Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161. importance. Information is given on modern methods of control of these lice on domestic animals, small The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) animals, poultry, and humans, as well as a historical prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of review of earlier methods of louse control. Also race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, included is a historical review of the scientific classifi- political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all cation of these lice, including some of the disagree- prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with ment between various taxonomists. This publication disabilities who require alternative means for communi- should be a primary reference for medical and veteri- cation of program information (Braille, large print, nary entomologists, livestock managers, extension audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of specialists, domestic-animal researchers, and veteri- Communications at (202) 720-2791. narians. To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, Keywords: chewing lice, sucking lice, Mallophaga, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC Anoplura, Menoponidae, Philopteridae, 20250, or call (1-800-245-6340 (voice) or (202) Trichodectidae, shortnosed cattle louse, human lice, 720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment louse control opportunity employer. Mention of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. Issued July 1997 CONTENTS Preface ^ Order Mallophaga (Chewing Lice) 6 Suborder Amblycera /^ Family Abrocomophagidae 7 Family Boopiidae 7 Genus Heterodoxas 7 Family Gyropidae 11 Family Laemobothriidae 12 Family Menoponidae 18 Genus Menacanthus 20 Genus Menopon 25 Genus Trinoton 28 Genus Colpocephalum 28 Genus Neocolpocephalum 30 Genus Eomenopon 30 Family Ricinidae 30 Family Trimenoponidae 30 Suborder Ischnocera 36 Family Philopteridae 36 Genus Cuclotogaster 39 Genus Goniocotes 39 Genus Goniodes 43 Genus Lagopoecus 47 Genus Lipeurus 47 Genus Oxylipeurus 51 Genus Pectinopygus 51 Genus Quadraceps 55 Genus Rallicola 55 Genus Strigiphilus 55 Other Genera and Species 55 Family Trichodectidae 60 Genus Bovicola 61 Genus Trichodectes 97 Genus Damalinia 100 Genus Felicola 100 Genus Tricholipeurus 101 Suborder Rhynchophthirina 106 Family Haematomyzidae 106 Genus Haematomyzus 106 Order Anoplura (Sucking Lice) 113 Family Echinophthiriidae 113 Family Enderleinellidae 119 Family Haematopinidae 119 Genus Haematopinus 123 Family Hamophthiriidae 150 III Family Hoplopleuridae 150 Genus Hoplopleura 150 Genus Pterophthirus 154 Other Genera 154 Family Hybophthiridae 1 54 Family Linognathidae 158 Genus Linognathus 158 Genus Solenopotes 181 Family Microthoraciidae 187 Family Neolinognathidae 191 Family Pecaroecidae 191 Family Pedicinidae 191 Family Pediculidae 191 Family Polyplacidae 198 Family Pthiridae 201 Family Ratemiidae 205 Lice Control 209 Control of Lice on Domestic Animals 209 Control of Lice on Small Animals 215 Control of Human Lice 21 5 Control of Poultry Lice 21 7 References 220 Index 247 Appendix A A-1 Appendix B B-1 IV PREFACE Years ago, Manning Price and I began writing a book Gathering illustrations was an important part of book about livestock insects. After slowly learning about writing, and numerous people have helped with that. book writing and making some mistakes, we did write But we specifically mention Sam Wen Wang and Jan the book. But we were never able to complete all the Read at College Station, TX, and Rene Davis of ARS at chapters in a particular year. Manning, with little or no Weslaco, TX. help from me, wrote the chapter on livestock lice, and that chapter was in the hands of an ARS editor at the As for secretarial help, we were assisted by several time of his death. excellent and dedicated workers. Elizabeth Ann Andrus of Texas A&M University and Suzanne Thomas, Doris Although I had only the fuzziest acquaintance with lice, Ernst, and Virginia Moffitt of ARS were outstanding I undertook the task of putting that chapter into final assistants who must have privately grieved about our form—gathering up his collection of books, bulletins, bookwriting skills and deplored the slow pace at which reprints, etc., and then indexing and filing them in we worked. alphabetical order. (Manning didn't use index cards. He had an intimate acquaintance with his collection of publications and could pull any particular one out of the stack on his desk at any time.) My tasks of learning something about lice and organizing the literature certainly delayed the issuance of this book. At about the same time, it was decided that the original plan to publish a single book at this level of detail—and keep it up to date—was impractical. So we are publish- ing one group of insects at a time. This publication is the first. So now you know how I came to write with all the authority I could muster about all the crawly little critters that I had never really wanted to learn about. Inevitably, I did become interested in them, but if you find mistakes—and Tm sure that any very discerning reader will—they are my mistakes, not Manning's. All I could do was try to remain faithful to his concept of what people might want to know about lice—or per- haps it was his concept of what people ought io know about lice. This project of writing a book about livestock insects faltered and would certainly have failed except for the guidance and support of many ARS and Texas A&M University management-type people. To name only a few, there was T.W. Edminster, who first approved "Livestock Insects'' for publication by ARS. And Rex Johnston, Claude Schmidt, Bob Hoffman, and Roger Drummond provided ample support through the years. The people from ARS Information Staff labored with us from that beginning long ago. Junith Van Deusen in particular has been the patient and persevering editor on this project. I nsect taxonomists are not in complete agreement on mouthparts, Königsmann (1960) and Clay (1970) added the scientific classification of the small, wingless, their support to hlopkins' placement of all parasitic lice parasitic insects that are commonly known by the Old in a single order. However, they believed that Hopkins' English word "lice/' Apparently Packard (1887) was the suborder Mallophaga combined groups that are not first to suggest that parasitic lice are related to the free- close kin and that use of the name Mallophaga should living booklice or barklice (= psocids) (order be discontinued. The two classifications of Phthiraptera Psocoptera). Kellogg (1896, 1902), a prominent early are compared below: specialist in the classification of lice, agreed. It is now generally accepted that both chewing and sucking lice Hopkins (1949) Clay (1970) descended from psocidlike ancestors, and some ento- Order Phthiraptera Order Phthiraptera mologists have even placed all orders in the superorder Suborder Mallophaga Psocodea. The development of the parasitic habit by Superfamily Amblycera Suborder Amblycera Mallophaga and Anoplura was explained by Osborn Superfamily Ischnocera Suborder Ischnocera (1891 ) as having been a progression from the free-living Superfamily Rhynchophthirina Suborder Rhynchophthirina state to a semiparasitic form that sometimes fed on both Suborder Anoplura Suborder Anoplura plants and vertebrate hosts to the modern parasite. Symmons (1952), who studied the heads of both The heads of representatives of Clay's four suborders are booklice and parasitic lice, found that the tentorium illustrated in figure 2. (internal skeleton of the head) was well developed in Psocoptera and
Recommended publications
  • Review of the Systematics, Biology and Ecology of Lice from Pinnipeds and River Otters (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Echinophthiriidae)
    Zootaxa 3630 (3): 445–466 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3630.3.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8DEB0C1-81EF-47DF-9A16-4C03B7AF83AA Review of the systematics, biology and ecology of lice from pinnipeds and river otters (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Echinophthiriidae) MARIA SOLEDAD LEONARDI1 & RICARDO LUIS PALMA2 1Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Provincia de Chubut, Argentina 2Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand Abstract We present a literature review of the sucking louse family Echinophthiriidae, its five genera and twelve species parasitic on pinnipeds (fur seals, sea lions, walruses, true seals) and the North American river otter. We give detailed synonymies and published records for all taxonomic hierarchies, as well as hosts, type localities and repositories of type material; we highlight significant references and include comments on the current taxonomic status of the species. We provide a summary of present knowledge of the biology and ecology for eight species. Also, we give a host-louse list, and a bibliography to the family as complete as possible. Key words: Phthiraptera, Anoplura, Echinophthiriidae, Echinophthirius, Antarctophthirus, Lepidophthirus, Proechi- nophthirus, Latagophthirus, sucking lice, Pinnipedia, Otariidae, Odobenidae, Phocidae, Mustelidae, fur seals, sea lions, walruses, true seals, river otter Introduction Among the sucking lice (Anoplura), the family Echinophthiriidae is the only family with species adapted to live on pinnipeds—a mammalian group that includes fur seals and sea lions (Otariidae), walruses (Odobenidae), and true seals (Phocidae) (Durden & Musser 1994a 1994b)—as well as on the North American river otter (Kim & Emerson 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure-Function Relationship of the Lung of the Australian Sea Lion Neophoca Cinerea
    The Structure-Function Relationship of the Lung of the Australian Sea Liont Neophoc e clnerea by Anthony Nicholson B.V.Sc. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhY' Department of PathologY' UniversitY of Adelaide February 1984 Frontispiece: Group of four adull female Australian sea lions basking in the sun at Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island. ËF:æ: oo',,, 'å¡ -*-d, l--- --a - .¡* É--- .-\tb.<¡- <} b' \ .ltl '' 4 qÙ CONTENTS Page List of Figures X List of Tables xi Abstract XIV Declaration XV Acknowledge m ents I I. Introduction Chapter \ I I.I Classification of Marine Mammals I I.2', Distribution of Australian Pinnipeds 2 I.3 Diving CaPabilitY 3 PhYsiologY 1.4 Diving 4 Cardiovascular SYstem ' l'.4.I B I.4.2 OxYgen Stores 1l L.4.3 BiochemicalAdaPtations L3 I.4.4 PulmonarYFunction I.4.5 Effects oi Incteased Hydrostatic Pressure T6 l-8 1.5 SummarY and Aims 20 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods 20 ?.I Specimen Collection 2I 2.2 Lung Fixation 2I 2.3 Lung Votume Determination 22 2.4 Parasite Collection and Incubation 22 2.5 M icroscoPY 22 2.5.I Light MicroscoPY Electron Microscopy 23 2..5.2 Trãnsmission 23 2.5.3 Scanning ElectronMicroscopy 25 Chapter 5. Norm al ResPiratorY Structure 25 t.r Introduction 25 Mam maI Respiratory System 3.2 Terrestrial 25 1.2.I MacroscoPtc 27 3.2.2 MicroscoPic 27 SYstem 3.3 Pinniped ResPiratorY 27 3.3.I MacroscoPic 28 3.3.2 MicroscoPic 3I 3.4 Results 3I 1.4.L MacroscoPic 32 3.4.2 MicroscoPic 7B 3.5 Discussion 7B 3.5.I MacroscoPtc 79 3.5.2 MicroscoPic 92 3.6 SummarY IV Page Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chocó-Darién Conservation Corridor
    July 4, 2011 The Chocó-Darién Conservation Corridor A Project Design Note for Validation to Climate, Community, and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards (2nd Edition). CCB Project Design Document – July 4, 2011 Executive Summary Colombia is home to over 10% of the world’s plant and animal species despite covering just 0.7% of the planet’s surface, and has more registered species of birds and amphibians than any other country in the world. Along Colombia’s northwest border with Panama lies the Darién region, one of the most diverse ecosystems of the American tropics, a recognized biodiversity hotspot, and home to two UNESCO Natural World Heritage sites. The spectacular rainforests of the Darien shelter populations of endangered species such as the jaguar, spider monkey, wild dog, and peregrine falcon, as well as numerous rare species that exist nowhere else on the planet. The Darién is also home to a diverse group of Afro-Colombian, indigenous, and mestizo communities who depend on these natural resources. On August 1, 2005, the Council of Afro-Colombian Communities of the Tolo River Basin (COCOMASUR) was awarded collective land title to over 13,465 hectares of rainforest in the Serranía del Darién in the municipality of Acandí, Chocó in recognition of their traditional lifestyles and longstanding presence in the region. If they are to preserve the forests and their traditional way of life, these communities must overcome considerable challenges. During 2001- 2010 alone, over 10% of the natural forest cover of the surrounding region was converted to pasture for cattle ranching or cleared to support unsustainable agricultural practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (North of Mexico), Which Reflects the Taxonomic Studies Published Since That Date
    The Genera and Species of Mallopbaga of North America (North of Mexico) Part II. Suborder AMBLYCERA by K. C. Emerson, PhD. SKgT-SSTcTS'S-? SWW TO M"7-5001 PREFACE This volume is essentially a revision of my 1964 publication, Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (north of Mexico), which reflects the taxonomic studies published since that date. Host criteria for the birds has been expanded to include consideration of all species listed in The A. 0. U. Checklist of North American Birds. Fifth Edition (1957). A few species of birds definitely known to be extinct are omitted from the listings of probable hosts, even though new species may still be found on museum skins. Mammal hosts considered remain those recorded in Millsr and Kellogg, List of North American Recent Mammals (1955), as; being found north of Mexico. Dr. Theresa Clay, British Museum (Natural History), ar.d especially Dr. Roger D. Price, University of Minnesota, during the last few years, have reviewed several genera of the Menoporidae; however, several of the larger genera are still in need of review. Unfortunately this volume could not be delayed until work on these genera is completed. CONTENTS BOOPIDAE Heterodoxus GYROPIDAE Gliricola Gyropus Macrogyropus Pitrufquenia LAEMOBOTHRIIDAE Laemobothrion MENOPONIDAE A ctornitbophi.lus Arnyrsidea Ancistrona Ardeiphilus Austromenopon Bonomiella Ciconiphilus Clayia Colpocephalum Comatomenopon Cuculiphilus Dennyus Eidmanniella Eucolpocephalum Eureum Fregatiella Gruimenopon Heleonomus Hohorstiella Holomenopon Kurodaia Longimenopon Machaerilaemus Menacanthus Menopon Myrsidea Nosopon Numidicola - Osborniella Piagetiella Plegadiphilus Procellariphaga Pseudomenopon Somaphantus Trinoton RICINIDAE Ricinus Trochiliphagus Trochiloectes TRIMENOPONIDAE Trimenopon Suborder AMBLYCERA Family BOOPIDAE Genus HETERODOXUS Heterodoxus LeSouef and Bullen. 1902. Vict.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 # the Author(S) 2019
    Parasitology Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06273-2 ARTHROPODS AND MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER Antarctophthirus microchir infestation in synanthropic South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) males diagnosed by a novel non-invasive method David Ebmer1 & Maria José Navarrete2 & Pamela Muñoz2 & Luis Miguel Flores2 & Ulrich Gärtner3 & Anja Taubert1 & Carlos Hermosilla1 Received: 29 December 2018 /Accepted: 18 February 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Antarctophthirus microchir is a sucking louse species belonging to the family Echinophthiriidae and has been reported to parasitize all species of the subfamily Otariinae, the sea lions. Former studies on this ectoparasite mainly required fixation, immobilization, or death of host species and especially examinations of adult male sea lions are still very rare. Between March and May 2018, adult individuals of a unique Burban^ bachelor group of South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens)living directly in the city of Valdivia, Chile, were studied regarding their ectoparasite infestation status. For first time, a non-invasive method in the form of a lice comb screwed on a telescopic rod and grounded with adhesive tape was used for sample taking process. Overall, during combing different stages of A. microchir were detected in 4/5 O. flavescens individuals, especially at the junction between the back and hind flippers. Our findings represent the first report of A. microchir infesting individuals of this synanthropic colony and fulfilling complete life cycle in a sea lion group despite inhabiting freshwater and in absence of females/ pups. Our Btelescopic lice comb apparatus^ offers a new strategy to collect different stages of ectoparasites and a range of epidermal material, such as fur coat hair and superficial skin tissue for a broad spectrum of research fields in wildlife sciences in an unmolested and stress reduced manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture P£R\ (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 BALTIMORE, MO., U. S. A. THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS By R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 I. The cockroach. Order Orthoptera 3 The head and the organs of ingestion 4 General structure of the head and mouth parts 4 The labrum 7 The mandibles 8 The maxillae 10 The labium 13 The hypopharynx 14 The preoral food cavity 17 The mechanism of ingestion 18 The alimentary canal 19 II. The biting lice and booklice. Orders Mallophaga and Corrodentia. 21 III. The elephant louse 30 IV. The sucking lice. Order Anoplura 31 V. The flies. Order Diptera 36 Mosquitoes. Family Culicidae 37 Sand flies. Family Psychodidae 50 Biting midges. Family Heleidae 54 Black flies. Family Simuliidae 56 Net-winged midges. Family Blepharoceratidae 61 Horse flies. Family Tabanidae 61 Snipe flies. Family Rhagionidae 64 Robber flies. Family Asilidae 66 Special features of the Cyclorrhapha 68 Eye gnats.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasite Communities of Tropical Forest Rodents: Influences of Microhabitat Structure and Specialization
    PARASITE COMMUNITIES OF TROPICAL FOREST RODENTS: INFLUENCES OF MICROHABITAT STRUCTURE AND SPECIALIZATION By Ashley M. Winker Parasitism is the most common life style and has important implications for the ecology and evolution of hosts. Most organisms host multiple species of parasites, and parasite communities are frequently influenced by the degree of host specialization. Parasite communities are also influenced by their habitat – both the host itself and the habitat that the host occupies. Tropical forest rodents are ideal for examining hypotheses relating parasite community composition to host habitat and host specialization. Proechimys semispinosus and Hoplomys gymnurus are morphologically-similar echimyid rodents; however, P. semispinosus is more generalized, occupying a wider range of habitats. I predicted that P. semispinosus hosts a broader range of parasite species that are less host-specific than does H. gymnurus and that parasite communities of P. semispinosus are related to microhabitat structure, host density, and season. During two dry and wet seasons, individuals of the two rodent species were trapped along streams in central Panama to compare their parasites, and P. semispinosus was sampled on six plots of varying microhabitat structure in contiguous lowland forest to compare parasite loads to microhabitat structure. Such structure was quantified by measuring thirteen microhabitat variables, and dimensions were reduced to a smaller subset using factor analysis to define overall structure. Ectoparasites were collected from each individual, and blood smears were obtained to screen for filarial worms and trypanosomes. In support of my prediction, the habitat generalist ( P. semispinosus ) hosted more individual fleas, mites, and microfilaria; contrary to my prediction, the habitat specialist (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Türleri Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera)
    Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg RESEARCH ARTICLE 17 (5): 787-794, 2011 DOI:10.9775/kvfd.2011.4469 Chewing lice (Phthiraptera) Found on Wild Birds in Turkey Bilal DİK * Elif ERDOĞDU YAMAÇ ** Uğur USLU * * Selçuk University, Veterinary Faculty, Department of Parasitology, Alaeddin Keykubat Kampusü, TR-42075 Konya - TURKEY ** Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, TR-26470 Eskişehir - TURKEY Makale Kodu (Article Code): KVFD-2011-4469 Summary This study was performed to detect chewing lice on some birds investigated in Eskişehir and Konya provinces in Central Anatolian Region of Turkey between 2008 and 2010 years. For this aim, 31 bird specimens belonging to 23 bird species which were injured or died were examined for the louse infestation. Firstly, the feathers of each bird were inspected macroscopically, all observed louse specimens were collected and then the examined birds were treated with a synthetic pyrethroid spray (Biyo avispray-Biyoteknik®). The collected lice were placed into the tubes with 70% alcohol and mounted on slides with Canada balsam after being cleared in KOH 10%. Then the collected chewing lice were identified under the light microscobe. Eleven out of totally 31 (35.48%) birds were found to be infested with at least one chewing louse species. Eighteen lice species were found belonging to 16 genera on infested birds. Thirteen of 18 lice species; Actornithophilus piceus piceus (Denny, 1842); Anaticola phoenicopteri (Coincide, 1859); Anatoecus pygaspis (Nitzsch, 1866); Colpocephalum heterosoma Piaget, 1880; C. polonum Eichler and Zlotorzycka, 1971; Fulicoffula lurida (Nitzsch, 1818); Incidifrons fulicia (Linnaeus, 1758); Meromenopon meropis Clay ve Meinertzhagen, 1941; Meropoecus meropis (Denny, 1842); Pseudomenopon pilosum (Scopoli, 1763); Rallicola fulicia (Denny, 1842); Saemundssonia lari Fabricius, O, 1780), and Trinoton femoratum Piaget, 1889 have been recorded from Turkey for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Türleri Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera)
    Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg ARTICLE IN PRESS RESEARCH ARTICLE xx (x): xxx-xxx, 2011 Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera) Species Found On Birds Along the Aras River, Iğdır, Eastern Turkey Bilal DIK * Çağan Hakkı ŞEKERCIOĞLU ** Mehmet Ali KIRPIK *** * University of Selçuk, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Alaaddin Keykubat Kampüsü, TR-42075 Konya - TURKEY ** Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, 84112 Utah - USA ** KuzeyDoga Society, İstasyon Mah., İsmail Aytemiz Cad., No. 161, TR--36200, Kars -TURKEY *** Kafkas University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Deparment of Biology, TR-36200 Kars -TURKEY Makale Kodu (Article Code): KVFD-2011-4075 Summary Chewing lice were sampled from the birds captured and ringed between September-October 2009 at the Aras River (Yukarı Çıyrıklı, Tuzluca, Iğdır) bird ringing station in eastern Turkey. Eighty-one bird specimens of 23 species were examined for lice infestation. All lice collected from the birds were placed in separate tubes with 70% alcohol. Louse specimens were cleared in 10% KOH, mounted in Canada balsam on glass slides and identified under a binocular light microscope. Sixteen out of 81 birds examined (19,75%) were infested with at least one chewing louse specimens. A total of 13 louse species were found on birds. These were: Austromenopon durisetosum (Blagoveshtchensky, 1948), Actornithophilus multisetosus (Blagoveshtchensky, 1940), Anaticola crassicornis (Scopoli, 1763), Cummingsiella ambigua (Burmeister, 1838), Menacanthus alaudae (Schrank, 1776), Menacanthus curuccae (Schrank, 1776), Menacanthus eurysternus (Burmeister, 1838), Menacanthus pusillus (Niztsch, 1866), Meromenopon meropis (Clay&Meinertzhagen, 1941), Myrsidea picae (Linnaeus, 1758), Pseudomenopon scopulacorne (Denny, 1842), Rhynonirmus scolopacis (Denny, 1842), and Trinoton querquedulae (Linnaeus, 1758).
    [Show full text]
  • Free and Prior Informed Consent
    Is the Concept of “Free and Prior Informed Consent” Effective as a Legal and Governance Tool to Ensure Equity among Indigenous Peoples? (A Case Study on the Experience of the Tagbanua on Free Prior Informed 1 Consent, Coron Island, Palawan, Philippines) Grizelda Mayo-Anda, Loreto L. Cagatulla, Antonio G. M. La Viňa EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Free and Prior Informed Consent is a process established under Philippine law which seeks to guarantee the participation of indigenous communities in decision making on matters affecting their common interests. This paper looks into the experience of the Tagbanua indigenous community of Coron Island, Palawan, Philippines on the application of the concept of Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). The study area focused on the two Tagbanua communities in Coron Island - Barangays Banuang Daan and Cabugao. Coron Island is home to the seafaring Tagbanua tribes and has been identified as one of the country’s important areas for biodiversity.. The Tagbanua community has managed to secure their tenure on the island and its surrounding waters through the issuance and recognition by the government of an ancestral domain title, one of the first examples of its kind in the Philippines. The study concludes that the exercise of Free Prior and Informed Consent by the Tagbanua community is an important and fundamental tool to ensure that the indigenous peoples will benefit from the resources within their ancestral territory. Among others, it has given them a new tool to protect their environment and to obtain an equitable share of the economic benefits of their natural resources. The study also shows that the exercise of Free Prior and Informed Consent by the Tagbanua communities of Barangays Banuang Daan and Cabugao was recognized by government and non-government stakeholders, although in varying degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mallophaga of New England Birds James Edward Keirans Jr
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1966 THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS JAMES EDWARD KEIRANS JR. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation KEIRANS, JAMES EDWARD JR., "THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS" (1966). Doctoral Dissertations. 834. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/834 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67—163 KEIRANS, Jr., James Edward, 1935— THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1966 E n tom ology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS BY JAMES E.° KEIRANS, -TK - A. B,, Boston University, i960 A. M., Boston University, 19^3 A THESIS Submitted to The University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Zoology June, 1966 This thesis has been examined and approved. May 12i 1966 Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my thanks to Dr. James G. Conklin, Chairman, Department of Entomology and chairman of my doctoral committee, for his guidance during the course of these studies and for permission to use the facilities of the Entomology Department. My grateful thanks go to Dr. Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals
    The lUCN Species Survival Commission 1994 lUCN Red List of Threatened Animals Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre PADU - MGs COPY DO NOT REMOVE lUCN The World Conservation Union lo-^2^ 1994 lUCN Red List of Threatened Animals lUCN WORLD CONSERVATION Tile World Conservation Union species susvival commission monitoring centre WWF i Suftanate of Oman 1NYZ5 TTieWlLDUFE CONSERVATION SOCIET'' PEOPLE'S TRISr BirdLife 9h: KX ENIUNGMEDSPEaES INTERNATIONAL fdreningen Chicago Zoulog k.J SnuicTy lUCN - The World Conservation Union lUCN - The World Conservation Union brings together States, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organisations in a unique world partnership: some 770 members in all, spread across 123 countries. - As a union, I UCN exists to serve its members to represent their views on the world stage and to provide them with the concepts, strategies and technical support they need to achieve their goals. Through its six Commissions, lUCN draws together over 5000 expert volunteers in project teams and action groups. A central secretariat coordinates the lUCN Programme and leads initiatives on the conservation and sustainable use of the world's biological diversity and the management of habitats and natural resources, as well as providing a range of services. The Union has helped many countries to prepare National Conservation Strategies, and demonstrates the application of its knowledge through the field projects it supervises. Operations are increasingly decentralised and are carried forward by an expanding network of regional and country offices, located principally in developing countries. I UCN - The World Conservation Union seeks above all to work with its members to achieve development that is sustainable and that provides a lasting Improvement in the quality of life for people all over the world.
    [Show full text]