DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mallophaga of New England Birds James Edward Keirans Jr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mallophaga of New England Birds James Edward Keirans Jr University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1966 THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS JAMES EDWARD KEIRANS JR. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation KEIRANS, JAMES EDWARD JR., "THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS" (1966). Doctoral Dissertations. 834. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/834 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67—163 KEIRANS, Jr., James Edward, 1935— THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1966 E n tom ology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS BY JAMES E.° KEIRANS, -TK - A. B,, Boston University, i960 A. M., Boston University, 19^3 A THESIS Submitted to The University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Zoology June, 1966 This thesis has been examined and approved. May 12i 1966 Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my thanks to Dr. James G. Conklin, Chairman, Department of Entomology and chairman of my doctoral committee, for his guidance during the course of these studies and for permission to use the facilities of the Entomology Department. My grateful thanks go to Dr. Robert L. Blickle for his kindness and patience in allowing me to gain a small portion of his knowledge of medical entomology and insect taxonomy. To the other members of my committee, Dr. Wilbur Bullock, Dr. Albion R. Hodgdon, Dr. Lorus J. Milne, and Dr. Paul Schaefer, my sincere thanks for their generous help and encouragement. I cannot individually thank here all those who contributed their time in collecting the vast numbers of birds necessary for a study of this kind. However, I must acknowledge the special assistance of Burdett Barrett who collected many of the Anseriform and Charadriiform birds and Arthur H. Mason who continues to amaze me with his ability to spot birds. To Dr. A. Edmund Brower, my thanks for allowing me to use his personal Mallophaga collection. To Dr. K. C. Emerson, my grateful appreciation for allowing me to examine the Mallophaga collection at the National Museum and for his personal kindness to my wife and me during our visits to Washington, D. C. Lastly, to my wife, my heartfelt thanks for her numerous sacrifices and untiring assistance. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................. 1 SYSTEMATIC S ............................................... 3 METHODS AND MATERIALS...................................... 5 KEY TO THE SUBORDERS AND FAMILIES OF MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS...................................... 10 FAMILY LAEMOBOTHRIIDAE..................................... 11 LAEMOBOTHRION............................. 12 L. atrum................................................ 13 L. maximum................. Ik L. tinnunculi................................... 16 KEY TO THE NEW ENGLAND MENOPONIDAE..................... 17 AC TORNITHOPHILUS.......................................... 20 A. ~bicolor...................................... 21 A. flumineus............................................. 22 A. hoplopteri maculosus................................... 23 A. limarius.......................................... ... 23 A. ocellatus............................................. 2k A. ochraceus............................................. 25 A. paludosus............................................. 26 A. pediculoides........... 27 A. piceus lari ...................................... 28 A. piceus piceus......................................... 29 A. salulosus...... 31 A. stictus........ 32 A. totani................................................ 32 A. umbrinus........... 33 AMYRSIDEA................................................. 36 A. megalosoma....... 37 AUSTROMENOPON............................................. 39 A. aegialitidis. ........................................ ^0 A. alpinum............................................... 40 A. atrofulvum............................................ kl A. corporosum................. k2 A. durisetosum........................................... *4-3 A. merguli............................................... ^3 A. nigropleurum.......................................... UU A. phaeopodis....... UU ii A. squatarolae....................... ^5 A. transversum........................................... k6 A. uriae...................... *4-6 BQNOMIELLA................................................ U8 B. colunibae.............................................. k9 CICONIPHILUS.............................................. 50 C. dLecimfasciatus ................................... 51 C. melanophi............................................. 53 C. pectiniventris........................................ 53 COLPOCEPHALUM............................................. 55 C. brachysomum...................................... 57 £■ fla-vescens.............................. 58 C. nanum................................................. 59 0 . turbinatum............................................ 6l £. zerafae............................................... 62 CUCULIPHILUS.............................................. 6k C. decoratum............................................. 65 C. alternatus....... 65 DEHtraUS.................................................. 66 D. dubius................................................ 67 EIDMAIMIELLA......................................... 69 E. brevipalpis........................................... 70 E. pustulosa............................................. 70 EUREUM........................................... 71 E . ewingi.................................... 73 HOHORSTIELLA. ........................................... 7^ H. lata.................................................. 75 HOLOMENOPON............................................... 76 H. clypeilargum................................ 77 H. leucoxanthum. ....................................... 77 H. loomisil.............................................. 77 H. lunarium ........................................ 78 H. transvaalense......................................... 79 KURODAJA........................... 80 iii K. acadieae............................................. 8l K. flammei.............................................. 8l K. fulvofasciata......................................... 82 K. haliaeeti............................................ 83 K. magna.................................. 83 K. painei............................................... 8k MACHAER ILAEMCJS................................................ 86 M. americanus. ........................ *............ 87 M. coirrplexus............................................. 87 M . maestus .................. 87 M. malleus............ 89 M. melospizae..................... 90 MEHACANTHUS............ 91 M. alaskensis. ........................... 92 M. autocapillus.......................................... 92 M. annulatus............................................. 93 M. camelinus............................................. 93 M. chrysophaeus.......................................... 9^ M. colaptis.............................................. 95 M. cornutus.............................................. 95 M. pal.lidulus............................................ 95 M. expansus.............................................. 96 M. meniscus.............................................. 96 M. mutabilis........................... 97 M. perforatus...... 97 M. stramineus....... 98 M. tenuifrons............ 98 MEN0P0N.............................. 100 MERSIDEA.................................................. 101 M. cucullaris.............................................. 103 M. incerta................................................. 103 M. interrupta.............................................. 10^ M. latifrons............................................... 105 M. major.................................................. 106 M. melanorum............................................... 107 M. palloris............................................... 107 M. quadrifasciata....................................... 108 M. quadr imacul at a .'.................. ................. 108 M. ridulosa................................................ 108 M. rustica.......................................... 109 M. troglodyti.............................................. 110 PIAGETIELLA............................................... Ill PSEUD0MEN0P0N............................................. 112 iv P. insolens............................................. 113 P. par.................................................. 113 P. pilosum.............................................. 113 P. qadrii....... llU TRINOTON....... 115 T. anserinum............................................. 116 T. querquedulae.......................................... 117 FAMILY RICINIDAE................................... 118 RICINUS.................................................. 119 R. angulatus................................ 120 R. arcuatus.............................................. 120 R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Variation Within a Broadly Distributed Chewing Louse Genus (Thomomydoecus)
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Honors Program Theses Honors Program 2020 Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2020 Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Bruns, Clarissa Elizabeth, "Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus)" (2020). Honors Program Theses. 433. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/433 This Open Access Honors Program Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN A BROADLY DISTRIBUTED CHEWING LOUSE GENUS (THOMOMYDOECUS) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Designation University Honors with Distinction Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa May 2020 This Study by: Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Entitled: Genetic distribution within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) has been approved as meeting the thesis or project requirement for the Designation University Honors with Distinction ________ ______________________________________________________ Date James Demastes, Honors Thesis Advisor, Biology ________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr. Jessica Moon, Director, University Honors Program Abstract No broad study has been conducted to examine the genetics of Thomomydoecus species and their patterns of geographic variation. Chewing lice and their parasite-host relationships with pocket gophers have been studied as a key example of cophylogeny (Demastes et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an Overview of the Geographical Distribution of Chewing Lice Parasitizing Chicken
    European Journal of Taxonomy 685: 1–36 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.685 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Gustafsson D.R. & Zou F. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:151B5FE7-614C-459C-8632-F8AC8E248F72 Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken Daniel R. GUSTAFSSON 1,* & Fasheng ZOU 2 1 Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Xingang West Road 105, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China. 2 Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong, China. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8D918E7D-07D5-49F4-A8D2-85682F00200C 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A0E4F4A7-CF40-4524-AAAE-60D0AD845479 Abstract. The geographical range of the typically host-specific species of chewing lice (Phthiraptera) is often assumed to be similar to that of their hosts. We tested this assumption by reviewing the published records of twelve species of chewing lice parasitizing wild and domestic chicken, one of few bird species that occurs globally. We found that of the twelve species reviewed, eight appear to occur throughout the range of the host. This includes all the species considered to be native to wild chicken, except Oxylipeurus dentatus (Sugimoto, 1934). This species has only been reported from the native range of wild chicken in Southeast Asia and from parts of Central America and the Caribbean, where the host is introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns Suborder LARI
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 191, 223 & 227-228. Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns The family sequence of Christidis & Boles (1994), who adopted that of Sibley et al. (1988) and Sibley & Monroe (1990), is followed here. Suborder LARI: Skuas, Gulls, Terns and Skimmers Condon (1975) and Checklist Committee (1990) recognised three subfamilies within the Laridae (Larinae, Sterninae and Megalopterinae) but this division has not been widely adopted. We follow Gochfeld & Burger (1996) in recognising gulls in one family (Laridae) and terns and noddies in another (Sternidae). The sequence of species for Stercorariidae and Laridae follows Peters (1934) and for Sternidae follows Bridge et al. (2005). Family LARIDAE Rafinesque: Gulls Laridia Rafinesque, 1815: Analyse de la Nature: 72 – Type genus Larus Linnaeus, 1758. Genus Larus Linnaeus Larus Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 136 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Larus marinus Linnaeus. Gavia Boie, 1822: Isis von Oken, Heft 10: col. 563 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Larus ridibundus Linnaeus. Junior homonym of Gavia Moehring, 1758. Hydrocoleus Kaup, 1829: Skizz. Entw.-Gesch. Eur. Thierw.: 113 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Larus minutus Linnaeus. Chroicocephalus Eyton, 1836: Cat. Brit. Birds: 53 – Type species (by monotypy) Larus cucullatus Reichenbach = Larus pipixcan Wagler. Gelastes Bonaparte, 1853: Journ. für Ornith.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (North of Mexico), Which Reflects the Taxonomic Studies Published Since That Date
    The Genera and Species of Mallopbaga of North America (North of Mexico) Part II. Suborder AMBLYCERA by K. C. Emerson, PhD. SKgT-SSTcTS'S-? SWW TO M"7-5001 PREFACE This volume is essentially a revision of my 1964 publication, Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (north of Mexico), which reflects the taxonomic studies published since that date. Host criteria for the birds has been expanded to include consideration of all species listed in The A. 0. U. Checklist of North American Birds. Fifth Edition (1957). A few species of birds definitely known to be extinct are omitted from the listings of probable hosts, even though new species may still be found on museum skins. Mammal hosts considered remain those recorded in Millsr and Kellogg, List of North American Recent Mammals (1955), as; being found north of Mexico. Dr. Theresa Clay, British Museum (Natural History), ar.d especially Dr. Roger D. Price, University of Minnesota, during the last few years, have reviewed several genera of the Menoporidae; however, several of the larger genera are still in need of review. Unfortunately this volume could not be delayed until work on these genera is completed. CONTENTS BOOPIDAE Heterodoxus GYROPIDAE Gliricola Gyropus Macrogyropus Pitrufquenia LAEMOBOTHRIIDAE Laemobothrion MENOPONIDAE A ctornitbophi.lus Arnyrsidea Ancistrona Ardeiphilus Austromenopon Bonomiella Ciconiphilus Clayia Colpocephalum Comatomenopon Cuculiphilus Dennyus Eidmanniella Eucolpocephalum Eureum Fregatiella Gruimenopon Heleonomus Hohorstiella Holomenopon Kurodaia Longimenopon Machaerilaemus Menacanthus Menopon Myrsidea Nosopon Numidicola - Osborniella Piagetiella Plegadiphilus Procellariphaga Pseudomenopon Somaphantus Trinoton RICINIDAE Ricinus Trochiliphagus Trochiloectes TRIMENOPONIDAE Trimenopon Suborder AMBLYCERA Family BOOPIDAE Genus HETERODOXUS Heterodoxus LeSouef and Bullen. 1902. Vict.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Phthiraptera)
    ANNALES HISTORICO-NATURALES MUSEI NATIONALIS HUNGARICI Volume 104 Budapest, 2012 pp. 5–109 A checklist of lice of Hungary (Insecta: Phthiraptera) Z. VAS1*, J. RÉKÁSI2 & L. RÓZSA3 1 Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1088 Budapest, Baross u. 13, Hungary; Department of Biomathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, H-1078 Budapest, István u. 2, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Pannonhalma Benedictiner School, H-9090 Pannonhalma, Vár 2, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 3 MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány P. sétány 1/C, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] A checklist of louse species and subspecies collected from wild or domestic (exotic pets excluded) birds and mammals including humans in Hungary since 1945 is provided. The list is based on formerly published data and includes 279 louse species and subspecies. Their hosts represent 156 bird and 30 mammal species. Additionally, further 550 louse species (and subspecies) are also listed, whose occurrence is likely as judged from geographic and host distribution but have not been detected yet. This paper presents the most complete review of the Hungarian louse fauna. – Louse, host association, birds, mammals, ectoparasites. INTRODUCTION Hungary’s sucking louse (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) fauna was summa- rized by PIOTROWSKI (1970). The chewing louse (Phthiraptera: Amblycera, Ischnocera) fauna was evaluated in two checklists (RÉKÁSI 1993a, 1994) summarizing data for avian and mammalian hosts separately. Subsequently, more recent world checklists for sucking lice (DURDEN &MUSSER 1994) and for chewing lice (PRICE et al. 2003) critically reviewed the nomenclature, taxonomy and host-parasite relationships of this insect order as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture P£R\ (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 BALTIMORE, MO., U. S. A. THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS By R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 I. The cockroach. Order Orthoptera 3 The head and the organs of ingestion 4 General structure of the head and mouth parts 4 The labrum 7 The mandibles 8 The maxillae 10 The labium 13 The hypopharynx 14 The preoral food cavity 17 The mechanism of ingestion 18 The alimentary canal 19 II. The biting lice and booklice. Orders Mallophaga and Corrodentia. 21 III. The elephant louse 30 IV. The sucking lice. Order Anoplura 31 V. The flies. Order Diptera 36 Mosquitoes. Family Culicidae 37 Sand flies. Family Psychodidae 50 Biting midges. Family Heleidae 54 Black flies. Family Simuliidae 56 Net-winged midges. Family Blepharoceratidae 61 Horse flies. Family Tabanidae 61 Snipe flies. Family Rhagionidae 64 Robber flies. Family Asilidae 66 Special features of the Cyclorrhapha 68 Eye gnats.
    [Show full text]
  • Türleri Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera)
    Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg RESEARCH ARTICLE 17 (5): 787-794, 2011 DOI:10.9775/kvfd.2011.4469 Chewing lice (Phthiraptera) Found on Wild Birds in Turkey Bilal DİK * Elif ERDOĞDU YAMAÇ ** Uğur USLU * * Selçuk University, Veterinary Faculty, Department of Parasitology, Alaeddin Keykubat Kampusü, TR-42075 Konya - TURKEY ** Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, TR-26470 Eskişehir - TURKEY Makale Kodu (Article Code): KVFD-2011-4469 Summary This study was performed to detect chewing lice on some birds investigated in Eskişehir and Konya provinces in Central Anatolian Region of Turkey between 2008 and 2010 years. For this aim, 31 bird specimens belonging to 23 bird species which were injured or died were examined for the louse infestation. Firstly, the feathers of each bird were inspected macroscopically, all observed louse specimens were collected and then the examined birds were treated with a synthetic pyrethroid spray (Biyo avispray-Biyoteknik®). The collected lice were placed into the tubes with 70% alcohol and mounted on slides with Canada balsam after being cleared in KOH 10%. Then the collected chewing lice were identified under the light microscobe. Eleven out of totally 31 (35.48%) birds were found to be infested with at least one chewing louse species. Eighteen lice species were found belonging to 16 genera on infested birds. Thirteen of 18 lice species; Actornithophilus piceus piceus (Denny, 1842); Anaticola phoenicopteri (Coincide, 1859); Anatoecus pygaspis (Nitzsch, 1866); Colpocephalum heterosoma Piaget, 1880; C. polonum Eichler and Zlotorzycka, 1971; Fulicoffula lurida (Nitzsch, 1818); Incidifrons fulicia (Linnaeus, 1758); Meromenopon meropis Clay ve Meinertzhagen, 1941; Meropoecus meropis (Denny, 1842); Pseudomenopon pilosum (Scopoli, 1763); Rallicola fulicia (Denny, 1842); Saemundssonia lari Fabricius, O, 1780), and Trinoton femoratum Piaget, 1889 have been recorded from Turkey for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ID Euring Latin Binomial English Name Phenology Galliformes
    BIRDS OF METAURO RIVER: A GREAT ORNITHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN A SMALL ITALIAN URBANIZING BIOTOPE, REQUIRING GREATER PROTECTION 1 SUPPORTING INFORMATION / APPENDICE Check list of the birds of Metauro river (mouth and lower course / Fano, PU), up to September 2020. Lista completa delle specie ornitiche del fiume Metauro (foce e basso corso /Fano, PU), aggiornata ad Settembre 2020. (*) In the study area 1 breeding attempt know in 1985, but in particolar conditions (Pandolfi & Giacchini, 1985; Poggiani & Dionisi, 1988a, 1988b, 2019). ID Euring Latin binomial English name Phenology GALLIFORMES Phasianidae 1 03700 Coturnix coturnix Common Quail Mr, B 2 03940 Phasianus colchicus Common Pheasant SB (R) ANSERIFORMES Anatidae 3 01690 Branta ruficollis The Red-breasted Goose A-1 (2012) 4 01610 Anser anser Greylag Goose Mi, Wi 5 01570 Anser fabalis Tundra/Taiga Bean Goose Mi, Wi 6 01590 Anser albifrons Greater White-fronted Goose A – 4 (1986, february and march 2012, 2017) 7 01520 Cygnus olor Mute Swan Mi 8 01540 Cygnus cygnus Whooper Swan A-1 (1984) 9 01730 Tadorna tadorna Common Shelduck Mr, Wi 10 01910 Spatula querquedula Garganey Mr (*) 11 01940 Spatula clypeata Northern Shoveler Mr, Wi 12 01820 Mareca strepera Gadwall Mr, Wi 13 01790 Mareca penelope Eurasian Wigeon Mr, Wi 14 01860 Anas platyrhynchos Mallard SB, Mr, W (R) 15 01890 Anas acuta Northern Pintail Mi, Wi 16 01840 Anas crecca Eurasian Teal Mr, W 17 01960 Netta rufina Red-crested Pochard A-4 (1977, 1994, 1996, 1997) 18 01980 Aythya ferina Common Pochard Mr, W 19 02020 Aythya nyroca Ferruginous
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: an Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C
    Cambridge University Press 0521632412 - Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: An Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C. Barnard Index More information Index This index includes all the higher taxonomic categories mentioned in the book, from orders down to families, but page numbers are given only for the main occurrences of those names. It therefore also acts as a complete alphabetic list of the higher taxa of British insects and arachnids (except for the numerous families of mites). Acalyptratae 173, 188 Anyphaenidae 327 Acanthosomatidae 55 Aphelinidae 198, 293, 308 Acari 320, 330 Aphelocheiridae 55 Acartophthalmidae 173, 191 Aphididae 56, 62 Acerentomidae 23 Aphidoidea 56, 61 Acrididae 39 Aphrophoridae 56 Acroceridae 172, 180, 181 Apidae 198, 217 Aculeata 197, 206 Apioninae 83, 134 Adelgidae 56, 62, 64 Apocrita 197, 198, 206, 227 Adelidae 146 Apoidea 198, 214 Adephaga 82, 91 Arachnida 320 Aderidae 83, 126, 127 Aradidae 55 Aeolothripidae 52 Araneae 320, 326 Aepophilidae 55 Araneidae 327 Aeshnidae 31 Araneomorphae 327 Agelenidae 327 Archaeognatha 21, 25, 26 Agromyzidae 173, 188, 193 Arctiidae 146, 162 Alexiidae 83 Argidae 197, 201 Aleyrodidae 56, 67, 68 Argyronetidae 327 Aleyrodoidea 56, 66 Arthropleona 22 Alucitidae 146 Aschiza 173, 184 Alucitoidea 146 Asilidae 172, 180, 181, 182 Alydidae 55, 58 Asiloidea 172, 181 Amaurobiidae 327 Asilomorpha 172, 180, 182 Amblycera 48 Asteiidae 173, 189 Anisolabiidae 41 Asterolecaniidae 56, 70 Anisopodidae 172, 175, 177 Atelestidae 172, 183, 185 Anisopodoidea 172 Athericidae 172, 181 Anisoptera 31 Attelabidae 83, 134 Anobiidae 82, 119 Atypidae 327 Anoplura 48 Auchenorrhyncha 54, 55, 59 Anthicidae 83, 90, 126 Aulacidae 198, 228 Anthocoridae 55, 57, 58 Aulacigastridae 173, 192 Anthomyiidae 173, 174, 186, 187 Anthomyzidae 173, 188 Baetidae 28 Anthribidae 83, 88, 133, 134 Beraeidae 142 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521632412 - Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: An Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C.
    [Show full text]
  • Türleri Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera)
    Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg ARTICLE IN PRESS RESEARCH ARTICLE xx (x): xxx-xxx, 2011 Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera) Species Found On Birds Along the Aras River, Iğdır, Eastern Turkey Bilal DIK * Çağan Hakkı ŞEKERCIOĞLU ** Mehmet Ali KIRPIK *** * University of Selçuk, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Alaaddin Keykubat Kampüsü, TR-42075 Konya - TURKEY ** Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, 84112 Utah - USA ** KuzeyDoga Society, İstasyon Mah., İsmail Aytemiz Cad., No. 161, TR--36200, Kars -TURKEY *** Kafkas University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Deparment of Biology, TR-36200 Kars -TURKEY Makale Kodu (Article Code): KVFD-2011-4075 Summary Chewing lice were sampled from the birds captured and ringed between September-October 2009 at the Aras River (Yukarı Çıyrıklı, Tuzluca, Iğdır) bird ringing station in eastern Turkey. Eighty-one bird specimens of 23 species were examined for lice infestation. All lice collected from the birds were placed in separate tubes with 70% alcohol. Louse specimens were cleared in 10% KOH, mounted in Canada balsam on glass slides and identified under a binocular light microscope. Sixteen out of 81 birds examined (19,75%) were infested with at least one chewing louse specimens. A total of 13 louse species were found on birds. These were: Austromenopon durisetosum (Blagoveshtchensky, 1948), Actornithophilus multisetosus (Blagoveshtchensky, 1940), Anaticola crassicornis (Scopoli, 1763), Cummingsiella ambigua (Burmeister, 1838), Menacanthus alaudae (Schrank, 1776), Menacanthus curuccae (Schrank, 1776), Menacanthus eurysternus (Burmeister, 1838), Menacanthus pusillus (Niztsch, 1866), Meromenopon meropis (Clay&Meinertzhagen, 1941), Myrsidea picae (Linnaeus, 1758), Pseudomenopon scopulacorne (Denny, 1842), Rhynonirmus scolopacis (Denny, 1842), and Trinoton querquedulae (Linnaeus, 1758).
    [Show full text]
  • International Black-Legged Kittiwake Conservation Strategy and Action Plan Acknowledgements Table of Contents
    ARCTIC COUNCIL Circumpolar Seabird Expert Group July 2020 International Black-legged Kittiwake Conservation Strategy and Action Plan Acknowledgements Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................4 CAFF Designated Agencies: Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................................................5 • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway Chapter 2: Ecology of the kittiwake ....................................................................................................................6 • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada Species information ...............................................................................................................................................................................................6 • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) Habitat requirements ............................................................................................................................................................................................6 • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland Life cycle and reproduction ................................................................................................................................................................................7 • Icelandic Institute of Natural
    [Show full text]