The Gypsy Moth and Its Natural Enemies Agriculture Information Bulletin No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Gypsy Moth and Its Natural Enemies Agriculture Information Bulletin No THE GYPSY MOTH AND ITS NATURAL ENEMIES AGRICULTURE INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 381 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE i^Q^^áh nú'3^1 '/■*X. -//' ■*iS3l^ THE AUTHOR ROBERT W. CAMPBELL is principal ecologist at the North- eastern Forest Experiment Station's research unit maintained at Syracuse, N. Y., in cooperation with the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry at Syracuse University. He received his bachelor's degree in forestry from the State University of New York College of Forestry in 1953 and his master's and Ph.D. degrees in forestry from the University of Michigan in 1959 and 1961. He joined the USDA Forest Service's Northeastern Forest Experiment Station in 1961. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks to both Wayne Trimm and Robert W. Brown, whose beautiful illustrations reflect careful study of their sub- jects. I also thank the many gypsy moth watchers who have shared their observations and experiences with me. Issued February 1975 11 THE GYPSY MOTH AND ITS NATURAL ENEMIES by Robert W. Campbell CONTENTS BEHAVIOR 2 Hatch and dispersal 2 Young larvae 2 Older larvae 4 Pre-pupae and pupae 4 Adults 6 Eggs 6 MORTALITY 8 Young larvae 8 Older larvae 11 Pre-pupae 18 Pupae 18 Adults 21 Eggs 21 AGENTS THAT KILL THE SEXES DIFFERENTIALLY 22 CHANGES IN GYPSY MOTH POPULATION DENSITY 23 A FEW LAST WORDS 27 111 CAMPBELL, ROBERT W. 1974. The Gypsy Moth and its Natural Enemies. Agr. Inf. Bull. No. 381,27 p., illus. Patterns of gypsy moth behavior are described, especially those related to population density. Natural mortality-causing factors that operate against this insect are also described. Several agents kill subadult male and female gypsy moths at different rates. Major determinants of year-to-year changes in gypsy moth numbers are described. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 74-600201 IV jYÍOST OF US have grown more or less than just sitting around and watching our immune to the sort of long-range, remote trees be gobbled up. threats that we read or hear about so fre- For example, millions of forested acres in quently in this age of instant communication. the northeastern United States were treated But those who have seen a gypsy moth out- with DDT in the 1950's, even though we had break can testify that the threat this insect far too little factual information about either poses seems immediate and sometimes almost the natural life system of the insect itself or terrifying. the possible interactions between the insect's life system and this one-dimensional method Millions of dollars have been spent in ef- of treatment. forts to control this pest or to eliminate it My introduction to this insect was based on from this continent; yet it continues to spread the notion that somebody should do nothing and to defoliate our woodland, park, and or- at all except sit on a stump and watch the namental trees. insect. The late Dr. Donald L. Collins, the Gypsy moths, Porthetria dispar (L.), were state entomologist of New York, offered me a imported to the United States from Europe summer job as "gypsy moth watcher" in 1957. in 1868 by a scientist who thought he could I took that job, and found my niche, I guess, use them to make silk. They escaped, bred, because IVe been a gypsy moth watcher ever thrived, and built up populations that soon since. began to damage trees in Massachusetts. Insect-pest management has been identified so closely with chemical pesticides in recent The gypsy moth is a defoliator. It devours years that we tend to ignore the fact that the foliage of hardwood trees— especially these pesticides are only a part of pest-popu- oaks— which can kill the trees. From the first Iktion management. We should know our infestations in Massachusetts, the gypsy moth enemy beforehand in enough detail so that has spread until it is now the major insect we can use pesticides only in bona fide emer- threat to the hardwood forests of the north- gencies; and other methods—including doing eastern United States. nothing—^would become much more promi- Some of our failures to control this pest nent in the management scheme. have had their roots in the long-standing The following notes about the gypsy moth, notion that we must at all times do something. its behavior, and its ecology have been col- This notion, in turn, seems to have been based lected during 17 years of observing this in- on the premise that doing anything is better sect pest. BEHAVIOR Hatch and Dispersal on a silken thread, which is easily broken by Gypsy moth larvae usually begin to hatch wind movement, so they may become wind- around the first of May. Hatch time is deter- borne. The insects are buoyant at this stage, mined primarily by temperature, so you will and the wind may carry them for long dis- probably find the earliest hatch from egg tances. masses on the exposed bark of dark-colored This windborne dispersal period, which may trees, like red oak. Egg masses that were de- continue for about 2 weeks, often results in posited in sheltered places—under rocks for rather massive re-distribution of the popula- example—are likely to hatch a few days later. tion. Re-distribution serves as a potent sur- The tiny caterpillars are much lighter in vival mechanism for the species and frequently color when they hatch than they will be a few tends to prolong gypsy moth outbreaks. Ul- hours later (fig. 1). Because they nearly al- timately, of course, the caterpillars must ways spend a few hours on the egg mass, you either establish themselves on edible foliage or may see caterpillars of various hues on a single perish. egg mass. Early-stage caterpillars orient toward light; Young Larvae so when they move away from the egg mass, Long-range dispersal of larvae probably they nearly always move upward. Only on a ceases shortly after the insects establish them- heavily overcast day may you find a few cater- selves on suitable foliage. The larvae grow pillars moving downward from the egg mass. rapidly. The male molts its skin four times, Most of the larvae ascend to the top of the the female five times. The caterpillar stage tree, which by this time has produced foliage between molts is called an instar; so male about the size of rabbit ears. Many of these gypsy moths usually have five caterpillar in- larvae immediately spin down from the foliage stars, and females have six. Extra-instar cater- pillars are sometimes present in the popula- tion. Young caterpillars usually remain on or near the foliage until they have molted twice. Once, though, I worked in a place containing an enormously dense population, where mil- lions of the second- and third-instar insects had spun silken threads from the canopy to the forest floor (fig. 2). At this time, a walk through these woods was like walking through an endless spider web—a horrible experience. Fortunately, this situation is rare. Figure 1.—Hatching gypsy moth larvae. Light in color when first hatched, they turn dark within a few hours. These insects will soon begin crawling up the tree. Figure 2.—This young larva has spun a sill<en thread from the tree crown. This thread will probably break as he drops, and the wind may carry him to another loca- tion . possibly as much as 20 miles away. The many long hairs on his body increase his air-borne buoyancy. Older Larvae in the woods. They can be easily induced to use artifiicial resting locations, such as burlap Beginning about half-way through the third bands placed on the trees; and this method instar, you may find increasing numbers of has been used with some success to control caterpillars on the boles of trees. The insects the insect. are then undergoing a profound behavioral At dusk these caterpillars leave their rest- change. They are beginning to use dry, dark ing places and climb back up into the tree places for resting during daylight hours, and crown. You may need a flashlight to see this, they will continue to do this for the balance too; but you can almost set your watch by of their caterpillar lifetime. the time this re-ascent of the trees begins. Since the population on any given date will Caterpillar behavior changes as population probably contain caterpillars in three or four density increases. At intermediate densities different instars, this behavioral change may you are likely to find the caterpillars resting seem to be in a state of ñux for about 3 weeks. under bark flakes on the living boles of species The behavior of the older caterpillars is re- like white oak, which they would not use un- lated closely to population density. der lower density regimes. By the time most of the caterpillars in At extremely high densities, the caterpillars sparse populations are midway through their apparently do not use resting places at all un- fourth instar, most of them descend from the til they are ready to pupate. Rather, they crown of their host tree at the first detectable remain on the foliage, feeding continuously sign of morning light, to find a daytime rest- both day and night. ing place. You have to get out of bed early to At the end of this last behavioral phase, see this, and you'll need a flashlight. which is characteristic of outbreak conditions, Typically, the caterpillars descend to the the insects that are about to pupate usually tree base and spend the daylight hours under descend from the foliage, fill every available dead leaves on the forest floor (fig.
Recommended publications
  • Faa 119 Biodiversity Analysis
    , MOLDOVA FAA 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS February 2007 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared1 by DevTech Systems, Inc. under an EPIQ II subcontract to PA Government Services, Inc. This page left intentionally blank MOLDOVA FAA 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS February 2007 Prepared by DevTech Systems, Inc. under an EPIQ II subcontract to PA Government Services, Inc. Contract # EPP-I-00-03-00015-00, subcontract # EPP3R015-4S-003, Task Order 3. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government Cover photo credits: Jeff Ploetz, Steve Nelson, Aureliu Overcenco This page left intentionally blank TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................III PREFACE ........................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... VI SECTION I: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ......................................................1 SECTION II: THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY .....................................................................3 A. The Importance of Biodiversity...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • John Lowell Capinera
    JOHN LOWELL CAPINERA EDUCATION: Ph.D. (entomology) University of Massachusetts, 1976 M.S. (entomology) University of Massachusetts, 1974 B.A. (biology) Southern Connecticut State University, 1970 EXPERIENCE: 2015- present, Emeritus Professor, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida. 1987-2015, Professor and Chairman, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida. 1985-1987, Professor and Head, Department of Entomology, Colorado State University. 1981-1985, Associate Professor, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University. 1976-1981, Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University. RESEARCH INTERESTS Grasshopper biology, ecology, distribution, identification and management Vegetable insects: ecology and management Terrestrial molluscs (slugs and snails): identification, ecology, and management RECOGNITIONS Florida Entomological Society Distinguished Achievement Award in Extension (1998). Florida Entomological Society Entomologist of the Year Award (1998). Gamma Sigma Delta (The Honor Society of Agriculture) Distinguished Leadership Award of Merit (1999). Elected Fellow of the Entomological Society of America (1999). Elected president of the Florida Entomological Society (2001-2002; served as vice president and secretary in previous years). “Handbook of Vegetable Pests,” authored by J.L. Capinera, named an ”Outstanding Academic Title for 2001” by Choice Magazine, a reviewer of publications for university and research libraries. “Award of Recognition” by the Entomological Society of America Formal Vegetable Insect Conference for publication of Handbook of Vegetable Pests (2002) “Encyclopedia of Entomology” was awarded Best Reference by the New York Public Library (2004), and an Outstanding Academic Title by CHOICE (2003). “Field Guide to Grasshoppers, Katydids, and Crickets of the United States” co-authored by J.L. Capinera received “Starred Review” book review in 2005 from Library Journal, a reviewer of library materials.
    [Show full text]
  • E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
    Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Calosoma~In-Cen- ;-0:Sand
    THE GENUS CALOSOMA~IN-CEN- TRAL AMERICA, THE ANTILLES, ;-0:SAND fSOUTH :AMERICA 0(COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE)- TATIANA GIDASPOW BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 124: ARTICLE 7 NEW YORK: -1963 THE GENUS CALOSOMA IN CENTRAL AMERICA, THE ANTILLES, AND SOUTH AMERICA (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE) THE GENUS CALOSOMA IN CENTRAL AMERICA, THE ANTILLES, AND SOUTH AMERICA (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE) TATIANA GIDASPOW Department of Entomology The American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 124 : ARTICLE 7 NEW YORK: 1963 BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Volume 124, article 7, pages 275-314, figures 1-88, tables 1, 2 Issued March 18, 1963 Price: $1.00 a copy INTRODUCTION THE PRESENT REVIEW includes the species of localities given by these authors were limited the genus Calosoma to be found in South and often referred to the country as a whole. America, the Antilles, the Galapagos Islands, In the last 22 years a great deal of additional and Central America south of Mexico. I have information about the distribution of the provided keys for the identification of all species and the variations of local forms has subgenera and species, and all taxa are rede- become available. scribed with the exception of those that were A total of 1919 specimens has been ex- redescribed in the paper on the Calosoma of amined, including the types in the Chaudoir North America (Gidaspow, 1959). For a his- and Dejean collections, except for Calosoma tory of the genus and a discussion of charac- bridgesi Chaudoir which I could not locate ters, see my earlier report (Gidaspow, 1959).
    [Show full text]
  • (Jeannel, 1940) As a New Synonym of Calosoma Imbricatum Hottentotum
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 609: 11–28 (2016) Calosoma aethiops (Jeannel, 1940) as a new synonym... 11 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.609.6822 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Calosoma aethiops (Jeannel, 1940) as a new synonym of Calosoma imbricatum hottentotum Chaudoir, 1852, a new status of Calosoma roeschkei Breuning, 1927, and a revision of the Calosoma senegalense group sensu Häckel, 2012 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Carabini) Martin Häckel1, Jan Farkač1, Rostislav Sehnal2 1 Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech Uni- versity of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 1176, CZ-165 21 Prague 6 – Suchdol, Czech Republic 2 V Zahrádkách 962, CZ-273 51 Unhošť, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Martin Häckel ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Casale | Received 11 October 2015 | Accepted 25 April 2016 | Published 8 August 2016 http://zoobank.org/91E491A4-07C5-448C-BA83-1E4FAB807066 Citation: Häckel M, Farkač J, Sehnal R (2016) Calosoma aethiops (Jeannel, 1940) as a new synonym of Calosoma imbricatum hottentotum Chaudoir, 1852, a new status of Calosoma roeschkei Breuning, 1927, and a revision of the Calosoma senegalense group sensu Häckel, 2012 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Carabini). ZooKeys 609: 11–28. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.609.6822 Abstract Calosoma aethiops (Jeannel, 1940) as a new synonym of Calosoma imbricatum hottentotum Chaudoir, 1852, a new status of Calosoma roeschkei Breuning, 1927, and a revision of the Calosoma senegalense group sensu Häckel, 2012 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Carabini). Conducted is a taxonomic revision of the Caloso- ma senegalense group sensu Häckel, 2012. Placed in the group sensu stricto are four species: C.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the XIV European Carabidologists Meeting, Westerbork, 14-18 September, 2009”, Vol
    18th European Carabidologist Meeting – Rennes 25-29 September 2017 FINANCIAL SUPPORT We thank all the partners who provided their technical and financial support for the organisation of the 18th European Carabidologist Meeting: … 18th European Carabidologist Meeting – Rennes 25-29 September 2017 SCIENTIFIC BOARD President: Elsa CANARD, INRA, UMR IGEPP, Rennes, France Manuel PLANTEGENEST, Agrocampus-ouest, UMR IGEPP, Rennes, France Members: Audrey Alignier, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes, France Stéphanie Aviron, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes, France Marc Dufrêne, Liege University - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium Lovei Gabor, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark Guénola Péres, Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR SAS, Rennes, France Julien Pétillon, EA Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, Rennes, France Roberto Pizzoloto, Università della Calabria – Dept. B.E.S.T., Rende, Italy David Renault, Université Rennes 1, UMR Ecobio, Rennes, France Pavel Saska, Crop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republik Lucija Šerić Jelaska, Croatian Ecological Society, Zagreb, Croatia José Serrano, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain John Spence, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Yann Tricault, Agrocampus Ouest, UMR IGEPP, Angers, France STEERING COMMITTEE President: Elsa CANARD, INRA, UMR IGEPP, Rennes Secretary: Isabelle BAUMGARTEN, Agrocampus-ouest, Rennes Members: Audrey Alignier, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes Stéphanie Aviron, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes Françoise Burel, CNRS, UMR Ecobio, Rennes El Aziz Djoudi, EA Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, Rennes Romain
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Insects of Utah Guide
    BENEFICIAL INSECTS OF UTAH beneficial insects & other natural enemies identification guide PUBLICATION COORDINATORS AND EDITORS Cami Cannon (Vegetable IPM Associate and Graphic Design) Marion Murray (IPM Project Leader) AUTHORS Cami Cannon Marion Murray Ron Patterson (insects: ambush bug, collops beetle, red velvet mite) Katie Wagner (insects: Trichogramma wasp) IMAGE CREDITS All images are provided by Utah State University Extension unless otherwise noted within the image caption. CONTACT INFORMATION Utah State University IPM Program Dept. of Biology 5305 Old Main Hill Logan, UT 84322 (435) 797-0776 utahpests.usu.edu/IPM FUNDING FOR THIS PUBLICATION WAS PROVIDED BY: USU Extension Grants Program CONTENTS PREFACE Purpose of this Guide ................................................................6 Importance of Natural Enemies ..................................................6 General Practices to Enhance Natural Enemies ...........................7 Plants that will Enhance Natural Enemy Populations ..................7 PREDATORS Beetles .....................................................................................10 Flies .........................................................................................24 Lacewings/Dustywings .............................................................32 Mites ........................................................................................36 Spiders .....................................................................................42 Thrips ......................................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance of Priority Terrestrial Invertebrates in Scotland
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 609 Surveillance of priority terrestrial invertebrates in Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 609 Surveillance of priority terrestrial invertebrates in Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Athayde Tonhasca Scottish Natural Heritage Battleby Redgorton PERTH PH1 3EW Telephone: 01738 458671 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Littlewood, N.A. & Stockan, J.A. 2013. Surveillance of priority terrestrial invertebrates in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 609. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2013. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Surveillance of priority terrestrial invertebrates in Scotland Commissioned Report No. 609 Contractor: N.A. Littlewood & J.A. Stockan Year of publication: 2013 Background Scottish Natural Heritage has been asked by Scottish ministers to implement a strategy for the surveillance of priority habitats and species in Scotland. This report covers the development of such strategies for 55 species of non-marine invertebrates and draws extensively on expert comment from consultees with specialised knowledge of individual species covered. For each species, a report was written to present background information about the status of the species in Scotland together with issues relevant to surveillance, such as ecology, habitat and threats. This is followed by a Surveillance Methodology, outlining measures that can be taken to monitor the species in such a way as to determine trends in population size, range or status.
    [Show full text]
  • Gypsy Moth Management in the United States: a Cooperative Approach
    Gypsy Moth Management in the United States: a cooperative approach Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Volume II of IV Chapters 1-8 and Appendixes A-E United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Newtown Square, PA NA–MB–01–12 August 2012 Gypsy Moth Management in the United States: a cooperative approach Type of Statement: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Area covered by statement: The 50 United States and District of Columbia Lead agency: Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Responsible official: James R. Hubbard, Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry Sidney R. Yates Federal Building 201 14th Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20250 For more information: Noel F. Schneeberger, Forest Health Program Leader Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry 11 Campus Boulevard, Suite 200 Newtown Square, PA 19073 610–557–4121 [email protected] Joint lead agency: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Responsible official: Rebecca A. Bech, Deputy Administrator for Plant Protection and Quarantine 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 302-E Washington, DC 20250 For more information: Julie S. Spaulding, Gypsy Moth Program Coordinator Emergency and Domestic Programs 4700 River Road, Unit 137 Riverdale, MD 20737 301–851–2184 [email protected] Abstract: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are proposing an addition to the gypsy moth management program that was described in the 1995 Environmental Impact Statement—Gypsy Moth Management in the United States: a cooperative approach—and chosen in the 1996 Record of Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Production and Release of Calosoma Sycophanta L
    TurkJZool 30(2006)181-185 ©TÜB‹TAK MassProductionandReleaseof Calosomasycophanta L. (Coleoptera:Carabidae)UsedagainstthePineProcessionaryMoth, Thaumetopoeapityocampa (Schiff.)(Lepidoptera:Thaumetopoeidae), inBiologicalControl MehmetKANAT*,MuhammetÖZBOLAT DepartmentofForestEngineering,FacultyofForestry,KahramanmaraflSütcü‹mamUniversity, 46060Kahramanmarafl-TURKEY Received:19.07.2005 Abstract: ThisstudywasconductedtodeterminethemassproductionofCalosomasycophantaL.underlaboratoryconditions(23 °C,60%-65%RHandaphotoperiodof8:16(L:D)h,85%-90%soilhumidity)between2001and2004inKahramanmarafl.The adultemergenceperiodofC.sycophantastartedon21Februaryandextendeduntil7March(fromsoil).Whentheyemerged,they fedoncaterpillarsofthepineprocessionarymoth.Theegglayingperiodcontinuedfor20-25dayswithahatchingperiod6-13 days,Threelarvalinstarswereobserved.Durationofthefirstinstarswas7-11days,ofthesecondwas8-12days,andofthethird was15-18days.Thepupalstageofthebeetlecontinuedfor9to16days.Duringthisapplicationpupaeshouldbeputintohumi d soil25-30cmdeep.Approximately200-250laboratoryrearedindividualswerereleasedperhectare. KeyWords: Calosomasycophanta,Predator,Thaumetopoeapityocampa,massproduction,Kahramanmarafl ÇamKeseböce¤ineKarfl›BiyolojikMücadeledeKullan›lan Calosomasycophanta L.’n›nKitleÜretimiveAraziyeSal›m› Özet: Buçal›flmaCalosomasycophantaL.’n›nkitleüretimiamac›ylalaboratuarkoflullar›nda(23°C,%60-65nem,fotoperiyod8:16 saat(gece:gündüz),%85-90topraknemi)2001-2004y›llar›aras›ndaKahramanmaraflbölgesindeyürütülmüfltür.C.sycophanta erginlerininbölgedetopraktanç›k›fllar›21fiubat-7Marttarihleriaras›ndad›r.Erginlertopraktanç›kt›klar›ndaçamkeseböce¤
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Olfactory Cues on the Movement Behavior of the Predatory Beetle Calosoma Wilcoxi
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2016 Effects of Olfactory Cues on the Movement Behavior of the Predatory Beetle Calosoma wilcoxi Kennesha Myrick-Bragg Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Entomology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Kennesha J. Myrick-Bragg 2016 All Rights Reserved Effects of olfactory cues on the movement behavior of the predatory beetle Calosoma wilcoxi A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Kennesha Myrick-Bragg Biology, B.S., Virginia Commonwealth University 2012 Director: Derek M Johnson Assistant Professor, Department of Biology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA 2016 Acknowledgement Many thanks to Joel Bragg, Kaydence Moseley, Abigail Nelson, Savanna Scott, Phillip Avery, Carolyn Booth, Sarah Mooneyham, Caroline Sorey, Peter Alison, Daniel Booth, Sunauz Moezzi, Rainey-Dale Delisle, Lesley Bulluck, and Brett Butler for assistance in insect collection and rearing. I would also like to thank Derek M. Johnson for his patience and support. This work
    [Show full text]
  • Range-Expansion in Processionary Moths and Biological Control
    insects Review Range-Expansion in Processionary Moths and Biological Control Jetske G. de Boer 1,* and Jeffrey A. Harvey 1,2 1 Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Department of Ecological Sciences, Section Animal Ecology, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-317-473632 Received: 30 March 2020; Accepted: 23 April 2020; Published: 28 April 2020 Abstract: Global climate change is resulting in a wide range of biotic responses, including changes in diel activity and seasonal phenology patterns, range shifts polewards in each hemisphere and/or to higher elevations, and altered intensity and frequency of interactions between species in ecosystems. Oak (Thaumetopoea processionea) and pine (T. pityocampa) processionary moths (hereafter OPM and PPM, respectively) are thermophilic species that are native to central and southern Europe. The larvae of both species are gregarious and produce large silken ‘nests’ that they use to congregate when not feeding. During outbreaks, processionary caterpillars are capable of stripping foliage from their food plants (oak and pine trees), generating considerable economic damage. Moreover, the third to last instar caterpillars of both species produce copious hairs as a means of defence against natural enemies, including both vertebrate and invertebrate predators, and parasitoids. These hairs contain the toxin thaumetopoein that causes strong allergic reactions when it comes into contact with human skin or other membranes. In response to a warming climate, PPM is expanding its range northwards, while OPM outbreaks are increasing in frequency and intensity, particularly in northern Germany, the Netherlands, and southern U.K., where it was either absent or rare previously.
    [Show full text]