DOCSLIB.ORG

An Investigation Into the Health of Subtidal Reef Environments in South

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Examining the health of subtidal reef environments in South Australia Part 4: Assessment of community reef monitoring and status of selected South Australian reefs based on the results of the 2007 surveys Greg Collings, Simon Bryars, David Turner, James Brook and Mandee Theil Published August 2008 SARDI Publication number F2008/000511-1 Examining the health of subtidal reef environments in South Australia Part 4: Assessment of community reef monitoring and status of selected South Australian reefs based on the results of the 2007 surveys Greg Collings, Simon Bryars, David Turner, James Brook and Mandee Theil August 2008 SARDI Publication Number F2008/000511-1 This report contains information generated by the Reef Health program and is supported by the following agencies: This publication may be cited as: Collings, G., Bryars, S., Turner, D., Brook, J. and Theil, M. (2008) ‘Examining the health of subtidal reef environments in South Australia, Part 4: Assessment of community reef monitoring and status of selected South Australian reefs based on the results of the 2007 surveys.’ SARDI Publication Number F2008/000511-1 South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. More information: Further information about the Reef Health Program along with copies of reports and technical documents may be obtained from the Reef Watch website at http://www.reefwatch.asn.au, or by contacting SARDI Aquatic Sciences. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach, SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au Disclaimer. The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief Scientist. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. © 2008 SARDI Aquatic Sciences This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the authors. Printed in Adelaide August 2008 Cover photo: Alison Eaton SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication Number F2008/000511-1 SARDI Research Report Series Number 295 ISBN Number 978-0-7308-5392-3 Author(s): Greg Collings, Simon Bryars, David Turner, James Brook, Mandee Theil Reviewers: Jason Tanner, Scoresby Shepherd (SARDI), Timothy Kildea (SA Water), Approved by: Jason Tanner Signed: Date: 5 August 2008 Circulation: Public domain Collings et al. Health of subtidal reefs in South Australia Part 4. Page 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................3 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................5 2 METHODS..............................................................................................................................................8 2.1 Survey sites...................................................................................................................................8 2.2 Scientific Reef Health Survey..................................................................................................10 2.3 Community Reef Watch Survey..............................................................................................10 2.4 Data manipulation - index calculation ...................................................................................11 2.4.1 Indices of areal cover ......................................................................................................................11 2.4.2 Indices of abundance ......................................................................................................................12 2.4.3 Binary indicators ...........................................................................................................................13 2.4.4 Indices of species richness................................................................................................................13 2.4.5 Scaling of indices............................................................................................................................13 2.4.6 Overall index of reef health............................................................................................................15 2.5 Data analyses..............................................................................................................................15 2.5.1 Biotic patterns of reef assemblages and reef health in 2007 .............................................................15 2.5.2 Changes in reef health 2005 - 2007..............................................................................................16 2.5.3 Comparison of community-based and professional reef monitoring data............................................17 3 RESULTS...............................................................................................................................................19 3.1 Patterns of reef assemblages and reef health in 2007..........................................................19 3.2 Changes in reef health 2005 – 2007 .......................................................................................25 3.3 Comparison of scientific and community survey data........................................................34 4 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................40 4.1 Current status of Adelaide’s reefs...........................................................................................40 4.2 Temporal change in reefal communities ...............................................................................43 4.3 Efficacy of community-based monitoring ............................................................................52 4.4 Comparison of LIT ordination and index calculation methods........................................58 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................63 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................66 APPENDIX A: SAMPLING METHODOLOGY (ADAPTED FROM TURNER ET AL. 2007).....................72 APPENDIX B: SITE DESCRIPTIONS FOR REEFS INCLUDED IN THE 2007 SURVEYS..........................79 APPENDIX C: REPORTING CODES USED DURING DATA ANALYSIS...................................................81 Collings et al. Health of subtidal reefs in South Australia Part 4. Page 2 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following people and agencies: Financial and in-kind contributions Data collection, synthesis and the production of this report were made possible through the generous financial and in-kind support of the following agencies: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC Project Number 2004/078), South Australian Water Corporation, South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage (DEH), Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Adelaide and Mount Lofty Natural Resources Management Board, Flinders University of South Australia, Conservation Council of South Australia (CCSA), South Australian Fishing Industry Council, South Australian Recreational Fishing Advisory Council, and Seanet. Field and laboratory staff Staff from a number of agencies actively participated in the field program as divers and support staff: Bruce Miller-Smith, Sharon Drabsch, (SARDI Aquatic Sciences); Alison Eaton, Yvette Eglinton, Sue Murray-Jones, (DEH); and Tim Kildea (SA Water). Thanks to Steve Leske and the volunteers from the Reef Watch community monitoring program for conducting surveys and supplying data for comparison. Much of this study involved comparison with data from surveys conducted by Reef Watch. The quantity and quality of this dataset and the work that went into producing it cannot be overestimated. Thanks and congratulations are due to all those involved with this organization. Reviewers We thank Jason Tanner and Scoresby Shepherd (SARDI), and Tim Kildea (SA Water) for useful comments on early drafts of the report. Others Thanks to the northern fishers for supplying the coordinates for the Northern Reef. Collings et al. Health of subtidal reefs in South Australia Part 4. Page 3 Executive summary Concern over the degradation of Adelaide’s metropolitan reefs has led to several Reef Health scientific surveys since 1996 and the ongoing community Reef Watch monitoring program. The last survey was conducted in 2005, and the subsequent report provided a health ranking for a number of reefs adjacent to Adelaide. The present report extends the 2005 survey report by: 1. Providing an up-to-date assessment of the condition of Adelaide’ s reefs; 2. Comparing the condition of Adelaide’s reefs in 2007 with the 2005
Recommended publications
  • Parks Victoria Technical Series No

    Parks Victoria Technical Series No

    Deakin Research Online This is the published version: Barton, Jan, Pope, Adam and Howe, Steffan 2012, Marine protected areas of the Flinders and Twofold Shelf bioregions Parks Victoria, Melbourne, Vic. Available from Deakin Research Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30047221 Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner. Copyright: 2012, Parks Victoria. Parks Victoria Technical Paper Series No. 79 Marine Natural Values Study (Vol 2) Marine Protected Areas of the Flinders and Twofold Shelf Bioregions Jan Barton, Adam Pope and Steffan Howe* School of Life & Environmental Sciences Deakin University *Parks Victoria August 2012 Parks Victoria Technical Series No. 79 Flinders and Twofold Shelf Bioregions Marine Natural Values Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Along Victoria’s coastline there are 30 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that have been established to protect the state’s significant marine environmental and cultural values. These MPAs include 13 Marine National Parks (MNPs), 11 Marine Sanctuaries (MSs), 3 Marine and Coastal Parks, 2 Marine Parks, and a Marine Reserve, and together these account for 11.7% of the Victorian marine environment. The highly protected Marine National Park System, which is made up of the MNPs and MSs, covers 5.3% of Victorian waters and was proclaimed in November 2002. This system has been designed to be representative of the diversity of Victoria’s marine environment and aims to conserve and protect ecological processes, habitats, and associated flora and fauna. The Marine National Park System is spread across Victoria’s five marine bioregions with multiple MNPs and MSs in each bioregion, with the exception of Flinders bioregion which has one MNP.
  • (CHORDATES) in the TASMANIAN MUSEUM by A.P

    (CHORDATES) in the TASMANIAN MUSEUM by A.P

    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 126, 1992 109 A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE OF THE TYPE MATERIAL (CHORDATES) IN THE TASMANIAN MUSEUM by A.P. Andrews ANDREWS, A.P., 1992 (31 :x): A descriptive catalogue of the type material (chordates) in the Tasmanian Museum. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 126: 109-113. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.126.109 ISSN 0080-4703. Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, 40 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000. A classified list of the chordate type specimens, including references and collection data, is given together with notes on condition. Key Words: chordates, types, catalogue, Tasmania. INTRODUCTION Class TELEOSTOMI Order CLUPEIFORMES A total of 87 type specimens of the Phylum Chordata is Family STERNOPTYCHIDAE registered in the collections of the Tasmanian Museum and Genus Polyipnus Gunther, 1887 Art Gallery. This catalogue lists the types, together with the Po/yipnus tridentifer McCulloch, 1914 original name and reference. Subsequent changes in taxonomy Biol. Res. Endeavour 2(3), 3 Jul. 1914: 87 are recorded where necessary. Also included are the collection data, where known with certainty, a brief description of each Syn types: 0151 (5), spirit specimens. specimen and notes on the condition. The old registration Locality: Great Australian Bight, 800-900 m, 14 May 1913, numbers are included where applicable, together with those FIS Endeavour. in current use (which should be cited). Note: Some fin damage but otherwise in good condition. The practice adopted by Andrews (1971) and Green Old registration number 037. (197 4) of listing all available registered data is followed, irrespective of whether the specimens could be located at the time of writing.
  • “Understanding, Enjoying & Caring for Our Oceans”

    “Understanding, Enjoying & Caring for Our Oceans”

    MLSSA JOURNAL 2006 “understanding, enjoying & caring for our oceans” NUMBER 16 ISSN 0813 - 7404 DECEMBER 2006 NON MEMBERS $5.00 (plus postage and packing) 1 MLSSA JOURNAL THE MARINE LIFE SOCIETY OF SOUTH our website at:- http://www.mlssa.asn.au AUSTRALIA Inc. Or you may wish to write to the Society for a form, or to complete the one inside the rear Are you interested in any aspect of marine life? cover of this Journal (or a photocopy) and send Do you want to learn more about the underwater it with your payment to MLSSA. world? Are you concerned about pollution of our oceans and destruction of reefs and seagrass The postal address of the Society is:- beds? If so MLSSA is for you. MLSSA Inc. Our motto is “--- understanding, enjoying and 120 Wakefield Street, caring for our oceans ---”. These few words ADELAIDE 5000. summarise our aims. Members seek to understand our ocean, derive enjoyment from OUR LOGO observations of marine life and are committed to The MLSSA logo on the front page features a protection of the marine environment. Leafy Seadragon which is unique to southern Australian waters. The Leafy is South Australia’s Become a Society member and enjoy contact first totally protected fish and is the State marine with others with similar interests. Our members emblem. Its beauty surpasses that of any include divers, marine aquarists and naturalists. creature found in tropical waters and, once seen by divers, is amongst the most remembered of Our activities include:- their diving experiences. -Studying our local marine environment -Community Education -Underwater photography Established in 1976, MLSSA holds monthly meetings and occasional field trips.
  • The Fish Communities and Main Fish Populations of the Jurien Bay Marine Park

    The Fish Communities and Main Fish Populations of the Jurien Bay Marine Park

    The fish communities and main fish populations of the Jurien Bay Marine Park Fairclough, D.V., Potter, I.C., Lek, E., Bivoltsis, A.K. and Babcock, R.C. Strategic Research Fund for the Marine Environment Collaborative Research Project Final Report May 2011 2 The fish communities and main fish populations of the Jurien Bay Marine Park Fairclough, D.V. Potter, I.C. Lek, E. Bivoltsis, A.K. Babcock, R.C. May 2011 Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch Western Australia 6150 ISBN: 978-0-86905-999-9 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. 3 4 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary...........................................................................................................v 2.0 Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................vii 3.0 General Introduction.........................................................................................................1 3.1 Marine protected areas.....................................................................................................1 3.1.1 Fisheries management goals .....................................................................................1 3.1.2 Indirect effects of MPAs...........................................................................................2
  • Observations on Some Tasmanian Fishes: Part Xxxi Review of Gnathanacanthidae

    Observations on Some Tasmanian Fishes: Part Xxxi Review of Gnathanacanthidae

    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 120, 1986 51 OBSERVATIONS ON SOME TASMANIAN FISHES: PART XXXI REVIEW OF GNATHANACANTHIDAE by the late E.O.G. Scott (with four tables, four text-figures and three plates) SCOTT, E.O.G ., 1986 (12:ix): Observations on some Tasmanian fishes: Part XXXI - Review of Gnathanacan­ thidae. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 120: 51-75, 3 pl. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.120.51 ISSN 0080-4 703. Formerly Queen Victoria Muse um and Art Gallery, Launceston, Australia 7250. GNATHANACANTHIDAE. The sole representative of this family, Gnathanacamhus goetzeei Bleeker, 1855, specified in the last century as the type of three different genera by Dutch, English and Australian ichthyologists, with type locality Tasmania (twice), Victoria, and endemic to southern Australian waters, is here made the subject of detailed investigation based on 15 individuals. Fin spines and rays are specified by rectified exponential equations. Differential growth with age is recognized; consistent negative correlation of the lengths of fin spines and rays with overall length of fish occurs. Features not previously reported include: presence of a subrectangular fleshy intermandibular pad, not matched in other families of the suborder Scorpaenoidei; disposition of dermal papillae, known to be irregular on the head and body, in parallel rows on the fins; and intrusion beneath the upper margin of operculum of a slip of papillate integument. Key Words: Tasmania, fish, Gnathanacanthidae. Spinae capite nullae. Cristae occipitales sej untae INTRODUCTION ossa interspinosa amplectentes. Dentes maxillis This paper follows the general plan of others parvi pluriserali; vomerini palatinique nulli.
  • Towards a System of Ecologically Representative Marine Protected

    Towards a System of Ecologically Representative Marine Protected

    10 Notes on Current Protection and Management within Recommended Areas _____ 452 10.1 Nuyts Archipelago, St Francis Isles and Coastal Embayments (Murat Bioregion) ____________452 10.2 Baird Bay to Cape Bauer (including nearshore islands) (Murat/Eyre Bioregions Boundary) ___453 10.3 Venus Bay and Surrounds (Eyre Bioregion) ___________________________________________453 10.4 Investigator Group of Islands (Eyre Bioregion) ________________________________________454 10.5 Thorny Passage (Eyre Bioregion) ____________________________________________________455 10.6 Sir Joseph Banks Group and Dangerous Reef (including Tumby Bay) (Eyre Bioregion) ______455 10.7 Neptune Islands Group (Eyre Bioregion) _____________________________________________456 10.8 Gambier Islands Group (Eyre Bioregion) _____________________________________________456 10.9 Franklin Harbor and Surrounding Waters (Spencer Gulf/North Spencer Gulf Bioregions Boundary) ___________________________________________________________________________457 10.10 Upper Spencer Gulf (North Spencer Gulf Bioregion)___________________________________457 10.11 South-Eastern Spencer Gulf (Spencer Gulf Bioregion) _________________________________459 10.12 Western Investigator Strait, between the “Toe” of Yorke Peninsula and Northern Kangaroo Island (Eyre/Gulf St Vincent Biregion Boundary)___________________________________________460 10.13 North-Western, Western and South-Western Kangaroo Island (Eyre Region)______________461 10.14 Southern Eyre (Eyre Bioregion) ____________________________________________________461
  • Adaptive Management of Temperate Reefs to Minimise Effects of Climate Change: Developing New Effective Approaches for Ecological Monitoring and Predictive Modelling

    Adaptive Management of Temperate Reefs to Minimise Effects of Climate Change: Developing New Effective Approaches for Ecological Monitoring and Predictive Modelling

    Neville Barrett, Amanda Bates, Maria Beger, Rick Stuart-Smith, Craig Syms, Neil Holbrook, Nathan Knott, David Booth, Brendan Kelaher, Stefan Howe, Colin Buxton and Graham Edgar FRDC Project 2010/506 The Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), established in 2010, comprises the University of Tasmania’s internationally recognised expertise across the full spectrum of temperate marine, Southern Ocean, and Antarctic research and education. September 2014 IMaS – Sandy Bay Building 49 (between the law Building & the University gym) Cnr alexander street & grosvenor street sandy Bay tasmania australia telephone: +61 3 6226 2937 Postal address: Private Bag 129, Hobart tas 7001 IMaS – taroona nubeena Crescent taroona tasmania australia telephone: +61 3 6227 7277 Postal address: Private Bag 49, Hobart tas 7001 www.imas.utas.edu.au translatingnatureintoknowledge Adaptive management of temperate reefs to minimise effects of climate change: Developing new effective approaches for ecological monitoring and predictive modelling Neville Barrett, Amanda Bates, Maria Beger, Rick Stuart-Smith, Craig Syms, Neil Holbrook, Nathan Knott, David Booth, Brendan Kelaher, Stefan Howe, Colin Buxton, and Graham Edgar. September 2014 FRDC Project No 2010/506 © 2014 Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-86295-770-1 Adaptive management of temperate reefs to minimise effects of climate change: Developing new effective approaches for ecological monitoring and predictive modelling] Project No. 2010/506 2014 Ownership of Intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and the University of Tasmania. This publication (and any information sourced from it) should be attributed to Barrett, N., Bates, A., Beger, M., Syms, C., Holbrook, N., Knott, N., Booth, D., Kelaher, B., Howe, S., Buxton, C.
  • Trophic Implications of Light Reductions for Amphibolis Griffithii Seagrass Fauna

    Trophic Implications of Light Reductions for Amphibolis Griffithii Seagrass Fauna

    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2010 Trophic implications of light reductions for Amphibolis Griffithii seagrass fauna Adam Gartner Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Gartner, A. (2010). Trophic implications of light reductions for Amphibolis Griffithii seagrass fauna. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/134 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/134 Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2010 Trophic implications of light reductions for Amphibolis Griffithii ase grass fauna Adam Gartner Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation Gartner, A. (2010). Trophic implications of light reductions for Amphibolis Griffithii seagrass fauna. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ theses/134 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/134 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
  • Port Phillip Heads Marine National Park Identification Booklet Revised Edition 2020 Acknowledgements

    Port Phillip Heads Marine National Park Identification Booklet Revised Edition 2020 Acknowledgements

    Port Phillip Heads Marine National Park Identification Booklet Revised Edition 2020 Acknowledgements Many people contributed their knowledge, time and passion to put this Identification Booklet together. We are grateful for the help of: • Friends of Beware Reef Marine Sanctuary • Coastcare Victoria – Gippsland • Reef Life Survey • Parks Victoria Acknowledgement: Nick Bouma, Jacqui Pocklington, Mark Rodrigue, Steffan Howe, Danni Rizzo, John Ariens, Lachlan Cohen, Don Love, Alan Wilkins and Jan Watson. Disclaimer Lots of effort was put in to provide accurate information, unfortunately this Identification Booklet may not be perfect. It is proposed to be a simple guide only and should be considered as such. This project was funded with the support of the Victorian Government Photography by: Friends of Beware Reef, Museum Victoria and Parks Victoria. Port Phillip Heads Marine National Park and Rules Port Phillip Heads Marine National Park filter-feeding animals that live in the area. (3580ha) protects a diverse marine environment comprising of six separate The incredible diversity of marine life areas – Point Lonsdale, Point Nepean, around the entrance to Port Phillip Bay is Pope’s Eye, Swan Bay, Mud Islands & due to the wide range of habitats in the Portsea Hole. area and its central Victorian location. The area marks the end of the range for The park protects a wide range of some animals and plants that prefer the habitats, including extensive rocky cold waters of western Victoria, but it also intertidal and subtidal reef systems, a supports some warmth-loving species range of underwater gorges, colourful from eastern Australia that can survive sponge gardens, tall kelp forests, in the bay’s relatively calm and shallow emerald seagrass beds, stretches of waters.
  • Part 2 – Key Species Groups

    Part 2 – Key Species Groups

    Species groups: Phytoplankton Part 2 – Key Species Groups 4 Species groups 4.1 Phytoplankton Principal contributors Luke Twomey Paul Van Ruth Other contributors Anya Waite Peter Thompson Species group name and description The term phytoplankton usually refers to autotrophic planktonic organisms in the euphotic zone (surface lit waters) of an aquatic ecosystem. Phytoplankton communities are largely comprised of protists from a diverse range of taxonomic classes including; glaucophytes, green algae, cryptomonads, chrysophytes, haptophytes, diatoms, dinoflagellates, apicomplexa, euglenoids and cerozoa. Prokaryotic Cyanobacteria are also included in the phytoplankton. The definition of phytoplankton however, is not straight forward, complicated by the ability of some taxa to change their modes of nutrition. Many dinoflagellates for example, are heterotrophic able to obtain nutrients through phagocytosis. Additionally, mixotrophs have the ability to combine heterotrophy and autotrophy (Jansson et al. 1996). Generally the decision whether on not to include particular organisms within the phytoplankton is subjective, typically left to the individual researcher to determine whether or not the organism is autotrophic or not. More often than not, the whole protist community are included as phytoplankton if they are filterable on a glass fibre filter or equivalent. Traditionally taxonomists have identified phytoplankton using light microscopy and in more recent decades electron microscopy. Modern techniques enable resolution of individual cells down to about 5 μm. Phytoplankton are generally defined by three size classes, microplankton (20-200μm), nanoplankton (2- 20μm) and picoplankton (0.2-2μm) (Sieburth et al. 1978). Diatoms and dinoflagellates are the most abundant of the micro and nanoplankton size classes (Jeffrey and Vesk 1997), and were for many years thought to be responsible for the majority of oceanic primary production.
  • Patterns in the Distribution and Abundance of Reef Fishes in South Eastern Australia

    Patterns in the Distribution and Abundance of Reef Fishes in South Eastern Australia

    Patterns in the Distribution and Abundance of Reef Fishes in South Eastern Australia Madhavi A. Colton Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2011 Department of Zoology The University of Melbourne Parkville, Victoria 3010 Australia ABSTRACT This research investigated patterns in the distribution and abundance of nearshore fishes of south-eastern Australia. I used two methods to survey fishes, underwater visual census (UVC) and baited remote underwater video (BRUV). A comparison between these methods revealed that BRUV recorded higher relative abundance of mobile predators, while UVC observed higher relative abundance of herbivores, territorial species, and small site-attached species. These results suggest that studies surveying diversity would do best to employ multiple methods. In cases where funds are limited, UVC may provide a more complete estimate of diversity than BRUV as UVC recorded higher diversity, species richness and more individuals. Combining measures of abundance with habitat data, I investigated fish-habitat associations, specifically exploring how altering spatial grain influenced the strength of correlations between fish and habitat. Species of different sizes responded to habitat measured over different scales, with large-bodied species only displaying strong correlations with habitat when it was measured over large scales. These results suggest that research quantifying fish-habitat associations needs to take spatial grain into account. In addition, many species may respond to changes in habitat at scales larger than are typically investigated. Understanding not only how species interact with their environment but also the scale at which these associations occur is essential for management and conservation.
  • Adec Preview Generated PDF File

    Adec Preview Generated PDF File

    Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 63: 9-50 (2001). Checklist of the fishes of Western Australia J. Barry Hutchins Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia INTRODUCTION Western Australia is uniquely advantaged by Western Australia has the longest coastline of all being the only Australian State with comprehensive the Australian States, covering approximately tropical and temperate elements in its fish fauna. 12500 km .and over 21 degrees of latitude. It is The nearshore tropical species of its northern seas bathed by waters of fluctuating quality that in rival those of Queensland's Great Barrier Reef in general reflect changes in latitude and bathymetry. diversity (Hutchins, 1999), and have much in The shallow nearshore waters encompass several common with southern Indonesia and other areas major biogeographic regions, namely the tropical of the Indo-West Pacific (AlIen and Swainston Dampierian Province in the north and the 1988). Its temperate fauna shares many species with temperate Flindersian Province in the south; the southern and south-eastern Australia, as well as two meet on the central west coast in a broad possessing a distinctive endemic component overlap zone that Hutchins (1994) referred to as the (Hutchins, 1994). Subtropical species inhabiting the Leeuwin Province. These two regions support central west coast are found nowhere else in markedly different ecosystems: coral reefs and Australia, although many have apparent sister mangroves characterise the north, whereas rocky species at similar latitudes on the east coast. reefs and seagrass beds exemplify the south. The Western Australia lacks many of the nearshore cold overlapping zone supports elements of both temperate fishes of Victoria and Tasmania regions.