DOCSLIB.ORG

Faa 119 Biodiversity Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Faa 119 Biodiversity Analysis , MOLDOVA FAA 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS February 2007 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared1 by DevTech Systems, Inc. under an EPIQ II subcontract to PA Government Services, Inc. This page left intentionally blank MOLDOVA FAA 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS February 2007 Prepared by DevTech Systems, Inc. under an EPIQ II subcontract to PA Government Services, Inc. Contract # EPP-I-00-03-00015-00, subcontract # EPP3R015-4S-003, Task Order 3. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government Cover photo credits: Jeff Ploetz, Steve Nelson, Aureliu Overcenco This page left intentionally blank TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................III PREFACE ........................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... VI SECTION I: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ......................................................1 SECTION II: THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY .....................................................................3 A. The Importance of Biodiversity............................................................................................................................................ 3 B. Biodiversity Status, Trends and Threats .............................................................................................................................. 4 1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Agricultural and agro-ecosystems..................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Forestry and Forests........................................................................................................................................................... 8 4. Rivers, Wetlands and Aquatic Systems ............................................................................................................................ 9 5. Invasive Species ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 6. Poverty, Public Awareness, and Socio-economic issues.............................................................................................. 11 7. Governance Issues............................................................................................................................................................ 12 SECTION III: ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT, DONORS, AND NGO COMMUNITY.............................................................................................. 14 A. Conservation Actions Taken: Landscape .......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Protected Areas................................................................................................................................................................. 14 2. Forestry and Forests (2000-present) .............................................................................................................................. 17 3. Species monitoring and management............................................................................................................................. 18 4. Rivers, Wetlands and Aquatic Systems .......................................................................................................................... 18 5. Government Sponsored Environmental R&D ............................................................................................................ 19 B. Conservations Actions Taken: Policy, Institutional, and Legal ...................................................................................... 20 1. Overview 20 2. Policy Framework and Reforms ..................................................................................................................................... 21 3. Institutional Framework and Changes........................................................................................................................... 22 C. Conservations Actions Taken: International Agreements, Commitments, & Donors ............................................... 25 1. General Framework for International Cooperation..................................................................................................... 25 2. International and regional agreements........................................................................................................................... 26 3. Regional Conventions ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 4. Bilateral cooperation......................................................................................................................................................... 29 5. Cooperation with international donors and organizations.......................................................................................... 29 D. Civil Society: the role of NGOs in Biodiversity Conservations ..................................................................................... 33 E. Donor Biodiversity Projects and Related Financing........................................................................................................ 37 F. USAID Contributions and Opportunities through Current On-going Projects/Programs....................................... 38 SECTION IV: ACTIONS NECESSARY TO CONSERVE BIODIVERSITY....................42 A. Agriculture and Agroecosystems ........................................................................................................................................ 42 B. Forestry and Forests............................................................................................................................................................. 43 C. Waters and aquatic ecosystems ........................................................................................................................................... 43 D. Invasive species..................................................................................................................................................................... 44 E. Poverty, Public Awareness, and Socio-economic issues.................................................................................................. 44 F. Governance Issues................................................................................................................................................................ 44 SECTION V: EXTENT TO WHICH USAID ACTIONS MEET THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED ...............................................................................................46 A. Future Programming ............................................................................................................................................................ 46 B. Recommendations for Potential Contributions of Future Programming to Address Identified Threats ................ 47 SECTION VI: CONSOLIDATED MATRIX – THREATS, ACTIONS, EXTENT TO WHICH, & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... 51 ANNEX A: MAPS AND ANNOTATED RAMSAR LIST FOR MOLDOVA. .....................57 ANNEX B: ENVIRONMENT-RELATED LEGISLATION & CONCEPTS, PLANS, PROGRAMS, & STRATEGIES....................................................................62 USAID/Moldova FAA 119 Biodiversity Analysis i ANNEX C: INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS.............................................................65 ANNEX D: DONOR & NGO FUNDED PROJECTS IN MOLDOVA...............................66 ANNEX E: ENDANGERED SPECIES: RED BOOK OF MOLDOVA AND IUCN RED LIST...............................................................................................................75 ANNEX F: LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED ..............................................................86 ANNEX G: REFERENCES...................................................................................................88 ANNEX H: SCOPE OF WORK............................................................................................. 91 TABLES Table 1. Available Land by use (thousands ha)...................................................................................................... 6 Table 2. Agricultural landowners ................................................................................................................................6 Table 3. Soil erosion areas (thousands ha)............................................................................................................... 7 Table 4. Moldsilva timber throw (tree felling)........................................................................................................ 9 Table 5. Water quality (media annual) of big river water in the Republic of Moldova (2002)...............11 Table 6. Natural Areas Protected by State .............................................................................................................14
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends of Aquatic Alien Species Invasions in Ukraine
    Aquatic Invasions (2007) Volume 2, Issue 3: 215-242 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.8 Open Access © 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 REABIC Research Article Trends of aquatic alien species invasions in Ukraine Boris Alexandrov1*, Alexandr Boltachev2, Taras Kharchenko3, Artiom Lyashenko3, Mikhail Son1, Piotr Tsarenko4 and Valeriy Zhukinsky3 1Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU); 37, Pushkinska St, 65125 Odessa, Ukraine 2Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU; 2, Nakhimova avenue, 99011 Sevastopol, Ukraine 3Institute of Hydrobiology NASU; 12, Geroyiv Stalingrada avenue, 04210 Kiyv, Ukraine 4Institute of Botany NASU; 2, Tereschenkivska St, 01601 Kiyv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] (BA), [email protected] (AB), [email protected] (TK, AL), [email protected] (PT) *Corresponding author Received: 13 November 2006 / Accepted: 2 August 2007 Abstract This review is a first attempt to summarize data on the records and distribution of 240 alien species in fresh water, brackish water and marine water areas of Ukraine, from unicellular algae up to fish. A checklist of alien species with their taxonomy, synonymy and with a complete bibliography of their first records is presented. Analysis of the main trends of alien species introduction, present ecological status, origin and pathways is considered. Key words: alien species, ballast water, Black Sea, distribution, invasion, Sea of Azov introduction of plants and animals to new areas Introduction increased over the ages. From the beginning of the 19th century, due to The range of organisms of different taxonomic rising technical progress, the influence of man groups varies with time, which can be attributed on nature has increased in geometrical to general processes of phylogenesis, to changes progression, gradually becoming comparable in in the contours of land and sea, forest and dimensions to climate impact.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SUCEAVA COUNTY COUNCIL Department of External Partnerships
    SUCEAVA COUNTY COUNCIL Department of external partnerships and diaspora Chernivtsi region The most important activities commonly developed, since the signing of the partnership between Suceava county and Chernivtsi region, in Ukraine, were as follows: - twinning between schools and territorial-administrative units from Suceava county with similar ones from Chernivtsi region; - exchanges of experience between specialists from different fields of activity in the two regions; - participation, based on reciprocity, in rest camps, organized for children; - organizing, in common, folklore festivals, poetry contests, performances; - study trips; - sport competitions between students; - organizing conferences, symposiums, training activities with the participation of teachers, school inspectors and school directors from the two partner regions in order to conclude partnerships and to promote projects of common interest; - exchange of teaching materials, books; - providing school programs for the assimilation (familiarization with) of the mother tongue, knowledge of the history and traditions of minorities; - regular work meetings at the headquarters of the two administrative-territorial units, as well as at the PCTF Siret-Porubne and Porubne-Siret, with the participation of the administrative leaders of Suceava county and Chernivtsi region. In the field of culture, a series of activities of particular importance have been carried out, for the organization of which Suceava County Council, as well as the Cernăuţi Regional State Administration and
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3: Lancashire Key Species Search Results and Definition
    Appendix 3: Lancashire Key Species Search Results and Definition 'Lancashire Key Species' (LKS) is used by LERN as a collective term to refer to species which have a recognised status, either nationally or locally. Specifically, it includes species identified in one or more of the following sources: The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (usually referred to as the 2010 Habitats Regulations) implement Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitats Directive) into national legislation. Articles 12 and 13 of the Habitats Directive contains a range of prohibitions seeking to protect species listed on Annex IV (animal and plant species in need of strict protection). European Protected Species are animals and plants that receive protection under The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010. LKS includes species listed on Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive. These species, together with the birds protected under the Birds Directive, are called species of 'Community interest'. The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) (WCA) implements parts of the Birds Directive 2009 [2] and the Berne Convention (1979) [3] into national legislation. It includes a number of Schedules which are reviewed (usually every five years) on which details of the protected species, and their level of protection, are shown. A detailed summary of the relevant sections of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, along with the protection afforded under them can be found within Paragraphs 118-122 of ODPM Circular_06/2005 . Species listed on Schedules 1, 5 and 8 are included on the list of LKS: Schedule 1 refers to Birds and their young, for which it is an offence to intentionally or recklessly disturb at, on or near an ‘active’ nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Academia De Ştiinţe a Moldovei Institutul Patrimoniului Cultural
    E-ISSN 2537–6152 Categoria B ACADEMIA DE ŞTIINŢE A MOLDOVEI INSTITUTUL PATRIMONIULUI CULTURAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA THE INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК МОЛДОВЫ ИНСТИТУТ КУЛЬТУРНОГО НАСЛЕДИЯ REVISTA DE ETNOLOGIE ŞI CULTUROLOGIE Volumul XX THE JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY AND CULTUROLOGY Volume XX ЖУРНАЛ ЭТНОЛОГИИ И КУЛЬТУРОЛОГИИ Том XX CHIŞINĂU, 2016 Colegiul de redacție: Procop S. Redactor principal. Doctor în filologie, Duşacova N. Doctor în istorie, cercetător ştiinţific conferenţiar, director al Centrului de Etnologie al Insti- superior, Centrul de Tipologie şi Semiotică a Folclorului, tutului Patrimoniului Cultural al AȘM. svetlanaprocop@ Universitatea de Stat din Rusia (Moscova). dushakova@ mail.ru list.ru Zaicovschi T. Redactor responsabil. Doctor în filolo- Ghinoiu I. Doctor în geografie, cercetător ştiinţific gie, conferenţiar, cercetător ştiinţific coordonator la Cen- principal, gradul I, secretar ştiinţific al Institutului de trul de Etnologie al Institutului Patrimoniului Cultural. Etnografie şi Folclor „C. Brăiloiu”, Academia Română [email protected] (Bucureşti). [email protected] Damian V. Secretar responsabil. Doctor în istorie, Guboglo M. Doctor habilitat în istorie, profesor, cercetător ştiinţific superior la Centrul de Etnologie al vice-director al Institutului de Etnologie şi Antropolo- IPC al AȘM. [email protected] gie „N. Mikluho-Maklai”, Academia de Știinţe din Rusia Cara N. Doctor în filologie, cercetător ştiinţific co- (Moscova). [email protected] ordonator la Centrul de Etnologie al Institutului Patrimo- Nicoglo D. Doctor în istorie, cercetător ştiinţific niului Cultural al AȘM. [email protected] superior la Centrul de Etnologie al IPC al AȘM. Derlicki J. Doctor în etnologie, cercetător ştiinţific [email protected] la Departamentul de Etnologie al Institutului de Arhe- S te p a n o v V.
    [Show full text]
  • IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008
    RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2008 RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30th June 2008 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON BIH.................................................................. 5 3 IDENTIFIED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ............................................................. 8 3-a Relevant institutions.......................................................................................................................................8 3-b Experts.............................................................................................................................................................9 3-c Relevant scientific publications ...................................................................................................................10 3-c-i) Birds...........................................................................................................................................................10 3-c-ii) Fish ........................................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iii) Mammals ...............................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iv)
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Natura 2000 Management
    Workshop on Natura 2000 Management Threats, Challenges and Solutions With a specific focus on management of forest and grassland habitats in the Alpine biogeographic region The state of play of Natura 2000 management and financing in Romania prepared by Laura Done, Speleological Foundation "Club Speo Bucovina" Please answer the following questions regarding recent developments of Natura 2000 in your country. 1. Last development of the establishment of Natura 2000: • are there any changes in the Natura 2000 coverage in the last years: Yes, geographical diversification and competence domains. • do you expect any changes in the next few years: Yes, we expect that more areas to be added to Natura2000 network. • do you consider that the network is complete: No. There are still many studies to be made and approved for areas that need to be included in the network. • Any ideas for CEEweb support and activities in this field? Facilitating the exchange of good practices between the NGOs in the network. Involving the young people in Natura 2000 projects. 2. SAC designation process: • how many SCI till now: SCIs on Suceava County territory approved through the order of the Ministry of Environment and Forests No.2387/2011 to modify the order of the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development No.1964/2007 regarding naming natural protected areas of comuniotary importance as integrated part of the ecological European network Natura 2000: 1. ROSCI0010 – Bistrița Aurie (Golden Bistrita) – situated on the administrative territories of Cârlibaba, Ciocăneşti and Iacobeni, administred by Romanian Waters; ‐ plans started to be developed 2. ROSCI0019 – Călimani – Gurghiu ‐ situated on the administrative territories of Poiana Stampei, Dorna Candrenilor, Panaci and Şaru Dornei, administred by Călimani National Park; ‐ plans are ready 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafficking in Transnistria: the Role of Russia
    Trafficking in Transnistria: The Role of Russia by Kent Harrel SIS Honors Capstone Supervised by Professors Linda Lubrano and Elizabeth Anderson Submitted to the School of International Service American University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with General University Honors Bachelor of Arts Degree May 2009 Abstract After declaring de facto independence from the Republic of Moldova in 1992, the breakaway region of Transnistria became increasingly isolated, and has emerged as a hotspot for weapons and human trafficking. Working from a Realist paradigm, this project assesses the extent to which the Russian government and military abet trafficking in Transnistria, and the way in which Russia uses trafficking as a means to adversely affect Moldova’s designs of broader integration within European spheres. This project proves necessary because the existing scholarship on the topic of Transnistrian trafficking failed to focus on the role of the Russian government and military, and in turn did not account for the ways in which trafficking hinders Moldova’s national interests. The research project utilizes sources such as trafficking policy centers, first-hand accounts, trade agreements, non-governmental organizations, and government documents. A review of the literature employs the use of secondary sources such as scholarly and newspaper articles. In short, this project develops a more comprehensive understanding of Russia’s role in Moldovan affairs and attempts to add a significant work to the existing literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Participants List Final Conference
    SANTE Final Conference, Prague, Czech Republik, 18. - 20.3.2011 - Participants list First name: Surname: E-mail address: Organisation: Country: Galina Gorbatenkova [email protected] LTSA Latvia Kestutis Levickis [email protected] NEMUNAS Lithuania Anders Tharsgaard [email protected] ISCA Denmark Jacob Schouenborg [email protected] ISCA Denmark Saska Benedicic Tomat [email protected] ISCA Slovenia Antonio Borgogni [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Anders Kragh Jespersen [email protected] DGI Denmark Anna Streber [email protected] ISCA Germany Millar Stoddart [email protected] SALSC Scotland Eloisa Lorente [email protected] University of Bedfordshire, Uk Spain Giovanni Capelli [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Rosa Pasqualina De Vincenco [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Simone Digennaro [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Borislav Obradovic [email protected] University of Novi Sad Serbia Toni Llop [email protected] UBAE Spain Antonio Saccone [email protected] UISP Italy Jean Claude Besnard [email protected] UFOLEP France First name: Surname: E-mail address: Organisation: Country: Benedictas Siliunas [email protected] NEMUNAS Lithuania David Laing [email protected] SALSC Scotland Sami Kokko [email protected] University of Jyvaskyla Finland Artan Shytaj [email protected] University of Tirana Albania Aivars Kaupuzs [email protected] LTSA Latvia Silvia Crevels [email protected] NSA, Nederlandse Sport Alliantie Netherland Miroslav Zitko [email protected] CASPV Czech Republic Steen Bille [email protected] DGI Denmark Vlasta Syslova [email protected] CASPV Czech Republic Jitka Hozakova [email protected] CASPV Czech Republic Jana Havrdova [email protected] Czech Aerobic/Fitness/Dance A.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea-Arthropoda) Fauna of Sinop and Samsun and Their Ecology
    J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 15: 47- 60 (2009) Freshwater and brackish water Malacostraca (Crustacea-Arthropoda) fauna of Sinop and Samsun and their ecology Sinop ve Samsun illeri tatlısu ve acısu Malacostraca (Crustacea-Arthropoda) faunası ve ekolojileri Mehmet Akbulut1*, M. Ruşen Ustaoğlu2, Ekrem Şanver Çelik1 1 Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Fisheries Faculty, Çanakkale-Turkey 2 Ege University, Fisheries Faculty, Izmir-Turkey Abstract Malacostraca fauna collected from freshwater and brackishwater in Sinop and Samsun were studied from 181 stations between February 1999 and September 2000. 19 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 15 genuses were found in 134 stations. In total, 23 taxon were found: 11 Amphipoda, 6 Decapoda, 4 Isopoda, and 2 Mysidacea. Limnomysis benedeni is the first time in Turkish Mysidacea fauna. In this work at the first time recorded group are Gammarus pulex pulex, Gammarus aequicauda, Gammarus uludagi, Gammarus komareki, Gammarus longipedis, Gammarus balcanicus, Echinogammarus ischnus, Orchestia stephenseni Paramysis kosswigi, Idotea baltica basteri, Idotea hectica, Sphaeroma serratum, Palaemon adspersus, Crangon crangon, Potamon ibericum tauricum and Carcinus aestuarii in the studied area. Potamon ibericum tauricum is the most encountered and widespread species. Key words: Freshwater, brackish water, Malacostraca, Sinop, Samsun, Turkey Introduction The Malacostraca is the largest subgroup of crustaceans and includes the decapods such as crabs, mole crabs, lobsters, true shrimps and the stomatopods or mantis shrimps. There are more than 22,000 taxa in this group representing two third of all crustacean species and contains all the larger forms. *Corresponding author: [email protected] 47 Malacostracans play an important role in aquatic ecosystems and therefore their conservation is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • “Romanian Waters”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania
    NATIONAL ADMNISTRATION “ROMANIAN WATERS” Romania key input to the Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters under the UNECE Water Convention Prut River Basin CORINA COSMINA BOSCORNEA, PhD National Administration “Romanian Waters ”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania Ukraine - Kiev, 28 th April 2010 Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Romanian transboundary river basins Information about transboundary river basins: •Somes/Szamos, •Mures/Maros, •Crisuri, Tisza River •Banat, basin •Siret, •Prut, •Dobrogea-Litoral , •Arges-Vedea Danube •Banat River Basin •Buzau-Ialomita District •Jiu Romanian river basins Prut river basins in the Danube river basin district Prut river basin 1. General description of the Prut river basin The total Population Area in area of the Major density in the Shared the Character with an river basin transbound area in the countries country in average elevation in the ary river country km² (%) country (persons/km 2) upland character Romania, (Ukrainian 10,990 Ukraine and 27820 Prut Carpathians) and 55 (39.5%) Moldova lowland (lower reaches) • The Prut river basin is shared by Ukraine, Romania and Moldova Its source is in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Later, the Prut forms the border between Romania and Moldova. • The rivers Lapatnic, Drageste and Racovet are transboundary tributaries in the Prut sub-basin; they cross the Ukrainian- Moldavian border. • The Prut River’s major national tributaries are the rivers Cheremosh and Derelui, (Ukraine), Baseu, Jijia,
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, Systematics
    A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) By Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) ____________________________________ Adviser: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Christine M. Mayer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Elliot J. Tramer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. David J. Jude ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Juan L. Bouzat ____________________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 Copyright © 2009 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. _______________________________________________________________________ An Abstract of Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) The University of Toledo December 2009 The study of biodiversity, at multiple hierarchical levels, provides insight into the evolutionary history of taxa and provides a framework for understanding patterns in ecology. This is especially poignant in invasion biology, where the prevalence of invasiveness in certain taxonomic groups could
    [Show full text]