Underground Railroad in Western New York
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
When the Mountain Became the Escarpment.FH11
Looking back... with Alun Hughes WHEN THE MOUNTAIN BECAME THE ESCARPMENT The Niagara Escarpment hasnt always been But Coronelli was not the first to put Niagara known by that name. Early in the 19th century it on the map. That distinction belongs to Father Louis was often referred to as the Mountain, and of course Hennepin, the Recollect priest who was the first it is still called that in Hamilton and Grimsby today. European to describe Niagara Falls from personal We in eastern Niagara have largely forgotten the observation. In his Description de la Louisiane, name, though it survives in the City of Thorolds published in 1683, five years after his visit, he speaks motto Where the Ships Climb the Mountain. of le grand Sault de Niagara, and labels it thus on the accompanying map. This is the form that So when did the name Niagara Escarpment first prevails thereafter, and it is the spelling used for Fort come into use? And what about the areas other de Niagara, established by the French at the mouth Niagara names, like Niagara Falls, Niagara River of the river in 1726. The English followed suit, and Niagara Peninsula? When did these first appear? though on many early maps (e.g. Moll 1715, I dont pretend to have definitive answers there Mitchell 1782) they use the name Great Fall of are too many sources I have not seen but I can Niagara rather than Niagara Falls. suggest some preliminary conclusions. In his Description Hennepin also refers to la The name Niagara is definitely of native origin, belle Riviere de Niagara, so the name Niagara though there is no agreement about its meaning. -
Rethinking the Niagara Frontier
Ongoing work in the Niagara Region Next Steps Heritage Development in Western New York The November Roundtable concluded with a lively Rethinking the Niagara Frontier It would be a mistake, however, to say that the process of heritage development has discussion of the prospects for bi-national cooperation European Participants yet to begin here. around issues of natural and cultural tourism and her- itage development. There is no shortage of assets or Michael Schwarze-Rodrian As Bradshaw Hovey of UB’s smaller scale and at a finer grain. Projekt Ruhr GmbH Urban Design Project outlined, He highlighted the case of Fort stories, and there is great opportunity we can seize by Berliner Platz 6-8 A report on the November Roundtable there are initiatives in environ- Erie, one of the smaller commu- working together. Essen, Germany 45127 mental repair, historic preserva- nities in the region, but one that Email: schwarze-rodrian@projek- tion, infrastructure investment, rightfully lays claim to the title of Some identified the need to truhr.de economic development, and cul- “gateway to Canada.” broaden and deepen grassroots November 20, 2000 tural interpretation ongoing from What Fort Erie has done is rel- involvement, while others zeroed Christian Schützinger one end of the region to the atively simple. They have in on the necessity of engaging Bodensee-Alpenrhein Tourismus other. matched local assets with eco- leadership at higher levels of gov- Focus on heritage Bethlehem Steel Plant Postfach 16 In Buffalo, work is proceeding Source: Patricia Layman Bazelon nomic trends and community ernment and business. There was A-6901 Bregenz, Austria To develop the great bi-national region that spans the Niagara River, we should on the redevelopment of South goals to identify discrete areas of a great deal of discussion about Email: c.schuetzinger@bodensee- Buffalo “brownfields”; aggressive works; and a cultural tourism desired investment. -
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Proposal Cover
Final Report June 2017 Transit Survey for GBRNTC moore & associates 2017 Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Onboard Survey Greater Buffalo-Niagara Regional Transportation Council Final Report Table of Contents Chapter 1: Executive Summary .................................................... 01 Chapter 2: Overview and Methodology ....................................... 07 Chapter 3: Analysis and Key Findings ........................................... 19 Chapter 4: Spatial Analysis .......................................................... 77 Appendix A: Survey Instrument – Bus Survey .............................. A-1 Appendix B: Survey Instrument – Rail Survey .............................. B-1 Appendix C: Simple Frequencies – Bus Survey ............................. C-1 Appendix D: Simple Frequencies – Rail Survey ............................. D-1 Appendix E: Transfer Matrix ....................................................... E-1 Appendix F: Data Dictionary ........................................................ F-1 Moore & Associates, Inc. | 2017 2017 Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Onboard Survey Greater Buffalo-Niagara Regional Transportation Council Final Report This page intentionally blank. Moore & Associates, Inc. | 2017 2017 Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Onboard Survey Greater Buffalo-Niagara Regional Transportation Council Final Report Chapter 1 Executive Summary In 2017, the Greater Buffalo-Niagara Transportation Council retained Moore & Associates to conduct an origin/destination study of -
Imagine Niagara
This page has been intentionally left blank. Chapter 1 1 - 2 1. Imagine Niagara Physical and Economic Background The Regional Municipality of Niagara is located in Southern Ontario between Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. It corresponds approximately to the area commonly referred to as the "Niagara Peninsula" and will be referred to here as simply "the Region". It is bounded on the east by the Niagara River and the State of New York, and on the west by the City of Hamilton and Haldimand County. The Region is at one end of the band of urban development around the western end of Lake Ontario. Chapter 1 1 - 3 The Region was formed in 1970 and includes all of the areas within the boundaries of the former Counties of Lincoln and Welland. There are twelve local municipalities within the Region; these were formed by the rearrangement and amalgamation of the twenty-six municipalities which existed before 1970. The Queen Elizabeth Way and other provincial highways place most of the Region within ninety minutes' travel time of Toronto. Hamilton-Wentworth, with a population of over 400,000, is about thirty minutes away from the centre of the Region. Four road and two rail bridges connect the Region to the western part of New York State. About 2,500,000 people live along the United States' side of the Niagara River. The developing industrial complex at Nanticoke, on the shore of Lake Erie to the southwest, is about an hour's travel time from the centre of the Region. Physical Characteristics The "Niagara Peninsula" area is not a true peninsula but is a narrow neck of land stretching between Lakes Erie and Ontario. -
Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I
Intensive Level Survey Historic Resources – Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I 3.0 Historical Overview This section provides a narrative history of the City of Niagara Falls with specific emphasis on the Downtown neighborhood. The overview addresses significant trends and themes associated with the city’s historic context. The Downtown neighborhood’s period of significance is identified and examined in this chapter. Martin Wachadlo, architectural historian, conducted the background historic research. 3.1 Niagara County: Physiology and Geology Figure 3-1. Niagara Falls, Niagara Falls, New York Niagara County borders the southern shore of Lake Ontario in the extreme northwestern corner of New York State, and occupies part of the Huron and Ontario Plains. The Ontario Plain comprises part of Lake Ontario to the foot of the Niagara Escarpment1, and the Huron plain extends from the crest of the escarpment southward beyond the county line. The Niagara Escarpment begins in Watertown, New York, USA and extends westerly along the Manitoulin Island in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The escarpment continues through Wisconsin and Illinois. With geological material measuring 64-ft thick, the stratigraphy at Niagara Falls provides a glimpse into the overall rock types comprising the Niagara Escarpment (Figure 3-1). The top layer is Lockport Dolomite, a hard rock referred to as the "Lower Silurian Group." Below the top layer is Rochester Shale, which is much softer and wears away easily with the effects of erosion. Under the shale are harder strata of limestone and dolostone known as the "Clinton Group." Below the harder strata is Grimsby sandstone. -
2019 State Employees Federated Appeal
2019 State Employees Federated Appeal Albany Albany Albany Albany Albany Albany Albany Allegany Allegany Allegany Allegany Allegany Allegany Allegany Bronx Bronx Bronx Bronx Bronx Bronx Bronx Broome Broome Broome Broome Broome Broome Broome Cattaraugus Cattaraugus Cattaraugus Cattaraugus Cattaraugus Cattaraugus Cattaraugus Cayuga Cayuga Cayuga Cayuga Cayuga Cayuga Cayuga Chautauqua Chautauqua Chautauqua Chautauqua Chautauqua Chautauqua Chautauqua Chemung Chemung Chemung Chemung Chemung Chemung Chemung Chenango Chenango Chenango Chenango Chenango Chenango Chenango Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Cortland Cortland Cortland Cortland Cortland Cortland Cortland Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Dutchess Dutchess Dutchess Dutchess Dutchess Dutchess Dutchess Erie Erie Erie Erie Erie Erie Erie Essex Essex Essex Essex Essex Essex Essex Franklin Franklin Franklin Franklin Franklin Franklin Franklin Fulton Fulton Fulton Fulton Fulton Fulton Fulton Genesee Genesee Genesee Genesee Genesee Genesee Genesee Greene Greene Greene Greene Greene Greene Greene WEHamilton Hamilton Hamilton Hamilton areHamilton Hamilton Hamilton Herkimer Herkimer Herkimer Herkimer Herkimer Herkimer Herkimer Jeferson Jeferson Jeferson Jeferson Jeferson Jeferson Jeferson Kings Kings Kings Kings Kings Kings Kings Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Livingston Livingston Livingston Livingston Livingston Livingston Livingston Madison Madison Madison Madison Madison -
Regional Lifeguard Contacts 2020
REGIONAL LIFEGUARD CONTACTS 2020 Central New York Park Region Erin McPeak 6105 E. Seneca Tnpk. (315) 492 - 1756 Jamesville, NY 13078 fax (315) 492 - 3277 [email protected] Finger Lakes Park Region Andrew Chouinard 2221 Taughannock Park Rd. (607) 387 - 7041, ext. 104 Trumansburg, NY 14886 fax (607) 387 - 3390 [email protected] New York City Region Darren Green Riverbank State Park (212) 694 - 3664 or 3665 679 Riverside Drive fax (212) 694 - 3668 New York, New York 10031 [email protected] Palisades Interstate Park Commission Erin Martin Bear Mountain State Park (845) 786 - 2701, ext. 232 Administration Building fax (845) 947 - 5293 Bear Mountain, NY 10911 [email protected] Saratoga/Capital District Park Region Laura Smith Saratoga Spa State Park (518) 584 - 2000, ext. 252 19 Roosevelt Drive fax (518) 584 - 5694 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 [email protected] Taconic Park Region Gerri Covert P. O. Box 308 (845) 889 - 3899 Staatsburg, NY 12580 fax (845) 889 - 8217 [email protected] Thousand Islands Park Region Shirley Denesha Keewaydin State Park (315) 482 - 2593, ext. 213 PO Box 247 fax (315) 482 - 9413 Alexandria Bay, NY 13607 [email protected] Allegany Park Region Jennifer Conlan 2373 ASP Rte 1, Suite 3 (716) 354 - 9101, ext. 223 Salamanca, NY 14779 [email protected] Genesee Park Region Mary Jane Brooks 1 Letchworth State Park (585) 493 - 3604 Castile, NY 14427 fax (585) 493 - 5272 [email protected] Niagara Frontier Park Region Vince Iacovitti P.O. -
New York State Division of Parole Area Office Liaisons
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE Attachment 5 AREA OFFICE LIAISONS Dated: 11/9/09 COUNTY / BOROUGH AREA SUPERVISOR OFFICE LOCATION PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS Albany A/O 10 North Russell Road Albany A/S Joseph Ingemie Albany, NY 12206 518-459-3871 518-459-7164 [email protected] Niagara Frontier A/O 444 Third Street Niagara Falls, NY Allegany A/S Philip Overfield 14301 716-285-5342 716-285-5497 [email protected] Bronx II A/O 14 Bruckner Blvd Bronx A/S Frank Gemmati Bronx, NY 10454 718-292-7494 718-292-6251 [email protected] Brooklyn V A/O 340 Livingston Street Brooklyn A/S Charles Feliciano Brooklyn, NY 11217 718-422-1433 718-596-6073 [email protected] Binghamton A/O State Office Bldg 44 Hawley St Broome A/S Alpina Taylor Binghamton, NY 13901 607-721-8523 607-721-8535 [email protected] Niagara Frontier A/O 444 Third Street Niagara Falls, NY Cattaraugus A/S Philip Overfield 14301 716-285-5342 716-285-5497 [email protected] Syracuse A/O 333 E. Washington St Cayuga A/S John Maslyn Syracuse, NY 13202 315-428-4093 315-428-4085 [email protected] Niagara Frontier A/O 444 Third Street Niagara Falls, NY Chautauqua A/S Philip Overfield 14301 716-285-5342 716-285-5497 [email protected] Elmira A/O 100 West Chemung Pl. Chemung A/S Alpina Taylor Elmira, NY 14904 607-734-6667 607-737-6289 [email protected] Utica A/O 207 Genesee Street Chenango A/S John Pick Utica, NY 13501 315-793-2572 315-793-2608 [email protected] NENY A/O 10 North Russell Road Clinton A/S Felix Rosa Albany, NY 12206 518-459-7311 518-459-7164 [email protected] 12/2/2010 Page 1 of 6 NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE Attachment 5 AREA OFFICE LIAISONS Dated: 11/9/09 COUNTY / BOROUGH AREA SUPERVISOR OFFICE LOCATION PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS NENY A/O 10 North Russell Road Columbia A/S Felix Rosa Albany, NY 12206 518-459-7311 518-459-7164 [email protected] Syracuse A/O 333 E. -
Niagara National Heritage Area Study
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Niagara National Heritage Area Study Study Report 2005 Contents Executive Summaryr .................................................................................................. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................5 Part 1: Study Purpose and Backgroundr Project History ....................................................................................................................11 Legislation ..........................................................................................................................11 Study Process ......................................................................................................................12 Planning Context ................................................................................................................15 The Potential for Heritage Tourism ..................................................................................20 Part 2: Affected Environmentr .............................................................................. Description of the Study Area ..........................................................................................23 Natural Resources ..............................................................................................................24 Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................................26 -
NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE
NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE Gerard V. Middleton, Nick Eyles, Nina Chapple, and Robert Watson American Geophysical Union and Geological Association of Canada Field Trip A3: Guidebook May 23, 2009 Cover: The Battle of Queenston Heights, 13 October, 1812 (Library and Archives Canada, C-000276). The cover engraving made in 1836, is based on a sketch by James Dennis (1796-1855) who was the senior British officer of the small force at Queenston when the Americans first landed. The war of 1812 between Great Britain and the United States offers several examples of the effects of geology and landscape on military strategy in Southern Ontario. In short, Canada’s survival hinged on keeping high ground in the face of invading American forces. The mouth of the Niagara Gorge was of strategic value during the war to both the British and Americans as it was the start of overland portages from the Niagara River southwards around Niagara Falls to Lake Erie. Whoever controlled this part of the Niagara River could dictate events along the entire Niagara Peninsula. With Britain distracted by the war against Napoleon in Europe, the Americans thought they could take Canada by a series of cross-border strikes aimed at Montreal, Kingston and the Niagara River. At Queenston Heights, the Niagara Escarpment is about 100 m high and looks north over the flat floor of glacial Lake Iroquois. To the east it commands a fine view over the Niagara Gorge and river. Queenston is a small community perched just below the crest of the escarpment on a small bench created by the outcrop of the Whirlpool Sandstone. -
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority
New York State Office of the State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli Division of State Government Accountability Capital Planning Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Report 2015-S-37 April 2016 2015-S-37 Executive Summary Purpose To determine whether the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFTA) has complied with the capital planning requirements of the Public Authorities Law and whether its capital plans ensure the highest priority facility needs are adequately addressed. The audit scope period is January 1, 2012 through October 30, 2015. Background The NFTA is a multi-modal transportation authority responsible for air and public transportation in Erie and Niagara counties in New York State. NFTA businesses include a bus, light rail, and paratransit system and two international airports. NFTA records show it owns more than 3,700 capital assets costing approximately $1.6 billion. The Public Authorities Law requires NFTA to prepare a five-year capital plan, along with annual capital spending plans. NFTA’s fiscal 2015-16 capital spending plan totaled $68.7 million. Key Findings • During our audit period, NFTA prepared multi-year and annual capital spending plans as required by the Public Authorities Law. However, it could not demonstrate that these plans definitively addressed its highest priority capital needs. • Of NFTA’s 3,700 capital assets, 685 (19 percent) originally costing $184 million were not in a state of good repair, including: buses and light rail cars; light rail stations and bus shelters; NFTA’s radio and train control systems; its rail station escalators; and the light rail’s catenary system, which provides power for the trains through overhead wires. -
Niagara Gorge – Whirlpool, Smeaton, Queenston Sites - Lower Niagara River, Ontario
1.1.1 Important Amphibian and Reptile Areas Nomination Form NIAGARA GORGE – WHIRLPOOL, SMEATON, QUEENSTON SITES - LOWER NIAGARA RIVER, ONTARIO PART 1: Nomination Eligibility Criteria Nominations for an Important Amphibian and Reptile Areas Program (IMPARA) site must be made on this Nomination Form. Please read through the IMPARA site eligibility criteria below to ensure that your nomination complies. These criteria are intended to be the first step in a dialogue between the nominator and Canadian Herpetological Society (CHS). Your nomination may not be considered if you fail to comply with this checklist. IMPARA eligibility criteria: a. Site has species of conservation concern. b. Site has a high diversity of species. c. Site fulfills important life history function for gatherings of individuals or aggregations of species. 1.1 Species of Conservation Concern A site that that is nominated under this criterion must contain a significant number of individuals of a species that is of conservation concern. CHS uses the broad definition of a species used by COSEWIC, which defines species as, "Any indigenous species, subspecies, variety or geographically defined population of wild fauna and flora." Species of conservation concern are any species with the following designations: Globally designated as Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). See (http://www.iucnredlist.org/search) and enter species name. 1 Nationally designated as at-risk (Endangered, Threatened, and Species of Special Concern) by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) or the federal Species at Risk Public Registry (SARA). Provincially/territorially designated as at-risk by the provincial or territorial government or other designated group that assesses the status of species within a province, or a provincial/regional Conservation Data Centre.