DOCSLIB.ORG

Niagara River Watershed Fish Community Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Niagara River Watershed Fish Community Report Niagara River Watershed Fish Community Assessment (1997 to 2011) December 2012 Authors: . Anne R. Yagi, Niagara Area Management Biologist - Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 4890 Victoria Ave. N., Vineland Station. Ontario, P.O. Box 5000, L0R 2E0, email: [email protected] . Catharine Blott Contract Fisheries Crew Leader- Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 4890 Victoria Ave. N., Vineland Station. Ontario, P.O. Box 5000, L0R 2E0 Recommended Citation: Yagi A.R and C. Blott. 2012. Niagara River Watershed Fish Community Assessment (1997 to 2011) Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources unpublish report 168pp + appendices Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank our funding partners Canada Ontario Agreement (COA) and the expertise of Erling Holm (Royal Ontario Museum) for verification of fisheries identification. We also wish to thank the Lake Erie Unit (LEU) for use of the Electrofishing boat and their staff. Our Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) fish crew leaders were David Denyes (2008 -2009), Cathy Blott (2007) and John Radford (2003 to 2005). MNR fish crew members were William Radford(2007-2009, Jay Wolek (2008-2009), Kelly Wright (2009) and Ryan McLean (2007), Karla Spence (2004 – 2005), Ed Stacey (2005), Shannon Baka (2003-2004), and Andrea Dunn (2003). In addition other MNR staff and volunteers assisted as needed- they were Nelson Denyes, Rob Tervo,Kelly Tonellato, Kathy Richardson, Greg Belmore, Amy Brant and Katharine Yagi. From the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) there were Jocelyn Baker, Chris Attema, Kerry Royer and Laura Eddy. Cover Photograph is Gord Ives (MNR-LEU) holding a muskellunge and was taken by Anne Yagi during spring 2008 on the Welland River between the Canals section. Photograph below (left to right) David Denyes, Katharine Yagi, Rob Tervo and Amy Brant back pack electrofishing on Drapers Creek by Anne Yagi. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 11 2 NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED & ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCES ................... 12 2.1 Natural Setting.........................................................................................................................12 2.2 Altered Niagara River Watershed & Establishement of Aquatic Resource Area (ARA’s) 15 2.2.1 Hydroelectric Development.................................................................................................................15 2.2.2 Welland Shipping Canal Development................................................................................................16 2.2.3 Other Water Control Structures ...........................................................................................................20 2.2.4 Niagara River Watershed - Aquatic Resource Areas...........................................................................20 2.3 Implications of Anthropogenic Influences on Aquatic Habitat in the Watershed ............21 2.3.1 Water Level Fluctuation ......................................................................................................................21 2.3.2 Low Flow Augmentation.....................................................................................................................23 2.3.3 Fish Spawning Migration.....................................................................................................................24 2.3.4 Emerald Shiner Spring Migration - Upper Niagara River Tributaries.................................................26 2.4 Previous Fish Studies- Niagara River Watershed ................................................................27 2.4.1 Lower Niagara River ...........................................................................................................................27 2.4.2 Upper Niagara River............................................................................................................................27 2.4.3 Welland River......................................................................................................................................28 3 METHODS........................................................................................................................... 29 3.1 Boat Electrofishing ..................................................................................................................29 3.2 Tributary Sampling.................................................................................................................29 3.2.1 Seining.................................................................................................................................................30 3.2.2 Back Pack Electrofishing.....................................................................................................................30 3.3 Fish Sampling...........................................................................................................................30 3.4 Other Parameters ....................................................................................................................31 3.5 Niagara Area Fish Database...................................................................................................31 3.6 Data Analysis ...........................................................................................................................31 4 SAMPLING RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 32 4.1 Lower Niagara River...............................................................................................................32 4.2 Upper Niagara River...............................................................................................................35 4.2.1 Upper Niagara Tributaries ...................................................................................................................39 4.3 Chippawa Channel ..................................................................................................................59 4.3.1 Chippawa Channel Tributaries ............................................................................................................62 4.4 Queenston Reservoir ...............................................................................................................72 4.5 Welland River East..................................................................................................................74 4.5.1 Welland River East Tributary ..............................................................................................................76 4.6 Welland River Between the Old and New Welland Canals.................................................78 4.7 Welland River West to Port Davidson Weir .........................................................................81 2 4.7.1 Welland River West Tributaries ..........................................................................................................85 4.8 Welland River Upstream of Port Davidson to Binbrook Reservoir .................................108 4.8.1 Tributaries Upstream Port Davidson Weir.........................................................................................112 4.9 Binbrook Reservoir ...............................................................................................................127 4.10 Welland River Headwaters...................................................................................................131 4.11 Summary of the Aquatic Resource Areas ...........................................................................133 4.11.1 Welland River West Habitat Quality ............................................................................................133 4.11.2 Connectivity & Species Distribution ............................................................................................137 4.12 Summary of Niagara River Watershed Tributaries...........................................................140 5 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................... 142 5.1 The Niagara River System....................................................................................................142 5.2 Water Level Controls ............................................................................................................144 5.3 Welland River Flow Controls...............................................................................................144 5.3.1 Triangle Island Flow Junction ...........................................................................................................146 5.3.2 Old Canal Syphon Structure ..............................................................................................................149 5.3.3 Binbrook Reservoir............................................................................................................................150 5.4 Connectivity Controllers.......................................................................................................152 5.5 Instream Habitat Restoration...............................................................................................153 5.5.1 Upper Niagara River Tributaries .......................................................................................................153
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review
    Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review • William Printup, Civil Engineering • Wendy Andersen, Permitting Allegheny National Forest Slide 1 Wildlife Learning Objectives For successful completion of the wildlife section, contestants should be able to: 1. Assess suitability of habitat for given wildlife species 2. Identify signs of wildlife 3. Cite examples of food chains based on specific site conditions 4. Analyze/Interpret site factors that limit or enhance population growth, both in the field and with aerial photos 5. Interpret significance of habitat alteration due to human impacts on site 6. Evaluate factors that might upset ecological balance of a specific site 7. Identify wildlife by their tracks, skulls, pelts, etc. 8. Interpret how presence of wildlife serves as an indicator of environmental quality 9. Identify common wildlife food Slide 2 WILDLIFE OUTLINE I. Identification of NYS Species (http://www.dec.ny.gov/23.html) • A. Identify NYS wildlife species by specimens, skins/pelts, pictures, skulls, silhouettes, decoys, wings, feathers, scats, tracks, animal sounds, or other common signs • B. Identify general food habits, habitats, and habits from teeth and/or skull morphology • C. Specific habitats of the above • II. Wildlife Ecology • A. Basic ecological concepts and terminology • B. Wildlife population dynamics • 1) Carrying capacity • 2) Limiting factors • C. Adaptations of wildlife • 1) Anatomical, physiological and/or behavioral • D. Biodiversity • 1) Genetic, species, ecosystem or community Slide 3 Outline Continued.. • III. Wildlife Conservation and Management • A. Common management practices and methods • 1) Conservation • 2) Protection • 3) Enhancement • B. Hunting regulations • C. Land conflicts with wildlife habitat needs • D. Factors influencing management decisions • 1) Ecological • 2) Financial •3) Social • E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae
    The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae March 2011 Niagara River RAP Welland River Eutrophication Study Technical Working Group The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae March 2011 Written by: Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority On behalf of: Welland River Eutrophication Technical Working Group The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae Written By: Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority On Behalf: Welland River Eutrophication Technical Working Group Niagara River Remedial Action Plan For more information contact: Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Valerie Cromie, Coordinator Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 905-788-3135 [email protected] The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern Welland River Eutrophication Study Technical Working Group Ilze Andzans Region Municipality of Niagara Valerie Cromie Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Sarah Day Ontario Ministry of the Environment Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Martha Guy Environment Canada Veronique Hiriart-Baer Environment Canada Tanya Labencki Ontario Ministry of the Environment Dan McDonell Environment
    [Show full text]
  • NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE
    NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE Gerard V. Middleton, Nick Eyles, Nina Chapple, and Robert Watson American Geophysical Union and Geological Association of Canada Field Trip A3: Guidebook May 23, 2009 Cover: The Battle of Queenston Heights, 13 October, 1812 (Library and Archives Canada, C-000276). The cover engraving made in 1836, is based on a sketch by James Dennis (1796-1855) who was the senior British officer of the small force at Queenston when the Americans first landed. The war of 1812 between Great Britain and the United States offers several examples of the effects of geology and landscape on military strategy in Southern Ontario. In short, Canada’s survival hinged on keeping high ground in the face of invading American forces. The mouth of the Niagara Gorge was of strategic value during the war to both the British and Americans as it was the start of overland portages from the Niagara River southwards around Niagara Falls to Lake Erie. Whoever controlled this part of the Niagara River could dictate events along the entire Niagara Peninsula. With Britain distracted by the war against Napoleon in Europe, the Americans thought they could take Canada by a series of cross-border strikes aimed at Montreal, Kingston and the Niagara River. At Queenston Heights, the Niagara Escarpment is about 100 m high and looks north over the flat floor of glacial Lake Iroquois. To the east it commands a fine view over the Niagara Gorge and river. Queenston is a small community perched just below the crest of the escarpment on a small bench created by the outcrop of the Whirlpool Sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Celebrate Niagara Peninsula's Native Plants
    A GUIDE TO CELEBRATE NIAGARA PENINSULA’S NATIVE PLANTS 250 Thorold Road West, 3rd Floor Welland, ON L3C 3W2 Phone: 905.788.3135 Fax: 905.788.1121 www.npca.ca Like us on Facebook www.facebook.com/NiagaraPeninsulaConservationAuthority Follow us on Twitter @NPCA_Ontario © 2014 Sixth Edition – Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority The Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy of the information contained within this publication and is not responsible for any errors or omissions. The Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority warns consumers that it is not advisable to eat any of the fruits or plants described in this publication. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................2 to 5 Flowering Times and Bloom Colour ............................................................................6 to 7 Native Plant List .................................................................................................... 8 to 15 Dry Conditions - Sunny - Wildflowers ..................................................................... 16 to 22 Dry Conditions - Sunny - Grasses ....................................................................................23 Dry Conditions - Sunny - Trees ........................................................................................24 Moist to Wet Conditions - Sunny - Wildflowers ........................................................ 25 to 28 Moist to Wet Conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology and Application of a Statistical Approach to the Universal Soil Loss Equation (Usle): Welland River Case Study
    Middle States Geographer, 1996, 29:105-113 METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION OF A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO THE UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION (USLE): WELLAND RIVER CASE STUDY Shannon L. Vickers1 , Kim N. Irvine2, and Ian G. Droppo3 1. Department of Geography, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1. 2. Department of Geography and Planning, State University College, Buffalo, NY 14222. 3. National Water Research Institute, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7R 4A6. ABSTRACI': The WeI/and River watershed drains an area of 880 km2 and is part of the Niagara River Area of Concem. As one step towards remediation, the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was used to estimate soil erosion inputs to the river from each of the 34 sub-basins in the watershed. An innovative approach using risk and uncertainty analysis was incorporated into the conventional USLE estimates in order to address concems about uncertainty due to the variability of the USLE parameters across the WeI/and River watershed. This paper describes the methodology for the statistical approach to the USLE and those sub-basins with high potential soil loss were identified. INTRODUCflON (USLE) was used to estimate soil erosion rates for each of the 34 sub-basins in the watershed. A risk and uncertainty analysis (including probability The Welland River watershed is part of the distribution fitting and simulations using Latin Niagara River Area of Concern. Areas of Concern Hypercube sampling) was incorporated into the around the Great Lakes have been designated by conventional USLE estimates and was performed the International Joint Commission (DC) as using BESTFIT and @RISK, which are EXCEL exhibiting various environmental impairments.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (3MB)
    MAGYAR NYELVŐR 142. ÉVF. * 2018. ÁPRILIS–JÚNIUS * 2. SZÁM Dayka Gábornak Aorthographia címet kapott, kéziratban fennmaradt magyar nyelvű, nyelvészeti jellegű írásáról 1. Bevezetés. A tervem az, hogy a nyelvtudomány-történet keretében bemutas- sam a mindössze huszonnyolc évet élt, sajátos hangú 18. századi költőnek, Dayka Gábornak a kéziratban fennmaradt nyelvtani, egyáltalán nyelvészeti irányultsá- gú munkáit. A sorrendet illetően a Dayka-kutatáshoz alapot nyújtó Dayka Gábor Összes Művei című kötetet követem (az adatait l. DGÖM). Ez a kötet egyébként tartalmazza Dayka Gábornak – költői és prózai alkotásain kívül – a következő nyelvtani, nyelvészeti jellegű írásait: „Grammatikák és grammatikai jegyzetek: 1. Magyar nyelvű grammatikai tárgyú írások: a) Aorthographia és b) Grammati- kai feljegyzések. – 2. Proludium in Institutiones Linguae Hungaricae. – 3. Ternio Grammaticae Hungaricae 1794” (DGÖM 7). Meg kell jegyeznem, hogy bár e munkáknak se a pontos keletkezési idejét, se egymás utáni következésük sor- rendjét nem lehetett bizonyítottan megállapítani, a DGÖM-ben alkalmazott és idézett sorrend látszik logikusnak és követendőnek. A kötet tartalmazza az ere- deti szövegeken kívül – ha idegen nyelvűek – azok fordítását is, továbbá minden szöveg után a széles körű rálátással megírt jegyzeteket, amelyek megemlékeztek a kéziratról, az illető szöveg megjelenéséről, valamint közölnek szövegkritikát, és „Magyarázatok” címen tárgyalják az illető mű keletkezés- és fogadástörténetét, valamint közölnek számos fogalmat, jelenséget megvilágító megjegyzést. Egyéb- ként a filológusi feldolgozást a lehetséges teljességre, a rendszerességre, a minden lényeges kérdésnek az utánajárására, a logikus felépítésre, a pontosságra, valamint a világos megfogalmazásra való törekvés jellemzi (l. részletesen: DGÖM 64–9). Elöljáróban még szólok több éve tartó Dayka-kutatásaim első eredményé- ről, a Mi vitte Dayka Gábort, a költőt a nyelvtanírás, egyáltalán a nyelvtudomány felé? című tanulmányról (Szathmári 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ Buffalo Harbor NOAA Chart 14833
    BookletChart™ Buffalo Harbor NOAA Chart 14833 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the The International boundary between the United States and Canada follows a general middle of the river course in the upper Niagara River National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration from the head of the river downstream to the head of Grand Island National Ocean Service where the river forks around the island. The boundary then follows Office of Coast Survey Chippawa Channel and is generally less than 1,000 feet off the west shore of Grand Island until Chippawa Channel and Niagara River Channel www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov join at the northwest end of Grand Island. The boundary again follows a 888-990-NOAA general middle of the river course around the south side of Goat Island and over Niagara Falls. What are Nautical Charts? Chart Datum, Upper Niagara River.–Depths and vertical clearances under overhead cables and bridges in the Niagara River from its Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show confluence with Lake Erie to the head of navigation, the turning basin at water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much Niagara Falls, NY, is as follows: from Lake Erie to the Black Rock Canal more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and Lock is the Low Water Datum of Lake Erie, 569.2 feet (173.5 meters); efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial from just below the Black Rock Canal Lock to the south end of Grand ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Annual Macrophyte Abundance in Warmer Locations in Consequence of Nutrients in Lakes V205a Page 2 the Longer Plant Growing-Season
    Nutrients in Lakes V205a Page 1 Reference Type: Journal Article Record Number: 482 Author: Moss, B.; Stephen, D.; Balayla, D. M.; Becares, E.; Collings, S. E.; Fernandez-Alaez, C.; Fernandez-Alaez, M.; Ferriol, C.; Garcia, P.; Goma, J.; Gyllstroem, M.; Hansson, L. A.; Hietala, J.; Kairesalo, T.; Miracle, M. R.; Romo, S.; Rueda, J.; Russell, V.; Stahl-Delbanco, A.; Svensson, M.; Vakkilainen, K.; Valentin, M.; Van De Bund, W. J.; Van Donk, E.; Vicente, E.; Villena, M. J. Year: 2004 Title: Continental-scale patterns of nutrient and fish effects on shallow lakes: Synthesis of a pan-european mesocosm experiment Journal: Freshwater Biology Volume: 49 Issue: 12 Pages: 1633-1649 Accession Number: AN 2005:18924 Abstract: 1. Results are analyzed from 11 expts. in which effects of fish addn. and nutrient loading on shallow lakes were studied in mesocosms. The expts., five in 1998, six in 1999, were carried out in six lakes, distributed from Finland to southern Spain, according to a std. protocol. 2. Effects of the treatments on 29 std. chem., phytoplankton and zooplankton variables are examd. to assess the relative importance of bottom-up (nutrient enrichment) and top-down (fish predation) effects. For each year, the expts. in different locations are treated as replicates in a meta-anal. Results of individual expts. are then compared in terms of the patterns of significant influences of nutrient addn. and fish predation with these overall results (the baseline), and between years in the same location. 3. The overall meta-anal. gave consistent results across the 2 years, with nutrient loading influencing all of the chem.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara River
    Niagara River Area of Concern Canadian Section Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010 The Niagara River is a 58-km waterway connecting Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. The Canadian section of the Niagara River Area of Concern extends along the entire length of the Canadian side of the Niagara River, and includes the Canadian side of Niagara Falls and the Welland River watershed. The Niagara River drains extensive farmland on the Canadian side and passes through heavily industrialized, residential and parkland areas on the United States side. More than one half of the flow of the river is diverted for electrical power generation on both sides of the river. The river supports one of the largest and most diverse concentrations of gulls in the world, and its gorge and cliffs below the falls are habitat for some of the highest concentrations of rare plant species in Ontario. Environmental concerns on the Canadian side of the Niagara River Area of Concern have focused on the loss and degradation of wetlands and fish habitat, and the resulting impacts on fish and wildlife populations that depend on this habitat. Most of these impacts are associated with non-point sources of pollution from rural areas of the Niagara–Welland River basin, particularly runoff of pesticides and nutrients. (By contrast, most of the environmental concerns in the United States section are associated with toxic contamination from past industrial management practices, particularly the seepage of toxic wastes from chemical dumps, and the discharge of municipal wastes.) PARTNERSHIPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION The Niagara River was designated an Area of Concern in 1987 under the Canada–United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study
    GREAT LAKES ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY STUDY Final Report Fall 2007 GREAT LAKES ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY STUDY By: Transport Canada U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Transportation The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Environment Canada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication This publication is also available in French under the title: Étude des Grands Lacs et de la Voie maritime du Saint-Laurent. Rapport final, automne 2007. Permission is granted by the Department of Transport, Canada, and the U.S. Department of Transportation, to copy and/or reproduce the contents of this publication in whole or in part provided that full acknowledgement is given to the Department of Transport, Canada, and the U.S. Department of Transportation, and that the material be accurately reproduced. While the use of this material has been authorized, the Department of Transport, Canada, and the U.S. Department of Transportation, shall not be responsible for the manner in which the information is presented, nor for any interpretation thereof. The information in this publication is to be considered solely as a guide and should not be quoted as or considered to be a legal authority. It may become obsolete in whole or in part at any time without notice. Publication design and layout by ACR Communications Inc. ii Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are pleased to present the binational report on the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study, the result of collaborative research and analysis by seven federal departments and agencies from Canada and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Region Fallsview Boulevard & Clifton Hill
    Points of Interest Wego Routes Compliments of Niagara Falls Tourism 1 800 56 FALLS Attractions Wineries Parking Lundy’s Lane Niagara Parks niagarafallstourism.com & Hornblower Cruises Niagara 905 356 6061 Restaurants Others Hospital Fallsview / Clifton Hill NOTL Shuttle QEW Toronto 4 24 32 Niagara Region 77 y 7 87 w 68 43 k P a r 6 a g SHOW US HOW YOU 12 20 13 ia 57 42 N East West Line 8 25 #EXPLORENIAGARA Lake Ontario 87 58 Stanley Ave Stanley Virgil Ave Stanley QEW Niagara River 4 O’Neil St ) 15 Lakeshore Rd " 19 Townline Rd Townline Townline Rd Townline 5 3 Huggins St & 16 Port Niagara-on- y 22 y 34 Garner Rd Garner Dalhousie the-Lake Rd Garner St Catharines w 51 Carlton St 27 k 18 P Niagara Stone Rd 100 a r a 83 a g g a a i Montrose Rd Montrose Niagara River Rd Montrose 54 N 9 45 11 90 Thorold Stone Rd Queenston 79 75 QEW 5 14 10 81 81 46 50 2 York Rd 60 7 66 405 73 1 14 Portage Rd 52 3 406 55 Glendale Ave 81 23 13 67 89 4 QEW Fairview Bridge St Whirlpool Cemetery 6 Bridge Kalar Rd Rd Kalar Kalar 17 Thorold 70 Stanley Ave Stanley 100 Ave Stanley Victoria Ave Victoria 50 Ave Victoria Queen St 21 42 61 3 Thorold Stone Rd Drummond Rd Rd Drummond Drummond 69 Decew Rd Morrison St y Woodbine St w Portage Rd k Oakes P Short Hills a Park r Dorchester Rd Dorchester Provincial Park 420 a Rd Dorchester g ia 70 ane N U.S.A 78 dy’s L Lu n Niagara y Niagara River a Niagara Pkwy W 20 QEW Falls y B lle Niagara River ea Va 50 ver da m 5 s R d 2 Falls Ave 420 Walnut St Hiram St 72 Fallsview Boulevard & Clifton Hill Fallsview Boulevard & Clifton Hill
    [Show full text]