Niagara Region Fallsview Boulevard & Clifton Hill
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York
Revised Stratigraphy and Correlations of the Niagaran Provincial Series (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York By Carlton E. Brett, Dorothy H. Tepper, William M. Goodman, Steven T. LoDuca, and Bea-Yeh Eckert U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2086 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of the University of Rochester UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1995 10 REVISED STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATIONS OF THE NIAGARAN PROVINCIAL SERIES been made in accordance with the NASC. Because the The history of nomenclature of what is now termed the NASC does not allow use of the "submember" category, Medina Group, beginning with Conrad ( 1837) and ending units that would be of this rank are treated as informal units with Bolton (1953), is presented in Fisher (1954); Bolton and have been given alphanumeric designations. Informal (1957, table 2) presents a detailed summary of this nomen- units are discussed under the appropriate "member" clature for 1910-53. A historical summary of nomenclature categories. of the Medina Group in the Niagara region is shown in fig- The use of quotes for stratigraphic nomenclature in this ure 7. Early investigators of the Medina include Conrad report is restricted to units that have been misidentified or (1837); Vanuxem (1840, first usage of Medina; 1842); Hall abandoned. If stratigraphic nomenclature for a unit has (1840, 1843); Gilbert (1899); Luther (1899); Fairchild changed over time, the term for the unit is shown, with cap- (1901); Grabau (1901, 1905, 1908, 1909, 1913); Kindle and italization, as given in whatever reference is cited rather Taylor (1913); Kindle (1914); Schuchert (1914); Chadwick than according to the most recent nomenclature. -
Official Road Map of Ontario
5 Kilometres 0 Miles 5 5 kilomètres 0 milles 5 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016 © Imprimeur de la Reine pour l’Ontario, 2016 18 FORT mn Niagara-On-The-Lake GEORGE D LAKE ONTARIO E R 87 OR SH hg (LAC ONTARIO) KE 93 LA hg55 Youngstown mn EAST & WEST LINE 2 87 1 18F Virgil hg D po ST F R NE RD NE ST. CATHARINES RD Y OUR RD E W LI N K W P A 3 RD E LINE R RT F N O 48 TOW o M N SH u IA W O KE I ION r L hg R T LA G S EL E SI LA S E S N A I L 83 86 V KE E AN I MA LINE 5 RD R C CES hg R C ST Dhg A ST N R 18 42 T M A O ON EE R C SCOT i C RD l mn A 51 38 hg AIRPORT RD C e LTON ST R 47 K 46 G CAR A IV O hg N A QEW I OO A M O N 44 L E A N E BROCK'S MONUMENT 104 R T AV S 55 Lewiston 49 48 C R dc T A O r po e RD I 12 7 RD CONC. N R hg O RD I D e O D N O 3RD AVE A LLA k S E Q L UE P E T W E NS KW Queenston 11 TO N ST Queenston-Lewiston Y St. -
Public Works 2002 Map.Cdr
Queen St. Youngstown Nassau St. Rd. Front St. Lakeshore King St. 89 Niven Mary MississaugaSt. John St. E. QEW 87 Rd. Mile Ck. Hunter Rd. Niagara Hamilton St. Four 55 Pkwy. East & West Line ses Lake Ontario o 93 Four Port M Weller Line 1 Fifty Point Lambert Rd. bert o Cons. Area R shore Rd. Virgil River . Lake Mile Creek Line 2 78 Church Rd. Bradfield Rd. Concession 6 Rd. QEW Pkwy Townline Rd. Concession 3 Rd. Concession 4 Rd. 87 Irvine Rd. Stoney Creek 39 Rd. 18F Read Rd. Line 3 74 Niagara 18 86 McNab Rd. Rd. Line 3 Lakeshore 40 N. Service Rd. 48 55 Railroad St. St. Progressive Ave. Kelson Ave. Line 4 Port Dalhousie Scott 83 Rd 71 Lakeshore Rd. Carlton Rd. TOWN OF Larkin Rd. 512 Lake St. Concession 2 Rd. Lakeport aks d. Blvd. Livingston Ave. Sandy Cove Dr. R O 10 Main St. 88 Casablanca 100 Line 5 Rd. Linwell Vine St. Niagara Dist. 68 Niagara 64 Prudhommes Henley Airport 39 North Service Rd. Regatta Niagara Stone Rd. Main St. Bunting Rd. 81 57 Landing 87 NIAGARA-ON-THE-LAKE Line 6 Main St. Course d. Jordan Scott St. Four Mile Ck.Line Rd. 6 R Ridge Geneva St. Rd. 40 Grantham Ave. Bartlet Ave. 14 Harbour Lakeshore Rd. Martindale Rd. Beamer Memorial South Service Rd. Niagara St. d. R Conservation Area Rd. 50 Pond 47 Line 7 Stewart Rd. Durham Green 55 Hysert First Ave. 49 Lane Ave. 46 Fifty Green Alway Rd. Bowslaugh Rd. d. 104 Lane R Carlton St. -
3591 Foreign Investment Map 17X11 PRINT
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN NIAGARA Fort Erie France Germany Japan Switzerland United States Grimsby Italy Japan United States Lake Ontario Lincoln France Germany Italy Netherlands Switzerland United States Niagara Niagara Falls City of Hamilton St. Catharines -on-the-Lake Austria France Germany Sweden Taiwan United Kingdom United States QEW Niagara-on-the-Lake Grimsby China Italy Japan Netherlands United States Lincoln Pelham France Port Colborne 20 Canal Brazil Switzerland United States 58 St. Catharines Welland Welland Thorold Denmark Finland Germany Italy Japan Luxembourg Mexico United Kingdom United States Thorold West Lincoln 406 Pelham Niagara Falls Brazil United Kingdom United States Welland 20 France Germany Italy Switzerland United Kingdom United States West Lincoln Welland QEW United States Haldimand County Waineet Fort Erie United States Canal Port Colborne Welland Welland 3 3 0 5 10 KM DISCLAIMER: This map is not representative of all foreign direct investment in Niagara. The companies included are those that responded to the foreign ownership section of Lake Erie the Niagara Employment Inventory survey. FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN NIAGARA AUSTRIA JAPAN UNITED STATES continued... Palfinger North America Niagara Falls Construction & industrial CimCorp North America Grimsby Material handling equipment Boreal Science St Catharines Industrial equipment supply machinery Durez Canada Company Ltd. Fort Erie Plastic products Brunner Manufacturing and Sales Niagara Falls Automotive parts BELGIUM Kintetsu World Express Inc. Fort Erie Customs and logistics Cappco Tubular Products West Lincoln Pipe and tubing supply Mitsubishi Power Systems Canada NOTL Industrial equipment supply CHA Canada St Catharines Engineering services Cytec Solvay Group Niagara Falls Sustainable chemistry Niagara Investment Castings St Catharines Metal foundry Cla Val Canada Corp. -
NIAGARA HARDWARE & LUMBER ] [ C~1~~Rca~R~!M.~1~1~ ~1~~~,1.~~D
l"OT1T EH.IE - When Fort Ho11e\e1 he rlid ~ay that. "HI 1':nc's ,\I .Jolson" wants to s111g each and e1·ery one of us si n::i~ I ;i solo nnd I\ hen a scll-oul cro11r!I more of the songs that arc 111 e1µptaucls wildly and .croons ak.1g nu1 hearts. there 11 ou ld b ~ fewe1 \ with enlhus1asm, one 1\ould have Itears tomorrow". _ to conrlucle Sat urclav's " Parade of Harmony" \1 ill be a terrific LADY QUARTETS ll e1ddilion lo the border toll'n·s I Described as the "greatest ro~ler of annual e1 cnt~ I border incident e1 er", the show '1 fealu1:ed lady barbershoppers. The local chapter of the Society the first any11 here, from both for the T'rcservat ion and J<.:n Isides of the inlernational boun couragcment of Barber Shop ' dary The Lake Ene Dearies and Quartet Singin~ in Amt>rica put the Buffalo-Fort Erie Sll'ect Ade this one on . I[ il docs not be line Chorus upstaged their hus· <'OmE' an annual evrnt. all sorts bands with such tunes as "\'es of people will be '' disap. Sir, that's mv Bab\" and " Jn pom1cd. the Good Old. Sum~ertime". It 1\as unusual to sec Fort ~laster of Ceremonies Geor"e ]'.:ncans. noted by some for their Shields, oC Toronto, conductect"' a I conservatism, walk into the au sing song and after the first fell' ditoril::i1 of Fort Eric Sccondarv bars he could well har1> I a ken SchoDl an.d sci erat hours later o. -
Niagara Agricultural Profile
NIAGARA AGRICULTURE PROFILE INTRODUCTION Agriculture is a very important sector in Niagara both culturally and economically. Niagara has long been known as an agricultural powerhouse in Ontario, specifically for tender fruit and floriculture production. In recent years, the region continues to diversify and produce higher value agricultural outputs. As of 2016, Niagara was home to 1,827 farms covering 218,251 acres of farmland. Although from 2011 to 2016 the number of farms and farmland area decreased, average farms in Niagara increased in size to produce higher value farm products while continuing to diversify and access new market opportunities. During this same time period, the average farm size in Niagara increased by 7.2% from 111 acres to 119 acres, while gross farm receipt value per acre increased by 17.9% from $3,256 to $3,850. Niagara’s agricultural sector also represents a major portion of the value of gross farm receipts in the Golden Horseshoe region of southern Ontario and is becoming increasingly more significant. In 2016, gross farm receipts in Niagara totaled $838.1 million, which was a 15.5% increase over 2011. This represents 42.8% of the gross farm receipts in the Golden Horseshoe region. Niagara farms area also investing more in farm capital, which includes land, buildings, animals, equipment, machinery and technology. In 2016, average farm capital was $2,133,650, which was a 48.9% increase, or $700,863 more than 2011. Although the agricultural sector in Niagara is showing significant economic gains, there are some major challenges on the horizon. As of 2016, the average age of a farm operator in Niagara was 56 years and has been increasing consistently. -
The Lake Report Resorts Corporation Which Marotta Also Owns
Lakereport.ca / Niagaranow.com Time to Hyper-local news for Niagara-on-the-Lake get peachy The Page 9 Vol. 2,Lake Issue 30 Niagara-on-the-Lake’s Report most respected newspaper August 1, 2019 Marotta not giving up on Randwood development Dariya Baiguzhiyeva applicant was Two Sisters The Lake Report Resorts Corporation which Marotta also owns. Developer Benny Marotta “Mr. Marotta and his may have given up on one legal team determined that of his legal battles with the withdrawing the appeal was Town of Niagara-on-the- the most cost-efficient and Lake, but he hasn’t given fair process for resolving up on plans to develop the this case,” Gabrielle Totesau historic Randwood Estate. said in an email response to Marotta, who wants to The Lake Report. build a multi-storey hotel “In terms of next steps, and a residential subdivision Mr. Marotta and his legal on the old Randwood prop- team are focused on con- erty, last week withdrew his tinuing their efforts to work zoning appeal to the Local with the town and SORE to The Randwood Estate. DARIYA BAIGUZHIYEVA Planning Appeal Tribunal. find a solution that works However, a spokesper- for everyone.” Street East. for its legal costs. determine otherwise.” ness as SORE believes there son for Marotta’s com- Marotta’s proposal was Lyle Hall, a spokesperson “Even if he was to come Hall suggested the town are a number of “serious pany, Solmar Development met with a strong opposi- for SORE, said the group back under a new process should send Marotta’s deficiencies” with the ap- Corp. -
The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae
The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae March 2011 Niagara River RAP Welland River Eutrophication Study Technical Working Group The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae March 2011 Written by: Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority On behalf of: Welland River Eutrophication Technical Working Group The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae Written By: Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority On Behalf: Welland River Eutrophication Technical Working Group Niagara River Remedial Action Plan For more information contact: Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Valerie Cromie, Coordinator Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 905-788-3135 [email protected] The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern Welland River Eutrophication Study Technical Working Group Ilze Andzans Region Municipality of Niagara Valerie Cromie Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Sarah Day Ontario Ministry of the Environment Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Martha Guy Environment Canada Veronique Hiriart-Baer Environment Canada Tanya Labencki Ontario Ministry of the Environment Dan McDonell Environment -
Parking Bylaw Frustrates Niagara on the Green Resident
Lakereport.ca / Niagaranow.com The Hyper-local news for Niagara-on-the-Lake Lake Report Asparagus rush! | Page 14 Vol. 4, Issue 18 SPECIAL EDITION: Pandemic Heroes | Page 15 May 6, 2021 Marotta unveils 191-home subdivision plan for Rand Estate Richard Harley His company, Solmar (Ni- proposal, noting there are the number of homes is plan, saying it is “complete- covered with houses.” The Lake Report agara 2) Inc., wants to build no townhouses included appropriate. ly inappropriate.” SORE considers the 191 units on the 26-acre in his draft plan. A resident group that’s Lyle Hall, a spokesperson Rand Estate to be “the most Developer Benny Marotta property, comprising 125 Compared to some been vocal in opposing for the group, called it a important heritage estate has submitted new plans for single-family dwellings and other developments in town, Marotta’s plans for the Rand “high-density development property in NOTL,” he said his controversial develop- 66 semi-detached homes. notably one on the main Estate at every step, Save that would leave almost ev- in response to questions ment project on the his- Marotta said he is hopeful entrance to Niagara-on- Our Rand Estate (SORE), ery square inch of the back toric Rand Estate. the town will agree to his the-Lake, he said he feels takes issue with the latest half of this iconic property Continued on Page 7 ‘Idiotic’ parking bylaw frustrates Niagara on the Green resident AstraZeneca vaccine. FILE/JESSICA MAXWELL Pharmacies run out of vaccine, with no promise of more to come Kevin MacLean macy in Old Town delivered The Lake Report its final shots on Monday. -
NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE
NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE Gerard V. Middleton, Nick Eyles, Nina Chapple, and Robert Watson American Geophysical Union and Geological Association of Canada Field Trip A3: Guidebook May 23, 2009 Cover: The Battle of Queenston Heights, 13 October, 1812 (Library and Archives Canada, C-000276). The cover engraving made in 1836, is based on a sketch by James Dennis (1796-1855) who was the senior British officer of the small force at Queenston when the Americans first landed. The war of 1812 between Great Britain and the United States offers several examples of the effects of geology and landscape on military strategy in Southern Ontario. In short, Canada’s survival hinged on keeping high ground in the face of invading American forces. The mouth of the Niagara Gorge was of strategic value during the war to both the British and Americans as it was the start of overland portages from the Niagara River southwards around Niagara Falls to Lake Erie. Whoever controlled this part of the Niagara River could dictate events along the entire Niagara Peninsula. With Britain distracted by the war against Napoleon in Europe, the Americans thought they could take Canada by a series of cross-border strikes aimed at Montreal, Kingston and the Niagara River. At Queenston Heights, the Niagara Escarpment is about 100 m high and looks north over the flat floor of glacial Lake Iroquois. To the east it commands a fine view over the Niagara Gorge and river. Queenston is a small community perched just below the crest of the escarpment on a small bench created by the outcrop of the Whirlpool Sandstone. -
3. Heritage Impact Assessment
HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT LAURA SECORD SCHOOL, 5 Walnut Street, Queenston Village Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake, Regional Municipality of Niagara FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 1, 2016 Megan Hobson, M.A., Dipl. Heritage Conservation Laura Secord School_Queenston Village_FINAL HIA_MHobson_01 Feb 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page no/ 1.0 BACKGROUND & METHODOLOGY 3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION (SEE APENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS) 4 3.0 HISTORY OF THE SITE 6 3.1 QUEENSTON VILLAGE 6 3.2 LAURA SECORD SCHOOL 8 4.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUES 10 4.1 QUEENSTON VILLAGE 10 4.1.1 BUILT HERITAGE 10 4.2 LAURA SECORD SCHOOL 12 4.2.1 BUILT HERITAGE 12 4.2.2 ARCHEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL 13 5.0 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE (SEE APPENDIX B: BY-LAW 4373-10 Schedule B) 14 6.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (SEE APPENDIX C: ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) 15 6.1 RATIONALE & PURPOSE 20 6.2 PLANNING CONTEXT 20 6.2.1 OFFICIAL PLAN 21 6.2.2 QUEENSTON VILLAGE SECONDARY PLAN 22 6.2.2.1 SPECIAL POLICY AREA (SPA-2) 22 6.2.2.2 SITE SPECIFIC POLICIES 23 7.0 IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES 25 7.1 QUEENSTON VILLAGE 25 7.2 LAURA SECORD SCHOOL 26 8.0 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS 27 9.0 SUMMARY STATEMENT & CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS 29 10.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 11.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE AUTHOR 31 12.0 APPENDICES 12.1 APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS 12.2 APPENDIX B: ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS Laura Secord School_Queenston Village_FINAL HIA_MHobson_01 Feb 2016 2 1.0 BACKGROUND & METHODOLOGY This report was prepared by heritage consultant Megan Hobson for the Willowbank School as a requirement for obtaining planning approval for a development proposal in the Village of Queenston. -
Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment: Smithville Northwest Subdivision Development
Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment: Smithville Northwest Subdivision Development Lot 10, Concession 9 Geographic Township of South Grimsby, now Township of West Lincoln Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario Prepared for: Quentin Developments Inc. and Dunloe Developments Inc. 1858 Avenue Road, Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5M 3Z5 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 200-835 Paramount Drive Stoney Creek, ON L8J 0B4 Tel: (905) 385-3234 Licensee: Patrick Hoskins, MA License Number: P415 PIF Number: P415-0080-2016 Project Number: 160940347 ORIGINAL REPORT April 19, 2016 STAGE 1-2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: SMITHVILLE NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. I PROJECT PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................. II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... II 1.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................... 1.1 1.1 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 1.1 1.1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................... 1.1 1.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT .....................................................................................................