Mandara+ Bibliography
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Central Chadic Reconstructions
Central Chadic Reconstructions Richard Gravina 2014 © 2014 Richard Gravina Foreword This document is a presentation of a reconstruction of the Proto-Central Chadic lexicon, along with full supporting data. These reconstructions are presented in conjunction with my PhD dissertation on the reconstruction of the phonology of Proto-Central Chadic (University of Leiden). You can view the data at http://centralchadic.webonary.org, and also view a summary dictionary of Proto- Central Chadic at http://protocentralchadic.webonary.org. The Central Chadic languages are spoken in north-east Nigeria, northern Cameroon, and western Chad. The Ethnologue lists 79 Central Chadic languages. Data comes from 59 of these languages, along with a number of dialects. Classification The classification used here results from the identification of regular changes in the consonantal phonemes amongst groups of Central Chadic languages. Full evidence is given in the dissertation. The summary classification is as follows (dialects are in parentheses; languages not cited in the data are in italics): Bata group: Bachama, Bata, Fali, Gude, Gudu, Holma, Jimi, Ngwaba, Nzanyi, Sharwa, Tsuvan, Zizilivakan Daba group: Buwal, Daba, Gavar, Mazagway, Mbudum, Mina Mafa group: Cuvok, Mafa, Mefele Tera group: Boga, Ga’anda, Hwana, Jara, Tera (Nyimatli) Sukur group: Sukur Hurza group: Mbuko, Vame Margi group: Bura, Cibak, Kilba, Kofa, Margi, Margi South, Nggwahyi, Putai Mandara group: Cineni, Dghwede, Glavda, Guduf, Gvoko, Mandara (Malgwa), Matal, Podoko Mofu group: Dugwor, Mada, -
Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates. -
An Atlas of Nigerian Languages
AN ATLAS OF NIGERIAN LANGUAGES 3rd. Edition Roger Blench Kay Williamson Educational Foundation 8, Guest Road, Cambridge CB1 2AL United Kingdom Voice/Answerphone 00-44-(0)1223-560687 Mobile 00-44-(0)7967-696804 E-mail [email protected] http://rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm Skype 2.0 identity: roger blench i Introduction The present electronic is a fully revised and amended edition of ‘An Index of Nigerian Languages’ by David Crozier and Roger Blench (1992), which replaced Keir Hansford, John Bendor-Samuel and Ron Stanford (1976), a pioneering attempt to synthesize what was known at the time about the languages of Nigeria and their classification. Definition of a Language The preparation of a listing of Nigerian languages inevitably begs the question of the definition of a language. The terms 'language' and 'dialect' have rather different meanings in informal speech from the more rigorous definitions that must be attempted by linguists. Dialect, in particular, is a somewhat pejorative term suggesting it is merely a local variant of a 'central' language. In linguistic terms, however, dialect is merely a regional, social or occupational variant of another speech-form. There is no presupposition about its importance or otherwise. Because of these problems, the more neutral term 'lect' is coming into increasing use to describe any type of distinctive speech-form. However, the Index inevitably must have head entries and this involves selecting some terms from the thousands of names recorded and using them to cover a particular linguistic nucleus. In general, the choice of a particular lect name as a head-entry should ideally be made solely on linguistic grounds. -
The Evolution of Linguistic Diversity
The Evolution of Linguistic Diversity Daniel Nettle Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD University College London 1996 ProQuest Number: 10044366 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10044366 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the causes and consequences of diversity in human language. It is divided into three sections, each of which addresses a different aspect of the topic. The first section uses computer simulations to examine various mechanisms which may produce diversity in language: imperfect learning, geographical isolation, selection on the basis of social affiliation, and functional selection amongst linguistic variants. It is concluded that social and functional selection by speakers provide the main motive forces for the divergence of languages. The second section examines the factors influencing the geographical distribution of languages in the world. By far the most important is the ecological regime in which people live. Seasonal climates produce large ethnolinguistic groups because people form large networks of exchange to mitigate the subsistence risk to which they are exposed. -
Works of Russell G. Schuh
UCLA Works of Russell G. Schuh Title Schuhschrift: Papers in Honor of Russell Schuh Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7c42d7th ISBN 978-1-7338701-1-5 Publication Date 2019-09-05 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7c42d7th#supplemental Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Schuhschrift Margit Bowler, Philip T. Duncan, Travis Major, & Harold Torrence Schuhschrift Papers in Honor of Russell Schuh eScholarship Publishing, University of California Margit Bowler, Philip T. Duncan, Travis Major, & Harold Torrence (eds.). 2019. Schuhschrift: Papers in Honor of Russell Schuh. eScholarship Publishing. Copyright ©2019 the authors This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Interna- tional License. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. ISBN: 978-1-7338701-1-5 (Digital) 978-1-7338701-0-8 (Paperback) Cover design: Allegra Baxter Typesetting: Andrew McKenzie, Zhongshi Xu, Meng Yang, Z. L. Zhou, & the editors Fonts: Gill Sans, Cardo Typesetting software: LATEX Published in the United States by eScholarship Publishing, University of California Contents Preface ix Harold Torrence 1 Reason questions in Ewe 1 Leston Chandler Buell 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 A morphological asymmetry . 2 1.3 Direct insertion of núkàtà in the left periphery . 6 1.3.1 Negation . 8 1.3.2 VP nominalization fronting . 10 1.4 Higher than focus . 12 1.5 Conclusion . 13 2 A case for “slow linguistics” 15 Bernard Caron 2.1 Introduction . -
Encoding Topography and Direction in the Verbal Systems of Lamang and Hdi (Central Chadic)
14 ENCODING TOPOGRAPHY AND DIRECTION IN THE VERBAL SYSTEMS OF LAMANG AND HDI (CENTRAL CHADIC) H. Ekkehard Wolff 1. Introduction' In some Chadic languages of northeastern Nigeria and northern Cameroon, in what would appear to be a fairly restricted geographical area, we are likely to find the mapping of salient TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES of the habitat of the speakers into the grammar of their language. Speakers tend to explicitly and almost consistently indicate, by morphological and/or syntactic means, the DIRECTION of movement of action as either UPHILL or DOWNHILL or as on the SAME LEVEL OF ELEVATION. Also, they have a choice of looking at it from either the SOURCE/ORIGIN or the GOAL/TARGET of the movement, and this can also be encoded in the verb. Speakers of these languages also like to encode movement of the speaker or some protagonist TOWARDS a certain location (often called ALLATIVE), or movement FROM a certain deictic point of reference towards the speaker or protagonist (usually called VENTIVE), or movement away from the speaker or another point of deictic reference (ABLATIVE or EFFERENTIAL), distinct from other locative directional concepts such as movement into (ILLATIVE) and out of (ELATIVE). In such systems it could be expected that the speakers also have a choice to indicate that the deictic centre of the discourse has shifted to some location not identical with that of the speaker or some protagonist (a concept referred to as * Parts of this paper were presented at the 31 st Conference of the Berkeley Linguistic Society in February 2005 in the Special Session on Languages of West Africa in the presence of Russell G. -
Auxiliary Schedule 3 : Language
AUXILIARY SCHEDULE 3 : LANGUAGE (1) This separate schedule is an auxiliary to the enumerated classes 2/9, A/Z. The concepts in it are available only to qualify those classes, and their classmarks are not to be used on their own. (2) These classmarks may be added to any class where the instruction appears to add letters from Schedule 3; e.g. in Class J Education, JV is special categories of educands, and at JVG Language groups, Non-English (or favoured language) speaking appears the instruction: Add to JVG letters C/Z from Schedule 3; so Education of Bantus would be JVG HN. Or, in Schedule 2, BQ is Linguistic group areas, and BQH N would be Bantu-speaking areas. (3) A prominent use of the Schedule will be to specify translations, version, etc., of particular works in classes like Literature, Religion and Philosophy; e.g. PM6 Versions of the New Testament, has the instruction Add to PM6 letters C/Z from Schedule 3; so PM6 RF is Greek versions. (4) Where no such special provision is made, the language of a document can be specified by adding Schedule 3 notation to 2X from Schedule 1, e.g. Encyclopaedia of economics, in French T3A 2XV. (5) If a library wishes to give a preferred position with a short classmark to a particular language (e.g. that of the place where the library is situated) the letter F or Z may be used. (6) Any language may be qualified by the preceding arrays C/E by direct retroactive synthesis; e.g. -
Online Bibliography of Chadic and Hausa Linguistics
Online Bibliography of Chadic and Hausa Linguistics PAUL NEWMAN Online Bibliography of Chadic and Hausa Linguistics compiled by PAUL NEWMAN 1. INTRODUCTION The Online Bibliography of Chadic and Hausa Linguistics (OBCHL), henceforth the ‘biblio’, is an updated, expanded, and corrected edition of the bibliography published some fifteen years ago by Rüdiger Köppe Verlag (Newman 1996). That biblio was built on valuable earlier works including Hair (1967), Newman (1971), Baldi (1977), R. M. Newman (1979), Awde (1988), and Barreteau (1993). The ensuing years have witnessed an outpouring of new publications on Chadic and Hausa, written by scholars from around the globe, thereby creating the need for a new, up-to-date bibliography. Data gathered for this online edition, which was compiled using EndNote, an excellent and easy to use bibliographic database program, have come from my own library and internet searches as well as from a variety of published sources. Particularly valuable have been the reviews of the earlier bibliography, most notably the detailed review article by Baldi (1997), the Hausa and Chadic entries in the annual Bibliographie Linguistique, compiled over the past dozen years by Dr. Joe McIntyre, and the very useful list of publications found regularly in Méga-Tchad. The enormous capacity afforded by the internet to organize and update large-scale reference works such as bibliographies and dictionaries enables us to present this new online bibliography as a searchable, open access publication. This Version-02 is presented in PDF format only. A goal for the future is to make the biblio available in database format as well. 2. -
The Afroasiatic Languages
CAMBRIDGE LANGUAGE SURVEYS Generaleditors P. Austin (University ofMelbourne) THE AFROASIATIC J. Bresnan (Stanford University) B. Comrie (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig) LANGUAGES S. Crain (University of Maryland) W. Dressler (University of Vienna) C. J. E wen ( University of Leiden) R. Lass (University of Cape Town) D. Lightfoot ( University of Mary/and) K. Rice (Vniversity ofToronto) I. Roberts (University of Cambridge) Edited by S. Romaine (University of Oxford) N. V. Smith (Vniversity College, London) ZYGMUNT FRAJZYNGIER This series offers general accounts of the major language families of the ERIN SHAY world, with volumes organized either on a purely genetic basis or on a geographical basis, whichever yields the most convenient and intelligible grouping in each case. Each volume compares and contrasts the typological features of the languages it deals with. lt also treats the relevant genetic relationships, historical development, and sociolinguistic issues arising from their role and use in the world today. The books are intended for linguists from undergraduate level upwards, but no special knowledge of the languages under consideration is assumed. Volumes such as those on Australia and the Amazon Basin are also of wider relevance, as the future of the languages and their speakers raises important social and political issues. Volumes already published include Chinese Jerry Norman The Languages of Japan Masayoshi Shibatani Pidgins and Creoles (Volume I: Theory and Structure; Volume II: Reference Survey) John A. Holm The Indo-Aryan Languages Colin Masica The Celtic Languages edited by Donald MacAulay The Romance Languages Rebecca Posner The Amazonian Languages edited by R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. -
Kilba Morphological Processes: a Descriptive Analysis
Mohammed Aminu Muazu University of Maiduguri Kilba morphological processes: A descriptive analysis Abstract. This paper examines the morphological processes that occur in Kilba. Three major processes have been identified: affixation, reduplication and modification. Affixation includes prefixatin and suffixation, while reduplication and modification can be complete or partial. We account for this within the model of the approach of Matthews (1993) and Abubakar (2000). 1. Introduction Greenberg (1963) classifies Kilba in the Bura –Margi group of the Chadic family of the Afro- Asiatic pylum. It is spoken in the Hong local government area of Adamawa state in Northern Nigeria. Hong and Gaya. Agriculture, blacksmithing, weaving, are included in the economics activities of the people Muazu (1995). Hananiya (1993) and Muazu (1995) state that there are two dialects in the language, 2. Morphological processes in Kilba Matthews (1993) discusses morphological processes, identifying there basic types viz: affixation, reduplication, and modification. Affixation can include prefixation, infixation, or suffixation, while reduplication and modification are divided into complete and partial. A Bubakar (2000) agrees with Mathews (1993) about affixation and reduplication, but differs slightly on modification. According to Abubakar (2000), modification is the major morphological processes, but he does not subcategorize modification. Processes identified 2 include suppletion, vowel change, stress change, tone modification, subtraction, clipping, hypocorism, conversion, blend, and acronyms. 2.1.1. Prefixation in Kilba In this study, we discovered four prefixes, namely,: ndùr-, njìr-, mbòr-, and vìr-.The two prefixes, nd∂r- ‘one who’ and njir- ‘people of”, both have the idea of ‘doer of” when prefixed to a verb. ndùr- is neutral gender marking ‘singular’, while njìr is a neutral gender marking ‘plural’. -
Chadic Lexical Database Issue II
INSTITUTE FOR ORIENTAL STUDIES RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OLGA STOLBOVA Chadic Lexical Database Issue II lateral fricatives , ', with Semitic, Egyptian and South Cushitic parallels Polygrafiya Moscow, 2007 ББЛ 81.2 С81 Olga Stolbova Chadic Lexical Databa Issue II. , ', .. Калуга: ИП Кошелев А.Б., 2007.- 176с. ISBN 978-902948-19-3 Olga Stolbova, 2007 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Olga Stolbova Chadic Lexical Database Issue II. , ', . Подписано в печать 17.12.2007. Формат 60х84/16. Бумага офсетная. Печать трафаретная. усл. печ. л. 11. Тираж 200 экз. Заказ N 125. Отпечатано АП «Полиграфия», г. Калуга, ул. Тульская, 13а. Лиц.ПДЛ N 42-29 от 23.13.99 2 Институт востоковедения Российской Академии Наук О.В. Столбова Лексическая база данных по чадским языкам Выпуск II , ', , «Полиграфия» Москва-Калуга 2007 3 Contents Page -
Comparative Chadic : Phonology and Lexicon
COMPARATIVE CHADIC : PHONOLOGY AND LEXICON PAUL NEWMAN AND ROXANA MA HE AREA south of the Sahara, stretching across Northern Nigeria, the Northern TCameroons, and into the Chad Republic, is a region of unusual linguistic diversity.1 In addition to Kanuri, which belongs to the Nilo-Saharan family, and Fulani, the easternmost extension of the West Atlantic group of languages, this region contains an extremely large number of languages whose linguistic classification has not been settled. One of these, Hausa, a major world language spoken as a mother tongue or a second language by perhaps over twenty million people, has been the subject of study for the past 100 years. 2 Most of the others, all of which have considerably under 150,000 speakers, were known until recently only by means of short word lists collected by field workers whose training was below modern standards. In 1936, Lukas [18] attempted to bring order out of chaos by tentatively classifying some of the languages of this region. 3 He set up two distinct groups, a ' Chado-Hamitic' group to which he assigned Hausa, Bolewa, Kotoko, Mubi, and other languages generally characterized by the presence of grammatical gender, and a ' Mandara ' group, comprised of Wandala (Mandara), Margi, and other languages of the Nigeria-Cameroons border area, languages not having grammatical gender. Some languages were incorrectly classified because of the inordinate importance ascribed to certain typological features (notably grammatical gender), but on the whole, Lukas presented a reliable, conservative classification based on considerations of phonology and vocabulary as well as of grammar. Writing in 1952 for the Handbook of African Languages [29], Lukas4 reasserted the basic division between the ' Chado-Hamitic ' and ' Mandara ' languages, although he greatly expanded the list of languages under each group.