DOCSLIB.ORG

Examining the Risk of Disease Transmission Between Wild Dall's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examining the Risk of Disease Transmission Between Wild Dall's University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Wildlife Disease and Zoonotics Disease 8-20-2005 Examining the Risk of Disease Transmission between Wild Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats, and Introduced Domestic Sheep, Goats, and Llamas in the Northwest Territories Elena Garde University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK Susan Kutz University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK Helen Schwantje Wildlife Veterinarian, Biodiversity Branch, Ministry of Environment, Victoria, BC Alasdair Veitch Wildlife Management, Environment and Natural Resources, Sahtu Region, Norman Wells, NT Emily Jenkins Wildlife Disease Specialist / Research Scientist, Canadian Wildlife Service, Saskatoon, SK See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zoonoticspub Part of the Veterinary Infectious Diseases Commons Garde, Elena; Kutz, Susan; Schwantje, Helen; Veitch, Alasdair; Jenkins, Emily; and Elkin, Brett, "Examining the Risk of Disease Transmission between Wild Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats, and Introduced Domestic Sheep, Goats, and Llamas in the Northwest Territories" (2005). Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Disease. Paper 29. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zoonoticspub/29 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Disease and Zoonotics at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Disease by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Elena Garde, Susan Kutz, Helen Schwantje, Alasdair Veitch, Emily Jenkins, and Brett Elkin This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zoonoticspub/29 Examining the Risk of Disease Transmission between Wild Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats, and Introduced Domestic Sheep, Goats, and Llamas in the Northwest Territories Prepared for: The Northwest Territories Agricultural Policy Framework and Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories, Canada August 20, 2005 Examining the Risk of Disease Transmission between Wild Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats, and Introduced Domestic Sheep, Goats, and Llamas in the Northwest Territories Elena Garde 1,2 , Susan Kutz 1,3 , Helen Schwantje 4, Alasdair Veitch 5, Emily Jenkins 1,6 , Brett Elkin 7 1 Research Group for Arctic Parasitology and the Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4. 2 Associate Wildlife Veterinarian, Biodiversity Branch, Ministry of Environment, PO Box 9338, Stn Prov Govt, 2975 Jutland Road, Victoria, BC, V8W 9M1, (250) 953-4285 [email protected] 3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary AB, T2N 4N1 Ph: (306) 229-6110 4 Wildlife Veterinarian, Biodiversity Branch, Ministry of Environment, PO Box 9338, Stn Prov Govt, 2975 Jutland Road, Victoria, BC, V8W 9M1, (250) 953-4285 [email protected] 5 Supervisor, Wildlife Management, Environment and Natural Resources, Sahtu Region, P.O. Box 130, Norman Wells, NT X0E 0V0, Ph: (867) 587-2786; Fax: (867) 587-2359 [email protected] 6 Wildlife Disease Specialist / Research Scientist, Canadian Wildlife Service, 115 Perimeter Rd. Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X4 (306) 975-5357, (306) 966-7246 7 Disease & Contaminants Specialist, Environment and Natural Resources, 500 – 6102 50 th Ave. Yellowknife, NT X1A 3S8. Ph: (867) 873-7761; Fax: (867) 873-0293 [email protected] This project was funded by: Northwest Territories Agricultural Policy Framework, Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories and Western Northwest Territories Biophysical Study Climate Change Action Fund, Natural Resources Canada Cumulative Impacts Monitoring Program, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Cover photo by Environment and Natural Resources, Sahtu Region, GNWT i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF RISK ASSESSMENT FOR INTRODUCTION OF DOMESTIC SHEEP, GOATS OR LLAMAS INTO NORTHWEST TERRITORIES ............................................................................................................................. 7 Objective ............................................................................................................................7 Background........................................................................................................................8 Methods............................................................................................................................ 13 Disclaimers....................................................................................................................... 15 SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF PATHOGENS OF HIGHEST CONCERN.. 17 Description ....................................................................................................................17 Bacteria: ........................................................................................................................... 17 Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) ..........................................17 Mycoplasma conjunctivae and M. ovipneumoniae ....................................................... 20 Pasteurella spp. and Mannheimia haemolytica ............................................................24 Viruses:............................................................................................................................. 32 Contagious Ecthyma .....................................................................................................32 Parainfluenza 3..............................................................................................................35 Parasites ........................................................................................................................... 37 Helminths ......................................................................................................................37 Muellerius capillaris .....................................................................................................37 Ectoparasites..................................................................................................................39 Oestrus ovis ...................................................................................................................39 SECTION 3. IDENTIFICATION OF PATHOGENS WITH UNKNOWN CONSEQUENCES............................................................................................. 41 Description ....................................................................................................................41 Bacteria ............................................................................................................................ 41 Chlamydophila spp........................................................................................................ 41 Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis ...........................................................................44 Coxiella burnetti (Q-fever)............................................................................................45 ii Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae .........................................................................................46 Mycoplasma arginini and Mycoplasma mycoides ........................................................ 48 Viruses.............................................................................................................................. 51 Adenovirus ....................................................................................................................51 Border Disease Virus and Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus...............................................52 Corona Virus .................................................................................................................54 Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease and Bluetongue Viruses.............................................55 Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis.................................................................................57 Respiratory Syncytial Virus ..........................................................................................59 Parasites ........................................................................................................................... 61 Helminths ......................................................................................................................61 Parelaphostrongylus odocoilei .....................................................................................61 Gastrointestinal Trichostrongylids ................................................................................62 Haemonchus spp. ..............................................................................................63 Marshallagia sp .................................................................................................65 Nematodirus spp................................................................................................67 Teladorsagia spp ...............................................................................................68
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout Has in THIS ISSUE Dbeen Awarded the President’S Cup Letter from the President
    DSC NEWSLETTER VOLUME 32,Camp ISSUE 5 TalkJUNE 2019 Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout has IN THIS ISSUE Dbeen awarded the President’s Cup Letter from the President .....................1 for her pending world record East African DSC Foundation .....................................2 Defassa Waterbuck. Awards Night Results ...........................4 DSC’s April Monthly Meeting brings Industry News ........................................8 members together to celebrate the annual Chapter News .........................................9 Trophy and Photo Award presentation. Capstick Award ....................................10 This year, there were over 150 entries for Dove Hunt ..............................................12 the Trophy Awards, spanning 22 countries Obituary ..................................................14 and almost 100 different species. Membership Drive ...............................14 As photos of all the entries played Kid Fish ....................................................16 during cocktail hour, the room was Wine Pairing Dinner ............................16 abuzz with stories of all the incredible Traveler’s Advisory ..............................17 adventures experienced – ibex in Spain, Hotel Block for Heritage ....................19 scenic helicopter rides over the Northwest Big Bore Shoot .....................................20 Territories, puku in Zambia. CIC International Conference ..........22 In determining the winners, the judges DSC Publications Update
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Morgan Creek and East Fork of the Salmon River Bighorn Sheep Herds and Management of Bighorn Sheep in Idaho
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1971 Ecology of the Morgan Creek and East Fork of the Salmon River Bighorn Sheep Herds and Management of Bighorn Sheep in Idaho James K. Morgan Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Other Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Morgan, James K., "Ecology of the Morgan Creek and East Fork of the Salmon River Bighorn Sheep Herds and Management of Bighorn Sheep in Idaho" (1971). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1593. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1593 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Frontispiece Adult ewe, lamb, and adult ram ECOLOGY Of THE MORGAN CREEK AND EAST FORK OF · T~ SALMON Rl VER . BIGHORN SHEEP HERDS AND MANAGEMENT OFBIGHQRN SHEEP IN IDAHO by James K. Morgan A thesis submitted in partial fulfi Ilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Wi I d I i fa B i 0 logy App rov..ed: ~~jo7 Professor' Coi{m 11teec Memt5'#"r Gomm i ttee Merrfber . DeW &r Graduate Stud i es UTAH STATE UNIV~RSITY Logan, utah 1971 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Errol Nielson, Big Game Supervisor for the Idaho Fish and Game Department, deserves my warmest thanks for the patience and under­ standing that encouraged me during difficult times.
    [Show full text]
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Rickettsia Raoultii and R. Slovaca in Melophagus Ovinus, The
    Liu et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:600 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1885-7 SHORT REPORT Open Access First report of Rickettsia raoultii and R. slovaca in Melophagus ovinus, the sheep ked Dan Liu1†, Yuan-Zhi Wang2†, Huan Zhang1†, Zhi-Qiang Liu3†, Ha-zi Wureli1, Shi-Wei Wang4, Chang-Chun Tu5 and Chuang-Fu Chen1* Abstract Background: Melophagus ovinus (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), a hematophagous ectoparasite, is mainly found in Europe, Northwestern Africa, and Asia. This wingless fly infests sheep, rabbits, and red foxes, and causes inflammation, wool loss and skin damage. Furthermore, this parasite has been shown to transmit diseases, and plays a role as a vector. Herein, we investigated the presence of various Rickettsia species in M. ovinus. Methods: In this study, a total of 95 sheep keds were collected in Kuqa County and Alaer City southern region of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, northwestern China. First, collected sheep keds were identified on the species level using morphological keys and molecular methods based on a fragment of the 18S ribosomal DNA gene (18S rDNA). Thereafter, to assess the presence of rickettsial DNA in sheep keds, the DNA of individual samples was screened by PCR based on six Rickettsia-specific gene fragments originating from six genes: the 17-kilodalton antigen gene (17-kDa), 16S rRNA gene (rrs),surfacecellantigen4gene(sca4),citratesynthasegene(gltA), and outer membrane protein A and B genes (ompA and ompB). The amplified products were confirmed by sequencing and BLAST analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_ LOC=blasthome). Results: According to its morphology and results of molecular analysis, the species was identified as Melophagus ovinus,with100%identitytoM.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Parasites in Domestic Animals
    ARTHROPOD PARASITES IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS Abbreviations KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER CODE Metazoa Arthropoda Insecta Siphonaptera INS:Sip Mallophaga INS:Mal Anoplura INS:Ano Diptera INS:Dip Arachnida Ixodida ARA:Ixo Mesostigmata ARA:Mes Prostigmata ARA:Pro Astigmata ARA:Ast Crustacea Pentastomata CRU:Pen References Ashford, R.W. & Crewe, W. 2003. The parasites of Homo sapiens: an annotated checklist of the protozoa, helminths and arthropods for which we are home. Taylor & Francis. Taylor, M.A., Coop, R.L. & Wall, R.L. 2007. Veterinary Parasitology. 3rd edition, Blackwell Pub. HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST Class: MAMMALIA [mammals] Subclass: EUTHERIA [placental mammals] Order: PRIMATES [prosimians and simians] Suborder: SIMIAE [monkeys, apes, man] Family: HOMINIDAE [man] Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 [man] ARA:Ast Sarcoptes bovis, ectoparasite (‘milker’s itch’)(mange mite) ARA:Ast Sarcoptes equi, ectoparasite (‘cavalryman’s itch’)(mange mite) ARA:Ast Sarcoptes scabiei, skin (mange mite) ARA:Ixo Ixodes cornuatus, ectoparasite (scrub tick) ARA:Ixo Ixodes holocyclus, ectoparasite (scrub tick, paralysis tick) ARA:Ixo Ornithodoros gurneyi, ectoparasite (kangaroo tick) ARA:Pro Cheyletiella blakei, ectoparasite (mite) ARA:Pro Cheyletiella parasitivorax, ectoparasite (rabbit fur mite) ARA:Pro Demodex brevis, sebacceous glands (mange mite) ARA:Pro Demodex folliculorum, hair follicles (mange mite) ARA:Pro Trombicula sarcina, ectoparasite (black soil itch mite) INS:Ano Pediculus capitis, ectoparasite (head louse) INS:Ano Pediculus humanus, ectoparasite (body
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 5(3), 972-999 REVIEW ARTICLE ……………………………………………………
    ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 5(3), 972-999 Journal Homepage: - www.journalijar.com Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3597 DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3597 REVIEW ARTICLE HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS AND OVINE HOST: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW. *Saeed El-Ashram1,2, Ibrahim Al Nasr3,4, Rashid mehmood5,6, Min Hu7, Li He7, *Xun Suo1 1. National Animal Protozoa Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. 2. Faculty of Science, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt. 3. College of Science and Arts in Unaizah, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia. 4. College of Applied Health Sciences in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass 51921, Saudi Arabia. 5. College of information science and technology, Beijing normal university, Beijing, china. 6. Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Management Sciences and Information Technology, Kotli Azad Kashmir, 11100, Pakistan 7. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Development of Veterinary Products, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei,China. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Manuscript Info Abstract ……………………. ……………………………………………………………… Manuscript History Gastrointestinal (GI) parasitic infections are a world-wide problem for Received: 05 January 2017 both small- and large-scale farmers. Infection by GI parasites in Final Accepted: 09 February 2017 ruminants, including sheep and goat can result in harsh economic losses Published: March 2017 in a variety of ways: reproductive inefficiency, decreased work capacity, involuntary culling, diminished food intake, poor animal growth rates and lower weight gains, treatment and management costs, Key words:- Gastrointestinal (GI) parasitic infections; and mortality in heavily parasitized animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Helminthological Society O Washington
    VOLUME 9 JULY, 1942 NUMBER 2 PROCEEDINGS of The Helminthological Society o Washington Supported in part by the Brayton H . Ransom Memorial Trust Fund EDITORIAL COMMITTEE JESSE R. CHRISTIE, Editor U . S . Bureau of Plant Industry EMMETT W . PRICE U. S. Bureau of Animal Industry GILBERT F. OTTO Johns Hopkins University HENRY E. EWING U. S . Bureau of Entomology DOYS A. SHORB U. S. Bureau of Animal Industry Subscription $1 .00 a Volume; Foreign, $1 .25 Published by THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON VOLUME 9 JULY, 1942 NUMBER 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON The Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington is a medium for the publication of notes and papers in helminthology and related subjects . Each volume consists of 2 numbers, issued in January and July . Volume 1, num- ber 1, was issued in April, 1934 . The Proceedings are intended primarily for the publication of contributions by members of the Society but papers by persons who are not members will be accepted provided the author will contribute toward the cost of publication . Manuscripts may be sent to any member of the editorial committee . Manu- scripts must be typewritten (double spaced) and submitted in finished form for transmission to the printer . Authors should not confine themselves to merely a statement of conclusions but should present a clear indication of the methods and procedures by which the conclusions were derived . Except in the case of manu- scripts specifically designated as preliminary papers to be published in extenso later, a manuscript is accepted with the understanding that it is not to be pub- lished, with essentially the same material, elsewhere .
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3
    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Sheep Keds
    Extension Bulletin 1389 insect answers CONTROL OF SHEEP KEDS The sheep ked or sheep “tick,” Melophagus ovinus, Sheep keds that become dislodged do not usually pose is found on sheep in most sheep-raising areas of the a threat of reinfestation to other sheep. Dislodged keds world. In the United States it is most abundant in the only live about 4 days off their hosts. Spread is al- west. most entirely from sheep to sheep, although people (shearers, etc.) can help to spread them. Symptomology and Economics The ked is ticklike in appearance, about 1/4 inch long, The sheep ked is a pest only of domestic or mountain and reddish or gray-brown in color. It is unusual in sheep and goats. There are no alternate host animals not laying eggs. Eggs, produced singly, are retained and no free-living stages. in the uterus and hatch there. The young larva re- mains within the female ked, feeding from special Keds generally infest the neck, breast, shoulders, nutritive glands until it is fully developed. Only one belly, and thighs, and can be easily detected by part- develops at a time. When full development is reached, ing the wool. They pierce the skin and suck blood, each larva is expelled almost immediately, forming a causing irritation to the sheep and forcing them to puparium that attaches to the wool. scratch and bite at themselves. Scratching results in wool tags left on fence wires. Heavily infested animals may become weak and un- thrifty and show weight loss, anemia, wool staining, reduced resistance to disease, and a condition called “cockle.” Cockles are raised bumplike skin blemishes caused by ked bites.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Habitat Use by Dall Sheep and an Interior
    THESIS HABITAT USE BY DALL SHEEP AND AN INTERIOR ALASKA MAMMAL COMMUNITY Submitted by Jeremy S. Dertien Graduate Degree Program in Ecology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Paul F. Doherty, Jr. Cameron Aldridge Calvin F. Bagley Copyright by Jeremy Stephen Dertien 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT HABITAT USE BY DALL SHEEP AND AN INTERIOR ALASKA MAMMAL COMMUNITY Anthropogenic disturbances are increasingly recognized for effects on the behavior and physiology of wildlife species. Military training, a potential source of disturbance, has shown mixed behavioral and physiological effects on wildlife, including mountain ungulates. Dall sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) are an important species for hunting and wildlife viewing in Alaska and have shown an aversion to some forms of human disturbance such as direct overflights. Military training is expanding into potential Dall sheep habitat on two training areas of Fort Wainwright, Alaska; Molybdenum Ridge and Black Rapids Training Area. I placed camera traps in expected optimal and sub-optimal Dall sheep habitat to estimate the spatiotemporal habitat use of sheep and to make training recommendations to the U.S. military. Then, I further explored the available data and estimated the habitat use of species in four different mammalian guilds and the co-occurrence of habitat use between apex predators and potential prey species. In Chapter 1, I introduce the impetus for the study, the use of 54 camera traps in respect to mountain sheep, and the overall study design. My cameras captured over 8,000 images of sheep during the continuous 15-month sampling period.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]