1 SUCEAVA COUNTY COUNCIL Department of External Partnerships
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
0740 250 162 Cotin Rodica -..: CCD Suceava
ANUL ȘCOLAR 2018 - 2019 Colibaba Georgeta - 0740 250 162 Cotin Rodica - 0745 176 090 Maria Guzu - 0754052946 DATE DE DE DATE CONTACT METODISTI PROFESORI Zup Daniela - 0754 054 258 Nr. Crt. Unitatea școlară Zona Responsabil 1 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "LUCA ARBURE" ARBORE RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 2 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA BAINET RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 3 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA BALCAUTI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 4 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "GEORGE TOFAN" BILCA RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 5 LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC SPECIAL BIVOLARIE RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 6 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA BIVOLARIE RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 7 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA BRODINA RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 8 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA BURLA RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 9 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA CALAFINDESTI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 10 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA DORNESTI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 11 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "IRACLIE PORUMBESCU" FRATAUTII NOI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 12 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA FRATAUTII VECHI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 13 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "SAMSON BODNARESCU" GALANESTI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 14 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "PAHOMIE C VASILIU" GRAMESTI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 15 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "MIHAIL SADOVEANU" GRANICESTI RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 16 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "I.G.SBIERA" HORODNIC DE JOS RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 17 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA "IULIAN VESPER" HORODNIC DE SUS RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 18 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA NR. 1 IASLOVAT RĂDĂUȚI + SIRET Colibaba Georgeta 19 SCOALA GIMNAZIALA -
Profiles of Rural Households in the North-East Development Region of Romania: Case Studies
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Brumă, Ion Sebastian; Bohatereţ, Valentin Mihai; Tanasǎ, Lucian Conference Paper Profiles of rural households in the North-East Development Region of Romania: Case studies Provided in Cooperation with: The Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), Bucharest Suggested Citation: Brumă, Ion Sebastian; Bohatereţ, Valentin Mihai; Tanasǎ, Lucian (2017) : Profiles of rural households in the North-East Development Region of Romania: Case studies, In: Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania. 8th Edition of the International Symposium, November 2017, Bucharest, The Research Institute for Agricultural Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), Bucharest, pp. 191-196 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190898 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. -
Academia De Ştiinţe a Moldovei Institutul Patrimoniului Cultural
E-ISSN 2537–6152 Categoria B ACADEMIA DE ŞTIINŢE A MOLDOVEI INSTITUTUL PATRIMONIULUI CULTURAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA THE INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК МОЛДОВЫ ИНСТИТУТ КУЛЬТУРНОГО НАСЛЕДИЯ REVISTA DE ETNOLOGIE ŞI CULTUROLOGIE Volumul XX THE JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY AND CULTUROLOGY Volume XX ЖУРНАЛ ЭТНОЛОГИИ И КУЛЬТУРОЛОГИИ Том XX CHIŞINĂU, 2016 Colegiul de redacție: Procop S. Redactor principal. Doctor în filologie, Duşacova N. Doctor în istorie, cercetător ştiinţific conferenţiar, director al Centrului de Etnologie al Insti- superior, Centrul de Tipologie şi Semiotică a Folclorului, tutului Patrimoniului Cultural al AȘM. svetlanaprocop@ Universitatea de Stat din Rusia (Moscova). dushakova@ mail.ru list.ru Zaicovschi T. Redactor responsabil. Doctor în filolo- Ghinoiu I. Doctor în geografie, cercetător ştiinţific gie, conferenţiar, cercetător ştiinţific coordonator la Cen- principal, gradul I, secretar ştiinţific al Institutului de trul de Etnologie al Institutului Patrimoniului Cultural. Etnografie şi Folclor „C. Brăiloiu”, Academia Română [email protected] (Bucureşti). [email protected] Damian V. Secretar responsabil. Doctor în istorie, Guboglo M. Doctor habilitat în istorie, profesor, cercetător ştiinţific superior la Centrul de Etnologie al vice-director al Institutului de Etnologie şi Antropolo- IPC al AȘM. [email protected] gie „N. Mikluho-Maklai”, Academia de Știinţe din Rusia Cara N. Doctor în filologie, cercetător ştiinţific co- (Moscova). [email protected] ordonator la Centrul de Etnologie al Institutului Patrimo- Nicoglo D. Doctor în istorie, cercetător ştiinţific niului Cultural al AȘM. [email protected] superior la Centrul de Etnologie al IPC al AȘM. Derlicki J. Doctor în etnologie, cercetător ştiinţific [email protected] la Departamentul de Etnologie al Institutului de Arhe- S te p a n o v V. -
Workshop on Natura 2000 Management
Workshop on Natura 2000 Management Threats, Challenges and Solutions With a specific focus on management of forest and grassland habitats in the Alpine biogeographic region The state of play of Natura 2000 management and financing in Romania prepared by Laura Done, Speleological Foundation "Club Speo Bucovina" Please answer the following questions regarding recent developments of Natura 2000 in your country. 1. Last development of the establishment of Natura 2000: • are there any changes in the Natura 2000 coverage in the last years: Yes, geographical diversification and competence domains. • do you expect any changes in the next few years: Yes, we expect that more areas to be added to Natura2000 network. • do you consider that the network is complete: No. There are still many studies to be made and approved for areas that need to be included in the network. • Any ideas for CEEweb support and activities in this field? Facilitating the exchange of good practices between the NGOs in the network. Involving the young people in Natura 2000 projects. 2. SAC designation process: • how many SCI till now: SCIs on Suceava County territory approved through the order of the Ministry of Environment and Forests No.2387/2011 to modify the order of the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development No.1964/2007 regarding naming natural protected areas of comuniotary importance as integrated part of the ecological European network Natura 2000: 1. ROSCI0010 – Bistrița Aurie (Golden Bistrita) – situated on the administrative territories of Cârlibaba, Ciocăneşti and Iacobeni, administred by Romanian Waters; ‐ plans started to be developed 2. ROSCI0019 – Călimani – Gurghiu ‐ situated on the administrative territories of Poiana Stampei, Dorna Candrenilor, Panaci and Şaru Dornei, administred by Călimani National Park; ‐ plans are ready 4. -
Trafficking in Transnistria: the Role of Russia
Trafficking in Transnistria: The Role of Russia by Kent Harrel SIS Honors Capstone Supervised by Professors Linda Lubrano and Elizabeth Anderson Submitted to the School of International Service American University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with General University Honors Bachelor of Arts Degree May 2009 Abstract After declaring de facto independence from the Republic of Moldova in 1992, the breakaway region of Transnistria became increasingly isolated, and has emerged as a hotspot for weapons and human trafficking. Working from a Realist paradigm, this project assesses the extent to which the Russian government and military abet trafficking in Transnistria, and the way in which Russia uses trafficking as a means to adversely affect Moldova’s designs of broader integration within European spheres. This project proves necessary because the existing scholarship on the topic of Transnistrian trafficking failed to focus on the role of the Russian government and military, and in turn did not account for the ways in which trafficking hinders Moldova’s national interests. The research project utilizes sources such as trafficking policy centers, first-hand accounts, trade agreements, non-governmental organizations, and government documents. A review of the literature employs the use of secondary sources such as scholarly and newspaper articles. In short, this project develops a more comprehensive understanding of Russia’s role in Moldovan affairs and attempts to add a significant work to the existing literature. -
My Kastner and Nathanson 'Roots' Trip to Bucovina and Moldavia In
Merle Kastner My Kastner and Nathanson ‘Roots’ Trip to Bucovina and Moldavia in July, 2012 My Kastner and Nathanson ‘Roots’ Trip to Bucovina and Moldavia, July, 2012: Towns in Bucovina and Moldavia, referred to in this account and distances that we covered: The first two days: Suceava to Radauti is 36.1 km Radauti to is 7.1 km Sucevi a Monastery is 25.4 km Sucevi a MoFrătăuţiinastery Vechito Marginea is 10.7 km MargineaFrătăuţii Vechi to Suceava to is 41.6ţ km ----------------------------------------ţ The third day: Suceava to Falticeni is 24.7 km From Falticeni to Piatra Neam is 77.6 km From Piatra Neam to Negulesti is: 149.9 km to Suceava is 211.6 țkm -----------------------------------------ț NeguleştiThe fourth and last day: Suceava to Chernivtski/Czernowitz, Ukraine is 82.4 km ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What and where is Bucovina – a brief history: Bucovina meaning ‘the Land of the Beech Trees’, (a little smaller than the state of Connecticut, USA) was formerly an independent crown land in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. There was a large and thriving Jewish population in Bucovina. Jews were heavily represented in the crafts, the learned professions and in government. Jews lived in many towns in Bukovina, ranging from a metropolis such as Czernowitz, to many tiny shtetls1. Already oppressed by the January 1938 decree reconsidering their citizenship, Bucovina’s Jews became the direct target of persecution. Between June 28, 1940 and July 5, 1941, Northern Bukovina, including Czernowitz, was under Soviet rule, as a result of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The deportation of the 3,500 people to Siberia was effected by the Soviets prior to the advancing Romanian/German occupation of Northern Bukovina. -
EXPLOITATION of FISHING RESOURCES in SUCEAVA COUNTY: PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS (Rb/T) of SPECIALIZED FARMS in a MOUNTAINOUS REGION
Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade, 67(3), 909-920, 2015 DOI:10.2298/ABS140307052B EXPLOITATION OF FISHING RESOURCES IN SUCEAVA COUNTY: PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS (RB/T) OF SPECIALIZED FARMS IN A MOUNTAINOUS REGION Ionel Bostan1,*, Dorel Mates2, Elena Hlaciuc1, Veronica Grosu1, Marian Socoliuc1, Bogdan Andronic3, Marius Ciubotariu1, Anisoara Apetri1, Gheorghe Morosan1 and Camelia Mihalciuc1 1 Doctoral School of Economics, Stefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania 2 Doctoral School of Economics, West University, Timișoara, Romania 3 Faculty of Economic Sciences, Danubius University, Galati, Romania *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: Aquaculture is an economic sector that has rapidly grown in recent years, due to European programs and the support provided for this activity. Given this accelerated development and the attention this sector receives on an interna- tional level, this paper focuses on identifying the growth factors in the sector and highlighting certain general aspects of its development in Romania, followed by an analysis of the available data on the exploitation of fishing resources in Suceava County in terms of performance. Key words: aquaculture; fishing; environment/ecology; European policies/instruments; profitability; assets; investments. Received March 7, 2014; Accepted July 1, 2014 INTRODUCTION healthy choices for EU citizens, as well as the fact that this is a dynamic sector whose development will cre- Fish farming and aquaculture in the European Union ate jobs and decent standards of living for fishermen is one of the food production sectors that has devel- (EC, 2013a). The efforts of the European Commission oped at a rapid pace, supplying almost half of the fish have targeted a radical change in this sector (Dam- and seafood quantities consumed worldwide (EC, anaki, 2014), encouraging EU member states to de- 2013a). -
Bucovina Monasteries
Bucovina Monasteries The land of Bucovina The Austrians gave the name “Die Buchenland”, “The Land of Beech Woods” to the area. Historical Bucovina was about twice its present size, but the northern part now belongs to the Ukraine as a result of the Soviet-German Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact of August 1940. What remains, forms partly the modern administrative county of Suceava. The county of Suceava is bound in the north by the Ukraine, and in the west by the Romanian region of Transylvania, with its counties Bistriţa-Năsăud and Maramureş along the ridges of the Carpathians. On the eastern and southern sides are Moldavian counties: Botoşani and Iaşi in the east, Neamţ, Harghita and Mureş in the south. Bucovina is a synthesis of the variety, harmony and beauty of Romanian landscape, its richness of relief with mountains, tablelands, gorges, hills, fields, and valleys, its rivers, streams and lakes, its forests, flora and fauna. Landmarks The impressive number of churches to be found in Bucovina, Romania, with their fine exterior and interior frescoes, have been preserved and handed down from mediaeval times, and because of their uniqueness and artistic value, were added to UNESCO’s World Cultural Heritage List in 1993. There is no other place in the world where such a group of churches, with such high quality exterior frescoes, are to be seen. The churches were founded, in most cases, as family burial places of princes and high nobles. Each painter, although following the canonical iconographic programme, interpreted the scenes in a slightly different way. Using colors like the famous Voronet blue, the green- red of Sucevita, the yellow of Moldovita, the red of Humor and the green of Arbore, the painters (most of them unknown) described the biblical stories of the earth and heaven, stories of man’s beginnings and of his life after death. -
“Romanian Waters”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania
NATIONAL ADMNISTRATION “ROMANIAN WATERS” Romania key input to the Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters under the UNECE Water Convention Prut River Basin CORINA COSMINA BOSCORNEA, PhD National Administration “Romanian Waters ”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania Ukraine - Kiev, 28 th April 2010 Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Romanian transboundary river basins Information about transboundary river basins: •Somes/Szamos, •Mures/Maros, •Crisuri, Tisza River •Banat, basin •Siret, •Prut, •Dobrogea-Litoral , •Arges-Vedea Danube •Banat River Basin •Buzau-Ialomita District •Jiu Romanian river basins Prut river basins in the Danube river basin district Prut river basin 1. General description of the Prut river basin The total Population Area in area of the Major density in the Shared the Character with an river basin transbound area in the countries country in average elevation in the ary river country km² (%) country (persons/km 2) upland character Romania, (Ukrainian 10,990 Ukraine and 27820 Prut Carpathians) and 55 (39.5%) Moldova lowland (lower reaches) • The Prut river basin is shared by Ukraine, Romania and Moldova Its source is in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Later, the Prut forms the border between Romania and Moldova. • The rivers Lapatnic, Drageste and Racovet are transboundary tributaries in the Prut sub-basin; they cross the Ukrainian- Moldavian border. • The Prut River’s major national tributaries are the rivers Cheremosh and Derelui, (Ukraine), Baseu, Jijia, -
The Residence of Bukovyna and Dalmatia Metropolitans in Chernivtsi
THE RESIDENCE OF BUKOVYNA AND DALMATIA METROPOLITANS IN CHERNIVTSI NOMINATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE OF THE FOR INSCRIPTION THE RESIDENCE OF BUKOVYNA AND DALMATIA METROPOLITANS I N CHERNIVTSI ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST 2008 PREPARED BY GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE, STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL OF YURIJ FEDKOVYCH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Summery…………………………………………………………………………..…5 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY 1.A Country . …... 16 1.B State, province or region . …………..…18 1.C Name of property . …….….19 1.D Geographical coordinates to the nearest second. Property description . ……. 19 1.E Maps and plans . ………...20 1.F Area of nominated property and proposed buffer zone . .. … . ..22 2. DESCRIPTION 2.A Description of property . ………........26 2.B History and development . .………………..38 3. JUSTIFICATION FOR INSCRIPTION 3.A Criteria under which inscription is proposed and justifi cation for inscription 48 3.B Proposed statement of outstanding universal value . 54 3.C Comparative analysis . 55 3.D Integrity and authenticity . 75 4. STATE OF CONSERVATION AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY 4.A Present state of conservation . .79 4.B Factors affecting the property . 79 (i) Development pressures . 80 (ii) Environmental pressures . 80 (iii) Natural disasters and risk preparedness . 80 (iv) Visitor/tourism pressures . 81 (v) Number of inhabitants within the property and the buffer zone . .. 87 5. PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPERTY 5.A Ownership . 90 5.B Protective designation . 98 5.C Means of implementing protective measures . 110 5.D Existing plans related to municipality and region in which the proposed property is located . 111 5.E Property management plan or other management system . -
The Distribution of Salt Massifs and The
Section Hydrology and Water Resources THE DISTRIBUTION OF SALT MASSIFS AND THE EXPLOITATION OF ANCIENT AND CURRENT RESERVES OF MINERALIZED WATERS WITHIN THE SIRET HYDROGRAPHICAL BASIN (ROMANIA) – CASE STUDY FOR THE EASTERN AREA OF THE EASTERN CARPATHIANS Professor Dr Gheorghe Romanescu1 Associate Professor Dr Marius Alexianu2 Research Assistant Dr Andrei Asăndulesei3 1 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of Geography, Romania. 2 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, Faculty of Letters, Romania. 3 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, Interdisciplinary Research Department – Field Science, Romania. ABSTRACT The present study proposed to underline the importance of salt-water reserves in the life of the local communities and to quantify the value of certain basic elements that can affect their chemical properties. The salinity does not produce pollution, but only a restriction of water use in certain domains. There is a close connection between the genesis of salt reserves and the emergence of springs, the type of rock, the regional and local climatic regime, the type of hydrographical network supply, and the liquid discharge. The waters within the Carpathian mountainous and sub-mountainous area can be influenced directly by the emergence of salt deposits on the surface. The poorest springs are situated in the area of the Moldavian Subcarpathians, where there are diapiric outcrops. The Neolithic settlements in the east of the Eastern Carpathians attest the oldest use of salt springs in the world. Some springs may be underlined by the humans through animals, mostly the sheep, which looked for salinized fields for their optimal water intake. -
Garda Forestiera Suceava
SUCEAVA Ocolul Silvic U.A.T. Adâncata integral Balcăuţi integral Dumbrăveni integral Grămeşti integral Hânteşti integral Salcea integral Adâncata Siminicea integral Siret integral Veresti integral Zvoriştea integral Mitocu Dragomirnei partial Suceava partial Zamostea partial Breaza partial Izvoarele Sucevei partial Breaza Fundu Moldovei partial Moldova Suliţa partial Sadova partial Brodina partial Izvoarele Sucevei partial Moldoviţa partial Brodina Moldova Suliţa partial Putna partial Straja partial Broşteni partial Broşteni Panaci partial Cârlibaba partial Cârlibaba Izvoarele Sucevei partial Crucea integral Crucea Broşteni partial Dolhasca integral Dolheşti integral Fântânele integral Dolhasca Liteni integral Udeşti integral Forăşti partial Vultureşti partial Coșna partial Dorna Candrenilor partial Dorna Candrenilor Poiana Stampei partial Vatra Dornei partial Ulma integral Brodina partial Falcău Izvoarele Sucevei partial Straja partial Baia integral Boroaia integral Cornu Luncii integral Drăguşeni integral Fălticeni integral Fântâna Mare integral Hartop integral Horodniceni integral Fălticeni Preuteşti integral Rădăşeni integral Vadu Moldovei integral Forăşti partial Vultureşti partial Râşca partial pt.vegetatia din afara Bunesti fondului forestier. Frasin integral Gura Humorului partial Frasin Stulpicani partial Vama partial Berchişeşti integral Capu Câmpului integral Păltinoasa integral Gura Humorului Gura Humorului partial Ilişeşti partial Mănăstirea Humorului partial Pârteştii de Jos partial Ciocăneşti integral Iacobeni integral