 138 137 25.4 10.9 399 22.8 169 70 4.37 1.83 32.9 14,960 283 544 1,340 51 237 124 115 20.0 9.1 352 21.7 150 72 4.38 1.81 32.2 17,130 309 194 1,281 40 95 134 115 19.6 10.1 414 25.5 176 73 5.17 2.33 32.8 16,307 355 398 1,488 54 177 147 122 22.7 10.6 372 20.9 150 74 4.2 2.12 34.4 15,721 309 481 1,324 47 197 114 112 19.2 9.4 365 22.1 146 76 4.61 2.74 34.3 16,638 306 261 1,263 41 109 139 118 22.1 10.7 399 23.2 165 167 Table A3. (Continued) LA-ICP-MS (ppm)

Sample Nb Mo Ag Cd In Sn Sb Cs Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm 1 0.98 0.06 0.17 0.08 1.48 0.05 0.13 162 42.0 2 16.6 0.83 0.06 0.08 0.07 1.33 0.06 0.08 129 15.4 33.9 5.0 24.5 6.5 3 15.9 0.83 0.03 0.07 0.08 1.14 0.06 0.07 132 14.3 33.8 4.5 22.3 5.2 5 17.3 1.01 0.18 0.19 0.11 1.58 0.09 0.10 140 15.7 36.7 4.9 22.6 5.5 7 17.3 0.88 0.05 0.08 0.08 1.26 0.04 0.09 140 15.7 35.3 5.1 23.9 6.2 8 17.8 0.90 0.03 0.16 0.04 1.12 0.07 0.10 147 16.1 38.5 5.2 25.5 6.2 9 19.3 0.85 0.07 0.07 0.08 1.44 0.06 0.13 156 16.2 39.5 5.3 25.8 6.6 11 17.3 0.91 0.06 0.11 0.08 1.33 0.05 0.11 145 15.3 37.9 5.0 23.7 5.5 12 16.4 0.98 0.06 0.11 0.09 1.34 0.06 0.12 148 16.0 37.1 4.8 23.6 5.7 13 17.1 1.00 0.04 0.10 0.07 1.33 0.05 0.10 142 15.5 36.6 4.8 23.3 5.7 15 16.8 0.89 0.05 0.08 0.08 1.15 0.07 0.08 143 15.1 37.0 4.9 22.5 6.1 17 15.6 0.92 0.08 0.08 0.07 1.20 0.08 0.08 142 16.7 34.4 5.0 25.0 6.7 18 17.5 0.99 0.23 0.06 0.09 1.29 0.15 0.09 133 14.7 35.3 4.9 23.5 5.4 19 - 1.02 0.08 0.10 0.22 1.37 0.07 0.12 152 - 37.4 - - - 21 17.3 1.06 0.08 0.15 0.09 1.49 0.07 138 14.8 35.6 4.9 24.3 5.4 24 17.2 0.79 0.07 0.11 0.09 1.25 0.04 0.10 138 15.3 35.1 4.8 23.7 5.5 25 17.6 0.96 0.10 0.08 0.40 1.52 0.08 0.08 148 15.4 37.8 5.0 23.8 6.0 26 17.4 0.84 0.07 0.03 0.07 1.12 0.48 0.09 140 16.2 35.4 5.0 24.3 5.5 27 17.0 0.98 0.07 0.07 0.13 1.22 0.05 0.12 144 15.8 38.1 5.0 24.4 5.5 29 17.0 0.95 0.06 0.11 1.52 0.09 0.08 142 15.3 36.2 5.1 24.4 5.6 30 16.6 0.92 0.04 0.06 0.06 1.33 0.05 0.10 144 15.7 36.9 5.0 23.0 5.7 31 17.2 0.92 0.08 0.04 0.08 1.48 0.05 0.12 148 15.4 38.3 4.9 23.0 5.8 32 17.1 0.87 0.08 0.12 0.13 1.18 0.05 0.09 138 15.7 35.9 4.8 24.4 5.6 33 16.5 0.87 0.07 0.15 0.09 1.30 0.11 0.13 146 15.1 38.1 4.9 22.7 5.4 34 17.2 0.77 0.06 0.10 0.14 1.14 0.07 0.11 141 16.0 35.8 4.9 23.2 6.1 35 17.4 0.93 0.07 0.10 0.09 1.34 0.07 0.10 154 16.7 38.9 5.4 25.5 6.3 36 17.8 1.04 0.03 0.07 0.09 1.43 0.07 0.11 151 17.0 39.3 5.5 26.8 6.2 38 18.3 0.92 0.08 0.08 0.09 1.29 0.06 0.13 158 16.8 40.5 5.3 26.0 6.3 42 18.5 1.03 0.09 0.09 0.07 1.35 0.07 0.11 152 16.9 38.4 5.2 24.7 6.2 44 16.6 0.81 0.04 0.07 0.09 1.14 0.05 0.10 139 15.4 35.0 5.0 23.5 5.8 51 18.0 ------146 16.8 36.9 5.2 25.0 6.6 53 16.0 0.84 0.08 0.19 0.08 1.30 0.08 0.12 139 15.9 36.7 4.9 24.6 6.2 55 ------56 ------58 17.7 0.89 0.07 0.06 0.10 1.28 0.04 0.12 150 16.9 38.6 5.2 26.2 6.1 60 18.7 1.03 0.02 0.07 0.08 1.19 0.06 0.10 149 17.1 39.8 5.4 26.2 7.0 61 17.8 0.95 0.08 0.08 1.37 0.03 0.10 152 15.7 39.0 5.1 23.3 5.5 62 - 0.86 0.08 0.12 0.09 1.37 0.08 0.12 140 - 39.3 - - - 63 17.6 0.85 0.12 0.11 0.09 1.36 0.05 0.12 148 16.1 38.1 5.0 25.4 5.8 64 15.7 0.98 0.05 0.05 0.06 1.24 0.05 0.11 133 14.7 33.5 4.5 23.0 5.7 65 18.1 1.06 0.08 0.09 0.09 1.32 0.04 0.10 146 16.0 37.7 5.3 24.4 6.0 70 15.0 0.93 0.06 0.10 0.06 1.19 0.07 0.10 131 14.9 33.8 4.7 22.5 5.6 72 18.6 0.81 0.19 0.05 0.08 1.38 0.08 157 17.6 39.4 5.7 25.7 6.5 73 17.1 0.85 0.03 0.14 0.08 1.32 0.06 0.10 140 15.5 37.0 5.0 22.9 5.6 74 15.4 0.87 0.30 0.12 0.08 1.19 0.01 0.08 134 15.6 35.2 5.1 24.5 5.6 76 18.3 0.83 0.02 0.04 0.08 1.35 0.06 0.12 147 16.3 37.5 5.3 25.2 6.3 168 Table A3. (Continued) LA-ICP-MS (ppm)

Sample Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Hf Ta W Pb Th U 1 0.20 1.36 2 1.91 6.8 0.89 5.3 0.93 2.5 0.28 1.74 0.29 4.2 1.06 0.19 1.03 1.16 0.33 3 1.85 5.7 0.69 4.5 0.83 2.1 0.25 1.88 0.24 3.7 0.99 0.19 0.95 1.16 0.35 5 2.08 5.7 0.79 4.9 0.88 2.5 0.33 2.02 0.24 4.1 1.08 0.25 5.00 1.24 0.34 7 1.85 6.5 0.91 5.4 0.96 2.9 0.38 2.09 0.22 4.7 1.12 0.21 1.09 1.22 0.34 8 2.01 6.2 0.84 5.0 0.96 2.6 0.31 2.22 0.26 4.4 1.16 0.20 1.08 1.33 0.39 9 2.05 6.4 0.82 5.2 0.97 2.6 0.31 2.25 0.29 4.3 1.06 0.32 1.27 1.29 0.39 11 1.97 5.5 0.83 4.7 0.86 2.2 0.32 1.98 0.26 4.3 0.99 0.24 1.20 1.24 0.38 12 1.96 6.0 0.77 4.5 0.89 2.2 0.28 1.56 0.25 3.9 1.02 0.24 1.15 1.12 0.31 13 1.96 5.9 0.74 4.8 0.87 2.4 0.31 1.81 0.27 4.0 1.06 0.21 1.08 1.27 0.39 15 2.00 5.1 0.75 4.8 0.84 2.6 0.30 2.09 0.27 4.2 1.06 0.23 1.10 1.27 0.40 17 1.99 7.3 0.83 6.3 1.18 3.0 0.37 2.47 0.28 4.9 1.09 0.14 1.14 1.37 0.30 18 1.98 5.0 0.78 5.0 0.79 2.3 0.33 1.88 0.26 4.0 0.96 0.25 2.05 1.14 0.42 19 ------0.24 1.47 - - 21 1.80 5.3 0.8 4.6 0.82 2.3 0.28 1.95 0.24 4.0 0.98 0.20 1.42 1.20 0.39 24 1.88 6.0 0.78 4.7 0.84 2.6 0.30 1.88 0.24 4.3 1.05 0.22 1.14 1.21 0.35 25 1.78 5.1 0.83 4.9 0.92 2.3 0.26 1.86 0.24 4.1 1.07 0.15 1.14 1.24 0.38 26 2.07 6.3 0.82 4.7 0.93 2.5 0.27 1.95 0.25 4.1 1.01 0.20 1.50 1.20 0.34 27 1.84 5.0 0.82 5.1 0.90 2.5 0.32 1.78 0.26 4.1 1.00 0.29 1.15 1.23 0.35 29 1.95 4.7 0.79 4.7 0.87 2.2 0.26 1.75 0.21 3.6 1.01 0.18 1.66 1.14 0.37 30 1.81 5.7 0.79 4.8 0.86 2.2 0.25 1.65 0.24 3.8 0.96 0.19 1.14 1.22 0.34 31 1.78 5.3 0.74 4.6 0.81 2.3 0.26 1.84 0.20 3.8 1.00 0.28 1.18 1.10 0.40 32 1.85 5.7 0.83 5.1 0.85 2.6 0.29 1.80 0.26 4.3 1.06 0.26 1.29 1.27 0.34 33 1.86 5.4 0.74 4.5 0.77 2.2 0.24 1.74 0.23 3.6 1.00 0.26 1.34 1.20 0.40 34 1.86 5.8 0.83 4.9 0.79 2.4 0.29 1.91 0.25 3.9 1.02 0.22 1.16 1.21 0.39 35 2.10 5.8 0.88 5.0 0.90 2.6 0.29 1.88 0.26 4.2 1.09 0.25 1.15 1.15 0.41 36 1.86 6.3 0.9 4.7 1.01 2.6 0.28 1.85 0.24 4.0 0.99 0.24 1.27 1.27 0.44 38 1.96 5.9 0.91 4.6 0.84 2.3 0.29 1.86 0.26 4.1 1.08 0.18 1.21 1.24 0.40 42 1.96 5.8 0.83 5.0 0.88 2.4 0.26 1.84 0.28 4.5 1.16 0.24 1.30 1.31 0.40 44 2.06 6.2 0.86 5.0 0.93 2.6 0.37 1.89 0.27 4.3 0.99 0.22 1.01 1.20 0.37 51 1.97 5.9 0.8 4.8 0.90 2.4 0.28 2.01 0.26 4.2 1.13 - - 1.35 0.38 53 1.80 5.9 0.83 4.8 0.94 2.2 0.27 1.81 0.25 4.0 1.04 0.21 1.23 1.23 0.39 55 ------56 ------58 2.05 6.4 0.84 5.2 0.94 2.4 0.29 2.05 0.22 4.5 1.15 0.22 1.28 1.42 0.37 60 2.20 6.5 0.9 5.8 0.94 2.7 0.34 2.16 0.27 4.4 1.04 0.21 1.23 1.37 0.44 61 1.96 5.5 0.76 4.7 0.78 2.2 0.25 1.69 0.22 3.8 0.99 0.26 1.23 1.18 0.43 62 ------0.25 1.16 - - 63 2.04 6.2 0.83 4.9 0.86 2.5 0.24 1.83 0.26 4.2 1.04 0.22 1.30 1.28 0.40 64 1.79 5.7 0.76 4.4 0.86 2.3 0.29 1.68 0.21 3.8 0.98 0.19 0.99 1.18 0.36 65 1.95 6.0 0.84 5.1 0.96 2.4 0.31 2.00 0.28 4.5 0.96 0.27 1.32 1.32 0.42 70 1.81 5.8 0.84 4.6 0.88 2.3 0.30 1.82 0.24 4.0 0.89 0.17 1.02 1.17 0.34 72 2.00 6.2 0.87 5.5 0.96 2.7 0.33 1.92 0.27 4.4 1.22 0.22 1.32 1.47 0.44 73 1.91 5.9 0.77 4.7 0.83 2.2 0.30 1.75 0.27 4.3 0.93 0.24 1.22 1.15 0.41 74 1.82 5.7 0.83 4.8 0.80 2.1 0.26 1.65 0.24 4.0 0.91 0.23 1.09 1.16 0.39 76 2.00 6.0 0.79 4.7 0.88 2.6 0.30 1.79 0.25 4.2 1.07 0.20 1.22 1.25 0.36 Table A4. Major and trace element analyses of melt inclusions from Kilauea Iki sample Iki-22. Electron Microprobe (wt. %) FTIR Correction Temperature PEC Analytical Host H2O CO2 Sample (°C) % SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 FeO* MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 S Cl Total Fo (wt.%) (ppm) Corrected Melt Inclusions Compositions 1 1,256 9.2 49.78 2.19 12.53 11.00 - 10.54 11.07 2.18 0.44 0.26 0.01 0.01 100 86.2 0.36 0 10a 1,289 12.0 48.79 2.42 12.21 11.05 0.13 11.77 10.82 2.05 0.50 0.27 0.14 0.02 100 87.4 0.46 127 10b 1,289 12.7 48.83 2.47 12.13 11.05 0.15 11.77 10.78 2.05 0.48 0.29 0.14 0.02 100 87.4 0.44 103 11a 1,267 11.4 49.42 2.46 12.21 11.01 0.16 10.86 11.12 2.01 0.49 0.27 0.15 0.01 100 86.5 0.44 83 11b 1,272 9.8 49.39 2.55 12.30 11.02 0.17 10.90 10.73 2.15 0.53 0.27 0.12 0.02 100 86.5 0.51 127 11c 1,272 9.8 49.39 2.55 12.30 11.02 0.17 10.90 10.73 2.15 0.53 0.27 0.12 0.02 100 86.5 - - 13 1,216 4.8 50.39 2.36 12.24 10.95 0.19 9.34 11.83 1.99 0.46 0.26 0.09 0.01 100 85.0 0.50 149 14b 1,294 13.3 48.72 2.48 12.06 11.06 0.14 12.01 10.72 2.02 0.51 0.27 0.13 0.02 100 87.5 0.32 214 15 1,279 12.3 49.46 2.19 11.92 11.04 0.13 11.57 10.89 2.07 0.46 0.28 0.04 0.01 100 87.1 0.41 52 2 1,261 11.4 50.04 1.86 12.86 10.99 - 10.40 10.65 2.55 0.39 0.25 0.12 0.01 100 85.9 0.26 174 3a 1,315 14.4 49.49 2.20 11.53 11.08 - 12.59 10.45 2.06 0.35 0.24 0.13 0.01 100 87.8 0.33 106 3b 1,315 16.2 48.97 2.29 11.72 11.09 - 12.65 10.24 2.18 0.55 0.32 0.11 0.02 100 87.9 - - 6 1,275 12.2 49.07 2.23 12.44 11.03 - 11.39 11.21 1.96 0.43 0.24 0.06 0.01 100 87.1 0.63 0 8 1,316 15.3 49.29 2.24 11.82 11.09 - 12.83 10.11 2.08 0.29 0.26 0.13 0.01 100 88.0 0.47 174 9 1,247 8.1 50.59 1.95 11.57 10.98 0.16 10.10 11.58 2.31 0.46 0.29 0.14 0.01 100 85.6 0.46 103 Uncorrected Melt Inclusion Compositions 1 - - 51.07 2.42 13.80 10.12 - 7.25 12.18 2.40 0.48 0.29 0.01 0.01 98.92 86.2 0.39 0 10a - - 50.51 2.75 13.86 9.78 0.13 7.48 12.29 2.33 0.57 0.31 0.15 0.02 97.60 87.4 0.52 143 10b - - 50.69 2.83 13.88 9.65 0.15 7.22 12.34 2.35 0.55 0.33 0.16 0.02 97.50 87.4 0.50 116 11a - - 50.86 2.77 13.78 10.16 0.16 6.60 12.54 2.27 0.55 0.30 0.16 0.02 97.47 86.5 0.50 93 11b - - 50.12 2.83 13.63 11.19 0.17 6.91 11.89 2.39 0.58 0.29 0.13 0.02 97.40 86.5 0.57 141 11c - - 50.12 2.83 13.63 11.19 0.17 6.91 11.89 2.39 0.58 0.29 0.13 0.02 97.40 86.5 - - 13 - - 50.61 2.48 12.86 11.35 0.18 7.25 12.43 2.09 0.48 0.28 0.09 0.01 97.51 85.0 0.53 158 14b - - 50.84 2.87 13.90 9.27 0.14 7.38 12.37 2.33 0.59 0.31 0.15 0.02 97.46 87.5 0.36 243 15 - - 51.57 2.49 13.58 9.27 0.13 7.35 12.41 2.36 0.52 0.32 0.05 0.01 98.10 87.1 0.46 59 2 - - 52.37 2.10 14.52 8.60 - 6.82 12.00 2.88 0.44 0.28 0.14 0.01 97.72 85.9 0.29 192 3a - - 51.50 2.57 13.46 9.88 - 7.31 12.18 2.41 0.41 0.28 0.15 0.01 98.61 87.8 0.38 122 3b - - 52.00 2.74 13.97 8.26 - 7.21 12.17 2.60 0.66 0.38 0.13 0.02 99.07 87.9 - - 6 - - 51.15 2.55 14.18 9.17 - 7.22 12.74 2.23 0.49 0.28 0.07 0.01 98.77 87.1 0.71 0 8 - - 51.37 2.64 13.94 9.96 - 7.10 11.89 2.45 0.34 0.30 0.15 0.01 98.04 88.0 0.55 203 9 - - 51.73 2.12 12.58 10.29 0.16 7.18 12.60 2.51 0.50 0.32 0.15 0.01 97.58 85.6 0.50 112 169 Table A4. (Continued) LA-ICP-MS (ppm)

Sample Li B Sc Ti V Cr Mn Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Rb Sr Y Zr Corrected Melt Inclusions Compositions 1 4.48 2.17 33.5 13,800 295 394 1206 55.1 441 104 95 20.2 6.88 309 19.6 126 10a 3.96 2.51 31.3 15,132 285 411 1081 56.4 462 121 100 22.9 8.04 337 18.3 128 10b 4.14 2.31 31.3 15,034 297 379 1123 57.5 480 130 98 23.6 9.36 341 18.0 131 11a 4.41 2.61 32.4 14,689 301 510 1284 58.1 329 110 121 22.7 8.65 333 17.9 127 11b 4.74 2.38 29.9 15,172 302 300 1270 58.3 345 139 122 24.1 8.81 354 19.0 129 11c 4.10 2.05 28.7 13,407 269 389 1141 51.0 317 73 107 21.3 7.88 313 17.5 110 13 5.39 2.01 33.9 14,583 338 348 1464 54.4 286 145 126 26.3 8.51 337 18.2 129 14b 3.25 4.67 37.2 13,604 218 788 923 47.2 451 96 51 21.7 7.28 333 31.2 207 15 4.55 2.10 30.6 13,137 289 477 1086 57.5 443 108 103 19.7 8.18 317 16.6 118 2 3.92 2.23 31.6 12,126 276 422 985 49.6 432 48 90 20.9 6.23 369 19.5 170 3a 4.28 2.92 28.6 14,128 263 511 925 54.7 603 239 89 23.3 9.11 378 18.0 139 3b 4.71 2.71 30.4 13,719 260 391 1136 58.3 612 114 114 22.2 6.87 296 19.0 124 6 3.87 1.99 32.8 13,744 273 368 1037 51.3 442 116 90 21.7 6.08 357 19.6 126 8 4.03 1.94 28.3 13,192 259 462 1040 57.2 643 120 108 18.8 3.79 264 17.6 113 9 4.31 2.59 36.7 11,310 314 420 1172 52.6 369 108 109 20.6 6.73 308 16.1 122 Uncorrected Melt Inclusion Compositions 1 4.77 2.28 35.9 15,080 322 376 1319 42.8 198 113 95 22.1 7.53 338 21.4 137 10a 4.30 2.70 34.4 16,957 318 375 1215 40.7 132 135 100 25.6 9.03 378 20.6 144 10b 4.48 2.48 34.5 16,990 335 343 1271 40.6 147 146 97 26.6 10.58 386 20.3 148 11a 4.73 2.81 35.5 16,484 336 523 1443 41.6 84 123 122 25.4 9.72 374 20.1 143 11b 5.10 2.54 32.5 16,910 336 292 1418 43.9 102 155 123 26.8 9.82 394 21.2 144 11c 4.38 2.17 31.2 14,943 300 394 1273 35.7 74 81 107 23.7 8.79 349 19.5 122 13 5.61 2.07 35.5 15,423 357 338 1550 45.9 134 153 127 27.9 9.00 356 19.3 136 14b 3.47 5.16 41.2 15,405 246 814 1046 29.4 100 108 44 24.5 8.25 377 35.3 235 15 4.91 2.23 33.6 14,698 322 453 1216 39.9 124 120 102 22.1 9.16 355 18.5 132 2 4.16 2.36 34.0 13,371 303 403 1087 35.8 145 53 89 23.0 6.87 407 21.5 187 3a 4.75 3.22 31.9 16,334 303 465 1072 36.0 165 276 88 27.0 10.55 437 20.8 161 3b 5.22 2.98 34.2 15,874 300 343 1316 40.3 146 132 118 25.6 7.96 343 22.0 143 6 4.13 2.10 36.0 15,371 305 346 1162 37.2 130 130 90 24.2 6.81 400 21.9 141 8 4.50 2.10 31.8 15,389 301 406 1217 37.0 136 139 109 21.9 4.44 308 20.5 132 9 4.56 2.72 39.1 12,245 339 407 1269 40.9 137 116 109 22.3 7.29 334 17.4 132 170 Table A4. (Continued) LA-ICP-MS (ppm)

Sample Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Nd Sm Dy Yb Hf W Pb Th Corrected Melt Inclusions Compositions 1 10.2 0.63 0.08 0.06 1.36 106 10.5 26.1 18.6 5.1 4.2 1.80 3.16 0.11 0.81 0.74 10a 16.1 0.80 0.07 0.08 1.45 133 14.1 35.4 21.0 5.2 4.1 1.40 3.34 0.22 1.04 1.17 10b 16.8 0.89 0.07 0.07 1.48 130 14.2 35.2 21.3 4.9 4.0 1.47 3.16 0.21 1.12 1.09 11a 14.4 0.79 0.04 0.05 1.34 131 14.2 33.4 20.6 5.2 3.9 1.48 2.88 0.19 1.03 0.99 11b 15.1 0.76 0.06 0.07 1.49 140 13.7 36.2 21.6 5.4 4.1 1.61 3.19 0.14 1.09 1.02 11c 13.4 0.73 0.05 0.08 1.40 119 11.8 31.1 18.7 4.7 3.8 1.45 2.73 0.19 1.00 0.82 13 13.7 0.93 0.06 0.10 1.65 118 12.7 35.1 20.2 5.2 4.0 1.50 3.19 0.21 1.13 0.88 14b 14.5 0.53 0.31 0.07 1.94 128 16.8 31.2 26.0 7.4 6.8 2.23 5.11 0.19 1.09 1.19 15 11.0 0.75 0.04 0.06 1.48 111 10.4 27.9 17.6 5.0 4.1 1.49 2.86 0.14 0.94 0.72 2 10.8 0.68 0.04 0.07 1.85 89 11.7 33.3 24.4 5.8 3.9 1.53 3.71 0.10 0.84 0.68 3a 13.5 0.81 0.10 0.06 1.59 140 12.7 31.8 20.5 5.1 4.2 1.44 3.63 0.14 1.21 0.89 3b 9.7 0.65 0.06 0.07 1.41 92 9.5 25.7 18.6 4.8 4.3 1.49 3.18 0.11 0.81 0.70 6 11.8 0.58 0.04 0.06 1.27 102 11.7 26.8 19.7 5.0 4.1 1.38 3.15 0.11 0.71 0.85 8 7.5 0.51 0.05 0.07 1.32 58 8.1 23.6 17.4 4.8 3.7 1.47 2.91 0.09 0.62 0.51 9 10.6 0.62 0.05 0.08 1.39 103 10.5 27.0 18.1 5.0 3.8 1.32 3.05 0.14 0.84 0.70 Uncorrected Melt Inclusion Compositions 1 11.2 0.67 0.09 0.07 1.44 116 11.5 28.5 20.4 5.6 4.6 1.97 3.46 0.12 0.88 0.81 10a 18.0 0.86 0.08 0.08 1.57 149 15.8 39.7 23.6 5.8 4.6 1.57 3.75 0.25 1.17 1.32 10b 19.0 0.96 0.08 0.08 1.61 147 16.1 39.8 24.1 5.6 4.5 1.66 3.57 0.24 1.27 1.23 11a 16.2 0.86 0.04 0.05 1.46 147 15.9 37.5 23.1 5.8 4.4 1.66 3.23 0.21 1.16 1.11 11b 16.9 0.82 0.07 0.07 1.61 156 15.3 40.3 24.1 6.0 4.5 1.80 3.56 0.16 1.22 1.14 11c 14.9 0.79 0.05 0.09 1.51 132 13.2 34.7 20.8 5.3 4.2 1.61 3.05 0.21 1.11 0.92 13 14.5 0.97 0.06 0.10 1.72 124 13.4 37.1 21.3 5.5 4.2 1.58 3.38 0.22 1.19 0.93 14b 16.5 0.56 0.35 0.08 2.13 145 19.0 35.3 29.5 8.4 7.7 2.53 5.79 0.21 1.23 1.35 15 12.3 0.81 0.05 0.07 1.59 124 11.7 31.3 19.7 5.6 4.6 1.67 3.20 0.16 1.05 0.81 2 11.9 0.72 0.04 0.07 1.98 98 12.9 36.7 27.0 6.4 4.3 1.69 4.09 0.11 0.93 0.75 3a 15.6 0.89 0.11 0.07 1.77 162 14.7 36.8 23.8 5.9 4.9 1.67 4.20 0.16 1.40 1.03 3b 11.2 0.71 0.07 0.08 1.55 107 11.0 29.7 21.5 5.6 5.0 1.72 3.68 0.13 0.93 0.81 6 13.2 0.61 0.05 0.07 1.36 114 13.1 30.0 22.0 5.6 4.6 1.53 3.52 0.13 0.79 0.95 8 8.7 0.54 0.06 0.09 1.46 68 9.5 27.5 20.4 5.6 4.4 1.71 3.41 0.11 0.73 0.60 9 11.5 0.65 0.05 0.08 1.47 112 11.4 29.2 19.6 5.4 4.1 1.43 3.30 0.15 0.91 0.76 171 Table A5. Olivine major and trace element compositions from Kilauea Iki sample Iki-22. Electron Microprobe (wt. %) LA-ICP-MS (ppm)

Analytical Sample SiO2 Al2O3 FeO* MnO MgO CaO Total Fo Li Sc Ti V Cr Co Ni Cu Zn 1 40.26 0.05 13.01 - 45.6 0.27 99.2 86.2 1.41 7.5 177 10.2 581 186 3026 4.5 98 10a 39.64 0.05 11.96 0.16 46.34 - 98.15 87.4 1.27 6.6 416 13.7 703 183 3119 6.8 101 10b 39.64 0.05 11.96 0.16 46.34 - 98.15 87.4 1.53 7.0 175 9.7 656 185 3012 5.7 101 11a 39.61 0.02 12.55 0.17 45.21 - 97.57 86.5 1.84 7.3 207 10.9 410 191 2303 6.5 112 11b 39.61 0.02 12.55 0.17 45.21 - 97.57 86.5 1.68 7.2 225 9.6 366 182 2435 6.3 109 11c 39.61 0.02 12.55 0.17 45.21 - 97.57 86.5 1.71 7.1 191 9.4 338 182 2404 5.6 110 13 39.63 0.04 14.14 0.18 44.96 - 98.94 85.0 1.79 7.2 241 11.4 513 200 2890 7.2 119 15 40.01 0.04 12.31 0.17 46.74 - 99.27 87.1 1.6 6.0 136 9.8 677 204 3101 5.4 111 2 40.06 0.04 13.15 - 45.12 0.26 98.62 85.9 1.57 8.4 83 7.8 614 183 3200 4.2 104 3a 40.1 0.04 11.44 - 46 0.26 97.84 87.8 1.34 7.3 169 8.6 799 173 3368 5.0 91 3b 40.45 0.06 11.55 - 46.94 0.24 99.24 87.9 1.5 6.7 124 9.0 692 172 3554 5.0 92 6 39.79 0.03 12.23 - 46.16 0.25 98.47 87.1 1.69 6.4 152 7.4 553 169 3046 5.6 89 8 40.08 0.05 11.36 - 46.61 0.23 98.33 88.0 1.27 7.4 226 10.8 791 176 3636 5.8 100 9 39.7 0.05 13.53 0.16 45.17 - 98.61 85.6 1.35 7.7 86 9.6 575 192 3159 4.3 110

LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample Ga Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Sn Ba La Ce Nd Sm Dy Yb Hf Pb 1 0.30 0.02 1.95 0.21 0.82 0.08 0.24 0.45 0.89 0.06 0.22 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.01 10a 0.57 0.04 6.08 0.35 2.26 0.26 0.26 0.41 3.37 0.27 0.85 0.56 0.10 0.12 0.06 0.07 0.01 10b 0.37 0.10 2.49 0.29 1.17 0.17 0.31 0.46 1.04 0.09 0.37 0.13 0.05 0.03 0.02 11a 0.39 3.62 0.15 0.98 0.08 0.22 0.40 1.34 0.11 0.48 0.14 11b 0.41 0.12 2.94 0.18 0.82 0.09 0.24 0.44 1.34 0.11 0.47 0.17 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 11c 0.23 0.04 2.58 0.23 0.80 0.14 0.22 0.44 0.68 0.05 0.34 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.01 13 0.41 4.36 0.31 1.34 0.16 0.31 0.48 1.88 0.10 0.43 0.14 0.11 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 15 0.33 1.72 0.18 0.71 0.05 0.25 0.53 0.80 0.04 0.26 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.00 2 0.24 0.47 0.14 0.28 0.01 0.28 0.52 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 3a 0.37 3.04 0.22 0.91 0.06 0.26 0.45 1.62 0.07 0.41 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.02 3b 0.58 1.10 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.23 0.49 0.73 0.04 0.26 0.03 0.02 0.04 6 0.26 2.19 0.16 0.63 0.04 0.26 0.52 0.88 0.07 0.33 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.06 8 0.43 2.72 0.24 1.10 0.09 0.33 0.48 0.74 0.09 0.33 0.14 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.01 9 0.19 0.06 0.45 0.09 0.29 0.00 0.29 0.47 0.17 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.02 Dashed spaces indicate measurement not taken, blank values indicate measurement was below detection limits. 172 173 APPENDIX B

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR CHAPTER FOUR

Appendix B contains analytical results for experiments during amphibole analyses. Table B1 summaries repeat EMPA analyses of an amphibole standard using identical operating conditions as our unknown analyses. Table B2 summarizes repeat LA- ICP-MS analyses of secondary mafic glass standards at the same settings as unknown amphibole analyses. Tables B3, B4, B5, and B6 contain major and trace element analyses from Mt. Pinatubo, Mt. St. Helens, Mt. Hood, and Shiveluch Volcano, respectively. In each of these tables an asterisk (*) next to the sample ID denotes trace element analyses with a 30 u µm spot instead of a 50 µm spot for all other analyses.

Table B1. Summary of analytical uncertainty for EMPA analyses of amphibole standard. Accuracy % standard standard Detection Actual Median (measured/actual) deviation error Limit SiO2 40.4 41.0 102 0.3 0.1 0.1 TiO2 4.72 4.39 93 0.04 0.01 0.03 Al2O3 14.9 14.6 98 0.1 0.0 0.1 FeO 10.9 11.0 101 0.4 0.1 0.1 MnO 0.090 0.094 104 0.015 0.003 0.061 MgO 12.8 13.3 104 0.3 0.1 0.0 CaO 10.3 10.0 98 0.1 0.0 0.0 Na2O 2.60 2.45 94 0.07 0.01 0.25 K2O 2.05 2.05 100 0.04 0.01 0.19 P2O5 0.054 0.032 0.006 0.546 F 0.119 0.032 0.006 0.122 Cl 0.024 0.003 0.001 0.008 SO2 0.036 0.015 0.003 0.044 Total 99.2 All values are wt. % and medians and standard deviations calculated from 25 analyses of Kakanui amphibole (USNM 143965) run at the same operating conditions as unknown amphibole analyses. 174

Table B2. Summary of trace element secondary standard accuracy and precision. GSD-1G % Accepted Accuracy standard standard Value Median (Measured deviation error Element (ppm) +/- (ppm) / Accepted) (ppm) n (ppm)

Li 43 6 45.5 106 3.1 72 0.4 B 50 20 53.2 106 4.3 12 1.3 Si 248691 3740 258112 104 12116 64 1515 Sc 52 2 52.7 101 2.0 72 0.2 Ti 7434 360 8044 108 181 72 21 V 44 2 45.3 103 2.2 72 0.3 Co 40 2 40.8 102 2.2 72 0.3 Ni 58 4 62.1 107 4.0 72 0.5 Cu 42 2 42.6 101 3.2 72 0.4 Zn 54 2 55.4 103 4.6 72 0.5 Ga 54 7 55.0 102 3.4 72 0.4 Ge 32 8 33.2 104 2.3 38 0.4 Rb 37.3 0.4 37.7 101 2.5 72 0.3 Sr 69.4 0.7 68.0 98 1.7 72 0.2 Y 42 2 38.6 92 1.7 72 0.2 Zr 42 2 40.5 96 1.9 72 0.2 Nb 42 3 41.7 99 1.1 72 0.1 Mo 39 3 39.7 102 2.8 34 0.5 Ag 23 3 23.3 101 1.9 72 0.2 Cd 18 4 17.1 95 1.0 8 0.4 In 38 5 37.9 100 2.5 72 0.3 Sn 29 6 29.3 101 1.9 72 0.2 Ba 67 1 69.3 103 2.8 72 0.3 La 39.1 0.4 37.6 96 1.3 72 0.1 Ce 41.4 0.4 40.7 98 1.3 72 0.1 Pr 45 1 43.6 97 1.3 72 0.2 Nd 44.7 0.5 43.7 98 1.8 72 0.2 Sm 47.8 0.5 46.7 98 1.7 72 0.2 Eu 41 2 39.8 97 1.4 72 0.2 Gd 50.7 0.5 47.2 93 2.3 72 0.3 Dy 51.2 0.5 48.8 95 2.5 72 0.3 Er 40.1 0.4 40.3 100 3.6 72 0.4 Yb 50.9 0.5 48.3 95 2.3 72 0.3 Pb 50 2 50.2 100 4.5 72 0.5 175 Table B2. Continued. BCR-2G % Accuracy Accepted (Measured standard standard Value Median / deviation error Element (ppm) +/- (ppm) Accepted) (ppm) n (ppm)

Li 9 1 9.2 102 1.2 29 0.22 B 6 1 5.12 85 3.7 5 1.7 Si 254301 1870 256005 101 13208 27 2542 Sc 33 2 34.87 106 1.74 29 0.32 Ti 14100 1000 13937 99 371 29 68.92 V 425 18 440 104 20.53 29 3.81 Co 38 2 37.90 100 2.11 29 0.39 Ni 13 2 12.63 97 1.59 29 0.30 Cu 21 5 17.16 82 1.44 29 0.27 Zn 125 5 155 124 12.89 29 2.39 Ga 23 1 59.62 259 13.83 29 2.57 Ge 1.5 0.1 1.99 133 0.23 17 0.06 Rb 47 0.5 45.58 97 2.41 29 0.45 Sr 342 4 325 95 7.07 29 1.31 Y 35 3 30.12 86 1.14 29 0.21 Zr 184 15 169 92 6.74 29 1.25 Nb 12.5 1 11.28 90 0.42 29 0.08 Mo 270 30 266 99 12.83 14 3.43 Ag 0.5 0.4 1.19 239 0.41 29 0.08 Cd 0.2 0.16 78 0.02 2 0.01 In 0.11 0.02 0.08 76 0.02 29 0.00 Sn 2.6 0.4 1.65 64 0.13 29 0.02 Ba 683 7 664 97 21.92 29 4.07 La 24.7 0.3 23.66 96 0.97 29 0.18 Ce 53.3 0.5 50.47 95 1.89 29 0.35 Pr 6.7 0.4 6.26 93 0.25 29 0.05 Nd 28.9 0.3 27.30 94 1.34 29 0.25 Sm 6.59 0.07 6.18 94 0.47 29 0.09 Eu 1.97 0.02 1.82 92 0.15 29 0.03 Gd 6.71 0.07 6.25 93 0.77 29 0.14 Dy 6.44 0.06 5.72 89 0.36 29 0.07 Er 3.7 0.04 3.50 95 0.64 29 0.12 Yb 3.39 0.03 2.87 85 0.36 29 0.07 Pb 11 1 10.70 97 1.16 29 0.21 176

Table B2. Continued. BHVO-2G % Accuracy Accepted (Measured standard standard Value Median / deviation error Element (ppm) +/- (ppm) Accepted) (ppm) n (ppm)

Li 4.4 0.8 4.38 99 0.80 29 0.15 B 2.88 0.98 4 0.49 Si 230460 467 229142 99 14359 27 2763 Sc 33 2 33.15 100 1.10 29 0.20 Ti 16300 900 16426 101 412 29 77 V 308 19 323 105 20.71 29 3.85 Co 44 2 43.37 99 3.07 29 0.57 Ni 116 7 120 104 9.08 29 1.69 Cu 127 11 122 96 10.75 29 2.00 Zn 102 6 112 110 11.51 29 2.14 Ga 22 3 23.90 109 3.27 29 0.61 Ge 1.6 0.1 1.66 104 0.27 17 0.07 Rb 9.2 0.04 8.47 92 0.77 29 0.14 Sr 396 1 387 98 8.08 29 1.50 Y 26 2 21.99 85 1.37 29 0.25 Zr 170 7 156 92 8.53 29 1.58 Nb 18.3 0.8 16.00 87 0.54 29 0.10 Mo 3.8 0.2 3.76 99 0.29 14 0.08 Ag 0.35 0.13 29 0.02 Cd 0.1 0.02 0.07 69 0.04 2 0.02 In 0.1 0.02 0.08 82 0.01 28 0.00 Sn 2.6 0.6 1.35 52 0.11 29 0.02 Ba 131 2 129 98 3.48 29 0.65 La 15.2 0.2 14.68 97 0.65 29 0.12 Ce 37.6 0.2 35.96 96 1.29 29 0.24 Pr 5.35 0.22 4.88 91 0.22 29 0.04 Nd 24.5 0.2 23.74 97 1.36 29 0.25 Sm 6.1 0.03 5.67 93 0.47 29 0.09 Eu 2.07 0.01 1.97 95 0.11 29 0.02 Gd 6.16 0.05 5.72 93 0.60 29 0.11 Dy 5.28 0.05 4.77 90 0.39 29 0.07 Er 2.56 0.02 2.35 92 0.40 29 0.08 Yb 2.01 0.02 1.73 86 0.21 29 0.04 Pb 1.7 0.2 1.68 99 0.19 29 0.03 Table B3. Amphibole analyses from the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total P22892-1A-1-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 454 939 42.5 1.85 13.2 11.9 11.3 14.8 0.13 2.26 0.77 0.01 0.12 0.014 0.019 98.9 P22892-1A-1-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 840 969 42.7 1.70 13.6 11.6 11.8 14.7 0.16 2.39 0.87 0.08 0.05 0.016 0.019 99.8 P22892-1A-1-3 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 411 936 42.8 1.41 12.8 11.7 11.0 15.4 0.14 2.24 0.77 0.12 0.13 0.016 0.016 98.6 P22892-1A-1-4 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 583 963 41.8 2.13 13.6 11.5 12.4 14.3 0.12 2.29 0.86 0.07 0.04 0.013 0.014 99.1 P22892-1A-2-1 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 174 845 48.6 0.77 8.4 10.8 14.3 14.5 0.61 1.44 0.26 0.00 0.03 0.030 0.024 99.7 P22892-1A-2-2 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 414 939 43.8 1.81 13.0 11.6 12.0 14.7 0.18 2.33 0.73 0.03 0.10 0.015 0.023 100.4 P22892-1A-3-2* single basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 398 933 43.3 1.59 12.7 11.6 11.5 15.1 0.13 2.30 0.72 0.01 0.06 0.016 0.026 99.1 P22892-1A-4-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 720 957 43.1 1.90 13.2 11.8 10.5 15.6 0.09 2.27 0.93 0.01 0.10 0.013 0.012 99.4 P22892-1A-4-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 758 964 42.7 1.90 13.6 11.7 11.2 14.9 0.16 2.26 0.94 0.01 0.09 0.011 0.014 99.5 P22892-1A-5-1* rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 822 951 42.4 1.75 13.7 11.9 12.1 14.1 0.13 2.43 0.86 0.00 0.08 0.015 0.045 99.4 P22892-1A-5-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 727 966 42.6 1.91 13.3 11.7 10.8 15.2 0.14 2.31 0.82 0.01 0.03 0.015 0.028 99.0 P22892-1A-5-5 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 789 960 42.8 1.57 13.3 11.7 10.8 15.4 0.12 2.31 0.87 0.00 0.12 0.008 0.016 99.0 P22892-1A-6-2 single basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 770 968 42.3 1.88 13.6 11.7 11.3 15.0 0.12 2.31 0.91 0.03 0.12 0.014 0.014 99.3 P22892-1A-6-3* core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 787 961 43.4 1.82 13.1 11.9 9.9 15.8 0.11 2.34 0.94 0.02 0.19 0.007 0.002 99.6 P22892-1A-6-4* rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 474 936 41.9 1.95 13.8 11.9 13.0 13.5 0.15 2.33 0.71 0.12 0.09 0.018 0.009 99.5

CN6791-i-1-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 163 829 48.9 0.78 8.0 10.5 13.7 15.2 0.47 1.36 0.26 0.03 0.05 0.043 0.010 99.4 CN6791-i-1-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 212 855 46.7 0.85 9.3 10.9 14.7 13.9 0.57 1.43 0.42 0.01 0.05 0.045 0.000 98.9 CN6791-i-1-3 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 159 837 48.7 0.75 7.8 10.7 14.1 15.0 0.59 1.28 0.34 0.00 0.05 0.033 0.006 99.4 CN6791-i-2-1 single basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 137 804 50.6 0.71 6.9 10.4 13.1 16.0 0.51 0.98 0.16 0.03 0.02 0.038 0.000 99.4 CN6791-i-3-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 161 830 49.0 0.76 7.7 10.5 13.2 15.5 0.53 1.21 0.23 0.00 0.12 0.044 0.014 98.8 CN6791-i-3-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 176 817 48.1 0.79 8.6 10.9 13.9 14.6 0.46 1.28 0.38 0.01 0.09 0.035 0.000 99.1 CN6791-i-3-3 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 181 846 47.7 0.83 8.5 10.7 14.2 14.6 0.54 1.41 0.33 0.04 0.08 0.049 0.010 98.9 CN6791-i-3-4 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 174 843 48.6 0.76 8.2 10.8 14.1 14.7 0.66 1.26 0.30 0.00 0.07 0.033 0.000 99.5 CN6791-i-4-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 154 828 49.1 0.79 7.6 10.6 13.6 15.2 0.55 1.25 0.26 0.00 0.10 0.039 0.000 99.1 CN6791-i-4-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 145 824 50.0 0.73 7.2 10.6 13.4 15.5 0.62 1.13 0.22 0.01 0.00 0.039 0.004 99.4 CN6791-i-5-1 single basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 166 836 49.0 0.85 8.1 10.7 13.6 15.3 0.51 1.34 0.23 0.02 0.10 0.040 0.000 99.8 CN6791-i-6-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hst 411 934 42.9 1.78 12.8 11.7 11.5 14.8 0.15 2.26 0.67 0.07 0.03 0.017 0.014 98.7 CN6791-i-6-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Tsch-Prg 369 930 44.0 1.63 12.2 11.6 10.7 15.8 0.15 2.18 0.68 0.04 0.11 0.015 0.000 99.1 CN6791-i-6-3 single basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 132 813 50.7 0.79 6.8 10.4 12.7 16.3 0.46 1.20 0.19 0.01 0.16 0.036 0.001 99.7 CN6791-i-6-4 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 160 833 48.8 0.81 7.8 10.8 13.8 15.1 0.59 1.22 0.31 0.07 0.05 0.043 0.005 99.5 CN6791-i-6-5 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 169 854 49.3 0.75 7.9 10.4 14.0 15.1 0.68 1.30 0.24 0.02 0.03 0.040 0.000 99.8 CN6791-i-7-1 rim basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 170 826 49.1 0.80 8.3 10.5 14.4 15.0 0.48 1.25 0.22 0.06 0.06 0.045 0.005 100.3 CN6791-i-7-2 core basalt inclusion June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 148 837 49.4 0.72 7.7 10.9 13.6 15.0 0.60 1.55 0.24 0.00 0.19 0.035 0.007 99.9 CN6791-i-8-1 single basalt inclusion June 7-12 Tsch-Prg 388 933 44.0 1.87 12.6 11.7 11.2 15.3 0.14 2.28 0.68 0.00 0.14 0.016 0.007 99.9 177 Table B3. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb P22892-1A-1-1 13.7 189228 62.9 11098 465 55.0 197 2.31 53.7 16.6 1.32 3.39 319 21.5 41.4 1.88 0.052 0.95 115 6.19 21.5 4.10 23.2 6.63 1.76 5.47 4.13 1.77 1.26 0.51 P22892-1A-1-2 10.2 181773 50.1 10407 460 59.1 136 1.56 60.6 16.3 1.24 3.70 298 21.4 52.5 1.50 0.07 0.080 1.08 111 5.31 20.7 3.91 23.4 5.31 2.06 6.73 4.16 2.54 1.72 0.49 P22892-1A-1-3 12.0 177692 50.5 10714 428 54.9 155 2.80 53.0 15.4 0.72 3.79 344 23.2 53.6 1.84 0.102 1.04 131 7.28 26.0 4.19 26.9 6.46 2.45 8.24 5.66 2.59 2.14 0.50 P22892-1A-1-4 12.8 184687 60.7 12579 545 61.7 108 3.47 57.2 19.4 1.37 4.26 319 23.7 63.6 1.38 0.042 0.122 1.42 143 6.49 22.3 4.09 23.6 8.05 1.74 6.34 5.77 2.72 1.67 0.53 P22892-1A-2-1 13.2 218124 78.7 5181 309 52.8 67.6 12.3 243 18.9 4.21 1.04 30.7 83.2 40.7 4.26 0.256 2.41 18.7 12.9 59.4 10.9 60.2 16.3 2.98 16.8 16.2 7.97 7.95 0.87 P22892-1A-2-2 17.2 191439 79.4 10974 511 68.7 150 5.36 47.9 16.8 1.87 3.71 298 20.0 52.5 2.23 0.036 0.110 1.45 105 4.22 16.8 3.12 16.9 6.43 1.86 5.99 4.91 2.22 1.61 0.66 P22892-1A-3-2* 17.3 193010 64.6 10789 469 65.4 221 0.99 60.2 15.7 1.87 4.18 290 21.1 46.7 1.34 0.103 0.84 98.9 4.46 18.6 3.47 20.0 6.28 1.90 7.20 4.94 2.77 1.86 0.64 P22892-1A-4-1 7.88 200146 81.6 11840 553 69.2 197 3.04 45.2 16.7 1.28 3.80 297 18.3 39.1 1.15 0.088 1.28 120 4.01 17.0 2.90 18.7 5.22 1.72 6.66 3.79 1.67 1.35 0.38 P22892-1A-4-2 9.14 192387 91.7 12402 529 66.4 158 3.49 48.4 16.8 1.15 3.85 305 18.3 47.5 1.29 0.103 1.11 114 4.18 18.3 3.35 17.3 6.28 1.94 6.42 4.32 2.68 1.34 0.44 P22892-1A-5-1* 22.7 172912 56.6 11766 510 63.2 97.7 2.33 63.6 20.2 2.71 3.80 308 22.6 45.8 1.64 0.087 1.12 120 4.99 18.9 3.49 20.1 7.82 1.83 8.10 3.35 2.03 1.39 0.59 P22892-1A-5-2 174836 88.8 12685 518 64.9 187 1.63 46.8 16.4 3.39 347 23.0 45.6 1.02 0.068 1.17 130 5.61 18.6 3.98 22.3 6.31 1.94 6.56 4.07 2.22 1.93 0.40 P22892-1A-5-5 18.6 193172 88.7 11775 504 64.8 221 5.81 49.4 17.8 1.92 4.52 299 18.5 39.4 1.17 0.096 1.30 118 4.47 16.3 3.15 18.3 5.80 1.89 6.02 3.35 1.86 2.06 0.47 P22892-1A-6-2 2.27 177437 97.7 12863 510 62.8 185 2.09 46.8 15.9 1.43 3.89 322 21.0 45.5 1.17 0.005 0.145 1.17 123 4.85 18.4 3.35 20.5 5.04 1.91 6.05 4.77 2.26 1.40 0.41 P22892-1A-6-3* 11.8 199969 85.4 11908 505 62.3 153 4.79 48.8 19.5 1.91 7.29 331 22.5 77.1 1.26 0.29 0.152 1.11 135 6.30 20.0 4.03 21.9 5.67 1.51 7.24 3.45 2.07 1.76 0.76 P22892-1A-6-4* 22.7 178777 69.4 13057 538 65.9 76.3 9.86 59.6 19.4 2.08 4.02 383 25.7 65.4 1.61 0.116 0.93 164 7.36 26.0 4.98 25.5 8.82 1.59 7.80 6.01 3.24 1.35 0.61

CN6791-i-1-1 33.4 219111 72.1 4860 289 55.6 93.1 4.22 246 19.7 3.32 0.75 28.9 74.9 30.8 4.76 0.195 2.36 19.2 12.2 56.0 10.2 58.4 16.8 2.99 15.4 14.2 8.31 7.19 0.58 CN6791-i-1-2 15.7 230950 79.6 4502 299 53.5 77.6 9.77 267 18.5 2.79 1.52 28.6 78.3 28.9 4.21 0.220 2.39 23.8 13.2 59.4 11.1 60.4 14.0 3.29 15.6 15.1 8.22 8.36 0.65 CN6791-i-1-3 16.3 225189 99.7 4677 265 53.1 70.4 2.60 249 18.3 3.40 0.49 26.4 95.1 32.0 4.59 0.035 0.255 3.01 15.1 12.6 60.1 11.5 63.7 19.4 3.47 20.4 19.1 10.5 7.87 0.54 CN6791-i-2-1 54.5 226937 64.9 5037 290 55.0 96.3 2.87 257 17.1 2.79 0.07 28.3 69.3 35.8 4.39 0.009 0.173 2.10 20.8 11.1 48.9 9.23 45.7 15.9 2.46 15.1 11.5 7.95 6.30 0.49 CN6791-i-3-1 69.3 251260 64.0 5204 307 61.1 116 21.7 281 19.8 3.02 0.76 35.6 64.7 37.2 4.27 0.057 0.222 2.52 22.9 9.46 46.3 8.62 47.2 12.7 2.79 11.8 12.3 7.00 5.99 0.52 CN6791-i-3-2 45.1 235059 96.5 5429 323 60.8 89.1 27.0 259 21.2 4.28 2.85 34.4 83.4 30.7 5.55 0.044 0.262 2.92 36.1 11.6 54.9 10.4 61.0 18.5 3.66 17.5 15.6 11.0 7.64 0.95 CN6791-i-3-3 59.3 219559 70.3 5284 279 49.6 78.3 20.6 247 18.9 3.59 0.58 33.4 78.7 35.5 4.98 0.06 0.033 0.202 2.37 27.2 13.1 56.2 10.9 60.2 17.4 3.61 15.8 13.3 7.96 7.98 0.53 CN6791-i-3-4 30.7 206502 71.5 5617 296 50.3 66.7 8.17 262 18.5 2.67 1.19 34.0 71.6 32.9 4.62 0.189 2.40 27.8 12.9 59.3 11.1 56.7 12.9 2.82 15.4 14.0 6.89 7.15 0.59 CN6791-i-4-1 35.1 214427 71.6 4714 273 50.5 98.5 4.89 253 15.6 2.55 1.11 31.1 66.7 34.8 3.64 0.09 0.170 1.96 28.3 9.62 45.7 8.62 44.4 13.2 2.84 14.5 13.5 7.57 6.58 0.69 CN6791-i-4-2 31.9 230068 71.5 5482 286 56.8 81.4 5.62 258 18.8 3.49 0.51 33.0 74.6 38.3 4.35 0.004 0.238 2.13 23.5 11.6 52.2 9.97 51.1 15.4 2.87 13.2 14.0 9.00 8.29 0.54 CN6791-i-5-1 77.8 240007 67.2 5203 308 57.6 96.7 21.7 263 17.7 2.35 1.43 33.3 73.4 35.4 3.93 0.011 0.190 2.36 25.9 10.3 47.8 8.95 50.5 15.1 3.12 15.7 14.3 7.94 6.73 0.46 CN6791-i-6-1 19.1 176492 64.7 12695 531 65.1 236 5.15 56.9 18.4 0.95 3.66 304 20.9 38.8 1.74 0.113 1.20 102 4.79 19.0 3.53 20.5 6.63 2.16 7.51 4.76 1.99 1.79 0.42 CN6791-i-6-2 13.2 199320 57.9 10609 488 66.8 268 17.3 56.1 17.8 1.39 3.59 295 17.2 36.5 1.65 0.058 0.092 1.14 99.2 4.30 16.8 3.09 18.7 7.40 1.62 5.63 4.52 2.29 1.36 0.53 CN6791-i-6-3 42.7 219127 64.2 5405 313 54.9 123 17.5 196 15.5 2.56 1.74 45.1 46.4 35.5 3.14 0.079 0.151 1.49 30.9 9.04 39.5 6.68 37.4 9.93 2.41 11.8 10.6 5.29 5.21 0.48 CN6791-i-6-4 56.4 227198 71.2 4713 276 52.7 90.2 9.05 267 18.1 3.59 0.30 28.0 76.1 33.8 4.51 0.009 0.222 2.46 19.1 12.0 52.1 9.98 52.9 14.5 3.22 15.1 14.0 8.22 6.61 0.42 CN6791-i-6-5 70.5 216400 71.0 5095 283 52.4 87.5 41.2 234 18.1 2.88 1.88 31.7 69.5 34.6 4.18 0.171 2.07 31.2 11.2 50.2 9.51 53.5 14.0 2.79 13.9 13.2 8.23 6.04 0.70 CN6791-i-7-1 15.8 233006 62.4 5079 276 56.1 100 4.81 261 18.4 3.04 0.54 30.5 70.9 33.8 4.29 0.205 2.19 18.2 11.0 53.4 9.93 50.4 15.4 3.26 14.3 14.5 6.87 7.69 0.47 CN6791-i-7-2 14.1 230805 87.5 4831 267 55.1 76.8 10.6 275 18.7 3.95 1.44 29.8 87.5 51.8 4.21 0.270 2.38 23.0 12.7 61.2 11.3 66.4 18.0 3.42 18.1 16.2 9.48 8.92 0.68 CN6791-i-8-1 38.4 207740 60.3 11327 533 69.3 214 4.32 62.5 19.2 1.99 4.84 305 21.6 44.0 1.59 0.098 1.14 107 5.24 18.7 3.50 18.6 6.47 1.70 7.46 4.16 2.37 1.49 0.69 178 Table B3. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 22892-2A2-1-1 rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 714 943 42.9 1.54 13.3 11.9 11.2 14.9 0.14 2.28 0.81 0.01 0.03 0.014 0.008 98.9 22892-2A2-1-2 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 923 984 41.8 1.79 14.0 11.7 11.5 14.9 0.13 2.44 0.93 0.01 0.12 0.013 0.025 99.2 22892-2A2-1-3 single June 7-12 Mg-Hst 793 970 42.7 2.00 13.7 11.7 11.0 15.1 0.10 2.36 0.86 0.00 0.02 0.013 0.013 99.5 22892-2A2-2-1* rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 467 933 42.1 1.74 13.6 11.9 12.0 14.3 0.11 2.27 0.76 0.06 0.07 0.016 0.025 99.0 22892-2A2-2-2 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 759 969 41.9 2.12 13.9 11.8 11.9 14.2 0.14 2.38 0.80 0.08 0.13 0.014 0.017 99.4 22892-2A2-2-3 rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 414 934 44.1 1.64 13.0 11.8 10.5 15.5 0.12 2.36 0.77 0.02 0.03 0.011 0.000 99.7 22892-2A2-2-4 rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 698 941 41.3 1.62 14.6 11.8 14.2 12.7 0.20 2.24 0.83 0.05 0.06 0.026 0.014 99.6 22892-2A2-2-5 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 804 962 42.6 1.78 14.1 11.6 12.0 14.3 0.15 2.33 0.82 0.07 0.11 0.011 0.033 100.0 22892-2A2-2-6 rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 444 932 43.4 1.70 13.2 11.9 10.7 15.4 0.10 2.24 0.83 0.04 0.03 0.012 0.018 99.6 22892-2A2-2-7 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 864 982 41.9 1.99 13.9 11.8 11.8 14.7 0.14 2.43 0.94 0.02 0.01 0.010 0.009 99.7 22892-2A2-3-1 rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 584 950 42.2 1.72 13.3 11.8 11.6 14.9 0.13 2.23 0.84 0.00 0.03 0.014 0.011 98.9 22892-2A2-3-2 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 604 967 41.6 2.08 13.7 11.6 12.2 14.5 0.13 2.31 0.84 0.06 0.05 0.010 0.019 99.1 22892-2A2-3-3 single June 7-12 Mg-Hst 458 945 43.0 1.80 13.1 11.8 10.5 15.4 0.13 2.25 0.84 0.08 0.12 0.010 0.032 99.1 22892-2A2-3-4 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 595 955 42.0 2.09 13.6 11.8 11.4 14.8 0.09 2.24 0.85 0.08 0.15 0.011 0.008 99.1 22892-2A2-4-1* rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 437 926 43.1 1.64 13.0 11.9 10.9 15.2 0.11 2.18 0.86 0.04 0.08 0.019 0.000 99.0 22892-2A2-4-2 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 666 968 41.6 2.06 14.1 11.6 11.8 14.3 0.16 2.22 0.96 0.07 0.05 0.010 0.026 99.0 22892-2A2-4-3 rim June 7-12 Mg-Hst 440 931 43.1 1.62 13.0 11.9 10.9 15.3 0.12 2.22 0.82 0.01 0.06 0.011 0.019 99.2 22892-2A2-4-4 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 747 949 43.9 1.55 13.0 11.7 11.0 15.5 0.13 2.32 0.87 0.07 0.07 0.013 0.021 100.1 22892-2A2-4-5 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 785 954 41.8 1.61 14.0 11.8 12.4 14.1 0.14 2.36 0.78 0.04 0.13 0.018 0.030 99.1 22892-2A2-4-7 core June 7-12 Mg-Hst 660 961 41.3 1.98 14.1 11.8 11.7 14.4 0.12 2.22 0.97 0.06 0.13 0.013 0.000 98.7

P22892-1A2-1-1 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 186 850 47.2 0.77 8.4 10.7 14.0 14.3 0.65 1.27 0.34 0.00 0.09 0.040 0.012 97.8 P22892-1A2-1-2 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 139 825 50.1 0.72 7.0 10.2 13.4 15.8 0.55 1.21 0.17 0.06 0.11 0.034 0.000 99.3 P22892-1A2-1-3 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 167 827 48.5 0.84 8.2 10.7 13.6 15.1 0.46 1.32 0.28 0.00 0.08 0.045 0.013 99.1 P22892-1A2-1-4 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 141 815 50.0 0.70 7.1 10.4 13.4 15.5 0.57 1.09 0.20 0.02 0.09 0.037 0.000 99.1 P22892-1A2-2-1 single andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 159 831 48.7 0.81 7.8 10.5 13.4 15.3 0.51 1.28 0.25 0.00 0.07 0.041 0.000 98.6 P22892-1A2-2-4 single andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 145 830 49.3 0.71 7.3 10.6 13.5 15.4 0.58 1.29 0.23 0.05 0.04 0.037 0.020 99.1 P22892-1A2-2-6 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 182 876 48.0 0.87 8.1 10.2 13.7 15.2 0.60 1.47 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.050 0.004 98.6 P22892-1A2-2-7 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 164 840 49.1 0.98 7.9 10.3 13.9 15.2 0.50 1.33 0.20 0.00 0.03 0.044 0.003 99.4 P22892-1A2-3-1 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 139 823 50.6 0.66 7.0 10.3 13.0 15.9 0.56 1.23 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.037 0.001 99.6 P22892-1A2-3-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 180 826 48.4 0.86 8.6 10.9 13.9 14.7 0.50 1.30 0.41 0.02 0.00 0.042 0.004 99.7 P22892-1A2-4-1* rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 177 839 48.5 0.81 8.2 10.4 13.8 15.1 0.53 1.24 0.24 0.05 0.06 0.049 0.000 99.0 P22892-1A2-4-2 core andesite June 7-12 Tsch-Prg 423 939 43.3 1.52 12.9 11.7 9.4 15.8 0.10 2.34 0.37 0.00 0.12 0.012 0.030 97.6 P22892-1A2-5-1 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 158 828 48.7 0.79 7.9 10.9 14.0 14.6 0.59 1.33 0.35 0.01 0.04 0.039 0.010 99.3 P22892-1A2-5-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 205 863 47.1 0.81 9.1 10.5 15.5 13.7 0.65 1.42 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.044 0.000 99.2 P22892-1A2-6-1 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 182 828 47.9 0.90 8.6 10.6 14.3 14.4 0.45 1.31 0.33 0.00 0.07 0.052 0.001 99.0 P22892-1A2-6-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 181 834 48.3 0.88 8.8 10.9 14.3 14.1 0.52 1.52 0.39 0.00 0.05 0.039 0.003 99.7 179 Table B3. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 22892-2A2-1-1 2.04 205425 61.9 11079 517 68.2 202 7.61 62.2 19.1 1.54 4.76 323 19.2 45.4 1.49 0.104 1.25 123 4.76 22.5 3.95 23.1 6.60 2.01 6.17 4.06 2.72 1.23 0.64 22892-2A2-1-2 3.78 195303 84.9 12297 519 65.0 158 2.01 50.5 19.2 1.71 4.33 316 19.9 49.0 0.99 0.132 1.22 126 4.95 20.3 3.24 20.4 6.90 2.26 6.17 4.59 2.38 2.00 0.45 22892-2A2-1-3 4.47 211092 87.3 13149 551 67.4 219 3.49 53.3 20.9 2.38 4.94 334 19.0 44.5 1.18 0.005 0.112 1.65 133 4.49 18.9 3.64 19.8 6.04 1.93 6.63 3.67 2.01 1.65 0.61 22892-2A2-2-1* 3.97 202282 56.7 11894 530 69.2 121 1.62 70.4 21.0 1.33 4.24 382 21.6 53.5 2.28 0.17 0.082 1.17 149 6.06 26.9 4.89 25.4 7.47 2.29 8.23 6.03 2.60 1.59 0.87 22892-2A2-2-2 6.60 198568 82.0 13267 554 67.1 151 6.42 52.6 21.1 2.06 5.00 384 22.8 61.6 1.49 0.024 0.111 1.66 163 6.64 24.3 4.40 25.0 6.15 2.15 7.21 5.44 2.47 1.80 0.76 22892-2A2-2-3 2.87 179853 71.6 11107 454 60.5 230 2.19 49.4 17.4 1.00 3.18 341 19.8 41.5 1.52 0.079 0.94 122 5.24 20.9 3.90 20.2 6.56 1.65 6.37 4.69 1.82 1.82 0.52 22892-2A2-2-4 9.88 176125 49.9 10771 489 63.8 90.1 3.70 69.7 20.0 1.68 3.57 353 23.0 59.7 1.77 0.090 1.31 135 6.14 26.1 4.81 24.5 6.75 2.43 6.54 4.87 3.20 1.96 0.65 22892-2A2-2-5 2.39 185266 67.1 11984 524 67.9 110 2.95 48.7 19.2 1.44 3.97 330 21.7 48.4 1.11 0.041 0.092 1.35 131 4.67 20.2 3.71 21.8 6.26 2.17 7.32 4.82 2.49 2.39 0.57 22892-2A2-2-6 4.54 181086 62.2 11645 486 63.6 156 4.48 61.7 19.6 1.73 3.52 385 22.5 57.0 1.95 0.006 0.094 1.30 145 7.04 28.2 4.62 25.9 7.68 2.30 7.21 5.43 2.73 1.70 0.69 22892-2A2-2-7 2.48 190123 79.8 13668 555 67.7 146 2.47 50.3 20.3 1.55 3.82 330 19.4 55.1 0.99 0.100 1.28 139 5.84 22.0 4.06 23.1 6.19 2.07 5.79 5.04 2.58 1.99 0.47 22892-2A2-3-1 8.68 190817 75.2 11746 502 66.0 254 1.97 51.6 17.8 1.44 4.32 346 18.8 40.9 1.95 0.042 0.100 0.77 130 5.15 23.1 3.38 19.8 6.62 2.04 5.72 4.19 1.84 1.20 0.66 22892-2A2-3-2 3.47 181566 73.2 13861 541 62.6 105 2.63 50.2 21.3 1.97 3.99 400 24.3 60.1 1.58 0.06 0.036 0.107 1.47 168 6.99 27.2 4.58 26.6 7.80 2.25 7.03 5.50 2.63 1.69 0.61 22892-2A2-3-3 0.82 188432 79.3 11604 503 61.1 141 1.71 44.2 18.3 1.32 3.47 321 19.6 38.4 1.13 0.090 1.20 120 4.21 17.3 3.35 19.9 5.76 1.91 5.36 3.87 1.70 1.62 0.44 22892-2A2-3-4 2.57 183213 77.5 12957 541 64.1 114 2.09 48.1 18.6 1.45 4.13 353 23.1 54.9 1.47 0.110 1.27 140 5.45 21.8 3.98 22.4 7.15 1.98 6.38 5.30 2.67 2.21 0.48 22892-2A2-4-1* 208439 76.9 11208 502 66.1 260 1.46 56.9 19.4 1.41 4.23 325 19.6 40.3 1.65 0.094 1.26 121 4.69 20.7 3.58 20.5 5.96 1.96 5.25 5.68 2.13 0.83 0.46 22892-2A2-4-2 0.84 195208 71.9 12711 543 65.5 138 2.60 48.1 21.8 1.58 5.16 329 23.2 56.2 1.39 0.046 0.152 1.50 143 5.12 20.3 3.94 21.4 6.68 1.81 5.66 4.47 2.16 1.72 0.62 22892-2A2-4-3 1.87 201912 59.3 11063 466 63.3 218 5.07 56.6 19.2 1.58 3.27 362 22.7 52.7 1.71 0.112 1.33 133 6.90 25.3 4.66 26.2 7.58 1.83 6.88 5.06 2.01 1.50 0.60 22892-2A2-4-4 4.69 187663 60.0 10316 439 64.9 188 1.08 53.9 18.1 1.21 2.89 314 21.4 44.6 1.70 0.095 1.20 106 5.10 20.2 3.54 21.7 5.55 1.90 6.29 4.83 2.71 1.71 0.53 22892-2A2-4-5 3.22 192599 45.9 9924 452 62.3 101 1.31 61.0 20.2 1.87 4.05 305 22.9 56.5 1.62 0.115 1.38 116 5.84 21.1 4.02 22.7 7.36 2.05 6.60 5.19 2.60 1.87 0.48 22892-2A2-4-7 5.28 193550 71.2 13022 553 71.1 132 6.01 50.5 20.1 1.86 4.22 325 22.2 56.4 1.21 0.008 0.071 1.51 138 5.42 21.1 3.98 21.3 7.39 2.01 6.17 5.28 2.54 2.32 0.65

P22892-1A2-1-1 6.32 204535 87.7 5404 269 47.3 61.1 1.25 245 17.4 3.69 0.45 30.7 82.8 34.8 4.50 0.042 0.233 2.46 20.4 13.6 56.3 10.9 59.5 16.6 3.18 16.8 16.8 8.56 7.88 0.67 P22892-1A2-1-2 31.6 216801 58.9 5285 270 54.9 99.2 1.44 232 16.2 3.16 0.41 32.0 67.6 35.3 4.42 0.166 1.91 18.3 10.4 45.0 8.79 47.7 12.5 2.97 14.2 12.0 7.55 6.31 0.41 P22892-1A2-1-3 66.9 213718 69.1 5301 274 55.5 89.5 9.07 211 15.7 3.32 0.29 27.0 69.7 37.3 4.83 0.012 0.232 1.92 19.4 11.3 51.7 10.1 57.5 14.1 3.93 17.0 14.4 8.62 6.84 0.52 P22892-1A2-1-4 15.1 196947 62.1 5470 273 51.9 92.5 9.45 215 16.0 2.70 0.43 36.6 63.5 39.9 3.99 0.170 1.61 24.3 10.8 47.5 8.93 48.5 13.8 3.13 14.6 11.5 7.81 6.30 0.56 P22892-1A2-2-1 24.1 213900 65.2 4914 240 53.9 83.0 2.76 224 14.6 3.45 0.73 26.0 83.1 33.4 5.05 0.181 2.28 19.1 14.5 65.2 12.1 62.6 18.6 3.41 17.3 16.4 10.1 8.55 0.45 P22892-1A2-2-4 68.4 210158 69.3 5087 272 55.3 93.9 8.77 243 17.7 2.73 0.48 31.2 72.6 35.4 4.37 0.128 2.29 21.3 10.8 50.0 10.3 52.9 15.9 3.29 15.6 14.4 8.34 7.73 0.45 P22892-1A2-2-6 58.5 208888 59.4 5283 280 53.8 99.1 7.18 224 17.2 2.94 0.46 34.9 68.2 37.2 4.67 0.199 2.16 20.5 10.9 46.0 8.30 46.3 12.1 2.92 14.3 12.7 8.08 7.13 0.43 P22892-1A2-2-7 55.2 202401 45.0 6619 284 53.6 110 7.77 233 18.2 2.33 0.36 38.3 74.8 46.0 4.61 0.035 0.148 2.25 25.9 9.99 47.8 8.98 50.4 14.6 3.64 14.8 14.8 7.78 7.68 0.45 P22892-1A2-3-1 53.4 210062 58.7 4380 251 52.0 92.4 11.4 212 14.8 3.07 1.96 40.7 66.3 29.7 3.42 0.10 0.110 1.78 25.7 16.0 59.3 10.5 52.7 14.5 2.91 16.2 13.8 8.13 7.25 0.71 P22892-1A2-3-2 37.4 208953 93.0 5190 310 52.0 80.2 7.44 240 19.6 3.47 0.82 30.4 77.2 32.2 4.65 0.039 0.227 2.80 24.3 12.6 59.8 10.7 58.4 17.7 3.64 18.4 16.8 9.07 8.30 0.61 P22892-1A2-4-1* 103 232170 74.9 5887 316 56.5 118 13.7 253 16.9 2.75 35.7 63.7 40.6 4.55 0.25 0.220 2.17 22.4 9.83 43.1 8.32 39.1 13.8 2.42 11.9 12.3 6.79 6.46 0.62 P22892-1A2-4-2 35.2 194361 94.3 10344 533 58.0 162 3.40 49.7 13.3 1.54 1.11 160 18.6 17.0 0.64 0.004 0.073 0.69 38.7 0.82 4.24 0.90 7.37 2.60 1.05 3.55 4.46 2.33 1.86 0.14 P22892-1A2-5-1 10.5 208097 70.3 5151 267 50.4 77.0 1.07 236 17.4 3.13 0.35 31.0 79.4 38.5 4.99 0.211 2.35 20.2 13.4 55.8 10.7 55.8 15.5 3.17 17.9 15.5 9.59 9.15 0.49 P22892-1A2-5-2 19.1 206584 66.8 5546 276 45.6 56.1 2.65 224 15.3 2.27 0.50 44.8 59.8 43.2 4.03 0.141 1.57 21.9 11.3 44.5 8.36 46.4 10.8 2.65 12.3 11.5 6.54 7.22 0.56 P22892-1A2-6-1 40.3 218892 68.4 5404 292 57.7 90.9 2.21 229 18.2 3.02 0.43 37.5 78.0 39.1 4.64 0.132 2.16 22.9 12.5 56.5 10.4 57.5 17.0 3.28 16.2 15.6 9.31 7.47 0.51 P22892-1A2-6-2 33.5 216257 95.7 5498 296 48.2 69.9 8.01 230 18.0 3.14 1.30 33.1 72.9 30.4 3.99 0.210 2.38 25.3 14.3 60.9 10.8 58.6 14.8 3.03 12.9 14.7 8.30 7.23 0.59 180 Table B3. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total P22692-2A-1-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 207 854 47.5 0.93 9.1 10.8 14.1 14.5 0.56 1.35 0.37 0.01 0.00 0.041 0.015 99.3 P22692-2A-11-2 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 142 821 49.1 0.81 7.1 10.2 12.8 15.9 0.40 1.28 0.21 0.01 0.08 0.041 0.018 98.0 P22692-2A-11-4 single andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 154 833 49.4 0.79 7.3 10.3 13.3 15.5 0.60 1.11 0.19 0.04 0.11 0.038 0.000 98.6 P22692-2A-11-5* rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hst 448 943 42.4 2.05 13.0 11.8 11.2 14.7 0.15 2.22 0.69 0.07 0.13 0.015 0.014 98.5 P22692-2A-11-6 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hst 446 947 41.9 1.97 12.7 11.7 10.6 15.0 0.12 2.26 0.79 0.08 0.12 0.012 0.017 97.3 P22692-2A-12-1 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 125 797 49.7 0.59 6.6 10.8 13.1 15.2 0.61 1.04 0.28 0.00 0.06 0.018 0.014 98.1 P22692-2A-12-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 185 849 46.8 0.86 8.5 10.9 14.0 14.0 0.64 1.35 0.37 0.04 0.11 0.039 0.000 97.6 P22692-2A-12-3 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 171 836 47.3 0.78 8.2 10.9 14.2 14.0 0.63 1.30 0.33 0.01 0.00 0.036 0.000 97.8 P22692-2A-12-4 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 130 802 49.1 0.63 6.8 10.8 13.3 14.9 0.61 1.11 0.27 0.01 0.13 0.024 0.011 97.7 P22692-2A-12-5 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 170 836 47.1 0.79 8.2 10.8 14.4 14.0 0.62 1.28 0.34 0.00 0.07 0.041 0.000 97.6 P22692-2A-15-2 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 163 844 48.0 0.79 7.7 10.3 13.6 15.1 0.55 1.26 0.25 0.00 0.21 0.040 0.005 97.9 P22692-2A-15-3 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 178 847 46.8 0.85 8.2 10.5 14.2 14.6 0.54 1.25 0.31 0.01 0.28 0.048 0.000 97.5 P22692-2A-15-4 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 200 847 47.2 0.79 8.9 10.7 14.4 13.8 0.61 1.36 0.42 0.03 0.08 0.041 0.006 98.3 P22692-2A-2-3 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 174 839 47.9 0.79 8.2 10.5 13.9 14.9 0.53 1.27 0.25 0.04 0.11 0.047 0.006 98.5 P22692-2A-5-1* rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hst 732 965 41.5 1.77 13.0 11.7 10.6 15.0 0.14 2.28 0.82 0.00 0.08 0.012 0.012 96.9 P22692-2A-5-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 200 878 46.2 0.84 8.8 10.9 14.7 13.7 0.72 1.51 0.43 0.03 0.06 0.049 0.013 98.0 P22692-2A-6-2 single andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 169 827 48.0 0.78 8.2 10.7 13.9 14.9 0.49 1.26 0.30 0.03 0.09 0.041 0.000 98.7 P22692-2A-8-1* rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 164 849 48.3 0.76 7.8 10.5 14.0 15.1 0.59 1.34 0.24 0.02 0.06 0.047 0.000 98.8 P22692-2A-8-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 163 834 49.1 0.84 7.7 10.8 10.9 16.8 0.42 1.26 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.040 0.000 98.2 P22692-2A-8-3 core andesite June 7-12 Tsch-Prg 426 917 44.0 1.69 12.9 11.6 11.0 14.6 0.25 1.98 0.42 0.02 0.18 0.017 0.001 98.5 P22692-2A-9-1 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 166 838 48.8 0.82 7.9 10.2 13.5 15.3 0.49 1.30 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.046 0.000 98.7 P22692-2A-9-2 core andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 135 811 49.2 0.70 6.8 10.4 12.7 15.9 0.48 1.09 0.19 0.00 0.02 0.033 0.012 97.4 P22692-2A-9-4 rim andesite June 7-12 Mg-Hbl 144 836 48.9 0.72 7.0 10.3 12.9 15.8 0.56 1.20 0.20 0.02 0.11 0.038 0.015 97.7 P22692-2A-9-5* rim andesite June 7-12 Tsch-Prg 331 896 44.6 0.57 11.7 11.3 11.0 15.9 0.16 2.06 0.69 0.18 0.13 0.014 0.045 98.4

PN-2-1-2 core dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 187 832 47.4 0.81 8.6 10.6 13.6 14.8 0.45 1.28 0.34 0.04 0.06 0.050 0.000 98.1 PN-2-1-3 core dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 147 816 49.0 0.74 7.3 10.5 13.0 15.9 0.46 1.09 0.21 0.00 0.01 0.035 0.015 98.3 PN-2-1-4 rim dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 148 821 48.4 0.74 7.3 10.4 13.0 15.5 0.46 1.20 0.25 0.02 0.01 0.040 0.005 97.3 PN-2-2-1 single dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 155 832 49.0 0.72 7.7 10.7 13.9 15.1 0.57 1.31 0.22 0.00 0.01 0.035 0.000 99.3 PN-2-2-2 core dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 161 832 48.5 0.73 8.1 10.9 14.1 14.7 0.57 1.38 0.36 0.01 0.03 0.032 0.004 99.5 PN-2-2-3 rim dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 194 865 47.9 0.85 8.7 10.6 13.8 15.1 0.56 1.44 0.37 0.02 0.02 0.054 0.000 99.3 PN-2-3-1 single dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 148 817 49.2 0.82 7.3 10.4 12.9 15.7 0.47 1.14 0.21 0.05 0.00 0.036 0.000 98.2 PN-2-3-2 single dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 160 837 48.6 0.88 7.6 10.2 13.3 15.5 0.49 1.22 0.22 0.02 0.07 0.044 0.015 98.3 PN-2-4-1 single dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 165 844 48.3 0.76 7.8 10.4 13.4 15.4 0.54 1.28 0.20 0.05 0.12 0.042 0.005 98.2 PN-2-4-2 single dacite early June 15 Mg-Hbl 164 826 48.2 0.74 7.9 10.5 14.0 14.8 0.52 1.16 0.28 0.01 0.11 0.047 0.014 98.3 181 Table B3. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb P22692-2A-1-2 7.14 228559 61.7 5278 328 63.5 96.3 1.60 246 17.7 3.62 0.70 39.3 68.2 38.3 4.84 0.218 2.82 26.4 12.5 56.8 11.6 58.4 14.9 3.23 14.7 13.8 7.36 5.51 0.71 P22692-2A-11-2 5.78 196718 66.1 5464 286 57.0 136 1.34 198 15.1 2.46 0.21 35.5 59.1 41.2 4.25 0.027 0.132 1.66 21.3 8.93 40.0 7.62 41.7 11.5 2.56 11.4 10.9 6.43 5.33 0.39 P22692-2A-11-4 5.34 191732 70.1 5311 264 49.4 96.4 0.78 206 15.2 2.37 0.13 30.2 69.4 38.6 4.29 0.006 0.154 1.93 19.0 10.8 47.6 8.74 47.4 14.0 2.99 15.5 12.7 6.87 7.11 0.51 P22692-2A-11-5* 6.67 176102 74.7 11871 454 57.2 128 13.3 73.7 19.9 1.31 6.22 363 25.5 51.0 2.37 0.016 0.087 1.11 141 8.97 26.0 4.19 27.4 7.65 1.74 7.24 6.05 2.87 2.36 2.02 P22692-2A-11-6 2.03 174708 70.6 12522 491 58.9 148 2.39 56.2 17.3 1.20 2.35 341 21.9 47.7 1.67 0.035 0.074 1.20 140 6.41 24.4 4.13 22.4 7.20 1.95 6.89 5.22 3.48 1.43 0.68 P22692-2A-12-1 3.56 192556 86.2 4413 234 43.6 59.8 1.05 212 13.2 3.34 0.68 24.2 92.4 25.3 5.21 0.196 2.04 19.7 14.4 63.5 12.5 67.4 18.8 3.18 17.7 17.2 9.77 7.93 0.47 P22692-2A-12-2 4.00 195528 84.3 5062 262 46.2 57.3 0.65 222 15.1 3.19 0.74 29.0 83.8 28.2 4.82 0.174 2.07 24.2 13.4 63.7 11.5 62.5 17.8 3.26 16.1 15.5 10.2 8.98 0.52 P22692-2A-12-3 4.28 198301 87.9 4940 255 43.3 61.2 1.65 219 15.4 3.17 0.41 28.2 86.9 30.2 4.63 0.031 0.198 2.18 20.1 14.0 64.5 11.8 66.5 17.1 3.24 17.3 16.7 10.0 9.25 0.48 P22692-2A-12-4 5.52 203006 98.4 4393 247 43.5 55.3 0.85 223 14.3 2.80 0.50 25.2 94.9 30.4 4.13 0.024 0.171 1.95 14.6 13.0 58.8 11.1 60.1 18.3 3.11 19.3 17.5 11.0 9.27 0.45 P22692-2A-12-5 4.76 198007 88.3 4683 247 45.5 62.1 1.50 224 15.2 2.99 0.44 29.3 90.2 31.4 4.76 0.003 0.180 2.21 18.4 13.6 62.0 11.2 64.1 17.4 3.34 17.7 17.0 9.14 8.94 0.47 P22692-2A-15-2 6.41 201743 64.6 5069 261 50.8 87.5 2.60 209 14.6 2.76 0.66 30.9 70.7 37.3 4.36 0.038 0.155 1.73 22.7 10.4 46.1 8.97 46.6 13.3 3.00 13.7 13.1 8.13 6.75 0.50 P22692-2A-15-3 6.06 189145 89.0 5260 267 44.9 67.4 1.44 215 17.4 3.10 0.77 32.8 90.8 34.5 5.57 0.176 2.45 27.6 13.9 60.6 11.7 66.9 16.7 3.58 17.5 16.6 10.0 9.46 0.60 P22692-2A-15-4 5.45 196750 82.9 5520 279 45.6 62.3 1.17 214 17.5 2.89 0.55 34.5 79.9 33.9 5.13 0.005 0.184 2.40 27.3 13.6 60.6 10.9 58.2 16.6 3.74 15.3 14.1 9.15 7.34 0.59 P22692-2A-2-3 3.03 232173 61.4 5179 276 56.5 89.1 1.91 248 15.4 3.30 0.49 28.6 72.7 34.6 4.37 0.014 0.191 2.17 18.0 10.9 56.2 9.92 54.3 13.9 3.05 14.8 14.4 7.50 7.03 0.48 P22692-2A-5-1* 179532 76.6 11653 493 61.8 172 3.87 56.0 18.4 2.66 2.99 285 22.0 40.7 1.53 0.036 0.088 0.96 100 3.79 17.9 3.20 17.4 5.50 1.59 6.87 3.35 2.56 1.66 0.52 P22692-2A-5-2 3.13 213920 98.6 4922 286 46.3 64.9 5.39 246 18.0 3.20 0.40 28.4 101 31.5 5.62 0.003 0.184 2.46 24.9 12.9 67.8 12.8 67.8 19.1 3.27 19.3 19.9 11.0 9.75 0.71 P22692-2A-6-2 6.51 220237 70.4 4805 252 52.8 71.9 2.53 237 17.3 3.16 1.94 31.6 80.5 34.0 4.55 0.09 0.188 2.14 32.6 12.6 57.7 10.9 58.8 15.0 3.18 15.5 17.3 8.80 8.68 0.82 P22692-2A-8-1* 3.70 198797 68.0 5327 270 52.1 84.3 2.76 214 13.9 2.66 0.40 35.3 71.7 35.5 3.98 0.138 1.88 20.2 10.6 44.6 8.81 45.7 13.8 2.74 11.3 14.1 8.04 7.25 0.41 P22692-2A-8-2 5.79 212146 77.3 6289 295 56.7 141 3.62 216 16.4 2.71 0.46 50.0 64.9 41.6 3.97 0.152 1.85 26.0 9.65 42.3 7.87 42.9 12.9 2.61 13.7 12.2 7.02 6.38 0.64 P22692-2A-8-3 5.77 195017 94.9 10606 344 51.3 263 5.99 126 16.2 1.89 0.76 197 27.6 28.2 1.74 0.064 0.070 1.01 56.7 4.63 15.7 2.64 17.9 5.32 1.28 5.14 6.23 2.93 2.61 0.78 P22692-2A-9-1 8.25 224675 58.9 5756 255 53.0 74.2 15.4 191 19.7 2.74 6.48 80.6 59.8 51.8 4.28 0.15 0.032 0.173 1.61 79.7 10.6 40.5 7.59 36.3 12.1 2.72 11.2 9.43 6.98 5.92 2.13 P22692-2A-9-2 4.26 195531 62.4 5250 242 50.3 88.6 3.72 201 16.3 2.68 0.21 37.6 64.8 37.2 4.25 0.124 1.50 24.6 9.93 41.6 8.43 44.2 11.5 2.50 12.8 11.2 7.38 6.19 0.43 P22692-2A-9-4 7.14 212842 56.8 5747 262 52.7 74.1 2.83 220 18.5 2.46 3.35 38.3 67.3 45.9 4.54 0.01 0.027 0.140 1.92 50.9 10.7 45.7 8.58 45.5 13.0 2.63 13.6 12.0 7.45 6.51 0.94 P22692-2A-9-5* 3.20 210112 8.53 3345 218 60.2 264 6.94 76.9 16.5 1.76 5.65 214 11.1 58.9 2.69 0.032 0.027 0.91 88.9 12.9 38.2 5.47 25.6 5.31 1.32 2.90 1.55 0.89 0.83 0.96

PN-2-1-2 5.88 237684 69.0 4694 280 59.7 93.9 0.71 242 16.3 3.03 0.64 27.5 66.3 29.9 4.35 0.029 0.217 2.11 20.1 11.3 59.3 10.5 54.5 14.5 2.97 14.1 12.1 6.99 6.56 0.55 PN-2-1-3 5.27 242960 61.0 5442 284 67.1 90.0 0.77 219 14.8 3.34 0.38 36.3 62.3 36.9 4.10 0.07 0.021 0.143 1.56 18.6 10.3 48.2 8.09 44.7 14.5 2.68 12.5 12.4 7.27 6.61 0.38 PN-2-1-4 6.03 238828 66.7 5593 330 60.9 97.3 1.34 257 19.4 3.71 0.58 30.7 64.7 34.4 4.38 0.034 0.180 2.42 28.1 11.9 59.7 9.99 52.1 14.0 2.64 14.1 12.8 6.69 6.55 0.54 PN-2-2-1 5.94 222161 67.7 4515 264 50.2 69.4 1.67 231 14.7 3.40 0.77 27.9 76.8 28.6 4.65 0.194 2.24 20.2 13.0 61.4 11.1 57.4 16.6 2.91 16.8 12.9 8.57 7.75 0.66 PN-2-2-2 6.15 223875 82.5 4911 342 55.0 75.4 1.39 254 18.4 4.04 0.69 27.6 78.7 25.4 5.36 0.210 2.76 24.2 13.5 71.0 12.3 64.2 18.4 3.33 17.4 16.3 9.07 8.55 0.65 PN-2-2-3 5.90 222929 73.9 5005 322 54.2 76.9 2.10 256 18.8 3.70 0.70 28.0 79.6 35.8 5.52 0.05 0.007 0.240 2.79 21.9 11.7 62.8 11.1 59.1 17.1 3.01 16.2 14.5 9.20 8.20 0.69 PN-2-3-1 5.75 252290 63.1 5036 306 66.8 115 0.83 245 15.7 3.66 0.34 26.3 62.1 31.4 3.76 0.003 0.169 1.86 15.7 9.40 50.1 9.02 47.9 13.8 2.66 13.4 12.0 6.64 6.02 0.42 PN-2-3-2 7.74 244666 60.1 4801 307 63.9 113 0.94 268 16.9 3.72 0.42 27.0 68.1 30.7 4.20 0.036 0.210 2.31 17.4 8.97 49.7 9.24 46.7 13.2 2.65 14.7 12.6 7.45 6.92 0.51 PN-2-4-1 9.33 281345 63.7 4935 329 70.9 135 2.66 323 20.8 6.06 0.64 28.0 63.8 33.3 4.37 0.290 2.84 18.5 9.39 57.3 9.53 48.6 12.2 3.22 13.4 11.2 5.69 7.18 0.67 PN-2-4-2 6.29 268322 75.8 4947 366 65.1 107 2.37 309 22.4 5.07 0.61 28.5 70.6 25.4 4.65 0.295 3.03 20.0 12.4 63.8 11.1 56.7 14.5 3.25 13.9 12.7 6.95 7.41 0.70 182 Table B3. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 3a-1-2 rim dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 179 850 49.4 0.80 8.3 10.4 13.9 15.2 0.60 1.33 0.29 0.02 0.06 0.054 0.000 100.4 3a-1-3 core dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 178 848 48.4 0.89 8.3 10.6 14.0 15.1 0.57 1.28 0.25 0.04 0.06 0.042 0.007 99.4 3a-1-4 core dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 178 828 49.5 0.83 8.4 10.6 13.9 14.9 0.53 1.25 0.31 0.01 0.11 0.046 0.011 100.5 3a-2-2 rim dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 142 819 50.4 0.74 7.2 10.5 13.3 16.0 0.52 1.14 0.25 0.00 0.12 0.035 0.019 100.2 3a-2-3 core dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 190 862 48.8 0.87 8.6 10.3 14.0 15.0 0.57 1.43 0.30 0.03 0.19 0.052 0.022 100.2 3a-3-1 rim dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 166 838 48.8 0.75 7.9 10.6 13.9 15.1 0.61 1.21 0.28 0.01 0.05 0.045 0.011 99.2 3a-3-2 core dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 193 855 47.7 0.96 8.9 10.7 14.3 14.7 0.52 1.45 0.31 0.03 0.05 0.045 0.014 99.7 3a-3-3 core dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 157 844 49.8 0.82 7.6 10.6 13.7 15.3 0.69 1.24 0.23 0.05 0.11 0.036 0.019 100.2 3a-4-1 single dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 140 811 50.5 0.67 7.1 10.5 13.2 15.8 0.53 1.14 0.21 0.04 0.04 0.035 0.009 99.9 3a-4-2 single dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 182 841 48.6 0.84 8.4 10.6 13.6 15.4 0.52 1.22 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.051 0.011 99.5 3a-5-2 single dacite early-middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 138 819 50.7 0.71 7.0 10.4 13.7 15.6 0.62 1.11 0.17 0.03 0.10 0.037 0.000 100.2

3b-1-1 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 174 835 48.4 0.81 8.5 10.9 14.2 14.7 0.53 1.40 0.39 0.02 0.10 0.043 0.000 99.9 3b-1-2 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 164 835 48.9 0.80 8.0 10.6 14.1 15.1 0.54 1.31 0.29 0.00 0.08 0.052 0.008 99.7 3b-1-3 rim dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 149 827 50.2 0.79 7.3 10.3 13.6 15.6 0.57 1.15 0.23 0.00 0.02 0.044 0.015 99.8 3b-1-4 rim dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 149 825 50.1 0.71 7.4 10.5 13.4 15.8 0.53 1.21 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.038 0.007 100.0 3b-1-5 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 135 807 50.1 0.67 7.0 10.5 13.3 15.9 0.48 1.14 0.25 0.00 0.01 0.044 0.027 99.5 3b-2-1 rim dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 141 808 49.9 0.77 7.2 10.6 13.0 16.1 0.44 1.14 0.21 0.04 0.02 0.041 0.000 99.5 3b-2-2 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 151 819 50.1 0.74 7.6 10.5 13.9 15.3 0.54 1.19 0.28 0.01 0.05 0.035 0.013 100.3 3b-3-1 rim dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 137 813 50.5 0.71 7.0 10.5 13.3 15.9 0.54 1.13 0.19 0.05 0.09 0.034 0.005 100.0 3b-3-2 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 136 804 51.0 0.72 7.1 10.7 13.4 15.7 0.55 1.15 0.22 0.02 0.11 0.036 0.020 100.6 3b-4-1 rim dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 152 825 50.5 0.79 7.5 10.5 12.7 16.3 0.48 1.19 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.036 0.010 100.3 3b-5-2 single dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 128 803 50.7 0.64 6.6 10.6 13.2 16.0 0.57 0.99 0.21 0.00 0.12 0.037 0.005 99.7 3b-6-2 rim dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 156 819 49.8 0.73 7.8 10.7 13.7 15.3 0.56 1.16 0.32 0.02 0.11 0.030 0.004 100.2 3b-6-3 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 173 838 48.3 0.81 8.2 10.9 14.1 14.8 0.61 1.23 0.32 0.00 0.03 0.032 0.008 99.3 3b-6-4 core dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 175 839 48.6 0.82 8.4 10.9 14.3 14.5 0.63 1.34 0.37 0.01 0.08 0.030 0.010 100.0 3b-6-5 single dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 150 813 49.6 0.73 7.7 11.0 14.0 15.1 0.57 1.20 0.28 0.00 0.18 0.032 0.009 100.4 3b-6-6 single dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 165 822 49.0 0.81 8.1 10.8 13.7 15.2 0.50 1.23 0.36 0.03 0.05 0.040 0.000 99.8 3b-7-2 single dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 191 823 48.3 0.80 9.0 11.0 14.1 14.5 0.47 1.29 0.43 0.02 0.06 0.048 0.000 100.0 3b-7-4 single dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 139 815 50.8 0.77 7.1 10.5 12.8 16.4 0.47 1.16 0.18 0.00 0.16 0.034 0.016 100.4 3b-7-5 single dacite middle June 15 Mg-Hbl 161 813 49.1 0.82 8.1 10.8 13.2 15.4 0.41 1.26 0.26 0.06 0.06 0.033 0.013 99.5 183 Table B3. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 3a-1-2 6.24 232313 66.9 4994 292 59.5 105 2.75 260 19.6 4.05 1.03 29.6 68.0 33.4 4.41 0.035 0.179 2.49 23.4 10.9 52.7 9.23 49.7 14.0 3.02 12.8 12.4 7.38 6.92 0.80 3a-1-3 6.97 236674 57.5 5879 360 65.4 97.6 0.92 283 21.3 3.54 0.49 36.4 53.7 36.7 3.82 0.05 0.036 0.212 2.39 23.4 10.4 50.2 7.92 42.8 11.9 2.66 11.4 9.38 5.96 5.71 0.77 3a-1-4 7.11 239405 72.3 5534 372 63.0 84.8 0.64 286 22.4 4.18 0.72 31.3 74.2 30.7 4.73 0.16 0.027 0.253 3.21 25.8 12.6 68.6 11.5 59.8 15.9 3.20 15.6 13.5 7.76 6.95 0.81 3a-2-2 5.67 242786 62.5 4840 311 63.2 101 0.90 292 18.0 4.13 0.35 26.6 65.0 30.4 3.76 0.010 0.192 2.27 16.7 10.4 55.5 10.0 49.7 14.0 2.95 14.6 12.2 7.62 6.89 0.45 3a-2-3 6.77 233793 60.6 5206 336 62.4 111 1.22 281 20.1 3.94 0.71 33.4 59.1 36.8 3.98 0.036 0.167 2.29 21.2 10.2 51.2 8.89 49.3 12.6 2.74 12.6 11.1 6.75 5.83 0.61 3a-3-1 6.37 238691 66.3 5478 315 62.2 112 1.07 274 19.8 4.41 0.45 29.4 74.1 35.3 4.51 0.09 0.016 0.217 2.49 21.4 11.0 54.6 9.76 52.6 15.2 3.24 14.6 14.5 8.60 7.68 0.55 3a-3-2 5.25 234089 70.6 6019 334 57.6 91.6 1.22 265 20.7 4.07 1.12 38.8 67.0 36.4 4.76 0.006 0.203 2.43 28.5 11.3 55.9 9.45 50.0 13.2 3.05 15.4 11.8 6.83 7.42 0.71 3a-3-3 5.02 225888 75.1 6135 334 56.7 85.5 1.56 256 20.1 3.37 0.68 36.9 69.4 35.9 4.37 0.04 0.014 0.211 2.26 31.1 11.9 60.4 10.3 52.4 13.2 3.04 13.6 12.9 7.37 7.20 0.69 3a-4-1 6.55 242946 67.6 5042 319 67.8 109 1.06 285 18.9 4.11 0.47 30.0 67.3 31.9 3.88 0.09 0.028 0.203 2.34 17.5 10.1 53.1 9.18 49.6 13.9 2.91 14.0 12.3 7.37 7.01 0.52 3a-4-2 5.89 221012 59.6 5821 354 65.4 129 1.36 261 19.3 3.49 0.80 45.4 52.2 35.3 4.26 0.168 1.98 29.6 10.2 49.1 8.11 42.4 11.1 2.64 9.76 9.75 5.59 5.06 0.62 3a-5-2 5.75 234135 71.8 4600 313 59.7 93.9 0.99 297 18.3 4.25 0.52 26.0 72.1 29.4 4.08 0.009 0.237 2.56 19.2 10.4 53.9 9.11 49.6 15.2 3.43 13.2 13.4 6.59 7.35 0.53

3b-1-1 5.65 240486 84.1 4746 356 58.6 76.3 2.91 269 19.9 4.64 0.75 30.5 77.8 31.8 4.89 0.250 3.21 20.3 11.7 66.3 10.9 57.4 17.2 3.46 13.3 13.2 8.49 7.81 0.68 3b-1-2 6.67 240982 79.3 4858 346 64.5 91.4 2.97 304 20.7 5.24 0.50 27.3 70.2 27.6 5.15 0.014 0.214 2.79 21.3 12.4 65.8 10.8 57.4 16.6 3.10 15.5 14.0 7.81 7.89 0.61 3b-1-3 8.13 254245 57.7 5252 311 67.3 113 4.66 299 20.5 4.61 1.90 32.9 69.8 37.2 4.29 0.05 0.208 2.32 37.4 9.81 47.2 8.12 45.7 13.8 2.88 14.2 14.0 7.89 7.65 0.83 3b-1-4 6.30 233682 75.0 5237 342 67.3 114 0.84 273 21.4 4.75 0.64 31.7 77.0 30.7 4.78 0.009 0.225 2.92 23.5 12.5 63.0 11.1 61.2 16.4 3.42 15.0 14.5 8.55 7.49 0.70 3b-1-5 6.55 232438 68.1 4721 309 62.8 123 0.82 277 17.7 4.07 0.62 28.9 64.8 32.4 3.89 0.06 0.045 0.208 2.09 20.9 10.5 53.7 9.31 50.5 12.8 2.88 13.3 12.8 6.77 7.15 0.54 3b-2-1 5.86 254275 70.6 5056 342 74.3 119 0.82 300 20.0 4.85 0.56 29.2 73.1 31.8 4.80 0.035 0.210 2.30 22.1 11.4 56.6 9.60 52.1 13.4 3.20 15.6 13.6 7.48 7.26 0.58 3b-2-2 7.43 228663 63.0 5070 322 65.3 93.2 0.95 282 19.7 3.63 0.54 29.7 62.7 31.9 4.43 0.03 0.014 0.230 2.10 22.4 10.5 53.9 8.87 47.6 14.8 3.11 14.6 13.2 7.06 6.68 0.64 3b-3-1 6.96 235811 63.7 5047 305 63.2 97.2 3.14 277 18.2 3.95 0.59 31.3 66.9 34.3 3.92 0.09 0.033 0.192 2.60 18.7 10.0 50.5 9.16 48.3 13.5 2.98 13.2 12.7 7.11 6.83 0.56 3b-3-2 6.22 232629 83.5 5077 312 62.0 97.7 0.93 284 20.0 4.66 0.78 31.1 80.7 30.9 4.71 0.208 2.91 22.2 13.6 62.8 11.9 62.0 16.6 3.29 15.5 14.2 8.88 7.75 0.62 3b-4-1 6.52 234520 67.9 5215 327 62.4 97.1 0.85 279 20.2 4.37 0.47 31.5 70.9 33.8 5.17 0.007 0.206 2.59 20.6 11.8 59.6 10.2 54.3 15.1 3.13 14.4 12.4 8.49 6.76 0.71 3b-5-2 6.21 218808 73.0 4454 269 56.4 84.5 3.16 272 16.1 4.05 0.16 25.3 74.9 34.6 4.08 0.06 0.172 2.41 13.4 11.2 54.1 10.6 54.0 15.3 2.77 14.2 14.2 8.59 7.65 0.44 3b-6-2 6.39 212576 95.0 5015 322 61.9 90.7 1.48 270 20.7 4.28 0.89 27.8 83.9 28.4 4.83 0.009 0.254 3.03 21.7 12.3 64.0 11.9 57.8 17.7 3.37 17.7 15.9 8.19 8.99 0.69 3b-6-3 5.65 225483 105 5058 311 54.6 70.5 0.78 274 18.4 3.98 0.75 29.3 89.1 32.0 4.65 0.028 0.262 2.85 23.7 13.3 64.8 12.0 62.7 18.5 3.02 17.5 15.6 10.6 8.56 0.67 3b-6-4 5.48 213880 83.9 5519 315 49.8 65.7 3.22 275 20.2 4.32 0.69 30.0 86.9 37.1 4.30 0.221 2.81 19.8 13.6 62.6 11.5 59.7 16.5 3.49 17.1 15.6 9.92 8.27 0.79 3b-6-5 4.53 215309 95.7 4954 321 56.9 76.2 6.11 303 21.2 5.25 0.72 29.5 81.5 29.3 5.44 0.09 0.034 0.190 3.05 23.1 12.8 72.5 11.7 61.7 16.9 3.41 17.2 13.4 8.51 8.71 0.74 3b-6-6 6.17 219767 82.6 5384 320 60.3 98.5 2.65 274 20.5 4.15 0.82 28.3 82.7 34.6 4.77 0.025 0.254 2.78 25.9 11.6 63.3 10.9 59.5 16.4 3.12 16.6 15.9 9.19 8.27 0.62 3b-7-2 6.65 215629 87.7 5354 310 55.6 93.5 1.14 259 19.4 4.09 0.68 31.2 85.8 34.1 5.18 0.214 2.76 22.7 13.5 65.1 12.2 59.3 17.2 3.48 18.5 14.6 8.54 8.95 0.73 3b-7-4 5.89 225891 75.3 5019 312 63.5 113 20.2 251 17.3 3.46 0.28 30.3 65.7 37.5 3.79 0.005 0.156 1.71 18.0 8.85 44.9 7.98 44.4 14.2 2.70 13.6 12.5 7.22 5.61 0.51 3b-7-5 6.68 223110 65.8 5083 312 59.1 104 0.95 252 17.2 3.69 0.45 30.6 66.8 36.9 4.12 0.035 0.178 2.51 17.2 10.6 51.8 9.53 51.0 13.7 2.93 13.1 12.7 7.68 6.13 0.55 184 Table B3. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 3d-1-3 single dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 151 827 50.2 0.72 7.4 10.5 13.1 15.8 0.56 1.20 0.23 0.02 0.04 0.038 0.009 99.8 3d-2-1 rim dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 136 823 51.0 0.77 6.9 10.5 13.4 16.2 0.60 1.11 0.17 0.04 0.07 0.036 0.011 100.8 3d-2-10 core dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 211 883 48.4 0.89 9.0 10.5 14.4 14.6 0.72 1.46 0.31 0.08 0.10 0.048 0.000 100.5 3d-2-2 core dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 172 827 48.7 0.73 8.3 10.9 14.2 14.5 0.62 1.23 0.41 0.00 0.05 0.035 0.008 99.6 3d-2-3 rim dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 151 818 50.4 0.78 7.5 10.5 13.4 15.6 0.52 1.17 0.22 0.00 0.03 0.041 0.000 100.2 3d-2-4 core dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 155 830 49.4 0.73 7.7 10.6 13.4 15.6 0.52 1.28 0.23 0.02 0.00 0.045 0.000 99.5 3d-2-5 core dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 166 838 48.3 0.81 8.1 10.8 13.7 15.1 0.53 1.32 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.037 0.002 99.2 3d-2-6 rim dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 167 835 48.9 0.74 8.1 10.8 14.1 14.7 0.62 1.29 0.33 0.02 0.00 0.047 0.008 99.7 3d-2-7 core dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 158 830 48.8 0.72 7.9 10.9 14.1 14.9 0.60 1.27 0.28 0.05 0.13 0.037 0.013 99.7 3d-2-8 single dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 152 830 50.0 0.76 7.4 10.5 13.5 15.6 0.59 1.16 0.24 0.00 0.10 0.036 0.004 99.9 3d-2-9 rim dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 167 847 49.6 0.76 7.8 10.3 14.2 15.1 0.65 1.22 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.037 0.000 100.1 3d-3-3 single dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 162 829 49.9 0.85 8.0 10.7 13.3 15.7 0.48 1.33 0.26 0.02 0.00 0.043 0.000 100.5 3d-4-1 single dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 148 824 49.6 0.73 7.4 10.6 13.1 15.7 0.52 1.24 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.036 0.000 99.2 3d-4-3 single dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 177 839 49.0 0.87 8.4 10.6 13.6 15.2 0.50 1.35 0.28 0.01 0.00 0.050 0.000 99.9 3d-5-2 core dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 170 834 48.6 0.79 8.2 10.7 13.8 15.1 0.53 1.28 0.30 0.01 0.05 0.043 0.006 99.3 3d-5-3 rim dacite middle-late June 15 Mg-Hbl 147 818 50.0 0.73 7.4 10.7 13.2 15.8 0.55 1.11 0.23 0.02 0.08 0.037 0.000 99.9

PN-1-1-1 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 207 861 47.0 0.99 9.2 10.5 14.1 14.5 0.43 1.56 0.35 0.00 0.14 0.067 0.017 98.8 PN-1-1-2 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 187 824 48.0 0.91 8.9 10.9 14.6 14.3 0.44 1.32 0.43 0.00 0.12 0.049 0.005 100.0 PN-1-1-3 core dacite late June 15 Tsch-Prg 315 904 44.8 1.50 11.2 11.1 13.4 13.7 0.46 1.76 0.50 0.04 0.10 0.043 0.003 98.6 PN-1-2-2 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 170 847 48.6 0.81 8.0 10.3 13.5 15.3 0.50 1.37 0.31 0.03 0.12 0.047 0.010 98.9 PN-1-2-3 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 194 852 47.5 0.84 8.9 10.8 14.0 14.8 0.49 1.45 0.34 0.00 0.05 0.045 0.000 99.2 PN-1-3-2 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 165 846 48.4 0.81 7.9 10.5 13.8 15.3 0.55 1.30 0.23 0.00 0.07 0.040 0.009 98.9 PN-1-3-3 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 187 846 47.6 0.94 8.6 10.7 14.1 14.7 0.51 1.33 0.34 0.01 0.04 0.045 0.034 99.0 PN-1-3-4 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 176 836 47.6 0.81 8.4 10.7 13.7 14.7 0.51 1.34 0.33 0.00 0.12 0.036 0.000 98.3 PN-1-3-5 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 169 847 48.1 0.84 8.0 10.5 13.8 15.0 0.57 1.29 0.31 0.00 0.08 0.037 0.015 98.5 PN-1-4-2 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 124 800 50.4 0.69 6.6 10.5 12.6 16.4 0.44 1.11 0.16 0.03 0.12 0.036 0.000 99.1 PN-1-4-3 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 160 831 48.1 0.80 8.0 10.8 14.0 15.1 0.50 1.32 0.33 0.02 0.02 0.038 0.005 99.0 PN-1-4-4 core dacite late June 15 Tsch-Prg 372 907 44.1 1.39 12.2 11.1 16.0 12.3 0.55 1.72 0.64 0.05 0.02 0.081 0.000 100.2 PN-1-5-1 single dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 148 829 49.2 0.74 7.3 10.7 13.5 15.6 0.58 1.14 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.046 0.011 99.1 PN-1-5-2 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 146 817 50.1 0.78 7.3 10.5 12.9 15.9 0.49 1.15 0.18 0.00 0.03 0.039 0.010 99.3 PN-1-5-3 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 167 834 48.9 0.77 8.1 10.8 14.0 14.9 0.57 1.33 0.30 0.04 0.04 0.041 0.003 99.7 PN-1-5-4 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 150 819 50.1 0.75 7.5 10.6 13.2 15.7 0.53 1.19 0.23 0.01 0.03 0.037 0.000 99.8 PN-1-5-5 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 148 822 49.4 0.85 7.4 10.6 13.5 15.1 0.57 1.21 0.23 0.05 0.06 0.038 0.000 99.0 PN-1-6-2 single dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 148 824 50.6 0.86 7.4 10.4 13.1 15.7 0.52 1.26 0.21 0.04 0.05 0.040 0.000 100.1 PN-1-7-1 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 182 845 48.9 0.71 8.5 10.8 14.2 14.4 0.69 1.32 0.33 0.00 0.03 0.029 0.005 99.9 PN-1-7-2 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 179 855 49.5 0.80 8.2 10.3 13.9 15.2 0.62 1.33 0.30 0.01 0.08 0.043 0.019 100.3 PN-1-7-3 core dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 198 854 47.6 0.83 9.0 10.9 14.6 14.2 0.60 1.43 0.32 0.03 0.10 0.031 0.025 99.7 PN-1-7-4 rim dacite late June 15 Mg-Hbl 175 843 49.8 0.74 8.2 10.6 13.4 15.4 0.58 1.34 0.29 0.00 0.13 0.044 0.001 100.6 185 Table B3. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 3d-1-3 5.39 243445 69.3 4873 309 63.1 119 1.09 244 18.4 3.42 0.65 30.2 67.4 32.5 4.15 0.193 2.44 19.4 10.3 51.7 9.35 47.3 13.8 3.00 13.4 13.3 8.45 7.35 0.54 3d-2-1 5.88 226413 81.1 4628 273 55.2 79.9 1.71 262 19.2 4.39 0.62 26.5 103 31.8 4.67 0.038 0.229 2.67 19.2 11.4 57.2 11.0 61.1 19.2 3.30 20.1 18.9 12.8 9.87 0.54 3d-2-10 5.73 215155 63.7 5603 291 54.4 85.0 1.15 252 21.2 3.17 0.52 37.8 66.5 42.2 4.45 0.08 0.040 0.186 2.44 26.7 10.9 49.1 8.78 49.7 12.1 3.08 12.9 12.2 8.43 6.45 0.70 3d-2-2 5.04 214761 84.0 4600 288 51.0 65.7 1.07 253 19.6 3.72 0.73 29.5 80.3 30.7 4.93 0.270 2.44 19.6 12.7 58.9 10.9 58.2 16.8 3.32 16.4 14.3 10.7 8.20 0.57 3d-2-3 6.51 223654 66.2 5209 281 58.1 104 1.89 250 17.5 2.91 0.31 34.9 72.3 41.9 4.20 0.018 0.162 2.10 19.0 10.5 47.3 8.85 50.0 14.6 2.89 13.9 13.2 9.42 7.46 0.45 3d-2-4 5.76 218144 66.3 4925 286 57.3 110 2.03 242 17.4 3.34 0.63 33.0 67.2 38.2 3.92 0.013 0.170 1.94 20.3 10.8 47.8 8.96 47.3 14.6 2.96 13.0 14.2 8.23 6.98 0.44 3d-2-5 5.08 210702 79.3 5049 287 55.1 79.1 0.74 246 19.6 3.38 0.55 31.6 81.2 35.3 4.49 0.011 0.192 2.74 19.5 11.9 56.8 10.5 57.3 15.3 3.12 16.4 15.1 10.2 7.38 0.55 3d-2-6 4.91 218135 93.5 4806 285 50.3 71.4 2.72 253 19.0 4.26 0.40 28.4 92.4 31.2 4.56 0.026 0.269 2.95 18.3 11.9 58.7 10.6 63.1 19.1 3.42 18.9 18.0 12.4 10.4 0.57 3d-2-7 5.81 225408 102 4208 268 51.6 62.6 2.10 255 17.5 4.18 0.63 24.2 94.3 25.4 4.44 0.12 0.244 2.40 16.5 12.4 59.8 11.5 66.1 21.4 2.93 19.5 20.2 12.8 10.1 0.44 3d-2-8 6.07 221197 64.9 4892 281 55.9 91.0 0.64 243 16.8 3.14 0.17 29.2 68.3 36.0 4.11 0.07 0.024 0.176 2.08 17.5 11.0 48.4 9.23 52.0 13.7 2.94 12.9 13.2 9.10 6.83 0.50 3d-2-9 5.47 222993 63.9 5157 289 53.3 94.9 0.98 256 19.2 3.86 0.66 31.3 71.6 35.8 4.50 0.175 2.44 19.7 11.4 54.0 9.80 50.9 14.1 2.95 12.9 13.1 8.99 7.07 0.62 3d-3-3 5.81 218213 62.9 5320 297 58.3 147 0.89 231 17.3 3.37 0.70 43.3 61.5 35.4 3.82 0.12 0.011 0.180 2.14 24.9 9.77 44.7 8.45 45.9 13.9 2.81 13.5 11.2 8.41 6.57 0.52 3d-4-1 5.92 251506 74.9 4842 315 64.5 119 1.66 293 21.3 4.60 0.41 30.1 72.9 32.2 4.08 0.017 0.216 2.62 19.6 11.0 56.6 10.1 55.2 15.1 2.97 15.4 14.3 9.37 7.43 0.53 3d-4-3 7.27 253496 63.9 5270 327 67.2 118 1.35 272 21.0 4.01 0.78 32.3 69.2 33.5 4.54 0.220 2.77 23.4 10.8 56.1 9.43 50.8 14.4 2.88 12.9 13.8 9.47 7.16 0.64 3d-5-2 5.21 222344 74.9 4887 302 56.9 76.5 0.71 241 19.2 3.53 0.61 30.0 76.6 29.8 4.69 0.188 2.58 20.5 12.9 63.8 11.2 58.8 17.0 3.13 15.9 15.1 9.28 8.15 0.47 3d-5-3 6.24 253276 72.7 4665 299 66.4 105 0.86 267 19.9 4.14 1.09 27.7 74.4 32.6 4.00 0.011 0.226 2.65 21.8 11.9 63.4 10.4 58.6 15.3 3.41 15.2 14.7 9.75 7.98 0.64

PN-1-1-1 6.48 246265 73.8 5822 296 56.9 103 1.98 203 21.0 3.09 5.02 52.2 65.5 40.7 4.54 0.05 0.034 0.160 2.11 73.3 12.2 46.7 8.69 43.5 13.6 2.59 11.3 11.4 8.29 5.86 1.19 PN-1-1-2 4.28 235376 74.5 5373 290 53.7 95.7 0.84 218 17.8 3.83 0.89 34.7 80.9 37.3 4.87 0.003 0.200 2.36 21.9 12.9 57.2 10.3 55.0 15.0 3.19 15.3 13.9 10.2 7.91 0.51 PN-1-1-3 5.85 208809 84.1 9191 367 47.7 196 0.90 191 17.7 1.67 1.55 84.8 23.5 35.4 1.24 0.035 0.122 1.36 56.4 11.0 33.2 4.83 22.2 5.19 1.98 5.65 4.82 2.70 1.81 0.80 PN-1-2-2 5.37 229313 70.3 4968 265 55.4 91.9 0.76 224 16.8 2.98 0.82 30.4 76.6 39.8 4.47 0.214 1.99 21.9 11.4 49.6 9.16 48.1 14.4 2.91 14.2 13.8 8.30 7.31 0.46 PN-1-2-3 4.84 213437 75.4 5467 311 54.0 83.2 1.17 209 19.6 3.64 0.68 34.6 85.1 33.1 5.65 0.09 0.011 0.170 2.52 27.7 14.6 62.2 11.7 62.8 17.4 3.50 17.4 15.8 10.6 8.18 0.47 PN-1-3-2 6.92 229032 64.3 5561 305 57.0 113 0.62 225 17.4 2.94 0.44 34.0 73.0 39.1 4.43 0.155 2.10 22.1 10.4 51.9 9.22 48.8 14.5 2.89 16.7 12.6 7.93 6.48 0.50 PN-1-3-3 5.11 222444 79.1 5754 280 52.9 80.2 1.12 222 17.6 3.25 1.52 36.6 79.8 34.5 5.10 0.196 2.35 25.6 14.4 58.8 11.2 62.9 17.2 3.13 18.1 15.5 11.2 7.27 0.59 PN-1-3-4 5.20 195378 88.0 4897 268 50.2 64.2 0.43 207 16.7 3.43 0.37 31.0 84.8 31.1 5.21 0.205 2.18 19.8 13.5 59.7 11.4 62.3 16.0 3.28 18.7 14.8 10.6 8.15 0.50 PN-1-3-5 4.80 213375 76.5 5418 262 50.5 79.1 0.74 208 16.7 3.27 0.53 32.7 86.4 35.7 4.90 0.003 0.160 2.08 22.0 12.9 55.3 11.1 58.3 15.7 3.44 17.3 14.7 11.5 8.38 0.43 PN-1-4-2 4.86 217834 65.2 4764 260 53.9 97.5 1.03 204 14.1 2.58 0.30 30.8 70.1 38.6 4.01 0.154 1.85 16.1 13.0 48.6 9.53 51.2 13.5 2.92 13.5 13.1 7.43 6.49 0.34 PN-1-4-3 4.21 219132 78.0 5082 272 49.9 81.5 0.90 222 15.6 3.46 0.59 31.4 80.8 33.1 4.38 0.007 0.191 1.90 20.9 13.3 60.2 10.9 56.9 16.2 2.95 16.7 14.4 9.91 8.09 0.46 PN-1-4-4 3.74 209496 100 7774 402 51.7 99.9 1.72 231 21.2 2.40 1.18 60.0 57.9 35.5 3.91 0.08 0.014 0.208 1.97 51.2 15.4 61.0 9.93 45.9 10.6 3.01 11.3 10.5 7.04 5.44 1.16 PN-1-5-1 5.71 243980 70.8 5109 304 60.7 80.4 0.74 261 18.5 4.38 0.45 28.8 79.3 33.7 4.28 0.03 0.207 2.49 17.8 13.6 62.0 11.0 59.1 15.4 3.15 16.0 15.9 9.43 7.56 0.53 PN-1-5-2 5.88 228406 67.5 4947 288 57.3 102 2.29 253 17.9 3.81 0.39 30.2 73.6 38.6 4.20 0.241 2.13 19.4 11.7 52.4 9.54 57.9 16.5 3.28 14.7 13.4 10.0 6.94 0.56 PN-1-5-3 7.42 246584 75.6 4751 299 56.2 98.7 2.73 255 20.1 3.89 1.79 30.7 77.0 31.8 4.37 0.190 2.51 33.5 12.3 56.0 10.0 54.3 15.2 3.28 14.3 12.7 9.41 6.89 0.92 PN-1-5-4 5.36 243113 76.1 4904 296 58.0 82.3 2.10 264 18.4 3.63 0.62 29.2 76.1 33.6 4.28 0.019 0.211 2.60 19.3 12.3 55.1 10.2 55.2 15.5 3.24 14.9 14.0 9.07 8.27 0.56 PN-1-5-5 6.61 227049 72.7 6527 327 59.3 60.6 1.35 256 17.9 3.24 0.42 45.9 66.3 48.6 4.13 0.019 0.170 1.85 26.9 10.9 48.9 8.37 47.0 13.6 3.23 13.4 11.6 8.08 6.68 0.51 PN-1-6-2 6.09 227308 62.7 5497 303 63.9 111 1.69 251 16.9 3.28 0.18 36.2 66.2 36.4 4.26 0.152 2.12 23.6 10.5 50.3 8.26 45.8 11.2 3.15 13.3 11.4 8.07 6.14 0.43 PN-1-7-1 5.05 218275 109 5040 292 48.2 58.9 1.88 247 21.0 4.30 0.71 27.5 99.8 31.5 4.82 0.015 0.265 3.24 20.8 13.9 65.7 12.7 70.6 18.7 3.64 20.2 18.6 13.6 10.6 0.54 PN-1-7-2 5.63 211740 67.4 5154 281 51.1 82.6 1.59 223 17.2 2.87 0.45 31.9 70.4 36.6 4.68 0.011 0.169 1.82 20.2 10.4 46.9 8.95 47.9 14.3 3.25 14.8 13.5 8.38 6.59 0.51 PN-1-7-3 5.01 221106 111 4916 314 49.8 63.9 1.87 243 20.4 4.30 0.49 25.2 101 29.1 5.17 0.281 3.40 21.1 13.7 67.9 13.0 72.6 20.7 3.88 20.6 19.1 12.6 9.65 0.66 PN-1-7-4 5.29 208558 82.0 4691 290 54.3 77.2 0.77 213 18.0 3.49 0.53 28.9 80.6 32.7 4.21 0.01 0.022 0.156 2.30 19.5 11.9 57.6 10.4 58.7 16.4 2.86 14.5 14.0 10.6 8.50 0.53 186 Table B4. Amphibole analyses from the 1980 eruptions of Mt. St. Helens. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Deposit Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 18cd01-1-2 rim May 18 cryptodome Mg-Hbl 174 867 47.1 1.67 8.7 10.8 14.4 14.8 0.24 1.88 0.20 0.02 0.11 0.044 0.002 100.1 18cd01-1-4 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 444 974 43.1 2.85 12.8 11.1 14.7 12.9 0.20 2.32 0.39 0.05 0.06 0.055 0.013 100.6 18cd01-1-5 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 476 982 42.6 2.89 13.5 11.1 14.0 13.0 0.17 2.42 0.37 0.02 0.10 0.042 0.014 100.4 18cd01-1-9 rim May 18 cryptodome Mg-Hbl 182 859 46.8 1.78 9.1 10.8 14.8 14.5 0.23 1.86 0.32 0.01 0.05 0.044 0.000 100.4 18cd01-2-1 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 238 885 45.0 1.50 10.6 11.0 15.8 13.7 0.25 2.13 0.21 0.00 0.09 0.021 0.026 100.3 18cd01-2-3 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 258 913 43.7 2.49 10.9 10.7 16.8 12.6 0.19 2.28 0.36 0.03 0.06 0.030 0.025 100.2 18cd01-2-4 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 277 917 44.0 2.68 11.3 10.9 16.8 12.4 0.22 2.29 0.40 0.07 0.03 0.032 0.012 101.1 18cd01-2-5 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 248 882 45.3 1.51 10.9 10.9 16.2 13.5 0.24 2.08 0.22 0.04 0.09 0.018 0.014 101.0 18cd01-3-1 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 421 950 43.7 2.27 13.2 11.4 12.4 14.6 0.13 2.40 0.27 0.02 0.10 0.015 0.008 100.5 18cd01-3-3 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 519 954 44.0 2.07 13.1 11.1 12.2 14.8 0.09 2.49 0.25 0.00 0.03 0.012 0.012 100.1 18cd01-4-1 single May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 290 929 44.4 2.14 11.3 10.9 15.0 13.6 0.20 2.34 0.32 0.03 0.10 0.026 0.000 100.5 18cd01-5-1 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 588 964 42.4 2.13 13.9 11.1 15.1 12.7 0.21 2.54 0.37 0.03 0.15 0.028 0.037 100.6 18cd01-5-3 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 215 881 46.0 1.99 10.0 11.0 15.2 14.0 0.23 2.01 0.31 0.03 0.06 0.050 0.020 100.9 18cd01-6-1 single May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 295 918 43.8 1.99 11.3 10.7 14.3 13.9 0.17 2.23 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.042 0.000 98.9 18cd01-6-3 single May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 496 963 43.4 2.28 13.1 11.0 12.8 14.5 0.12 2.44 0.32 0.01 0.09 0.021 0.004 100.0 18cd02-1-1 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 206 878 46.0 1.94 9.7 10.8 15.0 14.3 0.22 1.97 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.045 0.007 100.3 18cd02-1-3 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 346 936 43.4 1.95 12.3 10.9 15.4 13.4 0.18 2.44 0.33 0.03 0.13 0.030 0.000 100.5 18cd02-2-1 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 499 983 44.7 2.11 12.6 10.8 11.2 15.8 0.10 2.44 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.020 0.017 100.3 18cd02-2-3 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 427 952 43.7 2.09 13.3 10.9 13.0 14.5 0.09 2.36 0.26 0.01 0.09 0.016 0.001 100.3 18cd02-3-1 rim May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 371 935 43.3 2.14 12.5 11.2 14.0 13.9 0.18 2.23 0.28 0.01 0.06 0.018 0.005 99.8 18cd02-3-4 core May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 403 964 45.0 1.85 12.5 10.8 11.0 15.8 0.11 2.42 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.013 0.001 100.0 18cd02-4-1 single May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 209 893 45.6 2.03 9.8 10.9 15.0 14.2 0.24 2.16 0.28 0.00 0.08 0.050 0.014 100.4 18cd03-1-1 single May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 536 975 44.3 2.05 13.1 11.0 11.5 15.3 0.13 2.40 0.33 0.03 0.07 0.013 0.010 100.3 18cd03-2-1 single May 18 cryptodome Tsch-Prg 205 884 45.5 2.01 9.7 11.0 14.5 14.3 0.20 2.11 0.26 0.00 0.07 0.046 0.000 99.7

18pp01-1-1 rim May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 269 906 44.9 1.98 10.9 10.9 14.2 14.3 0.18 2.15 0.26 0.05 0.11 0.029 0.014 100.0 18pp01-1-3 core May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 398 959 43.5 2.31 12.6 10.4 14.6 13.6 0.15 2.40 0.28 0.02 0.06 0.023 0.042 100.1 18pp01-1-5 core May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 493 963 43.1 2.40 13.1 10.6 14.9 13.0 0.17 2.49 0.34 0.01 0.06 0.028 0.026 100.3 18pp01-2-2 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 520 975 43.5 2.15 13.1 10.8 13.2 14.3 0.18 2.54 0.28 0.05 0.01 0.023 0.036 100.2 18pp01-4-1 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 328 930 43.8 1.96 11.8 10.8 14.7 13.9 0.22 2.21 0.30 0.00 0.04 0.025 0.011 99.7 18pp01-5-1 rim May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 362 934 43.7 2.06 12.4 11.2 14.1 14.0 0.18 2.31 0.30 0.03 0.04 0.016 0.025 100.3 18pp01-5-2 core May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 550 995 44.7 2.10 12.8 11.0 10.9 15.7 0.12 2.47 0.30 0.00 0.09 0.017 0.015 100.5 18pp01-6-2 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 202 877 46.0 1.97 9.6 11.0 14.5 14.5 0.24 1.94 0.27 0.06 0.10 0.034 0.014 100.2 18pp01-7-2 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 543 965 42.4 2.22 13.6 11.1 14.5 13.1 0.20 2.48 0.31 0.02 0.06 0.027 0.019 100.0 18pp01-8-1 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 383 936 43.0 1.85 12.7 11.0 15.0 13.4 0.22 2.30 0.43 0.02 0.06 0.029 0.038 100.0 18pp01-9-1 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 415 969 44.2 2.05 12.6 10.8 11.4 15.6 0.09 2.36 0.26 0.02 0.06 0.014 0.009 99.5 18pp02-2-1 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 219 890 45.9 1.96 10.0 10.9 14.8 14.3 0.24 2.09 0.25 0.01 0.02 0.030 0.014 100.5 18pp02-3-1 single May 18 pumice Mg-Hbl 189 877 46.3 1.71 9.1 10.8 14.8 14.5 0.28 1.91 0.30 0.04 0.05 0.051 0.005 99.9 18pp03-1-1 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 210 881 45.7 2.17 9.9 11.0 14.7 14.1 0.21 2.05 0.36 0.00 0.06 0.037 0.010 100.2 18pp03-2-2 single May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 520 979 43.8 2.24 13.0 10.7 12.1 15.0 0.11 2.55 0.25 0.01 0.06 0.022 0.010 99.9 18pp03-3-1 rim May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 421 944 43.5 2.17 13.3 11.2 13.2 13.9 0.15 2.40 0.28 0.00 0.11 0.015 0.009 100.2 18pp03-3-3 core May 18 pumice Tsch-Prg 775 1025 44.2 2.17 12.8 11.0 10.9 15.4 0.11 2.57 0.30 0.03 0.09 0.016 0.014 100.0 187 Table B4. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 18cd01-1-2 17.2 208235 131 12317 365 67.8 70.4 8.79 163 18.2 80.5 77.1 76.7 7.87 0.035 0.281 1.81 40.7 8.32 36.1 7.58 46.0 18.5 2.98 19.0 16.3 9.01 6.67 0.29 18cd01-1-4 20.3 223381 79.2 20589 498 66.7 244 2.27 144 18.7 0.81 279 26.5 58.5 9.33 0.053 0.157 1.10 59.5 4.50 17.1 3.38 18.3 6.31 2.36 7.07 5.83 2.88 2.07 1.26 18cd01-1-5 19.2 237644 73.0 21483 509 62.7 365 6.15 147 16.7 0.94 298 23.4 49.7 9.01 0.060 0.110 0.99 66.8 3.52 13.3 2.49 16.3 4.71 1.88 6.11 4.89 1.97 1.82 0.77 18cd01-1-9 17.0 195965 118 12663 353 65.0 57.6 5.94 141 18.0 0.57 97.3 56.0 66.9 5.67 0.055 0.219 1.45 41.6 5.50 24.0 4.80 31.9 11.0 2.81 13.0 11.3 5.82 4.11 0.50 18cd01-2-1 19.4 198228 72.4 9926 422 71.4 46.1 7.52 133 15.8 0.59 119 24.1 51.2 4.38 0.025 0.106 0.67 26.9 3.13 12.8 2.49 14.5 4.24 1.59 4.45 4.56 2.87 2.19 0.31 18cd01-2-3 20.9 218447 97.4 17199 548 74.4 52.3 8.05 119 18.7 0.88 133 54.2 90.7 10.5 0.018 0.182 0.88 60.7 5.47 24.1 4.51 28.3 10.2 2.45 11.4 11.0 6.19 4.73 0.49 18cd01-2-4 20.3 200904 106 19469 515 76.2 51.1 6.31 107 21.0 0.88 155 55.1 88.8 10.0 0.025 0.214 0.77 67.9 5.21 22.0 4.20 25.9 8.73 2.11 10.9 11.3 6.15 4.47 0.46 18cd01-2-5 19.0 227366 73.3 10444 433 69.4 43.6 6.39 119 16.9 0.45 116 23.2 57.5 4.75 0.039 0.090 0.75 30.4 3.47 13.0 2.63 14.2 4.35 1.56 4.86 4.32 2.49 2.61 0.37 18cd01-3-1 21.8 204224 77.0 15317 595 76.7 97.5 12.8 85.5 18.2 0.75 205 22.0 36.7 2.53 0.029 0.112 0.89 53.1 2.26 10.5 2.16 13.6 4.62 1.65 6.01 4.97 2.35 1.47 0.63 18cd01-3-3 19.0 200304 78.7 15143 599 75.5 124 7.83 75.4 17.1 0.62 184 20.7 35.1 2.10 0.023 0.118 0.88 34.6 1.79 8.52 1.78 10.5 4.32 1.37 4.89 4.40 2.16 1.72 0.39 18cd01-4-1 18.3 232946 139 15111 463 74.2 85.1 8.29 144 18.6 0.67 115 56.4 64.5 6.24 0.030 0.210 1.42 46.0 5.99 24.9 5.42 33.6 12.2 3.14 13.4 12.1 5.92 4.17 0.49 18cd01-5-1 16.6 224170 111 14420 487 73.7 93.7 7.87 133 19.0 0.54 122 48.7 57.8 4.96 0.014 0.200 1.29 42.6 5.33 21.1 4.56 29.2 11.7 2.39 13.2 10.6 6.65 4.53 0.54 18cd01-5-3 17.8 219143 131 13798 455 70.6 97.5 6.63 134 17.9 0.70 101 51.2 55.7 4.60 0.040 0.210 1.28 41.2 4.54 21.1 4.65 28.2 10.5 2.42 11.3 10.7 5.69 3.98 0.53 18cd01-6-1 20.8 219496 72.9 13572 371 61.7 37.2 14.1 117 16.7 0.55 137 39.1 57.0 4.09 0.040 0.170 1.22 40.5 3.68 17.8 3.52 24.6 8.16 2.20 9.88 8.28 4.48 3.34 0.50 18cd01-6-3 17.8 218881 131 13782 454 70.5 97.4 6.62 134 17.9 0.70 101 51.1 55.7 4.59 0.040 0.210 1.28 41.2 4.53 21.1 4.64 28.1 10.5 2.41 11.3 10.7 5.68 3.98 0.53 18cd02-1-1 15.0 217907 128 13642 444 69.0 76.4 56.5 158 18.1 0.65 93.6 62.9 70.9 6.44 0.043 0.300 1.63 51.1 6.53 30.6 5.98 37.9 14.2 2.83 15.2 13.6 7.02 4.90 0.73 18cd02-1-3 17.6 197687 117 14255 516 68.8 79.9 11.8 143 18.6 0.63 98.5 55.6 65.0 6.36 0.043 0.263 1.61 57.8 5.70 27.1 5.30 35.6 11.7 2.68 13.2 13.9 5.87 4.46 0.54 18cd02-2-1 18.9 320546 80.1 14860 637 77.2 254 2.86 74.7 15.2 0.70 166 18.2 38.5 1.87 0.064 0.112 0.78 32.0 1.71 7.90 1.80 11.0 4.48 1.17 4.42 4.30 2.22 1.46 0.35 18cd02-2-3 16.2 257829 65.9 14580 500 67.6 44.9 8.73 91.4 15.7 0.69 168 22.6 40.1 2.24 0.038 0.109 1.14 38.0 2.26 9.64 1.98 12.5 4.74 1.57 4.61 5.36 2.52 1.86 0.39 18cd02-3-1 18.7 234359 80.5 14971 563 72.4 91.2 11.9 86.1 16.3 0.52 213 23.2 39.5 2.64 0.098 0.99 44.6 2.44 10.7 2.20 13.5 5.44 1.55 5.17 5.27 2.60 1.61 0.41 18cd02-3-4 14.1 226901 82.7 13940 676 75.6 330 2.97 69.1 15.6 0.70 160 17.7 28.3 1.49 0.013 0.083 0.76 31.9 1.52 7.17 1.35 11.0 3.22 1.29 4.74 4.08 1.97 1.51 0.36 18cd02-4-1 19.0 234994 138 13727 446 70.5 80.3 6.23 146 16.6 0.63 89.8 60.2 64.8 6.39 0.021 0.220 1.38 43.5 6.00 27.2 5.44 36.6 12.6 2.66 15.2 12.7 6.72 5.32 0.51 18cd03-1-1 19.1 268722 73.3 14439 628 78.1 184 15.4 89.4 15.6 0.77 164 17.0 30.6 1.89 0.056 0.114 0.80 32.1 1.53 7.48 1.47 9.72 4.19 1.25 4.04 3.75 1.86 1.52 0.31 18cd03-2-1 20.9 274863 126 14387 465 74.5 71.1 132 151 20.7 0.70 109 50.8 63.6 5.80 0.065 0.260 1.55 47.9 5.00 24.8 5.24 32.2 10.6 2.35 13.5 12.5 5.75 4.77 0.57

18pp01-1-1 3.85 209354 87.0 13606 620 68.7 217 1.83 94.4 14.4 0.37 142 24.1 33.5 2.67 0.043 0.126 0.95 34.7 2.33 10.5 2.36 13.2 5.89 1.45 5.37 5.12 3.10 1.73 0.34 18pp01-1-3 4.98 257152 61.3 16041 520 71.4 48.7 2.15 112 18.1 0.53 186 28.3 43.3 4.04 0.048 0.115 1.12 40.4 1.80 8.46 1.98 12.2 5.03 1.71 6.09 5.85 3.50 2.37 0.50 18pp01-1-5 4.09 239065 66.7 17248 571 70.4 73.6 2.39 113 21.2 1.01 192 30.3 40.2 3.68 0.023 0.129 1.03 49.2 1.92 9.66 2.09 15.2 4.46 1.61 7.17 6.33 3.49 2.31 0.58 18pp01-2-2 3.80 211758 132 14261 416 66.2 73.0 2.28 129 17.1 0.74 110 53.1 62.5 6.07 0.046 0.250 1.41 45.0 5.25 24.6 5.03 31.5 12.2 2.81 13.0 12.1 6.36 4.30 0.47 18pp01-4-1 3.84 225114 122 13358 485 70.4 136 3.39 135 18.9 0.37 100 57.1 67.9 6.01 0.026 0.242 1.38 42.2 5.69 26.2 5.46 33.9 12.5 2.68 13.7 12.6 6.92 4.59 0.50 18pp01-5-1 3.96 208528 77.2 14899 598 76.3 146 1.76 83.6 17.0 0.71 175 21.7 34.5 2.11 0.059 0.114 0.88 31.3 1.87 8.01 1.82 11.1 4.47 1.41 5.25 4.53 2.17 1.46 0.35 18pp01-5-2 3.66 194682 79.6 14768 657 74.4 319 1.67 64.0 14.7 0.67 168 16.8 25.7 1.51 0.047 0.080 0.59 27.9 1.35 6.01 1.21 8.82 3.37 1.12 4.51 3.70 1.78 1.29 0.30 18pp01-6-2 4.89 227296 139 13844 413 70.1 64.8 1.68 153 17.2 0.60 96.8 64.3 69.4 6.41 0.065 0.269 1.59 46.2 5.98 27.8 5.66 35.5 12.9 3.10 17.1 15.2 6.71 5.75 0.56 18pp01-7-2 4.23 232715 68.7 15759 568 70.4 54.0 3.25 95.9 17.7 0.62 198 23.6 36.5 2.22 0.028 0.119 1.01 45.9 2.09 8.70 1.86 14.2 4.61 1.57 6.49 5.66 2.86 2.08 0.47 18pp01-8-1 3.94 229432 68.7 12734 503 53.3 29.7 1.43 139 21.0 0.98 170 40.9 63.4 11.4 0.042 0.175 1.53 60.5 6.12 25.6 5.19 31.2 9.04 3.00 9.70 9.88 4.83 3.49 0.54 18pp01-9-1 5.01 212056 80.4 14621 672 84.9 303 5.13 84.1 17.0 1.89 162 19.4 38.0 1.81 0.033 0.095 0.77 36.3 2.15 7.88 1.76 10.3 4.11 1.18 4.88 4.44 2.17 1.71 0.53 18pp02-2-1 3.44 273446 85.4 13691 526 69.8 120 1.60 143 17.7 0.67 93.8 42.0 67.5 4.96 0.010 0.229 1.38 47.0 6.30 25.9 4.98 31.2 9.88 2.71 10.7 8.57 4.99 3.62 0.53 18pp02-3-1 4.52 219392 136 11987 372 71.3 63.9 8.67 176 20.4 0.58 73.2 72.2 74.2 6.32 0.034 0.264 1.72 37.1 7.20 31.7 6.55 43.5 14.4 2.86 17.6 15.9 8.13 6.05 0.55 18pp03-1-1 3.62 266570 140 15206 457 68.3 89.1 2.28 134 17.8 0.76 102 50.8 57.8 5.94 0.058 0.222 1.48 54.3 5.54 23.2 4.84 31.2 11.1 2.59 13.6 11.0 5.84 3.62 0.53 18pp03-2-2 4.22 237580 65.5 14930 598 71.8 265 4.48 69.7 14.9 0.68 167 15.6 21.9 2.08 0.067 0.65 34.3 1.30 5.59 1.26 8.51 3.38 1.05 3.40 3.75 1.98 1.30 0.32 18pp03-3-1 3.33 245161 72.2 14456 644 73.2 246 1.75 72.1 14.6 0.87 161 16.1 23.9 1.73 0.043 0.111 0.65 34.5 1.51 7.26 1.40 9.69 3.38 1.13 4.32 3.80 1.50 1.29 0.35 18pp03-3-3 2.65 249177 76.2 15713 764 86.9 398 2.42 84.0 20.2 0.98 187 16.8 24.0 1.78 0.040 0.110 0.82 35.7 1.46 7.23 1.43 8.43 3.09 1.32 3.90 3.59 1.75 1.36 0.39 188 Table B4. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Deposit Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 12af16-1-1 core June 12 airfall Mg-Hbl 178 850 46.2 2.01 9.2 10.9 15.1 13.7 0.20 1.94 0.35 0.04 0.07 0.054 0.000 99.7 12af16-1-2 rim June 12 airfall Mg-Hbl 179 862 46.0 1.94 9.1 10.8 15.3 13.6 0.23 2.05 0.36 0.00 0.16 0.052 0.018 99.7 12af16-2-1 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 299 942 44.6 2.44 11.4 11.1 12.8 14.7 0.17 2.47 0.24 0.06 0.05 0.038 0.009 100.0 12af16-2-2 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 292 899 43.8 2.41 11.6 10.9 16.1 12.2 0.20 2.23 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.020 0.022 99.9 12af16-2-3 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 181 842 45.4 1.96 9.5 10.5 17.9 12.0 0.21 1.99 0.37 0.00 0.04 0.040 0.009 99.9 12af16-2-4 rim June 12 airfall Mg-Hst 287 1018 41.6 2.29 11.3 9.8 18.2 13.6 0.18 3.08 0.53 0.04 0.08 0.064 0.002 100.7 12af16-3-1 single June 12 airfall Mg-Hbl 172 834 47.2 1.21 8.6 10.6 15.0 14.1 0.35 1.57 0.44 0.02 0.05 0.211 0.000 99.4 12af16-3-2 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 304 922 44.0 1.90 11.6 10.8 14.7 13.5 0.21 2.36 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.023 0.018 99.4 12af16-4-1 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 388 935 44.9 2.10 12.4 10.9 10.9 15.1 0.10 2.34 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.011 0.021 99.2 12af16-4-2 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 381 931 43.4 2.28 12.8 11.1 13.7 13.4 0.10 2.50 0.26 0.02 0.16 0.020 0.010 99.7 12af16-5-1 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 408 928 44.1 1.68 12.8 11.0 11.7 14.8 0.15 2.17 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.015 0.037 98.7 12af16-5-2 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 350 930 43.4 2.01 12.1 10.9 14.2 13.7 0.22 2.21 0.27 0.01 0.02 0.024 0.011 98.9 12af16-6-1 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 340 944 43.6 2.32 11.9 11.1 12.8 14.4 0.16 2.41 0.28 0.00 0.09 0.017 0.007 99.1 12af16-6-2 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 301 916 44.8 2.34 11.5 11.1 12.5 14.6 0.10 2.33 0.28 0.06 0.00 0.017 0.024 99.7 12af16-7-1 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 257 908 44.9 2.01 10.7 10.6 15.3 13.5 0.24 2.22 0.35 0.03 0.08 0.031 0.014 99.9

12af9-1-1 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 279 928 43.3 2.67 11.1 10.8 14.7 13.2 0.17 2.37 0.27 0.02 0.11 0.027 0.020 98.7 12af9-1-2 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 273 919 44.2 2.80 10.9 10.8 14.0 13.5 0.16 2.28 0.31 0.05 0.09 0.019 0.013 99.2 12af9-1-3 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 291 926 43.0 2.74 11.3 10.8 14.7 13.0 0.16 2.31 0.32 0.05 0.07 0.020 0.002 98.5 12af9-1-4 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 291 942 42.8 2.94 11.1 11.0 13.8 13.6 0.17 2.33 0.31 0.05 0.00 0.023 0.024 98.2 12af9-1-5 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 290 945 43.0 2.82 11.1 10.8 14.4 13.5 0.21 2.33 0.28 0.07 0.02 0.027 0.011 98.6 12af9-1-6 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 275 928 42.7 2.54 11.0 10.8 15.4 12.7 0.23 2.31 0.32 0.05 0.02 0.026 0.000 98.2 12af9-2-2 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 300 929 44.7 2.60 11.5 11.0 13.5 13.8 0.16 2.46 0.51 0.03 0.15 0.029 0.019 100.4 12af9-2-3 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 308 929 43.3 2.63 11.5 11.0 13.9 13.6 0.17 2.26 0.48 0.04 0.10 0.033 0.018 98.9 12af9-3-1 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 341 956 43.5 2.45 11.9 11.3 11.4 15.3 0.12 2.49 0.30 0.01 0.18 0.028 0.008 99.1 12af9-3-2 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 318 931 44.0 1.81 11.6 10.8 14.5 13.7 0.27 2.31 0.27 0.01 0.14 0.024 0.025 99.4 12af9-5-1 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 248 914 43.9 2.66 10.4 10.8 13.6 13.5 0.16 2.34 0.46 0.01 0.06 0.053 0.008 97.8 12af9-5-2 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 251 918 44.9 2.56 10.6 10.9 13.5 13.9 0.18 2.41 0.28 0.04 0.03 0.030 0.000 99.4 12af9-5-3 core June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 251 917 44.3 2.52 10.6 11.0 13.6 13.9 0.15 2.40 0.29 0.02 0.11 0.031 0.001 99.0 12af9-5-4 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 257 920 44.4 2.60 10.6 10.9 13.6 13.8 0.19 2.34 0.30 0.00 0.09 0.030 0.025 98.9 12af9-5-5 rim June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 237 908 45.1 2.40 10.3 10.9 13.5 14.1 0.18 2.36 0.30 0.03 0.09 0.034 0.025 99.4 12af9-6-2 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 298 942 43.2 2.38 11.2 10.4 15.2 13.3 0.25 2.30 0.30 0.04 0.02 0.032 0.026 98.6 12af9-6-3 single June 12 airfall Tsch-Prg 289 949 43.3 2.43 11.1 10.5 14.9 13.1 0.24 2.52 0.24 0.02 0.04 0.029 0.000 98.5 189 Table B4. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 12af16-1-1 272 194664 129 13048 394 66.0 97.1 39.2 137 18.6 0.56 83.7 74.0 94.3 9.58 0.246 1.38 46.9 8.44 35.6 7.23 45.3 16.2 2.93 16.8 16.6 7.78 5.89 0.46 12af16-1-2 193 192306 98.1 12960 361 64.4 82.8 31.7 143 19.0 0.67 90.4 61.9 92.2 10.2 0.042 0.212 1.26 49.9 8.02 33.2 6.61 40.0 13.0 2.36 15.0 12.7 7.65 5.08 0.50 12af16-2-1 213 187136 95.0 16187 522 67.4 109 36.6 99.2 18.3 0.73 172 39.5 70.6 6.31 0.047 0.134 0.87 50.0 4.29 17.6 3.49 20.4 6.99 2.04 9.19 8.10 4.61 3.14 0.49 12af16-2-2 293 185763 92.1 15701 404 60.5 65.3 48.0 137 19.2 0.68 170 46.2 72.2 5.79 0.040 0.161 1.04 52.1 4.98 20.7 3.99 25.1 8.54 2.34 8.68 9.45 5.64 4.28 0.65 12af16-2-3 299 195733 73.1 12360 485 64.9 72.8 42.7 139 19.7 1.54 88.3 54.2 108 9.89 0.058 0.153 1.11 50.8 8.17 36.2 6.60 33.1 9.87 2.23 11.3 10.7 7.07 5.35 0.61 12af16-2-4 211 159263 76.2 14391 489 60.1 88.7 33.9 75.8 15.6 1.32 137 26.8 57.3 4.25 0.033 0.109 0.65 44.5 3.68 13.7 2.30 14.7 5.06 1.62 6.56 5.82 2.90 2.46 0.44 12af16-3-1 283 201742 84.2 7747 245 58.3 75.1 33.2 209 20.1 0.59 72.2 73.6 59.3 8.31 0.025 0.176 2.56 41.8 12.0 58.3 11.1 62.7 18.9 3.66 18.5 16.7 8.17 6.22 0.50 12af16-3-2 283 181872 71.2 12728 305 53.5 19.6 41.2 123 19.2 0.53 145 43.4 64.2 4.15 0.040 0.141 1.07 44.3 4.37 19.4 4.24 26.5 9.13 2.74 10.2 9.68 4.99 4.06 0.51 12af16-4-1 389 193047 87.3 15182 582 72.8 274 65.6 63.6 16.0 0.60 198 20.1 33.1 2.00 0.091 0.62 39.2 1.95 8.38 1.61 11.9 4.71 1.49 4.82 4.44 2.34 1.58 0.30 12af16-4-2 280 193600 84.2 14980 488 69.2 79.7 55.8 82.0 16.8 0.73 214 24.2 39.5 2.62 0.055 0.103 0.83 41.4 2.40 8.82 1.72 12.3 3.20 1.33 6.22 5.11 3.50 1.74 0.58 12af16-5-1 420 193792 85.3 12305 521 72.3 119 63.0 75.1 17.5 0.63 161 24.2 41.4 1.43 0.035 0.110 0.80 31.4 1.86 7.52 1.76 11.7 4.34 1.38 5.38 5.10 2.89 2.02 0.29 12af16-5-2 379 189379 70.4 12895 393 63.2 73.6 53.0 108 19.1 0.48 154 32.6 50.6 2.63 0.026 0.136 0.89 36.4 3.05 14.2 2.96 18.8 6.62 2.23 6.39 6.93 3.56 2.77 0.42 12af16-6-1 341 198339 99.8 15374 577 73.3 135 37.7 88.4 18.1 0.62 186 25.9 36.2 2.48 0.023 0.108 0.94 42.8 1.88 9.20 2.07 13.3 4.33 1.42 6.40 5.85 3.26 1.96 0.41 12af16-6-2 336 184068 108 16657 579 76.2 179 39.8 83.5 16.9 0.71 186 24.6 35.2 2.75 0.031 0.124 0.82 46.0 2.25 10.3 2.07 11.9 4.59 1.61 5.80 5.48 3.07 2.00 0.41 12af16-7-1 276 186548 69.4 15017 503 65.8 79.4 42.7 117 21.2 0.94 113 56.6 136 11.5 0.059 0.136 1.12 64.6 8.75 37.2 6.77 38.8 11.1 2.38 11.6 11.6 6.36 5.26 0.52

12af9-1-1 15.6 184237 101 18656 549 63.6 66.9 2.58 91.8 16.9 0.56 152 42.4 60.0 5.85 0.058 0.124 0.69 54.6 4.27 16.7 3.47 22.7 8.47 2.07 8.89 8.89 4.92 4.20 0.38 12af9-1-2 17.3 185102 113 19390 618 71.9 67.3 2.84 84.8 17.7 0.53 166 41.9 55.3 6.23 0.024 0.133 0.72 63.0 3.81 17.4 3.35 21.7 6.86 2.24 9.14 8.79 4.93 3.49 0.42 12af9-1-3 16.0 187309 110 18641 608 72.8 69.4 2.51 88.3 17.9 0.73 174 41.3 54.1 6.26 0.041 0.114 0.69 66.6 4.07 16.7 3.43 21.3 6.88 1.91 9.15 8.59 4.83 3.78 0.42 12af9-1-4 17.6 192559 128 20908 734 78.6 90.1 2.86 86.3 18.3 0.71 168 41.5 58.6 5.42 0.034 0.142 0.76 63.8 3.75 16.1 3.40 20.2 7.18 1.98 9.38 8.65 4.62 3.28 0.43 12af9-1-5 15.0 193330 120 19468 645 73.1 67.2 2.36 90.1 18.0 0.56 149 42.8 57.1 5.41 0.035 0.139 0.79 49.4 3.86 16.4 3.26 21.2 7.93 1.72 8.82 8.26 4.80 3.44 0.45 12af9-1-6 15.9 180285 92.3 18512 540 66.6 65.3 2.96 93.0 18.1 0.52 148 42.0 63.4 6.63 0.029 0.128 0.68 48.3 4.24 18.6 3.61 22.8 8.27 2.11 9.50 9.77 4.69 3.86 0.42 12af9-2-2 12.2 199384 52.5 18135 500 58.6 132 2.60 98.2 22.5 0.93 221 42.2 108 21.3 0.044 0.127 1.30 85.9 7.60 30.6 5.22 33.0 9.53 2.61 10.3 9.40 5.10 3.10 0.47 12af9-2-3 10.9 179933 59.2 17773 468 57.3 127 2.48 99.8 21.9 1.15 188 43.2 119 19.5 0.043 0.149 1.35 77.7 8.03 31.8 5.61 32.5 10.1 2.38 9.06 9.84 5.31 3.81 0.48 12af9-3-1 12.9 209614 97.8 15891 600 76.4 219 2.97 102 20.2 0.70 183 32.5 55.7 3.73 0.028 0.134 0.97 57.3 3.58 16.3 3.10 18.5 6.27 1.89 7.51 7.05 4.24 2.52 0.51 12af9-3-2 11.2 186136 71.7 11656 290 60.5 21.9 2.09 139 21.1 1.06 118 43.9 63.2 3.45 0.046 0.158 1.33 36.4 4.02 20.0 3.95 27.1 8.90 2.93 11.7 10.3 5.84 4.16 0.56 12af9-5-1 10.9 191373 131 18687 670 65.8 252 2.28 106 22.7 0.79 178 78.2 148 28.1 0.044 0.223 1.85 100 10.9 45.3 8.64 54.4 17.0 3.37 17.8 16.8 8.72 7.06 0.54 12af9-5-2 11.1 195493 144 17735 692 65.0 284 2.43 98.1 20.2 0.71 172 83.6 136 24.0 0.047 0.238 1.66 68.8 9.45 39.4 7.75 46.3 17.3 3.52 19.4 18.1 9.43 6.45 0.42 12af9-5-3 10.5 198235 145 17513 694 67.5 291 2.22 102 21.0 0.59 178 82.3 135 25.2 0.033 0.228 1.62 69.6 9.49 38.9 7.58 46.4 16.0 3.55 19.5 16.2 9.51 6.58 0.46 12af9-5-4 9.29 187538 113 17803 629 64.6 251 2.08 97.5 20.4 0.61 172 71.3 124 24.7 0.040 0.189 1.43 59.4 8.97 36.0 7.19 43.9 14.0 3.12 15.6 14.9 7.98 5.97 0.42 12af9-5-5 9.31 190786 145 16225 652 64.9 279 2.13 108 20.6 0.65 172 79.4 123 25.4 0.028 0.205 1.44 65.2 8.64 35.3 7.08 45.0 16.1 3.05 17.1 16.7 9.26 5.56 0.46 12af9-6-2 13.1 186786 108 16262 545 59.8 189 2.73 122 20.2 0.72 186 58.8 107 21.1 0.039 0.140 0.89 69.5 8.08 32.2 5.87 37.9 12.7 2.38 13.6 12.8 6.68 4.76 0.46 12af9-6-3 12.6 186855 114 16869 574 58.8 189 2.66 114 23.0 0.87 171 74.2 144 28.7 0.038 0.170 1.51 102 12.9 49.8 8.56 51.9 17.6 2.90 18.2 15.9 8.05 5.57 0.55 190 Table B4. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Deposit Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 12pf1-1-2 rim June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 200 873 45.2 2.06 9.4 10.7 13.8 14.1 0.18 2.00 0.29 0.04 0.08 0.040 0.006 97.9 12pf1-1-3 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 333 924 42.6 1.94 11.9 11.0 13.8 13.3 0.18 2.34 0.26 0.02 0.16 0.018 0.022 97.7 12pf1-1-4 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 317 936 42.9 2.28 11.5 10.7 14.5 13.2 0.23 2.30 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.015 0.017 97.7 12pf1-10-2 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 517 962 43.4 2.15 12.6 10.8 10.7 15.1 0.10 2.40 0.26 0.00 0.08 0.015 0.022 97.5 12pf1-2-1 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 334 944 42.2 2.45 11.8 11.1 13.8 13.2 0.21 2.45 0.19 0.02 0.09 0.017 0.019 97.6 12pf1-2-2 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 331 929 42.8 2.46 11.8 11.0 14.1 12.9 0.20 2.33 0.19 0.03 0.11 0.018 0.004 98.0 12pf1-2-3 rim June 12 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 197 860 45.9 1.88 9.3 10.7 13.8 13.9 0.21 1.95 0.27 0.03 0.12 0.045 0.004 98.1 12pf1-4-2 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 413 940 44.2 2.03 12.6 10.7 11.1 15.2 0.09 2.24 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.014 0.035 98.5 12pf1-4-3 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 417 943 43.0 2.14 12.8 11.0 11.9 14.3 0.14 2.26 0.29 0.10 0.03 0.016 0.019 98.0 12pf1-5-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 248 890 44.5 2.02 10.4 10.7 13.8 13.8 0.17 2.11 0.31 0.01 0.11 0.038 0.000 98.0 12pf1-6-2 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 289 905 44.6 2.04 11.1 10.7 13.2 13.9 0.17 2.19 0.30 0.02 0.09 0.033 0.016 98.3 12pf1-6-3 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 209 873 45.2 1.79 9.6 10.7 13.5 14.3 0.19 1.99 0.28 0.02 0.02 0.040 0.004 97.6 12pf1-8-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 204 871 45.6 1.92 9.4 10.8 13.2 14.3 0.21 1.96 0.30 0.03 0.11 0.045 0.011 97.9 bl12pf10-1-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 285 909 44.2 1.85 11.1 10.8 13.8 14.1 0.16 2.22 0.27 0.00 0.15 0.021 0.018 98.8 bl12pf10-10-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 286 903 45.1 1.88 11.1 10.8 13.3 14.5 0.15 2.14 0.33 0.06 0.08 0.029 0.015 99.6 bl12pf10-2-2 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 215 883 45.8 1.86 9.7 10.7 13.5 14.7 0.18 2.05 0.29 0.01 0.10 0.039 0.025 99.0 bl12pf10-3-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 189 861 46.2 1.83 9.2 10.7 14.2 14.3 0.20 1.92 0.30 0.03 0.11 0.043 0.000 99.0 bl12pf10-4-2 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 367 926 43.8 1.87 12.2 10.7 13.3 14.0 0.17 2.23 0.27 0.02 0.07 0.013 0.021 98.7 bl12pf10-4-3 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 206 877 45.7 1.95 9.6 10.8 13.8 14.4 0.19 2.02 0.29 0.02 0.05 0.043 0.006 98.8 bl12pf10-5-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 225 890 44.8 1.97 10.0 10.6 15.4 13.4 0.25 2.06 0.29 0.05 0.07 0.043 0.013 99.0 bl12pf10-5-2 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 209 885 45.0 2.06 9.7 10.9 14.1 14.2 0.21 2.03 0.23 0.01 0.09 0.033 0.001 98.5 bl12pf10-6-3 rim June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 523 963 43.3 2.00 13.2 10.8 12.1 14.6 0.17 2.30 0.32 0.01 0.10 0.011 0.008 99.0 bl12pf10-6-4 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 513 964 43.8 1.99 12.6 10.9 10.9 15.5 0.10 2.43 0.29 0.03 0.07 0.015 0.013 98.7 bl12pf10-7-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 207 883 46.2 1.63 9.7 10.6 14.8 14.4 0.23 2.10 0.28 0.00 0.09 0.032 0.023 100.0 bl12pf10-8-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 230 886 44.7 2.06 10.2 10.8 14.3 14.0 0.17 2.06 0.26 0.04 0.10 0.034 0.016 98.8 bl12pf10-9-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 201 870 46.0 1.90 9.4 10.8 13.8 14.4 0.21 1.93 0.28 0.01 0.03 0.046 0.020 99.0 bl12pf13-1-2 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 386 927 43.6 2.06 12.9 11.1 14.6 13.0 0.19 2.40 0.32 0.08 0.00 0.033 0.015 100.4 bl12pf13-2-1 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 342 937 44.3 2.13 12.0 11.1 12.6 14.8 0.15 2.36 0.25 0.02 0.06 0.018 0.010 99.7 bl12pf13-2-2 rim June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 307 907 44.4 1.91 11.6 11.0 13.6 14.0 0.17 2.20 0.20 0.00 0.15 0.055 0.017 99.2 bl12pf13-3-1 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 252 896 44.2 2.06 10.7 11.1 14.2 13.8 0.19 2.13 0.37 0.01 0.16 0.024 0.013 98.9 bl12pf13-3-2 rim June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 233 897 45.1 2.00 10.2 10.9 14.3 14.0 0.26 2.11 0.29 0.05 0.07 0.023 0.014 99.2 bl12pf13-4-1 single June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 410 947 43.3 2.17 12.7 11.0 12.7 14.1 0.17 2.34 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.022 0.022 99.0 bl12pf13-5-1 core June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 433 937 42.9 2.07 13.4 11.0 13.6 13.3 0.15 2.33 0.35 0.00 0.10 0.019 0.022 99.2 bl12pf13-5-2 rim June 12 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 209 882 45.7 2.01 9.7 10.8 14.3 14.1 0.23 2.08 0.27 0.00 0.07 0.037 0.031 99.5 191 Table B4. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 12pf1-1-2 7.25 218256 166 14278 438 72.1 81.7 3.21 141 20.3 0.47 94.4 62.1 61.9 6.94 0.030 0.245 1.46 55.7 6.17 27.9 5.73 35.4 14.1 2.87 13.1 13.3 7.71 4.63 0.49 12pf1-1-3 7.89 204697 90.7 13490 399 67.5 73.6 1.86 132 17.7 0.54 126 47.6 58.0 4.39 0.032 0.172 1.14 44.7 5.01 22.8 4.53 28.8 10.2 2.47 10.3 9.96 5.52 3.93 0.43 12pf1-1-4 6.01 202455 113 15674 339 73.1 66.8 3.40 95.1 19.6 0.47 154 50.0 75.1 3.23 0.037 0.145 0.68 42.8 2.92 12.6 2.62 18.8 7.53 2.59 8.91 10.4 5.50 3.81 0.21 12pf1-10-2 6.04 197150 85.4 15303 593 71.9 275 1.53 58.9 14.3 0.55 179 19.3 30.0 1.93 0.028 0.084 0.65 32.0 1.58 6.83 1.70 10.3 3.90 1.42 5.11 3.72 2.42 1.52 0.24 12pf1-2-1 7.32 193772 92.9 16394 352 69.4 91.3 1.59 87.6 16.5 0.42 193 28.1 35.7 3.53 0.044 0.122 0.54 44.2 2.14 9.08 1.93 12.5 4.74 1.76 6.46 5.81 3.28 2.24 0.29 12pf1-2-2 7.53 209573 101 16882 351 72.0 86.2 1.99 113 19.6 0.44 181 38.0 51.4 3.47 0.031 0.150 0.70 49.3 2.57 12.1 2.42 16.0 6.58 2.16 7.62 8.44 4.72 3.02 0.33 12pf1-2-3 9.51 211183 133 12633 414 73.0 76.9 2.20 159 19.2 0.61 89.7 62.4 60.8 5.46 0.029 0.250 1.53 42.8 5.79 29.0 5.68 36.1 11.2 2.85 15.5 13.0 6.83 5.60 0.54 12pf1-4-2 6.85 195359 80.8 13615 618 74.3 376 3.42 65.7 14.2 0.43 169 16.5 21.8 1.76 0.034 0.081 0.57 31.6 1.20 5.42 1.18 7.25 2.13 1.13 3.56 2.82 1.92 1.02 0.26 12pf1-4-3 5.49 197173 88.2 14701 563 74.1 138 1.51 75.0 17.0 0.69 202 23.0 32.3 2.20 0.038 0.099 0.78 41.0 2.16 9.12 1.79 12.3 5.21 1.43 4.87 4.95 2.74 1.62 0.33 12pf1-5-1 11.4 200285 129 13258 433 66.9 78.7 2.58 129 18.8 1.31 115 51.2 60.4 4.71 0.042 0.211 1.35 53.9 5.82 23.0 4.85 30.7 12.3 2.74 12.9 12.8 7.05 4.20 0.67 12pf1-6-2 7.26 207060 121 13147 391 71.2 95.7 1.36 124 18.9 0.62 116 54.5 63.7 4.55 0.018 0.208 1.29 44.4 5.51 22.9 4.67 33.4 10.5 2.67 12.7 10.5 6.65 4.51 0.44 12pf1-6-3 6.49 214419 94.9 13362 368 69.0 54.9 1.76 121 19.5 0.71 134 45.4 58.6 4.07 0.036 0.167 1.30 44.3 4.52 18.2 3.87 25.6 9.95 2.62 11.2 9.69 5.53 4.41 0.54 12pf1-8-1 6.64 202761 137 13078 422 63.7 93.3 4.83 125 17.4 0.51 96.8 59.0 62.5 5.81 0.033 0.201 1.31 47.3 6.45 25.3 5.47 35.3 13.9 2.71 13.3 13.3 6.84 4.98 0.47 bl12pf10-1-1 64.2 276655 137 12689 429 66.3 88.3 17.2 145 17.1 0.63 93.6 64.7 70.4 6.37 0.050 0.214 1.40 41.9 6.54 28.8 5.98 35.2 13.9 2.56 16.9 13.2 8.75 5.53 0.53 bl12pf10-10-1 87.4 250228 91.0 12908 550 69.9 113 21.7 114 17.6 0.52 130 35.5 44.7 3.20 0.019 0.149 1.03 34.0 3.36 15.0 3.27 21.0 8.09 1.96 8.66 7.89 4.97 3.00 0.44 bl12pf10-2-2 76.0 267992 135 12614 444 67.0 89.3 17.5 143 18.6 0.67 99.8 58.7 65.4 5.91 0.039 0.223 1.61 41.9 6.06 27.0 5.40 32.5 14.1 2.70 13.4 12.7 8.05 5.00 0.56 bl12pf10-3-1 70.4 204248 142 12761 386 70.9 68.2 21.4 157 17.9 0.51 84.4 65.1 68.0 6.38 0.028 0.237 1.43 43.8 6.70 29.7 5.98 37.7 13.3 2.82 15.2 13.6 8.26 5.44 0.59 bl12pf10-4-2 68.6 241214 116 12420 480 65.3 130 18.4 151 17.3 0.63 110 47.6 55.9 4.15 0.023 0.184 1.25 37.8 4.75 20.4 4.42 25.4 9.74 2.52 10.6 9.74 6.18 3.56 0.51 bl12pf10-4-3 72.7 226703 140 13243 449 68.5 111 17.2 153 19.9 0.64 95.5 59.2 67.9 6.32 0.045 0.279 1.50 43.3 6.37 28.6 5.77 36.2 12.2 2.90 13.3 13.6 8.25 5.58 0.56 bl12pf10-5-1 106 264136 111 14229 547 87.0 83.8 32.6 180 22.1 0.45 102 44.5 52.6 5.61 0.025 0.237 1.72 46.6 4.99 25.7 4.81 29.6 9.82 2.52 10.3 9.46 5.98 3.87 0.64 bl12pf10-5-2 96.6 266227 111 14763 521 85.4 76.0 28.1 163 21.5 1.24 108 44.1 52.9 6.27 0.054 0.305 1.78 48.5 5.09 28.9 5.27 30.1 9.77 2.42 10.9 10.2 6.36 3.92 0.79 bl12pf10-6-3 55.4 290100 75.8 13582 607 74.3 124 10.6 80.6 15.0 0.50 162 19.6 30.9 1.71 0.010 0.110 0.71 31.5 1.36 7.66 1.62 10.3 4.32 1.72 4.58 4.12 2.46 1.15 0.34 bl12pf10-6-4 51.9 217014 80.9 13959 649 72.6 279 8.54 68.3 15.1 0.57 185 18.1 30.4 1.59 0.060 0.097 0.76 35.6 1.78 7.55 1.53 10.6 3.65 1.14 4.32 4.00 2.61 1.52 0.31 bl12pf10-7-1 68.8 231534 130 12003 387 69.2 66.9 20.7 153 17.6 0.44 82.1 60.4 67.2 6.05 0.102 0.249 1.47 40.4 6.50 28.9 5.78 36.4 12.4 2.41 13.1 12.2 7.85 5.04 0.57 bl12pf10-8-1 70.6 248539 92.7 13363 532 64.0 136 24.7 109 17.1 0.65 130 34.8 46.2 3.43 0.059 0.170 1.09 38.9 3.65 16.2 2.98 19.8 6.60 2.08 8.87 7.88 4.41 3.29 0.43 bl12pf10-9-1 73.7 243117 131 13094 430 67.4 63.5 16.9 158 18.1 0.63 99.1 55.8 63.6 5.99 0.027 0.245 1.50 42.5 5.69 25.8 5.26 33.5 11.6 2.53 12.9 12.6 7.56 4.53 0.59 bl12pf13-1-2 22.2 208612 133 13547 464 67.9 113 6.03 126 18.3 0.55 107 63.7 73.7 6.25 0.026 0.198 1.43 52.9 6.90 31.5 6.16 41.2 14.5 3.07 16.5 13.7 6.66 4.92 0.53 bl12pf13-2-1 27.5 203773 83.3 14715 526 76.1 182 5.38 75.3 16.4 0.60 173 23.8 48.3 2.80 0.028 0.106 0.77 38.5 2.35 9.71 2.05 12.0 4.96 1.55 5.36 4.50 2.48 1.45 0.34 bl12pf13-2-2 25.4 201361 70.9 14375 460 67.6 84.1 6.25 98.8 18.9 0.32 173 32.2 52.1 3.60 0.029 0.118 0.82 42.7 3.12 14.5 2.88 19.6 6.74 2.02 7.78 6.56 3.52 3.01 0.40 bl12pf13-3-1 24.0 203965 100 13776 441 53.2 43.7 4.72 104 20.0 0.79 121 49.6 104 8.04 0.049 0.141 2.10 56.9 6.00 24.8 4.56 27.0 8.65 2.30 10.2 10.4 6.57 4.76 0.37 bl12pf13-3-2 22.7 205321 96.0 14116 409 60.5 45.6 4.71 119 18.5 0.75 121 51.2 97.5 8.87 0.041 0.141 1.79 56.3 5.98 25.0 4.28 27.7 9.28 2.29 11.6 10.5 6.35 4.23 0.39 bl12pf13-4-1 27.0 200957 69.2 14901 519 71.7 78.0 6.06 84.3 18.7 0.29 198 21.2 30.7 2.58 0.021 0.106 0.82 38.7 1.83 7.76 1.77 12.1 4.76 1.29 5.32 4.60 2.62 1.70 0.39 bl12pf13-5-1 28.1 192467 73.5 14460 513 72.1 49.5 8.67 100 19.3 0.61 191 25.3 34.3 1.95 0.028 0.110 0.99 39.7 1.74 8.98 1.62 12.3 5.59 1.53 5.25 5.11 3.23 1.99 0.39 bl12pf13-5-2 21.6 207990 107 14131 470 65.2 68.7 14.8 114 18.3 0.68 144 42.6 53.5 4.05 0.044 0.169 1.12 44.4 4.58 19.2 3.43 27.9 8.99 2.03 10.8 9.38 5.10 3.33 0.55 192 Table B4. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Deposit Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 22af19-1-1 single July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 499 970 43.2 2.09 13.0 10.9 12.6 14.7 0.16 2.39 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.018 0.006 99.4 22af19-1-3 single July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 217 896 45.1 2.12 10.0 11.0 14.9 14.1 0.21 2.17 0.29 0.02 0.05 0.044 0.016 100.1 22af19-2-1 single July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 203 882 45.8 1.99 9.6 11.0 14.6 14.5 0.23 1.96 0.30 0.00 0.03 0.043 0.008 100.1 22af19-3-1 sigle July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 411 959 44.5 2.14 12.6 10.8 11.7 15.4 0.12 2.32 0.25 0.01 0.06 0.016 0.040 100.0 22af19-4-1 core July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 414 960 44.0 2.08 12.8 11.0 12.5 14.7 0.15 2.42 0.25 0.00 0.07 0.019 0.021 100.1 22af19-4-2 rim July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 526 958 43.3 2.23 13.4 11.2 13.0 14.1 0.15 2.43 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.014 0.016 100.1 22af19-5-1 single July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 210 895 46.0 2.02 9.7 11.0 14.0 14.6 0.23 2.13 0.26 0.02 0.04 0.041 0.020 100.2 22af19-6-1 core July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 386 936 44.4 1.82 12.6 10.8 13.9 14.1 0.20 2.28 0.27 0.04 0.04 0.008 0.000 100.6 22af19-6-3 rim July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 216 894 45.3 1.99 9.9 11.0 14.6 14.3 0.24 2.04 0.28 0.02 0.05 0.037 0.017 99.7

22af3-1-1 rim July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 291 911 44.4 1.93 11.3 10.9 14.4 13.9 0.20 2.15 0.25 0.01 0.06 0.023 0.020 99.5 22af3-1-3 core July 22 airfall Tsch-Prg 202 878 45.9 1.97 9.6 10.8 14.7 14.2 0.22 1.99 0.30 0.03 0.00 0.040 0.016 99.8 22af3-2-2 single July 22 airfall Mg-Hbl 192 861 46.5 1.96 9.5 11.0 14.7 14.2 0.19 1.98 0.34 0.05 0.12 0.043 0.011 100.5

22pf17-1-1 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 335 926 43.5 1.83 12.0 10.9 14.9 13.4 0.21 2.34 0.28 0.03 0.04 0.020 0.000 99.5 22pf17-1-3 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 331 915 43.8 1.64 11.9 11.0 14.3 13.8 0.23 2.18 0.28 0.06 0.00 0.021 0.004 99.2 22pf17-10-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 403 940 43.7 2.13 12.7 10.9 13.0 14.1 0.14 2.32 0.30 0.03 0.15 0.019 0.022 99.6 22pf17-10-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 374 936 43.7 2.05 12.4 10.8 13.0 14.3 0.12 2.34 0.29 0.02 0.04 0.019 0.017 99.0 22pf17-11-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow invalid 491 958 44.0 1.74 12.7 10.6 11.6 15.4 0.12 2.34 0.24 0.03 0.15 0.014 0.022 98.8 22pf17-12-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 524 959 44.4 1.94 12.7 11.0 10.5 15.7 0.12 2.39 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.012 0.000 99.2 22pf17-12-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 533 959 43.9 2.00 12.9 11.0 10.5 15.5 0.09 2.37 0.29 0.01 0.11 0.015 0.009 98.8 22pf17-14-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 538 961 44.3 1.95 13.1 10.9 11.3 15.2 0.14 2.40 0.31 0.07 0.05 0.016 0.003 99.8 22pf17-14-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 551 965 44.3 2.08 13.0 11.1 10.8 15.4 0.12 2.47 0.29 0.03 0.07 0.023 0.021 99.7 22pf17-15-1 core July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 712 982 43.9 1.90 12.9 10.8 10.5 15.7 0.13 2.46 0.29 0.08 0.02 0.009 0.006 98.6 22pf17-15-2 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 538 952 43.9 2.08 13.3 11.1 11.9 14.7 0.11 2.40 0.25 0.00 0.15 0.018 0.000 99.9 22pf17-16-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 378 933 43.1 2.25 12.8 11.0 15.6 12.5 0.21 2.40 0.40 0.05 0.10 0.035 0.022 100.5 22pf17-16-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 179 867 45.9 1.94 9.0 11.0 13.6 14.8 0.17 2.03 0.29 0.01 0.10 0.038 0.011 98.9 22pf17-16-3 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 511 972 44.1 1.92 12.8 10.9 11.2 15.7 0.14 2.46 0.26 0.06 0.07 0.015 0.023 99.7 22pf17-16-4 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 194 872 46.3 1.91 9.4 11.0 14.0 14.5 0.23 2.01 0.29 0.02 0.11 0.040 0.016 99.9 22pf17-18-1 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 190 868 46.5 1.84 9.2 10.9 14.0 14.6 0.23 1.95 0.26 0.03 0.10 0.039 0.013 99.7 22pf17-18-2 core July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 362 932 44.8 1.82 12.3 10.8 12.6 14.6 0.16 2.38 0.27 0.09 0.21 0.015 0.019 100.1 22pf17-18-4 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 196 877 45.5 2.04 9.4 11.0 14.2 14.3 0.21 2.05 0.28 0.01 0.09 0.040 0.000 99.1 22pf17-18-5 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 193 859 46.2 1.92 9.4 10.9 13.8 14.4 0.19 1.92 0.27 0.00 0.15 0.042 0.000 99.2 22pf17-2-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 190 868 46.0 1.96 9.3 11.0 13.6 14.8 0.17 1.97 0.26 0.00 0.05 0.035 0.023 99.1 22pf17-2-3 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 198 870 46.5 1.88 9.5 10.8 13.8 14.5 0.21 2.03 0.26 0.00 0.11 0.043 0.008 99.6 22pf17-3-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 231 888 45.0 1.84 10.1 10.6 15.1 13.8 0.23 2.01 0.30 0.00 0.11 0.038 0.000 99.1 22pf17-4-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 201 875 45.8 2.02 9.6 10.9 14.1 14.3 0.17 2.11 0.27 0.02 0.19 0.041 0.000 99.7 22pf17-4-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 200 877 45.7 1.87 9.5 10.9 14.3 14.2 0.23 2.03 0.27 0.01 0.14 0.043 0.024 99.2 22pf17-4-3 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 201 877 45.6 1.88 9.4 10.8 14.2 14.4 0.23 1.95 0.24 0.04 0.08 0.043 0.005 99.0 193 Table B4. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 22af19-1-1 3.72 203637 77.8 14349 587 66.5 126 1.43 74.3 16.1 0.62 200 23.6 45.9 2.01 0.103 0.093 0.96 44.2 2.50 10.4 2.04 13.8 4.85 1.71 6.15 4.98 2.82 1.63 1.73 22af19-1-3 3.67 215705 113 14557 446 66.0 74.7 1.85 138 18.6 0.75 123 57.0 68.1 6.00 0.055 0.231 1.46 49.9 5.93 24.1 5.04 32.7 11.8 2.84 12.5 12.0 7.86 4.23 0.56 22af19-2-1 3.69 196168 140 13562 391 63.4 68.6 1.43 141 16.3 0.75 97.3 64.6 72.7 6.29 0.373 0.259 1.33 45.1 6.25 26.8 5.72 39.4 13.6 3.26 16.0 14.0 8.83 6.01 0.48 22af19-3-1 4.13 211339 78.0 13667 542 68.0 132 1.95 73.0 15.6 0.58 169 21.8 40.3 1.86 0.095 0.121 0.77 30.8 1.83 7.80 1.60 12.1 4.26 1.31 6.11 4.95 3.54 2.12 0.27 22af19-4-1 2.66 224741 73.0 13978 527 65.2 134 2.10 73.7 14.9 1.00 181 19.7 31.4 1.95 0.074 0.084 0.71 34.9 1.51 7.12 1.65 10.9 3.99 1.43 5.41 4.62 2.99 1.60 0.30 22af19-4-2 3.77 205650 75.0 15377 547 67.7 69.7 2.16 86.7 17.1 0.79 205 25.1 38.6 2.17 0.045 0.114 0.81 42.4 2.05 8.87 1.89 13.3 5.80 1.67 6.22 5.52 3.40 1.96 0.46 22af19-5-1 3.43 197476 131 14326 459 64.2 110 2.35 121 15.0 0.72 120 49.9 57.4 4.66 0.057 0.142 1.04 41.7 4.89 20.0 4.18 28.2 10.5 2.41 11.7 10.1 7.07 3.63 0.44 22af19-6-1 3.67 198766 110 13024 491 64.9 116 1.80 125 16.5 0.90 121 47.2 58.7 4.42 0.067 0.168 1.23 38.8 4.27 19.1 4.35 28.2 10.1 2.45 11.8 10.8 5.78 3.96 0.43 22af19-6-3 3.24 208574 128 13076 453 69.1 122 1.33 114 15.3 0.65 105 55.5 57.6 5.01 0.056 0.205 1.10 37.0 5.08 22.1 4.52 29.9 11.2 2.37 13.3 11.4 7.32 4.52 0.44

22af3-1-1 3.26 184031 115 13402 405 60.9 61.8 1.53 131 16.5 0.56 113 52.5 64.6 5.17 0.026 0.209 1.44 45.0 5.05 22.8 4.89 31.0 11.0 2.41 12.5 11.6 6.96 4.40 0.49 22af3-1-3 3.56 195707 149 12923 408 67.2 73.1 1.46 143 16.3 0.36 86.8 65.8 70.9 6.51 0.035 0.252 1.47 42.2 6.41 29.1 5.82 37.1 14.2 2.85 16.6 14.0 9.02 5.24 0.51 22af3-2-2 4.12 204916 150 12611 365 59.7 64.6 2.62 137 15.4 0.50 79.8 72.7 71.3 6.14 0.304 0.235 1.46 40.5 6.84 29.1 6.12 40.3 14.8 2.86 17.5 15.4 10.1 5.75 0.55

22pf17-1-1 20.5 209521 83.4 12253 327 65.0 54.9 5.25 138 20.9 0.57 124 46.1 63.4 3.42 0.036 0.199 1.50 37.8 4.56 21.1 4.34 26.6 10.3 2.51 11.3 8.75 5.38 3.39 0.59 22pf17-1-3 36.5 223936 39.1 11296 333 61.7 79.5 9.16 150 19.7 0.41 130 30.7 63.8 3.59 0.086 0.158 1.45 31.8 4.07 18.6 3.70 23.6 6.68 2.42 6.78 6.47 3.82 2.98 0.50 22pf17-10-1 44.1 204096 69.7 15071 550 75.2 89.5 11.2 93.9 19.5 1.03 194 22.0 36.9 2.24 0.022 0.120 0.89 41.3 2.29 9.21 1.90 12.5 4.01 1.57 5.56 4.69 2.35 1.61 0.42 22pf17-10-2 32.7 209797 70.4 14988 564 77.3 90.5 6.69 93.2 19.3 0.65 169 21.1 35.8 2.23 0.021 0.110 0.89 34.5 1.78 8.24 1.80 10.7 4.23 1.51 5.06 4.87 2.60 1.72 0.35 22pf17-11-2 32.9 205052 78.6 12988 634 80.9 243 11.9 77.5 18.3 0.61 154 19.6 40.9 1.64 0.038 0.095 0.87 30.3 1.72 7.84 1.54 11.1 3.97 1.32 4.45 4.42 2.29 1.78 0.39 22pf17-12-1 34.5 217166 80.7 13854 698 82.6 299 23.8 70.6 16.6 0.80 173 16.2 18.7 1.35 0.032 0.081 0.58 31.6 1.20 5.66 1.09 7.37 3.19 1.04 3.88 3.65 1.79 1.28 0.33 22pf17-12-2 33.6 205556 77.3 13612 661 77.0 308 14.8 68.7 17.1 0.83 160 15.5 22.2 1.32 0.029 0.075 0.65 29.2 1.18 5.51 0.98 7.03 3.21 1.13 3.85 3.73 1.78 1.62 0.30 22pf17-14-1 29.7 201768 80.9 13798 636 79.5 274 8.99 68.0 16.6 0.79 160 17.2 26.3 1.60 0.021 0.083 0.62 31.3 1.37 6.26 1.15 8.20 2.74 1.14 3.98 3.53 1.69 1.48 0.27 22pf17-14-2 33.5 216181 84.0 14603 692 81.3 240 8.43 70.5 18.0 0.87 186 19.4 29.3 1.76 0.033 0.091 0.77 36.7 1.64 8.03 1.54 10.4 4.15 1.29 4.02 4.21 2.05 1.41 0.39 22pf17-15-1 27.4 205450 73.5 13033 606 75.7 207 13.8 69.0 17.0 0.93 158 16.7 21.4 1.17 0.023 0.076 0.64 28.4 1.38 5.53 1.20 7.45 3.01 1.03 4.24 3.48 1.91 1.39 0.34 22pf17-15-2 31.2 208844 77.0 14200 666 79.8 313 9.18 66.1 16.9 0.89 183 17.4 24.0 1.58 0.016 0.073 0.72 34.3 1.28 6.39 1.26 8.40 2.68 0.92 4.34 3.58 1.68 1.36 0.35 22pf17-16-1 36.5 220962 132 13912 445 79.7 70.6 11.6 156 22.7 0.80 103 62.0 69.0 5.85 0.062 0.244 1.64 49.4 6.03 28.5 5.97 35.5 12.9 2.90 14.6 14.0 6.06 5.03 0.58 22pf17-16-2 32.1 230189 158 13618 451 74.7 81.0 7.44 163 22.1 0.58 83.7 62.5 65.3 6.91 0.042 0.271 1.91 51.2 6.71 31.5 6.02 38.0 14.6 2.72 16.7 14.4 7.56 4.72 0.64 22pf17-16-3 55.1 210900 78.6 13344 665 81.7 294 18.8 74.4 16.5 0.79 150 18.1 31.3 1.48 0.128 0.085 0.83 31.5 1.25 6.61 1.29 8.29 3.10 1.15 4.07 4.35 2.39 1.40 0.31 22pf17-16-4 39.0 228135 131 13114 437 71.7 67.7 31.8 156 21.0 0.69 91.2 61.3 72.5 5.72 0.071 0.254 1.54 46.8 6.52 31.8 5.95 36.4 13.3 2.66 16.3 13.0 7.13 4.08 0.67 22pf17-18-1 30.1 220175 137 13401 484 76.8 121 17.7 160 20.6 0.65 93.9 57.0 64.1 6.35 0.072 0.246 1.56 46.1 6.39 27.1 5.31 34.6 11.8 2.58 14.0 13.1 6.32 4.66 0.58 22pf17-18-2 44.2 223835 110 12763 591 77.1 241 21.1 145 20.2 0.77 117 39.9 53.7 3.88 0.042 0.200 1.25 38.4 4.41 19.8 3.90 22.9 8.77 1.96 9.67 8.83 5.34 3.23 0.50 22pf17-18-4 37.8 215257 145 13354 448 71.6 76.9 16.4 163 20.7 0.77 98.4 59.2 63.9 5.76 0.100 0.245 1.55 48.7 6.19 28.7 5.57 35.1 11.8 2.62 13.5 12.9 6.36 4.82 0.58 22pf17-18-5 41.3 217348 146 12941 436 74.5 76.6 20.1 158 20.4 0.69 87.6 64.2 68.2 6.56 0.040 0.280 1.59 46.5 6.82 32.5 5.79 38.7 14.6 2.98 15.0 14.6 7.40 4.88 0.51 22pf17-2-2 30.6 223143 145 13295 445 73.4 80.7 8.76 155 20.1 0.63 94.3 62.1 73.2 6.60 0.060 0.245 1.60 53.0 6.96 30.9 6.09 37.9 13.3 3.04 14.7 13.0 7.89 5.11 0.73 22pf17-2-3 30.7 221000 142 12859 455 77.2 84.9 16.4 160 21.7 0.69 89.0 64.6 71.6 6.69 0.040 0.283 1.63 44.6 6.82 30.5 6.20 41.0 13.7 2.88 16.5 14.4 7.31 4.74 0.61 22pf17-3-1 27.9 236553 128 13128 432 72.3 65.2 9.72 191 23.1 1.39 99.0 65.7 75.9 7.10 0.076 0.246 1.62 74.6 9.64 38.0 6.98 42.0 14.3 2.68 16.4 14.2 7.61 5.21 1.27 22pf17-4-1 27.5 216893 140 14295 452 72.9 83.1 14.1 144 20.1 0.47 103 58.5 64.9 6.53 0.023 0.235 1.59 50.1 6.04 28.8 5.75 36.3 11.5 2.71 12.7 12.2 7.52 4.73 0.59 22pf17-4-2 30.3 216476 118 13149 479 72.5 97.1 19.1 152 20.0 0.62 93.6 61.0 66.9 5.59 0.031 0.238 1.64 46.7 6.49 28.7 5.99 35.1 12.6 2.80 14.3 12.8 6.87 4.85 0.57 22pf17-4-3 34.4 218509 130 13566 469 75.9 95.0 18.6 158 20.2 0.72 85.9 63.0 70.7 6.50 0.030 0.258 1.65 43.6 6.60 29.6 5.93 38.7 13.3 2.89 14.7 13.1 6.86 5.24 0.57 194 Table B4. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Deposit Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total 22pf17-5-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 201 878 45.8 2.01 9.5 10.8 14.1 14.3 0.20 2.09 0.29 0.01 0.07 0.042 0.000 99.2 22pf17-7-1 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 200 880 45.4 1.98 9.5 10.9 14.0 14.2 0.22 2.08 0.27 0.00 0.11 0.040 0.005 98.6 22pf17-7-2 core July 22 pyroclastic flow Mg-Hbl 192 872 46.1 1.93 9.4 10.7 14.2 14.2 0.19 2.13 0.30 0.06 0.15 0.034 0.012 99.4 22pf17-7-3 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 208 877 45.8 1.83 9.7 10.8 14.2 14.2 0.24 2.04 0.26 0.03 0.20 0.040 0.004 99.4 22pf17-8-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 529 977 43.6 1.97 13.1 10.5 11.9 15.0 0.14 2.46 0.24 0.05 0.06 0.019 0.024 99.1 22pf17-9-2 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 353 919 44.0 1.97 12.2 10.9 13.6 13.8 0.18 2.22 0.24 0.01 0.07 0.020 0.031 99.2

22pfA6-1-1 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 310 916 43.2 1.92 11.5 10.5 15.5 12.8 0.24 2.19 0.20 0.05 0.02 0.025 0.013 98.1 22pfA6-1-2 core July 22 pyroclastic flow low-Ca 341 932 43.6 1.89 11.7 9.8 15.9 12.8 0.25 2.17 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.023 0.013 98.4 22pfA6-2-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 218 877 45.4 1.93 9.8 10.8 14.0 14.1 0.19 2.01 0.27 0.07 0.06 0.045 0.020 98.7 22pfA6-2-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 213 879 45.1 1.99 9.8 10.9 14.2 14.1 0.17 2.08 0.30 0.02 0.06 0.056 0.049 98.8 22pfA6-3-1 core July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 359 925 43.7 1.89 12.0 11.0 11.8 14.8 0.13 2.20 0.23 0.00 0.02 0.021 0.035 97.7 22pfA6-3-2 rim July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 307 906 43.0 2.08 11.6 10.5 16.7 11.9 0.23 2.18 0.27 0.07 0.03 0.030 0.015 98.7 22pfA6-3-3 core July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 324 925 43.6 1.83 11.5 10.6 13.6 14.0 0.19 2.20 0.26 0.02 0.07 0.019 0.038 97.9 22pfA6-4-1 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 439 949 43.0 2.06 13.1 10.8 11.4 14.7 0.10 2.23 0.27 0.00 0.07 0.019 0.002 97.8 22pfA6-6-2 single July 22 pyroclastic flow Tsch-Prg 346 945 44.4 1.98 11.7 10.8 10.9 15.7 0.12 2.33 0.24 0.00 0.07 0.015 0.026 98.2

7wrs16-1-1 single August 7 Mg-Hbl 192 875 46.4 1.91 9.4 10.8 14.7 14.2 0.24 2.07 0.26 0.03 0.10 0.035 0.024 100.3 7wrs16-1-3 single August 7 Tsch-Prg 280 917 44.8 1.76 11.0 10.5 14.7 14.1 0.23 2.22 0.24 0.01 0.07 0.027 0.013 99.8 7wrs16-2-1 single August 7 Tsch-Prg 253 896 45.2 1.80 10.7 10.9 14.7 14.0 0.22 2.14 0.25 0.02 0.15 0.027 0.009 100.1 7wrs16-3-1 rim August 7 Tsch-Prg 371 943 42.9 2.30 12.6 11.1 14.4 13.4 0.16 2.46 0.30 0.02 0.07 0.026 0.014 99.6 7wrs16-3-3 core August 7 Tsch-Prg 386 935 44.9 1.80 12.4 10.9 11.2 15.5 0.12 2.29 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.021 0.022 99.6 7wrs16-4-2 core August 7 Tsch-Prg 550 975 43.7 2.26 13.2 11.0 11.9 14.8 0.13 2.54 0.33 0.06 0.07 0.022 0.012 100.0 7wrs16-4-4 rim August 7 Tsch-Prg 423 957 44.0 2.18 12.8 10.8 11.8 15.2 0.16 2.24 0.28 0.03 0.09 0.016 0.015 99.8 7wrs16-5-1 rim August 7 Mg-Hbl 140 832 46.8 1.89 8.2 10.9 16.4 13.4 0.22 2.00 0.43 0.01 0.10 0.169 0.000 100.5 7wrs16-5-2 core August 7 Mg-Hbl 148 846 46.6 1.96 8.3 10.9 15.4 13.9 0.23 1.98 0.43 0.00 0.22 0.119 0.000 100.1 7wrs16-6-2 rim August 7 Tsch-Prg 455 954 42.7 2.22 13.6 11.1 13.3 13.8 0.14 2.38 0.34 0.06 0.08 0.015 0.016 99.8 7wrs16-6-3 core August 7 Tsch-Prg 522 966 43.9 2.09 13.1 10.9 11.7 15.2 0.11 2.45 0.28 0.00 0.03 0.011 0.007 99.7 7wrs16-7-2 single August 7 Tsch-Prg 492 962 44.0 2.00 12.9 10.7 12.7 14.7 0.15 2.41 0.25 0.03 0.07 0.015 0.026 100.0 7wrs16-8-1 single August 7 Mg-Hbl 138 851 46.7 1.82 8.0 10.9 15.6 14.2 0.22 2.08 0.43 0.01 0.16 0.120 0.011 100.3 195 Table B4. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb 22pf17-5-1 34.9 217968 148 13622 439 72.4 87.8 10.4 158 20.5 0.58 92.0 60.4 64.3 6.10 0.039 0.274 1.61 45.7 6.27 28.6 5.66 35.3 13.6 2.77 15.3 13.3 6.62 5.07 0.61 22pf17-7-1 26.1 225642 134 12991 448 75.9 86.1 10.1 158 20.8 0.59 90.4 62.4 68.9 6.19 0.039 0.267 1.61 48.0 6.31 30.1 6.16 39.3 13.6 2.89 15.6 14.7 7.05 5.02 0.58 22pf17-7-2 27.8 219655 141 13238 447 75.6 79.8 13.5 164 22.0 1.03 90.9 64.8 69.1 6.18 0.049 0.267 1.70 45.4 6.23 30.8 6.15 38.5 13.8 2.86 15.1 14.3 7.29 5.13 0.61 22pf17-7-3 31.3 220215 147 12747 441 71.9 72.6 8.12 162 20.4 0.57 89.5 64.0 67.1 6.32 0.014 0.256 1.61 49.3 5.73 31.7 6.14 38.8 14.6 2.73 15.1 13.8 7.23 5.60 0.58 22pf17-8-1 31.5 197252 78.0 12993 622 74.6 241 9.32 71.9 17.4 0.86 164 18.2 25.3 1.46 0.033 0.087 0.74 35.2 1.29 6.68 1.18 8.54 3.05 1.25 3.94 3.84 2.14 1.44 0.34 22pf17-9-2 35.8 208507 120 13071 514 71.0 180 21.0 116 17.8 0.70 121 42.8 53.4 3.82 0.032 0.204 1.15 39.0 3.88 18.8 3.78 21.7 8.54 2.03 11.4 9.05 5.08 3.66 0.46

22pfA6-1-1 7.20 208881 65.5 13342 436 61.8 72.5 2.62 130 18.6 0.57 131 28.7 63.8 6.96 0.031 0.108 0.82 40.8 4.13 18.6 3.23 18.7 5.25 2.19 5.89 6.30 3.33 2.78 0.42 22pfA6-1-2 7.81 199612 66.9 13513 465 63.6 98.1 2.69 126 18.5 0.35 127 28.7 58.7 6.75 0.033 0.124 0.63 38.3 4.42 17.8 3.36 18.4 5.26 1.93 5.15 5.94 3.30 2.47 0.39 22pfA6-2-1 13.0 212139 102 14557 468 71.0 73.0 4.97 141 20.0 0.87 125 46.7 56.9 5.27 0.028 0.187 1.23 50.5 4.45 19.8 4.06 25.9 9.40 2.28 9.70 9.77 5.43 3.72 0.67 22pfA6-2-2 10.7 205344 103 14187 434 72.6 56.0 7.73 130 19.7 0.39 123 49.3 61.1 4.74 0.040 0.199 1.31 48.0 4.80 22.1 4.18 29.1 10.9 2.56 11.0 11.2 6.05 4.44 0.48 22pfA6-3-1 11.4 224353 74.8 13727 472 72.2 128 2.02 95.1 19.1 0.52 160 30.3 51.5 2.70 0.043 0.131 1.09 37.0 2.39 12.4 2.36 15.6 5.48 1.81 6.61 6.26 3.15 2.38 0.39 22pfA6-3-2 12.3 207182 53.7 13890 323 65.2 35.7 5.73 140 20.9 0.63 156 44.5 74.9 5.70 0.076 0.154 1.05 47.2 6.00 24.3 4.73 27.0 8.64 2.25 10.0 8.42 5.36 3.85 0.59 22pfA6-3-3 9.58 216647 61.8 12919 370 70.4 20.2 1.68 113 19.7 0.86 137 36.5 57.9 3.59 0.009 0.157 1.10 37.9 3.71 16.6 3.27 22.5 7.21 1.87 7.91 7.87 3.65 3.10 0.46 22pfA6-4-1 12.0 201124 85.3 14710 656 79.4 132 4.24 72.8 18.0 0.76 202 21.6 37.9 1.70 0.035 0.101 0.83 37.9 1.89 8.79 1.93 11.4 3.66 1.35 4.30 4.52 2.29 1.95 0.35 22pfA6-6-2 11.7 204332 86.4 13773 612 79.1 170 3.69 71.5 16.8 0.52 171 20.0 31.1 1.74 0.111 0.099 0.79 31.5 1.62 7.28 1.38 9.98 3.62 1.33 4.50 4.67 1.80 1.24 0.34

7wrs16-1-1 3.40 193390 155 13002 378 65.7 63.1 1.48 143 17.2 0.37 86.7 65.5 73.6 6.46 0.211 0.231 1.40 39.0 6.62 27.2 5.89 37.3 13.3 2.80 15.5 14.1 9.51 5.53 0.51 7wrs16-1-3 3.35 206894 77.0 12285 321 60.4 34.2 1.71 124 17.9 0.58 119 44.7 58.6 3.95 0.084 0.154 1.32 35.8 3.37 16.9 3.55 24.4 8.34 1.97 9.67 9.55 5.61 3.31 0.49 7wrs16-2-1 4.49 214322 120 12572 397 62.6 91.0 2.27 144 18.8 0.63 110 53.0 59.3 4.69 0.032 0.257 1.32 41.4 4.67 20.9 4.61 30.9 10.1 2.40 12.6 10.9 6.70 4.02 0.52 7wrs16-3-1 4.01 237423 101 14671 543 71.2 185 2.02 88.9 16.5 0.68 152 33.9 47.9 3.25 0.194 0.124 0.93 40.9 3.22 13.6 2.86 19.9 6.51 1.90 8.54 7.99 4.66 3.02 0.45 7wrs16-3-3 3.34 248138 81.1 12099 597 75.0 237 1.57 71.1 15.8 0.68 146 20.9 31.0 1.42 0.061 0.086 0.72 27.0 1.29 6.00 1.37 10.0 4.49 1.23 4.96 4.08 2.52 1.74 0.35 7wrs16-4-2 3.79 260946 73.5 14973 572 70.8 177 1.44 71.0 13.5 0.87 181 19.2 29.8 1.81 0.054 0.096 0.72 31.3 1.44 6.24 1.27 9.91 3.00 1.47 5.01 4.51 2.80 1.67 0.37 7wrs16-4-4 4.15 248061 77.1 14664 605 72.1 203 1.51 68.2 14.2 0.49 170 19.9 40.8 1.73 0.040 0.094 0.80 31.0 2.01 7.28 1.61 10.3 4.12 1.34 4.51 4.57 2.50 1.63 0.34 7wrs16-5-1 4.72 191258 102 12977 389 71.9 126 1.45 152 18.1 0.55 68.2 99.9 163 17.3 0.020 0.261 1.65 73.6 19.3 74.8 13.8 72.6 20.4 2.99 21.7 19.1 14.0 9.67 0.60 7wrs16-5-2 4.83 198161 134 13497 408 70.2 144 1.36 138 17.5 0.55 72.6 115 152 16.7 0.040 0.289 1.62 67.1 15.9 64.4 12.2 75.1 23.5 3.48 25.0 23.4 15.4 9.94 0.55 7wrs16-6-2 4.34 226172 75.9 15366 550 67.0 53.4 1.27 91.2 17.2 0.66 209 26.7 38.7 2.27 0.247 0.120 0.87 39.7 2.37 9.75 2.17 14.3 4.96 1.81 6.77 5.77 3.45 2.15 0.50 7wrs16-6-3 4.11 237580 80.0 13560 605 69.0 178 1.34 70.6 14.3 0.67 162 20.5 33.4 1.42 0.053 0.099 0.74 30.7 1.62 6.75 1.54 10.5 4.04 1.29 4.35 4.45 2.72 1.81 0.33 7wrs16-7-2 3.65 247576 79.4 13138 586 70.2 187 2.60 64.7 13.5 0.35 156 18.6 43.6 1.70 0.035 0.051 0.69 28.6 1.67 6.28 1.36 9.63 3.98 1.24 4.18 3.78 2.76 1.73 0.31 7wrs16-8-1 3.91 205699 133 12357 361 73.1 137 1.97 147 16.0 0.54 67.3 123 150 16.1 0.106 0.269 1.51 55.6 14.8 60.7 12.0 74.1 23.5 3.46 27.9 25.8 17.2 10.2 0.59 196 Table B5. Amphibole analyses from the 1980 eruptions of Mt. Hood. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total MH09-04-1-1 rim Old Maid Tsch-Prg 217 871 45.2 1.94 10.2 11.1 15.5 13.4 0.22 2.06 0.36 0.11 0.20 0.094 0.002 100.2 MH09-04-1-2 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 156 830 46.8 1.68 8.3 10.9 14.5 14.4 0.23 1.68 0.35 0.00 0.16 0.089 0.017 99.0 MH09-04-1-3 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 146 817 47.1 1.55 8.0 10.9 14.6 14.5 0.22 1.59 0.36 0.03 0.29 0.093 0.001 99.3 MH09-04-1-4 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 142 822 47.9 1.33 7.8 10.9 13.7 15.2 0.26 1.63 0.28 0.02 0.25 0.106 0.003 99.3 MH09-04-2-1 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 140 811 48.2 1.50 7.8 10.9 14.1 14.8 0.24 1.57 0.31 0.01 0.10 0.093 0.000 99.6 MH09-04-2-2 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 188 867 46.3 1.82 9.1 11.0 13.4 14.8 0.24 1.91 0.36 0.03 0.20 0.077 0.001 99.3 MH09-04-2-3 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 145 821 47.1 1.54 8.1 11.0 13.9 14.8 0.19 1.73 0.34 0.02 0.17 0.101 0.002 98.9 MH09-04-3-1 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 160 834 47.3 1.70 8.4 10.9 14.0 14.6 0.24 1.70 0.37 0.00 0.16 0.087 0.020 99.6 MH09-04-3-2 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 138 810 47.8 1.54 7.7 10.9 13.7 14.8 0.22 1.58 0.28 0.03 0.15 0.092 0.015 98.9 MH09-04-3-3 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 170 833 46.9 1.73 8.8 11.1 14.3 14.2 0.23 1.74 0.39 0.03 0.16 0.101 0.022 99.7 MH09-04-3-4 single Old Maid Mg-Hbl 166 838 46.4 1.63 8.6 11.1 14.0 14.7 0.24 1.64 0.34 0.06 0.24 0.087 0.006 99.0 MH09-04-3-5 single Old Maid Mg-Hbl 197 857 46.3 1.88 9.5 11.2 13.4 14.5 0.20 1.90 0.35 0.00 0.18 0.075 0.000 99.5 MH09-04-4-2 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 161 837 46.9 1.72 8.5 10.9 13.8 14.6 0.19 1.84 0.35 0.01 0.15 0.088 0.000 99.1 MH09-04-4-3 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 125 815 47.7 1.28 7.0 10.8 13.3 15.7 0.24 1.50 0.29 0.00 0.10 0.097 0.014 98.0 MH09-04-5-1 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 118 789 48.8 1.21 6.9 10.9 13.7 15.5 0.22 1.42 0.27 0.02 0.20 0.087 0.013 99.2 MH09-04-5-2 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 158 811 47.4 1.66 8.5 10.8 15.0 13.8 0.21 1.64 0.36 0.04 0.09 0.090 0.003 99.6 MH09-04-5-3 core Old Maid Mg-Hbl 140 809 47.8 1.60 7.9 10.9 14.2 14.4 0.22 1.66 0.29 0.00 0.17 0.084 0.008 99.2 MH09-04-5-4 core Old Maid Tsch-Prg 338 915 43.1 2.38 12.0 11.0 15.1 12.4 0.23 2.21 0.25 0.04 0.05 0.039 0.000 98.8 MH09-04-5-5 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 130 801 48.5 1.43 7.5 10.9 14.4 14.9 0.24 1.51 0.27 0.00 0.37 0.088 0.012 100.1 MH09-04-6-1 rim Old Maid Mg-Hbl 157 824 47.1 1.62 8.4 11.1 14.0 14.7 0.22 1.62 0.37 0.02 0.23 0.098 0.020 99.5

MH09-04a-1-1 rim Old Maid mafic enclave Mg-Hbl 142 816 48.4 1.48 7.8 10.9 13.9 14.9 0.28 1.60 0.30 0.02 0.13 0.088 0.011 99.9 MH09-04a-1-2 core Old Maid mafic enclave Mg-Hbl 132 814 47.6 1.40 7.6 11.0 14.0 15.1 0.22 1.64 0.27 0.03 0.18 0.096 0.000 99.1 MH09-04a-10-2 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 326 947 43.6 2.72 11.7 11.1 12.3 14.8 0.11 2.36 0.20 0.05 0.00 0.023 0.025 98.9 MH09-04a-11-1 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 422 945 43.7 2.23 13.1 11.3 11.7 14.6 0.14 2.33 0.27 0.04 0.08 0.019 0.019 99.6 MH09-04a-12-1 rim Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 401 938 43.1 2.18 12.8 10.7 15.2 12.6 0.21 2.36 0.23 0.06 0.09 0.027 0.027 99.6 MH09-04a-12-2 core Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 480 960 41.8 2.37 14.1 11.1 13.3 13.3 0.13 2.43 0.20 0.06 0.05 0.019 0.017 98.9 MH09-04a-14-3 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 314 942 44.1 3.09 11.7 11.3 12.8 14.3 0.12 2.40 0.36 0.02 0.07 0.029 0.005 100.2 MH09-04a-15-2b single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 536 985 43.0 2.48 13.4 10.8 12.0 14.6 0.16 2.45 0.25 0.01 0.04 0.016 0.008 99.3 MH09-04a-16-2 rim Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 298 940 43.3 3.23 11.4 11.2 13.4 13.9 0.13 2.34 0.24 0.09 0.10 0.031 0.009 99.3 MH09-04a-17-1 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 370 947 43.5 2.01 12.2 10.1 15.9 12.7 0.27 2.32 0.31 0.01 0.16 0.032 0.005 99.5 MH09-04a-18-4 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 573 969 43.4 2.18 13.6 10.9 11.5 14.6 0.13 2.41 0.22 0.05 0.13 0.015 0.025 99.2 MH09-04a-2-2 core Old Maid mafic enclave Mg-Hbl 120 805 49.1 1.29 7.0 10.9 13.6 15.5 0.28 1.52 0.30 0.00 0.22 0.086 0.007 99.9 MH09-04a-3-1 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 341 949 43.0 2.96 11.9 11.1 13.1 14.0 0.14 2.32 0.35 0.09 0.20 0.027 0.019 99.2 MH09-04a-5-2 single Old Maid mafic enclave Mg-Hst 263 959 44.1 2.75 11.0 11.3 12.8 14.1 0.17 2.99 0.26 0.04 0.19 0.024 0.016 99.9 MH09-04a-5-3 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 322 932 43.6 2.66 11.6 11.1 13.1 14.2 0.15 2.23 0.24 0.05 0.07 0.026 0.006 99.1 MH09-04a-6-2 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 336 937 43.8 2.67 11.8 11.0 12.5 14.6 0.10 2.26 0.24 0.02 0.09 0.014 0.009 99.2 MH09-04a-6-4 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 392 979 43.6 2.65 12.2 10.6 12.0 15.0 0.16 2.45 0.18 0.06 0.13 0.019 0.020 99.1 MH09-04a-7-1 rim Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 426 962 44.1 2.24 13.1 11.0 11.5 15.1 0.15 2.39 0.19 0.04 0.05 0.015 0.008 99.8 MH09-04a-7-2 core Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 340 948 43.7 2.92 11.9 11.1 12.4 14.5 0.13 2.35 0.29 0.01 0.08 0.023 0.013 99.5 MH09-04a-8-1 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 348 956 43.4 2.86 12.0 11.2 11.9 14.8 0.11 2.40 0.27 0.04 0.12 0.024 0.013 99.1 MH09-04a-9-1 single Old Maid mafic enclave Tsch-Prg 302 932 43.2 2.72 11.5 10.9 15.0 13.2 0.17 2.32 0.25 0.15 0.16 0.028 0.004 99.5 197 Table B5. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb MH09-04-1-1 119 182254 105 13808 400 62.8 107 35.0 143 17.1 0.14 189 57.2 81.4 8.15 0.159 0.307 1.57 49.7 7.26 30.3 6.15 31.8 12.0 2.72 14.4 12.3 5.18 4.72 0.51 MH09-04-1-2 101 3.46 202301 178 11818 381 69.2 115 13.5 167 18.1 3.47 0.55 93.5 124 93.0 15.3 0.039 0.275 1.98 62.9 13.2 63.3 12.2 77.6 25.2 4.15 31.2 26.5 14.1 8.18 0.64 MH09-04-1-3 88.2 191151 151 10964 405 63.0 130 12.3 147 15.9 2.85 78.6 112 87.7 13.8 0.303 1.65 51.0 14.5 62.1 11.6 71.2 23.3 3.82 27.2 22.5 14.4 8.27 0.60 MH09-04-1-4 130 3.05 214899 105 10013 288 62.6 96.6 24.4 158 16.2 2.87 0.89 75.4 101 92.6 12.6 0.251 2.03 41.9 14.4 57.5 12.2 69.6 19.8 3.79 19.6 18.2 11.3 8.22 0.71 MH09-04-2-1 126 14.9 203119 121 10778 317 65.6 97.9 23.6 149 15.1 2.50 80.4 97.8 84.2 12.5 0.162 2.00 47.8 12.3 53.5 9.36 61.9 20.6 4.09 22.2 16.7 10.6 7.36 0.40 MH09-04-2-2 69.3 3.81 196826 86.8 12988 349 65.6 71.0 8.74 138 16.5 2.62 1.01 115 57.3 93.2 10.2 0.048 0.214 1.36 54.8 10.5 41.1 7.17 46.7 14.1 2.70 13.8 9.39 6.78 5.17 0.73 MH09-04-2-3 119 208938 116 10742 330 67.4 99.8 14.8 153 16.9 2.47 0.18 82.8 97.5 79.2 13.3 0.191 1.72 48.7 13.4 57.9 11.2 61.6 18.2 3.55 23.8 18.5 11.1 7.70 0.89 MH09-04-3-1 124 207190 94.4 11339 340 66.1 91.6 50.5 146 15.2 1.95 0.61 86.4 91.2 94.6 13.8 0.234 1.89 47.9 13.0 53.9 9.99 59.7 19.3 3.18 20.5 17.9 11.4 6.15 0.37 MH09-04-3-2 118 187506 138 10309 339 67.2 98.7 14.0 139 14.9 2.04 74.3 97.0 78.5 13.6 0.081 0.255 1.86 46.5 12.4 54.5 10.6 60.3 22.2 3.71 26.1 19.2 12.0 6.72 0.23 MH09-04-3-3 135 2.13 209536 125 10295 313 65.4 105 29.1 163 16.7 3.03 75.3 108 79.4 14.5 0.048 0.250 1.82 47.2 14.7 67.0 13.0 73.7 25.2 3.56 27.9 21.6 11.3 8.99 0.48 MH09-04-3-4 140 0.06 217895 111 11193 359 70.9 111 54.5 163 16.7 3.25 96.8 93.5 85.4 14.4 0.278 2.27 47.0 12.7 59.5 10.6 64.0 17.9 3.26 18.3 16.5 10.6 6.61 0.62 MH09-04-3-5 149 6.10 204474 98.6 14186 456 72.2 153 37.6 147 19.5 1.96 0.86 135 64.5 88.7 10.0 0.263 1.96 68.2 11.2 45.7 8.02 43.7 13.2 3.80 14.5 12.0 7.49 6.06 0.78 MH09-04-4-2 90.9 3.83 202849 125 10763 328 65.8 102 16.1 141 16.4 2.81 0.69 80.7 82.4 86.2 13.2 0.035 0.277 1.68 56.5 13.0 54.3 11.1 52.2 19.3 3.09 17.6 19.6 10.7 4.89 0.64 MH09-04-4-3 122 2.31 209106 139 8909 288 69.1 120 25.8 165 15.9 2.17 55.0 133 70.1 15.5 0.240 1.44 29.3 14.4 70.0 14.3 79.9 26.4 3.51 35.5 28.7 14.8 9.45 0.16 MH09-04-5-1 118 227692 134 9807 296 68.9 112 28.0 200 15.1 3.03 66.7 111 73.9 13.9 0.299 1.91 43.3 15.1 66.4 13.7 72.8 25.5 4.09 23.8 23.3 12.2 9.49 0.31 MH09-04-5-2 35.9 202548 136 12127 359 69.0 123 1.32 174 19.3 2.16 98.6 108 126 15.1 0.142 0.264 1.60 60.1 15.0 62.8 12.0 75.5 24.2 3.37 28.0 22.4 12.7 7.00 0.41 MH09-04-5-3 77.6 216592 139 10745 325 75.1 117 6.98 178 18.1 2.09 0.85 80.4 93.9 93.1 14.7 0.311 1.60 47.3 11.1 49.8 9.51 57.0 19.1 3.44 24.4 19.5 12.1 6.67 0.46 MH09-04-5-4 94.8 1.68 220779 103 15014 448 73.0 189 8.75 174 17.0 2.39 169 70.4 71.5 10.3 0.201 0.96 44.5 8.93 37.4 7.50 45.2 12.0 2.62 13.2 12.8 8.71 4.37 0.41 MH09-04-5-5 116 225110 135 10863 335 78.0 128 22.6 196 15.3 3.10 80.9 110 81.8 14.1 0.277 1.92 39.0 14.8 59.4 10.8 77.9 24.8 3.48 23.9 21.8 12.9 7.83 0.39 MH09-04-6-1 136 1.69 208443 119 11652 340 66.1 105 21.5 154 16.1 1.72 91.1 97.5 104 13.6 0.311 2.17 54.2 12.4 52.3 10.7 63.5 16.9 3.68 21.2 18.3 10.2 6.42 0.45

MH09-04a-1-1 121 213924 115 9847 323 67.6 108 19.5 187 17.9 3.38 0.33 70.4 87.7 62.2 11.6 0.037 0.272 2.19 49.9 13.1 60.5 11.4 66.3 18.9 3.19 18.2 22.9 10.2 7.22 0.62 MH09-04a-1-2 93.4 1.30 216000 114 9439 307 71.4 99.3 9.42 193 19.1 3.07 0.28 66.2 94.8 67.7 13.0 0.073 0.256 2.37 44.0 13.0 65.4 12.6 71.7 22.9 3.66 23.3 21.4 12.5 9.26 0.43 MH09-04a-10-2 91.7 25.3 196303 75.9 19763 503 79.1 372 43.5 85.7 19.1 0.94 4.32 255 24.7 45.7 5.15 0.038 0.120 0.90 64.8 3.02 13.3 3.09 15.4 6.14 2.27 6.06 4.61 2.09 1.68 1.89 MH09-04a-11-1 135 14.4 207428 56.3 15491 458 81.2 412 31.0 89.3 21.9 1.35 290 19.4 69.7 4.17 0.125 0.76 58.4 2.50 12.4 2.32 13.0 5.20 1.79 4.47 4.46 3.66 0.93 0.25 MH09-04a-12-1 132 17.8 205571 59.2 16586 426 76.3 204 57.5 92.5 23.0 0.21 283 25.0 56.0 4.18 0.154 0.028 1.08 62.6 3.05 11.3 2.19 16.5 4.12 2.66 5.37 5.98 2.42 2.48 0.60 MH09-04a-12-2 125 5.19 219034 56.2 16966 478 86.2 321 28.9 98.4 24.0 2.93 0.72 300 21.4 61.1 4.63 0.098 1.00 62.5 2.53 11.9 2.68 16.4 4.60 1.55 6.59 4.51 3.71 1.78 0.37 MH09-04a-14-3 113 9.94 198534 80.9 19383 473 78.4 313 49.7 93.7 19.5 1.81 246 25.0 37.4 4.92 0.173 0.81 67.2 2.60 13.5 2.68 18.9 7.41 2.17 6.35 5.53 2.55 2.29 0.50 MH09-04a-15-2b 94.7 3.68 194978 64.0 16531 458 71.1 296 35.0 70.6 15.9 2.40 300 25.1 80.1 4.41 0.157 0.101 0.68 48.8 3.38 11.0 1.97 13.0 4.95 1.89 4.86 6.05 3.45 0.84 0.11 MH09-04a-16-2 114 1.90 189587 80.7 22103 505 72.2 171 32.3 88.2 16.6 2.48 0.37 251 34.4 80.9 6.79 0.123 0.086 0.96 85.0 5.22 20.6 3.51 24.4 8.46 2.22 10.5 6.98 5.38 3.18 5.84 MH09-04a-17-1 79.3 195290 54.5 15253 219 53.2 23.9 19.1 128 18.8 2.90 194 44.8 74.3 7.77 0.181 0.62 47.2 4.05 18.0 4.04 27.3 7.52 2.26 12.2 8.55 3.51 3.81 0.44 MH09-04a-18-4 126 200126 55.9 16325 444 69.9 352 20.5 75.3 16.5 1.08 273 20.4 75.3 5.46 0.006 0.104 0.51 50.2 2.53 10.2 1.94 13.8 5.05 1.38 4.93 3.87 0.81 1.90 0.22 MH09-04a-2-2 114 0.83 218463 119 9538 308 68.2 106 20.7 198 17.6 3.19 0.10 71.5 89.7 69.1 12.0 0.271 2.00 47.3 13.1 61.5 11.9 69.5 22.7 3.78 20.5 22.0 11.3 8.44 0.40 MH09-04a-3-1 70.3 2.27 228396 71.6 20045 584 75.7 352 27.7 97.6 24.9 2.37 4.16 254 24.0 68.4 5.45 0.152 1.02 148 4.08 16.6 3.06 18.6 7.47 1.82 9.25 5.78 3.57 1.81 2.37 MH09-04a-5-2 73.5 7.80 221941 63.3 16878 456 80.7 372 36.9 124 23.3 0.51 251 22.8 76.4 5.20 0.113 0.072 1.18 62.1 3.17 13.6 2.21 16.7 3.79 1.63 5.53 6.82 2.33 2.41 0.45 MH09-04a-5-3 96.1 9.78 208110 79.2 19354 486 82.8 317 38.0 87.9 21.0 1.64 1.75 248 26.6 51.7 5.18 0.122 0.96 66.0 3.18 13.5 2.67 18.2 6.31 2.09 6.29 6.83 3.13 1.98 1.06 MH09-04a-6-2 83.8 6.57 204025 87.5 20078 515 83.3 328 35.0 89.0 20.5 1.62 252 24.2 48.7 5.87 0.138 0.93 70.5 2.74 12.4 2.74 16.4 4.98 2.01 8.45 6.20 2.67 1.59 0.65 MH09-04a-6-4 119 5.00 190059 72.8 19115 477 77.4 387 34.0 88.0 21.6 0.68 0.66 258 23.5 44.6 5.50 0.107 0.97 62.3 2.32 10.7 1.87 17.5 5.80 1.68 6.65 6.78 3.19 1.91 0.47 MH09-04a-7-1 121 2.52 209074 50.7 15666 407 76.1 348 33.8 85.1 21.9 1.72 0.03 304 21.4 68.3 4.80 0.111 1.09 58.9 2.69 13.9 2.22 15.1 4.39 1.85 6.27 5.08 2.91 1.58 0.29 MH09-04a-7-2 112 194573 88.6 19851 557 84.9 459 29.4 79.8 19.4 1.64 261 22.0 36.5 4.89 0.086 0.84 58.9 1.91 10.2 2.16 15.3 5.73 2.13 6.12 6.20 2.95 1.59 0.41 MH09-04a-8-1 172 3.70 212818 69.4 18587 593 79.6 430 52.8 96.5 22.9 1.74 0.69 264 22.4 43.4 4.33 0.107 1.03 70.6 2.88 11.7 2.27 14.9 4.57 1.70 5.80 5.83 2.10 1.31 0.46 MH09-04a-9-1 134 9.21 199770 64.7 18769 528 91.4 251 50.6 104 20.9 0.95 235 22.4 52.2 4.19 0.106 0.150 0.97 53.1 3.17 14.0 2.54 17.0 5.44 1.88 4.74 7.45 2.81 2.84 0.51 198 Table B5. Continued. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %), from Koleszar (2011) Sample ID Spot Location Eruption Date Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total MH08-08-04 core Timberline Tsch-Prg 295 939 44.0 2.62 11.1 10.7 13.7 14.3 0.18 2.25 0.26 0.09 0.031 99.2 MH08-08-04 rim Timberline Tsch-Prg 295 939 44.0 2.62 11.1 10.7 13.7 14.3 0.18 2.25 0.26 0.09 0.031 99.2 MH08-08-08 core Timberline Mg-Hbl 142 822 47.0 1.53 8.0 11.0 14.8 14.6 0.23 1.65 0.35 0.14 0.091 99.3 MH08-08-08 rim Timberline Mg-Hbl 142 822 47.0 1.53 8.0 11.0 14.8 14.6 0.23 1.65 0.35 0.14 0.091 99.3 MH08-08-10 single Timberline Mg-Hbl 165 835 46.5 1.73 8.6 11.1 13.9 14.8 0.22 1.62 0.31 0.11 0.083 98.9 MH08-08-13 rim Timberline Mg-Hbl 147 830 46.8 1.56 8.0 10.9 14.5 14.6 0.28 1.62 0.31 0.14 0.109 98.7 MH08-08-14 single Timberline Tsch-Prg 194 866 45.0 2.01 9.4 11.2 14.5 14.1 0.21 1.88 0.37 0.12 0.059 98.8

MH09-03-02* single Pollallie Mg-Hbl 158 831 46.8 1.58 8.4 10.9 14.3 14.6 0.20 1.72 0.33 0.25 0.077 99.0 MH09-03-03 core Pollallie Mg-Hbl 147 830 47.0 1.80 8.1 11.1 14.0 14.9 0.20 1.70 0.35 0.24 0.094 99.3 MH09-03-03 rim Pollallie Mg-Hbl 147 830 47.0 1.80 8.1 11.1 14.0 14.9 0.20 1.70 0.35 0.24 0.094 99.3 MH09-03-06 rim Pollallie Mg-Hbl 150 831 46.6 1.67 8.1 11.0 13.9 14.7 0.23 1.66 0.35 0.15 0.107 98.5 MH09-03-07 core Pollallie Mg-Hbl 160 796 46.5 1.81 8.7 11.2 14.5 13.4 0.17 1.58 0.34 0.13 0.091 98.4 MH09-03-07 rim Pollallie Mg-Hbl 160 796 46.5 1.81 8.7 11.2 14.5 13.4 0.17 1.58 0.34 0.13 0.091 98.4

MH09-03a-06 single Pollallie mafic enclave Mg-Hbl 153 832 47.2 1.80 8.3 11.2 13.6 15.1 0.19 1.70 0.28 0.22 0.072 99.6 MH09-03a-07 core Pollallie mafic enclave Mg-Hbl 162 844 46.6 1.86 8.7 11.3 13.7 15.0 0.17 1.86 0.34 0.25 0.083 99.6 MH09-03a-07 rim Pollallie mafic enclave Mg-Hbl 162 844 46.6 1.86 8.7 11.3 13.7 15.0 0.17 1.86 0.34 0.25 0.083 99.6 199 Table B5. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb MH08-08-04 6.00 205480 87.6 17013 447 69.3 142 11.3 113 18.7 1.78 0.43 178 43.6 73.2 6.51 0.030 0.176 1.12 53.4 4.50 20.4 4.30 26.0 9.79 2.81 10.0 9.60 6.11 3.28 0.34 MH08-08-04 6.64 214932 89.4 16013 391 63.7 72.6 1.34 114 18.2 1.77 0.33 174 46.6 82.0 7.59 0.027 0.181 0.98 51.9 4.75 22.8 4.47 28.2 10.6 2.60 10.7 10.6 6.10 4.08 0.35 MH08-08-08 28.2 0.61 200776 167 11116 330 65.8 100 22.0 161 19.1 2.94 0.36 88.2 128 114 14.5 0.020 0.339 2.22 58.8 16.1 69.4 13.7 80.0 28.1 4.52 32.5 29.2 15.4 8.99 0.48 MH08-08-08 9.05 1.18 223073 111 8866 305 70.8 106 3.82 201 17.3 3.62 0.34 65.9 118 69.0 13.2 0.025 0.306 1.99 46.5 16.2 74.4 14.6 83.2 27.6 3.56 28.1 26.8 16.4 8.89 0.56 MH08-08-10 9.46 0.26 225900 91.1 11827 401 64.7 166 15.5 158 17.7 1.95 0.37 107 66.8 81.9 9.89 0.036 0.231 1.93 58.6 12.7 52.8 9.24 55.3 15.2 3.40 14.1 13.3 8.84 6.03 0.65 MH08-08-13 6.11 3.73 202353 151 10706 352 65.2 105 4.78 173 16.5 2.98 0.43 90.8 115 96.2 13.3 0.061 0.313 1.69 47.6 13.8 63.5 12.8 79.1 28.0 3.70 29.2 26.8 15.6 9.38 0.53 MH08-08-14 25.8 0.44 204854 112 13295 378 63.4 172 20.2 148 19.5 2.04 0.42 191 65.4 76.0 9.75 0.033 0.239 1.77 64.3 8.86 38.4 7.54 48.2 15.7 3.14 15.5 14.1 8.44 5.26 0.50

MH09-03-02* 93.4 5.73 268346 148 10604 341 76.9 155 12.7 169 20.2 3.61 0.28 83.6 111 133 12.1 0.060 0.374 1.87 48.8 14.7 70.7 13.3 80.6 31.0 3.94 20.5 25.3 14.7 9.42 0.14 MH09-03-03 16.3 2.65 224345 197 11364 344 66.9 121 7.23 152 17.2 3.13 0.20 88.0 138 95.1 13.3 0.043 0.365 1.72 65.4 13.5 61.2 13.2 82.5 28.5 3.96 32.0 29.6 18.7 10.3 0.46 MH09-03-03 83.2 2.91 218563 143 10888 336 65.4 120 22.0 77.7 18.0 3.12 0.51 84.4 122 82.7 13.3 0.026 0.322 1.77 65.3 14.2 63.5 12.8 77.5 27.2 3.91 29.3 26.1 17.1 10.4 0.52 MH09-03-06 54.2 6.11 208548 125 12375 411 72.4 113 19.3 149 18.6 3.01 0.28 110 80.5 86.3 11.4 0.030 0.237 1.81 57.0 9.97 45.3 9.19 53.2 15.7 3.39 18.7 17.3 11.8 6.71 MH09-03-07 118 4.92 220265 131 11848 335 70.5 115 41.4 156 19.7 3.09 0.38 103 103 112 14.2 0.032 0.323 1.66 65.4 13.6 64.4 12.2 76.6 24.6 4.75 28.3 27.1 13.4 8.86 0.38 MH09-03-07 84.7 4.54 237953 115 12111 420 72.7 126 27.3 158 19.6 3.34 0.32 107 93.3 104 13.7 0.086 0.231 1.66 64.8 12.5 59.6 11.7 63.9 19.8 3.45 21.6 20.2 11.5 7.78 0.50

MH09-03a-06 92.3 12.0 215063 173 12209 354 70.1 153 100 142 19.4 3.00 0.42 104 98.6 100 13.0 0.058 0.331 1.53 64.9 12.3 54.7 10.8 65.7 22.7 4.27 23.6 22.0 13.3 8.15 MH09-03a-07 91.1 2.93 219235 182 12439 363 73.8 152 65.4 138 18.3 2.77 0.38 105 99.5 91.4 12.9 0.032 0.310 1.70 58.8 10.9 53.4 10.1 62.5 21.8 3.91 23.7 22.8 13.4 7.53 0.31 MH09-03a-07 57.2 1.77 213231 180 12445 373 72.2 156 15.2 148 17.8 2.90 0.41 103 96.1 93.0 13.0 0.040 0.309 1.61 58.6 11.6 55.3 10.6 64.2 22.8 4.04 22.9 21.1 13.3 7.53 0.50 200 Table B6. Amphibole analyses from Shiveluch volcano. Ridolfi and Renzulli (2012) Major Elements by EMPA (wt. %), from Humphreys et al. (2006, 2007) Sample ID Spot Location Species P (MPa) T (C) SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 CaO FeO MgO MnO Na2O K2O P2O5 F Cl SO2 Total m10s41-1 rim Mg-Hbl 117 824 48.5 1.59 6.6 11.4 10.8 16.3 0.32 1.60 0.26 97.3 m10s41-2 core Tsch-Prg 225 907 44.7 1.77 9.7 11.3 12.5 14.5 0.31 2.08 0.37 97.4 m10s410-2 core Mg-Hbl 114 822 48.7 1.56 6.4 11.2 11.0 16.3 0.32 1.54 0.27 97.3 m10s410-3 core Mg-Hbl 114 822 48.7 1.56 6.4 11.2 11.0 16.3 0.32 1.54 0.27 97.3 m10s412-2 core Tsch-Prg 219 903 44.2 2.26 9.7 11.4 12.2 14.5 0.25 2.14 0.38 97.0 m10s414-1 core Tsch-Prg 332 942 42.8 1.53 11.6 11.2 13.5 13.5 0.34 2.32 0.40 97.3 m10s414-2 core Tsch-Prg 332 942 42.8 1.53 11.6 11.2 13.5 13.5 0.34 2.32 0.40 97.3 m10s415-1 Tsch-Prg 206 900 45.1 1.99 9.4 11.3 12.1 14.9 0.26 2.10 0.41 97.6 m10s416-1 Mg-Hbl 165 853 46.0 1.81 8.3 11.1 13.2 14.2 0.34 1.73 0.55 97.3 m10s42-1 rim Mg-Hbl 146 854 46.8 1.79 7.7 11.4 11.5 15.6 0.30 1.78 0.33 97.2 m10s42-2 core Mg-Hbl 163 858 46.2 1.59 8.3 11.3 12.0 15.2 0.29 1.84 0.34 97.1 m10s42-3 core Tsch-Prg 210 904 44.3 2.34 9.5 11.4 12.5 14.3 0.28 2.09 0.48 97.2 m10s43-1 rim Tsch-Prg 220 893 45.1 1.65 9.8 11.2 12.5 14.8 0.22 2.12 0.40 97.8 m10s43-2 core Tsch-Prg 266 924 43.8 2.30 10.6 11.2 12.6 14.1 0.24 2.22 0.46 97.5 m10s44-1 core Tsch-Prg 232 898 44.4 1.77 10.0 11.3 13.3 14.0 0.34 2.03 0.50 97.6 m10s44-2 Mg-Hbl 169 861 46.8 1.47 8.3 11.1 12.0 15.1 0.35 1.81 0.39 97.4 m10s44-3 core Mg-Hbl 143 836 48.6 1.33 7.4 10.7 11.2 15.3 0.35 1.72 0.37 97.1 m15s411-2 core Mg-Hbl 142 882 47.6 1.73 7.2 11.1 11.0 17.2 0.33 1.70 0.31 98.3 m15s412-1 rim Mg-Hbl 139 830 47.9 1.64 7.5 11.2 11.5 15.3 0.32 1.65 0.31 97.3 m15s413-1 Mg-Hbl 132 819 48.8 1.63 7.3 11.3 10.6 15.6 0.30 1.71 0.30 97.6 m15s42-1 Tsch-Prg 195 916 44.9 2.19 9.0 11.3 11.7 16.0 0.26 2.03 0.40 97.8 m15s43-1 rim Tsch-Prg 263 958 43.7 1.79 10.3 11.3 12.4 15.5 0.28 2.17 0.45 98.0 m15s44-1 rim Tsch-Prg 232 947 43.9 1.82 9.7 11.2 12.4 16.1 0.27 2.11 0.38 97.9 m15s46-1 rim Tsch-Prg 293 945 43.9 1.48 11.0 11.4 11.3 16.3 0.22 2.29 0.22 98.2 m15s46-2 Tsch-Prg 202 923 45.1 2.04 9.0 11.1 12.3 15.9 0.29 1.99 0.45 98.2 m15s48-1 core Tsch-Prg 197 929 45.1 1.99 8.9 11.2 11.9 16.3 0.28 2.00 0.36 98.1 m15s48-2 core Tsch-Prg 197 929 45.1 1.99 8.9 11.2 11.9 16.3 0.28 2.00 0.36 98.1 m15shv8-1 core Tsch-Prg 191 911 45.4 1.92 8.9 11.2 12.2 16.2 0.26 1.97 0.42 98.4 m15shv8-3 core Tsch-Prg 230 959 43.7 2.69 9.7 11.2 12.2 15.8 0.25 2.24 0.43 98.2 m8s25-1 rim Mg-Hbl 237 886 45.6 1.54 10.2 11.6 9.6 16.1 0.12 2.24 0.21 97.2 m8s25-2 core Tsch-Prg 245 917 43.9 2.49 10.3 11.2 13.2 13.5 0.28 2.24 0.49 97.6 m8s26-2 Mg-Hbl 171 872 46.0 2.18 8.5 11.2 12.1 14.8 0.26 1.97 0.41 97.5 201 Table B6. Continued. Major Elements by LA-ICP-MS (ppm) Sample ID Li B Si Sc Ti V Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ag In Sn Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Pb m10s41-1 7.28 60.1 10325 334 54.9 108 3.17 147 15.3 0.48 99.7 35.6 75.6 2.96 0.03 0.110 1.18 57.1 4.99 20.2 4.33 23.1 6.91 1.78 7.30 6.41 4.06 3.38 0.48 m10s41-2 7.18 62.3 10340 484 63.1 232 4.02 158 18.2 0.57 97.0 38.2 95.5 4.24 0.11 0.042 0.099 1.51 79.0 6.23 25.4 5.38 28.0 7.62 2.07 8.65 6.82 4.24 4.27 0.51 m10s410-2 8.74 74.4 9671 320 56.2 139 4.16 149 14.2 1.32 53.6 45.7 66.7 3.90 0.14 0.124 1.60 66.0 6.97 28.7 5.51 29.3 9.10 1.73 8.74 9.15 4.87 4.32 0.60 m10s410-3 4.72 63.5 9049 288 56.4 126 2.72 154 14.0 0.41 48.1 39.3 56.6 3.91 0.028 0.120 1.37 43.8 6.43 28.3 5.39 28.2 8.78 1.90 7.59 7.03 4.15 4.48 0.36 m10s412-2 5.85 101 12170 431 60.8 150 2.54 128 15.6 0.57 119 40.3 59.3 2.83 0.04 0.031 0.137 1.33 64.1 4.12 18.7 3.78 23.8 8.03 1.91 7.93 8.66 4.59 4.06 0.35 m10s414-1 8.01 62.7 9253 338 58.3 105 4.39 146 14.7 0.55 82.8 35.1 83.0 3.11 0.08 0.052 0.119 1.31 55.9 5.86 22.7 4.51 24.3 7.09 1.75 7.02 6.45 4.34 3.72 0.40 m10s414-2 8.52 66.3 9208 425 56.5 76.1 5.04 123 14.2 0.91 143 27.8 47.5 1.68 0.023 0.086 1.02 52.1 2.34 11.1 2.37 14.8 4.43 1.44 5.86 5.41 2.98 2.68 0.37 m10s415-1 5.60 60.6 11760 392 56.9 141 6.74 144 16.0 0.72 121 35.1 73.8 3.47 0.04 0.062 0.132 1.31 78.8 7.79 28.1 5.23 30.3 7.77 1.96 7.86 6.91 4.09 3.80 0.62 m10s416-1 8.02 69.9 9878 328 60.1 126 4.70 157 15.1 0.41 72.4 41.6 63.7 3.76 0.09 0.028 0.170 1.59 53.4 6.46 27.7 5.30 30.3 9.25 1.97 9.16 8.10 4.39 4.12 0.44 m10s42-1 7.20 64.0 9968 335 60.7 143 3.68 159 15.9 0.51 81.6 43.7 84.6 3.67 0.07 0.029 0.143 1.44 56.0 6.64 27.1 5.24 29.5 8.10 2.25 8.63 7.77 4.59 4.38 0.47 m10s42-2 5.00 70.3 10368 339 67.1 170 3.90 158 16.0 0.73 80.8 54.7 80.5 4.11 0.10 0.140 1.66 74.3 6.79 29.1 5.86 35.2 10.5 2.61 11.8 10.5 5.91 4.69 0.50 m10s42-3 7.09 74.6 13366 391 57.6 141 3.88 132 18.7 0.95 121 65.4 83.1 4.31 0.07 0.043 0.154 1.73 105 11.8 34.9 7.64 42.8 14.3 3.21 14.1 12.6 7.88 5.56 0.66 m10s43-1 4.53 66.9 9141 407 58.9 134 4.86 121 16.8 0.66 111 34.4 94.5 3.52 0.07 0.035 0.116 1.43 82.3 6.96 26.8 4.86 25.3 6.59 1.70 6.00 6.02 3.87 4.00 0.48 m10s43-2 6.53 87.8 13845 466 67.5 147 6.16 159 16.9 1.16 166 48.0 71.8 2.97 0.10 0.064 0.134 1.29 109 7.03 25.2 4.55 28.5 9.75 2.44 10.0 10.4 4.98 4.32 0.62 m10s44-1 5.37 72.1 10728 473 60.2 90.6 6.18 173 18.0 0.60 98.0 35.6 85.9 2.73 0.08 0.051 0.141 1.21 75.0 5.48 20.7 3.85 22.1 6.46 1.84 6.98 6.88 4.14 3.49 0.64 m10s44-2 5.94 64.9 9498 341 62.4 105 4.63 177 15.1 0.10 59.5 50.1 75.5 3.95 0.12 0.046 0.169 1.71 40.3 7.61 30.5 5.96 33.0 9.66 2.22 9.49 9.19 5.26 5.33 0.49 m10s44-3 8.14 67.7 8432 350 57.4 107 4.01 160 14.2 0.57 55.0 45.0 62.4 3.03 0.11 0.049 0.135 1.61 57.5 5.83 24.8 5.05 28.8 9.35 2.03 9.37 8.18 4.74 4.29 0.47 m15s411-2 5.53 71.9 9712 309 61.6 114 3.17 169 16.2 0.40 52.8 52.6 63.2 4.15 0.09 0.035 0.162 1.72 50.9 7.90 33.4 6.39 35.3 9.55 2.59 10.6 9.86 5.94 4.75 0.50 m15s412-1 4.03 99.4 11445 408 67.5 199 4.02 155 18.2 0.46 70.5 78.9 83.8 5.04 0.11 0.032 0.228 2.12 77.3 7.37 36.2 7.63 46.2 16.2 3.27 16.8 15.6 7.51 6.61 0.52 m15s413-1 7.44 83.1 12252 389 58.8 137 3.97 148 17.8 0.59 87.9 60.6 71.6 3.64 0.10 0.134 0.213 1.58 64.4 11.9 41.0 7.09 36.1 11.6 2.90 11.9 10.8 6.24 5.39 0.48 m15s42-1 9.09 65.4 12647 448 67.9 188 7.66 133 18.0 0.87 115 46.2 81.5 3.93 0.04 0.036 0.140 1.58 101 5.85 26.6 5.38 31.8 10.0 2.25 8.98 8.49 4.71 4.50 0.57 m15s43-1 9.28 78.9 10499 458 62.7 181 5.23 149 18.6 1.46 105 28.1 49.0 1.50 0.09 0.094 0.170 1.31 49.7 5.03 20.0 3.72 18.0 5.07 1.79 6.95 5.47 3.04 3.03 0.77 m15s44-1 10.4 65.0 11273 469 60.6 169 7.03 138 18.2 0.85 129 34.4 66.2 2.79 0.09 0.051 0.117 1.13 64.1 4.49 17.5 3.52 21.7 6.79 1.82 7.31 5.93 3.92 3.26 0.57 m15s46-1 7.94 68.8 9879 391 67.9 233 6.91 141 17.1 0.47 114 29.1 59.0 1.96 0.05 0.050 0.143 1.26 45.3 4.11 17.2 3.55 20.0 5.58 1.58 6.96 5.75 3.22 3.24 0.56 m15s46-2 5.28 69.5 12721 487 68.0 169 4.46 166 17.7 0.80 103 41.2 74.8 3.68 0.11 0.155 1.76 93.3 5.99 26.0 5.17 27.0 7.52 2.23 8.69 7.07 4.64 3.98 0.67 m15s48-1 7.90 70.5 12684 428 63.8 202 4.91 150 16.6 0.81 109 47.9 77.4 3.97 0.10 0.043 0.148 1.67 83.5 5.18 23.7 5.17 30.8 10.6 2.45 9.29 9.69 5.08 4.32 0.56 m15s48-2 8.16 64.1 12012 439 64.2 194 4.55 141 17.8 0.89 108 37.0 84.7 4.02 0.12 0.048 0.152 1.66 84.2 5.60 23.5 4.82 26.5 7.62 2.13 7.22 7.06 4.52 3.65 0.50 m15shv8-1 6.61 72.8 11585 465 71.3 165 9.23 147 17.6 1.07 90.1 38.3 81.1 3.58 0.27 0.062 0.127 1.68 81.4 5.52 24.9 4.64 24.0 7.37 1.91 6.51 5.94 4.41 4.37 0.66 m15shv8-3 3.87 102 15697 440 62.1 142 4.49 132 18.1 0.64 112 68.1 79.3 4.51 0.10 0.015 0.174 1.74 110 5.25 28.0 5.71 36.8 11.7 2.78 12.1 13.5 7.42 5.81 0.56 m8s25-1 12.8 73.0 8975 372 75.8 183 5.73 95.0 15.6 0.56 155 19.3 55.0 1.54 0.06 0.068 0.106 1.26 40.7 2.25 9.69 2.06 13.9 4.40 1.53 5.01 4.23 2.31 1.64 0.32 m8s25-2 17.7 61.8 15095 1092 118 187 33.7 389 43.4 12.3 112 40.3 164 4.27 1.04 0.096 0.212 2.69 190 8.27 30.8 5.39 27.9 7.01 1.85 7.83 7.15 3.93 4.92 4.39 m8s26-2 6.93 85.2 12442 451 71.3 168 4.79 138 17.4 0.61 65.9 52.1 88.7 4.21 0.09 0.080 0.172 1.75 78.5 6.20 28.6 5.28 31.8 9.87 2.40 9.69 9.58 5.72 5.51 0.51 202 203 APPENDIX C

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR CHAPTER FIVE

This appendix includes whole rock compositional data and sample locations (Table C1) as well as more detailed results of 40Ar-39Ar analysis and major and trace element data for some of our dated samples. We include plateau and isochron plots for all dated samples from the Curaçao Lava Formation (Figure C2) and the Dumisseau Formation (Figure C3). Samples in these files are listed in the same order as in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. 204 Table C1. Major and trace element whole rock analyses from the Curaçao Lava Formation and the Dumisseau Formation. Curaçao Lava Formation Sample Cao-03 Cao-04a Cao-07 a Cao-10 Cao-13 Cao-14 Cao-18 Cao-20 Cao-21 Lat 12.27329 12.26857 12.26914 12.14768 12.12588 12.13771 12.16639 12.28987 12.30754 Long (negative) 69.07389 69.07848 69.07892 68.84962 68.81816 68.83017 68.96115 69.07974 69.13903 Plateau Age (Ma) 66.7 70.2 88.4 62.3 86.0 79.4 83.9 74.2 NP 2s uncertainty 0.8 1.1 2.1 0.8 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.4 Major Elements by XRF (wt .%) SiO2 51.61 50.88 51.03 50.17 49.95 50.86 51.74 52.37 50.97 TiO2 1.25 1.00 1.52 1.06 0.66 0.98 1.17 1.24 0.89 Al2O3 14.29 14.00 13.37 14.71 15.83 14.49 14.58 14.10 14.77 FeO* 11.17 10.16 12.91 10.29 8.23 10.25 10.92 10.72 9.58 MnO 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.18 0.17 MgO 7.21 8.55 7.16 8.64 9.15 8.50 7.72 7.01 8.67 CaO 10.23 11.78 11.56 12.15 14.05 11.79 11.48 11.61 11.44 Na2O 3.59 3.12 2.05 2.42 1.76 2.70 2.01 2.56 3.10 K2O 0.29 0.19 0.09 0.23 0.06 0.11 0.06 0.07 0.28 P2O5 0.13 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.08 Total 96.76 96.56 97.82 189.82 98.35 96.50 97.49 97.72 97.49 Trace Elements by ICP-MS unless * denoting XRF (ppm) Co* 147 148 44.7 232 91.6 103 112 116 98.8 Ga* 16.7 13.8 15.3 28.0 13.3 14.4 15.5 15.8 14.2 Cu* 162 124 200 253 143 131 143 159 125 Zn* 86.0 64.0 110 62.7 65.7 65.5 80.3 85.5 76.0 Cr* 157 349 224 740 534 313 129 178 374 Ni* 85.9 102 75.8 248 128 97.3 78.1 81.6 115 V* 372 317 378 632 241 318 361 373 300 Ba 18.0 21.0 16.6 15.0 7.9 9.9 7.2 24.9 11.7 Sc 48.1 47.0 56.6 49.8 45.3 48.5 48.5 48.2 47.8 Sr 120 102 77.8 224 88.2 90.8 80.8 123 151 Rb 3.60 1.80 1.62 0.74 0.44 1.28 0.55 0.96 2.71 Y 22.7 18.6 24.0 19.1 12.8 17.2 20.7 22.3 16.7 Nb 4.15 3.14 4.51 3.55 2.13 2.85 3.97 4.29 2.63 Zr 57.0 46.0 69.9 49.7 30.3 42.0 52.4 56.4 40.9 La 3.25 2.57 3.89 2.76 1.65 2.33 3.28 3.32 2.35 Ce 8.40 6.76 9.56 7.33 4.39 6.11 8.19 8.54 6.24 Pr 1.32 1.10 1.55 1.16 0.71 0.97 1.23 1.30 1.00 Nd 6.79 5.65 8.60 5.95 3.73 4.98 6.25 6.77 5.08 Sm 2.34 2.01 2.73 2.05 1.37 1.77 2.14 2.34 1.76 Eu 0.90 0.77 1.03 0.81 0.56 0.75 0.89 0.90 0.71 Gd 3.22 2.65 3.69 2.87 1.84 2.53 2.96 3.23 2.49 Tb 0.62 0.52 0.63 0.55 0.36 0.48 0.56 0.61 0.49 Dy 4.15 3.41 4.51 3.60 2.36 3.26 3.88 4.09 3.28 Ho 0.89 0.74 0.95 0.78 0.52 0.71 0.84 0.90 0.72 Er 2.53 2.04 2.91 2.16 1.42 1.97 2.34 2.54 2.03 Tm 0.37 0.30 0.37 0.32 0.21 0.29 0.35 0.37 0.31 Yb 2.30 1.83 2.68 1.98 1.32 1.81 2.18 2.35 1.91 Lu 0.38 0.31 0.41 0.32 0.21 0.29 0.35 0.38 0.31 Cs 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.24 Hf 1.62 1.31 1.90 1.43 0.89 1.23 1.54 1.63 1.21 Ta 0.29 0.22 0.30 0.27 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.31 0.19 Pb 0.19 0.16 0.29 0.63 0.48 0.60 1.06 0.82 0.20 Th 0.29 0.22 0.32 0.23 0.13 0.20 0.27 0.28 0.21 U 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.10 0.06 a major elements by EMP and trace elements by LA-ICP-MS; NP denotes samples without acceptable plateau ages. See Tables 1 and 2 for full age data. 205 Table C1. (Continued) Curaçao Lava Formation Sample Cao-22 Cao-30 Cao-32 Cao-35d Cao-40b Cur-10-02 Cur-21i b Lat 12.37064 12.14723 12.28911 12.30081 12.14115 12.11720 Long (negative) 69.13426 68.84871 69.09496 69.09429 68.96057 68.88011 Plateau Age (Ma) NP 62.8 NP 86.3 91.8 63.0 92.0 2s uncertainty 1.0 2.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 Major Elements by XRF (wt .%) No SiO2 49.84 50.72 52.08 Data c 51.68 51.78 50.07 TiO2 0.97 1.04 1.25 1.21 1.03 0.79 Al2O3 14.58 14.26 13.93 13.80 14.26 14.11 FeO* 10.42 10.11 11.80 11.64 9.96 9.55 MnO 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.18 MgO 9.20 8.51 7.41 7.67 8.08 10.45 CaO 10.69 12.16 11.22 11.76 10.97 11.08 Na2O 2.87 2.62 1.91 1.82 3.38 2.34 K2O 0.99 0.24 0.09 0.11 0.19 0.30 P2O5 0.20 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.07 Total 95.19 98.50 95.96 99.48 98.26 99.98 Trace Elements by ICP-MS unless * denoting XRF (ppm) Co* 97.5 109 148 138 102 12.4 Ga* 15.7 14.2 15.4 15.6 15.1 116.3 Cu* 125 128 188 163 144 78.7 Zn* 79.2 69.2 63.2 69.5 84.1 533 Cr* 282 384 86.3 59.5 279 187 Ni* 73.1 116 81.8 89.1 107 268 V* 307 316 382 349 326 25.8 Ba 243 11.0 20.5 23.4 26.0 46.8 Sc 45.8 47.9 49.5 48.0 46.8 91.8 Sr 267 222 133 90.6 157 4.45 Rb 12.6 0.66 1.03 1.42 2.76 14.3 Y 18.0 18.6 21.1 22.7 20.1 3.17 Nb 2.38 3.31 3.77 4.78 2.91 37.2 Zr 43.5 47.9 52.3 62.2 49.2 2.53 La 3.49 2.65 2.98 3.78 2.77 6.21 Ce 9.36 7.09 7.70 9.91 7.34 0.95 Pr 1.55 1.12 1.22 1.55 1.17 4.53 Nd 8.03 5.76 6.28 7.70 6.01 1.51 Sm 2.63 2.00 2.24 2.64 2.12 0.57 Eu 0.94 0.78 0.84 0.97 0.85 2.01 Gd 3.19 2.79 2.98 3.44 2.92 0.37 Tb 0.55 0.53 0.58 0.64 0.56 2.55 Dy 3.44 3.56 3.97 4.23 3.76 0.54 Ho 0.72 0.76 0.86 0.91 0.80 1.56 Er 1.99 2.09 2.39 2.54 2.27 0.24 Tm 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.38 0.33 1.59 Yb 1.75 1.92 2.24 2.35 2.08 0.24 Lu 0.27 0.31 0.36 0.38 0.32 Cs 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 1.09 Hf 1.32 1.36 1.55 1.78 1.43 0.22 Ta 0.16 0.24 0.27 0.35 0.20 0.17 Pb 0.66 0.20 0.33 1.12 0.20 0.24 Th 0.48 0.23 0.28 0.38 0.31 0.07 U 0.24 0.06 0.08 0.15 0.07 b Cur-21i data from Kerr et al. (1996); c No major or trace element analysis available. 206

Table C1. (Continued) Dumisseau Formation HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- Sample HA-76-117 HA-76-28 109 110 144 159 164

Plateau Age (Ma) NP 87.1 93.6 NP 86.8 82.8 NP 2s uncertainty 1.1 1.8 0.7 0.7 Major Elements by XRF (wt .%) SiO2 48.79 49.48 49.40 49.13 50.08 48.88 50.02 TiO2 2.91 2.48 2.19 2.19 2.94 3.44 3.18 Al2O3 15.03 15.02 13.75 13.91 13.77 13.26 13.28 FeO* 13.36 11.98 11.96 11.80 13.12 14.46 13.83 MnO 0.22 0.18 0.21 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 MgO 5.16 6.71 7.90 7.84 5.66 5.82 5.96 CaO 11.65 11.31 12.39 12.68 11.16 11.03 10.63 Na2O 2.52 2.40 1.98 1.97 2.45 2.42 2.38 K2O 0.12 0.21 0.06 0.07 0.32 0.14 0.26 P2O5 0.25 0.21 0.17 0.17 0.30 0.31 0.27 Total 98.41 100.71 98.95 98.68 99.29 98.63 99.99 Trace Elements by ICP-MS unless * denoting XRF (ppm) Co* Ga* 22.1 20.9 19.7 19.8 24.1 24.0 23.0 Cu* 190 170 150 160 223 226 212 Zn* 130 110 102 103 146 140 132 Cr* 128 193 492 475 104 64.9 127 Ni* 73.8 99.4 156 139 75.7 74.4 74.8 V* 376 335 334 340 373 413 382 Ba 45.0 51.0 21.0 21.0 73.0 62.0 54.0 Sc 35.7 31.9 35.2 35.0 35.5 37.4 35.3 Sr 275 262 211 211 259 267 236 Rb 0.60 1.90 1.00 1.30 3.60 3.00 2.70 Y 31.7 27.8 23.8 23.4 35.8 37.2 35.0 Nb 13.4 11.3 8.78 8.76 16.9 17.5 14.3 Zr 157 135 109 110 191 198 182 La 11.8 9.95 7.61 7.53 15.6 15.2 12.4 Ce 29.8 25.0 19.6 19.6 37.7 38.1 31.9 Pr 4.44 3.76 3.00 3.01 5.38 5.56 4.78 Nd 21.2 18.1 14.8 14.7 25.4 26.3 23.1 Sm 6.04 5.18 4.47 4.48 7.08 7.45 6.85 Eu 2.18 1.89 1.62 1.59 2.34 2.47 2.31 Gd 6.73 5.79 5.03 5.09 7.69 8.11 7.55 Tb 1.15 0.98 0.84 0.85 1.28 1.32 1.26 Dy 6.72 5.85 5.04 5.04 7.48 7.99 7.41 Ho 1.31 1.14 0.97 0.97 1.46 1.52 1.42 Er 3.26 2.83 2.46 2.43 3.65 3.82 3.62 Tm 0.45 0.38 0.33 0.32 0.49 0.51 0.47 Yb 2.60 2.23 1.93 1.93 2.84 3.01 2.81 Lu 0.39 0.34 0.29 0.29 0.44 0.45 0.42 Cs 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.02 Hf 4.26 3.62 2.97 2.96 4.99 5.17 4.80 Ta 0.90 0.75 0.61 0.60 1.13 1.19 1.01 Pb 1.01 0.65 0.50 0.53 2.55 1.08 0.77 Th 0.99 0.81 0.61 0.63 1.38 1.29 1.05 U 0.30 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.42 0.38 0.33 No location coordinates available for the Dumisseau Formation samples. 207 Table C1. (Continued) Dumisseau Formation HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- HA-77- Sample HA-77-170 178 237 244 245 29 62

Plateau Age (Ma) 90.8 86.0 NP 85.2 NP 88.0 NP 2s uncertainty 1.8 1.1 1.1 1.2 Major Elements by XRF (wt .%) SiO2 49.92 49.28 49.53 49.28 49.35 50.44 TiO2 2.67 2.77 2.80 2.49 3.26 1.32 Al2O3 15.95 15.64 14.64 15.22 15.11 15.15 FeO* 12.73 12.78 13.41 12.26 12.35 11.96 MnO 0.20 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20 MgO 4.32 5.06 5.79 6.18 5.34 6.31 CaO 11.23 11.20 10.75 11.54 11.22 12.16 Na2O 2.60 2.61 2.47 2.42 2.55 2.26 K2O 0.14 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.33 0.09 P2O5 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.29 0.11 Total 96.88 98.31 99.23 99.33 99.14 99.41 Trace Elements by ICP-MS unless * denoting XRF (ppm) Co* Ga* 23.5 24.4 22.7 23.3 23.7 17.8 Cu* 205 191 209 167 235 207 Zn* 129 124 135 109 126 103 Cr* 95.2 95.7 128 204 171 128 Ni* 81.0 88.6 100 113 94.9 67.3 V* 327 345 356 338 368 373 Ba 41.0 53.0 53.0 44.0 70.0 21.0 Sc 30.7 32.0 33.3 32.6 34.2 51.1 Sr 287 280 259 262 264 90.0 Rb 1.30 1.40 1.80 3.00 4.90 1.40 Y 29.5 30.3 28.1 27.4 35.9 31.2 Nb 12.8 13.3 12.3 11.2 15.4 3.46 Zr 148 153 141 134 185 71.0 La 11.6 11.8 10.7 9.94 13.6 3.66 Ce 28.6 29.1 26.2 25.0 34.2 9.48 Pr 4.22 4.30 3.91 3.72 5.07 1.53 Nd 20.1 20.4 18.6 17.8 24.2 8.07 Sm 5.59 5.86 5.40 5.20 6.90 2.88 Eu 2.06 2.10 1.92 1.90 2.36 1.14 Gd 6.34 6.54 6.01 5.75 7.69 4.14 Tb 1.06 1.09 1.00 0.98 1.29 0.82 Dy 6.20 6.43 6.00 5.76 7.56 5.60 Ho 1.21 1.25 1.14 1.12 1.46 1.25 Er 3.08 3.15 2.90 2.79 3.67 3.52 Tm 0.41 0.43 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.52 Yb 2.44 2.51 2.32 2.24 2.93 3.33 Lu 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.33 0.44 0.53 Cs 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 Hf 3.92 4.00 3.76 3.57 4.88 2.03 Ta 0.87 0.89 0.85 0.77 1.04 0.24 Pb 1.59 1.47 1.60 0.60 0.83 0.54 Th 0.93 0.98 0.87 0.79 1.13 0.35 U 0.29 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.35 0.11 208 Figure C1. Complete 40Ar-39Ar age spectra for the Curaçao Lava Formation.

120 Cur-21i gm 3600 Plateau: 92.0 ± 1.0 Ma 110 MSWD 2.32 3000 Total Fusion: 92.0 ± 1.5 Ma 100 2400 Ar 36

Age (Ma) Age 1800

90 / Ar Isochron Age: 91.9 ± 1.0 Ma 40 1200 MSWD 2.42 40Ar/36Ar initial: 295.9 ± 2.4 80 600

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 110 Cao-40b pl 1400

1200 100 1000 Ar

36 36 800 90 Age (Ma) Age

Ar / Ar 600

40 40 Isochron Age: 90.5 ± 3.2 Ma Plateau: 91.8 ± 2.1 Ma MSWD 1.92 80 MSWD 1.72 400 40Ar/36Ar initial: 299.2 ± 8.7 Total Fusion: 91.5 ± 1.7 Ma 200

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 120 Cao-07 gl Plateau: 88.4 ± 2.1 Ma 800 110 MSWD 0.61 Total Fusion: 87.4 ± 2.3 Ma 100 600 Ar

90 36

Age (Ma) Age 400 Ar / Ar

40 Isochron Age: 83.2 ± 22.9 Ma 80 MSWD 0.72 200 40Ar/36Ar initial: 318.5 ± 106 70

60 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 130 1200 Cao-35d gl 120 1000 110 100 800

90 Ar 36 36 600

Age (Ma) Age 80 Ar / Ar

40 40 Isochron Age: 89.0 ± 6.1 Ma 70 Plateau: 86.3 ± 2.4 Ma 400 MSWD 0.47 MSWD 0.54 40 36 60 Ar/ Ar initial: 278.6 ± 32.5 Total Fusion: 86.0 ± 2.8 Ma 200 50 40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 209 Figure C1. (Continued) 130 1400 Cao-13 pl Plateau: 86.0 ± 1.9 Ma 120 1200 MSWD 0.44 110 Total Fusion: 85.7 ± 3.0 Ma 1000 100

90 Ar 800 36 36

Age (Ma) Age 80 600 Ar / Ar Isochron Age: 86.0 ± 1.9 Ma 70 40 MSWD 0.47 400 40Ar/36Ar initial: 295.1 ± 1.6 60 200 50 40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 100 1200 Cao-18 pl 95 Plateau: 83.9 ± 1.6 Ma 1000 MSWD 0.40 Total Fusion: 83.9 ± 1.7 Ma 90 800 Ar

85 36 600

Age (Ma) Age Isochron Age: 83.4 ± 2.1 Ma Ar / Ar

40 MSWD 0.41 80 400 40Ar/36Ar initial: 296.5 ± 3.6

75 200

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 160 600 Cao-14 pl 140 500 Plateau: 79.4 ± 1.9 Ma 120 MSWD 1.62 Total Fusion: 97.5 ± 3.0 Ma 400 100 Ar

36 36 300 Age (Ma) Age 80 Ar / Ar

40 40 Isochron Age: 81.0 ± 8.6 Ma 200 60 MSWD 1.83 40Ar/36Ar initial: 291.7 ± 19.7 40 100

20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 130 700 79-Be-069 gm 120 600 110 100 500 90

Ar 400 80 36

Age (Ma) Age Isochron Age: 77.6 ± 6.1 Ma 70 / Ar 300 40 40 MSWD 0.33 60 Plateau: 79.6 ± 3.6 Ma 200 40Ar/36Ar initial: 296.5 ± 2.7 50 MSWD 0.35 Total Fusion: 74.4 ± 4.6 Ma 100 40 30 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 210 Figure C1. (Continued) 100 1000 BK-79-262 gm 90 800

80 600 Ar

70 36

Age (Ma) Age Isochron Age: 77.8 ± 4.1 Ma

Ar / Ar 400 Plateau: 74.9 ± 2.1 Ma 40 MSWD 0.54 60 40 36 MSWD 0.78 Ar/ Ar initial: 288.8 ± 8.1 Total Fusion: 73.7 ± 2.6 Ma 200 50

40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 110 Cao-20 gm 1000 100

90 800 80

Ar 600

70 36 Age (Ma) Age Isochron Age: 72.9 ± 2.5 Ma 60 / Ar 40 400 MSWD 1.19 40Ar/36Ar initial: 298.8 ± 3.8 50 Plateau: 74.2 ± 2.4 Ma MSWD 1.56 200 40 Total Fusion: 74.1 ± 2.3 Ma

30 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 6 12 18 24 30 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 90 Cao-04a gm 600 80

70 400 Ar 36 36

Age (Ma) Age Isochron Age: 70.7 ± 2.5 Ma

60 / Ar MSWD 0.89 40 40 40 36 Plateau: 70.2 ± 1.1 Ma 200 Ar/ Ar initial: 294.0 ± 5.7 50 MSWD 0.82 Total Fusion: 69.1 ± 1.2 Ma

40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 80 700 Cao-03 gm 75 600 70 500 65 400 Ar

60 36 Age (Ma) Age 300 Isochron Age: 67.2 ± 1.2 Ma Plateau: 66.7 ± 0.8 Ma / Ar 55 40 MSWD 1.18 MSWD 1.20 200 40Ar/36Ar initial: 294.3 ± 2.2 50 Total Fusion: 66.3 ± 0.9 Ma 45 100

40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 211 Figure C1. (Continued)

120 Cur-21i gm 3600 Plateau: 92.0 ± 1.0 Ma 110 MSWD 2.32 3000 Total Fusion: 92.0 ± 1.5 Ma 100 2400 Ar 36

Age (Ma) Age 1800

90 / Ar Isochron Age: 91.9 ± 1.0 Ma 40 1200 MSWD 2.42 40Ar/36Ar initial: 295.9 ± 2.4 80 600

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 110 Cao-40b pl 1400

1200 100 1000 Ar

36 36 800 90 Age (Ma) Age

Ar / Ar 600

40 40 Isochron Age: 90.5 ± 3.2 Ma Plateau: 91.8 ± 2.1 Ma MSWD 1.92 80 MSWD 1.72 400 40Ar/36Ar initial: 299.2 ± 8.7 Total Fusion: 91.5 ± 1.7 Ma 200

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 120 Cao-07 gl Plateau: 88.4 ± 2.1 Ma 800 110 MSWD 0.61 Total Fusion: 87.4 ± 2.3 Ma 100 600 Ar

90 36

Age (Ma) Age 400 Ar / Ar

40 Isochron Age: 83.2 ± 22.9 Ma 80 MSWD 0.72 200 40Ar/36Ar initial: 318.5 ± 106 70

60 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 130 1200 Cao-35d gl 120 1000 110 100 800

90 Ar 36 36 600

Age (Ma) Age 80 Ar / Ar

40 40 Isochron Age: 89.0 ± 6.1 Ma 70 Plateau: 86.3 ± 2.4 Ma 400 MSWD 0.47 MSWD 0.54 40 36 60 Ar/ Ar initial: 278.6 ± 32.5 Total Fusion: 86.0 ± 2.8 Ma 200 50 40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 212 Figure C1. (Continued) 120 500 BK-79-183 gm 100 400

80 300 Ar 60 36

Age (Ma) Age Isochron Age: 71.0 ± 22.5 Ma Ar / Ar 200 40 MSWD 0.42 40 40Ar/36Ar initial: 292.3 ± 13.0 Plateau: 63.4 ± 10.7 Ma 100 20 MSWD 0.38 Total Fusion: 53.4 ± 10.8 Ma 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 100 400 BK-79-163 gm

80 300 Total Fusion: 41.2 ± 2.9 Ma 60 Ar

36 200 Age (Ma) Age

40 / Ar 40

100 20

0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 200 Cao-32 gm 1200 170 1000 Total Fusion: 118.0 ± 3.5 Ma 140 800 Ar

110 36

Age (Ma) Age 600 Ar / Ar 40 40 80 400

50 200

20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 213 Figure C1. (Continued) 80 Cao-22 gm 4000 75

3000 70 Ar 36 36

Age (Ma) Age 2000

65 / Ar 40 40 Total Fusion: 72.4 ± 0.5 Ma 60 1000

55 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 90 1600 Cao-21 gm 1400 80 Total Fusion: 61.2 ± 0.7 Ma 1200 70 1000 Ar

60 36 800 Age (Ma) Age

Ar / Ar 600 50 40 400 40 200

30 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 80 BK-79-263 gl 70 800

60 600 50 Ar

40 Total Fusion: 53.1 ± 1.5 Ma 36 Age (Ma) Age 400 Ar / Ar

30 40

20 200 10

0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 214 Figure C2. Complete 40Ar-39Ar age spectra for the Curaçao Lava Formation. 160 1400 HA-77-109 gm 1200 140 Plateau: 93.6 ± 1.8 Ma MSWD 1.90 1000 Total Fusion: 95.4 ± 2.1Ma 120

Ar 800 36 36 Age (Ma) Age

100 / Ar 600 40 Isochron Age: 92.5 ± 1.8 Ma 400 MSWD 1.2 40 36 80 Ar/ Ar initial: 300.6 ± 4.6 200

60 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 140 HA-77-170 pl 2800 130 2400 120 Plateau: 90.8 ± 1.8 Ma MSWD 0.24 2000

110 Total Fusion: 92.7 ± 2.1 Ma Ar

36 36 1600

Age (Ma) Age 100 Ar / Ar 1200 40 40 Isochron Age: 90.2 ± 2.1 Ma 90 800 MSWD 0.08 40Ar/36Ar initial: 298.0 ± 4.7 80 400

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 130 8000 HA-77-29 pl 120 Plateau: 88.0 ± 1.2 Ma 6000 110 MSWD 1.58 Total Fusion: 88.7 ± 1.2 Ma Ar 100 36 4000 Age (Ma) Age Ar / Ar

40 Isochron Age: 87.1 ± 1.1 Ma 90 MSWD 0.80 2000 40Ar/36Ar initial: 310.1 ± 8.9 80

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 120 8000 HA-76-28 pl

110 Plateau: 87.1 ± 1.1 Ma 6000 MSWD 0.45 100 Total Fusion: 87.7 ± 1.2 Ma Ar 36 4000 Age (Ma) Age

90 / Ar

40 40 Isochron Age: 86.9 ± 1.2 Ma MSWD 0.54 2000 40Ar/36Ar initial: 297.8 ± 10.5 80

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 60 120 180 240 300 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 215 Figure C2. (Continued) 110 12000 HA-77-144 pl 105 10000 Plateau: 86.8 ± 0.7 Ma 100 MSWD 0.14 8000 95 Total Fusion: 86.8 ± 0.8 Ma Ar 90 36 6000 Age (Ma) Age Ar / Ar

85 40 Isochron Age: 86.9 ± 0.8 Ma 4000 MSWD 0.15 80 40Ar/36Ar initial: 293.1 ± 18.5 2000 75

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 100 200 300 400 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 110 6000 HA-77-178 pl

5000 100

4000 90 Ar 36 3000 Age (Ma) Age

80 / Ar

40 40 Isochron Age: 85.5 ± 1.2 Ma Plateau: 86.0 ± 1.1 Ma 2000 MSWD 0.22 MSWD 0.45 40Ar/36Ar initial: 302.5 ± 10.7 70 Total Fusion: 86.4 ± 1.2 Ma 1000

60 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 40 80 120 160 200 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 110 HA-77-244 pl 105 8000

100 Plateau: 85.2 ± 1.1 Ma 6000 95 MSWD 0.54 Ar 90 Total Fusion: 86.0 ± 1.4 Ma 36 Age (Ma) Age 4000 Ar / Ar

85 40 Isochron Age: 84.9 ± 1.2 Ma MSWD 0.20 80 40Ar/36Ar initial: 299.4 ± 4.6 2000 75

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 60 120 180 240 300 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 120 3600 HA-77-159 wr 3000 100

2400 80 Ar 36 1800

Age (Ma) Age Plateau: 82.8 ± 0.7 Ma 60 / Ar MSWD 1.52 40 Isochron Age: 83.4 ± 0.9 Ma 1200 Total Fusion: 75.8 ± 0.8 Ma MSWD 1.03 40 36 40 Ar/ Ar initial: 286.7 ± 9.7 600

20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 216 Figure C2. (Continued)

160 600 Plateau: 105.0 ± 5.3 Ma HA-77-62 pl 140 MSWD 1.09 500 Total Fusion: 105.2 ± 6.0 Ma

120 400 Ar

100 36 300 Age (Ma) Age Ar / Ar

40 40 Isochron Age: 100.8 ± 7.2 Ma 200 80 MSWD 1.06 40Ar/36Ar initial: 298.4 ± 4.1 60 100

40 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 130 4000 HA-76-117 wr

120 Plateau: 85.2 ± 0.7 Ma 3000 MSWD 1.02 110 Total Fusion: 91.1 ± 0.7 Ma Ar 36 36 2000 Age (Ma) Age

100 / Ar 40 40 Isochron Age: 85.2 ± 0.9 Ma MSWD 0.89 1000 40 36 90 Ar/ Ar initial: 300.4 ± 8.7

80 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 110 HA-77-237 gm 2000 105 Plateau: 86.1 ± 0.8 Ma 100 MSWD 1.24 1600 95 Total Fusion: 89.8 ± 1.1 Ma

Ar 1200 90 36 Age (Ma) Age Ar / Ar

85 40 800 Isochron Age: 86.4 ± 3.9 Ma MSWD 1.24 80 40Ar/36Ar initial: 292.0 ± 49.0 400 75

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 217 Figure C2. (Continued) 3000 130 HA-77-245 wr

110 Total Fusion: 77.7 ± 1.1 Ma 2400

90 1800 Ar 36 36

Age (Ma) Age 70 Ar / Ar

40 40 1200 50 600 30

10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 120 1400 HA-77-110 gm 115 1200 110 105 1000 Total Fusion: 90.5 ± 1.8 Ma 100 800 Ar 95 36 Age (Ma) Age 600 90 / Ar 40 85 400 80 200 75 70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar 120 7000 HA-77-164 wr 6000 110 5000 Total Fusion: 91.0 ± 0.6 Ma 100

Ar 4000 36 Age (Ma) Age

90 / Ar 3000 40 40 2000 80 1000

70 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 Cumulative 39Ar Released (%) 39Ar / 36Ar