DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ([email protected]) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep). This fish fauna can be broken into a number of components: 45% are species which occur across all of sou them Australia; 25% are southern or southwestern species, at or close to their eastern limit; 19% are restricted to the southeast coasts from South Australia to at least southern New South Wales; 7% are at or close to the western limit of their range; and 6% are at or close to the southern end of their range. Two Tasmanian species are at their northernlimit at Wilsons Promontory. The influence ofthe East Australian Current, and the geomorphology and geological history of the area are discussed in relation to the composition, affinitiesand origins of the fish fauna of this region. Introduction to low water mark and the offshore islands were incorporated into the National Park in the Until relatively recently, there has been limited 1920s. information available on the composition and In 1987 and 1988, the then Depar1ment of Con­ distributions of coastal fishesalong the southern servation and Environment funded a survey of coast of Australia, particularly for Victorian distributions and abundances of benthic reef waters. This situation has recently improved fishes within the proposed Wilsons Promontory through a number of publications on southern Marine Park system. The objectives of this Australian fishes, particularly those of Edgar et survey were twofold: al. ( 1982), Last et al. ( 1983), Hutchins and to detennine the composition of fishes in Swainston ( 1986), Coleman ( 1987), Kuiter waters surrounding Wilsons Promontory and in ( 1993), Hutchins (1994 ), Gomon et a!. ( 1994) and Comer Inlet; and Last and Stevens (1994). Kuiter (1993) and the to provide a baseline census of composition latter two publications provide the best coverage and relatiw abundances of reef fishes prior to for Victorian waters. implementation of marine park legislation. In April 1988, a system of marine parks and Several other studies have examined the reserves was established around Wilsons composition of the fish fauna of the Wilsons Promontory in eastern Victoria, principally to Promontory region. In 1980. Barry Hutchins of conserve marine flora and fauna associated with the Western Australian Museum surveyed the rocky reef communities in this region. Terrestrial reef fishes of the Glennie Group and Norman habitats and biota of Wilsons Promontory Bay, recording 58 species (unpubl. data). In 1982, have been protected since 1898. The coastal strip the Museum of Victoria undertook a survey of 143 144 M. L. TURNER AND M. D. NORMAN species of marine habitats around the promontory, generat- Most sites were dominated by large comosa ing a checklist of 140 fish species (Wilson et al., brown algae, particularly Phyllospora often formed 1990). In the same year, the then Marine Science and Ecklonia radiata. These algae Laboratories (Marine and Freshwater Resources thick stands. The understory was principally a mixture of Institute) commenced a 3-year demersal trawl coralline turf algae interspersed with Cystophora and survey of Eastern Bass Strait. Data from this brown algae (including species of survey was kindly provided by D. Hobday, Sargassum), green algae (including Caulerpa high diversity DCNR (unpubl. data). This survey recorded spp. and Cladophora rugosa).and a 99 species from trawl sites adjacent to of smaller species of red algae. Algal growth Wilsons Promontory. Jackson and Davies is limited to areas of sufficient light. In the shade (1983) examined the freshwater and estuarine of overhangs and at depths greater than fishes of Wilsons Promontory, recording 37 20-35 metres (depending on water clarity), species. invertebrate communities predominated. The The results of the study reported here, com- dominant groups are anthozoans, bryozoans and bined with data from the above studies, published sponges. See Wilson et al. (1990) for treatment of records and museum collections, have been used the invertebrate fauna of the region. to generate a checklist of the fish fauna of this Checklist sites for this survey are shown in fig- 1 and habitat descriptions region. As Wilsons Promontory forms the most ure . Site codes, location southerly point of the Australian mainland, are presented in table 1 for each site. extending well into Bass Strait, the role and Personnel and training. Fish surveys were under- position of this prominent land mass in the taken by the authors in 1987 and 1988, assisted in distributions of southern Australian fishes is the first year by staff and participants from worthy of examination. The components and Operation Raleigh, a British organization which affinities of this fauna may provide insights into provides educational and developmental experi- the biogeographic processes occurring in this ences for young people ("Venturers"). Venturers region. were trained in fish identification by the authors employing photographs, illustrations, keys and Study area and methods reference texts. Sources for identifications were Edgar et al. (1982), Last et al. (1983), Hutchins area. Wilsons Promontory (39°00'S, Study and Swainston (1986), and Coleman (1987). 146°25'E) protrudes into Bass Strait from southeastern Victoria, forming the southernmost Survey techniques. Boats were used to access all using inflat- point of the Australian mainland (Fig. 1). This sites. West coast sites were accessed promontory consists of granite mountains and able dinghies. South and east coast sites were valleys extending below the water line and accessed using larger boats (30 m Blue Nabilla emerging as outcrops to form offshore islands. and 18 m Osprey), provided through the National Drowned valleys have formed bays with sandy Safety Council. spent mini- floors and beaches. The subtidal topography At each site, two or more divers a recording all species present. is diverse, ranging from vertical walls, to large mum of 30 minutes granite slabs (with or without cracks), boulder Searches were made under overhangs, in caves slopes (boulder diameters from 0.2 to 20 m), to and amongst kelp, using torches to investigate the extensive sand plains which surround the deeper caves and crevices. All fish encountered the depth Promontory at depths of 30-50 metres. Located at between the surface and maximum Fish the northern end of Wilsons Promontory is Corner (presented in table 1) were recorded. were recorded Inlet, a large shallow estuarine bay of intertidal identifications and numbers Illustrations and notes were mud flats and sea grass beds. Deeper channels fill on acrylic slates. to and drain this large bay. Several rocky reefs are made of unidentified fishes and compared following dives. present, adjacent to one of the inlet's primary reference texts immediately channels. Species of uncertain identity were discarded from Twenty six sites were surveyed around the checklists. coastline of Wilsons Promontory, including three Approximate numbers of each fish species to an indica- sites within Corner Inlet. All sites were granite were recorded at each site, provide the search time, reefs, varying in aspect, topography, slope, depth tion of relative abundances. As were and level of exposure to surge and currents. area covered and capabilities of personnel Specific locations were chosen to include the not standardized, numbers at each site can not be majority of reef habitat types and aspects. directly compared. Instead, abundance of each FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET 145 Inlet. Table 1 . Fish checklist sites around Wilsons Promontory and in Corner Site Code Location Habitat Maximum Date depth (m) censused West Coast Tongue Point Tl Small cove on Large boulders covered with 16 24.4.1987 northern side of tip Phyllospora comosa and swim-throughs at depth. Reef almost vertical without large horizontal areas. Sand at 16 m. Leonard Point 1 LI Northern side of Phyllospora covered large 22 18.4.1987 point, near tip. boulders, bommies and drop offs to sandy bottom at 22 m. Part of large reef. Leonard Point 2 L2 Midway between Heavy Phyllospora growth on 12 24.4.1987 point and shore in narrow rocky slopes to sand Picnic Bay. at 12 m. Leonard Point 3 L3 Small sheltered cove Phyllospora growth on granite 5 18.4.1987 on south side of boulders and patchy reef on point. sand. 22 11.4.1987, Pillar Point 1 PI At tip of point close Large boulders covered in to deep water.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mechanisms of Ecosystem Stability for Kelp Beds in Urban Environments
    Mechanisms of ecosystem stability for kelp beds in urban environments By Simon E Reeves November 2017 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies I DECLARATIONS This declaration certifies that: (i) This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution. (ii) The work contained in this thesis, except where otherwise acknowledged, is the result of my own investigations. (iii) Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used (iv) The thesis is less than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Signed: (Simon Reeves) Date: 1/12/2017 Statement of authority of access This thesis may be available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: (Simon Reeves) Date: 1/12/2017 II 20/7/18 ABSTRACT Ecologists have long been interested in determining the role biotic relationships play in natural systems. Even Darwin envisioned natural systems as "bound together by a web of complex relations”, noting how “complex and unexpected are the checks and relations between organic beings” (On the Origin of Species, 1859, pp 81-83). Any event or phenomenon that alters the implicit balance in the web of interactions, to any degree, can potentially facilitate a re-organisation in structure that can lead to a wholescale change to the stability of a natural system. As a result of the increasing diversity and intensity of anthropogenic stressors on ecosystems, previously well-understood biotic interactions and emergent ecological functions are being altered, requiring a reappraisal of their effects.
    [Show full text]
  • REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY on KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program
    2006-2007 Kangaroo Island Natural Resources ManagementDate2007 Board Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board REEF FISH BIODIVERSITYKangaroo Island Natural ON Resources KANGAROO Management ISLAND Board SEAGRASS FAUNAL BIODIVERSITYREPORT TITLE ON KI Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 1 REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY ON KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program A report prepared for the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board by Daniel Brock Martine Kinloch December 2007 Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 2 Oceans of Blue The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this report are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. The Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. Project Officer Contact Details Martine Kinloch Coast and Marine Program Manager Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4312 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board Contact Details Jeanette Gellard General Manager PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4340 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] © Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board This document may be reproduced in whole or part for the purpose of study or training, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and to its not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Faunal Assemblages and Habitat Types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia
    Relationships between faunal assemblages and habitat types in Broke Inlet, Western Australia Submitted by James Richard Tweedley This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2010 B.Sc (Hons) University of Portsmouth (UK) MRes University of Plymouth (UK) Declaration I declare that the information contained in this thesis is the result of my own research unless otherwise cited, and has as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any university. __________________________________________ James Richard Tweedley Shifting Sands: The sand bar at the mouth of Broke Inlet in (top) summer and (bottom) winter 2008. Bottom photo by Bryn Farmer. Abstract The work for this thesis was undertaken in Broke Inlet, a seasonally-open estuary on the south coast of Western Australia and the only estuary in that region which is regarded as “near-pristine” (Commonwealth of Australia, 2002). The only previous seasonal studies of the environmental and biotic characteristics of this estuary involved broad-based descriptions of the trends in salinity, temperature and ichthyofaunal characteristics at a limited number of sites. Furthermore, no attempt has been made to identify statistically the range of habitats present in the nearshore and offshore waters of this system, and the extents to which the characteristics of the fish and benthic invertebrate faunas are related to habitat type. These types of data provide not only reliable inventories of the habitat and faunal characteristics of Broke Inlet, but also a potential basis for predicting the likely impact of anthropogenic and climatic changes in Broke Inlet in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region
    Marine Environment and Ecology Benthic Ecology Subprogram Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region SARDI Publication No. F2009/000681-1 SARDI Research Report series No. 416 Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO BOX 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2009 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 1 Information Systems and Database Support Program Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie December 2009 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000681-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 416 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 2 This Publication may be cited as: Rowling, K.P., Sorokin, S.J., Mantilla, L. & Currie, D.R.. (2009) Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000681-1. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief of Division. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Epinephelinae (Teleostei: Serranidae)
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 240-283, 1993 PHYLOGENY OF THE EPINEPHELINAE (TELEOSTEI: SERRANIDAE) Carole C. Baldwin and G. David Johnson ABSTRACT Relationships among epinepheline genera are investigated based on cladistic analysis of larval and adult morphology. Five monophyletic tribes are delineated, and relationships among tribes and among genera of the tribe Grammistini are hypothesized. Generic com- position of tribes differs from Johnson's (1983) classification only in the allocation of Je- boehlkia to the tribe Grammistini rather than the Liopropomini. Despite the presence of the skin toxin grammistin in the Diploprionini and Grammistini, we consider the latter to be the sister group of the Liopropomini. This hypothesis is based, in part, on previously un- recognized larval features. Larval morphology also provides evidence of monophyly of the subfamily Epinephelinae, the clade comprising all epinepheline tribes except Niphonini, and the tribe Grammistini. Larval features provide the only evidence of a monophyletic Epine- phelini and a monophyletic clade comprising the Diploprionini, Liopropomini and Gram- mistini; identification of larvae of more epinephelines is needed to test those hypotheses. Within the tribe Grammistini, we propose that Jeboehlkia gladifer is the sister group of a natural assemblage comprising the former pseudogrammid genera (Aporops, Pseudogramma and Suttonia). The "soapfishes" (Grammistes, Grammistops, Pogonoperca and Rypticus) are not monophyletic, but form a series of sequential sister groups to Jeboehlkia, Aporops, Pseu- dogramma and Suttonia (the closest of these being Grammistops, followed by Rypticus, then Grammistes plus Pogonoperca). The absence in adult Jeboehlkia of several derived features shared by Grammistops, Aporops, Pseudogramma and Suttonia is incongruous with our hypothesis but may be attributable to paedomorphosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Plan Appendices
    ENVIRONMENT PLAN APPENDICES NON-PRODUCTION WELL OPERATIONS ENVIRONMENT PLAN (WHITE IBIS-1, TREFOIL-1 AND YOLLA-1) Table of Contents Title 1 Assessment of the activity against the aims of marine park management plans 2 Assessment of the activity against the aims of threatened species’ management plans 3 Project information sheet 4 Stakeholder communications 5 AHO Notice to Mariners 6 EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool results Appendix 1 Assessment of the activity against the management aims of marine park management plans Assessment of the activity against the aims of protected area management plans COMMONWEALTH 1a South-east Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network 1b The National Light Pollution Guidelines for Wildlife Assessment of the activity against the stated management strategies and actions of the South-east Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2013-2023 (DNP, 2013) The table below provides an assessment of the routine and non-routine operations against the IUCN objectives outlined in the Australian IUCN Reserve Management Principles for Commonwealth Marine Protected Areas (Environment Australia, 2002). Zonation of relevant AMP based on IUCN categories IUCN Ia IUCN Ib IUCN II IUCN III IUCN IV IUCN V IUCN VI Boags - - - - - - Note: Only Category IUCN VI AMPs are relevant to the activity. As such, only the Category IUCN VI management principles are assessed. Category IUCN 1994 IUCN 1994 primary Australian IUCN reserve management Predicted consequences from routine activities or a category objective principles (Schedule 8 of the EPBC worst-case hydrocarbon spill description Regulations 2000) IUCN VI Area containing To protect natural The reserve or zone should be managed Routine discharges from the vessel will not impact on the Managed predominantly ecosystems and use mainly for the sustainable use of natural AMPs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • 2219573-REP-Marine Assessment Report AR
    Appendix L – Marine Assessment GHD | Report for Hunter Water Corporation - Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant, 2219573 Hunter Water Corporation Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant Marine Environment Assessment Amendment Report July 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and structure of this report .................................................................................... 2 2. Project changes ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Key features of the amended Project .................................................................................. 4 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Review of relevant legislation .............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Review of databases and searches ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Review of previous marine ecology reports ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fishes of Lord Howe Island
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Allen, Gerald R., Douglass F. Hoese, John R. Paxton, J. E. Randall, C. Russell, W. A. Starck, F. H. Talbot, and G. P. Whitley, 1977. Annotated checklist of the fishes of Lord Howe Island. Records of the Australian Museum 30(15): 365–454. [21 December 1976]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.30.1977.287 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF LORD HOWE ISLAND G. R. ALLEN, 1,2 D. F. HOESE,1 J. R. PAXTON,1 J. E. RANDALL, 3 B. C. RUSSELL},4 W. A. STARCK 11,1 F. H. TALBOT,1,4 AND G. P. WHITlEy5 SUMMARY lord Howe Island, some 630 kilometres off the northern coast of New South Wales, Australia at 31.5° South latitude, is the world's southern most locality with a well developed coral reef community and associated lagoon. An extensive collection of fishes from lord Howelsland was made during a month's expedition in February 1973. A total of 208 species are newly recorded from lord Howe Island and 23 species newly recorded from the Australian mainland. The fish fauna of lord Howe is increased to 447 species in 107 families. Of the 390 species of inshore fishes, the majority (60%) are wide-ranging tropical forms; some 10% are found only at lord Howe Island, southern Australia and/or New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linnaean Collections
    THE LINNEAN SPECIAL ISSUE No. 7 The Linnaean Collections edited by B. Gardiner and M. Morris WILEY-BLACKWELL 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ © 2007 The Linnean Society of London All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The designations of geographic entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers, the Linnean Society, the editors or any other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The Linnaean Collections Introduction In its creation the Linnaean methodology owes as much to Artedi as to Linneaus himself. So how did this come about? It was in the spring of 1729 when Linnaeus first met Artedi in Uppsala and they remained together for just over seven years. It was during this period that they not only became the closest of friends but also developed what was to become their modus operandi. Artedi was especially interested in natural history, mineralogy and chemistry; Linnaeus on the other hand was far more interested in botany. Thus it was at this point that they decided to split up the natural world between them. Artedi took the fishes, amphibia and reptiles, Linnaeus the plants, insects and birds and, while both agreed to work on the mammals, Linneaus obligingly gave over one plant family – the Umbelliforae – to Artedi “as he wanted to work out a new method of classifying them”.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Species Survey
    ISSN: 1328-5548 Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute Report No. 4 Exotic Marine Pests in the Port of Hastings, Victoria. D. R. Currie and D. P. Crookes December 1997 Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute PO Box 114 Queenscliff 3225 CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1. BACKGROUND 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PORT OF HASTINGS 3 2.1 Shipping movements 3 2.2 Port development and maintenance activities 4 2.21 Dredge and spoil dumping 4 2.22 Pile construction and cleaning 5 3. EXISTING BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION 5 4. SURVEY METHODS 6 4.1 Phytoplankton 6 4.11 Sediment sampling for cyst-forming species 6 4.12 Phytoplankton sampling 6 4.2 Trapping 7 4.3 Zooplankton 7 4.4 Diver observations and collections on wharf piles 7 4.5 Visual searches 7 4.6 Epibenthos 8 4.7 Benthic infauna 8 4.8 Seine netting 8 4.9 Sediment analysis 8 5. SURVEY RESULTS 9 5.1 Port environment 9 5.2 Introduced species in port 9 5.21 ABWMAC target introduced species 9 5.22 Other target species 11 5.23 Additional exotic species detected 12 5.24 Adequacy of survey intensity 13 6. IMPACT OF EXOTIC SPECIES 13 7. ORIGIN AND POSSIBLE VECTORS FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF EXOTIC SPECIES FOUND IN THE PORT. 14 8. INFLUENCES OF THE PORT ENVIRONMENT ON THE SURVIVAL OF INTRODUCED SPECIES. 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 16 REFERENCES 17 TABLES 1-6 21 FIGURES 1-5 25 APPENDICES 1 & 2 36 SUMMARY The Port of Hastings in Westernport Bay was surveyed for introduced species between 4th and 15th of March 1997.
    [Show full text]