DOCSLIB.ORG

In South Australia COVER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In South Australia COVER The State of Biological Resources in South Australia COVER: The tiny Feathertail Glider Acrobates pygmaeus is confined to well wooded areas in the State's South East. Active mostly at night, it is capable of gliding between trees up to 20 metres apart in search of its diet of nectar, blossoms, sap and small invertebrate animals. 7?0í3ib.v /VaRwoad THE STATE OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA A contribution toward improving our understanding of the South Australian environment Graeme Greenwood and Elizabeth Gum Conservation Projects Branch Department of Environment and Planning 1986 (second printing 1988) ISBN 7243 88397 CONTENTS Page List of Figures List of Tables List of Appendices v SUMMARY vii CONCLUSIONS xiv 1. TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.1.1 The Agricultural Area 1.1.2 Marginal and Arid Lands 1.2 TERRESTRIAL FLORA 24 1.2.1 Vascular Plants 24 1.2.2Non vascular Plants 33 36 1.3 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA 1.3.1 Vertebrates 36 1.3.2 Invertebrates 43 2. INLAND WATER ENVIRONMENT 52 2.1 BACKGROUND 52 2.2 INLAND WATER FLORA 65 2.3 INLAND WATER FAUNA 67 Page 2.3.1 Vertebrates 70 2.3.2 Invertebrates 74 3. MARINE ENVIRONMENT 81 3.1 BACKGROUND 81 3.1.1 Seas and Their Significance to South Australia 81 3.1.2 The Marine Biota of South Australia 86 3.2 MARINE FLORA 93 3.2.1 Seagrasses 94 3.2.2 Seaweeds 99 3.2.3 Phytoplankton 100 3.2.4 Mangroves 101 3.3 MARINE FAUNA 106 3.3.1 Vertebrates 107 3.3.2 Invertebrates 111 4. ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 116 4.1 FLORA 116 4.2 FAUNA 120 APPENDICES 128 BIBLIOGRAPHY 165 i LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1 Level of disturbance resulting from European 2 Settlement Figure 1.2 Current land occupation of South Australia 5 Figure 1.3 Vegetation clearance applications monthly status 7 Figure 1.4 Increase in National Parks, Conservation Parks, 10 Recreation Parks, and Game Reserves in South Australia, 1892 -1985 Figure 1.5 Native vegetation in the central and southern Mt 13 Lofty Ranges in 1945 Figure 1.6 Native vegetation in the central and southern Mt 14 Lofty Ranges in 1968 Figure 1.7 Native vegetation in Kangaroo Island in 1945, 1958, 15 1969 and 1981 Figure 1.8 Changes in arid land shrub density on Frome Downs 20 Cattle Station Figure 1.9 Changes in an arid zone plant community following removal of grazing 21 Figure 1.10 Reference map of regions 26 Figure 1.11 Numbers of plant species presumed extinct in each region of South Australia 28 Figure 1.12 Number of endangered plant species in each region 28 of South Australia Figure 1.13 Areas of wetland in South Australia 56 11 Page Figure1.14 Primary productivity of South Australian ecosystems 91 Figure1.15 Major features of the coastal zone 92 Figure1.16 Extent of seagrass decline off Adelaide metropolitan coast 97 Figure1.17 Coastal wetlands of South Australia 103 Figure1.18 Trends in the clearance of native vegetation in the Agricultural Regions 117 Figure1.19 Relative abundance of plant associations by region, and their representation in NPWS reserves 119 Figure1.20 Conservation Status of South Australia's 165 plant 119 association Figure1.21 Conservation status of South Australian vascular plant species 121 Figure1.22 Taxonomic status of non vascular plants in South Australia 121 Figure1.23 Status and diversity of the native South Australian vertebrate fauna 123 Figure1.24 Taxonomic status of invertebrate animals in South Australia 126 111 LIST OF TABLES Page Table1.1 Modification to natural vegetation 3 Table1.2 Extent of native vegetation clearance in South 4 Australia's agricultural areas in 1974 and 1985 Table1.3 Changes in numbers of arid land shrubs on a 2140 m transect at Frome Downs Cattle Station, South Australia, in the 45 year period after cattle grazing commenced in 1929 22 Table1.4 Number of plant species within each threat category for South Australia 27 Table1.5 Plant species conserved in South Australia 30 Table1.6 Conservation status of plant associations in South Australia 31 Table1.7 Most threatened plant association categories in each environmental province 32 Table1.8 Status of terrestrial mammals in South Australia 38 Table1.9 Status of birds in South Australia 42 Table1.10 Summary of the status of South Australian terrestrial vertebrates 44 Table1.11 Major groups of terrestrial invertebrates and current state of knowledge 45 Table1.12 Current status of wetlands in South Australia 58 Table1.13 Unconserved wetlands of particular significance in South Australia 63 iv Page Table 1.14 Status of wetland birds in South Australia 72 Table 1.15 Status of inland water fishes in South Australia 74 Table 1.16 Freshwater invertebrates monitored by the State Water Laboratory of the Engineering and Water Supply Department since 1978 78 Table 1.17 Major invertebrate groups of inland waters and current state of knowledge 79 Table 1.18 Main types of marine habitat and associated biota 88 Table 1.19 Engineering and Water Supply Department reports containing references to South Australian seaweed and /or seagrasses 100 Table 1.20 Mangrove sites considered to be under stress in South Australia 106 Table 1.21 Status of marine mammals in South Australia 110 Table 1.22 Commercially exploited marine invertebrates in South Australia 112 Table 1.23 Extent of knowledge of marine invertebrates 114 V LIST OF APPENDICES Page Appendix 1 State Herbarium regions of South Australia 129 Appendix 2 Coding system for native flora and fauna 130 Appendix 3 Native vegetation species presumed extinct in South Australia threats and former occurrence 134 Appendix 4 Endangered native vegetation species in South Australia threats and occurrence 135 Appendix 5 Rare or threatened native plants in South Australia 137 Appendix 6 Threatened plant species of the Mt Lofty Ranges and Kangaroo Island regions of South Australia 143 Appendix 7 South Australian rare or threatened plants in cultivation at Botanic Gardens of Adelaide 144 Appendix 8 Rare plants in cultivation at Black Hill Native Flora Research Unit 146 Appendix 9 Research projects underway at Black Hill Native Flora Research Unit dealing with rare or endangered species of native plants 148 Appendix 10 An index of conservation priorities for plant associations categories not conserved or poorly conserved in South Australia 149 Appendix 11 Environmental provinces of South Australia 153 Appendix 12 Mammals 154 Appendix 13 Birds 167 Vi Page Appendix14 Reptiles and Amphibians 189 Appendix15 Freshwater fishes 201 Appendix16 Marine fishes 206 vii SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to describe, evaluate and explain the current condition and conservation status of South Australia's indigenous biological resources. It forms part of a major study of the state of the South Australian environment. It excludes introduced cultivated plants and domestic animals, other than those which now exist in the wild. For practical purposes the report is divided into three sections, each dealing with the biota of a major habitat type. These are: 1. The terrestrial, or land environment. 2. The inland water environment, including saline and temporary water bodies, and 3. The marine environment. The report examines each of these in terms of: the current state of knowledge the availability and applicability of data the current condition of each major habitat type, based on existing knowledge and data, and the conservation status of, and the legislative protection afforded to the State's biological resources. 1. TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT a) The State of Knowledge. Two components of the terrestrial biota are well documented. These are the flowering plants, and the birds and mammals. All have been studied historically, with survey reports, specific and general accounts being widely available. Trends for species and communities generally can be discerned. viii For the lower plants including mosses, liverworts, lichens and fungi, the reptiles, and invertebrate animals generally, there is a paucity of current information and an overall lack of historical data. b) Availability and Application of Data. Most information used is in published form. The existence of maps and aerial photographs over time sequences has allowed data to be compiled for the quantitative assessment of loss rates for native vegetation in the agricultural regions of the State. In the arid northern part of the State however, no such data base exists and inferences have been drawn from the small number of documented experimental case studies. Data for the birds and mammals are from a variety of published and unpublished sources, comprising documented fact and the informed opinions of individuals actively researching particular groups in South Australia. Where information on other groups is available, it is not yet possible to apply it because of incompleteness, a lack of historical perspective, or both. c) State of the Terrestrial Environment Biota. The information available indicates: That natural vegetation in the agricultural region has declined in area by approximately 80% since European settlement, and the trend towards further clearance is continuing. In the arid zone the standing crop of native vegetation has declined significantly. A combination of habitat loss, and the competition from introduced plants and animals has resulted in extinction for 28 native mammal and 5 bird species. In addition 6 flowering plant species are presumed to be extinct on a national level. Many more plants are extinct within South Australia, but no statistics are available to enable an accurate assessment to be made of the situation. Research in this area is vital to provide basic data upon which to base management of the State's flora. ix It is possible that less conspicuous components of the biota have already become extinct or are likely to do so without ever coming to the attention of either the general or scientific communities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying Versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology Following the Evolution of an Innovation
    vol. 195, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2020 E-Article Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology following the Evolution of an Innovation Terry J. Ord,1,* Joan Garcia-Porta,1,† Marina Querejeta,2,‡ and David C. Collar3 1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia; 2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC–Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37–49, Barcelona 08003, Spain; 3. Department of Organismal and Environmental Biology, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606 Submitted August 1, 2018; Accepted July 16, 2019; Electronically published December 17, 2019 Online enhancements: supplemental material. Dryad data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t7g227h. fi abstract: Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are eral de nitions of what represents an innovation have been factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many offered (reviewed by Rabosky 2017), this classical descrip- innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on tion arguably remains the most useful (Galis 2001; Stroud morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species and Losos 2016; Rabosky 2017). Hypothesized innovations can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympat- have drawn considerable attention among ecologists and ric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the in- evolutionary biologists because they can expand the range novation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) of ecological niches occupied within communities. In do- and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing ing so, innovations are thought to be important engines of selection on body size (dragons).
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Bird Notes
    canberra ISSN 0314-8211 bird Volume 41 Number 2 June 2016 notes Registered by Australia Post 100001304 CANBERRA ORNITHOLOGISTS GROUP PO Box 301 Civic Square ACT 2608 2014-15 Committee President Alison Russell-French 0419 264 702 Vice-President Neil Hermes 0413 828 045 Secretary Bill Graham 0466 874 723 Treasurer Lia Battisson 6231 0147 (h) Member Jenny Bounds Member Sue Lashko Member Bruce Lindenmayer Member Chris Davey Member Julie McGuiness Member David McDonald Member Paul Fennell Email contacts General enquiries [email protected] President [email protected] Canberra Bird Notes [email protected]/[email protected] COG Database Inquiries [email protected] COG Membership [email protected] COG Web Discussion List [email protected] Conservation [email protected] Gang-gang Newsletter [email protected] GBS Coordinator [email protected] Publications for sale [email protected] Unusual bird reports [email protected] Website [email protected] Woodland Project [email protected] Other COG contacts Jenny Bounds Conservation Field Trips Sue Lashko 6251 4485 (h) COG Membership Sandra Henderson 6231 0303 (h) Canberra Bird Notes Michael Lenz 6249 1109 (h) Newsletter Editor Sue Lashko, Gail Neumann (SL) 6251 4485 (h) Databases Jaron Bailey 0439 270 835 (a. h.) Garden Bird Survey Duncan McCaskill 6259 1843 (h) Rarities Panel Barbara Allan 6254 6520 (h) Talks Program Organiser Jack Holland 6288 7840 (h) Records Officer Nicki Taws 6251 0303 (h) Website Julian Robinson 6239 6226 (h) Sales Kathy Walter 6241 7639 (h) Waterbird Survey Michael Lenz 6249 1109 (h) Distribution of COG publications Dianne Davey 6254 6324 (h) COG Library Barbara Allan 6254 6520 (h) Please use the General Inquiries email to arrange access to library items or for general enquiries, or contact the Secretary on 0466 874 723.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Lake Frome & Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991-2001
    A Review of Lake Frome and Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991 – 2001 s & ark W P il l d a l i f n e o i t a N South Australia A Review of Lake Frome and Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991 – 2001 Strzelecki Regional Reserves Lake Frome This review has been prepared and adopted in pursuance to section 34A of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage Adelaide, South Australia July 2002 © Department for Environment and Heritage ISBN: 0 7590 1038 2 Prepared by Outback Region National Parks & Wildlife SA Department for Environment and Heritage Front cover photographs: Lake Frome coastline, Lake Frome Regional Reserve, supplied by R Playfair and reproduced with permission. Montecollina Bore, Strzelecki Regional Reserve, supplied by C. Crafter and reproduced with permission. Department for Environment and Heritage TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)].
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogates for Conserving Biodiversity in the Port Stephens-Great Lakes Marine Park
    Assessing the effectiveness of surrogates for conserving biodiversity in the Port Stephens-Great Lakes Marine Park Vanessa Owen B Env Sc, B Sc (Hons) School of the Environment University of Technology Sydney Submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 Certificate of Original Authorship I certify that the work in this thesis has not been previously submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used as indicated in the thesis. Signature of Student: Date: Page ii Acknowledgements I thank my supervisor William Gladstone for invaluable support, advice, technical reviews, patience and understanding. I thank my family for their encouragement and support, particularly my mum who is a wonderful role model. I hope that my children too are inspired to dream big and work hard. This study was conducted with the support of the University of Newcastle, the University of Technology Sydney, University of Sydney, NSW Office of the Environment and Heritage (formerly Department of Environment Climate Change and Water), Marine Park Authority NSW, NSW Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries) and the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) program funded through the Department of Industry, Climate Change, Science, Education, Research and Tertiary Education. The sessile benthic assemblage fieldwork was led by Dr Oscar Pizarro and undertaken by the University of Sydney’s Australian Centre for Field Robotics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Fishes from the Cavalli Islands, Northland, New Zealand
    TANE 25, 1979 A CHECKLIST OF FISHES FROM THE CAVALLI ISLANDS, NORTHLAND, NEW ZEALAND by Jon Nicholson 16 Gordon Craig Place, Algies Bay, Warkworth ABSTRACT During the course of 80 scuba dives over 10 days, 74 species of fish belonging to 33 families were observed around the Cavalli Islands off the north-east coast of New Zealand. These numbers exceed those given in checklists from other species-rich areas mainly because of the intensity of the survey. INTRODUCTION The Cavalli Islands are situated approximately 2km off the eastern coast of Northland, New Zealand, closer to the coast but further north than the Poor Knights Islands (Fig. 1). Their location makes them an interesting area to use when comparing the coastal fish population structure with the more diverse population, effected as it is by migrants from tropical seas, found in the off-shore islands of the Poor Knights group. In an earlier study (Willan el al 1979) a large number of fish species were found in the Matai Bay area on the eastern side of the Karikari Peninsula, an area further north than the Cavalli Islands, but on the mainland coast. This survey indicated that an isolated island situation may not be necessary for large species numbers to be present. The Cavalli Islands are separated from the coast and from each other by a series of passages of varying width. The topography of these islands lends itself to the formation of a wide variety of habitats. Some of these represent typical coastal underwater formations, while others, on the eastern side, are deep water drop-offs, more typical of the outer islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ([email protected]) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep).
    [Show full text]
  • South-East Marine Region Profile
    South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region June 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region, Commonwealth of Australia 2015’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Front cover: Seamount (CSIRO) Back cover: Royal penguin colony at Finch Creek, Macquarie Island (Melinda Brouwer) B / South-east marine region profile South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region Contents Figures iv Tables iv Executive Summary 1 The marine environment of the South-east Marine Region 1 Provincial bioregions of the South-east Marine Region 2 Conservation values of the South-east Marine Region 2 Key ecological features 2 Protected species 2 Protected places 2 Human activities and the marine environment 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Seahorses and Other Syngnathids in Countries Outside Asia (1998-2001)
    ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2011 Volume 19 Number 1 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) 1 Edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 181 pages © published 2011 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 1 Cite as: Vincent, A.C.J., Giles, B.G., Czembor, C.A., and Foster, S.J. (eds). 2011. Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001). Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1). Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia [ISSN 1198-6727]. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 2011 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster CONTENTS DIRECTOR ’S FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Taxonomy and Biogeography of Widespread
    Systematics and Biogeography of Three Widespread Australian Freshwater Fish Species. by Bernadette Mary Bostock B.Sc. (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Deakin University February 2014 i ABSTRACT The variation within populations of three widespread and little studied Australian freshwater fish species was investigated using molecular genetic techniques. The three species that form the focus of this study are Leiopotherapon unicolor, Nematalosa erebi and Neosilurus hyrtlii, commonly recognised as the three most widespread Australian freshwater fish species, all are found in most of the major Australian drainage basins with habitats ranging from clear running water to near stagnant pools. This combination of a wide distribution and tolerance of a wide range of ecological conditions means that these species are ideally suited for use in investigating phylogenetic structure within and amongst Australian drainage basins. Furthermore, the combination of increasing aridity of the Australian continent and its diverse freshwater habitats is likely to promote population differentiation within freshwater species through the restriction of dispersal opportunities and localised adaptation. A combination of allozyme and mtDNA sequence data were employed to test the null hypothesis that Leiopotherapon unicolor represents a single widespread species. Conventional approaches to the delineation and identification of species and populations using allozyme data and a lineage-based approach using mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequences were employed. Apart from addressing the specific question of cryptic speciation versus high colonisation potential in widespread inland fishes, the unique status of L. unicolor as both Australia’s most widespread inland fish and most common desert fish also makes this a useful species to test the generality of current biogeographic hypotheses relating to the regionalisation of the Australian freshwater fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Community Composition and Structure in a Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: the Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2012 Spider Community Composition and Structure In A Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture Lori R. Spears Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Spears, Lori R., "Spider Community Composition and Structure In A Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture" (2012). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1207. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1207 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPIDER COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE IN A SHRUB-STEPPE ECOSYSTEM: THE EFFECTS OF PREY AVAILABILITY AND SHRUB ARCHITECTURE by Lori R. Spears A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Ecology Approved: ___________________________ ___________________________ James A. MacMahon Edward W. Evans Major Professor Committee Member ___________________________ ___________________________ S.K. Morgan Ernest Ethan P. White Committee Member Committee Member ___________________________ ___________________________ Eugene W. Schupp Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2012 ii Copyright © Lori R. Spears 2012 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Spider Community Composition and Structure in a Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture by Lori R.
    [Show full text]
  • Pisces: Terapontidae) with Particular Reference to Ontogeny and Phylogeny
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Davis, Aaron Marshall (2012) Dietary ecology of terapontid grunters (Pisces: Terapontidae) with particular reference to ontogeny and phylogeny. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/27673/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/27673/ Dietary ecology of terapontid grunters (Pisces: Terapontidae) with particular reference to ontogeny and phylogeny PhD thesis submitted by Aaron Marshall Davis BSc, MAppSci, James Cook University in August 2012 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Marine and Tropical Biology James Cook University 1 2 Statement on the contribution of others Supervision was provided by Professor Richard Pearson (James Cook University) and Dr Brad Pusey (Griffith University). This thesis also includes some collaborative work. While undertaking this collaboration I was responsible for project conceptualisation, laboratory and data analysis and synthesis of results into a publishable format. Dr Peter Unmack provided the raw phylogenetic trees analysed in Chapters 6 and 7. Peter Unmack, Tim Jardine, David Morgan, Damien Burrows, Colton Perna, Melanie Blanchette and Dean Thorburn all provided a range of editorial advice, specimen provision, technical instruction and contributed to publications associated with this thesis. Greg Nelson-White, Pia Harkness and Adella Edwards helped compile maps. The project was funded by Internal Research Allocation and Graduate Research Scheme grants from the School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University (JCU).
    [Show full text]