Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GOALS for CANON ENVIROTHON CURRICULUM to Develop A
GOALS FOR CANON ENVIROTHON CURRICULUM To develop a teacher friendly, hands on natural resources curriculum. To provide activities and lessons for teams new to the Envirothon, while challenging experienced teams. Use of these curriculum materials will result in: . •Increased Envirothon participation at the local, regional, and State/Provincial levels. •Increased team scores at the Canon Envirothon Contest in the four natural resource categories: soils and land use, aquatic ecology, forestry, and wildlife. Canon Envirothon SOILS/LAND USE CORE ACTIVITY OUTLINE The key points for each Envirothon topic are “fleshed out” into core activities. • Each of the key points is included in one or more of the core activities. • Each core activity contains extended activities, as well as the top resources and professional contacts. Key vocabulary words are also included. • The National Science Standards suggest evaluations for each activity should encourage the students to process the data they collect during the activity, and provide solutions based on the data. This ties each activity into the issues portion of the contest. • Evaluation is based on the information provided for each core activity and from the data students collect. This allows students to make educated decisions and create solutions for the key issues. • Core activities will be evaluated using a performance based assessment. Soils/Land Use Curriculum Soils/Land Use Envirothon Key Points 1S Recognize soil as an important and dynamic resource. 2S Recognize and understand the features of a soil profile. 3S Describe basic soil properties and soil formation factors. 4S Understand the origin of soil parent materials. 5S Identify soil constituents (clay, organic matter, sand and silt). -
Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Elk (Cervus Elaphus) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Elk (Cervus elaphus) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park Environmental Assessment Executive Summary ________________________________________________________________________ Elk Status and Management in Great Smoky Mountains National Park SUMMARY Elk were extirpated from the southern Appalachians in the early 1800’s pre- dating Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM, Park) establishment in 1934. In 1991, Park management took steps to initiate a habitat feasibility study to determine whether elk could survive in GRSM. The feasibility study concluded that there seemed to be adequate resources required by elk in and around GRSM, but many questions remained and could be answered only by reintroducing a small population of elk in the southern Appalachians and studying the results. An experimental release of elk was initiated in 2001 to assess the feasibility of population reestablishment in GRSM. Research efforts from 2001 to 2008 demonstrated that the current elk population had limited impact on the vegetation in GRSM, the demographic data collected supported that the population was currently sustainable, and human-elk conflicts were minimal. Estimated long-term growth rates and simulations maintained a positive growth rate in 100% of trials and produced an average annual growth rate of 1.070. This outcome indicates a sustainable elk population has been established in the Park, and has resulted in the need to develop long-term management plans for this population. Four alternatives are proposed: a No Action Alternative where the current elk management would continue based on short-term research objectives of the experimental release; an Adaptive Management Alternative where elk (the Preferred and Environmentally Preferred Alternative) are managed as a permanent resource in GRSM; an alternative with extremely limited management of elk; and an alternative implementing complete elk removal. -
Non-Point Source (NPS) Pollution and Low Impact Development (LID)
Envirothon Study Guide Non-point source (NPS) Pollution and Low Impact Development 201(LID)2 1 This Study GuideEnvirothon is to be Study used Guide to help - Forestry Envirothon teams prepare for the Ontario Envirothon Program. 2012 Ontario Envirothon Preface This report was written by Nousheen Ahmed, Stephen Jeschke, Clarissa Jewell and Tyler Miller in partial fulfillment of the Credit for Product II course in the third year of the Ecosystem Management Technology Program 2011 at Sir Sandford Fleming College. This study guide was written for Kristina Quinlan of the Ontario Forestry Association. This study guide focuses on nonpoint source pollution and low impact development, and ties these two issues to the core topics of aquatics, forests, soils and wildlife. The guide contains background information on these topics in addition to case studies, activities, references and a glossary. Also included in this package are informational videos designed to teach students about water quality issues and learn about different monitoring and identifying that can be used in the field. The objective of this study guide is to provide Ontario Envirothon participants with information on the 2012 topic “Nonpoint Source Pollution and Low Impact Development”. Activities, case studies and sample questions are highlighted throughout the study guide to ensure a comprehensive understanding of nonpoint source pollution and low impact development issues. We would like to thank our faculty advisor, Sara Kelly, for her guidance and input throughout the course of this project. We would also like to thank Kristina Quinlan for her support as a mentor in creating this guide. We sincerely hope that this study guide will be of value to Ontario Envirothon students in the future. -
Florida Envirothon Study Packet Aquatic Section
Florida Envirothon Study Packet Aquatic Section Contents CONTENTS WATER CYCLE FACTS .............................................................................................................. 1 The Hydrologic Cycle......................................................................................................... 1 AQUIFER FACTS......................................................................................................................... 5 Classification ........................................................................................................................ 5 Recharge .............................................................................................................................. 5 Shallow Aquifer................................................................................................................... 6 Deep Aquifer........................................................................................................................ 6 Major Florida Aquifers ....................................................................................................... 7 Human Impacts ................................................................................................................... 8 Management Techniques ................................................................................................... 9 RIVER SYSTEM FACTS ............................................................................................................ 11 River Features ................................................................................................................... -
Interim Strategic Management Plan for Elk, 2016-2019
INTERIM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK INTERIM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK Strategic Management Plan for Elk Project Team Executive Sponsor Paul Telander Managing Sponsor Leslie McInenly Project Manager John Williams Process and Facilitation Team Greg Nelson, Blane Klemek, Ruth Anne Franke, Joel Huener, Graham Parson, Kyle Arola, Kristi Coughlon, Rita Albrecht The MN DNR received input and advice from citizen volunteers from across the region and state. Two work groups representing the Grygla area and Kittson County met during 2014 to review the 2009 plan and make recommendations for the 2016 plan. The MN DNR would like to thank and recognize these volunteers for their contributions of ideas and time to complete the plan. Grygla Work Group Kittson Work Group Jacob Boyd Robert Albrecht Ronald Engelstad Paul Blomquist James Gladen Carl Christopherson Bryan Grove Jon Eerkes Gary Huschle Casey Faken Jay Huseby Erik Finney Mark Johnson John Hart Gary Kiesow Kenneth Hultgren Darwin Klamar Brad Kulyk Pat McMullen Mark Larson Gavin Nordby Mike Larson Jamie Omdahl Roland (Doc) Larter Gary Satre Pat McMullen Brian Stanley Tom Miesner James Younggren Leon Olson Kim Murphy Cody Schmalz Donnie Schmiedeberg Ex-Officio Kelly Turgeon Howard Person (U of M Extension) Joseph (Joe) Wilebski Ex-Officio Nathan Johnson (U of M Extension) Copies of this plan may be obtained at: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4040 651-296-6157, 1-888-MINNDNR (1-888-646-6367) i INTERIM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK www.dnr.state.mn.us August 3, 2017 Notice is hereby given that the Interim Elk Management Plan for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has been completed and is now adopted. -
Annual Report 2018 He Finest Way to Measure What the Rocky Mountain Elk Landowners and Partners to the Table
Annual Report 2018 he finest way to measure what the Rocky Mountain Elk landowners and partners to the table. That’s exactly the case TFoundation has accomplished is through the soles of your there along McKay Creek where the goal is to greatly improve PRESIDENT’S boots, the chirps of cows and calves as they filter through aspens, the health of 45,000 acres throughout the watershed. And this & CHAIRMAN’S the smell of rain on sage, that first flash of ivory tines through is the kind of work RMEF helped accomplish in 2018 on almost MESSAGE black timber. Those are the moments that stay with us, and RMEF 135,000 acres across 27 of the 28 states that are home to wild elk. delivered them all across America in 2018. RMEF also sustained its long history of seeking answers Last year we forever protected more than 13,000 acres of to the crucial questions shaping North America’s wildlife and the most vital elk country in eight states. That included two wild lands. We invested more than $700,000 in 2018 to help fund families who fled Texas heat and Big Apple hustle and found 39 research studies in 14 states, working to find lasting solutions an overlooked stretch of Colorado. Neighbors and friends now, to chronic wasting disease, document crucial elk migration their passion led them to ensure their home ground remains corridors and much more. magnificent, wild and whole by donating a pair of conservation People only spend their money to join or sustain their easements on more than 2,300 acres. -
Envirothon Brochure
“Our experience was Everyone Benefits from that the Canon Envirothon Participation Envirothon offered a unique opportunity for The Envirothon is more than a competition. individual students to bring their fundamental Together with teachers, schools and profession- knowledge and reason- als, we help develop knowledgeable citizens 2 3 5 ing ability together as a 1 4 team to focus on under- who can make informed decisions that affect the standing critical areas of quality of life in our communities. Ultimately, we our environment.” are creating new leaders who will provide the Dr. Lois Blondeau Arizona volunteer advisor vision for our future and well-being. Take Advantage of the Envirothon Today Soils and Land Use Aquatic Ecology Forestry Wildlife Environmental Issues Professional soil scientists Students work alongside Students develop an A favorite for many Challenged by field “I participated in the Both teachers and students enjoy the Envirothon’s in-class help students learn about soil marine and freshwater understanding of the Envirothon participants, professionals, students work Envirothon for three learning that combines hands-on, outdoor activities. Student structure, interpret maps, and biologists to assess the practices for maintaining students learn firsthand from as a team to explore the years and it has been a teams are exposed to scientists and experts in the field who evaluate land forms, and soil quality of delicate aquatic healthy forest ecosystems wildlife experts about animal facets of the current wonderful experience. I coach and guide their learning experience. Teams then compete characteristics that affect ecosystems. They also learn to through the help of populations, their dynamics, environmental issues and have gained years of in local Envirothons and winners advance to state/provincial/ agricultural and development identify aquatic organisms, professional foresters. -
Watershed Ripples-Winter 2020
Watershed Ripples The title “Watershed Ripples” refers to the carbon footprint we leave behind, which impacts the future of our watershed. Every action has a reaction, or a ripple effect, which affects our natural resources. Winter Snow, Ice and Insects... One never knows if March will bring snow or rain to NE Ohio 2020 or a combination of both in a matter of minutes. However on the next warm up look at the base of the trees on top of the The mission of the crunchy-crystalized snow mounds. You might be fortunate Geauga Soil and Water enough to witness tiny specks bouncing around in a somewhat Conservation District disoriented manner. These tiny specks of early insects emerging is “To conserve, are springtails or often nicknamed snow fleas. Their bodies are protect, and enhance designed with a fluid which acts similar to ant-freeze and allows the natural resources of them to remain active throughout the cold. Did you know they Geauga County by are good litter bugs? These tiny little decomposers live in the topsoil and leaf litter while providing leadership, consuming; plants, bacteria and fungus. If you look closely they have the traits of an insect however some might be hairy and some have scales yet all are wingless. These curious education, and looking creatures have some pretty amazing adaptations. Located underneath on their assistance to all.” abdomen you will find a glue peg; which actually should be more aptly named a straw. This tube is used to siphon water during extreme dry spells from various sources. And how do they get their name springtails anyway? Also located underneath is a tenaculum; a tiny hook where the furcula or spring is secured. -
Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L
Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L. 2016 Work Plan Date of Report: May 29, 2016 Date of Next Status Update Report: Date of Work Plan Approval: Project Completion Date: 30 June 2019 Does this submission include an amendment request? __ PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Elk to Northeastern Minnesota Project Manager: James D Forester Organization: University of Minnesota Mailing Address: 2003 Upper Buford Cir., Suite 135 City/State/Zip Code: Saint Paul, MN 55108 Telephone Number: (612) 626‐6721 Email Address: [email protected] Web Address: foresterlab.cfans.umn.edu Location: Carlton, Pine, and St. Louis Counties Total ENRTF Project Budget: ENRTF Appropriation: $300,000 Amount Spent: $0 Balance: $300,000 Legal Citation: M.L. 2016, Chp. 186, Sec. 2, Subd. 03l Appropriation Language: $300,000 the second year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota in cooperation with the Fond du Lac Band and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation to determine the habitat suitability and levels of public support for restoring elk to northeastern Minnesota. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2019, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered. Page 1 of 12 05/29/2016 Subd. 03l - DRAFT I. PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Elk to Northeastern Minnesota II. PROJECT STATEMENT: Elk historically occupied most of Minnesota prior to the early 1900’s. Although two small populations were re‐ established in northwest MN, they are currently managed at low levels to reduce human‐wildlife conflict. Forested areas of the state, however, could avoid some of these conflicts and see significant ecological and economic benefits from returning elk to the landscape. -
Final Report
2016 Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2019 PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Elk to Northeastern Minnesota PROJECT MANAGER: James D. Forester AFFILIATION: University of Minnesota MAILING ADDRESS: 2003 Upper Buford Cir., Suite 135 CITY/STATE/ZIP: St. Paul/MN/55108 PHONE: (612) 626-6721 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: foresterlab.cfans.umn.edu FUNDING SOURCE: Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund LEGAL CITATION: M.L. 2016, Chp. 186, Sec. 2, Subd. 03l APPROPRIATION AMOUNT: $300,000 AMOUNT SPENT: $300,000 AMOUNT REMAINING: $ 300,000 Sound bite of Project Outcomes and Results This study examined the feasibility of restoring elk to northeastern Minnesota. It provides information for determining where elk restoration will be successful, should it occur. Results show that habitat suitability and landowner support are not limiting factors for restoring elk to northeastern Minnesota. Overall Project Outcome and Results Elk historically occupied most of Minnesota prior to the early 1900s, but now only 3 small groups occur in northwestern Minnesota. These groups are managed at low levels to reduce human-elk conflict. Forested areas of the state could avoid some conflict and see ecological and economic benefits from returning elk to the landscape. Evidence from other states indicates elk restoration can be successful, but success is dependent on forest management and public support for elk by local communities. This study examined the feasibility of restoring elk to 3 study areas in northeastern Minnesota. It provides information that will be useful for determining where elk restoration will be successful, should it occur, including information about social acceptance and habitat suitability. -
2020 Summer Newsletter
2020 Summer Newsletter Rainwater-Our Valuable Resource! Have you ever noticed the soothing feeling that you get when you look out the window at the rain and hear the the sound of the raindrops falling gently on the leaves? There is a current clip on TV that features rain falling on leaves with the words “do nothing for fifteen seconds” that produces the same effect. The calming effect of rainfall is just one small way that rainfall is valuable. Rainfall is also valuable as an important part of the hydrological cycle of the earth’s water and replenishes our surface and groundwaters. There are 326 million-trillion gallons of water on our planet. Less than 0.03 percent of that water is fresh water and two-thirds of that is tied up in ice and glaciers. This means that our freshwater resources are extremely limited and should be used wisely. We need to try and reduce our water footprint, which is the amount of fresh water used to produce or supply the goods and services we use. If you want to get an idea of what your water footprint is, read the article below and go to www.watercalculator.org and click on the water calculator. Not only do we need to conserve our use of freshwater but we also need to understand and respect rainwater in its role as stormwater and the devastating effects it can produce with flooding and the pollution it carries into our streams and rivers. Different regions receive varying amounts of rainfall annually. For instance, about 39.6 inches of rain fall on Akron yearly and it rains an average of 157.6 days in the City. -
Download (3MB)
MAGYAR NYELVŐR 142. ÉVF. * 2018. ÁPRILIS–JÚNIUS * 2. SZÁM Dayka Gábornak Aorthographia címet kapott, kéziratban fennmaradt magyar nyelvű, nyelvészeti jellegű írásáról 1. Bevezetés. A tervem az, hogy a nyelvtudomány-történet keretében bemutas- sam a mindössze huszonnyolc évet élt, sajátos hangú 18. századi költőnek, Dayka Gábornak a kéziratban fennmaradt nyelvtani, egyáltalán nyelvészeti irányultsá- gú munkáit. A sorrendet illetően a Dayka-kutatáshoz alapot nyújtó Dayka Gábor Összes Művei című kötetet követem (az adatait l. DGÖM). Ez a kötet egyébként tartalmazza Dayka Gábornak – költői és prózai alkotásain kívül – a következő nyelvtani, nyelvészeti jellegű írásait: „Grammatikák és grammatikai jegyzetek: 1. Magyar nyelvű grammatikai tárgyú írások: a) Aorthographia és b) Grammati- kai feljegyzések. – 2. Proludium in Institutiones Linguae Hungaricae. – 3. Ternio Grammaticae Hungaricae 1794” (DGÖM 7). Meg kell jegyeznem, hogy bár e munkáknak se a pontos keletkezési idejét, se egymás utáni következésük sor- rendjét nem lehetett bizonyítottan megállapítani, a DGÖM-ben alkalmazott és idézett sorrend látszik logikusnak és követendőnek. A kötet tartalmazza az ere- deti szövegeken kívül – ha idegen nyelvűek – azok fordítását is, továbbá minden szöveg után a széles körű rálátással megírt jegyzeteket, amelyek megemlékeztek a kéziratról, az illető szöveg megjelenéséről, valamint közölnek szövegkritikát, és „Magyarázatok” címen tárgyalják az illető mű keletkezés- és fogadástörténetét, valamint közölnek számos fogalmat, jelenséget megvilágító megjegyzést. Egyéb- ként a filológusi feldolgozást a lehetséges teljességre, a rendszerességre, a minden lényeges kérdésnek az utánajárására, a logikus felépítésre, a pontosságra, valamint a világos megfogalmazásra való törekvés jellemzi (l. részletesen: DGÖM 64–9). Elöljáróban még szólok több éve tartó Dayka-kutatásaim első eredményé- ről, a Mi vitte Dayka Gábort, a költőt a nyelvtanírás, egyáltalán a nyelvtudomány felé? című tanulmányról (Szathmári 2016).