NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
When the Mountain Became the Escarpment.FH11
Looking back... with Alun Hughes WHEN THE MOUNTAIN BECAME THE ESCARPMENT The Niagara Escarpment hasnt always been But Coronelli was not the first to put Niagara known by that name. Early in the 19th century it on the map. That distinction belongs to Father Louis was often referred to as the Mountain, and of course Hennepin, the Recollect priest who was the first it is still called that in Hamilton and Grimsby today. European to describe Niagara Falls from personal We in eastern Niagara have largely forgotten the observation. In his Description de la Louisiane, name, though it survives in the City of Thorolds published in 1683, five years after his visit, he speaks motto Where the Ships Climb the Mountain. of le grand Sault de Niagara, and labels it thus on the accompanying map. This is the form that So when did the name Niagara Escarpment first prevails thereafter, and it is the spelling used for Fort come into use? And what about the areas other de Niagara, established by the French at the mouth Niagara names, like Niagara Falls, Niagara River of the river in 1726. The English followed suit, and Niagara Peninsula? When did these first appear? though on many early maps (e.g. Moll 1715, I dont pretend to have definitive answers there Mitchell 1782) they use the name Great Fall of are too many sources I have not seen but I can Niagara rather than Niagara Falls. suggest some preliminary conclusions. In his Description Hennepin also refers to la The name Niagara is definitely of native origin, belle Riviere de Niagara, so the name Niagara though there is no agreement about its meaning. -
It's Happeninghere
HAMILTON IT’S HAPPENING HERE Hamilton’s own Arkells perform at the 2014 James Street Supercrawl – photo credit: Colette Schotsman www.tourismhamilton.com HAMILTON: A SNAPSHOT Rich in culture and history and surrounded by spectacular nature, Hamilton is a city like no other. Unique for its ideal blend of urban and natural offerings, this post-industrial, ambitious city is in the midst of a fascinating transformation and brimming with story ideas. Ideally located in the heart of southern Ontario, midway between Toronto and Niagara Falls, Hamilton provides an ideal destination or detour. From its vibrant arts scene, to its rich heritage and history, to its incredible natural beauty, it’s happening here. Where Where Where THE ARTS NATURE HISTORY thrive surrounds is revealed Hamilton continues to make Bounded by the picturesque shores One of the oldest and most headlines for its explosive arts scene of Lake Ontario and the lush historically fascinating cities in the – including a unique grassroots landscape of the Niagara region outside of Toronto, Hamilton movement evolving alongside the Escarpment, Hamilton offers a is home to heritage-rich architecture, city’s long-established arts natural playground for outdoor lovers world-class museums and 15 institutions. Inspiring, fun and – all within minutes of the city’s core. National Historic Sites. accessible, the arts in Hamilton are yours to explore. • More than 100 waterfalls can be • Dundurn Castle brings Hamilton’s found just off the Bruce Trail along Victorian era to life in a beautifully • Monthly James Street North the Niagara Escarpment, a restored property overlooking the Art Crawls and the annual James UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve harbour while Hamilton Museum of Street Supercrawl draw hundreds of that cuts across the city. -
The Niagara Area Is a Superb Destination for a Short and Easy
he Niagara area isia asuperb gaOnce in thre Niagara rea gion, cycling is an obvious T destination for a short and easy activity choice for all abilities as trails are flat and cycling holiday with the option to add on a wide many are dedicated to non vehicular traffic only. N In addition you might want to consider: range of diverse activities. e region is only 1 ½ hours driving time from Toronto and 45 minutes • a jet boat ride on the Niagara River from Buffalo, New York. ere are four bridge crossings from the United States into the area to • a wet outing on the Maid of the Mist boat make it particularly reachable by car for the up close to the Niagara Falls themselves American tourist. ere are now two types of train service offered from Toronto to the Niagara Falls • visiting and tasting at one of the seventy or area on summer weekends so people without a car so wineries that lie between Grimsby and have easy access. If you fly into Hamilton, Toronto Niagara-on-the-Lake or Buffalo you can avail yourself of one of the • spa visits countless shuttle or taxi options. • a play at the world class Shaw Festival eatre • strolling through Niagara-on-the-Lake, one of Canada’s prettiest towns • excellent shopping and dining e Niagara area is best visited in late spring, summer and early fall. e weather tends to be hot and humid in the summer with rain possi - ble at anytime though rarely does it last for more than a few days. -
Cold Hardy Grapes
Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2009 Project Report Project Title: Cold Hardy Hybrid Wine Grapes: Cropping, Vigor Management, Wines. Project Leader: Kevin Iungerman, CCE Northeast NY Commercial Fruit Program. Collaborators. Dr. Justine Vanden Heuvel, Dept. of Horticultural Sciences, Grape Program. Dr.Wayne Wilcox, Cornell Department of Plant Pathology. Dr. Tim Martinson, Cornell Statewide Viticulture Extension Program. Dr. Anna Katherine Mansfield and Chris Gerling, Department of Food Science, Enology. Mike Davis, farm manager, Cornell Baker Farm, Willsboro. Steven Lerch, Cornell Grape Program, Geneva. Extension Associations and Fruit Growers of CCE’s NENY Commercial Fruit Program. Lake Champlain Grape Growers Association and Willsboro and NENYF volunteers. Cooperating Producers: County Producer Farm/Vineyard City/Town State Albany Mike DiCrescenzo Altamont Vineyard Altamont NY Clinton Phil Favreau Stone House Vineyard Mooers NY Clinton Mary and Gilles Fortin Amazing Grace Vnyrd. Chazy NY Clinton Erwin Kalmar (New 2009. Unnamed) Champlain Que. Clinton Richard Lamoy Hid-in-Pines Vineyard Morrisonville NY Clinton Rob McDowell Purple Gate Vineyard Plattsburgh NY Clinton N. Peck, C. Read North Star Vineyard Mooers NY Clinton Dan Vesco Vesco Ridge Vnyrd. Essex W. & K. Reinhardt Blue Stone Vineyards Willsboro NY Essex Peter Rowley Edgewater Farm Willsboro NY Essex Todd Trzaskos Vermont Logic (Essex Land) VT Saratoga Mike Spiak Kayaderosseras Vnyrd. Greenfield Cen. NY Washington Gerry Barnhart Victoryview Vineyard Schatigcoke NY Washington Ken Denberg Natural Selection Farm Cambridge NY Washington S. Knapp, D. Wilson Slyboro Ciderhouse Granville NY Orange Ed Lincoln Maple Gate Farm Randolph VT Background: The 300-vine Willsboro Wine Grape Trial was planted in 2005 to comparatively evaluate 25-hybrid cold-hardy-wine-grape-cultivars. -
(Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York
Revised Stratigraphy and Correlations of the Niagaran Provincial Series (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York By Carlton E. Brett, Dorothy H. Tepper, William M. Goodman, Steven T. LoDuca, and Bea-Yeh Eckert U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2086 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of the University of Rochester UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1995 10 REVISED STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATIONS OF THE NIAGARAN PROVINCIAL SERIES been made in accordance with the NASC. Because the The history of nomenclature of what is now termed the NASC does not allow use of the "submember" category, Medina Group, beginning with Conrad ( 1837) and ending units that would be of this rank are treated as informal units with Bolton (1953), is presented in Fisher (1954); Bolton and have been given alphanumeric designations. Informal (1957, table 2) presents a detailed summary of this nomen- units are discussed under the appropriate "member" clature for 1910-53. A historical summary of nomenclature categories. of the Medina Group in the Niagara region is shown in fig- The use of quotes for stratigraphic nomenclature in this ure 7. Early investigators of the Medina include Conrad report is restricted to units that have been misidentified or (1837); Vanuxem (1840, first usage of Medina; 1842); Hall abandoned. If stratigraphic nomenclature for a unit has (1840, 1843); Gilbert (1899); Luther (1899); Fairchild changed over time, the term for the unit is shown, with cap- (1901); Grabau (1901, 1905, 1908, 1909, 1913); Kindle and italization, as given in whatever reference is cited rather Taylor (1913); Kindle (1914); Schuchert (1914); Chadwick than according to the most recent nomenclature. -
4 Removal of Niagara Scenic Parkway
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Telephone: (716) 286-4310 June 26, 2018 The Niagara Falls City Council Niagara Falls, New York RE: Removal of the Niagara Scenic Parkway —from Main Street to Findlay Drive Council Members: An agreement has been reached between the Power Authority of the State of New York ("NYPA"), the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation ("State Parks"), the New York State Department of Transportation ("NYSDOT"), the USA Niagara Development Corporation ("USAN"), and the City of Niagara Falls (the "City"), which is the next step in the ROBERT MOSES PARKWAY NORTH SEGMENT REMOVAL PROJECT (Project). This construction project is estimated to cost $38,500,000. It is largely funded through NYPA ($36,500,000), with the balance being paid for by New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation ($2,000,000). No municipal capital funds are required for this Agreement to take effect. Since constructed in 1962, the former Robert Moses Parkway has not just been the subject of severe criticism but a malignancy that has decimated our community by having cut off both residents and visitors from the Niagara River, Niagara River Gorge, and the public lands connected thereto. The Parkway, rather than being the transportation link in service of economic development and city-building, instead only served to create an effective by-pass around the City and its Main Street, Pine Avenue, and other traditional business corridors. This Project, more than any before marks the largest removal, reconfiguration and regeneration of urban land since a portion of the Parkway passing through Niagara Falls State Park and Prospect Park was removed in the late 1970s. -
Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths
Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths Town of Fort Erie Regional Road Number Road Name Segment Width in Metres Gorham Road – Lakeshore 1 Dominion Road 20.1 Road Rosehill Road – Central 3 Garrison Road 30.5 Avenue QEW – Thompson Road 30.5 Thompson Road – 26.2 19 Gilmore Road Concession Road Concession Road – Niagara 23.2 Boulevard Stevensville Road – Bowen Road 26.2 Thompson Road 21 Thompson Road – Niagara Phipps Street 20.1 Parkway Montrose Road – QEW 30.5 25 Netherby Road QEW – Niagara Parkway 26.2 Stevensville Road Carver Street – CP Railway 20.1 116 Stevensville Road / Sodom C.P. Railway – North Limit of 26.1 Road Fort Erie Helena Street / Thompson Dominion Road – Phipps 122 26.2 Road Street Lakeshore Road – Niagara 124 Central Avenue 26.2 Parkway Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths Town of Grimsby Regional Road Number Road Name Segment Width in Metres 10 Casablanca Boulevard Main Street West – QEW 26.2 Mud Street – Ridge Road Mountain Road 26.2 East Ridge Road East – Main 12 Mountain Road 20.1 Street West Christie Street Main Street West - QEW 26.2 Christie Street QEW – Olive Street 30.5 East of Park Road South – Park Road / Bartlett Avenue 39.6 Main Street East 14 Main Street East – Central Bartlett Avenue 35.4 Avenue West Limit of Grimsby – 39 QEW North Service Road 26.2 Olive Street West Limit of Grimsby – 40 QEW South Service Road 26.2 East Limit of Grimsby West Limit of Grimsby – 73 Mud Street West and East 26.2 East Limit of Grimsby West Limit of Grimsby – 26.2 Casablanca Boulevard Casablanca Boulevard – 81 Main Street West 20.1 Robinson -
Making Land on the Toronto Waterfront in the 1850S Thomas Mcilwraith
Document generated on 09/24/2021 10:01 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine Digging Out and Filling In Making Land on the Toronto Waterfront in the 1850s Thomas McIlwraith Volume 20, Number 1, June 1991 Article abstract A half-million square metres (50 hectares) was brought in to railroad and URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1017560ar commercial use at wharfage-level along the Toronto lakefront during the DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1017560ar 1850s. This major engineering project involved cutting down the terrace south of Front Street, and this was the source of most of the fill dumped into the Bay. See table of contents Neither railroad cars nor harbour dredges were capable of delivering the additional material necessary for building anticipated port lands, and many parts of the waterfront remained improperly filled for decades. The land-area Publisher(s) that was created should be regarded as a byproduct of short-run, selfish commercial interests, abetted by a City Council that gave only lip-service to the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine concept of a parklike lakefront. ISSN 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article McIlwraith, T. (1991). Digging Out and Filling In: Making Land on the Toronto Waterfront in the 1850s. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 20(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017560ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1991 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. -
Official Road Map of Ontario
5 Kilometres 0 Miles 5 5 kilomètres 0 milles 5 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016 © Imprimeur de la Reine pour l’Ontario, 2016 18 FORT mn Niagara-On-The-Lake GEORGE D LAKE ONTARIO E R 87 OR SH hg (LAC ONTARIO) KE 93 LA hg55 Youngstown mn EAST & WEST LINE 2 87 1 18F Virgil hg D po ST F R NE RD NE ST. CATHARINES RD Y OUR RD E W LI N K W P A 3 RD E LINE R RT F N O 48 TOW o M N SH u IA W O KE I ION r L hg R T LA G S EL E SI LA S E S N A I L 83 86 V KE E AN I MA LINE 5 RD R C CES hg R C ST Dhg A ST N R 18 42 T M A O ON EE R C SCOT i C RD l mn A 51 38 hg AIRPORT RD C e LTON ST R 47 K 46 G CAR A IV O hg N A QEW I OO A M O N 44 L E A N E BROCK'S MONUMENT 104 R T AV S 55 Lewiston 49 48 C R dc T A O r po e RD I 12 7 RD CONC. N R hg O RD I D e O D N O 3RD AVE A LLA k S E Q L UE P E T W E NS KW Queenston 11 TO N ST Queenston-Lewiston Y St. -
Growing Grapes in Missouri
MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................ -
Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S
HO-88 Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S. Kaan Kurtural and Patsy E. Wilson, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky; Imed E. Dami, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University rapes grown in Kentucky are sub- usually more harmful to grapevines than Even in established fruit growing areas, ject to environmental stresses that steady cool temperatures. temperatures occasionally reach critical reduceG crop yield and quality, and injure Mesoclimate is the climate of the vine- levels and cause significant damage. The and kill grapevines. Damaging critical yard site affected by its local topography. moderate hardiness of grapes increases winter temperatures, late spring frosts, The topography of a given site, including the likelihood for damage since they are short growing seasons, and extreme the absolute elevation, slope, aspect, and the most cold-sensitive of the temperate summer temperatures all occur with soils, will greatly affect the suitability of fruit crops. regularity in regions of Kentucky. How- a proposed site. Mesoclimate is much Freezing injury, or winterkill, oc- ever, despite the challenging climate, smaller in area than macroclimate. curs as a result of permanent parts of certain species and cultivars of grapes Microclimate is the environment the grapevine being damaged by sub- are grown commercially in Kentucky. within and around the canopy of the freezing temperatures. This is different The aim of this bulletin is to describe the grapevine. It is described by the sunlight from spring freeze damage that kills macroclimatic features affecting grape exposure, air temperature, wind speed, emerged shoots and flower buds. Thus, production that should be evaluated in and wetness of leaves and clusters. -
Underground Railroad in Western New York
Underground Railroad on The Niagara Frontier: Selected Sources in the Grosvenor Room Key Grosvenor Room Buffalo and Erie County Public Library 1 Lafayette Square * = Oversized book Buffalo, New York 14203-1887 Buffalo = Buffalo Collection (716) 858-8900 Stacks = Closed Stacks, ask for retrieval www.buffalolib.org GRO = Grosvenor Collection Revised June 2020 MEDIA = Media Room Non-Fiction = General Collection Ref. = Reference book, cannot be borrowed 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 Books .............................................................................................................................. 2 Newspaper Articles ........................................................................................................ 4 Journal & Magazine Articles .......................................................................................... 5 Slavery Collection in the Rare Book Room ................................................................... 6 Vertical File ..................................................................................................................... 6 Videos ............................................................................................................................. 6 Websites ......................................................................................................................... 7 Further resources at BECPL .........................................................................................